LUCY results show females have equivalent outcomes to males following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair despite more complex aortic morphology

The Role of Narrow Aortic Bifurcation in Affecting EVAR Treatment and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The narrow aortic bifurcation (NAB) is considered a risk factor for endograft thrombosis after aorto-biiliac endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for aortic or iliac aneurysm. Nowadays, no consensus on the threshold diameter for the definition of NAB is reached and other aortic bifurcation features are rarely considered. The aim of the study is to assess the EVAR outcomes using bifurcated endograft according to anatomical characteristics of aortic bifurcation.

METHODS

The study included patients treated with primary EVAR from 2016 to 2022. A retrospective analysis of single-center prospectively collected database was performed. Patients were classified in standard aortic bifurcation (SAB) (aortic bifurcation diameter >20 mm), NAB (≤20 mm and >16 mm), and extremely NAB (eNAB) (≤16 mm). The 3 groups were compared in terms of patient demographics, risk factors, procedure setting (elective or urgent/emergent), and type of deployed endograft. In NAB and eNAB groups, severe calcification (SC) and length of stenotic aortic bifurcation >10 mm (long-NAB) were assessed from preoperative imaging. In SAB, NAB, and eNAB groups, following outcomes were evaluated: rate of intraoperative iliac endograft stenting (unilateral or kissing stenting), primary patency (PP), freedom from endograft-related reintervention, and overall survival during follow-up.

RESULTS

The total number of deployed aorto-biiliac endografts was 365 (mean age: 76.6 ± 7.4 years; male 89.3%): SAB 298 (81.6%), NAB 57 (15.6%), and eNAB 10 (2.7%) cases. Female gender, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, and active smokers were more frequent in patients with smaller aortic bifurcation diameter (P = 0.002, 0.039, and 0.010, respectively). In NAB and eNAB groups, SC was reported in 18/67 cases (26.9%) and long-NAB in 15/67 cases (25.4%). Patients with eNAB have more frequent SC of aortic bifurcation (60% vs. NAB 21.1%, P = 0.018) and long-NAB (50% vs. NAB 17.5%, P = 0.023). In SAB, NAB, and eNAB, intraoperative iliac endograft stenting was performed in 34/298 (11.4%), 9/57 (15.8%), and 5/10 (50%), respectively (P = 0.001). Kissing stenting was performed more frequently in groups with smaller aortic bifurcation diameter (P = 0.010). Mean follow-up was 30.2 ± 21.5 months. At 1, 3, and 5 years, PP was 98.5%, 96.6%, and 95.6%, respectively. eNAB had lower rate of PP compared to NAB group (P = 0.030). Long-NAB had lower rate of PP (P = 0.035). At 1, 3, and 5 years, endograft-related reintervention was 96.8%, 86.7%, and 76.7%, respectively, with no differences between 3 groups (P = 0.423). At 1, 3, and 5 years, survival was 92.5%, 77.6%, and 58.1%, respectively, with no difference between SAB, NAB, and eNAB (P = 0.673).

CONCLUSIONS

Female gender, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, and active smokers have more frequently smaller aortic bifurcation diameter. eNAB patients have more challenging anatomical characteristics compared with NAB group, requiring higher rate of intraoperative stenting, especially kissing stenting. Mid-term PP seems to be negatively influenced by aortic bifurcation ≤16 mm and long-NAB.

Comprehensive framework of factors accounting for worse aortic aneurysm outcomes in females: A scoping review

Sex-based outcome studies have consistently documented worse results for females undergoing care for abdominal aortic aneurysms. This review explores the underlying factors that account for worse outcomes in the females sex. A scoping review of studies reporting sex-based disparities on abdominal aortic aneurysms was performed. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. Factors that account for worse outcomes in the females sex were identified, grouped into themes, and analyzed. Key findings of each study are reported and a comprehensive framework of these factors is presented. A total of 35 studies were identified as critical in highlighting sex-based disparities in care of patients with aortic aneurysms. We identified the following 10 interrelated themes in the chain of aneurysm care that account for differential outcomes in females: natural history, risk factors, pathobiology, biomechanics, screening, morphology, device design and adherence to instructions for use, technique, trial enrollment, and social determinants. Factors accounting for worse outcomes in the care of females with aortic aneurysms were identified and described. Some factors are immediately actionable, such as screening criteria, whereas device design improvement will require further research and development. This comprehensive framework of factors affecting care of aneurysms in females should serve as a blueprint to develop education, outreach, and future research efforts to improve outcomes in females.

Brazilian Society for Angiology and Vascular Surgery guidelines on abdominal aortic aneurysm

The Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, through the Guidelines Project, presents new Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Guidelines, on the subject of care for abdominal aortic aneurysm patients. Its development prioritized descriptive guidelines, using the EMBASE, LILACS, and PubMed databases. References include randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and cohort studies. Quality of evidence was evaluated by a pair of coordinators, aided by the RoB 2 Cochrane tool and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale forms. The subjects include juxtarenal aneurysms, infected aneurysms, and new therapeutic techniques, especially endovascular procedures. The current version of the guidelines include important recommendations for the primary topics involving diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up for abdominal aortic aneurysm patients, providing an objective guide for medical practice, based on scientific evidence and widely available throughout Brazil.

Low profile endografts for the endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms

INTRODUCTION

Favorable midterm outcomes have been reported with the use of low-profile endografts (LPE), but long-term data is still needed. Furthermore, it is unclear if each of these LPE may have advantages over the other, which may, in turn, affect the outcomes. We systematically reviewed the literature about complications and reintervention rates of patients submitted to endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) using LPE.

MATHERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted including articles that reported 30-days and follow-up mortality, complications, and reintervention rates of patients treated with EVAR using Incraft (Cordis), Zenith LP/Alpha (Cook Medical Inc) and Ovation (Endologix) endografts.

RESULTS

36 papers were evaluated, reporting results of 582 patients treated with Zenith device, 1211 with Incraft and 3449 with Ovation. During follow up, similar survival and freedom from reintervention rates were reported among the various types of endograft both at 1 and 3 years. The incidence of limb stenosis/kinking was significantly higher in patients treated with Zenith LP/Alpha (2.1%, P = 0.008), while the Incraft device had a significantly lower proportion of type III endoleaks (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival and freedom from reintervention rates were comparable among the three LPEs. The Cook Zenith device had the highest rates of limb stenosis/kinking, while the Incraft device had the lowest occurrence of type III endoleak.

PROSPERO

Registration number: CRD42022315875.

Disparities in reporting and representation by sex, race, and ethnicity in endovascular aortic device trials

OBJECTIVE

Vulnerable populations, including women and racial and ethnic minorities, have been historically underrepresented in clinical trials. We, therefore, studied the demographics of patients enrolled in pivotal endovascular aortic device trials in the United States.

METHODS

We queried the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) medical devices database for all FDA-approved endografts for the treatment of aortic aneurysms, transections, and dissections from September 1999 to November 2021. These included abdominal endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), thoracic EVAR (TEVAR), fenestrated EVAR (FEVAR) devices, and dissection stents. Multiple cases of approval for expanded indications were included separately. The primary outcomes included the proportion of trials reporting participant sex, race, and ethnicity and the proportion of enrolled participants across sex, racial, and ethnic groups.

RESULTS

The FDA provided 29 approvals from 29 trials of 24 devices: 15 EVAR devices (52%), 12 TEVAR devices (41%), 1 FEVAR device (3.4%), and 1 dissection stent (3.4%). These trials had included 4046 patients. Of the 29 trials, all had reported on the sex of the participants, and the median female enrollment was 21% (interquartile range [IQR], 11%-34%). The EVAR trials had the lowest female enrollment (11%; IQR, 8.7%-13%) compared with 41% (IQR, 27%-45%) in the TEVAR trials, 21% in the FEVAR trial, and 34% in the dissection stent trial (P < .01 for the difference). Only 52% of the trials had reported the three most common racial groups (White, Black, Asian), and only 48% had reported Hispanic ethnicity. The TEVAR trials were the most likely to report all three racial groups and Hispanic ethnicity (92% and 75%, respectively), while the EVAR trials had the lowest reporting rates (13% and 20%, respectively). Where reported, the median enrollment of racial and ethnic groups across the trials was as follows: Black patients, 9.8% (FEVAR, 0%; EVAR, 1.9%; TEVAR, 12%; dissection stent, 25%; P = .01); Asian patients, 2.4% (EVAR, 0.6%; FEVAR, 2.4%; TEVAR, 2.5%; dissection stent, 11%; P = .24); and Hispanic patients, 3.8% (EVAR, 1.3%; FEVAR, 2.4%; TEVAR, 3.9%; dissection stent, 4.1%; P = .75).

CONCLUSIONS

Racial and ethnic minority groups were underrepresented and underreported in pivotal aortic device trials that led to FDA approval. Female patients were also underrepresented in these aortic trials, especially for EVAR. These data suggest the need for standardization of reporting practices and minimum thresholds for minority and female participation in pivotal trials to promote equitable representation.

"Aortic Balloon-Molding" (ABM) During Ovation Endograft Implantation Expands Graft Use for Hostile Neck Anatomy

BACKGROUND

Challenging aortoiliac anatomy such as short neck and narrow access vessels is responsible for EVAR ineligibility in up to 50% of cases. The Ovation stent-graft helped widen the range of AAAs suitable for EVAR thanks to its low-profile delivery system and polymer-filled sealing rings. However, its advantages are offset by a tight sizing chart that can lead to increased risk of type Ia endoleak or endograft infolding from under or oversizing, respectively. We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of a novel endovascular technique developed to expand the use of the Ovation endograft while avoiding these issues.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent EVAR with the Ovation endograft at our institution between March 2019 and December 2020. "Aortic Balloon Molding" or ABM is a novel endovascular technique in which the graft is pre-cannulated and a compliant aortic balloon is inflated at the site of the graft's sealing rings during polymer administration. The technique was preferentially performed in patients with hostile neck anatomy (HNA) defined as any or all of angulation>60°, reverse taper configuration, ≥50% circumferential thrombus or calcification. Patients undergoing traditional deployment were compared to those in whom ABM was performed. Endpoints included neck-related adjunctive procedures, technical success, type Ia endoleak at completion angiogram and 1-year freedom from type Ia endoleak and migration.

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients were included in the study, of which, 26 (60.5%) were treated with the ABM technique. Mean follow-up was 7.9±6 months. Patients in the ABM group were more likely to have a reverse taper neck (61.5% vs. 41.2%, P=0.1), to have significant circumferential thrombus or calcium (23.1% vs. 5.9%, P=0.1) and to be treated outside of the Ovation IFU regarding anatomic characteristics (65.4% vs. 41.2%, P=0.1). Technical success was achieved in 100% of cases. However, patients in the ABM group were less likely to require a neck-related adjunctive procedure (7.7% vs. 23.5%, P=0.1). Only one type Ia endoleak was observed at completion angiogram in a patient treated without ABM. At one-year, freedom from type Ia endoleak or migration was 100% for both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic Balloon Molding proves to be a safe and effective adjunctive technique for the treatment of AAAs with hostile neck anatomy using the Ovation stent-graft. This may allow optimal endograft sizing to achieve adequate seal in complex aortic anatomies. Further research is warranted to evaluate the long-term outcomes of this technique.

Female Sex Is Associated With Reintervention and Mortality Following Elective Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

OBJECTIVE

While sex differences in endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) outcomes are increasingly reported, but contributing factors remain without consensus. We investigated disparities in sex-specific outcomes following elective EVAR at our institution and evaluated factors that may predispose females to increased morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing elective EVAR from 2011 to 2020 at a suburban tertiary care center was performed. The primary outcomes were five-year survival and freedom from reintervention. Fisher's exact test, t-tests, and Kaplan-Meier analysis using the rank-log test investigated associations between sex and outcomes. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model controlling for age and common comorbidities evaluated the effect of sex on survival and freedom from reintervention.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy-three patients underwent elective EVAR during the study period, including 68 (25%) females and 205 (75%) males. Females were older on average than males (76 years vs. 73 years, p= <0.01) and were more likely to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; 38% versus 23%, p=0.01), require home oxygen therapy (9% versus 2%, p=0.04) or dialysis preoperatively (4% versus 0%, p=0.02). Distribution of other common vascular comorbidities was similar between the sexes. Thirty-day readmission was greater in females than males (18% versus 8%, p=0.02). Females had significantly lower survival at five years (48% ± 7.9% versus 65% ± 4.3%, p<0.01) and significantly lower one-year (89% ± 4.1% for females vs. 94% ± 1.7% for males, p=0.01) and five-year freedom from reintervention (69% ± 8.9% versus 84% ± 3.3%, p=0.02). On multivariable analysis, female sex (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-2.9), congestive heart failure (HR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2-3.9) and age (HR: 1.1, 95% CI: 1.0-1.1) were associated with 5-year mortality. Female sex remained as the only variable with a statistically significant association with five-year reintervention (HR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.1-4.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Female sex was associated with decreased five-year survival and increased one and five-year reintervention following elective EVAR. Data from our institution suggests factors beyond patient age and baseline health risk likely contribute to greater surgical morbidity and mortality for females following elective EVAR.

Update Aortenerkrankungen

Die vorliegende Arbeit berichtet über die neuesten wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnisse im Zusammenhang mit Aortenaneurysmen und -dissektionen. Schwerpunkt hierbei sind die Pathophysiologie und Genetik, der Einfluss von Fluorochinolonen auf Aortenaneurysmen und -dissektionen sowie Marker der Aortitis. Ferner werden die wichtigsten aktuellen Leitlinienempfehlungen aus den Jahren 2017 bis 2020 zusammengefasst – der Fokus liegt hierbei auf dem Screening, der Diagnostik, den Grenzwerten für die Therapieindikationen, der Art und den technischen Details der Behandlung sowie Nachsorge von Aneurysmen der Aorta ascendens, des Aortenbogens, der Aorta descendens und abdominalis, Penetrating aortic Ulcers, bei genetisch bedingten Bindegewebserkrankungen mit Aortenbeteiligungen, Aortitis und mykotischen Aneurysmen.

Profile of the Ovation ALTO abdominal stent graft for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: overview of its safety and efficacy

INTRODUCTION

The Ovation ALTO is the next generation aortic stent graft from Endologix for the treatment of infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysms. The device uses polymer-injected rings to create a proximal seal at the aneurysm neck.

AREAS COVERED

Results from the first clinical study of the ALTO graft are analyzed and the potential benefits of the graft in minimizing post-treatment aneurysmal neck dilation discussed. The implications of the ALTO's Instructions-For-Use (IFU) and low-profile delivery system are also reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

The re-positioning of the sealing rings higher on the graft and an integrated compliant balloon are the most significant improvements on the Ovation iX, facilitating accurate placement of the proximal sealing ring and prompt balloon dilation of the polymer rings. The expansion the IFU to include neck lengths of ≥7 mm will mean more patients are eligible for infra-renal EVAR within IFU with the ALTO device. The published data on the device to date is limited. With over 1000 implants worldwide we would hope for more published data to become available. If this demonstrates similar mid-term results to that seen with the Ovation iX in arguably more hostile neck anatomy, then the Ovation ALTO is likely to be more widely used.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on early mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in females in urgent and elective setting

OBJECTIVE

Females represent a group of patients with higher mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), endovascular (EVAR) or open (OSR), repair. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the 30-day mortality after AAA repair in females, comparing both EVAR and OSR, in elective and urgent settings.

METHODS

The protocol of the review was registered to the PROSPERO (CRD42021242686). A search of the English literature was conducted, using PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases, from inception to March 5, 2021, using the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines (PRISMA). Only studies reporting on 30-day mortality of AAA repair, in urgent and elective setting, comparing EVAR and OSR, in female population were eligible. Patients were stratified according to the need for elective or urgent repair. Symptomatic and ruptured cases were included into the urgent group. Individual studies were assessed for risk of bias using the ROBINS-I tool. The GRADE approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality after AAA repair in the female population, comparing EVAR and OSR. The outcomes were summarized as odds ratio along with their 95% confidence intervals (CI), through a paired meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Eight studies reported data on 30-day mortality following AAA repair. A total of 56,982 females (22,995 EVAR vs. 33,987 OSR) were included. A significantly reduced total 30-day mortality rate was recorded among females that underwent EVAR compared to OSR (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.23-0.27; P<.001, Ι²=86%). Also a reduced 30-day mortality was found in females that underwent elective EVAR compared to OSR (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.33-0.41; P< .001, Ι²=48%). Despite that OSR was more frequently offered in the urgent setting (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.19-0.23; P< .001, Ι²=84%), EVAR was associated with a reduced 30-day mortality (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.40-0.57; P<.001, Ι²=0%).

CONCLUSIONS

In females, EVAR is associated with lower 30-day mortality in both elective and urgent AAA repair, although it appears as less likely to be offered in the setting of urgent AAA repair.

Differences in Comorbidities Between Women and Men Treated with Elective Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is performed to prevent rupture. For reasons as yet unknown, the 30-day mortality risk after elective AAA repair is higher in women than in men. We hypothesised that this higher risk might be related to differences in comorbidity.

METHODS

Systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42019133314) according to PRISMA guidelines. A search in the EMBASE/MEDLINE/CENTRAL databases identified 1870 studies that included patients who underwent elective AAA repair (final search February 17^th, 2021). Ultimately, 28 studies were included and all reported comorbidities were categorised into 17 comorbidity groups. Additionally, 15 groups of clearly defined comorbidities were used for sensitivity analysis. For both groups, meta-analyses of each comorbidity were performed to estimate the difference in pooled prevalence between women and men with a random effects model.

RESULTS

When analysing data of all reported comorbidities (17 groups), smoking [risk difference (RD) 11%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4-18], diabetes (RD 3%, 95% CI 2-4), ischaemic heart disease (RD 12%, 95% CI 8-16), arrhythmia (RD 3%, 95% CI 0.4-5), liver disease (RD 0.1%, 95% CI 0.01-0.2), and cancer (RD 3%, 95% CI 2-4)) were less prevalent in women, whereas, hypertension (RD 4%, 95% CI 3-6) and pulmonary disease (RD 4%, 95% CI 3-5) were more prevalent in women. At the time of surgery women were significantly older than men (74.9 years versus 72.4; mean difference 2.4 years (95% CI 2.1-2.7)). In the sensitivity analysis of 15 comorbidity groups, the same comorbidities remained significantly different between women and men, except smoking and arrhythmia. Women had a higher mortality risk than men (RD 1%, 95% CI 1-2).

CONCLUSIONS

Although women undergoing elective AAA repair have fewer baseline comorbidities than men, their 30-day mortality risk is higher. In-depth studies on the cause of death in women after elective AAA repair are needed to explain this discrepancy in mortality.

Female Sex and Outcomes after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Propensity Score Matched Cohort Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have showed a potential disadvantage of female patients who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The current study aims to determine sex-specific perioperative and long-term outcomes using propensity score matched unselected nationwide health insurance claims data.

METHODS

Insurance claims from a large German fund were used, covering around 8% of the insured German population. Patients who underwent endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for intact AAA from 1 January 2011 to 30 April 2017 were included in the cohort. A 1:2 female to male propensity score matching was applied to adjust for confounding variables. Perioperative and long-term outcomes after 5 years were determined using matching and regression methods.

RESULTS

Among a total of 3736 patients (19.3% females, mean 75 years) undergoing EVAR for intact AAA, we identified 1863 matched patients. Before matching, females were more likely to be previously diagnosed with hypothyroidism, electrolyte disorders, rheumatoid disorders, and depression, while males were more often diabetics. In the matched sample, 23.4% of the females and 25.8% of the males died during a median follow-up of 776 and 792 days, respectively. Perioperatively, females were more likely to exhibit acute limb ischemia (5.3% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.031) and major bleeding (22.0% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.001) before they were discharged to rehabilitation (5.5% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001) when compared to males. No statistically significant difference in perioperative (odds ratio 1.12, 95% CI 0.54-2.16) or long-term mortality (hazard ratio 0.91, 95% CI 0.76-1.08) was observed between sexes. This was also true regarding aortic reintervention rates after 1 year (2.0% vs. 2.9%) and 5 years (10.9% vs. 8.1%).

CONCLUSION

The current retrospective matched analysis of insurance claims revealed high early access-related morbidity in females when compared to their male counterparts. Short-term or long-term survival and reintervention outcomes were similar between sexes.

An update on the ovation abdominal stent graft for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: current evidence and future perspectives

Introduction: The Ovation stent-graft has presented satisfactory mid-term results in the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Its unique design with uncoupling of fixation and sealing and the lowest profile in the market has expanded the treatment in AAA with challenging neck anatomies and, especially, in the females presenting mostly with narrow iliac access vessels. Morever, a new design modification, the Ovation Alto was recently introduced in the Market, while certain off-label uses of the Ovation in treating either juxtarenal- or short-necked AAA have been proposed. Areas covered: Aim of this article was to present the current articles with the long-term results of the Ovation endograft and discuss the new developments and modifications in its use. Expert commentary: the Ovation stent-graft exhibits very satisfactory clinical long-term results in AAA treated within the instructions-for-use, expands significantly the treatment of AAA in females and overcomes reliably challenging anatomical issues of the infrarenal neck that would render these cases ineligible for treatment with any other endograft. Εxperience with the specific, unique technical features of Ovation as well as careful selection of patients and meticulous preoperative study of the AAA anatomy are key-elements to the successful performance of this endograft.