1
|
Nishio Lucar AG, Patel A, Mehta S, Yadav A, Doshi M, Urbanski MA, Concepcion BP, Singh N, Sanders ML, Basu A, Harding JL, Rossi A, Adebiyi OO, Samaniego-Picota M, Woodside KJ, Parsons RF. Expanding the access to kidney transplantation: Strategies for kidney transplant programs. Clin Transplant 2024; 38:e15315. [PMID: 38686443 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
Kidney transplantation is the most successful kidney replacement therapy available, resulting in improved recipient survival and societal cost savings. Yet, nearly 70 years after the first successful kidney transplant, there are still numerous barriers and untapped opportunities that constrain the access to transplant. The literature describing these barriers is extensive, but the practices and processes to solve them are less clear. Solutions must be multidisciplinary and be the product of strong partnerships among patients, their networks, health care providers, and transplant programs. Transparency in the referral, evaluation, and listing process as well as organ selection are paramount to build such partnerships. Providing early culturally congruent and patient-centered education as well as maximizing the use of local resources to facilitate the transplant work up should be prioritized. Every opportunity to facilitate pre-emptive kidney transplantation and living donation must be taken. Promoting the use of telemedicine and kidney paired donation as standards of care can positively impact the work up completion and maximize the chances of a living donor kidney transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angie G Nishio Lucar
- Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Ankita Patel
- Recanati-Miller Transplantation Institute, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shikha Mehta
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Anju Yadav
- Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mona Doshi
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Megan A Urbanski
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Neeraj Singh
- Willis Knighton Health System, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | - M Lee Sanders
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Organ Transplant Center, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Arpita Basu
- Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jessica L Harding
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ana Rossi
- Piedmont Transplant Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Oluwafisayo O Adebiyi
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University Health Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | | | - Ronald F Parsons
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvannia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bhattarai D, Lee SO, Joshi N, Jun SR, Lo S, Jiang L, Gokden N, Parajuli N. Cold Storage Followed by Transplantation Induces Immunoproteasome in Rat Kidney Allografts: Inhibition of Immunoproteasome Does Not Improve Function. KIDNEY360 2024; 5:743-752. [PMID: 38303110 PMCID: PMC11146655 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0000000000000368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
Key Points Cold storage (CS) increases the severity of graft dysfunction in a time-dependent manner, and prolonged CS decreases animal survival. CS plus transplant increases iproeasome levels/assembly in renal allografts; IFN-γ is a potential inducer of the iproteasome. Inhibiting iproteasome ex vivo during renal CS did not confer graft protection after transplantation. Background It is a major clinical challenge to ensure the long-term function of transplanted kidneys. Specifically, the injury associated with cold storage (CS) of kidneys compromises the long-term function of the grafts after transplantation. Therefore, the molecular mechanisms underlying CS-related kidney injury are attractive therapeutic targets to prevent injury and improve long-term graft function. Previously, we found that constitutive proteasome function was compromised in rat kidneys after CS followed by transplantation. Here, we evaluated the role of the immunoproteasome (i proteasome), a proteasome variant, during CS followed by transplantation. Methods Established in vivo rat kidney transplant model with or without CS containing vehicle or iproteasome inhibitor (ONX 0914) was used in this study. The i proteasome function was performed using rat kidney homogenates and fluorescent-based peptide substrate specific to β 5i subunit. Western blotting and quantitative RT-PCR were used to assess the subunit expression/level of the i proteasome (β 5i) subunit. Results We demonstrated a decrease in the abundance of the β 5i subunit of the i proteasome in kidneys during CS, but β 5i levels increased in kidneys after CS and transplant. Despite the increase in β 5i levels and its peptidase activity within kidneys, inhibiting β 5i during CS did not improve graft function after transplantation. Summary These results suggest that the pharmacologic inhibition of immunoproteasome function during CS does not improve graft function or outcome. In light of these findings, future studies targeting immunoproteasomes during both CS and transplantation may define the role of immunoproteasomes on short-term and long-term kidney transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dinesh Bhattarai
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Seong-Ok Lee
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Neelam Joshi
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Se-Ran Jun
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Sorena Lo
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Li Jiang
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Neriman Gokden
- Department of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Nirmala Parajuli
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
- Division of Nephrology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schold JD, Huml AM, Husain SA, Poggio ED, Buchalter RB, Lopez R, Kaplan B, Mohan S. Deceased donor kidneys from higher distressed communities are significantly less likely to be utilized for transplantation. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:1723-1732. [PMID: 37001643 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
The proportion of kidneys procured for transplantation but not utilized exceeds 20% in the United States. Factors associated with nonutilization are complex, and further understanding of novel causes are critically important. We used the national Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data (2010-2022) to evaluate associations of Distressed Community Index (DCI) of deceased donor residence and likelihood of kidney nonutilization (n = 209 413). Deceased donors from higher distressed communities were younger, had an increased history of hypertension and diabetes, were CDC high-risk, and had higher terminal creatinine and donation after brain death. Mechanisms and circumstances of death varied significantly by DCI. The proportion of kidney nonutilization was 19.9%, which increased by DCI quintile (Q1 = 18.1% to Q5 = 21.6%). The adjusted odds ratio of nonutilization from the highest quintile DCI communities was 1.22 (95% CI = 1.16-1.28; reference = lowest DCI), which persisted stratified by donor race. Donors from highly distressed communities were highly variable by the donor service area (range: 1%-51%; median = 21%). There was no increased risk for delayed graft function or death-censored graft loss by donor DCI but modest increased adjusted hazard for overall graft loss (high DCI = 1.05; 95% CI = 1.01-1.10; reference = lowest DCI). Results indicate that donor residential distress is associated with significantly higher rates of donor kidney nonutilization with notable regional variation and minimal impact on recipient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse D Schold
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
| | - Anne M Huml
- Department of Kidney Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - S Ali Husain
- Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Emilio D Poggio
- Department of Kidney Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - R Blake Buchalter
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Rocio Lopez
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Bruce Kaplan
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weindelmayer J, Mengardo V, Torroni L, Gervasi MC, Hetoja S, De Pasqual CA, Simion D, Giacopuzzi S. The "Weekday Effect" on Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol for Gastrectomy. Dig Surg 2023; 40:100-107. [PMID: 37399795 DOI: 10.1159/000531022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol demonstrated to improve outcomes after gastrectomy, some papers evidenced a detrimental effect on postoperative morbidity related to the "weekday effect." We aimed to understand whether the day of gastrectomy could affect postoperative outcomes and compliance with ERAS items. METHODS We included all patients that underwent gastrectomy for cancer between January 2017 and September 2021. Cohort was divided considering the day of surgery: Early group (Monday-Wednesday) and Late group (Thursday-Friday). Compliance with protocol and postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS Two hundred twenty-seven patients were included in Early group, while 154 were in Late group. The groups were comparable in preoperative characteristics. No significant difference in pre/intraoperative and postoperative ERAS items' compliance was apparent between Early and Late groups, with most items exceeding the 70% threshold. Median length of stay was 6.5 days and 6 days in Early and Late groups (p = 0.616), respectively. Morbidity was 50% in both groups, with severe complications that occurred in 13% of Early patients and 15% of Late patients. Ninety-day mortality was 2%, and it was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS In a center with a standardized ERAS protocol, the weekday of gastrectomy has no significant impact on the success of each ERAS item and on postoperative surgical and oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Weindelmayer
- General and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Valentina Mengardo
- General and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Lorena Torroni
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Clelia Gervasi
- General and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Selma Hetoja
- General and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Carlo Alberto De Pasqual
- General and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Davide Simion
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics and Gynecology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Simone Giacopuzzi
- General and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang H, Yi Y, Xiao T, Li A, Liu Y, Huang X. The weekend effect in kidney transplantation outcomes: A meta-analysis. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0287447. [PMID: 37327225 PMCID: PMC10275449 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether kidney transplants performed during weekends have worse outcomes than those performed during weekdays. METHODS For this systematic review, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (January 2000 to January 2023) were searched. We examined the survival rates of patients and grafts for hospital inpatients admitted during weekends and those admitted during weekdays. To be included, the study had to be in English and had to provide discrete survival data around weekends versus weekdays, including patients who were admitted as inpatients over the weekend. RESULTS Five studies (n = 163,506 patients) were examined. The hazards ratio (HR) of the survival rate of patients with weekend transplantation was 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96 to 1.06) when compared with patients with weekday transplantation. Patients who had renal transplant on weekends had an overall allograft survival HR of 1.01 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.03) and death-censored allograft survival HR of 1.01 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.04). Comparison of length of hospital stay, rejection, surgical complications, and vascular complications between renal transplants on weekends and those on weekdays showed no statistical difference. CONCLUSION Hospital inpatients admitted for renal transplantation during weekends have a survival rate similar to that of inpatients admitted during weekdays. The weekend effect of renal transplantation was very weak; hence, transplantations done during weekends and weekdays are both appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haifeng Wang
- Department of Urology, Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan, Fujian, China
| | - Yi Yi
- Department of Urology, Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan, Fujian, China
| | - Tan Xiao
- Department of Urology, Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan, Fujian, China
| | - Aiqing Li
- Department of Urology, Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan, Fujian, China
| | - Yongfei Liu
- Department of Urology, Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan, Fujian, China
| | - Xiaoli Huang
- Department of Hematology, Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan, Fujian, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
King KL, Husain SA, Yu M, Adler JT, Schold J, Mohan S. Characterization of Transplant Center Decisions to Allocate Kidneys to Candidates With Lower Waiting List Priority. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2316936. [PMID: 37273203 PMCID: PMC10242426 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.16936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Allocation of deceased donor kidneys is meant to follow a ranked match-run list of eligible candidates, but transplant centers with a 1-to-1 relationship with their local organ procurement organization have full discretion to decline offers for higher-priority candidates and accept them for lower-ranked candidates at their center. Objective To describe the practice and frequency of transplant centers placing deceased donor kidneys with candidates who are not the highest rank at their center according to the allocation algorithm. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used 2015 to 2019 organ offer data from US transplant centers with a 1-to-1 relationship with their local organ procurement organization, following candidates for transplant events from January 2015 to December 2019. Participants were deceased kidney donors with a single match-run and at least 1 kidney transplanted locally and adult, first-time, kidney-only transplant candidates receiving at least 1 offer for a locally transplanted deceased donor kidney. Data were analyzed from March 1, 2022 to March 28, 2023. Exposure Demographic and clinical characteristics of donors and recipients. Main Outcomes and Measures The outcome of interest was kidney transplantation into the highest-priority candidate (defined as transplanted after zero declines for local candidates in the match-run) vs a lower-ranked candidate. Results This study assessed 26 579 organ offers from 3136 donors (median [IQR] age, 38 [25-51] years; 2903 [62%] men) to 4668 recipients. Transplant centers skipped their highest-ranked candidate to place kidneys further down the match-run for 3169 kidneys (68%). These kidneys went to a median (IQR) of the fourth- (third- to eighth-) ranked candidate. Higher kidney donor profile index (KDPI; higher score indicates lower quality) kidneys were less likely to go to the highest-ranked candidate, with 24% of kidneys with KDPI of at least 85% going to the top-ranked candidate vs 44% of KDPI 0% to 20% kidneys. When comparing estimated posttransplant survival (EPTS) scores between the skipped candidates and the ultimate recipients, kidneys were placed with recipients with both better and worse EPTS than the skipped candidates, across all KDPI risk groups. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of local kidney allocation at isolated transplant centers, we found that centers frequently skipped their highest-priority candidates to place kidneys further down the allocation prioritization list, often citing organ quality concerns but placing kidneys with recipients with both better and worse EPTS with nearly equal frequency. This occurred with limited transparency and highlights the opportunity to improve the matching and offer algorithm to improve allocation efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen L. King
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York
| | - S. Ali Husain
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York
| | - Miko Yu
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York
| | - Joel T. Adler
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin
| | - Jesse Schold
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bunnapradist S, Rosenthal JT, Huang E, Dafoe D, Seto T, Cohen A, Danovitch G. Deceased Donor Kidney Nonuse: A Systematic Approach to Improvement. Transplant Direct 2023; 9:e1491. [PMID: 37250491 PMCID: PMC10219747 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
A large number of procured kidneys continue not to be transplanted, while the waiting list remains high. Methods We analyzed donor characteristics for unutilized kidneys in our large organ procurement organization (OPO) service area in a single year to determine the reasonableness of their nonuse and to identify how we might increase the transplant rate of these kidneys. Five experienced local transplant physicians independently reviewed unutilized kidneys to identify which kidneys they would consider transplanting in the future. Biopsy results, donor age, kidney donor profile index, positive serologies, diabetes, and hypertension were risk factors for nonuse. Results Two-thirds of nonused kidneys had biopsies with high degree of glomerulosclerosis and interstitial fibrosis. Reviewers identified 33 kidneys as potentially transplantable (12%). Conclusions Reducing the rate of unutilized kidneys in this OPO service area will be achieved by setting acceptable expanded donor characteristics, identifying suitable well-informed recipients, defining acceptable outcomes, and systematically evaluating the results of these transplants. Because the improvement opportunity will vary by region, to achieve a significant impact on improving the national nonuse rate, it would be useful for all OPOs, in collaboration with their transplant centers, to conduct a similar analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suphamai Bunnapradist
- David Geffen School of Mesdicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - J. Thomas Rosenthal
- David Geffen School of Mesdicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Edmund Huang
- Department of Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Donald Dafoe
- Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA
| | | | | | - Gabriel Danovitch
- David Geffen School of Mesdicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kadatz MJ, Gill J, Gill J, Lan JH, McMichael LC, Chang DT, Gill JS. The Benefits of Preemptive Transplantation Using High-Kidney Donor Profile Index Kidneys. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2023; 18:634-643. [PMID: 37027505 PMCID: PMC10278842 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.0000000000000134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) is a percentile score summarizing the likelihood of allograft failure: A KDPI ≥85% is associated with shorter allograft survival, and 50% of these donated kidneys are not currently used for transplantation. Preemptive transplantation (transplantation without prior maintenance dialysis) is associated with longer allograft survival than transplantation after dialysis; however, it is unknown whether this benefit extends to high-KDPI transplants. The objective of this analysis was to determine whether the benefit of preemptive transplantation extends to recipients of transplants with a KDPI ≥85%. METHODS This retrospective cohort study compared the post-transplant outcomes of preemptive and nonpreemptive deceased donor kidney transplants using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. 120,091 patients who received their first, kidney-only transplant between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2017, were studied, including 23,211 with KDPI ≥85%. Of this cohort, 12,331 patients received a transplant preemptively. Time-to-event models for the outcomes of allograft loss from any cause, death-censored graft loss, and death with a functioning transplant were performed. RESULTS Compared with recipients of nonpreemptive transplants with a KDPI of 0%-20% as the reference group, the risk of allograft loss from any cause in recipients of a preemptive transplant with KDPI ≥85% (hazard ratio [HR], 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39 to 1.64) was lower than that in recipients of nonpreemptive transplant with a KDPI ≥85% (HR, 2.39; 95% CI, 2.21 to 2.58) and similar to that of recipients of a nonpreemptive transplant with a KDPI of 51%-84% (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.52 to 1.70). CONCLUSIONS Preemptive transplantation is associated with a lower risk of allograft failure, irrespective of KDPI, and preemptive transplants with KDPI ≥85% have comparable outcomes with nonpreemptive transplants with KDPI 51%-84%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J. Kadatz
- Kidney Transplant Program, Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jagbir Gill
- Kidney Transplant Program, Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Providence Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Justin Gill
- Kidney Transplant Program, Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - James H. Lan
- Kidney Transplant Program, Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lachlan C. McMichael
- Kidney Transplant Program, Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Doris T. Chang
- Providence Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - John S. Gill
- Kidney Transplant Program, Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Providence Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shamaa TM, Kitajima T, Ivanics T, Shimada S, Mohamed A, Yeddula S, Rizzari M, Collins K, Yoshida A, Abouljoud M, Nagai S. Variation of Liver Transplant Practice and Outcomes During Public Holidays in the United States: Analysis of United Network for Organ Sharing Registry. Transplant Direct 2023; 9:e1463. [PMID: 37009167 PMCID: PMC10065833 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
It has been reported that patients hospitalized outside regular working hours have worse outcomes. This study aims to compare outcomes following liver transplantation (LT) performed during public holidays and nonholidays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tayseer M. Shamaa
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Toshihiro Kitajima
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Tommy Ivanics
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Shingo Shimada
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Adhnan Mohamed
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Sirisha Yeddula
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Michael Rizzari
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Kelly Collins
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Atsushi Yoshida
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Marwan Abouljoud
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Shunji Nagai
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
McCulloh I, Stewart D, Kiernan K, Yazicioglu F, Patsolic H, Zinner C, Mohan S, Cartwright L. An experiment on the impact of predictive analytics on kidney offer acceptance decisions. Am J Transplant 2023:S1600-6135(23)00353-2. [PMID: 36958629 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
Due to the breadth of factors that might affect kidney transplant decisions to accept an organ or wait for another, presumably "better" offer, a high degree of heterogeneity in decision-making exists among transplant surgeons and hospitals. These decisions do not typically include objective predictions regarding the future availability of equivalent or better-quality organs, nor the likelihood of patient death while waiting for another organ. To investigate the impact of displaying such predictions on organ donation decision making, we conducted a statistically designed experiment involving 53 kidney transplant professionals, where kidney organ offers were presented via an online application and systematically altered to observe effects on decision making. We found that providing predictive analytics for time-to-better offer and patient mortality improves decision consensus and decision maker confidence in their decision. Providing a visual display of the patient's mortality slope under accept/reject conditions shortened the time to decide, but did not have an impact on the decision itself. Presenting risk of death in a loss frame as opposed to a gain frame improved decision consensus and decision confidence. Patient-specific predictions surrounding future organ offers and mortality may improve decision quality, confidence, and expediency while improving organ utilization and patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian McCulloh
- Discovery Lab, Applied Intelligence, Accenture, Washington, DC, USA; Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | | | - Kevin Kiernan
- Discovery Lab, Applied Intelligence, Accenture, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Heather Patsolic
- Discovery Lab, Applied Intelligence, Accenture, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Greenberg JW, Fatuzzo SH, Ramineni A, Chin C, Wittekind SG, Lorts A, Lehenbauer DG, Louis LB, Zafar F, Morales DLS. Heart transplant offers are less likely to be accepted on weekends, holidays, and conferences. J Heart Lung Transplant 2023; 42:345-353. [PMID: 36509608 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The existence of a "weekend effect" in heart transplantation (HTx) is understudied. The present study sought to determine whether the odds of (HTx) offer acceptance differed for adult and pediatric candidates depending upon the day on which the offer occurred. METHODS United Network for Organ Sharing data were used to identify all HTx offers to adult (listing age ≥18) and pediatric candidates from 2000-2019. Odds of offer acceptance were studied, comparing weekends, holidays, and conferences (Society of Thoracic Surgeons [STS], American Association for Thoracic Surgery [AATS], International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation [ISHLT]) to "baseline" (all other days). Multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of offer nonacceptance, controlling for the impacts of program transplant volume, region, and candidate characteristics. RESULTS A total of 323,953 offers occurred - 298,405 to adults and 25,548 to pediatric candidates. Clinically significant differences did not exist in donor or candidate characteristics between baseline or other events. The number of offers per day was stable throughout the year for both adults (p = 0.191) and pediatrics (p = 0.976). In adults, independently lower odds of acceptance existed on weekends (OR 0.88 [95% CI 0.84-0.92]), conferences in aggregate (0.86 [0.77-0.95]), and holidays in aggregate (0.81 [0.72-0.91]). In children, independently lower odds of acceptance were seen on weekends (0.88 [0.79-0.98]), during STS (0.46 [0.25-0.83], and during Christmas (0.32 [0.14-0.76]). CONCLUSIONS The day on which a HTx offer occurs significantly impacts its likelihood of acceptance. Further work can determine the impacts of human behavior or resource distribution, but knowledge of this phenomenon can inform efforts to ensure ideal organ allocation throughout the year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason W Greenberg
- The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
| | - Stephen H Fatuzzo
- The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Aadhyasri Ramineni
- The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Clifford Chin
- The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Samuel G Wittekind
- The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Angela Lorts
- The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - David G Lehenbauer
- The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Louis B Louis
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Farhan Zafar
- The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - David L S Morales
- The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Husain SA, King KL, Cron DC, Lentine KL, Adler JT, Mohan S. Influence of organ quality on the observed association between deceased donor kidney procurement biopsy findings and graft survival. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:2842-2854. [PMID: 35946600 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Deceased donor kidney procurement biopsies findings are the most common reason for kidney discard. Retrospective studies have found inconsistent associations with post-transplant outcomes but may have been limited by selection bias because kidneys with advanced nephrosclerosis from high-risk donors are typically discarded. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of kidneys transplanted in the United States from 2015 to 2019 with complete biopsy data available, defining "suboptimal histology" as glomerulosclerosis ≥11%, IFTA ≥mild, and/or vascular disease ≥mild. We used time-to-event analyses to determine the association between suboptimal histology and death-censored graft failure after stratification by kidney donor profile index (KDPI) (≤35%, 36%-84%, ≥85%) and final creatinine (<1 mg/dl, 1-2 mg/dl, >2 mg/dl). Among 30 469 kidneys included, 36% had suboptimal histology. In adjusted analyses, suboptimal histology was associated with death-censored graft failure among kidneys with KDPI 36-84% (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09-1.36), but not KDPI≤35% (HR 1.24, 0.94-1.64) or ≥ 85% (HR 0.99, 0.81-1.22). Similarly, suboptimal histology was associated with death-censored graft failure among kidneys from donors with creatinine 1-2 mg/dl (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.20-1.60) but not <1 mg/dl (HR 1.07, 0.93-1.23) or >2 mg/dl (HR 0.95, 0.75-1.20). The association of procurement histology with graft longevity among intermediate-quality kidneys that were likely to be both biopsied and transplanted suggests biopsies provide independent organ quality assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Ali Husain
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kristen L King
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA
| | - David C Cron
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Krista L Lentine
- Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Joel T Adler
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Scurt FG, Ernst A, Hammoud B, Wassermann T, Mertens PR, Schwarz A, Becker JU, Chatzikyrkou C. Effect of creatinine metrics on outcome after transplantation of marginal donor kidneys. Nephrology (Carlton) 2022; 27:973-982. [PMID: 36043436 DOI: 10.1111/nep.14108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Predicting outcome after transplantation of marginal kidneys is a challenging task. Donor creatinine or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) are integral components of the respective risk scores. However, there is uncertainty on which of their values obtained successively during procurement is the most suitable. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a retrospective study of 221 adult brain death donors with marginal kidneys, transplanted in 223 recipients. We applied logistic regression analysis to investigate the association between initial (at hospital admission), nadir (lowest), zenith (highest) and terminal (at recovery) donor eGFR with primary non-function (PNF), delayed graft function (DGF), 3- and 12-month graft function and 1- and 3-year patient- and death-censored graft survival. RESULTS In the multivariate analysis, admission, terminal, and the lowest donor eGFR could most accurately predict DGF. The respective ORs [95% CI] were: 0.875 [0.771-0.993], 0.818 [95% CI: 0.726-0.922] and 0.793 [0.689-0.900]. Although not being significant for DGF (OR 0.931 [95% CI: 0.817-1.106]), the highest eGFR was the best predictor of 3-month graft function (adjusted b coefficient 1.161 [95% CI: 0.355-1.968]). Analysis of primary nonfunction showed that determination of initial and the highest eGFR proved to be the best predictors. The respective ORs [95% CI] were: 0.804 [0.667-0.968] and 0.750 [0.611-0.919]. There were no differences in the risk associations of each of the four eGFR recordings with patient- and graft survival. CONCLUSION The various eGFR recordings determined during the procurement process of marginal donors can predict PNF, DGF and 3- and 12-month graft function. Regarding short-term patient- and graft survival, there appears to be impacted by recipient factors rather than donor kidney function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian G Scurt
- University Clinic for Nephrology and Hypertension, Diabetology and Endocrinology, Medical Faculty, Otto-von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Angela Ernst
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ben Hammoud
- University Clinic for Nephrology and Hypertension, Diabetology and Endocrinology, Medical Faculty, Otto-von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Tamara Wassermann
- Department of Pneumology, Medical Faculty, Otto-von Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Peter R Mertens
- University Clinic for Nephrology and Hypertension, Diabetology and Endocrinology, Medical Faculty, Otto-von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Anke Schwarz
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Jan U Becker
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christos Chatzikyrkou
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,PHV Dialysis Center, Halberstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Greenberg JW, Morales DLS, Ahmed HF, Desai MV, Riggs KW, Hayes D, Lehenbauer DG, Hossain MM, Zafar F. Overly Selective Offer Acceptance is Associated With High Waitlist Mortality for the Most Ill Lung Transplant Candidates. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022:S1043-0679(22)00261-1. [PMID: 36356907 DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2022.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The demand for organs for lung transplantation (LTx) continues to outweigh supply. However, nearly 75% of donor lungs are never transplanted. LTx offer acceptance practices and the effects on waitlist/post-transplant outcomes by candidate clinical acuity are understudied. UNOS was used to identify all LTx candidates, donors, and offers from 2005 to 2019. Candidates were grouped by Lung Allocation Score (LAS; applicable post-2005, ages ≥12 years): LAS<40, 40-60, 61-80, and >80. Offer acceptance patterns, waitlist death/decompensation, and post-transplant survival (PTS) were compared. "Acceptable organ offers" were those from donors whose organs were accepted for transplantation. Approximately 3 million offers to 34,531 candidates were reviewed. Median waitlist durations were: 9 days-(LAS>80), 17 days-(LAS 61-80), 42 days-(LAS 40-60), 125 days-(LAS<40) (P < 0.001 between all). Per waitlist-day, offer rates were: total offers - 0.8/day-(LAS>80), 0.7/day-(LAS 61-80), 0.6/day-(LAS 40-60), 0.4/day-(LAS<40); acceptable offers - 0.34/day-(LAS>80), 0.32/day-(LAS 61-80), 0.24/day-(LAS 40-60), 0.15/day-(LAS<40) (both P < 0.001 between all LAS). Among patients who experienced waitlist mortality/decompensation, ≥1 acceptable offer was declined in 92% (3939/4270) of patients - 78% for LAS >80, 88% for LAS 61-80, 93% for LAS 40-60, and 96% for LAS <40. Thirty-day waitlist mortality/decompensation rates were: 46%-(LAS>80), 24%-(LAS 61-80), 5%-(LAS 40-60), <1%-(LAS<40) (P < 0.001 between all). PTS was equivalent between patients for whom the first/second offer vs later offers were accepted (all LAS P > 0.4). The first offers that LTx candidates receive (including acceptable organs) are declined for nearly all candidates. Healthier candidates can afford offer selectivity but more ill patients (LAS>60) cannot, experiencing exceedingly high 30-day waitlist mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason W Greenberg
- The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio..
| | - David L S Morales
- The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Hosam F Ahmed
- The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Mallika V Desai
- The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Kyle W Riggs
- The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Don Hayes
- The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - David G Lehenbauer
- The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Md M Hossain
- The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Farhan Zafar
- The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yamamoto T, Shah A, Fruscione M, Kimura S, Elias N, Yeh H, Kawai T, Markmann JF. Revisiting the "Weekend Effect" on Adult and Pediatric Liver and Kidney Offer Acceptance. Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e937825. [PMID: 36329622 PMCID: PMC9641986 DOI: 10.12659/aot.937825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 08/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Weekends can impose resource and manpower constraints on hospitals. Studies using data from prior allocation schemas showed increased adult organ discards on weekends. We examined the impact of day of the week on adult and pediatric organ acceptance using contemporary data. MATERIAL AND METHODS Retrospective analysis of UNOS-PTR match-run data of all offers for potential kidney and liver transplant from 1/1/2016 to 7/1/2021 were examined to study the rate at which initial offers were declined depending on day of the week. Risk factors for decline were also evaluated. RESULTS Of the total initial adult/pediatric liver and kidney offers, the fewest offers occurred on Mondays and Sundays. The decline rate for adult/pediatric kidneys was highest on Saturdays and lowest on Tuesdays. The decline rate for adult livers was highest on Saturday and lowest on Wednesday. In contrast, the decline rate for pediatric livers was highest on Tuesdays and lowest on Wednesdays. Independent risk factors from multivariate analysis of the adult/pediatric kidney and liver decline rate were analyzed. The weekend offer remains an independent risk factor for adult kidney and liver offer declines, but for pediatric offers, these were not significant independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS Although allocation systems have changed, and the availability of kidneys and livers have increased in the USA over the past 5 years, the weekend effect remains significant for adult liver and kidney offers for declines. Interestingly, the weekend effect was not seen for pediatric liver and kidney offers.
Collapse
|
16
|
Reddy V, da Graca B, Martinez E, Ruiz R, Asrani SK, Testa G, Wall A. Single-center analysis of organ offers and workload for liver and kidney allocation. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:2661-2667. [PMID: 35822324 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The volume of abdominal organ offers received by the Baylor Simmons Transplant Institute has increased over time, resulting in a higher workload for our donor call team. To quantify the increase in organ offers, determine the characteristics of these offers, and estimate the impact on our transplant center workload, we collected center-specific organ offer data from May 2019 to July 2021 using the UNOS Center Acceptance and Refusal Evaluation Report and performed a time study that collected the number of communications and time spent on communications for organ offers made during a typical week. The total offers per month increased by 140% (270/month to 648/month), while the number of transplanted organs remained stable. In addition, the percentage of offers for organs that were never transplanted increased from 54% to 75%. In a representative week-long time study, surgeons made 505, center coordinators 590, and answering service coordinators 318 distinct communications, averaging 3, 4, and 2 communications/hour. Between November 2019 and July 2021, offer-related workload increased by an estimated 97%. These results demonstrate a sizeable inefficiency in abdominal organ allocation associated with a nonrecoverable cost to our transplant center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikrant Reddy
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | | - Eric Martinez
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Richard Ruiz
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Sumeet K Asrani
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Giuliano Testa
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Anji Wall
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Schutter R, Vrijlandt WAL, Weima GM, Pol RA, Sanders JSF, Crop MJ, Leuvenink HGD, Moers C. Kidney utilization in the Netherlands - do we optimally use our donor organs? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2022; 38:787-796. [PMID: 36318454 PMCID: PMC9976738 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfac300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To ensure optimal utilization of deceased donor kidneys, it is important to understand the precise reasons why kidneys are discarded. In this study we aimed to obtain a comprehensive overview of kidney utilization and discard during the entire donation process in the Netherlands. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study we analysed kidney utilization of 3856 kidneys in the Netherlands between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2020. For every kidney that was not transplanted, we determined the moment of and reason for discard through a unique case-by-case assessment. RESULTS Kidney discard according to the traditional definition (procured but not transplanted) was 7.8%. However, when kidneys that seemed medically suitable at the beginning of the donation process were also included, many more potential donor kidneys were lost and the total non-utilization was 24.4%. Subjectively presumed impaired organ quality was responsible for 34.2% of all discarded kidneys. Two-thirds of kidneys discarded due to acute kidney injury (AKI) had only AKI stage 1 or 2. CONCLUSION The classical definition of organ discard underestimates the non-utilization of deceased donor kidneys. Strategies to improve kidney utilization could be a revision of the maximum allowed agonal time in donation after circulatory death, careful consideration in reporting and accepting kidneys from donors with AKI and a prospectively filled registry of detailed organ discard reasons, including the 'silent' non-utilization before procurement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Robert A Pol
- Department of Surgery – Organ Donation and Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Stephan F Sanders
- Department of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Meindert J Crop
- Department of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Henri G D Leuvenink
- Department of Surgery – Organ Donation and Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Cyril Moers
- Department of Surgery – Organ Donation and Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Quaresima S, Mennini G, Manzia TM, Avolio AW, Angelico R, Spoletini G, Lai Q. The liver transplant surgeon Mondays blues: an Italian perspective. Updates Surg 2022; 75:531-539. [PMID: 35948742 PMCID: PMC10042950 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01348-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Poor data exist on the influence of holidays and weekdays on the number and the results of liver transplantation (LT) in Italy. The study's main objective is to investigate the impact of holidays and the different days of the week on the LT number and early graft survival rates in a multi-centric Italian series. We performed a retrospective analysis on 1,026 adult patients undergoing first deceased-donor transplantation between January 2004 and December 2018 in the three university centers in Rome. During the 4,504 workdays, 881 LTs were performed (85.9%; one every 5.1 days on average). On the opposite, 145 LTs were done during the 975 holidays (14.1%; one every 7.1 days on average). Fewer LTs were performed on holidays (P = 0.004). There were no substantial differences in donor-, recipient- and transplant-related characteristics in LTs performed on weekdays or holidays. On Monday, fewer transplants were performed (vs. other weekdays: P < 0.0001; vs. Sunday: P = 0.03). At multivariable Cox regression analysis, LTs performed during the holiday or during the different days of the week were not found to be independent risk factors for the risk of 3- and 12-month graft loss. At three-month survival curves, no differences were observed among the transplants performed during the holidays versus the workdays (86.2 vs. 85.0%; P-0.70). The range of graft survival rates based on the day of the week was 81.6-86.9%, without showing any significant differences (P = 0.57). Fewer transplants are performed on holidays and Mondays. Survivals are not affected by holidays or the day the transplant is performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Quaresima
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties, Sapienza University of Rome, AOU Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Mennini
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties, Sapienza University of Rome, AOU Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Tommaso M Manzia
- Department of Surgery Science, University of Rome Tor Vergata, U.O.C. Chirurgia Epatobiliare e Trapianti, Fondazione PTV, Rome, Italy
| | - Alfonso W Avolio
- General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Angelico
- Department of Surgery Science, University of Rome Tor Vergata, U.O.C. Chirurgia Epatobiliare e Trapianti, Fondazione PTV, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Spoletini
- General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Quirino Lai
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties, Sapienza University of Rome, AOU Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Schold JD, Huml AM, Poggio ED, Reese PP, Mohan S. A tool for decision-making in kidney transplant candidates with poor prognosis to receive deceased donor transplantation in the United States. Kidney Int 2022; 102:640-651. [PMID: 35760150 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
The primary outcomes for kidney transplant candidates are receipt of deceased or living donor transplant, death or removal from the waiting list. Here, we conducted a retrospective analysis of national Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data to evaluate outcomes for 208,717 adult kidney transplant candidates following the 2014 Kidney Allocation System in the United States. Competing risks models were utilized to evaluate Time to Equivalent Risk (TiTER) of deceased donor transplantation (DDTX) and death versus waitlist removal. We also evaluated TiTER based on kidney donor profile index (KDPI) and donor age. For all groups, the cumulative incidence of DDTX was initially higher from time of listing than death or waitlist removal. However, following accrued time on the waiting list, the cumulative incidence of death or waitlist removal exceeded DDTX for certain patient groups, particularly older, diabetic, blood type B and O and shorter pre-listing dialysis time. TiTER for all candidates aged 65-69 averaged 41 months and for 70 and older patients 28 months. Overall, 39.6% of candidates were in risk groups with TiTER under 72 months and 18.5% in groups with TiTER under 24 months. Particularly for older candidates, TiTER for kidneys was substantially shorter for younger donors or lower KDPI. Thus, our findings reveal that a large proportion of waitlisted patients in the United States have poor prognoses to ever undergo DDTX and our data may improve shared decision-making for candidates at time of waitlist placement. Hence, for specific patient groups, TiTER may be a useful tool to disseminate and quantify benefits of accepting relatively high risk donor organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse D Schold
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Center for Populations Health Research, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
| | - Anne M Huml
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Emilio D Poggio
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Peter P Reese
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York; The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, Columbia University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
King KL, Husain SA, Cohen DJ, Schold JD, Mohan S. The role of bypass filters in deceased donor kidney allocation in the United States. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:1593-1602. [PMID: 35090080 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Kidney transplant centers set organ offer filters enabling all candidates at their center to be bypassed during allocation of deceased donor kidneys from the UNOS Organ Center. These filters aim to increase allocation efficiency by preemptively screening out offers unlikely to be accepted. National data were used to compare filter settings of 175 centers in 2007 and in 2019. We examined characteristics of centers whose settings became increasingly restrictive over time, and associations between filter settings and organ offer acceptance. Overall, centers became more open to receiving offers over time, from a median 62% of filters open to receiving national offers in 2007 to 73% in 2019. Intravenous drug use filter settings changed most, from 63 to 153 willing centers. Centers with more open filter settings had higher transplant volume and offer acceptance ratios across all risk categories despite preemptively screening out fewer offers compared to centers with less open settings, but similar transplant rates. There was significant geographic heterogeneity in the distribution of centers with more open filter settings. Current center bypass filters may impact patients' access to transplantation without achieving their full potential for improving allocation efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen L King
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA
| | - S Ali Husain
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA
| | - David J Cohen
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jesse D Schold
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Center for Populations Health Research, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Husain SA, King KL, Cron DC, Neidlinger NA, Ng H, Mohan S, Adler JT. Association of transplant center market concentration and local organ availability with deceased donor kidney utilization. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:1603-1613. [PMID: 35213789 PMCID: PMC9177771 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 01/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Although there is a shortage of kidneys available for transplantation, many transplantable kidneys are not procured or are discarded after procurement. We investigated whether local market competition and/or organ availability impact kidney procurement/utilization. We calculated the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) for deceased donor kidney transplants (2015-2019) for 58 US donation service areas (DSAs) and defined 4 groups: HHI ≤ 0.32 (high competition), HHI = 0.33-0.51 (medium), HHI = 0.53-0.99 (low), and HHI = 1 (monopoly). We calculated organ availability for each DSA as the number kidneys procured per incident waitlisted candidate, grouped as: <0.42, 0.42-0.69, >0.69. Characteristics of procured organs were similar across groups. In adjusted logistic regression, the HHI group was inconsistently associated with composite export/discard (reference: high competition; medium: OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.11-1.20; low 1.01, 0.96-1.06; monopoly 1.19, 1.13-1.26) and increasing organ availability was associated with export/discard (reference: availability <0.42; 0.42-0.69: OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.30-1.40; >0.69: OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.73-1.93). When analyzing each endpoint separately, lower competition was associated with higher export and only market monopoly was weakly associated with lower discard, whereas higher organ availability was associated with export and discard. These results indicate that local organ utilization is more strongly influenced by the relative intensity of the organ shortage than by market competition between centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed A. Husain
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York
| | - Kristen L. King
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York
| | - David C. Cron
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Han Ng
- Department of Economics, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Joel T. Adler
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
King KL, Husain SA, Perotte A, Adler JT, Schold JD, Mohan S. Deceased donor kidneys allocated out of sequence by organ procurement organizations. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:1372-1381. [PMID: 35000284 PMCID: PMC9081167 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Deceased donor kidney allocation follows a ranked match-run of potential recipients. Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) are permitted to deviate from the mandated match-run in exceptional circumstances. Using match-run data for all deceased donor kidney transplants (Ktx) in the US between 2015 and 2019, we identified 1544 kidneys transplanted from 933 donors with an OPO-initiated allocation exception. Most OPOs (55/58) used this process at least once, but 3 OPOs performed 64% of the exceptions and just 2 transplant centers received 25% of allocation exception Ktx. At 2 of 3 outlier OPOs these transplants increased 136% and 141% between 2015 and 2019 compared to only a 35% increase in all Ktx. Allocation exception donors had less favorable characteristics (median KDPI 70, 41% with history of hypertension), but only 29% had KDPI ≥ 85% and the majority did not meet the traditional threshold for marginal kidneys. Allocation exception kidneys went to larger centers with higher offer acceptance ratios and to recipients with 2 fewer priority points-equivalent to 2 less years of waiting time. OPO-initiated exceptions for kidney allocation are growing increasingly frequent and more concentrated at a few outlier centers. Increasing pressure to improve organ utilization risks increasing out-of-sequence allocations, potentially exacerbating disparities in access to transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen L King
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY
| | - S Ali Husain
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY
| | - Adler Perotte
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Joel T. Adler
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Jesse D Schold
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
- Center for Populations Health Research, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Husain SA, King KL, Adler JT, Mohan S, Perotte R. Impact of Extending Eligibility for Reinstatement of Waiting Time After Early Allograft Failure: A Decision Analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2022; 79:354-361. [PMID: 34562524 PMCID: PMC8881308 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.07.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE The shortage of deceased donor kidneys identified for potential transplantation in the United States is exacerbated by a high proportion of deceased donor kidneys being discarded after procurement. We estimated the impact of a policy proposal aiming to increase organ utilization by extending eligibility for waiting time reinstatement for recipients experiencing early allograft failure after transplantation. STUDY DESIGN Decision analysis informed by clinical registry data. SETTING & POPULATION We used Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data to identify 76,044 deceased-donor kidneys procured in the United States from 2013 to 2017, 80% of which were transplanted and 20% discarded. INTERVENTION Extend waiting time reinstatement for recipients experiencing allograft failure from the current 90 days to 1 year after transplantation. OUTCOME Net impact to the waitlist, defined as the estimated number of additional transplants minus estimated increase in waiting list reinstatements. MODEL, PERSPECTIVE, & TIMEFRAME We estimated (1) the number of additional deceased donor kidneys that would be transplanted if there was a 5%-25% relative reduction in discards, and (2) the number of recipients who would regain waiting time under a 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month reinstatement policy. RESULTS Reinstating a waiting time for recipients experiencing allograft failure up to 1 year after transplantation yielded more additional transplants than growth in additions to the waiting list for all model assumptions except the combination of a very low relative reduction in discards (5%) and a very high failure rate of transplanted kidneys that would previously have been discarded (≥5 times the rate of currently transplanted kidneys). LIMITATIONS Lack of empirical evidence supporting the proposed impact of such a policy change. CONCLUSIONS A policy change reinstating waiting time for deceased donor kidneys recipients with allograft failure up to 1 year after transplantation should explored as a decision science-based intervention to improve organ utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Ali Husain
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY
| | - Kristen L. King
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY
| | - Joel T. Adler
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA,Center for Surgery and Public Health at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Rimma Perotte
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ,Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Treacy PJ, Barthe F, Bentellis I, Falagario UG, Prudhomme T, Imbert de La Phalecque L, Shaikh A, Albano L, Chevallier D, Durand M. Is night-time surgical procedure for renal graft at higher risk than during the day? A single center study cohort of 179 patients. Immun Inflamm Dis 2022; 10:225-234. [PMID: 34796677 PMCID: PMC8767511 DOI: 10.1002/iid3.566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Various surgical centers tend to postpone a kidney transplantation (KT) to the following morning than to operate at night-time. The objective of our study was to assess whether there was any difference between daytime and night-time renal transplantation in our institution. METHOD This study is a retrospective monocentric study including all the KTs that were performed between 2012 and 2013 by transplant expert surgeons in our institution. Clavien-Dindo (CD) complications were classified according to 7 variables going from 1 to 5. Time before postgraft diuresis and delayed graft function (DGF) were also analyzed. Two groups of patients were formed according to threshold value of incision time (6.30 p.m.). Data comparison were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test. RESULTS A total of 179 patients were included. Median follow-up was 24 months. Cold ischemia time was longer in the night-time transplantation (1082 vs. 807 min, p < .001), but rewarming time was shorter (47.24 vs. 52.15 min, p = .628). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups using the Kruskal-Wallis method for CD complications (Qobs: 0.076; p = .735). CD complications proportion was similar, with a majority of grade II complications (72.7% daytime group vs. 75.4% night-time group (p = .735). DGF (19 patients for daytime group vs. 13 patients for night-time group, p = .359) and time before postgraft diuresis (4.65 days daytime group vs. 5.27 days night-time group, p = .422) were similar between both groups. Multivariate analysis did not show significant predictors of CD complications Grade 3 and more. CONCLUSION Night-time renal transplantation did not induce more postoperative CD complications than diurnal procedures in our cohort, challenging the false preconceptions that allow surgical teams to delay this surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Flora Barthe
- Urology, Andrology, Renal Transplant Unit, Hôpital Pasteur 2CHU de NiceNiceFrance
| | - Imad Bentellis
- Urology, Andrology, Renal Transplant Unit, Hôpital Pasteur 2CHU de NiceNiceFrance
| | | | - Thomas Prudhomme
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, CHU RangueilToulouse University HospitalToulouseFrance
| | | | - Aysha Shaikh
- Urology, Andrology, Renal Transplant Unit, Hôpital Pasteur 2CHU de NiceNiceFrance
| | - Laetitia Albano
- Department of Renal Transplantation, Hôpital Pasteur 2Nice Sophia‐Antipolis UniversityNiceFrance
| | - Daniel Chevallier
- Urology, Andrology, Renal Transplant Unit, Hôpital Pasteur 2CHU de NiceNiceFrance
| | - Matthieu Durand
- Urology, Andrology, Renal Transplant Unit, Hôpital Pasteur 2CHU de NiceNiceFrance
- Department of Renal Transplantation, Hôpital Pasteur 2Nice Sophia‐Antipolis UniversityNiceFrance
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mohan S, Schold JD. Accelerating deceased donor kidney utilization requires more than accelerating placement. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:7-8. [PMID: 34637595 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.,Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jesse D Schold
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Center for Populations Health Research, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
King KL, Chaudhry SG, Ratner LE, Cohen DJ, Husain SA, Mohan S. Declined Offers for Deceased Donor Kidneys Are Not an Independent Reflection of Organ Quality. KIDNEY360 2021; 2:1807-1818. [PMID: 35372993 PMCID: PMC8785847 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0004052021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Background Deceased donor kidney offers are frequently declined multiple times before acceptance for transplantation, despite significant organ shortage and long waiting times. Whether the number of times a kidney has been declined, reflecting cumulative judgments of clinicians, is associated with long-term transplant outcomes remains unclear. Methods In this national, retrospective cohort study of deceased donor kidney transplants in the United States from 2008 to 2015 (n=78,940), we compared donor and recipient characteristics and short- and long-term graft and patient survival outcomes grouping by the sequence number at which the kidney was accepted for transplantation. We compared outcomes for kidneys accepted within the first seven offers in the match-run, after 8-100 offers, and for hard-to-place kidneys distinguishing those requiring >100 and >1000 offers before acceptance. Results Harder-to-place kidneys had lower donor quality and higher rates of delayed graft function (46% among kidneys requiring >1000 offers before acceptance versus 23% among kidneys with ≤7 offers). In unadjusted models, later sequence groups had higher hazard of all-cause graft failure, death-censored graft failure, and patient mortality; however, these associations were attenuated after adjusting for Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI). After adjusting for donor factors already taken into consideration during allocation, and recipient factors associated with long-term outcomes, graft, and patient survival outcomes were not significantly different for the hardest-to-place kidneys compared with the easiest-to-place kidneys, with the exception of death-censored graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.16, 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.28). Conclusion Late sequence offers may represent missed opportunities for earlier successful transplant for the higher-priority waitlisted candidates for whom the offers were declined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen L King
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York
| | - Sulemon G Chaudhry
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Lloyd E Ratner
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - David J Cohen
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - S Ali Husain
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York.,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Shepherd S, Formica RN. Improving Transplant Program Performance Monitoring. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-021-00344-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
28
|
Emmons BR, Husain SA, King KL, Adler JT, Mohan S. Variations in deceased donor kidney procurement biopsy practice patterns: A survey of U.S. organ procurement organizations. Clin Transplant 2021; 35:e14411. [PMID: 34196034 PMCID: PMC8556234 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Procurement biopsies have become a common practice in the evaluation and allocation of deceased donor kidneys in the United States despite questions about their value and reproducibility. We sought to determine the extent of OPO-level differences in criteria used to decide which deceased donor kidneys undergo a procurement biopsy and to assess the degree of variability in procurement biopsy technique and interpretation across OPOs. METHODS Each of the country's 58 OPOs were invited to participate in the survey. OPOs were divided into two groups based on organ availability ratio and deceased donor kidney discard rate. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Fifty-out-of-fifty-eight invited OPOs (86% response rate) responded to the survey between November 2020 and December 2020. Thirty (60%) OPOs reported that they have formal criteria for performing kidney procurement biopsy, but for 29 of these OPOs, transplant centers can request biopsy on kidneys that do not meet criteria. OPOs used a total of seven different variables and 12 different numerical thresholds to define impaired kidney function that would prompt a procurement biopsy. Additionally, wide variability was seen in biopsy technique and procedures for biopsy interpretation and reporting of findings to transplant programs. These findings identify a clear opportunity for standardization of procurement biopsies to best practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan R. Emmons
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - S. Ali Husain
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY
| | - Kristen L. King
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY
| | - Joel T. Adler
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Center for Surgery and Public Health at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Yang Z, Gerull WD, Shepherd HM, Marklin GF, Takahashi T, Meyers BF, Kozower BD, Patterson GA, Nava RG, Hachem RR, Witt CA, Byers DE, Guillamet RV, Pasque MK, Yan Y, Kreisel D, Puri V. Different-team procurements: A potential solution for the unintended consequences of change in lung allocation policy. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:3101-3111. [PMID: 33638937 PMCID: PMC8390571 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Revised: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The new lung allocation policy has led to an increase in distant donors and consequently enhanced logistical burden of procuring organs. Though early single-center studies noted similar outcomes between same-team transplantation (ST, procuring team from transplanting center) and different-team transplantation (DT, procuring team from different center), the efficacy of DT in the contemporary era remains unclear. In this study, we evaluated the trend of DT, rate of transplanting both donor lungs, 1-year graft survival, and risk of Grade 3 primary graft dysfunction (PGD) using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipient (SRTR) database from 2006 to 2018. A total of 21619 patients (DT 2085, 9.7%) with 19837 donors were included. Utilization of DT decreased from 15.9% in 2006 to 8.5% in 2018. Proportions of two-lung donors were similar between the groups, and DT had similar 1-year graft survival as ST for both double (DT, HR 1.108, 95% CI 0.894-1.374) and single lung transplants (DT, HR 1.094, 95% CI 0.931-1.286). Risk of Grade 3 PGD was also similar between ST and DT. Given our results, expanding DT may be a feasible option for improving lung procurement efficiency in the current era, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhizhou Yang
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - William D. Gerull
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Hailey M. Shepherd
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Tsuyoshi Takahashi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Bryan F. Meyers
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Benjamin D. Kozower
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - G. Alexander Patterson
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ruben G. Nava
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ramsey R. Hachem
- Division of Pulmonology and Critical Care, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Chad A. Witt
- Division of Pulmonology and Critical Care, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Derek E. Byers
- Division of Pulmonology and Critical Care, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Michael K. Pasque
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Yan Yan
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Daniel Kreisel
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Varun Puri
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Batal I, Serban G, Mohan S, Husain SA, Vasilescu ER, Crew RJ, Dube G, Sandoval PR, Coley SM, Santoriello D, Stokes MB, D'Agati VD, Cohen DJ, Markowitz G, Hardy MA, Ratner LE. The clinical significance of receiving a kidney allograft from deceased donor with chronic histologic changes. Mod Pathol 2021; 34:1795-1805. [PMID: 33986461 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00815-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 04/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Allograft survival of deceased donor kidneys with suboptimal histology (DRTx/suboptimal histology: >10% glomerulosclerosis, >10% tubulointerstitial scarring, or >mild vascular sclerosis) is inferior to both DRTx with optimal histology (DRTx/optimal histology) and living donor kidneys irrespective of histologic changes (LRTx). In this report, we explored the reasons behind this guarded outcome with a special focus on the role of alloimmunity. We initially assessed gene expression in 39 time-zero allograft biopsies using the Nanostring 770 genes PanCancer Immune Profiling Panel. Subsequently, we studied 696 consecutive adult kidney allograft recipients that were grouped according to allograft type and histology at time-zero biopsy [DRTx/suboptimal histology (n = 194), DRTx/optimal histology (n = 166), and LRTx (n = 336)]. Part-1: Several immune pathways were upregulated in time-zero biopsies from DRTx/suboptimal histology (n = 11) compared to LRTx (n = 17) but not to DRTx/optimal histology (n = 11). Part-2: Amongst the three groups of recipients, DRTx/suboptimal histology had the highest incidence of acute rejection episodes, most of which occurred during the first year after transplantation (early rejection). This increase was mainly attributed to T cell mediated rejection, while the incidence of antibody-mediated rejection was similar amongst the three groups. Importantly, early acute T cell mediated rejection was a strong independent predictor for allograft failure in DRTx/suboptimal histology (adjusted HR: 2.13, P = 0.005) but not in DRTx/optimal histology nor in LRTx. Our data highlight an increased baseline immunogenicity in DRTx/suboptimal histology compared to LRTx but not to DRTx/optimal histology. However, our results suggest that donor chronic histologic changes in DRTx may help transfer such increased baseline immunogenicity into clinically relevant acute rejection episodes that have detrimental effects on allograft survival. These findings may provide a rationale for enhanced immunosuppression in recipients of DRTx with baseline chronic histologic changes to minimize subsequent acute rejection and to prolong allograft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Batal
- Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Geo Serban
- Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.,Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Syed A Husain
- Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elena-Rodica Vasilescu
- Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Russel J Crew
- Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Geoffrey Dube
- Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - P Rodrigo Sandoval
- Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shana M Coley
- Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dominick Santoriello
- Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael B Stokes
- Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vivette D D'Agati
- Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David J Cohen
- Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Glen Markowitz
- Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark A Hardy
- Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lloyd E Ratner
- Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lentine KL, Pastan S, Mohan S, Reese PP, Leichtman A, Delmonico FL, Danovitch GM, Larsen CP, Harshman L, Wiseman A, Kramer HJ, Vassalotti J, Joseph J, Longino K, Cooper M, Axelrod DA. A Roadmap for Innovation to Advance Transplant Access and Outcomes: A Position Statement From the National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis 2021; 78:319-332. [PMID: 34330526 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Over the past 65 years, kidney transplantation has evolved into the optimal treatment for patients with kidney failure, dramatically reducing suffering through improved survival and quality of life. However, access to transplant is still limited by organ supply, opportunities for transplant are inequitably distributed, and lifelong transplant survival remains elusive. To address these persistent needs, the National Kidney Foundation convened an expert panel to define an agenda for future research. The key priorities identified by the panel center on the needs to develop and evaluate strategies to expand living donation, improve waitlist management and transplant readiness, maximize use of available deceased donor organs, and extend allograft longevity. Strategies targeting the critical goal of decreasing organ discard that warrant research investment include educating patients and clinicians about potential benefits of accepting nonstandard organs, use of novel organ assessment technologies and real-time decision support, and approaches to preserve and resuscitate allografts before implantation. The development of personalized strategies to reduce the burden of lifelong immunosuppression and support "one transplant for life" was also identified as a vital priority. The panel noted the specific goal of improving transplant access and graft survival for children with kidney failure. This ambitious agenda will focus research investment to promote greater equity and efficiency in access to transplantation, and help sustain long-term benefits of the gift of life for more patients in need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krista L Lentine
- Saint Louis University Center for Abdominal Transplantation, St Louis, MO.
| | - Stephen Pastan
- Department of Medicine, Emory Transplant Center, Atlanta, GA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Peter P Reese
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Alan Leichtman
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | | | | | - Lyndsay Harshman
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Transplant Institute, Iowa City, IA
| | - Alexander Wiseman
- Department of Medicine, Centura Health-Porter Adventist Hospital, Aurora, CO
| | | | - Joseph Vassalotti
- National Kidney Foundation, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Matthew Cooper
- Department of Surgery, Medstar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington, DC
| | - David A Axelrod
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Transplant Institute, Iowa City, IA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
|
33
|
Adler JT, Husain SA, King KL, Mohan S. Greater complexity and monitoring of the new Kidney Allocation System: Implications and unintended consequences of concentric circle kidney allocation on network complexity. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:2007-2013. [PMID: 33314637 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The deceased donor kidney allocation system in the United States has undergone several rounds of iterative changes, but these changes were not explicitly designed to address the geographic variation in access to transplantation. The new allocation system, expected to start in December 2020, changes the definition of "local allocation" from the Donation Service Area to 250 nautical mile circles originating from the donor hospital. While other solid organs have adopted a similar approach, the larger number of both kidney transplant centers and transplant candidates is likely to have different consequences. Here, we discuss the incredible increase in complexity in allocation, discuss some of the likely intended and unintended consequences, and propose metrics to monitor the new system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel T Adler
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Center for Surgery and Public Health at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Syed A Husain
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York
| | - Kristen L King
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York.,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Reese PP, Aubert O, Loupy A. Authors' Reply. J Am Soc Nephrol 2021; 32:1264-1265. [PMID: 33910999 PMCID: PMC8259692 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2021020207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Peter. P. Reese
- Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, University of Paris, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U970, Paris, France,Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Olivier Aubert
- Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, University of Paris, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U970, Paris, France,Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, University of Paris, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U970, Paris, France,Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Schold JD, Mohan S, Huml A, Buccini LD, Sedor JR, Augustine JJ, Poggio ED. Failure to Advance Access to Kidney Transplantation over Two Decades in the United States. J Am Soc Nephrol 2021; 32:913-926. [PMID: 33574159 PMCID: PMC8017535 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2020060888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extensive research and policies have been developed to improve access to kidney transplantation among patients with ESKD. Despite this, wide variation in transplant referral rates exists between dialysis facilities. METHODS To evaluate the longitudinal pattern of access to kidney transplantation over the past two decades, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with ESKD initiating ESKD or placed on a transplant waiting list from 1997 to 2016 in the United States Renal Data System. We used cumulative incidence models accounting for competing risks and multivariable Cox models to evaluate time to waiting list placement or transplantation (WLT) from ESKD onset. RESULTS Among the study population of 1,309,998 adult patients, cumulative 4-year WLT was 29.7%, which was unchanged over five eras. Preemptive WLT (prior to dialysis) increased by era (5.2% in 1997-2000 to 9.8% in 2013-2016), as did 4-year WLT incidence among patients aged 60-70 (13.4% in 1997-2000 to 19.8% in 2013-2016). Four-year WLT incidence diminished among patients aged 18-39 (55.8%-48.8%). Incidence of WLT was substantially lower among patients in lower-income communities, with no improvement over time. Likelihood of WLT after dialysis significantly declined over time (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.79 to 0.82) in 2013-2016 relative to 1997-2000. CONCLUSIONS Despite wide recognition, policy reforms, and extensive research, rates of WLT following ESKD onset did not seem to improve in more than two decades and were consistently reduced among vulnerable populations. Improving access to transplantation may require more substantial interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse D. Schold
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio,Center for Populations Health Research, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York,Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York
| | - Anne Huml
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Laura D. Buccini
- Center for Populations Health Research, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - John R. Sedor
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Emilio D. Poggio
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Husain SA, King KL, Mohan S. Left-digit bias and deceased donor kidney utilization. Clin Transplant 2021; 35:e14284. [PMID: 33705569 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Cognitive biases shown to impact medical decision-making include left-digit bias, the tendency to focus on a continuous variable's leftmost digit. We hypothesized that left-digit bias impacts deceased donor kidney utilization through heuristic processing of donor age and creatinine. We used US registry data to identify 87 019 kidneys recovered (2015-2019) and compared the proportion around thresholds for donor age (69 vs. 70 years) and creatinine (1.9 vs. 2.0 mg/dl), then compared the risk of kidney discard. Kidneys from donors aged 70 vs. 69 years were more frequently discarded (77% vs. 65%, p < .001), with higher risk of discard even after adjusting for KDRI (adjusted RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.21, p = .018). Similarly, kidneys from donors with final creatinine 2.0 vs. 1.9 mg/dl were more frequently discarded (37% vs. 29%, p < .001), with higher risk of discard after adjusting for KDRI (adjusted RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.07-1.33, p = .001). However, no significant left-digit effect was found when examining other donor age (39/40, 49/50, 59/60 years) or creatinine (0.9/1.0, 2.9/3.0 mg/dl) thresholds. The findings suggest a possible left-digit effect affecting kidney utilization at specific thresholds. Additional investigations of the impact of this and other heuristics on organ utilization are needed to identify potential areas for decision-making interventions aimed at reducing kidney discard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Ali Husain
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kristen L King
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Karami F, Kernodle AB, Ishaque T, Segev DL, Gentry SE. Allocating kidneys in optimized heterogeneous circles. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:1179-1185. [PMID: 32808468 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2020] [Revised: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Recently, the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network approved a plan to allocate kidneys within 250-nm circles around donor hospitals. These homogeneous circles might not substantially reduce geographic differences in transplant rates because deceased donor kidney supply and demand differ across the country. Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from 2016-2019, we used an integer program to design unique, heterogeneous circles with sizes between 100 and 500 nm that reduced supply/demand ratio variation across transplant centers. We weighted demand according to wait time because candidates who have waited longer have higher priority. We compared supply/demand ratios and average travel distance of kidneys, using heterogeneous circles and 250 and 500-nm fixed-distance homogeneous circles. We found that 40% of circles could be 250 nm or smaller, while reducing supply/demand ratio variation more than homogeneous circles. Supply/demand ratios across centers for heterogeneous circles ranged from 0.06 to 0.13 kidneys per wait-year, compared to 0.04 to 0.47 and 0.05 to 0.15 kidneys per wait-year for 250-nm and 500-nm homogeneous circles, respectively. The average travel distance for kidneys using heterogeneous, and 250-nm and 500-nm fixed-distance circles was 173 nm, 134 nm, and 269 nm, respectively. Heterogeneous circles reduce geographic disparity compared to homogeneous circles, while maintaining reasonable travel distances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatemeh Karami
- Industrial Engineering Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Amber B Kernodle
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Tanveen Ishaque
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sommer E Gentry
- Department of Mathematics, United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Price MB, Yan G, Joshi M, Zhang T, Hickner BT, O'Mahony C, Goss J, Galván TN, Cotton RT, Rana A. Prediction of Kidney Allograft Discard Before Procurement: The Kidney Discard Risk Index. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2021; 19:204-211. [PMID: 33605206 DOI: 10.6002/ect.2020.0340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is an 18.9% discard rate among kidney allografts. Here, we aimed to determine predictors of kidney discard and construct an index to identify high-probability discard kidney allografts prior to procurement. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 102 246 potential kidney allograft donors from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database were used in this analysis. The cohort was randomized into 2 groups. The training set included 67% of the cohort and was used to derive a predictive index for discard that comprised 21 factors identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The validation set included 33% and was used to internally validate the kidney discard risk index. RESULTS In 77.3% of donors, at least 1 kidney was used for transplant, whereas in 22.7% of donors, both kidneys were discarded. The kidney discard risk index was highly predictive of discard with a C statistic of 0.89 (0.88-0.89). The bottom 10th percentile had a discard rate of 0.73%, whereas the top 10th percentile had a discard rate of 83.65%. The 3 most predictive factors for discard were age, creatinine level, and hepatitis C antibody status. CONCLUSIONS We identified 21 factors predictive of discard prior to donor procurement and used these to develop a kidney discard risk index with a C statistic of 0.89.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathew Brent Price
- From the Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplantation and Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Alechinsky L, Abdessater M, Parra J, Malaquin G, Huot O, Bastien O, Barrou B, Drouin SJ. Retrieved but not transplanted kidneys: how to limit the losses? A retrospective national study. Transpl Int 2021; 34:1845-1852. [PMID: 33570752 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Despite the organ shortage, a significant number of deceased donor kidneys are retrieved but not transplanted (RNTK). This study aims to describe and analyze the main causes of potential grafts discard and to propose adequate solutions. We collected data from the Cristal database of the French Biomedicine Agency about RNTK over one year. Expert opinion was taken from urologists with extensive expertise in renal transplantation. They retrospectively analyzed each record to assess the appropriateness of each graft refusal and subsequent kidney discard. Of 252 kidneys were retrieved but not transplanted in France over one year. The main reasons for discard were vascular abnormalities in 43.7% (n = 110), suspicion of malignant tumor in 18.7% (n = 47), and severe histological lesions on preimplantation biopsy in 12.3% (n = 31). The reason for kidney refusal was undetermined in 4.8% (n = 12). Iatrogenic lesions were responsible for 26.2% (n = 66). Overall, 46.0% (n = 16) and 25.0% (n = 63) of the grafts were, respectively, properly and improperly denied, and the analysis was not possible in 29.0% (n = 73). In total, 36.9% of RNTK could have been transplanted. Reduction of iatrogenic lesions, improvement of microsurgical repair skills, and proper histological examination are necessary to reduce the number of RNTK. A prospective study applying the proposed principles is undoubtedly essential to complete this work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Alechinsky
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, APHP - Sorbonne University, Pitié Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Maher Abdessater
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, APHP - Sorbonne University, Pitié Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Jerôme Parra
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, APHP - Sorbonne University, Pitié Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | - Olivier Huot
- Agence de la Biomédecine, Saint Denis la Plaine Cedex, France
| | - Olivier Bastien
- Agence de la Biomédecine, Saint Denis la Plaine Cedex, France
| | - Benoit Barrou
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, APHP - Sorbonne University, Pitié Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Sarah J Drouin
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, APHP - Sorbonne University, Pitié Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Yu K, King K, Husain SA, Dube GK, Stevens JS, Ratner LE, Cooper M, Parikh CR, Mohan S. Kidney nonprocurement in solid organ donors in the United States. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:3413-3425. [PMID: 32342627 PMCID: PMC8448558 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2019] [Revised: 03/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
There are limited data on the nonprocurement of kidneys from solid organ donors. Analysis of Standard Transplant Analysis and Research files was undertaken on all deceased donors in the United States with at least 1 solid organ recovered. From 2000 to 2018, 21 731 deceased donor kidneys (averaging 1144 kidneys per year) were not procured. No kidneys were procured from 8% of liver donors, 3% of heart donors, and 3% of lung donors. Compared to donors with all kidneys procured, those with none procured were older and more likely obese, black, hypertensive, diabetic, hepatitis C positive, smokers, Public Health Service - Increased Risk designated, deceased after cardiac death, or deceased after cerebrovascular accident. Although these donors had lower quality kidneys (median Kidney Donor Risk Index (interquartile range) 1.9 (1.0) vs 1.2 (0.7)), there was substantial overlap in quality between nonprocured and procured kidneys. Nearly one third of nonprocurements were attributed to donor history. Donors with elevated terminal creatinine likely resulting from acute kidney injury (AKI) had higher odds of kidney nonprocurement. Nonprocurement odds varied widely across Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network regions, with a positive correlation between donor kidney nonprocurements and kidney discards at the donation service area level. These findings suggest current discard rates underestimate the underutilization of deceased donor kidneys and more research is needed to optimize safe procurement and utilization of kidneys from donors with AKI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen Yu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York
| | - Kristen King
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York
| | - Syed A. Husain
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York
| | - Geoffrey K. Dube
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Jacob S. Stevens
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Lloyd E. Ratner
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Matthew Cooper
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Chirag R. Parikh
- Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York,The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York,Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
King KL, Husain SA, Schold JD, Patzer RE, Reese PP, Jin Z, Ratner LE, Cohen DJ, Pastan SO, Mohan S. Major Variation across Local Transplant Centers in Probability of Kidney Transplant for Wait-Listed Patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 31:2900-2911. [PMID: 33037131 PMCID: PMC7790218 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2020030335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Geographic disparities in access to deceased donor kidney transplantation persist in the United States under the Kidney Allocation System (KAS) introduced in 2014, and the effect of transplant center practices on the probability of transplantation for wait-listed patients remains unclear. METHODS To compare probability of transplantation across centers nationally and within donation service areas (DSAs), we conducted a registry study that included all United States incident adult kidney transplant candidates wait listed in 2011 and 2015 (pre-KAS and post-KAS cohorts comprising 32,745 and 34,728 individuals, respectively). For each center, we calculated the probability of deceased donor kidney transplantation within 3 years of wait listing using competing risk regression, with living donor transplantation, death, and waiting list removal as competing events. We examined associations between center-level and DSA-level characteristics and the adjusted probability of transplant. RESULTS Candidates received deceased donor kidney transplants within 3 years of wait listing more frequently post-KAS (22%) than pre-KAS (19%). Nationally, the probability of transplant varied 16-fold between centers, ranging from 4.0% to 64.2% in the post-KAS era. Within DSAs, we observed a median 2.3-fold variation between centers, with up to ten-fold and 57.4 percentage point differences. Probability of transplantation was correlated in the post-KAS cohort with center willingness to accept hard-to-place kidneys (r=0.55, P<0.001) and local organ supply (r=0.44, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Large differences in the adjusted probability of deceased donor kidney transplantation persist under KAS, even between centers working with the same local organ supply. Probability of transplantation is significantly associated with organ offer acceptance patterns at transplant centers, underscoring the need for greater understanding of how centers make decisions about organs offered to wait-listed patients and how they relate to disparities in access to transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen L King
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York
| | - S Ali Husain
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York
| | - Jesse D Schold
- Center for Populations Health Research, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Rachel E Patzer
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Peter P Reese
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Zhezhen Jin
- Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Lloyd E Ratner
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - David J Cohen
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
| | - Stephen O Pastan
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology Group, New York, New York
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Brewer B. Click it or give it: Increased seat belt law enforcement and organ donation. HEALTH ECONOMICS 2020; 29:1400-1421. [PMID: 32744400 DOI: 10.1002/hec.4140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2020] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/20/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Laws mandating that individuals wear a seat belt have the presumed goal of reducing motor vehicle accident fatalities, but the prevailing view is that they may reduce the number of organs available. I provide a conceptual model identifying mechanisms whereby the law could either increase or decrease organ donation. Exploiting variation across states and time in the adoption of primary seat belt enforcement, I investigate these mechanisms and estimate the effect of the law on the supply of organs. The law increases seat belt usage and decreases motor vehicle accident fatalities, which translates to a sizeable reduction in the number of motor vehicle accident-based organ donors. In contrast, the law is not associated with changes in the number of organ donors from nonmotor vehicle accident-based sources and is robust to controlling for hospital-specific effects. The effects are concentrated within organs expected to be most negatively impacted by the seat belt. Although primary enforcement represents a net-gain to society in terms of lives saved, the negative impact on organ donation suggests further emphasis be placed on policies aimed at increasing the availability of organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Brewer
- Department of Economics, Finance and Insurance, University of Hartford, West Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Deceased donation represents the largest supply of organs for transplant in the United States. Organs with suboptimal characteristics related to donor disease or recovery-related issues are increasingly discarded at the time of recovery, prompting late allocation to candidates later in the match sequence. Late allocation contributes to organ injury by prolonging cold ischemia, which may further lead to the risk of organ discard, despite the potential to provide benefit to certain transplant candidates. RECENT FINDINGS Expedited placement of marginal organs has emerged as a strategy to address the growing problem of organ discard of marginal organs that have been declined late after recovery. In this review, we describe the basis for expedited organ placement, and approaches to facilitating placement of these grafts, drawing examples from kidney and liver donation and transplantation globally. SUMMARY There is significant global variation in practice related to late allocation. Multiple policy mechanisms exist to facilitate expedited placement, including simultaneous offers to multiple centers, predesignation of aggressive centers, and increasing organ procurement organization autonomy in late allocation. Optimizing late allocation of deceased donor organs holds significant promise to increase the number of transplants.
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidneys transplanted from deceased donors with serum creatinine-defined acute kidney injury (AKI) have similar allograft survival as non-AKI kidneys but are discarded at a higher rate. Urine injury biomarkers are sensitive markers of structural kidney damage and may more accurately predict graft outcomes. METHODS In the 2010-2013 multicenter Deceased Donor Study of 2430 kidney transplant recipients from 1298 donors, we assessed the association of donor urine injury biomarkers microalbumin, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, kidney injury molecule-1, IL-18, and liver-type fatty acid binding protein with graft failure (GF) and death-censored GF (dcGF) using Cox proportional hazard models (median follow-up 4 y). We examined if serum creatinine-defined donor AKI modified this association to assess the relationship between subclinical donor AKI (elevated biomarkers without creatinine-defined AKI) and GF. Through chart review of a subcohort (1137 recipients), we determined associations between donor injury biomarkers and a 3-year composite outcome of GF, mortality, or estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤ 20mL/min/1.73m. RESULTS Risk of GF, dcGF, and 3-year composite outcome did not vary with donor injury biomarker concentrations after adjusting for donor, transplant, and recipient characteristics (adjusted hazard ratio ranged from 0.96 to 1.01 per log-2 increase in biomarker). Subclinical injury in transplanted kidneys without AKI was not associated with GF. CONCLUSIONS AKI measured using injury biomarkers was not associated with posttransplant graft outcomes (at median 4 y posttransplant). When assessing posttransplant graft viability, clinicians can prioritize other donor and recipient factors over donor kidney injury, measured by either serum creatinine or urine injury biomarkers.
Collapse
|
45
|
Husain SA, Shah V, Alvarado Verduzco H, King KL, Brennan C, Batal I, Coley SM, Hall IE, Stokes MB, Dube GK, Crew RJ, Perotte A, Natarajan K, Carpenter D, Sandoval PR, Santoriello D, D’Agati V, Cohen DJ, Ratner L, Markowitz G, Mohan S. Impact of Deceased Donor Kidney Procurement Biopsy Technique on Histologic Accuracy. Kidney Int Rep 2020; 5:1906-1913. [PMID: 33163711 PMCID: PMC7609887 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 06/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The factors that influence deceased donor kidney procurement biopsy reliability are not well established. We examined the impact of biopsy technique and pathologist training on procurement biopsy accuracy. Methods We retrospectively identified all deceased donor kidney-only transplants at our center from 2006 to 2016 with both procurement and reperfusion biopsies performed and information available on procurement biopsy technique and pathologist (n = 392). Biopsies were scored using a previously validated system, classifying “suboptimal” histology as the presence of at least 1 of the following: glomerulosclerosis ≥11%, moderate/severe interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy, or moderate/severe vascular disease. We calculated relative risk ratios (RRR) to determine the influence of technique (core vs. wedge) and pathologist (renal vs. nonrenal) on concordance between procurement and reperfusion biopsy histologic classification. Results A total of 171 (44%) procurement biopsies used wedge technique, and 221 (56%) used core technique. Results of only 36 biopsies (9%) were interpreted by renal pathologists. Correlation between procurement and reperfusion glomerulosclerosis was poor for both wedge (r2 = 0.11) and core (r2 = 0.14) biopsies. Overall, 34% of kidneys had discordant classification on procurement versus reperfusion biopsy. Neither biopsy technique nor pathologist training was associated with concordance between procurement and reperfusion histology, but a larger number of sampled glomeruli was associated with a higher likelihood of concordance (adjusted RRR = 1.12 per 10 glomeruli, 95% confidence interval = 1.04−1.22). Conclusions Biopsy technique and pathologist training were not associated with procurement biopsy histologic accuracy in this retrospective study. Prospective trials are needed to determine how to optimize procurement biopsy practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Ali Husain
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA
- Correspondence: S. Ali Husain, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, 622 West 168th Street PH4-124, New York, New York 10032, USA.
| | - Vaqar Shah
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Hector Alvarado Verduzco
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kristen L. King
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA
| | - Corey Brennan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ibrahim Batal
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shana M. Coley
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Isaac E. Hall
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - M. Barry Stokes
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Geoffrey K. Dube
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - R. John Crew
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Adler Perotte
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Karthik Natarajan
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dustin Carpenter
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - P. Rodrigo Sandoval
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dominick Santoriello
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vivette D’Agati
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - David J. Cohen
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lloyd Ratner
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Glen Markowitz
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Brennan C, Sandoval PR, Husain SA, King KL, Dube GK, Tsapepas D, Mohan S, Ratner LE. Impact of warm ischemia time on outcomes for kidneys donated after cardiac death Post-KAS. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e14040. [PMID: 32654278 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Prolonged warm (WIT) and cold (CIT) ischemia times are often important considerations in the discard of DCD kidneys, but their impact on post-transplant outcomes in the post-KAS era is unclear. We examined the association of ischemia time on delayed graft function (DGF) and death-censored graft failure for DCD kidneys. The 2018 SRTR SAF was utilized to identify post-KAS DCD kidney transplants occurring from 2015 to 2018. Relative risk and Cox regression were used to calculate risk of delayed graft function and hazard of death-censored graft failure, respectively. We identified 4,680 kidneys from DCD donors transplanted from 2015 to 2018 with recorded WIT and CIT times. Median WIT was 21.0 minutes (IQR 14.0-28.0), and CIT was 18.5 hours (IQR 13.9-23.5). The overall incidence of DGF was 42.7%. In a univariable relative risk regression model, extended CIT (24-30 hours:RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.15-1.77; >30 hours:RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.22-1.77) and WIT (20-40 minutes:RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.03-1.17) were associated with increased risk of DGF. When included in a multivariable model, neither prolonged CIT nor WIT were significantly associated with death-censored graft failure. Prolonged WIT and CIT are associated with increased DGF but not death-censored graft failure in recipients of DCD kidney transplants in the post-KAS era. Extended ischemia alone should not be used as a basis for discard or non-utilization of these organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corey Brennan
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York City, New York, USA.,New York- Presbyterian Hospital, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Pedro Rodrigo Sandoval
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Syed Ali Husain
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York City, New York, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Kristen L King
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York City, New York, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Geoffrey K Dube
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Demetra Tsapepas
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York City, New York, USA.,New York- Presbyterian Hospital, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Sumit Mohan
- The Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York City, New York, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York City, New York, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Lloyd E Ratner
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York City, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kim DW, Tsapepas D, King KL, Husain SA, Corvino FA, Dillon A, Wang W, Mayne TJ, Mohan S. Financial impact of delayed graft function in kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e14022. [PMID: 32573812 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Increased utilization of suboptimal organs in response to organ shortage has resulted in increased incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) after transplantation. Although presumed increased costs associated with DGF are a deterrent to the utilization of these organs, the financial burden of DGF has not been established. We used the Premier Healthcare Database to conduct a retrospective analysis of healthcare resource utilization and costs in kidney transplant patients (n = 12 097) between 1/1/2014 and 12/31/2018. We compared cost and hospital resource utilization for transplants in high-volume (n = 8715) vs low-volume hospitals (n = 3382), DGF (n = 3087) vs non-DGF (n = 9010), and recipients receiving 1 dialysis (n = 1485) vs multiple dialysis (n = 1602). High-volume hospitals costs were lower than low-volume hospitals ($103 946 vs $123 571, P < .0001). DGF was associated with approximately $18 000 (10%) increase in mean costs ($130 492 vs $112 598, P < .0001), 6 additional days of hospitalization (14.7 vs 8.7, P < .0001), and 2 additional ICU days (4.3 vs 2.1, P < .0001). Multiple dialysis sessions were associated with an additional $10 000 compared to those with only 1. In conclusion, DGF is associated with increased costs and length of stay for index kidney transplant hospitalizations and payment schemes taking this into account may reduce clinicians' reluctance to utilize less-than-ideal kidneys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel W Kim
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.,Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY, USA
| | - Demetra Tsapepas
- Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Analytics, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kristen L King
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.,Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY, USA
| | - S Ali Husain
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.,Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Sumit Mohan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.,Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) Group, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Deceased Brain Dead Donor Liver Transplantation and Utilization in the United States: Nighttime and Weekend Effects. Transplantation 2020; 103:1392-1404. [PMID: 30444802 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding factors that contribute to liver discards and nonusage is urgently needed to improve organ utilization. METHODS Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipient data, we studied a national cohort of all US adult, deceased brain dead donor, isolated livers available for transplantation from 2003 to 2016, including organ-specific and system-wide factors that may affect organ procurement and discard rates. RESULTS Of 73 686 available livers, 65 316 (88.64%) were recovered for transplant, of which 6454 (9.88%) were ultimately discarded. Livers that were not procured or, on recovery, discarded were more frequently from older, heavier, hepatitis B virus (HCV)+, and more comorbid donors (P < 0.001). However, even after adjustment for organ quality, the odds of liver nonusage were 11% higher on the weekend (defined as donor procurements with cross-clamping occurring from 5:00 PM Friday until 11:59 AM Sunday) compared with weekdays (P < 0.001). Nonuse rates were also higher at night (P < 0.001), defined as donor procurements with cross-clamping occurring from 5:00 PM to 5:00 AM; however, weekend nights had significantly higher nonuse rates compared with weekday nights (P = 0.005). After Share 35, weekend nonusage rates decreased from 21.77% to 19.51% but were still higher than weekday nonusage rates (P = 0.065). Weekend liver nonusage was higher in all 11 United Network of Organ Sharing regions, with an absolute average of 2.00% fewer available livers being used on the weekend compared with weekdays. CONCLUSIONS Although unused livers frequently have unfavorable donor characteristics, there are also systemic and operational factors, including time of day and day of the week a liver becomes available, that impact the chance of liver nonprocurement and discard.
Collapse
|
49
|
Ville S, Branchereau J, Cornuaud A, Dantal J, Legendre C, Buron F, Morelon E, Garrigue V, Lequentrec M, Albano L, Cassuto E, Girerd S, Ladrière M, Glotz D, Lefaucher C, Kerleau C, Foucher Y, Giral M. The weekend effect in kidney transplantation outcomes: a French cohort-based study. Transpl Int 2020; 33:1030-1039. [PMID: 32428980 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Revised: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Numerous studies have reported a weekend effect on outcomes for diseases treated at hospitals. No study has been conducted in France for kidney transplantation. We therefore performed a cohort-based study to evaluate whether outcomes of kidney transplant recipients display a weekend effect. Data were extracted from the French DIVAT cohort. Patients aged 18 years and older, transplanted with a single kidney from deceased donors between 2005 and 2017 were studied. Linear regression, logistic regression, and cause-specific Cox model were used. Among the 6652 studied patients, 4653 patients were transplanted during weekdays (69.9%) versus 1999 during weekends (30.1%). The only statistically significant difference was the percentage of patients with vascular surgical complication(s) at 30 days: 13.3% in the weekend group versus 16.2% in the weekday group 0.79 (95% CI: 0.68; 0.92). We did not observe other significant differences for the other outcomes: patient or graft survival, the risk of acute rejection episodes, the 30-day percentage of urological complications, and the 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate. Our study highlights a small protective weekend effect with less post-surgery vascular complications compared to weekdays. This paradox might be explained by a different handling of weekend transplantations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Ville
- CRTI UMR 1064, Université de Nantes, ITUN, RTRS Centaure, Inserm, Nantes, France.,INSERM UMR 1246 - SPHERE, Nantes University, Tours University, Nantes, France
| | - Julien Branchereau
- CRTI UMR 1064, Université de Nantes, ITUN, RTRS Centaure, Inserm, Nantes, France.,INSERM UMR 1246 - SPHERE, Nantes University, Tours University, Nantes, France
| | | | - Jacques Dantal
- CRTI UMR 1064, Université de Nantes, ITUN, RTRS Centaure, Inserm, Nantes, France.,INSERM UMR 1246 - SPHERE, Nantes University, Tours University, Nantes, France
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Kidney Transplant Center, Necker University Hospital, APHP, RTRS Centaure, Paris Descartes and Sorbonne Paris Cité Universities, Paris, France
| | - Fanny Buron
- Nephrology, Transplantation and Clinical Immunology Department, RTRS Centaure, Edouard Herriot University Hospital, Hospices Civils, Lyon, France
| | - Emmanuel Morelon
- Nephrology, Transplantation and Clinical Immunology Department, RTRS Centaure, Edouard Herriot University Hospital, Hospices Civils, Lyon, France
| | - Valérie Garrigue
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Department, Lapeyronie University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Moglie Lequentrec
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Department, Lapeyronie University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Laetitia Albano
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Hospital Pasteur, Nice, France
| | - Elisabeth Cassuto
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Hospital Pasteur, Nice, France
| | - Sophie Girerd
- Renal Transplantation Department, Brabois University Hospital, Nancy, France
| | - Marc Ladrière
- Renal Transplantation Department, Brabois University Hospital, Nancy, France
| | - Denis Glotz
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, CHU Paris-GH St-Louis Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | - Carmen Lefaucher
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, CHU Paris-GH St-Louis Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | - Clarisse Kerleau
- CRTI UMR 1064, Université de Nantes, ITUN, RTRS Centaure, Inserm, Nantes, France.,INSERM UMR 1246 - SPHERE, Nantes University, Tours University, Nantes, France
| | - Yohann Foucher
- INSERM UMR 1246 - SPHERE, Nantes University, Tours University, Nantes, France.,Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Magali Giral
- CRTI UMR 1064, Université de Nantes, ITUN, RTRS Centaure, Inserm, Nantes, France.,Kidney Transplant Center, Necker University Hospital, APHP, RTRS Centaure, Paris Descartes and Sorbonne Paris Cité Universities, Paris, France.,Centre d'Investigation Clinique en Biothérapie, Nantes, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Lo SB, Blaszak RT, Parajuli N. Targeting Mitochondria during Cold Storage to Maintain Proteasome Function and Improve Renal Outcome after Transplantation. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:E3506. [PMID: 32429129 PMCID: PMC7279041 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21103506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Compared to maintenance dialysis, kidney transplantation results in improved patient survival and quality of life. Kidneys from living donors perform best; however, many patients with ESKD depend on kidneys from deceased donors. After procurement, donor kidneys are placed in a cold-storage solution until a suitable recipient is located. Sadly, prolonged cold storage times are associated with inferior transplant outcomes; therefore, in most situations when considering donor kidneys, long cold-storage times are avoided. The identification of novel mechanisms of cold-storage-related renal damage will lead to the development of new therapeutic strategies for preserving donor kidneys; to date, these mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this review, we discuss the importance of mitochondrial and proteasome function, protein homeostasis, and renal recovery during stress from cold storage plus transplantation. Additionally, we discuss novel targets for therapeutic intervention to improve renal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sorena B. Lo
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA;
| | - Richard T. Blaszak
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA;
| | - Nirmala Parajuli
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA;
| |
Collapse
|