Unique molecular changes in kidney allografts after simultaneous liver-kidney compared with solitary kidney transplantation

Primary hyperoxaluria: Long-term outcomes of isolated kidney versus simultaneous liver/kidney transplant

OBJECTIVES

To compare long-term transplant outcomes (organ rejection and retransplant) of simultaneous liver/kidney transplant (SLK) versus isolated kidney transplant (IK) for patients with primary hyperoxaluria (PH).

METHODS

The Rare Kidney Stone Consortium PH registry was queried to identify patients with PH who underwent SLK or IK from 1999 to 2021. Patient characteristics and long-term transplant outcomes were abstracted and analyzed. Statistical comparisons were performed with Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

We identified 250 patients with PH, of whom 35 received care at Mayo Clinic and underwent SLK or IK. Patients who underwent SLK as their index transplant had lower odds of kidney rejection than did those who underwent IK (hazard ratio [HR], 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08-0.99; p = .048). The immunoprotective effect of concomitant liver and kidney transplant appeared to enhance outcomes for patients with PH. Additionally, the odds of retransplant were significantly lower for patients who underwent SLK as their index transplant than for those who underwent IK (HR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02-0.42; p = .003). Of five patients who underwent IK and had maintained graft function for at least 5 years after transplant, three (60%) had documented vitamin B6 responsiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PH who underwent SLK had a lower risk of kidney rejection and retransplant than those who underwent IK. Accurate genetic assessment for vitamin B6 responsiveness may optimize IK allocation. Novel therapeutics, such as lumasiran, have been introduced as promising agents for the management of PH.

Combined Organ Transplantation in Patients with Advanced Liver Disease

Transplantation of the liver in combination with other organs is an increasingly performed procedure. Over the years, continuous improvement in survival could be realized through careful patient selection and refined organ preservation techniques, in spite of the challenges posed by aging recipients and donors, as well as the increased use of steatotic liver grafts. Herein, we revisit the epidemiology, allocation policies in different transplant zones, indications, and outcomes with regard to simultaneous organ transplants involving the liver, that is combined heart-liver, liver-lung, liver-kidney, and multivisceral transplantation. We address challenges surrounding combined organ transplantation such as equity, utility, and logistics of dual organ implantation, but also advantages that come along with combined transplantation, thereby focusing on molecular mechanisms underlying immunoprotection provided by the liver to the other allografts. In addition, the current standing and knowledge of machine perfusion in combined organ transplantation, mostly based on center experience, will be reviewed. Notwithstanding all the technical advances, shortage of organs, and the lack of universal eligibility criteria for certain multi-organ combinations are hurdles that need to be tackled in the future.

Human liver derived mesenchymal stromal cells ameliorate murine ischemia-induced inflammation through macrophage polarization

Introduction

The immunomodulatory properties of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) have been well-characterized in in-vitro and in-vivo models. We have previously shown that liver MSC (L-MSC) are superior inhibitors of T-cell activation/proliferation, NK cell cytolytic function, and macrophage activation compared to adipose (A-MSC) and bone marrow MSC (BM-MSC) in-vitro.

Method

To test these observations in-vivo, we infused these types of MSC into mice with unilateral renal artery stenosis (RAS), an established model of kidney inflammation. Unilateral RAS was induced via laparotomy in 11-week-old, male 129-S1 mice under general anesthesia. Control mice had sham operations. Human L-MSC, AMSC, and BM-MSC (5x105 cells each) or PBS vehicle were injected intra-arterially 2 weeks after surgery. Kidney morphology was studied 2 weeks after infusion using micro-MRI imaging. Renal inflammation, apoptosis, fibrosis, and MSC retention were studied ex-vivo utilizing western blot, immunofluorescence, and immunohistological analyses.

Results

The stenotic kidney volume was smaller in all RAS mice, confirming significant injury, and was improved by infusion of all MSC types. All MSC-infused groups had lower levels of plasma renin and proteinuria compared to untreated RAS. Serum creatinine improved in micetreated with BM- and L-MSC. All types of MSC located to and were retained within the stenotic kidneys, but L-MSC retention was significantly higher than A- and BM-MSC. While all groups of MSC-treated mice displayed reduced overall inflammation and macrophage counts, L-MSC showed superior potency in-vivo at localizing to the site of inflammation and inducing M2 (reparative) macrophage polarization to reduce inflammatory changes.

Discussion

These in-vivo findings extend our in-vitro studies and suggest that L-MSC possess unique anti-inflammatory properties that may play a role in liver-induced tolerance and lend further support to their use as therapeutic agents for diseases with underlying inflammatory pathophysiology.

Simultaneous combined transplantation: Intricacies in immunosuppression management

Simultaneous combined transplantation (SCT), i.e. the transplantation of two solid organs within the same procedure, can be required when the patients develop more than one end-stage organ failure. The development of SCT over the last 20 years could only be possible thanks to progress in the surgical techniques and in the perioperative management of patients in an ageing population. Performing such major transplant surgeries from the same donor, in a short amount of time, and in critical pathophysiological conditions, is often considered to be counterbalanced by the immune benefits expected from these interventions. However, SCT includes a wide array of different transplant combinations, with each time a different immunological constellation. Recent research offers new insights into the immune mechanisms involved in these different settings. Progress in the understanding of these immunological intricacies help to address the optimal induction and maintenance immunosuppressive treatment strategies. In this review, we summarize the different immunological benefits according to the type of SCT performed. We also incorporate the main outcomes according to the immunological risk at transplantation, and the deleterious impact of preformed or de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in the different types of SCT. Finally, we propose comprehensive and evidence-based induction and maintenance immunosuppression strategies guided by the type of SCT.

The Italian data on SARS-CoV-2 infection in transplanted patients support an organ specific immune response in liver recipients

Introduction

The study of immune response to SARSCoV-2 infection in different solid organ transplant settings represents an opportunity for clarifying the interplay between SARS-CoV-2 and the immune system. In our nationwide registry study from Italy, we specifically evaluated, during the first wave pandemic, i.e., in non-vaccinated patients, COVID-19 prevalence of infection, mortality, and lethality in liver transplant recipients (LTRs), using non-liver solid transplant recipients (NL-SOTRs) and the Italian general population (GP) as comparators.

Methods

Case collection started from February 21 to June 22, 2020, using the data from the National Institute of Health and National Transplant Center, whereas the data analysis was performed on September 30, 2020.To compare the sex- and age-adjusted distribution of infection, mortality, and lethality in LTRs, NL-SOTRs, and Italian GP we applied an indirect standardization method to determine the standardized rate.

Results

Among the 43,983 Italian SOTRs with a functioning graft, LTRs accounted for 14,168 patients, of whom 89 were SARS-CoV-2 infected. In the 29,815 NL-SOTRs, 361 cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection were observed. The geographical distribution of the disease was highly variable across the different Italian regions. The standardized rate of infection, mortality, and lethality rates in LTRs resulted lower compared to NL-SOTRs [1.02 (95%CI 0.81-1.23) vs. 2.01 (95%CI 1.8-2.2); 1.0 (95%CI 0.5-1.5) vs. 4.5 (95%CI 3.6-5.3); 1.6 (95%CI 0.7-2.4) vs. 2.8 (95%CI 2.2-3.3), respectively] and comparable to the Italian GP.

Discussion

According to the most recent studies on SOTRs and SARS-CoV-2 infection, our data strongly suggest that, in contrast to what was observed in NL-SOTRs receiving a similar immunosuppressive therapy, LTRs have the same risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, mortality, and lethality observed in the general population. These results suggest an immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in LTRS that is different from NL-SOTRs, probably related to the ability of the grafted liver to induce immunotolerance.

Issues in multi-organ transplantation of the liver with kidney or heart in polycystic liver-kidney disease or congenital heart disease: Current practices and immunological aspects

Solid organ transplantation has become an integral part of the management of patients with end-stage diseases of the kidney, liver, heart and lungs. Most procedures occur in isolation, but multi-organ transplantation of the liver with either the kidney or heart has become an option. As more patients with congenital heart disease and cardiac cirrhosis survive into adulthood, particularly after the Fontan procedure, liver transplant teams are expected to face questions regarding multi-organ (heart-liver) transplantation. Similarly, patients with polycystic kidneys and livers may be managed by multi-organ transplantation. Herein, we review the indications and outcomes of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation for polycystic liver-kidney disease, and discuss the indications, timing and procedural aspects of combined heart-liver transplantation. We also summarise the evidence for, and potential mechanisms underlying, the immunoprotective impact of liver allografts on the simultaneously transplanted organs.

Examining the Role for Donor-specific Antibody Testing in Simultaneous Liver-kidney Transplantation: A Single-center Analysis of Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) is increasingly used for patients with concurrent end-stage liver and renal disease. Emerging evidence suggests that simultaneous liver transplant can provide a tolerogenic benefit to multiorgan transplant recipients. Posttransplant donor-specific antibody (DSA) may be associated with worse outcomes; however, the role for testing DSA in SLKT is unclear.

METHODS

This study retrospectively assessed the impact of DSA on outcomes following primary SLKT at a large-volume center between 2008 and 2018. Patients were grouped by positive DSA, negative DSA, and DSA not tested, and data were obtained from our institutional database and chart review.

RESULTS

The cohort included 138 SLKT recipients with a mean age of 56.1 ± 9.7 y; 61.6% were male, and 55.8% were Hispanic. Overall, 62 patients were tested for DSA posttransplant, and 33 patients (23.9%) had at least 1 DSA detected. A total of 34 patients (24.6%) experienced at least 1 episode of liver rejection, and 23 patients (16.7%) experienced kidney rejection. Over 50% of patients with de novo DSA changed status during their posttransplant course. Rates of both liver and kidney rejection were slightly higher in the DSA + group, but liver allograft, kidney allograft, and patient survival did not differ when grouped by whether DSA testing was performed or DSA positivity.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that SLKT is associated with excellent long-term patient and allograft survival with a relatively low rate of rejection. In our experience, testing for DSA does not impact SLKT outcomes' and further multicenter analyses are needed to establish standard of care.

Seeking Standardized Definitions for HLA-incompatible Kidney Transplants: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

There is no standard definition for "HLA incompatible" transplants. For the first time, we systematically assessed how HLA incompatibility was defined in contemporary peer-reviewed publications and its prognostic implication to transplant outcomes.

METHODS

We combined 2 independent searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 2015 to 2019. Content-expert reviewers screened for original research on outcomes of HLA-incompatible transplants (defined as allele or molecular mismatch and solid-phase or cell-based assays). We ascertained the completeness of reporting on a predefined set of variables assessing HLA incompatibility, therapies, and outcomes. Given significant heterogeneity, we conducted narrative synthesis and assessed risk of bias in studies examining the association between death-censored graft failure and HLA incompatibility.

RESULTS

Of 6656 screened articles, 163 evaluated transplant outcomes by HLA incompatibility. Most articles reported on cytotoxic/flow T-cell crossmatches (n = 98). Molecular genotypes were reported for selected loci at the allele-group level. Sixteen articles reported on epitope compatibility. Pretransplant donor-specific HLA antibodies were often considered (n = 143); yet there was heterogeneity in sample handling, assay procedure, and incomplete reporting on donor-specific HLA antibodies assignment. Induction (n = 129) and maintenance immunosuppression (n = 140) were frequently mentioned but less so rejection treatment (n = 72) and desensitization (n = 70). Studies assessing death-censored graft failure risk by HLA incompatibility were vulnerable to bias in the participant, predictor, and analysis domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimization of transplant outcomes and personalized care depends on accurate HLA compatibility assessment. Reporting on a standard set of variables will help assess generalizability of research, allow knowledge synthesis, and facilitate international collaboration in clinical trials.

Immunology of simultaneous liver and kidney transplants with identification and prevention of rejection

Simultaneous liver and kidney (SLK) transplantation is considered the best treatment modality among selected patients with both chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Since the first SLK transplant in 1983, the number of SLK transplants has increased worldwide, and particularly in the United States since the implementation of the MELD system in 2002. SLK transplants are considered a relatively low immunological risk procedure evidenced by multiple studies displaying the immunomodulatory properties of the liver on the immune system of SLK recipients. SLK recipients demonstrate lower rates of both cellular and antibody-mediated rejection on the kidney allograft when compared to kidney transplant-alone recipients. Therefore, SLK transplants in the setting of preformed donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) are a common practice, at many centers. Acceptance and transplantation of SLKs are based solely on ABO compatibility without much consideration of crossmatch results or DSA levels. However, some studies suggest an increased risk for rejection for SLK recipients transplanted across high levels of pre-formed HLA DSA. Despite this, there is no consensus regarding acceptable levels of pre-formed DSA, the role of pre-transplant desensitization, splenectomy, or immunosuppressive management in this unique population. Also, the impact of post-transplant DSA monitoring on long-term outcomes is not well-studied in SLK recipients. In this article, we review recent and relevant past articles in this field with a focus on the immunological risk factors among SLK recipients, and strategies to mitigate the negative outcomes among them.

Burden of early hospitalization after simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: Results from the US Multicenter SLKT Consortium

The burden of early hospitalization (within 6 months) following simultaneous liver-kidney transplant (SLKT) is not known. We examined risk factors associated with early hospitalization after SLKT and their impact on patient mortality conditional on 6-month survival. We used data from the US Multicenter SLKT Consortium cohort study of all adult SLKT recipients between 2002 and 2017 who were discharged alive following SLKT. We used Poisson regression to model rates of early hospitalizations after SLKT. Cox regression was used to identify risk factors associated with mortality conditional on survival at 6 months after SLKT. Median age (N = 549) was 57.7 years (interquartile range [IQR], 50.6-63.9) with 63% males and 76% Whites; 33% had hepatitis C virus, 20% had non-alcohol-associated fatty liver disease, 23% alcohol-associated liver disease, and 24% other etiologies. Median body mass index (BMI) and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-sodium scores were 27.2 kg/m2 (IQR, 23.6-32.2 kg/m2 ) and 28 (IQR, 23-34), respectively. Two-thirds of the cohort had at least one hospitalization within the first 6 months of SLKT. Age, race, hospitalization at SLKT, diabetes mellitus, BMI, and discharge to subacute rehabilitation (SAR) facility after SLKT were independently associated with a high incidence rate ratio of early hospitalization. Number of hospitalizations within the first 6 months did not affect conditional survival. Early hospitalizations after SLKT were very common but did not affect conditional survival. Although most of the risk factors for early hospitalization were nonmodifiable, discharge to SAR after initial SLKT was associated with a significantly higher incidence rate of early hospitalization. Efforts and resources should be focused on identifying SLKT recipients at high risk for early hospitalization to optimize their predischarge care, discharge planning, and long-term follow-up.

New Approaches to the Diagnosis of Rejection and Prediction of Tolerance in Liver Transplantation

Immunosuppression after liver transplantation is essential for preventing allograft rejection. However, long-term drug toxicity and associated complications necessitate investigation of immunosuppression minimization and withdrawal protocols. Development of such protocols is hindered by reliance on current paradigms for monitoring allograft function and rejection status. The current standard of care for diagnosis of rejection is histopathologic assessment and grading of liver biopsies in accordance with the Banff Rejection Activity Index. However, this method is limited by cost, sampling variability, and interobserver variation. Moreover, the invasive nature of biopsy increases the risk of patient complications. Incorporating noninvasive techniques may supplement existing methods through improved understanding of rejection causes, hepatic spatial architecture, and the role of idiopathic fibroinflammatory regions. These techniques may also aid in quantification and help integrate emerging -omics analyses with current assessments. Alternatively, emerging noninvasive methods show potential to detect and distinguish between different types of rejection while minimizing risk of adverse advents. Although biomarkers have yet to replace biopsy, preliminary studies suggest that several classes of analytes may be used to detect rejection with greater sensitivity and in earlier stages than traditional methods, possibly when coupled with artificial intelligence. Here, we provide an overview of the latest efforts in optimizing the diagnosis of rejection in liver transplantation.

Liver mesenchymal stem cells are superior inhibitors of NK cell functions through differences in their secretome compared to other mesenchymal stem cells

Liver-resident mesenchymal stem cells (L-MSCs) are superior inhibitors of alloreactive T cell responses compared to their counterparts from bone marrow (BM-MSCs) or adipose tissue (A-MSCs), suggesting a role in liver’s overall tolerogenic microenvironment. Whether L-MSCs also impact NK cell functions differently than other MSCs is not known. We generated and characterized L-MSCs, A-MSCs and BM-MSCs from human tissues. The mass spectrometry analysis demonstrated that L-MSC secretome is uniquely different than that of A-MSC/BM-MSC, with enriched protein sets involved in IFNγ responses and signaling. When co-cultured with primary human NK cells, L-MSCs but not other MSCs, decreased surface expression of activating receptors NKp44 and NKG2D. L-MSCs also decreased IFNγ secretion by IL-2-stimulated NK cells more effectively than other MSCs. Cytolytic function of NK cells were reduced significantly when co-cultured with L-MSCs, whereas A-MSCs or BM-MSCs did not have a major impact. Mechanistic studies showed that the L-MSC-mediated reduction in NK cell cytotoxicity is not through changes in secretion of the cytotoxic proteins Perforin, Granzyme A or B, but through increased production of HLA-C1 found in L-MSC secretome that inhibits NK cells by stimulating their inhibitory receptor KIRDL2/3. L-MSCs are more potent inhibitors of NK cell functions than A-MSC or BM-MSC. Combined with their T cell inhibitory features, these results suggest L-MSCs contribute to the tolerogenic liver microenvironment and liver-induced systemic tolerance often observed after liver transplantation.

Long-term outcomes of crossmatch positive simultaneous liver-kidney transplantations in the United States

The long-term outcomes of positive crossmatch (+XM) simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplantations are conflicting. We examined the association between crossmatch status and SLK outcomes in recipients discharged on tacrolimus and mycophenolate with or without steroids. We analyzed the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients for all primary SLK recipients between 2003 and 2020 with available crossmatch and induction data. We grouped recipients according to the crossmatch status: negative crossmatch (-XM; n = 3040) and +XM (n = 407). Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to examine recipient, death-censored liver, and death-censored kidney survival by crossmatch status. Cox proportional hazard models were used to investigate the association between crossmatch status and outcomes of interest with follow-up censored at 10 years. Models were adjusted for recipient age, sex, diabetes mellitus, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, duration on the liver waiting list, induction immunosuppression, steroid maintenance, hepatitis C infection, donor age and sex, local vs. shared organ, cold ischemia time, and previous liver transplantation status. In the univariable analysis, crossmatch status was not associated with recipient survival (log-rank p = 0.63), death-censored liver graft survival (log-rank p = 0.05), or death-censored kidney graft survival (log-rank p = 0.11). Compared with -XM, +XM recipients had a similar 1-year liver rejection rate, but higher kidney rejection rate (4.6% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.002). In the multivariable models, +XM status was not associated with deleterious long-term recipient, liver, or kidney grafts survival. -XM and +XM SLK transplantations have comparable long-term recipient, liver graft, and kidney survival with a slightly increased risk of early kidney allograft rejection in the +XM group. Crossmatch positivity in SLK transplantations should not influence the decision to use organs from a specific donor.

Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation

End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) after liver transplantation is associated with high morbidity and mortality. This increase in mortality can be offset by performing a kidney transplant at the time of the liver transplant in select cases. Accordingly, Margreiter and colleague; s performed the first simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplant in 1983. The number of SLK transplants has increased by more than 300% since then. In 1990%, 1.7% of all liver transplants in the United States were SLK transplants which increased to 9.9% by 2016. This steep increase was likely due to the implementation of the model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) scoring system in 2002, which is heavily weighted by serum creatinine.

Alloantibodies after simultaneous liver-kidney transplant: A story of primary nonfunction, retransplantation, and antibody-mediated rejection

Simultaneous liver-kidney transplant (SLKT) in the presence of antihuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor-specific antibodies (DSA) is a well-accepted practice. Herein, we describe the evolution of alloantibodies in a patient who received an SLKT. The pre-SLKT serum sample showed multiple strong DSA. As expected, all DSA cleared in a sample collected 4 days after the SLKT. Because of the primary nonfunction of the liver in the SLKT, the patient had a second liver transplant 4 days later. An abrupt increase in DSA levels against the kidney was detected 10 days after the second liver transplant. These DSA were refractory to treatment, and the transplanted kidney was lost due to antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). A detailed study of the HLA epitopes recognized by DSA and, after normalization with third-party alloantibodies to address the effect of multiple transfusions and liver allograft neutralization, showed that the elimination of these antibodies depended on the HLA antigens expressed by the transplanted liver cells. The return of DSA after removal of the first transplanted liver was associated with AMR in the transplanted kidney.

Crossmatch, Donor-specific Antibody Testing, and Immunosuppression in Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Transplantation: A Review

Since the introduction of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) in the 1960s, the potential for immunological protection from the liver allograft to a simultaneously transplanted kidney has been recognized. Due to expanded indications and changes in allocation policies, there has been increased utilization of SLKT. Despite growing experience, a lack of consensus exists regarding the extent of the immunological privilege of the liver the role for donor-specific HLA antibody (DSA) and crossmatch testing, and appropriateness of modern immunosuppression protocols in SLKT recipients. This review provides a detailed analysis of SLKT outcomes in the context of these factors, suggesting that although the liver can reduce the incidence of antibody-mediated rejection, attention should be given to liver allograft function, previous failed transplants, and other risk factors in pretransplant risk assessment. Current methods of DSA and crossmatch testing in SLKT are also discussed, and the role of specific DSA (high mean fluorescence intensity antibody, C1q+ binding) and their potential importance in posttransplant risk assessment are examined. Finally, trends in SLKT immunosuppression are discussed, including the use of nondepleting agents for induction and de-escalating use of steroids for maintenance immunosuppression. Ongoing research, including multicenter or randomized trials, will be necessary to optimize immune-related outcomes in SLKT recipients.

Current State of Multiorgan Transplantation and Implications for Future Practice and Policy

The incidence of kidney dysfunction has increased in liver transplant and heart transplant candidates, reflecting a changing patient population and allocation policies that prioritize the most urgent candidates. A higher burden of pretransplant kidney dysfunction has resulted in a substantial rise in the utilization of multiorgan transplantation (MOT). Owing to a shortage of available deceased donor kidneys, the increased use of MOT has the potential to disadvantage kidney-alone transplant candidates, as current allocation policies generally provide priority for MOT candidates above all kidney-alone transplant candidates. In this review, the implications of kidney disease in liver transplant and heart transplant candidates is reviewed, and current policies used to allocate organs are discussed. Important ethical considerations pertaining to MOT allocation are examined, and future policy modifications that may improve both equity and utility in MOT policy are considered.

Progressive decline of function in renal allografts with normal 1-year biopsies: Gene expression studies fail to identify a classifier

Histologic findings on 1-year biopsies such as inflammation with fibrosis and transplant glomerulopathy predict renal allograft loss by 5 years. However, almost half of the patients with graft loss have a 1-year biopsy that is either normal or has only interstitial fibrosis. The goal of this study was to determine if there was a gene expression profile in these relatively normal 1-year biopsies that predicted subsequent decline in renal function. Using transcriptome microarrays we measured intragraft mRNA levels in a retrospective Discovery cohort (170 patients with a normal/minimal fibrosis 1-year biopsy, 54 with progressive decline in function/graft loss and 116 with stable function) and developed a nested 10-fold cross-validated gene classifier that predicted progressive decline in renal function (positive predictive value = 38 ± 34%%; negative predictive value = 73 ± 30%, c-statistic = .59). In a prospective, multicenter Validation cohort (270 patients with Normal/Interstitial Fibrosis [IF]), the classifier had a 20% positive predictive value, 85% negative predictive value and .58 c-statistic. Importantly, the majority of patients with graft loss in the prospective study had 1-year biopsies scored as Normal or IF. We conclude predicting graft loss in many renal allograft recipients (i.e., those with a relatively normal 1-year biopsy and eGFR > 40) remains difficult.

Renal Outcomes After Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation: Results from the US Multicenter Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation Consortium

Simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) is increasingly common in the United States. However, little is known about the renal-related outcomes following SLKT, which are essential to maximize the health of these allografts. We examined the factors impacting renal function following SLKT. This is an observational multicenter cohort study from the US Multicenter SLKT Consortium consisting of recipients of SLKT aged ≥18 years of transplantations performed between February 2002 and June 2017 at 6 large US centers in 6 different United Network for Organ Sharing regions. The primary outcome was incident post-SLKT stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) defined as <30 mL/minute/1.73 m² or listing for kidney transplant. The median age of the recipients (n = 570) was 58 years (interquartile range, 51-64 years), and 37% were women, 76% were White, 33% had hepatitis C virus infection, 20% had nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and 23% had alcohol-related liver disease; 68% developed ≥ stage 3 CKD at the end of follow-up. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year incidence rates of post-SLKT stage 4-5 CKD were 10%, 12%, and 16%, respectively. Pre-SLKT diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio [HR], 1.45; 95% CI, 1.00-2.15), NASH (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.01-2.45), and delayed kidney graft function (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.10-2.71) were the recipient factors independently associated with high risk, whereas the use of tacrolimus (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.89) reduced the risk. Women (β = -6.22 ± 2.16 mL/minute/1.73 m² ; P = 0.004), NASH (β = -7.27 ± 3.27 mL/minute/1.73 m² ; P = 0.027), and delayed kidney graft function (β = -7.25 ± 2.26 mL/minute/1.73 m² ; P = 0.007) were independently associated with low estimated glomerular filtration rate at last follow-up. Stage 4-5 CKD is common after SLKT. There remains an unmet need for personalized renal protective strategies, specifically stratified by sex, diabetes mellitus, and liver disease, to preserve renal function among SLKT recipients.

Current and Evolving Indications for Simultaneous Liver Kidney Transplantation

This review will discuss the etiologies of kidney disease in liver transplant candidates, provide a historical background of the prior evolution of simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplant indications, discuss the current indications for SLK including Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network policies and Model for End Stage Liver Disease exception points, as well as provide an overview of the safety net kidney transplant policy. Finally, the authors explore unanswered questions and future research needed in SLK transplantation.

The Utility of Donor-specific Antibody Monitoring and the Role of Kidney Biopsy in Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Recipients With De Novo Donor-specific Antibodies

BACKGROUND

There is limited information about the utility of donor-specific antibody (DSA) against HLA monitoring and the role of protocol kidney biopsy for de novo DSA (dnDSA) in simultaneous liver and kidney (SLK) transplant recipients.

METHODS

We analyzed SLK transplant recipients transplanted between January 2005 and December 2017, who had DSA checked posttransplant. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether they developed dnDSA posttransplant (dnDSA+) or not (dnDSA-). Kidney graft rejection ±45 d of dnDSA and a kidney death-censored graft survival were the primary endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of 83 SLK transplant recipients fulfilled our selection criteria. Of those, 23 were dnDSA+ and 60 were dnDSA-. Twenty-two of 23 dnDSA+ patients had DSA against class II HLA, predominantly against DQ. Fifteen recipients underwent kidney biopsy ±45 d of dnDSA. Six of these were clinically indicated due to kidney graft dysfunction. The other 9 had a protocol kidney biopsy only due to dnDSA, and 6 of these 9 had a rejection. Also, 3 recipients had sequential biopsies of both the kidney and liver grafts. Among those with sequential biopsies of both grafts, there was a difference between the organs in the rate and types of rejections. At last follow up, dnDSA was not associated with graft failure of either the kidney or liver.

CONCLUSIONS

Although our study was limited by a small sample size, it suggests the potential utility of DSA monitoring and protocol kidney biopsy for dnDSA.

Liver transplantation for congenital hepatic fibrosis

Congenital hepatic fibrosis (CHF) is a hereditary fibrocystic disease that can progress to portal hypertension and recurrent cholangitis requiring liver transplantation (LT). It can be associated with renal pathology and need for kidney transplantation (KT). We describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing liver transplantation alone (LTA) and simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) for CHF using the Unites States Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. A total of 197 patients who received LT for CHF between 2002 and 2018 were identified - 87 (44.2%) received SLKT, 110 (55.8%) received LTA. The 1-, 3- and 5-year patient survival were 99.0%, 96.2% and 94.6%. The 1-, 3- and 5-year liver graft survival were 94.9%, 91.1% and 89.6%. No significant differences in patient or liver graft survival were observed between the SLKT and LTA groups, or between paediatric and adult recipients. 53.3% of patients with CHF necessitating LT also have significant renal disease requiring KT. Kidney graft survival for isolated KT prior to LT were poorer compared with KT performed simultaneously or after LT. Both LTA and SLKT for CHF are associated with excellent long-term outcomes in paediatric and adult patients.

Cell-Mediated Therapies to Facilitate Operational Tolerance in Liver Transplantation

Cell therapies using immune cells or non-parenchymal cells of the liver have emerged as potential treatments to facilitate immunosuppression withdrawal and to induce operational tolerance in liver transplant (LT) recipients. Recent pre-clinical and clinical trials of cellular therapies including regulatory T cells, regulatory dendritic cells, and mesenchymal cells have shown promising results. Here we briefly summarize current concepts of cellular therapy for induction of operational tolerance in LT recipients.

Comparable in vitro Function of Human Liver-Derived and Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: Implications for Cell-Based Therapy

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) have been investigated extensively for their immunotherapeutic and regenerative properties, which may differ by cell source. In MSCs harvested from donors matched for sex, age, and body mass index, we compared the proliferative and migration functions of liver-derived MSCs (L-MSCs) and adipose tissue-derived MSCs (A-MSCs) (n = 6 donors each). Cellular senescence was evaluated by senescence-associated beta-galactosidase enzyme activity and expression of senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) factors using real-time quantitative polymerase chain and by western blot assay. The pro-angiogenic and reparative potency of MSCs was compared by co-culturing MSCs with injured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). The proliferation and migration properties were similar in L-MSCs and A-MSCs. Although cell cycle arrest and SASP genes were similarly expressed in both MSCs, tumor necrosis factor alpha gene and protein expression were significantly downregulated in L-MSCs. In co-cultured injured HUVEC, A-MSCs restored significantly more tubes and tube connections than L-MSCs. Therefore, despite many functional similarities between L-MSCs and A-MSCs, L-MSCs have enhanced immunomodulatory properties, while A-MSCs appear to have better pro-angiogenic and vascular reparative potency. Availability of a broad range of cellular options might enable selecting cell-based therapy appropriate for the specific underlying disease.

Heart-After-Liver Transplantation Attenuates Rejection of Cardiac Allografts in Sensitized Patients

BACKGROUND

In patients undergoing heart transplantation, significant allosensitization limits access to organs, resulting in longer wait times and high waitlist mortality. Current desensitization strategies are limited in enabling successful transplantation.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to describe the cumulative experience of combined heart-liver transplantation using a novel heart-after-liver transplant (HALT) protocol resulting in profound immunologic protection.

METHODS

Reported are the results of a clinical protocol that was instituted to transplant highly sensitized patients requiring combined heart and liver transplantation at a single institution. Patients were dual-organ listed with perceived elevated risk of rejection or markedly prolonged waitlist time due to high levels of allo-antibodies. Detailed immunological data and long-term patient and graft outcomes were obtained.

RESULTS

A total of 7 patients (age 43 ± 7 years, 86% women) with high allosensitization (median calculated panel reactive antibody = 77%) underwent HALT. All had significant, unacceptable donor specific antibodies (DSA) (>4,000 mean fluorescence antibody). Prospective pre-operative flow cytometric T-cell crossmatch was positive in all, and B-cell crossmatch was positive in 5 of 7. After HALT, retrospective crossmatch (B- and T-cell) became negative in all. DSA fell dramatically; at last follow-up, all pre-formed or de novo DSA levels were insignificant at <2,000 mean fluorescence antibody. No patients experienced >1R rejection over a median follow-up of 48 months (interquartile range: 25 to 68 months). There was 1 death due to metastatic cancer and no significant graft dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

A heart-after-liver transplantation protocol enables successful transplantation via near-elimination of DSA and is effective in preventing adverse immunological outcomes in highly sensitized patients listed for combined heart-liver transplantation.

Optimizing the Selection of Patients for Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplant

Simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation has increased significantly in the Model for End Stage Liver Disease era. The transplantation policy has evolved significantly since the implementation of allocation based on the Model for End Stage Liver Disease. Current policy takes into account the medical eligibility criteria for simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation listing. It also provides a safety net option and prioritizes kidney transplant after liver transplant recipients who are unlikely to recover their renal function within 60 to 365 days after liver transplant alone. This review seeks to understand the underlying challenges in carefully selecting the candidates while optimizing the patient selection.

Combined Liver-Kidney Transplantation With Preformed Anti-human Leukocyte Antigen Donor-Specific Antibodies

Introduction

The impact of preformed donor-specific anti–human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (pDSAs) after combined liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT) is still uncertain.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study in 8 European high-volume transplant centers and investigated the outcome of 166 consecutive CLKTs, including 46 patients with pDSAs.

Results

Patient survival was lower in those with pDSAs (5-year patient survival rate of 63% and 78% with or without pDSA, respectively; P = 0.04). The presence of pDSAs with a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) ≥ 5000 (hazard ratio 4.96; 95% confidence interval: 2.3–10.9; P < 0.001) and the presence of 3 or more pDSAs (hazard ratio 6.5; 95% confidence interval: 2.5–18.8; P = 0.05) were independently associated with death. The death-censored liver graft survival was similar in patients with or without pDSAs. Kidney graft survival was comparable in both groups. (The 1- and 5-year death-censored graft survival rates were 91.6% and 79.5%, respectively, in patients with pDSAs and 93% and 88%, respectively, in the donor-specific antibody [DSA]-negative group, P = not significant). Despite a higher rate of kidney graft rejection in patients with pDSAs (5-year kidney graft survival rate without rejection of 87% and 97% with or without pDSAs, respectively; P = 0.04), kidney function did not statistically differ between both groups at 5 years post-transplantation (estimated glomerular filtration rate 45 ± 17 vs. 57 ± 29 ml/min per 1.73 m², respectively, in patients with and without pDSAs). Five recipients with pDSAs (11.0%) experienced an antibody-mediated kidney rejection that led to graft loss in 1 patient.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that CLKT with pDSAs is associated with a lower patients’ survival despite good recipients’, liver and kidney grafts’ outcome.

Impact of Induction Immunosuppression Strategies in Simultaneous Liver/Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

There is scant data on the use of induction immunosuppression for simultaneous liver/kidney transplantation (SLKT).

METHODS

We analyzed the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network registry from 1996 to 2016 to compare outcomes of SLKT, based on induction immunosuppression.

RESULTS

Of 5172 patients, 941 (18%) received T-cell depletion induction, 1635 (32%) received interleukin 2 receptor antagonist (IL2-RA), and 2596 (50%) received no induction (NI). At 5 years, patient survivals were 68% in the T-cell group, 74% in the IL2-RA group, and 71% in the NI group (P = 0.0006). Five-year liver and kidney allograft survivals were 67% and 64% in the T-cell group, 73% and 70% in the IL2-RA group, and 70% and 68% in the NI group (P = 0.001 and 0.003), respectively. On multivariate analysis, the type of induction had no impact on patient or allograft survival. Maintenance steroids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) at discharge were associated with improved patient and graft survival (steroids: patient survival hazard ratio [HR] 0.37 [0.27-0.52], liver survival HR 0.43 [0.31-0.59], kidney survival HR 0.46 [0.34-0.63]; P < 0.0001, CNI: patient survival HR 0.3 [0.21-0.43], liver survival HR 0.3 [0.2-0.44], kidney survival HR 0.4 [0.26-0.59]; P < 0.0001). CNI maintenance in patients who received T-cell induction was associated with decreased patient, liver, and kidney allograft survivals (respective HR: 1.4 [1.1, 1.8]; 1.5 [1.1, 1.9]; 1.3 [1.08, 1.7]; P < 0.05) CONCLUSION.: Induction immunosuppression had no impact on patient and allograft survival in SLKT, while maintenance steroids and CNI were associated with improved patient and graft survivals. Given the inherent limitations of a registry analysis, these findings should be interpreted with caution.

Sequential Versus Combined Heart-Liver Transplantation in the USA

INTRODUCTION

Combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT) has resulted in acceptable survival rates compared to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) alone and orthotopic heart transplantation alone. Using the US transplant registry, we compared outcomes following sequential and combined HLT.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study. De-identified data were obtained from the United Network Organ Sharing Registry. The primary outcome was patient survival from the date of OLT. Secondary outcomes included liver allograft survival and heart allograft survival.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 301 CHLT recipients and six sequential heart-liver transplantation (SHLT) recipients. Patient survival after CHLT was 88% at 1 year, 84% at 3 years, and 82% at 5 years compared to 83%, 67%, and 50% in the SHLT group (p = 0.010). Liver allograft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 88%,83% and 82%, respectively, in the CHLT group compared to 83% and 67%, and 50%, respectively, in the SHLT group (p = 0.009). After OLT, heart allograft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 86%, 79%, and 74% in the CHLT group, respectively, compared to 83%, 67%, and 50% in the SHLT group (p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the limited size of the SHLT cohort, we found that CHLT was superior to SHLT in survival rate and graft survival. The better outcomes noted in CHLT may relate to immunoprotection provided by liver transplantation from the same donor.

Delayed Implantation of Pumped Kidneys Decreases Renal Allograft Futility in Combined Liver-Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Combined liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT) improves survival for liver transplant recipients with renal dysfunction; however, the tenuous perioperative hemodynamic and metabolic milieu in high-acuity CLKT recipients increases delayed graft function and kidney allograft failure. We sought to analyze whether delayed KT through pumping would improve kidney outcomes following CLKT.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis (University of California Los Angeles [n = 145], Houston Methodist Hospital [n = 79]) was performed in all adults receiving CLKT at 2 high-volume transplant centers from February 2004 to January 2017, and recipients were analyzed for patient and allograft survival as well as renal outcomes following CLKT.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients (28.1%) underwent delayed implantation of pumped kidneys during CLKT (dCLKT) and 161 patients (71.9%) received early implantation of nonpumped kidneys during CLKT (eCLKT). Most recipients were high-acuity with median biologic model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score of, 35 for dCLKT and 34 for eCLKT (P = ns). Pretransplant, dCLKT had longer intensive care unit stay, were more often intubated, and had greater vasopressor use. Despite this, dCLKT exhibited improved 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient and kidney survival (P = 0.02) and decreased length of stay (P = 0.001), kidney allograft failure (P = 0.012), and dialysis duration (P = 0.031). This reduced kidney allograft futility (death or continued need for hemodialysis within 3 mo posttransplant) for dCLKT (6.3%) compared with eCLKT (19.9%) (P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed implantation of pumped kidneys is associated with improved patient and renal allograft survival and decreased hospital length of stay despite longer kidney cold ischemia. These data should inform the ethical debate as to the futility of performing CLKT in high-acuity recipients.

Kidney Rejection Following Simultaneous Liver-kidney Transplantation

Background.

Donor-specific antibodies are reported to increase the risk of rejection and reduce allograft survival following simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation. Optimal immunosuppression regimens to reduce this risk and to treat rejection episodes are underinvestigated.

Methods.

Cohort analysis of the first 27 simultaneous liver-kidney transplant recipients, between 2014 and 2018 at our unit, is performed under a new risk stratification policy. Those with donor-specific antibodies to class II HLA with a mean fluorescence intensity >10 000 are considered high risk for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). These patients received immunosuppression, which consisted of induction therapy, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone. All other patients are considered low risk and received tacrolimus and prednisolone alone.

Results.

Three patients were high risk for rejection, and 2 of these patients developed AMR, which was treated with plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin. At 1 y, their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were 50 and 59 mL/min. Two other patients developed AMR, which was similarly treated, and their 1-y eGFR was 31 and 50 mL/min. The overall histologically proven acute rejection rate within the first year was 33%, and median eGFR, for the 27 patients, at 1 y was 52 mL/min and at 2 y was 49 mL/min.

Conclusions.

This study confirms that there is a risk of AMR following simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation despite increased immunosuppression. This can be effectively treated with plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin.

Association between longer hospitalization and development of de novo donor specific antibodies in simultaneous liver-kidney transplant recipients

Background: De novo Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA) are considered as a risk factor for the kidney allograft outcomes in recipients after simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT). We hypothesized that length of hospital stay (LOS) might be associated with de novo DSA development of due to the increased likelihood of receiving blood transfusions with reduced immunosuppressive regimens.Methods: This study is a single-center, retrospective cohort study consisting of 85 recipients who underwent SLKT from 2009 to 2018 in our hospital. We divided the patients into two groups according to LOS [long hospital stay (L) group (LOS >14 days) and short hospital stay (S) group (LOS ≤14 days)]. Propensity score (PS) has been created using logistic regression to predict LOS greater than median of 14 days. The association between the presence of de novo DSA and LOS was assessed by logistic regression models adjusted for PS.Results: The mean age at transplantation of the entire cohort was 55.5 ± 10.1 years. Sixty percent of the recipients were male and Caucasian. Median LOS in (L) group was three-fold longer than (S) group [L: median 30 days (IQR: 21-52), S: median 8.5 days (IQR: 7-11)]. Eight patients developed de novo DSA after SLKT (9.4%), all of them were in (L) group. Longer LOS was significantly associated with higher risk of development of de novo DSA in unadjusted (OR_{+ each 5 days}: 1.09, 95% CI:1.02-1.16) and PS adjusted (OR_{+ each 5 days}: 1.11, 95% CI:1.02-1.21) analysis.Conclusion: Longer hospitalization is significantly associated with the development of de novo DSA in SLKT.

Kidney Graft Outcomes in High Immunological Risk Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplants

Recipients of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantations (SLKTs) have a lower risk of rejection compared with recipients of kidney transplants alone. However, there is disagreement about the impact of pretransplant anti-human leukocyte antigen sensitization on patient and kidney graft survival in the long term. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of the recipient immunological risk and comorbidities in renal graft outcomes on SLKT. We reviewed the SLKTs performed in our center from May 1993 until September 2017. Patient and graft survival were analyzed according to the immunological risk, comorbidities, liver and kidney rejection episodes, immunosuppression, and infections. A total of 20 recipients of SLKT were considered in the high immunological risk (HIR) group, and 68 recipients were included in the low immunological risk (LIR) control group. The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection, second renal transplant, and time on dialysis prior to transplantation were significantly higher in the HIR group. The incidence of acute kidney rejection was higher in the HIR group (P<0.01). However, death-censored kidney graft survival as well as the estimated glomerular filtration rate at follow-up were not different between the 2 groups. Comorbidities, but not the immunological risk, impact negatively on patient survival. Despite the higher incidence of rejection in the HIR SLKT group, longterm renal function and graft survival were similar to the LIR group.

Phenotypic, Transcriptional, and Functional Analysis of Liver Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Their Immunomodulatory Properties

The liver is an immunologically active organ with a tolerogenic microenvironment at a quiescent state. The immunoregulatory properties of the liver appear to be retained after transplantation because liver allografts can reduce alloresponses against other organs that are simultaneously transplanted. Mechanisms of this phenomenon remain unknown. Given the known immunomodulatory properties of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), we hypothesized that liver mesenchymal stromal cells (L-MSCs) are superior immunomodulators and contribute to liver-mediated tolerance. L-MSCs, generated from human liver allograft biopsies, were compared with adipose mesenchymal stromal cells (A-MSCs) and bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs). Trilineage differentiation of L-MSCs was confirmed by immunohistochemistry. Comparative phenotypic analyses were done by flow cytometry and transcriptome analyses by RNA sequencing in unaltered cell cultures. The in vitro functional analyses were performed using alloreactive T cell proliferation assays. The transcriptome analysis showed that the L-MSCs are different than the A-MSCs and BM-MSCs, with significant enrichment of genes and gene sets associated with immunoregulation. Compared with the others, L-MSCs were found to express higher cell surface levels of several select immunomodulatory molecules. L-MSCs (versus A-MSCs/BM-MSCs) inhibited alloreactive T cell proliferation (22.7% versus 56.4%/58.7%, respectively; P < 0.05) and reduced the frequency of interferon ɤ-producing T cells better than other MSCs (52.8% versus 94.4%/155.4%; P < 0.05). The antiproliferative impact of L-MSCs was not dependent on cell-to-cell contact, could be reversed incompletely by blocking programmed death ligand 1, and required a higher concentration of the competitive inhibitor of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase for complete reversal. In conclusion, L-MSCs appear to be uniquely well-equipped immunomodulatory cells, and they are more potent than A-MSCs and BM-MSCs in that capacity, which suggests that they may contribute to liver-induced systemic tolerance.

Current status of combined liver-kidney transplantation

Combined liver-kidney transplantation is a life-saving procedure for patients with end-stage liver disease and underlying chronic kidney disease, or prolonged acute kidney injury. Due to physiologic changes secondary to portal hypertension in patients with end-stage liver disease, kidney injury is common, and combined liver-kidney transplantation accounts for 10% of all the liver transplants performed in the United States. Recently implemented policy in the United States standardizes the medical criteria for eligibility, and introduces a 'safety net' for those who are transplanted with a liver graft alone, in order to be able to receive a kidney graft later. Increasing number of combined liver-kidney transplants provides a large cohort of patients to be studied in detail for identification of factors (both donor and recipient-related) associated with better outcomes. Data regarding the safety and efficacy of delaying the kidney transplant part of the combined liver-kidney transplantation, and the immunologic benefits of the multi-organ transplantations including the liver are emerging. Here, we review the most recent analyses, and provide our opinion regarding the best practices in combined liver-kidney transplantation based on the evidence.

Rapid reduction of high-level pre-formed donor-specific antibodies after simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: a report of two cases

Background

Kidney transplantation performed in the presence of high-titre donor-specific antibodies (DSA) may result in hyper-acute or accelerated antibody-mediated rejection and rapid allograft loss. Previous studies have shown that this risk may be mitigated with simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT); however, the mechanisms are not well defined. Here we report the evolution of pre-formed, high-level DSAs in two highly sensitised SLKT recipients peri-operatively and describe a profound sustained depletion of all DSAs from the time of liver anastomosis with no extra desensitisation therapy required.

Case presentation

Two patients underwent SLKT and received our centre’s standard renal transplant immunosuppression with basiliximab and methylprednisolone for induction therapy and prednisolone, mycophenolate and tacrolimus for maintenance therapy. HLA antibody samples were collected pre-operatively, and immediately post-liver and post-kidney revascularisation, and then regularly in the post-transplant period. Complement Dependant Cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatches were also performed. Both patients were highly sensitised with a PRA over 97%. One patient had a positive B- and T-cell crossmatch pre-transplant. These positive CDC crossmatches became negative and the level of pre-formed DSAs reduced profoundly and rapidly, within 3 h post-liver revascularisation. The reduction in pre-formed DSAs, regardless of subclass, was seen immediately post-liver revascularisation, before implantation of the renal allografts. No significant reduction in non-donor specific HLA-antibodies was observed. Both patients maintained good graft function with no rejection on kidney allograft protocol biopsies performed at 10-weeks post-transplant.

Conclusions

These cases support the protective immunoregulatory role of the liver in the setting of SLKT, with no extra desensitisation treatment given pre-operatively for these highly sensitised patients.

Revisiting the liver’s role in transplant alloimmunity

The transplanted liver can modulate the recipient immune system to induce tolerance after transplantation. This phenomenon was observed nearly five decades ago. Subsequently, the liver’s role in multivisceral transplantation was recognized, as it has a protective role in preventing rejection of simultaneously transplanted solid organs such as kidney and heart. The liver has a unique architecture and is home to many cells involved in immunity and inflammation. After transplantation, these cells migrate from the liver into the recipient. Early studies identified chimerism as an important mechanism by which the liver modulates the human immune system. Recent studies on human T-cell subtypes, cytokine expression, and gene expression in the allograft have expanded our knowledge on the potential mechanisms underlying immunomodulation. In this article, we discuss the privileged state of liver transplantation compared to other solid organ transplantation, the liver allograft’s role in multivisceral transplantation, various cells in the liver involved in immune responses, and the potential mechanisms underlying immunomodulation of host alloresponses.

Donor-specific hypo-responsiveness occurs in simultaneous liver-kidney transplant recipients after the first year

Kidney allografts of patients who undergo simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation incur less immune-mediated injury, and retain better function compared to other kidney allografts. To characterize the host alloimmune responses in 28 of these patients, we measured the donor-specific alloresponsiveness and phenotypes of peripheral blood cells after the first year. These values were then compared to those of 61 similarly immunosuppressed recipients of a solitary kidney or 31 recipients of liver allografts. Four multicolor, non-overlapping flow cytometry protocols were used to assess the immunophenotypes. Mixed cell cultures with donor or third party cells were used to measure cell proliferation and interferon gamma production. Despite a significant overlap, simultaneous liver-kidney transplant recipients had a lower overall frequency of circulating CD8⁺, activated CD4⁺ and effector memory T cells, compared to solitary kidney transplant recipients. Simultaneous liver-kidney transplant recipient T cells had a significantly lower proliferative response to the donor cells compared to solitary kidney recipients (11.9 vs. 42.9%), although their response to third party cells was unaltered. The frequency of interferon gamma producing alloreactive T cells in simultaneous liver-kidney transplant recipients was significantly lower than that of solitary kidney transplant recipients. Flow cytometric analysis of the mixed cultures demonstrated that both alloreactive CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ compartments of the simultaneous liver-kidney transplant recipient circulating blood cells were smaller. Thus, the phenotypic and functional characteristics of the circulating blood cells of the simultaneous liver-kidney transplant recipients resembled those of solitary liver transplant recipients, and appear to be associated with donor-specific hypo-alloresponsiveness.

Liver-inclusive intestinal transplantation results in decreased alloimmune-mediated rejection but increased infection

Background and aims

A co-transplanted liver allograft has been thought to protect other organs from rejection-mediated injury; however, detailed analyses of co-transplanted liver on intestinal allograft outcomes have not been conducted to date. The aim of the study was to compare immune-mediated injury, causes of graft failure and clinical outcomes between recipients who underwent either a liver-inclusive intestinal transplant (LITx) or liver-exclusive intestinal transplant (LETx).

Methods

Between May 2000 and May 2010, 212 adult patients undergoing LITx (n =76) and LETx (n =136) were included. LITx underwent either liver combined intestinal or full multivisceral transplantation. LETx underwent either isolated intestinal or modified multivisceral transplantation.

Results

During 44.9 ± 31.4 months of follow-up, death-censored intestinal graft survival was significantly higher for LITx than LETx (96.9%, 93.2% and 89.9% vs 91.4%, 69.3% and 60.0% at 1, 3 and 5 years; p =0.0001). Incidence of graft loss due to rejection was higher in LETx than in LITx (30.9% vs 6.6%; p <0.0001), while infection was the leading cause of graft loss due to patient death in LITx (25.0% vs 5.1%; p <0.0001). Despite similar immunosuppression, the average number (0.87 vs 1.42, p =0.02) and severity of acute cellular rejection episode (severe grade: 7.9% vs 21.3%; p =0.01) were lower in LITx than in LETx. Incidence of acute antibody-mediated rejection was also significantly lower in LITx than in LETx (3.6% vs 15.2%; p =0.03). Incidence of chronic rejection was reduced in LITx (3.9% vs 24.3%; p =0.0002).

Conclusions

Intestinal allografts with a liver component appear to decrease risk of rejection but increase risk of infection. Our findings emphasize that LITx has characteristic immunologic and clinical features. Lower immunosuppression may need to be considered for patients who undergo LITx to attenuate increased risk of infection.

Simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: shifting renal allograft gene expression from inflammation toward preservation

Exposure of renal allografts to donor-specific antibodies activates many proinflammatory genes, resulting in antibody-mediated rejection. Simultaneous liver transplantation reduces the development of antibody-mediated rejection in renal grafts exposed to donor-specific antibodies. A study by Taner et al. in this issue of Kidney International shows this effect of the liver to involve more than simply absorbing donor-specific antibodies, with a shift in the pattern of gene expression in the kidney away from proinflammatory toward preservation of tissue function.