Progestins and their effects on the breast

Progesterone limits the tumor-promoting effects of the beta-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin via non-nuclear receptors

The post-menopausal state in women is associated with increased cancer incidence, the reasons for which remain obscure. Curiously, increased circulating levels of beta-hCG (human chorionic gonadotropin) (a hormonal subunit linked with tumors of several lineages) are also often observed post-menopause. This study describes a previously unidentified interplay between beta-hCG and progesterone in tumorigenesis. Progesterone mediated apoptosis in beta-hCG responsive tumor cells via non-nuclear receptors. The transgenic expression of beta-hCG, particularly in the absence of the ovaries (a mimic of the post-menopausal state) constituted a potent pro-tumorigenic signal. Significantly, the administration of progesterone had significant anti-tumor effects. RNA-seq profiling identified molecular signatures associated with these processes. TCGA analysis revealed correlates between the expression of several newly identified genes and poor prognosis in post-menopausal patients of lung adenocarcinoma, colon adenocarcinoma, and glioblastoma. Specifically in these women, the detection of intra-tumoral/extra-tumoral beta-hCG may serve as a useful prognostic indicator, and treatment with progesterone on its detection may prove beneficial.

The Management of Menopausal Symptoms in Women Following Breast Cancer: An Overview

The improved detection and successful treatment of breast cancer, resulting in better survival rates, has led to an increasing number of women living with the effects of treatment modalities and their long-term consequences. Menopausal symptoms following breast cancer can occur at an earlier age, be more severe and significantly influence a woman's overall wellbeing, in particular, sexual function, quality of life and adherence to treatment. There is a dearth of good quality evidence on the safest and most effective treatment options available for these women, and this article aims to summarize the current available treatments. Pertinent to these women is general advice, such as avoidance of triggers, and lifestyle modifications. Following which, non-pharmacological interventions, including cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), hypnosis, acupuncture, stellate ganglion nerve block and complementary agents, are discussed. Pharmacological therapies and their safety profile in these high-risk women are then examined; namely, menopausal hormone therapy, progestogens, antidepressants (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors), gabapentin, clonidine and intra-vaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA). Finally, neurokinin 3 receptor antagonists, promising new agents for the treatment of troublesome menopausal vasomotor symptoms, are discussed.

Estradiol therapy and breast cancer risk in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between estradiol therapy and incidence of breast cancer, taking into consideration of different types of combined progestogen, the duration of exposure and the type of regimen.

METHOD

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

RESULT

A total of 14 studies were included in our study. In estradiol-only therapy analysis, meta-analysis resulted a pooled OR =0.90, 95% CI (0.40, 2.02) from the RCTs and pooled OR = 1.11, 95% CI (0.98, 1.27) from observational studies. However, in the analysis of estradiol-progestogen therapy, the risk of breast cancer varies according to the type of progestogen and the duration with more than five years (OR = 2.43, 95% CI (1.79, 3.29)) presented a higher risk than using less than five years (OR = 1.49, 95% CI (1.03, 2.15)).

CONCLUSIONS

Estradiol-only therapy carries no risk for breast cancer, while the breast cancer risk varies according to the type of progestogen. Estradiol therapy combined with medroxyprogesterone, norethisterone and levonorgestrel related to an increased risk of breast cancer, estradiol therapy combined with dydrogesterone and progesterone carries no risk. The breast cancer risk rise progressively by prolonged use, furthermore, comparing to sequential therapy, continuous therapy carries a higher risk.

Kaempferol Exhibits Progestogenic Effects in Ovariectomized Rats

OBJECTIVE

Progesterone (P₄) plays a central role in women's health. Synthetic progestins are used clinically in hormone replacement therapy (HRT), oral contraceptives, and for the treatment of endometriosis and infertility. Unfortunately, synthetic progestins are associated with side effects, including cardiovascular disease and breast cancer. Botanical dietary supplements are widely consumed for the alleviation of a variety of gynecological issues, but very few studies have characterized natural compounds in terms of their ability to bind to and activate progesterone receptors (PR). Kaempferol is a flavonoid that functions as a non-steroidal selective progesterone receptor modulator (SPRM) in vitro. This study investigated the molecular and physiological effects of kaempferol in the ovariectomized rat uteri.

METHODS

Since genistein is a phytoestrogen that was previously demonstrated to increase uterine weight and proliferation, the ability of kaempferol to block genistein action in the uterus was investigated. Analyses of proliferation, steroid receptor expression, and induction of well-established PR-regulated targets Areg and Hand2 were completed using histological analysis and qPCR gene induction experiments. In addition, kaempferol in silico binding analysis was completed for PR. The activation of estrogen and androgen receptor signalling was determined in vitro.

RESULTS

Molecular docking analysis confirmed that kaempferol adopts poses that are consistent with occupying the ligand-binding pocket of PRA. Kaempferol induced expression of PR regulated transcriptional targets in the ovariectomized rat uteri, including Hand2 and Areg. Consistent with progesterone-l ke activity, kaempferol attenuated genistein-induced uterine luminal epithelial proliferation without increasing uterine weight. Kaempferol signalled without down regulating PR expression in vitro and in vivo and without activating estrogen and androgen receptors.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, these data suggest that kaempferol is a unique natural PR modulator that activates PR signaling in vitro and in vivo without triggering PR degradation.

Hormone replacement therapy in the geriatric patient: current state of the evidence and questions for the future. Estrogen, progesterone, testosterone, and thyroid hormone augmentation in geriatric clinical practice: part 1

This article presents an up-to-date review of the literature on hormone augmentation in the elderly to help primary care physicians better evaluate and utilize hormone replacement and optimization strategies to benefit their patients. The scientific literature suggests that hormone supplementation with estrogen, progesterone, testosterone, growth hormone, and thyroid hormone has the potential to improve quality of life and to prevent, or reverse, the many symptoms and conditions associated with aging, including fatigue, depression, weight gain,frailty, osteoporosis, loss of libido, and heart disease. Possible long-term side effects are also considered.

Hormone replacement therapy and some risk factors for breast cancer among Slovenian postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to examine the influence of the use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and of some generally recognized risk factors on breast cancer risk among Slovenian postmenopausal women.

METHODS

Eligible women diagnosed with breast cancer and a control group of women of the same age and ethnicity were invited to participate in the case-control study via a personal letter and asked to complete a written questionnaire. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 784 cases and 709 controls aged 50-69 years were enrolled. HRT use was inversely associated with breast cancer risk. The effect was most pronounced with the use of estrogen-only replacement therapy (odds ratio (OR) 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-0.87). Longer duration of HRT use did not result in a significant change in risk (1 to <5 years of HRT use: OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.26-0.73; ≥ 5 years of HRT use: OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30-0.87). Obesity (25 ≤ body mass index <30 kg/m(2): OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.04-1.73; body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m(2): OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.36-2.63), smoking ≥ 10 cigarettes per day (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.20-2.43), and any first-degree relative with breast or ovarian cancer (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.11-2.08) were positively associated with breast cancer risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis revealed some differences from the previously published literature, which might reflect underlying demographic changes. Comprehensive medical care in HRT users without pre-existing breast abnormalities probably reduces the incidence of new breast cancer cases in Slovenia.

Risk of breast cancer during hormone replacement therapy: mechanisms

Regarding estrogen replacement therapy, two main mechanisms have to be considered for it to be discussed as a potential carcinogen in the breast, and also considering the World Health Organization definition of estrogens and estrogen/progestogen combinations as “carcinogenic”: (i) the proliferative/apoptotic effects on already pre-existing estrogen-sensitive cancer cells and (ii) the production of possible genotoxic estrogen metabolites. By addition of the progestogen component, as is usual in non-hysterectomized women, both mechanisms can lead to an increased risk compared to estrogenonly therapy. The detailed mechanisms underlying the development of the benign breast epithelial cell into clinically relevant breast cancer cells are very complicated. Based on these mechanisms, the following simplified summary of the main steps explains that: (i) an increased risk cannot be excluded, (ii) especially when estrogens are combined with progestogens, but (iii) there are differences between the preparations used in therapy; (iv) the risk seems to be very rare, needing very special cellular and extracellular conditions, (v) and could even be decreased in special situations of estrogen therapy. It is concluded that when critically reviewed, an increased risk of breast cancer during hormone replacement therapy cannot be excluded in very rare cases. Definitive mechanistic evidence for a possible causal relationship with carcinogenesis still remains open.

Neutral effect of ultra-low-dose continuous combined estradiol and norethisterone acetate on mammographic breast density

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of two different ultra-low doses of continuous combined hormone therapy and placebo on mammographic breast density in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

A subpopulation of 255 postmenopausal women from the CHOICE trial were randomly assigned to 0.5 mg 17beta-estradiol (E2) + 0.25 mg norethisterone acetate (NETA), 0.5 mg E2 + 0.1 mg NETA, or placebo. Women using hormone replacement therapy (HRT) up to 2 months prior to the study were excluded; 154 women fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Mammograms were performed at baseline and after 6 months. Breast density was evaluated by visual classification scales and a computer-assisted digitized technique.

RESULTS

No significant differences were detected between the active treatment groups and the placebo group in the digitized quantification. The mean baseline values for density around 20% were unchanged after 6 months. Also, visual classifications showed no increase in breast density in any study group.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to currently available bleed-free regimens, the new ultra-low-dose combination of 0.5 mg E2 and 0.1 mg NETA seems to have very little or even a neutral effect on the breast. Both digitized quantification and visual assessment of breast density were unchanged after 6 months. Larger prospective studies should be performed to confirm this new finding.

Could transdermal estradiol + progesterone be a safer postmenopausal HRT? A review

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in young postmenopausal women is a safe and effective tool to counteract climacteric symptoms and to prevent long-term degenerative diseases, such as osteoporotic fractures, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus and possibly cognitive impairment. The different types of HRT offer to many extent comparable efficacies on symptoms control; however, the expert selection of specific compounds, doses or routes of administration can provide significant clinical advantages. This paper reviews the role of the non-oral route of administration of sex steroids in the clinical management of postmenopausal women. Non-orally administered estrogens, minimizing the hepatic induction of clotting factors and others proteins associated with the first-pass effect, are associated with potential advantages on the cardiovascular system. In particular, the risk of developing deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary thromboembolism is negligible in comparison to that associated with oral estrogens. In addition, recent indications suggest potential advantages for blood pressure control with non-oral estrogens. To the same extent, a growing literature suggests that the progestins used in association with estrogens may not be equivalent. Recent evidence indeed shows that natural progesterone displays a favorable action on the vessels and on the brain, while this might not be true for some synthetic progestins. Compelling indications also exist that differences might also be present for the risk of developing breast cancer, with recent trials indicating that the association of natural progesterone with estrogens confers less or even no risk of breast cancer as opposed to the use of other synthetic progestins. In conclusion, while all types of hormone replacement therapies are safe and effective and confer significant benefits in the long-term when initiated in young postmenopausal women, in specific clinical settings the choice of the transdermal route of administration of estrogens and the use of natural progesterone might offer significant benefits and added safety.

Comparative analysis of the uterine and mammary gland effects of drospirenone and medroxyprogesterone acetate

The role of progestins in combined hormone therapy is the inhibition of uterine epithelial cell proliferation. The Women's Health Initiative study provided evidence for an increased risk of breast cancer in women treated with conjugated equine estrogens plus the synthetic progestin medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), compared with conjugated equine estrogens-only treatment. These findings continue to be discussed, and it remains to be clarified whether the results obtained for MPA in the Women's Health Initiative study are directly applicable to other progestins used in hormone therapy. In this study we compared in a mouse model the effects of the synthetic progestins, MPA, and drospirenone in two major target organs: the uterus and mammary gland. As quantitative measures of progestin activity, we analyzed maintenance of pregnancy, ductal side branching in the mammary gland, and proliferation of mammary and uterine epithelial cells as well as target gene induction in both organs. The outcome of this study is that not all synthetic progestins exhibit the same effects. MPA demonstrated uterine activity and mitogenic activity in the mammary gland at the same doses. In contrast, drospirenone behaved similarly to the natural hormone, progesterone, and exhibited uterine activity at doses lower than those leading to considerable proliferative effects in the mammary gland. We hypothesize that the safety of combined hormone therapy in postmenopausal women may be associated with a dissociation between the uterine and mammary gland activities of the progestin component.

Crosstalk between GH/IGF-I axis and steroid hormones (progesterone, 17beta-estradiol) in canine mammary tumours

Growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), progesterone (P4) and 17beta-estradiol (17-E2) concentrations have been studied in 84 mammary tumours (44 dysplasias and benign tumours and 40 malignant neoplasias) from 33 female dogs. Thirteen normal mammary glands from 80 healthy female dogs were also analysed as controls. GH concentrations were determined in mammary homogenates by radio-immunoassay. IGF-I, P4 and 17-E2 tissue levels were determined by enzyme-immunoassay (EIA) techniques. The potential correlations between GH/IGF-I concentrations and P4 and 17-E2 mammary tissue levels were investigated. Tissue GH (p<0.01) and IGF-I concentrations (p<0.01) were significantly higher in malignant tumours than in benign neoplasms. Likewise, malignant tumours were the mammary lesions that displayed the highest P4 and 17-E2 tissue levels. Strong correlations between GH/IGF-I (n=84; r=0.436; p<0.001), P4/GH (n=84; r=0.562; p<0.001) and 17-E2/IGF-I (n=84; r=0.638; p<0.001) were observed in tumoral tissue homogenates. Our study provides evidence that P4 might increase autocrine GH production which might directly stimulate local or systemic IGF-I secretion. Additionally, the IGF-I effect might be influenced by local levels of 17-E2. These results suggest that all these hormones and factors might act as local growth factors stimulating the development and/or maintenance of canine mammary tumours in an autocrine/paracrine manner.

Oral, injected and implanted contraceptives and breast cancer risk among U.S. Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women

Associations between oral contraceptive (OC) use and breast cancer have been reported, but few studies have considered associations in racial and ethnic minorities. Data regarding injected or implanted hormonal contraceptives are limited. In a case-control study of Hispanic (796 cases, 919 controls) and non-Hispanic white (1,522 cases, 1,596 controls) women in the U.S. southwest interviewed in 2000-2005, 49% of Hispanic controls and 66% of non-Hispanic white controls reported having used OC. Breast cancer odds ratios (OR) associated with OC use within the past 5 years were 1.22 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80, 1.84) among Hispanics, 1.28 (95% CI 0.93, 1.76) among non-Hispanic whites, 1.27 (95% CI 0.99, 1.63) for both ethnic groups combined and 1.53 (95% CI 0.98, 2.40) for estrogen receptor (ER) negative tumors. OC use for 20 years or longer was associated with ORs of 1.50 (95% CI 1.04, 2.17) for both ethnic groups combined, and 2.23 (95% CI 1.17, 4.25) for ER negative tumors. Hormonal contraceptive injections were used by 3.3% of Hispanic controls and 2.8% of non-Hispanic white controls, OR 1.23 (95% CI 0.88, 1.73). Fifteen cases and 2 controls reported use of a subdermal contraceptive implant, OR 8.59 (95% CI 1.92, 38.39). Associations between OC use and breast cancer in Hispanics are consistent with modestly increased risk among recent users and for ER negative tumors, as observed in other populations. Based on a small number of users of contraceptive implants, a significantly increased breast cancer risk was observed; continued surveillance of implant users may be warranted.

Breast response to menopausal hormone therapy--aspects on proliferation, apoptosis and mammographic density

Breast cancer is the major malignancy among women in the Western world. The breast is clearly a target organ for sex steroid hormones and hormonal treatments have been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. The balance between proliferation and apoptosis is important for breast cell homeostasis. Mammographic breast density has been identified as a strong and independent risk factor for breast cancer. It seems clear that there is a difference between various hormonal treatments with regard to their effects on breast density and cell proliferation. Also, not all women respond similarly to the same treatment. Combined estrogen and progestogen therapy generally will enhance density and proliferation more than treatment with estrogen alone. Certain constitutional and hormonal factors appear to be predictive of breast reactivity. Older women with a low body mass index respond more strongly to treatment. Estrogen levels have a positive and androgens a negative association to increase in density and proliferation. A combination of increased proliferation and decreased apoptosis could be one mechanism to explain the excess risk of breast cancer during combined estrogen/progestogen treatment. Tibolone seems to have less impact on breast response than conventional hormone therapy. Efforts should be made to identify those women with an adverse response to treatment as well as therapeutic principles with the least possible influence on the breast.

Hot flash therapies in breast cancer survivors

More than 86% of those diagnosed with invasive breast cancer are expected to survive for >/= 5 years after their diagnosis. Approximately 75% of postmenopausal women who had breast cancer report experiencing hot flashes. More than 90% of young survivors also experience hot flashes, which can be more severe and long lasting, with iatrogenic ovarian ablation or antiestrogen therapy. There are numerous options for the treatment of hot flashes. Not one treatment fits all. Some treatments are generally more effective than others, and each has different side effects. This review is meant to provide the basic information needed to make a decision about the best treatment for a breast survivor experiencing hot flashes.

The effect of low dose hormone therapy on mammographic breast density

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of two standard and one low dose continuous hormone therapy regimens on mammography.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-two non-hysterectomized postmenopausal women were randomly allocated either to conjugated equine estrogens 0.625 mg plus medroxyprogesterone acetate 5 mg (CEE/MPA, n=38), 17beta-estradiol 2 mg plus norethisterone acetate 1 mg (E2/NETA, n=44) or 17beta-estradiol 1 mg plus norethisterone acetate 0.5 mg (low E2/NETA, n=50). Treatment was continuous and the study period lasted 12 months. Main outcome measures were the changes according to Wolfe classification between baseline and 12-month mammograms.

RESULTS

Five (13.2%) women in the CEE/MPA group showed an increase in breast density. Fourteen (31.8%) women on E2/NETA and 6 (12.2%) on low E2/NETA treatment revealed an increase in breast density. No woman exhibited an involution of fibroglandular tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

Different hormone therapy regimens have a variable impact on breast density probably depending on the steroid used. Low dose hormone therapy associates with significantly lesser increase in breast density.

Management of menopausal symptoms in patients with breast cancer: an evidence-based approach

Increasing numbers of women have menopausal symptoms after treatment for breast cancer. These symptoms can result directly from cancer treatments (such as oophorectomy, ovarian suppression, chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure, and antioestrogens), as a spontaneous event, or after discontinuation of hormone-replacement therapy. The onset of menopausal symptoms after treatment for breast cancer can have a long-lasting effect on quality of life, body image, sexual function, and self esteem. Hormone-replacement therapy that contains oestrogen is the most effective treatment for menopausal symptoms in healthy women. However, evidence from one randomised controlled trial suggests that use of hormone replacement therapy after breast cancer raises the risk of recurrence and of new primary breast cancer. As the incidence of breast cancer increases and survival continues to improve, the number of women with menopausal symptoms will probably rise. Safe and effective non-hormonal treatments for severe menopausal symptoms after breast cancer are urgently needed. Few studies have addressed the management of menopausal symptoms after breast cancer, and the quality of studies is generally poor. Progestagens, and selective inhibitors of serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake seem to offer reasonable symptom palliation, but the long-term effectiveness and safety of these preparations is not known. We propose that the management of menopausal symptoms in patients with a history of cancer requires a patient-centred, but multidisciplinary, approach.

Exogenous progestagens and the human breast

The role of progestins (or progestagens) on the breast tissue remains controversial. However, according to the molecule and the duration of application, cell differentiation and apoptosis may predominate over proliferation. Progestins are also used as second-line agents for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. In young women with benign breast disease, long-term treatment with 19-nortestosterone progestins had a trend to decrease breast cancer risk contrarily to what was observed in postmenopausal women receiving estrogens. Several compounds with progestational activity have been used for HRT. Small differences in the structure of the molecules may lead to pronounced differences in activities, some progestins exerting androgenic effects and some exerting estrogenic or glucocorticoid like activities. While most progestins do not bind to the estrogen receptors, it has been shown that some androgenic progestins stimulate MCF7 cells proliferation while progestins derived from progesterone did not induce cell multiplication in the same cell lines. Therefore, different progestins may induce different effects on the breast cells. Whether the progestins available to date are able to bind specifically to the progesterone receptors PR-A or PR-B and whether this is of clinical relevance to breast cell proliferation is still unclear. Although the relationship between progestin use and breast cancer risk is still the subject of debate and controversy, the data reported to date suggest that 5 years of treatment carry a low risk but further duration of use increases the risk. Further studies are still needed, randomised long-term prospective studies as well as from the laboratory, especially to determine whether a sequential or continuous regimen would be preferable as far as breast-cell response and apoptosis are concerned, and what are the effects of the various molecules used for HRT.