A novel rotating HF membrane to control fouling on anaerobic membrane bioreactors treating wastewater

Anaerobic membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater: Progress in resource and energy recovery improvement approaches

Anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) offer promise in municipal wastewater treatment, with potential benefits including high-quality effluent, energy recovery, sludge reduction, and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. However, AnMBR face hurdles like membrane fouling, low energy recovery, etc. In light of net-zero carbon target and circular economy strategy, this work sought to evaluate novel AnMBR configurations, focusing on performance, fouling mitigation, net-energy generation, and nutrients-enhancing integrated configurations, such as forward osmosis (FO), membrane distillation (MD), bioelectrochemical systems (BES), membrane photobioreactor (MPBR), and partial nitrification-anammox (PN/A). In addition, we highlight the essential role of AnMBR in advancing the circular economy and propose ideas for the water-energy-climate nexus. While AnMBR has made significant progress, challenges, such as fouling and cost-effectiveness persist. Overall, the use of novel configurations and energy recovery strategies can further improve the sustainability and efficiency of AnMBR systems, making them a promising technology for future sustainable municipal wastewater treatment.

Designing sustainable membrane-based water treatment via fouling control through membrane interface engineering and process developments

Membrane-based water treatment processes have been established as a powerful approach for clean water production. However, despite the significant advances made in terms of rejection and flux, provision of sustainable and energy-efficient water production is restricted by the inevitable issue of membrane fouling, known to be the major contributor to the elevated operating costs due to frequent chemical cleaning, increased transmembrane resistance, and deterioration of permeate flux. This review provides an overview of fouling control strategies in different membrane processes, such as microfiltration, ultrafiltration, membrane bioreactors, and desalination via reverse osmosis and forward osmosis. Insights into the recent advancements are discussed and efforts made in terms of membrane development, modules arrangement, process optimization, feed pretreatment, and fouling monitoring are highlighted to evaluate their overall impact in energy- and cost-effective water treatment. Major findings in four key aspects are presented, including membrane surface modification, modules design, process integration, and fouling monitoring. Among the above mentioned anti-fouling strategies, a large part of research has been focused on membrane surface modifications using a number of anti-fouling materials whereas much less research has been devoted to membrane module advancements and in-situ fouling monitoring and control. At the end, a critical analysis is provided for each anti-fouling strategy and a rationale framework is provided for design of efficient membranes and process for water treatment.

Low-cost ceramic membrane bioreactor: Effect of backwashing, relaxation and aeration on fouling. Protozoa and bacteria removal

Membrane biological reactors (MBR) constitute an alternative to conventional wastewater treatments for improved recovery, reuse, and recycling of water. MBRs have a smaller footprint, provide better biotreatment and achieve a high-quality effluent. This work analyses the use of MBRs innovative low-cost ceramic membranes for wastewater treatment. We propose low-cost ceramic membranes as an alternative to the more expensive commercial ceramic membranes. Low-cost membranes were made of clay, calcium carbonate, potato starch, almond shell and chamotte. We synthesized two different selective layers, from clay and/or TiO₂. We characterized the membranes (pore diameter and water permeance) and their performance in a laboratory scale MBR. To mitigate membrane fouling and preserve the continued operation along time, the effect of different operating cycles was measured, considering two physical cleaning strategies: relaxation and backwashing. Cycles of 9 min of operation, 30 s of relaxation and 1 min of backwashing provided the lowest fouling rate. We investigated the effect of air scouring on fouling by operating with different air flow rates. Once experimental conditions were optimized, the overall performance of the different ceramic membranes was tested. The membrane with a TiO₂ thin layer provided the best resistance to fouling, as well as a good retention capacity of E. coli, Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts.

Seasonal and annual energy efficiency of mainstream anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) in temperate climates: Assessment in onsite pilot plant and estimation in scaled-up plant

The seasonal and annual energy efficiency of mainstream anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) was first assessed in an onsite pilot plant (15 m³/d) and then estimated in a scaled-up plant (10,000 m³/d) in temperate climates (15-25 °C). It was found that the annual net electricity demand was 0.100 and 0.090 kWh/m³, and the annual net energy (electricity + heat) demand was -0.158 and -0.309 kWh/m³ under the dissolved methane recovery condition and the non-recovery condition, respectively, demonstrated that the application of mainstream AnMBR in temperate climates is electricity saving and energy positive. The energy efficiency of the AnMBR decreased with temperature drop due to the reduction of methane production, and the increase in biogas sparging to mitigate membrane fouling. Since approximately 26.7%-39.7% of input COD remained in sludge, attention should be paid to recovering this potential energy to improve the overall energy performance of the mainstream AnMBR plants in future.

Impact of permeate flux and gas sparging rate on membrane performance and process economics of granular anaerobic membrane bioreactors

This research investigated the impact of permeate flux and gas sparging rate on membrane permeability, dissolved and colloidal organic matter (DCOM) rejection and process economics of granular anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs). The goal of the study was to understand how membrane fouling control strategies influence granular AnMBR economics. To this end, short- and long-term filtration tests were performed under different permeate flux and specific gas demand (SGD) conditions. The results showed that flux and SGD conditions had a direct impact on membrane fouling. At normalised fluxes (J₂₀) of 4.4 and 8.7 L m^-2 h^-1 (LMH) the most favourable SGD condition was 0.5 m³ m^-2 h^-1, whereas at J₂₀ of 13.0 and 16.7 LMH the most favourable SGD condition was 1.0 m³ m^-2 h^-1. The flux and the SGD did not have a direct impact on DCOM rejection, with values ranging between 31 and 44%. The three-dimensional excitation-emission matrix fluorescence (3DEEM) spectra showed that protein-like fluorophores were predominant in mixed liquor and permeate samples (67-79%) and were retained by the membrane (39-50%). This suggests that protein-like fluorophores could be an important foulant for these systems. The economic analysis showed that operating the membranes at moderate fluxes (J₂₀ = 7.8 LMH) and SGD (0.5 m³ m^-2 h^-1) could be the most favourable alternative. Finally, a sensitivity analysis illustrated that electricity and membrane cost were the most sensitive economic parameters, which highlights the importance of reducing SGD requirements and improving membrane permeability to reduce costs of granular AnMBRs.

Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors for Municipal Wastewater Treatment: A Literature Review

Currently, there is growing scientific interest in the development of more economic, efficient and environmentally friendly municipal wastewater treatment technologies. Laboratory and pilot-scale surveys have revealed that the anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) is a promising alternative for municipal wastewater treatment. Anaerobic membrane bioreactor technology combines the advantages of anaerobic processes and membrane technology. Membranes retain colloidal and suspended solids and provide complete solid–liquid separation. The slow-growing anaerobic microorganisms in the bioreactor degrade the soluble organic matter, producing biogas. The low amount of produced sludge and the production of biogas makes AnMBRs favorable over conventional biological treatment technologies. However, the AnMBR is not yet fully mature and challenging issues remain. This work focuses on fundamental aspects of AnMBRs in the treatment of municipal wastewater. The important parameters for AnMBR operation, such as pH, temperature, alkalinity, volatile fatty acids, organic loading rate, hydraulic retention time and solids retention time, are discussed. Moreover, through a comprehensive literature survey of recent applications from 2009 to 2021, the current state of AnMBR technology is assessed and its limitations are highlighted. Finally, the need for further laboratory, pilot- and full-scale research is addressed.

Comparison between novel vibrating ceramic MBR and conventional air-sparging MBR for domestic wastewater treatment: Performance, fouling control and energy consumption

Two crucial themes emerge from the growing application of MBRs treating domestic wastewater so far: fouling control and energy demand. The significance of in-situ shear-enhanced methods for fouling control in MBRs has been widely acknowledged with air sparging over decades. However, it is still a challenge to develop energy-efficient ways to replace energy-intensive air sparging for effective fouling control during long-term real domestic wastewater treatment. A novel vibrating flat-sheet ceramic MBR (VMBR) was established for investigating the effects of different shear rates on treatment performance, fouling control and specific energy demand compared with air-sparging MBR (ASMBR). Three levels of shear rates with vibration speed of 120, 80, and 40 RPM in the VMBR, versus specific aeration rate of 1.5, 1.0 and 0.5 LPM in the ASMBR were examined as high-, middle- and low-shear phases. Results showed that the VMBR removed over 78.35% TOC, 89.89% COD and 99.9% NH₄-N over three phases, and retarded initial increases in transmembrane pressure to control membrane fouling effectively with average fouling rate around 2.31 kPa/d, 3.59 kPa/d and 10.15 kPa/d, almost 70% lower than the ASMBR in Phase 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Particle size distribution of mixed liquor revealed that colloids and biopolymer clusters were significantly reduced in the VMBR showing less propensity for foulant formation. DOM characteristics further indicated that lower production of polysaccharides and protein (by approximately half in Phases 1 and 2) of SMP and EPS in the VMBR generated lower biopolymer content, promoting better fouling mitigation and enhanced dewaterability compared to the ASMBR. Moreover, the VMBR showed superior energy efficiency for fouling control and could save 51.7% to 78.5% energy of the ASMBR under similar-shear condition. The combination of excellent treatment performance, fouling control and energy efficiency from the VMBR makes this an attractive strategy for future improvement of MBR designs in full-scale application with the potential to replace conventional ASMBR.

Anaerobic membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment: Novel configurations, fouling control and energy considerations

Water shortage, public health and environmental protection are key motives to treat wastewater. The widespread adoption of wastewater as a resource depends upon development of an energy-efficient technology. Anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) technology has gained increasing popularity due to their ability to offset the disadvantages of conventional treatment technologies. However there are several hurdles, yet to climb over, for wider spread and scale-up of the technology. This paper reviews fundamental aspects of anaerobic digestion of wastewater, and identifies the challenges and opportunities to the further development of AnMBRs. Membrane fouling and its implications are discussed, and strategies to control membrane fouling are proposed. Novel AnMBR configurations are discussed as an integrated approach to overcome technology limitations. Energy demand and recovery in AnMBRs is analyzed. Finally key issues that require urgent attention to facilitate global penetration of AnMBR technology are highlighted.

Energy recovery potential of thermophilic high-solids co-digestion of coffee processing wastewater and waste activated sludge by anaerobic membrane bioreactor

A large amount of wastewater is generated in the processing of coffee from fruit to cup. Thermophilic high-solids co-digestion of coffee processing wastewater (CPW) and waste activated sludge (WAS) has been succeeded by anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR). Chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiencies of 92 ± 3% with an average methane yield of 0.28 LCH₄/gCOD_removed were achieved at a high solids content of 50 g/L in the AnMBR. The optimal digestion performance of 82.4% removal COD conversion to CH₄ was achieved at hydraulic retention time (HRT) 10 d. Energy balance analysis revealed AnMBR has succeeded in energy positive at all the HRTs. The net energy potential (NEP) was determined to average 2.12-2.82 kJ/gCOD, amongst which the maximum NEP was achieved at HRT 15 d. These results indicated the high-solids co-digestion by AnMBR is a promising approach to maximize the bioenergy conversion from the co-substrate of CPW and WAS.

Application of anaerobic membrane bioreactors to municipal wastewater treatment at ambient temperature: A review of achievements, challenges, and perspectives

This review surveys the implementation of anaerobic membrane bioreactors in municipal wastewater treatment at ambient temperature. High chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiencies and methane conversion rates were achieved under various conditions, while also achieving a low sludge yield of 0.04-0.09 g volatile suspended solids (VSS)/g COD. A survey of energy demands for pilot-scale anaerobic membrane bioreactors showed that they could be energy neutral or even positive, even though high energy (0.08-0.35 kWh/m³) is required to clear membrane fouling. Thus, the use of anaerobic membrane bioreactors in municipal wastewater treatment at ambient temperature is very promising. However, some challenges such as membrane fouling control, methane in effluent, low COD/SO₄^2--S ratio, and deficiencies in alkalinity should be addressed, especially the latter. Future research perspectives relating to the challenges and further research are proposed.

Critical review of fouling mitigation strategies in membrane bioreactors treating water and wastewater

The current research was an effort to critically review all approaches used for membrane fouling control in the membrane bioreactors treating water and wastewater. The first generation of antifouling methods tried to optimize operational conditions, or used chemical agents to control membrane fouling. Despite their positive impacts on the fouling mitigation, these methods did not provide a sustainable solution for the problem. Moreover, chemical agents may affect microorganisms in bioreactors and has some environmental drawbacks. The improved knowledge of membrane fouling mechanism and effective factors has directed the attention of researchers to novel methods that focus on disrupting fouling mechanism through affecting fouling causing bacteria. Employing nanomaterials, cell entrapment, biologically- and electrically-based methods are the latest efforts. The results of this review indicate that sustainable control of membrane fouling requires employing more than one single approach. Large scale application of fouling mitigation strategies should be the focus of future studies.

Current status of the pilot-scale anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatments of domestic wastewaters: A critical review

This review presented the performances of the pilot-scale anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs) treating domestic wastewater. High COD removal efficiencies and low biosolids productions were achieved at HRTs comparable to conventional aerobic processes under ambient temperatures. The energy demands for fouling control in the pilot-scale AnMBRs ranged from 0.04 to 1.35kWh/m³, which is lower than those of lab-scale AnMBRs and aerobic MBRs. The energy demands for fouling control were in the order of gas sparging>particle sparging>rotating membrane AnMBR. Two major factors affecting the energy demand in gas sparging AnMBRs were specific gas demands (SGD_m) and operating flux. The energy potentials in wastewater were significantly affected by the influent sulfate concentrations. Energy balances indicated that five out of nine pilot-scale AnMBRs was energy positive. However, further improvements of the AnMBRs are required to implement the energy positive wastewater treatment process.