1
|
Pannafino G, Chen JJ, Mithani V, Payero L, Gioia M, Crickard JB, Alani E. The Dmc1 recombinase physically interacts with and promotes the meiotic crossover functions of the Mlh1-Mlh3 endonuclease. Genetics 2024; 227:iyae066. [PMID: 38657110 PMCID: PMC11228845 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyae066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
The accurate segregation of homologous chromosomes during the Meiosis I reductional division in most sexually reproducing eukaryotes requires crossing over between homologs. In baker's yeast approximately 80% of meiotic crossovers result from Mlh1-Mlh3 and Exo1 acting to resolve double-Holliday junction intermediates in a biased manner. Little is known about how Mlh1-Mlh3 is recruited to recombination intermediates to perform its role in crossover resolution. We performed a gene dosage screen in baker's yeast to identify novel genetic interactors with Mlh1-Mlh3. Specifically, we looked for genes whose lowered dosage reduced meiotic crossing over using sensitized mlh3 alleles that disrupt the stability of the Mlh1-Mlh3 complex and confer defects in mismatch repair but do not disrupt meiotic crossing over. To our surprise we identified genetic interactions between MLH3 and DMC1, the recombinase responsible for recombination between homologous chromosomes during meiosis. We then showed that Mlh3 physically interacts with Dmc1 in vitro and in vivo. Partial complementation of Mlh3 crossover functions was observed when MLH3 was expressed under the control of the CLB1 promoter (NDT80 regulon), suggesting that Mlh3 function can be provided late in meiotic prophase at some functional cost. A model for how Dmc1 could facilitate Mlh1-Mlh3's role in crossover resolution is presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianno Pannafino
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Jun Jie Chen
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Viraj Mithani
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Lisette Payero
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Michael Gioia
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - J Brooks Crickard
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Eric Alani
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bolognini D, Halgren A, Lou RN, Raveane A, Rocha JL, Guarracino A, Soranzo N, Chin J, Garrison E, Sudmant PH. Global diversity, recurrent evolution, and recent selection on amylase structural haplotypes in humans. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.02.07.579378. [PMID: 38370750 PMCID: PMC10871346 DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.07.579378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
The adoption of agriculture, first documented ~12,000 years ago in the Fertile Crescent, triggered a rapid shift toward starch-rich diets in human populations. Amylase genes facilitate starch digestion and increased salivary amylase copy number has been observed in some modern human populations with high starch intake, though evidence of recent selection is lacking. Here, using 52 long-read diploid assemblies and short read data from ~5,600 contemporary and ancient humans, we resolve the diversity, evolutionary history, and selective impact of structural variation at the amylase locus. We find that amylase genes have higher copy numbers in populations with agricultural subsistence compared to fishing, hunting, and pastoral groups. We identify 28 distinct amylase structural architectures and demonstrate that nearly identical structures have arisen recurrently on different haplotype backgrounds throughout recent human history. AMY1 and AMY2A genes each exhibit multiple duplications/deletions with mutation rates >10,000-fold the SNP mutation rate, whereas AMY2B gene duplications share a single origin. Using a pangenome graph-based approach to infer structural haplotypes across thousands of humans, we identify extensively duplicated haplotypes present at higher frequencies in modern day populations with traditionally agricultural diets. Leveraging 533 ancient human genomes we find that duplication-containing haplotypes (i.e. haplotypes with more amylase gene copies than the ancestral haplotype) have increased in frequency more than seven-fold over the last 12,000 years providing evidence for recent selection in West Eurasians. Together, our study highlights the potential impacts of the agricultural revolution on human genomes and the importance of long-read sequencing in identifying signatures of selection at structurally complex loci.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alma Halgren
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, USA
| | - Runyang Nicolas Lou
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, USA
| | | | - Joana L Rocha
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, USA
| | - Andrea Guarracino
- Department of Genetics, Genomics, and Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, USA
| | | | - Jason Chin
- Foundation for Biological Data Science, Belmont, USA
| | - Erik Garrison
- Department of Genetics, Genomics, and Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, USA
| | - Peter H Sudmant
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, USA
- Center for Computational Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Joo JH, Hong S, Higashide MT, Choi EH, Yoon S, Lee MS, Kang HA, Shinohara A, Kleckner N, Kim KP. RPA interacts with Rad52 to promote meiotic crossover and noncrossover recombination. Nucleic Acids Res 2024; 52:3794-3809. [PMID: 38340339 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Meiotic recombination is initiated by programmed double-strand breaks (DSBs). Studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have shown that, following rapid resection to generate 3' single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) tails, one DSB end engages a homolog partner chromatid and is extended by DNA synthesis, whereas the other end remains associated with its sister. Then, after regulated differentiation into crossover- and noncrossover-fated types, the second DSB end participates in the reaction by strand annealing with the extended first end, along both pathways. This second-end capture is dependent on Rad52, presumably via its known capacity to anneal two ssDNAs. Here, using physical analysis of DNA recombination, we demonstrate that this process is dependent on direct interaction of Rad52 with the ssDNA binding protein, replication protein A (RPA). Furthermore, the absence of this Rad52-RPA joint activity results in a cytologically-prominent RPA spike, which emerges from the homolog axes at sites of crossovers during the pachytene stage of the meiotic prophase. Our findings suggest that this spike represents the DSB end of a broken chromatid caused by either the displaced leading DSB end or the second DSB end, which has been unable to engage with the partner homolog-associated ssDNA. These and other results imply a close correspondence between Rad52-RPA roles in meiotic recombination and mitotic DSB repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong H Joo
- Department of Life Sciences, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, South Korea
| | - Soogil Hong
- Department of Life Sciences, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, South Korea
| | - Mika T Higashide
- Institute for Protein Research, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Eui-Hwan Choi
- Department of Life Sciences, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, South Korea
- New Drug Development Center, Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation, Deagu 41061, South Korea
| | - Seobin Yoon
- Department of Life Sciences, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, South Korea
| | - Min-Su Lee
- Department of Life Sciences, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, South Korea
| | - Hyun Ah Kang
- Department of Life Sciences, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, South Korea
| | - Akira Shinohara
- Institute for Protein Research, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Nancy Kleckner
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge 02138, USA
| | - Keun P Kim
- Department of Life Sciences, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dash S, Joshi S, Pankajam AV, Shinohara A, Nishant KT. Heterozygosity alters Msh5 binding to meiotic chromosomes in the baker's yeast. Genetics 2024; 226:iyad214. [PMID: 38124392 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyad214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Meiotic crossovers are initiated from programmed DNA double-strand breaks. The Msh4-Msh5 heterodimer is an evolutionarily conserved mismatch repair-related protein complex that promotes meiotic crossovers by stabilizing strand invasion intermediates and joint molecule structures such as Holliday junctions. In vivo studies using homozygous strains of the baker's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SK1) show that the Msh4-Msh5 complex associates with double-strand break hotspots, chromosome axes, and centromeres. Many organisms have heterozygous genomes that can affect the stability of strand invasion intermediates through heteroduplex rejection of mismatch-containing sequences. To examine Msh4-Msh5 function in a heterozygous context, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation and sequencing (ChIP-seq) analysis in a rapidly sporulating hybrid S. cerevisiae strain (S288c-sp/YJM789, containing sporulation-enhancing QTLs from SK1), using SNP information to distinguish reads from homologous chromosomes. Overall, Msh5 localization in this hybrid strain was similar to that determined in the homozygous strain (SK1). However, relative Msh5 levels were reduced in regions of high heterozygosity, suggesting that high mismatch densities reduce levels of recombination intermediates to which Msh4-Msh5 binds. Msh5 peaks were also wider in the hybrid background compared to the homozygous strain (SK1). We determined regions containing heteroduplex DNA by detecting chimeric sequence reads with SNPs from both parents. Msh5-bound double-strand break hotspots overlap with regions that have chimeric DNA, consistent with Msh5 binding to heteroduplex-containing recombination intermediates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suman Dash
- School of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram, Trivandrum 695551, India
| | - Sameer Joshi
- School of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram, Trivandrum 695551, India
| | - Ajith V Pankajam
- School of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram, Trivandrum 695551, India
| | - Akira Shinohara
- Institute for Protein Research, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Koodali T Nishant
- School of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram, Trivandrum 695551, India
- Center for High-Performance Computing, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram, Trivandrum 695551, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Horan TS, Ascenção CFR, Mellor C, Wang M, Smolka MB, Cohen PE. The DNA helicase FANCJ (BRIP1) functions in double strand break repair processing, but not crossover formation during prophase I of meiosis in male mice. PLoS Genet 2024; 20:e1011175. [PMID: 38377115 PMCID: PMC10906868 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Meiotic recombination between homologous chromosomes is initiated by the formation of hundreds of programmed double-strand breaks (DSBs). Approximately 10% of these DSBs result in crossovers (COs), sites of physical DNA exchange between homologs that are critical to correct chromosome segregation. Virtually all COs are formed by coordinated efforts of the MSH4/MSH5 and MLH1/MLH3 heterodimers, the latter representing the defining marks of CO sites. The regulation of CO number and position is poorly understood, but undoubtedly requires the coordinated action of multiple repair pathways. In a previous report, we found gene-trap disruption of the DNA helicase, FANCJ (BRIP1/BACH1), elicited elevated numbers of MLH1 foci and chiasmata. In somatic cells, FANCJ interacts with numerous DNA repair proteins including MLH1, and we hypothesized that FANCJ functions with MLH1 to regulate the major CO pathway. To further elucidate the meiotic function of FANCJ, we produced three new Fancj mutant mouse lines via CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing: a full-gene deletion, truncation of the N-terminal Helicase domain, and a C-terminal dual-tagged allele. We also generated an antibody against the C-terminus of the mouse FANCJ protein. Surprisingly, none of our Fancj mutants show any change in either MLH1 focus counts during pachynema or total CO number at diakinesis of prophase I. We find evidence that FANCJ and MLH1 do not interact in meiosis; further, FANCJ does not co-localize with MSH4, MLH1, or MLH3 in meiosis. Instead, FANCJ co-localizes with BRCA1 and TOPBP1, forming discrete foci along the chromosome cores beginning in early meiotic prophase I and densely localized to unsynapsed chromosome axes in late zygonema and to the XY chromosomes in early pachynema. Fancj mutants also exhibit a subtle persistence of DSBs in pachynema. Collectively, these data indicate a role for FANCJ in early DSB repair, but they rule out a role for FANCJ in MLH1-mediated CO events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tegan S. Horan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
- Cornell Reproductive Sciences Center, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
| | - Carolline F. R. Ascenção
- Cornell Reproductive Sciences Center, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
- Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
| | - Christopher Mellor
- Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
| | - Meng Wang
- Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
| | - Marcus B. Smolka
- Cornell Reproductive Sciences Center, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
- Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
| | - Paula E. Cohen
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
- Cornell Reproductive Sciences Center, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ahuja JS, Sandhu R, Huang L, Klein F, Börner GV. Temporal and Functional Relationship between Synaptonemal Complex Morphogenesis and Recombination during Meiosis. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.01.11.575218. [PMID: 38260343 PMCID: PMC10802607 DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.11.575218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
During prophase of meiosis I, programmed double strand breaks (DSBs) are processed into crossovers, a critical requirement for segregation of homologous chromosomes (homologs) and genome haploidization in sexually reproducing organisms. Crossovers form via homologous recombination in close temporospatial association with morphogenesis of the synaptonemal complex (SC), a proteinaceous structure that connects paired homologs along their length during the pachytene stage. Synapsis and recombination are a paradigm for the interplay between higher order chromosome structure and DNA metabolism, yet their temporal and functional relationship remains poorly understood. Probing linkage between these processes in budding yeast, we show that SC assembly is associated with a distinct threshold number of unstable D-loops. The transition from bona fide paranemic D-loops to plectonemic DSB single end invasions (SEIs) is completed during midpachynema, when the SC is fully assembled. Double Holliday junctions (dHJs) form at the time of desynapsis and are resolved into crossovers during diplonema. The SC central element component Zip1 shepherds recombination through three transitions, including DSB first end strand exchange and second end capture, as well as dHJ resolution. Zip1 mediates SEI formation independent of its polymerization whereas precocious Zip1 assembly interferes with double Holliday junction resolution. Together, our findings indicate that the synaptonemal complex controls recombination while assembled but also beyond its disassembly, possibly by establishing spatial constraints at recombination sites.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
The raison d'être of meiosis is shuffling of genetic information via Mendelian segregation and, within individual chromosomes, by DNA crossing-over. These outcomes are enabled by a complex cellular program in which interactions between homologous chromosomes play a central role. We first provide a background regarding the basic principles of this program. We then summarize the current understanding of the DNA events of recombination and of three processes that involve whole chromosomes: homolog pairing, crossover interference, and chiasma maturation. All of these processes are implemented by direct physical interaction of recombination complexes with underlying chromosome structures. Finally, we present convergent lines of evidence that the meiotic program may have evolved by coupling of this interaction to late-stage mitotic chromosome morphogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise Zickler
- Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Nancy Kleckner
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hu J, Ferlez B, Dau J, Crickard JB. Rad53 regulates the lifetime of Rdh54 at homologous recombination intermediates. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:11688-11705. [PMID: 37850655 PMCID: PMC10681728 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Rdh54 is a conserved DNA translocase that participates in homologous recombination (HR), DNA checkpoint adaptation, and chromosome segregation. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rdh54 is a known target of the Mec1/Rad53 signaling axis, which globally protects genome integrity during DNA metabolism. While phosphorylation of DNA repair proteins by Mec1/Rad53 is critical for HR progression little is known about how specific post translational modifications alter HR reactions. Phosphorylation of Rdh54 is linked to protection of genomic integrity but the consequences of modification remain poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that phosphorylation of the Rdh54 C-terminus by the effector kinase Rad53 regulates Rdh54 clustering activity as revealed by single molecule imaging. This stems from phosphorylation dependent and independent interactions between Rdh54 and Rad53. Genetic assays reveal that loss of phosphorylation leads to phenotypic changes resulting in loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) outcomes. Our data highlight Rad53 as a key regulator of HR intermediates through activation and attenuation of Rdh54 motor function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingyi Hu
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Bryan Ferlez
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Jennifer Dau
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - J Brooks Crickard
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pannafino G, Chen JJ, Mithani V, Payero L, Gioia M, Brooks Crickard J, Alani E. The Dmc1 recombinase physically interacts with and promotes the meiotic crossover functions of the Mlh1-Mlh3 endonuclease. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.11.13.566911. [PMID: 38014100 PMCID: PMC10680668 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.13.566911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
The accurate segregation of homologous chromosomes during the Meiosis I reductional division in most sexually reproducing eukaryotes requires crossing over between homologs. In baker's yeast approximately 80 percent of meiotic crossovers result from Mlh1-Mlh3 and Exo1 acting to resolve double-Holliday junction (dHJ) intermediates in a biased manner. Little is known about how Mlh1-Mlh3 is recruited to recombination intermediates and whether it interacts with other meiotic factors prior to its role in crossover resolution. We performed a haploinsufficiency screen in baker's yeast to identify novel genetic interactors with Mlh1-Mlh3 using sensitized mlh3 alleles that disrupt the stability of the Mlh1-Mlh3 complex and confer defects in mismatch repair but do not disrupt meiotic crossing over. We identified several genetic interactions between MLH3 and DMC1, the recombinase responsible for recombination between homologous chromosomes during meiosis. We then showed that Mlh3 physically interacts with Dmc1 in vitro and at times in meiotic prophase when Dmc1 acts as a recombinase. Interestingly, restricting MLH3 expression to roughly the time of crossover resolution resulted in a mlh3 null-like phenotype for crossing over. Our data are consistent with a model in which Dmc1 nucleates a polymer of Mlh1-Mlh3 to promote crossing over.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianno Pannafino
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA 14853
| | - Jun Jie Chen
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA 14853
| | - Viraj Mithani
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA 14853
| | - Lisette Payero
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA 14853
| | - Michael Gioia
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA 14853
| | - J Brooks Crickard
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA 14853
| | - Eric Alani
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA 14853
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Horan TS, Ascenção CFR, Mellor CA, Wang M, Smolka MB, Cohen PE. The DNA helicase FANCJ (BRIP1) functions in Double Strand Break repair processing, but not crossover formation during Prophase I of meiosis in male mice. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.10.06.561296. [PMID: 37873301 PMCID: PMC10592954 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.06.561296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
During meiotic prophase I, recombination between homologous parental chromosomes is initiated by the formation of hundreds of programmed double-strand breaks (DSBs), each of which must be repaired with absolute fidelity to ensure genome stability of the germline. One outcome of these DSB events is the formation of Crossovers (COs), the sites of physical DNA exchange between homologs that are critical to ensure the correct segregation of parental chromosomes. However, COs account for only a small (~10%) proportion of all DSB repair events; the remaining 90% are repaired as non-crossovers (NCOs), most by synthesis dependent strand annealing. Virtually all COs are formed by coordinated efforts of the MSH4/MSH5 and MLH1/MLH3 heterodimers. The number and positioning of COs is exquisitely controlled via mechanisms that remain poorly understood, but which undoubtedly require the coordinated action of multiple repair pathways downstream of the initiating DSB. In a previous report we found evidence suggesting that the DNA helicase and Fanconi Anemia repair protein, FANCJ (BRIP1/BACH1), functions to regulate meiotic recombination in mouse. A gene-trap disruption of Fancj showed an elevated number of MLH1 foci and COs. FANCJ is known to interact with numerous DNA repair proteins in somatic cell repair contexts, including MLH1, BLM, BRCA1, and TOPBP1, and we hypothesized that FANCJ regulates CO formation through a direct interaction with MLH1 to suppress the major CO pathway. To further elucidate the function of FANCJ in meiosis, we produced three new Fancj mutant mouse lines via CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing: a full-gene deletion, a mutant line lacking the MLH1 interaction site and the N-terminal region of the Helicase domain, and a C-terminal 6xHIS-HA dual-tagged allele of Fancj. We also generated an antibody against the C-terminus of the mouse FANCJ protein. Surprisingly, while Fanconi-like phenotypes are observed within the somatic cell lineages of the full deletion Fancj line, none of the Fancj mutants show any change in either MLH1 focus counts during pachynema or total CO number at diakinesis of prophase I of meiosis. We find evidence that FANCJ and MLH1 do not interact in meiosis; further, FANCJ does not co-localize with MSH4, MLH1, or MLH3 during late prophase I. Instead, FANCJ forms discrete foci along the chromosome cores beginning in early meiotic prophase I, occasionally co-localizing with MSH4, and then becomes densely localized on unsynapsed chromosome axes in late zygonema and to the XY chromosomes in early pachynema. Strikingly, this localization strongly overlaps with BRCA1 and TOPBP1. Fancj mutants also exhibit a subtle persistence of DSBs in pachynema. Collectively, these data suggest a role for FANCJ in early DSB repair events, and possibly in the formation of NCOs, but they rule out a role for FANCJ in MLH1-mediated CO events. Thus, the role of FANCJ in meiotic cells involves different pathways and different interactors to those described in somatic cell lineages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tegan S Horan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
- Cornell Reproductive Sciences Center, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| | - Carolline F R Ascenção
- Cornell Reproductive Sciences Center, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
- Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| | | | - Meng Wang
- Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| | - Marcus B Smolka
- Cornell Reproductive Sciences Center, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
- Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| | - Paula E Cohen
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
- Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Börner GV, Hochwagen A, MacQueen AJ. Meiosis in budding yeast. Genetics 2023; 225:iyad125. [PMID: 37616582 PMCID: PMC10550323 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyad125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Meiosis is a specialized cell division program that is essential for sexual reproduction. The two meiotic divisions reduce chromosome number by half, typically generating haploid genomes that are packaged into gametes. To achieve this ploidy reduction, meiosis relies on highly unusual chromosomal processes including the pairing of homologous chromosomes, assembly of the synaptonemal complex, programmed formation of DNA breaks followed by their processing into crossovers, and the segregation of homologous chromosomes during the first meiotic division. These processes are embedded in a carefully orchestrated cell differentiation program with multiple interdependencies between DNA metabolism, chromosome morphogenesis, and waves of gene expression that together ensure the correct number of chromosomes is delivered to the next generation. Studies in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae have established essentially all fundamental paradigms of meiosis-specific chromosome metabolism and have uncovered components and molecular mechanisms that underlie these conserved processes. Here, we provide an overview of all stages of meiosis in this key model system and highlight how basic mechanisms of genome stability, chromosome architecture, and cell cycle control have been adapted to achieve the unique outcome of meiosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Valentin Börner
- Center for Gene Regulation in Health and Disease (GRHD), Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA
| | | | - Amy J MacQueen
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06459, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Premkumar T, Paniker L, Kang R, Biot M, Humphrey E, Destain H, Ferranti I, Okulate I, Nguyen H, Kilaru V, Frasca M, Chakraborty P, Cole F. Genetic dissection of crossover mutants defines discrete intermediates in mouse meiosis. Mol Cell 2023; 83:2941-2958.e7. [PMID: 37595556 PMCID: PMC10469168 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023]
Abstract
Crossovers (COs), the exchange of homolog arms, are required for accurate chromosome segregation during meiosis. Studies in yeast have described the single-end invasion (SEI) intermediate: a stabilized 3' end annealed with the homolog as the first detectible CO precursor. SEIs are thought to differentiate into double Holliday junctions (dHJs) that are resolved by MutLgamma (MLH1/MLH3) into COs. Currently, we lack knowledge of early steps of mammalian CO recombination or how intermediates are differentiated in any organism. Using comprehensive analysis of recombination in thirteen different genetic conditions with varying levels of compromised CO resolution, we infer CO precursors include asymmetric SEI-like intermediates and dHJs in mouse. In contrast to yeast, MLH3 is structurally required to differentiate CO precursors into dHJs. We verify conservation of aspects of meiotic recombination and show unique features in mouse, providing mechanistic insight into CO formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tolkappiyan Premkumar
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Program in Genetics and Epigenetics, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lakshmi Paniker
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rhea Kang
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Program in Genetics and Epigenetics, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mathilde Biot
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ericka Humphrey
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Honorine Destain
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Isabella Ferranti
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Iyinyeoluwa Okulate
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Holly Nguyen
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vindhya Kilaru
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Melissa Frasca
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Program in Genetics and Epigenetics, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Parijat Chakraborty
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Francesca Cole
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Program in Genetics and Epigenetics, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Guarracino A, Buonaiuto S, de Lima LG, Potapova T, Rhie A, Koren S, Rubinstein B, Fischer C, Gerton JL, Phillippy AM, Colonna V, Garrison E. Recombination between heterologous human acrocentric chromosomes. Nature 2023; 617:335-343. [PMID: 37165241 PMCID: PMC10172130 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-05976-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
The short arms of the human acrocentric chromosomes 13, 14, 15, 21 and 22 (SAACs) share large homologous regions, including ribosomal DNA repeats and extended segmental duplications1,2. Although the resolution of these regions in the first complete assembly of a human genome-the Telomere-to-Telomere Consortium's CHM13 assembly (T2T-CHM13)-provided a model of their homology3, it remained unclear whether these patterns were ancestral or maintained by ongoing recombination exchange. Here we show that acrocentric chromosomes contain pseudo-homologous regions (PHRs) indicative of recombination between non-homologous sequences. Utilizing an all-to-all comparison of the human pangenome from the Human Pangenome Reference Consortium4 (HPRC), we find that contigs from all of the SAACs form a community. A variation graph5 constructed from centromere-spanning acrocentric contigs indicates the presence of regions in which most contigs appear nearly identical between heterologous acrocentric chromosomes in T2T-CHM13. Except on chromosome 15, we observe faster decay of linkage disequilibrium in the pseudo-homologous regions than in the corresponding short and long arms, indicating higher rates of recombination6,7. The pseudo-homologous regions include sequences that have previously been shown to lie at the breakpoint of Robertsonian translocations8, and their arrangement is compatible with crossover in inverted duplications on chromosomes 13, 14 and 21. The ubiquity of signals of recombination between heterologous acrocentric chromosomes seen in the HPRC draft pangenome suggests that these shared sequences form the basis for recurrent Robertsonian translocations, providing sequence and population-based confirmation of hypotheses first developed from cytogenetic studies 50 years ago9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Guarracino
- Department of Genetics, Genomics and Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
- Genomics Research Centre, Human Technopole, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Buonaiuto
- Institute of Genetics and Biophysics, National Research Council, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Tamara Potapova
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Arang Rhie
- Genome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sergey Koren
- Genome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Christian Fischer
- Department of Genetics, Genomics and Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | - Adam M Phillippy
- Genome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Vincenza Colonna
- Department of Genetics, Genomics and Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
- Institute of Genetics and Biophysics, National Research Council, Naples, Italy
| | - Erik Garrison
- Department of Genetics, Genomics and Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tsubouchi H. The Hop2-Mnd1 Complex and Its Regulation of Homologous Recombination. Biomolecules 2023; 13:biom13040662. [PMID: 37189409 DOI: 10.3390/biom13040662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Homologous recombination (HR) is essential for meiosis in most sexually reproducing organisms, where it is induced upon entry into meiotic prophase. Meiotic HR is conducted by the collaborative effort of proteins responsible for DNA double-strand break repair and those produced specifically during meiosis. The Hop2-Mnd1 complex was originally identified as a meiosis-specific factor that is indispensable for successful meiosis in budding yeast. Later, it was found that Hop2-Mnd1 is conserved from yeasts to humans, playing essential roles in meiosis. Accumulating evidence suggests that Hop2-Mnd1 promotes RecA-like recombinases towards homology search/strand exchange. This review summarizes studies on the mechanism of the Hop2-Mnd1 complex in promoting HR and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideo Tsubouchi
- Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama 226-8503, Kanagawa, Japan
- School of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama 226-8503, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gioia M, Payero L, Salim S, Fajish V. G, Farnaz AF, Pannafino G, Chen JJ, Ajith VP, Momoh S, Scotland M, Raghavan V, Manhart CM, Shinohara A, Nishant KT, Alani E. Exo1 protects DNA nicks from ligation to promote crossover formation during meiosis. PLoS Biol 2023; 21:e3002085. [PMID: 37079643 PMCID: PMC10153752 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023] Open
Abstract
In most sexually reproducing organisms crossing over between chromosome homologs during meiosis is essential to produce haploid gametes. Most crossovers that form in meiosis in budding yeast result from the biased resolution of double Holliday junction (dHJ) intermediates. This dHJ resolution step involves the actions of Rad2/XPG family nuclease Exo1 and the Mlh1-Mlh3 mismatch repair endonuclease. Here, we provide genetic evidence in baker's yeast that Exo1 promotes meiotic crossing over by protecting DNA nicks from ligation. We found that structural elements in Exo1 that interact with DNA, such as those required for the bending of DNA during nick/flap recognition, are critical for its role in crossing over. Consistent with these observations, meiotic expression of the Rad2/XPG family member Rad27 partially rescued the crossover defect in exo1 null mutants, and meiotic overexpression of Cdc9 ligase reduced the crossover levels of exo1 DNA-binding mutants to levels that approached the exo1 null. In addition, our work identified a role for Exo1 in crossover interference. Together, these studies provide experimental evidence for Exo1-protected nicks being critical for the formation of meiotic crossovers and their distribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Gioia
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
| | - Lisette Payero
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
| | - Sagar Salim
- School of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram, Trivandrum, India
| | - Ghanim Fajish V.
- Institute for Protein Research, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Amamah F. Farnaz
- School of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram, Trivandrum, India
| | - Gianno Pannafino
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
| | - Jun Jie Chen
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
| | - V. P. Ajith
- School of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram, Trivandrum, India
| | - Sherikat Momoh
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
| | - Michelle Scotland
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
| | - Vandana Raghavan
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
| | - Carol M. Manhart
- Department of Chemistry, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Akira Shinohara
- Institute for Protein Research, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - K. T. Nishant
- School of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram, Trivandrum, India
- Center for High-Performance Computing, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram, Trivandrum, India
| | - Eric Alani
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ziolkowski PA. Why do plants need the ZMM crossover pathway? A snapshot of meiotic recombination from the perspective of interhomolog polymorphism. PLANT REPRODUCTION 2023; 36:43-54. [PMID: 35819509 PMCID: PMC9958190 DOI: 10.1007/s00497-022-00446-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
At the heart of meiosis is crossover recombination, i.e., reciprocal exchange of chromosome fragments between parental genomes. Surprisingly, in most eukaryotes, including plants, several recombination pathways that can result in crossover event operate in parallel during meiosis. These pathways emerged independently in the course of evolution and perform separate functions, which directly translate into their roles in meiosis. The formation of one crossover per chromosome pair is required for proper chromosome segregation. This "obligate" crossover is ensured by the major crossover pathway in plants, and in many other eukaryotes, known as the ZMM pathway. The secondary pathways play important roles also in somatic cells and function mainly as repair mechanisms for DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) not used for crossover formation. One of the consequences of the functional differences between ZMM and other DSB repair pathways is their distinct sensitivities to polymorphisms between homologous chromosomes. From a population genetics perspective, these differences may affect the maintenance of genetic variability. This might be of special importance when considering that a significant portion of plants uses inbreeding as a predominant reproductive strategy, which results in loss of interhomolog polymorphism. While we are still far from fully understanding the relationship between meiotic recombination pathways and genetic variation in populations, recent studies of crossovers in plants offer a new perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr A Ziolkowski
- Laboratory of Genome Biology, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Szymanska-Lejman M, Dziegielewski W, Dluzewska J, Kbiri N, Bieluszewska A, Poethig RS, Ziolkowski PA. The effect of DNA polymorphisms and natural variation on crossover hotspot activity in Arabidopsis hybrids. Nat Commun 2023; 14:33. [PMID: 36596804 PMCID: PMC9810609 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35722-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
In hybrid organisms, genetically divergent homologous chromosomes pair and recombine during meiosis; however, the effect of specific types of polymorphisms on crossover is poorly understood. Here, to analyze this in Arabidopsis, we develop the seed-typing method that enables the massively parallel fine-mapping of crossovers by sequencing. We show that structural variants, observed in one of the generated intervals, do not change crossover frequency unless they are located directly within crossover hotspots. Both natural and Cas9-induced deletions result in lower hotspot activity but are not compensated by increases in immediately adjacent hotspots. To examine the effect of single nucleotide polymorphisms on crossover formation, we analyze hotspot activity in mismatch detection-deficient msh2 mutants. Surprisingly, polymorphic hotspots show reduced activity in msh2. In lines where only the hotspot-containing interval is heterozygous, crossover numbers increase above those in the inbred (homozygous). We conclude that MSH2 shapes crossover distribution by stimulating hotspot activity at polymorphic regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Szymanska-Lejman
- Laboratory of Genome Biology, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
| | - Wojciech Dziegielewski
- Laboratory of Genome Biology, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
| | - Julia Dluzewska
- Laboratory of Genome Biology, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
| | - Nadia Kbiri
- Laboratory of Genome Biology, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
| | - Anna Bieluszewska
- Laboratory of Genome Biology, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
| | - R Scott Poethig
- Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Piotr A Ziolkowski
- Laboratory of Genome Biology, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ziesel A, Weng Q, Ahuja JS, Bhattacharya A, Dutta R, Cheng E, Börner GV, Lichten M, Hollingsworth NM. Rad51-mediated interhomolog recombination during budding yeast meiosis is promoted by the meiotic recombination checkpoint and the conserved Pif1 helicase. PLoS Genet 2022; 18:e1010407. [PMID: 36508468 PMCID: PMC9779700 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
During meiosis, recombination between homologous chromosomes (homologs) generates crossovers that promote proper segregation at the first meiotic division. Recombination is initiated by Spo11-catalyzed DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). 5' end resection of the DSBs creates 3' single strand tails that two recombinases, Rad51 and Dmc1, bind to form presynaptic filaments that search for homology, mediate strand invasion and generate displacement loops (D-loops). D-loop processing then forms crossover and non-crossover recombinants. Meiotic recombination occurs in two temporally distinct phases. During Phase 1, Rad51 is inhibited and Dmc1 mediates the interhomolog recombination that promotes homolog synapsis. In Phase 2, Rad51 becomes active and functions with Rad54 to repair residual DSBs, making increasing use of sister chromatids. The transition from Phase 1 to Phase 2 is controlled by the meiotic recombination checkpoint through the meiosis-specific effector kinase Mek1. This work shows that constitutive activation of Rad51 in Phase 1 results in a subset of DSBs being repaired by a Rad51-mediated interhomolog recombination pathway that is distinct from that of Dmc1. Strand invasion intermediates generated by Rad51 require more time to be processed into recombinants, resulting in a meiotic recombination checkpoint delay in prophase I. Without the checkpoint, Rad51-generated intermediates are more likely to involve a sister chromatid, thereby increasing Meiosis I chromosome nondisjunction. This Rad51 interhomolog recombination pathway is specifically promoted by the conserved 5'-3' helicase PIF1 and its paralog, RRM3 and requires Pif1 helicase activity and its interaction with PCNA. This work demonstrates that (1) inhibition of Rad51 during Phase 1 is important to prevent competition with Dmc1 for DSB repair, (2) Rad51-mediated meiotic recombination intermediates are initially processed differently than those made by Dmc1, and (3) the meiotic recombination checkpoint provides time during prophase 1 for processing of Rad51-generated recombination intermediates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Ziesel
- Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America
| | - Qixuan Weng
- Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America
| | - Jasvinder S. Ahuja
- Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Abhishek Bhattacharya
- Center for Gene Regulation in Health and Disease and Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Raunak Dutta
- Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America
| | - Evan Cheng
- Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America
| | - G. Valentin Börner
- Center for Gene Regulation in Health and Disease and Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Michael Lichten
- Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Nancy M. Hollingsworth
- Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tan T, Tan Y, Wang Y, Yang X, Zhai B, Zhang S, Yang X, Nie H, Gao J, Zhou J, Zhang L, Wang S. Negative supercoils regulate meiotic crossover patterns in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:10418-10435. [PMID: 36107772 PMCID: PMC9561271 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Interference exists ubiquitously in many biological processes. Crossover interference patterns meiotic crossovers, which are required for faithful chromosome segregation and evolutionary adaption. However, what the interference signal is and how it is generated and regulated is unknown. We show that yeast top2 alleles which cannot bind or cleave DNA accumulate a higher level of negative supercoils and show weaker interference. However, top2 alleles which cannot religate the cleaved DNA or release the religated DNA accumulate less negative supercoils and show stronger interference. Moreover, the level of negative supercoils is negatively correlated with crossover interference strength. Furthermore, negative supercoils preferentially enrich at crossover-associated Zip3 regions before the formation of meiotic DNA double-strand breaks, and regions with more negative supercoils tend to have more Zip3. Additionally, the strength of crossover interference and homeostasis change coordinately in mutants. These findings suggest that the accumulation and relief of negative supercoils pattern meiotic crossovers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taicong Tan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University , China
| | - Yingjin Tan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University , China
| | - Ying Wang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University , China
| | - Xiao Yang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University , China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University , Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education , Jinan, Shandong 250001, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health , Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine , Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Binyuan Zhai
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University , China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University , Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education , Jinan, Shandong 250001, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health , Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine , Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Shuxian Zhang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University , China
- Advanced Medical Research Institute, Shandong University , Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Xuan Yang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University , China
| | - Hui Nie
- Center for Cell Structure and Function, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Resistance Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Normal University , Jinan 250014, Shandong, China
| | - Jinmin Gao
- Center for Cell Structure and Function, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Resistance Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Normal University , Jinan 250014, Shandong, China
| | - Jun Zhou
- Center for Cell Structure and Function, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Resistance Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Normal University , Jinan 250014, Shandong, China
| | - Liangran Zhang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University , China
- Advanced Medical Research Institute, Shandong University , Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Center for Cell Structure and Function, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Resistance Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Normal University , Jinan 250014, Shandong, China
| | - Shunxin Wang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University , China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University , Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education , Jinan, Shandong 250001, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health , Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine , Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Keymakh M, Dau J, Hu J, Ferlez B, Lisby M, Crickard JB. Rdh54 stabilizes Rad51 at displacement loop intermediates to regulate genetic exchange between chromosomes. PLoS Genet 2022; 18:e1010412. [PMID: 36099310 PMCID: PMC9506641 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Homologous recombination (HR) is a double-strand break DNA repair pathway that preserves chromosome structure. To repair damaged DNA, HR uses an intact donor DNA sequence located elsewhere in the genome. After the double-strand break is repaired, DNA sequence information can be transferred between donor and recipient DNA molecules through different mechanisms, including DNA crossovers that form between homologous chromosomes. Regulation of DNA sequence transfer is an important step in effectively completing HR and maintaining genome integrity. For example, mitotic exchange of information between homologous chromosomes can result in loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH), and in higher eukaryotes, the development of cancer. The DNA motor protein Rdh54 is a highly conserved DNA translocase that functions during HR. Several existing phenotypes in rdh54Δ strains suggest that Rdh54 may regulate effective exchange of DNA during HR. In our current study, we used a combination of biochemical and genetic techniques to dissect the role of Rdh54 on the exchange of genetic information during DNA repair. Our data indicate that RDH54 regulates DNA strand exchange by stabilizing Rad51 at an early HR intermediate called the displacement loop (D-loop). Rdh54 acts in opposition to Rad51 removal by the DNA motor protein Rad54. Furthermore, we find that expression of a catalytically inactivate allele of Rdh54, rdh54K318R, favors non-crossover outcomes. From these results, we propose a model for how Rdh54 may kinetically regulate strand exchange during homologous recombination. Homologous recombination is an important pathway in repairing DNA double strand breaks. For the purposes of this study, HR can be divided into two stages. The first is a DNA repair stage in which the broken DNA molecule is fixed. In the second stage, information can move from one DNA molecule to another. Enzymes that use the power of ATP hydrolysis to move along dsDNA aid in regulating both stages of HR. In this work we focused on the understudied DNA motor protein Rdh54. We combined genetic and biochemical approaches to show that Rdh54 regulates HR by stabilizing the recombinase protein Rad51 at early HR intermediates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Keymakh
- Deparment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University Ithaca, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
| | - Jennifer Dau
- Deparment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University Ithaca, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
| | - Jingyi Hu
- Deparment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University Ithaca, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
| | - Bryan Ferlez
- Deparment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University Ithaca, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
| | - Michael Lisby
- Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - J. Brooks Crickard
- Deparment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University Ithaca, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shodhan A, Xaver M, Wheeler D, Lichten M. Turning coldspots into hotspots: targeted recruitment of axis protein Hop1 stimulates meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2022; 222:6649696. [PMID: 35876814 PMCID: PMC9434160 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyac106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) that initiate meiotic recombination are formed in the context of the meiotic chromosome axis, which in Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains a meiosis-specific cohesin isoform and the meiosis-specific proteins Hop1 and Red1. Hop1 and Red1 are important for DSB formation; DSB levels are reduced in their absence and their levels, which vary along the lengths of chromosomes, are positively correlated with DSB levels. How axis protein levels influence DSB formation and recombination remains unclear. To address this question, we developed a novel approach that uses a bacterial ParB-parS partition system to recruit axis proteins at high levels to inserts at recombination coldspots where Hop1 and Red1 levels are normally low. Recruiting Hop1 markedly increased DSBs and homologous recombination at target loci, to levels equivalent to those observed at endogenous recombination hotspots. This local increase in DSBs did not require Red1 or the meiosis-specific cohesin component Rec8, indicating that, of the axis proteins, Hop1 is sufficient to promote DSB formation. However, while most crossovers at endogenous recombination hotspots are formed by the meiosis-specific MutLγ resolvase, crossovers that formed at an insert locus were only modestly reduced in the absence of MutLγ, regardless of whether or not Hop1 was recruited to that locus. Thus, while local Hop1 levels determine local DSB levels, the recombination pathways that repair these breaks can be determined by other factors, raising the intriguing possibility that different recombination pathways operate in different parts of the genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anura Shodhan
- Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | - Martin Xaver
- Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | - David Wheeler
- Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | - Michael Lichten
- Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lorenz A, Mpaulo SJ. Gene conversion: a non-Mendelian process integral to meiotic recombination. Heredity (Edinb) 2022; 129:56-63. [PMID: 35393552 PMCID: PMC9273591 DOI: 10.1038/s41437-022-00523-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Meiosis is undoubtedly the mechanism that underpins Mendelian genetics. Meiosis is a specialised, reductional cell division which generates haploid gametes (reproductive cells) carrying a single chromosome complement from diploid progenitor cells harbouring two chromosome sets. Through this process, the hereditary material is shuffled and distributed into haploid gametes such that upon fertilisation, when two haploid gametes fuse, diploidy is restored in the zygote. During meiosis the transient physical connection of two homologous chromosomes (one originally inherited from each parent) each consisting of two sister chromatids and their subsequent segregation into four meiotic products (gametes), is what enables genetic marker assortment forming the core of Mendelian laws. The initiating events of meiotic recombination are DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) which need to be repaired in a certain way to enable the homologous chromosomes to find each other. This is achieved by DSB ends searching for homologous repair templates and invading them. Ultimately, the repair of meiotic DSBs by homologous recombination physically connects homologous chromosomes through crossovers. These physical connections provided by crossovers enable faithful chromosome segregation. That being said, the DSB repair mechanism integral to meiotic recombination also produces genetic transmission distortions which manifest as postmeiotic segregation events and gene conversions. These processes are non-reciprocal genetic exchanges and thus non-Mendelian.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Lorenz
- Institute of Medical Sciences (IMS), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
| | - Samantha J Mpaulo
- Institute of Medical Sciences (IMS), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Diffusion and distal linkages govern interchromosomal dynamics during meiotic prophase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119:e2115883119. [PMID: 35302885 PMCID: PMC8944930 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2115883119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
SignificanceEssential for sexual reproduction, meiosis is a specialized cell division required for the production of haploid gametes. Critical to this process are the pairing, recombination, and segregation of homologous chromosomes (homologs). While pairing and recombination are linked, it is not known how many linkages are sufficient to hold homologs in proximity. Here, we reveal that random diffusion and the placement of a small number of linkages are sufficient to establish the apparent "pairing" of homologs. We also show that colocalization between any two loci is more dynamic than anticipated. Our study provides observations of live interchromosomal dynamics during meiosis and illustrates the power of combining single-cell measurements with theoretical polymer modeling.
Collapse
|
24
|
Vines AJ, Cox K, Leland BA, King MC. Homology-directed repair involves multiple strand invasion cycles in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell 2022; 33:ar30. [PMID: 35080989 PMCID: PMC9250353 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e20-07-0433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Homology-directed repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) represents a highly faithful pathway. Non–crossover repair dominates in mitotically growing cells, likely through a preference for synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA). How homology-directed repair mechanism choice is orchestrated in time and space is not well understood. Here, we develop a microscopy-based assay in living fission yeast to determine the dynamics and kinetics of an engineered, site-specific interhomologue repair event. We observe highly efficient homology search and homology-directed repair in this system. Surprisingly, the initial distance between the DSB and the donor sequence does not correlate with the duration of repair. Instead, we observe that repair often involves multiple site-specific and Rad51-dependent colocalization events between the DSB and donor sequence. Upon loss of the RecQ helicase Rqh1 (BLM in humans) we observe rapid repair possibly involving a single strand invasion event, suggesting that multiple strand invasion cycles antagonized by Rqh1 could reflect ongoing SDSA. However, failure to colocalize with the donor sequence and execute repair is also more likely in rqh1Δ cells, possibly reflecting erroneous strand invasion. This work has implications for the molecular etiology of Bloom syndrome, caused by mutations in BLM and characterized by aberrant sister chromatid crossovers and inefficient repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda J Vines
- Department of Cell Biology, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, Connecticut, USA, 06520
| | - Kenneth Cox
- Department of Cell Biology, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, Connecticut, USA, 06520
| | - Bryan A Leland
- Department of Cell Biology, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, Connecticut, USA, 06520
| | - Megan C King
- Department of Cell Biology, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, Connecticut, USA, 06520
| |
Collapse
|