1
|
Hassan J, Saeed SM, Deka L, Uddin MJ, Das DB. Applications of Machine Learning (ML) and Mathematical Modeling (MM) in Healthcare with Special Focus on Cancer Prognosis and Anticancer Therapy: Current Status and Challenges. Pharmaceutics 2024; 16:260. [PMID: 38399314 PMCID: PMC10892549 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16020260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The use of data-driven high-throughput analytical techniques, which has given rise to computational oncology, is undisputed. The widespread use of machine learning (ML) and mathematical modeling (MM)-based techniques is widely acknowledged. These two approaches have fueled the advancement in cancer research and eventually led to the uptake of telemedicine in cancer care. For diagnostic, prognostic, and treatment purposes concerning different types of cancer research, vast databases of varied information with manifold dimensions are required, and indeed, all this information can only be managed by an automated system developed utilizing ML and MM. In addition, MM is being used to probe the relationship between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD interactions) of anti-cancer substances to improve cancer treatment, and also to refine the quality of existing treatment models by being incorporated at all steps of research and development related to cancer and in routine patient care. This review will serve as a consolidation of the advancement and benefits of ML and MM techniques with a special focus on the area of cancer prognosis and anticancer therapy, leading to the identification of challenges (data quantity, ethical consideration, and data privacy) which are yet to be fully addressed in current studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmin Hassan
- Drug Delivery & Therapeutics Lab, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh; (J.H.); (S.M.S.)
| | | | - Lipika Deka
- Faculty of Computing, Engineering and Media, De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK;
| | - Md Jasim Uddin
- Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
| | - Diganta B. Das
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nemali A, Vockert N, Berron D, Maas A, Bernal J, Yakupov R, Peters O, Gref D, Cosma N, Preis L, Priller J, Spruth E, Altenstein S, Lohse A, Fliessbach K, Kimmich O, Vogt I, Wiltfang J, Hansen N, Bartels C, Schott BH, Maier F, Meiberth D, Glanz W, Incesoy E, Butryn M, Buerger K, Janowitz D, Pernecky R, Rauchmann B, Burow L, Teipel S, Kilimann I, Göerß D, Dyrba M, Laske C, Munk M, Sanzenbacher C, Müller S, Spottke A, Roy N, Heneka M, Brosseron F, Roeske S, Dobisch L, Ramirez A, Ewers M, Dechent P, Scheffler K, Kleineidam L, Wolfsgruber S, Wagner M, Jessen F, Duzel E, Ziegler G. Gaussian Process-based prediction of memory performance and biomarker status in ageing and Alzheimer's disease-A systematic model evaluation. Med Image Anal 2023; 90:102913. [PMID: 37660483 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2023.102913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
Neuroimaging markers based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) combined with various other measures (such as genetic covariates, biomarkers, vascular risk factors, neuropsychological tests etc.) might provide useful predictions of clinical outcomes during the progression towards Alzheimer's disease (AD). The use of multiple features in predictive frameworks for clinical outcomes has become increasingly prevalent in AD research. However, many studies do not focus on systematically and accurately evaluating combinations of multiple input features. Hence, the aim of the present work is to explore and assess optimal combinations of various features for MR-based prediction of (1) cognitive status and (2) biomarker positivity with a multi-kernel learning Gaussian process framework. The explored features and parameters included (A) combinations of brain tissues, modulation, smoothing, and image resolution; (B) incorporating demographics & clinical covariates; (C) the impact of the size of the training data set; (D) the influence of dimensionality reduction and the choice of kernel types. The approach was tested in a large German cohort including 959 subjects from the multicentric longitudinal study of cognitive impairment and dementia (DELCODE). Our evaluation suggests the best prediction of memory performance was obtained for a combination of neuroimaging markers, demographics, genetic information (ApoE4) and CSF biomarkers explaining 57% of outcome variance in out-of-sample predictions. The highest performance for Aβ42/40 status classification was achieved for a combination of demographics, ApoE4, and a memory score while usage of structural MRI further improved the classification of individual patient's pTau status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Nemali
- Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany.
| | - N Vockert
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
| | - D Berron
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
| | - A Maas
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
| | - J Bernal
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
| | - R Yakupov
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
| | - O Peters
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Psychiatry, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - D Gref
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Psychiatry, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - N Cosma
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Psychiatry, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - L Preis
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Psychiatry, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - J Priller
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany; School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Munich, Germany; University of Edinburgh and UK DRI, Edinburgh, UK
| | - E Spruth
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - S Altenstein
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - A Lohse
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - K Fliessbach
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany; University of Bonn Medical Center, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease and Geriatric Psychiatry/Psychiatry, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - O Kimmich
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - I Vogt
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - J Wiltfang
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Goettingen, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen, University of Goettingen, Von-Siebold-Str. 5, 37075 Goettingen, Germany; Neurosciences and Signaling Group, Institute of Biomedicine (iBiMED), Department of Medical Sciences, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - N Hansen
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen, University of Goettingen, Von-Siebold-Str. 5, 37075 Goettingen, Germany
| | - C Bartels
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen, University of Goettingen, Von-Siebold-Str. 5, 37075 Goettingen, Germany
| | - B H Schott
- Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Goettingen, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen, University of Goettingen, Von-Siebold-Str. 5, 37075 Goettingen, Germany
| | - F Maier
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50924 Cologne, Germany
| | - D Meiberth
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50924 Cologne, Germany
| | - W Glanz
- Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany
| | - E Incesoy
- Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
| | - M Butryn
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
| | - K Buerger
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE, Munich), Feodor-Lynen-Strasse 17, 81377 Munich, Germany; Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Feodor-Lynen-Strasse 17, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - D Janowitz
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Feodor-Lynen-Strasse 17, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - R Pernecky
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE, Munich), Feodor-Lynen-Strasse 17, 81377 Munich, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) Munich, Munich, Germany; Ageing Epidemiology Research Unit (AGE), School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - B Rauchmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - L Burow
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - S Teipel
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock, Germany; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany
| | - I Kilimann
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock, Germany; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany
| | - D Göerß
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany
| | - M Dyrba
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock, Germany
| | - C Laske
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Tübingen, Germany; Section for Dementia Research, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - M Munk
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Tübingen, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - C Sanzenbacher
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Tübingen, Germany
| | - S Müller
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - A Spottke
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany; Department of Neurology, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - N Roy
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - M Heneka
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - F Brosseron
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - S Roeske
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - L Dobisch
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
| | - A Ramirez
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany; Department of Neurology, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany; Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Joseph-Stelzmann-Strasse 26, 50931 Köln, Germany; Division of Neurogenetics and Molecular Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Psychiatry & Glenn Biggs Institute for Alzheimer's and Neurodegenerative Diseases, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - M Ewers
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE, Munich), Feodor-Lynen-Strasse 17, 81377 Munich, Germany; Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Feodor-Lynen-Strasse 17, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - P Dechent
- MR-Research in Neurosciences, Department of Cognitive Neurology, Georg-August-University Goettingen, Germany
| | - K Scheffler
- Department for Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - L Kleineidam
- University of Bonn Medical Center, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease and Geriatric Psychiatry/Psychiatry, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - S Wolfsgruber
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany; University of Bonn Medical Center, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease and Geriatric Psychiatry/Psychiatry, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - M Wagner
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany; University of Bonn Medical Center, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease and Geriatric Psychiatry/Psychiatry, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - F Jessen
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany; Department of Psychiatry, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50924 Cologne, Germany; Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Joseph-Stelzmann-Strasse 26, 50931 Köln, Germany
| | - E Duzel
- Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
| | - G Ziegler
- Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wen J, Skampardoni I, Tian YE, Yang Z, Cui Y, Erus G, Hwang G, Varol E, Boquet-Pujadas A, Chand GB, Nasrallah I, Satterthwaite T, Shou H, Shen L, Toga AW, Zaleskey A, Davatzikos C. Neuroimaging-AI Endophenotypes of Brain Diseases in the General Population: Towards a Dimensional System of Vulnerability. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.08.16.23294179. [PMID: 37662256 PMCID: PMC10473785 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.16.23294179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
Disease heterogeneity poses a significant challenge for precision diagnostics in both clinical and sub-clinical stages. Recent work leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) has offered promise to dissect this heterogeneity by identifying complex intermediate phenotypes - herein called dimensional neuroimaging endophenotypes (DNEs) - which subtype various neurologic and neuropsychiatric diseases. We investigate the presence of nine such DNEs derived from independent yet harmonized studies on Alzheimer's disease (AD1-2)1, autism spectrum disorder (ASD1-3)2, late-life depression (LLD1-2)3, and schizophrenia (SCZ1-2)4, in the general population of 39,178 participants in the UK Biobank study. Phenome-wide associations revealed prominent associations between the nine DNEs and phenotypes related to the brain and other human organ systems. This phenotypic landscape aligns with the SNP-phenotype genome-wide associations, revealing 31 genomic loci associated with the nine DNEs (Bonferroni corrected P-value < 5×10-8/9). The DNEs exhibited significant genetic correlations, colocalization, and causal relationships with multiple human organ systems and chronic diseases. A causal effect (odds ratio=1.25 [1.11, 1.40], P-value=8.72×1-4) was established from AD2, characterized by focal medial temporal lobe atrophy, to AD. The nine DNEs and their polygenic risk scores significantly improved the prediction accuracy for 14 systemic disease categories and mortality. These findings underscore the potential of the nine DNEs to identify individuals at a high risk of developing the four brain diseases during preclinical stages for precision diagnostics. All results are publicly available at: http://labs.loni.usc.edu/medicine/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junhao Wen
- Laboratory of AI and Biomedical Science (LABS), Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ioanna Skampardoni
- Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Imaging Laboratory (AIBIL), Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AID), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Ye Ella Tian
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Zhijian Yang
- Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Imaging Laboratory (AIBIL), Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AID), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Yuhan Cui
- Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Imaging Laboratory (AIBIL), Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AID), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Guray Erus
- Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Imaging Laboratory (AIBIL), Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AID), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Gyujoon Hwang
- Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Imaging Laboratory (AIBIL), Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AID), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Erdem Varol
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, New York University, New York, USA
| | | | - Ganesh B. Chand
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ilya Nasrallah
- Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Imaging Laboratory (AIBIL), Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AID), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Theodore Satterthwaite
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Haochang Shou
- Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Imaging Laboratory (AIBIL), Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AID), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Li Shen
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Arthur W. Toga
- Laboratory of Neuro Imaging (LONI), Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Andrew Zaleskey
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Imaging Laboratory (AIBIL), Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AID), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Habes M, Jacobson AM, Braffett BH, Rashid T, Ryan CM, Shou H, Cui Y, Davatzikos C, Luchsinger JA, Biessels GJ, Bebu I, Gubitosi-Klug RA, Bryan RN, Nasrallah IM. Patterns of Regional Brain Atrophy and Brain Aging in Middle- and Older-Aged Adults With Type 1 Diabetes. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2316182. [PMID: 37261829 PMCID: PMC10236234 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.16182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Little is known about structural brain changes in type 1 diabetes (T1D) and whether there are early manifestations of a neurodegenerative condition like Alzheimer disease (AD) or evidence of premature brain aging. Objective To evaluate neuroimaging markers of brain age and AD-like atrophy in participants with T1D in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study, identify which brain regions are associated with the greatest changes in patients with T1D, and assess the association between cognition and brain aging indices. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study leveraged data collected during the combined DCCT (randomized clinical trial, 1983-1993) and EDIC (observational study, 1994 to present) studies at 27 clinical centers in the US and Canada. A total of 416 eligible EDIC participants and 99 demographically similar adults without diabetes were enrolled in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ancillary study, which reports cross-sectional data collected in 2018 to 2019 and relates it to factors measured longitudinally in DCCT/EDIC. Data analyses were performed between July 2020 and April 2022. Exposure T1D diagnosis. Main Outcomes and Measures Psychomotor and mental efficiency were evaluated using verbal fluency, digit symbol substitution test, trail making part B, and the grooved pegboard. Immediate memory scores were derived from the logical memory subtest of the Wechsler memory scale and the Wechsler digit symbol substitution test. MRI and machine learning indices were calculated to predict brain age and quantify AD-like atrophy. Results This study included 416 EDIC participants with a median (range) age of 60 (44-74) years (87 of 416 [21%] were older than 65 years) and a median (range) diabetes duration of 37 (30-51) years. EDIC participants had consistently higher brain age values compared with controls without diabetes, indicative of approximately 6 additional years of brain aging (EDIC participants: β, 6.16; SE, 0.71; control participants: β, 1.04; SE, 0.04; P < .001). In contrast, AD regional atrophy was comparable between the 2 groups. Regions with atrophy in EDIC participants vs controls were observed mainly in the bilateral thalamus and putamen. Greater brain age was associated with lower psychomotor and mental efficiency among EDIC participants (β, -0.04; SE, 0.01; P < .001), but not among controls. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this study suggest an increase in brain aging among individuals with T1D without any early signs of AD-related neurodegeneration. These increases were associated with reduced cognitive performance, but overall, the abnormal patterns seen in this sample were modest, even after a mean of 38 years with T1D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad Habes
- Neuroimage Analytics Laboratory (NAL) and the Biggs Institute Neuroimaging Core (BINC), Glenn Biggs Institute for Alzheimer's and Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Alan M. Jacobson
- NYU Long Island School of Medicine, NYU Langone Hospital-Long Island, Mineola, New York
| | | | - Tanweer Rashid
- Neuroimage Analytics Laboratory (NAL) and the Biggs Institute Neuroimaging Core (BINC), Glenn Biggs Institute for Alzheimer's and Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | | | - Haochang Shou
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Yuhan Cui
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | | | - Geert J. Biessels
- Department of Neurology, UMCU Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ionut Bebu
- George Washington University, Biostatistics Center, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Rose A. Gubitosi-Klug
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - R. Nick Bryan
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Ilya M. Nasrallah
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li J, Li S, Li X, Miao S, Dong C, Gao C, Liu X, Hao D, Xu W, Huang M, Cui J. Primary bone tumor detection and classification in full-field bone radiographs via YOLO deep learning model. Eur Radiol 2022; 33:4237-4248. [PMID: 36449060 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09289-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Automatic bone lesions detection and classifications present a critical challenge and are essential to support radiologists in making an accurate diagnosis of bone lesions. In this paper, we aimed to develop a novel deep learning model called You Only Look Once (YOLO) to handle detecting and classifying bone lesions on full-field radiographs with limited manual intervention. METHODS In this retrospective study, we used 1085 bone tumor radiographs and 345 normal bone radiographs from two centers between January 2009 and December 2020 to train and test our YOLO deep learning (DL) model. The trained model detected bone lesions and then classified these radiographs into normal, benign, intermediate, or malignant types. The intersection over union (IoU) was used to assess the model's performance in the detection task. Confusion matrices and Cohen's kappa scores were used for evaluating classification performance. Two radiologists compared diagnostic performance with the trained model using the external validation set. RESULTS In the detection task, the model achieved accuracies of 86.36% and 85.37% in the internal and external validation sets, respectively. In the DL model, radiologist 1 and radiologist 2 achieved Cohen's kappa scores of 0.8187, 0.7927, and 0.9077 for four-way classification in the external validation set, respectively. The YOLO DL model illustrated a significantly higher accuracy for intermediate bone tumor classification than radiologist 1 (95.73% vs 88.08%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS The developed YOLO DL model could be used to assist radiologists at all stages of bone lesion detection and classification in full-field bone radiographs. KEY POINTS • YOLO DL model can automatically detect bone neoplasms from full-field radiographs in one shot and then simultaneously classify radiographs into normal, benign, intermediate, or malignant. • The dataset used in this retrospective study includes normal bone radiographs. • YOLO can detect even some challenging cases with small volumes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Li
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003, Shandong, China
| | - Sudong Li
- College of Computer Science and Technology, Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266071, China
| | - Xiaoli Li
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003, Shandong, China
| | - Sheng Miao
- School of Information and Control Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao, 266520, China
| | - Cheng Dong
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003, Shandong, China
| | - Chuanping Gao
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003, Shandong, China
| | - Xuejun Liu
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003, Shandong, China
| | - Dapeng Hao
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003, Shandong, China
| | - Wenjian Xu
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003, Shandong, China
| | - Mingqian Huang
- Department of Radiology, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, 10029-0310, USA
| | - Jiufa Cui
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003, Shandong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bayer JMM, Thompson PM, Ching CRK, Liu M, Chen A, Panzenhagen AC, Jahanshad N, Marquand A, Schmaal L, Sämann PG. Site effects how-to and when: An overview of retrospective techniques to accommodate site effects in multi-site neuroimaging analyses. Front Neurol 2022; 13:923988. [PMID: 36388214 PMCID: PMC9661923 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.923988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Site differences, or systematic differences in feature distributions across multiple data-acquisition sites, are a known source of heterogeneity that may adversely affect large-scale meta- and mega-analyses of independently collected neuroimaging data. They influence nearly all multi-site imaging modalities and biomarkers, and methods to compensate for them can improve reliability and generalizability in the analysis of genetics, omics, and clinical data. The origins of statistical site effects are complex and involve both technical differences (scanner vendor, head coil, acquisition parameters, imaging processing) and differences in sample characteristics (inclusion/exclusion criteria, sample size, ancestry) between sites. In an age of expanding international consortium research, there is a growing need to disentangle technical site effects from sample characteristics of interest. Numerous statistical and machine learning methods have been developed to control for, model, or attenuate site effects - yet to date, no comprehensive review has discussed the benefits and drawbacks of each for different use cases. Here, we provide an overview of the different existing statistical and machine learning methods developed to remove unwanted site effects from independently collected neuroimaging samples. We focus on linear mixed effect models, the ComBat technique and its variants, adjustments based on image quality metrics, normative modeling, and deep learning approaches such as generative adversarial networks. For each method, we outline the statistical foundation and summarize strengths and weaknesses, including their assumptions and conditions of use. We provide information on software availability and comment on the ease of use and the applicability of these methods to different types of data. We discuss validation and comparative reports, mention caveats and provide guidance on when to use each method, depending on context and specific research questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna M. M. Bayer
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Paul M. Thompson
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
| | - Christopher R. K. Ching
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
| | - Mengting Liu
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Andrew Chen
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Alana C. Panzenhagen
- Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Biológicas: Bioquímica, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Department of Translational Psychiatry, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany
| | - Neda Jahanshad
- Laboratory of Brain eScience, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
| | - Andre Marquand
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Lianne Schmaal
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hameed BS, Krishnan UM. Artificial Intelligence-Driven Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:5382. [PMID: 36358800 PMCID: PMC9657087 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is among the most challenging forms of cancer to treat, owing to its late diagnosis and aggressive nature that reduces the survival rate drastically. Pancreatic cancer diagnosis has been primarily based on imaging, but the current state-of-the-art imaging provides a poor prognosis, thus limiting clinicians' treatment options. The advancement of a cancer diagnosis has been enhanced through the integration of artificial intelligence and imaging modalities to make better clinical decisions. In this review, we examine how AI models can improve the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer using different imaging modalities along with a discussion on the emerging trends in an AI-driven diagnosis, based on cytopathology and serological markers. Ethical concerns regarding the use of these tools have also been discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahrudeen Shahul Hameed
- Centre for Nanotechnology & Advanced Biomaterials (CeNTAB), Shanmugha Arts, Science, Technology and Research Academy, Deemed University, Thanjavur 613401, India
- School of Chemical & Biotechnology (SCBT), Shanmugha Arts, Science, Technology and Research Academy, Deemed University, Thanjavur 613401, India
| | - Uma Maheswari Krishnan
- Centre for Nanotechnology & Advanced Biomaterials (CeNTAB), Shanmugha Arts, Science, Technology and Research Academy, Deemed University, Thanjavur 613401, India
- School of Chemical & Biotechnology (SCBT), Shanmugha Arts, Science, Technology and Research Academy, Deemed University, Thanjavur 613401, India
- School of Arts, Sciences, Humanities & Education (SASHE), Shanmugha Arts, Science, Technology and Research Academy, Deemed University, Thanjavur 613401, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bakas S, Sako C, Akbari H, Bilello M, Sotiras A, Shukla G, Rudie JD, Santamaría NF, Kazerooni AF, Pati S, Rathore S, Mamourian E, Ha SM, Parker W, Doshi J, Baid U, Bergman M, Binder ZA, Verma R, Lustig RA, Desai AS, Bagley SJ, Mourelatos Z, Morrissette J, Watt CD, Brem S, Wolf RL, Melhem ER, Nasrallah MP, Mohan S, O'Rourke DM, Davatzikos C. The University of Pennsylvania glioblastoma (UPenn-GBM) cohort: advanced MRI, clinical, genomics, & radiomics. Sci Data 2022; 9:453. [PMID: 35906241 PMCID: PMC9338035 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01560-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most common aggressive adult brain tumor. Numerous studies have reported results from either private institutional data or publicly available datasets. However, current public datasets are limited in terms of: a) number of subjects, b) lack of consistent acquisition protocol, c) data quality, or d) accompanying clinical, demographic, and molecular information. Toward alleviating these limitations, we contribute the "University of Pennsylvania Glioblastoma Imaging, Genomics, and Radiomics" (UPenn-GBM) dataset, which describes the currently largest publicly available comprehensive collection of 630 patients diagnosed with de novo glioblastoma. The UPenn-GBM dataset includes (a) advanced multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging scans acquired during routine clinical practice, at the University of Pennsylvania Health System, (b) accompanying clinical, demographic, and molecular information, (d) perfusion and diffusion derivative volumes, (e) computationally-derived and manually-revised expert annotations of tumor sub-regions, as well as (f) quantitative imaging (also known as radiomic) features corresponding to each of these regions. This collection describes our contribution towards repeatable, reproducible, and comparative quantitative studies leading to new predictive, prognostic, and diagnostic assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Chiharu Sako
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michel Bilello
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Aristeidis Sotiras
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology and Institute for Informatics, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Gaurav Shukla
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christiana Care Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jeffrey D Rudie
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Natali Flores Santamaría
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Anahita Fathi Kazerooni
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sarthak Pati
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Saima Rathore
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Mamourian
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sung Min Ha
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology and Institute for Informatics, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - William Parker
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jimit Doshi
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ujjwal Baid
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mark Bergman
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Zev A Binder
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ragini Verma
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Robert A Lustig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Arati S Desai
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Stephen J Bagley
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Zissimos Mourelatos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer Morrissette
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christopher D Watt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Steven Brem
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ronald L Wolf
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Elias R Melhem
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - MacLean P Nasrallah
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Donald M O'Rourke
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Madhogarhia R, Haldar D, Bagheri S, Familiar A, Anderson H, Arif S, Vossough A, Storm P, Resnick A, Davatzikos C, Fathi Kazerooni A, Nabavizadeh A. Radiomics and radiogenomics in pediatric neuro-oncology: A review. Neurooncol Adv 2022; 4:vdac083. [PMID: 35795472 PMCID: PMC9252112 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The current era of advanced computing has allowed for the development and implementation of the field of radiomics. In pediatric neuro-oncology, radiomics has been applied in determination of tumor histology, identification of disseminated disease, prognostication, and molecular classification of tumors (ie, radiogenomics). The field also comes with many challenges, such as limitations in study sample sizes, class imbalance, generalizability of the methods, and data harmonization across imaging centers. The aim of this review paper is twofold: first, to summarize existing literature in radiomics of pediatric neuro-oncology; second, to distill the themes and challenges of the field and discuss future directions in both a clinical and technical context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Madhogarhia
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Debanjan Haldar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Institute of Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sina Bagheri
- Center for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ariana Familiar
- Center for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hannah Anderson
- Center for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sherjeel Arif
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Arastoo Vossough
- Center for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Phillip Storm
- Department of Neurosurgery, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Adam Resnick
- Center for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anahita Fathi Kazerooni
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ali Nabavizadeh
- Center for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fathi Kazerooni A, Bagley SJ, Akbari H, Saxena S, Bagheri S, Guo J, Chawla S, Nabavizadeh A, Mohan S, Bakas S, Davatzikos C, Nasrallah MP. Applications of Radiomics and Radiogenomics in High-Grade Gliomas in the Era of Precision Medicine. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13235921. [PMID: 34885031 PMCID: PMC8656630 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13235921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiomics and radiogenomics offer new insight into high-grade glioma biology, as well as into glioma behavior in response to standard therapies. In this article, we provide neuro-oncology, neuropathology, and computational perspectives on the role of radiomics in providing more accurate diagnoses, prognostication, and surveillance of patients with high-grade glioma, and on the potential application of radiomics in clinical practice, with the overarching goal of advancing precision medicine for optimal patient care. Abstract Machine learning (ML) integrated with medical imaging has introduced new perspectives in precision diagnostics of high-grade gliomas, through radiomics and radiogenomics. This has raised hopes for characterizing noninvasive and in vivo biomarkers for prediction of patient survival, tumor recurrence, and genomics and therefore encouraging treatments tailored to individualized needs. Characterization of tumor infiltration based on pre-operative multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) scans may allow prediction of the loci of future tumor recurrence and thereby aid in planning the course of treatment for the patients, such as optimizing the extent of resection and the dose and target area of radiation. Imaging signatures of tumor genomics can help in identifying the patients who benefit from certain targeted therapies. Specifying molecular properties of gliomas and prediction of their changes over time and with treatment would allow optimization of treatment. In this article, we provide neuro-oncology, neuropathology, and computational perspectives on the promise of radiomics and radiogenomics for allowing personalized treatments of patients with gliomas and discuss the challenges and limitations of these methods in multi-institutional clinical trials and suggestions to mitigate the issues and the future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anahita Fathi Kazerooni
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Stephen J. Bagley
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;
- Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Sanjay Saxena
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Sina Bagheri
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Jun Guo
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Sanjeev Chawla
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Ali Nabavizadeh
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - MacLean P. Nasrallah
- Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
MRI-based machine learning for determining quantitative and qualitative characteristics affecting the survival of glioblastoma multiforme. Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 85:222-227. [PMID: 34687850 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2021.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our current study aims to consider the image biomarkers extracted from the MRI images for exploring their effects on glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients' survival. Determining its biomarker helps better manage the disease and evaluate treatments. It has been proven that imaging features could be used as a biomarker. The purpose of this study is to investigate the features in MRI and clinical features as the biomarker association of survival of GBM. METHODS 55 patients were considered with five clinical features, 10 qualities pre-operative MRI image features, and six quantitative features obtained using BraTumIA software. It was run ANN, C5, Bayesian, and Cox models in two phases for determining important variables. In the first phase, we selected the quality features that occur at least in three models and quantitative in two models. In the second phase, models were run with the extracted features, and then the probability value of variables in each model was calculated. RESULTS The mean of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve (AUC) after running four machine learning techniques were 80.47, 82.54, 79.78, and 0.85, respectively. In the second step, the mean of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 79.55, 78.71, 79.83, and 0.87, respectively. CONCLUSION We found the largest size of the width, the largest size of length, radiotherapy, volume of enhancement, volume of nCET, satellites, enhancing margin, and age feature are important features.
Collapse
|
12
|
Khanna O, Fathi Kazerooni A, Farrell CJ, Baldassari MP, Alexander TD, Karsy M, Greenberger BA, Garcia JA, Sako C, Evans JJ, Judy KD, Andrews DW, Flanders AE, Sharan AD, Dicker AP, Shi W, Davatzikos C. Machine Learning Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomic Feature Analysis to Predict Ki-67 in World Health Organization Grade I Meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2021; 89:928-936. [PMID: 34460921 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyab307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although World Health Organization (WHO) grade I meningiomas are considered "benign" tumors, an elevated Ki-67 is one crucial factor that has been shown to influence tumor behavior and clinical outcomes. The ability to preoperatively discern Ki-67 would confer the ability to guide surgical strategy. OBJECTIVE In this study, we develop a machine learning (ML) algorithm using radiomic feature analysis to predict Ki-67 in WHO grade I meningiomas. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed for a cohort of 306 patients who underwent surgical resection of WHO grade I meningiomas. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was used to perform radiomic feature extraction followed by ML modeling using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator wrapped with support vector machine through nested cross-validation on a discovery cohort (n = 230), to stratify tumors based on Ki-67 <5% and ≥5%. The final model was independently tested on a replication cohort (n = 76). RESULTS An area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.78-0.90) with a sensitivity of 84.1% and specificity of 73.3% was achieved in the discovery cohort. When this model was applied to the replication cohort, a similar high performance was achieved, with an AUC of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.73-0.94), sensitivity and specificity of 82.6% and 85.5%, respectively. The model demonstrated similar efficacy when applied to skull base and nonskull base tumors. CONCLUSION Our proposed radiomic feature analysis can be used to stratify WHO grade I meningiomas based on Ki-67 with excellent accuracy and can be applied to skull base and nonskull base tumors with similar performance achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omaditya Khanna
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anahita Fathi Kazerooni
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christopher J Farrell
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael P Baldassari
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Tyler D Alexander
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael Karsy
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Benjamin A Greenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College & Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jose A Garcia
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Chiharu Sako
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - James J Evans
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kevin D Judy
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David W Andrews
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Adam E Flanders
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ashwini D Sharan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Adam P Dicker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College & Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Wenyin Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College & Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Calhoun VD, Pearlson GD, Sui J. Data-driven approaches to neuroimaging biomarkers for neurological and psychiatric disorders: emerging approaches and examples. Curr Opin Neurol 2021; 34:469-479. [PMID: 34054110 PMCID: PMC8263510 DOI: 10.1097/wco.0000000000000967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The 'holy grail' of clinical applications of neuroimaging to neurological and psychiatric disorders via personalized biomarkers has remained mostly elusive, despite considerable effort. However, there are many reasons to continue to be hopeful, as the field has made remarkable advances over the past few years, fueled by a variety of converging technical and data developments. RECENT FINDINGS We discuss a number of advances that are accelerating the push for neuroimaging biomarkers including the advent of the 'neuroscience big data' era, biomarker data competitions, the development of more sophisticated algorithms including 'guided' data-driven approaches that facilitate automation of network-based analyses, dynamic connectivity, and deep learning. Another key advance includes multimodal data fusion approaches which can provide convergent and complementary evidence pointing to possible mechanisms as well as increase predictive accuracy. SUMMARY The search for clinically relevant neuroimaging biomarkers for neurological and psychiatric disorders is rapidly accelerating. Here, we highlight some of these aspects, provide recent examples from studies in our group, and link to other ongoing work in the field. It is critical that access and use of these advanced approaches becomes mainstream, this will help propel the community forward and facilitate the production of robust and replicable neuroimaging biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vince D Calhoun
- Tri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Godfrey D Pearlson
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Jing Sui
- Tri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
- Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhang B, Lin L, Wu S, Al-Masqari ZHMA. Multiple Subtypes of Alzheimer's Disease Base on Brain Atrophy Pattern. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11020278. [PMID: 33672406 PMCID: PMC7926857 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11020278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a disease of a heterogeneous nature, which can be disentangled by exploring the characteristics of each AD subtype in the brain structure, neuropathology, and cognition. In this study, a total of 192 AD and 228 cognitively normal (CN) subjects were obtained from the Alzheimer’s disease Neuroimaging Initiative database. Based on the cortical thickness patterns, the mixture of experts method (MOE) was applied to the implicit model spectrum of transforms lined with each AD subtype, then their neuropsychological and neuropathological characteristics were analyzed. Furthermore, the piecewise linear classifiers composed of each AD subtype and CN were resolved, and each subtype was comprehensively explained. The following four distinct AD subtypes were discovered: bilateral parietal, frontal, and temporal atrophy AD subtype (occipital sparing AD subtype (OSAD), 29.2%), left temporal dominant atrophy AD subtype (LTAD, 22.4%), minimal atrophy AD subtype (MAD, 16.1%), and diffuse atrophy AD subtype (DAD, 32.3%). These four subtypes display their own characteristics in atrophy pattern, cognition, and neuropathology. Compared with the previous studies, our study found that some AD subjects showed obvious asymmetrical atrophy in left lateral temporal-parietal cortex, OSAD presented the worst cerebrospinal fluid levels, and MAD had the highest proportions of APOE ε4 and APOE ε2. The subtype characteristics were further revealed from the aspect of the model, making it easier for clinicians to understand. The results offer an effective support for individual diagnosis and prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baiwen Zhang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Environment and Life Sciences, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; (B.Z.); (S.W.); (Z.H.M.A.A.-M.)
- Intelligent Physiological Measurement and Clinical Translation, Beijing International Base for Scientific and Technological Cooperation, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
| | - Lan Lin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Environment and Life Sciences, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; (B.Z.); (S.W.); (Z.H.M.A.A.-M.)
- Intelligent Physiological Measurement and Clinical Translation, Beijing International Base for Scientific and Technological Cooperation, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +86-10-6739-1610
| | - Shuicai Wu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Environment and Life Sciences, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; (B.Z.); (S.W.); (Z.H.M.A.A.-M.)
- Intelligent Physiological Measurement and Clinical Translation, Beijing International Base for Scientific and Technological Cooperation, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
| | - Zakarea H. M. A. Al-Masqari
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Environment and Life Sciences, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; (B.Z.); (S.W.); (Z.H.M.A.A.-M.)
- Intelligent Physiological Measurement and Clinical Translation, Beijing International Base for Scientific and Technological Cooperation, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mang A, Bakas S, Subramanian S, Davatzikos C, Biros G. Integrated Biophysical Modeling and Image Analysis: Application to Neuro-Oncology. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2020; 22:309-341. [PMID: 32501772 PMCID: PMC7520881 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-121105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) tumors come with vastly heterogeneous histologic, molecular, and radiographic landscapes, rendering their precise characterization challenging. The rapidly growing fields of biophysical modeling and radiomics have shown promise in better characterizing the molecular, spatial, and temporal heterogeneity of tumors. Integrative analysis of CNS tumors, including clinically acquired multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and the inverse problem of calibrating biophysical models to mpMRI data, assists in identifying macroscopic quantifiable tumor patterns of invasion and proliferation, potentially leading to improved (a) detection/segmentation of tumor subregions and (b) computer-aided diagnostic/prognostic/predictive modeling. This article presents a summary of (a) biophysical growth modeling and simulation,(b) inverse problems for model calibration, (c) these models' integration with imaging workflows, and (d) their application to clinically relevant studies. We anticipate that such quantitative integrative analysis may even be beneficial in a future revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification for CNS tumors, ultimately improving patient survival prospects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Mang
- Department of Mathematics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA;
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Department of Mathematics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA;
| | - Shashank Subramanian
- Oden Institute of Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA; ,
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA); Department of Radiology; and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA; ,
| | - George Biros
- Oden Institute of Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA; ,
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dou X, Yao H, Feng F, Wang P, Zhou B, Jin D, Yang Z, Li J, Zhao C, Wang L, An N, Liu B, Zhang X, Liu Y. Characterizing white matter connectivity in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: An automated fiber quantification analysis with two independent datasets. Cortex 2020; 129:390-405. [PMID: 32574842 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.03.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Revised: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive dementia. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has been widely used to show structural integrity and delineate white matter (WM) degeneration in AD. The automated fiber quantification (AFQ) method is a fully automated approach that can rapidly and reliably identify major WM fiber tracts and evaluate WM properties. The main aim of this study was to assess WM integrity and abnormities in a cohort of patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and AD as well as normal controls (NCs). For this purpose, we first used AFQ to identify 20 major WM tracts and assessed WM integrity and abnormalities in a cohort of 120 subjects (39 NCs, 34 aMCI patients and 47 AD patients) in a discovery dataset and 122 subjects (43 NCs, 37 aMCI patients and 42 AD patients) in a replicated dataset. Pointwise differences along WM tracts were identified in the discovery dataset and simultaneously confirmed in the replicated dataset. Next, we investigated the utility of DTI measures along WM tracts as features to distinguish patients with AD from NCs via multilevel cross validation using a support vector machine. Correlation analysis revealed the identified microstructural WM alterations and classification output to be highly associated with cognitive ability in the patient groups, suggesting that they may be a robust biomarker of AD. This systematic study provides a pipeline to examine WM integrity and its potential clinical application in AD and may be useful for studying other neurological and psychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuejiao Dou
- Brainnetome Center & National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
| | - Hongxiang Yao
- Department of Radiology, The Second Medical Centre, National Clinical Research Centre for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, China
| | - Feng Feng
- Department of Neurology, The Second Medical Centre, National Clinical Research Centre for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, China
| | - Pan Wang
- Department of Neurology, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, 300350, China; Department of Neurology, Nankai University Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Bo Zhou
- Department of Neurology, The Second Medical Centre, National Clinical Research Centre for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, China
| | - Dan Jin
- Brainnetome Center & National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
| | - Zhengyi Yang
- Brainnetome Center & National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jin Li
- Brainnetome Center & National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Cui Zhao
- Department of Neurology, The Second Medical Centre, National Clinical Research Centre for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, China
| | - Luning Wang
- Department of Neurology, The Second Medical Centre, National Clinical Research Centre for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, China
| | - Ningyu An
- Department of Radiology, The Second Medical Centre, National Clinical Research Centre for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, China
| | - Bing Liu
- Brainnetome Center & National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xi Zhang
- Department of Neurology, The Second Medical Centre, National Clinical Research Centre for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, China.
| | - Yong Liu
- Brainnetome Center & National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
El-Rashidy MA. An efficient methodology for discovering both of gene-environment interactions and gene-gene interactions causing genetic diseases. EGYPTIAN INFORMATICS JOURNAL 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eij.2019.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
18
|
Liu H, Li H, Habes M, Li Y, Boimel P, Janopaul-Naylor J, Xiao Y, Ben-Josef E, Fan Y. Robust Collaborative Clustering of Subjects and Radiomic Features for Cancer Prognosis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2020; 67:2735-2744. [PMID: 31995474 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2020.2969839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Feature dimensionality reduction plays an important role in radiomic studies with a large number of features. However, conventional radiomic approaches may suffer from noise, and feature dimensionality reduction techniques are not equipped to utilize latent supervision information of patient data under study, such as differences in patients, to learn discriminative low dimensional representations. To achieve robustness to noise and feature dimensionality reduction with improved discriminative power, we develop a robust collaborative clustering method to simultaneously cluster patients and radiomic features into distinct groups respectively under adaptive sparse regularization. Our method is built upon matrix tri-factorization enhanced by adaptive sparsity regularization for simultaneous feature dimensionality reduction and denoising. Particularly, latent grouping information of patients with distinct radiomic features is learned and utilized as supervision information to guide the feature dimensionality reduction, and noise in radiomic features is adaptively isolated in a Bayesian framework under a general assumption of Laplacian distributions of transform-domain coefficients. Experiments on synthetic data have demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed approach in data clustering, and evaluation results on an FDG-PET/CT dataset of rectal cancer patients have demonstrated that the proposed method outperforms alternative methods in terms of both patient stratification and prediction of patient clinical outcomes.
Collapse
|
19
|
Rudie JD, Weiss DA, Saluja R, Rauschecker AM, Wang J, Sugrue L, Bakas S, Colby JB. Multi-Disease Segmentation of Gliomas and White Matter Hyperintensities in the BraTS Data Using a 3D Convolutional Neural Network. Front Comput Neurosci 2019; 13:84. [PMID: 31920609 PMCID: PMC6933520 DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2019.00084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
An important challenge in segmenting real-world biomedical imaging data is the presence of multiple disease processes within individual subjects. Most adults above age 60 exhibit a variable degree of small vessel ischemic disease, as well as chronic infarcts, which will manifest as white matter hyperintensities (WMH) on brain MRIs. Subjects diagnosed with gliomas will also typically exhibit some degree of abnormal T2 signal due to WMH, rather than just due to tumor. We sought to develop a fully automated algorithm to distinguish and quantify these distinct disease processes within individual subjects’ brain MRIs. To address this multi-disease problem, we trained a 3D U-Net to distinguish between abnormal signal arising from tumors vs. WMH in the 3D multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI, i.e., native T1-weighted, T1-post-contrast, T2, T2-FLAIR) scans of the International Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) 2018 dataset (ntraining = 285, nvalidation = 66). Our trained neuroradiologist manually annotated WMH on the BraTS training subjects, finding that 69% of subjects had WMH. Our 3D U-Net model had a 4-channel 3D input patch (80 × 80 × 80) from mpMRI, four encoding and decoding layers, and an output of either four [background, active tumor (AT), necrotic core (NCR), peritumoral edematous/infiltrated tissue (ED)] or five classes (adding WMH as the fifth class). For both the four- and five-class output models, the median Dice for whole tumor (WT) extent (i.e., union of AT, ED, NCR) was 0.92 in both training and validation sets. Notably, the five-class model achieved significantly (p = 0.002) lower/better Hausdorff distances for WT extent in the training subjects. There was strong positive correlation between manually segmented and predicted volumes for WT (r = 0.96) and WMH (r = 0.89). Larger lesion volumes were positively correlated with higher/better Dice scores for WT (r = 0.33), WMH (r = 0.34), and across all lesions (r = 0.89) on a log(10) transformed scale. While the median Dice for WMH was 0.42 across training subjects with WMH, the median Dice was 0.62 for those with at least 5 cm3 of WMH. We anticipate the development of computational algorithms that are able to model multiple diseases within a single subject will be a critical step toward translating and integrating artificial intelligence systems into the heterogeneous real-world clinical workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey D Rudie
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - David A Weiss
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Rachit Saluja
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Andreas M Rauschecker
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Jiancong Wang
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Leo Sugrue
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - John B Colby
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gore JC. Artificial intelligence in medical imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 68:A1-A4. [PMID: 31857130 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The medical specialty radiology has experienced a number of extremely important and influential technical developments in the past that have affected how medical imaging is deployed. Artificial intelligence (AI) is potentially another such development that will introduce fundamental changes into the practice of radiology. In this commentary the historical evolution of some major changes in radiology are traced as background to how AI may also be embraced into practice. Potential new capabilities provided by AI offer exciting prospects for more efficient and effective use of medical images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John C Gore
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Schilling KG, Landman BA. AI in MRI: A case for grassroots deep learning. Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 64:1-3. [PMID: 31283972 PMCID: PMC8278255 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt G Schilling
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Bennett A Landman
- Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Electrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yan W, Calhoun V, Song M, Cui Y, Yan H, Liu S, Fan L, Zuo N, Yang Z, Xu K, Yan J, Lv L, Chen J, Chen Y, Guo H, Li P, Lu L, Wan P, Wang H, Wang H, Yang Y, Zhang H, Zhang D, Jiang T, Sui J. Discriminating schizophrenia using recurrent neural network applied on time courses of multi-site FMRI data. EBioMedicine 2019; 47:543-552. [PMID: 31420302 PMCID: PMC6796503 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2019] [Revised: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current fMRI-based classification approaches mostly use functional connectivity or spatial maps as input, instead of exploring the dynamic time courses directly, which does not leverage the full temporal information. METHODS Motivated by the ability of recurrent neural networks (RNN) in capturing dynamic information of time sequences, we propose a multi-scale RNN model, which enables classification between 558 schizophrenia and 542 healthy controls by using time courses of fMRI independent components (ICs) directly. To increase interpretability, we also propose a leave-one-IC-out looping strategy for estimating the top contributing ICs. FINDINGS Accuracies of 83·2% and 80·2% were obtained respectively for the multi-site pooling and leave-one-site-out transfer classification. Subsequently, dorsal striatum and cerebellum components contribute the top two group-discriminative time courses, which is true even when adopting different brain atlases to extract time series. INTERPRETATION This is the first attempt to apply a multi-scale RNN model directly on fMRI time courses for classification of mental disorders, and shows the potential for multi-scale RNN-based neuroimaging classifications. FUND: Natural Science Foundation of China, the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Institutes of Health Grants, National Science Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weizheng Yan
- National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition and Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Vince Calhoun
- Tri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS) Center, Atlanta 30303, GA, USA
| | - Ming Song
- National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition and Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Yue Cui
- National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition and Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Hao Yan
- Peking University Sixth Hospital, Institute of Mental Health, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Shengfeng Liu
- National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition and Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Lingzhong Fan
- National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition and Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Nianming Zuo
- National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition and Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Zhengyi Yang
- National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition and Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Kaibin Xu
- National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition and Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Jun Yan
- Peking University Sixth Hospital, Institute of Mental Health, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Luxian Lv
- Department of Psychiatry, Henan Mental Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453002, Henan, China; Henan Key Lab of Biological Psychiatry, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453002, Henan, China
| | - Jun Chen
- Department of Radiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, China
| | - Yunchun Chen
- Department of Psychiatry, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi, China
| | - Hua Guo
- Zhumadian Psychiatric Hospital, Zhumadian 463000, Henan, China
| | - Peng Li
- Peking University Sixth Hospital, Institute of Mental Health, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Lin Lu
- Peking University Sixth Hospital, Institute of Mental Health, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Ping Wan
- Zhumadian Psychiatric Hospital, Zhumadian 463000, Henan, China
| | - Huaning Wang
- Department of Psychiatry, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi, China
| | - Huiling Wang
- Department of Radiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, China
| | - Yongfeng Yang
- Department of Psychiatry, Henan Mental Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453002, Henan, China; Henan Key Lab of Biological Psychiatry, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453002, Henan, China; Key Laboratory for NeuroInformation of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, Sichuan, China
| | - Hongxing Zhang
- Department of Psychiatry, Henan Mental Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453002, Henan, China; Department of Psychology, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453002, Henan, China
| | - Dai Zhang
- Peking University Sixth Hospital, Institute of Mental Health, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China; Center for Life Sciences/PKU-IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Tianzi Jiang
- National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition and Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Key Laboratory for NeuroInformation of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, Sichuan, China; Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, QLD, Australia; CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
| | - Jing Sui
- National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition and Brainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
| |
Collapse
|