Pilot randomized controlled trial of functional electrical stimulation cycling exercise in people with multiple sclerosis with mobility disability

Functional electrical stimulation combined with voluntary cycling accentuates VO2 response in people with severe multiple sclerosis: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Lower limb muscle weakness and reduced balance due to disease progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) may make robust aerobic exercise difficult. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling combined with voluntary cycling may allow people with severe MS to enhance the intensity of aerobic exercise. The aim of this study was to investigate the cardiorespiratory, power, and participant-reported perceptions during acute bouts of FES cycling, voluntary cycling, and FES cycling combined with voluntary cycling (FES assist cycling).

METHODS

Participants with severe MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] ≥ 6.0) undertook three exercise trials on a leg cycle ergometer. Trial 1 involved 30 min of FES cycling; Trial 2 involved two 10-minute bouts of voluntary cycling separated by 10 min rest; and Trial 3 was a combination of trials 1 and 2 (FES assist cycling). Outcome measures included VO2 (volume of oxygen consumption), cycle power output, heart rate, RPE, and post-exercise perceptions of pain and fatigue.

RESULTS

Ten people with severe MS participated (9 female; age 52.4 ± 9.98 y; EDSS 7.1 ± 0.6). The average VO2 during the 30-minute trials was significantly higher for FES assist cycling compared to voluntary cycling (429.7 ± 111.0 vs 388.5 ± 101.0 mL/min, 95% CI 23.4 to 113.0 mL/min, p = 0.01), with a large effect size (Hedges' g = 1.04). Participants reported similar rates of perceived exertion at the end of FES cycling (13 ± 2), voluntary cycling (14 ± 2), and FES assist cycling (15 ± 1); p = 0.14. Self-reported pain was higher during both FES cycling (5.4 vs 0.3; 95% CI 3.4 to 6.7, p = 0.01, Hedges' g = 2.07) and FES assist cycling (4.2 vs. 0.3; 95% CI 2.3 to 5.5, p = 0.01, Hedges' g = 1.71) than voluntary cycling, both with large effect sizes. There was no difference in self-reported fatigue at the end of each trial (p = 0.21).

CONCLUSION

This study found FES assist cycling produced significantly higher VO2 values than voluntary cycling, although the clinical significance of these differences is unknown. Participants performed FES assist cycling at a self-reported RPE consistent with moderate to vigorous intensity, however it was considered light-intensity exercise when expressed by METS. FES assist cycling was no more fatiguing post-exercise than the other modes.

The effects of hybrid functional electrical stimulation interval training on aerobic fitness and fatigue in people with advanced multiple sclerosis: An exploratory pilot training study

BACKGROUND

Improving aerobic fitness in people with advanced multiple sclerosis (MS) may reduce fatigue, and lower the risk of cardiovascular disease, as has been found for people with mild to moderate MS. Training targeting aerobic fitness can be challenging due to paresis, access to suitable equipment and fatigue. The aim of this study was to investigate whether people with advanced multiple sclerosis could perform functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling combined with arm crank interval exercise (hybrid FES interval training) training, and its effects on aerobic fitness and fatigue.

METHODS

Hybrid FES interval training was performed 2 d/wk for 12 weeks. Each session consisted of 40 min of continuous FES cycling with arm crank intervals of 30 s work/30 s rest added concurrently for 20 min. The intensity target was a minimum of 60 % of arm crank power and 'hard' measured by rate of perceived exertion (RPE). Attendance, compliance to intensity and time targets, adverse events, and drop outs were measured. Aerobic fitness was assessed by an arm crank maximal test. Fatigue was measured via the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS).

RESULTS

Seven participants (6 female; age 57.1 ± 7.8y; Expanded Disability Status Scale 7.1 ± 0.8) with advanced MS attended 80 ± 10.4 % of the scheduled exercise sessions and there were no adverse events or drop outs. Average RPE at the end of each training session was 15.1 ± 2.1, representing vigorous intensity exercise. Aerobic fitness did not change pre- to post-intervention (14.2 ± 5.7 to 14.8 ± 6.0 mL/kg/min [p = 0.43]), and resulted in a small effect size (ES) (0.30). The reduction in fatigue during the intervention (31.0 ± 10.4 to 21.7 ± 11.4 [p = 0.10]), resulted in a moderate to large ES (-0.77).

CONCLUSION

Hybrid FES interval training could be performed 2 days per week for 12 weeks and represented vigorous intensity exercise, but there was no change in aerobic fitness. The reduction in participants' perceptions of fatigue represented a moderate to large ES, indicating hybrid FES interval training might be suitable for people with advanced MS who need exercise equipment appropriate for their condition.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered with Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (U1111-1194-2040).

The effect of lower back and lower-extremity kinesiology taping on static balance and physical function performance in people with multiple sclerosis: A pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) can lead to numerous deficits in body functions, including balance and mobility impairment. This study examined the effect of lower back and lower extremity kinesiology tape (KT) application on static balance and physical functioning performance in people with MS (pwMS) and compared that to a non-elastic tape.

METHODS

This pilot randomized study recruited and enrolled 10 participants with MS that were allocated into two groups: kinesio (n = 6) and non-elastic (n = 4) tape. Participants were assessed with and without the respective tape on static balance with eyes open and closed and various physical function tests.

RESULTS

Effect sizes for the Kinesio tape intervention were found to be small, while effect sizes for the sham tape/place condition varied from small to high. For both groups, the tendency was to reduce or maintain performance on the tests comparing tape and no tape. A subsequent, mixed-factor ANOVA revealed no significant difference between KT or sham tape/placebo.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that KT applied on lower back and lower extremity muscles does not seem to improve static balance and physical function performance in pwMS.

Lessons learned from clinical trials of exercise and physical activity in people with MS - guidance for improving the quality of future research

The body of research on exercise and physical activity among persons with multiple sclerosis(MS) has expanded rapidly in quantity, but not necessarily quality, over the past 20+ years. There is evidence for beneficial effects of exercise and physical activity on immune cells and neurotrophic factors, brain structure and function, walking and cognitive performance, fatigue, depression, and pain, and quality of life among persons with MS. Nevertheless, there is heterogeneity in the outcomes of exercise and physical activity, and a recognition of substantial challenges for improving the effectiveness of those behaviors in MS. To move the field forward, members of the National MS Society physical wellness research working-group pooled collective experiences for identifying challenges, logistic complexities, and opportunities for researchers in designing and conducting interventions of exercise and physical activity among persons with MS. We examined the scope of our experiences and identified collective "lessons learned" regarding the behaviors themselves; study design features and stage of research; study setting, safety, and sample selection; and implementation of randomized controlled trials(RCTs) and treatment fidelity. This paper provides a resource that can inform researchers, particularly new investigators or established investigators transitioning into MS, on conducting high-quality RCTs on exercise and physical activity in MS.

The effects of cycling using lower limb active passive trainers in people with neurological conditions: a systematic review

Background Active passive trainers are frequently used as a safe, feasible way for people with neurological disabilities to exercise. However, evidence regarding their efficacy is limited. The aim of this study was to review the literature investigating the effects of lower limb active passive trainer cycling, with or without functional electrical stimulation, on spasticity, cardiovascular fitness, function and quality of life in people with neurological conditions

Methods Five electronic databases were searched from inception to June 2021. Studies included: randomised controlled trials using lower limb active passive trainers as a cycling intervention; participants with neurological conditions, such as multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, stroke and Parkinson's disease; and at least one outcome related to spasticity, cardiovascular fitness, physical function or quality of life.

Results A total of 12 articles were included (n=423 participants, 52% male). Of these, six used functional electrical stimulation-assisted active passive trainer interventions, and the remaining six used active passive trainer interventions alone. A meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant improvement in walking endurance; however, this only included stroke studies (6-Minute Walk Test performance, P<0.00001). No statistically significant improvement in walking speed was found (P=0.31). A significant improvement in spasticity was reported by three studies (two using the active passive trainer intervention alone, one using the active passive trainer with functional electrical stimulation). One study reported improvement in quality of life. Few studies considered cardiovascular fitness.

Conclusions The included studies featured heterogeneous designs, outcome measures, exercise prescriptions and participant disability levels, which made comparison difficult. Active passive trainer interventions appear to improve walking endurance in people with stroke; however, the effect on other outcomes and in other conditions remains unclear. It also remains uncertain as to whether functional electrical stimulation-assisted cycling is more beneficial than active passive trainer cycling alone.

Exercise for Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Expert Consensus

Background: Neuropathic pain (NP), a severe and disruptive symptom following many diseases, normally restricts patients' physical functions and leads to anxiety and depression. As an economical and effective therapy, exercise may be helpful in NP management. However, few guidelines and reviews focused on exercise therapy for NP associated with specific diseases. The study aimed to summarize the effectiveness and efficacy of exercise for various diseases with NP supported by evidence, describe expert recommendations for NP from different causes, and inform policymakers of the guidelines.

Design: A systematic review and expert consensus.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed. We included systematic review and meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which assessed patients with NP. Studies involved exercise intervention and outcome included pain intensity at least. Physiotherapy Evidence Database and the Assessment of Multiple Systematic reviews tool were used to grade the quality assessment of the included RCTs and systematic reviews, respectively. The final grades of recommendation were based on strength of evidence and a consensus discussion of results of Delphi rounds by the Delphi consensus panel including 21 experts from the Chinese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine.

Results: Eight systematic reviews and 21 RCTs fulfilled all of the inclusion criteria and were included, which were used to create the 10 evidence-based consensus statements. The 10 expert recommendations regarding exercise for NP symptoms were relevant to the following 10 different diseases: spinal cord injury, stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, cervical radiculopathy, sciatica, diabetic neuropathy, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, HIV/AIDS, and surgery, respectively. The exercise recommended in the expert consensus involved but was not limited to muscle stretching, strengthening/resistance exercise, aerobic exercise, motor control/stabilization training and mind-body exercise (Tai Chi and yoga).

Conclusions: Based on the available evidence, exercise is helpful to alleviate NP intensity. Therefore, these expert consensuses recommend that proper exercise programs can be considered as an effective alternative treatment or complementary therapy for most patients with NP. The expert consensus provided medical staff and policymakers with applicable recommendations for the formulation of exercise prescription for NP. This consensus statement will require regular updates after five–ten years.

PILOT STUDY OF ENHANCING CARDIORESPIRATORY EXERCISE RESPONSE IN PEOPLE WITH ADVANCED MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS WITH HYBRID FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION

OBJECTIVE

To investigate through a pilot study the acute cardiorespiratory responses during functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling, arm cranking exercise (ACE) and a combination of ACE and FES cycling (Hybrid FES cycling) in people with advanced multiple sclerosis (MS) to provide preliminary guidance for effective aerobic exercise prescription.

DESIGN

Acute repeated measures.

SETTING

Laboratory setting.

PARTICIPANTS

Inclusion criteria was a diagnosis of MS, with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 6.0 to 8.5. Included were 9 participants (7 female, age 54.7 ± 8.8 years, EDSS 7.0 ± 7.2).

INTERVENTION

Participants were assessed on three different exercise modalities (FES cycling, ACE, Hybrid FES cycling) at 40%, 60%, 80% and 100% of mode-specific peak workload.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Oxygen consumption (VO₂) and heart rate (HR) were measured at each workload.

RESULTS

Hybrid FES cycling evoked a significantly higher VO_2relative (mL∙kg^-1∙min^-1) and HR (bpm) at most workloads as compared with ACE or FES cycling. At the 100% workload, HR for Hybrid FES cycling was 125 (113-148) bpm and was significantly higher than ACE at 99 (95-119) bpm (p=0.008) and FES cycling at 94 (79-100) bpm (p=0.008). Similarly, at the 100% workload, VO_2relative for Hybrid FES cycling was 11.8 (7.6-17.6) mL∙kg^-1∙min^-1 and was significantly higher than ACE at 8.9 (5.3-12.5) mL∙kg^-1∙min^-1 (p=0.012) and FES cycling at 6.8 (4.1-9.2) mL∙kg^-1∙min^-1 (p=0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study showed that Hybrid FES cycling can elicit a greater cardiorespiratory response compared to ACE or FES cycling in people with advanced MS. Thus, Hybrid FES cycling might provide a potent enough stimulus to induce clinically relevant changes in cardiorespiratory fitness. Training studies are warranted to document the magnitude and sustainability of aerobic capacity adaptations to Hybrid FES cycling and associated health outcomes in advanced MS.

Effect of Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling Exercise on Lower Limb Strength Asymmetry in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis

Background:

Lower limb strength asymmetry (ie, significant difference between contralateral limbs) has been associated with mobility impairment in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, whether an adaptive exercise modality can be used to modify lower limb strength and potentially improve mobility is unclear. The effect of functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling on lower limb strength asymmetry in persons with MS with mobility impairment was assessed, and the association between change in lower limb strength asymmetries and changes in functional and self-reported mobility outcomes was explored.

Methods:

Eight adults with MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale scores, 5.5–6.5) were included. Outcomes included knee extensor and knee flexor strength asymmetry, Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) test, 2-Minute Walk Test (2MWT), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12). Participants received 24 weeks (3 times per week) of FES cycling or passive leg cycling.

Results:

The FES condition demonstrated a small decrease in knee extensor (d = −0.33) and knee flexor (d = −0.23) strength asymmetry compared with passive leg cycling. With both groups combined, weak-to-strong associations were observed between change in knee extensor asymmetry and change in T25FW test time (rs = −0.43), 2MWT time (rs = −0.24), TUG test time (rs = 0.55), and MSWS-12 score (rs = 0.43). Moderate correlations were observed between change in knee flexor asymmetry and change in T25FW test time (rs = −0.31), TUG test time (rs = 0.33), and MSWS-12 score (rs = 0.35).

Conclusions:

FES cycling may be an efficacious exercise modality for reducing lower limb strength asymmetry and improving mobility in persons with MS.

Dosage and Effectiveness of Aerobic Training on Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Functional Capacity, Balance, and Fatigue in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits of aerobic training (AT) programs on cardiorespiratory fitness, functional capacity, balance, and fatigue in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) and to identify the optimal dosage of AT programs for individuals with MS via a systematic review with meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Two electronic databases were searched until March 2020 (PubMed-Medline and Web of Science).

STUDY SELECTION

Studies examining the effect of AT program on cardiorespiratory fitness, functional capacity, balance, and fatigue were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we included 43 studies. A total sample of 1070 individuals with MS (AT group, n=680; control group, n=390) were analyzed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The AT group demonstrated a significant increase in cardiorespiratory fitness (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.29; P=.002), functional capacity (timed Up and Go Test: SMD, -1.14; P<.001; gait speed: SMD, -1.19; P<.001; walking endurance: SMD, 0.46; P<.001), and balance (SMD, 3.49; P<.001) after training. Fatigue perception also decreased (SMD, -0.45; P<.001). However, no significant differences were observed when compared with the control group in either cardiorespiratory fitness (SMD, 0.14; P=.19) or fatigue perception. Nevertheless, we observed significant differences between the AT and control groups in balance (P=.02), gait speed (P=.02), and walking endurance (P=.03), favoring the participants who performed AT. Regarding the subgroup analysis, no significant differences were observed between subgroups in any of the variables studied except for gait speed, for which a greater increase in posttraining was observed when the AT program applied the continuous method (χ²=7.75; P=.005) and the exercises were performed by walking (χ²=9.36; P=.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Aerobic training improves gait speed, walking endurance, and balance. Cardiorespiratory fitness and fatigue perception also improved after AT, but we found no differences with the control group. In addition, subgroup analysis suggested that training using continuous and walking methods could optimize gait speed.

Functional electrical stimulation cycling, goal-directed training, and adapted cycling for children with cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial

AIM

To test the efficacy of functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling, goal-directed training, and adapted cycling, compared with usual care, to improve function in children with cerebral palsy (CP).

METHOD

The intervention was delivered between 2017 and 2019 and included three sessions per week for 8 weeks (2×1h sessions at a children's hospital, and 1h home programme/week). Hospital sessions included 30 minutes of FES cycling and 30 minutes of goal-directed training. Home programmes included goal-directed training and adapted cycling. The comparison group continued usual care. Primary outcomes were gross motor function assessed by the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) and goal performance/satisfaction assessed using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Secondary outcomes were sit-to-stand and activity capacity, participation in home, school, and community activities, and power output. Linear regression was used to determine the between-group mean difference immediately post-training completion after adjusting for baseline scores.

RESULTS

This randomized controlled trial included 21 participants (mean age=10y 3mo, standard deviation [SD]=3y; Gross Motor Function Classification System level: II=7, III=6, IV=8) who were randomized to the intervention (n=11) or usual care group (n=10). Between-group differences at T2 favoured the intervention group for GMFM-88 (mean difference=7.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3-12.6; p=0.007), GMFM-66 (mean difference=5.9; 95% CI: 3.1-8.8; p<0.001), COPM performance (mean difference=4.4; 95% CI: 3.9-5.3; p<0.001) and satisfaction (mean difference=5.2; 95% CI: 4.0-6.4; p<0.001).

INTERPRETATION

Children with CP achieved meaningful functional improvements after FES cycling, goal-directed training, and adapted cycling training. Cycling programmes for children with CP should be individualized and goal directed.

Effects of Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling on Fatigue and Quality of Life in People with Multiple Sclerosis Who Are Nonambulatory

BACKGROUND

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling provides an exercise opportunity for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) who are nonambulatory. This study evaluated the efficacy of FES cycling for reducing fatigue and improving quality of life in people with MS who are nonambulatory and compared outcomes with those in a control group that did not take part in FES cycling.

METHODS

Adults with MS with self-reported Expanded Disability Status Scale scores of 7.0 to 8.5 were randomized into a training group (n = 12) or a control group (n = 9). The training group performed FES cycling for 30 minutes, two to three times a week for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was safety, measured as the number and type of adverse events and any increase in symptoms. Other outcomes collected before and after the intervention were scores on the modified Ashworth Scale, manual muscle test, 5-item Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS-5), Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (FSMC), Medical Outcomes Study Pain Effects Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 (MSQOL-54), and Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale.

RESULTS

Twelve participants completed the study and were analyzed. Six participants completed training with no adverse events. The MFIS-5 (Cohen's d = 0.60), FSMC (Cohen's d = 0.37), and PHQ-9 (Cohen's d = 0.67) scores and the physical health composite of the MSQOL-54 (Cohen's d = 1.48) improved for the training group compared with the control group (n = 6).

CONCLUSIONS

Functional electrical stimulation cycling is safe for people with MS who are nonambulatory and may reduce fatigue and improve measurements of quality of life.

Safety and Feasibility of Various Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling Protocols in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis Who Are Nonambulatory

Objective

To examine the safety, feasibility, and response to functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling protocols requiring differing levels of effort in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) who are nonambulatory.

Design

Pilot study with pre-post intervention testing.

Setting

Outpatient clinic setting of a long-term acute care hospital.

Participants

Individuals (N=10) with MS (6 men; mean age 58.6±9.86y) who use a wheelchair for community mobility. Participants’ Expanded Disability Status Scale score ranged from 6.5 to 8.5 (median 7.5).

Intervention

Participants performed 3 or 4 FES cycling protocols requiring different levels of volitional effort during 6-8 testing sessions.

Main Outcome Measures

The primary outcome was safety, measured by adverse events and increase in MS symptoms, all assessed throughout, immediately post- and 1 day postsession. FES cycling performance for each protocol was also recorded. Exploratory outcome measures collected before and after all testing sessions included functional assessment of MS, MS Impact Scale, Exercise Self Efficacy Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 item, and the Zarit Caregiver Burden Scale.

Results

All participants (4 women, 6 men) completed all testing sessions. There were no serious adverse events or differences in vitals or symptoms between protocols. Two participants had an isolated episode of mild hypotension. Changes in pain, spasticity, and fatigue were minimal. Five participants were able to cycle for 30 minutes and completed interval training protocols requiring increasing difficulty. The remainder cycled for <3 minutes and completed a rest interval protocol. There was modest improvement on the exploratory outcome measures.

Conclusions

People with MS who use a wheelchair for community mobility can safely perform FES cycling requiring more effort than previously reported research. Therefore, the individuals may experience greater benefits than previously reported. Further study is required to better understand the potential benefits for optimizing function and improving health in people with MS.

•

People with multiple sclerosis who are nonambulatory can safely perform functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling using parameters requiring more effort.

•

FES cycling may offer an opportunity for increased exercise stimulus or neuromuscular training if individuals are adequately challenged using an appropriate cycling protocol.

Electrical Stimulation of Muscle: Electrophysiology and Rehabilitation

The generation of action potentials in intramuscular motor and sensory axons in response to an imposed external current source can evoke muscle contractions and elicit widespread responses throughout the nervous system that impact sensorimotor function. The benefits experienced by individuals exposed to several weeks of treatment with electrical stimulation of muscle suggest that the underlying adaptations involve several physiological systems, but little is known about the specific changes elicited by such interventions.

Accessible exercise equipment and individuals with multiple sclerosis: Aerobic demands and preferences

BACKGROUND

Although exercise training has benefits for individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS), research regarding the type of exercise equipment that requires the greatest aerobic demand, and consumer-based preferences, is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the aerobic demands of various pieces of accessible exercise equipment and consumer-based preferences on several domains.

METHODS

Ten individuals with moderate-severity MS had their VO2 measured during 10 minutes of moderate-intensity arm ergometry (AE), body-weight support treadmill training (BWSTT), recumbent arm-leg exercise (NuStep), FES-arm exercise (RT300), FES-leg exercise (RT300) and FES arm-leg exercise (RT200). VO2peak test was also measured on the NuStep and the RT200. Equipment preferences were determined by questionnaire after moderate exercise sessions.

RESULTS

AE required a lower VO2 compared to the NuStep (p = 0.02), and FES-arm exercise required a lower VO2 compared to the NuStep (p = 0.01) and FES arm-leg exercise (p = 0.04). There was no difference in VO2peak when using the NuStep or FES arm-leg exercise. AE was perceived as safer than BWSTT, but otherwise there were no preferences for any equipment.

CONCLUSIONS

For individuals with moderate-severity MS, arm-only exercise requires less aerobic demands than combined arm-leg exercise at a moderate intensity. Perceived risks may be greater when exercise requires a transfer, upright positioning, or assistance.

Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling Exercise for People with Multiple Sclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There has been substantial interest in the role of exercise for managing impairments, limitations, and disability progression among persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). Despite established benefits of exercise training for persons who have mild-to-moderate MS, the ability to deliver exercise to persons who experience higher disability remains challenging. One promising approach for exercise in this population is functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling. This review provides a summary of the current evidence for FES cycling as an exercise training modality in persons with MS with respect to prescription, safety, tolerability, and acute and chronic effects.

RECENT FINDINGS

We searched the literature for studies involving FES cycling exercise in persons with MS published in English up until July 2019. Eight studies were retrieved: two studies examined acute effects, two studies examined chronic effects, and four studies reported on both acute and chronic effects of FES cycling exercise. The overall quality of the studies was low, with only one, small, randomized controlled trial (RCT). There is limited but promising evidence for the application of FES cycling exercise among persons with MS who have moderate-to-severe disability. Participants were capable of engaging in regular FES cycling exercise (~ 30 min, 2-3×/week), with few, mild adverse events experienced. Preliminary evidence from small, mostly uncontrolled trials supports the potential benefits of FES cycling on physiological fitness, walking mobility, and symptoms of fatigue and pain. High-quality RCTs of FES cycling exercise are necessary for providing recommendations for integrating exercise training in the management of advanced MS.

Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling Exercise in People with Multiple Sclerosis: Secondary Effects on Cognition, Symptoms, and Quality of Life

BACKGROUND

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling is an advanced rehabilitation modality that involves systematic mild electrical stimulation of focal muscle groups to produce leg cycling movement against an adjustable work rate. The present study reports on the efficacy of an assessor-blinded, pilot randomized controlled trial of supervised FES cycling exercise in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) on secondary trial outcomes, including cognition, fatigue, pain, and health-related quality of life.

METHODS

Eleven adult participants with MS were randomized to receive FES cycling exercise (n = 6) or passive leg cycling (n = 5) for 24 weeks. Cognitive processing speed was assessed using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Symptoms of fatigue and pain were assessed using the Fatigue Severity Scale, the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, and the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Physical and psychological health-related quality of life were assessed using the 29-item Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale.

RESULTS

Eight participants (four, FES; four, passive leg cycling) completed the intervention and outcome assessments. The FES cycling exercise resulted in moderate-to-large improvements in cognitive processing speed (d = 0.53), fatigue severity (d = -0.92), fatigue impact (d = -0.45 to -0.68), and pain symptoms (d = -0.67). The effect of the intervention on cognitive performance resulted in a clinically meaningful change, based on established criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide preliminary evidence for the benefits of FES cycling exercise on cognition and symptoms of fatigue and pain. Appropriately powered randomized controlled trials of FES cycling exercise are necessary to determine its efficacy for people with MS.

Evaluating functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling on cardiovascular, musculoskeletal and functional outcomes in adults with multiple sclerosis and mobility impairment: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

People with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) are at an increased risk of diseases associated with low levels of physical activity (PA). Deconditioning may lead to an acceleration in the development of secondary complications from MS, impairing physical function and exacerbating disease progression. Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) Cycling may provide a suitable lower limb exercise intervention for PwMS with mobility impairment. The effects of FES cycling on cardiovascular, musculoskeletal and functional outcomes for PwMS with mobility impairment are yet to be investigated to date.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to systematically examine the outcomes of PwMS with mobility impairment following FES cycling intervention.

METHODS

A systematic search of four electronic databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL and PEDro) from their inception to 8th January 2019 was performed. Inclusion criteria was (1) include human participants with definite diagnosis of MS (2) participants had to be aged 18 years or older (3) include participants with mobility impairment (determined as an average participant EDSS ≥ 6.0) (4) evaluate FES cycling as an intervention study.

RESULTS

Initial searches found 1163 studies. 9 of which met the full inclusion criteria: 5 pre-post studies with no control group, 2 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 1 retrospective study and 1 case study. Two studies had the same participant group and intervention but reported different outcomes. Outcome data was available for n = =76 unique participants, with n = =82 completing a FES cycling intervention. Of the n = =4 papers with clear dropout rates, pooled dropout rate was 25.81%. Two papers reported non-significant improvements in aerobic capacity following a FES cycling intervention. Four papers reported no change in lower limb strength and two papers reported significant reductions in spasticity post training. Four studies failed to provide information regarding adverse events with the other studies reporting n = =10 adverse events across 36 participants.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest FES cycle training may reduce CVD risk alongside trends for a reduction in spasticity post training, however the low quality of the literature precludes any definitive conclusions. FES cycle training appears to be well tolerated in PwMS with mobility impairment, with no serious adverse events.

The Role of Wearable Devices in Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common neurological disorder in young adults. The prevalence of walking impairment in people with MS (pwMS) is estimated between 41% and 75%. To evaluate the walking capacity in pwMS, the patient reported outcomes (PROs) and performance-based tests (i.e., the 2-minute walk test, the 6-minute walk test, the Timed 25-Foot Walk Test, the Timed Up and Go Test, and the Six Spot Step Test) could be used. However, some studies point out that the results of both performance-based tests and objective measures (i.e., by accelerometer) could not reflect patient reports of walking performance and impact of MS on daily life. This review analyses different motion sensors embedded in smartphones and motion wearable device (MWD) that can be useful to measure free-living walking behavior, to evaluate falls, fatigue, sedentary lifestyle, exercise, and quality of sleep in everyday life of pwMS. Caveats and limitations of MWD such as variable accuracy, user adherence, power consumption and recharging, noise susceptibility, and data management are discussed as well.