Herpes simplex virus encephalitis temporally associated with dimethyl fumarate-induced lymphopenia in a multiple sclerosis patient

Reactivation of Herpes Zoster in a Young Patient With Multiple Sclerosis Under Dimethyl Fumarate Treatment and Normal Lymphocyte Subsets Count: A Case Report

Herpes zoster (HZ) infection results from the reactivation of the varicella-zoster virus (VZV), which remains dormant in the dorsal root ganglia after an initial chickenpox infection. Although HZ appears more common in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) than expected in the general population, few studies have investigated this association, particularly with a normal absolute lymphocyte count (ALC). Additionally, no reported cases have discussed the clinical presentation of such patients. This report describes the case of a 26-year-old female with a known history of relapsing-remitting MS on dimethyl fumarate (DMF) treatment. She presented with a history of painful erythematous blisters, diagnosed as acute HZ infection with a normal ALC. This case provides evidence that warrants further research and attention to the management of patients with MS receiving DMF, particularly regarding infectious risks. It highlights the importance of pharmacovigilance and the potential benefits of VZV and HZ immunization in DMF recipients.

Clinical use of dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis treatment: an update to include China, using a modified Delphi method

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is a widely used oral disease-modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis (MS). Its efficacy and safety profiles are supported by over a decade of experience. Differences exist between Asia and Europe/United States in the prevalence and characteristics of MS; most data for DMF are derived from populations outside Asia. DMF was recently (2021) approved for use in China. The objectives of this review were to evaluate the evidence for DMF's profile, to provide an update to healthcare providers on current knowledge surrounding its use and to assess the relevance of existing data to use in China. This study used a modified Delphi method based on the insights of a scientific Steering Committee (SC), with a structured literature review conducted to assess the data of DMF. The literature review covered all papers in English (from 01 January 2011 to 21 February 2022) that include 'dimethyl fumarate' and 'multiple sclerosis', and their MeSH terms, on PubMed, supplemented by EMBASE and Citeline searches. Papers were categorized by topic and assessed for relevance and quality, before being used to formulate statements summarizing the literature on each subject. SC members voted on/revised statements, requiring ⩾80% agreement and ⩽10% disagreement for inclusion. Statements not reaching this level were discussed further until agreement was reached or until there was agreement to remove the statement. A total of 1030 papers were retrieved and used to formulate the statements and evidence summaries considered by the SC members. A total of 45 statements were agreed by the SC members. The findings support the positive efficacy and safety profile of DMF in treating patients with MS. Limited Chinese patient data are an ongoing consideration; however, based on current evidence, the statements are considered applicable to both the global and Chinese populations. DMF is a valuable addition to address unmet MS treatment needs in China. Registration: Not applicable.

Investigation of Neurological Complications after COVID-19 Vaccination: Report of the Clinical Scenarios and Review of the Literature

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), broke out in 2019 and became a pandemic in 2020. Since then, vaccines have been approved to prevent severe illness. However, vaccines are associated with the risk of neurological complications ranging from mild to severe. Severe complications such as vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) associated with acute ischaemic stroke have been reported as rare complications post-COVID-19 vaccination. During the pandemic era, VITT evaluation is needed in cases with a history of vaccination within the last month prior to the event. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) should be suspected in patients following immunization with persistent headaches who are unresponsive to analgesics. In this article, we investigated neurological complications after COVID-19 vaccination and provided more subsequent related clinical studies of accurate diagnosis, pathophysiological mechanisms, incidence, outcome, and management.

Lymphopenia during treatment with dimethyl fumarate in patients with multiple sclerosis: Prevalence, predicting factors and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Lymphopenia is a common side effect of treatment with dimethyl fumarate (DMF) in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Prevalence and predictive factors of this side effect are still uncertain, because literature has provided discrepant results and it is still a matter of debate if lymphopenia is associated with a better treatment outcome.

METHODS

We retrospectively recruited PwMS treated for at least one month with DMF and collected clinical, demographic data and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) during follow-up. Lymphopenia was graded according to CTCAE. Patients according to the grade in lymphopenia (all grades) and severe lymphopenia (grade II-IV). To evaluate predictors of lymphopenia, we compared characteristics of patients with/without lymphopenia and patients with/without severe lymphopenia. A logistic binary regression was performed to elucidate any predictive factor of lymphopenia and severe lymphopenia. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate sensibility and specificity of predictors. We analyzed treatment outcome with NEDA-3 status at 1- and 2-years.

RESULTS

98 of 105 patients treated with DMF were included. 46.9% developed lymphopenia, 27.6% severe lymphopenia. Lymphopenia was associated with basal ALC (p<0.001, AUC=0.786), treatment duration (p = 0.01, AUC=0.685),% of reduction at third month (p = 0.001, AUC=0.616) Severe lymphopenia was associated with basal ALC (p = 0.003, AUC=0.750).NEDA-3 status at 1-year (n = 66) and at 2-year (n = 44) did not differ in patients with/without lymphopenia (p = 0.059; p = 0.583) or with/without severe lymphopenia (p = 1.02; p = 0.169).

CONCLUSION

Lymphopenia is a common side effect of DMF and basal ALC predicts its development. Lymphopenia is not associated with the achievement of NEDA-3 status.

Herpes Simplex Virus Meningoencephalitis Following Pulse-Dose Methylprednisolone: A Case Report and Literature Review

Patient: Male, 76-year-old

Final Diagnosis: Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) encephalitis

Symptoms: Encephalopathy

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: Lumbar puncture

Specialty: Critical Care Medicine

The Role of Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle Metabolites in Viral Infections

Host cell metabolism is essential for the viral replication cycle and, therefore, for productive infection. Energy (ATP) is required for the receptor-mediated attachment of viral particles to susceptible cells and for their entry into the cytoplasm. Host cells must synthesize an array of biomolecules and engage in intracellular trafficking processes to enable viruses to complete their replication cycle. The tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle has a key role in ATP production as well as in the synthesis of the biomolecules needed for viral replication. The final assembly and budding process of enveloped viruses, for instance, require lipids, and the TCA cycle provides the precursor (citrate) for fatty acid synthesis (FAS). Viral infections may induce host inflammation and TCA cycle metabolic intermediates participate in this process, notably citrate and succinate. On the other hand, viral infections may promote the synthesis of itaconate from TCA cis-aconitate. Itaconate harbors anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, and anti-microbial properties. Fumarate is another TCA cycle intermediate with immunoregulatory properties, and its derivatives such as dimethyl fumarate (DMF) are therapeutic candidates for the contention of virus-induced hyper-inflammation and oxidative stress. The TCA cycle is at the core of viral infection and replication as well as viral pathogenesis and anti-viral immunity. This review highlights the role of the TCA cycle in viral infections and explores recent advances in the fast-moving field of virometabolism.

Lymphopenia Caused by Virus Infections and the Mechanisms Beyond

Viral infections can give rise to a systemic decrease in the total number of lymphocytes in the blood, referred to as lymphopenia. Lymphopenia may affect the host adaptive immune responses and impact the clinical course of acute viral infections. Detailed knowledge on how viruses induce lymphopenia would provide valuable information into the pathogenesis of viral infections and potential therapeutic targeting. In this review, the current progress of viruses-induced lymphopenia is summarized and the potential mechanisms and factors involved are discussed.

Infection Mitigation Strategies for Multiple Sclerosis Patients on Oral and Monoclonal Disease-Modifying Therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The newer, higher-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS)-orals and monoclonals-have more profound immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive properties than the older, injectable therapies and require risk mitigation strategies to reduce the risk of serious infections. This review will provide a systematic framework for infectious risk mitigation strategies relevant to these therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

We classify risk mitigation strategies according to the following framework: (1) screening and patient selection, (2) vaccinations, (3) antibiotic prophylaxis, (4) laboratory and MRI monitoring, (5) adjusting dose and frequency of DMT, and (6) behavioral modifications to limit the risk of infection. We systematically apply this framework to the infections for which risk mitigations are available: hepatitis B, herpetic infections, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, and tuberculosis. We also discuss up-to-date recommendations regarding COVID-19 vaccinations for patients on DMTs. We offer a practical, comprehensive, DMT-specific framework of derisking strategies designed to minimize the risk of infections associated with the newer MS therapies.

Pharmacovigilance during treatment of multiple sclerosis: early recognition of CNS complications

An increasing number of highly effective disease-modifying therapies for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) have recently gained marketing approval. While the beneficial effects of these drugs in terms of clinical and imaging outcome measures is welcomed, these therapeutics are associated with substance-specific or group-specific adverse events that include severe and fatal complications. These adverse events comprise both infectious and non-infectious complications that can occur within, or outside of the central nervous system (CNS). Awareness and risk assessment strategies thus require interdisciplinary management, and robust clinical and paraclinical surveillance strategies. In this review, we discuss the current role of MRI in safety monitoring during pharmacovigilance of patients treated with (selective) immune suppressive therapies for MS. MRI, particularly brain MRI, has a pivotal role in the early diagnosis of CNS complications that potentially are severely debilitating and may even be lethal. Early recognition of such CNS complications may improve functional outcome and survival, and thus knowledge on MRI features of treatment-associated complications is of paramount importance to MS clinicians, but also of relevance to general neurologists and radiologists.

Lower lymphocyte counts and older age are associated with reduced multiple sclerosis disease activity during dimethyl fumarate treatment

BACKGROUND

delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is a disease modifying therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. The drug causes lymphocyte count reduction, which can lead to lymphopenia development during treatment. This is an important safety issue, due to infectious risk, mainly progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). If the lymphocyte count influences the response to treatment is still a matter of debate, as there are contrasting contrasting data in the literature. Considering this, we aimed to identify DMF induced lymphopenia risk factors and to evaluate lymphopenia impact on MS disease activity in a real world setting.

METHODS

a retrospective study on 135 MS patients receiving DMF with a mean treatment duration of 32.3±15.9 months was performed. Baseline and follow-up demographic, clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and laboratory data were collected.

RESULTS

44 patients (32.6%) developed lymphopenia, with 11 (8.1%) grade 1, 23 (17.0%) grade 2 and 10 (7.4 %) grade 3. Older age and lower basal absolute lymphocyte count were found to be associated with lymphopenia development on a binary regression model (p<0.001 and p=0.009). When compared with non lymphopenic+lymphopenia grade 1 patients, those experiencing lymphopenia grade 2+3 had longer disease activity free survival (p<0.001), fewer clinical relapses (p=0.005) and lower MRI disease activity (p≤0.001). On Cox regression model, older age and lymphopenia grade 2+3 were found to be protective factors against disease activity (HR=0.966; 95% C.I.=0.942-0.992; p=0.009 for age; HR=0.137; 95% C.I.=0.043-0.439; p=0.001 for lymphopenia grade 2+3) and MRI disease activity (HR=0.968; 95% C.I.=0.941-0.997; p=0.030 for age; HR=0.142; 95% C.I.=0.034-0.591; p=0.007 for lymphopenia grade 2+3). Only lymphopenia grade 2+3 was found to be a predictor of clinical relapses (HR=0.970; 95% C.I.=0.936-1.005; p=0.095 for age; HR=0.115; 95% C.I.=0.016-0.854; p=0.034 for lymphopenia grade 2+3), with a protective effect.

CONCLUSION

older age and lower basal lymphocyte count were found to be associated with lymphopenia development. Lymphopenia grade 2+3 and older age could be protective against clinical and radiologic disease activity during DMF treatment.

Dimethyl fumarate induced lymphopenia in multiple sclerosis: A review of the literature

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is a first line medication for multiple sclerosis. It has a favourable safety profile, however, there is concern regarding the occurrence of moderate-severe and sustained lymphopenia and the associated risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. We carried out an extensive literature review to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying this adverse reaction. Dynamic changes in certain components of the immune system are likely to be important for the therapeutic effects of DMF, including depletion of memory T cells and decrease in activated T cells together with expansion of naïve T cells. Similar modifications were reported for the B cell components. CD8⁺ T cells are particularly susceptible to DMF-induced cell death, with marked reductions observed in lymphopenic subjects. The reasons underlying such increased sensitivity are not known, nor it is known how expansion of other lymphocyte subsets occurs. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying DMF action is challenging: in vivo DMF is rapidly metabolized to monomethyl fumarate (MMF), a less potent immunomodulator in vitro. Pharmacokinetics indicate that MMF is the main active species in vivo. However, the relative importance of DMF and MMF in toxicity remains unclear, with evidence presented in favour of either of the compounds as toxic species. Pharmacogenetic studies to identify genetic predictors of DMF-induced lymphopenia are limited, with inconclusive results. A role of the gut microbiome in the pharmacological effects of DMF is emerging. It is clear that further investigations are necessary to understand the mechanisms of DMF-induced lymphopenia and devise preventive strategies. Periodic monitoring of absolute lymphocyte counts, currently performed in clinical practise, allows for the early detection of lymphopenia as a risk-minimization strategy.

The underpinning biology relating to multiple sclerosis disease modifying treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

SARS-CoV-2 viral infection causes COVID-19 that can result in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which can cause significant mortality, leading to concern that immunosuppressive treatments for multiple sclerosis and other disorders have significant risks for both infection and ARDS.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the biology that potentially underpins immunity to the SARS-Cov-2 virus and the immunity-induced pathology related to COVID-19 and determine how this impinges on the use of current disease modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis.

OBSERVATIONS

Although information about the mechanisms of immunity are scant, it appears that monocyte/macrophages and then CD8 T cells are important in eliminating the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This may be facilitated via anti-viral antibody responses that may prevent re-infection. However, viral escape and infection of leucocytes to promote lymphopenia, apparent CD8 T cell exhaustion coupled with a cytokine storm and vascular pathology appears to contribute to the damage in ARDS.

IMPLICATIONS

In contrast to ablative haematopoietic stem cell therapy, most multiple-sclerosis-related disease modifying therapies do not particularly target the innate immune system and few have any major long-term impact on CD8 T cells to limit protection against COVID-19. In addition, few block the formation of immature B cells within lymphoid tissue that will provide antibody-mediated protection from (re)infection. However, adjustments to dosing schedules may help de-risk the chance of infection further and reduce the concerns of people with MS being treated during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Neurological immunotherapy in the era of COVID-19 - looking for consensus in the literature

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is concerning for patients with neuroimmunological diseases who are receiving immunotherapy. Uncertainty remains about whether immunotherapies increase the risk of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or increase the risk of severe disease and death upon infection. National and international societies have developed guidelines and statements, but consensus does not exist in several areas. In this Review, we attempt to clarify where consensus exists and where uncertainty remains to inform management approaches based on the first principles of neuroimmunology. We identified key questions that have been addressed in the literature and collated the recommendations to generate a consensus calculation in a Delphi-like approach to summarize the information. We summarize the international recommendations, discuss them in light of the first available data from patients with COVID-19 receiving immunotherapy and provide an overview of management approaches in the COVID-19 era. We stress the principles of medicine in general and neuroimmunology in particular because, although the risk of viral infection has become more relevant, most of the considerations apply to the general management of neurological immunotherapy. We also give special consideration to immunosuppressive treatment and cell-depleting therapies that might increase susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection but reduce the risk of severe COVID-19.

In this Review, the authors synthesize recommendations on the management of neuroimmunological disease in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. They consider these recommendations alongside the first available data from patients, and provide an overview of management approaches in the COVID-19 era.

The risk that the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses for people who are receiving immunotherapy for neuroimmunological disease remains unclear.

Guidelines and statements have been published by societies and individuals, but the level of consensus differs for different aspects; we use a Delphi-like process to clarify where consensus exists.

Without evidence, management of neuroimmunological diseases in the context of COVID-19 requires application of the first principles of immunotherapy, taking into account disease-related, patient-related, physician-related, environment-related and COVID-19-related factors.

In general, corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin and/or plasma exchange for the treatment of acute neuroimmunological deteriorations can be administered with low risk in the COVID-19 pandemic.

In general, ongoing immunotherapy should not be stopped because of the COVID-19 pandemic; treatment initiation and optimization are also recommended.

For some aspects of immunotherapy in the context of COVID-19, consensus in the literature is low, and collection of data in patient registries is important for resolving these uncertainties.

Role of Viruses in the Pathogenesis of Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune inflammatory disease, where the underlying etiological cause remains elusive. Multiple triggering factors have been suggested, including environmental, genetic and gender components. However, underlying infectious triggers to the disease are also suspected. There is an increasing abundance of evidence supporting a viral etiology to MS, including the efficacy of interferon therapy and over-detection of viral antibodies and nucleic acids when compared with healthy patients. Several viruses have been proposed as potential triggering agents, including Epstein-Barr virus, human herpesvirus 6, varicella-zoster virus, cytomegalovirus, John Cunningham virus and human endogenous retroviruses. These viruses are all near ubiquitous and have a high prevalence in adult populations (or in the case of the retroviruses are actually part of the genome). They can establish lifelong infections with periods of reactivation, which may be linked to the relapsing nature of MS. In this review, the evidence for a role for viral infection in MS will be discussed with an emphasis on immune system activation related to MS disease pathogenesis.

Fingolimod and Dimethyl-Fumarate-Derived Lymphopenia is not Associated with Short-Term Treatment Response and Risk of Infections in a Real-Life MS Population

BACKGROUND

The association between treatment-related lymphopenia in multiple sclerosis, drug efficacy and the risk of infections is not yet fully understood.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess whether lymphopenia is associated with short-term treatment response and infection rate in a real-life multiple sclerosis population treated with fingolimod and dimethyl-fumarate. We assessed the associations between baseline absolute lymphocyte count and the lymphocyte mean percentage decrease at 6 and 12 months with treatment response and the occurrence of adverse events over 12 months in the entire cohort of patients and in the two treatment groups separately.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational real-world study of patients with multiple sclerosis treated with fingolimod and dimethyl-fumarate at the MS Center of the University of Genoa between 2011 and 2018. Patients with at least 12 months of follow-up were eligible if [1] they had an Expanded Disability Status Scale assessment at baseline and 12 months after treatment onset, [2] they had undergone brain magnetic resonance imaging at baseline and after 12 months, and [3] absolute lymphocyte counts were available at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Patients shifting from dimethyl-fumarate to fingolimod or vice versa were excluded from the analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 137 and 75 patients treated with fingolimod and dimethyl-fumarate, respectively, were included in the analysis. At 12 months, fingolimod-treated patients were more likely to experience grade II and grade III lymphopenia compared with dimethyl-fumarate patients (p < 0.001, χ2 = 94) and had a higher lymphocyte mean percentage decrease (p < 0.001, U = 540). A higher number of previous therapies and a lower baseline absolute lymphocyte count were predictors of lymphopenia at 6 months (p = 0.047, odds ratio = 1.60 and p = 0.014, odds ratio = 1.1) and 12 months (p = 0.003, odds ratio = 1.97 and p = 0.023, odds ratio = 1.1). In fingolimod-treated patients only, female sex and a higher Expanded Disability Status Scale score were predictors of lymphopenia at 12 months (p = 0.006, odds ratio = 7.58 and p = 0.03, odds ratio = 1.56). Neither absolute lymphocyte count at 6 and 12 months nor the mean percentage decrease at 6 and 12 months predicted No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-3) status at 1 year, the occurrence of relapses, disease activity on MRI or disability progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that peripheral blood lymphocyte changes are not associated with short-term treatment response and with the rate of infections during fingolimod and dimethyl-fumarate treatment in real-world patients. Higher treatment exposure and a lower baseline absolute lymphocyte count are risk factors for lymphopenia development during fingolimod and dimethyl-fumarate therapy.

Cerebral HSV-1 Vasculitis as a Fatal Complication of Immunosuppression in Non-Hodgkin´s Lymphoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Patients with lymphoma are predisposed to infection because of the immunocompromised state related to the disease itself and as a consequence of chemo-/radiotherapy. Here, we report a case of Herpes-simplex virus encephalitis (HSE) in an immunosuppressed patient with splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL), a rare indolent variant of non-Hodgkin´s lymphoma (NHL). The course was complicated febrile neutropenia and HSV-1-related cerebral vasculitis causing progressive ischemic stroke. This case illustrates the expanding spectrum of atypical clinical and radiological manifestations of HSE in patients treated with myelotoxic drugs. Moreover, we summarize the few central nervous system manifestations of SMZL reported in the literature and discuss distinct causes of neurological deterioration in patients with NHL.

Immunomodulatory Strategies in Herpes Simplex Virus Encephalitis

Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) can be responsible for life-threatening HSV encephalitis (HSE). The mortality rate of patients with HSE who do not receive antiviral treatment is 70%, with most survivors suffering from permanent neurological sequelae. The use of intravenous acyclovir together with improved diagnostic technologies such as PCR and magnetic resonance imaging has resulted in a reduction in the mortality rate to close to 20%. However, 70% of surviving patients still do not recover complete neurological functions. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop more effective treatments for a better clinical outcome. It is well recognized that cerebral damage resulting from HSE is caused by viral replication together with an overzealous inflammatory response. Both of these processes constitute potential targets for the development of innovative therapies against HSE. In this review, we discuss recent progress in therapy that may be used to ameliorate the outcome of patients with HSE, with a particular emphasis on immunomodulatory agents. Ideally, the administration of adjunctive immunomodulatory drugs should be initiated during the rise of the inflammatory response, and its duration should be limited in time to reduce undesired effects. This critical time frame should be optimized by the identification of reliable biomarkers of inflammation.