Spinal vasopressin alleviates formalin-induced nociception by enhancing GABAA receptor function in mice

The differential in vivo contribution of spinal α2A- and α2C-adrenoceptors in tonic and acute evoked nociception in the rat

Spinal α₂-adrenoceptor induces analgesia by neuronal inhibition of primary afferent fibers. This family receptor coupled to G _i/o proteins can be subdivided into three functional subtypes: α_2A, α_2B, and α_2C-adrenoceptors, and current evidence on spinal analgesia supports the relevance of α_2A and seems to exclude the role of α_2B, but the functional contribution of α_2C-adrenoceptors remains elusive. The present study was designed to pharmacologically dissect the contribution of spinal α₂-adrenoceptor subtypes modulating tonic or acute peripheral nociception. Using male Wistar rats, we analyzed the effect of spinal clonidine (a non-selective α_2A/α_2B/α_2C-adrenoceptor agonist) and/or selective subtype α₂-adrenoceptor antagonists on: 1) tonic nociception induced by subcutaneous formalin (flinching behavior) or 2) acute nociception induced by peripheral electrical stimulus in in vivo extracellular recordings of spinal dorsal horn second-order wide dynamic range (WDR) neurons. Clonidine inhibited the nocifensive behavior induced by formalin, an effect blocked by BRL 44408 (α_2A-adrenoceptor antagonist) but not by imiloxan (α_2B-adrenoceptor antagonist) or JP 1302 (α_2C-adrenoceptor antagonist). Similarly, spinal BRL 44408 reversed the clonidine-induced inhibition of nociceptive WDR activity. Interestingly, spinal JP 1302 per se produced behavioral antinociception (an effect blocked by bicuculline, a preferent GABA_A channel blocker), but no correlation was found with the electrophysiological experiments. These data imply that, at the spinal level, 1) presynaptic α_2A-adrenoceptor activation produces antinociception during acute or tonic nociceptive stimuli; and 2) under tonic nociceptive (inflammatory) input, spinal α_2C-adrenoceptors are pronociceptive, probably by the inactivation of GABAergic transmission. This result supports a differential role of α_2A and α_2C-adrenoceptors modulating nociception.

The Heart as a Target of Vasopressin and Other Cardiovascular Peptides in Health and Cardiovascular Diseases

The automatism of cardiac pacemaker cells, which is tuned, is regulated by the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and multiple endocrine and paracrine factors, including cardiovascular peptides. The cardiovascular peptides (CPs) form a group of essential paracrine factors affecting the function of the heart and vessels. They may also be produced in other organs and penetrate to the heart via systemic circulation. The present review draws attention to the role of vasopressin (AVP) and some other cardiovascular peptides (angiotensins, oxytocin, cytokines) in the regulation of the cardiovascular system in health and cardiovascular diseases, especially in post-infarct heart failure, hypertension and cerebrovascular strokes. Vasopressin is synthesized mostly by the neuroendocrine cells of the hypothalamus. There is also evidence that it may be produced in the heart and lungs. The secretion of AVP and other CPs is markedly influenced by changes in blood volume and pressure, as well as by other disturbances, frequently occurring in cardiovascular diseases (hypoxia, pain, stress, inflammation). Myocardial infarction, hypertension and cardiovascular shock are associated with an increased secretion of AVP and altered responsiveness of the cardiovascular system to its action. The majority of experimental studies show that the administration of vasopressin during ventricular fibrillation and cardiac arrest improves resuscitation, however, the clinical studies do not present consisting results. Vasopressin cooperates with the autonomic nervous system (ANS), angiotensins, oxytocin and cytokines in the regulation of the cardiovascular system and its interaction with these regulators is altered during heart failure and hypertension. It is likely that the differences in interactions of AVP with ANS and other CPs have a significant impact on the responsiveness of the cardiovascular system to vasopressin in specific cardiovascular disorders.

Upregulation of the hypothalamo-neurohypophysial system and activation of vasopressin neurones attenuates hyperalgesia in a neuropathic pain model rat

Arginine vasopressin (AVP) is a hypothalamic neurosecretory hormone well known as an antidiuretic, and recently reported to be involved in pain modulation. The expression kinetics of AVP and its potential involvement in the descending pain modulation system (DPMS) in neuropathic pain (NP) remains unclear. We investigated AVP expression and its effects on mechanical and thermal nociceptive thresholds using a unilateral spinal nerve ligation (SNL) model. All rats with SNL developed NP. Intensities of enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) in the supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei, median eminence, and posterior pituitary were significantly increased at 7 and 14 days post-SNL in AVP-eGFP rats. In situ hybridisation histochemistry revealed significantly increased AVP mRNA expression at 14 days post-SNL compared with the sham control group. The chemogenetic activation of AVP neurones significantly attenuated mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia with elevated plasma AVP concentration. These analgesic effects were suppressed by pre-administration with V1a receptor antagonist. AVP neurones increased the neuronal activity of serotonergic dorsal raphe, noradrenergic locus coeruleus, and inhibitory interneurones in the spinal dorsal horn. These results suggest that the hypothalamo-neurohypophysial system of AVP is upregulated in NP and activated endogenous AVP exerts analgesic effects via the V1a receptors. AVP neurones may activate the DPMS.

β-elemene relieves neuropathic pain in mice through the regulation on C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 3 and GABAA receptor

β-elemene (Bel) is a sesquiterpene compound has shown potential in the antinociceptive treatment. This study focused on the function of Bel in neuropathic pain relief in mice. A murine model with spared nerve injury (SNI) was established and treated with Bel. The paw withdrawal thresholds in response to mechanical and thermal stimulations were examined using von Frey filaments. The L4-L6 spinal dorsal horn tissue samples were collected for histological examination. Bel treatment reduced the sensitivities of model mice to mechanical and thermal stimulations, and it inhibited activation of microglia and the secretion of inflammatory cytokines including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6 in tissues. Bel treatment reduced the expression of nociceptor excitatory NMDAR whereas enhanced the expression of nociceptor inhibitory GABAA receptor to relieve the nociception of mice. CXCR3 was a downstream molecule mediated by Bel. Either overexpression of CXCR3 or downregulation of GABAA receptor in the tissues aggravated the neuropathic pain in SNI mice which was initially relieved by Bel. In conclusion, this study suggested that Bel might serve as a drug for nociception management by inhibiting CXCR3 and upregulating GABAA receptor. This study may offer novel insights into the field of neuropathic pain relief.

The role of oxytocin, vasopressin, and their receptors at nociceptors in peripheral pain modulation

Oxytocin and vasopressin are neurohypophyseal hormones with sequence similarity and play a central role in bodily homeostatic regulation. Pain is currently understood to be an important phenotype that those two neurohormones strongly downregulate. Nociceptors, the first component of the ascending neural circuit for pain signals, have constantly been shown to be modulated by those peptides. The nociceptor modulation appears to be critical in pain attenuation, which has led to a gradual increase in scientific interest about their physiological processes and also drawn attention to their translational potentials. This review focused on what are recently understood and stay under investigation in the functional modulation of nociceptors by oxytocin and vasopressin. Effort to produce a nociceptor-specific view could help to construct a more systematic picture of the peripheral pain modulation by oxytocin and vasopressin.

Arginine vasopressin: Direct and indirect action on metabolism

From its identification and isolation in 1954, arginine vasopressin (AVP) has attracted attention, not only for its peripheral functions such as vasoconstriction and reabsorption of water from kidney, but also for its central effects. As there is now considerable evidence that AVP plays a crucial role in feeding behavior and energy balance, it has become a promising therapeutic target for treating obesity or other obesity-related metabolic disorders. However, the underlying mechanisms for AVP regulation of these central processes still remain largely unknown. In this review, we will provide a brief overview of the current knowledge concerning how AVP controls energy balance and feeding behavior, focusing on physiological aspects including the relationship between AVP, circadian rhythmicity, and glucocorticoids.

DNA Microarray Analysis of Differential Gene Expression in the Dorsal Root Ganglia of Four Different Neuropathic Pain Mouse Models

Purpose

Pathological stimuli or injury to the peripheral nervous system can trigger neuropathic pain with common clinical features such as allodynia and hypersensitivity. Although various studies have identified molecules or genes related to neuropathic pain, the essential components are still unclear. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the molecular and genetic factors related to neuropathic pain.

Methods

We extracted candidate genes in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) from three nerve injury mouse models and a sham-operated model (sciatic nerve ligation and resection, sural nerve resection, spared nerve injury [SNI], and sham) using DNA microarray to elucidate the genes responsible for the neuropathic pain mechanism in the SNI model, which exhibits hypersensitivity in the hindpaw of the preserved sural nerve area. We eliminated as many biases as possible. We then focused on an upregulated endogenous vasopressin receptor and clarified whether it is closely associated with traumatic neuropathic pain using a knockout mouse and drug-mediated suppression of the gene.

Results

Algorithm analysis of DNA microarray results identified 50 genes significantly upregulated in the DRG of the SNI model. Two independent genes—cyclin-dependent kinase-1 (CDK-1) and arginine vasopressin receptor 1A (V1a)—were subsequently identified as candidate SNI-specific genes in the DRG by quantitative PCR analysis. Administration of V1a agonist to wild-type SNI mice significantly alleviated neuropathic pain. However, V1a knockout mice did not exhibit higher hypersensitivity to mechanical stimulation than wild-type mice. In addition, V1a knockout mice showed similar pain behaviors after SNI to wild-type mice.

Conclusion

Through the DNA microarray analysis of several neuropathic models, we detected specific genes related to chronic pain. In particular, our results suggest that V1a in the DRG may partially contribute to the mechanism of neuropathic pain.

Differential role of specific cardiovascular neuropeptides in pain regulation: Relevance to cardiovascular diseases

In many instances, the perception of pain is disproportionate to the strength of the algesic stimulus. Excessive or inadequate pain sensation is frequently observed in cardiovascular diseases, especially in coronary ischemia. The mechanisms responsible for individual differences in the perception of cardiovascular pain are not well recognized. Cardiovascular disorders may provoke pain in multiple ways engaging molecules released locally in the heart due to tissue ischemia, inflammation or cellular stress, and through neurogenic and endocrine mechanisms brought into action by hemodynamic disturbances. Cardiovascular neuropeptides, namely angiotensin II (Ang II), angiotensin-(1-7) [Ang-(1-7)], vasopressin, oxytocin, and orexins belong to this group. Although participation of these peptides in the regulation of circulation and pain has been firmly established, their mutual interaction in the regulation of pain in cardiovascular diseases has not been profoundly analyzed. In the present review we discuss the regulation of the release, and mechanisms of the central and systemic actions of these peptides on the cardiovascular system in the context of their central and peripheral nociceptive (Ang II) and antinociceptive [Ang-(1-7), vasopressin, oxytocin, orexins] properties. We also consider the possibility that they may play a significant role in the modulation of pain in cardiovascular diseases. The rationale for focusing attention on these very compounds was based on the following premises (1) cardiovascular disturbances influence the release of these peptides (2) they regulate vascular tone and cardiac function and can influence the intensity of ischemia - the factor initiating pain signals in the cardiovascular system, (3) they differentially modulate nociception through peripheral and central mechanisms, and their effect strongly depends on specific receptors and site of action. Accordingly, an altered release of these peptides and/or pharmacological blockade of their receptors may have a significant but different impact on individual sensation of pain and comfort of an individual patient.

Role of vasopressin V1 antagonist in the action of vasopressin on the cooling-evoked hemodynamic perturbations of rats

We aimed to investigate the role of arginine vasopressin (AVP) acting via the AVPV1 receptor in the autonomic cardiovascular responses to cold stress (CS). The study was conducted on adult male Sprague-Dawley rats with telemetry transmitters implanted to monitor heart rate (HR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) throughout the experiment course. Rats were divided into four groups and were given, respectively, saline (control group), AVPV1 antagonist (V1880) alone, and V1880 following the removal of sympathetic outflows using hexamethonium (HEX+V1880) or guanethidine (GUA + V1880). Rats were subjected to the CS stimuli (rapid immersion of the rat's limbs into 4 °C water). Hemodynamic responses were recorded at baseline (PreCS), during CS, and after CS. Data analysis was performed using descriptive methods and spectral and cross-spectral analysis of blood pressure variability (BPV) and heart rate variability (HRV). Key results showed that at PreCS, inhibition of AVPV1 increases SBP and HR as well as very-low-frequency BPV and low-frequency BPV, which is attenuated by hexamethonium (effect on SBP only) and guanethidine (effect on both SBP and HR). HEX+V1880 results in increased high-frequency BPV and attenuated very-low-frequency HRV, while GUA + V1880 results in increased high-frequency HRV and attenuated very-low-frequency HRV. During CS, we observed that SBP and HR, as well as very-low-frequency BPV and low-frequency BPV, were similar in the control group and the group with AVPV1 inhibition, while AVPV1 inhibition results in attenuated high-frequency BPV. Furthermore, we observed that changes produced by AVPV1 inhibition alone were affected differently by HEX+V1880 and GUA + V1880, particularly in low-frequency HRV and very-low-frequency HRV. The results support that AVPV1 mediates autonomic cardiovascular responses at both baseline and CS stimuli conditions are associated with central mechanism engagement.

The AVPR1A Gene and Its Single Nucleotide Polymorphism rs10877969: A Literature Review of Associations with Health Conditions and Pain

BACKGROUND

Pain is the quintessential symptom for individuals suffering from sickle cell disease (SCD). Although the degree of suffering and the cost of treatment are staggering, SCD continues to be grossly understudied, including a lack of data for pain-related genes and prevalence of polymorphisms in this population. This lack of data adds to the inadequacy of pain therapy in this population. Pain genetics investigators have recently examined allele frequencies of single-nucleotide polymorphisms from candidate genes in people who have SCD. One of the genes identified was the arginine vasopressin receptor 1A gene (AVPR1A) and its associated single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs10877969. Progress in explaining pain-related polymorphisms associated with SCD can be facilitated by understanding the literature. Aim/Design: The purpose of this literature review was to describe mechanisms of the polymorphic gene AVPR1A and the phenotypic variations associated with its SNPs relative to health conditions and pain.

METHODS

Published studies were included if the research addressed AVPR1A and was a full article in a peer-reviewed journal, in the English language, a human or animal study, and published 2009 to present. Abstracts were included if they were in English and provided information not found in a full article.

RESULTS

The results of this review revealed that AVPR1A is associated with behavioral phenotypes, which include pair bonding, autism spectrum disorder, musical aptitude, infidelity, altruism, monogamy, mating, substance abuse, and alcohol preference. In addition, there were associations with pain, stress pain by sex, and sickle cell pain.

CONCLUSION

Summary of this literature could provide insights into future pain research of this SNP in people with SCD.

The role of peripheral vasopressin 1A and oxytocin receptors on the subcutaneous vasopressin antinociceptive effects

BACKGROUND

Vasopressin (AVP) seems to play a role as an antinociceptive neurohormone, but little is known about the peripheral site of action of its antinociceptive effects. Moreover, AVP can produce motor impairment that could be confused with behavioural antinociception. Finally, it is not clear which receptor is involved in the peripheral antinociceptive AVP effects.

METHODS

In anaesthetized rats with end-tidal CO₂ monitoring, extracellular unitary recordings were performed, measuring the evoked activity mediated by Aβ-, Aδ-, C-fibres and post-discharge. Behavioural nociception and motor impairment were evaluated under subcutaneous AVP (0.1-10 μg) using formalin and rotarod tests. Selective antagonists to vasopressin (V_1A R) or oxytocin receptors (OTR) were used. Additionally, vasopressin and oxytocin receptors were explored immunohistochemically in skin tissues.

RESULTS

Subcutaneous AVP (1 and 10 μg/paw) induced antinociception and a transitory reduction of the end-tidal CO₂ . The neuronal activity associated with Aδ- and C-fibre activation was diminished, but no effect was observed on Aβ-fibres. AVP also reduced paw flinches in the formalin test and a transitory locomotor impairment was also found. The AVP-induced antinociception was blocked by the selective antagonist to V_1A R (SR49059) or OTR (L368,899). Immunohistochemical evidence of skin VP and OT receptors is given.

CONCLUSIONS

Subcutaneous AVP produces antinociception and behavioural analgesia. Both V1a and OTR participate in those effects. Our findings suggest that antinociception could be produced in a local manner using a novel vasopressin receptor located in cutaneous sensorial fibres. Additionally, subcutaneous AVP also produces important systemic effects such as respiratory and locomotor impairment.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our findings support that AVP produces peripheral antinociception and behavioural analgesia in a local manner; nevertheless, systemic effects are also presented. Additionally, this is the first detailed electrophysiological analysis of AVP antinociceptive action after subcutaneous administration. The results are reasonably explained by the demonstration of V_1A R and OTR in cutaneous fibres.