Serotonin dependent masking of hippocampal sharp wave ripples

On the varieties of conscious experiences: Altered Beliefs Under Psychedelics (ALBUS)

How is it that psychedelics so profoundly impact brain and mind? According to the model of "Relaxed Beliefs Under Psychedelics" (REBUS), 5-HT2a agonism is thought to help relax prior expectations, thus making room for new perspectives and patterns. Here, we introduce an alternative (but largely compatible) perspective, proposing that REBUS effects may primarily correspond to a particular (but potentially pivotal) regime of very high levels of 5-HT2a receptor agonism. Depending on both a variety of contextual factors and the specific neural systems being considered, we suggest opposite effects may also occur in which synchronous neural activity becomes more powerful, with accompanying "Strengthened Beliefs Under Psychedelics" (SEBUS) effects. Such SEBUS effects are consistent with the enhanced meaning-making observed in psychedelic therapy (e.g. psychological insight and the noetic quality of mystical experiences), with the imposition of prior expectations on perception (e.g. hallucinations and pareidolia), and with the delusional thinking that sometimes occurs during psychedelic experiences (e.g. apophenia, paranoia, engendering of inaccurate interpretations of events, and potentially false memories). With "Altered Beliefs Under Psychedelics" (ALBUS), we propose that the manifestation of SEBUS vs. REBUS effects may vary across the dose-response curve of 5-HT2a signaling. While we explore a diverse range of sometimes complex models, our basic idea is fundamentally simple: psychedelic experiences can be understood as kinds of waking dream states of varying degrees of lucidity, with similar underlying mechanisms. We further demonstrate the utility of ALBUS by providing neurophenomenological models of psychedelics focusing on mechanisms of conscious perceptual synthesis, dreaming, and episodic memory and mental simulation.

A tale of two receptors: simultaneous targeting of NMDARs and 5-HT 4 Rs exerts additive effects against stress

BACKGROUND

Serotonin (5-HT) receptors and N -methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) have both been implicated in the pathophysiology of depression and anxiety disorders. Here, we evaluated whether targeting both receptors through combined dosing of ( R , S )-ketamine, an NMDAR antagonist, and prucalopride, a serotonin type IV receptor (5-HT 4 R) agonist, would have additive effects, resulting in reductions in stress-induced fear, behavioral despair, and hyponeophagia.

METHODS

A single injection of saline (Sal), ( R , S )-ketamine (K), prucalopride (P), or a combined dose of ( R , S )-ketamine and prucalopride (K+P) was administered before or after contextual fear conditioning (CFC) stress in both sexes. Drug efficacy was assayed using the forced swim test (FST), elevated plus maze (EPM), open field (OF), marble burying (MB), and novelty-suppressed feeding (NSF). Patch clamp electrophysiology was used to measure the effects of combined drug on neural activity in hippocampal CA3. c-fos and parvalbumin (PV) expression in the hippocampus (HPC) and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) was examined using immunohistochemistry and network analysis.

RESULTS

We found that a combination of K+P, given before or after stress, exerted additive effects, compared to either drug alone, in reducing a variety of stress-induced behaviors in both sexes. Combined K+P administration significantly altered c-fos and PV expression and network activity in the HPC and mPFC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that combined K+P has additive benefits for combating stress-induced pathophysiology, both at the behavioral and neural level. Our findings provide preliminary evidence that future clinical studies using this combined treatment strategy may prove advantageous in protecting against a broader range of stress-induced psychiatric disorders.

Impairments in hippocampal oscillations accompany the loss of LTP induced by GIRK activity blockade

Learning and memory occurrence requires of hippocampal long-term synaptic plasticity and precise neural activity orchestrated by brain network oscillations, both processes reciprocally influencing each other. As G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels rule synaptic plasticity that supports hippocampal-dependent memory, here we assessed their unknown role in hippocampal oscillatory activity in relation to synaptic plasticity induction. In alert male mice, pharmacological GIRK modulation did not alter neural oscillations before long-term potentiation (LTP) induction. However, after an LTP generating protocol, both gain- and loss-of basal GIRK activity transformed LTP into long-term depression, but only specific suppression of constitutive GIRK activity caused a disruption of network synchronization (δ, α, γ bands), even leading to long-lasting ripples and fast ripples pathological oscillations. Together, our data showed that constitutive GIRK activity plays a key role in the tuning mechanism of hippocampal oscillatory activity during long-term synaptic plasticity processes that underlies hippocampal-dependent cognitive functions.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors suppress sharp wave ripples in the ventral hippocampus

Biased memory processing contributes to the development and exacerbation of depression, and thus could represent a potential therapeutic target for stress-induced mental disorders. Synchronized spikes in hippocampal neurons, corresponding to sharp wave ripples (SWRs), may play a crucial role in memory reactivation. In this study, we showed that the frequency of SWRs increased in the ventral hippocampus, but not in the dorsal hippocampus, after stress exposure. Administration of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) fluoxetine and fluvoxamine inhibited the generation of ventral hippocampal SWRs and reduced locomotor activity and local field potential power in the gamma bands. These results suggest that the antidepressant effects of SSRIs may be mediated by the suppression of ventral hippocampal SWRs.

Understanding the effects of serotonin in the brain through its role in the gastrointestinal tract

The neuromodulatory arousal system imbues the nervous system with the flexibility and robustness required to facilitate adaptive behaviour. While there are well-understood mechanisms linking dopamine, noradrenaline and acetylcholine to distinct behavioural states, similar conclusions have not been as readily available for serotonin. Fascinatingly, despite clear links between serotonergic function and cognitive capacities as diverse as reward processing, exploration, and the psychedelic experience, over 95% of the serotonin in the body is released in the gastrointestinal tract, where it controls digestive muscle contractions (peristalsis). Here, we argue that framing neural serotonin as a rostral extension of the gastrointestinal serotonergic system dissolves much of the mystery associated with the central serotonergic system. Specifically, we outline that central serotonin activity mimics the effects of a digestion/satiety circuit mediated by hypothalamic control over descending serotonergic nuclei in the brainstem. We review commonalities and differences between these two circuits, with a focus on the heterogeneous expression of different classes of serotonin receptors in the brain. Much in the way that serotonin-induced peristalsis facilitates the work of digestion, serotonergic influences over cognition can be reframed as performing the work of cognition. Extending this analogy, we argue that the central serotonergic system allows the brain to arbitrate between different cognitive modes as a function of serotonergic tone: low activity facilitates cognitive automaticity, whereas higher activity helps to identify flexible solutions to problems, particularly if and when the initial responses fail. This perspective sheds light on otherwise disparate capacities mediated by serotonin, and also helps to understand why there are such pervasive links between serotonergic pathology and the symptoms of psychiatric disorders.

Fenfluramine modulates the anti-amnesic effects induced by sigma-1 receptor agonists and neuro(active)steroids in vivo

Fenfluramine (N-ethyl-α-methl-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenethylamine) is an anti-seizure medication (ASM) particularly effective in patients with Dravet syndrome, a severe treatment-resistant epileptic encephalopathy. Fenfluramine acts not only as neuronal serotonin (5-HT) releaser but also as a positive modulator of the sigma-1 receptor (S1R). We here examined the modulatory activity of Fenfluramine on the S1R-mediated anti-amnesic response in mice using combination analyses. Fenfluramine and Norfenfluramine, racemate and isomers, were combined with either the S1R agonist (PRE-084) or the S1R-acting neuro(active)steroids, pregnenolone sulfate (PREGS), Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), or progesterone. We report that Fenfluramine racemate or (+)-Fenfluramine, in the 0.1-1 mg/kg dose range, attenuated the dizocilpine-induced learning deficits in spontaneous alternation and passive avoidance, and showed low-dose synergies in combination with PRE-084. These effects were blocked by the S1R antagonist NE-100. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate or PREGS attenuated dizocilpine-induced learning deficits in the 5-20 mg/kg dose range. Co-treatments at low dose between steroids and Fenfluramine or (+)-Fenfluramine were synergistic. Progesterone blocked Fenfluramine effect. Finally, Fenfluramine and (+)-Fenfluramine effects were prevented by the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY-100635 or 5-HT2A antagonist RS-127445, but not by the 5-HT1B/1D antagonist GR 127935 or the 5-HT2C antagonist SB 242084, confirming a 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptor involvement in the drug effect on memory. We therefore confirmed the positive modulation of Fenfluramine racemate or dextroisomer on S1R and showed that, in physiological conditions, the drug potentiated the low dose effects of neuro(active)steroids, endogenous S1R modulators. The latter are potent modulators of the excitatory/inhibitory balance in the brain, and their levels must be considered in the antiepileptic action of Fenfluramine.

Neuromodulation of the mind-wandering brain state: the interaction between neuromodulatory tone, sharp wave-ripples and spontaneous thought

Mind-wandering has become a captivating topic for cognitive neuroscientists. By now, it is reasonably well described in terms of its phenomenology and the large-scale neural networks that support it. However, we know very little about what neurobiological mechanisms trigger a mind-wandering episode and sustain the mind-wandering brain state. Here, we focus on the role of ascending neuromodulatory systems (i.e. acetylcholine, noradrenaline, serotonin and dopamine) in shaping mind-wandering. We advance the hypothesis that the hippocampal sharp wave-ripple (SWR) is a compelling candidate for a brain state that can trigger mind-wandering episodes. This hippocampal rhythm, which occurs spontaneously in quiescent behavioural states, is capable of propagating widespread activity in the default network and is functionally associated with recollective, associative, imagination and simulation processes. The occurrence of the SWR is heavily dependent on hippocampal neuromodulatory tone. We describe how the interplay of neuromodulators may promote the hippocampal SWR and trigger mind-wandering episodes. We then identify the global neuromodulatory signatures that shape the evolution of the mind-wandering brain state. Under our proposed framework, mind-wandering emerges due to the interplay between neuromodulatory systems that influence the transitions between brain states, which either facilitate, or impede, a wandering mind. This article is part of the theme issue 'Offline perception: voluntary and spontaneous perceptual experiences without matching external stimulation'.

Up and Down States and Memory Consolidation Across Somatosensory, Entorhinal, and Hippocampal Cortices

In the course of a day, brain states fluctuate, from conscious awake information-acquiring states to sleep states, during which previously acquired information is further processed and stored as memories. One hypothesis is that memories are consolidated and stored during "offline" states such as sleep, a process thought to involve transfer of information from the hippocampus to other cortical areas. Up and Down states (UDS), patterns of activity that occur under anesthesia and sleep states, are likely to play a role in this process, although the nature of this role remains unclear. Here we review what is currently known about these mechanisms in three anatomically distinct but interconnected cortical areas: somatosensory cortex, entorhinal cortex, and the hippocampus. In doing so, we consider the role of this activity in the coordination of "replay" during sleep states, particularly during hippocampal sharp-wave ripples. We conclude that understanding the generation and propagation of UDS may provide key insights into the cortico-hippocampal dialogue linking archi- and neocortical areas during memory formation.

A model of cholinergic suppression of hippocampal ripples through disruption of balanced excitation/inhibition

Sharp wave-ripples (140-220 Hz) are patterns of brain activity observed in the local field potential of the hippocampus which are present during memory consolidation. As rodents switch from memory consolidation to memory encoding behaviors, cholinergic inputs to the hippocampus from neurons in the medial septum-diagonal band of Broca cause a marked reduction in ripple incidence. The mechanism for this disruption in ripple power is not fully understood. In isolated neurons, the major effect of cholinergic input on hippocampal neurons is depolarization of the membrane potential, which affects both hippocampal pyramidal neurons and inhibitory interneurons. Using an existing model of ripple-frequency oscillations that includes both pyramidal neurons and interneurons, we investigated the mechanism whereby depolarizing inputs to these neurons can affect ripple power and frequency. We observed that ripple power and frequency are maintained, as long as inputs to pyramidal neurons and interneurons are balanced. Preferential drive to pyramidal neurons or interneurons, however, affects ripple power and can disrupt ripple oscillations by pushing ripple frequency higher or lower. Thus, an imbalance in drive to pyramidal neurons and interneurons provides a means whereby cholinergic input can suppress hippocampal ripples.

Partial homologies between sleep states in lizards, mammals, and birds suggest a complex evolution of sleep states in amniotes

It is crucial to determine whether rapid eye movement (REM) sleep and slow-wave sleep (SWS) (or non-REM sleep), identified in most mammals and birds, also exist in lizards, as they share a common ancestor with these groups. Recently, a study in the bearded dragon (P. vitticeps) reported states analogous to REM and SWS alternating in a surprisingly regular 80-s period, suggesting a common origin of the two sleep states across amniotes. We first confirmed these results in the bearded dragon with deep brain recordings and electro-oculogram (EOG) recordings. Then, to confirm a common origin and more finely characterize sleep in lizards, we developed a multiparametric approach in the tegu lizard, a species never recorded to date. We recorded EOG, electromyogram (EMG), heart rate, and local field potentials (LFPs) and included data on arousal thresholds, sleep deprivation, and pharmacological treatments with fluoxetine, a serotonin reuptake blocker that suppresses REM sleep in mammals. As in the bearded dragon, we demonstrate the existence of two sleep states in tegu lizards. However, no clear periodicity is apparent. The first sleep state (S1 sleep) showed high-amplitude isolated sharp waves, and the second sleep state (S2 sleep) displayed 15-Hz oscillations, isolated ocular movements, and a decrease in heart rate variability and muscle tone compared to S1. Fluoxetine treatment induced a significant decrease in S2 quantities and in the number of sharp waves in S1. Because S2 sleep is characterized by the presence of ocular movements and is inhibited by a serotonin reuptake inhibitor, as is REM sleep in birds and mammals, it might be analogous to this state. However, S2 displays a type of oscillation never previously reported and does not display a desynchronized electroencephalogram (EEG) as is observed in the bearded dragons, mammals, and birds. This suggests that the phenotype of sleep states and possibly their role can differ even between closely related species. Finally, our results suggest a common origin of two sleep states in amniotes. Yet, they also highlight a diversity of sleep phenotypes across lizards, demonstrating that the evolution of sleep states is more complex than previously thought.

Until recently, the general understanding about sleep was that only mammals and birds show two sleep states: slow-wave sleep and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Consequently, it was thought that these two states appeared independently in these warm-blooded animals. However, a recent paper reported the presence of these two states in the bearded dragon lizard (Pogona vitticeps), suggesting that these two states arose with the common ancestor of mammals, birds, and reptiles. We confirmed the presence of two sleep states in the bearded dragon and compared its sleep with that of another lizard, the Argentine tegu (Salvator merianae). Our results show that both lizard species have two sleep states with similarities to the two sleep states observed in mammals and birds. Additionally, our study of behavioral and physiological parameters as well as the brain activity associated with sleep in these lizards allowed us to also show important differences between these two species of lizards and between lizards, birds, and mammals. Our findings indicate that sleep in lizards is more complex than previously thought and raise further questions about the nature, function, and evolution of these two sleep states.

Frameworking memory and serotonergic markers

The evidence for neural markers and memory is continuously being revised, and as evidence continues to accumulate, herein, we frame earlier and new evidence. Hence, in this work, the aim is to provide an appropriate conceptual framework of serotonergic markers associated with neural activity and memory. Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT]) has multiple pharmacological tools, well-characterized downstream signaling in mammals’ species, and established 5-HT neural markers showing new insights about memory functions and dysfunctions, including receptors (5-HT1A/1B/1D, 5-HT2A/2B/2C, and 5-HT3-7), transporter (serotonin transporter [SERT]) and volume transmission present in brain areas involved in memory. Bidirectional influence occurs between 5-HT markers and memory/amnesia. A growing number of researchers report that memory, amnesia, or forgetting modifies neural markers. Diverse approaches support the translatability of using neural markers and cerebral functions/dysfunctions, including memory formation and amnesia. At least, 5-HT1A, 5-HT4, 5-HT6, and 5-HT7receptors and SERT seem to be useful neural markers and therapeutic targets. Hence, several mechanisms cooperate to achieve synaptic plasticity or memory, including changes in the expression of neurotransmitter receptors and transporters.

Pretreatment with β-adrenergic receptor agonists facilitates induction of LTP and sharp wave ripple complexes in rodent hippocampus

Norepinephrine, is involved in the enhancement of learning and memory formation by regulating synaptic mechanisms through its ability to activate pre- and post-synaptic adrenergic receptors. Here we show that β-agonists of norepinephrine facilitate the induction of both associational LTP and sharp wave ripples (SPW-Rs) in acute slices of rat hippocampus in area CA3. Surprisingly, this facilitating effect persists when slices are only pretreated with β-receptor agonists followed by wash out and application of the unspecific β-adrenoreceptor (βAR) antagonist propranolol. During application of βAR agonists repeated stimulation resulted in facilitated induction of SPW-Rs. Since SPW-Rs are thought to be involved in memory replay we studied the effects of βAR-agonists on spontaneous SPW-Rs in murine hippocampus and found that amplitude and incidence of SPW-Rs increased. These effects involve cyclic-AMP and the activation of protein kinase A and suggest a supportive role in memory consolidation. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Neuromodulation of the Feedforward Dentate Gyrus-CA3 Microcircuit

The feedforward dentate gyrus-CA3 microcircuit in the hippocampus is thought to activate ensembles of CA3 pyramidal cells and interneurons to encode and retrieve episodic memories. The creation of these CA3 ensembles depends on neuromodulatory input and synaptic plasticity within this microcircuit. Here we review the mechanisms by which the neuromodulators aceylcholine, noradrenaline, dopamine, and serotonin reconfigure this microcircuit and thereby infer the net effect of these modulators on the processes of episodic memory encoding and retrieval.