1
|
Cagol A, Tsagkas C, Granziera C. Advanced Brain Imaging in Central Nervous System Demyelinating Diseases. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2024; 34:335-357. [PMID: 38942520 DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2024.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
In recent decades, advances in neuroimaging have profoundly transformed our comprehension of central nervous system demyelinating diseases. Remarkable technological progress has enabled the integration of cutting-edge acquisition and postprocessing techniques, proving instrumental in characterizing subtle focal changes, diffuse microstructural alterations, and macroscopic pathologic processes. This review delves into state-of-the-art modalities applied to multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease. Furthermore, it explores how this dynamic landscape holds significant promise for the development of effective and personalized clinical management strategies, encompassing support for differential diagnosis, prognosis, monitoring treatment response, and patient stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Cagol
- Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Hegenheimermattweg 167b, 4123 Allschwil, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Spitalstrasse 2, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; Department of Health Sciences, University of Genova, Via A. Pastore, 1 16132 Genova, Italy. https://twitter.com/CagolAlessandr0
| | - Charidimos Tsagkas
- Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Hegenheimermattweg 167b, 4123 Allschwil, Switzerland; Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health (NIH), 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Cristina Granziera
- Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Hegenheimermattweg 167b, 4123 Allschwil, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Spitalstrasse 2, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Coll L, Pareto D, Carbonell-Mirabent P, Cobo-Calvo Á, Arrambide G, Vidal-Jordana Á, Comabella M, Castilló J, Rodrı Guez-Acevedo B, Zabalza A, Galán I, Midaglia L, Nos C, Auger C, Alberich M, Río J, Sastre-Garriga J, Oliver A, Montalban X, Rovira À, Tintoré M, Lladó X, Tur C. Global and Regional Deep Learning Models for Multiple Sclerosis Stratification From MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2024; 60:258-267. [PMID: 37803817 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The combination of anatomical MRI and deep learning-based methods such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) is a promising strategy to build predictive models of multiple sclerosis (MS) prognosis. However, studies assessing the effect of different input strategies on model's performance are lacking. PURPOSE To compare whole-brain input sampling strategies and regional/specific-tissue strategies, which focus on a priori known relevant areas for disability accrual, to stratify MS patients based on their disability level. STUDY TYPE Retrospective. SUBJECTS Three hundred nineteen MS patients (382 brain MRI scans) with clinical assessment of disability level performed within the following 6 months (~70% training/~15% validation/~15% inference in-house dataset) and 440 MS patients from multiple centers (independent external validation cohort). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE Single vendor 1.5 T or 3.0 T. Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Gradient-Echo and Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery sequences. ASSESSMENT A 7-fold patient cross validation strategy was used to train a 3D-CNN to classify patients into two groups, Expanded Disability Status Scale score (EDSS) ≥ 3.0 or EDSS < 3.0. Two strategies were investigated: 1) a global approach, taking the whole brain volume as input and 2) regional approaches using five different regions-of-interest: white matter, gray matter, subcortical gray matter, ventricles, and brainstem structures. The performance of the models was assessed in the in-house and the independent external cohorts. STATISTICAL TESTS Balanced accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). RESULTS With the in-house dataset, the gray matter regional model showed the highest stratification accuracy (81%), followed by the global approach (79%). In the external dataset, without any further retraining, an accuracy of 72% was achieved for the white matter model and 71% for the global approach. DATA CONCLUSION The global approach offered the best trade-off between internal performance and external validation to stratify MS patients based on accumulated disability. EVIDENCE LEVEL 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Llucia Coll
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Deborah Pareto
- Section of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pere Carbonell-Mirabent
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Álvaro Cobo-Calvo
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Georgina Arrambide
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ángela Vidal-Jordana
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Manuel Comabella
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joaquín Castilló
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Breogán Rodrı Guez-Acevedo
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana Zabalza
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ingrid Galán
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Luciana Midaglia
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlos Nos
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Auger
- Section of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Manel Alberich
- Section of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Río
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jaume Sastre-Garriga
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Arnau Oliver
- Research Institute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - Xavier Montalban
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Àlex Rovira
- Section of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mar Tintoré
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Lladó
- Research Institute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - Carmen Tur
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nakamura K, Sun Z, Hara-Cleaver C, Bodhinathan K, Avila RL. Natalizumab reduces loss of gray matter and thalamic volume in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A post hoc analysis from the randomized, placebo-controlled AFFIRM trial. Mult Scler 2024; 30:687-695. [PMID: 38469809 DOI: 10.1177/13524585241235055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Loss of brain gray matter fractional volume predicts multiple sclerosis (MS) progression and is associated with worsening physical and cognitive symptoms. Within deep gray matter, thalamic damage is evident in early stages of MS and correlates with physical and cognitive impairment. Natalizumab is a highly effective treatment that reduces disease progression and the number of inflammatory lesions in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of natalizumab on gray matter and thalamic atrophy. METHODS A combination of deep learning-based image segmentation and data augmentation was applied to MRI data from the AFFIRM trial. RESULTS This post hoc analysis identified a reduction of 64.3% (p = 0.0044) and 64.3% (p = 0.0030) in mean percentage gray matter volume loss from baseline at treatment years 1 and 2, respectively, in patients treated with natalizumab versus placebo. The reduction in thalamic fraction volume loss from baseline with natalizumab versus placebo was 57.0% at year 2 (p < 0.0001) and 41.2% at year 1 (p = 0.0147). Similar findings resulted from analyses of absolute gray matter and thalamic fraction volume loss. CONCLUSION These analyses represent the first placebo-controlled evidence supporting a role for natalizumab treatment in mitigating gray matter and thalamic fraction atrophy among patients with RRMS. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER NCT00027300URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00027300.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kunio Nakamura
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weeda MM, van Nederpelt DR, Twisk JWR, Brouwer I, Kuijer JPA, van Dam M, Hulst HE, Killestein J, Barkhof F, Vrenken H, Pouwels PJW. Multimodal MRI study on the relation between WM integrity and connected GM atrophy and its effect on disability in early multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2024; 271:355-373. [PMID: 37716917 PMCID: PMC10769935 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11937-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by pathology in white matter (WM) and atrophy of grey matter (GM), but it remains unclear how these processes are related, or how they influence clinical progression. OBJECTIVE To study the spatial and temporal relationship between GM atrophy and damage in connected WM in relapsing-remitting (RR) MS in relation to clinical progression. METHODS Healthy control (HC) and early RRMS subjects visited our center twice with a 1-year interval for MRI and clinical examinations, including the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) scores. RRMS subjects were categorized as MSFC decliners or non-decliners based on ΔMSFC over time. Ten deep (D)GM and 62 cortical (C) GM structures were segmented and probabilistic tractography was performed to identify the connected WM. WM integrity was determined per tract with, amongst others, fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), neurite density index (NDI), and myelin water fraction (MWF). Linear mixed models (LMMs) were used to investigate GM and WM differences between HC and RRMS, and between MSFC decliners and non-decliners. LMM was also used to test associations between baseline WM z-scores and changes in connected GM z-scores, and between baseline GM z-scores and changes in connected WM z-scores, in HC/RRMS subjects and in MSFC decliners/non-decliners. RESULTS We included 13 HCs and 31 RRMS subjects with an average disease duration of 3.5 years and a median EDSS of 3.0. Fifteen RRMS subjects showed declining MSFC scores over time, and they showed higher atrophy rates and greater WM integrity loss compared to non-decliners. Lower baseline WM integrity was associated with increased CGM atrophy over time in RRMS, but not in HC subjects. This effect was only seen in MSFC decliners, especially when an extended WM z-score was used, which included FA, MD, NDI and MWF. Baseline GM measures were not significantly related to WM integrity changes over time in any of the groups. DISCUSSION Lower baseline WM integrity was related to more cortical atrophy in RRMS subjects that showed clinical progression over a 1-year follow-up, while baseline GM did not affect WM integrity changes over time. WM damage, therefore, seems to drive atrophy more than conversely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merlin M Weeda
- MS Center Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - D R van Nederpelt
- MS Center Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J W R Twisk
- Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Brouwer
- MS Center Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J P A Kuijer
- MS Center Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M van Dam
- MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy and Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H E Hulst
- Health-, Medical-, and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J Killestein
- MS Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F Barkhof
- MS Center Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
| | - H Vrenken
- MS Center Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P J W Pouwels
- MS Center Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tahedl M, Wiltgen T, Voon CC, Berthele A, Kirschke JS, Hemmer B, Mühlau M, Zimmer C, Wiestler B. Cortical Thin Patch Fraction Reflects Disease Burden in MS: The Mosaic Approach. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2023; 45:82-89. [PMID: 38164526 PMCID: PMC10756581 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a8064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE GM pathology plays an essential role in MS disability progression, emphasizing the importance of neuroradiologic biomarkers to capture the heterogeneity of cortical disease burden. This study aimed to assess the validity of a patch-wise, individual interpretation of cortical thickness data to identify GM pathology, the "mosaic approach," which was previously suggested as a biomarker for assessing and localizing atrophy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We investigated the mosaic approach in a cohort of 501 patients with MS with respect to 89 internal and 651 external controls. The resulting metric of the mosaic approach is the so-called thin patch fraction, which is an estimate of overall cortical disease burden per patient. We evaluated the mosaic approach with respect to the following: 1) discrimination between patients with MS and controls, 2) classification between different MS phenotypes, and 3) association with established biomarkers reflecting MS disease burden, using general linear modeling. RESULTS The thin patch fraction varied significantly between patients with MS and healthy controls and discriminated among MS phenotypes. Furthermore, the thin patch fraction was associated with disease burden, including the Expanded Disability Status Scale, cognitive and fatigue scores, and lesion volume. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the validity of the mosaic approach as a neuroradiologic biomarker in MS. The output of the mosaic approach, namely the thin patch fraction, is a candidate biomarker for assessing and localizing cortical GM pathology. The mosaic approach can furthermore enhance the development of a personalized cortical MS biomarker, given that the thin patch fraction provides a feature on which artificial intelligence methods can be trained. Most important, we showed the validity of the mosaic approach when referencing data with respect to external control MR imaging repositories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlene Tahedl
- From the Department of Neuroradiology (M.T., J.S.K., C.Z., B.W.), School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Tun Wiltgen
- Department of Neurology (T.W., C.C.V., A.B., B.H., M.M.), School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Cui Ci Voon
- Department of Neurology (T.W., C.C.V., A.B., B.H., M.M.), School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Achim Berthele
- Department of Neurology (T.W., C.C.V., A.B., B.H., M.M.), School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan S Kirschke
- From the Department of Neuroradiology (M.T., J.S.K., C.Z., B.W.), School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Hemmer
- Department of Neurology (T.W., C.C.V., A.B., B.H., M.M.), School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (B.H.), Munich, Germany
| | - Mark Mühlau
- Department of Neurology (T.W., C.C.V., A.B., B.H., M.M.), School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- From the Department of Neuroradiology (M.T., J.S.K., C.Z., B.W.), School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- From the Department of Neuroradiology (M.T., J.S.K., C.Z., B.W.), School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Nederpelt DR, Amiri H, Brouwer I, Noteboom S, Mokkink LB, Barkhof F, Vrenken H, Kuijer JPA. Reliability of brain atrophy measurements in multiple sclerosis using MRI: an assessment of six freely available software packages for cross-sectional analyses. Neuroradiology 2023; 65:1459-1472. [PMID: 37526657 PMCID: PMC10497452 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-023-03189-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Volume measurement using MRI is important to assess brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, differences between scanners, acquisition protocols, and analysis software introduce unwanted variability of volumes. To quantify theses effects, we compared within-scanner repeatability and between-scanner reproducibility of three different MR scanners for six brain segmentation methods. METHODS Twenty-one people with MS underwent scanning and rescanning on three 3 T MR scanners (GE MR750, Philips Ingenuity, Toshiba Vantage Titan) to obtain 3D T1-weighted images. FreeSurfer, FSL, SAMSEG, FastSurfer, CAT-12, and SynthSeg were used to quantify brain, white matter and (deep) gray matter volumes both from lesion-filled and non-lesion-filled 3D T1-weighted images. We used intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) to quantify agreement; repeated-measures ANOVA to analyze systematic differences; and variance component analysis to quantify the standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). RESULTS For all six software, both between-scanner agreement (ICCs ranging 0.4-1) and within-scanner agreement (ICC range: 0.6-1) were typically good, and good to excellent (ICC > 0.7) for large structures. No clear differences were found between filled and non-filled images. However, gray and white matter volumes did differ systematically between scanners for all software (p < 0.05). Variance component analysis yielded within-scanner SDC ranging from 1.02% (SAMSEG, whole-brain) to 14.55% (FreeSurfer, CSF); and between-scanner SDC ranging from 4.83% (SynthSeg, thalamus) to 29.25% (CAT12, thalamus). CONCLUSION Volume measurements of brain, GM and WM showed high repeatability, and high reproducibility despite substantial differences between scanners. Smallest detectable change was high, especially between different scanners, which hampers the clinical implementation of atrophy measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David R van Nederpelt
- MS Center Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Houshang Amiri
- MS Center Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Iman Brouwer
- MS Center Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Samantha Noteboom
- MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy and Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lidwine B Mokkink
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1007MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- MS Center Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, UCL London, London, UK
| | - Hugo Vrenken
- MS Center Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost P A Kuijer
- MS Center Amsterdam, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Storelli L, Pagani E, Pantano P, Piervincenzi C, Tedeschi G, Gallo A, De Stefano N, Battaglini M, Rocca MA, Filippi M. Methods for Brain Atrophy MR Quantification in Multiple Sclerosis: Application to the Multicenter INNI Dataset. J Magn Reson Imaging 2023; 58:1221-1231. [PMID: 36661195 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current therapeutic strategies in multiple sclerosis (MS) target neurodegeneration. However, the integration of atrophy measures into the clinical scenario is still an unmet need. PURPOSE To compare methods for whole-brain and gray matter (GM) atrophy measurements using the Italian Neuroimaging Network Initiative (INNI) dataset. STUDY TYPE Retrospective (data available from INNI). POPULATION A total of 466 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (mean age = 37.3 ± 10 years, 323 women) and 279 healthy controls (HC; mean age = 38.2 ± 13 years, 164 women). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE A 3.0-T, T1-weighted (spin echo and gradient echo without gadolinium injection) and T2-weighted spin echo scans at baseline and after 1 year (170 MS, 48 HC). ASSESSMENT Structural Image Evaluation using Normalization of Atrophy (SIENA-X/XL; version 5.0.9), Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM-v12); and Jim-v8 (Xinapse Systems, Colchester, UK) software were applied to all subjects. STATISTICAL TESTS In MS and HC, we evaluated the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) among FSL-SIENA(XL), SPM-v12, and Jim-v8 for cross-sectional whole-brain and GM tissue volumes and their longitudinal changes, the effect size according to the Cohen's d at baseline and the sample size requirement for whole-brain and GM atrophy progression at different power levels (lowest = 0.7, 0.05 alpha level). False discovery rate (Benjamini-Hochberg procedure) correction was applied. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS SPM-v12 and Jim-v8 showed significant agreement for cross-sectional whole-brain (ICC = 0.93 for HC and ICC = 0.84 for MS) and GM volumes (ICC = 0.66 for HC and ICC = 0.90) and longitudinal assessment of GM atrophy (ICC = 0.35 for HC and ICC = 0.59 for MS), while no significant agreement was found in the comparisons between whole-brain and GM volumes for SIENA-X/XL and both SPM-v12 (P = 0.19 and P = 0.29, respectively) and Jim-v8 (P = 0.21 and P = 0.32, respectively). SPM-v12 and Jim-v8 showed the highest effect size for cross-sectional GM atrophy (Cohen's d = -0.63 and -0.61). Jim-v8 and SIENA(XL) showed the smallest sample size requirements for whole-brain (58) and GM atrophy (152), at 0.7 power level. DATA CONCLUSION The findings obtained in this study should be considered when selecting the appropriate brain atrophy pipeline for MS studies. EVIDENCE LEVEL 4. TECHNICAL EFFICACY Stage 1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loredana Storelli
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Pagani
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrizia Pantano
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- IRCCS NEUROMED, Pozzilli, Italy
| | | | - Gioacchino Tedeschi
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, and 3T MRI-Center, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Gallo
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, and 3T MRI-Center, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola De Stefano
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Marco Battaglini
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Maria A Rocca
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cagol A, Fuertes NC, Stoessel M, Barakovic M, Schaedelin S, D'Souza M, Würfel J, Brandt AU, Kappos L, Sprenger T, Naegelin Y, Kuhle J, Granziera C, Papadopoulou A. Optical coherence tomography reflects clinically relevant gray matter damage in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2023; 270:2139-2148. [PMID: 36625888 PMCID: PMC10025239 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11535-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Retinal degeneration leading to optical coherence tomography (OCT) changes is frequent in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). OBJECTIVE To investigate associations among OCT changes, MRI measurements of global and regional brain volume loss, and physical and cognitive impairment in PwMS. METHODS 95 PwMS and 52 healthy controls underwent OCT and MRI examinations. Mean peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness and ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) volume were measured. In PwMS disability was quantified with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). Associations between OCT, MRI, and clinical measures were investigated with multivariable regression models. RESULTS In PwMS, pRNFL and GCIPL were associated with the volume of whole brain (p < 0.04), total gray matter (p < 0.002), thalamus (p ≤ 0.04), and cerebral cortex (p ≤ 0.003) -both globally and regionally-, but not white matter. pRNFL and GCIPL were also inversely associated with T2-lesion volume (T2LV), especially in the optic radiations (p < 0.0001). The brain volumes associated with EDSS and SDMT significantly overlapped with those correlating with pRNFL and GCIPL. CONCLUSIONS In PwMS, pRNFL and GCIPL reflect the integrity of clinically-relevant gray matter structures, underling the value of OCT measures as markers of neurodegeneration and disability in multiple sclerosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Cagol
- Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINK) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nuria Cerdá Fuertes
- Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINK) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marc Stoessel
- Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINK) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Muhamed Barakovic
- Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINK) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sabine Schaedelin
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marcus D'Souza
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jens Würfel
- Medical Image Analysis Center and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Alexander U Brandt
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- University of Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINK) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Till Sprenger
- Department of Neurology, DKD Helios Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Yvonne Naegelin
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jens Kuhle
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Cristina Granziera
- Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINK) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Athina Papadopoulou
- Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINK) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
- Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pennington P, Weinstock-Guttman B, Kolb C, Jakimovski D, Sacca K, Benedict RHB, Eckert S, Stecker M, Lizarraga A, Dwyer MG, Schumacher CB, Bergsland N, Picco P, Bernitsas E, Zabad R, Pardo G, Negroski D, Belkin M, Hojnacki D, Zivadinov R. Communicating the relevance of neurodegeneration and brain atrophy to multiple sclerosis patients: patient, provider and researcher perspectives. J Neurol 2023; 270:1095-1119. [PMID: 36376729 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11405-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) atrophy provides valuable additional evidence of an ongoing neurodegeneration independent of lesion accrual in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). However, there are limitations for interpretation of CNS volume changes at individual patient-level. Patients are receiving information on the topic of atrophy through various sources, including media, patient support groups and conferences, and discussions with their providers. Whether or not the topic of CNS atrophy should be proactively discussed with PwMS during office appointments is currently controversial. This commentary/perspective article represents perspectives of PwMS, providers and researchers with recommendations for minimizing confusion and anxiety, and facilitating proactive discussion about brain atrophy, as an upcoming routine measure in evaluating disease progression and treatment response monitoring. The following recommendations were created based on application of patient's and provider's surveys, and various workshops held over a period of 2 years: (1) PwMS should receive basic information on understanding of brain functional anatomy, and explanation of inflammation and neurodegeneration; (2) the expertise for atrophy measurements should be characterized as evolving; (3) quality patient education materials on these topics should be provided; (4) the need for standardization of MRI exams has to be explained and communicated; (5) providers should discuss background on volumetric changes, including references to normal aging; (6) the limitations of brain volume assessments at an individual-level should be explained; (7) the timing and language used to convey this information should be individualized based on the patient's background and disease status; (8) a discussion guide may be a very helpful resource for use by providers/staff to support these discussions; (9) understanding the role of brain atrophy and other MRI metrics may elicit greater patient satisfaction and acceptance of the value of therapies that have proven efficacy around these outcomes; (10) the areas that represent possibilities for positive self-management of MS symptoms that foster hope for improvement should be emphasized, and in particular regarding use of physical and mental exercise that build or maintain brain reserve through increased network efficiency, and (11) an additional time during clinical visits should be allotted to discuss these topics, including creation of specific educational programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penny Pennington
- Advisory Council, Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Bianca Weinstock-Guttman
- Department of Neurology, Jacobs Comprehensive MS Treatment and Research Center, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Channa Kolb
- Department of Neurology, Jacobs Comprehensive MS Treatment and Research Center, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Dejan Jakimovski
- Department of Neurology, Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, 100 High Street, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA
| | - Katherine Sacca
- Advisory Council, Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Ralph H B Benedict
- Department of Neurology, Jacobs Comprehensive MS Treatment and Research Center, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Svetlana Eckert
- Department of Neurology, Jacobs Comprehensive MS Treatment and Research Center, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Marc Stecker
- Advisory Council, Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Alexis Lizarraga
- Department of Neurology, Jacobs Comprehensive MS Treatment and Research Center, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Michael G Dwyer
- Department of Neurology, Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, 100 High Street, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.,Center for Biomedical Imaging at Clinical Translational Science Institute, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Carol B Schumacher
- Advisory Council, Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Niels Bergsland
- Department of Neurology, Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, 100 High Street, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.,IRCCS, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy
| | - Patricia Picco
- Advisory Council, Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | | | - Rana Zabad
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Gabriel Pardo
- Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | | - Martin Belkin
- Michigan Institute for Neurological Disorders (MIND), Farmington Hills, MI, USA
| | - David Hojnacki
- Department of Neurology, Jacobs Comprehensive MS Treatment and Research Center, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Robert Zivadinov
- Department of Neurology, Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, 100 High Street, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA. .,Center for Biomedical Imaging at Clinical Translational Science Institute, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van der Weijden CWJ, Pitombeira MS, Haveman YRA, Sanchez-Catasus CA, Campanholo KR, Kolinger GD, Rimkus CM, Buchpiguel CA, Dierckx RAJO, Renken RJ, Meilof JF, de Vries EFJ, de Paula Faria D. The effect of lesion filling on brain network analysis in multiple sclerosis using structural magnetic resonance imaging. Insights Imaging 2022; 13:63. [PMID: 35347460 PMCID: PMC8960512 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01198-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Graph theoretical network analysis with structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients can be used to assess subtle changes in brain networks. However, the presence of multiple focal brain lesions might impair the accuracy of automatic tissue segmentation methods, and hamper the performance of graph theoretical network analysis. Applying “lesion filling” by substituting the voxel intensities of a lesion with the voxel intensities of nearby voxels, thus creating an image devoid of lesions, might improve segmentation and graph theoretical network analysis. This study aims to determine if brain networks are different between MS subtypes and healthy controls (HC) and if the assessment of these differences is affected by lesion filling. Methods The study included 49 MS patients and 19 HC that underwent a T1w, and T2w-FLAIR MRI scan. Graph theoretical network analysis was performed from grey matter fractions extracted from the original T1w-images and T1w-images after lesion filling. Results Artefacts in lesion-filled T1w images correlated positively with total lesion volume (r = 0.84, p < 0.001) and had a major impact on grey matter segmentation accuracy. Differences in sensitivity for network alterations were observed between original T1w data and after application of lesion filling: graph theoretical network analysis obtained from lesion-filled T1w images produced more differences in network organization in MS patients. Conclusion Lesion filling might reduce variability across subjects resulting in an increased detection rate of network alterations in MS, but also induces significant artefacts, and therefore should be applied cautiously especially in individuals with higher lesions loads. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-022-01198-4.
Collapse
|
11
|
Predictive MRI Biomarkers in MS—A Critical Review. Medicina (B Aires) 2022; 58:medicina58030377. [PMID: 35334554 PMCID: PMC8949449 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58030377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: In this critical review, we explore the potential use of MRI measurements as prognostic biomarkers in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, for both conventional measurements and more novel techniques such as magnetization transfer, diffusion tensor, and proton spectroscopy MRI. Materials and Methods: All authors individually and comprehensively reviewed each of the aspects listed below in PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar. Results: There are numerous MRI metrics that have been proven by clinical studies to hold important prognostic value for MS patients, most of which can be readily obtained from standard 1.5T MRI scans. Conclusions: While some of these parameters have passed the test of time and seem to be associated with a reliable predictive power, some are still better interpreted with caution. We hope this will serve as a reminder of how vast a resource we have on our hands in this versatile tool—it is up to us to make use of it.
Collapse
|
12
|
Lie IA, Weeda MM, Mattiesing RM, Mol MAE, Pouwels PJW, Barkhof F, Torkildsen Ø, Bø L, Myhr KM, Vrenken H. Relationship Between White Matter Lesions and Gray Matter Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review. Neurology 2022; 98:e1562-e1573. [PMID: 35173016 PMCID: PMC9038199 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000200006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives There is currently no consensus about the extent of gray matter (GM) atrophy that can be attributed to secondary changes after white matter (WM) lesions or the temporal and spatial relationships between the 2 phenomena. Elucidating this interplay will broaden the understanding of the combined inflammatory and neurodegenerative pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis (MS), and separating atrophic changes due to primary and secondary neurodegenerative mechanisms will then be pivotal to properly evaluate treatment effects, especially if these treatments target the different processes individually. To untangle these complex pathologic mechanisms, this systematic review provides an essential first step: an objective and comprehensive overview of the existing in vivo knowledge of the relationship between brain WM lesions and GM atrophy in patients diagnosed with MS. The overall aim was to clarify the extent to which WM lesions are associated with both global and regional GM atrophy and how this may differ in the different disease subtypes. Methods We searched MEDLINE (through PubMed) and Embase for reports containing direct associations between brain GM and WM lesion measures obtained by conventional MRI sequences in patients with clinically isolated syndrome and MS. No restriction was applied for publication date. The quality and risk of bias in included studies were evaluated with the Quality Assessment Tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies (NIH, Bethesda, MA). Qualitative and descriptive analyses were performed. Results A total of 90 articles were included. WM lesion volumes were related mostly to global, cortical and deep GM volumes, and those significant associations were almost without exception negative, indicating that higher WM lesion volumes were associated with lower GM volumes or lower cortical thicknesses. The most consistent relationship between WM lesions and GM atrophy was seen in early (relapsing) disease and less so in progressive MS. Discussion The findings suggest that GM neurodegeneration is mostly secondary to damage in the WM during early disease stages while becoming more detached and dominated by other, possibly primary neurodegenerative disease mechanisms in progressive MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Anne Lie
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Merlin M Weeda
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rozemarijn M Mattiesing
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marijke A E Mol
- Medical Library, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Petra J W Pouwels
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, UCL London, London, UK
| | - Øivind Torkildsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Neuro-SysMed, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Lars Bø
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Norwegian Multiple Sclerosis Competence Centre, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Kjell-Morten Myhr
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Neuro-SysMed, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Hugo Vrenken
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Liu XY, Ma GY, Wang S, Gao Q, Guo C, Wei Q, Zhou X, Chen LP. Perivascular space is associated with brain atrophy in patients with multiple sclerosis. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2022; 12:1004-1019. [PMID: 35111601 DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perivascular space (PVS) is associated with neurodegenerative and neuroimmune diseases. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is traditionally a neuroimmune disease. However, studies show neurodegeneration also plays a vital role in MS. At present, most studies conclude severer PVS in MS is an imaging marker of neuroinflammation, while a 7T MRI study suggests that PVS in MS is associated with neurodegeneration. METHODS In this study, 82 MS patients (n=82) and 32 healthy controls (n=32) were enrolled. The following indexes were measured: the number, size and distribution of PVS, the PVS score, corpus callosum index (CCI), corpus callosum area (CCA), the ratio of the corpus callosum to the cranium (CCR), aligned third ventricle width (a3VW), and unaligned third ventricle width (u3VW). RESULTS The PVS score (4 vs. 3, P=0.041), PVSs number (103.280±45.107 vs. 87.625±30.139, P=0.035), and enlarged perivascular spaces (EPVSs) number (9 vs. 1, P<0.001) of MS patients were significantly higher than in the healthy controls. PVSs number (23.5 vs. 13) and EPVSs number (1 vs. 0) in the basal ganglia (BG), and EPVSs number (3 vs. 0) in centrum semiovale (CSO) of MS patients were significantly higher than in the healthy controls, P<0.001. In MS patients, PVS was correlated with age and hypertension but not to the extended disability status scale (EDSS) score and other clinical data. In MS patients, PVS score was correlated with CCA (rs=0.272; P=0.013) and the CCR (rs=0.219; P=0.048), and PVSs number was correlated with CCA (rs=0.255; P=0.021), the correlation disappeared after adjusting hypertension and age. In MS patients in remission, PVSs number was correlated with CCA (rs=0.487; P=0.019), CCR (rs=0.479; P=0.021), and PVS score was correlated with CCA (rs=0.453; P=0.03). After adjustment of hypertension and age, the total number of PVSs was correlated with CCA (rs=0.419; P=0.049). CONCLUSIONS The PVS load in MS patients was heavier than healthy people, especially in BG and CSO. PVS was not correlated with EDSS in MS patients. The PVS of MS patients was associated with CCA and CCR, and PVSs number was independently related with CCA in MS patients in remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue-Yu Liu
- Department of Neurology, Key Laboratory of Neurology of Hebei Province, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Gai-Ying Ma
- Department of Neurology, Key Laboratory of Neurology of Hebei Province, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Shi Wang
- Department of Neurology, Key Laboratory of Neurology of Hebei Province, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Qian Gao
- Department of Neurology, Key Laboratory of Neurology of Hebei Province, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Cong Guo
- Department of Neurology, Key Laboratory of Neurology of Hebei Province, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Qiao Wei
- Department of Neurology, Key Laboratory of Neurology of Hebei Province, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Xuan Zhou
- Department of Neurology, Key Laboratory of Neurology of Hebei Province, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Li-Ping Chen
- Department of Neurology, Key Laboratory of Neurology of Hebei Province, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wal A, Khandai M, Vig H, Srivastava P, Agarwal A, Wadhwani S, Wal P. Evidence-Based Treatment, assisted by Mobile Technology to Deliver, and Evidence-Based Drugs in South Asian Countries. ARCHIVES OF PHARMACY PRACTICE 2022. [DOI: 10.51847/d5zeajvk6x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
15
|
Qiao H, Chen L, Zhu F. Ranking convolutional neural network for Alzheimer's disease mini-mental state examination prediction at multiple time-points. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE 2022; 213:106503. [PMID: 34798407 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease. Predicting Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in monitoring the progress of AD. Existing machine learning based methods cast MMSE prediction as a single metric regression problem simply and ignore the relationship between subjects with various scores. METHODS In this study, we proposed a ranking convolutional neural network (rankCNN) to address the prediction of MMSE through muti-classification. Specifically, we use a 3D convolutional neural network with sharing weights to extract the feature from MRI, followed by multiple sub-networks which transform the cognitive regression into a series of simpler binary classification. In addition, we further use a ranking layer to measure the ranking information between samples to strengthen the ability of the classification by extracting more discriminative features. RESULTS We evaluated the proposed model on ADNI-1 and ADNI-2 datasets with a total of 1,569 subjects. The Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of our proposed model at baseline is 2.238 and 2.434 on ADNI-1 and ADNI-2, respectively. Extensive experimental results on ADNI-1 and ADNI-2 datasets demonstrate that our proposed model is superior to several state-of-the-art methods at both baseline and future MMSE prediction of subjects. CONCLUSION This paper provides a new method that can effectively predict the MMSE at baseline and future time points using baseline MRI, making it possible to use MRI for accurate early diagnosis of AD. The source code is freely available at https://github.com/fengduqianhe/ADrankCNN-master.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hezhe Qiao
- Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 400714, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
| | - Lin Chen
- Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 400714, China.
| | - Fan Zhu
- Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 400714, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cortese R, Giorgio A, Severa G, De Stefano N. MRI Prognostic Factors in Multiple Sclerosis, Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder, and Myelin Oligodendrocyte Antibody Disease. Front Neurol 2021; 12:679881. [PMID: 34867701 PMCID: PMC8636325 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.679881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Several MRI measures have been developed in the last couple of decades, providing a number of imaging biomarkers that can capture the complexity of the pathological processes occurring in multiple sclerosis (MS) brains. Such measures have provided more specific information on the heterogeneous pathologic substrate of MS-related tissue damage, being able to detect, and quantify the evolution of structural changes both within and outside focal lesions. In clinical practise, MRI is increasingly used in the MS field to help to assess patients during follow-up, guide treatment decisions and, importantly, predict the disease course. Moreover, the process of identifying new effective therapies for MS patients has been supported by the use of serial MRI examinations in order to sensitively detect the sub-clinical effects of disease-modifying treatments at an earlier stage than is possible using measures based on clinical disease activity. However, despite this has been largely demonstrated in the relapsing forms of MS, a poor understanding of the underlying pathologic mechanisms leading to either progression or tissue repair in MS as well as the lack of sensitive outcome measures for the progressive phases of the disease and repair therapies makes the development of effective treatments a big challenge. Finally, the role of MRI biomarkers in the monitoring of disease activity and the assessment of treatment response in other inflammatory demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system, such as neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte antibody disease (MOGAD) is still marginal, and advanced MRI studies have shown conflicting results. Against this background, this review focused on recently developed MRI measures, which were sensitive to pathological changes, and that could best contribute in the future to provide prognostic information and monitor patients with MS and other inflammatory demyelinating diseases, in particular, NMOSD and MOGAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa Cortese
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Antonio Giorgio
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Gianmarco Severa
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Nicola De Stefano
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Vrenken H, Jenkinson M, Pham DL, Guttmann CRG, Pareto D, Paardekooper M, de Sitter A, Rocca MA, Wottschel V, Cardoso MJ, Barkhof F. Opportunities for Understanding MS Mechanisms and Progression With MRI Using Large-Scale Data Sharing and Artificial Intelligence. Neurology 2021; 97:989-999. [PMID: 34607924 PMCID: PMC8610621 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000012884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have heterogeneous clinical presentations, symptoms, and progression over time, making MS difficult to assess and comprehend in vivo. The combination of large-scale data sharing and artificial intelligence creates new opportunities for monitoring and understanding MS using MRI. First, development of validated MS-specific image analysis methods can be boosted by verified reference, test, and benchmark imaging data. Using detailed expert annotations, artificial intelligence algorithms can be trained on such MS-specific data. Second, understanding disease processes could be greatly advanced through shared data of large MS cohorts with clinical, demographic, and treatment information. Relevant patterns in such data that may be imperceptible to a human observer could be detected through artificial intelligence techniques. This applies from image analysis (lesions, atrophy, or functional network changes) to large multidomain datasets (imaging, cognition, clinical disability, genetics). After reviewing data sharing and artificial intelligence, we highlight 3 areas that offer strong opportunities for making advances in the next few years: crowdsourcing, personal data protection, and organized analysis challenges. Difficulties as well as specific recommendations to overcome them are discussed, in order to best leverage data sharing and artificial intelligence to improve image analysis, imaging, and the understanding of MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugo Vrenken
- From the MS Center Amsterdam (H.V., A.d.S., V.W.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC (M.P.), the Netherlands; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), FMRIB (M.J.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (NDCN), University of Oxford, UK; Human Imaging and Image Processing Core (D.L.P.), Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, The Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Bethesda, MD; Center for Neurological Imaging (C.R.G.G.), Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Section of Neuroradiology (Department of Radiology) (D.P.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Research Institute (VHIR), Autonomous University Barcelona, Spain; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; AMIGO (M.J.C.), School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London; and Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL London, UK.
| | - Mark Jenkinson
- From the MS Center Amsterdam (H.V., A.d.S., V.W.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC (M.P.), the Netherlands; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), FMRIB (M.J.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (NDCN), University of Oxford, UK; Human Imaging and Image Processing Core (D.L.P.), Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, The Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Bethesda, MD; Center for Neurological Imaging (C.R.G.G.), Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Section of Neuroradiology (Department of Radiology) (D.P.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Research Institute (VHIR), Autonomous University Barcelona, Spain; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; AMIGO (M.J.C.), School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London; and Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL London, UK
| | - Dzung L Pham
- From the MS Center Amsterdam (H.V., A.d.S., V.W.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC (M.P.), the Netherlands; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), FMRIB (M.J.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (NDCN), University of Oxford, UK; Human Imaging and Image Processing Core (D.L.P.), Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, The Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Bethesda, MD; Center for Neurological Imaging (C.R.G.G.), Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Section of Neuroradiology (Department of Radiology) (D.P.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Research Institute (VHIR), Autonomous University Barcelona, Spain; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; AMIGO (M.J.C.), School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London; and Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL London, UK
| | - Charles R G Guttmann
- From the MS Center Amsterdam (H.V., A.d.S., V.W.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC (M.P.), the Netherlands; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), FMRIB (M.J.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (NDCN), University of Oxford, UK; Human Imaging and Image Processing Core (D.L.P.), Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, The Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Bethesda, MD; Center for Neurological Imaging (C.R.G.G.), Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Section of Neuroradiology (Department of Radiology) (D.P.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Research Institute (VHIR), Autonomous University Barcelona, Spain; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; AMIGO (M.J.C.), School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London; and Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL London, UK
| | - Deborah Pareto
- From the MS Center Amsterdam (H.V., A.d.S., V.W.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC (M.P.), the Netherlands; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), FMRIB (M.J.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (NDCN), University of Oxford, UK; Human Imaging and Image Processing Core (D.L.P.), Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, The Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Bethesda, MD; Center for Neurological Imaging (C.R.G.G.), Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Section of Neuroradiology (Department of Radiology) (D.P.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Research Institute (VHIR), Autonomous University Barcelona, Spain; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; AMIGO (M.J.C.), School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London; and Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL London, UK
| | - Michel Paardekooper
- From the MS Center Amsterdam (H.V., A.d.S., V.W.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC (M.P.), the Netherlands; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), FMRIB (M.J.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (NDCN), University of Oxford, UK; Human Imaging and Image Processing Core (D.L.P.), Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, The Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Bethesda, MD; Center for Neurological Imaging (C.R.G.G.), Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Section of Neuroradiology (Department of Radiology) (D.P.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Research Institute (VHIR), Autonomous University Barcelona, Spain; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; AMIGO (M.J.C.), School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London; and Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL London, UK
| | - Alexandra de Sitter
- From the MS Center Amsterdam (H.V., A.d.S., V.W.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC (M.P.), the Netherlands; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), FMRIB (M.J.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (NDCN), University of Oxford, UK; Human Imaging and Image Processing Core (D.L.P.), Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, The Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Bethesda, MD; Center for Neurological Imaging (C.R.G.G.), Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Section of Neuroradiology (Department of Radiology) (D.P.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Research Institute (VHIR), Autonomous University Barcelona, Spain; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; AMIGO (M.J.C.), School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London; and Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL London, UK
| | - Maria A Rocca
- From the MS Center Amsterdam (H.V., A.d.S., V.W.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC (M.P.), the Netherlands; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), FMRIB (M.J.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (NDCN), University of Oxford, UK; Human Imaging and Image Processing Core (D.L.P.), Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, The Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Bethesda, MD; Center for Neurological Imaging (C.R.G.G.), Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Section of Neuroradiology (Department of Radiology) (D.P.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Research Institute (VHIR), Autonomous University Barcelona, Spain; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; AMIGO (M.J.C.), School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London; and Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL London, UK
| | - Viktor Wottschel
- From the MS Center Amsterdam (H.V., A.d.S., V.W.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC (M.P.), the Netherlands; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), FMRIB (M.J.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (NDCN), University of Oxford, UK; Human Imaging and Image Processing Core (D.L.P.), Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, The Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Bethesda, MD; Center for Neurological Imaging (C.R.G.G.), Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Section of Neuroradiology (Department of Radiology) (D.P.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Research Institute (VHIR), Autonomous University Barcelona, Spain; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; AMIGO (M.J.C.), School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London; and Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL London, UK
| | - M Jorge Cardoso
- From the MS Center Amsterdam (H.V., A.d.S., V.W.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC (M.P.), the Netherlands; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), FMRIB (M.J.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (NDCN), University of Oxford, UK; Human Imaging and Image Processing Core (D.L.P.), Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, The Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Bethesda, MD; Center for Neurological Imaging (C.R.G.G.), Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Section of Neuroradiology (Department of Radiology) (D.P.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Research Institute (VHIR), Autonomous University Barcelona, Spain; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; AMIGO (M.J.C.), School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London; and Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL London, UK
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- From the MS Center Amsterdam (H.V., A.d.S., V.W.), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC (M.P.), the Netherlands; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), FMRIB (M.J.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (NDCN), University of Oxford, UK; Human Imaging and Image Processing Core (D.L.P.), Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, The Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Bethesda, MD; Center for Neurological Imaging (C.R.G.G.), Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Section of Neuroradiology (Department of Radiology) (D.P.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Research Institute (VHIR), Autonomous University Barcelona, Spain; Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.A.R.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; AMIGO (M.J.C.), School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London; and Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering (F.B.), UCL London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Krajnc N, Bsteh G, Berger T. Clinical and Paraclinical Biomarkers and the Hitches to Assess Conversion to Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review. Front Neurol 2021; 12:666868. [PMID: 34512500 PMCID: PMC8427301 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.666868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Conversion to secondary progressive (SP) course is the decisive factor for long-term prognosis in relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), generally considered the clinical equivalent of progressive MS-associated neuroaxonal degeneration. Evidence is accumulating that both inflammation and neurodegeneration are present along a continuum of pathologic processes in all phases of MS. While inflammation is the prominent feature in early stages, its quality changes and relative importance to disease course decreases while neurodegenerative processes prevail with ongoing disease. Consequently, anti-inflammatory disease-modifying therapies successfully used in relapsing MS are ineffective in SPMS, whereas specific treatment for the latter is increasingly a focus of MS research. Therefore, the prevention, but also the (anticipatory) diagnosis of SPMS, is of crucial importance. The problem is that currently SPMS diagnosis is exclusively based on retrospectively assessing the increase of overt physical disability usually over the past 6–12 months. This inevitably results in a delay of diagnosis of up to 3 years resulting in periods of uncertainty and, thus, making early therapy adaptation to prevent SPMS conversion impossible. Hence, there is an urgent need for reliable and objective biomarkers to prospectively predict and define SPMS conversion. Here, we review current evidence on clinical parameters, magnetic resonance imaging and optical coherence tomography measures, and serum and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in the context of MS-associated neurodegeneration and SPMS conversion. Ultimately, we discuss the necessity of multimodal approaches in order to approach objective definition and prediction of conversion to SPMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nik Krajnc
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Gabriel Bsteh
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Berger
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bernal J, Valverde S, Kushibar K, Cabezas M, Oliver A, Lladó X. Generating Longitudinal Atrophy Evaluation Datasets on Brain Magnetic Resonance Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks and Segmentation Priors. Neuroinformatics 2021; 19:477-492. [PMID: 33389607 DOI: 10.1007/s12021-020-09499-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Brain atrophy quantification plays a fundamental role in neuroinformatics since it permits studying brain development and neurological disorders. However, the lack of a ground truth prevents testing the accuracy of longitudinal atrophy quantification methods. We propose a deep learning framework to generate longitudinal datasets by deforming T1-w brain magnetic resonance imaging scans as requested through segmentation maps. Our proposal incorporates a cascaded multi-path U-Net optimised with a multi-objective loss which allows its paths to generate different brain regions accurately. We provided our model with baseline scans and real follow-up segmentation maps from two longitudinal datasets, ADNI and OASIS, and observed that our framework could produce synthetic follow-up scans that matched the real ones (Total scans= 584; Median absolute error: 0.03 ± 0.02; Structural similarity index: 0.98 ± 0.02; Dice similarity coefficient: 0.95 ± 0.02; Percentage of brain volume change: 0.24 ± 0.16; Jacobian integration: 1.13 ± 0.05). Compared to two relevant works generating brain lesions using U-Nets and conditional generative adversarial networks (CGAN), our proposal outperformed them significantly in most cases (p < 0.01), except in the delineation of brain edges where the CGAN took the lead (Jacobian integration: Ours - 1.13 ± 0.05 vs CGAN - 1.00 ± 0.02; p < 0.01). We examined whether changes induced with our framework were detected by FAST, SPM, SIENA, SIENAX, and the Jacobian integration method. We observed that induced and detected changes were highly correlated (Adj. R2 > 0.86). Our preliminary results on harmonised datasets showed the potential of our framework to be applied to various data collections without further adjustment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Bernal
- Computer Vision and Robotics Institute, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain.
| | - Sergi Valverde
- Computer Vision and Robotics Institute, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - Kaisar Kushibar
- Computer Vision and Robotics Institute, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - Mariano Cabezas
- Computer Vision and Robotics Institute, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - Arnau Oliver
- Computer Vision and Robotics Institute, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - Xavier Lladó
- Computer Vision and Robotics Institute, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Trufanov A, Bisaga G, Skulyabin D, Temniy A, Poplyak M, Chakchir O, Efimtsev A, Dmitriy T, Odinak M, Litvinenko I. Thalamic nuclei degeneration in multiple sclerosis. J Clin Neurosci 2021; 89:375-380. [PMID: 34090763 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.05.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 05/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To define both the severity and extent of structural alteration in certain thalamic nuclei by means of MR morphometry and to compare these findings with clinical performance in different phenotypes of multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS We comparatively measured the thalamus nuclei volumes of patients with remitting-relapsing (RRMS) and secondary-progressive (SPMS) phenotypes of multiple sclerosis and healthy control subjects (HC). The evaluation of neurological performance was based on the results of Expanded Disability Status Scale and Multiple Sclerosis Severity Scale. Cognitive and mental state was rated according to the results of Mini-Mental State Examination, Frontal Assessment Battery, Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Freesurfer 6.0 was used for thalamic nuclei volumes calculation. RESULTS The median volume decline in thalamic pulvinar nuclei in RRMS group on the left side (anterior nucleus - 186,6 mm3, posterior nucleus - 149,4 mm3, medial nucleus 852,4 mm3) compared to HC (anterior nucleus - 229,2 mm3, posterior nucleus - 187,5 mm3, medical nucleus - 1081,3 mm3). Same group, right side - anterior nucleus - 219,5 mm3, posterior nucleus 187,1 mm3, medial nucleus - 989,6 mm3; HC group - anterior nucleus 261,1 mm3, posterior nucleus 240,5 mm3, medial nucleus - 1196,7 mm3 (p < 0,05). The highest correlation of the written section of SDMT was observed with the left ventral anterior nucleus (r = 0,71). CONCLUSION These findings indicate the credible correlation between clinical progression of neurological and cognitive impairment in MS patients with asymmetry left-sided thalamic nuclei atrophy and may be considered a potential predicting tool of MS progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artem Trufanov
- Department of Nanobiotechnology, Autonomous Non-profit Higher Education Organization (University associated with the Interparliamentary Assembly of the Eurasian Economic Community), 14/1, letter B, Smolyachkova Street, 194044 Saint-Petersburg, Russia; Department of Neurology, Kirov Military Medical Academy, 6, Lebedeva Street, 194044 Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
| | - Gennady Bisaga
- Department of Neurology, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 2, Akkuratova Street, 197341 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | - Dmitry Skulyabin
- Department of Neurology, Kirov Military Medical Academy, 6, Lebedeva Street, 194044 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | - Alexandr Temniy
- Department of Neurology, Kirov Military Medical Academy, 6, Lebedeva Street, 194044 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | - Mariya Poplyak
- Department of Neurology, Kirov Military Medical Academy, 6, Lebedeva Street, 194044 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | - Oleg Chakchir
- Department of Nanobiotechnology, Autonomous Non-profit Higher Education Organization (University associated with the Interparliamentary Assembly of the Eurasian Economic Community), 14/1, letter B, Smolyachkova Street, 194044 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | - Aleksandr Efimtsev
- Department of Radiology, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 2, Akkuratova Street, 197341 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | - Tarumov Dmitriy
- Department of Psychiatry, Kirov Military Medical Academy, 6, Lebedeva Street, 194044 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | - Miroslav Odinak
- Department of Neurology, Kirov Military Medical Academy, 6, Lebedeva Street, 194044 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | - Igor Litvinenko
- Department of Neurology, Kirov Military Medical Academy, 6, Lebedeva Street, 194044 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
de Sitter A, Burggraaff J, Bartel F, Palotai M, Liu Y, Simoes J, Ruggieri S, Schregel K, Ropele S, Rocca MA, Gasperini C, Gallo A, Schoonheim MM, Amann M, Yiannakas M, Pareto D, Wattjes MP, Sastre-Garriga J, Kappos L, Filippi M, Enzinger C, Frederiksen J, Uitdehaag B, Guttmann CRG, Barkhof F, Vrenken H. Development and evaluation of a manual segmentation protocol for deep grey matter in multiple sclerosis: Towards accelerated semi-automated references. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2021; 30:102659. [PMID: 33882422 PMCID: PMC8082260 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep grey matter (dGM) structures, particularly the thalamus, are clinically relevant in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, segmentation of dGM in MS is challenging; labeled MS-specific reference sets are needed for objective evaluation and training of new methods. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to (i) create a standardized protocol for manual delineations of dGM; (ii) evaluate the reliability of the protocol with multiple raters; and (iii) evaluate the accuracy of a fast-semi-automated segmentation approach (FASTSURF). METHODS A standardized manual segmentation protocol for caudate nucleus, putamen, and thalamus was created, and applied by three raters on multi-center 3D T1-weighted MRI scans of 23 MS patients and 12 controls. Intra- and inter-rater agreement was assessed through intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC); spatial overlap through Jaccard Index (JI) and generalized conformity index (CIgen). From sparse delineations, FASTSURF reconstructed full segmentations; accuracy was assessed both volumetrically and spatially. RESULTS All structures showed excellent agreement on expert manual outlines: intra-rater JI > 0.83; inter-rater ICC ≥ 0.76 and CIgen ≥ 0.74. FASTSURF reproduced manual references excellently, with ICC ≥ 0.97 and JI ≥ 0.92. CONCLUSIONS The manual dGM segmentation protocol showed excellent reproducibility within and between raters. Moreover, combined with FASTSURF a reliable reference set of dGM segmentations can be produced with lower workload.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra de Sitter
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, NL, Netherlands
| | - Jessica Burggraaff
- Department of Neurology, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, NL, Netherlands.
| | - Fabian Bartel
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, NL, Netherlands
| | - Miklos Palotai
- Center for Neurological Imaging, Department of radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yaou Liu
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, NL, Netherlands
| | - Jorge Simoes
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, NL, Netherlands
| | - Serena Ruggieri
- Department of Human Neurosciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, IT, Italy; Department of Neurosciences, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, IT, Italy
| | - Katharina Schregel
- Center for Neurological Imaging, Department of radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA; Institute of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, DE, Germany
| | - Stefan Ropele
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AT, Austria
| | - Maria A Rocca
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, United States; Neurology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, UniSR, Milan, IT, Italy
| | - Claudio Gasperini
- Department of Neurosciences, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, IT, Italy
| | - Antonio Gallo
- Division of Neurology and 3T MRI Research Center, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, IT, Italy
| | - Menno M Schoonheim
- Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NL, Netherlands
| | - Michael Amann
- Medical Image Analysis Center (MIAC), United States; Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic and Neuroradiology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, Basel, CH, Switzerland
| | - Marios Yiannakas
- Department of Neuroinflammation, Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Deborah Pareto
- Section of Neuroradiology and MRI Unit, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Valld'Hebron, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, ES, Spain
| | - Mike P Wattjes
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, NL, Netherlands; Deptartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, DE, Germany
| | - Jaume Sastre-Garriga
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital iValld'Hebron, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, ES, Spain
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic and Neuroradiology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, Basel, CH, Switzerland
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, United States; Neurology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, UniSR, Milan, IT, Italy; Neurophysiology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, IT, Italy
| | - Christian Enzinger
- Division of Neuroradiology, Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AT, Austria
| | - Jette Frederiksen
- Department of Neurology, Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagen, DK, Denmark
| | - Bernard Uitdehaag
- Department of Neurology, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, NL, Netherlands
| | - Charles R G Guttmann
- Center for Neurological Imaging, Department of radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, NL, Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering, UCL, London, UK
| | - Hugo Vrenken
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, NL, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dangond F, Donnelly A, Hohlfeld R, Lubetzki C, Kohlhaas S, Leocani L, Ciccarelli O, Stankoff B, Sormani MP, Chataway J, Bozzoli F, Cucca F, Melton L, Coetzee T, Salvetti M. Facing the urgency of therapies for progressive MS - a Progressive MS Alliance proposal. Nat Rev Neurol 2021; 17:185-192. [PMID: 33483719 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-020-00446-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Therapies for infiltrative inflammation in multiple sclerosis (MS) have advanced greatly, but neurodegeneration and compartmentalized inflammation remain virtually untargeted as in other diseases of the nervous system. Consequently, many therapies are available for the relapsing-remitting form of MS, but the progressive forms remain essentially untreated. The objective of the International Progressive MS Alliance is to expedite the development of effective therapies for progressive MS through new initiatives that foster innovative thinking and concrete advancements. Based on these principles, the Alliance is developing a new funding programme that will focus on experimental medicine trials. Here, we discuss the reasons behind the focus on experimental medicine trials, the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches and of the programme, and why we hope to advance therapies while improving the understanding of progression in MS. We are soliciting public and academic feedback, which will help shape the programme and future strategies of the Alliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alexis Donnelly
- Department of Computer Science, O'Reilly Institute, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Reinhard Hohlfeld
- Institute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, Biomedical Center and Hospital of the Ludwig Maximilians Universität München, Munich, Germany.,Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (Synergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Catherine Lubetzki
- Neurology Department, Sorbonne University, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | - Letizia Leocani
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Neurorehabilitation Department and Experimental Neurophysiology Unit, INSPE, Scientific Institute Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Olga Ciccarelli
- Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.,National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Bruno Stankoff
- Sorbonne University, Brain and Spine Institute, ICM, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Maria Pia Sormani
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Jeremy Chataway
- Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.,National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | | | - Francesco Cucca
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Università di Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Lisa Melton
- MS Research Australia, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Marco Salvetti
- Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Centre for Experimental Neurological Therapies (CENTERS), Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy. .,IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo (INM) Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Burggraaff J, Liu Y, Prieto JC, Simoes J, de Sitter A, Ruggieri S, Brouwer I, Lissenberg-Witte BI, Rocca MA, Valsasina P, Ropele S, Gasperini C, Gallo A, Pareto D, Sastre-Garriga J, Enzinger C, Filippi M, De Stefano N, Ciccarelli O, Hulst HE, Wattjes MP, Barkhof F, Uitdehaag BMJ, Vrenken H, Guttmann CRG. Manual and automated tissue segmentation confirm the impact of thalamus atrophy on cognition in multiple sclerosis: A multicenter study. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2020; 29:102549. [PMID: 33401136 PMCID: PMC7787946 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE Thalamus atrophy has been linked to cognitive decline in multiple sclerosis (MS) using various segmentation methods. We investigated the consistency of the association between thalamus volume and cognition in MS for two common automated segmentation approaches, as well as fully manual outlining. METHODS Standardized neuropsychological assessment and 3-Tesla 3D-T1-weighted brain MRI were collected (multi-center) from 57 MS patients and 17 healthy controls. Thalamus segmentations were generated manually and using five automated methods. Agreement between the algorithms and manual outlines was assessed with Bland-Altman plots; linear regression assessed the presence of proportional bias. The effect of segmentation method on the separation of cognitively impaired (CI) and preserved (CP) patients was investigated through Generalized Estimating Equations; associations with cognitive measures were investigated using linear mixed models, for each method and vendor. RESULTS In smaller thalami, automated methods systematically overestimated volumes compared to manual segmentations [ρ=(-0.42)-(-0.76); p-values < 0.001). All methods significantly distinguished CI from CP MS patients, except manual outlines of the left thalamus (p = 0.23). Poorer global neuropsychological test performance was significantly associated with smaller thalamus volumes bilaterally using all methods. Vendor significantly affected the findings. CONCLUSION Automated and manual thalamus segmentation consistently demonstrated an association between thalamus atrophy and cognitive impairment in MS. However, a proportional bias in smaller thalami and choice of MRI acquisition system might impact the effect size of these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Burggraaff
- Department of Neurology, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Yao Liu
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Juan C Prieto
- Center for Neurological Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1249 Boylston Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| | - Jorge Simoes
- Department of Neurology, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Alexandra de Sitter
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Serena Ruggieri
- Department of Human Neurosciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 5, 00185 Roma RM, Italy; Department of Neurosciences, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Circonvallazione Gianicolense, 87, 00152 Roma RM, Italy.
| | - Iman Brouwer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Mara A Rocca
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, and Neurology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 58, 20132 Milano MI, Italy; Neurology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 58, 20132 Milano MI, Italy.
| | - Paola Valsasina
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, and Neurology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 58, 20132 Milano MI, Italy.
| | - Stefan Ropele
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, 8036 Graz, Austria.
| | - Claudio Gasperini
- Department of Neurosciences, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Circonvallazione Gianicolense, 87, 00152 Roma RM, Italy.
| | - Antonio Gallo
- Division of Neurology and 3T MRI Research Center, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Viale Abramo Lincoln, 5, 81100 Caserta, CE, Napoli, Italy.
| | - Deborah Pareto
- Section of Neuroradiology and MRI Unit, Department of Radiology, University Hospital iValld'Hebron, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Jaume Sastre-Garriga
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital iValld'Hebron, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Christian Enzinger
- Division of Neuroradiology, Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, 8036 Graz, Austria.
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, and Neurology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 58, 20132 Milano MI, Italy; Neurology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 58, 20132 Milano MI, Italy; Neurophysiology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, and (14)Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina, 58, 20132 Milano, MI, Italy; Department of Neurological and Behavioural Sciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena SI, Italy.
| | - Nicola De Stefano
- Department of Neurological and Behavioural Sciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena SI, Italy.
| | - Olga Ciccarelli
- Department of Neuroinflammation UCL, Queen Square Institute of Neurology UCL, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.
| | - Hanneke E Hulst
- Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1108, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Mike P Wattjes
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Straße, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering, UCL, 235 Euston Rd, Bloomsbury, London NW1 2BU, United Kingdom.
| | - Bernard M J Uitdehaag
- Department of Neurology, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Hugo Vrenken
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Charles R G Guttmann
- Center for Neurological Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1249 Boylston Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Weeda MM, Pruis IJ, Westerveld ASR, Brouwer I, Bellenberg B, Barkhof F, Vrenken H, Lukas C, Schneider R, Pouwels PJW. Damage in the Thalamocortical Tracts is Associated With Subsequent Thalamus Atrophy in Early Multiple Sclerosis. Front Neurol 2020; 11:575611. [PMID: 33281710 PMCID: PMC7705066 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.575611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: In early multiple sclerosis (MS), thalamus atrophy and decreased integrity of the thalamocortical white matter (WM) tracts have been observed. Objective: To investigate the temporal association between thalamus volume and WM damage in the thalamocortical tract in subjects with early MS. Methods: At two time points, 72 subjects with early MS underwent T1, FLAIR and diffusion tensor imaging. Thalamocortical tracts were identified with probabilistic tractography using left and right thalamus as seed regions. Regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of annual percentage change in both thalamus volumes and integrity of the connected tracts. Results: Significant atrophy was seen in left and right thalamus (p < 0.001) over the follow-up period (13.7 ± 4.8 months), whereas fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) changes of the left and right thalamus tracts were not significant, although large inter-subject variability was seen. Annual percentage change in left thalamus volume was significantly predicted by baseline FA of the left thalamus tracts F(1.71) = 4.284, p = 0.042; while no such relation was found for the right thalamus. Annual percentage change in FA or MD of the thalamus tracts was not predicted by thalamus volume or any of the demographic parameters. Conclusion: Over a short follow-up time, thalamus atrophy could be predicted by decreased integrity of the thalamic tracts, but changes in the integrity of the thalamic tracts could not be predicted by thalamus volume. This is the first study showing directionality in the association between thalamus atrophy and connected WM tract damage. These results need to be verified over longer follow-up periods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merlin M Weeda
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC-Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ilanah J Pruis
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC-Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Aimee S R Westerveld
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC-Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Iman Brouwer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC-Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Barbara Bellenberg
- Institute of Neuroradiology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC-Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hugo Vrenken
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC-Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Carsten Lukas
- Institute of Neuroradiology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Ruth Schneider
- Institute of Neuroradiology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.,Department of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Petra J W Pouwels
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC-Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rothstein TL. Gray Matter Matters: A Longitudinal Magnetic Resonance Voxel-Based Morphometry Study of Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. Front Neurol 2020; 11:581537. [PMID: 33281717 PMCID: PMC7689315 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.581537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) lesions in white matter (WM) are easily detected with conventional MRI which induce inflammation thereby generating contrast. WM lesions do not consistently explain the extent of clinical disability, cognitive impairment, or the source of an exacerbation. Gray matter (GM) structures including the cerebral cortex and various deep nuclei are known to be affected early in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (PPMS) and drive disease progression, disability, fatigue, and cognitive dysfunction. However, little is known about how rapidly GM lesions develop and accumulate over time. Objective: The purpose of this study is to analyze the degree and rate of progression in 25 patients with PPMS using voxel-based automated volumetric quantitation. Methods: This is a retrospective single-center study which includes a cohort of 25 patients with PPMS scanned utilizing NeuroQuant® 3 dimensional voxel-based morphometry (3D VBM) automated analysis and database and restudied after a period of ~1 year (11–14 months). Comparisons with normative data were acquired for whole brain, forebrain parenchyma, cortical GM, hippocampus, thalamus, superior and inferior lateral ventricles. GM volume changes were correlated with their clinical motor and cognitive scores using Extended Disability Status Scales (EDSS) and Montreal Cognitive Assessments (MoCA). Results: Steep reductions occurred in cerebral cortical GM and deep GM nuclei volumes which correlated with each patient's clinical and cognitive impairment. The median observed percentile volume losses were statistically significant compared with the 50th percentile for each GM component. Longitudinal assessments of an unselected sample of one dozen patients involved in the PPMS study showed prominent losses occurring mainly in cortical GM and hippocampus which were reflected in their EDSS and MoCA. The longitudinal results were compared with a similar sample of patients having Relapsing MS (RMS) whose GM values were largely in normal range, annualized volume GM changes were much less, while WM hyperintensities were in abnormal range in half the unselected cases. Conclusions: Knowledge of the degree and rapidity with which cortical atrophy and deep GM volume loss develops clarifies the source of progressive cognitive and clinical decline in PPMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ted L Rothstein
- Department of Neurology, Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Care and Research Center, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Millward JM, Ramos Delgado P, Smorodchenko A, Boehmert L, Periquito J, Reimann HM, Prinz C, Els A, Scheel M, Bellmann-Strobl J, Waiczies H, Wuerfel J, Infante-Duarte C, Chien C, Kuchling J, Pohlmann A, Zipp F, Paul F, Niendorf T, Waiczies S. Transient enlargement of brain ventricles during relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. JCI Insight 2020; 5:140040. [PMID: 33148886 PMCID: PMC7710287 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.140040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The brain ventricles are part of the fluid compartments bridging the CNS with the periphery. Using MRI, we previously observed a pronounced increase in ventricle volume (VV) in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model of multiple sclerosis (MS). Here, we examined VV changes in EAE and MS patients in longitudinal studies with frequent serial MRI scans. EAE mice underwent serial MRI for up to 2 months, with gadolinium contrast as a proxy of inflammation, confirmed by histopathology. We performed a time-series analysis of clinical and MRI data from a prior clinical trial in which RRMS patients underwent monthly MRI scans over 1 year. VV increased dramatically during preonset EAE, resolving upon clinical remission. VV changes coincided with blood-brain barrier disruption and inflammation. VV was normal at the termination of the experiment, when mice were still symptomatic. The majority of relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients showed dynamic VV fluctuations. Patients with contracting VV had lower disease severity and a shorter duration. These changes demonstrate that VV does not necessarily expand irreversibly in MS but, over short time scales, can expand and contract. Frequent monitoring of VV in patients will be essential to disentangle the disease-related processes driving short-term VV oscillations from persistent expansion resulting from atrophy. Brain ventricle volumes expand and contract during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, suggesting that short-term inflammatory processes are interlaced with gradual brain atrophy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason M Millward
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.,Institute for Medical Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paula Ramos Delgado
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alina Smorodchenko
- Medical School Hamburg, University of Applied Sciences and Medical University, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Laura Boehmert
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Joao Periquito
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Henning M Reimann
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Prinz
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Antje Els
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Scheel
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Judith Bellmann-Strobl
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint venture of the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Jens Wuerfel
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Medical Image Analysis Center (MIAC AG) and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Carmen Infante-Duarte
- Institute for Medical Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Claudia Chien
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Joseph Kuchling
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Pohlmann
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frauke Zipp
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Friedemann Paul
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint venture of the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thoralf Niendorf
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.,Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint venture of the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sonia Waiczies
- Experimental Ultrahigh Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Spinal cord atrophy in a primary progressive multiple sclerosis trial: Improved sample size using GBSI. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2020; 28:102418. [PMID: 32961403 PMCID: PMC7509079 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2020] [Revised: 08/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
The GBSI provided clinically meaningful measurements of spinal cord atrophy, with low sample size. Deriving spinal cord atrophy from brain MRI using the GBSI is easier than spinal cord MRI. Spinal cord atrophy on GBSI could be used as a secondary outcome measure.
Background We aimed to evaluate the implications for clinical trial design of the generalised boundary-shift integral (GBSI) for spinal cord atrophy measurement. Methods We included 220 primary-progressive multiple sclerosis patients from a phase 2 clinical trial, with baseline and week-48 3DT1-weighted MRI of the brain and spinal cord (1 × 1 × 1 mm3), acquired separately. We obtained segmentation-based cross-sectional spinal cord area (CSA) at C1-2 (from both brain and spinal cord MRI) and C2-5 levels (from spinal cord MRI) using DeepSeg, and, then, we computed corresponding GBSI. Results Depending on the spinal cord segment, we included 67.4–98.1% patients for CSA measurements, and 66.9–84.2% for GBSI. Spinal cord atrophy measurements obtained with GBSI had lower measurement variability, than corresponding CSA. Looking at the image noise floor, the lowest median standard deviation of the MRI signal within the cerebrospinal fluid surrounding the spinal cord was found on brain MRI at the C1-2 level. Spinal cord atrophy derived from brain MRI was related to the corresponding measures from dedicated spinal cord MRI, more strongly for GBSI than CSA. Spinal cord atrophy measurements using GBSI, but not CSA, were associated with upper and lower limb motor progression. Discussion Notwithstanding the reduced measurement variability, the clinical correlates, and the possibility of using brain acquisitions, spinal cord atrophy using GBSI should remain a secondary outcome measure in MS studies, until further advancements increase the quality of acquisition and reliability of processing.
Collapse
|
28
|
Ineichen BV, Sati P, Granberg T, Absinta M, Lee NJ, Lefeuvre JA, Reich DS. Magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis animal models: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and white paper. Neuroimage Clin 2020; 28:102371. [PMID: 32818883 PMCID: PMC7451445 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most important paraclinical tool for assessing drug response in multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical trials. As such, MRI has also been widely used in preclinical research to investigate drug efficacy and pathogenic aspects in MS animal models. Keeping track of all published preclinical imaging studies, and possible new therapeutic approaches, has become difficult considering the abundance of studies. Moreover, comparisons between studies are hampered by methodological differences, especially since small differences in an MRI protocol can lead to large differences in tissue contrast. We therefore provide a comprehensive qualitative overview of preclinical MRI studies in the field of neuroinflammatory and demyelinating diseases, aiming to summarize experimental setup, MRI methodology, and risk of bias. We also provide estimates of the effects of tested therapeutic interventions by a meta-analysis. Finally, to improve the standardization of preclinical experiments, we propose guidelines on technical aspects of MRI and reporting that can serve as a framework for future preclinical studies using MRI in MS animal models. By implementing these guidelines, clinical translation of findings will be facilitated, and could possibly reduce experimental animal numbers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin V Ineichen
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States.
| | - Pascal Sati
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Tobias Granberg
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martina Absinta
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Nathanael J Lee
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Jennifer A Lefeuvre
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Daniel S Reich
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Reduced accuracy of MRI deep grey matter segmentation in multiple sclerosis: an evaluation of four automated methods against manual reference segmentations in a multi-center cohort. J Neurol 2020; 267:3541-3554. [PMID: 32621103 PMCID: PMC7674567 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-10023-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Deep grey matter (DGM) atrophy in multiple sclerosis (MS) and its relation to cognitive and clinical decline requires accurate measurements. MS pathology may deteriorate the performance of automated segmentation methods. Accuracy of DGM segmentation methods is compared between MS and controls, and the relation of performance with lesions and atrophy is studied. Methods On images of 21 MS subjects and 11 controls, three raters manually outlined caudate nucleus, putamen and thalamus; outlines were combined by majority voting. FSL-FIRST, FreeSurfer, Geodesic Information Flow and volBrain were evaluated. Performance was evaluated volumetrically (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC)) and spatially (Dice similarity coefficient (DSC)). Spearman's correlations of DSC with global and local lesion volume, structure of interest volume (ROIV), and normalized brain volume (NBV) were assessed. Results ICC with manual volumes was mostly good and spatial agreement was high. MS exhibited significantly lower DSC than controls for thalamus and putamen. For some combinations of structure and method, DSC correlated negatively with lesion volume or positively with NBV or ROIV. Lesion-filling did not substantially change segmentations. Conclusions Automated methods have impaired performance in patients. Performance generally deteriorated with higher lesion volume and lower NBV and ROIV, suggesting that these may contribute to the impaired performance. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00415-020-10023-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
30
|
Kuchling J, Paul F. Visualizing the Central Nervous System: Imaging Tools for Multiple Sclerosis and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders. Front Neurol 2020; 11:450. [PMID: 32625158 PMCID: PMC7311777 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are autoimmune central nervous system conditions with increasing incidence and prevalence. While MS is the most frequent inflammatory CNS disorder in young adults, NMOSD is a rare disease, that is pathogenetically distinct from MS, and accounts for approximately 1% of demyelinating disorders, with the relative proportion within the demyelinating CNS diseases varying widely among different races and regions. Most immunomodulatory drugs used in MS are inefficacious or even harmful in NMOSD, emphasizing the need for a timely and accurate diagnosis and distinction from MS. Despite distinct immunopathology and differences in disease course and severity there might be considerable overlap in clinical and imaging findings, posing a diagnostic challenge for managing neurologists. Differential diagnosis is facilitated by positive serology for AQP4-antibodies (AQP4-ab) in NMOSD, but might be difficult in seronegative cases. Imaging of the brain, optic nerve, retina and spinal cord is of paramount importance when managing patients with autoimmune CNS conditions. Once a diagnosis has been established, imaging techniques are often deployed at regular intervals over the disease course as surrogate measures for disease activity and progression and to surveil treatment effects. While the application of some imaging modalities for monitoring of disease course was established decades ago in MS, the situation is unclear in NMOSD where work on longitudinal imaging findings and their association with clinical disability is scant. Moreover, as long-term disability is mostly attack-related in NMOSD and does not stem from insidious progression as in MS, regular follow-up imaging might not be useful in the absence of clinical events. However, with accumulating evidence for covert tissue alteration in NMOSD and with the advent of approved immunotherapies the role of imaging in the management of NMOSD may be reconsidered. By contrast, MS management still faces the challenge of implementing imaging techniques that are capable of monitoring progressive tissue loss in clinical trials and cohort studies into treatment algorithms for individual patients. This article reviews the current status of imaging research in MS and NMOSD with an emphasis on emerging modalities that have the potential to be implemented in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Kuchling
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt–Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt–Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt–Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Friedemann Paul
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt–Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt–Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt–Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abdelhak A, Huss A, Stahmann A, Senel M, Krumbholz M, Kowarik MC, Havla J, Kümpfel T, Kleiter I, Wüstinger I, Zettl UK, Schwartz M, Roesler R, Friede T, Ludolph AC, Ziemann U, Tumani H. Explorative study of emerging blood biomarkers in progressive multiple sclerosis (EmBioProMS): Design of a prospective observational multicentre pilot study. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2020; 18:100574. [PMID: 32478196 PMCID: PMC7251538 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Defining clinical and subclinical progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) is challenging. Patient history, expanded disability status scale (EDSS), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) all have shortcomings and may underestimate disease dynamics. Emerging serum biomarkers such as glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light chain (NfL) proved useful in many cross-sectional studies. However, longitudinal data on patients with progressive MS is scarce. Objectives To assess whether the serum biomarkers GFAP and NfL might differentiate between patients with progressive vs. non-progressive disease stages and predict the disease course according to the Lublin criteria. Methods EmBioProMS is a pilot, observational, prospective, multicentric study funded by the German Multiple Sclerosis Society (DMSG). 200 patients with MS according to the 2017 McDonald criteria and history of relapse-independent progression at any time (progressive MS, PMS), younger than 65 years, and with EDSS ≤ 6.5 will be recruited in 6 centres in Germany. At baseline, month 6, and 18, medical history, EDSS, Nine-Hole-Peg-Test (9-HPT), Timed-25-Foot-Walk-Test (T-25FW), Symbol-Digit-Modalities-Test (SDMT), serum GFAP, and NfL, MRI (at least baseline and month 18) and optional optical coherence tomography (OCT) will be performed. Disease progression before and during the study is defined by confirmed EDSS progression, increase by ≥ 20% in 9-HPT or T-25FW time. Conclusions This longitudinal multicentre study will reveal to what extent the prediction of disease progression in patients with PMS will be improved by the analysis of serum biomarkers in conjunction with routine clinical data and neuroimaging measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Abdelhak
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andre Huss
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Alexander Stahmann
- MS Forschungs- und Projektentwicklungs-gGmbH, MS-Registry by the German MS-Society, Hanover, Germany
| | - Makbule Senel
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Markus Krumbholz
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Markus C. Kowarik
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Joachim Havla
- Institute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Tania Kümpfel
- Institute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Ingo Kleiter
- Marianne-Strauß-Klinik, Behandlungszentrum Kempfenhausen für Multiple Sklerose Kranke gGmbH, Berg, Germany
- St. Josef-Hospital, Department of Neurology, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Isabella Wüstinger
- Marianne-Strauß-Klinik, Behandlungszentrum Kempfenhausen für Multiple Sklerose Kranke gGmbH, Berg, Germany
| | - Uwe K. Zettl
- Department of Neurology, Neuroimmunological Section, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Margit Schwartz
- Department of Neurology, Neuroimmunological Section, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Romy Roesler
- Fachklinik für Neurologie Dietenbronn, Schwendi, Germany
| | - Tim Friede
- Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - Ulf Ziemann
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Hayrettin Tumani
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
- Fachklinik für Neurologie Dietenbronn, Schwendi, Germany
- Corresponding author. Universitäts- und Rehabilitationskliniken Ulm (RKU), Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gonzalez-Escamilla G, Ciolac D, De Santis S, Radetz A, Fleischer V, Droby A, Roebroeck A, Meuth SG, Muthuraman M, Groppa S. Gray matter network reorganization in multiple sclerosis from 7-Tesla and 3-Tesla MRI data. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2020; 7:543-553. [PMID: 32255566 PMCID: PMC7187719 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Revised: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to determine the ability of 7T‐MRI for characterizing brain tissue integrity in early relapsing‐remitting MS patients compared to conventional 3T‐MRI and to investigate whether 7T‐MRI improves the performance for detecting cortical gray matter neurodegeneration and its associated network reorganization dynamics. Methods Seven early relapsing‐remitting MS patients and seven healthy individuals received MRI at 7T and 3T, whereas 30 and 40 healthy controls underwent separate 3T‐ and 7T‐MRI sessions, respectively. Surface‐based cortical thickness (CT) and gray‐to‐white contrast (GWc) measures were used to model morphometric networks, analyzed with graph theory by means of modularity, clustering coefficient, path length, and small‐worldness. Results 7T‐MRI had lower CT and higher GWc compared to 3T‐MRI in MS. CT and GWc measures robustly differentiated MS from controls at 3T‐MRI. 7T‐ and 3T‐MRI showed high regional correspondence for CT (r = 0.72, P = 2e‐78) and GWc (r = 0.83, P = 5.5e‐121) in MS patients. MS CT and GWc morphometric networks at 7T‐MRI showed higher modularity, clustering coefficient, and small‐worldness than 3T, also compared to controls. Interpretation 7T‐MRI allows to more precisely quantify morphometric alterations across the cortical mantle and captures more sensitively MS‐related network reorganization. Our findings open new avenues to design more accurate studies quantifying brain tissue loss and test treatment effects on tissue repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine-Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Dumitru Ciolac
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine-Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Angela Radetz
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine-Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Vinzenz Fleischer
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine-Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Amgad Droby
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine-Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Alard Roebroeck
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology & Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Sven G Meuth
- Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Muthuraman Muthuraman
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine-Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sergiu Groppa
- Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine-Main Neuroscience Network (rmn2), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Sastre-Garriga J, Pareto D, Battaglini M, Rocca MA, Ciccarelli O, Enzinger C, Wuerfel J, Sormani MP, Barkhof F, Yousry TA, De Stefano N, Tintoré M, Filippi M, Gasperini C, Kappos L, Río J, Frederiksen J, Palace J, Vrenken H, Montalban X, Rovira À. MAGNIMS consensus recommendations on the use of brain and spinal cord atrophy measures in clinical practice. Nat Rev Neurol 2020; 16:171-182. [PMID: 32094485 PMCID: PMC7054210 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-020-0314-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Early evaluation of treatment response and prediction of disease evolution are key issues in the management of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). In the past 20 years, MRI has become the most useful paraclinical tool in both situations and is used clinically to assess the inflammatory component of the disease, particularly the presence and evolution of focal lesions - the pathological hallmark of MS. However, diffuse neurodegenerative processes that are at least partly independent of inflammatory mechanisms can develop early in people with MS and are closely related to disability. The effects of these neurodegenerative processes at a macroscopic level can be quantified by estimation of brain and spinal cord atrophy with MRI. MRI measurements of atrophy in MS have also been proposed as a complementary approach to lesion assessment to facilitate the prediction of clinical outcomes and to assess treatment responses. In this Consensus statement, the Magnetic Resonance Imaging in MS (MAGNIMS) study group critically review the application of brain and spinal cord atrophy in clinical practice in the management of MS, considering the role of atrophy measures in prognosis and treatment monitoring and the barriers to clinical use of these measures. On the basis of this review, the group makes consensus statements and recommendations for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaume Sastre-Garriga
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Deborah Pareto
- Section of Neuroradiology and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marco Battaglini
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Maria A Rocca
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Olga Ciccarelli
- NMR Research Unit, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Christian Enzinger
- Department of Neurology and Division of Neuroradiology, Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jens Wuerfel
- Medical Image Analysis Center (MIAC AG) and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Maria P Sormani
- Biostatistics Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, MS Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tarek A Yousry
- NMR Research Unit, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, University College London Hospitals National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Nicola De Stefano
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Mar Tintoré
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Gasperini
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurosciences, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jordi Río
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jette Frederiksen
- Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup and University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Jackie Palace
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Hugo Vrenken
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, MS Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Xavier Montalban
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Division of Neurology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Àlex Rovira
- Section of Neuroradiology and Magnetic Resonance Unit, Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tsagkas C, Chakravarty MM, Gaetano L, Naegelin Y, Amann M, Parmar K, Papadopoulou A, Wuerfel J, Kappos L, Sprenger T, Magon S. Longitudinal patterns of cortical thinning in multiple sclerosis. Hum Brain Mapp 2020; 41:2198-2215. [PMID: 32067281 PMCID: PMC7268070 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Revised: 12/21/2019] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
In multiple sclerosis (MS), cortical atrophy is correlated with clinical and neuropsychological measures. We aimed to examine the differences in the temporospatial evolution of cortical thickness (CTh) between MS‐subtypes and to study the association of CTh with T2‐weighted white matter lesions (T2LV) and clinical progression. Two hundred and forty‐three MS patients (180 relapsing–remitting [RRMS], 51 secondary‐progressive [SPMS], and 12 primary‐progressive [PPMS]) underwent annual clinical (incl. expanded disability status scale [EDSS]) and MRI‐examinations over 6 years. T2LV and CTh were measured. CTh did not differ between MS‐subgroups. Higher total T2LV was associated with extended bilateral CTh‐reduction on average, but did not correlate with CTh‐changes over time. In RRMS, CTh‐ and EDSS‐changes over time were negatively correlated in large bilateral prefrontal, frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital areas. In SPMS, CTh was not associated with the EDSS. In PPMS, CTh‐ and EDSS‐changes over time were correlated in small clusters predominantly in left parietal areas. Increase of brain lesion load does not lead to an immediate CTh‐reduction. Although CTh did not differ between MS‐subtypes, a dissociation in the correlation between CTh‐ and EDSS‐changes over time between RRMS and progressive‐MS was shown, possibly underlining the contribution of subcortical pathology to clinical progression in progressive‐MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charidimos Tsagkas
- Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland.,Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Medical Image Analysis Center AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M Mallar Chakravarty
- Cerebral Imaging Centre - Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, QC, Canada.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Yvonne Naegelin
- Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael Amann
- Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland.,Medical Image Analysis Center AG, Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Allschwil, Switzerland
| | - Katrin Parmar
- Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland.,Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Athina Papadopoulou
- Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland.,Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitat Berlin, Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jens Wuerfel
- Medical Image Analysis Center AG, Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Allschwil, Switzerland
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland.,Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Till Sprenger
- Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Neurology, DKD HELIOS Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Stefano Magon
- Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland.,Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Andravizou A, Dardiotis E, Artemiadis A, Sokratous M, Siokas V, Tsouris Z, Aloizou AM, Nikolaidis I, Bakirtzis C, Tsivgoulis G, Deretzi G, Grigoriadis N, Bogdanos DP, Hadjigeorgiou GM. Brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis: mechanisms, clinical relevance and treatment options. AUTO- IMMUNITY HIGHLIGHTS 2019; 10:7. [PMID: 32257063 PMCID: PMC7065319 DOI: 10.1186/s13317-019-0117-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system characterized by focal or diffuse inflammation, demyelination, axonal loss and neurodegeneration. Brain atrophy can be seen in the earliest stages of MS, progresses faster compared to healthy adults, and is a reliable predictor of future physical and cognitive disability. In addition, it is widely accepted to be a valid, sensitive and reproducible measure of neurodegeneration in MS. Reducing the rate of brain atrophy has only recently been incorporated as a critical endpoint into the clinical trials of new or emerging disease modifying drugs (DMDs) in MS. With the advent of easily accessible neuroimaging softwares along with the accumulating evidence, clinicians may be able to use brain atrophy measures in their everyday clinical practice to monitor disease course and response to DMDs. In this review, we will describe the different mechanisms contributing to brain atrophy, their clinical relevance on disease presentation and course and the effect of current or emergent DMDs on brain atrophy and neuroprotection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athina Andravizou
- Department of Neurology, Laboratory of Neurogenetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo Hill, 41100 Larissa, Greece
| | - Efthimios Dardiotis
- Department of Neurology, Laboratory of Neurogenetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo Hill, 41100 Larissa, Greece
| | - Artemios Artemiadis
- Immunogenetics Laboratory, 1st Department of Neurology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Aeginition Hospital, Vas. Sophias Ave 72-74, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Sokratous
- Department of Neurology, Laboratory of Neurogenetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo Hill, 41100 Larissa, Greece
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University General Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Viopolis, 40500 Larissa, Greece
| | - Vasileios Siokas
- Department of Neurology, Laboratory of Neurogenetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo Hill, 41100 Larissa, Greece
| | - Zisis Tsouris
- Department of Neurology, Laboratory of Neurogenetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo Hill, 41100 Larissa, Greece
| | - Athina-Maria Aloizou
- Department of Neurology, Laboratory of Neurogenetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo Hill, 41100 Larissa, Greece
| | - Ioannis Nikolaidis
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, 2nd Department of Neurology, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Christos Bakirtzis
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, 2nd Department of Neurology, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Georgios Tsivgoulis
- Second Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Athens, “Attikon” University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Georgia Deretzi
- Department of Neurology, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Grigoriadis
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, 2nd Department of Neurology, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Dimitrios P. Bogdanos
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University General Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Viopolis, 40500 Larissa, Greece
| | - Georgios M. Hadjigeorgiou
- Department of Neurology, Laboratory of Neurogenetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, University Hospital of Larissa, Biopolis, Mezourlo Hill, 41100 Larissa, Greece
- Department of Neurology, Medical School, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Gehr S, Kaiser T, Kreutz R, Ludwig WD, Paul F. Suggestions for improving the design of clinical trials in multiple sclerosis-results of a systematic analysis of completed phase III trials. EPMA J 2019; 10:425-436. [PMID: 31832116 PMCID: PMC6883016 DOI: 10.1007/s13167-019-00192-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This manuscript reviews the primary and secondary endpoints of pivotal phase III trials with immunomodulatory drugs in multiple sclerosis (MS). Considering the limitations of previous trial designs, we propose new standards for the planning of clinical trials, taking into account latest insights into MS pathophysiology and patient-relevant aspects. Using a systematic overview of published phase III (pivotal) trials performed as part of application for drug market approval, we evaluate the following characteristics: trial duration, number of trial participants, comparators, and endpoints (primary, secondary, magnetic resonance imaging outcome, and patient-reported outcomes). From a patient perspective, the primary and secondary endpoints of clinical trials are only partially relevant. High-quality trial data pertaining to efficacy and safety that stretch beyond the time frame of pivotal trials are almost non-existent. Understanding of long-term benefits and risks of disease-modifying MS therapy is largely lacking. Concrete proposals for the trial designs of relapsing (remitting) multiple sclerosis/clinically isolated syndrome, primary progressive multiple sclerosis, and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (e.g., study duration, mechanism of action, and choice of endpoints) are presented based on the results of the systematic overview. Given the increasing number of available immunotherapies, the therapeutic strategy in MS has shifted from a mere "relapse-prevention" approach to a personalized provision of medical care as to the choice of the appropriate drugs and their sequential application over the course of the disease. This personalized provision takes patient preferences as well as disease-related factors into consideration such as objective clinical and radiographic findings but also very burdensome symptoms such as fatigue, depression, and cognitive impairment. Future trial designs in MS will have to assign higher relevance to these patient-reported outcomes and will also have to implement surrogate measures that can serve as predictive markers for individual treatment response to new and investigational immunotherapies. This is an indispensable prerequisite to maximize the benefit of individual patients when participating in clinical trials. Moreover, such appropriate trial designs and suitable enrolment criteria that correspond to the mode of action of the study drug will facilitate targeted prevention of adverse events, thus mitigating risks for individual study participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinje Gehr
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Kaiser
- Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care) (IQWiG), Im Mediapark 8, 50670 Köln, Germany
| | - Reinhold Kreutz
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolf-Dieter Ludwig
- Arzneimittelkommission der deutschen Ärzteschaft (Drug Commission of the German Medical Association), Herbert-Lewin-Platz 1, 10623 Berlin, Germany
| | - Friedemann Paul
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Weeda MM, Middelkoop SM, Steenwijk MD, Daams M, Amiri H, Brouwer I, Killestein J, Uitdehaag BMJ, Dekker I, Lukas C, Bellenberg B, Barkhof F, Pouwels PJW, Vrenken H. Validation of mean upper cervical cord area (MUCCA) measurement techniques in multiple sclerosis (MS): High reproducibility and robustness to lesions, but large software and scanner effects. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2019; 24:101962. [PMID: 31416017 PMCID: PMC6704046 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Revised: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Atrophy of the spinal cord is known to occur in multiple sclerosis (MS). The mean upper cervical cord area (MUCCA) can be used to measure this atrophy. Currently, several (semi-)automated methods for MUCCA measurement exist, but validation in clinical magnetic resonance (MR) images is lacking. Methods Five methods to measure MUCCA (SCT-PropSeg, SCT-DeepSeg, NeuroQLab, Xinapse JIM and ITK-SNAP) were investigated in a predefined upper cervical cord region. First, within-scanner reproducibility and between-scanner robustness were assessed using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Dice's similarity index (SI) in scan-rescan 3DT1-weighted images (brain, including cervical spine using a head coil) performed on three 3 T MR machines (GE MR750, Philips Ingenuity, Toshiba Vantage Titan) in 21 subjects with MS and 6 healthy controls (dataset A). Second, sensitivity of MUCCA measurement to lesions in the upper cervical cord was assessed with cervical 3D T1-weighted images (3 T GE HDxT using a head-neck-spine coil) in 7 subjects with MS without and 14 subjects with MS with cervical lesions (dataset B), using ICC and SI with manual reference segmentations. Results In dataset A, MUCCA differed between MR machines (p < 0.001) and methods (p < 0.001) used, but not between scan sessions. With respect to MUCCA values, Xinapse JIM showed the highest within-scanner reproducibility (ICC absolute agreement = 0.995) while Xinapse JIM and SCT-PropSeg showed the highest between-scanner robustness (ICC consistency = 0.981 and 0.976, respectively). Reproducibility of segmentations between scan sessions was highest in Xinapse JIM and SCT-PropSeg segmentations (median SI ≥ 0.921), with a significant main effect of method (p < 0.001), but not of MR machine or subject group. In dataset B, SI with manual outlines did not differ between patients with or without cervical lesions for any of the segmentation methods (p > 0.176). However, there was an effect of method for both volumetric and voxel wise agreement of the segmentations (both p < 0.001). Highest volumetric and voxel wise agreement was obtained with Xinapse JIM (ICC absolute agreement = 0.940 and median SI = 0.962). Conclusion Although MUCCA is highly reproducible within a scanner for each individual measurement method, MUCCA differs between scanners and between methods. Cervical cord lesions do not affect MUCCA measurement performance. Mean upper cervical cord area (MUCCA) was obtained with five different methods. MUCCA was determined in a unique scan-rescan multi-vendor MR study. Reproducibility: MUCCA did not differ between scan-rescan images for any method. Robustness: MUCCA differed between methods and between scanners. Performance of MUCCA methods was not affected by the presence of lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M M Weeda
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC-location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - S M Middelkoop
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC-location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M D Steenwijk
- Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Daams
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC-location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H Amiri
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC-location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - I Brouwer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC-location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Killestein
- Department of Neurology, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B M J Uitdehaag
- Department of Neurology, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - I Dekker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC-location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C Lukas
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - B Bellenberg
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - F Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC-location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, UCL, London, UK
| | - P J W Pouwels
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC-location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H Vrenken
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC-location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Cortese R, Collorone S, Ciccarelli O, Toosy AT. Advances in brain imaging in multiple sclerosis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2019; 12:1756286419859722. [PMID: 31275430 PMCID: PMC6598314 DOI: 10.1177/1756286419859722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain imaging is increasingly used to support clinicians in diagnosing multiple sclerosis (MS) and monitoring its progression. However, the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in MS goes far beyond its clinical application. Indeed, advanced imaging techniques have helped to detect different components of MS pathogenesis in vivo, which is now considered a heterogeneous process characterized by widespread damage of the central nervous system, rather than multifocal demyelination of white matter. Recently, MRI biomarkers more sensitive to disease activity than clinical disability outcome measures, have been used to monitor response to anti-inflammatory agents in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. Similarly, MRI markers of neurodegeneration exhibit the potential as primary and secondary outcomes in clinical trials for progressive phenotypes. This review will summarize recent advances in brain neuroimaging in MS from the research setting to clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa Cortese
- Queen Square MS Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Sara Collorone
- Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, Russell Square, London WC1B 5EH, UK
| | - Olga Ciccarelli
- Queen Square MS Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London (UCL), London, UK
- National Institute for Health Research, UCL Hospitals, Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Ahmed T. Toosy
- Queen Square MS Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lommers E, Simon J, Reuter G, Delrue G, Dive D, Degueldre C, Balteau E, Phillips C, Maquet P. Multiparameter MRI quantification of microstructural tissue alterations in multiple sclerosis. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2019; 23:101879. [PMID: 31176293 PMCID: PMC6555891 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2019] [Revised: 04/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Objectives Conventional MRI is not sensitive to many pathological processes underpinning multiple sclerosis (MS) ongoing in normal appearing brain tissue (NABT). Quantitative MRI (qMRI) and a multiparameter mapping (MPM) protocol are used to simultaneously quantify magnetization transfer (MT) saturation, transverse relaxation rate R2* (1/T2*) and longitudinal relaxation rate R1 (1/T1), and assess differences in NABT microstructure between MS patients and healthy controls (HC). Methods This prospective cross-sectional study involves 36 MS patients (21 females, 15 males; age range 22–63 years; 15 relapsing-remitting MS - RRMS; 21 primary or secondary progressive MS - PMS) and 36 age-matched HC (20 females, 16 males); age range 21–61 years). The qMRI maps are computed and segmented in lesions and 3 normal appearing cerebral tissue classes: normal appearing cortical grey matter (NACGM), normal appearing deep grey matter (NADGM), normal appearing white matter (NAWM). Individual median values are extracted for each tissue class and MR parameter. MANOVAs and stepwise regressions assess differences between patients and HC. Results MS patients are characterized by a decrease in MT, R2* and R1 within NACGM (p < .0001) and NAWM (p < .0001). In NADGM, MT decreases (p < .0001) but R2* and R1 remain normal. These observations tend to be more pronounced in PMS. Quantitative MRI parameters are independent predictors of clinical status: EDSS is significantly related to R1 in NACGM and R2* in NADGM; the latter also predicts motor score. Cognitive score is best predicted by MT parameter within lesions. Conclusions Multiparametric data of brain microstructure concord with the literature, predict clinical performance and suggest a diffuse reduction in myelin and/or iron content within NABT of MS patients. We revisit microstructural alterations of NABT in MS patients by simultaneously quantifying three MRI parameters. Data suggest reduction of MT/R2*/R1 in NABT of MS patients, suggesting a reduction in myelin and/or iron content. Quantitative MRI parameters in NABT are independent predictors of clinical status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Lommers
- GIGA - CRC in vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; Clinical Neuroimmunology Unit, Neurology Department, CHU Liège, Belgium.
| | - Jessica Simon
- Psychology and Neurosciences of Cognition Research Unit, University of Liège, Belgium
| | - Gilles Reuter
- GIGA - CRC in vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; Neurosurgery Department, CHU Liège, Belgium
| | - Gaël Delrue
- Clinical Neuroimmunology Unit, Neurology Department, CHU Liège, Belgium
| | - Dominique Dive
- Clinical Neuroimmunology Unit, Neurology Department, CHU Liège, Belgium
| | | | - Evelyne Balteau
- GIGA - CRC in vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Christophe Phillips
- GIGA - CRC in vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; GIGA - in silico Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Pierre Maquet
- GIGA - CRC in vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; Clinical Neuroimmunology Unit, Neurology Department, CHU Liège, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
González-Villà S, Oliver A, Huo Y, Lladó X, Landman BA. Brain structure segmentation in the presence of multiple sclerosis lesions. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2019; 22:101709. [PMID: 30822719 PMCID: PMC6396016 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2018] [Accepted: 02/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Intensity-based multi-atlas segmentation strategies have shown to be particularly successful in segmenting brain images of healthy subjects. However, in the same way as most of the methods in the state of the art, their performance tends to be affected by the presence of MRI visible lesions, such as those found in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Here, we present an approach to minimize the effect of the abnormal lesion intensities on multi-atlas segmentation. We propose a new voxel/patch correspondence model for intensity-based multi-atlas label fusion strategies that leads to more accurate similarity measures, having a key role in the final brain segmentation. We present the theory of this model and integrate it into two well-known fusion strategies: Non-local Spatial STAPLE (NLSS) and Joint Label Fusion (JLF). The experiments performed show that our proposal improves the segmentation performance of the lesion areas. The results indicate a mean Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) improvement of 1.96% for NLSS (3.29% inside and 0.79% around the lesion masks) and, an improvement of 2.06% for JLF (2.31% inside and 1.42% around lesions). Furthermore, we show that, with the proposed strategy, the well-established preprocessing step of lesion filling can be disregarded, obtaining similar or even more accurate segmentation results. We present an approach to improve multi-atlas brain parcellation of MS patients. We integrate our model into 2 well-known segmentation strategies. Our model improves the segmentation on the lesion areas. The improvement on the lesion areas is also reflected in the global performance. With our model, lesion filling can be omitted, obtaining at least similar results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra González-Villà
- Institute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Ed. P-IV, Campus Montilivi, 17003 Girona, Spain; Electrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.
| | - Arnau Oliver
- Institute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Ed. P-IV, Campus Montilivi, 17003 Girona, Spain
| | - Yuankai Huo
- Electrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Xavier Lladó
- Institute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Ed. P-IV, Campus Montilivi, 17003 Girona, Spain
| | - Bennett A Landman
- Electrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Beadnall HN, Wang C, Van Hecke W, Ribbens A, Billiet T, Barnett MH. Comparing longitudinal brain atrophy measurement techniques in a real-world multiple sclerosis clinical practice cohort: towards clinical integration? Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2019; 12:1756286418823462. [PMID: 30719080 PMCID: PMC6348578 DOI: 10.1177/1756286418823462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2018] [Accepted: 11/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Whole brain atrophy (WBA) estimates in multiple sclerosis (MS) correlate more robustly with clinical disability than traditional, lesion-based metrics. We compare Structural Image Evaluation using Normalisation of Atrophy (SIENA) with the icobrain longitudinal pipeline (icobrain long), for assessment of longitudinal WBA in MS patients. Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan pairs [1.05 (±0.15) year separation] from 102 MS patients were acquired on the same 3T scanner. Three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted and two-dimensional (2D)/3D fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery sequences were analysed. Percentage brain volume change (PBVC) measurements were calculated using SIENA and icobrain long. Statistical correlation, agreement and consistency between methods was evaluated; MRI brain volumetric and clinical data were compared. The proportion of the cohort with annualized brain volume loss (aBVL) rates ⩾ 0.4%, ⩾0.8% and ⩾0.94% were calculated. No evidence of disease activity (NEDA) 3 and NEDA 4 were also determined. Results: Mean annualized PBVC was −0.59 (±0.65)% and −0.64 (±0.73)% as measured by icobrain long and SIENA. icobrain long and SIENA-measured annualized PBVC correlated strongly, r = 0.805 (p < 0.001), and the agreement [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.800] and consistency (ICC 0.801) were excellent. Weak correlations were found between MRI metrics and Expanded Disability Status Scale scores. Over half the cohort had aBVL ⩾ 0.4%, approximately a third ⩾0.8%, and aBVL was ⩾0.94% in 28.43% and 23.53% using SIENA and icobrain long, respectively. NEDA 3 was achieved in 35.29%, and NEDA 4 in 15.69% and 16.67% of the cohort, using SIENA and icobrain long to derive PBVC, respectively. Discussion: icobrain long quantified longitudinal WBA with a strong level of statistical agreement and consistency compared to SIENA in this real-world MS population. Utility of WBA measures in individuals remains challenging, but show promise as biomarkers of neurodegeneration in MS clinical practice. Optimization of MRI analysis algorithms/techniques are needed to allow reliable use in individuals. Increased levels of automation will enable more rapid clinical translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H N Beadnall
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - C Wang
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia Sydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | | | - M H Barnett
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia Sydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Amiri H, Brouwer I, Kuijer JPA, de Munck JC, Barkhof F, Vrenken H. Novel imaging phantom for accurate and robust measurement of brain atrophy rates using clinical MRI. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2019; 21:101667. [PMID: 30665101 PMCID: PMC6350260 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2018] [Revised: 11/26/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Brain volume loss, or atrophy, has been proven to be an important characteristic of neurological diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and multiple sclerosis. To use atrophy rate as a reliable clinical biomarker and to increase statistical power in clinical treatment trials, measurement variability needs to be minimized. Among other sources, systematic differences between different MR scanners are suspected to contribute to this variability. In this study we developed and performed initial validation tests of an MR-compatible phantom and analysis software for robust and reliable evaluation of the brain volume loss. The phantom contained three inflatable models of brain structures, i.e. cerebral hemisphere, putamen, and caudate nucleus. Software to reliably quantify volumes form the phantom images was also developed. To validate the method, the phantom was imaged using 3D T1-weighted protocols at three clinical 3T MR scanners from different vendors. Calculated volume change from MRI was compared with the known applied volume change using ICC and mean absolute difference. As assessed by the ICC, the agreement between our developed software and the applied volume change for different structures ranged from 0.999-1 for hemisphere, 0.976-0.998 for putamen, and 0.985-0.999 for caudate nucleus. The mean absolute differences between measured and applied volume change were 109-332 μL for hemisphere, 2.9-11.9 μL for putamen, and 2.2-10.1 μL for caudate nucleus. This method offers a reliable and robust measurement of volume change using MR images and could potentially be used to standardize clinical measurement of atrophy rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Houshang Amiri
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands..
| | - Iman Brouwer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joost P A Kuijer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan C de Munck
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.; Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, UCL, London, UK
| | - Hugo Vrenken
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|