Preferential Arc transcription at rest in the active ensemble during associative learning

[Histamine signaling restores retrieval of forgotten memories]

Histamine is a biological amine that functions as a neurotransmitter in the brain to regulate arousal, appetite, and cognitive functions. Many pharmacological studies using histamine receptor agonists and antagonists have found that histamine promotes memory consolidation and retrieval. More recently, we have revealed that the activation of the brain histaminergic system by H₃R antagonists/inverse agonists restores retrieval of forgotten long-term memory in mice and humans. The recovery of memory retrieval may involve histamine-induced excitatory effects. Histamine may increase neuronal excitability throughout the neural circuit, including both neurons that are and are not recruited into the memory trace, similar to noise added to the neural circuits for memory retrieval. Stochastic resonance can explain how adding noise to the circuit enhances memory retrieval. Memory is processed not only by consolidation and retrieval, but also by various processes such as maintenance, reconsolidation, extinction, and reinstatement. Further studies that separately analyze the memory processes are needed to elucidate the whole picture of the effects of histamine on learning and memory. Regarding the human histaminergic system, alterations in histamine signaling have been reported in several neuropsychiatric disorders, and these changes have been suggested to be involved in cognitive dysfunction in patients with the neuropsychiatric disorders. Therefore, the drugs that modulate histamine signaling, including H₃R antagonists/inverse agonists, may be effective in the treatment of cognitive dysfunction, including Alzheimer's disease.

Histamine: A Key Neuromodulator of Memory Consolidation and Retrieval

In pharmacological studies conducted on animals over the last four decades, histamine was determined to be a strong modulator of learning and memory. Activation of histamine signaling enhances memory consolidation and retrieval. Even long after learning and forgetting, it can still restore the retrieval of forgotten memories. These findings based on animal studies led to human clinical trials with histamine H₃ receptor antagonists/inverse agonists, which revealed their positive effects on learning and memory. Therefore, histamine signaling is a promising therapeutic target for improving cognitive impairments in patients with various neuropsychiatric disorders, including Alzheimer's disease. While the memory-modulatory effects of histamine receptor agonists and antagonists have been confirmed by several research groups, the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. This review summarizes how the activation and inhibition of histamine signaling influence memory processes, introduces the cellular and circuit mechanisms, and discusses the relationship between the human histaminergic system and learning and memory.

Experience-dependent persistent Arc expression is reduced in the aged hippocampus

Aging is typically accompanied by both memory decline and changes in hippocampal function. Lasting memory is thought to also require recapitulation of recent memory traces during subsequent rest-a phenomenon termed memory trace reactivation or replay. Replay becomes less synchronized in the CA1 region of aged animals, and while subtle, this deficit may have profound physiological consequences for driving plasticity. Importantly, spike timing changes during replay may impair the induction of plasticity-regulating gene products, such as activity-regulated cytoskeletal protein (Arc). To test this hypothesis, Arc transcription was assessed both during spatial exploration and subsequent memory-related replay in hippocampal CA1 of young and aged animals. A significant age-related difference was observed in the pattern of pyramidal cells expressing Arc during rest, supporting the hypothesis that altered plasticity-related cascade is a major consequence of the changes in coordinated activity that occur during consolidation in older animals.

The temporal effect of hippocampal Arc in the working memory paradigm during novelty exploration

Arc (activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein) is one of the neuronal Immediate Early Genes (IEG), which is involved in the consolidation of memory and is an essential factor in the induction of Long-term Potentiation (LTP), Long-term Depression (LTD) and homeostatic synaptic plasticity. It has also been implicated in the increased familiarization of novel environments during reference memory paradigms. However, the Arc associated temporal effects in a working memory paradigm during novelty exploration are not well studied. Therefore, in the present study, we used spontaneous alternation behavior (SAB) test along with the expression analysis of Arc to study its temporal effects on the working memory paradigms. Using a modified SAB test, we found that the increase in the duration of exposure to a novel environment in the short time-scale (<min) increases the alternations showing that short-term habituation increases the alternation rate. Additionally, during repeated exposure to a novel environment, the alternation rates decrease after shorter inter-session interval. Parallelly, we observed the upregulation of Arc mRNA and protein level 30 min after the SAB test in the cortex and hippocampus of mice, which returns to near-basal level after two hours. The novel experience, associated with the enhanced expression of Arc, helps in the decrease of alternations in subsequent sessions. This change in alternations was absent if the environment was familiar. Further, the role of Arc during these SAB test was confirmed by the inhibition of hippocampal Arc protein through the stereotaxic infusion of Arc antisense oligodeoxynucleotides. We observed that the Arc is involved in the temporal decrease of spontaneous alternations during a series of exposures to a novel environment. Finally, the significance of these results has been discussed in the light of Wagner's Sometimes Opponent Processes model, where we suggest that Arc reduces the ability for short-term habituation during repeated exposures in the working memory paradigm, and the loss of this ability is more prominent when subjected to a novel environment.

Prior observation of fear learning enhances subsequent self-experienced fear learning with an overlapping neuronal ensemble in the dorsal hippocampus

Information from direct experience and observation of others is integrated in the brain to enable appropriate responses to environmental stimuli. Fear memory can be acquired by observing a conspecific’s distress. However, it remains unclear how prior fear observation affects self-experienced fear learning. In this study, we tested whether prior observation of a conspecific receiving contextual fear conditioning affects subsequent self-experienced fear conditioning and how neuronal ensembles represent the integration of the observation and self-experience. Test mice observed demonstrator mice experiencing fear conditioning on day 1 and directly experienced fear conditioning on day 2. Contextual fear memory was tested on day 3. The prior observation of fear conditioning promoted subsequent self-experienced fear conditioning in a hippocampus-dependent manner. We visualized hippocampal neurons that were activated during the observation and self-experience of fear conditioning and found that self-experienced fear conditioning preferentially activated dorsal CA1 neurons that were activated during the observation. When mice observed and directly experienced fear conditioning in different contexts, preferential reactivation was not observed in the CA1, and fear memory was not enhanced. These findings indicate that dorsal CA1 neuronal ensembles that were activated during both the observation and self-experience of fear learning are implicated in the integration of observation and self-experience for strengthening fear memory.

Encoding of contextual fear memory requires de novo proteins in the prelimbic cortex

BACKGROUND

Despite our understanding of the significance of the prefrontal cortex in the consolidation of long-term memories (LTM), its role in the encoding of LTM remains elusive. Here we investigated the role of new protein synthesis in the mouse medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in encoding contextual fear memory.

METHODS

Because a change in the association of mRNAs to polyribosomes is an indicator of new protein synthesis, we assessed the changes in polyribosome-associated mRNAs in the mPFC following contextual fear conditioning (CFC) in the mouse. Differential gene expression in mPFC was identified by polyribosome profiling (n = 18). The role of new protein synthesis in mPFC was determined by focal inhibition of protein synthesis (n = 131) and by intra-prelimbic cortex manipulation (n = 56) of Homer 3, a candidate identified from polyribosome profiling.

RESULTS

We identified several mRNAs that are differentially and temporally recruited to polyribosomes in the mPFC following CFC. Inhibition of protein synthesis in the prelimbic (PL), but not in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) region of the mPFC immediately after CFC disrupted encoding of contextual fear memory. Intriguingly, inhibition of new protein synthesis in the PL 6 hours after CFC did not impair encoding. Furthermore, expression of Homer 3, an mRNA enriched in polyribosomes following CFC, in the PL constrained encoding of contextual fear memory.

CONCLUSIONS

Our studies identify several molecular substrates of new protein synthesis in the mPFC and establish that encoding of contextual fear memories require new protein synthesis in PL subregion of mPFC.

Cellular tagging as a neural network mechanism for behavioural tagging

Behavioural tagging is the transformation of a short-term memory, induced by a weak experience, into a long-term memory (LTM) due to the temporal association with a novel experience. The mechanism by which neuronal ensembles, each carrying a memory engram of one of the experiences, interact to achieve behavioural tagging is unknown. Here we show that retrieval of a LTM formed by behavioural tagging of a weak experience depends on the degree of overlap with the neuronal ensemble corresponding to a novel experience. The numbers of neurons activated by weak training in a novel object recognition (NOR) task and by a novel context exploration (NCE) task, denoted as overlapping neurons, increases in the hippocampal CA1 when behavioural tagging is successfully achieved. Optical silencing of an NCE-related ensemble suppresses NOR–LTM retrieval. Thus, a population of cells recruited by NOR is tagged and then preferentially incorporated into the memory trace for NCE to achieve behavioural tagging.

Short-term memories (STM) can become long-term memories when occurring alongside novel experiences. Here, the authors investigate the neural mechanisms behind such 'behavioural tagging' and find STM neural populations are preferentially incorporated into the ensembles encoding novel experiences.

Synaptic plasticity associated with a memory engram in the basolateral amygdala

Synaptic plasticity is a cellular mechanism putatively underlying learning and memory. However, it is unclear whether learning induces synaptic modification globally or only in a subset of neurons in associated brain regions. In this study, we genetically identified neurons activated during contextual fear learning and separately recorded synaptic efficacy from recruited and nonrecruited neurons in the mouse basolateral amygdala (BLA). We found that the fear learning induces presynaptic potentiation, which was reflected by an increase in the miniature EPSC frequency and by a decrease in the paired-pulse ratio. Changes occurred only in the cortical synapses targeting the BLA neurons that were recruited into the fear memory trace. Furthermore, we found that fear learning reorganizes the neuronal ensemble responsive to the conditioning context in conjunction with the synaptic plasticity. In particular, the neuronal activity during learning was associated with the neuronal recruitment into the context-responsive ensemble. These findings suggest that synaptic plasticity in a subset of BLA neurons contributes to fear memory expression through ensemble reorganization.

New technologies for examining the role of neuronal ensembles in drug addiction and fear

Correlational data suggest that learned associations are encoded within neuronal ensembles. However, it has been difficult to prove that neuronal ensembles mediate learned behaviours because traditional pharmacological and lesion methods, and even newer cell type-specific methods, affect both activated and non-activated neurons. In addition, previous studies on synaptic and molecular alterations induced by learning did not distinguish between behaviourally activated and non-activated neurons. Here, we describe three new approaches--Daun02 inactivation, FACS sorting of activated neurons and Fos-GFP transgenic rats--that have been used to selectively target and study activated neuronal ensembles in models of conditioned drug effects and relapse. We also describe two new tools--Fos-tTA transgenic mice and inactivation of CREB-overexpressing neurons--that have been used to study the role of neuronal ensembles in conditioned fear.

Blockade of stimulus convergence in amygdala neurons disrupts taste associative learning

Humans and non-human animals learn associations of temporally contingent stimuli to better cope with the changing environment. In animal models of classical conditioning, a neutral conditioned stimulus (CS) predicts an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US). Several lines of indirect evidence indicate that this learning may rely on stimulus convergence in a subset of neurons, but this hypothesis has not been directly tested. In the current study, we tested this hypothesis using a pharmacogenetic approach, the cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB)/Allatostatin Receptor system, to target a subset of amygdala neurons receiving convergent stimuli in mice during conditioned taste aversion. Virally infected basolateral amygdala neurons with higher CREB levels were predominantly active during CS presentation. Blocking stimulus convergence in infected neurons by silencing them during US disrupted taste associative memory. Moreover, silencing infected neurons only during CS also disrupted associative memory formation. These results provide support for the notion that convergent inputs of CS and US in a subpopulation of neurons are critical for associative memory formation.

Catching the engram: strategies to examine the memory trace

Memories are stored within neuronal ensembles in the brain. Modern genetic techniques can be used to not only visualize specific neuronal ensembles that encode memories (e.g., fear, craving) but also to selectively manipulate those neurons. These techniques are now being expanded for the study of various types of memory. In this review, we will summarize the genetic methods used to visualize and manipulate neurons involved in the representation of memory engrams. The methods will help clarify how memory is encoded, stored and processed in the brain. Furthermore, these approaches may contribute to our understanding of the pathological mechanisms associated with human memory disorders and, ultimately, may aid the development of therapeutic strategies to ameliorate these diseases.

Population activity in the dorsal hippocampal CA1 encoding the surrounding environment is absent during contextual fear memory expression

The hippocampus plays a critical role in contextual fear conditioning. Population activity in the hippocampal CA1 encoding the surrounding environment is thought to be responsible for retrieval of contextual fear memory. However, the characteristics of CA1 neuronal ensemble activity during retrieval of contextual fear memory remain unclear. Here, we examined CA1 ensemble activity during contextual fear memory expression in male C57Bl/6J mice, using Arc cellular compartment analysis of temporal activity by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The "Shock" group was conditioned with a footshock in two separate chambers, whereas the "No shock" group was not exposed to shocks in the chamber. Animals were then re-exposed to either the same chamber twice or two different conditioning chambers. In the No shock group, exposure to the same chamber twice activated a more significantly overlapping neuronal population than exposure to two different chambers. In the Shock group, exposure to the same conditioning chamber twice activated a similarly overlapping neuronal population as exposure to two different chambers, with overlap smaller than in nonshocked mice exposed to the same chamber twice. Thus, population activity in the hippocampal CA1 encoding the surrounding environment is detected during spatial exploration, but absent during contextual fear memory expression. Even the variable ensemble activity of CA1 may contribute to retrieval of contextual fear memory.

Off-line Arc transcription in active ensembles during fear memory retrieval

Neural activity and de novo protein synthesis during a rest period following memory retrieval in the amygdala is necessary for stabilization of reactivated fear memory. Arc/Arg3.1 (Arc) expression is regulated by neural activity and is a critical protein for memory reconsolidation. However, it remains unclear whether memory retrieval alters Arc transcription during subsequent rest. In this study, the populations of mouse lateral amygdala neurons that transcribe Arc during memory retrieval and at rest were detected using Arc cellular compartment analysis of temporal activity by fluorescence in situ hybridization (Arc catFISH). Results demonstrated that memory retrieval alters the composition of neuronal populations, which activate Arc transcription during subsequent rest. Approximately 50% of neurons that transcribe Arc at subsequent rest, transcribed Arc during memory retrieval, whereas only approximately 10% of neurons that transcribed Arc during a rest period prior to memory retrieval transcribe Arc during memory retrieval. In contrast, re-exposure to the chamber induced less preferential Arc transcription in latent inhibited mice that received shocks but recalled less conditioned fear. Taken together, these findings indicate that neuronal subpopulations activated during fear memory retrieval preferentially transcribe Arc during subsequent rest in the lateral amygdala. This preferential Arc transcription may contribute to memory reconsolidation.

Experience-dependent recruitment of Arc expression in multiple systems during rest

The patterns of ensemble activity in the hippocampal formation during wakeful, attentive behavior are recapitulated during subsequent resting states. This replay of activity has also been found in several brain regions across many species, indicating a very general biological phenomenon. Concomitantly, transcription of immediate-early genes (IEGs) such as Arc also reoccurs in the same hippocampal neurons, suggesting that IEGs contribute to "off-line" consolidation. If continued IEG expression during rest reflects a correlate of ensemble replay, then the same generality should be observed in IEG transcription patterns. This hypothesis was tested by examining Arc in F344 rats engaging in spatial exploration alongside a rest episode. The probability that an individual neuron participates in "constitutive" Arc expression during rest is increased by recent experience in multiple cortical regions as well as across the septal and temporal poles of the hippocampus, consistent with memory trace reactivation. That is, neurons that were recently active during spatial exploration are preferentially recruited into further Arc expression during subsequent rest. The continued Arc expression, however, occurs in only a small fraction of the cells that were engaged in transcription during previous behavior. This fraction is greatest in CA3 and progressively decreases in CA1, superficial, and deep cortical layers and is consistent with the idea that consolidation occurs rapidly in the hippocampus (centering on the CA3 recurrent network) while changes are much more gradual in neocortical synaptic networks.

Memory coding in plastic neuronal subpopulations within the amygdala

Specific neuronal subpopulations within specific brain areas are responsible for learning and memory. A fear memory engages a subset of lateral amygdala neurons, but whether multiple contextual fear memories engage the same or different subsets of lateral amygdala neurons remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate the representation of multiple contextual fear memories in the amygdala with cellular and temporal resolution using a large-scale imaging method. Mice were conditioned with a footshock in 2 separate chambers. They were then re-exposed to either the same conditioning chamber twice or 2 different conditioning chambers. The activities of individual neurons related to the re-exposures were determined by the subcellular distribution of Arc/Arg3.1 RNA. Reactivation of different memories activated partially (about 50%) overlapping neurons, whereas reactivation of the same memory activated more overlapping (about 65%) neurons. These findings indicate that lateral amygdala neurons related to different fear memories are partly common, and that a small but significant neuronal population (2.7% of total lateral amygdala neurons) encodes differences in individual fear memories. Moreover, memory retrieval increased the size of the neuronal subpopulation activated during subsequent retrieval. Taken together, our findings indicate that small plastic subsets of neurons encode fear memories from individual contexts.