Obesity Pillars roundtable: Excessive weight reduction with highly effective anti-obesity medications (heAOMs)

Nutritional considerations with antiobesity medications

The improved efficacy and generally favorable safety profile of recently approved and emerging antiobesity medications (AOMs), which result in an average weight reduction of ≥15%, represent significant advancement in the treatment of obesity. This narrative review aims to provide practical evidence-based recommendations for nutritional assessment, management, and monitoring of patients treated with AOMs. Prior to treatment, clinicians can identify preexisting nutritional risk factors and counsel their patients on recommended intakes of protein, dietary fiber, micronutrients, and fluids. During treatment with AOMs, ongoing monitoring can facilitate early recognition and management of gastrointestinal symptoms or inadequate nutrient or fluid intake. Attention should also be paid to other factors that can impact response to treatment and quality of life, such as physical activity and social and emotional health. In the context of treatment with AOMs, clinicians can play an active role in supporting their patients with obesity to improve their health and well-being and promote optimal nutritional and medical outcomes.

Highway to the danger zone? A cautionary account that GLP-1 receptor agonists may be too effective for unmonitored weight loss

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are revolutionizing obesity and type 2 diabetes treatment, delivering remarkable weight loss outcomes. These medications, leveraging the effects of the insulin-regulating hormone GLP-1 via actions on peripheral and central nervous system targets, have raised hopes with their bariatric surgery-rivaling results. However, questions remain about their long-term safety and efficacy. Drawing from our expertise in obesity medicine and psychiatry, we reflect upon our experiences with the clinical use of these medications and delve into the nuanced challenges and risks they pose, particularly for those prone to disordered eating or those diagnosed with rare genetic diseases of obesity. We contend that effectively managing weight loss within this "danger zone" necessitates (1) proactive screening and continuous monitoring for disordered eating, (2) vigilant monitoring for appetite-related maladaptive responses, including food aversion and dehydration, and (3) ongoing assessment for broader health impacts. A multifaceted, interdisciplinary approach that melds medical, psychological, dietary, and behavioral strategies is crucial to delivering tailored and thorough care to each patient.

Obesity, thrombosis, venous disease, lymphatic disease, and lipedema: An obesity medicine association (OMA) clinical practice statement (CPS) 2023

Background

This Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) is intended to provide clinicians with an overview on obesity, thrombosis, venous disease, lymphatic disease, and lipedema.

Methods

The scientific support for this CPS is based upon published citations, clinical perspectives of OMA authors, and peer review by the Obesity Medicine Association leadership.

Results

Topics in this CPS include obesity, thrombosis, venous disease, lymphatic disease, and lipedema. Obesity increases the risk of thrombosis and cardiovascular disease via fat mass and adiposopathic mechanisms. Treatment of thrombosis or thrombotic risk includes healthful nutrition, physical activity, and the requisite knowledge of how body weight affects anti-thrombotic medications. In addition to obesity-related thrombotic considerations of acute coronary syndrome and ischemic non-hemorrhagic stroke, this Clinical Practice Statement briefly reviews the diagnosis and management of clinically relevant presentations of deep vein thromboses, pulmonary embolism, chronic venous stasis, varicose veins, superficial thrombophlebitis, lipodermatosclerosis, corona phlebectatica, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, iliofemoral venous obstruction, pelvic venous disorder, post-thrombotic syndrome, as well as lymphedema and lipedema - which should be included in the differential diagnosis of other edematous or enlargement disorders of the lower extremities.

Conclusions

This Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) on obesity, thrombosis, and venous/lymphatic disease is one of a series of OMA CPSs designed to assist clinicians in the care of patients with the disease of obesity.

Obesity and hypertension: Obesity medicine association (OMA) clinical practice statement (CPS) 2023

Background

This Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) provides an overview of the mechanisms and treatment of obesity and hypertension.

Methods

The scientific support for this CPS is based upon published citations, clinical perspectives of OMA authors, and peer review by the Obesity Medicine Association leadership.

Results

Mechanisms contributing to obesity-related hypertension include unhealthful nutrition, physical inactivity, insulin resistance, increased sympathetic nervous system activity, renal dysfunction, vascular dysfunction, heart dysfunction, increased pancreatic insulin secretion, sleep apnea, and psychosocial stress. Adiposopathic factors that may contribute to hypertension include increased release of free fatty acids, increased leptin, decreased adiponectin, increased renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation, increased 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1, reduced nitric oxide activity, and increased inflammation.

Conclusions

Increase in body fat is the most common cause of hypertension. Among patients with obesity and hypertension, weight reduction via healthful nutrition, physical activity, behavior modification, bariatric surgery, and anti-obesity medications mostly decrease blood pressure, with the greatest degree of weight reduction generally correlated with the greatest degree of blood pressure reduction.

Case report of PLXNA4 variant associated with hyper-response to phentermine/topiramate pharmacotherapy: Potential genetic basis for superior weight loss response?

Background

Once thought to be primarily a result of lifestyle, it is now known that obesity has significant genetic components. Dozens of genes have been linked to obesity, and office-based genetic testing for obesity-associated genes is now readily available. As both pharmacotherapy and genetic testing for obesity become more accessible, pharmacogenetic personalization is becoming a reality. In this case report, a patient with a PLXNA4 polymorphism had a superior weight loss response to phentermine/topiramate therapy than has previously been reported in the literature. Thus, variants in PLXNA4 may provide a genetic basis for this patient's superior response to weight loss pharmacotherapy and cardiovascular risk factor reduction.

Methods

In this case study, office-based genetic testing was utilized to identify the presence of variants in nearly 80 genes that have been linked to obesity in a patient who had hyper-responsive weight loss results on phentermine/topiramate pharmacotherapy.

Results

A variant of the PLXNA4 gene, which has known pathogenic variants linked to genetic obesity syndromes, was identified in this patient who had a superior weight loss response to phentermine/topiramate pharmacotherapy.

Conclusion

Due to overlapping molecular pathways, it is possible that PLXNA4 variants convey a superior weight-loss response and therefore superior cardiovascular risk factor reduction phentermine/topiramate therapy. Further studies are needed to examine the relationship between PLXNA4 variants and weight loss with phentermine/topiramate pharmacotherapy.