Trigger Finger: Adult and Pediatric Treatment Strategies

Paediatric trigger fingers: a 47-year experience

Paediatric trigger finger is rare compared to adult trigger finger or paediatric trigger thumb, and the aetiology is unclear. Proposed causes include local trauma, anatomical anomalies and systemic conditions. The aim of the present study was to detail the anatomical causes of surgically treated paediatric trigger fingers and provide an operative algorithm based on the anatomical findings. A total of 76 trigger fingers in 38 patients were identified retrospectively at our institution between 1975 and 2022. In total, 41 fingers in 26 patients had anatomical variations. A nodular thickening on the tendon, similar to Notta's nodule in trigger thumbs, was the most common anatomical cause. Abnormal decussation of the flexor digitorum superficialis tendon was the second most common variation. The recurrence rate was significantly lower after resection of one slip of the flexor digitorum superficialis tendon compared to other surgical techniques in these patients. We recommend that surgeons assess for possible anatomical variation during surgery for the trigger finger.Level of evidence: IV.

The current landscape of antifibrotic therapy across different organs: A systematic approach

Fibrosis is a common pathological process that can affect virtually all the organs, but there are hardly any effective therapeutic options. This has led to an intense search for antifibrotic therapies over the last decades, with a great number of clinical assays currently underway. We have systematically reviewed all current and recently finished clinical trials involved in the development of new antifibrotic drugs, and the preclinical studies analyzing the relevance of each of these pharmacological strategies in fibrotic processes affecting tissues beyond those being clinically studied. We analyze and discuss this information with the aim of determining the most promising options and the feasibility of extending their therapeutic value as antifibrotic agents to other fibrotic conditions.

Treatment of trigger finger with metacarpophalangeal joint blocking orthosis vs relative motion extension orthosis: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The metacarpophalangeal joint blocking orthosis (MCPJ-BO) is one of the first-line orthotic treatment for patients with trigger finger (TF). Relative motion extension orthosis (RME-O) has recently emerged as a treatment option for various hand disorders involving TF.

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 6 weeks of orthotic treatment with the MCPJ-BO and the RME-O for pain relief. Function and satisfaction with the orthosis were assessed as secondary objectives.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized clinical study.

METHODS

Thirty patients with an average age of 50 years with Froimson stage 1-3 A1 pulley triggering participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to either the MCPJ-BO (n = 15; 10 females, five males) or the RME-O group (n = 15; 12 females, three males). The orthoses were worn full time for 6 weeks. All patients received patient education, activity modification, and flexor tendon gliding exercises as part of the rehabilitation program. Pre- and post-assessments included Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, and Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology questionnaire. The Mann-Whitney U test was conducted to analyze the difference between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in pain and function before treatment (p < 0.05). Within-group comparisons indicated that both orthoses relieved pain, but the MCPJ-BO group achieved greater pain relief (p = 0.001). There was a significant improvement in function in the MCPJ-BO group, with a mean change of 12.7 (p = 0.0001). The overall success rates for the MCPJ-BO group and RME-O group were 60% and 27%, respectively. Patients in both groups had high satisfaction with the orthosis.

CONCLUSIONS

MCPJ-BO and RME-O could be used for pain relief in the treatment of TF. The MCPJ-BO appears to be more effective than the RME-O in improving function.

Trigger Thumb in Pediatric Patients: A 20-Year Update

BACKGROUND

The study purpose was to analyze the characteristics of patients presenting for evaluation of pediatric trigger thumb over a 20-year period and to determine what factors were associated with operative versus nonoperative management.

METHODS

All patients evaluated for a pediatric trigger thumb by 1 of 2 hand surgeons at our institution between January 1, 2000, and August 31, 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. Data were collected, including patient demographics, laterality, patient age and stage of triggering at presentation, treatment recommendations, age at surgery (if performed), and complications. Comparison was made based on age group (<2 years, 2-5 years, and >5 years). Subgroup analysis was performed for patients who had alternative treatments recommended prior to surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 381 patients (468 thumbs) were identified. The average age at presentation was 3.1 years, 76% were stage IV locked trigger thumbs, and 78% underwent surgery. Patients below 2 years were more likely to have bilateral involvement and have nonoperative management recommended prior to surgery. Those below 5 years were more likely to present with stage IV triggering. Patients who presented with a stage IV trigger thumb and had an initial alternative treatment were more likely to go on to have surgery. The total complication rate was 5.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings are helpful in counseling families and better understanding this patient population. We recommend early surgical intervention, rather than observation or splinting, for patients with stage IV trigger thumbs who can safely undergo anesthesia.

Primary Negative Prognostic Factors in Pediatric and Adult Patients Undergoing Trigger Finger Surgery

Objectives This study aims to investigate the negative prognostic indicators of pediatric and adult trigger finger surgery patients concerning complications, recurrence, and satisfaction. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 61 patients with a total of 91 trigger fingers, including 31 in children and 30 in adult patients, all of whom were treated using a standardized surgical technique. The study considered several demographic and clinical factors, including age, gender, dominant hand, body mass index, occupation, history of trauma, single or multiple finger involvement, staging according to Green classification, diabetes mellitus, comorbidities, recurrence, revision surgery, utilization of non-surgical treatment methods, need for rehabilitation after surgery, time to return to work, the time interval from clinic initiation to the surgery, satisfaction and the duration of the follow-up period. In addition, the quick version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QDASH); and the visual analog scale (VAS) were used to assess patients' data. Results In adult patients, a statistically significant relationship was observed between the increasing grade of the Green stage and complication rate (p<0.001), recurrence (p<0.001), and lower satisfaction (p<0.001). No statistically significant relationship was identified between Green's classification and complications (p=0.129), recurrence (p=0.854), or satisfaction (p=0.143) in pediatric patients. While a statistically significant relationship existed between the time interval from clinic initiation to surgery and complications (p=0.033) in adult patients, no significant relationships were observed for recurrence or satisfaction. Conversely, there was no statistically significant relationship between the time interval from clinic initiation to surgery and complications, recurrence, or satisfaction in pediatric patients. Conclusion This study demonstrates that increasing the grade of the Green stage and duration of symptoms before surgery were the substantial factors contributing to prognosis in adult patients but not in pediatric patients. These findings can assist physicians during patients' treatment management. We suggest that physicians consider these factors for patients' satisfaction.

Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Ulnar Superficialis Slip Resection for Unfavourable Results after Trigger Finger Release

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ulnar superficial slip resection (USSR) for improving hand function after unfavourable results after triggering finger release using a minimally invasive approach. Methods: We evaluated 17 consecutive fingers of 16 patients who complained of unfavourable outcomes after primary trigger finger release. The chief complaints of the two index and 15 middle fingers were proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint pain during movement, flexion contracture of the PIP joint and snapping at the A2 pulley in eight, seven and two fingers, respectively. The joint arc of the active range of motion and extension loss of the PIP joint, grip strength, visual analogue score (VAS) of PIP joint pain and Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand were evaluated before and after surgery. Results: Thirteen fingers could release joint contracture and snapping by the USSR procedure. However, four fingers of three patients required total flexor digitorum superficialis resection to resolve the unsatisfactory conditions of the intraoperative decision. The joint arc of active range of motion and extension loss of the PIP joint, grip strength and VAS score significantly improved (mean of 16.1 months follow-up). Finally, 15 patients (88.2%) were satisfied with the symptom relief outcomes. Conclusions: USSR is an effective and satisfactory procedure for unfavourable conditions after trigger finger release, including PIP joint pain, joint contracture and snapping at the A2 pulley. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Iatrogenic flexor tendon rupture caused by misdiagnosing sarcoidosis-related flexor tendon contracture as tenosynovitis: A case report

BACKGROUND

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disease characterized by granuloma formation in various organs. Sarcoidosis-related flexor tendon contractures are uncommon in clinical settings. This contracture is similar to stenosing tenosynovitis and potentially leads to misdiagnosis and mistreatment. Herein, we report a rare case of sarcoidosis-related finger flexor tendon contracture that was misdiagnosed as tenosynovitis.

CASE SUMMARY

A 44-year-old woman presented to our department with flexion contracture of the right ring and middle fingers. The patient was misdiagnosed with tenosynovitis and underwent acupotomy release of the A1 pulley of the middle finger in another hospital that resulted in iatrogenic rupture of both the superficial and profundus flexors. Radiological presentation showed multiple sarcoid involvements in the pulmonary locations and ipsilateral forearm. A diagnosis of sarcoidosis was made based on the presence of non-caseating granulomas with tubercles consisting of Langhans giant cells with lymphocyte infiltration on biopsy, and the patient underwent surgical repair for the contracture. After 2 mo, the patient experienced another spontaneous rupture of the repaired middle finger tendon and underwent surgical re-repair. Satisfactory results were achieved at the 10 mo follow-up after reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Sarcoidosis-related finger contractures are rare; thus, caution should be exercised when dealing with such patients to avoid incorrect treatment.

Adult presentation of locked 'congenital' trigger thumb: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Although 'congenital' or paediatric trigger thumb is commonly seen in the paediatric age group, adult presentation is very rare. However it is crucial to acknowledge the occurrence of unusual manifestations of paediatric trigger thumbs, since paediatric trigger thumbs are considered a separate disease entity compared to the commonly seen stenosing tenosynovitis in adults.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of a 18-year-old young lady presenting with atraumatic locked trigger thumb, which was successfully treated surgically with intra-operative finding confirming abnormally thickened flexor pollicis longus tendon signifying a paediatric trigger thumb pathology.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Adult and paediatric trigger thumbs have different aetiology, with thickened A1 pulley and tendon sheath being the culprit in adults, whereas in paediatric thumbs thickened tendon nodules (Notta's node) are usually the causes of triggering.

CONCLUSION

This uncommon presentation in this case report is atypical in the age group presentation of paediatric trigger thumb, and should be distinguished from the usual trigger thumb pathology in adults. Although a transient period of extension lag in the early post-operative period may be evident, it can still be successfully treated with surgical release.

Ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Trigger finger is a common condition in the hand, and ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger has been widely used in recent years.

PURPOSE

This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger.

METHODS

We searched for relevant studies in the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Embase, PubMed, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Wanfang Data, and other resources from their inception to January 2023. Randomized controlled trials of ultrasound-guided acupotomy for trigger finger were included. The meta-analysis was carried out using Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 15.1.

RESULTS

Overall, 15 studies with 988 patients were included. The experimental group was treated with ultrasound-guided acupotomy, and the Control group received traditional acupotomy, traditional operation or injection of medication. Meta-analysis showed that the overall clinical effectiveness (OR = 4.83; 95% CI 2.49-9.37; I2 = 73.1%; P < 0.001) in the experimental group was significantly better than that of the control group. And the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score (WMD =  - 1; 95% CI - 1.24, - 0.76; I2 = 99%; P < 0.001), the QuinneII classification (WMD = - 0.84; 95% CI - 1.28, - 0.39; I2 = 99.1%, P < 0.001), the incidence of complications (RR = 0.26; 95% CI 0.11, 0.63; I2 = 0%, P = 0.003), and the recurrence rate (RR = 0.14; 95% CI 0.03, 0.74; I2 = 0%; P = 0.021) were significantly lower in the experimental group.

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review and meta-analysis can prove the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided acupotomy in the treatment of trigger finger, but this still needs to be verified by a clinical standard large sample test.

Effects of light-emitting diode therapy on hand stiffness and pain in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-refractory patients with tenosynovitis

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of light-emitting diode therapy (LEDT) in the management of pain and stiffness in patients with refractory hand tenosynovitis to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Methods

A total of 12 patients were enrolled in the study and received LEDT twice a week for four weeks. Sociodemographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected, and the visual analog scale (VAS) pain and stiffness scores of each hand were assessed every two weeks. The thickness of the flexor tendon in the patients' hand was evaluated using ultrasonography. To investigate the molecular effects of LEDT, we measured the expression levels of type III collagen in tendon cells, with and without LEDT treatment.

Results

After undergoing LEDT, participants showed clinically significant improvements in VAS pain scores at weeks 2, 4, and 8 compared to their baseline, and in VAS stiffness scores at weeks 4 and 8. According to the ultrasonography results, there was a decreasing tendency in tendon thickness for each finger in week 8 compared to the baseline, but the difference was not statistically significant. No adverse events were reported. Additionally, our results indicated a significant increase in type III collagen levels in the LEDT group compared to the control group (1.48±0.18 vs. 0.99±0.02, p=0.031), indicating a potential molecular mechanism for the observed clinical improvements.

Conclusion

LEDT may provide a viable alternative to pharmacological treatments in the future, due to its simple and easy method of administration.

Absorbable Sutures and Telemedicine for Patients Undergoing Trigger Finger Release

Background In the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, the development of care processes that reduce the need for in-person clinic visits while maintaining low complication rates is needed. The purpose of this study is to assess the outcomes of patients undergoing trigger finger release with various suture and follow-up visit types to assess the feasibility of shifting towards telemedicine-based follow-up protocols. Methods A retrospective review of 329 patients undergoing trigger finger release was performed. Patients were classified based on whether or not they received in-office follow-ups; whether they received absorbable or non-absorbable sutures; and whether they were treated using a telemedicine and absorbable suture protocol or other combination of sutures and follow-ups. Univariate statistics were performed to compare outcomes between groups. Results Patients who did not undergo in-office follow-up were more likely to experience residual stiffness or contracture (11.4% vs. 4.1%; p=0.033) but had no significant differences in 30-day reoperation, emergency department (ED) returns, wound complaints, and Quick DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) scores. When comparing chromic absorbable sutures to non-absorbable sutures, those with absorbable sutures were significantly more likely to have telemedicine visits but were also more likely to have wound complaints (17.9% vs. 8.5%; p=0.022). There was no significant difference in two- and six-week pain scores, 30-day reoperation, ED returns, residual symptoms, and Quick DASH scores. When comparing patients treated using the absorbable suture and telemedicine protocol with those receiving any other type of suture and postoperative follow-up, no significant differences in any postoperative clinical outcome measures were observed. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that the use of an absorbable suture and telemedicine protocol for patients undergoing trigger finger release yields similar outcomes as traditional methods of care. However, the use of absorbable sutures may result in decreased patient satisfaction with surgical wound healing.

Orthotic intervention options to non-surgically manage adult and pediatric trigger finger: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The design and efficacy of orthotic intervention to non-surgically manage adult and pediatric trigger finger vary widely.

PURPOSE

To identify types of orthoses (including relative motion), effectiveness, and outcome measurements used to non-surgically manage adult and pediatric trigger finger.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

The study was undertaken according to The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 Statement and registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews Registry, number CRD42022322515. Two independent authors electronically and manually searched, and screened 4 databases; selected articles following pre-set eligibility criteria; assessed the quality of the evidence using the Structured Effectiveness for Quality Evaluation of Study; and extracted the data.

RESULTS

Of the 11 articles included, 2 involved pediatric trigger finger and 9 adult trigger finger. Orthoses for pediatric trigger finger positioned finger(s), hand, and/or wrist of children in neutral extension. In adults, a single joint was immobilized by the orthosis, blocking either the metacarpophalangeal joint or the proximal or distal interphalangeal joint. All studies reported positive results with statistically significant improvements and medium to large effect size to almost every outcome measure, including the Number of Triggering Events in Ten Active Fist 1.37, Frequency of Triggering from 2.07 to 2.54, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure from 0.46 to 1.88, Visual Analogue Pain Scale from 0.92 to 2.00, and Numeric Rating Pain Scale from 0.49 to 1.31. Severity tools and patient-rated outcome measures were used with the validity and reliability of some unknown.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthoses are effective for non-surgical management of pediatric and adult trigger finger using various orthotic options. Although used in practice, evidence for the use of relative motion orthosis is absent. High-quality studies based on sound research questions and design using reliable and valid outcome measures are needed.

National Benchmarks for the Efficacy of Trigger Finger and the Risk Factors Associated With Failure

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of single and multiple corticosteroid injections used for symptomatic trigger finger. The rates of subsequent injections and the rate of tendon sheath release are reported along with the identification of risk factors correlated with failure of injection.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a national healthcare database was conducted identifying patients with a diagnosis of trigger finger or thumb. Inclusion required a tendon sheath injection on the same day or within six weeks of diagnosis. Patient cohorts were further stratified based on treatment success and those requiring additional injections within 6 months or surgery within 1 year of initial diagnosis.

RESULTS

Thirty-one thousand seven hundred fifty-one patients met inclusion criteria and underwent an initial injection within the study period. The efficacy of initial, second, and third injection was 66.3%, 79.4%, and 79.6%, respectively. Of the patients who failed an injection, 9.4% had tendon sheath release after a primary injection, 23.1% had surgery after a second injection, and 30.4% had surgery after a third injection. Only obesity (OR 1.2; P < 0.0001) and concomitant diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (OR 1.4; P < 0.0001) were found to be significant for injection failure on multivariate logistic regression analysis.

DISCUSSION

Overall corticosteroid injections were effective in greater than 65% of patients. This information may help guide treatment practice because there seems to be continued additional benefit to repeat corticosteroid injections after injection failure.

The effects of adding splint use to corticosteroid injection for the treatment of trigger finger: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Trigger finger is the most common flexor tendinopathy affecting the general population. We evaluated the effects of adding a static metacarpophalangeal joint splint to corticosteroid injection for the management of trigger finger in the short term.

METHODS

We carried out a randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms in Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at a university hospital. We randomly allocated 60 participants (34 women) with trigger fingers other than the thumb to two groups (both n = 30). The mean (SD) age was 41.5 (7.6) years. All participants received a single injection of 40 mg methylprednisolone plus 0.5 ml of lidocaine at the A1 pulley. Patients in the splint group wore a full time static splint for blocking the metacarpophalangeal joint for 3 months. The primary outcome was the Numerical Pain Rating Scale and the secondary outcomes were Boston questionnaire scores for symptom severity and functional status, grip strength, and the stages of stenosing tenosynovitis. We measured the outcomes at baseline, and in 1 and 3 months post-intervention.

RESULTS

Both interventions were effective; however, the splint group showed more reductions in pain (p = 0.013) and symptom severity (p = 0.047) and a larger decrease in the stages of tenosynovitis (p = 0.004) after 3 months. There was no significant difference in decreasing functional scores between the groups (p = 0.162). The splint group had a better (but not statistically significant) restoring grip strength (p = 0.056).

CONCLUSION

Wearing of a static metacarpophalangeal joint splint for 3 months following a single injection of corticosteroid increases and stabilises the benefits of the treatment for trigger finger.

Current Management of Trigger Digit in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Survey of ASSH Members

BACKGROUND

Traditional dogma regarding management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with trigger digit symptoms holds that A1 pulley release should be avoided. Surgical release was thought to further destabilize the metacarpophalangeal joint. Biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have limited the development of hand deformities. Despite advances in RA treatment, many textbooks continue to discourage release of the A1 pulley in RA patients. The aim of this study was to determine if this belief is consistent with current trends in surgical management of trigger digits in patients with RA.

METHODS

Active Members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) were surveyed on their training and current practices as related to RA patients with trigger digits.

RESULTS

Five hundred three surveys were completed (16% response rate). During training, 55% of ASSH Members were taught to avoid releasing the A1 pulley in RA patients. Seventy-one percent of respondents currently release the A1 pulley in RA patients with no preexisting deformities, no tenosynovial thickening, or if tenosynovectomy and flexor digitorum superficialis slip excision fail to relieve triggering. Forty percent reported that their practice has evolved toward more frequent release of the A1 pulley in RA patients.

CONCLUSION

The majority of ASSH Active Members were taught during training to avoid surgical release of the A1 pulley in RA patients to prevent acceleration of finger deformities. Indications and contraindications for A1 pulley release are evolving along with the improved natural history of RA associated with the use of biologic DMARDs.

Safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release using a needle knife: An anatomical study

Objective

The present study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release using a needle knife.

Methods

The author performed percutaneous A1 pulley release in 84 cadaveric hands fixed with 10% formalin. The cadaveric hands were divided into three groups: 28 hands in each group (group U: ultrasound-guided needle knife pushing group, group N: non-ultrasound-guided needle knife pushing group, group T: classical needle knife operation puncture group). Percutaneous A1 pulley release was performed, the soft tissue was dissected layer by layer, and the relevant anatomical data were measured.

Results

The injured cases were as follows: group U, 29 (20.7%); group N, 36 (25.7%); and group T, 28 (20.0%). There is no significant difference between different tissue injury types in different intervention methods. The missed release cases were as follows: group U, 8 (5.7%); group N, 4 (2.9%); and group T, 13 (9.3%). The percentage of released A1 pulley were as follows: group U, 71.4% ± 30.7%; group N, 66.0% ± 20.3%; and group T, 61.0% ± 30.4%. The percentage of released A1 pulley of the three groups were compared: group U > group N > group T, and there was statistical difference between the three groups. The full release rates of the three groups were compared: group U(31.4%) > group N(15.7%) > group T(13.6%), and there were significant difference in the full release of A1 pulley between group U and group T, group N.

Conclusion

Based on the cadaver specimen, the length and percentage of released A1 pulley is longer by ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release using a needle-knife. and there was no statistical difference in the injury rate between the three techniques.

Type of Study and Clinical Relevance

Clinical anatomic study. To test the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release using a needle knife in cadaveric hands, and provide an anatomically based support in clinic.

Pediatric hand ultrasound: common indications, injury, inflammation and masses

Ultrasound is a uniquely valuable tool for evaluating musculoskeletal problems in the pediatric hand. Acute and chronic injuries involving tendons and ligaments of the hand can be quickly assessed and can guide surgical decision-making. Using ultrasound, palpable lesions and masses can be evaluated for cystic and solid components aiding in differential diagnosis. Additionally, ultrasound provides evaluation of acute versus chronic changes of inflammatory arthritis, assessing disease severity and subclinical synovitis and serving as an adjunct to medical management. This review will cover common indications and ultrasound findings of the pediatric hand, focusing on common injuries, inflammatory arthritis and masses. Important anatomical features of the hand will be discussed as well as imaging technique and evaluation in the pediatric patient.

A New Test for Trigger Finger: The Lenox Independent Flexion Test

Background: The diagnosis of trigger finger (TF) in patients who do not demonstrate triggering at presentation can be challenging. We have been using a new test for TF - the Lenox Independent Flexion Test (LIFT). The aim of this study is to determine the sensitivity of LIFT in diagnosing TF. We hypothesise that LIFT will be more sensitive compared to the classic physical exam finding of triggering or locking with active range of motion (AROM). Methods: This is a prospective study of consecutive patients with TF over a 5-month period. Patients with the onset of trigger following trauma and trigger of the thumb were excluded. Patients were examined for tenderness over the first annular (A1) pulley, triggering or locking with AROM, and the LIFT was performed. A two-proportion test was used to determine whether the LIFT was more sensitive than triggering with AROM. Results: The study included 85 patients with 118 TFs. The average age of patients was 63 years and the study included 49 women. There were 69, 49, 0 and 0 grade I, II, III and IV TF, respectively. 108 fingers (92%) had a history of catching or locking of the affected digit, 110 (93%) had tenderness over the A1 pulley, 49 (44%) had triggering or locking with AROM and 102 (91%) had a positive LIFT. The LIFT was found to be more sensitive when compared to triggering with AROM (p < .001). Conclusion: The LIFT is more sensitive than triggering with AROM in the diagnosis of trigger digits. This test is especially useful in the diagnosis of TF in patients who do not have triggering at presentation. Level of Evidence: Level III (Diagnostic).

Pediatric Trigger Digit Presenting in the Setting of Trauma

BACKGROUND

Pediatric trigger digit is a relatively rare condition with incompletely understood etiology. In our practice, we noted a series of children presenting with pediatric trigger digit after an associated local trauma to the hand, which has not been previously described. The aim of this study was to analyze the nature of presentation of trigger digits, the accuracy of initial diagnosis, and the impact on treatment strategies used.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved retrospective review of our institution's experience with pediatric trigger finger from 2001 to 2015 was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with 26 affected digits were identified. Eighty-eight percent of patients were diagnosed with trigger thumb, whereas 3 patients (12%) had small finger triggering. Thirteen patients (59%) presented as outpatients, whereas 9 (41%) presented through the emergency department. All patients presenting to the emergency department were in the setting of recent minor trauma. Of this subset of patients, 67% had an incorrect initial diagnosis, leading to an average delay in treatment of 60 days. Ten patients (45% of total) were initially treated with immobilization versus surgical release of the A1 pulley. However, all but 2 of these patients required eventual A1 pulley release for persistent or recurrent triggering (88%).

CONCLUSIONS

The cause of trigger digit in children remains incompletely understood and may be multifactorial. In this series, a traumatic component to presentation was found in a significant number of patients. This association with minor trauma may contribute to misdiagnosis and delay in definitive treatment. Although initial treatment with immobilization does not seem to impact surgical outcome, we found a high rate of failure with initial immobilization. Most patients required eventual surgical management, regardless of whether or not the initial presentation was associated with trauma. When performed, we found that A1 pulley release alone has safe, reliable results.

Evaluation of the first annular pulley stretch effect under isometric contraction of the flexor tendon in healthy volunteers and trigger finger patients using ultrasonography

Background

Isometric exercises for a flexed finger have been reported to be effective for treating trigger finger as the flexor tendon widens the space under the first annular (A1) pulley towards the palmar destination during the exercise. This study aimed to evaluate the structural changes during the A1 pulley stretch in healthy volunteers and patients with trigger finger using ultrasonography.

Methods

We enrolled 25 male and 14 female patients (39 middle fingers). The thickness of the subcutaneous tissue (parameter a), A1 pulley (parameter b), and the flexor tendon (parameter c) and the distance between the dorsal surface of the flexor tendon and the palmar surface of the metacarpal head (parameter d) were measured using ultrasonography of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the middle finger flexed at 45° at rest (pattern A) and under isometric contraction of the flexor tendon against an extension force of the proximal interphalangeal joint (pattern B).

Results

The average differences between patterns A and B in the healthy volunteers were 0.29 mm (parameter a; P = 0.02), 0.017 mm (parameter b; P = 0.63), 0.16 (parameter c; P = 0.26), and 0.41 (parameter d; P = 0.004), and those in patients with trigger finger were 0.22 mm (parameter a; P = 0.23), 0.019 mm (parameter b; P = 0.85), 0.03 mm (parameter c; P = 0.82), and 0.78 mm (parameter d; P < 0.001). The distance between the dorsal side of the A1 pulley and the palmar surface of the metacarpal head was also significantly increased by 0.57 mm (8.2%) in healthy volunteers (P < 0.001) and 0.81 mm (11%) in patients with trigger finger (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

In this study, the space under the A1 pulley was expanded under isometric contraction of the flexor tendon. These findings support the effectiveness of pulley stretch exercises for the trigger finger condition.

Effectiveness of proximal interphalangeal joint-blocking orthosis vs metacarpophalangeal joint-blocking orthosis in trigger digit management: A randomized clinical trial

STUDY DESIGN

Patients with Green's classification grade 2 or 3 A1-pulley trigger digit (TD) were recruited and randomized to receive the proximal interphalangeal joint-blocking orthosis (PIPJ-BO) or metacarpophalangeal joint-blocking orthosis (MCPJ-BO).

INTRODUCTION

TD is a common hand condition that can affect one's performance in activities of daily living. Conservative management of TD involves prescription of orthoses to facilitate recovery. No studies have evaluated the effectiveness of PIPJ-BO, optimal orthosis wear regime, and other factors affecting orthotic effectiveness.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To compare the effectiveness of PIPJ-BO vs MCPJ-BO in TD management.

METHODS

Outcome measures included pain numerical rating scale, Green's classification grading, and Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand. Orthosis wear duration was also collated. Patients were followed up for 2 months, and changes between initial and final assessment score within each group and between both groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients with 43 TD were included in final analysis. Twenty-three TD were allocated PIPJ-BO while 20 with MCPJ-BO. Pain reduction was observed in both groups, but reduction was greater in PIPJ-BO group (P = .02). About 47.83% in PIPJ-BO group and 40% in MCPJ-BO group improved by at least 1 Green's classification grade. There was only significant improvement in Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score for PIPJ-BO group (P = .0007), and duration of orthosis wear was significantly longer in the PIPJ-BO group (P = .0010). Advancing age was found to have higher rate of orthosis failure.

DISCUSSION

Findings suggest that both orthoses are effective in reducing pain and disability and improve in triggering symptoms, with PIPJ-BO being more superior. Moreover, PIPJ-BO is less restrictive, has better cosmesis and allowed better functional performance than MCPJ-BO.

CONCLUSION

PIPJ-BO is more effective than MCPJ-BO in pain reduction and achieved better functional outcome. Orthosis wear of 24 hours for more than 8 weeks is recommended.

A1 pulley stretching treats trigger finger: A1 pulley luminal region under digital flexor tendon traction

BACKGROUND

A1 pulley stretching is recognized as a clinically beneficial treatment for trigger finger. It is thought to lead to an increase in the cross-sectional area of the A1 pulley luminal region, thus improving trigger finger symptoms. The purpose of the present study was thus to evaluate the resultant forces during stretching that increase the CSA of the A1 pulley luminal region using fresh-frozen cadavers.

METHODS

Using seven fingers from three fresh-frozen cadavers to replicate A1 pulley stretching, we investigated the resultant forces during stretching that increase the cross-sectional area of the A1 pulley luminal region. The traction forces of the flexor digitorum profundus tendons were increased in steps to 150 N, and the cross-sectional area and height of the A1 pulley luminal region were measured using ultrasonography.

FINDINGS

The cross-sectional area of the A1 pulley luminal region increased with step-wise increases in the flexor digitorum profundus traction. On average, the cross-sectional area and height of the A1 pulley luminal region showed increases of 31.4% and 43.6%, respectively, compared to the unloaded condition.

INTERPRETATION

These results confirmed that A1 pulley stretching increases the cross-sectional area of the A1 pulley luminal region. A1 pulley stretching has the potential to reduce the severity of trigger finger in patients facing surgery.

Acupotomy for patients with trigger finger: A systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND

Trigger finger is thought to be caused by aseptic inflammation of the A1 pulley and subsequent thickening and narrowing of the fibrous sheath. Acupotomy has been an important treatment for trigger finger. But an updated systematic review about this issue has not yet been released. This systematic review protocol is aimed at providing a higher quality method used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupotomy treatment for trigger finger.

METHODS

The following databases will be searched from the study inception to July 2019: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan-Fang Data, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. All English or Chinese randomized controlled trials related to acupotomy for trigger finger will be included. Two reviewers will independently perform the processes of study inclusion, data extraction, and quality assessment. The primary outcome will be assessed by improvement of the pain symptoms and finger activity. Secondary outcomes will be assessed through Safety assessment. Meta-analysis will be completed by RevMan V.5.3 software.

RESULTS

This systematic review will provide an assessment of the current state of acupotomy for trigger finger, aiming to show the efficacy and safety of treatment.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review will re-evaluate a higher-quality systematic review to obtain a relatively convincing conclusion that finds acupotomy to be a better choice for trigger finger patients.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018118663.

Hand, foot, and spine deformities in parkinsonian disorders

Hand and foot deformities, known as "striatal deformities", and other musculoskeletal abnormalities such as dropped head, bent spine, camptocormia, scoliosis and Pisa syndrome, are poorly understood and often misdiagnosed features of Parkinson's disease and other parkinsonian syndromes. These deformities share some similarities with known rheumatologic conditions and can be wrongly diagnosed as rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, Dupuytren's contracture, trigger finger, or other rheumatologic or orthopedic conditions. Neurologists, rheumatologists, and other physicians must be familiar with these deformities to prevent misdiagnosis and unnecessary diagnostic tests, and to recommend appropriate treatment options.

Treatment of paediatric trigger finger: a systematic review and treatment algorithm

PURPOSE

Paediatric trigger finger (PTF) is a rare condition as seen by the lack of studies published about paediatric populations. Due to this general lack of information, the steps to employ to correct this disorder, whether surgically or non-surgically, have not yet reached consensus status. The objective of this study is to review the published literature regarding treatment options for PTF in order to develop a proposed step-wise treatment algorithm for children presenting with trigger finger.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted on PubMed to locate English language studies reporting on treatment interventions of PTF. Data was collected on number of patients/fingers seen in the study, the category of the fingers involved, the number of patients/fingers undergoing each intervention and reported outcomes.

RESULTS

Seven articles reporting on 118 trigger fingers were identified. In all, 64 fingers were treated non-surgically, with 57.8% (37/64) resolving. In all, 54 fingers were initially surgically treated, with 87% (47/54) resolving. In total, 34 fingers did not have resolution of symptoms following primary treatment, and 27 fingers received follow-up treatment, with 92.6% (25/27) resolving. Overall, 92.4% (109/118) of fingers achieved resolution of symptoms after all treatments were completed.

CONCLUSION

Limitations for this study included few prospective studies and small sample sizes. This is likely due to the rarity of PTF. This review of the literature indicated that a step-wise approach, including non-operative and surgical techniques, should be employed in the management of PTF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This work meets the requirements of the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses).

Ultrasound-guided lower forearm median nerve block in open surgery for trigger thumb in 1- to 3-year-old children: A randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Trigger thumb is a common hand disability in children and is primarily treated with open surgery. A conscious median nerve block can usually meet the requirements for trigger thumb-releasing surgery in adults; however, its effectiveness in children requires further clarification. The present study aims to demonstrate whether ultrasound-guided lower forearm median nerve blockade is a viable option for children undergoing open surgery for trigger thumb.

METHODS

A prospective randomized study was designed to compare median nerve blocks guided by ultrasonography with those guided by anatomic landmarks. Following induction of general anesthesia, the children received a median nerve block performed either by ultrasound-guided block of the lower forearm (group U) or landmark-based blocking at the proximal wrist crease level (group T) with a 0.2% ropivacaine injection. The success rates were compared between groups as the primary endpoint; additional sufentanil and propofol administration, anesthesia recovery time, and other secondary endpoints were also compared.

RESULTS

A total of 100 children (age 1-3 years) with ASA status I who were scheduled for open surgery for trigger thumb were included in this study (n = 50 per group). Thirty-seven children in group T and 50 children in group U underwent successful blocks. The rate of unsuccessful blockade was significantly lower in group U than group T (0% and 26%, respectively), and rate of additional sufentanil and propofol administration was also lower in group U than in group T.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided lower forearm median nerve block can provide more effective analgesia, a higher success rate, and lower general and local anesthetic dosages than the anatomic landmark-based blocking method in children undergoing open surgery for trigger thumb.

The Safety of Percutaneous Trigger Digit Release Increased by Neurovascular Displacement with Local Hydraulic Dilatation: An Anatomical and Clinical Study

Background

Although percutaneous trigger digit release is common, controversy exists regarding its safety. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the neurovascular displacement by local hydraulic dilatation (LHD) during percutaneous trigger digit release.

Material/Methods

Ten cadaver hands with 50 digits were dissected in this anatomical study. The distance between bilateral neurovascular bundles in each digit was measured before LHD and after LHD. The difference between the measured data before LHD and those after LHD in the same digit was compared to assess the feasibility of the neurovascular displacement by LHD. A further 81 patients with 106 trigger digits were treated by percutaneous release with neurovascular displacement by LHD in our clinical series. All patients were followed for 12 months. During the follow-up period, the presence of any postoperative complication and patient satisfaction were recorded.

Results

In our anatomical study, there was a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) comparing the average distance of bilateral neurovascular bundles before LHD with that after LHD. In the current series, no complications, such as digital neurovascular injury or recurrence of trigger, were encountered. On subjective assessment, 80/81 patients (98.8%) with 105/106 digits (99.1%) were graded as satisfactory with complete resolution of symptoms by percutaneous release under LHD.

Conclusions

Based on our study anatomical and clinical results, the neurovascular displacement by LHD may be a feasible adjunctive technique that may play a role in increasing the safety of percutaneous trigger digit release.

Subclinical Partial Attritional Rupture of the Flexor Digitorum Profundus as an Etiology of Atraumatic Trigger Finger

Background

Trigger finger is a relatively common clinical entity. The etiology is most often attributable to stenosing tenosynovitis though traumatic cases have been described. When trigger finger is associated with an underlying flexor tendon rupture, previous cases have reported a clear association with overt laceration or previous trauma.

Methods

We present the case of a 23-year-old male active duty military service member who presented with a characteristic history and clinical exam consistent with trigger finger. The symptomatic onset was gradual, with no history of inciting trauma.

Results

Given symptomatic persistent triggering following failure of conservative management to include cortisone injections, the patient was taken for open A1 pulley release. Intraoperatively, the triggering was found to be attributable to a partial attritional rupture of the small finger flexor digitorum profundus tendon. Tendon debridement, tubularization, and A1 and partial A2 pulley releases were performed with subsequent resolution of triggering.

Conclusion

We present the rare case of subclinical atraumatic attritional rupture of the FDP tendon to the small finger as a cause of clinically apparent trigger finger. This is an important consideration as the hand surgeon must be prepared to address more atypical pathologies.