Impact of combined modality treatment with radiotherapy and S-1 on T2N0 laryngeal cancer: Possible improvement in survival through the prevention of second primary cancer and distant metastasis

Metronomic S-1 Adjuvant Chemotherapy Improves Survival in Patients with Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of using metronomic S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data on patients diagnosed with LANPC between January 2016 and December 2021. All patients were treated with induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without metronomic chemotherapy (MC). Toxicities during MC were recorded. The chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier methods, propensity score matching (PSM), and Cox proportional hazards model were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 474 patients were identified, including 64 (13.5%) and 410 (83.5%) patients with or without receiving MC, respectively. Patients who received metronomic S-1 had significantly better 3-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) (100% vs. 90.9%, p=0.038), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (98.5% vs. 84.1%, p=0.002), disease-free survival (DFS) (98.4% vs. 77.5%, p < 0.001), and overall survival (OS) (98.0% vs. 87.7%, p=0.008) compared to those without metronomic S-1. The multivariate prognostic analysis revealed that metronomic S-1 was identified as an independent prognostic factor associated with better DMFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.074; p=0.010), DFS (HR, 0.103; p=0.002) and OS (HR, 0.127; p=0.042), but not in LRFS (p=0.071). Similar results were found using PSM. Common adverse events observed in the metronomic S-1 group included leukopenia, neutropenia, increased total bilirubin, anorexia, rash/desquamation, and hyperpigmentation. All patients with adverse events were grade 1-2.

CONCLUSION

It is worth conducting a randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of metronomic S-1 on survival outcomes and toxicities of LANPC.

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are the most common cancers arising in the head and neck. Treatment of oral cavity cancer is generally surgery followed by radiotherapy, whereas oropharyngeal cancers, which are more likely to be advanced at the time of diagnosis, are managed with radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Surgery for oral cancers can be disfiguring and both surgery and radiotherapy have significant functional side effects. The development of new chemotherapy agents, new combinations of agents and changes in the relative timing of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy treatments may potentially bring about increases in both survival and quality of life for this group of patients. This review updates one last published in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery for oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma results in improved overall survival, improved disease-free survival and/or improved locoregional control, when incorporated as either induction therapy given prior to locoregional treatment (i.e. radiotherapy or surgery), concurrent with radiotherapy or in the adjuvant (i.e. after locoregional treatment with radiotherapy or surgery) setting.

SEARCH METHODS

An information specialist searched 4 bibliographic databases up to 15 September 2021 and used additional search methods to identify published, unpublished and ongoing studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours in the oral cavity or oropharynx, and that evaluated the addition of chemotherapy to other treatments such as radiotherapy and/or surgery, or compared two or more chemotherapy regimens or modes of administration.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For this update, we assessed the new included trials for their risk of bias and at least two authors extracted data from them. Our primary outcome was overall survival (time to death from any cause). Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (time to disease recurrence or death from any cause) and locoregional control (response to primary treatment). We contacted trial authors for additional information or clarification when necessary.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 100 studies with 18,813 participants. None of the included trials were at low risk of bias.  For induction chemotherapy, we reported the results for contemporary regimens that will be of interest to clinicians and people being treated for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Overall, there is insufficient evidence to clearly demonstrate a survival benefit from induction chemotherapy with platinum plus 5-fluorouracil prior to radiotherapy (hazard ratio (HR) for death 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 1.04, P = 0.11; 7427 participants, 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence), prior to surgery (HR for death 1.06, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.60, P = 0.77; 198 participants, 1 study; low-certainty evidence) or prior to concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) with cisplatin (HR for death 0.71, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.35, P = 0.30; 389 participants, 2 studies; low-certainty evidence). There is insufficient evidence to support the use of an induction chemotherapy regimen with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil plus docetaxel prior to CRT with cisplatin (HR for death 1.08, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.44, P = 0.63; 760 participants, 3 studies; low-certainty evidence).  There is insufficient evidence to support the use of adjuvant chemotherapy over observation only following surgery (HR for death 0.95, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.22, P = 0.67; 353 participants, 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Among studies that compared post-surgical adjuvant CRT, as compared to post-surgical RT, adjuvant CRT showed a survival benefit (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.98, P = 0.03; 1097 participants, 4 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Primary treatment with CRT, as compared to radiotherapy alone,  was associated with a reduction in the risk of death (HR for death 0.74, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.83, P < 0.00001; 2852 participants, 24 studies; moderate-certainty evidence).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review demonstrate that chemotherapy in the curative-intent treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers only seems to be of benefit when used in specific circumstances together with locoregional treatment. The  evidence does not show a clear survival benefit from the use of induction chemotherapy prior to radiotherapy, surgery or CRT. Adjuvant CRT reduces the risk of death by 16%, as compared to radiotherapy alone. Concurrent chemoradiation as compared to radiation alone is associated with a greater than 20% improvement in overall survival; however, additional research is required to inform how the specific chemotherapy regimen may influence this benefit.

The Efficacy and Adverse Events in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Following Radiotherapy Combined with S-1 Therapy: A Meta-Analysis

This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and adverse events associated with S-1 chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy for patients with head and neck cancer. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to 10 February 2021. Eligible studies included clinical trials using S-1 chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy for head and neck cancer patients that measured tumor response, local control rate, overall survival, and grade 3/4 adverse events. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. Twelve trials involving 378 patients met the selection criteria. The objective response and clinical benefit rate (complete/partial response and stable disease) of S-1 chemotherapy with radiotherapy were 86.3% (95% confidence interval (CI), 60.3-96.3) and 88.3% (95% CI, 70.1-96.1), respectively. The median 3-year local control rate, 3-year overall survival rate, and grade 3/4 adverse event rate were 84.0% (95% CI, 71.4-91.7), 69.6% (95% CI, 54.9-81.1), and 42.0% (95% CI, 36.2-48.0), respectively. S-1 combined with radiotherapy for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma results in a good tumor response, favorable survival rate, and low toxicity. A prospective randomized, double-blind trial is required to assess the efficacy and safety of S-1 combined with radiotherapy to treat HNSCC.

Could Primary Chemoradiotherapy in T2 Glottic Cancers Yield Results Comparable to Primary Radiotherapy in T1? Considerations from 531 German Early Stage Patients

T1 glottic cancer is a highly treatable disease with local control (LC) rates over 90% by either primary radiotherapy (pRT) or transoral laser microsurgery (TLM). LC of T2 glottic cancers is 15 percent points poorer on average. However, salvage after pRT entails more than 50% total laryngectomy. Therefore, there is a need for enhanced LC. Altered fractionation regimens improved LC in T1 but not in T2. For this reason, for T2, alternative strategies must be considered. In a large observational cohort study including 531 early-stage laryngeal cancers, a small number of patients were treated with primary chemoradiotherapy (pCRT). In multivariable analysis, factors associated with significantly poorer outcomes included age, comorbidities, supraglottic localization, and T category. While there was a significant difference between pRT and surgery (HR 1.79; 95%-CI: 1.15-2.79), there was none between pCRT and surgery (HR 0.70; 95%-CI: 0.33-1.51). There is evidence from the literature that pCRT in early glottic cancers could yield results that surpass the limits so far experienced in radiotherapy alone with acceptable toxicity. Thus, prospective randomized studies with larger numbers of patients are warranted.

Investigation of the affective factors on the survival rate of patients with laryngeal cancer using Cox proportional hazards and Lin -Ying's additive hazards models

Background: Determining the factors affecting survival and appropriate treatment methods leads to improving the survival rate and quality of life in cancer patients; therefore this study was aimed to determine the effective factors on the survival rate of patients with Laryngeal cancer in Kerman city, Iran.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 370 patients with Laryngeal cancer who referred to the hospitals of Kerman city, Iran during 2008 to 2018. Data were analyzed using Cox Proportional Hazards and Lin-Ying’s Additive Hazards models. Data analysis was done using SAS software version 9.4. The P-value of less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results: The mean age at the time of diagnosis was 58.16±10.60 years. About 92% of the patients were men. The patient’s 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10-years of overall survival rates were equal to 82.38%, 60.68%, 55.98%, 49.83%, and 30.91%, respectively. Age at the diagnosis (p=0.001), radiotherapy (p=0.001), chemotherapy (p=0.015), surgery (p=0.031), and smoking (p=0.001) were found to have significant effect on the patient’s survival rate in the Cox model. These variables were significant in the Lin-Ying model too.

Conclusion: Treatment is an important factor in controlling the disease and survival of cancer patients, and choosing the best treatment depends on the condition of the patient and the disease level.

Magnesium Isoglycyrrhizinate Induces an Inhibitory Effect on Progression and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition of Laryngeal Cancer via the NF-κB/Twist Signaling

Background

Magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate (MI) was extracted from roots of the plant Glycyrrhiza glabra, which displays multiple pharmacological activities such as anti-inflammation, anti-apoptosis, and anti-tumor. Here, we aimed to investigate the effect of MI on the progression and epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) of laryngeal cancer.

Methods

Forty laryngeal cancer clinical samples were used. The role of MI in the proliferation of laryngeal cancer cells was assessed by MTT assay, Edu assay and colony formation assay. The function of MI in the migration and invasion of laryngeal cancer cells was tested by transwell assays. The effect of MI on apoptosis of laryngeal cancer cells was determined by cell apoptosis assay. The impact of MI on tumor growth in vivo was analyzed by tumorigenicity analysis using Balb/c nude mice. qPCR and Western blot analysis were performed to measure the expression levels of gene and protein, respectively.

Results

We identified that EMT-related transcription factor Twist was significantly elevated in the laryngeal cancer tissues. The expression of Twist was also enhanced in the human laryngeal carcinoma HEP-2 cells compared with that in the primary laryngeal epithelial cells. The high expression of Twist was remarkably correlated with poor overall survival of patients with laryngeal cancer. Meanwhile, our data revealed that MI reduced cell proliferation, migration and invasion and enhanced apoptosis of laryngeal cancer cells in vitro. Moreover, MI decreased transcriptional activation and the expression levels of NF-κB and Twist, and alleviated EMT in vitro and in vivo. MI remarkably inhibited tumor growth and EMT of laryngeal cancer cells in vivo.

Conclusion

MI restrains the progression of laryngeal cancer and induces an inhibitory effect on EMT in laryngeal cancer by modulating the NF-κB/Twist signaling. Our finding provides new insights into the mechanism by which MI inhibits laryngeal carcinoma development, enriching the understanding of the anti-tumor function of MI.

How Should We Approach Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck Cancer Patients Ineligible for Standard Non-surgical Treatment?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cisplatin has been established as one of the most important agents in multidisciplinary treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC). However, since HNC patients are often elderly and typically have several comorbidities, a limited number of patients can tolerate high-dose cisplatin in real-world HNC populations. We will provide a review of therapeutic alternatives to high-dose cisplatin-based treatment in the setting of definitive and postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or induction chemotherapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical criteria for CDDP ineligibility have been discussed in HNC. When considering cisplatin-based chemotherapy as part of a non-surgical approach, precise evaluation of the patient's physical condition, nutritional status, and comorbidities is needed. Upfront surgery is an important option with high curability, if a de-intensified non-surgical approach is estimated to be unavoidable. Although no prospective data are available regarding alternatives to definitive cisplatin-based combination therapy for patients undergoing a non-surgical approach, cetuximab, carboplatin, or split-dose cisplatin-based regimens may be employed for cisplatin-ineligible patients in clinical practice. The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with radiotherapy may be a promising novel approach, and some trials are currently targeting the specific cohort of patients ineligible for high-dose cisplatin. There are no standard treatments for patients ineligible for high-dose cisplatin. A personalized treatment strategy should be proposed based on the individual benefit-to-risk ratio of each treatment option in patients ineligible for the standard of care. Prospective clinical trials for cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced HNC still need to be performed.

Chemoradiotherapy for high-risk stage II laryngeal cancer

BACKGROUND

Definitive radiotherapy (RT) for stage II laryngeal cancer is known to be less effective for locoregional control and survival (LRCS) in patients with high-risk factors (e.g., subglottic extension, impaired cord mobility, or bulky tumor size) than in low-risk patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for stage II laryngeal cancer patients with high-risk factors METHODS: Sixty-five consecutive patients with stage II laryngeal cancer who received radiotherapy (RT) alone or CRT were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were classified into three groups: RT, low risk (RT-low, n = 26); RT, high risk (RT-high, n = 25); and CRT, high risk (CRT-high, n = 14).

RESULTS

The glottis was the most common primary tumor site in all groups. Most patients in the CRT-high group received platinum-based CRT. The 5-year locoregional control and survival (LRCS) rates were 88.3, 44.2, and 85.7% in the RT-low, RT-high, and CRT-high groups, respectively. In multivariate analysis, high-risk disease and CRT were significantly associated with 5-year LRCS rates.

CONCLUSION

CRT may provide better locoregional control than RT alone in high-risk stage II laryngeal cancer.

SEMA3A Exon 9 Expression Is a Potential Prognostic Marker of Unfavorable Recurrence-Free Survival in Patients with Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma

This study tried to assess the prognostic value of semaphorin (SEMA) family genes in patients with tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) and the potential epigenetic alterations of the genes. The part of third-level TSCC data in The Cancer Genome Atlas-Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (TCGA-HNSC) was extracted using the UCSC Xena browser for analysis. Among 20 SEMA genes examined, 7 were markedly upregulated, while 8 were substantially decreased in TSCC tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues. SEMA3A was the only gene with independent prognostic value in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS) in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.697, 95% CI: 1.228-2.345, p = 0.001). Among the individual exons of SEMA3A, the exon 9 had a better prognostic value in terms of recurrence than total SEMA3A expression and its expression also independently predicted shorter RFS (HR: 2.193, 95% CI: 1.463-3.290, p < 0.001). The methylation levels of two CpG sites (cg06144675 and cg13988052) were moderately correlated with SEMA3A expression. Interestingly, cg06144675, which locates at the promoter region, showed a negative correlation with SEMA3A expression, whereas cg13988052, which is in the intron of SEMA3A gene body showed a positive correlation with SEMA3A expression. In conclusion, SEMA3A expression is aberrantly upregulated in TSCC tissues. Its exon 9 expression is a potentially valuable prognostic marker of unfavorable RFS in TSCC patients. Both promoter hypomethylation and gene body hypermethylation might contribute to the dysregulation.

Addition of S-1 to radiotherapy for treatment of T2N0 glottic cancer: Results of the multiple-center retrospective cohort study in Japan with a propensity score analysis

OBJECTIVES

This multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the significance of adding S-1 to radiotherapy (RT) for the treatment of T2N0 glottic cancer using a propensity score matched analysis in Japan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted on 287 patients with T2N0 glottic cancer who were treated with definitive RT or chemoradiotherapy with S-1 (S-1 RT) between April 2007 and March 2017. Propensity score matched analysis was performed to ensure the well-balanced characteristics of the groups of patients who received RT alone and S-1 RT. Overall, progression-free and laryngectomy-free survivals and local control and laryngeal preservation rates were compared.

RESULTS

Fifty-four pairs of patients were selected after performing propensity score matched analysis. Clinical characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. The overall survival of patients in the S-1 RT group was significantly better than those in the RT alone group (P = 0.008). The progression-free and laryngectomy-free survivals of patients in the S-1 RT group were also better than those in the RT alone group; however, the differences were not significant. In contrast, patients in the S-1 RT group had slightly lower local control and laryngeal preservation rates compared with those in the RT alone group. The incidence of dermatitis in the S-1 RT group was significantly higher than that in the RT alone group in the matched population (P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of S-1 to RT for the treatment of T2N0 glottic cancer was not associated with better local control and laryngeal preservation rates in this study.

Second primary malignancies in laryngeal carcinoma patients treated with definitive radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Second primary malignancy (SPM) is associated with decreased overall survival (OS) in laryngeal carcinomas (LC).

METHODS

One hundred eighty three LC patients were analyzed retrospectively. The primary and secondary endpoints were the incidence of SPM and the OS difference between patients with and without SPM.

RESULTS

SPM developed in 22 (12.0%) patients at median 52 months (range, 4-131 months), with a yearly 2.8% incidence, of which 19 (10.4%) and 3 (1.6%) were metachronous and synchronous, respectively. Lung was the commonest SPM (72.7%). Of 47 deaths, 12 (25.5%) were SPM related. Comparatively SPM patients had significantly shorter median OS (68.0 months vs. median not reached; P = 0.005), with lower 5-year (67.0% vs. 78.9%) and 8-year (32.6 vs. 69.8%) survival rates.

CONCLUSION

The present findings suggested the SPM as a competing risk factor for death in index LC patients with its annual incidence rate of 2.8% and for accounting one of every four deaths in this patients group. Emergence of lung carcinoma as the most frequent type of SPM and the ability to treat >50% of them with an estimated long-term outcomes emphasizes the importance of early diagnosis and curative treatment of SPMs.