1
|
Hu W, Hu J, Huang Q, Gao J, Zhang H, Kong L. Long-term outcomes after particle radiation therapy in patients with nasopharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:742. [PMID: 38890585 PMCID: PMC11186262 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12471-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nasopharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma (NACC) is a relatively rare salivary gland tumor that is generally associated with poor outcomes. High-dose radiotherapy is a key treatment for patients with NACC. This study reported the long-term efficacy and safety of particle beam radiation therapy (PBRT) for NACC. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twenty-six patients with nonmetastatic NACC who received definitive PBRT alone were included in this retrospective study. The majority of patients (92.3%) had locally advanced disease. Twenty-five (96.15%) patients received intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy (IMPT) followed by a carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) boost, and one patient received CIRT alone. Overall survival (OS), local control (LC), regional control (RC), and distant metastasis control (DMC) rates were calculated via the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 46.95 months for the entire cohort. Seven patients experienced local recurrence, and one patient experience neck lymph node recurrence. The 3- and 4-year OS, LC, RC, and DMC rates were 100% and 91.7%, 92.3% and 84.6%, 95.8% and 87.8%, and 90.2% and 71.3%, respectively. A total of 91.3% of the patients achieved complete remission of gross tumors at 1 year after PBRT. Severe acute toxicity was observed in only two patients. A grade 4 decrease in visual acuity was observed in one patient with orbital apex invasion. No late grade 3 or 5 toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION Definitive PBRT provided a satisfactory 4-year OS for patients with locally advanced NACC. The toxicity was acceptable and mild. Further follow-up is necessary to confirm the efficacy and safety of definitive PBRT for patients with NACC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weixu Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, 201315, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of radiation oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, 201315, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, 201315, China
| | - Jiyi Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, 201315, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of radiation oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, 201315, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, 201315, China
| | - Qingting Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, 201315, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of radiation oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, 201315, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, 201315, China
| | - Jing Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, 201315, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of radiation oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, 201315, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, 201315, China
| | - Haojiong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, 201315, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of radiation oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, 201315, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, 201315, China
| | - Lin Kong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, 201315, China.
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of radiation oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, 201315, China.
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, 201315, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Augustin E, Holtzman AL, Dagan R, Bryant CM, Indelicato DJ, Morris CG, Deraniyagala RL, Fernandes RP, Bunnell AM, Nedrud SM, Mendenhall WM. Long-Term Outcomes Following Definitive or Adjuvant Proton Radiotherapy for Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma. Int J Part Ther 2024; 11:100008. [PMID: 38757074 PMCID: PMC11096740 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2024.100008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy accounting for 1% of all head and neck cancers. Treatment for ACC has its challenges and risks, yet few outcomes studies exist. We present long-term outcomes of patients with ACC of the head and neck treated with proton therapy (PT). Materials and Methods Under an institutional review board-approved, single-institutional prospective outcomes registry, we reviewed the records of 56 patients with de novo, nonmetastatic ACC of the head and neck treated with PT with definitive (n = 9) or adjuvant PT (n = 47) from June 2007 to December 2021. The median dose to the primary site was 72.6 gray relative biological equivalent (range, 64-74.4) delivered as either once (n = 19) or twice (n = 37) daily treatments. Thirty patients received concurrent chemotherapy. Thirty-one patients received nodal radiation, 30 electively and 1 for nodal involvement. Results With a median follow-up of 6.2 years (range, 0.9-14.7), the 5-year local-regional control (LRC), disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, and overall survival rates were 88%, 85%, 89%, and 89%, respectively. Intracranial extension (P = .003) and gross residual tumor (P = .0388) were factors associated with LRC rates. While the LRC rate for those with a gross total resection was 96%, those with subtotal resection or biopsy alone were 81% and 76%, respectively. The 5-year cumulative incidence of clinically significant grade ≥3 toxicity was 15%, and the crude incidence at the most recent follow-up was 23% (n = 13). Conclusion This is the largest sample size with the longest median follow-up to date of patients with ACC treated with PT. PT can provide excellent disease control for ACC of the head and neck with acceptable toxicity. T4 disease, intracranial involvement, and gross residual disease at the time of PT following either biopsy or subtotal resection were significant prognostic features for worse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Etzer Augustin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Adam L. Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Roi Dagan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Curtis M. Bryant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Daniel J. Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Christopher G. Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Rohan L. Deraniyagala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health/Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - Rui P. Fernandes
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Anthony M. Bunnell
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Stacey M. Nedrud
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - William M. Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Light E, Bridge P. Clinical indications for carbon-ion radiotherapy in the UK: A critical review. Radiography (Lond) 2024; 30:425-430. [PMID: 38199158 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has unique radiobiological properties that cause increased radiobiological effect and tumour control, especially with hypoxic tissues. This critical review aimed to evaluate clinical response to CIRT across all published tumour sites to establish if there is a clinical need for a CIRT centre in the UK. METHODS A critical review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Literature searching was undertaken in November 2022 within the PubMed, Science Direct, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases using the term 'carbon ion radiotherapy' in the title, abstract or author keywords. RESULTS After critical appraisal, data was extracted from 78 primary study papers. Strong evidence supported use of CIRT for chondrosarcoma, chordoma, nasopharyngeal, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), oral cavity, prostate, rectal and salivary gland tumours. Further research is needed to strengthen the evidence base for some other tumour types. CONCLUSION The UK's incidence and mortality rates suggest a clinical need for CIRT for chondrosarcoma, chordoma, NSCLC, oral cavity, prostate, and rectal tumours. There is a need to improve survivorship amongst pancreatic, liver, and oesophageal cancer patients. Data published relating to CIRT for these tumours is promising but of lower quality and more research is needed in these areas. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The clinical response to CIRT for certain tumours suggests the need for a carbon-ion centre in the UK. Demand for further research [phase III trials] has been identified, giving the UK opportunity to establish a research centre, with opportunity to treat, contributing to world-renowned research whilst improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Light
- School of Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - P Bridge
- School of Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tan M, Chen Y, Du T, Wang Q, Wu X, Zhang Q, Luo H, Liu Z, Sun S, Yang K, Tian J, Wang X. Assessing the Impact of Charged Particle Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2024; 23:15330338241246653. [PMID: 38773763 PMCID: PMC11113043 DOI: 10.1177/15330338241246653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma (HNACC) is a radioresistant tumor. Particle therapy, primarily proton beam therapy and carbon-ion radiation, is a potential radiotherapy treatment for radioresistant malignancies. This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of charged particle radiation therapy on HNACC. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, and Medline until December 31, 2022. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary outcomes included treatment-related toxicity. Version 17.0 of STATA was used for all analyses. Results: A total of 14 studies, involving 1297 patients, were included in the analysis. The pooled 5-year OS and PFS rates for primary HNACC were 78% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 66-91%) and 62% (95% CI = 47-77%), respectively. For all patients included, the pooled 2-year and 5-year OS, LC, and PFS rates were as follows: 86.1% (95% CI = 95-100%) and 77% (95% CI = 73-82%), 92% (95% CI = 84-100%) and 73% (95% CI = 61-85%), and 76% (95% CI = 68-84%) and 55% (95% CI = 48-62%), respectively. The rates of grade 3 and above acute toxicity were 22% (95% CI = 13-32%), while late toxicity rates were 8% (95% CI = 3-13%). Conclusions: Particle therapy has the potential to improve treatment outcomes and raise the quality of life for HNACC patients. However, further research and optimization are needed due to the limited availability and cost considerations associated with this treatment modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingyu Tan
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yanliang Chen
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China
| | - Tianqi Du
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China
| | - Qian Wang
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xun Wu
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China
| | - Qiuning Zhang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China
- Graduate School, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Hongtao Luo
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China
- Graduate School, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiqiang Liu
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China
- Graduate School, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Shilong Sun
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China
- Graduate School, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Kehu Yang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Jinhui Tian
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiaohu Wang
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China
- Graduate School, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Montenegro C, Mattavelli D, Lancini D, Paderno A, Marazzi E, Rampinelli V, Tomasoni M, Piazza C. Treatment and outcomes of minor salivary gland cancers of the larynx and trachea: a systematic review. ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICA ITALICA : ORGANO UFFICIALE DELLA SOCIETA ITALIANA DI OTORINOLARINGOLOGIA E CHIRURGIA CERVICO-FACCIALE 2023; 43:365-374. [PMID: 37814980 PMCID: PMC10773543 DOI: 10.14639/0392-100x-n2635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
Objectives Malignant minor salivary glands carcinomas (MiSGC) of the larynx and trachea are rare tumours and published evidence is sparse. We conducted a systematic review to describe shareable treatment strategies and oncological outcomes of these neoplastic entities. Methods Full text English manuscripts published from January 1st 2000 to December 14th 2022 were included. Data on demographics, treatments and outcomes were collected. A pooled analysis of 5-year overall survival (OS) was performed. Results Seventeen articles and 365 patients met the inclusion criteria. The most common subsites involved were subglottic and distal trachea. Adenoid cystic carcinoma was, by far, the most frequent histotype. The first-choice treatment strategy was surgery (86.8%), while adjuvant treatments were delivered in 57.4% of patients. Only 12.9% were treated with definitive radiotherapy with/without chemotherapy. The mean follow-up was 68.3 months. One hundred nine (34.9%) deaths were recorded and 62.4% were cancer-related. Five-year OS ranged from 20% to 100% and, at pooled analysis, it was 83% (range, 78-87%). Conclusions In case of MiSGC of the larynx and trachea, surgery remains the mainstay of treatment. Adjuvant treatments are frequently delivered. Survival estimates are good overall, but highly heterogeneous.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Montenegro
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, School of Medicine, Brescia, Italy
| | - Davide Mattavelli
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, School of Medicine, Brescia, Italy
| | - Davide Lancini
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alberto Paderno
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Elisa Marazzi
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, School of Medicine, Brescia, Italy
| | - Vittorio Rampinelli
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Michele Tomasoni
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Cesare Piazza
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, School of Medicine, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Orlandi E, Barcellini A, Vischioni B, Fiore MR, Vitolo V, Iannalfi A, Bonora M, Chalaszczyk A, Ingargiola R, Riva G, Ronchi S, Valvo F, Fossati P, Ciocca M, Mirandola A, Molinelli S, Pella A, Baroni G, Pullia MG, Facoetti A, Orecchia R, Licitra L, Vago G, Rossi S. The Role of Carbon Ion Therapy in the Changing Oncology Landscape-A Narrative Review of the Literature and the Decade of Carbon Ion Experience at the Italian National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5068. [PMID: 37894434 PMCID: PMC10605728 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15205068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, 13 Asian and European facilities deliver carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for preclinical and clinical activity, and, to date, 55 clinical studies including CIRT for adult and paediatric solid neoplasms have been registered. The National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO) is the only Italian facility able to accelerate both protons and carbon ions for oncological treatment and research. METHODS To summarise and critically evaluate state-of-the-art knowledge on the application of carbon ion radiotherapy in oncological settings, the authors conducted a literature search till December 2022 in the following electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane. The results of 68 studies are reported using a narrative approach, highlighting CNAO's clinical activity over the last 10 years of CIRT. RESULTS The ballistic and radiobiological hallmarks of CIRT make it an effective option in several rare, radioresistant, and difficult-to-treat tumours. CNAO has made a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge on CIRT delivery in selected tumour types. CONCLUSIONS After an initial ramp-up period, CNAO has progressively honed its clinical, technical, and dosimetric skills. Growing engagement with national and international networks and research groups for complex cancers has led to increasingly targeted patient selection for CIRT and lowered barriers to facility access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Amelia Barcellini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapy, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Barbara Vischioni
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Maria Rosaria Fiore
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Viviana Vitolo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Alberto Iannalfi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Maria Bonora
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Agnieszka Chalaszczyk
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Rossana Ingargiola
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Giulia Riva
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Sara Ronchi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesca Valvo
- Scientific Directorate, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Piero Fossati
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- Department for Basic and Translational Oncology and Haematology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, 3500 Krems, Austria
| | - Mario Ciocca
- Medical Physics Unit, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Alfredo Mirandola
- Medical Physics Unit, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Silvia Molinelli
- Medical Physics Unit, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Andrea Pella
- Bioengineering Unit, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Guido Baroni
- Bioengineering Unit, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Giuseppe Pullia
- Radiobiology Unit, Research and Development Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Angelica Facoetti
- Radiobiology Unit, Research and Development Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IEO-European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Lisa Licitra
- Scientific Directorate, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Department of Head & Neck Medical Oncology 3, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology & Haemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Vago
- Presidency, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- School of Pathology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Sandro Rossi
- General Directorate, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Locati LD, Ferrarotto R, Licitra L, Benazzo M, Preda L, Farina D, Gatta G, Lombardi D, Nicolai P, Vander Poorten V, Chua MLK, Vischioni B, Sanguineti G, Morbini P, Fonseca I, Sozzi D, Merlotti A, Orlandi E. Current management and future challenges in salivary glands cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1264287. [PMID: 37795454 PMCID: PMC10546333 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1264287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Salivary gland cancers (SGCs) are rare, accounting for less than 5% of all malignancies of the head and neck region, and are morphologically heterogeneous. The diagnosis is mainly based on histology, with the complementary aid of molecular profiling, which is helpful in recognizing some poorly differentiated, borderline, or atypical lesions. Instrumental imaging defines the diagnosis, representing a remarkable tool in the treatment plan. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance are the most common procedures used to describe the primary tumour. The treatment of SGCs is multimodal and consists of surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy; each treatment plan is, however, featured on the patient and disease's characteristics. On 24 June 2022, in the meeting "Current management and future challenges in salivary gland cancers" many experts in this field discussed the state of the art of SGCs research, the future challenges and developments. After the meeting, the same pool of experts maintained close contact to keep these data further updated in the conference proceedings presented here. This review collects the insights and suggestions that emerged from the discussion during and after the meeting per se.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura D. Locati
- Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Medical Oncology Unit, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Pavia, Italy
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Lisa Licitra
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) National Cancer Institute, Milano, Italy
- University of Milan, Milano, Italy
| | - Marco Benazzo
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Preda
- Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Radiology Institute, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Davide Farina
- Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Spedali Civili di Brescia, Division of Radiology and Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Gemma Gatta
- Evaluative Epidemiology Unit, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) National Cancer Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Davide Lombardi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Study, Brescia, Italy
| | - Piero Nicolai
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Study, Padova, Italy
| | - Vincent Vander Poorten
- Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospital of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Section Head and Neck Oncology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Melvin Lee Kiang Chua
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Barbara Vischioni
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiotherapy, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Roma, Italy
| | - Patrizia Morbini
- Unit of Pathology, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Foundation Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Isabel Fonseca
- Anatomia Patológica, Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Davide Sozzi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
- Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy
| | - Anna Merlotti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Santa Croce and Carle Teaching Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Recent Advances, Systemic Therapy, and Molecular Targets in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041463. [PMID: 36835997 PMCID: PMC9967509 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
With an incidence of 3-4.5 cases per million, adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the head and neck is one of the most common tumors of the parotid and sublingual salivary glands. In the clinical course, ACC is shown to have an aggressive long-term behavior, which leads to the fact that radical surgical resection of the tumor with tumor-free margins remains the "gold standard" in treating ACC. Particle radiation therapy and systemic molecular biological approaches offer new treatment options. However, risk factors for the formation and prognosis of ACC have not yet been clearly identified. The aim of the present review was to investigate long-term experience of diagnosis and treatment as well as risk and prognostic factors for occurrence and outcome of ACC.
Collapse
|
9
|
Colombo E, Van Lierde C, Zlate A, Jensen A, Gatta G, Didonè F, Licitra LF, Grégoire V, Vander Poorten V, Locati LD. Salivary gland cancers in elderly patients: challenges and therapeutic strategies. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1032471. [PMID: 36505842 PMCID: PMC9733538 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1032471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs) are the most heterogeneous subgroup of head and neck malignant tumors, accounting for more than 20 subtypes. The median age of SGC diagnosis is expected to rise in the following decades, leading to crucial clinical challenges in geriatric oncology. Elderly patients, in comparison with patients aged below 65 years, are generally considered less amenable to receiving state-of-the-art curative treatments for localized disease, such as surgery and radiation/particle therapy. In the advanced setting, chemotherapy regimens are often dampened by the consideration of cardiovascular and renal comorbidities. Nevertheless, the elderly population encompasses a broad spectrum of functionalities. In the last decades, some screening tools (e.g. the G8 questionnaire) have been developed to identify those subjects who should receive a multidimensional geriatric assessment, to answer the question about the feasibility of complex treatments. In the present article, we discuss the most frequent SGC histologies diagnosed in the elderly population and the relative 5-years survival outcomes based on the most recent data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Moreover, we review the therapeutic strategies currently available for locoregionally advanced and metastatic disease, taking into account the recent advances in precision oncology. The synergy between the Multidisciplinary Tumor Board and the Geriatrician aims to shape the most appropriate treatment pathway for each elderly patient, focusing on global functionality instead of the sole chronological age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Colombo
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Charlotte Van Lierde
- Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven and Department of Oncology, section Head and Neck Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Alexandra Zlate
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - Alexandra Jensen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Giessen and Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - Gemma Gatta
- Evaluative Epidemiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Didonè
- Evaluative Epidemiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Lisa F. Licitra
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincent Grégoire
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - Vander Vander Poorten
- Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven and Department of Oncology, section Head and Neck Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Laura D. Locati
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ng WT, But B, Wong CH, Choi CW, Chua ML, Blanchard P, Lee AW. Particle beam therapy for nasopharyngeal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 37:41-56. [PMID: 36065359 PMCID: PMC9440257 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Particle beam therapy yields excellent short-term treatment outcomes among NPC patients. Particle beam therapy is generally safe in primary and recurrent NPC patients, with ≥G3 late toxicity rates of 20 % or less. An approximately 5% mortality rate was reported among recurrent NPC patients.
Background/purpose A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to better understand the benefits of particle beam therapy for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) treatment. The survival outcomes and toxicity of primary and recurrent NPC patients treated with proton or carbon ion beam therapy were investigated. Method PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were searched between 1 January 2007 to 3 November 2021. The inclusion and exclusion criteria included studies with either primary or recurrent NPC patients, sample size of ≥10 patients, and proton or carbon ion beam therapy as interventions. Twenty-six eligible studies with a total of 1502 patients were included. We used a random-effect meta-analysis to examine the impact of particle beam therapy on primary NPC patients and qualitatively described the results among recurrent patients. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), while secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC) and toxicity. Results The pooled OS at 1-year, 2-year and 3-year and 5-year for primary NPC patients who received particle beam therapy were 96 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) = 92 %-98 %), 93 % (95 % CI = 83 %-97 %), 90 % (95 % CI = 73 %-97 %) and 73 % (95 % CI = 52 %-87 %) respectively. The pooled 1-year and 2-year PFS, and LC for these patients were above 90 %. For locally recurrent NPC patients, the 1-year OS rate ranged from 65 % to 92 %, while the 1-year LC rate ranged from 80 % to 88 %. Both proton and carbon ion beam therapy were generally safe among primary and recurrent patients, with ≥G3 late toxicity rates of 20 % or less. Approximately a 5 % mortality rate was reported among recurrent patients. Conclusions This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated particle beam therapy has great potential in treating NPC, yielding excellent survival outcomes with low toxicity. However, further investigations are needed to assess the long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of this newer form of radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
11
|
Loap P, Vischioni B, Bonora M, Ingargiola R, Ronchi S, Vitolo V, Barcellini A, Goanta L, De Marzi L, Dendale R, Pacelli R, Locati L, Calugaru V, Mammar H, Cavalieri S, Kirova Y, Orlandi E. Biological Rationale and Clinical Evidence of Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy for Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Narrative Review. Front Oncol 2021; 11:789079. [PMID: 34917512 PMCID: PMC8668942 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.789079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare, basaloid, epithelial tumor, arising mostly from salivary glands. Radiation therapy can be employed as a single modality for unresectable tumors, in an adjuvant setting after uncomplete resection, in case of high-risk pathological features, or for recurrent tumors. Due to ACC intrinsic radioresistance, high linear energy transfer (LET) radiotherapy techniques have been evaluated for ACC irradiation: while fast neutron therapy has now been abandoned due to toxicity concerns, charged particle beams such as protons and carbon ions are at present the beams used for hadron therapy. Carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) is currently increasingly used for ACC irradiation. The aim of this review is to describe the immunological, molecular and clinicopathological bases that support ACC treatment with CIRT, as well as to expose the current clinical evidence that reveal the advantages of using CIRT for treating ACC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Loap
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Proton Therapy Center, Institut Curie, Orsay, France
| | - Barbara Vischioni
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Maria Bonora
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Rossana Ingargiola
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Sara Ronchi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Viviana Vitolo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Amelia Barcellini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Lucia Goanta
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Napoli, Italy
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Proton Therapy Center, Institut Curie, Orsay, France.,Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, INSERM LITO, Orsay, France
| | - Remi Dendale
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Proton Therapy Center, Institut Curie, Orsay, France
| | - Roberto Pacelli
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Napoli, Italy
| | - Laura Locati
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentin Calugaru
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Proton Therapy Center, Institut Curie, Orsay, France
| | - Hamid Mammar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Proton Therapy Center, Institut Curie, Orsay, France
| | - Stefano Cavalieri
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Youlia Kirova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Proton Therapy Center, Institut Curie, Orsay, France
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
The efficacy of iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy for the treatment of locally advanced adenoid cystic carcinoma of the base of tongue: a non-surgical approach. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2021; 13:395-401. [PMID: 34484353 PMCID: PMC8407254 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2021.108593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The present study retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness and safety of iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy for treatment of primary locally advanced adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the base of tongue (BOT). Material and methods This study was a retrospective analysis of data of 19 patients with ACC, who were treated with iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy between March 2008 and April 2018. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local control (LC), and radiation-related toxicities were determined. Factors affecting the outcomes were evaluated. Results Six males and 13 females were included in our study, with a median follow-up time of 35 months. 3- and 5-year OS rates were 71.5% and 47.6%, respectively. 3- and 5-year LC rates were 88.5% and 34.5%, respectively. 3- and 5-year DFS rates were 54.7% and 21.9%, respectively. A significant difference was observed in patients with or without brain metastases for OS rate. No severe acute toxicity was observed, while severe late toxicity was observed in one patient. Conclusions The results suggest that iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy is an effective and safe option for the treatment of primary locally advanced ACC of the base of the tongue, with reasonably satisfactory LC and OS.
Collapse
|
13
|
Ebner DK, Malouff TD, Frank SJ, Koto M. The Role of Particle Therapy in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma and Mucosal Melanoma of the Head and Neck. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:273-284. [PMID: 34285953 PMCID: PMC8270088 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-d-20-00076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Particle irradiation is suitable for resistant histologies owing to a combination of improved dose delivery with potential radiobiologic advantages in high linear energy transfer radiation. Within the head and neck, adenoid cystic carcinoma and mucosal melanoma are two such histologies, being radioresistant and lying closely proximal to critical structures. Here, we review the use of particle irradiation for adenoid cystic carcinoma and mucosal melanoma of the head and neck.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel K Ebner
- Hospital of the National Institutes of Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST Hospital), Chiba, Japan
| | - Timothy D Malouff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Masashi Koto
- Hospital of the National Institutes of Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST Hospital), Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rühle A, Grosu AL, Nicolay NH. The Particle Radiobiology of Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: A Key to Mitigating Radiation-Induced Tissue Toxicities in Cancer Treatment and Beyond? Front Oncol 2021; 11:616831. [PMID: 33912447 PMCID: PMC8071947 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.616831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) comprise a heterogeneous population of multipotent stromal cells that have gained attention for the treatment of irradiation-induced normal tissue toxicities due to their regenerative abilities. As the vast majority of studies focused on the effects of MSCs for photon irradiation-induced toxicities, little is known about the regenerative abilities of MSCs for particle irradiation-induced tissue damage or the effects of particle irradiation on the stem cell characteristics of MSCs themselves. MSC-based therapies may help treat particle irradiation-related tissue lesions in the context of cancer radiotherapy. As the number of clinical proton therapy centers is increasing, there is a need to decidedly investigate MSC-based treatments for particle irradiation-induced sequelae. Furthermore, therapies with MSCs or MSC-derived exosomes may also become a useful tool for manned space exploration or after radiation accidents and nuclear terrorism. However, such treatments require an in-depth knowledge about the effects of particle radiation on MSCs and the effects of MSCs on particle radiation-injured tissues. Here, the existing body of evidence regarding the particle radiobiology of MSCs as well as regarding MSC-based treatments for some typical particle irradiation-induced toxicities is presented and critically discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Molecular Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Molecular Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Akbaba S, Rühle A, Rothhaar S, Zamboglou C, Gkika E, Foerster R, Oebel L, Klodt T, Schmidberger H, Grosu AL, Debus J, Bostel T, Nicolay NH. Treatment outcomes of elderly salivary gland cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy - Results from a large multicenter analysis. Radiother Oncol 2020; 156:266-274. [PMID: 33359662 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.12.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To evaluate oncological outcomes and treatment-related toxicities of elderly salivary gland cancer patients undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Local/locoregional control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of elderly patients ≥ 65 years with primary salivary gland cancers undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy between 2005 and 2020 at three tertiary cancer centers were calculated. The impact of clinicopathological and treatment parameters on outcomes were analyzed, and acute and chronic toxicities were quantified. RESULTS 288 elderly salivary gland cancer patients were included in this multicenter analysis, and their median LRC, PFS and OS amounted to 113, 39 and 75 months, respectively. Age, performance status, comorbidities, definitive vs. adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy as well as locally/locoregionally advanced cancers and distant metastases correlated with reduced outcomes in elderly salivary gland patients. Patients receiving dose-escalated radiotherapy (total doses > 70 GyEQD2) with carbon ion boost radiation resulted in improved LRC, but no improvements in PFS or OS. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy did not improve treatment outcomes in elderly salivary gland carcinoma patients. Radiotherapy of elderly salivary gland cancer patients resulted in moderate higher-grade toxicities despite dose escalation with 70 (24.3%) and 48 patients (16.7%) experiencing acute and chronic grade 3 toxicities, respectively. No grade 4/5 toxicities were observed in this patient cohort. CONCLUSION Data from the largest multicenter analysis of elderly salivary gland cancer patients undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy demonstrate favorable LRC and tolerable toxicity rates. Decision-making for these vulnerable patients should be based on patient performance rather than chronological patient age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sofie Rothhaar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Robert Foerster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Laura Oebel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tristan Klodt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Malouff TD, Vallow LA, Seneviratne D, Mahajan A, Foote RL, Hoppe B, Beltran C, Buskirk SJ, Krishnan S, Trifiletti DM. Estimating the Number of Patients Eligible for Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in the United States. Int J Part Ther 2020; 7:31-41. [PMID: 33274255 PMCID: PMC7707324 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-19-00079.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is an emerging radiotherapy modality with potential advantages over conventional photon-based therapy, including exhibiting a Bragg peak and greater relative biological effectiveness, leading to a higher degree of cell kill. Currently, 13 centers are treating with CIRT, although there are no centers in the United States. We aimed to estimate the number of patients eligible for a CIRT center in the United States. Materials and Methods Using the National Cancer Database, we analyzed the incidence of cancers frequently treated with CIRT internationally (glioblastoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, locally advanced pancreatic cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, localized prostate cancer, soft tissue sarcomas, and specific head and neck cancers) diagnosed in the United States in 2015. The percentage and number of patients likely benefiting from CIRT was estimated with inclusion criteria from clinical trials and retrospective studies, and that ratio was applied to 2019 cancer statistics. An adaption correction rate was applied to estimate the potential number of patients treated with CIRT. Given the high dependency on prostate and lung cancers and the uncertain adoption of CIRT in those diseases, the data were then reanalyzed excluding those diagnoses. Results Of the 1 127 455 new cases of cancer diagnosed in the United States in 2015, there were 213 073 patients (18.9%) eligible for treatment with CIRT based on inclusion criteria. When applying this rate and the adaption correction rate to the 2019 incidence data, an estimated 89 946 patients (42.2% of those fitting inclusion criteria) are eligible for CIRT. Excluding prostate and lung cancers, there were an estimated 8922 patients (10% of those eligible for CIRT) eligible for CIRT. The number of patients eligible for CIRT is estimated to increase by 25% to 27.7% by 2025. Conclusion Our analysis suggests a need for CIRT in the United States in 2019, with the number of patients possibly eligible to receive CIRT expected to increase during the coming 5 to 10 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy D Malouff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Laura A Vallow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Robert L Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bradford Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Chris Beltran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Steven J Buskirk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Blakely EA. The 20th Gray lecture 2019: health and heavy ions. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20200172. [PMID: 33021811 PMCID: PMC8519642 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2020] [Revised: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Particle radiobiology has contributed new understanding of radiation safety and underlying mechanisms of action to radiation oncology for the treatment of cancer, and to planning of radiation protection for space travel. This manuscript will highlight the significance of precise physical and biologically effective dosimetry to this translational research for the benefit of human health.This review provides a brief snapshot of the evolving scientific basis for, and the complex current global status, and remaining challenges of hadron therapy for the treatment of cancer. The need for particle radiobiology for risk planning in return missions to the Moon, and exploratory deep-space missions to Mars and beyond are also discussed. METHODS Key lessons learned are summarized from an impressive collective literature published by an international cadre of multidisciplinary experts in particle physics, radiation chemistry, medical physics of imaging and treatment planning, molecular, cellular, tissue radiobiology, biology of microgravity and other stressors, theoretical modeling of biophysical data, and clinical results with accelerator-produced particle beams. RESULTS Research pioneers, many of whom were Nobel laureates, led the world in the discovery of ionizing radiations originating from the Earth and the Cosmos. Six radiation pioneers led the way to hadron therapy and the study of charged particles encountered in outer space travel. Worldwide about 250,000 patients have been treated for cancer, or other lesions such as arteriovenous malformations in the brain between 1954 and 2019 with charged particle radiotherapy, also known as hadron therapy. The majority of these patients (213,000) were treated with proton beams, but approximately 32,000 were treated with carbon ion radiotherapy. There are 3500 patients who have been treated with helium, pions, neon or other ions. There are currently 82 facilities operating to provide ion beam clinical treatments. Of these, only 13 facilities located in Asia and Europe are providing carbon ion beams for preclinical, clinical, and space research. There are also numerous particle physics accelerators worldwide capable of producing ion beams for research, but not currently focused on treating patients with ion beam therapy but are potentially available for preclinical and space research. Approximately, more than 550 individuals have traveled into Lower Earth Orbit (LEO) and beyond and returned to Earth. CONCLUSION Charged particle therapy with controlled beams of protons and carbon ions have significantly impacted targeted cancer therapy, eradicated tumors while sparing normal tissue toxicities, and reduced human suffering. These modalities still require further optimization and technical refinements to reduce cost but should be made available to everyone in need worldwide. The exploration of our Universe in space travel poses the potential risk of exposure to uncontrolled charged particles. However, approaches to shield and provide countermeasures to these potential radiation hazards in LEO have allowed an amazing number of discoveries currently without significant life-threatening medical consequences. More basic research with components of the Galactic Cosmic Radiation field are still required to assure safety involving space radiations and combined stressors with microgravity for exploratory deep space travel. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE The collective knowledge garnered from the wealth of available published evidence obtained prior to particle radiation therapy, or to space flight, and the additional data gleaned from implementing both endeavors has provided many opportunities for heavy ions to promote human health.
Collapse
|
18
|
Neck involvement and disease recurrence in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the minor salivary glands: the role of surgery in primary and progressive disease. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020; 50:423-430. [PMID: 32847711 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.07.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Revised: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyse the rates of metastatic events and clinical outcomes of patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the minor salivary glands and to critically evaluate the role of surgical therapy. A retrospective cohort study was designed including all patients with ACC of the oral minor salivary glands treated in the study department during the years 2010-2017. Relevant clinicopathological data were analysed to determine factors with an impact on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Forty-one patients with primary ACC of the oral cavity and the oropharynx were included. Cervical metastases were found in 14 patients (34.1%) and were shown to have a significant negative impact on OS (P=0.009) and PFS (P=0.03). Sixteen patients developed disease recurrence during follow-up (39.0%) and most patients exhibited local disease recurrence with or without regional or distant metastases (14/16, 87.5%). Local recurrence was treated successfully with surgery in five cases. We recommend surgical therapy for patients with ACC of the minor salivary glands, including elective neck dissection and microvascular reconstruction, to optimize the planning of adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
|
19
|
Malouff TD, Mahajan A, Krishnan S, Beltran C, Seneviratne DS, Trifiletti DM. Carbon Ion Therapy: A Modern Review of an Emerging Technology. Front Oncol 2020; 10:82. [PMID: 32117737 PMCID: PMC7010911 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy is one of the most widely used therapies for malignancies. The therapeutic use of heavy ions, such as carbon, has gained significant interest due to advantageous physical and radiobiologic properties compared to photon based therapy. By taking advantage of these unique properties, carbon ion radiotherapy may allow dose escalation to tumors while reducing radiation dose to adjacent normal tissues. There are currently 13 centers treating with carbon ion radiotherapy, with many of these centers publishing promising safety and efficacy data from the first cohorts of patients treated. To date, carbon ion radiotherapy has been studied for almost every type of malignancy, including intracranial malignancies, head and neck malignancies, primary and metastatic lung cancers, tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, prostate and genitourinary cancers, sarcomas, cutaneous malignancies, breast cancer, gynecologic malignancies, and pediatric cancers. Additionally, carbon ion radiotherapy has been studied extensively in the setting of recurrent disease. We aim to provide a comprehensive review of the studies of each of these disease sites, with a focus on the current trials using carbon ion radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
20
|
Adeberg S, Akbaba S, Lang K, Held T, Verma V, Nikoghosyan A, Bernhardt D, Münter M, Freier K, Plinkert P, Hauswald H, Herfarth K, Rieken S, Debus J, Jensen AD. The Phase 1/2 ACCEPT Trial: Concurrent Cetuximab and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy with Carbon Ion Boost for Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 106:167-173. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.09.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Revised: 08/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
21
|
Adeberg S, Windisch P, Ehret F, Baur M, Akbaba S, Held T, Bernhardt D, Haefner MF, Krauss J, Kargus S, Freudlsperger C, Plinkert P, Flechtenmacher C, Herfarth K, Debus J, Rieken S. Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) With Carbon Ion Boost in the Multimodal Treatment of Salivary Duct Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2019; 9:1420. [PMID: 31921675 PMCID: PMC6932999 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 11/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: To assess outcomes and treatment related toxicity following intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and a Carbon Ion Radiotherapy (CIRT) boost for salivary duct carcinoma (SDC). Methods: Twenty-eight consecutive patients with SDC who underwent a postoperative (82%) or definitive (18%) radiation therapy between 2010 and 2017 were assessed in this retrospective single-center analysis. CIRT boost was delivered with median 18 Gy(RBE) in 6 daily fractions, followed by an TomoTherapy®-based IMRT (median 54 Gy in 27 daily fractions). Treatment-related acute toxicity was assessed according to CTCAE Version 4. Results: Tumors were most commonly located in the major salivary glands (n = 25; 89%); 23 patients (82%) received previous surgery (R0: 30%; R1: 57%; R2: 4%; RX: 19%). Median follow-up was 30 months. Four patients (14%) experienced a local relapse and 3 (11%) developed locoregional recurrence. The two-year local control (LC) and locoregional control (LRC) was 96 and 93%, respectively. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 27 months, metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 69 months, and overall survival (OS) was 93 months. Acute grade 3 toxicity occurred in 11 patients (mucositis, dermatitis, xerostomia; n = 2 each (7%) were the most common) and 2 osteonecroses of the mandibular (grade 3) occurred. No patients experienced grade ≥4 toxicities. Conclusions: Multimodal therapy approaches with surgery followed by IMRT and CIRT boost for SDC leads to good local and locoregional disease control. However, the frequent occurrence of distant metastases limits the prognosis and requires optimization of adjuvant systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Paul Windisch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Ehret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Melissa Baur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias F Haefner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Steffen Kargus
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Freudlsperger
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Plinkert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Molinelli S, Bonora M, Magro G, Casale S, Dale JE, Fossati P, Hasegawa A, Mirandola A, Ronchi S, Russo S, Preda L, Valvo F, Orecchia R, Ciocca M, Vischioni B. RBE-weighted dose in carbon ion therapy for ACC patients: Impact of the RBE model translation on treatment outcomes. Radiother Oncol 2019; 141:227-233. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Revised: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
23
|
Blakely EA, Faddegon B, Tinkle C, Bloch C, Dominello M, Griffin RJ, Joiner MC, Burmeister J. Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: The United States needs at least one carbon ion facility. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 20:6-13. [PMID: 31573146 PMCID: PMC6839391 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2019] [Revised: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bruce Faddegon
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of California – San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
| | - Christopher Tinkle
- Department of Radiation OncologySt. Jude Children’s Research HospitalMemphisTNUSA
| | - Charles Bloch
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWAUSA
| | - Michael Dominello
- Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMIUSA
| | - Robert J Griffin
- Department of OncologyUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesLittle RockARUSA
| | - Michael C Joiner
- Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMIUSA
| | - Jay Burmeister
- Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMIUSA,Gershenson Radiation Oncology CenterBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMIUSA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Akbaba S, Heusel A, Mock A, Held T, Lang K, Hoerner-Rieber J, Forster T, Katayama S, Kargus S, Rieken S, Plinkert P, Herfarth K, Debus J, Adeberg S. The impact of age on the outcome of patients treated with radiotherapy for mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the salivary glands in the head and neck: A 15-year single-center experience. Oral Oncol 2019; 97:115-123. [PMID: 31494395 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Revised: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 08/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Data regarding treatment and survival outcome of patients with mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck are limited to case reports and case series. As a consequence of lacking evidence, treatment guidelines do not exist. We aimed to analyze the effect of modern radiotherapy in form of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) either with simultaneously integrated boost or carbon ion boost on local control and survival for a relatively large patient collective. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patient records of 62 consecutive patients treated with postoperative (n = 53, 85%) or definitive (n = 9, 15%) radiotherapy between 2004 and 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival (OS), distant progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC) and locoregional control (LRC) were statistically calculated and prognostic factors were identified using the log-rank test. Toxicity was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). RESULTS The median follow-up was 47 months (range, 4-188 months). The 3-year OS, DPFS, LC and LRC, estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves, were 82%, 87%, 89% and 92%, the estimated 5-year OS, DPFS, LC and LRC were 78%, 87%, 84% and 88%, respectively. In univariate analysis, age >56 years (vs. age ≤56 years) was identified as the only independent negative prognostic factor for decreased OS (HR = 1.078; 95%-CI = 1.029-1.130; p = 0.001), DPFS (HR = 1.055; 95%-CI = 1.000-1.114; p = 0.051) and LC (HR = 1.087; 95%-CI = 1.022-1.157; p = 0.008). Treatment was well tolerated without any grade ≥4 toxicity. Acute and late grade 3 toxicities were rare with 16% acute (n = 10) and 13% late toxicities (n = 8). CONCLUSION Radiotherapy with intensity modulated radiotherapy including either simultaneously integrated photon boost or active raster-scanning carbon ion boost for mucoepidermoid carcinomas of the head and neck resulted in excellent survival outcome and locoregional control with moderate toxicity. However, patients older than 56 years seem to have a disadvantage in all calculated endpoints (OS, DPFS, LRC) due to frequent local and distant relapses. CONDENSED ABSTRACT Modern radiotherapy with intensity modulated radiotherapy including either a simultaneously integrated photon boost or carbon ion boost for mucoepidermoid carcinoma results in excellent survival outcome and locoregional control with moderate toxicity. The 5-year OS, DPFS, LC and LRC, estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves, were 89%, 75%, 84% and 80%, respectively. Patients older than 56 years seem to have a disadvantage in all calculated endpoints (OS, DPFS, LRC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Astrid Heusel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Andreas Mock
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Sonja Katayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Steffen Kargus
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Peter Plinkert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Alterio D, Marvaso G, Ferrari A, Volpe S, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Modern radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Semin Oncol 2019; 46:233-245. [PMID: 31378376 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2019.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 148] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) plays a key role in curative-intent treatments for head and neck cancers. Its use is indicated as a sole therapy in early stage tumors or in combination with surgery or concurrent chemotherapy in advanced stages. Recent technologic advances have resulted in both improved oncologic results and expansion of the indications for RT in clinical practice. Despite this, RT administered to the head and neck region is still burdened by a high rate of acute and late side effects. Moreover, about 50% of patients with high-risk disease experience loco-regional recurrence within 3 years of follow-up. Therefore, in recent decades, efforts have been dedicated to optimize the cost/benefit ratio of RT in this subset of patients. The aim of the present review was to highlight modern concepts of RT for head and neck cancers considering both the technological advances that have been achieved and recent knowledge that has informed the biological interaction between radiation and both tumor and healthy tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Alterio
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Annamaria Ferrari
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Volpe
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|