Prognostic value of radiologic extranodal extension and its potential role in future N classification for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Criteria for the diagnosis of extranodal extension detected on radiological imaging in head and neck cancer: Head and Neck Cancer International Group consensus recommendations

Extranodal extension of tumour on histopathology is known to be a negative prognostic factor in head and neck cancer. Compelling evidence suggests that extranodal extension detected on radiological imaging is also a negative prognostic factor. Furthermore, if imaging detected extranodal extension could be identified reliably before the start of treatment, it could be used to guide treatment selection, as patients might be better managed with non-surgical approaches to avoid the toxicity and cost of trimodality therapy (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy together). There are many aspects of imaging detected extranodal extension that remain unresolved or are without consensus, such as the criteria to best diagnose them and the associated terminology. The Head and Neck Cancer International Group conducted a five-round modified Delphi process with a group of 18 international radiology experts, representing 14 national clinical research groups. We generated consensus recommendations on the terminology and diagnostic criteria for imaging detected extranodal extension to harmonise clinical practice and research. These recommendations have been endorsed by 19 national and international organisations, representing 34 countries. We propose a new classification system to aid diagnosis, which was supported by most of the participating experts over existing systems, and which will require validation in the future. Additionally, we have created an online educational resource for grading imaging detected extranodal extensions.

Enhancing efficacy and reducing toxicity: Therapeutic optimization in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

When applied as the standard therapeutic modality, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) improves local control and survival rates in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, distant metastasis continues to be the leading cause of treatment failure. Here, we review the most recent optimization strategies for combining chemotherapy with IMRT in high-risk patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. We focus on major clinical trials on induction chemotherapy and metronomic adjuvant chemotherapy, emphasizing their efficacy in mitigating distant metastasis and prognosis. We also highlight innovations in reducing toxicity in low-risk patients, particularly through approaches of excluding chemotherapy, adopting equivalent low-toxicity drugs, or selectively exempting lymph nodes with low metastatic risk from irradiation. These approaches have provided positive treatment outcomes and significantly enhanced patients' quality of life. Finally, we provide an overview of the evolving immunotherapy landscape, with a focus on the ongoing trials and future potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced NPC treatment.

Radiotherapy alone versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage II and T3N0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma with adverse features: A propensity score-matched cohort study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Whether concurrent chemoradiotherapy would provide survival benefits in patients with stage II and T3N0 NPC with adverse factors remains unclear in IMRT era. We aimed to assess the value of concurrent chemotherapy compared to IMRT alone in stage II and T3N0 NPC with adverse features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

287 patients with stage II and T3N0 NPC with adverse factors were retrospectively analyzed, including 98 patients who received IMRT alone (IMRT alone group) and 189 patients who received cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy (CCRT group). The possible prognostic factors were balanced using propensity score matching (PSM). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate the survival rates, and log-rank tests were employed to compare differences between groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 90.8 months (interquartile range = 75.6-114.7 months). The IMRT alone and the CCRT group were well matched; however, for all survival-related endpoints, there were no significant differences between them (5-year failure-free survival: 84.3% vs. 82.7%, P value = 0.68; 5-year overall survival: 87.3% vs. 90.6%, P value = 0.11; 5-year distant metastasis-free survival: 92.8% vs. 92.5%, P value = 0.97; 5-year locoregional relapse-free survival: 93.4% vs. 89.9%, P value = 0.30). The incidence of acute toxicities in the IMRT alone group was significantly lower than that in the CCRT group.

CONCLUSION

For patients with stage II and T3N0 NPC with adverse features treated using IMRT, no improvement in survival was gained by adding concurrent chemotherapy; however, the occurrence of acute toxicities increased significantly. For those combined with non-single adverse factors, the comprehensive treatment strategy needs further exploration.

Efficacy of salvage surgery versus re-irradiation for isolated regional lymph node recurrence in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To compare the clinical characteristics and prognoses of patients with isolated regional lymph node recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (irrNPC) who underwent surgery or re-irradiation treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 124 irrNPC patients who underwent initial radiotherapy between January 2010 and December 2020. The staging of regional lymph node recurrence was as follows: 75.8% for rN1, 14.5% for rN2, and 9.7% for rN3. Fifty-five patients underwent regional lymph node surgery (Surgery group), and sixty-nine patients received salvage radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (Re-irradiation group). The survival rate was compared using Kaplan‒Meier analysis and evaluated by the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 70 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 74%, and the median survival time was 60.8 months. There were no significant differences in 5-year OS (75.6% vs. 72.4%, P = 0.973), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS, 62.7% vs. 71.1%, P = 0.330) or distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS, 4.2% vs.78.7%, P = 0.677) between the Surgery group and Re-irradiation group. Multivariate analysis revealed age at recurrence, radiologic extra-nodal extension (rENE) status, and recurrent lymph node (rN) classification as independent prognostic factors for OS. The rENE status was an independent prognostic factor for DMFS. Subgroup analysis of the Surgery group revealed that the rN3 classification was an adverse prognostic factor for OS. Age at recurrence ≥ 50 years, GTV-N dose, and induction chemotherapy were found to be independent prognostic factors for OS, RRFS, and DMFS, respectively, in the Re-irradiation group.

CONCLUSIONS

For NPC patients with isolated regional lymph node recurrence after initial radiotherapy, those who underwent surgery had survival prognosis similar to those who underwent re-radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. A prospective study is needed to validate these findings.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 29 Studies Predicting Diagnostic Accuracy of CT, MRI, PET, and USG in Detecting Extracapsular Spread in Head and Neck Cancers

BACKGROUND

Extracapsular spread (ECS) is the extension of cancer cells beyond the lymph node capsule and is a significant prognostic factor in head and neck cancers. This meta-analysis compared the diagnostic accuracy of CT, MRI, PET, and USG in detecting ECS in head and neck cancers.

METHODOLOGY

The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that compared the diagnostic accuracy of CT, MRI, PET, and USG in detecting ECS in head and neck cancers. They included studies that were published between 1990 and December 2023 and that used histopathology as the reference standard for ECS.

RESULTS

The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CT scan were 0.63 (95% CI = 0.53-0.73) and 0.85 (95% CI = 0.74-0.91), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRI were 0.83 (95% CI = 0.71-0.90) and 0.85 (95% CI = 0.73-0.92), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PET were 0.80 (95% CI = 0.74-0.85) and 0.93 (95% CI = 0.92-0.94), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of USG were 0.80 (95% CI = 0.68-0.88) and 0.84 (95% CI = 0.74-0.91), respectively. MRI had significantly higher sensitivity than CT scan (p-0.05). The specificity of CT and MRI was not significantly different (p-0.99). PET scan had the highest specificity among all imaging modalities.

CONCLUSION

MRI is the most accurate imaging modality for detecting ECS in head and neck cancers. CT scan is a reasonable alternative, but PET scan may be considered when high specificity is required. USG may not add any further benefit in detecting ECS.

Refining the 8th edition TNM classification for EBV related nasopharyngeal carcinoma

The AJCC/UICC TNM classification describes anatomic extent of tumor progression and guides treatment decisions. Our comprehensive analysis of 8,834 newly diagnosed patients with non-metastatic Epstein-Barr virus related nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) from six Chinese centers indicates certain limitations in the current staging system. The 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC TNM classification inadequately differentiates patient outcomes, particularly between T2 and T3 categories and within the N classification. We propose reclassifying cases of T3 NPC with early skull-base invasion as T2, and elevating N1-N2 cases with grade 3 image-identified extranodal extension (ENE) to N3. Additionally, we suggest combining T2N0 with T1N0 into a single stage IA. For de novo metastatic (M1) NPC, we propose subdivisions of M1a, defined by 1-3 metastatic lesions without liver involvement, and M1b, characterized by >3 metastatic lesions or liver involvement. This proposal better reflects responses of NPC patients to the up-to-date treatments and their evolving risk profiles.

Significance of radiologic extranodal extension in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma with lymph node metastasis: a comprehensive nomogram

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the significance of rENE and creat a predictive tool (nomogram) for estimating Overall Survival (OS) in locoregionally advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC) patients with Lymph Node Metastasis (LNM) based on their clinical characteristics and Radiologic Extranodal Extension (rENE).

METHODS

Five hundred and sixty-nine NPC patients with LNM were randomly divided into training and validation groups. Significant factors were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses in the training cohort. Then, the nomogram based on the screening results was established to predict the Overall Survival (OS). Calibration curves and the Concordance index (C-index) gauged predictive accuracy and discrimination. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis assessed risk stratification, and clinical utility was measured using Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). The nomogram's performance was validated for discrimination and calibration in an independent validation cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 360 (63.2%) patients were present with radiologic extranodal extension at initial diagnosis. Patients with rENE had significantly lower OS than other patients. Multivariate analysis identified the five factors, including rENE, for the nomogram model. The C-index was 0.75 (0.71-0.78) in the training cohort and 0.76 (0.69-0.83) in the validation cohort. Notably, the nomogram outperformed the 8th TNM staging system, as evident from the higher AUC values (0.77 vs. 0.60 for 2year and 0.75 vs. 0.65 for 3year) and well-calibrated calibration curves. Decision curve analysis indicated improved Net Benefit (NB) with the nomogram for predicting OS. The log-rank test confirmed significant survival distinctions between risk groups in both training and validation cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated the prognostic value of rENE in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and developed a nomogram based on rENE and other factors to provide individual prediction of OS for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma with lymph node metastasis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Serum ferritin predicted prognosis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Elevated serum ferritin (SF) levels have been associated with poor prognosis in various cancer types, but its impact on nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains unclear. This retrospective study analyzed clinical data from 252 non-metastatic NPC patients admitted to Hainan General Hospital between January 2014 and May 2016. SF levels were measured using the chemiluminescence method. Patients were categorized into low, medium, and high-level SF groups based on tertile median SF levels. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models. The overall survival rates of the entire patient cohort at 1, 3, 5, and 8 years were 95.2%, 85.7%, 76.2%, and 68.9% respectively. The high-level SF group (SF > 164.00 ng/mL) had significantly worse overall survival (83.1 vs 96.3 months, P = 0.023) and progression-free survival (77.8 vs 93.3 months, P = 0.019) compared to the low-level SF group. Univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed that high SF levels, along with T3/T4 staging and N3 staging, were independent risk factors for poor prognosis. In conclusion, high SF levels are associated with shorter overall survival and progression-free survival in NPC patients.

Radiologic extranodal extension for nodal staging in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE

Extranodal extension (ENE) has the potential to add value to the current nodal staging system (N8th) for predicting outcome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This study aimed to incorporate ENE, as well as cervical nodal necrosis (CNN) to the current stage N3 and evaluated their impact on outcome prediction. The findings were validated on an external cohort.

METHODS & MATERIALS

Pre-treatment MRI of 750 patients from the internal cohort were retrospectively reviewed. Predictive values of six modified nodal staging systems that incorporated four patterns of ENE and two patterns of CNN to the current stage N3 for disease-free survival (DFS) were compared with that of N8th using multivariate cox-regression and concordance statistics in the internal cohort. Performance of stage N3 for predicting disease recurrence was calculated. An external cohort of 179 patients was used to validate the findings.

RESULTS

Incorporation of advanced ENE, which infiltrates into adjacent muscle/skin/salivary glands outperformed the other five modifications for predicting outcomes (p < 0.01) and achieved a significantly higher c-index for 5-year DFS (0.69 vs 0.72) (p < 0.01) when compared with that of N8th staging system. By adding advanced ENE to the current N3 increased the sensitivity for predicting disease recurrence from 22.4 % to 47.1 %. The finding was validated in the external cohort (5-year DFS 0.65 vs. 0.72, p < 0.01; sensitivity of stage N3 increased from 14.0 % to 41.9 % for disease recurrence).

CONCLUSION

Results from two centre cohorts confirmed that the radiological advanced ENE should be considered as a criterion for stage N3 disease in NPC.

Predictive function of tumor burden-incorporated machine-learning algorithms for overall survival and their value in guiding management decisions in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Objective

Accurate prognostic predictions and personalized decision-making on induction chemotherapy (IC) for individuals with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) remain challenging. This research examined the predictive function of tumor burden-incorporated machine-learning algorithms for overall survival (OS) and their value in guiding treatment in patients with LA-NPC.

Methods

Individuals with LA-NPC were reviewed retrospectively. Tumor burden signature-based OS prediction models were established using a nomogram and two machine-learning methods, the interpretable eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) risk prediction model, and DeepHit time-to-event neural network. The models' prediction performances were compared using the concordance index (C-index) and the area under the curve (AUC). The patients were divided into two cohorts based on the risk predictions of the most successful model. The efficacy of IC combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy was compared to that of chemoradiotherapy alone.

Results

The 1 221 eligible individuals, assigned to the training (n = 813) or validation (n = 408) set, showed significant respective differences in the C-indices of the XGBoost, DeepHit, and nomogram models (0.849 and 0.768, 0.811 and 0.767, 0.730 and 0.705). The training and validation sets had larger AUCs in the XGBoost and DeepHit models than the nomogram model in predicting OS (0.881 and 0.760, 0.845 and 0.776, and 0.764 and 0.729, P < 0.001). IC presented survival benefits in the XGBoost-derived high-risk but not low-risk group.

Conclusion

This research used machine-learning algorithms to create and verify a comprehensive model integrating tumor burden with clinical variables to predict OS and determine which patients will most likely gain from IC. This model could be valuable for delivering patient counseling and conducting clinical evaluations.

Efficacy of induction chemotherapy in lymph node-positive stage III nasopharyngeal carcinoma and identification of beneficiaries based on clinical features: A propensity score matching analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the role of induction chemotherapy (IC) in lymph node-positive (LN-positive) stage III nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

METHODS

In total, 627 patients with newly diagnosed LN-positive stage III NPC receiving CCRT or IC plus CCRT were included. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Propensity-score matching (PSM) was conducted to balance the intergroup covariates. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was employed to compare survival curves. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

After 1:1 PSM, 414 patients were identified (207 patients per group). Compared with CCRT, IC plus CCRT provided better survival (5-year PFS 88.4% vs. 78.6%, P = 0.01; overall survival [OS] 94.8% vs. 85.3%, P = 0.003; and distant metastasis-free survival [DMFS] 93.1% vs. 85.6%, P = 0.03). The IC beneficial effects on PFS were mainly present in patients with grade 2-3 ENE, elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH > 170U/L), and N2 disease. Patients with grade 2 CNN had comparable PFS benefits to those with grade 0-1 CNN. For patients with grade 0-1 ENE combined with LDH ≤ 170U/L, survival between the two groups was similar with 5-year PFS 93.6% vs. 90.4% (P = 0.50), OS 94.2% vs. 93.0% (P = 0.72), and DMFS 98.6% vs. 97.7% (P = 0.98).

CONCLUSION

Adding IC before CCRT improved survival in LN-positive stage III NPC patients. Additional IC did not provide better survival for patients with grade 0-1 ENE combined with LDH ≤ 170U/L and could be avoided in this population. CNN may not be a good risk factor for tailoring a personalized treatment plan.

Free-Breathing StarVIBE Sequence for the Detection of Extranodal Extension in Head and Neck Cancer: An Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance Study

(1) Background: This study aims to evaluate the image quality of abnormal cervical lymph nodes in head and neck cancer and the diagnostic performance of detecting extranodal extension (ENE) using free-breathing StarVIBE. (2) Methods: In this retrospective analysis, 80 consecutive head and neck cancer patients underwent StarVIBE before neck dissection at an academic center. Image quality was compared with conventional VIBE available for 28 of these patients. A total of 73 suspicious metastatic lymph nodes from 40 patients were found based on morphology and enhancement pattern on StarVIBE. Sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), and odds ratios were calculated for each MR feature from StarVIBE to predict pathologic ENE. (3) Results: StarVIBE showed significantly superior image quality, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for enlarged lymph nodes compared to VIBE. The MR findings of "invading adjacent planes" (SN, 0.54; SP, 1.00) and "matted nodes" (SN, 0.72; SP, 0.89) emerged as notable observations. The highest diagnostic performance was attained by combining these two features (SN, 0.93; SP, 0.89). (4) Conclusions: This study confirms that StarVIBE offers superior image quality for abnormal lymph nodes compared to VIBE, and it can accurately diagnose ENE by utilizing a composite MR criterion in head and neck cancer.

Radiologic Extranodal Extension of Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Prognostic Utility and Diagnostic Performance

BACKGROUND. Pathologic extranodal extension (ENE) in metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) has been associated with unfavorable prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to evaluate the prognostic utility of radiologic ENE and its diagnostic performance in predicting pathologic ENE in patients with NSCLC. METHODS. This retrospective study included 382 patients (mean age, 67 ± 10 [SD] years; 297 men, 85 women) diagnosed with NSCLC and clinical N1 or N2 disease between January 2010 and December 2016. Two thoracic radiologists reviewed staging chest CT examinations to record subjective overall impression for radiologic ENE (no ENE, possible/probable ENE, or unambiguous ENE), reviewing 30 examinations in consensus and the remaining examinations independently. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards model were used to evaluate the utility of radiologic ENE in predicting overall survival (OS). Prognostic utility of radiologic ENE was also assessed in patients with clinical N2a disease. In patients who underwent surgery, sensitivity and specificity were determined of radiologic unambiguous ENE in predicting pathologic ENE. RESULTS. The 5-year OS rates for no ENE, possible/probable ENE, and unambiguous ENE were 44.4%, 39.1%, and 20.9% for reader 1 and 45.7%, 36.6%, and 25.6% for reader 2, respectively. Unambiguous ENE was an independent prognostic factor for worse OS (reader 1: adjusted HR, 1.72, p = .008; reader 2: adjusted HR, 1.56, p = .03), whereas possible/probable ENE was not (reader 1: adjusted HR, 1.18, p = .33; reader 2: adjusted HR, 1.21, p = .25). In patients with clinical N2a disease, 5-year OS rate in patients with versus without unambiguous ENE for reader 1 was 22.2% versus 40.6% (p = .59) and for reader 2 was 27.6% versus 41.0% (p = .49). In 203 patients who underwent surgery (66 with pathologic ENE), sensitivity and specificity of radiologic unambiguous ENE for predicting pathologic ENE were 11% and 93% for reader 1 and 23% and 87% for reader 2. CONCLUSION. Radiologic unambiguous ENE was an independent predictor of worse OS in patients with NSCLC. The finding had low sensitivity but high specificity for pathologic ENE. CLINICAL IMPACT. Radiologic ENE may have a role in NSCLC staging workup and treatment selection.

Diagnostic challenges and prognostic implications of extranodal extension in head and neck cancer: a state of the art review and gap analysis

Extranodal extension (ENE) is a pattern of cancer growth from within the lymph node (LN) outward into perinodal tissues, critically defined by disruption and penetration of the tumor through the entire thickness of the LN capsule. The presence of ENE is often associated with an aggressive cancer phenotype in various malignancies including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In HNSCC, ENE is associated with increased risk of distant metastasis and lower rates of locoregional control. ENE detected on histopathology (pathologic ENE; pENE) is now incorporated as a risk-stratification factor in human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative HNSCC in the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) TNM classification. Although ENE was first described almost a century ago, several issues remain unresolved, including lack of consensus on definitions, terminology, and widely accepted assessment criteria and grading systems for both pENE and ENE detected on radiological imaging (imaging-detected ENE; iENE). Moreover, there is conflicting data on the prognostic significance of iENE and pENE, particularly in the context of HPV-associated HNSCC. Herein, we review the existing literature on ENE in HNSCC, highlighting areas of controversy and identifying critical gaps requiring concerted research efforts.

Involved site radiation therapy in stage I-III nasopharyngeal carcinoma with limited lymph node burden (ISRT-NPC) or elective region irradiation: a study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority randomized controlled phase III clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Current radiotherapy guidelines and consensus statements uniformly recommend elective region irradiation (ERI) as the standard strategy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, given the scarcity of skip-metastasis, the improved assessment accuracy of nodal involvement, and the striking advancements in chemotherapy for NPC, a one-fits-all delineation scheme for clinical target volumes of the nodal region (CTVn) may not be appropriate anymore, and modifications of the CTVn delineation strategy may be warranted. Involved site irradiation (ISI) covering merely the initially involved nodal site and potential extranodal extension has been confirmed to be as effective as ERI with decreased radiation-related toxicities in some malignancies, but has not yet been investigated in NPC. This study aims to compare the regional control, survival outcomes, radiation-related toxicities, and quality of life (QoL) of ISI with conventional ERI in NPC patients with a limited nodal burden.

METHODS

ISRT-NPC is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, noninferiority, phase III randomized controlled trial. A total of 414 patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive ISI or ERI. Randomization will be stratified by institution scale and N stage. Generally, in the ISI group, the high-risk CTV1 (dose: 60 Gy) includes a 1-cm expansion of the positive LN as well as the VIIa and the retrostyloid space above the bilateral transverse process of the atlantoaxial spine (C1), regardless of N status. The low-risk CTV2 (dose: 50 Gy) covers the cervical nodal region with a 3-cm caudal expansion below the transverse process of C1 for N0 disease and a 3-cm expansion below the positive LN for positive LNs.

DISCUSSION

The results of this trial are expected to confirm that ISI is a non-inferior strategy to ERI in stage I-III patients with low LN burden, enabling the minimization of treatment-related toxicity and improvement of long-term QoL without compromising regional control.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrails.gov, NCT05145660. Registered December 6, 2021.

Prognostic nomograms for nasopharyngeal carcinoma with nodal features and potential indication for N staging system: Validation and comparison of seven N stage schemes

PURPOSE

To identify the prognostic value of the nodal features, propose a nomogram-based N stage system and evaluate the performance of seven N stage schemes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients.

METHODS

Data from 1638 non-distant metastatic NPC patients were used to develop nomograms predicting 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Based on nomogram and multivariate analyses, a new N-stage scheme was proposed. The performance of the nomogram-based N staging system was assessed against five newly proposed N staging systems and the current 8th N staging system using a quantitative model to compare hazard consistency, discrimination, outcome prediction, and sample size balance. The Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests was used to compare survival differences.

RESULTS

Nomograms to predict OS and DMFS were constructed using extranodal extension infiltrating the surrounding structures (ENEmax), maximal axial diameter (MAD), large retropharyngeal lymph nodes (RLN, minimal axial diameter > 1.5 cm), multiple central nodal necrosis (CNN), and total lymph node (LN) number and level. Multivariate analysis showed the independent prognostic value of ENEmax and MAD > 3 cm for all selected survival endpoints (p < 0.05). Large RLN and lower neck involvement were independently associated with OS (p < 0.05). We proposed using a large RLN and MAD > 3 cm as N2 factors, and ENEmax and lower neck involvement as N3 factors. Among the seven N-stage schemes, our nomogram-based N scheme and ENEmax to N3 scheme (ENE3) ranked in the top two in the overall comparison with the elevated outcome predicting value (highest c-index). However, between the N0, N1, N1, and N2 subgroups, the ENE3 scheme showed no difference in OS or DMFS (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The predictive model highlighted the independent prognostic value of ENEmax, cervical lymph node, MAD, and large RLN, which can be used as criteria for future N staging.

MRI-based deep learning model predicts distant metastasis and chemotherapy benefit in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Chemotherapy remains controversial for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma because of its considerable prognostic heterogeneity. We aimed to develop an MRI-based deep learning model for predicting distant metastasis and assessing chemotherapy efficacy in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma. This multicenter retrospective study enrolled 1072 patients from three Chinese centers for training (Center 1, n = 575) and external validation (Centers 2 and 3, n = 497). The deep learning model significantly predicted the risk of distant metastases for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma and was validated in the external validation cohort. In addition, the deep learning model outperformed the clinical and radiomics models in terms of predictive performance. Furthermore, the deep learning model facilitates the identification of high-risk patients who could benefit from chemotherapy, providing useful additional information for individualized treatment decisions.

Prognostic significance of cervical radiologic carotid artery invasion by lymph node on magnetic resonance imaging in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE

Carotid artery invasion (CAI) has been demonstrated to be an important prognosticator in some head and neck cancers. This study aimed to examine the prognostic value of radiologic CAI (rCAI) by cervical lymphadenopathy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

NPC patients treated between January 2013 and December 2016 were included. Pre-treatment MRIs were reviewed for cervical rCAI according to the radiologic criteria. Univariate and multivariate models were constructed to assess the association between cervical rCAI and clinical outcomes. A new N classification system was proposed and compared to the 8th AJCC system.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients with MRI-positive lymph nodes was 84.7% (494/583), of whom cervical rCAI cases accounted for 42.3% (209/494). Cervical rCAI was associated with significantly poorer OS, DFS, DFFS and RFFS compared to non-rCAI (P < 0.05). Multivariate analyses confirmed that cervical rCAI was an independent prognosticator for DFS and DFFS, surpassing other nodal features, such as laterality, size, cervical node necrosis (CNN) and radiologic extranodal extension (rENE), while location of positive LNs remained independently associated with OS, DFS and DFFS. We propose a refined N classification: New_N1: upper neck LNs only without cervical rCAI; New_N2: upper neck LNs only with cervical rCAI; New_N3: upper and lower LNs. The proposed classification broadened the differences in OS, DFS and DFFS between N1 and N2 disease, and achieved a higher c-index for DFS and DFFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical rCAI was an independent unfavorable indicator of NPC. Compared to the AJCC system, the proposed N category showed satisfactory stratification between N1 and N2 disease, and better prediction of distant metastasis and disease failure.

Caudal distribution pattern of metastatic neck lymph nodes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and prognostic significance of nodal spread distances

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the caudal distribution pattern of metastatic neck lymph nodes (LNs) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and the prognostic significance of nodal spread distances (SDs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

NPC patients with neck metastatic LNs were enrolled. The most caudally located LNs were marked. SD was defined as the distance from marked LNs to the lateral process of the atlantoaxial spine (LPC1). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess association between MRI-identified nodal features and survival. Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and area under the curve (AUC) were used to compare AJCC (8th edition) N staging with the proposed N staging. Survival after induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (IC + CCRT) versus CCRT alone was compared between different SD groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1907 LNs (1164 patients) were contoured. SD > 7 cm was an independent predictor of overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and progression-free survival (PFS), with hazard ratios of 1.725, 1.553 and 1.414, respectively. When patients with SD > 7 cm were upgraded one N stage higher, the proposed N classification showed better stratification in OS, DMFS, and PFS between N1 and N2 stages. C-indices and AUCs of the proposed N staging were superior to AJCC N staging. IC + CCRT showed negative effect in N1-2 patients with SD ≤ 7 cm but improved OS in those with SD > 7 cm.

CONCLUSION

SD of metastatic LNs can predict survival in NPC. Integration of SD into AJCC N staging could improve its prognostic value and help identify patients requiring IC.

The role of radiologic extranodal extension in predicting prognosis and chemotherapy benefit for T1-2 N1 nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This multicenter retrospective study aimed to investigated the prognostic value of unequivocal radiologic extranodal extension (rENE) and the efficacy of chemotherapy for stage T1-2 N1 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in the IMRT era.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 1,082 patients treated in 2005-2017 from three centers. rENE was recorded as G1 (coalescent nodal mass comprising ≥ 2 inseparable nodes) or G2 (invading beyond perinodal fat to frankly infiltrate adjacent structures). Multivariable analysis (MVA) evaluated the prognostic value of rENE. The value of chemotherapy was assessed in rENE-positive (rENE + ) and rENE-negative (rENE - ) subset separately.

RESULTS

Centers 1, 2, and 3 had 139/515 (27.0 %), 100/365 (27.4 %), and 43/202 (21.3 %) cN + patients with rENE, respectively. Compared to rENE-, rENE + patients had a worse distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) (all p < 0.001). MVA confirmed the prognostic of both G1-rENE and G2-rENE for distant metastasis [G1: hazard ratio (HR): 2.933, G2: HR: 6.942, all p < 0.001] and death (G1: HR: 1.587, p = 0.040; G2: HR: 6.162, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference for DMFS and OS between chemo-radiotherapy and radiotherapy alone in rENE + and rENE - groups (all p > 0.1). However, rENE + patients with a cumulative cisplatin/nedaplatin dose (CCND) of > 160 mg/m² had an improved DMFS (p = 0.033) but no OS (p = 0.197).

CONCLUSION

Unequivocal rENE is prognostic in patients with T1-2 N1 NPC. Addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy did not affect DMFS and OS in rENE - patients. Chemotherapy with a CCND of > 160 mg/m² improved DMFS in rENE + patients.

Quantitative Spatial Characterization of Lymph Node Tumor for N Stage Improvement of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients

This study aims to investigate the feasibility of improving the prognosis stratification of the N staging system of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC) from quantitative spatial characterizations of metastatic lymph node (LN) for NPC in a multi-institutional setting. A total of 194 and 284 NPC patients were included from two local hospitals as the discovery and validation cohort. Spatial relationships between LN and the surrounding organs were quantified by both distance and angle histograms, followed by principal component analysis. Independent prognostic factors were identified and combined with the N stage into a new prognostic index by univariate and multivariate Cox regressions on disease-free survival (DFS). The new three-class risk stratification based on the constructed prognostic index demonstrated superior cross-institutional performance in DFS. The hazard ratios of the high-risk to low-risk group were 9.07 (p < 0.001) and 4.02 (p < 0.001) on training and validation, respectively, compared with 5.19 (p < 0.001) and 1.82 (p = 0.171) of N3 to N1. Our spatial characterizations of lymph node tumor anatomy improved the existing N-stage in NPC prognosis. Our quantitative approach may facilitate the discovery of new anatomical characteristics to improve patient staging in other diseases.

MRI-identified multidimensional nodal features predict survival and concurrent chemotherapy benefit for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Reliable predictors are urgently needed to identify stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients who could benefit from concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). We aimed to develop a nomogram integrating MRI-identified multidimensional features of lymph nodes to predict survival and assist the decision-making of CCRT for stage II NPC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 242 stage II NPC patients treated from January 2007 to December 2017. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Performance of nomogram was evaluated using calibration curves, Harrell Concordance Index (C-index), area under the curve (AUC) and decision curves analysis (DCA) and was compared with TNM staging. According to the individualized nomogram score, patients were classified into two risk cohorts and therapeutic efficacy of CCRT were evaluated in each cohort.

RESULTS

Three independent prognostic factors for OS: age, number and location of positive lymph nodes were included into the final nomogram. T stage was also incorporated due to its importance in clinical decision-making. Calibration plots demonstrated a good match between the predicted and our observed OS rates. C-index for nomogram was 0.726 compared with 0.537 for TNM staging (p < 0.001). DCAs confirmed the superior clinical utility of nomograms compared with TNM staging. CCRT compared to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) delivered OS benefit to patients in the high-risk group (5-year: 89.9% vs. 72.1%; 10-year: 72.5% vs. 34.2%, p = 0.011), but not in the low-risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

This lymph node features-based nomogram demonstrated excellent discrimination and predictive accuracy for stage II patients and could identify patients who can benefit from CCRT.

Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy/maintenance chemotherapy after induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Experiences of two centers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In general, there are not many studies exploring the clinical value of adjuvant chemotherapy or maintenance chemotherapy (AC/MC) after induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (IC+CCRT+AC/MC). The purpose of this study was to establish a clinical nomogram for the use of AC/MC in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two centers (Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Center [N = 1226] and Zhongshan People's Hospital [N = 150]) recruited 1376 patients with LA-NPC. All the patients underwent IC+CCRT; 560 patients received AC with cisplatin/nedaplatin plus docetaxel/paclitaxel (TP) or cisplatin/nedaplatin plus fluorouracil (PF), and 81 patients received MC with S-1. Multivariate Cox regression was used to confirm optimal predictors of progression-free survival (PFS), and a nomogram was established to identify patients into low-risk and high-risk cohorts. Additionally, bootstrap internal validation was performed to further verify our nomogram.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching (PSM), the survival curves were not statistically different between IC+CCRT+AC/MC and IC+CCRT (all p > 0.05). Then, a nomogram was developed based on variables that were screened by univariate and multivariate Cox regression, including N stage, cumulative platinum dose during CCRT, body mass index (BMI), IC cycles, IC regimen and cervical lymph node (CLN) necrosis and infiltration of adjacent tissues. The results of the nomogram showed that the high-risk cohort had greatly worse 5-year DMFS, LRFS, PFS and OS compared to low-risk cohort (all p < 0.05), and subgroup analysis found that the 5-year DMFS, PFS and OS of patients treated with IC+CCRT+AC/MC were better than those treated with IC+CCRT in high-risk cohort (all p < 0.05). Notably, the incidence of adverse effects for IC+CCRT+AC cohort was higher than that for IC+CCRT+MC cohort, especially leukocytopenia and neutropenia. IC+CCRT and IC+CCRT+MC were associated with similar incidences of adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of AC or MC to IC+CCRT could improve the DMFS of patients with high-risk NPC and prolong their survival. Additionally, our findings suggest a potential role of AC/MC following IC plus CCRT in the treatment of high-risk LA-NPC.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Radiotherapy Alone in the Treatment of Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Purpose

The role of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is still controversial. Our objective is to evaluate the value of concurrent chemotherapy in stage II NPC receiving radiotherapy (RT).

Methods

We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for studies comparing CCRT versus RT alone in stage II NPC with survival outcomes and toxicities, including locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and grade 3–4 acute toxicities. The hazard ratios (HRs) of survival outcomes and risk ratios (RRs) of toxicities were extracted for meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis for stage N1 patients was performed to further explore whether these populations can earn benefits from concurrent chemotherapy.

Results

Nine eligible studies with a total of 4,092 patients were included. CCRT was associated with a better OS (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.44–0.82), LRFS (HR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.50–0.78), and PFS (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.54–0.79), but with similar DMFS (HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.46–1.45) compared with two-dimensional RT (2DRT) alone. However, CCRT showed no survival benefit in terms of OS (HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.62–1.15), LRFS (HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.54–1.34), DMFS (HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.60–1.54), and PFS (HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.66–1.37) compared with intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) alone. Subgroup analyses indicated that CCRT had similar OS (HR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.37–2.96), LRFS (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.34–1.45), DMFS (HR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.53–2.00), and PFS (HR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.58–1.88) in the stage N1 populations. Meanwhile, compared to RT alone, CCRT significantly increased the incidence of grade 3–4 leukopenia (RR = 4.00, 95% CI 2.29–6.97), mucositis (RR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.16–1.77), and gastrointestinal reactions (RR = 8.76, 95% CI 2.63–29.12). No significant differences of grade 3–4 toxicity in thrombocytopenia (RR = 3.45, 95% CI 0.85–13.94) was found between the two groups.

Conclusion

For unselected patients with stage II NPC, CCRT was superior to 2DRT alone with better LRFS, PFS, and OS, while adding concurrent chemotherapy to IMRT did not significantly improve survival but exacerbated acute toxicities.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022318253.

Augmenting inter-rater concordance of radiologic extranodal extension in HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma: A multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

To assess intra- and inter-institutional concordance and identify methods to increase precision in radiologic extranodal extension (rENE) ascertainment in HPV+ oropharyngeal carcinoma.

METHODS

Six radiologists, blinded to clinical outcomes, from three centers assessed rENE in two phases: Phase-I (20 cases) utilized each individual's a priori appreciation of the literature. Phase-II (30 additional cases) was performed after deliberating experience and consolidating operating definitions. Intra- and inter-institutional Kappa were calculated at >50% and >75% certainty levels, respectively.

RESULTS

The Phase-I intra-institutional kappa was 0.76, 0.32, and 0.44 at >50% certainty and improved to 0.89, 0.61, and 0.66 at >75% certainty. Inter-institutional Fleiss' kappa also improved with higher certainty (from 0.40 to 0.57, p = 0.039).  The Phase-II inter-rater kappa was significantly higher than Phase-I at the same certainty level (both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A learning curve exists for rENE assessment. Strategies to augment reliability include high certainty for declaration, consolidated operating definitions, and sharing experience among radiologists.

Inter-rater concordance and operating definitions of radiologic nodal feature assessment in human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the reliability of radiologic nodal feature assessment in clinical node-positive human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Baseline CTs or MRIs of clinical node-positive human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma diagnosed between 2012 and 2015 were reviewed independently by two neuroradiologists for seven nodal features: radiologic nodal involvement, cystic change, presence of necrosis, clustering, conglomeration, coalescence, and extranodal extension. Consensus operating definitions were derived after discussion. The features were re-reviewed in a randomly selected cohort. Levels of certainty (probability of presence: <25%, ∼50%, ∼75%, and >90%) were recorded. Interrater concordance was calculated using Cohen's kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

A total of 413 patients (826 necks) were eligible. At initial review, the inter-rater kappa values for: radiologic nodal involvement, cystic change, necrosis, clustering, conglomeration, coalescence, and extranodal extension were 0.92, 0.64, 0.48, 0.32, 0.32, 0.62, and 0.56, respectively. A re-review of 94 randomly selected cases (188 necks) after consolidation of operating definitions for nodal features showed that the inter-rater kappa values of these features were 0.83, 0.62, 0.58, 0.32, 0.18, 0.68, and 0.74 when considering ≥50% certainty as positive, and improved to 0.94, 0.66, 0.59, 0.33, 0.19, 0.76, and 0.86 when considering ≥75% certainty as positive.

CONCLUSION

Clearly defined nomenclature results in improved interrater reliability when assessing radiologic nodal features, especially for coalescent adenopathy and extranodal extension. Higher levels of certainty are associated with higher inter-rater agreement. Radiology reporting should include clear definitions of clinically relevant nodal features as well as levels of certainty to serve various needs in clinical care and research.

Development and validation of radiologic scores for guiding individualized induction chemotherapy in T3N1M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to develop and validate radiologic scores from [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT and MRI to guide individualized induction chemotherapy (IC) for patients with T3N1M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

A total of 542 T3N1M0 patients who underwent pretreatment [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT and MRI were enrolled in the training cohort. A total of 174 patients underwent biopsy of one or more cervical lymph nodes. Failure-free survival (FFS) was the primary endpoint. The radiologic score, which was calculated according to the number of risk factors from the multivariate model, was used for risk stratification. The survival difference of patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with or without IC was then compared in risk-stratified subgroups. Another cohort from our prospective clinical trial (N = 353, NCT03003182) was applied for validation.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT was better than that of MRI (97.7% vs. 87.1%, p < 0.001) for diagnosing histologically proven metastatic cervical lymph nodes. Radiologic lymph node characteristics were independent risk factors for FFS (all p < 0.05). High-risk patients (n = 329) stratified by radiologic score benefited from IC (5-year FFS: IC + CCRT 83.5% vs. CCRT 70.5%; p = 0.0044), while low-risk patients (n = 213) did not. These results were verified again in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

T3N1M0 patients were accurately staged by both [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT and MRI. The radiologic score can correctly identify high-risk patients who can gain additional survival benefit from IC and it can be used to guide individualized treatment of T3N1M0 NPC.

KEY POINTS

• [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT was more accurate than MRI in diagnosing histologically proven cervical lymph nodes. • Radiologic lymph node characteristics were reliable independent risk factors for FFS in T3N1M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. • High-risk patients identified by the radiologic score based on [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT and MRI could benefit from the addition of induction chemotherapy.

Level Ib sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy in selected nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients based on the International Guideline

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility of level Ib sparing in selected nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) based on the International Guideline.

PATIENTS AND MATERIALS

Patients with histologically-proven NPC who received definitive IMRT at our group were candidates for this analysis. Other eligibility criteria for analysis were designed according to the recommendation of International Guideline for selective coverage of level Ib. Survival outcomes focused on regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS) and level Ib recurrence rate were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 450 patients were included, 60 of them received level Ib-covering IMRT due to the first three principles of the International Guideline according to our protocol. Of note, patients with level Ib involvement would receive ultrasound guided puncture, only those with positive pathological results would undergo level Ib-covering IMRT. For the remaining 390 patients who only fulfilled the last two criteria and/or level Ib involvement with negative pathological results, level Ib-sparing IMRT was delivered, with a median follow-up time of 112 months (range 6 to 194 months), reported 5- and 10-year RRFS were 95.4% and 92.9%, respectively. Twenty-two patients occurred regional recurrence at censorship (median 44.5 months), only 4(4/390, 1.03%) were recorded as level Ib recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Level Ib-sparing IMRT should be safe and feasible for patients who only had level II involvement with ECE, and/or had a MAD of greater than 2 cm in level II, and/or level Ib involvement with negative pathological results. Further well-designed multi-center prospective trials should be conducted.

Prognostic importance of radiologic extranodal extension in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated in a Canadian cohort

PURPOSE

To confirm the prognostic value of radiologic extranodal extension (rENE) and its role in clinical-N classification in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated in a western institution.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

NPC treated between 2010 and 2017 were included. Pre-treatment MRI were reviewed for unequivocal rENE and its grade: grade-1: tumour invading through any nodal capsule but confined to perinodal fat; grade-2: ≥2 adjacent nodes forming a coalescent nodal mass; grade-3: tumour extending beyond perinodal fat to invade/encase adjacent structures. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between rENE-positive (rENE+) and rENE-negative (rENE-) patients. Multivariable analysis (MVA) confirmed the prognostic importance of rENE and its grade. Staging schemas including rENE in N-classification were proposed and their performance evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 274 patients were eligible (43 cN0; 231 cN-positive). rENE was identified in 83/231 (36%) cN-positive, including grade 1/2/3 rENE in 14/58/11 cases. Compared to rENE-, rENE+ patients had a lower OS (68% vs 89%, p < 0.001) and DFS (58% vs 80%, p < 0.001). MVA confirmed the prognostic importance of grade-2 [HR: OS: 2.85 (p = 0.005); DFS: 2.89 (p < 0.001)] and grade-3 rENE [HR: OS 5.28 (p = 0.004); DFS 3.86 (p = 0.005)], with a trend for grade-1 vs rENE- [HR: OS 2.63 (p = 0.13); DFS 1.49 (p = 0.520)]. We evaluated classifying any rENE as cN3 (Proposal-I) or any grade-2/grade-3 rENE as cN3 (Proposal-II). The stage schema with Proposal-I cN-classification ranked the highest in the performance evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

rENE is an important prognostic factor in this western NPC cohort. We propose classifying any unequivocal rENE as cN3.

Residual Volume of Lymph Nodes During Chemoradiotherapy Based Nomogram to Predict Survival of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patient Receiving Induction Chemotherapy

Purpose

To accurately stratify nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients who were benefit from induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), we established residual volume of lymph nodes during chemoradiotherapy based nomogram to predict survival for NPC patients.

Methods

Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate predictive effects of tumor volume parameters. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify the prognostic factors, and nomogram models were developed to predict survival of NPC patients receiving IC followed by CCRT.

Results

Compared with other tumor volumetric parameters, midRT GTVnd was the best predictive factor for OS (HR: 1.043, 95%CI: 1.031-1.055), PFS (HR: 1.040, 95%CI: 1.030- 1.051), and DMFS (HR: 1.046, 95%CI: 1.034 – 1.059) according to the HR of Cox regression analysis. Based on multivariate analysis, three nomograms included midRT GTVnd were constructed to predict 4-year survival. The C-index of nomograms for each survival endpoints were as follow (training cohort vs. validation cohort): 0.746 vs. 0.731 for OS; 0.747 vs. 0.735 for PFS; 0.768 vs. 0.729 for DMFS, respectively. AUC showed a good discriminative ability. Calibration curves demonstrated a consistence between actual results and predictions. Decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that the nomograms had better clinical predictive effects than current TNM staging system.

Conclusion

We identified the best volumetric indicator associated with prognosis was the residual volume of lymph nodes at the fourth week of chemoradiotherapy for patients receiving IC followed by CCRT. We developed and validated three nomograms to predict specific probability of 4-year OS, PFS and DMFS for NPC patient receiving IC followed by CCRT.

Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Nasopharyngeal Cancer and Implication for TNM Staging by UICC: A Systematic Review of the Literature

This study aims to identify prognostic factors in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) to improve the current 8th edition TNM classification. A systematic review of the literature reported between 2013 and 2019 in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was conducted. Studies were included if (1) original clinical studies, (2) ≥50 NPC patients, and (3) analyses on the association between prognostic factors and overall survival. The data elements of eligible studies were abstracted and analyzed. A level of evidence was synthesized for each suggested change to the TNM staging and prognostic factors. Of 5,595 studies screened, 108 studies (44 studies on anatomical criteria and 64 on non-anatomical factors) were selected. Proposed changes/factors with strong evidence included the upstaging paranasal sinus to T4, defining parotid lymph node as N3, upstaging N-category based on presence of lymph node necrosis, as well as the incorporation of non-TNM factors including EBV-DNA level, primary gross tumor volume (GTV), nodal GTV, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, platelet count, SUVmax of the primary tumor, and total lesion glycolysis. This systematic review provides a useful summary of suggestions and prognostic factors that potentially improve the current staging system. Further validation studies are warranted to confirm their significance.

The prognostic value of radiologic extranodal extension in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The prognostic value of radiologic extranodal extension (rENE) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma remains controversial. In this study, a meta-analysis was performed to assess the prognostic value of ungraded rENE and unambiguous advanced rENE.

METHODS

A literature search through PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and manual searches was conducted until May 2021. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall survival and distant metastasis-free survival were extracted and pooled.

RESULTS

Nine eligible studies were published between 2012 and 2021. The pooled patient number was 7532 (range 61-1887). Seven studies were eligible for the analysis of ungraded rENE, while 3 studies were eligible for unambiguous advanced rENE. The results showed that ungraded rENE was associated with worse overall survival (HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.04-3.27) and significantly associated with worse distant metastasis-free survival (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.36-3.13). On the other hand, unambiguous advanced rENE was significantly associated with worse overall survival (HR 2.62, 95% CI 2.12-3.25) and worse distant metastasis-free survival (HR 3.14, 95% CI 1.85-5.33).

CONCLUSIONS

In nasopharyngeal carcinoma, both ungraded and unambiguous advanced rENE are significant prognosticators of overall survival and distant metastasis-free survival. More prospective studies are required to determine its role in risk stratification or clinical staging.

The Value of Cervical Node Features in Predicting Long-Term Survival of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Era

Objective

To investigate the prognostic value of cervical node features in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and build a prognostic nomogram to predict the long-term survival.

Methods

In this study, 1752 patients after IMRT from 2008 to 2011 were recruited. The clinical and laboratory characteristics and the nodal features including the nodal number, maximum dimension diameter, extranodal extension (ENE), and cervical node necrosis (CNN) were retrospective analyzed. Univariate Cox and multivariate proportional hazard regression models were used to test the prognostic value of nodal features. Prognostic nomograms were established to predict survival.

Results

The 10-year distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were 86.5% and 80.8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that age, sex, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), CNN, ENE, T stage, and N stage were independent factors for DSS. Two nomograms-nomogram A (without nodal features) and nomogram B (with nodal features)-were built. The calibration curve for the probability of DSS showed good agreement between prediction by nomogram and the actual observation. The C-index of nomogram B was higher than that for nomogram A in predicting DSS (0.708 vs 0.676, P<0.01).

Conclusion

The nodal features including ENE and CNN were negative prognostic factors for NPC, and the prognostic nomogram incorporating the nodal features was more accurate in predicting survival than the nomogram without nodal features.

The evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions

BACKGROUND

The classification criteria and staging groups for nasopharyngeal carcinoma described in the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) staging system have been revised over time. This study assessed the proportion of patients whose staging and treatment strategy have changed due to revisions of the UICC/AJCC staging system over the past 10 years (ie, from the sixth edition to the eighth edition), to provide information for further refinement.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1901 patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated in our cancer center between November 2009 and June 2012. The Akaike information criterion and Harrell concordance index were applied to evaluate the performance of the staging system.

RESULTS

In total, 25 (1.3%) of the 1901 patients who were staged as T2a according to the sixth edition system were downgraded to T1 in the eighth edition; 430 (22.6%) staged as N0 in the sixth edition were upgraded to N1 in the eighth edition; 106 (5.6%) staged as N1/2 in the sixth edition were upgraded to N3 in the eighth edition. In addition, 51 (2.7%) and 25 (1.3%) of the study population were upstaged from stage I to stage II and stage II to stage IVa, respectively; 10 (0.5%) was downgraded from stage II to stage I. The survival curves of adjacent N categories and staging groups defined by eighth classification system were well-separated. However, there was no significant difference in the locoregional failure-free survival (P = 0.730) and disease-free survival (P = 0.690) rates between the T2 and T3 categories in the eighth edition classification system.

CONCLUSIONS

Modifications to the tumor-node-metastasis staging system over the past 10 years have resulted in N classification changes in numerous cases. Although the eighth edition tumor-node-metastasis staging system better predicts survival outcomes, the T classification could be simplified in future revisions.

Prognostic Significance of Radiologic Extranodal Extension in Nasopharyngeal Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic value of radiologic extranodal extension (rENE) in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Tertiary university hospital.

METHODS

We identified patients with nasopharyngeal cancer and lymph node metastasis who underwent pretreatment neck computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and evaluated rENE from the involved lymph node. Univariate Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to compare rENE+ and rENE- groups for local regional relapse-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Of 61 cases, 24 (39.3%) were rENE+ and 37 (60.7%) were rENE-. The median follow-up was 65.5 months. The 5-year distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival rates were lower in the rENE+ group than the rENE- group (70.8% vs 89.2%, P = .016; 66.7% vs 89.2%, P = .01, respectively). Differences in locoregional control between the groups were not significant (P = .18). The 5-year rates for local regional relapse-free survival were 87.5% for rENE+ and 91.9% for rENE-. In multivariate analysis, the presence of rENE was a significant independent adverse prognostic factor for distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed that rENE is an independent prognostic factor for poor distant control and survival in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer.

Contemporary management of the neck in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Up to 85% of the patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma present with regional nodal metastasis. Although excellent nodal control is achieved with radiotherapy, a thorough understanding of the current TNM staging criteria and pattern of nodal spread is essential to optimize target delineation and minimize unnecessary irradiation to adjacent normal tissue. Selective nodal irradiation with sparing of the lower neck and submandibular region according to individual nodal risk is now emerging as the preferred treatment option. There has also been continual refinement in staging classification by incorporating relevant adverse nodal features. As for the uncommon occurrence of recurrent nodal metastasis after radiotherapy, surgery remains the standard of care.

Assessment Criteria and Clinical Implications of Extranodal Extension in Head and Neck Cancer

Tumor breaching the capsule of a lymph node is termed extranodal extension (ENE). It reflects aggressiveness of a tumor, creates anatomic challenges for disease clearance, and increases the risk of distant metastasis. Extranodal extension can be assessed on a pathology specimen, by radiology studies, and by clinical examination. Presence of ENE in a pathology specimen has long been considered a high-risk feature of disease progression and would ordinarily benefit from the addition of chemotherapy to adjuvant radiotherapy. Although the eighth edition of the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer stage classification dichotomizes pathologic ENE according to its presence or absence, emerging evidence suggests that the extent of a pathologic ENE may provide additional value for risk stratification to guide adjuvant therapy. Recent data suggest that the prognostic importance of pathologic ENE is also applicable for HPV-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. In addition, compelling data demonstrate that indisputable radiologic ENE is a powerful risk stratification tool to identify patients at high risk for treatment failure, especially distant metastasis, applicable for both HPV-positive and HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. However, the definition and taxonomy of radiologic ENE requires standardization. The goal of this review is to clarify the contemporary understanding of the prognostic implications of ENE in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, present the nuances of what is presently known and unknown, and elucidate how to classify ENE pathologically and radiologically with an understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. Finally, with the development of several risk stratification methods, the relative role of ENE and other prognostic schema will be explored.

Unambiguous advanced radiologic extranodal extension determined by MRI predicts worse outcomes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Potential improvement for future editions of N category systems

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To explore the prognostic value of different radiologic extranodal extension (rENE) grades and their potential improvement for the 8th edition N category in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2009 to 2013, a cohort of 1887 patients with NPC was retrospectively enrolled and randomized to the training (n = 955) and validation (n = 932) groups. rENE was categorized as follows: grade 0, nodes without rENE; grade 1, nodes with rENE infiltrating the surrounding fat only; grade 2, matted nodes; grade 3, nodes with rENE infiltrating adjacent structures.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients with MRI-positive cervical nodes was 66.5% (1254/1887), of whom grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 rENE cases accounted for 33.2% (416/1254), 14.9% (187/1254), 36.5% (458/1254) and 15.4% (193/1254), respectively. The kappa coefficients for the inter-rater and intra-rater assessments were 0.63, 0.51, 0.65 and 0.93, and 0.76, 0.69, 0.72 and 1.0 in grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 rENE, respectively. Grade 3 rENE rather than grades 0-2 rENE was an independent unfavorable predictor of overall survival and disease-free survival (P < 0.001). Recursive partitioning analysis was applied to refine the N category: eN0 (N0), eN1 (N1 without grade 3), eN2 (N2 without grade 3), and eN3 (N1/N2 with grade 3, N3). Compared to the current system, the proposed N category performed better in hazard consistency, hazard discrimination, sample size balance and outcome prediction.

CONCLUSION

Grade 3 rENE was an independent unfavorable indicator of NPC. Upstaging patients in N1-2 with grade 3 rENE to N3 led to a superior prognostic performance.

Prognostic value of clinical and radiologic extranodal extension and their role in the 8th edition TNM cN classification for HPV-negative oropharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

We evaluate the performance between the TNM-8 versus TNM-7 cN-classification and explore the relative prognostic contribution of radiologic extranodal extension (rENE) for HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-OPC).

MATERIALS/METHODS

All HPV- OPC treated with IMRT between 2005 and 2016 were included. cENE was defined as unambiguous "fixation" of a neck mass or "skin involvement" on clinical examination. rENE was recorded by re-reviewing pre-treatment CT/MR. Disease-free survival (DFS) stratified by cENE or rENE were compared. Multivariable analyses (MVA) calculated the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for the separate cENE and rENE attributes and their combination. A refined cN-category incorporating both cENE and rENE parameters was proposed. The performance of the revision was compared to TNM-8 and TNM-7.

RESULTS

Of 361 HPV- OPC, 97 were cN0 and 264 were cN+ with 48 cENE+ and 72 rENE+ respectively. Median follow-up was 5.4 years. The 3-year DFS was lower in cENE+ vs cENE-negative (cENE-) (23% vs 45%; aHR = 1.68, p = 0.008) and rENE+ vs rENE-negative (rENE-) patients (29% vs 45%; aHR = 1.44, p = 0.037). The cENE+/rENE+ subset had the worse DFS vs cENE-/rENE+ or cENE-/rENE- (24%/37%/46%, p = 0.005). We propose a refined cN-category wherein any cENE-/rENE+ case is reclassified one N-stratum higher while any cENE+ case remains cN3b. The stage schema with the refined N-categorization outperformed TNM-8, and both outperformed TNM-7.

CONCLUSIONS

cENE and rENE are both prognostic but the cENE+/rENE+ subset has the worst outcome. The TNM-8 cN-categories improves outcome prediction compared to the TNM-7. Incorporation of rENE into TNM-8 cN-categories may further augment performance.

Prognostic value of radiologic extranodal extension in patients with hypopharyngeal cancer treated with primary chemoradiation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of radiologic extranodal extension (rENE) in patients with hypopharyngeal cancer (HPC) treated with primary chemoradiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cancer registry data were reviewed from 2005 to 2014. Inclusion criteria included HPC, clinical N1-3 disease (AJCC staging system, 7th edition), and receiving radiotherapy. Patients with M1 diseaseor with synchronous/metachronous cancer were excluded. Staging images were reviewed by two radiologists. rENE was defined as infiltration of adjacent fat/muscles, irregular nodal surface, or irregular capsular enhancement. Clinical stage, rENE status, and clinical outcome were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 355 patients were included. Patients with rENE had lower 3-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates. Univariate analysis showed that clinical T4 or N3 stage, overall stage IV, and rENE correlated with OS and RFS. In multivariate analysis, clinical T4 or N3 stage correlated with poor OS, while clinical T4 or N3 stage and rENE were independent predictors of poor RFS. N1/2 without rENE was designated as Group 1, N1/2 with rENE as Group 2, and N3 with/without rENE as Group 3. The 3-year RFS rates in Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 55.8%, 41.0%, and 29.3%, respectively. The 3-year RFS rate in Group 1 was significantly higher than that in the other two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

rENE is an adverse prognostic factor for survival in patients with HPC treated with primary chemoradiation. It correlated with inferior RFS regardless of N stage. rENE may be used as a criterion for clinical ENE in future staging systems.

Pre- and Post-Radiotherapy Radiologic Nodal Features and Oropharyngeal Cancer Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prognostic value of pre-/post-radiotherapy (pre-/post-RT) radiologic lymph node (LN) features in human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) patients treated with definitive (chemo-)RT.

METHODS

Clinical node-positive OPCs treated from 2011 to 2015 were reviewed. Nodal features were reviewed by a radiologist on pre-/post-RT computed tomography (CTs). Univariable analysis calculated hazard ratio (HR) for regional failure (RF), distant metastasis (DM), and deaths. Multivariable analysis estimated adjusted HR (aHR) of significant nodal features identified in univariable analysis adjusting for confounders.

RESULTS

Pre-RT CT was undertaken in 344 HPV-positive and 94 HPV-negative OPC patients, of whom 242 (70%) HPV-positive and 67 (71%) HPV-negative also had a post-RT CT. Median follow-up was 4.9 years. Pre-RT LN calcification (pre-RT_LN-cal) increased the risk of RF in HPV-negative (aHR: 5.3, P = .007) but not HPV-positive patients (P = .110). Pre-RT radiologic extranodal extension (pre-RT_rENE+) increased the risk of DM and death in both HPV-negative (DM: aHR 6.6, P < .001; death: aHR 2.1, both P = .019) and HPV-positive patients (DM: aHR 4.9; death: aHR 3.0, both P < .001). Increased risk of RF occured with < 20% post-RT LN size reduction in both HPV-negative (HR 6.0, P = .002) and HPV-positive cases (HR 3.0, P = .049). Post-RT_LN-cal did not affect RF, DM, or death regardless of tumor HPV status (all P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Pre-RT_LN-cal is associated with higher RF risk in HPV-negative but not in HPV-positive patients. Pre-RT_rENE increases risk of DM and death regardless of tumor HPV status. Minimal post-RT LN size reduction (< 20%) increases risk of RF in both diseases. Post-RT_LN-cal + has no apparent influence on outcomes in either disease.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 (a single institution case-control series) Laryngoscope, 131:E1162-E1171, 2021.

Survival impacts of different nodal characteristics and T-classification in N3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the survival impacts of various nodal characteristics and T-classification on nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with the 8th AJCC/UICC staging criteria N3.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pretreatment MRIs from 110 staged N3 NPC patients were reviewed. There were 23 T1, 25 T2, 32 T3, and 30 T4, respectively. All except one patient belonged to WHO type II pathology. All patients received curative radiotherapy 68.0-76.8 Gy plus different chemotherapy, including induction, concurrent, adjuvant or any combination. Various endpoints, including OS (overall survival), DFS (disease-free survival), LRFFS (locoregional failure-free survival), DMFFS (distant metastasis failure-free survival) were compared between different nodal characteristics and T-classification.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in all analyzed survival curves between various nodal characteristics, including unilateral N3 vs. bilateral N3, "large" nodes (>6 cm) alone vs. "low" nodes (below the caudal border of cricoid cartilage) alone vs. combined "large" and "low" nodes, risk score 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 vs. 4 (by counting the sum of "large" and "low" nodes in the same case), and radiologic extra-nodal extension. Patients with T4, compared with those of T1-3 have worse OS (5-year rates, 42.2% vs. 82.8%, P < 0.0001), DFS (5-year rates, 43.9% vs. 68.9%, P = 0.0037), LRFFS (5-year rates, 69.3% vs. 82.7%, P = 0.0432), and DMFFS (5-year rates, 57.2% vs. 77.7%, P = 0.0163).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support merging previous N3a and N3b as a N3 category in the 8th edition new staging system. Patients with T4N3 diseases have extremely poor outcome and deserve to strengthen the treatment intensity in future trials.