Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on people living with diabetes: Experience from a low-middle income country in South Asia

Socioeconomic status and the effect of prolonged pandemic confinement on anthropometric and glycaemic outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIM

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the impact of COVID19 lockdown on the anthropometric and glycaemic outcomes of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and assess whether socioeconomic status (SES) was relevant to these changes.

METHODS

A search of three databases was conducted. Meta-analyses using random effects models were undertaken to combine anthropometric and glycaemic measures pre- and post-confinement. Subgroup analyses according to SES were also conducted.

RESULTS

This systematic review of 19 articles demonstrated that prolonged pandemic-related confinement is associated with a deterioration in both anthropometric and glycaemic outcomes among adults with T2DM. Furthermore, SES was found to be relevant to these changes. Specifically, BMI (kg/m2) showed an increase in mean difference of 0.72 (95% CI; 0.13, 1.31; p<0.05) between pre and post lockdown cohorts. High income countries displayed a greater increase in BMI compared to their lower middle-income counterparts. Regarding, fasting blood glucose (FBG), a statistically significant difference was observed in the upper middle-income group (mean difference: 5.10; 95% CI: 2.92, 7.27), and high-income group (mean difference: 6.03; 95% CI: 0.04, 12.02). There were no significant changes to weight, waist circumference, or HbA1C over the lockdown period.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest adults with T2DM may have received less effective care over the lockdown period, particularly in high income countries. Clinics and care providers may need to adopt more intensive contact and treatment plans in the post lockdown period to prevent lasting impacts on disease progression and metabolic sequelae.

Use of telemedicine to tackle health problems in South Asia during the COVID-19 era and beyond: a systematic review

Introduction

Telemedicine (TM) and teleconsultation services flourished during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transmission to avoid COVID-19 infection and physical contact. Many physicians switched to the virtual treatment mode and nearly all types of health disciplines were covered. Through this systematic review, the authors tried to explore the strengths and weaknesses of TM, identify the barriers to adopting TM by population, and explain the limitations of this healthcare delivery model.

Methods and results

In this systematic review, 28 studies were included (>53% high-quality studies) as eligible, where nearly 75% (n=21) of the studies were from India, and the remaining 25% (n=7) were from Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Nepal. Advice related to cancer, autoimmune diseases, and neurological diseases were the most common among the health disciplines in which TM was used. A peak in teleconsultation was observed during the high transmission phase of COVID-19, although major queries were associated with existing health complications and comorbidities.

Conclusion

Other than a few concerns regarding connectivity, privacy, and diagnosis, TM was in fact affordable, timesaving, feasible, and accurate, which ensured a highly satisfying experience among the participants (>80%).

Year-long effects of COVID-19 restrictions on glycemic control and body composition in patients with glucose intolerance in Japan: A single-center retrospective study

Aims/Instruction

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic, the lockdowns in Europe raised concerns about negative effects on glycemic control and body composition in patients with diabetes. In Japan, voluntary‐based restrictions were imposed as the declaration of a state of emergency (DSE), whose metabolic consequences have not been fully investigated. We carried out a single‐center retrospective study to evaluate changes in glycemic control and body composition in outpatients with glucose intolerance after the DSE.

Materials and Methods

We enrolled outpatients with glucose intolerance: (i) for whom longitudinal data about body composition were available; (ii) who participated in dietary follow up with nutritionists; and (iii) whose laboratory data included glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels before and after the DSE.

Results

Among 415 patients, we found no significant changes in HbA1c overall after the DSE. Bodyweight and fat mass increased significantly, whereas skeletal mass decreased significantly. HbA1c changes after the DSE were significantly correlated with changes in bodyweight and fat mass. In 128 patients whose HbA1c levels increased ≥0.3%, changes in bodyweight and fat mass were significantly larger than those in the other 287 patients. With regard to lifestyle changes, increased snacking was likely to worsen glycemic control (odds ratio 1.76, P = 0.036).

Conclusions

COVID‐19 restrictions in Japan had unfavorable metabolic consequences for patients with glucose intolerance, highlighted by increased bodyweight and body fat, and decreased skeletal muscle. In addition, lifestyle changes, such as increased snacking, might worsen glycemic control. Clinical attention and interventions are required to prevent such metabolic changes.