1
|
Marchi F, Bellini E, Iandelli A, Sampieri C, Peretti G. Exploring the landscape of AI-assisted decision-making in head and neck cancer treatment: a comparative analysis of NCCN guidelines and ChatGPT responses. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 281:2123-2136. [PMID: 38421392 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08525-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recent breakthroughs in natural language processing and machine learning, exemplified by ChatGPT, have spurred a paradigm shift in healthcare. Released by OpenAI in November 2022, ChatGPT rapidly gained global attention. Trained on massive text datasets, this large language model holds immense potential to revolutionize healthcare. However, existing literature often overlooks the need for rigorous validation and real-world applicability. METHODS This head-to-head comparative study assesses ChatGPT's capabilities in providing therapeutic recommendations for head and neck cancers. Simulating every NCCN Guidelines scenarios. ChatGPT is queried on primary treatments, adjuvant treatment, and follow-up, with responses compared to the NCCN Guidelines. Performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score, are employed for assessment. RESULTS The study includes 68 hypothetical cases and 204 clinical scenarios. ChatGPT exhibits promising capabilities in addressing NCCN-related queries, achieving high sensitivity and overall accuracy across primary treatment, adjuvant treatment, and follow-up. The study's metrics showcase robustness in providing relevant suggestions. However, a few inaccuracies are noted, especially in primary treatment scenarios. CONCLUSION Our study highlights the proficiency of ChatGPT in providing treatment suggestions. The model's alignment with the NCCN Guidelines sets the stage for a nuanced exploration of AI's evolving role in oncological decision support. However, challenges related to the interpretability of AI in clinical decision-making and the importance of clinicians understanding the underlying principles of AI models remain unexplored. As AI continues to advance, collaborative efforts between models and medical experts are deemed essential for unlocking new frontiers in personalized cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Marchi
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Elisa Bellini
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Andrea Iandelli
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Claudio Sampieri
- Department of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Otolaryngology-Hospital Cliníc, Barcelona, Spain
- Functional Unit of Head and Neck Tumors-Hospital Cliníc, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Giorgio Peretti
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sawka AM, Ghai S, Rotstein L, Irish JC, Pasternak JD, Gullane PJ, Monteiro E, Zahedi A, Gooden E, Eskander A, Chung J, Devon K, Su J, Xu W, Jones JM, Gafni A, Baxter NN, Goldstein DP. Gender Differences in Fears Related to Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer and Its Treatment. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 149:803-810. [PMID: 37410454 PMCID: PMC10326729 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.1642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
Importance Fear is commonly experienced by individuals newly diagnosed with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). Objective To explore the association between gender and fears of low-risk PTC disease progression, as well as its potential surgical treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants This single-center prospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care referral hospital in Toronto, Canada, and enrolled patients with untreated small low risk PTC (<2 cm in maximal diameter) that was confined to the thyroid. All patients had a surgical consultation. Study participants were enrolled between May 2016 and February 2021. Data analysis was performed from December 16, 2022, to May 8, 2023. Exposures Gender was self-reported by patients with low-risk PTC who were offered the choice of thyroidectomy or active surveillance. Baseline data were collected prior to the patient deciding on disease management. Main Outcomes and Measures Baseline patient questionnaires included the Fear of Progression-Short Form and Surgical Fear (referring to thyroidectomy) questionnaires. The fears of women and men were compared after adjustment for age. Decision-related variables, including Decision Self-Efficacy, and the ultimate treatment decisions were also compared between genders. Results The study included 153 women (mean [SD] age, 50.7 [15.0] years) and 47 men (mean [SD] age, 56.3 [13.8] years). There were no significant differences in primary tumor size, marital status, education, parental status, or employment status between the women and men. After adjustment for age, there was no significant difference observed in the level of fear of disease progression between men and women. However, women reported greater surgical fear compared with men. There was no meaningful difference observed between women and men with respect to decision self-efficacy or the ultimate treatment choice. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of patients with low-risk PTC, women reported a higher level of surgical fear but not fear of the disease compared with men (after adjustment for age). Women and men were similarly confident and satisfied with their disease management choice. Furthermore, the decisions of women and men were generally not significantly different. The context of gender may contribute to the emotional experience of being diagnosed with thyroid cancer and its treatment perception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna M. Sawka
- Division of Endocrinology, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sangeet Ghai
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network–Mount Sinai Hospital–Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lorne Rotstein
- Department of Surgery, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan C. Irish
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery/Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jesse D. Pasternak
- Department of Surgery, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patrick J. Gullane
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery/Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric Monteiro
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Afshan Zahedi
- Division of Endocrinology, Women’s College Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Everton Gooden
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, North York General Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Antoine Eskander
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Janet Chung
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Trillium Health Partners and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karen Devon
- Division of Endocrinology, Women’s College Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jie Su
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wei Xu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer M. Jones
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amiram Gafni
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy N. Baxter
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David P. Goldstein
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery/Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Butkus JM, Crippen M, Bar-Ad V, Luginbuhl A. Impact of adjuvant radiation therapy after definitive surgery in senior adults >80 years old with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma on overall survival. Front Oncol 2022; 12:973245. [PMID: 36248977 PMCID: PMC9562704 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.973245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) following surgical resection confers a survival benefit for adult patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We aim to investigate if adjuvant RT provides a similar survival advantage to patients ages 80+ through a national curated database. Methods This retrospective cohort study queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for all cases of HNSCC between 2004-2016. Patients treated with surgical resection alone were compared to those treated with surgery plus adjuvant RT. Overall survival (OS) was compared within adult (age <80 years) and senior adult (age ≥80 years) cohorts using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Hazard ratios (HR) were assessed using Cox proportional hazards to account for differences in patient characteristics, primary site, and HNSCC stage. Results NCDB identified 16,504 locally advanced HNSCC treated with definitive surgery with 9,129 (55.3%) also receiving adjuvant RT. The mean age was 63.8 years (SD = 12.0) with 88.7% of patients ages <80 years and 11.3% ages ≥80 years. In the adult cohort, adjuvant RT was associated with a significant increase in OS compared to surgery alone at 1 year (88.4% vs. 83.8%, p=<0.001), 3 years (64.0% vs. 59.2%, p=<0.001) and 5 years (52.8% vs. 47.2%, p=<0.001). Treatment with surgery alone remained a significant predictor of mortality risk at 1 year (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.35-1.64, p<0.001), 3 years (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.18-1.33, p<0.001), and 5 years (HR of 1.23, 95% CI 1.17-1.30, p=<0.001). In the senior adult cohort, there were no significant differences in OS between treatment groups at 1 year (73.4% vs. 74.8%, 0.296), 3 years (45.8% vs. 41.8%, p=0.465), or 5 years (28.2% vs. 27.7% p=0.759). Treatment with surgery alone was not a significant predictor of mortality risk at 1 year (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.90-1.36, p=0.316), 3 years (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.81-1.08, p=0.423), or 5 years (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.83-1.08, p=0.476). Conclusion The addition of adjuvant RT in senior patients (age ≥80 years) may not provide a similar OS benefit to that observed in younger patients. Further research is needed to best guide shared-decision making in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joann M. Butkus
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head & Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- *Correspondence: Joann M. Butkus,
| | - Meghan Crippen
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head & Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Voichita Bar-Ad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Adam Luginbuhl
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head & Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Eilsberger F, Luster M, Reiners C. Shared Decision Making for Radioiodine Therapy and the Actual Pattern of Care in Intermediate-Risk Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma. FRONTIERS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE (LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 1:797522. [PMID: 39355644 PMCID: PMC11440860 DOI: 10.3389/fnume.2021.797522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 10/03/2024]
Abstract
Radioiodine therapy (RAI) is usually a standard procedure performed after thyroidectomy in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). While the indication for RAI in high-risk patients has been established in various national and international guidelines, there is an ongoing discussion with regard to intermediate-risk patients. In addition to the inconsistent definition of this risk category, the absence of large multinational prospective randomized controlled trials forms the basis of the debate. In this context, the actual pattern of care and national guidelines in the country where the patient is living plays an important role with respect to regional iodine supply and goiter prevalence, preoperative diagnostics (fine needle aspiration biopsy), and corresponding surgical strategies. Participatory decision-making between physician and informed patient, which is demanded in principle today anyway, is of particular importance in this situation. This article will discuss the approach of shared decision making for radioiodine therapy in intermediate-risk DTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Markus Luster
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Reiners
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gao Y, Shan Y, Wang S, Li X, Jiang T, Cai L, Jiang X, Wang H. Decisional control preference among Chinese patients with advanced kidney disease: the role of mastery, perceived social support and self-efficacy. PSYCHOL HEALTH MED 2021; 27:2126-2137. [PMID: 34241551 DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2021.1952282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Although previous studies have shown a correlation between mastery, self-efficacy, and perceived social support among Chinese patients with advanced kidney disease, few studies have examined their relationship pathways. This study aimed to examine decisional control preference and the relationship between mastery, perceived social support, and self-efficacy among patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. A cross-sectional survey was conducted, and 350 participants were investigated using Control Preference Scale, Personal Mastery Scale, Perceived Social Support Scale, and Self-efficacy Scale. The mediating relationships were determined via structural equation modeling. Results showed that education and economic status were demographic factors influencing patients' decisional control preference. The model showed that mastery and self-efficacy had a direct effect on decisional control preference while perceived social support had an indirect effect mediated via mastery and self-efficacy. Therefore, improving self-efficacy can increase patient willingness to involve in medical decision-making. This study provides new interventions and future directions for promoting decisional control preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yajing Gao
- School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yan Shan
- Medical College of Zhengzhou University
| | | | - Xue Li
- School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | | | - Li Cai
- Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
| | - Xinxin Jiang
- School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Hong Wang
- School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dragan T, Duprez F, Van Gossum A, Gulyban A, Beauvois S, Digonnet A, Lalami Y, Van Gestel D. Prophylactic gastrostomy in locally advanced head and neck cancer: results of a national survey among radiation oncologists. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:656. [PMID: 34078309 PMCID: PMC8171041 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08348-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nutritional complications in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (LA-HNC) treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) often lead to placement of a prophylactic gastrostomy (PG) tube, while indication lacks harmonization. Our aim was to explore the current PG tube utilization among Belgian radiation oncology centers. METHODS A survey was distributed to all 24 Belgian Radiation oncology departments, with questions about the number of patient treated per year, whether the PG indication is discussed at the multidisciplinary board, placement technique, time of starting nutrition and removal, its impact on swallowing function and importance of clinical factors. For the latter Relative Importance and Discordance Indexes were calculated to describe the ranking and agreement. RESULTS All 24 centers submitted the questionnaire. Twenty three treat more than 20 head and neck (HNC) patients per year, while four (1 in 21-50; 3 in 51-100) are not discussing the gastrostomy tube indication at the multidisciplinary board. For the latter, endoscopic placement (68%) is the dominant technique, followed by the radiologic (16%) and laparoscopic (16%) methods. Seventy-five percent start the enteral nutrition when clinically indicated, 17% immediately and 8% from the start of radiotherapy. Majority of specialists (19/24) keep the gastrostomy tube until the patient assume an adequate oral feeding. Fifteen centres are considering PG decrease swallowing function. Regarding factors and their importance in the decision for the PG, foreseen irradiated volume reached highest importance, followed by 'anatomical site', 'patients' choice' and 'postoperative versus definitive' and 'local expertise', with decreasing importance respectively. Disagreement indexes showed moderate variation. CONCLUSIONS The use of a PG tube for LAHNC patients treated by CCRT shows disparity at national level. Prospective studies are needed to ensure proper indication of this supportive measure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatiana Dragan
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Head and Neck Unit), Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1 rue Héger Bordet - 1000 Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Fréderic Duprez
- Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - André Van Gossum
- Consultant at the Department of Gastroenterology and Clinical Nutrition, Hopital Erasme and Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Akos Gulyban
- Medical Physics Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sylvie Beauvois
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Head and Neck Unit), Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1 rue Héger Bordet - 1000 Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Antoine Digonnet
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Yassine Lalami
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dirk Van Gestel
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Head and Neck Unit), Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1 rue Héger Bordet - 1000 Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Heft Neal ME, Gao RW, Brennan JR, Haring CT, Chinn SB, Shuman AG, Casper KA, Malloy KM, Stucken CL, Mclean SA, Chad Brenner J, Lyden T, Blakely A, Mierzwa ML, Shah J, Schonewolf C, Swiecicki PL, Worden FP, Wolf GT, Bradford CR, Prince MEP, Rosko AJ, Spector ME. Functional outcomes and tracheostomy dependence following salvage oropharyngeal surgery. Oral Oncol 2021; 113:105034. [PMID: 33041214 PMCID: PMC10471134 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.105034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Salvage surgical treatment of oropharyngeal cancer is associated with significant morbidity. We aim to identify predictive factors of functional outcomes to improve patient selection and counseling when contemplating salvage oropharyngectomy. Methods: Patients with a history of radiation requiring salvage oropharyngeal surgery were identified. Primary outcomes were determined at one year post-salvage surgery and included Gastric tube (G-tube) dependence, dietary restrictions, tracheostomy dependence, and speech intelligibility. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of the primary outcomes. Results: At one year, 45% (22/49) of patients had a G-tube, 68% (33/48) had dietary restrictions, 10% (5/49) remained tracheostomy dependent, and 15% (4/26) had difficulty with speech intelligibility. On univariate analysis, pre-operative G-tube (83% vs. 40%, p=0.04), reconstruction with a free flap (54% vs. 0%, p=0.005), and bony resection (69% vs. 36%, p=0.04) were significantly associated with G-tube dependence at one year. On multivariate analysis, concurrent bony resection remained a significant predictor of G-tube dependence (HR 5.4, 95% CI 1.2–24, p=0.03). Predictors of dietary restriction included free-flap reconstruction (78% vs. 25%, HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02–0.87, p=0.04) and recurrence after two years (85% vs. 48%, HR 4.9, 95% CI 1.2–21, p=0.03). Supraglottic laryngectomy was significantly associated with tracheostomy dependence on univariate (67% vs. 7%, p=0.001) and multivariate analysis (HR 44.4, 95% CI 2.0–986, p=0.02). Conclusion and Relevance: Functional outcomes are suboptimal after salvage oropharyngectomy. Specific patient and disease factors are independently associated with worse speech and swallowing outcomes and may aid in pre-operative patient selection, risk stratification, and shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly E Heft Neal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Rebecca W Gao
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Julia R Brennan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Catherine T Haring
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Steven B Chinn
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Andrew G Shuman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Keith A Casper
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Kelly M Malloy
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Chaz L Stucken
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Scott A Mclean
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - J Chad Brenner
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Teresa Lyden
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Anna Blakely
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Michelle L Mierzwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Jennifer Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Caitlin Schonewolf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Paul L Swiecicki
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Frank P Worden
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Gregory T Wolf
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Carol R Bradford
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Mark E P Prince
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Andrew J Rosko
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Matthew E Spector
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Doekhie KD, Buljac-Samardzic M, Strating MMH, Paauwe J. Elderly patients' decision-making embedded in the social context: a mixed-method analysis of subjective norms and social support. BMC Geriatr 2020; 20:53. [PMID: 32050911 PMCID: PMC7017481 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-1458-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Older patients are increasingly encouraged to be actively involved but how they perceive their role in the decision-making process varies according to their health care providers and their health situation. Their role could be influenced by their social context but more specifically by subjective norms (i.e. patients’ view of the role that significant others expect them to play in the decision-making process) and perceived social support. We explore how social context (i.e. subjective norms and social support) relates to how the patient perceives their role in the decision-making process. Also, we explore the level of alignment on subjective norms between patients and their informal caregivers and nurses. Methods Mixed-method study among older patients, informal caregivers and nurses. For the quantitative questionnaire, a home care organisation randomly selected patients. The patients were asked to identify their informal caregiver and the home care organisation was asked to identify the nurse who was most involved in their care. In total 133 patients, 64 informal caregivers and 72 nurses were questioned. Participants for the qualitative interviews were selected using convenience sampling, resulting in the inclusion of ten patients, five informal caregivers and six nurses. Subjective norms were based on a previous study. Social support was measured with the ‘social support for health scale’ of the Health Literacy Questionnaire. The Control Preference Scale was used as outcome variable. The interviews focused on subjective norms, social support and how the patient perceived their role. Quantitative analysis included the calculation of subjective norm difference scores between respondent groups, one-way analysis of variance and multinomial logistic regression analysis. Directed content analysis was applied to the interviews using Atlas TI. Results Lower difference scores were found for patient-informal caregiver dyads (mean = 0.95), implying more alignment than in patient-nurse dyads (mean = 2.12). Patients perceiving themselves to have a shared or passive role tend to believe that they are expected to leave decision-making to the health care provider. Higher social support scores related more to a shared role. Alignment relates to: familiarity with the patient’s preferences, overprotectiveness or valuing the care provider’s opinion and the severity of the patient’s medical history. Conclusion Patients and informal caregivers align on whether the patient should make decisions. The more patients believe that they are expected to leave decision-making to the health care provider, the more they perceive themselves as having a passive role. The more patients who feel they have support, the more they perceive themselves as having a shared role. Patients and caregivers could be facilitated to make role expectations explicit. Examining support resources in the social network is desirable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirti D Doekhie
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Martina Buljac-Samardzic
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mathilde M H Strating
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Paauwe
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Applied Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Human Resource Studies, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lu X, Zhang R. Impact of Physician-Patient Communication in Online Health Communities on Patient Compliance: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e12891. [PMID: 31094342 PMCID: PMC6535977 DOI: 10.2196/12891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2018] [Revised: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 04/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In China, the utilization of medical resources is tense, and most hospitals are highly congested because of the large population and uneven distribution of medical resources. Online health communities (OHCs) play an important role in alleviating hospital congestions, thereby improving the utilization of medical resources and relieving medical resource shortages. OHCs have positive effects on physician-patient relationships and health outcomes. Moreover, as one of the main ways for patients to seek health-related information in OHCs, physician-patient communication may affect patient compliance in various ways. In consideration of the inevitable development of OHCs, although they have several shortcomings, identifying how physician-patient communication can impact patient compliance is important to improve patients’ health outcomes through OHCs. Objective This study aimed to investigate the impact of physician-patient communication on patient compliance in OHCs through the mediation of the perceived quality of internet health information, decision-making preference, and physician-patient concordance, using an empirical study based on the self-determination theory. Methods A research model was established, including 1 independent variable (physician-patient communication), 3 mediators (perceived quality of internet health information, decision-making preference, and physician-patient concordance), 1 dependent variable (patient compliance), and 4 control variables (age, gender, living area, and education level). Furthermore, a Web-based survey involving 423 valid responses was conducted in China to collect data, and structural equation modeling and partial least squares were adopted to analyze data and test the hypotheses. Results The questionnaire response rate was 79.2% (487/615) and the validity rate was 86.9% (423/487); reliability and validity are acceptable. The communication between physicians and patients in OHCs positively affects patient compliance through the mediation of the perceived quality of internet health information, decision-making preference, and physician-patient concordance. Moreover, physician-patient communication exhibits similar impacts on the perceived quality of internet health information, decision-making preference, and physician-patient concordance. Patients’ decision-making preference shows the weakest impact on patient compliance compared with the other 2 mediators. Ultimately, all 3 mediators play a partially mediating role between physician-patient communication and patient compliance. Conclusions We conclude that physician-patient communication in OHCs exhibits a positive impact on patient compliance; thus, patient compliance can be improved by guiding physician-patient communication in OHCs. Furthermore, our findings suggest that physicians can share high-quality health information with patients, discuss benefits, risks, and costs of treatment options with patients, encourage patients to express their attitudes and participate in health-related decision making, and strengthen the emotional connection with patients in OHCs, thereby decreasing patients’ misunderstanding of information and increasing concordance between physicians and patients. OHCs are required to not only strengthen the management of their published health information quality but also understand users’ actual attitudes toward information quality and then try to reduce the gap between the perceived and actual quality of information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyi Lu
- School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China
| | - Runtong Zhang
- School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
You HM, Park EY. Relationships between Attitude Towards Treatment, Distress, and Decision Conflict among Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy. ASIAN ONCOLOGY NURSING 2019. [DOI: 10.5388/aon.2019.19.4.242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Mi You
- Department of Nursing, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Gyeonggi, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Clayman ML. Shared decision making's adolescence and transition into adulthood. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2018; 101:1723-1724. [PMID: 30166085 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Marla L Clayman
- American Institutes for Research, 10 S. Riverside Plaza, Suite 600, Chicago, IL 60606, USA.
| |
Collapse
|