1
|
Lee MK, Lee CJ, Goo SY, Moon JY, Lee TH, Kang SM, Chung IM, Jeon JY. Exercise Preferences and Barriers Among Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction or Myocardial Infarction. Korean Circ J 2024; 54:54.e91. [PMID: 39175348 DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2024.0097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Revised: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Although cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is highly recommended in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), participation in CR is low mainly due to access barriers. Home-based CR (HBCR) has been recommended to overcome access barriers. Exercise is a core component of CR and should be developed and implemented based on individual characteristics. We aimed to assess physical activity behaviors, exercise preferences, and exercise barriers to understand physical activity characteristics of CVD patients. METHODS Participants were patients between the ages 19 to 75 years with a history of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or myocardial infarction (MI). They completed a cross-sectional survey at a tertiary hospital's outpatient clinic from April to June 2021. Survey data included physical activity levels, patterns, preference, and barriers of exercise. RESULTS Participants (n=189; 143 males, 46 females, 62.1±12.0 years) were diagnosed as either HFrEF (n=160, 84.7%) or a history of MI (n=97, 51.3%). Only 26.5% of patients engaged in moderate to vigorous exercise for more than 150 minutes per week. Participants preferred exercising alone or with families. Walking (65.6%) and resistance exercises (35.4%) were favored, with outdoor (37%) and home-based (30.2%) settings preferred over fitness centers (10.6%) and hospitals (0.5%). Barriers to exercise included fatigue (34.4%), poor health perception (31.7%), and low fitness levels (30.7%). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study can be used to develop tailored HBCR programs that consider individual preferences and address specific barriers, facilitating adequate physical activity engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mi Kyung Lee
- Frontier Research Institute of Convergence Sports Science, FRICSS, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chan Joo Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seon Young Goo
- Department of Sport Industry Studies, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Young Moon
- Department of Sport Industry Studies, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Ho Lee
- Department of Sport Industry Studies, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seok-Min Kang
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ick-Mo Chung
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Justin Y Jeon
- Frontier Research Institute of Convergence Sports Science, FRICSS, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Sport Industry Studies, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
- Exercise Medicine Center for Diabetes and Cancer Patients, ICONS, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
- Cancer Prevention Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McGowan H, Gutenberg J, Leitner V, Mühlhauser K, Breda A, Fischer M, Globits S, Grote V, Kiesl D, Mayr K, Muntean M, Podolsky A, Niebauer J, Crutzen R, Kulnik ST. Exploring physical activity preferences and motivation in long-term cardiac prevention: An Austrian cross-sectional survey. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0302226. [PMID: 38753841 PMCID: PMC11098351 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) patients often do not sustain physical activity (PA) behaviour in the long run, once they progress into a self-management stage of secondary prevention. This study aimed to explore former CR patients' PA preferences, determinants (i.e., influencing factors) and motivation for sustained PA engagement. We conducted a cross-sectional multi-centre survey using an original questionnaire based on prior qualitative interviews with cardiac patients. Five CR centres in Austria posted 500 questionnaires to former CR patients who had completed CR approximately three years prior, and 117 patients (23%) responded. Descriptive analysis was used to analyse closed-ended questions, and self-determination theory (SDT) was applied as a qualitative framework to analyse open-ended questions concerning motivation for PA engagement. Patients were generally physically active, but the majority (75.3%) did not fulfil the World Health Organisation's recommendations for aerobic PA and muscle strengthening. Most patients preferred being physically active outdoors (70%), engaging in aerobic-related (95%), individual and non-competitive exercises, with cycling (52%), walking (32%) and hiking (25%) among the most popular activities. Main determinants of PA were health, pain and motivation for 80%, 68%, 67% of patients, respectively. A subset of patients (77%) expanded on their motivations behind PA. According to SDT, most reasons (90%) were regulated by autonomous motivation (either extrinsically autonomously-regulated or intrinsic motivation) and stemmed mostly from health-related goals (e.g., fitness, general health, weight control), future quality-of-life aspirations (e.g., self-sufficiency in old age, presence for loved ones, preserving mobility) and enjoyment of PA. Patients' responses underscore the importance of promoting not only general PA, but also muscle strengthening training in CR interventions to maximise optimal health benefits. Our data further suggest that interventions which are aligned to patients' health goals and foster autonomous motivation may be particularly beneficial in increasing adherence to PA in the long-term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah McGowan
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Johanna Gutenberg
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Salzburg, Austria
- Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Veronika Leitner
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Kathrin Mühlhauser
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | - Michael Fischer
- VAMED Rehabilitation Center Kitzbühel, Kitzbühel, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research, Wien, Austria
| | | | - Vincent Grote
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research, Wien, Austria
| | - David Kiesl
- CARDIOMED Cardiac Rehabilitation Center, Linz, Austria
- Department of Internal Medicine I for Hematology with Stem Cell Transplantation, Hemostaseology and Medical Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen, Linz, Austria
- Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Karl Mayr
- CARDIOMED Cardiac Rehabilitation Center, Linz, Austria
| | | | - Andrea Podolsky
- Institute of Preventive and Applied Sports Medicine, University Hospital Krems, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria
| | - Josef Niebauer
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Salzburg, Austria
- University Institute of Sports Medicine, Prevention and Rehabilitation and Research Institute of Molecular Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Rik Crutzen
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Salzburg, Austria
- Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Tino Kulnik
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Claes J, Kuznetsova T, Cauwenberghs N, Cornelissen V. The changing landscape of cardiac rehabilitation and the power of personalized therapy. Front Cardiovasc Med 2024; 11:1393217. [PMID: 38699581 PMCID: PMC11063310 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1393217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jomme Claes
- Group Rehabilitation in Internal Disorders, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tatiana Kuznetsova
- Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nicholas Cauwenberghs
- Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Véronique Cornelissen
- Group Rehabilitation in Internal Disorders, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rogerson MC, Jackson AC, Navaratnam HS, Le Grande MR, Higgins RO, Clarke J, Murphy BM. Behavioural and psychological telehealth support for people with cardiac conditions: randomized trial of the 'back on track' self-management programme. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2024; 23:42-54. [PMID: 36989400 DOI: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvad034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Behaviour modification and mood management are essential to recovery after a cardiac event. Recent times have seen a major shift to remote delivery of cardiac services. This study assessed behavioural and psychological outcomes of the Back on Track online self-management programme, comparing the programme undertaken alone (self-directed) vs. with telephone support (supported). Relevance for people with depression was also assessed. METHODS AND RESULTS Participants with cardiac conditions (n = 122) were randomly assigned to self-directed or supported groups and given access to the online programme for 2 months. The programme addressed depression, anxiety, physical activity, and healthy eating. Supported group participants also received two telephone sessions facilitated by a trained counsellor to further enhance their self-management skills and engagement with the online modules. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and Active Australia Survey and Diet Quality Tool were administered at baseline, 2, and 6 months. χ2 tests were used to compare self-directed and supported groups. Cochrane's Q tests assessed changes over time in depression, anxiety, and physical activity (PA) and healthy diet guideline achievement. Participants in both groups showed reduced depression rates (self-directed, P < 0.05) and increased PA after programme completion (both groups, P < 0.05). Amongst those classified as depressed at baseline, significantly fewer were classified as depressed over time (P < 0.001) and significantly more were achieving the PA guidelines (P < 0.01) compared to those who were not depressed at baseline. CONCLUSIONS The Back on Track telehealth programme was effective in assisting with behavioural and emotional recovery after a cardiac event. The programme may be particularly beneficial for those who are depressed early in their recovery period. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12620000102976.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle C Rogerson
- Australian Centre for Heart Health, 75-79 Chetwynd St, PO Box 2137, North Melbourne, VIC 3051, Australia
| | - Alun C Jackson
- Australian Centre for Heart Health, 75-79 Chetwynd St, PO Box 2137, North Melbourne, VIC 3051, Australia
- Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre on Behavioral Health, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
- PRC Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Hema S Navaratnam
- Australian Centre for Heart Health, 75-79 Chetwynd St, PO Box 2137, North Melbourne, VIC 3051, Australia
| | - Michael R Le Grande
- Australian Centre for Heart Health, 75-79 Chetwynd St, PO Box 2137, North Melbourne, VIC 3051, Australia
- Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rosemary O Higgins
- Australian Centre for Heart Health, 75-79 Chetwynd St, PO Box 2137, North Melbourne, VIC 3051, Australia
- Department of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Department of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Joanne Clarke
- Australian Centre for Heart Health, 75-79 Chetwynd St, PO Box 2137, North Melbourne, VIC 3051, Australia
| | - Barbara M Murphy
- Australian Centre for Heart Health, 75-79 Chetwynd St, PO Box 2137, North Melbourne, VIC 3051, Australia
- Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hjertvikrem N, Brørs G, Instenes I, Helmark C, Pettersen TR, Rotevatn S, Zwisler ADO, Norekvål TM. Use of health services and perceived need for information and follow-up after percutaneous coronary intervention. BMC Res Notes 2024; 17:20. [PMID: 38183067 PMCID: PMC10768322 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-023-06662-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Few patients achieve full control of their coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors. Follow-up, such as cardiac rehabilitation, is important to increase adherence to lifestyle changes and treatment, to improve the patient's risk profile, and to treat established complications of CAD clinical events. However, the type of follow-up patients receive varies. Therefore, the aim of this research note was to describe and compare patients' self-reported use of health services, the type of follow-up patients reported to prefer, and the type of information patients reported to be important, in two countries with different follow-up practices after PCI. RESULTS We included 3417 patients in Norway and Denmark, countries with different follow-up strategies after PCI. The results showed large differences between the countries regarding health services used. In Denmark the most frequently used health services were consultations at outpatient clinics followed by visits to the general practitioner and visits to the fitness centre, whereas in Norway visits to the general practitioner were most common, followed by rehospitalisation and no follow-up used. However, patients found the same type of follow-up and information important in both countries. Patients' perceived need for follow-up and information decreased over time, suggesting a need for early follow-up when the patients are motivated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03810612 (18/01/2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Hjertvikrem
- Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
| | - Gunhild Brørs
- Clinic of Cardiology, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Irene Instenes
- Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Faculty of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | - Charlotte Helmark
- Department of Cardiology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Trond Røed Pettersen
- Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Faculty of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | - Svein Rotevatn
- Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ann Dorthe O Zwisler
- Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- REHPA, Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, Nyborg, Denmark
| | - Tone Merete Norekvål
- Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Faculty of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Noto S, Murata T, Saito S, Watanabe T, Kobayashi M. Preferences for Rehabilitation in Persons with a History of Stroke: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Patient Prefer Adherence 2023; 17:1611-1620. [PMID: 37465057 PMCID: PMC10350424 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s416699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the preferences of persons with a history of stroke for various attributes of rehabilitation using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Design Cross-sectional study. Setting A web-based survey. Participants A total of 600 adults with a history of stroke who were not asked whether or not they had participated in previous rehabilitation. Intervention None. Main Outcome Measures Preference weights by attribute ie, treatment time (30 minutes, one hour, one and a half hours), treatment content (walking exercises, activities of daily living; ADL exercises), priority treatment of paralyzed limbs (upper extremity, lower upper extremity), treatment location (hospital visit, home visit), therapist gender, and out-of-pocket costs for stroke rehabilitation using discrete choice experiment. Results The most common self-reported diagnosis was cerebral infarction (408 patients, 68%). The mean age was 62.0 ± 9.8 years, and 515 (85.8%) were male. Of the five attributes, excluding out-of-pocket costs, the highest relative importance score was treatment location (0.331), followed by treatment time (0.304). Among the rehabilitation programs, the statistically significant coefficients calculated were one hour of therapy (0.173, 95% CI = 0.088-0.258), hospital visits (0.241, 95% CI = 0.180-0.303), and female therapists (0.186, 95% CI = 0.125-0. 247). No significant differences were obtained regarding the treatment contents or the paralyzed limb to be treated. Conclusion A discrete choice experiment revealed that persons with a history of stroke prefer a one-hour hospital rehabilitation program with a female therapist, with cost being a major consideration for rehabilitation. The results of this study may provide useful information for rehabilitation professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinichi Noto
- Department of Rehabilitation, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan
| | | | | | - Takahiro Watanabe
- Rehabilitation Center, Niigata University Medical and Dental General Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ghisi GLDM, Aultman C, Konidis R, Sandison N, Oh P. Learning About Patient Satisfaction and Preferences for Onsite Visits During Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2023; 43:220-221. [PMID: 36728355 DOI: 10.1097/hcr.0000000000000769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela Lima de Melo Ghisi
- Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Silva V, Vilela EM, Teixeira M, Fontes-Carvalho R. Reply to Letter to the Editor regarding the article "Suboptimal control of cardiovascular risk factors in myocardial infarction survivors in a cardiac rehabilitation program". Rev Port Cardiol 2023; 42:85-86. [PMID: 36460271 DOI: 10.1016/j.repc.2022.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Vasco Silva
- Cardiovascular Research Center (UniC@RISE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Eduardo M Vilela
- Department of Cardiology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Portugal
| | - Madalena Teixeira
- Department of Cardiology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Portugal
| | - Ricardo Fontes-Carvalho
- Cardiovascular Research Center (UniC@RISE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Department of Cardiology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Liu Y, Su M, Lei Y, Tian J, Xue L, Zhang L. Patient Preferences for Cardiac Rehabilitation - A Systematic Review. Patient Prefer Adherence 2023; 17:75-88. [PMID: 36636288 PMCID: PMC9831083 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s392417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although a large number of studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation(CR), patient preferences for CR remain unclear. Knowing patient preferences may contribute to increasing patient participation and adherence, thus improving patient prognosis. METHODS A systematic search was carried out using electronic databases and manual reference checks from inception until 15th June 2022. Quantitative studies, qualitative studies and mixed methods studies assessing patient preferences for CR were included. Two researchers independently conducted study selectionand data extraction. CR preferences were divided into three categories: CR settings, CR components, and CR contents. A narrative synthesis was applied to integrate the results of the included studies. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to assess the quality of included studies. RESULTS Ultimately, 17 publications were included in this study. Regarding CR settings, most patients preferred the hospital to home, some considered both, and a few were willing to accept the local CR club as an alternative setting to the hospital. For CR components, regardless of age and gender, patients considered exercise training and nutrition counseling to be the most important and smoking cessation to be the least important. In exercise intervention of CR contents, progress discussion and encouragement were rated as most critical, and non-conflicting with other activities was rated as least critical. In psychological intervention of CR contents, most patients were willing to accept psychological intervention, and a few patients wanted to heal the trauma with the passage of time. CONCLUSION This systematic review provides important insights into patient preferences for CR, clarifying patient preferences for CR settings, components, and contents, along with possible influencing factors. Patient preferences may change due to the COVID-19 epidemic, and there is still a need to focus on patient preferences for CR and conduct more relevant primary research to validate the findings of this paper in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunyue Liu
- School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Mengyu Su
- School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yang Lei
- School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Yang Lei, School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, No. 101, Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 19955062997, Fax +86 258 6869 555, Email
| | - Jinping Tian
- School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China
- Jinping Tian, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, No. 300, Guangzhou Road, Gulou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13851550156, Fax +86 519 6809 1881, Email
| | - Leng Xue
- School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lin Zhang
- School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Farah R, Groot W, Pavlova M. Preferences for cardiovascular and pulmonary rehabilitation care: A discrete choice experiment among patients in Lebanon. Clin Rehabil 2022; 37:954-963. [PMID: 36583599 DOI: 10.1177/02692155221149371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patient preferences are important in designing optimal rehabilitation care. The aim of this study is to assess preferences for rehabilitation care among two groups of respondents. DESIGN An online discrete choice experiment survey was carried out. SETTING We use data for Lebanon, a country where rehabilitation care is still underdeveloped. PARTICIPANTS Patients who have undergone or are currently undergoing rehabilitation treatment (users) and those who have not (yet) used rehabilitation care (non-users). INTERVENTION Patients were asked to repeatedly choose between two hypothetical rehabilitation care packages with seven different attributes: attitude of the staff, travel time to clinic, out-of-pocket costs, medical equipment, rehabilitation plan, additional lifestyle education session, and support during rehabilitation care. MAIN MEASURES Preference heterogeneity among patients with different characteristics was investigated using random effect binary logistic regression (software package Stata 15). RESULTS In total, 126 respondents completed the survey. The most preferred attribute was an informal and friendly attitude of the staff followed by modern medical equipment, additional lifestyle education session via eHealth, and support during the rehabilitation program via phone call or SMS. Respondents were less in favor of going to the rehabilitation clinic and paying additional out-of-pocket costs for the rehabilitation treatment. This rank order was similar between users and non-users. CONCLUSION Preferences of patients regarding the type of program chosen (eHealth or at clinical-based) need to be included in future rehabilitation programs. Improving patient experience with rehabilitation programs by giving the best care based on a patient-centered approach is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Farah
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation (Group A), Chirec Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Wim Groot
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Milena Pavlova
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Quinn LM, Woolley AK, Davies MJ, Bodicoat DH, Seidu S, Khunti K, Hadjiconstantinou M. Educational preferences in individuals with cardiometabolic disease differs with age, ethnicity and educational status. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:3479-3486. [PMID: 36150978 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate how sociodemographic factors influence educational modality preferences in people with cardiometabolic disease. METHODS This was a cross-sectional study performed in people with diabetes and cardiovascular disease, who completed a questionnaire to denote their previous experience and ranked preferences for different educational modalities. RESULTS The questionnaire was completed by 3751 people, of whom 59% were men, median (interquartile range) age was 68 (59-76) years, and 78% were White European. In total, 73% had diabetes, 35% had heart disease, and 10% had history of stroke; the majority (83.4%) had one of these conditions. Overall preference was for one-to-one education (77% ranked first choice), and telephone education ranked the lowest. People tended to prefer modalities they had previously experienced. CONCLUSIONS We highlight the importance of considering factors that could influence selection of educational modalities including age, ethnicity, gender and educational level. We anticipate this approach will aid in the design, delivery and tailoring of educational programmes that are accessible to the diverse cohort of people living with chronic diseases, including diabetes and cardiovascular disease. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Given the influence of multiple demographic factors and previous experiences on expressed preferences, providers should support individuals to make informed decisions about educational interventions to maximise engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren M Quinn
- Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Angharad Kate Woolley
- Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Melanie J Davies
- Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK; Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Samuel Seidu
- Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK; Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Kamlesh Khunti
- Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK; Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shields GE, Wells A, Wright S, Vass CM, Doherty PJ, Capobianco L, Davies LM. Discrete choice experiment to investigate preferences for psychological intervention in cardiac rehabilitation. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062503. [PMID: 36343991 PMCID: PMC9644324 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is offered to people who recently experienced a cardiac event, and often comprises of exercise, education and psychological care. This stated preference study aimed to investigate preferences for attributes of a psychological therapy intervention in CR. METHODS A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted and recruited a general population sample and a trial sample. DCE attributes included the modality (group or individual), healthcare professional providing care, information provided prior to therapy, location and the cost to the National Health Service (NHS). Participants were asked to choose between two hypothetical designs of therapy, with a separate opt-out included. A mixed logit model was used to analyse preferences. Cost to the NHS was used to estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for aspects of the intervention design. RESULTS Three hundred and four participants completed the DCE (general public sample (n=262, mean age 47, 48% female) and trial sample (n=42, mean age 66, 45% female)). A preference for receiving psychological therapy was demonstrated by both samples (general population WTP £1081; 95% CI £957 to £1206). The general population appeared to favour individual therapy (WTP £213; 95% CI £160 to £266), delivered by a CR professional (WTP £48; 9% % CI £4 to £93) and with a lower cost (β=-0.002; p<0.001). Participants preferred to avoid options where no information was received prior to starting therapy (WTP -£106; 95% CI -£153 to -£59). Results for the location attribute were variable and challenging to interpret. CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrates a preference for psychological therapy as part of a programme of CR, as participants were more likely to opt-in to therapy. Results indicate that some aspects of the delivery which may be important to participants can be tailored to design a psychological therapy. Preference heterogeneity is an issue which may prevent a 'one-size-fits-all' approach to psychological therapy in CR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma E Shields
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Adrian Wells
- School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Stuart Wright
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Caroline M Vass
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- RTI Health Solutions, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Lora Capobianco
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Linda M Davies
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hwang R, Peters R, Harmer E, Boyde M, Morris NR. Insight into a real-world experience with completion of cardiac rehabilitation. Int J Cardiol 2022; 360:5-6. [PMID: 35636575 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.05.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Hwang
- Department of Physiotherapy, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia; School of Allied Health Sciences and Menzies Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
| | - Robyn Peters
- Department of Cardiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Australia; School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Emma Harmer
- Department of Cardiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Australia
| | - Mary Boyde
- Department of Cardiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Australia; School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Norman R Morris
- School of Allied Health Sciences and Menzies Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia; Allied Health Research Collaborative, The Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cahill PT, Reitzel M, Anaby DR, Camden C, Phoenix M, Romoff S, Campbell WN. Supporting rehabilitation stakeholders in making service delivery decisions: a rapid review of multi-criteria decision analysis methods. Disabil Rehabil 2022:1-14. [PMID: 35649688 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2080285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This review aimed to synthesize knowledge about multi-criteria decision analysis methods for supporting rehabilitation service design and delivery decisions, including: (1) describing the use of these methods within rehabilitation, (2) identifying decision types that can be supported by these methods, (3) describing client and family involvement, and (4) identifying implementation considerations. METHODS We conducted a rapid review in collaboration with a knowledge partner, searching four databases for peer-reviewed articles reporting primary research. We extracted relevant data from included studies and synthesized it descriptively and with conventional content analysis. RESULTS We identified 717 records, of which 54 met inclusion criteria. Multi-criteria decision analysis methods were primarily used to understand the strength of clients' and clinicians' preferences (n = 44), and five focused on supporting decision making. Shared decision making with stakeholders was evident in only two studies. Clients and families were mostly engaged in data collection and sometimes in selecting the relevant criteria. Good practices for supporting external validity were inconsistently reported. Implementation considerations included managing cognitive complexity and offering authentic choices. CONCLUSIONS Multi-criteria decision analysis methods are promising for better understanding client and family preferences and priorities across rehabilitation professions, contexts, and caseloads. Further work is required to use these methods in shared decision making, for which increased use of qualitative methods and stakeholder engagement is recommended. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONMulti-criteria decision analysis methods are promising for evidence-based, shared decision making for rehabilitation.However, most studies to date have focused on estimating stakeholder preferences, not supporting shared decision making.Cognitive complexity and modelling authentic and realistic decision choices are major barriers to implementation.Stakeholder-engagement and qualitative methods are recommended to address these barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter T Cahill
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Meaghan Reitzel
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Dana R Anaby
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.,CanChild Centre for Child Disability Research, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Chantal Camden
- CanChild Centre for Child Disability Research, Hamilton, Canada.,School of Rehabilitation, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Michelle Phoenix
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,CanChild Centre for Child Disability Research, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Shelley Romoff
- Empowered Kids Ontario-Enfants Avenir Ontario, Toronto, Canada
| | - Wenonah N Campbell
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,CanChild Centre for Child Disability Research, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hansen D, Abreu A, Ambrosetti M, Cornelissen V, Gevaert A, Kemps H, Laukkanen JA, Pedretti R, Simonenko M, Wilhelm M, Davos CH, Doehner W, Iliou MC, Kränkel N, Völler H, Piepoli M. Exercise intensity assessment and prescription in cardiovascular rehabilitation and beyond: why and how: a position statement from the Secondary Prevention and Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2022; 29:230-245. [PMID: 34077542 DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwab007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 01/02/2021] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
A proper determination of the exercise intensity is important for the rehabilitation of patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) since it affects the effectiveness and medical safety of exercise training. In 2013, the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC), together with the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation, published a position statement on aerobic exercise intensity assessment and prescription in cardiovascular rehabilitation (CR). Since this publication, many subsequent papers were published concerning the determination of the exercise intensity in CR, in which some controversies were revealed and some of the commonly applied concepts were further refined. Moreover, how to determine the exercise intensity during resistance training was not covered in this position paper. In light of these new findings, an update on how to determine the exercise intensity for patients with CVD is mandatory, both for aerobic and resistance exercises. In this EAPC position paper, it will be explained in detail which objective and subjective methods for CR exercise intensity determination exist for aerobic and resistance training, together with their (dis)advantages and practical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominique Hansen
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Centre Hasselt, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
- UHasselt, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, BIOMED-REVAL-Rehabilitation Research Centre, Hasselt University, Agoralaan, Building A, 3590 Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Ana Abreu
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria/Centro Académico de Medicina de Lisboa (CAML), Exercise and Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Laboratory, Centro Cardiovascular da Universidade de Lisboa (CCUL), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Marco Ambrosetti
- Cardiac Rehabilitation Unit, ASST Ospedale Maggiore Crema, Crema, Italy
| | - Veronique Cornelissen
- Research Unit of Cardiovascular Exercise Physiology, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Andreas Gevaert
- Research Group Cardiovascular Diseases, GENCOR Department, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Belgium
| | - Hareld Kemps
- Department of Cardiology, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Jari A Laukkanen
- Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
- Cardiovascular Department, IRCCS MultiMedica, Care and Research Institute, Sesto San Giovanni, Milano, Italy
| | - Roberto Pedretti
- Heart Transplantation Outpatient Department, Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test Research Department, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Maria Simonenko
- Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Wilhelm
- Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Constantinos H Davos
- BCRT-Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies, Department of Cardiology (Virchow Klinikum), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Partner Site Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolfram Doehner
- Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention Department, Corentin Celton Hospital, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris Centre Université de Paris, Paris, France
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin D-1220, Germany
| | - Marie-Christine Iliou
- Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Cardiology, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Nicolle Kränkel
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin D-1220, Germany
- Klinik am See, Rehabilitation Centers for Internal Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heinz Völler
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
- Heart Failure Unit, G. da Saliceto Hospital, AUSL Piacenza and University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Massimo Piepoli
- Heart Failure Unit, G. da Saliceto Hospital, AUSL Piacenza and University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sabbahi A, Canada JM, Babu AS, Severin R, Arena R, Ozemek C. Exercise training in cardiac rehabilitation: Setting the right intensity for optimal benefit. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2022; 70:58-65. [PMID: 35149002 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2022.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs are recommended standard-of-care by all major cardiovascular medicine professional organizations. Exercise training is the cornerstone for CR, with aerobic training being the primary form of training. The benefits of exercise training are multiple; however, improved cardiorespiratory fitness is of utmost importance. Moderate-intensity continuous training, supplemented with resistance training, has traditionally been the most common form of exercise training in CR. This review discusses the role of aerobic exercise training in CR and the importance of effective and personalized exercise prescription for optimized results. We also focus on the benefits and utility of high-intensity interval training across different clinical populations commonly seen in the CR setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Sabbahi
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; School of Physical Therapy, South College, Knoxville, TN, USA.
| | - Justin M Canada
- VCU Pauley Heart Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Abraham Samuel Babu
- Department of Physiotherapy, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | - Richard Severin
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Physical Therapy, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA
| | - Ross Arena
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Cemal Ozemek
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rogerson MC, Jackson AC, Navaratnam HS, Le Grande MR, Higgins RO, Clarke J, Murphy BM. Getting "Back on Track" After a Cardiac Event: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Web-Based Self-management Program. JMIR Res Protoc 2021; 10:e34534. [PMID: 34941550 PMCID: PMC8738993 DOI: 10.2196/34534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background After a cardiac event, a large majority of patients with cardiac conditions do not achieve recommended behavior change targets for secondary prevention. Mental health issues can also impact the ability to engage in health behavior change. There is a need for innovative, flexible, and theory-driven eHealth programs, which include evidence-based strategies to assist patients with cardiac conditions with their recovery, especially in behavioral and emotional self-management. Objective The aim of this study is to determine the short- and longer-term behavioral and emotional well-being outcomes of the Back on Track web-based self-management program. In addition, this study will test whether there is enhanced benefit of providing one-on-one telephone support from a trained lifestyle counselor, over and above benefit obtained through completing the web-based program alone. Methods People who have experienced a cardiac event in the previous 12 months and have access to the internet will be eligible for this study (N=120). Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two study conditions: either “self-directed” completion of the Back on Track program (without assistance) or “supported” completion of the Back on Track program (additional 2 telephone sessions with a lifestyle counselor). All participants will have access to the web-based Back on Track program for 2 months. Telephone sessions with the supported arm participants will occur at approximately 2 and 6 weeks post enrollment. Measures will be assessed at baseline, and then 2 and 6 months later. Outcome measures assessed at all 3 timepoints include dietary intake, physical activity and sitting time, smoking status, anxiety and depression, stage of change, and self-efficacy in relation to behavioral and emotional self-management, quality of life, and self-rated health and well-being. A demographic questionnaire will be included at baseline only and program acceptability at 2 months only. Results Recruitment began in May 2020 and concluded in August 2021. Data collection for the 6-month follow-up will be completed by February 2022, and data analysis and publication of results will be completed by June 2022. A total of 122 participants were enrolled in this study. Conclusions The Back on Track trial will enable us to quantify the behavioral and emotional improvements obtained and maintained for patients with cardiac conditions and, in particular, to compare two modes of delivery: (1) fully self-directed delivery and (2) supported by a lifestyle counselor. We anticipate that the web-based Back on Track program will assist patients in their recovery and self-management after an acute event, and represents an effective, flexible, and easily accessible adjunct to center-based rehabilitation programs. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620000102976; http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=378920&isReview=true International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/34534
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alun C Jackson
- Australian Centre for Heart Health, North Melbourne, Australia.,Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.,Centre on Behavioral Health, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, China
| | | | | | - Rosemary O Higgins
- Australian Centre for Heart Health, North Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.,Department of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Joanne Clarke
- Australian Centre for Heart Health, North Melbourne, Australia
| | - Barbara M Murphy
- Australian Centre for Heart Health, North Melbourne, Australia.,Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.,Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Shields GE, Wright S, Wells A, Doherty P, Capobianco L, Davies LM. Delivery preferences for psychological intervention in cardiac rehabilitation: a pilot discrete choice experiment. Open Heart 2021; 8:openhrt-2021-001747. [PMID: 34426529 PMCID: PMC8383873 DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a programme of care offered to people who recently experienced a cardiac event. There is a growing focus on home-based formats of CR and a lack of evidence on preferences for psychological care in CR. This pilot study aimed to investigate preferences for delivery attributes of a psychological therapy intervention in CR patients with symptoms of anxiety and/or depression. Methods A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted and recruited participants from a feasibility trial. Participants were asked to choose between two hypothetical interventions, described using five attributes; intervention type (home or centre-based), information provided, therapy manual format, cost to the National Health Service (NHS) and waiting time. A separate opt-out was included. A conditional logit using maximum likelihood estimation was used to analyse preferences. The NHS cost was used to estimate willingness to pay for aspects of the intervention delivery. Results 35 responses were received (39% response rate). Results indicated that participants would prefer to receive any form of therapy compared with no therapy. Statistically significant results were limited, but included participants being keen to avoid not receiving information prior to therapy (β=−0.270; p=0.03) and preferring a lower cost to the NHS (β=−0.001; p=0.00). No significant results were identified for the type of psychological intervention, format of therapy/exercises and programme start time. Coefficients indicated preferences were stronger for home-based therapy compared with centre-based, but this was not significant. Conclusions The pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of a DCE in this group, it identifies potential attributes and levels, and estimates the sample sizes needed for a full study. Preliminary evidence indicated that sampled participants tended to prefer home-based psychological therapy in CR and wanted to receive information before initiating therapy. Results are limited due to the pilot design and further research is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stuart Wright
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Adrian Wells
- School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Research and Innovation, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Patrick Doherty
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, North Yorkshire, UK
| | - Lora Capobianco
- Research and Innovation, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Linda Mary Davies
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Christie M, Coyne E, Mitchell M. The educational experiences and needs of patients with an internal cardiac defibrillator: An interpretive phenomenological study. Collegian 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.colegn.2020.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
20
|
|
21
|
Training intensity and improvements in exercise capacity in elderly patients undergoing European cardiac rehabilitation - the EU-CaRE multicenter cohort study. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0242503. [PMID: 33186408 PMCID: PMC7665625 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Guidelines for exercise intensity prescription in Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) are inconsistent and have recently been discussed controversially. We aimed (1) to compare training intensities between European CR centres and (2) to assess associations between training intensity and improvement in peak oxygen consumption ([Formula: see text]O2) in elderly CR patients. METHODS Peak [Formula: see text]O2, heart rate and work rate (WR) at the first and second ventilatory thresholds were measured at start of CR. Training heart rate was measured during three sessions spread over the CR. Multivariate models were used to compare training characteristics between centres and to assess the effect of training intensity on change in peak [Formula: see text]O2. RESULTS Training intensity was measured in 1011 out of 1633 EU-CaRE patients in 7 of 8 centers and the first and secondary ventilatory threshold were identified in 1166 and 817 patients, respectively. The first and second ventilatory threshold were found at 44% (SD 16%) and 78% (SD 9%) of peak WR and 78% (SD 9%) and 89% (SD 5%) of peak heart rate, respectively. Training intensity and session duration varied significantly between centres but change in peak [Formula: see text]O2 over CR did not. Training above the first individual threshold (β 0.62, 95% confidence interval [0.25-1.02]) and increase in training volume per hour (β 0.06, 95%CI [0.01-0.12]) were associated with a higher change in peak [Formula: see text]O2. CONCLUSION While training intensity and volume varied greatly amongst current European CR programs, changes in peak [Formula: see text]O2 were similar and the effect of training characteristics on these changes were small.
Collapse
|
22
|
Draper O, Goh I, Huang C, Kibblewhite T, Le Quesne P, Smith K, Gray E, Skinner M. Psychosocial interventions to optimize recovery of physical function and facilitate engagement in physical activity during the first three months following CABG surgery: a systematic review. PHYSICAL THERAPY REVIEWS 2020. [DOI: 10.1080/10833196.2020.1832714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Owen Draper
- School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Isaiah Goh
- School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Cong Huang
- School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | | | - Poppy Le Quesne
- School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Kate Smith
- School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Emily Gray
- Centre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Margot Skinner
- Centre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Halldorsdottir H, Thoroddsen A, Ingadottir B. Impact of technology-based patient education on modifiable cardiovascular risk factors of people with coronary heart disease: A systematic review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2020; 103:2018-2028. [PMID: 32595027 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.05.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Revised: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To collect evidence on what types of technology and content are most effective in helping people with coronary heart disease (CHD) to change their modifiable cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS A literature search was performed to find relevant studies published between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2018 in PubMed, CINAHL, PROQUEST and Scopus databases. Selected outcomes were risk factors (exercise, diet, blood pressure, blood sugar, cholesterol, body mass index, tobacco use). The quality of the studies was evaluated according to Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers Manual Checklists for risk for bias, TIDieR for quality of interventions, and PRISMA statement for presenting results. RESULTS Eighteen quantitative (17 RCT´s and one quasi-experimental) studies were included. Patient education delivered through telephone, text messaging, webpages, and smartphone applications resulted in significant changes in some risk factors of people with CHD. Sufficient descriptions of the content and intervention methods were lacking. CONCLUSION Patient education delivered with technology can help people with CHD to modify their risk factors. There is a need for better descriptions of the content and delivery of educational interventions in studies. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Patient education needs to be delivered with technological solutions that best support the multidimensional needs of CHD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hulda Halldorsdottir
- Landspitali - the National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland; Faculty of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
| | - Asta Thoroddsen
- Faculty of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Brynja Ingadottir
- Landspitali - the National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland; Faculty of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ambrosetti M, Abreu A, Corrà U, Davos CH, Hansen D, Frederix I, Iliou MC, Pedretti RF, Schmid JP, Vigorito C, Voller H, Wilhelm M, Piepoli MF, Bjarnason-Wehrens B, Berger T, Cohen-Solal A, Cornelissen V, Dendale P, Doehner W, Gaita D, Gevaert AB, Kemps H, Kraenkel N, Laukkanen J, Mendes M, Niebauer J, Simonenko M, Zwisler ADO. Secondary prevention through comprehensive cardiovascular rehabilitation: From knowledge to implementation. 2020 update. A position paper from the Secondary Prevention and Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2020; 28:460-495. [PMID: 33611446 DOI: 10.1177/2047487320913379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 323] [Impact Index Per Article: 80.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Secondary prevention through comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation has been recognized as the most cost-effective intervention to ensure favourable outcomes across a wide spectrum of cardiovascular disease, reducing cardiovascular mortality, morbidity and disability, and to increase quality of life. The delivery of a comprehensive and 'modern' cardiac rehabilitation programme is mandatory both in the residential and the out-patient setting to ensure expected outcomes. The present position paper aims to update the practical recommendations on the core components and goals of cardiac rehabilitation intervention in different cardiovascular conditions, in order to assist the whole cardiac rehabilitation staff in the design and development of the programmes, and to support healthcare providers, insurers, policy makers and patients in the recognition of the positive nature of cardiac rehabilitation. Starting from the previous position paper published in 2010, this updated document maintains a disease-oriented approach, presenting both well-established and more controversial aspects. Particularly for implementation of the exercise programme, advances in different training modalities were added and new challenging populations were considered. A general table applicable to all cardiovascular conditions and specific tables for each clinical condition have been created for routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Ambrosetti
- Department of Cardiac Rehabilitation, ICS Maugeri Care and Research Institute, Italy
| | - Ana Abreu
- Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria/Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte (CHULN), Centro Académico de Medicina de Lisboa (CAML), Centro Cardiovascular da Universidade de Lisboa (CCUL), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Ugo Corrà
- Department of Cardiac Rehabilitation, ICS Maugeri Care and Research Institute, Italy
| | - Constantinos H Davos
- Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, Greece
| | - Dominique Hansen
- REVAL and BIOMED-Rehabilitation Research Centre, Hasselt University, Belgium
| | | | - Marie C Iliou
- Department of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention, Hôpital Corentin Celton, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris Centre-Universite de Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Heinz Voller
- Klinik am See, Rehabilitation Centre for Internal Medicine, Rüdersdorf and Centre of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Potsdam, Germany
| | - Matthias Wilhelm
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Massimo F Piepoli
- Heart Failure Unit, G. da Saliceto Hospital, AUSL Piacenza and University of Parma, Italy
| | - Birna Bjarnason-Wehrens
- Department of Preventive and Rehabilitative Sport Medicine and Exercise Physiology, Institute for Cardiology and Sports Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Alain Cohen-Solal
- Cardiology Department, Hopital Lariboisiere, Paris University, France
| | | | - Paul Dendale
- Heart Centre, Jessa Hospital Campus Virga Jesse, Belgium
| | - Wolfram Doehner
- Department of Cardiology (Virchow Klinikum), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Germany.,BCRT - Berlin Institute of Health Centre for Regenerative Therapies, and Centre for Stroke Research Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | - Dan Gaita
- University of Medicine & Pharmacy 'Victor Babes' Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation Clinic, Romania
| | - Andreas B Gevaert
- Heart Centre, Jessa Hospital Campus Virga Jesse, Belgium.,Research group Cardiovascular Diseases, GENCOR Department, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Hareld Kemps
- Department of Cardiology, Maxima Medical Centre, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolle Kraenkel
- Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany.,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Germany
| | - Jari Laukkanen
- Central Finland Health Care District Hospital District, Finland
| | - Miguel Mendes
- Cardiology Department, CHLO-Hospital de Santa Cruz, Portugal
| | - Josef Niebauer
- University Institute of Sports Medicine, Prevention and Rehabilitation, Paracelsus Medical University, Austria
| | - Maria Simonenko
- Physiology Research and Blood Circulation Department, Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test SRL, Heart Transplantation Outpatient Department, Federal State Budgetary Institution, 'V.A. Almazov National Medical Research Centre' of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Russian Federation
| | - Ann-Dorthe Olsen Zwisler
- REHPA-Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Buttery AK. Cardiac Rehabilitation for Frail Older People. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2020; 1216:131-147. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-33330-0_13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
26
|
|
27
|
Boyde M, Whitty J, Peters R, Holliday J, Baker C, Hwang R, Lynagh D, Korczyk D. Author's response. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:396-397. [PMID: 30765049 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Boyde
- Cardiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; The University of Queensland, Australia.
| | - Jennifer Whitty
- Health Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK
| | - Robyn Peters
- Cardiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; The University of Queensland, Australia
| | - Julie Holliday
- Cardiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Charmiane Baker
- Cardiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Rita Hwang
- Physiotherapy, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Donna Lynagh
- Metro South Medicine and Chronic Disease Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Dariusz Korczyk
- Cardiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; The University of Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rawstorn JC, Cartledge S, Islam SMS, Maddison R. Rejoinder to "Patient preferences for the delivery of cardiac rehabilitation". PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:394-395. [PMID: 30377006 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Accepted: 10/21/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susie Cartledge
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | | | - Ralph Maddison
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|