Assessing helpful and harmful family and friend involvement in adults' type 2 diabetes self-management

Older Chinese and Filipino American Immigrants with Type 2 Diabetes and their Adult Child: A Qualitative Dyadic Exploration of Family Support

Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) among older Asian American immigrants (AA) is a growing concern. Asian Americans represent 9% of diagnosed diabetes. Very little is known on how older Asian American immigrants with T2D navigate diabetes management, in particular the role of family support. This qualitative study examines Chinese and Filipino Americans, the two largest Asian subgroups in the US (4.2 million, and 3.6 million, respectively), and family support dynamics among adult children and their parents diagnosed with T2D. Ten dyads (n = 20) made up of adult children and aging parents participated in in-depth and dyadic interviews. Results indicate that family support occurs in a trajectory of stages. The following thematic patterns emerged in these dyads around support: independence, transitions, partnership, and stepping in. The findings point to various supportive stages that Asian American adult children and aging parents with T2D experience and the importance of developing supportive interventions for both adult children and aging parents at these various stages.

The Role of Family in Diabetes Management for Mexican American Adults

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to characterize how family influences diabetes self-management in Mexican American adults. Methods: Data were analyzed from previously collected data that included 34 semi-structured interviews with Hispanic adults with diabetes and six focus groups with 37 adults with diabetes and family members. Themes related to family and diabetes management were identified and analyzed using a modified template approach. Results: Family-related facilitators to T2DM self-management were (1) provides support, (2) provides motivation, and (3) desire to protect family from diabetes. Family-related challenges were (1) lack of support, (2) family responsibilities, and (3) stress related to family. Diabetes education was shared with family members. Family member perspectives on T2DM included (1) not knowing how to help, (2) effect on emotional wellbeing, (3) diabetes affects the whole family, and (4) family provides support. Conclusion: Most participants with T2DM felt supported by family, but many desired more social support and support surrounding dietary changes from family. Many felt family did not understand what living with diabetes meant for them. Most family members wished to learn more about how to help. Future interventions should include family members and teach them supportive strategies to support beneficial diabetes self-management behaviors.

Transition to self-management among emerging adults with type 1 diabetes: a mixed methods study

Introduction

Emerging adulthood is challenging for young people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). This study evaluated transition to diabetes self-management and perceptions of care transfer using mixed methods.

Methods

An online survey queried demographics, management characteristics, diabetes knowledge, self-care readiness, adherence, and diabetes distress. T-tests compared survey scores between those with self-reported target A1c <7.0% versus ≥7.0%. Pearson correlations assessed associations between A1c and diabetes distress, stratified by A1c <7.0% versus ≥7.0%. Qualitative semi-structured interviews elicited perceptions of young adults; transcripts were analyzed using directed qualitative content analysis.

Results

Of 141 participants (30% male, 84% non-Hispanic white) completing the survey, 41% self-reported target A1c <7.0%. Diabetes knowledge and self-care readiness scores did not differ between those with A1c <7.0% versus ≥7.0%, while diabetes distress was lower (45 ± 20 vs 52 ± 20, p=0.01) and adherence higher (77 ± 12 vs 71 ± 14, p=0.02) in those with A1c <7.0% versus ≥7.0%. Diabetes distress was significantly associated with glycemic outcomes in those reporting A1c ≥7.0% (R=0.36, p<0.01). Qualitative analysis (24 participants) revealed five themes and two sub-themes, notable for need for more mental health support, support from others with T1D, benefits of technology for care autonomy, and challenges of obtaining diabetes supplies.

Discussion

Emerging adults with self-reported target A1c endorsed lower diabetes distress and higher adherence than those with elevated A1c. Mental health access, support from others with T1D, technology use, and guidance for supply acquisition may improve transition to self-management and care transfer for emerging adults with T1D.

Acceptability and feasibility of FAMS-T1D mHealth intervention to optimize self- and social regulation for emerging adults with type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Among emerging adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D), self-regulation and social regulation skills can help avoid high A1c and diabetes distress. FAMS (Family/friend Activation to Motivate Self-care) is mobile phone-delivered intervention that supports development of these skills and is efficacious among adults with type 2 diabetes. However, the acceptability and feasibility of the FAMS intervention among emerging adults with T1D are unknown.

METHODS

Therefore, we adapted FAMS for in a new disease context and developmental stage and then conducted a 3-month mixed-methods pre-post pilot study. Participants were emerging adults with T1D and a friend/family member enrolled as a support person (optional). Feasibility/acceptability outcomes and associated progression thresholds were recruitment (≥ 70% eligible emerging adults), retention (≥ 85%), intervention engagement (≥ 70%), and satisfaction (≥ 70%). We also collected qualitative feedback to determine if the intervention addressed relevant needs and explored changes in outcomes of interest (family/friend involvement, self-efficacy, self-management, distress, A1c).

RESULTS

Recruitment rates indicate recruitment of emerging adults with T1D (n = 30) and their support persons (n = 20) is feasible - 79% of emerging adults who screened as eligible enrolled and 70% of enrolled emerging adults invited a support person. Emerging adults completed 98% of coaching sessions, and response rates to automated text messages were median 85% IQR [68%, 90%]. Changes in selected measures for outcomes of interest were in expected directions suggesting sensitivity to changes occasioned by the intervention in a future evaluative trial. Emerging adults said FAMS-T1D helped with setting realistic goals, motivated them to prioritize diabetes goals, and increased support, indicating acceptability of the intervention in this new disease and developmental context.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest potential for FAMS-T1D to engage emerging adults and their support persons and feasibility for an evaluative trial examining effects on self-regulation (self-efficacy, self-management), social regulation (family/friend involvement), and outcomes (diabetes distress, A1c).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

We did not register this study on ClinicalTrials.gov because the purpose of the study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and study procedures and measures in preparation for a future trial. The purpose of that future trial will be to evaluate the effect of the intervention on health-related biomedical and behavioral outcomes, and that trial will be registered accordingly.

Older adults using social support to improve self-care (OASIS): Adaptation, implementation and feasibility of peer support for older adults with T2D in appalachia: A feasibility study protocol

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is 17% higher in rural dwellers compared to their urban counterparts, and it increases with age, with an estimated 25% of older adults (≥ 65 years) diagnosed. Appropriate self-care is necessary for optimal clinical outcomes. Overall, T2D self-care is consistently poor among the general population but is even worse in rural-dwellers and older adults. In rural Kentucky, up to 23% of adults in Appalachian communities have been diagnosed with T2D and, of those, 26.8% are older adults. To attain optimal clinical outcomes, social environmental factors, including social support, are vital when promoting T2D self-care. Specifically, peer support has shown to be efficacious in improving T2D self-care behaviors and clinical and psychosocial outcomes related to T2D; however, literature also suggests self-selected social support can be obstructive when engaging in healthful activities. Currently available evidence-based interventions (EBIs) using peer support have not been used to prioritize older adults, especially those living in rural communities.

METHOD

To address this gap, we conducted formative research with stakeholders, and collaboratively identified an acceptable and feasible peer support EBI-peer health coaching (PHC)-that has resulted in improved clinical and psychosocial T2D-related outcomes among participants who did not reside in rural communities nor were ≥65 years. The goal of the proposed study is to use a 2x2 factorial design to test the adapted PHC components and determine their preliminary effectiveness to promote self-care behaviors and improve glycemic control among older adults living in Appalachian Kentucky. Testing the PHC components of the peer support intervention will be instrumental in promoting care for older adults in Appalachia, as it will allow for a larger scale intervention, which if effective, could be disseminated to community partners in Appalachia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06003634) in August 2023.

Factors Influencing Medication Adherence Among Adults Living with Diabetes and Comorbidities: a Qualitative Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Medication adherence plays an important role in improving health outcomes related to diabetes and comorbidity. The potential factors influencing medication adherence and how they contribute to health behaviors have not been synthesized to date. This review synthesized qualitative studies that identified factors influencing medication adherence among adults living with diabetes and comorbidity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Twenty-eight findings were extracted and synthesized into four themes: perceived support, lack of knowledge, medication issues, and the importance of routine. The findings highlight the factors that support medication adherence and areas that can be targeted to support and promote medication adherence. The findings also support the potential role of healthcare providers in supporting people living with diabetes and comorbidity to adhere to and maintain medication regimes. Several factors were identified that are amenable to intervention within the clinical practice setting and have the potential to enhance medication adherence and improve health outcomes for people living with diabetes and comorbidities. The development of acceptable and effective interventions could have a positive effect on medication adherence and health outcomes.

A qualitative study exploring partner involvement in the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: The experiences of women and partners

AIMS

The aims of the study were to explore the experiences of women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and their partners and examine the factors influencing partner involvement in GDM management, seeking to inform a targeted couple-based intervention.

DESIGN

A descriptive qualitative study.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 14 women with GDM and their partners. Participants were recruited through convenience sampling from a tertiary hospital in Xi'an, China. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Three themes and 12 subthemes were identified. Theme I: Women's expectations of their partner's involvement in GDM management-practical support and emotional support. Theme II: Partner involvement in GDM management-constructive involvement, unhelpful involvement with good intentions and insufficient involvement. Theme III: Factors that influence partner involvement in GDM-knowledge of GDM, GDM risk perception, health consciousness, attitudes towards the treatment plan, couple communication regarding GDM management, family roles and appraisal of GDM management responsibility.

CONCLUSION

Women desired practical and emotional support from partners. The types of partner involvement in GDM management varied. Some partners provided constructive support, while some partners' involvement was limited, non-existent or actively unhelpful. By combining these results with the factors influencing partner involvement, our findings may help healthcare professionals develop strategies to involve partners in GDM care and enhance women's ability to manage GDM.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE

Partner involvement in GDM care may help them understand and better attend to women's needs, thus improving their experience and potential outcomes. This study highlights novel factors that need to be considered in developing couple-based interventions for this population.

REPORTING METHOD

The reporting follows the COREQ checklist.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Some patients were involved in data interpretation. There is no public contribution.

The Goldilocks Dilemma on Balancing User Response and Reflection in mHealth Interventions: Observational Study

Background

Mobile health (mHealth) has the potential to radically improve health behaviors and quality of life; however, there are still key gaps in understanding how to optimize mHealth engagement. Most engagement research reports only on system use without consideration of whether the user is reflecting on the content cognitively. Although interactions with mHealth are critical, cognitive investment may also be important for meaningful behavior change. Notably, content that is designed to request too much reflection could result in users' disengagement. Understanding how to strike the balance between response burden and reflection burden has critical implications for achieving effective engagement to impact intended outcomes.

Objective

In this observational study, we sought to understand the interplay between response burden and reflection burden and how they impact mHealth engagement. Specifically, we explored how varying the response and reflection burdens of mHealth content would impact users' text message response rates in an mHealth intervention.

Methods

We recruited support persons of people with diabetes for a randomized controlled trial that evaluated an mHealth intervention for diabetes management. Support person participants assigned to the intervention (n=148) completed a survey and received text messages for 9 months. During the 2-year randomized controlled trial, we sent 4 versions of a weekly, two-way text message that varied in both reflection burden (level of cognitive reflection requested relative to that of other messages) and response burden (level of information requested for the response relative to that of other messages). We quantified engagement by using participant-level response rates. We compared the odds of responding to each text and used Poisson regression to estimate associations between participant characteristics and response rates.

Results

The texts requesting the most reflection had the lowest response rates regardless of response burden (high reflection and low response burdens: median 10%, IQR 0%-40%; high reflection and high response burdens: median 23%, IQR 0%-51%). The response rate was highest for the text requesting the least reflection (low reflection and low response burdens: median 90%, IQR 61%-100%) yet still relatively high for the text requesting medium reflection (medium reflection and low response burdens: median 75%, IQR 38%-96%). Lower odds of responding were associated with higher reflection burden (P<.001). Younger participants and participants who had a lower socioeconomic status had lower response rates to texts with more reflection burden, relative to those of their counterparts (all P values were <.05).

Conclusions

As reflection burden increased, engagement decreased, and we found more disparities in engagement across participants' characteristics. Content encouraging moderate levels of reflection may be ideal for achieving both cognitive investment and system use. Our findings provide insights into mHealth design and the optimization of both engagement and effectiveness.

Spousal Involvement in Collaborative Management and Glycemic Behavior Change among Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review

Introduction

The marked increase in the number of individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) worldwide each year has resulted in the importance of the spouse's contribution to the promotion and support of patient self-management programs.

Objectives

This study aimed to systematically explore the role or involvement of spouses in collaborative management and glycemic behavior change in DM.

Methods

Five databases including Scopus, PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, SAGE, and Web of Science were reviewed for relevant articles retrieved from 2017 to 2022. Literature search used keywords, including "Spouse," "Support," "Self-management," "Glycemic Control," and "Diabetes mellitus." The Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines were used for appraisal review of journals. The component of partner support in the self-management of patients with DM is associated with an increase in the patient's glycemic level.

Results

Twenty-five studies were identified that describe the different spousal roles and strategies in the promotion and support of DM management. Overall, spouses' involvement positively impacted healthy diets, higher self-efficacy, improved quality of psychological well-being, increased perceived support, and changes in glycemic-influenced behavior. Adaptation in the spouse patient relationship including maintaining cohesiveness can result in positive coping is essential in normalizing and contextualizing the chronic condition of DM. Partner-based collaboration is important for diabetes management, overcoming management barriers, and generating communal coping.

Conclusion

This systematic review observed that the involvement of a spouse is important in improving collaborative management and results in better glycemic behavior in patients with DM. A better understanding of the relationship between spousal involvement, coping strategies, and adherence in daily management and the subsequent use of this information are highly useful for creating targeted and effective interventions.

Effectiveness of Family-oriented Education on Self-care behaviors of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background

Proper self-care practices play a crucial role in the well being and longevity of patients with cardiovascular disease. To effectively engage in self-care, it is imperative for patients to receive adequate education and training on the self-care process. This study was conducted to determine the effect of family-oriented education (FOE) on the self-care behaviors of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Methods

In this randomized clinical trial study, 70 patients hospitalized in two hospitals in Shiraz during November 2021-April 2022 participated after the first AMI. Patients were randomly assigned into control (N=35) and intervention groups (N=35) based on random allocation. In the intervention group, an educational program was conducted for patients and active family members during three sessions of 45 to 60 minutes. The control group received routine care. Demographic information form and Self-Care Agency scale was completed by the patients before the educational intervention, one month, and two months after the educational intervention. Data analysis was done through SPSS 22 using Chi-square test, independent t-test, Fisher's exact, and Friedman test. P˂0.05 was considered as the statistical significance level.

Results

There was no significant difference in self-care behaviors between the two groups before the intervention (P=0.71). The mean score of self-care behaviors in patients one month (P<0.001) and two months (P<0.001) after FOE in the intervention group showed a statistically significant difference with the control group. Also, the mean score of self-care behaviors two months after the education in the intervention group was significantly higher than before and one month after the intervention (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Given the positive effect of FOE on self-care behaviors of patients with AMI, it is recommended that educational interventions related to the treatment plan of these patients with the participation of families should be conducted.Trial Registration Number: IRCT20211116053078N.

Glycemic outcomes of a family-focused intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes: Main, mediated, and subgroup effects from the FAMS 2.0 RCT

AIMS

Family/friend Activation to Motivate Self-care (FAMS) is a self-care support intervention delivered via mobile phones. We evaluated FAMS' effects on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and intervention targets among adults with type 2 diabetes in a 15-month RCT.

METHODS

Persons with diabetes (PWDs) were randomized to FAMS or control with their support person (family/friend, optional). FAMS included monthly phone coaching and text messages for PWDs, and text messages for support persons over a 9-month intervention period.

RESULTS

PWDs (N = 329) were 52 % male, 39 % reported minoritized race or ethnicity, with mean HbA1c 8.6 ± 1.7 %. FAMS improved HbA1c among PWDs with a non-cohabitating support person (-0.64 %; 95 % CI [-1.22 %, -0.05 %]), but overall mean effects were not significant. FAMS improved intervention targets including self-efficacy, dietary behavior, and family/friend involvement during the intervention period; these improvements mediated post-intervention HbA1c improvements (total indirect effect -0.27 %; 95 % CI [-0.49 %, -0.09 %]) and sustained HbA1c improvements at 12 months (total indirect effect -0.19 %; 95 % CI [-0.40 %, -0.01 %]).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite improvements in most intervention targets, HbA1c improved only among PWDs engaging non-cohabitating support persons suggesting future family interventions should emphasize inclusion of these relationships. Future work should also seek to identify intervention targets that mediate improvements in HbA1c.

Acceptability and Feasibility of FAMS-T1D mHealth intervention to optimize self- & social regulation for emerging adults with type 1 diabetes

Background

Among emerging adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D), self-regulation and social regulation skills can help avoid high A1c and diabetes distress. FAMS (Family/friend Activation to Motivate Self-care) is mobile phone-delivered intervention that supports development of these skills and is efficacious among adults with type 2 diabetes. However, the acceptability and feasibility of the FAMS intervention among emerging adults with T1D is unknown.

Methods

Therefore, we adapted FAMS for in a new disease context and developmental stage then conducted a 3-month mixed-methods pre-post pilot study. Participants were emerging adults with T1D and a friend/family member enrolled as a support person (optional). Feasibility/acceptability outcomes and associated progression thresholds were recruitment (≥ 70% eligible emerging adults), retention (≥ 85%), intervention engagement (≥ 70%) and satisfaction (≥ 70%). We also collected qualitative feedback to determine if the intervention addressed relevant needs and explored changes in outcomes of interest (family/friend involvement, self-efficacy, self-management, distress, A1c).

Results

Recruitment rates indicate recruitment of emerging adults with T1D and their support persons is feasible - 79% of emerging adults who screened as eligible enrolled and 70% of enrolled emerging adults invited a support person. Emerging adults completed 98% of coaching sessions, and response rates to automated text messages were median 85% IQR [68%, 90%]. Changes in selected measures for outcomes of interest were in expected directions suggesting sensitivity to changes occasioned by the intervention in a future evaluative trial. Emerging adults said FAMS-T1D helped with setting realistic goals, motivated them to prioritize diabetes goals, and increased support, indicating acceptability of the intervention in this new disease and developmental context.

Conclusions

Findings suggest potential for FAMS-T1D to engage emerging adults and their support persons and feasibility for evaluation of effects on hypothesized intervention targets and outcomes in a subsequent evaluative trial.

Trial Registration

We did not register this study on clinicaltrials.gov because the purpose of the study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and study procedures and measures in preparation for a future trial. The purpose of that future trial will be to evaluate the effect of the intervention on health-related biomedical and behavioral outcomes and that trial will be registered accordingly.

Family Typology for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Longitudinal Stability and Validity for Diabetes Management and Well-being

OBJECTIVE

We validated longitudinally a typology of diabetes-specific family functioning (named Collaborative and Helpful, Satisfied with Low Involvement, Want More Involvement, and Critically Involved) in adults with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted k-means cluster analyses with nine dimensions to determine if the typology replicated in a diverse sample and if type assignment was robust to variations in sampling and included dimensions. In a subsample with repeated assessments over 9 months, we examined the stability and validity of the typology. We also applied a multinomial logistic regression approach to make the typology usable at the individual level, like a diagnostic tool.

RESULTS

Participants (N = 717) were 51% male, more than one-third reported minority race or ethnicity, mean age was 57 years, and mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was 7.9% (63 mmol/mol; 8.7% [72 mmol/mol] for the longitudinal subsample). The typology was replicated with respect to the number of types and dimension patterns. Type assignment was robust to sampling variations (97% consistent across simulations). Type had an average 52% stability over time within participants; instability was not explained by measurement error. Over 9 months, type was independently associated with HbA1c, diabetes self-efficacy, diabetes medication adherence, diabetes distress, and depressive symptoms (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The typology of diabetes-specific family functioning was replicated, and longitudinal analyses suggest type is more of a dynamic state than a stable trait. However, type varies with diabetes self-management and well-being over time as a consistent independent indicator of outcomes. The typology is ready to be applied to further precision medicine approaches to behavioral and psychosocial diabetes research and care.

Well-being outcomes of a family-focused intervention for persons with type 2 diabetes and support persons: Main, mediated, and subgroup effects from the FAMS 2.0 RCT

AIMS

Type 2 diabetes self-management occurs within social contexts. We sought to test the effects of Family/friend Activation to Motivate Self-care (FAMS), a self-care support intervention delivered via mobile phones, on psychosocial outcomes for persons with diabetes (PWDs) and their support persons.

METHODS

PWDs had the option to enroll with a friend/family member as a support person in a 15-month RCT to evaluate FAMS versus enhanced usual care. FAMS included 9 months of monthly phone coaching and text message support for PWDs, and text message support for enrolled support persons.

RESULTS

PWDs (N = 329) were 52% male and 39% reported minoritized race or ethnicity ; 50% enrolled with elevated diabetes distress. Support persons (N = 294) were 26% male and 33% reported minoritized race or ethnicity. FAMS improved PWDs' diabetes distress (d = -0.19) and global well-being (d = 0.21) during the intervention, with patterns of larger effects among minoritized groups. Post-intervention (9-month) and sustained (15-month) improvements were driven by changes in PWDs' self-efficacy, self-care behaviors, and autonomy support. Among support persons, FAMS improved helpful involvement without increasing burden or harmful involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

FAMS improved PWDs' psychosocial well-being, with post-intervention and sustained improvements driven by improved self-efficacy, self-care, and autonomy support. Support persons increased helpful involvement without adverse effects.

Well-being outcomes of a family-focused intervention for persons with type 2 diabetes and support persons: Main, mediated, and subgroup effects from the FAMS 2.0 RCT

Aims

Type 2 diabetes self-management occurs within social contexts. We sought to test the effects of Family/friends Activation to Motivate Self-care (FAMS), a self-care support intervention delivered via mobile phones, on psychosocial outcomes for persons with diabetes (PWDs) and their support persons.

Methods

PWDs had the option to enroll with a friend/family member as a support person in a 15-month RCT to evaluate FAMS versus enhanced usual care. FAMS included 9-months of monthly phone coaching and text message support for PWDs, and text message support for enrolled support persons.

Results

PWDs (N=329) were 52% male and 39% from minoritized racial or ethnic groups; 50% enrolled with elevated diabetes distress. Support persons (N=294) were 26% male and 33% minoritized racial or ethnic groups. FAMS improved PWDs' diabetes distress ( d =-0.19) and global well-being ( d =0.21) during the intervention, with patterns of larger effects among minoritized groups. Post-intervention and sustained (15-month) improvements were driven by changes in PWDs' self-efficacy, self-care behaviors, and autonomy support. Among support persons, FAMS improved helpful involvement without increasing burden or harmful involvement.

Conclusions

FAMS improved PWDs' psychosocial well-being, with post-intervention and sustained improvements driven by improved self-efficacy, self-care, and autonomy support. Support persons increased helpful involvement without adverse effects.

Glycemic outcomes of a family-focused intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes: Main, mediated, and subgroup effects from the FAMS 2.0 RCT

Aims

Family/friends Activation to Motivate Self-care (FAMS) is a self-care support intervention delivered via mobile phones. We evaluated FAMS effects on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and intervention targets among adults with type 2 diabetes in a 15-month RCT.

Methods

Persons with diabetes (PWDs) and their support persons (family/friend, optional) were randomized to FAMS or control. FAMS included monthly phone coaching and text messages for PWDs, and text messages for support persons over a 9-month intervention period.

Results

PWDs (N=329) were 52% male, 39% from minoritized racial or ethnic groups, with mean HbA1c 8.6±1.7%. FAMS improved HbA1c among PWDs with a non-cohabitating support person (-0.64%; 95% CI [-1.22%, -0.05%]), but overall effects were not significant. FAMS improved intervention targets including self-efficacy, dietary behavior, and family/friend involvement during the intervention period; these improvements mediated post-intervention HbA1c improvements (total indirect effect -0.27%; 95% CI [-0.49%, -0.09%]) and sustained HbA1c improvements at 12 months (total indirect effect -0.19%; 95% CI [-0.40%, -0.01%]).

Conclusions

Despite improvements in most intervention targets, HbA1c improved only among PWDs engaging non-cohabitating support persons suggesting future family interventions should emphasize inclusion of these relationships. Future work should also seek to identify intervention targets that mediate improvements in HbA1c.

Family involvement and diabetes distress across dyads for adults with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Family/friend involvement and diabetes distress are associated with outcomes for persons with type 2 diabetes (PWDs), but little is known about how they relate to each other. We aim to (1) describe associations between PWD and support person (SP) distress; (2) describe associations between involvement and diabetes distress for PWDs, for SPs, and across the dyad; and (3) explore whether associations differ by PWD-SP cohabitation.

METHODS

PWDs and SPs co-enrolled in a study evaluating the effects of a self-care support intervention and completed self-report measures at baseline.

RESULTS

PWDs and SPs (N = 297 dyads) were, on average, in their mid-50s and around one-third identified as racial or ethnic minorities. The association between PWD and SP diabetes distress was small (Spearman's ρ = 0.25, p < 0.01). For PWDs, experienced harmful involvement from family/friends was associated with more diabetes distress (standardized β = 0.23, p < 0.001) independent of helpful involvement in adjusted models. Separately, SPs' self-reported harmful involvement was associated with their own diabetes distress (standardized β = 0.35, p < 0.001) and with PWDs' diabetes distress (standardized β = 0.25, p = 0.002), independent of SPs' self-reported helpful involvement.

CONCLUSION AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Findings suggest dyadic interventions may need to address both SP harmful involvement and SP diabetes distress, in addition to PWD distress.

Diabetes Mellitus Family Assessment Instruments: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties

Although many instruments are used to assess the families of people with diabetes, their measurement properties have not been systematically reviewed. We aimed to identify and evaluate the psychometric properties of the instruments used to assess family functioning in adults with diabetes.

METHODS

A systematic literature review, according to the JBI systematic reviews of measurement properties, was conducted using different databases, including gray literature. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021239733. Two independent reviewers searched, screened, and assessed the risk of bias among the articles according to the COSMIN methodology. The quality of each included instrument was assessed using the updated criteria for good measurement properties.

RESULTS

Eighty-one studies were included, and thirty-one eligible instruments were identified. The psychometric properties frequently assessed were structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity.

CONCLUSIONS

Although 31 instruments were included, none of their psychometric properties were scored as "very good". From the instruments scored as adequate on development and content validity, five stood out for their quality appraisal.. The development of new instruments is not recommended. More studies should be conducted on the existing instruments to assess the less commonly evaluated psychometric properties. Using valid instruments to develop and evaluate interventions is essential to promote health literacy and the effectiveness of diabetes management.

Rationale, design, and recruitment outcomes for the Family/Friend Activation to Motivate Self-care (FAMS) 2.0 randomized controlled trial among adults with type 2 diabetes and their support persons

BACKGROUND

Self-care behaviors help reduce hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and prevent or delay type 2 diabetes (T2D) complications. Individualized interventions that support goal setting and self-monitoring improve self-care and HbA1c in the short-term; engaging family and friends may enhance and/or sustain effects. Family/Friend Activation to Motivate Self-care (FAMS) is a mobile phone-delivered intervention (i.e., phone coaching and text message support) based on Family Systems Theory which was successfully piloted among diverse adults with T2D.

METHODS

We made improvements to FAMS and conducted iterative usability testing to finalize FAMS 2.0 before evaluation in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Adult persons with diabetes (PWDs) who enrolled were asked to invite a support person (friend or family member) to participate alongside them. For the RCT, dyads were randomly assigned to FAMS 2.0 or enhanced treatment as usual (control) for the first 9 months of the 15-month trial. Outcomes include PWDs' HbA1c and psychosocial well-being (including diabetes distress) and support persons' own diabetes distress and support burden.

RESULTS

We recruited RCT participants from April 2020 through October 2021 (N = 338 PWDs with T2D; 89% [n = 300] with a support person). PWDs were 52% male, 62% non-Hispanic White, aged 56.9 ± 11.0 years with HbA1c 8.7% ± 1.7% at enrollment; 73% cohabitated with their enrolled support person. Data collection is ongoing through January 2023.

CONCLUSION

Findings will inform the utility of engaging family/friends in self-care behaviors for both PWD and support person outcomes. Using widely available mobile phone technology, FAMS 2.0, if successful, has potential for scalability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04347291 posted April 15, 2020.

Effectiveness-implementation trial comparing a family model of diabetes self-management education and support with a standard model

BACKGROUND

Diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) is an effective approach for improving diabetes self-care behaviors to achieve improved glycemic management and other health outcomes. Engaging family members may improve outcomes, both for the person with diabetes (PWD) and for the family members. However, family models of DSMES have been inconsistently defined and delivered. We operationalize Family-DSMES to be generalizable and replicable, detail our protocol for a comparative effectiveness trial comparing Standard-DSMES with Family-DSMES on outcomes for PWDs and family members, and detail our mixed-methods implementation evaluation plan.

METHODS

We will examine Family-DSMES relative to Standard-DSMES using a Hybrid Type 1 effectiveness-implementation design. Participants are ≥18 years old with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hemoglobin A1c ≥7.0%, recruited from rural and urban primary care clinics that are part of an academic medical center. Each participant invites a family member. Dyads are randomly assigned to Family- or Standard-DSMES, delivered in a small-group format via telehealth. Data are collected at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 6-, 12-, and 18-months post-intervention. Outcomes include PWDs' hemoglobin A1c (primary), other biometric, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes (secondary), and family members' diabetes-related distress, involvement in the PWD's diabetes management, self-efficacy for providing support, and biometric outcomes (exploratory). Our mixed-methods implementation evaluation will include process data collected during the trial and stakeholder interviews guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

CONCLUSION

Results will fill knowledge gaps about which type of DSMES may be most effective and guide Family-DSMES implementation efforts.

REGISTRATION

The trial is pre-registered at clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT04334109).

Dyadic digital health interventions: Their rationale and implementation

While most psychosocial and behavioral digital health interventions have been designed to be consumed by an individual, intervening at the level of a dyad - two interdependent individuals - can more comprehensively address the needs of both individuals and their relationship. The clinical utility of the dyadic digital health intervention approach, as well as the practical implementation of this design, will be demonstrated via three examples: eSCCIP, FAMS, and OurRelationship.

Study protocol for family model diabetes self-management education with Marshallese participants in faith-based organizations

Background

Culturally-appropriate family models of diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) using community health workers (CHWs) have been shown to help address barriers to improving type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) self-management for racial/ethnic minority communities; however, there is limited DSMES research among Marshallese and other Pacific Islanders. Using a community-based participatory research approach, we engaged community stakeholders to co-design a study to implement a culturally adapted family model DSMES (F-DSMES) intervention in faith-based organizations (FBOs) (i.e., churches).

Methods

Using a cluster-randomized controlled trial design, we will assess the effectiveness of the F-DSMES intervention for Marshallese patients with T2DM in Arkansas and Oklahoma. Twenty-four FBOs (with 12 primary participants per FBO) will be randomized to one of two study arms: the intervention arm or the wait-list control arm. Primary participants must have at least one family member willing to attend education sessions and data collection events. The F-DSMES intervention consists of ten h of diabetes education delivered by CHWs over eight to ten weeks. Data will be collected from the intervention arm at pre-intervention (baseline), immediate post-intervention (12 weeks), and three months post-intervention. The wait-list control arm will complete a second pre-intervention data collection before receiving the intervention. The primary study outcome will be glycemic control, as measured by HbA1c. Secondary measures include glucose, weight, body mass index, blood pressure, diabetes self-management behaviors, and diabetes management self-efficacy.

Conclusion

The knowledge gained from this research will inform future DSMES and other health promotion interventions conducted with Marshallese and other Pacific Islander communities.

Deconstructing type 2 diabetes self-management of Australian Pacific Islander women: Using a community participatory research and talanoa approach

Community-based participatory research using culturally appropriate talanoa approaches provided the framework to explore diabetes self-management of Australian Pacific Islander (API) women living with type 2 diabetes in South-East Queensland. Data collection included interviews with key informants (21), in-depth interviews with API women with diabetes (10), talanoa group discussions (7) and monthly steering committee meetings. Using an interpretive-constructionist lens and the interpretations of community members, four cultural constructs in diabetes self-management emerged: self-identity, spirituality, stigma and denial, and structural factors. Self-identity connected the women to their Pacific heritage that framed their collective roles as primary caregivers in the community. This gave the women a strong sense of belonging and helped maintain cultural, family and relational connections which were important for their day-to-day management of diabetes. Although spirituality through religion supported the women to cope with their diabetes a total reliance on God resulted in disengagement with self-care. Shame associated with disclosure also prevented effective self-management. Finally, structural factors such as access to healthcare, poor health literacy and cultural barriers associated with obesogenic environments impeded women from seeking appropriate diabetes care. However, family and community were critical in ensuring women were supported with their diabetes self-management. The findings highlight the importance of engaging families in healthcare planning decisions in the development of culturally responsive models of diabetes support care for API women with type 2 diabetes.

The influence of emotion regulation and family involvement on diabetes distress among adults with type 2 diabetes

Adults with diabetes frequently experience diabetes related distress, which is associated with negative health outcomes. Family members are commonly involved in patients' diabetes self-management. However, family involvement can have helpful and/or harmful effects on patients' diabetes outcomes. Use of interpersonal strategies to regulate negative emotions may play a role in patients' interactions with family members and experience of diabetes distress. This study examined the influences of interpersonal emotion regulation and family and friend involvement on diabetes distress among 373 adults with type 2 diabetes. Two separate three-step sequential linear regression models were used to test the main and interactive effects of harmful and helpful family involvement and interpersonal emotion regulation on diabetes distress. Greater use of interpersonal strategies to regulate negative emotions (p = .006) and greater harmful family involvement (p < .001) were significantly associated with greater diabetes distress. Interpersonal emotion regulation moderated the relationship of helpful (p = .007), but not harmful (p = .171) family involvement on diabetes distress. Specifically, greater helpful family involvement was associated with lower diabetes distress among adults with low (p = .017) but not high (p = .419) use of interpersonal strategies to regulate negative emotions. Helpful family involvement appears to be associated with lower diabetes distress, but only among patients with low levels of interpersonal emotion regulation.

A Telehealth Diabetes Intervention for Rural Populations: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) is a crucial component of diabetes care associated with improved clinical, psychosocial, and behavioral outcomes. The American Association of Diabetes Care and Education Specialists, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Academy of Family Physicians all recommend DSMES yet accessing linguistically and culturally appropriate DSMES is challenging in rural areas. The Diabetes One-Day (D1D) program is an established DSMES group intervention that has not been adapted or evaluated in rural communities.

Objective

The specific aims of this paper are (1) to adapt the existing D1D program for use in rural communities, called rural D1D (R-D1D); and (2) to conduct a patient-level randomized controlled trial to examine the effects of R-D1D and standard patient education, guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework.

Methods

This is a protocol for a pilot type II hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial of a culturally adapted virtual DSMES program for rural populations, R-D1D. We will use Boot Camp Translation, a process grounded in the principles of community-based participatory research, to adapt an existing DSMES program for rural populations, in both English and Spanish. Participants at 2 rural primary care clinics (4 cohorts of N=16 plus care partners, 2 in English and 2 in Spanish) will be randomized to the intervention or standard education control. The evaluation is guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework. Patient-level effectiveness outcomes (hemoglobin A_1c, diabetes distress, and diabetes self-care behaviors) will be assessed using patient-reported outcomes measures and a home A_1c test kit. Practice-level and patient-level acceptability and feasibility will be assessed using surveys and interviews.

Results

This study is supported by the National Institute of Nursing. The study procedures were approved, and the adaptation processes have been completed. Recruitment and enrollment started in July 2021.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this will be the first study to evaluate both effectiveness and implementation outcomes for virtually delivered DSMES, culturally adapted for rural populations. This research has implications for delivery to other rural locations where access to specialty diabetes care is limited.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04600622; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04600622

International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/34255

Care Partner Support Following a Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Intervention

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to understand care partner (CP) perceptions of an interdisciplinary diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) intervention and explore how the interdisciplinary DSMES intervention influences diabetes-specific day-to-day interactions from the CP's perspective.

METHODS

A multiple-methods research design comprised of an online survey including demographics and supportive behaviors and a semistructured interview was conducted. The survey was completed by 16 CPs. Of the 16 CPs, 11 participated in semistructured interviews. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Thematic analysis of semistructured interviews was conducted.

RESULTS

CPs provided support in 3 primary areas: (1) meal planning and preparation (87.5%), (2) participating in physical activity (56.3%), and (3) assisting with technology (43.8%). The main themes described by CPs include (1) the importance of diabetes education for caregivers, including the information they retained from the program, the acquisition of tools to support the person with diabetes, and the desire for more and ongoing education; (2) diabetes education enhances the CP's ability to provide social support and the challenges associated with support; and (3) partners described collaborative diabetes management such as finding middle ground and making changes together.

CONCLUSION

CPs play a significant role in patient diabetes self-management by providing social support and partnership. DSMES programs should seek to include CPs to enhance patient support.

Understanding the Roles of Romantic Partners and Parents in the Management of Type 1 Diabetes in Emerging Adults

During the emerging adulthood of people with type 1 diabetes, long-term romantic partners may be involved in diabetes management in ways that supplant parental involvement. We examined the perspectives of involvement in diabetes management of the parents and romantic partners of 29 emerging adults with type 1 diabetes, using qualitative interviews and an online survey. When the individuals with diabetes were in long-term romantic relationships, their partners were heavily involved in managing diabetes and providing support; however, when the individuals with diabetes were in short-term relationships or not in a relationship, their parents were described as having the biggest positive impact on their diabetes management. Emerging adults described the involvement of their parents and romantic partners in both positive and negative ways. Romantic relationship status is an important but understudied variable in understanding social involvement and its effects on type 1 diabetes management during emerging adulthood.

Partner Involvement in Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management: A Mixed-Methods Investigation

Researchers have recognized the role of social environment in diabetes management, with substantial attention directed toward spouses or romantic partners of people with diabetes. However, the specific ways in which partners are involved have not been articulated. This study, which included 207 couples in which one person was recently diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, used a mixed-methods approach to assess types of partner involvement in diabetes management. First, different types of partner involvement were qualitatively identified from audio-recorded interviews, and links between qualitative findings and demographics were examined. Next, qualitative codes were compared with quantitative measures of partner involvement. Finally, relations of qualitative codes to relationship quality and diabetes outcomes were assessed. Qualitative analyses identified three ways in which partners were involved in diabetes management (support provision, collaboration, and controlling behavior) and two ways in which they were not involved (independent coping and disengagement on the part of the person with diabetes). Participants with diabetes perceived less partner involvement than their partners. Comparisons with quantitative measures revealed that collaboration was distinct from partner support. Reports from participants with diabetes of collaboration, but not partner support, were connected to higher relationship quality and lower A1C, whereas partner reports of collaboration were related to better self-care. Diabetes disengagement was associated with poorer relationship and behavioral outcomes. These findings underscore the varied ways in which partners are and are not involved in diabetes management and suggest that collaboration is more beneficial than social support in terms of relationship quality and diabetes outcomes.

Changes in family involvement occasioned by FAMS mobile health intervention mediate changes in glycemic control over 12 months

Mobile phone-delivered interventions have proven effective in improving glycemic control (HbA1c) in the short term among adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Family systems theory suggests engaging family/friend in adults' diabetes self-care may enhance or sustain improvements. In secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial (N = 506), we examined intervention effects on HbA1c via change in diabetes-specific helpful and harmful family/friend involvement. We compared a text messaging intervention that did not target family/friend involvement (REACH), REACH plus family-focused intervention components targeting helpful and harmful family/friend involvement (REACH + FAMS), and a control condition. Over 6 months, both intervention groups experienced improvement in HbA1c relative to control, but at 12 months neither did. However, REACH + FAMS showed an indirect effect on HbA1c via change in helpful family/friend involvement at both 6 and 12 months while REACH effects were not mediated by family/friend involvement. Consistent with family systems theory, improvements in HbA1c mediated by improved family/friend involvement were sustained.

The Cochlear Implant Use Questionnaire: Assessing Habits and Barriers to Use

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to design a questionnaire to identify daily cochlear implant (CI) use habits and barriers to daily CI use and to administer this questionnaire to adult CI users. We hypothesized that recipients who reported a greater number of barriers to daily CI use would show lower daily CI use.

STUDY DESIGN

Questionnaire.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Hundred adult CI recipients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Questionnaire responses and amount of CI use per day as measured from the CI software.

RESULTS

The cochlear implant use questionnaire (CIUQ) was created and responses were obtained from 100 participants. The CIUQ yielded an average overall score of 23 (range, 3-54) out of 100; responses were variable, and CI recipients experienced different barriers to using their CI processor. The CIUQ overall score was significantly correlated with recipients' daily CI use (h/d) (rs = -0.561, p < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval [-0.694, -0.391]), which provides evidence of construct validity. Responses were immediately useful for identifying and overcoming barriers to consistent CI use with our study participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing evidence suggests that daily CI use is correlated with speech recognition outcomes. To optimize outcomes, clinicians should consider implementing this questionnaire to identify and overcome barriers to consistent, full-time CI processor use.

The effect of family-based intervention for adults with diabetes on HbA1c and other health-related outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of family-based intervention for adults with diabetes on glycosylated haemoglobin and other health-related outcomes.

BACKGROUND

The impact of family-based intervention on adults with diabetes has been evaluated in various studies, but there is uncertainty about their effect on health-related outcomes for adults with diabetes.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

METHODS

A review was performed and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Six relevant databases were searched from inception to 5 March 2021. Heterogeneity between studies was quantified by using Higgins' I² test. Sensibility and subgroup analyses were used to explore potential heterogeneity.

RESULTS

The review included 23 studies (3,114 participants). Family-based intervention had a significant effect on improving glycosylated haemoglobin levels, body mass index, blood pressure, fasting glucose, diabetes self-care, diabetes self-efficacy, diabetes distress and positive family support. Non-significant results were obtained for blood lipid, body weight, depression and negative family support. In particular, subgroup analyses indicated that family-based intervention in Asian regions was more effective in improving glycosylated haemoglobin levels than in other areas.

CONCLUSION

Family-based intervention may improve diabetes control, diabetes self-care, psychological well-being and positive family support in adults with diabetes and is especially effective in Asian regions. Given the limitations in current studies, further studies are recommended to combine family theory with family-based intervention, and to examine the effectiveness of such intervention for family members.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This review and meta-analysis provides evidence that family-based intervention can improve positive family support, which has a good effect on diabetes control and psychological well-being in adults with diabetes, and it is especially effective in Asian regions. Findings suggested that unreinforced participation by family members and integrating flexible strategies into family-based intervention may be equally effective.

Family interventions for adults living with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A qualitative meta-synthesis

OBJECTIVE

Review and synthesize qualitative research on family interventions for adults living with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

A qualitative metasynthesis was conducted. Analysis used imported concepts from realist evaluation - context, mechanisms, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Six studies met inclusion criteria in this qualitative systematic review. Powerful mechanisms were identified that occur outside the family intervention in the context of ethnic, racialized, and geographically defined groups. Many similarities were noted across contexts, such as low income. Mechanisms of interventions focused primarily on family member education. Outcomes were focused more on improving self-care behaviors, rather than family-oriented outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Systemic issues affecting social determinants of health set the context for family interventions for type 2 diabetes. When designing these interventions, intersectionality, scarcity, and family functioning may need to be considered.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Emphasis on education of family members may not be effective in improving diabetes outcomes, as many powerful mechanisms exist outside of these interventions.

Development of a Typology of Diabetes-Specific Family Functioning Among Adults With Type 2

BACKGROUND

Family members' responses to adults' diabetes and efforts to manage it vary widely. Multiple aspects of diabetes-specific family functioning have been identified as important for self-management and psychosocial well-being in theoretical (i.e., theories of social support and collaborative coping) and observational literature.

PURPOSE

Develop a typological framework of diabetes-specific family functioning and examine cross-sectional associations between type and diabetes outcomes.

METHODS

We used electronic health record (EHR) data to identify a cohort of 5,545 adults receiving outpatient care for type 2 diabetes and invited them to complete a survey assessing 10 dimensions of diabetes-specific family functioning. We used k-means cluster analysis to identify types. After type assignment, we used EHR data for the full cohort to generate sampling weights to correct for imbalance between participants and non-participants. We used weighted data to examine unadjusted associations between participant characteristics and type, and in regression models to examine associations between type and diabetes outcomes. Regression models were adjusted for sociodemographics, diabetes duration, and insulin status.

RESULTS

We identified and named four types: Collaborative and Helpful (33.8%), Satisfied with Low Involvement (22.2%), Want More Involvement (29.6%), and Critically Involved (14.5%; reflecting the highest levels of criticism and harmful involvement). Across these types, hemoglobin A1c, diabetes distress, depressive symptoms, diabetes medication adherence, and diabetes self-efficacy worsened. After covariate adjustment, type remained independently associated with each diabetes outcome (all p's < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The typology extends theories of family support in diabetes and applications of the typology may lead to breakthroughs in intervention design, tailoring, and evaluation.

Spousal Influence on Diabetes Self-care: Moderating Effects of Distress and Relationship Quality on Glycemic Control

BACKGROUND

Spouses often attempt to influence patients' diabetes self-care. Spousal influence has been linked to beneficial health outcomes in some studies, but to negative outcomes in others.

PURPOSE

We aimed to clarify the conditions under which spousal influence impedes glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Spousal influence was hypothesized to associate with poorer glycemic control among patients with high diabetes distress and low relationship quality.

METHODS

Patients with type 2 diabetes and their spouses (N = 63 couples) completed self-report measures before patients initiated a 7-day period of continuous glucose monitoring. Mean glucose level and coefficient of variation (CV) were regressed on spousal influence, diabetes distress, relationship quality, and their two- and three-way interactions.

RESULTS

The three-way interaction significantly predicted glucose variability, but not mean level. Results revealed a cross-over interaction between spousal influence and diabetes distress at high (but not low) levels of relationship quality, such that spousal influence was associated with less variability among patients with low distress, but more among those with high distress. Among patients with high distress and low relationship quality, a 1 SD increase in spousal influence predicted a difference roughly equivalent to the difference between the sample mean CV and a CV in the unstable glycemia range.

CONCLUSIONS

This was the first study to examine moderators of the link between spousal influence and glycemic control in diabetes. A large effect was found for glucose variability, but not mean levels. These novel results highlight the importance of intimate relationships in diabetes management.

Helping persons with multiple chronic conditions overcome barriers to self-management

ABSTRACT

The prevalence of multiple chronic conditions is growing dramatically, which complicates day-to-day self-management for patients. This article describes the features of multiple chronic conditions, an updated chronic care model, barriers to self-management, and strategies NPs can use to reduce or eliminate barriers to self-management in adults with multiple chronic conditions.

Text messaging to engage friends/family in diabetes self-management support: acceptability and potential to address disparities

OBJECTIVE

Explore acceptability of engaging family/friends in patients' type 2 diabetes (T2D) self-management using text messaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants (N = 123) recruited from primary care clinics for a larger trial evaluating mobile phone support for T2D completed self-report measures and a hemoglobin A1c test and then had the option to invite an adult support person to receive text messages. We examined characteristics and reasons of participants who did/did not invite a support person, responses to the invitation, and feedback from patients and support persons.

RESULTS

Participants were 55.9 ± 10.1 years old, 55% female, 53% minority, and 54% disadvantaged (low income, less than high school degree/GED, uninsured, and/or homeless). Participants who invited a support person (48%) were slightly younger, more likely to be partnered, and reported more depressive symptoms and more emergency department visits in the year prior to study enrollment as compared to participants who did not (all p <.05). Participants' reasons for inviting a support person included needing help and seeing benefits of engaging others, while reasons for not inviting a support person included concerns about being a "burden" and support person's ability or desire to text. Support persons reported the texts increased awareness, created dialogue, and improved their own health behaviors.

DISCUSSION

Patients inviting a support person had higher need and thus may stand to benefit most. Most support persons were open to engagement via text messages.

CONCLUSION

Across race and socioeconomic status, text messaging may engage support persons to increase health-related support-particularly for patients with higher levels of need.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02409329.

Mixed-Methods Randomized Evaluation of FAMS: A Mobile Phone-Delivered Intervention to Improve Family/Friend Involvement in Adults' Type 2 Diabetes Self-Care

BACKGROUND

Family and friends have both helpful and harmful effects on adults' diabetes self-management. Family-focused Add-on to Motivate Self-care (FAMS) is a mobile phone-delivered intervention designed to improve family/friend involvement, self-efficacy, and self-care via monthly phone coaching, texts tailored to goals, and the option to invite a support person to receive texts.

PURPOSE

We sought to evaluate how FAMS was received by a diverse group of adults with Type 2 diabetes and if FAMS improved diabetes-specific family/friend involvement (increased helpful and reduced harmful), diabetes self-efficacy, and self-care (diet and physical activity). We also assessed if improvements in family/friend involvement mediated improvements in self-efficacy and self-care.

METHODS

Participants were prospectively assigned to enhanced treatment as usual (control), an individualized text messaging intervention alone, or the individualized text messaging intervention plus FAMS for 6 months. Participants completed surveys at baseline, 3 and 6 months, and postintervention interviews. Between-group and multiple mediator analyses followed intention-to-treat principles.

RESULTS

Retention, engagement, and fidelity were high. FAMS was well received and helped participants realize the value of involving family/friends in their care. Relative to control, FAMS participants had improved family/friend involvement, self-efficacy, and diet (but not physical activity) at 3 and 6 months (all ps < .05). Improvements in family/friend involvement mediated effects on self-efficacy and diet for FAMS participants but not for the individualized intervention group.

CONCLUSIONS

The promise of effectively engaging patients' family and friends lies in sustained long-term behavior change. This work represents a first step toward this goal by demonstrating how content targeting helpful and harmful family/friend involvement can drive short-term effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02481596.