Content Analysis of 4 Fear of Falling Rating Scales by Linking to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

Content comparison of utility and effectiveness instruments to the Prosthetic Interventions Core Outcome Set: a step to inform the benefits measured in lower-limb prosthetic health economic evaluations

PURPOSE

Health Economic Evaluations (HEEs) calculate a cost-benefit ratio using utility and effectiveness instruments. It is unknown whether existing instruments measure the items of the Prosthetic Interventions Core Outcome Set (PI-COS) that represent the benefits most important to lower-limb prosthesis users and funders. Comparing the content of existing instruments against the PI-COS will support instrument selection for future prosthetic HEEs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Utility and effectiveness instruments used to evaluate prosthetic interventions were identified and their International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework (ICF) linking results were extracted. Content of each instrument was compared to the PI-COS through three metrics: content density, content diversity and bandwidth.

RESULTS

Of the 130 utility and effectiveness instruments, 24 had previously been linked to the ICF. The instrument with the greatest bandwidth (i.e., broadest content coverage of the PI-COS) was the SF-36 given it linked to 6 of the 14 items of the PI-COS. Combining PROMIS subscales and short-forms allow measurement of a greater range of the PI-COS items.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no perfect fit instrument providing coverage of the PI-COS using the metrics of content density, content diversity and bandwidth. The PROMIS instrument may provide increase coverage of the PI-COS in future HEEs.

Psychometric properties of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Falls Behavioral Scale in people with Parkinson's disease

PURPOSE

To verify the psychometric properties of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Falls Behavioral (FaB-Brazil) Scale in Parkinson's disease (PD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Participants (n = 96) were assessed by disease-specific, self-report and functional mobility measures. Internal consistency of the FaB-Brazil scale was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and inter-rater and test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). The standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), ceiling and floor effects, and convergent and discriminative validity were evaluated.

RESULTS

Internal consistency was moderate (α = 0.77). Excellent inter-rater (ICC = 0.90; p < 0.001) and test-retest (ICC = 0.91; p < 0.001) reliability were found. The SEM was 0.20 and MDC was 0.38. Ceiling and floor effects were not found. Convergent validity was established by the positive correlations between the FaB-Brazil scale and age, modified Hoehn and Yahr, PD duration, Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living, Timed Up & Go and 8-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, and negative correlations between the FaB-Brazil scale and community mobility, Schwab & England, and Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale. Females showed greater protective behaviors than males; recurrent fallers showed greater protective behaviors than non-recurrent fallers (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The FaB-Brazil scale is reliable and valid for assessing people with PD.

Validating a fear-of-falling-related activity avoidance scale in lower limb prosthesis users

BACKGROUND

Limited available data suggest that fear of falling (FoF) may be common among lower limb prosthesis users (LLPUs) and associated with negative rehabilitation outcomes. The impact of FoF on outcomes may be exacerbated when fear leads to self-imposed declines in activity. There is a need to identify the validity of fear-of-falling-related activity avoidance scales in LLPUs.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the convergent, discriminant, and known-group construct validity of the modified Survey of Activities and FoF in the Elderly (mSAFE) for LLPUs. Secondarily, we sought to determine if the mSAFE scale could be reduced without losing information regarding construct validity.

DESIGN

Online survey.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-nine persons with unilateral or bilateral amputation at the transtibial or transfemoral level, with ≥6 months experience using a definitive prosthesis for activities other than transfers.

INTERVENTION

Participants completed an online survey that consisted of the mSAFE and questions to assess FoF (yes/no), fear-of-falling-related activity avoidance (yes/no), as well as previously validated scales capturing related and unrelated constructs. T-tests were used to compare mSAFE score between yes/no respondents for known-group construct validity. Correlations between mSAFE and previously validated surveys assessed convergent and discriminant validity. Analyses were repeated on a reduced number of mSAFE items following a redundancy analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Not applicable.

RESULTS

Significant correlation coefficients of |0.440-0.825| were found for convergent validity with evidence of known-group construct validity (p < .021 for all comparisons). There was evidence for discriminant validity, with non-significant associations for two-of-three correlations. Results from validity analyses for a shortened 6-item mSAFE were similar to that for the full scale.

CONCLUSION

This study provided initial evidence regarding validity of the mSAFE as a measure to assess fear-of-falling-related activity avoidance in LLPUs. A 6-item scale may be appropriate if the full scale would be taxing or time-consuming.

Ataxia Rating Scales: Content Analysis by Linking to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

Ataxia management is mainly based on rehabilitation, symptomatic management, and functional improvement. Therefore, it is important to comprehensively assess ataxic symptoms and their impact on function. Recently, the movement disorders society recommended four generic ataxia rating scales: scale for assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA), international cooperative ataxia rating scales, Friedreich's ataxia rating scale (FARS), and unified multiple system atrophy rating scale (UMSARS). The aim of the study was to analyze and compare the content of the recommended ataxia rating scales by linking them to the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). A total of 125 meaningful concepts from 93 items of the four included scales were linked to 57 different ICF categories. The ICF categories were distributed in body structure (n = 8), body function (n = 26), activity and participation (n = 20), and environmental factors (n = 3) components. UMSARS and FARS were the only ones that have addressed the body structure or environmental factors component. The content analysis of ataxia rating scales would help clinicians and researchers select the most appropriate scale and understand ataxic symptoms and their impact on function. It seems that SARA is the optimal scale for rapid assessment of ataxia or in busy clinical settings. UMSARS or FARS are more appropriate for the investigating the impact of ataxia on overall health, and monitoring ataxia progression and disability.

Development and appropriateness of a scoring method for International Classification of Functioning, Disabilities, and Health assessment in older patients with heart failure: a Delphi survey of expert panel in Japan

OBJECTIVE

The number of older patients with heart failure (HF) is increasing in Japan and has become a social problem. There is an urgent need to develop a comprehensive assessment methodology based on the common language of healthcare; the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The purpose of this study was to develop and confirm the appropriateness of a scoring methodology for 43 ICF categories in older people with HF.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey. We applied the RAND/University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Appropriateness Method with a modified Delphi method.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We included a panel of 26 multidisciplinary experts on HF care consisting of home physicians, cardiovascular physicians, care managers, nurses, physical therapists, a pharmacist, occupational therapist, nutritionist and a social worker.

MEASURES

We conducted a literature review of ICF linking rules and developed a questionnaire on scoring methods linked to ICF categories in older people with HF. In the Delphi rounds, we sent the expert panel a questionnaire consisting of three questions for each of the 43 ICF categories. The expert panel responded to the questionnaire items on a 1 (very inappropriate) - 9 (very appropriate) Likert scale and repeated rounds until a consensus of 'Appropriate' and 'Agreement' was reached on all items.

RESULTS

A total of 21 panel members responded to all the Delphi rounds. In the first Delphi round, six question items in four ICF categories did not reach a consensus of 'Agreement', but the result of our modifications based on panel members' suggestions reached to a consensus of 'Appropriate' and 'Agreement' on all questions in the second Delphi round.

CONCLUSION

The ICF-based scoring method for older people with HF developed in this study was found to be appropriate. Future work is needed to clarify whether comprehensive assessment and information sharing based on ICF contributes to preventing readmissions.

Content comparison of four commonly used amputee mobility assessment scales in the literature by linking to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health

BACKGROUND

Despite the fact that there are a number of studies revealing the linkage of scales with the World Health Organization's international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF), there is a need for comprehensive studies examining the relationship between amputee mobility scales and ICF.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the content of four amputee mobility scales at the item level using the ICF.

METHODS

The Locomotor Capacity Index, Rivermead Mobility Index, Amputee Mobility Predictor, and Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility were analyzed by two health professionals for content comparison according to the ICF categories. Kappa statistic was used to calculate the degree of agreement between the two investigators.

RESULTS

A total of 62 items in the scales were analyzed and linked with ICF codes. The scale questions were linked with 27 different ICF codes as follows: 1 (3.7%) "body function", 23 (85.1%) "activity and participation", 2 (7.5%) "environmental factors," and 1 (3.7%) "not definable. The estimated kappa values ranged from 0.83 to 0.90 for ICF codes.

CONCLUSION

As a result of the study, the ICF is a highly effective resource that can be used in the analysis of amputee mobility scales. Because the scale items are more concentrated on the mobility chapter, it was seen that the scales generally served their purposes. In the light of the findings obtained, it is thought that the diversity of the scales in the concept distribution will guide clinicians and researchers in choosing scales according to their target groups.

Development of a questionnaire to assess fear of falling in children with neuromuscular diseases

Fear of falling (FOF) indicates loss of confidence in the ability to perform daily living activities without falling. Although specific questionnaires do exist to assess FOF in different patient populations, any of them targets the pediatric patients with neuromuscular diseases which falling is a frequent symptom. This study aims to present the development of a self-report FOF questionnaire for children with neuromuscular diseases, pilot application of the questionnaire, and its preliminary psychometric properties. An International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-based 'Pediatric Fear of Falling Questionnaire' for neuromuscular diseases (Ped-FOF) was created by the study team following the steps of developing an instrument. The questionnaire included 34 items which were organized based on the 'Activities and Participation' component of ICF-children and youth. Thirty children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) were recruited to obtain preliminary reliability and validity results of the questionnaire. The mean Ped-FOF score of study population was 15.30 ± 7.03. According to the preliminary results, intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.715 [confidence interval (CI) 95%], and moderate correlations between Ped-FOF and functional performance and quality of life were determined (P < 0.05). Ped-FOF promises a practical assessment of FOF in pediatrics with neuromuscular diseases with understandable items that allow self-report of children. Ped-FOF also allows clinicians and therapists to assess FOF efficiently in limited clinical time. Its preliminary reliability and validity results are also sufficient to be used in DMD that falling is a frequent condition, which indicates that the use of questionnaire is promising in many other pediatric neuromuscular disorders.

Mobility in Older Community-Dwelling Persons: A Narrative Review

Due to the demographic changes and the increasing awareness of the role of physical function, mobility in older age is becoming an important topic. Mobility limitations have been reported as increasingly prevalent in older persons affecting about 35% of persons aged 70 and the majority of persons over 85 years. Mobility limitations have been associated with increased fall risk, hospitalization, a decreased quality of life, and even mortality. As concepts of mobility are multifactorial and complex, in this narrative review, definitions, physical factors, and their age-related changes associated with mobility will be presented. Also, areas of cognitive decline and their impact on mobility, as well as neuromuscular factors related to mobility will be addressed. Another section will relate psychological factors such as Fall-related psychological concerns and sedentary behavior to mobility. Assessment of mobility as well as effective exercise interventions are only shortly addressed. In the last part, gaps and future work on mobility in older persons are discussed.

Instrumentos da prática clínica com versão em português e a abrangência de seus conteúdos usando a CIF como referência: uma revisão sistemática

RESUMO A prática clínica tem sido subsidiada por instrumentos que permitem acessar e registrar informações de funcionalidade e saúde dos indivíduos. Uma forma de conhecer qual conteúdo da Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde (CIF) os instrumentos contemplam é usá-la como referência para auxiliar o profissional na escolha do mais adequado para acessar informações biopsicossociais. O objetivo foi identificar instrumentos da prática clínica em saúde que tiveram seu conteúdo ligado com a CIF e a existência de versão na língua portuguesa deles. Para tanto foi realizada uma revisão sistemática nas bases de dados SciELO Brasil, Lilacs e PubMed com os descritores “CIF”, “questionário” e “regra de ligação” em português e inglês. Três pesquisadores independentes realizaram a seleção, e o nível de concordância foi obtido pelo coeficiente Kappa. Os critérios de elegibilidade foram: estudos primários de ligação de conteúdo de questionários, escalas, índices e checklists com a CIF publicados após 2001 em língua portuguesa ou inglesa. Foram incluídos 61 artigos, sendo 19 de origem brasileira. Dos 250 instrumentos ligados à CIF, 158 (63,2%) apresentaram versão em português sendo que dos 37 que mais se repetiram nos estudos, dois não apresentam essa versão. O coeficiente Kappa mostrou concordância entre moderada e boa (p<0,001). Este estudo apresentou um panorama da ligação de conteúdo de instrumentos da prática clínica à CIF identificando quais têm versão em língua portuguesa, o que contribuirá para o potencial fortalecimento da abordagem biopsicossocial dos profissionais de saúde.

Improving clarity and transparency in cognitive assessment: conversion of the Cambridge Cognition Examination to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

BACKGROUND

A variety of screening, diagnostic and assessment tools have been developed for use in dementia research and care. However, there is no consensus which tool to use and moreover there is no transparency in communication between countries and disciplines.

OBJECTIVE

To contribute to a more uniform assessment in dementia, the Cambridge Cognition Examination (CAMCOG) was converted to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

METHODS

In a qualitative design, CAMCOG-items and -scoring-system were converted to the ICF addressing 3 ICF domains: global and specific mental functions and general tasks and demands. Construct and discriminative validity was checked in a sample of 25 cognitively healthy elderly (CHE), 25 persons with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and 25 patients with mild Alzheimer's Disease (mAD).

RESULTS

A significant correlation was observed between CAMCOG/ICF-CAMCOG (r = - 0.987; p < 0.01). The areas under the curve (AUC) of the ICF-CAMCOG were between 0.819 and 0.978; comparable with the original CAMCOG. Only a significant difference between the AUC of the CHE versus MCI (0.911 vs. 0.819; p = 0.0094) was observed in favour of CAMCOG.

CONCLUSION

The clinical use of the ICF-CAMCOG looks promising offering a more detailed and interpretable scoring and may allow for better planning of resources to aid patients with dementia.

The effects of objectively measured physical activity and fitness on fear of falling among Korean older women

We examined the effects of objectively measured physical activity (PA) and physical fitness (PF) on fear of falling (FOF) among older adults. The subjects were 94 Korean females aged 65–79. PA was measured with accelerometers, PF with the senior fitness test and FOF with the Korean Survey of Activities and Fear of Falling in the Elderly. With the subjects’ age, number of chronic conditions, and history of falls included as correction factors, a multiple regression analysis showed that PA (P=0.016) and agility/dynamic balance measured by the 8-foot up-and-go test (UNG) (P=0.001) significantly influenced FOF. The FOF of the slowest UNG quartile was significantly higher than those of other groups (P=0.002). This study concludes that among female older adults agility/dynamic balance as measured by UNG is the main factor impacting FOF and individuals with markedly low UNG tend to have high FOF.

Disability is an Independent Predictor of Falls and Recurrent Falls in People with Parkinson's Disease Without a History of Falls: A One-Year Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Predictors of falls in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) who have not previously fallen are yet to be identified.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to identify predictors of all falls and recurrent falls in people with PD who had not fallen in the previous year and to explore the timing of falls in a 12-month follow-up period.

METHODS

Participants with PD (n = 130) were assessed by disease-specific, self-report and balance measures. Falls were recorded prospectively for 12 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to investigate time to falling.

RESULTS

Forty participants (31%) had ≥1 fall during follow-up and 21 (16%) had ≥2 falls. Disability, reduced balance confidence and greater concern about falling were associated with ≥1 fall in univariate analyses. Additionally, PD duration and severity, freezing of gait and impaired balance were associated with ≥2 falls (p <  0.05). Disability (Schwab and England scale, Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.56 per 10 points increase; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-0.80; p = 0.002) was associated with ≥1 fall in the final multivariate model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.65; 95% CI 0.55-0.76; p = 0.005). Disability (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale activities of daily living, OR = 1.20; 95% CI 1.07-1.34; p = 0.001) and levodopa equivalent dose (OR = 1.11 per 100 mg increase; 95% CI 0.95-1.30; p = 0.19) were associated with ≥2 falls in the final multivariate model (AUC = 0.72; 95% CI 0.60-0.84; p = 0.001). Recurrent fallers experienced their first fall earlier than single fallers (p <  0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Self-reported disability was the strongest single predictor of all falls and recurrent falls.

Comparison of Self-report and Performance-Based Balance Measures for Predicting Recurrent Falls in People With Parkinson Disease: Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Balance confidence and fear of falling are factors associated with recurrent falls in people with Parkinson disease (PD). However, the accuracy for predicting falls on the basis of self-report measures has not been widely investigated.

OBJECTIVE

The study objectives were: (1) to compare the accuracy of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC) and the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) with that of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), Functional Reach Test (FRT), and Timed "Up & Go" Test (TUG) for predicting recurrent falls in people with PD and (2) to explore the ability of combinations of up to 3 tests to predict recurrent falls.

DESIGN

This was a prospective cohort study involving 225 people with PD.

METHODS

Participants were assessed with the ABC, FES-I, BBS, FRT, TUG, and DGI. Participants who reported 2 or more falls in the 12-month follow-up period were classified as recurrent fallers. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were determined, and the Akaike information criterion was used to select the best predictive model.

RESULTS

Eighty-four participants (37.3%) were classified as recurrent fallers. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the ABC, FES-I, TUG, FRT, DGI, and BBS were 0.73, 0.74, 0.72, 0.74, 0.76, and 0.79, respectively. Two-test models provided additional discriminating ability compared with individual measures and had Akaike information criterion values similar to those of 3-test models, particularly the combination of the BBS with the FES-I.

LIMITATIONS

The lack of an external validation sample was a limitation of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The ABC and FES-I demonstrated moderate accuracy in predicting recurrent falls and a predictive ability similar to that of performance-based balance measures, especially the FRT and the TUG. Two-test models showed performance similar to that of 3-test models, suggesting that a combination of 2 measures may improve the ability to predict recurrent falls in people with PD. Specifically, the combination of the BBS with the FES-I may be considered.

Concerns About Falling in Parkinson's Disease: Associations with Disabilities and Personal and Environmental Factors

BACKGROUND

Fear of falling can be conceptualized in different ways, e.g., as concerns about falling or low fall-related self-efficacy. It is common in people with Parkinson's disease (PD), and there is growing knowledge about its contributing factors. However, previous multivariate studies have mainly focused on fear of falling in relation to PD-related disabilities, and less is known about the associations between fear of falling and personal and environmental factors.

OBJECTIVE

To identify explanatory factors of concerns about falling in people with PD by focusing on personal and environmental factors as well as PD-related disabilities.

METHODS

Data were collected from 241 persons with PD (39% women, median age 70 years, PD duration 8 years). Concerns about falling (assessed with the Falls Efficacy Scale-International, FES-I; categorized into low, moderate, or high concerns) were used as the dependent variable in a multivariate ordinal regression analysis. Personal factors, environmental factors and PD-related disabilities constituted independent variables.

RESULTS

Low, moderate and high concerns about falling were reported by 29% , 24% and 47% of the participants, respectively. Walking difficulties, orthostatism, motor symptoms, age, and fatigue (presented in order of importance) were significant (p <  0.05) explanatory factors of concerns about falling.

CONCLUSIONS

Several factors significantly explained concerns about falling in people with PD. Walking difficulties was by far the strongest explanatory factor. This suggests that minimizing walking difficulties should be a primary target when aiming at reducing concerns about falling in people with PD.

Psychometric properties of four fear of falling rating scales in people with Parkinson's disease

Background

Fear of falling (FOF) is commonly experienced in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD). It is a predictor of recurrent falls, a barrier to physical exercise, and negatively associated with health-related quality of life. A variety of rating scales exist that assess different aspects of FOF but comprehensive head-to-head comparisons of their psychometric properties in people with PD are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of four FOF rating scales in people with PD. More specifically, we investigated and compared the scales’ data completeness, scaling assumptions, targeting, and reliability.

Methods

The FOF rating scales were: the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), the Swedish FES (FES(S)), the Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale (ABC), and the modified Survey of Activities and Fear of Falling in the Elderly (mSAFFE). A postal survey was administered to 174 persons with PD. Responders received a second survey after two weeks.

Results

The mean (SD) age and PD duration of the 102 responders were 73 (8) and 7 (6) years, respectively. ABC had worse data completeness than the other scales (6.9 vs. 0.9–1.3% missing data). All scales had corrected item-total correlations exceeding 0.4 and showed acceptable reliabilities (Cronbach’s alpha and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) >0.80) but only FES-I had ICC >0.90. The standard error of measurements ranged from 7% (FES-I) to 12% (FES(S)), and the smallest detectable differences ranged from 20% (FES-I) to 33% (FES(S)) of the total score ranges. ABC and FES(S) had substantially more outliers than mSAFFE and FES-I (10 and 15 vs. 3 and 4, respectively) when the two test occasions were compared.

Conclusions

When assessing FOF in people with PD, the findings in the present study favoured the choice of FES-I or mSAFFE. However, FES-I was the only scale with ICC >0.90 which has been suggested as a minimum when using a scale for individual comparisons.