Benefits of combining aripiprazole to clozapine: three case reports

The association of lower urinary tract symptoms with schizophrenia and its treatments: A narrative review

BACKGROUND

A higher incidence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in people with schizophrenia compared to the general population is often suggested. However, it is not clear whether this is a genuine association, and whether it is a direct result of schizophrenia itself, or a side-effect of certain antipsychotics.

METHODS

We undertook a narrative review evaluating how the published literature reports the relationship between LUTS and schizophrenia and its treatments. We searched Embase, Ovid Emcare, and Ovid MEDLINE(R) ALL to August 2022, limited to the English language. We selected the following search terms: schizophrenia, schizophrenic, LUTS, overactive bladder, urinary urgency, urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, enuresis, nocturnal enuresis, and voiding dysregulation. We identified seven domains for assessment in advance of commencing the review. These were the categorization, description, and treatment status of schizophrenia; evaluation of LUTS; categorization of LUTS confounders; recapturing of the disease states of both schizophrenia and LUTS after therapies; assessment of the association between LUTS and schizophrenia and/or antipsychotics.

RESULTS

The association between LUTS and schizophrenia was poorly described. The evidence was low quality and focused predominantly on urinary incontinence as an antipsychotic side effect, neglecting other LUTS. The status of schizophrenia was often incompletely characterized, and no papers made use of a bladder diary or LUTS-specific questionnaires to assess symptoms. No papers collected information about LUTS in patients not on antipsychotics, nor did any thoroughly evaluate the influence of confounding variables. Despite the tendency of symptoms and severity of both conditions to fluctuate over time, no studies fully assessed the status of both schizophrenia and LUTS at baseline, therapy initiation, and follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

It is not possible to state whether there is an association between LUTS and schizophrenia or its treatments. This review highlights the need to improve research and clinical management of the urinary tract in schizophrenia, with meticulously designed longitudinal studies.

Clozapine augmentation with cariprazine for negative symptoms: a case series and literature review

Only about 50% of patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia respond to clozapine, and many more patients continue to experience ongoing and prominent negative symptoms. These negative symptoms, for which there are limited pharmacological options, may represent the greatest barrier to functional recovery. Cariprazine is a novel antipsychotic drug that is a partial agonist at dopamine D₂ and D₃ receptors with preferential binding to the D₃ receptor, antagonism of 5HT_2B receptors, and partial agonism at 5HT_1A receptors. Cariprazine is currently licenced for the treatment of schizophrenia in Europe and the United States and has also been approved for bipolar disorder in the United States. There is a limited body of evidence to suggest clinical effectiveness as an augmentation strategy for negative symptoms in those treated with clozapine. In this case series, we present five cases of successful treatment of negative symptoms by clozapine combined with cariprazine in treatment-resistant psychosis.

Third-generation antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia and non-responsivity or intolerance to clozapine regimen: What is the evidence?

Clozapine is considered « the golden standard » for the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but many patients do not present adequate responsivity even to this antipsychotic. If we add the need to strictly monitor the hematologic and cardiometabolic adverse events during each clozapine trial and the difficulty of preserving therapeutic adherence in patients with low insight, residual negative/positive symptoms, or economic challenges, then the necessity of exploring alternative interventions for these patients becomes obvious. Also, in case of intolerance to clozapine or where clozapine did not induce remission, clinicians have to find new ways to help their patients. Switching to other antipsychotics or using these agents as add-ons to clozapine are the main interventions explored in this review, for patients with schizophrenia resistant to clozapine (ultra-resistant schizophrenia, URS). When clozapine intolerance is detected, conversion to another antipsychotic with distinct pharmacologic properties or formulation (e.g., long-acting intramuscular injectable agents, LAI) may be a useful option. Third-generation antipsychotics (TGA) have been selected for their distinct pharmacodynamically profile, which allows, at a theoretical level, their use in combination with clozapine. This narrative review is based on searching four electronic databases, that retrieved 19 primary and secondary reports on aripiprazole (seven case reports or case series presenting 24 patients; nine clinical trials, and three systematic reviews/meta-analyses), two primary reports on brexpiprazole (case report and case series, N = 3 patients), and six primary reports on cariprazine (case reports and case series, N = 14 patients). Based on the information collected from these reports, which included oral and LAI formulations, the TGA most supported by evidence for the augmentation of clozapine is aripiprazole (high-and medium-quality data), followed by cariprazine (low-quality data). Brexpiprazole has not yet been systematically explored for this indication, and in the case of lumateperone, no report could be found. The efficacy of aripiprazole and cariprazine was supported in the domains of positive, negative, and general symptoms, and aripiprazole may positively impact the metabolic profile in patients with URS. Also, adding TGA may lead to a decrease in the dose of clozapine concomitantly administered. More data derived from good quality research are needed in order to confirm the circumstances of TGAs recommendation in patients with URS, either as monotherapy, or added to clozapine.

The Effect of Clozapine on Self-reported Duration of Sleep and Its Interaction With 23 Other Medications: A 5-Year Naturalistic Study

BACKGROUND

Sedation is a common and incapacitating clozapine adverse effect, but the factors associated with sedation and its pharmacological management remain poorly studied.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study based on deidentified electronic clinical records of clozapine-treated patients from the secondary mental health care provider for Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, United Kingdom. We first evaluated cross-sectionally the influence of clozapine dose, clozapine, and norclozapine plasma levels on self-reported hours slept, as a proxy for sedation, using bivariate correlation and then the longitudinal effect of changes in clozapine dose and other 23 medications using linear mixed effect models. We followed 241 clozapine-treated patients for 56 months on average, with 2237 face-to-face assessments in total.

RESULTS

Patients slept for a mean of 9.35 h/d, with 46% reporting 10 h/d or more. Cross-sectionally, sleep duration did not correlate with clozapine dose (r = 0.14, P = 0.106), but with clozapine plasma levels (r = 0.38, P < 0.0001) and norclozapine plasma levels (r = 0.25, P = 0.005). Longitudinally, the final mixed-effects model revealed 4 pharmacological variables that had a significant impact on hours slept: clozapine, risperidone augmentation, and atenolol were associated with increased sleep, whereas aripiprazole augmentation was associated with decreased sleep. We found that 20 other psychotropic medications measured were not associated with changes in sleep when added to clozapine. Excess sleep is a clozapine level-dependent adverse effect.

CONCLUSIONS

The impact of different augmentation strategies might help clinicians decide on the most adequate strategy, albeit further studies should confirm our results.

Augmentation of Antipsychotic Medications with Low-Dose Clozapine in Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia-Case Reports and Discussion

Treatment resistance in schizophrenia is often encountered in clinical practice, with clozapine usually recommended as the appropriate therapy. However, where clozapine proves ineffective or cannot be tolerated due to side effects, treatment options are limited. In patients within forensic mental health services, residual symptomatology often presents a barrier to discharge and can have lasting effects on prospects for rehabilitation as well as risk to self and others. This paper presents a review of the relevant literature and three cases of a novel approach, utilising clozapine in doses usually considered subtherapeutic, in combination with the primary antipsychotic treatment. In all three patients, it improved clinical efficacy as well as tolerability, resulting in improvement that allowed discharge from the forensic hospital.

Relationship between clozapine dose and severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms

Evidence supports the fact that clozapine can induce stressful obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS). Although clozapine's robust inhibition of serotonergic neurotransmission is believed to be a key mechanism underlying clozapine-induced OCS, the exact mechanism(s) are not fully understood. Intuitively, it is reasonable to believe that the dose of clozapine is likely related to emergent OCS severity. However, there is conflicting evidence where both positive and inverse relationships have been demonstrated between clozapine dose and emergent OCS severity. Upon examination of clozapine's receptor profile, in particular its affinity for 5-HT_2A and D₂ receptors, we hypothesize that there is a biphasic relationship between clozapine dose and emergent OCS severity. We present here a preliminary analysis of published cases in the literature to support our hypothesis.

Clozapine-Associated Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms and Their Management: A Systematic Review and Analysis of 107 Reported Cases

BACKGROUND

It is not uncommon to find obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) in patients treated with clozapine. These symptoms are attributed to anti-serotonergic effects of clozapine. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of reported cases of clozapine-associated OCS to better understand the nature and management of these symptoms.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO databases were searched with no publication year or language restrictions. Studies reporting cases of clozapine-associated OCS, either de novo or exacerbation of preexisting OCS, were included. The final search date was July 11, 2019.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven studies, involving 107 cases (75 de novo, 32 exacerbated OCS), were included. Clozapine triggered moderate-severe OCS at varying doses (100-900 mg/day) and treatment durations (median 6 months, interquartile range 2-24 months). Higher severity was significantly associated with preexisting OCS, poorer insight into OCS, and active psychosis at the time of OCS. Common strategies to treat clozapine-associated OCS included adding selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, clomipramine, or aripiprazole, often accompanied by clozapine dose reduction. The rate of response to antidepressants was 49% (29/59), where younger age, shorter duration of underlying illness, shorter cloza-pine treatment duration, better insight into OCS, and presence of taboo thoughts were significantly associated with antidepressant response. Subsequent clozapine dose reduction was effective in many non-responders, where aripiprazole was simultaneously added in 50% (8/16).

CONCLUSIONS

Clozapine can trigger severe OCS. Adding aripiprazole with/without clozapine dose reduction may be a good alternative to antidepressants for managing clozapine-associated OCS. Clinicians should be more vigilant about these adverse effects and administer appropriate treatments.

Unresolved Issues for Utilization of Atypical Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia: Antipsychotic Polypharmacy and Metabolic Syndrome

Atypical antipsychotics (AAP) are the prevailing form of schizophrenia treatment today due to their low side effects and superior efficacy. Nevertheless, some issues still need to be addressed. First, there are still a large number of patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), which has led to a growing trend to resort to AAP polypharmacy with few side effects. Most clinical treatment guidelines recommend clozapine monotherapy in TRS, but around one third of schizophrenic patients fail to respond to clozapine. For these patients, with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia AAP polypharmacy is a common strategy with a continually growing evidence base. Second, AAP generally have great risks for developing metabolic syndrome, such as weight gain, abnormality in glucose, and lipid metabolism. These metabolic side effects have become huge stumbling blocks in today's schizophrenia treatment that aims to improve patients' quality of life as well as symptoms. The exact reasons why this particular syndrome occurs in patients treated with AAP is as yet unclear though factors such as interaction of AAP with neurotransmitter receptors, genetic pholymorphisms, type of AAPs, length of AAP use, and life style of schizophrenic patients that may contribute to its development. The present article aimed to review the evidence underlying these key issues and provide the most reasonable interpretations to expand the overall scope of antipsychotics usage.

Sleep in Schizophrenia: Pathology and Treatment

Both subjective and objective assessments of sleep patterns in schizophrenia include a wide range of dyssomnias, with insomnia being the most frequently cited. Early and middle insomnia can range from mild disruption to total sleeplessness. Severe insomnia is a prodromal sign of clinical exacerbation or relapse. In general, most antipsychotic agents (APs) ameliorate this insomnia. However, in some schizophrenics APs can be associated with residual insomnia or with significant daytime somnolence. Furthermore, in some schizophrenics APs can induce or exacerbate comorbid sleep disorders such as restless legs syndrome, sleep-disordered breathing, and parasomnias such as sleepwalking.

Relationship of obsessive compulsive symptoms/disorder with clozapine: A retrospective study from a multispeciality tertiary care centre

OBJECTIVE

To study the prevalence, phenomenology and course of OCS/OCD in patients receiving clozapine.

METHODOLOGY

Case records of 220 patients who received clozapine for at least 3 months were reviewed.

RESULTS

One fifth (N=42; 19.1%) of patients had OCS/OCD, of which majority (13.2%) had onset of OCS/OCD prior to starting of clozapine and remaining 5.9% developed OCS/OCD after starting of clozapine. About one fourth of the patients with pre-existing OCS/OCD had worsening with clozapine while the remaining maintained at the same level (55.17%) or improved (20.7%). Majority of the patients who developed de novo OCS/OCD on clozapine were females and OCS/OCD emerged within 12 months (69.2%) of starting of clozapine. In those who developed OCS/OCD with clozapine, among obsessions, pathological doubts were most common, followed by obsessions with sexual content; among compulsions repetitive checking was the most common. SSRIs were required for management in half the patients, while the remaining improved spontaneously or with reduction in clozapine dose.

CONCLUSION

Clozapine can lead to aggravation or de novo presentation of OCS/OCD but these can be managed with reduction in dose or addition of SSRIs.

Quality of life in patients with schizophrenia: the impact of socio-economic factors and adverse effects of atypical antipsychotics drugs

This cross-sectional study compared the effects of treatment with atypical antipsychotic drugs on quality of life (QoL) and side effects in 218 patients with schizophrenia attending the ambulatory services of psychiatric in Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. Socio-economic variables were compared. The five-dimension EuroQoL (EQ-5D) was used to evaluate QoL, and side effects were assessed using the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser (UKU) Side Effect Rating Scale and the Simpson-Angus Scale. Data were analysed using the χ (2) test and Student's t test, with a significance level of 5 %. Average monthly household incomes in the medication groups were 1.1-2.1 minimum wages ($339-$678). UKU Scale scores showed significant differences in side effects, mainly, clozapine, quetiapine and ziprasidone (p < 0.05). EQ-5D scores showed that all drugs except olanzapine significantly impacted mobility (p < 0.05), and proportions of individuals reporting problems in other dimensions were high: 63.6 % of clozapine users reported mobility problems, 63.7 and 56.3 % of clozapine and ziprasidone users, respectively, had difficulties with usual activities, 68.8 and 54.5 % of ziprasidone and clozapine users, respectively, experienced pain and/or discomfort, and 72.8 % of clozapine users reported anxiety and/or depression. Psychiatric, neurological, and autonomous adverse effects, as well as other side effects, were prevalent in users of atypical antipsychotic drugs, especially clozapine and ziprasidone. Olanzapine had the least side effects. QoL was impacted by side effects and economic conditions in all groups. Thus, the effects of these antipsychotic agents appear to have been masked by aggravating social and economic situations.

Comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms in Schizophrenia: Insight into Pathomechanisms Facilitates Treatment

Insight into the biological pathomechanism of a clinical syndrome facilitates the development of effective interventions. This paper applies this perspective to the important clinical problem of obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) occurring during the lifetime diagnosis of schizophrenia. Up to 25% of schizophrenia patients suffer from OCS and about 12% fulfil the diagnostic criteria of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). This is accompanied by marked subjective burden of disease, high levels of anxiety, depression and suicidality, increased neurocognitive impairment, less favourable levels of social and vocational functioning, and greater service utilization. Comorbid patients can be assigned to heterogeneous subgroups. It is assumed that second generation antipsychotics (SGAs), most importantly clozapine, might aggravate or even induce second-onset OCS. Several epidemiological and pharmacological arguments support this assumption. Specific genetic risk factors seem to dispose patients with schizophrenia to develop OCS and risk-conferring polymorphisms has been defined in SLC1A1, BDNF, DLGAP3, and GRIN2B and in interactions between these individual genes. Further research is needed with detailed characterization of large samples. In particular interactions between genetic risk constellations, pharmacological and psychosocial factors should be analysed. Results will further define homogeneous subgroups, which are in need for differential causative interventions. In clinical practise, schizophrenia patients should be carefully monitored for OCS, starting with at-risk mental states of psychosis and longitudinal follow-ups, hopefully leading to the development of multimodal therapeutic interventions.

Making clozapine safer: current perspectives on improving its tolerability

ABSTRACT: 

Clozapine is the gold standard treatment for refractory schizophrenia and its benefits are supported by an evidence base. Yet, it remains largely underused in clinical practice. This is because of low acceptability from patients and reluctance in initiating, and delays in prescribing by clinicians. A major deterrent is often the common adverse reactions, which clinicians are apt to disregard, focusing instead on the severe but rare complications of clozapine, such as agranulocytosis. We will review recent evidence on increasing the prescription of clozapine, focusing particularly on improving the safety and tolerability of the drug, by effective management of its adverse effects. The adverse effects considered in our review include sedation, seizures, myoclonus, hypersalivation, nausea, constipation, hypotension, hypertension, tachycardia, myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, weight gain, diabetes, dyslipidemia, neutropenia, agranulocytosis, fever, nocturnal enuresis and obsessive–compulsive symptoms. We will also discuss strategies to enable successful clozapine rechallenge after severe cardiac and hematological adverse reactions, thus aiming to offer patients their best chance at recovery.

Treating symptomatic hyperprolactinemia in women with schizophrenia: presentation of the ongoing DAAMSEL clinical trial (Dopamine partial Agonist, Aripiprazole, for the Management of Symptomatic ELevated prolactin)

Prolactin elevations occur in people treated with antipsychotic medications and are often much higher in women than in men. Hyperprolactinemia is known to cause amenorrhea, oligomenorrhea, galactorrhea and gynecomastia in females and is also associated with sexual dysfunction and bone loss. These side effects increase risk of antipsychotic nonadherence and suicide and pose significant problems in the long term management of women with schizophrenia. In this manuscript, we review the literature on prolactin; its physiology, plasma levels, side effects and strategies for treatment. We also present the rationale and protocol for an ongoing clinical trial to treat symptomatic hyperprolactinemia in premenopausal women with schizophrenia. More attention and focus are needed to address these significant side effects and help the field better personalize the treatment of women with schizophrenia.

Comorbid obsessive-compulsive symptoms in schizophrenia: contributions of pharmacological and genetic factors

A large subgroup of around 25% of schizophrenia patients suffers from obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) and about 12% fulfill the diagnostic criteria of an obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The additional occurrence of OCS is associated with high subjective burden of disease, additional neurocognitive impairment, poorer social and vocational functioning, greater service utilization and high levels of anxiety and depression. Comorbid patients can be assigned to heterogeneous subgroups. One hypothesis assumes that second generation antipsychotics (SGAs), most importantly clozapine, might aggravate or even induce second-onset OCS. Several arguments support this assumption, most importantly the observed chronological order of first psychotic manifestation, start of treatment with clozapine and onset of OCS. In addition, correlations between OCS-severity and dose and serum levels and duration of clozapine treatment hint toward a dose-dependent side effect. It has been hypothesized that genetic risk-factors dispose patients with schizophrenia to develop OCS. One study in a South Korean sample reported associations with polymorphisms in the gene SLC1A1 (solute carrier family 1A1) and SGA-induced OCS. However, this finding could not be replicated in European patients. Preliminary results also suggest an involvement of polymorphisms in the BDNF gene (brain-derived neurotrophic factor) and an interaction between markers of SLC1A1 and the gene DLGAP3 (disc large associated protein 3) as well as GRIN2B (N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit 2B). Further research of well-defined samples, in particular studies investigating possible interactions of genetic risk-constellations and pharmacodynamic properties, are needed to clarify the assumed development of SGA-induced OCS. Results might improve pathogenic concepts and facilitate the definition of at risk populations, early detection and monitoring of OCS as well as multimodal therapeutic interventions.

Differential effects of antipsychotic agents on obsessive-compulsive symptoms in schizophrenia: a longitudinal study

Indirect evidence supports the assumption that antiserotonergic second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) induce and aggravate obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) in schizophrenia. However, multimodal studies assessing the long-term interaction of pharmacotherapy and psychopathology are missing. Over 12 months, we followed-up 75 schizophrenia patients who were classified into two groups according to antipsychotic treatment: clozapine or olanzapine (group I) versus aripiprazole or amisulpride (group II). We applied the Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) and investigated between-group changes over time as the primary endpoint. Group I showed markedly higher YBOCS scores at both time points. Repeated measure analyses of variance (ANOVAs) revealed significant interaction effects of group and time (per protocol sample (PP): p=0.006). This was due to persistently high OCS severity within group I, and decreasing YBOCS scores within group II. OCS severity correlated significantly with the negative and general psychopathology subscales of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), as well as with depressive symptoms. The progressive differences in OCS severity between our groups support the assumption of differential pharmacodynamic effects on comorbid OCS in schizophrenia. Further studies should address the pathogenetic mechanism, define patients at risk and facilitate early detection as well as therapeutic interventions.

Clozapine-induced obsessive-compulsive symptoms in schizophrenia: a critical review

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is rarely associated with schizophrenia, whereas 20 to 30% of schizophrenic patients, suffer from comorbid obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS). So far no single pathogenetic theory convincingly explained this fact suggesting heterogeneous subgroups. Based on long-term case observations, one hypothesis assumes that second-onset OCS in the course of schizophrenia might be a side effect of second generation antipsychotics (SGA), most importantly clozapine (CLZ). This review summarizes the supporting epidemiological and pharmacological evidence: Estimations on prevalence of OCS increase in more recent cross-sectional studies and in later disease stages. Longitudinal observations report the de novo-onset of OCS under clozapine treatment. This association has not been reported with first generation antipsychotics (FGA) or SGAs with mainly dopaminergic mode of action. Finally, significant correlations of OCS-severity with duration of treatment, dose and serum levels suggest clozapine-induced OCS. However, supposed causal interactions need further verifications. It is also unclear, which neurobiological mechanisms might underlie the pathogenetic process. Detailed genotypic and phenotypic characterizations of schizophrenics with comorbid OCS regarding neurocognitive functioning and activation in sensitive tasks of functional magnetic imaging are needed. Multimodal large-scaled prospective studies are necessary to define patients at risk for second-onset OCS and to improve early detection and therapeutic interventions.

Aripiprazole improves olanzapine-associated obsessive compulsive symptoms in schizophrenia

Many schizophrenic patients have comorbid obsessive-compulsive syndromes (OCS) frequently associated with antiserotonergic second-generation antipsychotics such as clozapine and olanzapine. Whereas cognitive behavioral therapy and antiobsessive antidepressants brought up inconsistent results, pharmacological add-on strategies were able to alleviate OCS. One suggestive agent for antiobsessive add-on treatment is aripiprazole, a partial agonist at dopamine and serotonin receptors. Here, we summarize the course of a patient with paranoid schizophrenia. She developed OCS during long-term treatment with olanzapine at 20 mg/d over a period of 10 years. Baseline assessment showed severe obsessions (Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) subscale score : 13) and compulsions (YBOCS subscale score : 10), whereas the psychotic syndrome was compensated (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, 11/17/28). The combination with aripiprazole (15 mg/) over a period of 12 weeks resulted in a marked improvement of OCS (YBOCS, 8/3) and some further improvement of the psychotic symptoms (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, 9/13/27). This observation points toward an antiobsessive potency of aripiprazole in combination with olanzapine, quite similar to approaches involving clozapine. Hence, the proposed strategy should be further evaluated in prospective controlled trials.

Safety and tolerability of antipsychotic polypharmacy

INTRODUCTION

Antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP), the concomitant use of ≥ 2 antipsychotics, is common in clinical practice. Prior reviews have focused on the efficacy of APP, but no systematic review exists regarding the safety and tolerability of this practice.

AREAS COVERED

A systematic review of adverse effects associated with APP was conducted to prepare this review; case series with ≥ 2 patients, chart reviews, naturalistic, database, cohort and randomized studies that reported on the association between APP in general or specific APP combinations and global or specific adverse effect were included. Methodological limitations of available studies are discussed and recommendations for clinicians and future research are provided.

EXPERT OPINION

Across mostly small and uncontrolled studies, APP has been associated with increased global side effect burden, rates of Parkinsonian side effects, anticholinergic use, hyperprolactinemia, sexual dysfunction, hypersalivation, sedation/somnolence, cognitive impairment and diabetes. Effects on akathisia and mortality were inconclusive. Although some combinations, particularly aripiprazole augmentation of an agent with greater side effect burden, may reduce weight gain, dyslipidemia, hyperprolactinemia and sexual dysfunction, APP should remain a last-resort treatment option after monotherapy, switching and non-antipsychotic combinations have failed. More data are needed to further inform the individualized risk-benefit evaluation of APP.

Role of aripiprazole in treatment-resistant schizophrenia

About one third of patients with schizophrenia respond unsatisfactorily to antipsychotic treatment and are termed "treatment-resistant". Clozapine is still the gold standard in these cases. However, 40%-70% of patients do not improve sufficiently on clozapine either. In the search for more efficacious strategies for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, drugs with different pharmacological profiles seem to raise new hopes, but are they valid? The aim of this review was to evaluate the evidence for aripiprazole as a potential strategy in monotherapy or combination therapy for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The evidence for aripiprazole monotherapy and for the combination of aripiprazole with psychotropics other than clozapine is scant, and no recommendation can be made on the basis of the currently available data. More effort has been made in describing combinations of aripiprazole and clozapine. Most of the open-label and case studies as well as case reports have shown positive effects of this combination on overall psychopathology and to some extent on negative symptoms. Several reports describe the possibility of dose reduction for clozapine in combination with aripiprazole, a strategy that might help so-called "treatment-intolerant" patients. The findings of four randomized controlled trials with respect to changes in psychopathology seem less conclusive. The most commonly found beneficial effects are better metabolic outcomes and indicators of the possibility of reducing the clozapine dose. However, other side effects, such as akathisia, are repeatedly reported. Further, none of the studies report longer-term outcomes. In the absence of alternatives, polypharmacy is a common strategy in clinical practice. Combining aripiprazole with clozapine in clozapine-resistant or clozapine-intolerant patients seems to be worthy of further investigation from the pharmacological and clinical points of view.

Antiserotonergic antipsychotics are associated with obsessive-compulsive symptoms in schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological investigations show that up to 30% of schizophrenic patients suffer from obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) associated with negative impact on the general prognosis. It has been proposed that antiserotonergic second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) might induce OCS, but investigations of large samples integrating psychopathology, neuropsychology and psychopharmacology are missing.

METHOD

We stratified 70 patients with schizophrenia according to their mode of antipsychotic treatment: clozapine and olanzapine (group I) compared with aripiprazole and amisulpride (group II). The groups were matched according to age, sex, educational levels and severity of the psychotic disorder (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale). As the primary endpoint, we evaluated OCS severity (Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale).

RESULTS

OCS were significantly more prevalent and severe in group I, in which OCS severity correlated with dosage of clozapine and duration of treatment. Pronounced cognitive deficits in group I were found in visuospatial perception and visual memory (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised block design, Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test), impulse inhibition (go/no-go test), higher perseveration scores (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test) and reduced set-shift abilities (Trail Making Test Part B, Set-shift Task). These cognitive domains correlated with OCS severity.

CONCLUSIONS

OCS in schizophrenia are associated with antiserotonergic SGA treatment, but longitudinal studies have to prove causality. Before starting treatment with antiserotonergic SGAs, specific neurocognitive domains should be evaluated, as visuospatial learning and impulse inhibition performance might allow early detection of OCS secondary to antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia.

Effect of aripiprazole augmentation of clozapine in schizophrenia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

The simultaneous prescription of two or more antipsychotic drugs in combination is a common treatment strategy for those patients who have demonstrated a suboptimal response to clozapine; nevertheless, evidence suggesting potential advantages of combination treatment with clozapine plus one antipsychotic in terms of efficacy and tolerability are still sparse. The present 24-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of adjunctive aripiprazole to clozapine therapy in schizophrenia was aimed to explore the efficacy of aripiprazole add-on pharmacotherapy on clinical symptomatology and cognitive functioning in a sample of patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia receiving clozapine. After clinical and neurocognitive assessments patients were randomly allocated to receive, in a double-blind design, either up to 15 mg/day of aripiprazole or a placebo. A final sample of thirty-one patients completed the study. The results obtained indicate that aripiprazole added to stable clozapine treatment showed a beneficial effect on the positive and general psychopathological symptomatology in a sample of treatment-resistant schizophrenia patients. Regarding executive cognitive functions, aripiprazole augmentation of clozapine had no significant effects. The findings provide evidence that aripiprazole augmentation of clozapine treatment is well-tolerated and may be of benefit for patients who are partially responsive to clozapine monotherapy; further double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in a larger number of patients are required to evaluate the therapeutic potential of aripiprazole augmentation of clozapine.

Augmentation of clozapine with aripiprazole in severe psychotic bipolar and schizoaffective disorders: a pilot study

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the augmentation of clozapine with aripiprazole in patients with treatment-resistant schizoaffective and psychotic bipolar disorders in a retrospective manner. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between the two drugs were also investigated.

PATIENTS

Three men and 4 women (median age 36 and 40 years, respectively) who had mean scores at BPRS and CGI-Severity of 59.1+/-12.0 and 5.4+/-0.5, respectively, were treated with clozapine (mean dose 292.9+/-220.7 mg/day). Patients received an adjunctive treatment with aripiprazole (mean dose 6.8 +/- 3.7 mg/day). Clozapine, norclozapine and aripiprazole plasma levels were measured by means of a high performance liquid chromatograpy with UV detection.

RESULTS

Total scores at BPRS decreased significantly (from 59.1+/-12.0 to 51.1+/-15.6, p=0.007) after aripirazole augmentation. In particular, the factors "thought disorder" (from 10.4+/-4.4 to 9.0+/-4.5, p=.047) and "anergia" (from 10.0+/-2.7 to 8.0+/-2.4, p=.018) significantly improved. Concomitant administration of aripiprazole and clozapine did not result in an increase in side effects over the period of treatment. Dose-normalized plasma levels of both clozapine and norclozapine and the clozapine/norclozapine metabolic ratio in all patients did not vary as well.

CONCLUSION

The augmentation of clozapine with aripirazole was safe and effective in severe psychotic schizoaffective and bipolar disorders which failed to respond to atypical antipsychotics. A possible pharmacokinetic interaction between clozapine and aripiprazole does not account for the improved clinical benefit obtained after aripiprazole augmentation.

Favourable results in treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients under combination of aripiprazole with clozapine

Clozapine is still the gold standard in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, a substantial amount of patients do not fully recover on clozapine monotherapy. Though there is still a lack of randomised controlled studies of combination strategies in treatment-resistant schizophrenia, they are widely used. Aripiprazole is a relatively new therapeutic option due to its partial D2 agonism. Both clozapine and aripiprazole, though having a generally favourable side-effect profile, may lead to insufficient response and might provoke side effects in monotherapy. We report the case of four patients in whom we observed a distinct clinical improvement with respect to positive and negative symptoms without major side effects under a combination of clozapine and aripiprazole. The combination of clozapine action and aripiprazole-mediated D(2) receptor regulation could be responsible for the described favourable effects and for the increase of D(2) receptor blockade after adding aripiprazole to clozapine observed in one patient. A combination of clozapine and aripiprazole may be an effective therapeutic strategy for some schizophrenic patients, leading to a good response with respect to positive and negative symptoms without the occurrence of major side effects.

Clozapine-induced obsessive-compulsive syndromes improve in combination with aripiprazole

Patients with schizophrenia often experience comorbid obsessive-compulsive syndromes (OCSs). Within these patients, a significant subgroup developed secondary OCS during treatment with antiserotonergic, atypical antipsychotic agents such as clozapine. Although cognitive behavioral therapy and antiobsessive antidepressants brought up inconsistent results, in some cases, dose reductions of clozapine in combination approaches were able to alleviate OCS. One suggestive agent for antiobsessive add-on treatment is aripiprazole, a partial agonist at dopamine and serotonin receptors.Here, we summarize the courses of 7 patients (6 men; mean age, 37 years; mean duration of psychotic illness, 17 years). They had been treated with clozapine for 9 years. The distressing and treatment-resistant comorbidity with OCS emerged approximately 4 years after the start of clozapine therapy. During combined treatment with mean doses of 22.9 mg of aripiprazole for 9.7 weeks, we assessed a small yet statistically not significant improvement of the psychotic disorder, whereas a marked reduction of obsessions and significant improvements of compulsions could be observed. The mean total Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Rating Scale decreased from 18.7 to 12.4 (P = 0.003).These data support the findings of 2 previous case reports and point toward an antiobsessive potency of aripiprazole. The relevant disabling comorbidities of psychosis and OCS need further investigation with multimodal neurobiological approaches. The proposed strategy should be further evaluated in prospective controlled trials with severity of comorbid OCS as a primary end point.

Antipsychotic polypharmacy in patients with schizophrenia in a brief hospitalization unit

INTRODUCTION

Antipsychotic monotherapy is considered the gold standard in pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. Only 2 of the main clinical guides recommend the use of antipsychotic polypharmacy (AP) for those patients refractory to monotherapy. Nonetheless, there is a large rate of studies, conducted in many different settings, showing that AP is more frequent as would be expected attending experts' recommendations.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we review all the psychotropic drugs dispensed to inpatients of a brief hospitalization psychiatric unit diagnosed as having schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision) at time of discharge in the year 2005. These included a total of 209 patients older than 18 years.

RESULTS

Of the 209 studied patients, 55.5% were discharged under AP treatment. Inpatients were given a mean of 3.06 psychotropic drugs and a mean of 1.61 antipsychotics at the time of hospital discharge. A total of 33.2% of the studied patients got anticholinergic drugs, and 66.2% were given benzodiazepines. The most prevalent combination of drugs was intramuscular long-acting risperidone plus an atypical antipsychotic. Amisulpride was the most used antipsychotic as adjuvant treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite different clinical guidelines, AP is a common pharmacological strategy as it is shown in our study and in the reviewed literature. Data in our study indicate that the observed rates of AP cannot exclusively be attributed to the treatment of patients with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia.

Combined low-dose clozapine with low-dose aripiprazole in a schizophrenic patient

Aripiprazole, a partial dopaminergic agonist, represents a well-tolerated and effective addition to the antipsychotic armamentarium. However, accumulated data indicates that aripiprazole may still induce extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) in susceptible patients. Guidelines for treating schizophrenia have consistently recommended antipsychotic monotherapy. Nevertheless, in certain clinical situations, a thorough evaluation of the benefit/risk ratio suggests that combinations of antipsychotic agents may improve treatment efficacy and tolerability. We report a schizophrenic patient for whom sequential administration of aripiprazole and risperidone induced severe EPS, and subsequent combination therapy with of clozapine and aripiprazole achieved adequate symptom control and markedly reduced EPS.

Polypharmacy with second-generation antipsychotics: a review of evidence

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to review the prevalence of polypharmacy with second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) in clinical practice, pharmacological reasons for such practice, and the evidence for and against such polypharmacy.

METHODS

Clinical trial reports, case reports, and reviews were identified by a PubMed literature search from 1966 through October 2006, with retrieved publications queried for additional references. We excluded reports on augmentation with non-antipsychotic medications and polypharmacy involving combinations of SGAs and first-generation (conventional) antipsychotics (FGAs) or combinations of two FGAs. We identified 75 reports concerning SGA polypharmacy, from which we extracted data on study design, sample size, medications, rating scales, outcome, and conclusions. Data from randomized controlled trials and larger case series are presented in detail and case reports are briefly discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Polypharmacy with SGAs is not uncommon, with prevalence varying widely (3.9% to 50%) depending on setting and patient population, despite limited support from blinded, randomized, controlled trials or case reports that employed an A-B-A (monotherapy-combination therapy-monotherapy) design and adequate dosing and duration of treatment. Rather than prohibiting or discouraging co-prescription of SGAs, needs of patients and clinicians should be addressed through evidence-based algorithms. Based on unmet clinical needs and modest evidence from case reports, combinations of two SGAs may merit future investigation in efficacy trials involving patients with schizophrenia who have treatment-resistant illness (including partial response) or who are responsive to treatment but develop intolerable adverse effects. Other areas that may merit future research are efficacy of SGA polypharmacy for schizophrenia accompanied by comorbid conditions (eg, anxiety, suicidal or self-injurious behavior, aggression) and for reducing length of stay in acute care settings.

Combined antipsychotic treatment involving clozapine and aripiprazole

Treatment resistance is considered a challenging problem of antipsychotic pharmacotherapy. In such cases, combination approaches are commonly used, for instance the add-on of aripiprazole to clozapine. This review aims at giving an overview of the present knowledge on this strategy. We performed a keyword-based screening of databases (including November 2007) and evaluated the data in a systematic manner. The courses of 94 patients were reported in 11 publications. At a mean dosage of 20.5 mg/day, aripiprazole achieved clinical improvement of psychotic symptoms and facilitated a dose reduction of clozapine from 476.7 to 425.1 mg/day. In parallel, clozapine serum levels decreased from 611 to 523 ng/ml. No pharmacokinetic interactions were reported, and clozapine-induced side effects ameliorated. However, single cases of extrapyramidal side effects occurred. The combination of clozapine and aripiprazole follows a neurobiological rationale and appears to be effective and tolerable. The results of placebo-controlled trials might allow further insight into the benefits and risks of this strategy.

[Present data and treatment schedule of aripiprazole in the treatment of schizophrenia]

Among the second generation antipsychotics, aripiprazole presents a new pharmacological profile, basically differentiated by a partial agonist effect on the D2 and D3 dopaminergic receptors. Five short-term efficacy studies, conducted on 1648 patients presenting with schizophrenia or acute relapse of schizoaffective disorders, demonstrated the greater efficacy of aripiprazole than the placebo and comparable efficacy to that of haloperidol and risperidone. The short-term tolerance profile was characterised by a lesser incidence of the extrapyramidal side effects and drowsiness than with haloperidol. Two thousand six hundred and eighty five patients were followed-up over a period of 26 to 52 weeks in five clinical trials versus a placebo and haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine and risperiodone: demonstrated efficacy in maintaining the response to treatment and on the delay before relapse was comparable to the other antipsychotics. The classical side effects of antipsychotics decreased in the long-term. Versus olanzapine, a glucid and lipid profile, clearly in favour of aripiprazole, was completed by a lesser incidence of hyperprolactinaemia. Aripiprazole is effective on all the dimensions of schizophrenia: the positive and negative and depressive and anxious symptomatology. It appears to be of interest, notably on the cognitive dimension, which should motivate more in-depth exploration of its place in the treatment in the early stages of schizophrenia. Its therapeutic schedule and the methods of initiation are an essential criterion to the success of treatment, notably during the substitution of other antipsychotics. The clinical and pharmacological originality of aripiprazole would justify the terminology of a "third generation antipsychotic".

Neurobiology confirms psychopathology. On the antagonism of psychosis and obsessive-compulsive syndromes

BACKGROUND

Psychopathological concepts of the 19th and early 20th century postulated an antagonism between psychotic and obsessive-compulsive disorders, assuming obsessions and compulsions to have protective effects on psychotic disintegration. Although both disorders have been subject to intense multimodal research, their pathogeneses are yet to be fully understood.

METHODS

Here, we discuss recent neurobiological findings pointing towards opposite directions which are strongly reminiscent of the historical psychopathological antagonism.

RESULTS

Obsessive-compulsive syndromes (OCS) are efficiently treated with serotonergic substances, while on the other hand modern antipsychotic drugs exert antiserotonergic effects. Especially these atypical antipsychotic substances, however, were found to involve the risk of inducing second-onset OCS. Dopamine antagonists are potent antipsychotic substances, whereas the partial dopamine agonist aripiprazole has been associated with an antiobsessive potency. Within the glutamatergic system, reduced NMDA-dependent glutamatergic neurotransmission is discussed to be one major pathomechanism of psychotic disorders, whilst NMDA antagonists have proven to be effective in improving treatment-resistant OCS. While neurogenetic findings seem to separate the populations in heterogeneous samples, detailed neuroimaging studies suggest that both disorders affect similar neurocircuits in different manners.

CONCLUSIONS

With regard to these findings, future research on schizo-obsessive syndromes will have to be multimodal, integrating psychopathology, neuropsychology, functional imaging, neurogenetics and psychopharmacology. Prospective trials involving these methods might be able to elucidate the dysbalances of neurotransmission and to locate the neuroanatomical and neuropsychological correlates. In particular, this might contribute to defining schizophrenic patients at risk for developing second-onset OCS and to evaluating new treatment strategies in patients suffering from both psychosis and OCS.