Quality of life and subjective well-being during treatment with antipsychotics in out-patients with schizophrenia

Structural validity of the 5-item World Health Organization Well-being Index (WHO-5) in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders

BACKGROUND

When monitoring the severity and impact of schizophrenia spectrum disorders, a measure of subjective well-being should ideally accompany measures of symptom severity and medication side effects. The self-reported 5-item World Health Organization Well-being Index (WHO-5) is a brief, generic, and widely used measure of subjective well-being. However, the structural validity of the WHO-5, namely, whether the individual item scores can be combined to produce a meaningful total score, has not been examined among patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

METHOD

Utilizing data from 399 Danish patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders attending the Psychiatric Services of the Central Denmark Region, we employed Rasch analysis to examine the structural validity (i.e., unidimensionality, overall fit to the Rasch model, and differential item functioning) of the WHO-5.

RESULTS

The WHO-5 was found to be unidimensional with no differential item functioning for age, sex, or inpatient/outpatient status. However, in the initial analysis, some misfit to the Rasch model, partially caused by the disordering of response categories, was evident. In adjusted analyses in which the item response categories 2 (Less than half of the time) and 3 (More than half of the time) were merged, overall fit to the model was improved.

CONCLUSIONS

When two item response categories were merged, the Danish version of the WHO-5 was found to be structurally valid for patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. This suggests that the WHO-5 holds promise as a measure of subjective well-being in this patient population.

Lived Experiences of Persons with Chronic Schizophrenia Living in the Community

Background

Each individual with schizophrenia experiences life uniquely, despite the sameness in their diagnosis. Understanding their experiences is vital for their better community integration and social work practice.

Method

We used the interpretative phenomenological approach. Persons with schizophrenia seeking outpatient services at a tertiary care institute in Bengaluru, India, were recruited through purposive sampling. In-depth interviews were conducted with six participants.

Results

Some of the meta-themes and subthemes identified were as follows: (a) perception about self (struggling with the sense of self, desire for normalcy, wanting to be in control of self and desire to live independently), (b) relationship with others (feeling supported by others and feeling rejected by others), (c) coping with consequences of illness (coping with disruptions in personal life and coping with disruptions in family life), and (d) experience of seeking treatment (reasons for seeking treatment, being on medication, and behavior of mental health professionals). The participants tried to find meaning in their lives by making sense of their illness. Family and community can have a significant impact on how persons with schizophrenia perceive their lives.

Conclusion

Mental health professionals need to encourage persons' and their families' greater participation in treatment planning and clinical interventions, which will enhance persons integration within the community and will help decrease the feeling of isolation commonly experienced when one lives with chronic mental illnesses.

Gender Difference in Cognitive Function Among Stable Schizophrenia: A Network Perspective

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the gender differences and influencing factors of cognitive function in stable schizophrenic patients, and to explore the cognitive characteristics of male and female patients.

METHODS

A total of 298 patients with chronic schizophrenia were divided into two groups according to gender. The differences of demographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups were firstly analyzed. Then the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) was used to measure their cognitive function, and the correlation between cognitive function and demographic characteristics and clinical characteristics was analyzed. Finally, the gender-based cognitive characteristics were explored through network analysis.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the RBANS total score and sub-item score between the male schizophrenia and female schizophrenia patients. Correlation analysis showed that RBANS total score was inversely proportional with age, duration and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score in male schizophrenia, while being directly proportional with age at onset and inversely proportional with PANSS score in female schizophrenia. Network analysis showed that language was the core of cognitive function for male schizophrenia, and the delayed memory was the core of cognitive function for female schizophrenia.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant gender difference in cognitive function score among patients with stable schizophrenia. The core cognitive functions of male and female schizophrenia are language and delayed memory, respectively.

Translation and cross-cultural adaption of an instrument measuring patient's well-being under treatment for schizophrenia

OBJECTIVES

The Subjective Well-Being under Neuroleptic (SWN) Scale is a self-rating scale measuring the well-being of patients with schizophrenia under antipsychotic drug treatment. The instrument has been globally used, with issues regarding the well-being assessment scale across different cultures, patient characteristics, and country-setting remains a controversy. This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the SWN scale into the Indonesian version (Indonesian Modified SWN or IM-SWN) and evaluate its validity and reliability.

METHODS

The SWN instrument was translated and culturally adapted following internationally accepted procedures, including forward translation, expert panel review, backward-translation, pretesting and cognitive interviewing, and psychometric analysis for the final version of the scale. The translated instrument was tested on 108 schizophrenia patients. The instrument's validity and reliability were assessed using Pearson's correlation and Cronbach's Alpha coefficient. Additional analysis for the socio-demographic and psychometric properties of the patient was also conducted.

RESULTS

The range of IM-SWN total score between 30 and 112. IM-SWN was found to have a high-reliability coefficient (0.897), and the internal consistency values of each question item ranged between 0.885 and 0.910. The results also showed a high correlation between five order factors (Physical functioning, mental functioning, self-control, emotional regulation, and social integration), with a total score of between 0.768 and 0.885.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlighted that the IM-SWN is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring well-being among the Indonesian population with schizophrenia.

Response and remission of subjective well-being in patients suffering from schizophrenia spectrum disorders

Background

Purpose of this study was to assess subjective well-being in schizophrenia inpatients and to find variables predictive for response and remission of subjective well-being.

Method

The subjective well-being under neuroleptic treatment scale (SWN-K) was used in 232 schizophrenia patients within a naturalistic multicenter trial. Early response was defined as a SWN-K total score improvement of 20% and by at least 10 points within the first 2 treatment weeks, response as an improvement in SWN-K total score of at least 20% and by at least 10 points from admission to discharge and remission in subjective well-being as a total score of more or equal to 80 points at discharge. Logistic regression and CART analyses were used to determine valid predictors of subjective well-being outcome.

Results

Twenty-nine percent of the patients were detected to be SWN-K early responders, 40% fulfilled criteria for response in subjective well-being and 66% fulfilled criteria for remission concerning subjective well-being. Among the investigated predictors, SWN-K early improvement and the educational status were significantly associated with SWN-K response. The SWN-K total score at baseline showed a significant negative predictive value for response. Baseline SWN-K total score, PANSS global subscore, and side effects as well as the educational status were found to be significantly predictive for remission.

Conclusions

Depressive symptoms should be radically treated and side effects closely monitored to improve the patient's subjective well-being. The important influence of subjective well-being on overall treatment outcome could be underlined.

Clinical and psychosocial factors associated with depression in patients with psychosis according to stage of illness

AIM

This study investigated the clinical characteristics and psychosocial factors associated with depression in patients with early psychosis according to stage of illness.

METHODS

The present study includes patients who fulfil the DSM-5 criteria for schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders. Patients were divided into two groups according to illness stage (the acute stage of first-episode psychosis and stabilization phase of recent-onset psychosis). Clinically meaningful depression was defined as moderate or severe on the depression dimension of the Clinician-Rated Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity scale in the DSM-5.

RESULTS

In total, 340 (207 first-episode and 133 recent-onset) patients were recruited in this study. Patients with comorbid depression were characterized by frequent suicidal ideation, a past suicide attempt, and lower scores on the Subjective Well-being Under Neuroleptics and Brief Resilience Scale in both groups. Long duration of untreated psychosis and higher scores on the Early Trauma Inventory Self Report were associated with depression in the acute stage of first-episode psychosis. In the stabilization phase of recent-onset psychosis group, a monthly income and scores for sexual desire and on the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale-III were significantly lower in patients with depression than in those without depression.

CONCLUSION

Comorbid depression was associated with high suicidality, lower quality of life and poor resilience in patients with first-episode and recent-onset psychosis. Depression was associated with factors that had been present before the initiation of treatment in patients with first-episode psychosis and with environmental factors in those in the stabilization phase.

Baseline results from the European non-interventional Antipsychotic Long acTing injection in schizOphrenia (ALTO) study

BACKGROUND

The Antipsychotic Long-acTing injection in schizOphrenia (ALTO) study was a non-interventional study across several European countries examining prescription of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics to identify sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients receiving and physicians prescribing LAIs. ALTO was also the first large-scale study in Europe to report on the use of both first- or second-generation antipsychotic (FGA- or SGA-) LAIs.

METHODS

Patients with schizophrenia receiving a FGA- or SGA-LAI were enrolled between June 2013 and July 2014 and categorized as incident or prevalent users. Assessments included measures of disease severity, functioning, insight, well-being, attitudes towards antipsychotics, and quality of life.

RESULTS

For the 572 patients, disease severity was generally mild-to-moderate and the majority were unemployed and/or socially withdrawn. 331/572 were prevalent LAI antipsychotic users; of whom 209 were prescribed FGA-LAI. Paliperidone was the most commonly prescribed SGA-LAI (56% of incident users, 21% of prevalent users). 337/572 (58.9%) were considered at risk of non-adherence. Prevalent LAI users had a tendency towards better insight levels (PANSS G12 item). Incident FGA-LAI users had more severe disease, poorer global functioning, lower quality of life, higher rates of non-adherence, and were more likely to have physician-reported lack of insight.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate a lower pattern of FGA-LAI usage, reserved by prescribers for seemingly more difficult-to-treat patients and those least likely to adhere to oral medication.

Effects of Group Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Young Patients in the Early Stage of Psychosis

OBJECTIVE

To develop a model of group cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for Korean patients with early psychosis.

METHODS

The group CBT utilized in the present study consisted of metacognitive training, cognitive restructuring, and lifestyle managements. The Subjective Well-being Under Neuroleptics (SWN-K), Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ), Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) were administered prior to and after CBT sessions. The participants were categorized into two groups according to the median duration of untreated psychosis (DUP; 4 months).

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients were included in this analysis. From pre- to post-therapy, there were significant increases in the SWN-K and DAI scores and significant decreases in the hostility subscale of the AIHQ, PSS, and CGI scores. Significant time × DUP interaction effects were observed for the SWN-K, DAI, and BDI scores, such that there were significant changes in patients with a short DUP but not in those with a long DUP.

CONCLUSION

The group CBT program had a positive effect on subjective wellbeing, attitude toward treatment, perceived stress, and suspiciousness of young Korean patients with early psychosis. These effects were particularly significant in patients with a short DUP.

Treatment outcomes in schizophrenia: qualitative study of the views of family carers

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia is a complex, heterogeneous disorder, with highly variable treatment outcomes, and relatively little is known about what is important to patients. The aim of the study was to understand treatment outcomes informal carers perceive to be important to people with schizophrenia.

METHOD

Qualitative interview study with 34 individuals and 8 couples who care for a person with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed by a thematic framework based approach.

RESULTS

Carers described well-recognised outcomes of importance, alongside more novel outcomes relating to: Safety (of the patient/others); insight (e.g. into non-reality of psychotic phenomena); respite from fear, distress or pain; socially acceptable behaviour; getting out of the house; attainment of life milestones; changes in personality and/or temperament; reduction of vulnerability to stress; and several aspects of physical health.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings have the potential to inform the development of patient- or carer- focused outcome measures that take into account the full range of domains that carers feel are important for patients.

Quality of life and clinical characteristics in a nonselected sample of patients with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Patients with schizophrenia experience low quality of life (QOL).

AIMS

To examine QOL in these patients and the relation between QOL and illness duration, adjusted daily doses (ADDs) of antipsychotics, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference and smoking.

METHODS

In this naturalistic, cross-sectional study, 82 patients were interviewed about smoking habits. Patients completed a QOL questionnaire (World Health Organization Quality of Life-Bref) consisting of physical, psychological, social and environmental domains and had height, weight and waist circumference measured. The characteristics and QOL were correlated using multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

QOL was significantly lower in the patients than in the general population (p < .01). In first-ever diagnosed patients, QOL was associated with BMI (regression coefficient (RC): physical -0.73, psychological -1.44 and environmental -0.55; all p < .05), ADD (RC: physical 3.71, psychological 4.37 and environmental 2.94; all p < .10) and smoking (RC: physical -0.69; p < .01). In the long-term ill patients, QOL was associated with BMI (RC: physical -1.19 and psychological -1.28; all p < .05) and illness duration (RC: physical 1.38; p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Patients experienced low QOL. Lower QOL was associated with high BMI, low ADD and smoking in first-ever diagnosed patients and with high BMI and short illness duration in long-term ill patients.

Factors associated with self-rated sexual function in Korean patients with schizophrenia receiving risperidone monotherapy

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the factors associated with sexual function in Korean patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

This study evaluated 169 patients with schizophrenia who were receiving risperidone monotherapy. The Visual Analog Scale was used to assess sexual function in terms of sexual desire, sexual arousal, and sexual satisfaction. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, the Beck Depression Inventory, the Korean version of the Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptic Treatment-Brief Form (SWN-K) scale, and the Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI) were also administered.

RESULTS

Sexual function was negatively associated with age, duration of illness, gender (female), marital status (single), the presence of tardive dyskinesia, and Beck Depression Inventory score, but positively associated with the SWN-K and DAI scores. A linear regression analysis revealed that being male and married had significant positive associations with sexual arousal, sexual satisfaction, and/or sexual desire, while the presence of tardive dyskinesia and a longer duration of illness were associated with poor sexual arousal and/or sexual desire. Additionally, sexual function was significantly associated with the SWN-K and DAI scores in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The acknowledgement and management of sexual dysfunction in patients with schizophrenia by clinicians may be important for improvement of their quality of life and adherence to medication.

Predictors of quality of life among individuals with schizophrenia

PURPOSE

The study reported here aimed to evaluate both biological and psychosocial factors as predictors for quality of life as well as to examine the associations between the factors and quality of life in individuals with schizophrenia.

METHODS

Eighty individuals with schizophrenia were recruited to the study. The Thai version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF was utilized to measure the quality of life. The five Marder subscales of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale were applied. Other tools for measurement included the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia and six social support deficits (SSDs). Pearson/Spearman correlation coefficients and the independent t-test were used for the statistical analysis to determine the associations of variables and the overall quality of life and the four domain scores. A multiple linear regression analysis of the overall quality of life and four domain scores was applied to determine their predictors.

RESULTS

The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score, positive symptoms, negative symptoms, disorganized thought, and anxiety/depression showed a significant correlation with the overall quality of life and most of the four domain scores. Depression, SSDs, and adverse drug events showed a significant correlation with a poorer overall quality of life. The multiple linear regression model revealed that negative symptoms, depression, and seeing a relative less often than once per week were predictors for the overall quality of life (adjusted R (2)=0.472). Negative symptoms were also found to be the main factors predicting a decrease in the four domains of quality of life - physical health, psychological, social relationships, and environment.

CONCLUSION

Negative symptoms, depression, and poor contact with relatives were the foremost predictors of poor quality of life in individuals with schizophrenia. Positive symptoms, negative symptoms, disorganized thought, anxiety/depression, SSDs, and adverse events were also found to be correlated with quality of life.

Factor structure of the Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptic treatment Scale-short form in schizophrenic outpatients: five factors or only one?

BACKROUND AND AIM: The Subjective Well-Being under Neuroleptics Scale, short form (SWNS), is a self-report measure that evaluates the states of well-being of schizophrenia patients using antipsychotic drugs independently from psychopathology of disease. This study examined the factor structure of the Turkish version of the scale using high-level statistical analyses.

METHODS

The SWNS was translated into Turkish and applied to 103 schizophrenic patients. A type of multi-trait-multi-method (MTMM) confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to determine the factor structure of the Turkish version of the scale.

RESULTS

The results of factor analysis of the SWNS were incompatible with the factor structure of the original scale. A set of MTMM analyses showed distinct method effects for both positive and negative item wording in the scale. In light of these findings, the factor structure of the SWNS was determined as having a one-dimensional structure, with bias due to item wording.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present investigation indicated that the sub-factors of the SWNS failed to emerge from the data. This study is the first to show that there is an urgent need for further examination of the factor structure of the SWNS with regard to method effects. This issue has important implications for the use of sub-factors by both researchers and practitioners.

Validation of the modified DUKE-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire in patients with schizophrenia

PURPOSE

The modified DUKE-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire (FSSQ) is considered a psychometric instrument to assess the social support in patients with schizophrenia. However, it has not been validated in this patient population. This issue is addressed here by examining the tool's psychometric properties in a clinical sample of patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

Two hundred and forty-one patients from ten Adult Mental Health Centres (AMHC) meeting the following inclusion criteria were included: (1) International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) diagnosis of schizophrenia; (2) Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scores ≤50; (3) Illness duration of more than 2 years; and (4) Clinical stability. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 1-year follow-up for clinical and psychosocial variables.

RESULTS

The factor analysis revealed two factors that explained 54.15 % of the variance. Internal consistency was excellent for the total FSSQ (0.87 at baseline and 0.88 at 1 year follow-up) and ranged between adequate and excellent for FSSQ domains. Correlations between FSSQ scores and those of global functioning, psychiatric symptoms, disability and quality of life ranged between small and large. There were significant differences between groups of patients with schizophrenia in FSSQ scores. Patients with higher levels of somatic complaints and patients who were disabled scored significantly lower in some or all FSSQ scores. After 1-year follow-up, patients improved in overall functioning and there was a decrease in psychiatric symptoms. There were mainly small significant associations between changes in FSSQ scores from baseline to 1-year follow-up and changes in the rest of the test scores, and AMHC visits between baseline and 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The FSSQ scores are reliable and valid, which suggests that the instrument is appropriate for the assessment of perceived social support in patients with schizophrenia.

Predictive value of symptoms for quality of life in first-episode schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Management of the disease symptomatology impacts the long-term functioning and quality of life (QOL) in psychotic patients.

AIM

The aim of this research was to study the association between psychiatric symptoms (positive, negative and general psychopathology symptoms) and QOL in first-episode schizophrenia patients.

METHODS

Fifty-five first-episode drug-naïve schizophrenia outpatients were recruited from a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, India. WHOQOL-Bref (World Health Organization Quality of Life) Scale was used to assess multi-dimensional domains of QOL (physical, psychological, social and environmental health). The patients were evaluated clinically using PANSS and followed up for 6 months. Multivariate analyses were carried out to outline the symptoms which are predictive of QOL in these patients.

RESULTS

Physical well-being as assessed with WHOQOL-Bref is significantly impacted by the positive, negative and general psychopathology symptoms of the disease. General psychopathology symptoms demonstrated a strong relationship with different facets of QOL. These symptoms are predictive of physical (P=0.025) and psychological health (P=0.026), social relationships (P=0.009) and environmental QOL (P=0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

The general psychopathology symptoms significantly impact QOL in a diverse manner. Negative symptoms have a greater influence than positive symptoms on subjective QOL.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The antipsychotics focus on primary positive and negative disease symptoms. There is a need to develop a holistic approach (target non-psychotic symptoms intensively) in the disease management to prevent further long-term impairment of QOL.

Effects of antipsychotic medications on quality of life and psychosocial functioning in patients with early-stage schizophrenia: 1-year follow-up naturalistic study

BACKGROUND

The relative effects of the atypical antipsychotic drugs and conventional agent on quality of life and psychosocial functioning in patients with early-stage schizophrenia is still uncertain because of an insufficient number of studies examining this issue.

METHODS

In a 12 months open-label, prospective observational, multicenter study, 1029 subjects with schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder within 5 years of onset were monotherapy with chlorpromazine, sulpiride, clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine or aripiprazole. The health-related quality of life and psychosocial functioning were assessed using Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), the Global Assessment Scale (GAS) and the Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADL), respectively.

RESULTS

At 12 months, treatment resulted in significant improvements in all 8 domain scores of SF-36, GAS and ADL score (all P-values< .001). However, only olanzapine and quetiapine groups demonstrated greater improvement in the role-psychical score of SF-36 and GAS score than did the chlorpromazine group (all P-values ≤ .002).

CONCLUSIONS

All antipsychotics may improve quality of life and social function in patients with early-stage schizophrenia, but further studies are needed to determine whether atypical antipsychotics are superior to conventional agents.

The effect of paliperidone extended release on subjective well-being and responses in patients with schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the subjective well-being and attitudes toward antipsychotic medication of patients with schizophrenia who had switched to paliperidone extended release (ER).

METHODS

A total of 291 patients with schizophrenia treated with antipsychotics participated in this open-label, 24-week switching study. The primary outcome measures were the Subjective Well-Being under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale-short version (SWN-K) and the Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI). The Krawiecka scale, Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia (CGI-SCH), Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP) were used to evaluate psychopathology and psychosocial functioning, respectively.

RESULTS

Data from a total of 243 subjects who received the study medication and had at least one follow-up assessment without a major protocol violation were analyzed. Scores on the DAI and SWN-K showed significant improvement between baseline and end-point measurements beginning during the second week. Scores on the Krawiecka scale, all five subscales of the CGI-SCH scale, and the PSP scale were also significantly improved at the end point compared with the baseline. Significant predictors of improvements in the SWN-K and DAI after a switch to paliperidone ER were baseline scores, reductions in scores on the Krawiecka scale, and previous risperidone use. A clinically relevant increase in body weight (≥7% weight gain) occurred in one-fourth of the participants who completed the 24-week study.

CONCLUSION

Switching to paliperidone ER improved the subjective well-being and attitudes towards antipsychotic medication in patients with schizophrenia. Exploratory analyses revealed that these improvements were particularly pronounced in patients who had been treated with risperidone before treatment with paliperidone ER.

In patients with schizophrenia, symptoms improvement can be uncorrelated with quality of life improvement

OBJECTIVES

Quality of life has been found to be associated with symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. Nevertheless, the mechanism that underlies this association is still unclear. The objective of this paper is to prospectively evaluate the quality of life of patients with schizophrenia in relation to the concurrent evolution of their symptoms, their expectations and their perceived position in life.

METHODS

Participants included 306 outpatients with schizophrenia who were interviewed at baseline, 6 and 12 months, about their quality of life (Outcome revealed by Preference in Schizophrenia, OPS) and symptoms (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, PANSS).

RESULTS

Quality of life relative to subject expectations remained stable over time. A decrease in symptoms was correlated to an increase in both expectations and perceived position in life but did not correlate to quality of life.

CONCLUSION

The level of expectations seems to play a major role in the subjective assessment of quality of life in patients with schizophrenia. Symptom improvement is not necessarily associated with quality of life improvement relative to subject expectations. Caregivers should be aware of this result so as to deal with possible disappointments in patients receiving a new efficient treatment.

Subjective effects of antipsychotic drugs and their relevance for compliance and remission

Only recently, success criteria became more ambitious and include a more thorough consideration of negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunction. The most important change within the last decade is the long overdue consideration of the patient's perspective. His/her subjective well-being, often unchanged or even worsened by typical antipsychotics, was neglected for a long time. One reason was the prejudice that schizophrenic patients are not able to self-rate their quality of life. Another reason was the belief that such data are not necessary because the psychiatrists' perspective, “objective” psychopathology, includes these domains. Among other scales, a self-report instrument has been constructed to evaluate “subjective well-being under neuroleptics” (SWN). This scale was used in numerous open and controlled trials, indicating: a) patients, if no longer acutely psychotic or suffering from severe cognitive deficits, are able to reliably assess their subjective well-being, b) high SWN is correlated with high compliance, c) atypical antipsychotics increase SWN, and d) individual improvements of SWN and of PANSS are not strongly related. Moreover, several studies found that early improvement of subjective well-being is a major predictor for the chance of remission. All these data indicate that a better consideration of the patient's perspective is possible and necessary.

Assessing function and functional outcome in schizophrenia

The diagnosis of schizophrenia can only be made in the presence of a loss of functioning in domains such as employment, independent living, and social functioning. Accurately measuring functioning is central to research on the course of the disorder, treatment and rehabilitation outcomes, and biosocial factors in schizophrenia. Assessments of functional disability have described three dimensions of functioning: functional capacity, functional performance, and functional outcome. The "competence/performance" distinction refers to the observation that an individual may demonstrate an ability to perform a functional task (capacity) but may not do so in her own community environment (performance). Functional outcomes are the result of both capacity and performance. Several recent reviews have compared the characteristics, reliability, and validity of various functional assessment instruments. Two major initiatives are underway to gather additional comparative data about functional assessment strategies. Recently, both the recovery movement and the recognition of the role of environmental factors in functioning have raised questions about the conceptual content of the functioning construct (construct validity). For instance, several studies have demonstrated that features of functioning need not track together over the course of the illness. In addition, the notion of recovery emphasizes processes like community integration and subjective well-being that are not static outcomes but are continually evolving features of the life course in chronic illness. Findings on the dynamic role of environmental moderators such as support and opportunity also present challenges to scientific constructs. For these reasons and others, the ecological validity of functional assessments has become a central concern. Both the verisimilitude and veridicality of functional assessments can be empirically assessed, but to date very few studies have measured the extent to which functional measures accurately predict individuals' behavior in their usual environments. Observational studies in naturalistic environments are one important area for future research.

Subjective well-being in schizophrenia as measured with the Subjective Well-Being under Neuroleptic Treatment scale: a review

OBJECTIVE

The Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptic Treatment scale (SWN) is the most widely used self-rating scale in recent research of subjective well-being in schizophrenia. We reviewed all available publications on relevant research of subjective well-being using the SWN, in order to evaluate measurement of subjective well-being with a single instrument.

METHOD

A MEDLINE and Embase search was performed for studies published between January 1994 and August 2010, analysing controlled and open clinical trials using the SWN.

RESULTS

A total of 52 publications were identified covering 44 studies. Strong evidence exists for improvement of subjective well-being during treatment. Atypical antipsychotics are associated with a higher level of well-being. However, dosage is more important than the kind of medication. Striatal dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy is correlated with subjective well-being. Early positive response of subjective well-being is predictive of a better outcome. Research on determinants of subjective well-being is rapidly expanding, focusing mostly on the effects of medication.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjective well-being of schizophrenia patients is a valuable outcome measure. It can be improved by optimizing antipsychotic treatment. More research on psychological and genetic predictors of subjective well-being is needed.

The World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version: a validation study in patients with schizophrenia

PURPOSE

The World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) is used for patients with schizophrenia although no validation is available. This work addresses this issue by dealing with its psychometric properties in a clinical sample of patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

Two hundred forty-one patients from 10 Adult Mental Health Care Centers (AMHCC) meeting the following inclusion criteria were included: (1) International Classification of Diseases-10 or ICD-10 diagnosis of schizophrenia, (2) Global Assessment of Functioning scores or GAF ≤ 50, 3) Illness duration of more than 2 years and (4) Clinical stability at assessment time. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at one-year follow-up regarding quality of life (QOL), clinical variables and other psychosocial measures.

RESULTS

Internal consistency was excellent for the total WHOQOL-BREF (0.88 at baseline and 0.89 at follow-up) and adequate (0.65-0.78 at baseline; 0.66-0.79 at one-year follow-up) for the WHOQOL-BREF domains. Correlations between WHOQOL-BREF scores and those of global functioning, psychiatric symptoms, disability and social support ranged between small and large. There were significant differences between groups of patients with schizophrenia in the WHOQOL-BREF. Patients who were anxious, disabled, lacked social support and used more social services scored significantly lower in some or all WHOQOL-BREF domains. Changes in WHOQOL-BREF scores were positively associated with changes over time in global functioning, social support and use of health services, and negatively with psychiatric symptoms and disability (correlation coefficients between small and moderate). After one-year follow-up, patients improved in overall functioning and there was a decrease in psychiatric symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the WHOQOL-BREF has good reliability and validity, and suggests that it is suitable for the assessment of QOL in patients with schizophrenia.

Challenging the assumption that improvement in functional outcomes is delayed relative to improvement in symptoms in the treatment of schizophrenia

OBJECTIVES

Functional improvement is generally thought to be distal to improvement in psychiatric symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. In this study, we assessed the effects of early response/non-response to an atypical antipsychotic across multiple outcome measures.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose, 12-week study that enrolled chronically-ill patients (n=628) diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who were experiencing acute symptom exacerbation. Patients were initially assigned to risperidone drug therapy (2-6 mg/day), and their response status at 2 weeks was determined. Early responders (ERs) continued with risperidone therapy, whereas early non-responders (ENRs) were randomized (1:1) in a double-blind manner to either continue on risperidone or switch to another atypical antipsychotic for 10 additional weeks of therapy. Subsequent treatment outcomes were measured by the Quality of Life Scale (QLS), Schizophrenia Objective Functioning Instrument (SOFI), and Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptics (SWN-K) scale.

RESULTS

Compared to ENRs, ERs to risperidone showed significantly more improvement from baseline to endpoint on the QLS total score and all 4 categories (p<.01), the SOFI overall global score and all 4 domains (p<.001), and the SWN-K total score and all 5 subscales (p<.05). Among ERs, the majority of improvement had already been attained by Week 2. There was concordance among clinician- and patient-rated scales across outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Improvement across multiple outcome dimensions was not delayed relative to improvement in psychiatric symptoms. Rather, patients who showed an early response to antipsychotic treatment as defined by improvement in psychiatric symptoms also showed early and consistent improvement in functioning, quality of life, and subjective well-being.

Clinician-rated functioning and patient-rated quality of life in schizophrenia: implications of their correspondence for psychopathology and side effects

OBJECTIVE

Past studies have found inconsistent associations between subjective and objective measures of quality of life (QOL) in schizophrenia. We hypothesized that this may be due to heterogeneity in the demographic and/or clinical variables inherent in the samples and we investigated this possibility.

METHODS

We stratified the patients according to a descriptive measure of correspondence between self-reported QOL and clinician-rated functioning. We then examined whether heterogeneous patterns existed among the subgroups in terms of demographic variables, symptom severity, associations between self-reported and clinician-rated psychopathology and associations between side effects, QOL and functioning.

RESULTS

The subgroups significantly differed with respect to clinician-rated positive symptoms (F=3.075, p<.05), subjective symptoms (somatization, F=5.768, p<.01; obsessive-compulsive, F=3.885, p<.05; interpersonal sensitivity, F=8.278, p<.001; depression, F=9.368, p<.001; anxiety, F=6.909, p<.01; hostility, F=7.787, p<.01; phobic anxiety, F=9.551, p<.001; paranoia, F=5.304, p<.01; psychoticism, F=5.071, p<.01) and in- and outpatient ratio (Chi(2)=11.58, p<.01). Only the subgroup with relatively good correspondence between clinician-rated functioning and self-reported QOL showed significant low to moderate associations between the aforementioned measures and side effects. In addition, they showed similar levels of significant associations between the positive and subjective symptoms. In contrast, other discordant subgroups lacked overall associations between side effects, functioning and QOL as well as between subjective and objective measures of psychopathology.

CONCLUSION

Low to moderate levels of correspondence between subjective QOL and objective functioning were partly supportive of the independence of the constructs. Insight is likely to be a mediating variable of the correspondence between self-report and clinician-rated measures and should be considered in studies using self-report measures.

The model of the relationships among the predictors of quality of life in chronic stage of schizophrenia

We attempted to formulate a model of quality of life (QoL) in chronic stage of schizophrenia with 72 patients by including key variables, i.e., psychopathology, insight, executive functioning, and side effects, proposed to be its significant predictors in previous studies. We applied the structural equation modelling (SEM) method to simultaneously test a number of possible hypotheses concerning the inter-relations among the predictors of QoL in schizophrenia patients by formulating possible models and examining their levels of fitness. Our most fit model (X(2)=2.106, df=4, P=0.716; CFI=1.000; TLI=1.213; RMSEA=0.000, LO=0.000, HI=0.132) showed that the severity of psychopathology not only directly causes poor QoL, but also by adversely affecting insight. On the other hand, executive function may not be affected significantly by psychopathology, but executive function still plays an important role in determining the QoL not only directly, but also indirectly by influencing self-evaluation of side-effects. Impaired insight and executive function caused by severe level of psychopathology contribute to an increased reporting of side-effects, resulting in cumulative dysfunction in daily life for patients with chronic schizophrenia. Our study illustrates that the complexity of the relationships among the predictors of QoL in chronic patients of schizophrenia should be considered when designing studies on QoL of this group.

Effect of Warm-Supplementing Kidney Yang (WSKY) added to risperidone on quality of life in patients with schizophrenia: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the quality of life, efficacy and safety of Warm-Supplementing Kidney Yang (WSKY) added to risperidone in patients with schizophrenia.

DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

The outpatient and inpatient departments of three hospitals.

SUBJECTS

One hundred and twenty patients with clinically diagnosed schizophrenia with predominantly negative symptoms were included in the study.

INTERVENTION

All 120 patients were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with WSKY group (n = 60) or placebo group (n = 60) added to risperidone for eight weeks.

MAIN MEASURE

The efficacy measures included the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale (WHOQOL-100), the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Social Disability Screening Schedule and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the trial.

RESULTS

The scores of quality of life in the WSKY group showed statistically significant improvement at the end-point of treatment compared with those in the placebo group (WSKY, increasing 40.5 (29.4); placebo, increasing 14.4 (27.1); F =24.900, P<0.001), while the scores of social function and depression symptoms also showed statistically significant improvement. The response rates for the WHOQOL-100 total scores were 50.0% for the WSKY group versus 31.7% for placebo group (chi( 2) = 4.172, P=0.041). There were no significant differences in the safety/tolerability measures between the WSKY group and the placebo group during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that WSKY added to risperidone significantly improved the quality of life, social function, depression symptom compared with placebo added to risperidone.

Subjective wellbeing under quetiapine treatment: effect of diagnosis, mood state, and anxiety

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of diagnosis, mood state, and anxiety on subjective wellbeing in patients with affective and non-affective psychotic disorders treated with quetiapine IR.

METHODS

2175 patients with schizophrenia-spectrum (SZ, n=1681), schizoaffective (SA, n=249), and bipolar disorder (BPD, n=245) were treated with quetiapine over 6 months and assessed with the Clinical Global Impression-Severity of illness Scale (CGI-S) and the Subjective Wellbeing under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K). Diagnostic group differences and effects of mood state and anxiety on subjective wellbeing were analyzed using multi-factorial linear regression analysis and mixed models repeated measures.

RESULTS

At baseline, despite similar CGI-S scores, significant SWN-K score differences between SZ (57.7 points), SA (64.1 points), and BPD (79.5 points) were detected. At baseline, depression (p<0.001) and anxiety (p<0.001) were independently associated with a worse and mania (p<0.001) with a better subjective wellbeing. Subjective wellbeing improved significantly in all groups (p<0.001; 27.6 points), and endpoint subjective wellbeing was not predicted by baseline depression or anxiety, but by endpoint depression and anxiety.

CONCLUSION

Interventions to improve subjective wellbeing should take into account the course of mood state and anxiety. Assessment of subjective wellbeing and subjective quality of life in acute mania may need adapted tools.

Long-term patterns of subjective wellbeing in schizophrenia: cluster, predictors of cluster affiliation, and their relation to recovery criteria in 2842 patients followed over 3 years

OBJECTIVE

To study the longitudinal patterns of subjective wellbeing in schizophrenia using cluster analysis and their relation to recovery criteria, further to examine predictors for cluster affiliation, and to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of baseline subjective wellbeing cut-offs for cluster affiliation.

METHODS

Data was collected in an observational 36-month follow-up study of 2842 patients with schizophrenia in Germany. Subjective wellbeing was assessed using the SWN-K scale. Cluster analyses were applied based on Ward's procedure. Predictors were analyzed using logistic regression models. Optimal SWN-K total score cut-off points for cluster affiliation were analyzed using Cohen's kappa.

RESULTS

4 distinct clusters were identified: a stable low (33%), a stable moderate (31%), a stable high (16%), and a cluster with distinct initial improvement and then stable high subjective wellbeing (20%). Highly concordant patterns were also observed for symptoms, social functioning, and quality of life. Sensitivity and specificity of SWN-K total score cut-offs at baseline were 82.8% and 63.8% for <or=60 points for the stable low cluster and 84.7% and 95.4% for >or=80 points for the stable high cluster. Affiliation to the stable low cluster was related to a 0.6% chance of being in recovery at 3-year endpoint.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term patterns of subjective wellbeing are stable and highly concordant with course of symptoms, functioning level, and quality of life. Baseline subjective wellbeing cut-off points were found to be sufficient predictors of outcome, which, particularly in case of impaired subjective wellbeing and low baseline functioning level, make early treatment adaptations mandatory.

Preliminary data concerning the reliability and psychometric properties of the Greek translation of the 20-item Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-20)

BACKGROUND

The 20-item Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-20) is a self-report scale developed in order to assess the well-being of patients receiving antipsychotic medication independent of the improvement in their psychotic symptoms. The current study reports on the reliability and the psychometric properties of the Greek translation of the SWN-20.

METHODS

A total of 100 inpatients or outpatients with schizophrenia (79 males and 21 females, aged 42.6 +/- 11.35 years old) from 3 different facilities were assessed with the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS), the Calgary Depression Scale and the Simpson-Angus Scale, and completed the SWN-20. The statistical analysis included the calculation of Pearson product moment correlation coefficient, the Cronbach alpha and factor analysis with Varimax normalised rotation.

RESULTS

The SWN-20 had an alpha value equal to 0.79 and all the items were equal. The factor analysis revealed the presence of seven factors explaining 66% of total variance. The correlation matrix revealed a moderate relationship of the SWN-20 and its factors with the PANSS-Negative (PANSS-N), PANSS-General Psychopathology (PANSS-G), the Simpson-Angus and the Calgary scales, and no relationship to age, education and income class.

DISCUSSION

The Greek translation of the SWN-20 is reliable, with psychometric properties close to the original scale.

Rates and predictors of remission and recovery during 3 years in 392 never-treated patients with schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have prospectively examined remission and recovery as well as their predictors in schizophrenia simultaneously. Aims of the study were to identify remission and recovery rates as well as their predictors in schizophrenia.

METHOD

392 never-treated patients with schizophrenia were assessed over 3 years. Combined remission and recovery required concurrent achievement of symptomatic and functional remission as well as adequate quality of life for at least 6 and 24 months respectively. Predictors were analysed using stepwise logistic regression models.

RESULTS

At 3 years, remission rates for symptoms, functioning and subjective wellbeing were 60.3%, 45.4% and 57.0%; recovery rates were 51.7%, 35.0% and 44.3%. Of those, 28.1% were in combined remission and 17.1% in combined recovery. Predictors mainly included the baseline functional status and early remission within the first 3 months.

CONCLUSION

The proportion of patients who met combined remission or recovery criteria is low. Early treatment adaptations in case of early non-remission are mandatory.

Patterns of physician and patient rated quality of life during antipsychotic treatment in outpatients with schizophrenia

Quality of life (QoL) in patients with schizophrenia has been assessed both from physician and patient perspectives, but little is known about agreement between these perspectives and predictors of agreement. The aim of this study was to analyze a large sample of patients with schizophrenia to discover patterns of physician and patient-rated QoL in patients with schizophrenia and identify predictors for these patterns. This study (EASE) was designed to investigate the QoL and subjective well-being in out-patients with schizophrenia during antipsychotic treatment in a naturalistic setting. Assessments were carried out at baseline and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, using the quality of life scale (QLS) and the subjective well-being on neuroleptics scale (SWN-K). A hierarchical cluster analysis was used to define groups of patients based on the SWN-K and QLS total scores at all visits. 1174 patients were included in the cluster analyses that were based on SWN-K and QLS total scores over time. Four distinct clusters were identified: patients with: (1) continuously high QoL (23.2%), (2) continuously moderate QoL (45.8%), (3) continuously low QoL (11.2%), and (4) improving QoL (19.9%). Clusters 1-3 were stable in terms of QoL, whilst cluster 4 changed towards improvement. Various predictors for the four clusters were identified. In the cluster with improving QoL, the absence of treatment with an oral conventional antipsychotic pre-study and no medication change due to lack of efficacy at baseline were predictors for improvement. In the cluster with continuously high QoL, no medication change due to lack of efficacy and lowest CGI-S scores at baseline were predictors. Oral conventional antipsychotic treatment pre-study was predictive for the cluster with continuously moderate QoL. In the cluster with continuously low QoL, medication change due to lack of efficacy and highest CGI-S scores were predictors. These findings suggest that various factors may predict whether a patient with schizophrenia experiences a continuously high QoL, a continuously moderate QoL, a continuously low QoL, or improving QoL whilst on antipsychotic treatment.

Evaluation of subjective treatment satisfaction with antipsychotics in schizophrenia patients

Adherence to antipsychotic treatment is particularly important in the long-term management of schizophrenia and other related psychotic disorders since poor adherence to medication is associated with poor health outcomes. Although the patients' subjective satisfaction with the medication is crucial for adherence to medication, few studies have examined the relationship between subjective satisfaction with antipsychotics and adherence. In this study, we investigated subjective satisfaction with antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia by using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), a self-reporting instrument to assess the major dimensions of patients' satisfaction with their medication. The subjects included 121 clinically stabilized outpatients who met the following criteria: 1) patients between 20 and 65 years of age, diagnosed with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders as defined by DSM-IV, 2) patients undergoing oral antipsychotic monotherapy or taking only an antiparkinsonian agent as an adjuvant remedy, and 3) patients who had received a stable dose of an antipsychotic for more than four weeks. Patients were asked to answer the TSQM questions, and their clinical symptoms were also evaluated by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Satisfaction with regard to side-effects (p=0.015) and global satisfaction (p=0.035) were significantly higher in patients taking second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs, n=111) than those taking first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs, n=10), whereas no significant difference was found between the two groups in clinical symptoms according to BPRS (p=0.637) or the Drug-induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale (DIEPSS, p=0.209). In addition, correlations were not significant between the subjective satisfactions and clinician-rated objective measures of the symptoms. These findings suggest that SGAs have more favorable subjective satisfaction profiles than FGAs in the treatment of schizophrenia. Since it is often difficult to detect the difference by a traditional objective assessment of the patients, it is desirable that physicians pay attention to the patients' subjective satisfaction in conjunction with their own objective clinical assessment.