Evidence of some strategic preservation of episodic learning in patients with schizophrenia

Metacognitive preserved generation strategy benefits for both younger and elderly participants with schizophrenia

Cognitive memory and introspection disturbances are considered core features of schizophrenia. Moreover, it remains unclear whether or not participants with schizophrenia are more cognitively impaired with ageing than healthy participants. The aims of this study were to use a metacognitive approach to determine whether elderly participants with schizophrenia are able to improve their memory performance using a specific generation strategy and to evaluate the memory benefits for them using this strategy. 20 younger and 20 older participants with schizophrenia and their comparison participants matched for age, gender and education learned paired associates words with either reading or generation, rated judgment of learning (JOL) and performed cued recall. Participants with schizophrenia recalled fewer words than healthy comparison participants, but they benefited more from generation, and this difference was stable with ageing. Their JOL magnitude was lower than that of healthy comparison participants, but JOL accuracy was not affected by either age or the pathology. In spite of their memory deficit, elderly and younger participants with schizophrenia benefited remarkably from the memory generation strategy. This result gives some cause for optimism as to the possibility for participants with schizophrenia to reduce memory impairment if learning conditions lead them to encode deeply.

Can individuals with schizophrenia be instructed to deliberately feign memory deficits?

INTRODUCTION

Neuropsychological tests are increasingly applied in research studies and clinical practice in psychiatry. In this context, the detection of poor effort is crucial to adequately interpret data. We measured schizophrenia patients' performance on a memory test designed to detect excessive malingering (the "21-Item Test"), before examining whether a second group of schizophrenia patients would excessively malinger on this test when given an incentive to feign memory impairment.

METHODS

Two independent studies including respectively 49 schizophrenia patients and 100 controls (study 1) and 25 schizophrenia patients and 25 controls (study 2) were conducted. In study 1, participants were asked to complete the 21-Item Test to the best of their ability. In study 2, participants were given a hypothetical scenario in which having a memory impairment would be financially advantageous for them, before completing the 21-Item Test.

RESULTS

In study 1, no participant scored at levels indicative of excessive malingering. In study 2, 84% of controls but only 36% of patients scored at excessive levels of malingering, and these patients had higher executive functioning than patients who did not excessively malinger, although it should be noted that a significantly greater proportion of patients excessively malingered in study 2 compared to study 1.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that schizophrenia patients do not normally feign excessive memory impairment during psychological testing. Furthermore, they are less able and/or less inclined to excessively malinger than controls in situations where a memory impairment would be advantageous, perhaps indicating a better ability to malinger without detection. Potential clinical implications are discussed.

Metamemory with ageing in schizophrenia: a first study

The aim was to study metamemory during encoding in older schizophrenia patients. Thirteen older patients were compared to 13 healthy controls. Despite their memory impairment, older schizophrenia patients were able to assess the material accurately. They were not able, however, to adapt their learning time as efficiently as controls.

Preserved strategic grain-size regulation in memory reporting in patients with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Cognitive and introspection disturbances are considered core features of schizophrenia. In real life, people are usually free to choose which aspects of an event they recall, how much detail to volunteer, and what degree of confidence to impart. Their decision will depend on various situational and personal goals. The authors explored whether schizophrenia patients are able to achieve a compromise between accuracy and informativeness when reporting semantic information.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients and 23 healthy matched control subjects answered general knowledge questions requiring numerical answers (how high is the Eiffel tower?), freely at first and then through a metamemory-based control. In the second phase, they answered with respect to two predefined intervals, one narrow and one broad; attributed a confidence judgment to both answers; and afterward selected one of the two answers. Data were analyzed using analyses of variance with group as the between-subjects factor.

RESULTS

Patients reported information at a self-paced level of precision less accurately than healthy participants. However, they benefited remarkably from the framing of the response and from the metamemory processes of monitoring and control to the point of improving their memory reporting and matching healthy subjects' accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of their memory deficit during free reporting, after accuracy monitoring, patients strategically regulated the grain size of their memory reporting and proved able to manage the competing goals of accuracy and informativeness. These results give some cause for optimism as to the possibility for patients to adapt to everyday life situations.

The global cognitive impairment in schizophrenia: consistent over decades and around the world

OBJECTIVE

Schizophrenia results in cognitive impairments as well as positive, negative, and disorganized symptomatology. The present study examines the extent to which these cognitive deficits are generalized across domains, potential moderator variables, and whether the pattern of cognitive findings reported in schizophrenia has remained consistent over time and across cultural and geographic variation.

METHOD

Relevant publications from 2006 to 2011 were identified through keyword searches in PubMed and an examination of reference lists. Studies were included if they (1) compared the cognitive performance of adult schizophrenia patients and healthy controls, (2) based schizophrenia diagnoses on contemporary diagnostic criteria, (3) reported information sufficient to permit effect size calculation, (4) were reported in English, and (5) reported data for neuropsychological tests falling into at least 3 distinct cognitive domains. A set of 100 non-overlapping studies was identified, and effect sizes (Hedge's g) were calculated for each cognitive variable.

RESULTS

Consistent with earlier analyses, patients with schizophrenia scored significantly lower than controls across all cognitive tests and domains (grand mean effect size, g=-1.03). Patients showed somewhat larger impairments in the domains of processing speed (g=-1.25) and episodic memory (g=-1.23). Our results also showed few inconsistencies when grouped by geographic region.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study extends findings from 1980 to 2006 of a substantial, generalized cognitive impairment in schizophrenia, demonstrating that this finding has remained robust over time despite changes in assessment instruments and alterations in diagnostic criteria, and that it manifests similarly in different regions of the world despite linguistic and cultural differences.