1
|
Wu X, Stabile LP, Burns TF. The Emerging Role of Immune Checkpoint Blockade for the Treatment of Lung Cancer Brain Metastases. Clin Lung Cancer 2024:S1525-7304(24)00124-4. [PMID: 38991863 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
Lung cancer has the highest incidence of brain metastases (BM) among solid organ cancers. Traditionally whole brain radiation therapy has been utilized for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) BM treatment, although stereotactic radiosurgery has emerged as the superior treatment modality for most patients. Highly penetrant central nervous system (CNS) tyrosine kinase inhibitors have also shown significant CNS activity in patients harboring select oncogenic drivers. There is emerging evidence that patients without oncogene-driven tumors derive benefit from the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The CNS activity of ICIs have not been well studied given exclusion of patients with active BM from landmark trials, due to concerns of inadequate CNS penetration and activity. However, studies have challenged the idea of an immune-privileged CNS, given the presence of functional lymphatic drainage within the CNS and destruction of the blood brain barrier by BM. An emerging understanding of the interactions between tumor and CNS immune cells in the BM tumor microenvironment also support a role for immunotherapy in BM treatment. In addition, posthoc analyses of major trials have shown improved intracranial response and survival benefit of regimens with ICIs over chemotherapy (CT) alone for patients with BM. Two prospective phase 2 trials evaluating pembrolizumab monotherapy and atezolizumab plus CT in patients with untreated NSCLC BM also demonstrated significant intracranial responses. This review describes the interplay between CNS immune cells and tumor cells, discusses current evidence for ICI CNS activity from retrospective and prospective studies, and speculates on future directions of investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiancheng Wu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Laura P Stabile
- Department of Pharmacology & Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Timothy F Burns
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mashiach E, Alzate JD, De Nigris Vasconcellos F, Adams S, Santhumayor B, Meng Y, Schnurman Z, Donahue BR, Bernstein K, Orillac C, Bollam R, Kwa MJ, Meyers M, Oratz R, Novik Y, Silverman JS, Harter DH, Golfinos JG, Kondziolka D. Improved outcomes for triple negative breast cancer brain metastases patients after stereotactic radiosurgery and new systemic approaches. J Neurooncol 2024; 168:99-109. [PMID: 38630386 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04651-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although ongoing studies are assessing the efficacy of new systemic therapies for patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the overwhelming majority have excluded patients with brain metastases (BM). Therefore, we aim to characterize systemic therapies and outcomes in a cohort of patients with TNBC and BM managed with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and delineate predictors of increased survival. METHODS We used our prospective patient registry to evaluate data from 2012 to 2023. We included patients who received SRS for TNBC-BM. A competing risk analysis was conducted to assess local and distant control. RESULTS Forty-three patients with 262 tumors were included. The median overall survival (OS) was 16 months (95% CI 13-19 months). Predictors of increased OS after initial SRS include Breast GPA score > 1 (p < 0.001) and use of immunotherapy such as pembrolizumab (p = 0.011). The median time on immunotherapy was 8 months (IQR 4.4, 11.2). The median time to new CNS lesions after the first SRS treatment was 17 months (95% CI 12-22). The cumulative rate for development of new CNS metastases after initial SRS at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years was 23%, 40%, and 70%, respectively. Thirty patients (70%) underwent multiple SRS treatments, with a median time of 5 months (95% CI 0.59-9.4 months) for the appearance of new CNS metastases after second SRS treatment. CONCLUSIONS TNBC patients with BM can achieve longer survival than might have been previously anticipated with median survival now surpassing one year. The use of immunotherapy is associated with increased median OS of 23 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elad Mashiach
- Department of Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Juan Diego Alzate
- Department of Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Sylvia Adams
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brandon Santhumayor
- Department of Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ying Meng
- Department of Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zane Schnurman
- Department of Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bernadine R Donahue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
- Maimonides Cancer Center, Maimonides Health, Brooklyn, NY, 11220, USA
| | - Kenneth Bernstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cordelia Orillac
- Department of Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rishitha Bollam
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maryann J Kwa
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marleen Meyers
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ruth Oratz
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yelena Novik
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joshua S Silverman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - David H Harter
- Department of Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - John G Golfinos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Douglas Kondziolka
- Department of Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang L, Chen S, Liu H, Meng L, Liu C, Wu X, Wang Y, Luo S, Tu H, Wang C, Zhang M, Gong X. PD-L1 inhibitors combined with whole brain radiotherapy in patients with small cell lung cancer brain metastases: Real-world evidence. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7125. [PMID: 38613182 PMCID: PMC11015079 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous studies have demonstrated that brain metastases patients may benefit from intracranial radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, it is unclear whether this treatment is effective for patients with small cell lung cancer brain metastases (SCLC-BMs). METHODS We conducted a retrospective study by analyzing medical records of patients with SCLC-BMs from January 1, 2017 to June 1, 2022. Data related to median overall survival (mOS), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 109 patients were enrolled, of which 60 received WBRT and 49 received WBRT-ICI. Compared to the WBRT alone cohort, the WBRT-ICI cohort showed longer mOS (20.4 months vs. 29.3 months, p = 0.021), mPFS (7.9 months vs. 15.1 months, p < 0.001), and iPFS (8.3 months vs. 16.5 months, p < 0.001). Furthermore, WBRT-ICI cohort had a better response rate for both BMs. (p = 0.035) and extracranial diseases (p < 0.001) compared to those receiving WBRT alone. Notably, the use of WBRT before ICI was associated with longer mOS compared to the use of WBRT after ICI (23.3 months for the ICI-WBRT group vs. 34.8 months for the WBRT-ICI group, p = 0.020). CONCLUSION Our results indicated that WBRT combined with immunotherapy improved survival in SCLC-BMs patients compared to WBRT monotherapy. Administering WBRT prior to ICI treatment is associated with improved survival outcomes compared to WBRT following ICI treatment, for patients with SCLC-BMs. These findings highlight the significance of conducting further prospective researches on combination strategies of intracranial radiotherapy and ICI in SCLC-BMs patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Litang Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of MedicineTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Shen Chen
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary HospitalTongji University, School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Hui Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of MedicineTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Lu Meng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of MedicineTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Chengxing Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Tongji HospitalTongji University, School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Xiaoting Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of MedicineTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Yingying Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of MedicineTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Shilan Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of MedicineTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Hongbin Tu
- Department of Integrated TCM and Western Medicine, Shanghai Pulmonary HospitalTongji University, School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Chunlei Wang
- Department of EndocrinologyThe Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nantong UniversityJiangsuChina
| | - Ming Zhang
- Department of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western MedicineShanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Chest HospitalShanghaiChina
| | - Xiaomei Gong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of MedicineTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Knox A, Wang T, Shackleton M, Ameratunga M. Symptomatic brain metastases in melanoma. Exp Dermatol 2024; 33:e15075. [PMID: 38610093 DOI: 10.1111/exd.15075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
Although clinical outcomes in metastatic melanoma have improved in recent years, the morbidity and mortality of symptomatic brain metastases remain challenging. Response rates and survival outcomes of patients with symptomatic melanoma brain metastases (MBM) are significantly inferior to patients with asymptomatic disease. This review focusses upon the specific challenges associated with the management of symptomatic MBM, discussing current treatment paradigms, obstacles to improving clinical outcomes and directions for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Knox
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Tim Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mark Shackleton
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Malaka Ameratunga
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mandalà M, Lorigan P, Sergi MC, Benannoune N, Serra P, Vitale MG, Giannarelli D, Arance AM, Couselo EM, Neyns B, Tucci M, Guida M, Spagnolo F, Rossi E, Occelli M, Queirolo P, Quaglino P, Depenni R, Merelli B, Placzke J, Di Giacomo AM, Del Vecchio M, Indini A, da Silva IP, Menzies AM, Long GV, Robert C, Rutkowski P, Ascierto PA. Combined immunotherapy in melanoma patients with brain metastases: A multicenter international study. Eur J Cancer 2024; 199:113542. [PMID: 38266540 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2023] [Revised: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ipilimumab plus nivolumab (COMBO) is the standard treatment in asymptomatic patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM). We report a retrospective study aiming to assess the outcome of patients with MBM treated with COMBO outside clinical trials. METHODS Consecutive patients treated with COMBO have been included. Demographics, steroid treatment, Central Nervous System (CNS)-related symptoms, BRAF status, radiotherapy or surgery, response rate (RR), progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have been analyzed. RESULTS 376 patients were included: 262 received COMBO as first-line and 114 as a subsequent line of therapy, respectively. In multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) (≥1 vs 0) [HR 1.97 (1.46-2.66)], extracerebral metastases [HR 1.92 (1.09-3.40)], steroid use at the start of COMBO [HR 1.59 (1.08-2.38)], CNS-related symptoms [HR 1.59 (1.08-2.34)], SRS (Stereotactic radiosurgery) [HR 0.63 (0.45-0.88)] and surgery [HR 0.63 (0.43-0.91)] were associated with OS. At a median follow-up of 30 months, the median OS (mOS) in the overall population was 21.3 months (18.1-24.5), whilst OS was not yet reached in treatment-naive patients, steroid-free at baseline. In patients receiving COMBO after BRAF/MEK inhibitors(i) PFS at 1-year was 15.7%. The dose of steroids (dexamethasone < vs ≥ 4 mg/day) was not prognostic. SRS alongside COMBO vs COMBO alone in asymptomatic patients prolonged survival. (p = 0.013). Toxicities were consistent with previous studies. An independent validation cohort (n = 51) confirmed the findings. CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrate remarkable long-term survival in treatment-naïve, asymptomatic, steroid-free patients, as well as in those receiving SRS plus COMBO. PFS and OS were poor in patients receiving COMBO after progressing to BRAF/MEKi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Mandalà
- Unit of Medical Oncology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Maria Chiara Sergi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Patricio Serra
- The University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Maria Grazia Vitale
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, I.N.T. IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale" Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Diana Giannarelli
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Eva Munoz Couselo
- Department of Medical Oncology. Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain & Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bart Neyns
- Department of Medical Oncology, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marco Tucci
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Michele Guida
- Rare Tumors and Melanoma Unit, IRCCS Istituto dei Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II," Bari, Italy
| | | | - Ernesto Rossi
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Pietro Quaglino
- Department of Dermatology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Roberta Depenni
- University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Department of Oncology, Hematology, Modena, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | | | - Joanna Placzke
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | | | - Alice Indini
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Ines Pires da Silva
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, and Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, and Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, and Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Caroline Robert
- Gustave Roussy and Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, I.N.T. IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale" Napoli, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Peiliang Wang MD, Yikun Li MM, Mengyu Zhao MM, Jinming Yu MD, Feifei Teng MD. Distinguishing immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis from radiation pneumonitis by CT radiomics features in non-small cell lung cancer. Int Immunopharmacol 2024; 128:111489. [PMID: 38266450 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.111489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a CT-based model to classify pneumonitis etiology in patients with non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) after radiotherapy(RT) and Immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs). METHODS We retrospectively identified 130 NSCLC patients who developed pneumonitis after receipt of ICIs only (n = 50), thoracic RT only (n = 50) (ICIs only + thoracic RT only, the training cohort, n = 100), and RT + ICIs (the test cohort, n = 30). Clinical and CT radiomics features were described and compared between different groups. We constructed a random forest (RF) classifier and a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier by CT radiomics to discern pneumonitis etiology. RESULTS The patients in RT + ICIs group have more high grade (grade 3-4) pneumonitis compared to patients in ICIs only or RT only group (p < 0.05). Pneumonitis after the combined therapy was not a simple superposition mode of RT-related pneumonitis(RP) and ICI-related pneumonitis(CIP), resulting in the distinct characteristics of both RT and ICIs-related pneumonitis. The RF classifier showed favorable discrimination between RP and CIP with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.859 (95 %CI: 0.788-0.929) in the training cohort and 0.851 (95 % CI: 0.700-1) in the test cohort. The LDA classifier achieved an AUC of 0.881 (95 %CI: 0.815-0.947) in the training cohort and 0.842 (95 %CI: 0.686-0.997) in the test cohort. Our analysis revealed four principal CT-based features shared across both models:original_glrlm_LongRunLowGrayLevelEmphasis, wavelet-HLL_firstorder_Median, wavelet-LLL_ngtdm_Busyness, and wavelet-LLL_glcm_JointAverage. CONCLUSION CT radiomics-based classifiers could provide a noninvasive method to identify the predominant etiology in NSCLC patients who developed pneumonitis after RT alone, ICIs alone or RT + ICIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M D Peiliang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250117, China
| | - M M Yikun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China
| | - M M Mengyu Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China
| | - M D Jinming Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250117, China
| | - M D Feifei Teng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250117, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li C, Li K, Zhong S, Tang M, Shi X, Bao Y. Which is the best treatment for melanoma brain metastases? A Bayesian network meta-analysis and systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 194:104227. [PMID: 38220124 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Melanoma has a high degree of central nervous system tropism, and there are many treatment modalities for melanoma brain metastases (MBM). The efficacy and toxicity of various treatments are still controversial. Therefore, they were evaluated by direct and indirect comparison to assist clinical decision-making in this study. METHOD A total of 7 therapeutic modalities for MBM were studied. Retrieval was conducted through Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of science databases and the quality of the included literature was evaluated. Meta-analysis and Bayesian network meta-analysis were performed using Review Manager and R language. RESULTS A total of 10 articles were included with 836 MBM patients. Direct comparison showed that stereotactic radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy (SRS + IT) was superior to IT (HR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.52-0.84) or SRS (HR = 0.81, 95%CI = 0.63-1.03) alone in improving intracranial progression-free survival (PFS). In terms of overall survival (OS), SRS + IT was superior to SRS alone (HR = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.49-0.83), or IT (HR = 0.59, 95%CI = 0.29-1.21). Rank probability and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) by indirect comparison showed that SRS + IT had the best effect on improving intracranial PFS (0.88) and OS (0.98). Additionally, various combination therapies, especially SRS + IT (0.72), increased the incidence of radiation necrosis (RN). In direct comparisons, SRS + IT (RR = 0.93, 95%CI = 0.47-1.83) and SRS + TT (targeted therapy) (RR = 0.24, 95%CI = 0.10-0.56) did not increase intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) compared with SRS. CONCLUSIONS SRS + IT treatment was the best choice for MBM patients in both intracranial PFS and OS, even though it also led to an increased probability of RN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cong Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Hospital of China Medical University, No. 4 Chongshandong, Huanggu, Shenyang 110084, China
| | - Kunhang Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Hospital of China Medical University, No. 4 Chongshandong, Huanggu, Shenyang 110084, China
| | - Shiyu Zhong
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Hospital of China Medical University, No. 4 Chongshandong, Huanggu, Shenyang 110084, China
| | - Mingzheng Tang
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, China
| | - Xin Shi
- School of Maths and Information Science, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai 264005, China; Business School, All Saints Campus, Manchester Metropolitan University, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom; Institute of Health Sciences, China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, China.
| | - Yijun Bao
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Hospital of China Medical University, No. 4 Chongshandong, Huanggu, Shenyang 110084, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mehkri Y, Windermere SA, Still MEH, Yan SC, Goutnik M, Melnick K, Doonan B, Ghiaseddin AP, Rahman M. The Safety and Efficacy of Concurrent Immune Checkpoint Blockade and Stereotactic Radiosurgery Therapy with Practitioner and Researcher Recommendations. World Neurosurg 2024; 181:e133-e153. [PMID: 37739175 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.09.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown growing promise in the treatment of brain metastases, especially combined with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The combination of ICIs with SRS has been studied for efficacy as well as increasing radiation necrosis risks. In this review, we compare clinical outcomes of radiation necrosis, intracranial control, and overall survival between patients with brain metastases treated with either SRS alone or SRS-ICI combination therapy. METHODS A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane was performed in May 2023 for articles comparing the safety and efficacy of SRS/ICI versus SRS-alone for treating brain metastases. RESULTS The search criteria identified 1961 articles, of which 48 met inclusion criteria. Combination therapy with SRS and ICI does not lead to significant increases in incidence of radiation necrosis either radiographically or symptomatically. Overall, no difference was found in intracranial control between SRS-alone and SRS-ICI combination therapy. Combination therapy is associated with increased median overall survival. Notably, some comparative studies observed decreased neurologic deaths, challenging presumptions that improved survival is due to greater systemic control. The literature supports SRS-ICI administration within 4 weeks of another for survival but remains inconclusive, requiring further study for other outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS Combination SRS-ICI therapy is associated with significant overall survival benefit for patients with brain metastases without significantly increasing radiation necrosis risks compared to SRS alone. Although intracranial control rates appear to be similar between the 2 groups, timing of treatment delivery may improve control rates and demands further study attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuf Mehkri
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | | | - Megan E H Still
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Sandra C Yan
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Michael Goutnik
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Melnick
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Bently Doonan
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Ashley P Ghiaseddin
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Maryam Rahman
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhou D, Gong Z, Wu D, Ma C, Hou L, Niu X, Xu T. Harnessing immunotherapy for brain metastases: insights into tumor-brain microenvironment interactions and emerging treatment modalities. J Hematol Oncol 2023; 16:121. [PMID: 38104104 PMCID: PMC10725587 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-023-01518-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases signify a deleterious milestone in the progression of several advanced cancers, predominantly originating from lung, breast and melanoma malignancies, with a median survival timeframe nearing six months. Existing therapeutic regimens yield suboptimal outcomes; however, burgeoning insights into the tumor microenvironment, particularly the immunosuppressive milieu engendered by tumor-brain interplay, posit immunotherapy as a promising avenue for ameliorating brain metastases. In this review, we meticulously delineate the research advancements concerning the microenvironment of brain metastases, striving to elucidate the panorama of their onset and evolution. We encapsulate three emergent immunotherapeutic strategies, namely immune checkpoint inhibition, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell transplantation and glial cell-targeted immunoenhancement. We underscore the imperative of aligning immunotherapy development with in-depth understanding of the tumor microenvironment and engendering innovative delivery platforms. Moreover, the integration with established or avant-garde physical methodologies and localized applications warrants consideration in the prevailing therapeutic schema.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dairan Zhou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 200003, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhenyu Gong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, 81675, Germany
| | - Dejun Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Chao Ma
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, Anhui, People's Republic of China
| | - Lijun Hou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 200003, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaomin Niu
- Department of Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 241 Huaihai West Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200030, People's Republic of China.
| | - Tao Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 200003, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Botticella A, Dhermain F. Combination of radiosurgery and immunotherapy in brain metastases: balance between efficacy and toxicities. Curr Opin Neurol 2023; 36:587-591. [PMID: 37865858 DOI: 10.1097/wco.0000000000001217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The incidence of brain metastasis is high and still increasing. Among local therapies, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective treatment option, optimally sparing normal brain, even for multiple brain metastases. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) become the new standard of care in an increasing number of cancers, and the combination SRS and ICI is often proposed to patients, but few data have been published on the efficacy and the toxicity of this association. RECENT FINDINGS Explaining this lack of consensus: retrospective studies with different primary cancers, various treatment lines and unknown levels of steroid exposure. Concerning the toxicity, the independent association of radionecrosis with brain-PTV volume was confirmed, and a decreased dose of SRS is now tested in a randomized study. Finally, a 'concurrent' delivery of SRS and ICI (within a 4 weeks' interval) seems the optimal schedule; fractionated radiosurgery for large brain metastasis should be favored. Radio-sensitizing nanoparticles and devices aiming to increase the permeability of the blood brain barrier should be considered in future combinations. SUMMARY The efficacy/toxicity balance of SRS-ICI combination should be regularly re-evaluated, anticipating continued progress in ICI and SRS delivery, with more long-survivors potentially exposed to long-term toxicities. Patients should be included in clinical trials and clearly informed to participate more closely in the final choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Botticella
- Department of Radiation Oncology, International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pierrard J, Seront E, Galot R, Gunes Tatar I, Baurain JF, Di Perri D. Regression of a melanoma brain metastasis that had appeared after immune checkpoint inhibitor discontinuation: a hypothesis-generating case. Acta Clin Belg 2023; 78:516-520. [PMID: 37466163 DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2023.2238374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
We present the case of a 50-year-old woman previously treated with nivolumab-ipilimumab combination therapy for a metastatic melanoma. Despite premature discontinuation of these immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after 2 cycles due to severe immune-related hepatitis, the patient achieved a complete response. Nine months later, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed progression of a single cerebral lesion, and the patient was referred for stereotactic radiosurgery. Unexpectedly, the brain MRI acquired one month later as part of radiosurgery planning showed a spontaneous regression of this lesion, allowing for radiosurgery cancellation. Follow-up imaging showed a sustained response, although the patient did not receive any other oncological treatment. We discuss here the potential immune mechanisms involved in this unusual course and the importance of better understanding the behaviour of tumours in the era of ICIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Pierrard
- UCLouvain, Institut de Recherche Experimentale Et Clinique (IREC), Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Emmanuel Seront
- Medical Oncology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
- Medical Oncology Department, Hopital de Jolimont, Haine Saint Paul, Belgium
| | - Rachel Galot
- UCLouvain, Institut de Recherche Experimentale Et Clinique (IREC), Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium
- Medical Oncology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Idil Gunes Tatar
- Radiology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean-François Baurain
- UCLouvain, Institut de Recherche Experimentale Et Clinique (IREC), Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium
- Medical Oncology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dario Di Perri
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hall J, Lui K, Tan X, Shumway J, Collichio F, Moschos S, Sengupta S, Chaudhary R, Quinsey C, Jaikumar S, Forbes J, Andaluz N, Zuccarello M, Struve T, Vatner R, Pater L, Breneman J, Weiner A, Wang K, Shen C. Factors associated with radiation necrosis and intracranial control in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and stereotactic radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2023; 189:109920. [PMID: 37769968 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Emerging data suggest immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or radiotherapy (SRT) may work synergistically, potentially increasing both efficacy and toxicity. This manuscript characterizes factors associated with intracranial control and radiation necrosis in this group. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients had non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, or melanoma and were treated from 2013 to 2021 at two institutions with ICI and SRS/SRT. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to analyze factors associated with local failure (LF) and grade 2+ (G2 + ) radiation necrosis. RESULTS There were 179 patients with 549 metastases. The median follow up from SRS/SRT was 14.7 months and the median tumor size was 7 mm (46 tumors ≥ 20 mm). Rates of LF and G2 + radiation necrosis per metastasis were 5.8% (32/549) and 6.9% (38/549), respectively. LF rates for ICI +/- 1 month from time of radiation versus not were 3% (8/264) and 8% (24/285) (p = 0.01), respectively. G2 + radiation necrosis rates for PD-L1 ≥ 50% versus < 50% were 17% (11/65) and 3% (5/203) (p=<0.001), respectively. PD-L1 ≥ 50% remained significantly associated with G2 + radiation necrosis on multivariate analysis (p = 0.03). Rates of intracranial failure were 54% (80/147) and 17% (4/23) (p = 0.001) for those without and with G2 + radiation necrosis, respectively. CONCLUSIONS PD-L1 expression (≥50%) may be associated with higher rates of G2 + radiation necrosis, and there may be improved intracranial control following the development of radiation necrosis. Administration of ICIs with SRS/SRT is overall safe, and there may be some local control benefit to delivering these concurrently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Kevin Lui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Xianming Tan
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - John Shumway
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Frances Collichio
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Stergios Moschos
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Soma Sengupta
- Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Rekha Chaudhary
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Carolyn Quinsey
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sivakumar Jaikumar
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jonathan Forbes
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Norberto Andaluz
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Mario Zuccarello
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Timothy Struve
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Ralph Vatner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Luke Pater
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - John Breneman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Ashley Weiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kyle Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Colette Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Royal-Preyra B. The Impact of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition on the Risk of Radiation Necrosis Following Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Metastatic Brain Cancer. Cureus 2023; 15:e51381. [PMID: 38161546 PMCID: PMC10757743 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.51381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose/objective Forty percent of cancer patients develop brain metastases (BM) and are often treated with stereotactic radiation (SRS/SRT). Checkpoint inhibitor (CI) use is suspected of increasing the risk of radiation necrosis (RN). Our aim is to determine whether treatment with CI is associated with an increased risk of RN in BM patients treated with SRS/SRT. Methods We retrospectively identified the medical records of BM patients treated with SRS/SRT between 1/2017 and 12/2021 using an institutional database. RN was defined by MRI imaging read by neuroradiologists and/or surgical pathology. V12GY of patients with and without RN was compared using the Mann-Whitney test. The chi-square test was used to see if RN was associated with CI use, histology, particular CI agent used, > 1 course SRS/SRT, SRS/SRT dose, chemotherapy, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), age, or sex. Results Two hundred and fifty-nine patients treated with 455 courses of SRS/SRT were analyzed. The most common primary histologies were lung 56% (N=146), breast 14% (N= 37), melanoma 9% (N=24), and renal cancer 7% (N=18). A total of 53.8% (N = no. of patients) were treated with CI. The overall rate of any RN was 21.8% (N=27) in the CI group compared to 14.8% (N=141) in the non-CI group (p=0.174). Mean V12Gy was 15.525 cc and 9.419 cc in patients with and without RN (p=0.02768). Mean number of SRS/SRT courses was 2 and 1.53 for patients with and without RN, and >1 course of SRS/SRT was a predictor of RN (p <0.01). Other features analyzed were not significant. Conclusion RN was higher in the BM patients treated with SRS/SRT receiving CI compared to non-CI patients (21.8%, N=27, versus 14.6%, N= 16), but failed to reach statistical significance. V12Gy and > 1 course of SRS/SRT was associated with RN. Caution should be taken in treating patients with SRS/SRT and CI there might be an increased risk of RN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Royal-Preyra
- Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Affilié Universitaire Regional, Trois-Rivières, CAN
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Badrigilan S, Meola A, Chang SD, Rezaeian S, Nemati H, Almasi T, Rostampour N. Stereotactic radiosurgery with immune checkpoint inhibitors for brain metastases: a meta-analysis study. Br J Neurosurg 2023; 37:1533-1543. [PMID: 34979828 DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2021.2022098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are an emerging tool in the treatment of brain metastases (BMs), Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), traditionally used for BMs, elicits an immune brain response and can act synergistically with ICIs. We aim to investigate the efficacy of ICI administered with SRS and determine the impact of timing on BM response. METHODS A systematical search was performed to identify potential studies concerning BMs managed with SRS alone or with SRS + ICI with relative timing administration (ICI concurrent with SRS, ICI nonconcurrent with SRS, SRS before ICI, SRS after ICI). The overall survival (OS), 12-month OS, local progression-free survival (LPFS), 12-month local brain control (LBC), distant progression-free survival (DPFS), 12-month distant brain control (DBC), and adverse events (intracranial hemorrhage, radionecrosis) were analyzed using the random-effects model. RESULTS A total of 16 retrospective studies with 1356 BM patients were included. Compared to nonconcurrent therapy, concurrent therapy revealed a significantly longer OS (HR= 1.43; p = 0.008) and 12-months LBC (HR = 1.91; p = 0.04), a similar 12-months DBC (HR = 1.12; p = 0.547) and higher complication rate (R = 0.77; p = 0.346). Concurrent therapy leads to a significantly higher OS compared to ICI before SRS (HR = 2.55; p = 0.0003). CONCLUSION The combination of SRS with ICI improves patients' clinical and radiological outcomes. The effectiveness of the combination is subject to the identification of an optimal therapeutic window.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samireh Badrigilan
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Antonio Meola
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Steven D Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Shahab Rezaeian
- Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health (RCEDH), Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Hossein Nemati
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Tinoosh Almasi
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Nima Rostampour
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ngu S, Werner C, D' Amico RS, Wernicke AG. Whole brain radiation therapy resulting in radionecrosis: a possible link with radiosensitising chemoimmunotherapy. BMJ Case Rep 2023; 16:e256758. [PMID: 38016763 PMCID: PMC10685978 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2023-256758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Radionecrosis describes a rare but serious complication of radiation therapy. In clinical practice, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is increasingly used in combination with systemic therapy, including chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitor and targeted therapy, either concurrently or sequentially. There is a paucity of literature regarding radionecrosis in patients receiving whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) alone (without additional SRS) in combination with immunotherapy or targeted therapies. It is observed that certain combinations increase the overall radiosensitivity of the tumorous lesions. We present a rare case of symptomatic radionecrosis almost 1 year after WBRT in a patient with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer on third-line chemoimmunotherapy. We discuss available research regarding factors that may lead to radionecrosis in these patients, including molecular and genetic profiles, specific drug therapy combinations and their timing or increased overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Ngu
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
| | - Cassidy Werner
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Randy S D' Amico
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - A Gabriella Wernicke
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tsakonas G, Ekman S, Koulouris A, Adderley H, Ackermann CJ, Califano R. Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer and brain metastasis. Int J Cancer 2023; 153:1556-1567. [PMID: 37334528 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
The presence of brain metastases (BM) is a negative prognostic factor for patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Their incidence seems to be higher in patients with oncogene-driven tumours, especially those with EGFR-mutated or ALK-rearranged tumours. Although targeted treatments demonstrate significant efficacy regarding BM, they only apply to a minority of NSCLC patients. On the other hand, systemic therapies for nononcogenic-driven NSCLC with BM have shown limited clinical benefit. In recent years, immunotherapy alone or combined with chemotherapy has been adopted as a new standard of care in first-line therapy. This approach seems to be beneficial to patients with BM in terms of efficacy and toxicity. Combined immune checkpoint inhibition as well as the combination of immunotherapy and radiation therapy show promising results with significant, but overall acceptable toxicity. A pragmatic approach of allowing enrolment of patients with untreated or symptomatic BM in randomised trials evaluating immune checkpoint inhibitors strategies, possibly coupled with central nervous system-related endpoints may be needed to generate data to refine treatment for this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Tsakonas
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet/Thoracic Oncology Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Simon Ekman
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet/Thoracic Oncology Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Andreas Koulouris
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet/Thoracic Oncology Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Helen Adderley
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Raffaele Califano
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Antelo G, Comas S, Casas F, Valduvieco I, Barreto T, Laplana M, Mases J, Oses G, Mollà M. Clinical outcomes and timing on the combination of focal radiation therapy and immunotherapy for the treatment of brain metastases. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1236398. [PMID: 37915576 PMCID: PMC10616465 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1236398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Radiotherapy is one of the standard treatments for brain metastases (BM). Over the past years, the introduction of immunotherapy as routine treatment for solid tumors has forced investigators to review and evaluate how it would interact with radiation. Radiation and Immunotherapy have shown a synergic effect activating the host's immune system and enhancing treatment response. The combinatory effect on BM is currently under investigation. Methods Data published on Pubmed to determine toxicity, survival, treatment characteristics and timing on the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy for the treatment of BM has been reviewed. Results Mostly retrospective reviews report an improvement of intracranial progression free survival (iPFS) when combining radioimmunotherapy for BM patients. Two systematic reviews and meta-analysis and one phase II prospective trial also report a benefit on iPFS without an increase of toxicity. Among the published literature, the definition of concurrency is heterogeneous, being one month or even narrowed intervals correlated to better clinical outcomes. Toxicity due to concurrent radioimmunotherapy, specifically symptomatic radionecrosis, is also directly analyzed and reported to be low, similar to the toxicity rates secondary to stereotactic radiosurgery alone. Conclusion Radiation combined with immunotherapy has shown in predominantly retrospective reviews a synergic effect on the treatment of BM. The concurrent combination of radioimmunotherapy is a feasible therapeutic strategy and seems to improve clinical outcomes, especially iPFS, when delivered within <30 days. Larger prospective and randomized studies are needed to establish reliable outcomes, best delivery strategies and toxicity profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela Antelo
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvia Comas
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Catalá d'Oncologia (ICO), Badalona, Badalona, Spain
| | - Francesc Casas
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Izaskun Valduvieco
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Tanny Barreto
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María Laplana
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joel Mases
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gabriela Oses
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Meritxell Mollà
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Robinson SD, Samuels M, Jones W, Gilbert D, Critchley G, Giamas G. Shooting the messenger: a systematic review investigating extracellular vesicle isolation and characterisation methods and their influence on understanding extracellular vesicles-radiotherapy interactions in glioblastoma. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:939. [PMID: 37798728 PMCID: PMC10552223 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11437-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extracellular vesicles (EVs) hold promise for improving our understanding of radiotherapy response in glioblastoma due to their role in intercellular communication within the tumour microenvironment (TME). However, methodologies to study EVs are evolving with significant variation within the EV research community. METHODS We conducted a systematic review to critically appraise EV isolation and characterisation methodologies and how this influences our understanding of the findings from studies investigating radiotherapy and EV interactions in glioblastoma. 246 articles published up to 24/07/2023 from PubMed and Web of Science were identified using search parameters related to radiotherapy, EVs, and glioblastoma. Two reviewers evaluated study eligibility and abstracted data. RESULTS In 26 articles eligible for inclusion (16 investigating the effects of radiotherapy on EVs, five investigating the effect of EVs on radiation response, and five clinical studies), significant heterogeneity and frequent omission of key characterisation steps was identified, reducing confidence that the results are related to EVs and their cargo as opposed to co-isolated bioactive molecules. However, the results are able to clearly identify interactions between EVs and radiotherapy bi-directionally within different cell types within the glioblastoma TME. These interactions facilitate transferable radioresistance and oncogenic signalling, highlighting that EVs are an important component in the variability of glioblastoma radiotherapy response. CONCLUSIONS Future multi-directional investigations interrogating the whole TME are required to improve subsequent clinical translation, and all studies should incorporate up to date controls and reporting requirements to increase the validity of their findings. This would be facilitated by increased collaboration between less experienced and more experienced EV research groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen David Robinson
- Department of Biochemistry and Biomedicine, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, John Maynard Smith Building, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QG, UK, (SDR, MS, WJ, GG).
- Sussex Cancer Centre, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK, (SDR, DG).
| | - Mark Samuels
- Department of Biochemistry and Biomedicine, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, John Maynard Smith Building, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QG, UK, (SDR, MS, WJ, GG)
| | - William Jones
- Department of Biochemistry and Biomedicine, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, John Maynard Smith Building, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QG, UK, (SDR, MS, WJ, GG)
| | - Duncan Gilbert
- Sussex Cancer Centre, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK, (SDR, DG)
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK, (DG)
| | - Giles Critchley
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK, (GC)
| | - Georgios Giamas
- Department of Biochemistry and Biomedicine, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, John Maynard Smith Building, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QG, UK, (SDR, MS, WJ, GG)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Yu Y, Chen H, Tian Z, Zhang Q, Shui Y, Shen L, Hu Q, Huang Z, Zhu S, Jiang H, Wei Q. Improved survival outcome with not-delayed radiotherapy and immediate PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor for non-small-cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases. J Neurooncol 2023; 165:127-137. [PMID: 37848757 PMCID: PMC10638122 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04459-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the impact of radiotherapy (RT) and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) sequence on the survival outcome in NSCLC patients with brain metastasis, and decide the best time to initiate RT. METHODS Patients were managed with delayed RT (ICI delivered over 2 weeks prior to RT), concurrent RT (ICI delivered within 2 weeks prior to or after RT), or upfront RT (RT delivered over 2 weeks prior to ICI). Overall survival (OS), intracranial local progression-free survival (iLPFS), and intracranial distant progression-free survival (iDPFS) were assessed. A meta-analysis was performed to analyze the association between survival outcome and RT/ICI sequence. RESULTS A total of 73 NSCLC patients were identified with a median follow-up of 13.9 months. Patients who receive delayed RT demonstrated shorter iLPFS (P = 0.0029), iDPFS (P = 0.016), and OS (P < 0.001). A meta-analysis was conducted and a total of 4 studies, 254 patients were included. The HR was 0.44 for iDPFS (P = 0.03), 0.41 for OS (P < 0.01) when compared concurrent with delayed RT, 0.21 for iDPFS (P < 0.01), 0.32 for OS (P < 0.01) when compared upfront with delayed RT, consistent with our conclusion that delayed RT brought with worst iDPFS and OS. More importantly, the best overall response rate (BOR) decreased in cases with longer RT and ICI intervals. Patients who receive intervals of RT and ICI within 7 days achieve the best median BOR of - 53%. CONCLUSIONS Delayed RT brought poor survival outcomes including iLPFS, iDPFS, and OS in NSCLC patients. The shorter interval of RT and ICI is associated with better BOR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaner Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Cancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Haiyan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Cancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Anhui Campus of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Bengbu, 233000, China
| | - Zhifeng Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Cancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Department of Radiotherapy, Lishui Municipal Central Hospital, Lishui, China
| | - Qun Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, 233000, China
| | - Yongjie Shui
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Cancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Li Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Cancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qiongge Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Cancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhifei Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, 233000, China
| | - Shuangqiu Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, 233000, China
| | - Hao Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, 233000, China.
| | - Qichun Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
- Cancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Center of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
- Anhui Campus of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Bengbu, 233000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Yan X, Qu F, Zhou Y. Progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy for non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases. Lung Cancer 2023; 184:107322. [PMID: 37611495 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
About 40% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop brain metastases (BMs) throughout the disease, and the occurrence of BMs is considered to have a fairly high mortality rate. Therefore, the management of brain metastases in NSCLC patients is a clinical challenge. Currently, multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment methods are often used to achieve effective control of intracranial disease and prolong survival. Immunotherapy (IT) is one of the core therapies for NSCLC. Single or combined IT represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) of programmed death-1(PD-1)/ programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with advanced NSCLC.ICIs has been shown to be safe and effective in patients with BMs, although patients with BMs are mostly underrepresented in randomized clinical trials. In this review, we summarized the mechanism of ICIs in the treatment of BMs, and the clinical research and treatment progress of ICIs and their combination with other therapies in patients with BMs s from NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Yan
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Dalian Third People's Hospital of Dalian Medical University, 116033, China
| | - Fanjie Qu
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Dalian Third People's Hospital of Dalian Medical University, 116033, China.
| | - Yi Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Dalian Third People's Hospital of Dalian Medical University, 116033, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lehrer EJ, Khosla AA, Ozair A, Gurewitz J, Bernstein K, Kondziolka D, Niranjan A, Wei Z, Lunsford LD, Mathieu D, Trudel C, Deibert CP, Malouff TD, Ruiz-Garcia H, Peterson JL, Patel S, Bonney P, Hwang L, Yu C, Zada G, Picozzi P, Franzini A, Attuati L, Prasad RN, Raval RR, Palmer JD, Lee CC, Yang HC, Fakhoury KR, Rusthoven CG, Dickstein DR, Sheehan JP, Trifiletti DM, Ahluwalia MS. Immune checkpoint inhibition and single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery in brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: an international multicenter study of 395 patients. J Neurooncol 2023; 165:63-77. [PMID: 37889444 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04413-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Approximately 80% of brain metastases originate from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are frequently utilized in this setting. However, concerns remain regarding the risk of radiation necrosis (RN) when SRS and ICI are administered concurrently. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted through the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation. Logistic regression models and competing risks analyses were utilized to identify predictors of any grade RN and symptomatic RN (SRN). RESULTS The study included 395 patients with 2,540 brain metastases treated with single fraction SRS and ICI across 11 institutions in four countries with a median follow-up of 14.2 months. The median age was 67 years. The median margin SRS dose was 19 Gy; 36.5% of patients had a V12 Gy ≥ 10 cm3. On multivariable analysis, V12 Gy ≥ 10 cm3 was a significant predictor of developing any grade RN (OR: 2.18) and SRN (OR: 3.95). At 1-year, the cumulative incidence of any grade and SRN for all patients was 4.8% and 3.8%, respectively. For concurrent and non-concurrent groups, the cumulative incidence of any grade RN was 3.8% versus 5.3%, respectively (p = 0.35); and for SRN was 3.8% vs. 3.6%, respectively (p = 0.95). CONCLUSION The risk of any grade RN and symptomatic RN following single fraction SRS and ICI for NSCLC brain metastases increases as V12 Gy exceeds 10 cm3. Concurrent ICI and SRS do not appear to increase this risk. Radiosurgical planning techniques should aim to minimize V12 Gy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Atulya A Khosla
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Ahmad Ozair
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jason Gurewitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth Bernstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Douglas Kondziolka
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Zhishuo Wei
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Claire Trudel
- Department of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | | | - Timothy D Malouff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Henry Ruiz-Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Samir Patel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Phillip Bonney
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lindsay Hwang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Cheng Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gabriel Zada
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Piero Picozzi
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Andrea Franzini
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Luca Attuati
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Rahul N Prasad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Raju R Raval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kareem R Fakhoury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Chad G Rusthoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Daniel R Dickstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Levis M, Gastino A, De Giorgi G, Mantovani C, Bironzo P, Mangherini L, Ricci AA, Ricardi U, Cassoni P, Bertero L. Modern Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases from Lung Cancer: Current Trends and Future Perspectives Based on Integrated Translational Approaches. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4622. [PMID: 37760591 PMCID: PMC10526239 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases (BMs) represent the most frequent metastatic event in the course of lung cancer patients, occurring in approximately 50% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and in up to 70% in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Thus far, many advances have been made in the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, allowing improvements in the prognosis of these patients. The modern approach relies on the integration of several factors, such as accurate histological and molecular profiling, comprehensive assessment of clinical parameters and precise definition of the extent of intracranial and extracranial disease involvement. The combination of these factors is pivotal to guide the multidisciplinary discussion and to offer the most appropriate treatment to these patients based on a personalized approach. Focal radiotherapy (RT), in all its modalities (radiosurgery (SRS), fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), adjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy (aSRT)), is the cornerstone of BM management, either alone or in combination with surgery and systemic therapies. We review the modern therapeutic strategies available to treat lung cancer patients with brain involvement. This includes an accurate review of the different technical solutions which can be exploited to provide a "state-of-art" focal RT and also a detailed description of the systemic agents available as effective alternatives to SRS/SRT when a targetable molecular driver is present. In addition to the validated treatment options, we also discuss the future perspective for focal RT, based on emerging clinical reports (e.g., SRS for patients with many BMs from NSCLC or SRS for BMs from SCLC), together with a presentation of innovative and promising findings in translational research and the combination of novel targeted agents with SRS/SRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Levis
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Alessio Gastino
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Greta De Giorgi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Cristina Mantovani
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Paolo Bironzo
- Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy;
| | - Luca Mangherini
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (L.M.); (A.A.R.); (P.C.)
| | - Alessia Andrea Ricci
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (L.M.); (A.A.R.); (P.C.)
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Paola Cassoni
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (L.M.); (A.A.R.); (P.C.)
| | - Luca Bertero
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (L.M.); (A.A.R.); (P.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Li H, Zhao Y, Ma T, Shao H, Wang T, Jin S, Liu Z. Radiotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the immunotherapy era. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1132482. [PMID: 37701437 PMCID: PMC10493776 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1132482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Currently, chemoimmunotherapy is the first-line treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, only 0.8%-2.5% of the patients presented complete response after chemoimmunotherapy. Considering that ES-SCLC is highly sensitive to radiotherapy, the addition of radiotherapy after first-line treatment for ES-SCLC could further improve local control, which may be beneficial for patients' survival. Prior studies have shown that consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (cTRT) can decrease disease progression and improve overall survival in patients with ES-SCLC who respond well to chemotherapy. However, the efficacy and safety of cTRT in the immunotherapy era remain unclear owing to a lack of prospective studies. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been shown to decrease brain metastasis (BM) and prolong survival in patients with limited-stage SCLC in previous reports. However, according to current guidelines, PCI is not commonly recommended for ES-SCLC. Immunotherapy has the potential to reduce the incidence of BM. Whether PCI can be replaced with regular magnetic resonance imaging surveillance for ES-SCLC in the era of immunotherapy remains controversial. Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is the standard treatment for BM in SCLC patients. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has shown promise in the treatment of limited BM. Considering the potential of immunotherapy to decrease BM, it is controversial whether SRS can replace WBRT for limited BM in the immunotherapy era. Additionally, with the addition of immunotherapy, the role of palliative radiotherapy may be weakened in patients with asymptomatic metastatic lesions. However, it is still indispensable and urgent for patients with obvious symptoms of metastatic disease, such as spinal cord compression, superior vena cava syndrome, lobar obstruction, and weight-bearing metastases, which may critically damage the quality of life and prognosis. To improve the outcome of ES-SCLC, we discuss the feasibility of radiotherapy, including cTRT, PCI, WBRT/SRS, and palliative radiotherapy with immunotherapy based on existing evidence, which may offer specific prospects for further randomized trials and clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huanhuan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Yangzhi Zhao
- Department of Hematology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Tiangang Ma
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Hao Shao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Tiejun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Shunzi Jin
- NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Zhongshan Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Yoo KH, Park DJ, Choi JH, Marianayagam NJ, Lim M, Meola A, Chang SD. Optimizing the synergy between stereotactic radiosurgery and immunotherapy for brain metastases. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1223599. [PMID: 37637032 PMCID: PMC10456862 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1223599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Solid tumors metastasizing to the brain are a frequent occurrence with an estimated incidence of approximately 30% of all cases. The longstanding conventional standard of care comprises surgical resection and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT); however, this approach is associated with limited long-term survival and local control outcomes. Consequently, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as a potential alternative approach. The primary aim of SRS has been to improve long-term control rates. Nevertheless, rare observations of abscopal or out-of-field effects have sparked interest in the potential to elicit antitumor immunity via the administration of high-dose radiation. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) has traditionally posed a significant challenge to the efficacy of systemic therapy in managing intracranial metastasis. However, recent insights into the immune-brain interface and the development of immunotherapeutic agents have shown promise in preclinical and early-phase clinical trials. Researchers have investigated combining immunotherapy with SRS to enhance treatment outcomes in patients with brain metastasis. The combination approach aims to optimize long-term control and overall survival (OS) outcomes by leveraging the synergistic effects of both therapies. Initial findings have been encouraging in the management of various intracranial metastases, while further studies are required to determine the optimal order of administration, radiation doses, and fractionation regimens that have the potential for the best tumor response. Currently, several clinical trials are underway to assess the safety and efficacy of administering immunotherapeutic agents concurrently or consecutively with SRS. In this review, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of the advantages and drawbacks of integrating immunotherapy into conventional SRS protocols for the treatment of intracranial metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Steven D. Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Jablonska PA, Muniz T, Ribeiro M, Liu ZA, Ye XY, Devaraja K, Laperriere N, Millar BA, Conrad T, Kongkham P, Butler M, Shultz DB. Toxicity and outcomes of melanoma brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery: the risk of subsequent symptomatic intralesional hemorrhage exceeds that of radiation necrosis. J Neurooncol 2023; 164:199-209. [PMID: 37552363 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04404-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to assess the outcomes and patterns of toxicity in patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with or without immunotherapy (IO). METHODS From a prospective registry, we reviewed MBM patients treated with single fraction Gamma Knife SRS between 2008 and 2021 at our center. We recorded all systemic therapies (chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy) administered before, during, or after SRS. Patients with prior brain surgery were excluded. We captured adverse events following SRS, including intralesional hemorrhage (IH), radiation necrosis (RN) and local failure (LF), as well as extracranial disease status. Distant brain failure (DBF), extracranial progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined using a cumulative Incidence function and the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Our analysis included 165 patients with 570 SRS-treated MBM. Median OS for patients who received IO was 1.41 years versus 0.79 years in patients who did not (p = 0.04). Ipilimumab monotherapy was the most frequent IO regimen (30%). In the absence of IO, the cumulative incidence of symptomatic (grade 2 +) RN was 3% at 24 months and remained unchanged with respect to the type or timing of IO. The incidence of post-SRS g2 + IH in patients who did not receive systemic therapy was 19% at 1- and 2 years compared to 7% at 1- and 2 years among patients who did (HR: 0.33, 95% CI 0.11-0.98; p = 0.046). Overall, neither timing nor type of IO correlated to rates of DBF, OS, or LF. Among patients treated with IO, the median time to extracranial PFS was 5.4 months (95% IC 3.2 - 9.1). CONCLUSION The risk of g2 + IH exceeds that of g2 + RN in MBM patients undergoing SRS, with or without IO. IH should be considered a critical adverse event following MBM treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola A Jablonska
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Thiago Muniz
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mauricio Ribeiro
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Zhihui Amy Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - Xiang Y Ye
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - Kaviya Devaraja
- Department of Medical Science, University of Toronto Institute and Princess Margaret Cancer Research Tower, Toronto, Canada
| | - Normand Laperriere
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Barbara-Ann Millar
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tatiana Conrad
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Paul Kongkham
- Department of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marcus Butler
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - David B Shultz
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
- , 700 University Avenue, 7Th Floor (Room 7-401), Toronto, ON, M5G 1Z5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bashraheel SS, Goda SK. Novel SPEA Superantigen Peptide Agonists and Peptide Agonist-TGFαL3 Conjugate. In Vitro Study of Their Growth-Inhibitory Effects for Targeted Cancer Immunotherapy. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:10507. [PMID: 37445686 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241310507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Bacterial superantigens (SAgs) are effective T-cell stimulatory molecules that lead to massive cytokine production. Superantigens crosslink between MHC class II molecules on the Antigen Presenting Cells (APC) and TCR on T-cells. This enables them to activate up to 20% of resting T cells, whilst conventional antigen presentation results in the activation of 0.001-0.0001% of the T cell population. These biological properties of superantigens make them attractive for use in immunotherapy. Previous studies have established the effectiveness of superantigens as therapeutic agents. This, however, was achieved with severe side effects due to the high lethality of the native toxins. Our study aims to produce superantigen-based peptides with minimum or no lethality for safer cancer treatment. In previous work, we designed and synthesized twenty overlapping SPEA-based peptides and successfully mapped regions in SPEA superantigen, causing a vasodilatory response. We screened 20 overlapping SPEA-based peptides designed and synthesized to cover the whole SPEA molecule for T-cell activation and tumor-killing ability. In addition, we designed and synthesized tumor-targeted superantigen-based peptides by fusion of TGFαL3 either from the N' or C' terminal of selected SPEA-based peptides with an eight-amino acid flexible linker in between. Our study identified parts of SPEA capable of stimulating human T-cells and producing different cytokines. We also demonstrated that the SPEA-based peptide conjugate binds specifically to cancer cells and can kill this cancer. Peptides induce T-cell activation, and tumor killing might pave the way for safer tumor-targeted superantigens (TTS). We proposed the combination of our new superantigen-based peptide conjugates with other immunotherapy techniques for effective and safer cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sayed K Goda
- College of Science and Technology, University of Derby, Derby DE22 1GB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Galluzzi L, Aryankalayil MJ, Coleman CN, Formenti SC. Emerging evidence for adapting radiotherapy to immunotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2023:10.1038/s41571-023-00782-x. [PMID: 37280366 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00782-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Immunotherapy has revolutionized the clinical management of many malignancies but is infrequently associated with durable objective responses when used as a standalone treatment approach, calling for the development of combinatorial regimens with superior efficacy and acceptable toxicity. Radiotherapy, the most commonly used oncological treatment, has attracted considerable attention as a combination partner for immunotherapy owing to its well-known and predictable safety profile, widespread clinical availability, and potential for immunostimulatory effects. However, numerous randomized clinical trials investigating radiotherapy-immunotherapy combinations have failed to demonstrate a therapeutic benefit compared with either modality alone. Such a lack of interaction might reflect suboptimal study design, choice of end points and/or administration of radiotherapy according to standard schedules and target volumes. Indeed, radiotherapy has empirically evolved towards radiation doses and fields that enable maximal cancer cell killing with manageable toxicity to healthy tissues, without much consideration of potential radiation-induced immunostimulatory effects. Herein, we propose the concept that successful radiotherapy-immunotherapy combinations might require modifications of standard radiotherapy regimens and target volumes to optimally sustain immune fitness and enhance the antitumour immune response in support of meaningful clinical benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Galluzzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Caryl and Israel Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Molykutty J Aryankalayil
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - C Norman Coleman
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Silvia C Formenti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jiang M, Hu Y, Lin G, Chen C, Li H. Radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: clinical trials, efficacy and future directions. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1177085. [PMID: 37325652 PMCID: PMC10261849 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1177085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a common malignancy worldwide and often diagnosed at advanced stages with poor prognosis. Combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy seems to be a promising approach for treating ESCC. This comprehensive review article summarizes the current state of combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy in locally advanced/metastatic ESCC, delineates the clinical trials that merit attention, and outlines unresolved issues and future research directions in this field. The clinical trial findings suggest that radio-immunotherapy combination may improve tumor response and overall survival with manageable side effects, highlighting the importance of patient selection and the necessity for further research to optimize treatment strategies. Issues such as irradiation dosage, fractionation regimen, irradiation site and technique of radiotherapy, as well as the timing, sequence and duration of combination therapy will all affect treatment outcomes, justifying further in-depth investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengjie Jiang
- Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hudock NL, Mani K, Khunsriraksakul C, Walter V, Nekhlyudov L, Wang M, Lehrer EJ, Hudock MR, Liu DJ, Spratt DE, Zaorsky NG. Future trends in incidence and long-term survival of metastatic cancer in the United States. COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE 2023; 3:76. [PMID: 37244961 DOI: 10.1038/s43856-023-00304-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have demonstrated epidemiological trends in individual metastatic cancer subtypes; however, research forecasting long-term incidence trends and projected survivorship of metastatic cancers is lacking. We assess the burden of metastatic cancer to 2040 by (1) characterizing past, current, and forecasted incidence trends, and (2) estimating odds of long-term (5-year) survivorship. METHODS This retrospective, serial cross-sectional, population-based study used registry data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER 9) database. Average annual percentage change (AAPC) was calculated to describe cancer incidence trends from 1988 to 2018. Autoregressive integrating moving average (ARIMA) models were used to forecast the distribution of primary metastatic cancer and metastatic cancer to specific sites from 2019 to 2040 and JoinPoint models were fitted to estimate mean projected annual percentage change (APC). RESULTS The average annual percent change (AAPC) in incidence of metastatic cancer decreased by 0.80 per 100,000 individuals (1988-2018) and we forecast an APC decrease by 0.70 per 100,000 individuals (2018-2040). Analyses predict a decrease in metastases to liver (APC = -3.40, 95% CI [-3.50, -3.30]), lung (APC (2019-2030) = -1.90, 95% CI [-2.90, -1.00]); (2030-2040) = -3.70, 95% CI [-4.60, -2.80]), bone (APC = -4.00, 95% CI [-4.30, -3.70]), and brain (APC = -2.30, 95% CI [-2.60, -2.00]). By 2040, patients with metastatic cancer are predicted to have 46.7% greater odds of long-term survivorship, driven by increasing plurality of patients with more indolent forms of metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS By 2040, the distribution of metastatic cancer patients is predicted to shift in predominance from invariably fatal to indolent cancers subtypes. Continued research on metastatic cancers is important to guide health policy and clinical intervention efforts, and direct allocations of healthcare resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas L Hudock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
- Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Kyle Mani
- Albert Einstein School of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Chachrit Khunsriraksakul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
- Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
- Department of Bioinformatics and Genomics, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Vonn Walter
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Larissa Nekhlyudov
- Department of Internal Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ming Wang
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Eric J Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria R Hudock
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA
- Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Dajiang J Liu
- Department of Bioinformatics and Genomics, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kang K, Wu Y, Yao Z, Lu Y. Tackling the current dilemma of immunotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A promising strategy of combining with radiotherapy. Cancer Lett 2023; 565:216239. [PMID: 37211066 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2023.216239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Progress in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been modest over the past decades until the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors, which have redefined the standard first-line treatment for extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). However, despite the positive results of several clinical trials, the limited survival benefit achieved suggests that the priming and sustaining of immunotherapeutic efficacy are poor and further investigation is urgently needed. In this review, we aim to summarize the potential mechanisms underlying the limited efficacy of immunotherapy and intrinsic resistance in ES-SCLC, including impaired antigen presentation and limited T cell infiltration. Moreover, to tackle the current dilemma, given the synergistic effects of radiotherapy on immunotherapy, especially the unique advantages of low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT), such as less immunosuppression and lower radiation toxicity, we propose radiotherapy as a booster to enhance the immunotherapeutic efficacy by overcoming the poor priming effect. Recent clinical trials, including ours, have also focused on adding radiotherapy, including LDRT, to first-line treatment of ES-SCLC. Additionally, we also suggest combination strategies to sustain the immunostimulatory effect of radiotherapy, as well as the cancer-immunity cycle, and further improve survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Kang
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yijun Wu
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhuoran Yao
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - You Lu
- Division of Thoracic Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ma W, Oliveira-Nunes MC, Xu K, Kossenkov A, Reiner BC, Crist RC, Hayden J, Chen Q. Type I interferon response in astrocytes promotes brain metastasis by enhancing monocytic myeloid cell recruitment. Nat Commun 2023; 14:2632. [PMID: 37149684 PMCID: PMC10163863 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-38252-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer metastasis to the brain is a significant clinical problem. Metastasis is the consequence of favorable interactions between invaded cancer cells and the microenvironment. Here, we demonstrate that cancer-activated astrocytes create a sustained low-level activated type I interferon (IFN) microenvironment in brain metastatic lesions. We further confirm that the IFN response in astrocytes facilitates brain metastasis. Mechanistically, IFN signaling in astrocytes activates C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 2 (CCL2) production, which further increases the recruitment of monocytic myeloid cells. The correlation between CCL2 and monocytic myeloid cells is confirmed in clinical brain metastasis samples. Lastly, genetically or pharmacologically inhibiting C-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 2 (CCR2) reduces brain metastases. Our study clarifies a pro-metastatic effect of type I IFN in the brain even though IFN response has been considered to have anti-tumor effects. Moreover, this work expands our understandings on the interactions between cancer-activated astrocytes and immune cells in brain metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weili Ma
- Immunology, Microenvironment and Metastasis Program, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Maria Cecília Oliveira-Nunes
- Immunology, Microenvironment and Metastasis Program, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Carisma Therapeutics, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Ke Xu
- MD/PhD Program, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Andrew Kossenkov
- Gene Expression & Regulation Program, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Benjamin C Reiner
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Richard C Crist
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - James Hayden
- Imaging Shared Resource, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Qing Chen
- Immunology, Microenvironment and Metastasis Program, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Fenioux C, Troussier I, Amelot A, Borius PY, Canova CH, Blais E, Mazeron JJ, Maingon P, Valéry CA. Long duration of immunotherapy before radiosurgery might improve intracranial control of melanoma brain metastases. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:206-213. [PMID: 37149466 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/19/2022] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite significant advances that have been made in management of metastatic melanoma with immune checkpoint therapy, optimal timing of combination immune checkpoint therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery is unknown. We have reported toxicity and efficiency outcomes of patients treated with concurrent immune checkpoint therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS From January 2014 to December 2016, we analyzed 62 consecutive patients presenting 296 melanoma brain metastases, treated with gamma-knife and receiving concurrent immune checkpoint therapy with anti-CTLA4 or anti-PD1 within the 12 weeks of SRS procedure. Median follow-up time was 18 months (mo) (13-22). Minimal median dose delivered was 18 gray (Gy), with a median volume per lesion of 0.219 cm3. RESULTS The 1-year control rate per irradiated lesion was 89% (CI 95%: 80.41-98.97). Twenty-seven patients (43.5%) developed distant brain metastases after a median time of 7.6 months (CI 95% 1.8-13.3) after gamma-knife. In multivariate analysis, positive predictive factors for intracranial tumor control were: delay since the initiation of immunotherapy exceeding 2 months before gamma-knife procedure (P=0.003) and use of anti-PD1 (P=0.006). Median overall survival (OS) was 14 months (CI 95%: 11-NR). Total irradiated tumor volume<2.1 cm3 was a positive predictive factor for overall survival (P=0.003). Ten patients (16.13%) had adverse events following irradiation, with four grade≥3. Predictive factors of all grade toxicity were: female gender (P=0.001) and previous treatment with MAPK (P=0.05). CONCLUSION A long duration of immune checkpoint therapy before stereotactic radiosurgery might improve intracranial tumor control, but this relationship and its ideal timing need to be assessed in prospective trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Fenioux
- Service de radiothérapie oncologique, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - I Troussier
- Service de radiothérapie oncologique, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - A Amelot
- Service de neurochirurgie, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - P Y Borius
- Service de neurochirurgie, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Unité de radiochirurgie gamma-knife, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - C H Canova
- Service de radiothérapie oncologique, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - E Blais
- Service de radiothérapie oncologique, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - J J Mazeron
- Service de radiothérapie oncologique, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - P Maingon
- Service de radiothérapie oncologique, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - C A Valéry
- Service de neurochirurgie, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Unité de radiochirurgie gamma-knife, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Vaios EJ, Winter SF, Shih HA, Dietrich J, Peters KB, Floyd SR, Kirkpatrick JP, Reitman ZJ. Novel Mechanisms and Future Opportunities for the Management of Radiation Necrosis in Patients Treated for Brain Metastases in the Era of Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2432. [PMID: 37173897 PMCID: PMC10177360 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiation necrosis, also known as treatment-induced necrosis, has emerged as an important adverse effect following stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS) for brain metastases. The improved survival of patients with brain metastases and increased use of combined systemic therapy and SRS have contributed to a growing incidence of necrosis. The cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP) synthase (cGAS) and stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway (cGAS-STING) represents a key biological mechanism linking radiation-induced DNA damage to pro-inflammatory effects and innate immunity. By recognizing cytosolic double-stranded DNA, cGAS induces a signaling cascade that results in the upregulation of type 1 interferons and dendritic cell activation. This pathway could play a key role in the pathogenesis of necrosis and provides attractive targets for therapeutic development. Immunotherapy and other novel systemic agents may potentiate activation of cGAS-STING signaling following radiotherapy and increase necrosis risk. Advancements in dosimetric strategies, novel imaging modalities, artificial intelligence, and circulating biomarkers could improve the management of necrosis. This review provides new insights into the pathophysiology of necrosis and synthesizes our current understanding regarding the diagnosis, risk factors, and management options of necrosis while highlighting novel avenues for discovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene J. Vaios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Sebastian F. Winter
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Helen A. Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Jorg Dietrich
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Katherine B. Peters
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Scott R. Floyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - John P. Kirkpatrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Zachary J. Reitman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tracz JA, Donnelly BM, Ngu S, Vojnic M, Wernicke AG, D'Amico RS. The abscopal effect: inducing immunogenicity in the treatment of brain metastases secondary to lung cancer and melanoma. J Neurooncol 2023; 163:1-14. [PMID: 37086369 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04312-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The phenomenon of radiation therapy (RT) causing regression of targeted lesions as well as lesions outside of the radiation field is known as the abscopal effect and is thought to be mediated by immunologic causes. This phenomena has been described following whole brain radiation (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastasis (BM) in advanced melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We systematically reviewed the available literature to identify which radiation modality and immunotherapy (IT) combination may elicit the abscopal effect, the optimal timing of RT and IT, and potential adverse effects inherent to the combination of RT and IT. METHODS Using PRISMA guidelines, a search of PubMed, Medline, and Web of Science was conducted to identify studies demonstrating the abscopal effect during treatment of NSCLC or melanoma with BM. RESULTS 598 cases of irradiated BM of melanoma or NSCLC in 18 studies met inclusion criteria. The most commonly administered ITs included PD-1 or CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), with RT most commonly administered within 3 months of ICI. Synergy between ICI and RT was described in 16 studies including evidence of higher tumor response within and outside of the irradiated field. In the 12 papers (n = 232 patients) that reported objective response rate (ORR) in patients with BM treated with RT and concurrent systemic IT, the non-weighted mean ORR was 49.4%; in the 5 papers (n = 110 patients) that reported ORR for treatment with RT or IT alone, the non-weighted mean ORR was 27.8%. No studies found evidence of significantly increased toxicity in patients receiving RT and ICI. CONCLUSION The combination of RT and ICIs may enhance ICI efficacy and induce more durable responses via the abscopal effect in patients with brain metastases of melanoma or NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jovanna A Tracz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, 10075, USA
| | - Brianna M Donnelly
- Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, 11549, USA
| | - Sam Ngu
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, 10075, USA
| | - Morana Vojnic
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, 10075, USA
| | | | - Randy S D'Amico
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, 10075, USA.
- Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, 11549, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Zhu KK, Wei JL, Xu YH, Li J, Rao XR, Xu YZ, Xing BY, Zhang SJ, Chen LC, Dong XR, Zhang S, Li ZY, Liu CW, Meng R, Wu G. Effect of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy on Diverse Organ Lesions in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Curr Med Sci 2023; 43:344-359. [PMID: 37002471 DOI: 10.1007/s11596-023-2702-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The combination of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is actively being explored in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, little is known about the optimal fractionation and radiotherapy target lesions in this scenario. This study investigated the effect of SBRT on diverse organ lesions and radiotherapy dose fractionation regimens on the prognosis of advanced NSCLC patients receiving ICIs. METHODS The medical records of advanced NSCLC patients consecutively treated with ICIs and SBRT were retrospectively reviewed at our institution from Dec. 2015 to Sep. 2021. Patients were grouped according to radiation sites. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were recorded using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between different treatment groups using the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. RESULTS A total of 124 advanced NSCLC patients receiving ICIs combined with SBRT were identified in this study. Radiation sites included lung lesions (lung group, n=43), bone metastases (bone group, n=24), and brain metastases (brain group, n=57). Compared with the brain group, the mean PFS (mPFS) in the lung group was significantly prolonged by 13.3 months (8.5 months vs. 21.8 months, HR=0.51, 95%CI: 0.28-0.92, P=0.0195), and that in the bone group prolonged by 9.5 months with a 43% reduction in the risk of disease progression (8.5 months vs. 18.0 months, HR=0.57, 95%CI: 0.29-1.13, P=0.1095). The mPFS in the lung group was prolonged by 3.8 months as compared with that in the bone group. The mean OS (mOS) in the lung and bone groups was longer than that of the brain group, and the risk of death decreased by up to 60% in the lung and bone groups as compared with that of the brain group. When SBRT was concurrently given with ICIs, the mPFS in the lung and brain groups were significantly longer than that of the bone group (29.6 months vs. 16.5 months vs. 12.1 months). When SBRT with 8-12 Gy per fraction was combined with ICIs, the mPFS in the lung group was significantly prolonged as compared with that of the bone and brain groups (25.4 months vs. 15.2 months vs. 12.0 months). Among patients receiving SBRT on lung lesions and brain metastases, the mPFS in the concurrent group was longer than that of the SBRT→ICIs group (29.6 months vs. 11.4 months, P=0.0003 and 12.1 months vs. 8.9 months, P=0.2559). Among patients receiving SBRT with <8 Gy and 8-12 Gy per fraction, the mPFS in the concurrent group was also longer than that of the SBRT→ICIs group (20.1 months vs. 5.3 months, P=0.0033 and 24.0 months vs. 13.4 months, P=0.1311). The disease control rates of the lung, bone, and brain groups were 90.7%, 83.3%, and 70.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION The study demonstrated that the addition of SBRT on lung lesions versus bone and brain metastases to ICIs improved the prognosis in advanced NSCLC patients. This improvement was related to the sequence of radiotherapy combined with ICIs and the radiotherapy fractionation regimens. Dose fractionation regimens of 8-12 Gy per fraction and lung lesions as radiotherapy targets might be the appropriate choice for advanced NSCLC patients receiving ICIs combined with SBRT.
Collapse
|
36
|
Mantziaris G, Pikis S, Xu Z, Mullen R, Alzate J, Bernstein K, Kondziolka D, Wei Z, Niranjan A, Lunsford LD, Liscak R, May J, Lee CC, Yang HC, Coupé FL, Mathieu D, Sheehan K, Sheehan D, Palmer JD, Perlow HK, Peker S, Samanci Y, Peterson J, Trifiletti DM, Shepard MJ, Elhamdani S, Wegner RE, Speckter H, Hernandez W, Warnick RE, Sheehan J. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intraventricular Metastases: A Multicenter Study. Neurosurgery 2023; 92:565-573. [PMID: 36512817 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraventricular metastases (IVMs) are uncommon, and their optimal management remains debatable. OBJECTIVE To define the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of IVMs. METHODS This retrospective, multicenter study included patients managed with SRS for IVMs. SRS-induced adverse events, local tumor or intracranial progression, and the frequency of new-onset hydrocephalus or leptomeningeal spread were documented. Analyses of variables related to patient neuroimaging or clinical outcomes were also performed. RESULTS The cohort included 160 patients from 11 centers who underwent SRS for treatment of 1045 intracranial metastases, of which 196 were IVMs. The median survival from SRS was 10 months. Of the 154 patients and 190 IVMs with imaging follow-up, 94 patients (61%) experienced distant intracranial disease progression and 16 IVMs (8.4%) progressed locally. The 12- and 24-month local IVM control rates were 91.4% and 86.1%, respectively. Sixteen (10%) and 27 (17.5%) patients developed hydrocephalus and leptomeningeal dissemination post-SRS, respectively. Adverse radiation effects were documented in 24 patients (15%). Eleven patients (6.9%) died because of intracranial disease progression. CONCLUSION SRS is an effective treatment option for IVMs, with a local IVM control rate comparable with SRS for parenchymal brain metastases. Leptomeningeal spread and hydrocephalus in patients with IVM occur in a minority of patients, but these patients warrant careful follow-up to detect these changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Mantziaris
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Stylianos Pikis
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Zhiyuan Xu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Reed Mullen
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA
| | - Juan Alzate
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Zhishuo Wei
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - Roman Liscak
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jaromir May
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - François-Louis Coupé
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Kimball Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Darrah Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Haley K Perlow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Selcuk Peker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yavuz Samanci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jennifer Peterson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Daniel M Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Matthew J Shepard
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - Shahed Elhamdani
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - Rodney E Wegner
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - Herwin Speckter
- Dominican Gamma Knife Center and Radiology Department, CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Wenceslao Hernandez
- Dominican Gamma Knife Center and Radiology Department, CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Ronald E Warnick
- Gamma Knife Center, Jewish Hospital, Mayfield Clinic, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Corrao G, Franchi M, Zaffaroni M, Vincini MG, de Marinis F, Spaggiari L, Orecchia R, Marvaso G, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Upfront Advanced Radiotherapy and New Drugs for NSCLC Patients with Synchronous Brain Metastases: Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze? A Real-World Analysis from Lombardy, Italy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041103. [PMID: 36831447 PMCID: PMC9953825 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM Healthcare administrative databases represent a valuable source for real-life data analysis. The primary aim of this study is to compare effectiveness and cost profile in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring synchronous brain metastases (BMs) who received non-chemo first-line systemic therapy with or without advanced radiotherapy (aRT). METHODS Diagnostic ICD-9-CM codes were used for identifying all patients with a new diagnosis of lung cancer between 2012 and 2019. Among these, patients who had started a first-line systemic treatment with either TKIs or pembrolizumab, alone or in combination with intensity-modulated or stereotactic RT, were selected. Clinical outcomes investigated included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time-to-treatment failure (TTF). The cost outcome was defined as the average per capita cumulative healthcare direct costs of the treatment, including all inpatient and outpatient costs. RESULTS The final cohort included 177 patients, of whom 58 were treated with systemic treatment plus aRT (STRT) and 119 with systemic treatment alone. The addition of aRT to systemic treatment was associated with a significantly better OS (p = 0.020) and PFS (p = 0.041) than systemic therapy alone. The ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) value indicated an average cost of €3792 for each month of survival after STRT treatment and confirmed clinical effectiveness but higher healthcare costs. CONCLUSIONS This real-world study suggests that upfront aRT for NCLSC patients with synchronous BMs represents a valid treatment strategy, boosting the efficacy of novel and emerging drug classes with sustainable costs for the health service. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE The present real-world study reports that the use of upfront advanced radiotherapyaRT and new-generation systemic agents, such as TKIs and pembrolizumab, may have higher oncological control and an improved cost-effectiveness profile than the use of new-generation systemic agents alone in NCLSC patients with synchronous brain metastases. Acquired evidence can also be used to inform policymakers that adding advanced radiotherapy results is a sustainable cost for the health service. Since approximately 50% of patients do not meet RCT inclusion criteria, a significant proportion of them is receiving treatment that is not evidence-informed; therefore, these results warrant further studies to identify the best radiotherapy timing and possible dose escalation approaches to improving treatment efficacy in patient subgroups not typically represented in randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Corrao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO—European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Franchi
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO—European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Maria Giulia Vincini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO—European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo de Marinis
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, IEO—European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Spaggiari
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, IEO—European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IEO—European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO—European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO—European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Andring L, Squires B, Seymour Z, Fahim D, Jacob J, Ye H, Marvin K, Grills I. Radionecrosis (RN) in patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and immunotherapy. Int J Neurosci 2023; 133:186-193. [PMID: 33685315 DOI: 10.1080/00207454.2021.1900843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Limited data exist regarding radionecrosis (RN) rates when patients receive immunotherapy (IT) and SRS for brain metastases. This study assesses the influence of such treatments on the rate of RN. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 352 lesions from 105 patients with metastatic melanoma or NSCLC treated with SRS and IT from 2012 to 2018. Lesions were excluded from analysis if patients had received WBRT or prior GK to the same lesion, if RN occurred before IT, or if IT had been discontinued >6 months pre-SRS or initiated >1 year post-SRS. IT was delivered concurrently (±30 days of SRS) or sequentially. Overall survival and RN rates were assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were performed to identify characteristics predicting RN. RESULTS Of 195 lesions from 63 patients included in analysis, the median prescription dose, IDL, lesion volume, and maximum tumor dimension (MTD) were 19 Gy, 50%, 0.15 cc and 0.8 cm, respectively. RN rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 7.3%, 10.4% and 10.4%. On UVA, RN risk increased with, isodose volume (IDV), MTD, and tumor volume (TV) whereas conformity index was associated with a trend toward decreased RN risk. Two-year RN rates increased with TV ≥ 0.3 cc (16% vs 1.1% p = 0.001), MTD ≥ 1.3 cm (19.1% vs 1.8% p < 0.003), and IDV ≥ 1.5 cc (19.6% vs 1.7% p = 0.001). Concurrent vs sequential timing of IT did not predict for RN. CONCLUSIONS Patients who received IT and SRS had acceptably low rates of RN. Timing of IT did not predict for RN. Further investigation is warranted to define RN risk with combined SRS and IT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Andring
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bryan Squires
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Zachary Seymour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Daniel Fahim
- Michigan Head and Spine Institute, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Jeffrey Jacob
- Michigan Head and Spine Institute, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Hong Ye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Kimberly Marvin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Inga Grills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Guan H, Zhou Z, Hou X, Zhang F, Zhao J, Hu K. Safety and potential increased risk of toxicity of radiotherapy combined immunotherapy strategy. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2023; 19:35-50. [PMID: 35538049 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Accumulating interest has emerged in exploring the toxicity profiles of the combination strategy of radiotherapy (RT) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Much remains unknown regarding safety and the potential increased risk of toxicity of a combined treatment. ICI prolongs survival but can induce immune-related adverse events as well. To increase awareness of adverse effect and support immediate and successful management, we go over the literature on the safety of RT combined immunotherapy strategy. Representative evidence relevant to RT combined with ICI in the brain, lung, head and neck, and pelvic malignance was reviewed respectively. Given radiation doses and fractionation, the irradiated volume, the timing of RT, and ICI would significantly affect the safety and efficiency of ICI+RT combination therapy, and no consensus had been reached about how to arrange RT delivery in the combined contexture, we went over the available literature and tried to address these challenges including the timing of RT, optimal dose and fractionations, RT target and target volume, and potential biomarkers to predict toxicity. We found even though RT+ICI combination therapy might augment toxicities, the majority of patients experienced grade 4 or 5 AE are relatively rare and no significant difference could be found between combination group and monotherapy group. Sometimes the acute toxicity with ICI is much less predictable and often life threatening and in some can give rise to permanent effects. Clinicians across disciplines should be aware of these uncommon lethal complications induced by ICI+RT. Early recognition is the key to successful treatment, reversibility of organ dysfunction, and in some cases even prevention of fatal outcome. If recognized early, managed properly, and no fatal AE occurs, the development of irAE indicates a good prognosis. It should be noted that nothing is known about potential late effects because very few studies have 5-year follow-up. The nature of irAE is the attack of activated immune cells on normal tissues. The nature of RT-induced AE is the DNA damage on normal tissue, which is related with the dose delivered and volume irradiated and the tolerance of surrounding normal tissues. The immune-modulating effect of SBRT may augment the damage on normal tissues. To maximize the antitumor immune response, 8-12 Gy/fraction is preferred when conducting RT. The available clinical evidence suggest RT of this dose/fractionated strategy combined with ICI have a tolerable AE profile, which need further validation by more clinical trials in the future. The combination strategy of RT with anti-PD1/PDL1 anti-body is supposed to be concurrent or RT followed by anti-PD1/PDL1 antibody. Although RT and ipilimumab combination sequence is controversial, ipilimumab prior to or concurrent with RT might be proper, which need more clinical validation. Under the concept of immunological dose painting, SBRT work as a trigger of immune response. It has been observed that SBRT of partially radiated tumors combined with ICI could induce similar tumor control compared with total tumor irradiation. The side effects of RT may be mitigated potentially due to the reduction of irradiated volume. The antitumor efficiency and safety profile of immunological RT dose painting+ICI deserve further investigation. Clinical predictive factors for irAE risk remain unclear, and more investigation deserves to be conducted about the irAE prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Guan
- Department of radiation oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Ziqi Zhou
- Department of radiation oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaorong Hou
- Department of radiation oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Fuquan Zhang
- Department of radiation oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jing Zhao
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Ke Hu
- Department of radiation oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
D’Aiello A, Miao E, Cheng H. Advances in the Management of Central Nervous System Metastases in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030844. [PMID: 36765802 PMCID: PMC9913558 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are common among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While the presence of brain metastases has historically portended poor prognosis, recent advances in local and systemic therapies have greatly improved outcomes for NSCLC patients with CNS involvement. Stereotactic radiology surgery (SRS) has emerged as an effective radiotherapy technique with fewer toxicities compared to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Furthermore, multi-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with CNS overall response rates (ORR) of up to 70-80% are now an accepted first-line approach for a subset of advanced NSCLC patients with targetable molecular alterations. In addition, while the CNS was once considered an immunologic sanctuary site, growing evidence shows that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can induce durable responses in brain metastases as well. Ongoing efforts to optimize CNS metastases management are necessary to refine multimodal treatment approaches and develop new therapeutics with better CNS penetrance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelica D’Aiello
- Department of Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
| | - Emily Miao
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
| | - Haiying Cheng
- Department of Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-718-430-2430
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lehrer EJ, Kowalchuk RO, Gurewitz J, Bernstein K, Kondziolka D, Niranjan A, Wei Z, Lunsford LD, Fakhoury KR, Rusthoven CG, Mathieu D, Trudel C, Malouff TD, Ruiz-Garcia H, Bonney P, Hwang L, Yu C, Zada G, Patel S, Deibert CP, Picozzi P, Franzini A, Attuati L, Prasad RN, Raval RR, Palmer JD, Lee CC, Yang HC, Harmsen WS, Jones BM, Sharma S, Ahluwalia MS, Sheehan JP, Trifiletti DM. Concurrent Administration of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Single Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Melanoma, and Renal Cell Carcinoma Brain Metastases is Not Associated With an Increased Risk of Radiation Necrosis Over Nonconcurrent Treatment: An International Multicenter Study of 657 Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023:S0360-3016(23)00057-3. [PMID: 36690161 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are highly effective treatments for brain metastases, particularly when these therapies are administered concurrently. However, there are limited data reporting the risk of radiation necrosis (RN) in this setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with brain metastases from primary non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, or melanoma treated with SRS and ICI were considered. Time-to-event analyses were conducted for any grade RN and symptomatic RN (SRN) with death incorporated as a competing risk. As a secondary analysis, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used for model development, and a loop of potential models was analyzed, with the highest-fidelity model selected. Brain V12 Gy thresholds identified on RPA were then incorporated into the competing risks analysis. Concurrent SRS and ICI administration. RESULTS Six hundred fifty-seven patients with 4182 brain metastases across 11 international institutions were analyzed. The median follow-up for all patients was 13.4 months. The median follow-up was 12.8 months and 14.1 months for the concurrent and nonconcurrent groups, respectively (P = .03). The median patient age was 66 years, and the median Karnofsky Performance Status was 90. In patients with any grade RN, 1- and 2-year rates were 6.4% and 9.9%, respectively. In patients with SRN, 1- and 2-year rates were 4.8% and 7.2%, respectively. On RPA, the highest-fidelity models consistently identified V12 Gy as the dominant variable predictive of RN. Three risk groups were identified by V12 Gy: (1) < 12 cm3; (2) 20 cm3 ≥ V12 Gy ≥ 12 cm3; (3) V12 Gy > 20 cm3. In patients with any grade RN, 1-year rates were 3.7% (V12 Gy < 12 cm3), 10.3% (20 cm3 ≥ V12 Gy ≥ 12 cm3), and 12.6% (V12 Gy > 20 cm3); the 2-year rates were 7.5% (V12 Gy < 12 cm3), 13.8% (20 cm3 ≥ V12 Gy ≥ 12 cm3), and 15.4% (V12 Gy > 20 cm3) (P < 0.001). In patients with any SRN, 1-year rates were 2.4% (V12 Gy < 12 cm3), 8.9% (20 cm3 ≥ V12 Gy ≥ 12 cm3), and 10.3% (V12 Gy > 20 cm3); the 2-year rates were 4.4% (V12 Gy < 12 cm3), 12.4% (20 cm3 ≥ V12 Gy ≥ 12 cm3), and 13.1% (V12 Gy > 20 cm3; P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in rates of any grade RN or SRN when accounting for therapy timing for all patients and by V12 risk group identified on RPA. CONCLUSIONS The use of SRS and ICI results in a low risk of any grade RN and SRN. This risk is not increased with concurrent administration. Therefore, ICI can safely be administered within 4-weeks of SRS. Three risk groups based on V12 Gy were identified, which clinicians may consider to further reduce rates of RN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
| | - Roman O Kowalchuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minneapolis
| | - Jason Gurewitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Kenneth Bernstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Douglas Kondziolka
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Zhishuo Wei
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kareem R Fakhoury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Chad G Rusthoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Quebec, Canada
| | - Claire Trudel
- Department of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Quebec, Canada
| | - Timothy D Malouff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Henry Ruiz-Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Phillip Bonney
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Lindsay Hwang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Cheng Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Gabriel Zada
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Samir Patel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Piero Picozzi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Andrea Franzini
- Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Luca Attuati
- Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Rozzano (Mi), Italy
| | - Rahul N Prasad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Raju R Raval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taiwan
| | | | - Brianna M Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Sonam Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | | | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Diehl CD, Rosenkranz E, Schwendner M, Mißlbeck M, Sollmann N, Ille S, Meyer B, Combs SE, Krieg SM. Dose Reduction to Motor Structures in Adjuvant Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy of Brain Metastases: nTMS-Derived DTI-Based Motor Fiber Tracking in Treatment Planning. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010282. [PMID: 36612277 PMCID: PMC9818359 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Resection of brain metastases (BM) close to motor structures is challenging for treatment. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) motor mapping, combined with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based fiber tracking (DTI-FTmot.TMS), is a valuable tool in neurosurgery to preserve motor function. This study aimed to assess the practicability of DTI-FTmot.TMS for local adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) planning of BM. Methods: Presurgically generated DTI-FTmot.TMS-based corticospinal tract (CST) reconstructions (FTmot.TMS) of 24 patients with 25 BM resected during later surgery were incorporated into the RT planning system. Completed fractionated stereotactic intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) plans were retrospectively analyzed and adapted to preserve FTmot.TMS. Results: In regular plans, mean dose (Dmean) of complete FTmot.TMS was 5.2 ± 2.4 Gy. Regarding planning risk volume (PRV-FTTMS) portions outside of the planning target volume (PTV) within the 17.5 Gy (50%) isodose line, the DTI-FTmot.TMS Dmean was significantly reduced by 33.0% (range, 5.9−57.6%) from 23.4 ± 3.3 Gy to 15.9 ± 4.7 Gy (p < 0.001). There was no significant decline in the effective treatment dose, with PTV Dmean 35.6 ± 0.9 Gy vs. 36.0 ± 1.2 Gy (p = 0.063) after adaption. Conclusions: The DTI-FTmot.TMS-based CST reconstructions could be implemented in adjuvant IMRT planning of BM. A significant dose reduction regarding motor structures within critical dose levels seems possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian D. Diehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Enrike Rosenkranz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Schwendner
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Mißlbeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Nico Sollmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Sebastian Ille
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), DKTK Partner Site, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Sandro M. Krieg
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
- TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hintelmann K, Petersen C, Borgmann K. Radiotherapeutic Strategies to Overcome Resistance of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases by Considering Immunogenic Aspects of Cancer Stem Cells. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:211. [PMID: 36612206 PMCID: PMC9818478 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer in women, and symptomatic brain metastases (BCBMs) occur in 15-20% of metastatic breast cancer cases. Despite technological advances in radiation therapy (RT), the prognosis of patients is limited. This has been attributed to radioresistant breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs), among other factors. The aim of this review article is to summarize the evidence of cancer-stem-cell-mediated radioresistance in brain metastases of breast cancer from radiobiologic and radiation oncologic perspectives to allow for the better interpretability of preclinical and clinical evidence and to facilitate its translation into new therapeutic strategies. To this end, the etiology of brain metastasis in breast cancer, its radiotherapeutic treatment options, resistance mechanisms in BCSCs, and effects of molecularly targeted therapies in combination with radiotherapy involving immune checkpoint inhibitors are described and classified. This is considered in the context of the central nervous system (CNS) as a particular metastatic niche involving the blood-brain barrier and the CNS immune system. The compilation of this existing knowledge serves to identify possible synergistic effects between systemic molecularly targeted therapies and ionizing radiation (IR) by considering both BCSCs' relevant resistance mechanisms and effects on normal tissue of the CNS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Hintelmann
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
- Laboratory of Radiobiology and Experimental Radiooncology, Center of Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Cordula Petersen
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kerstin Borgmann
- Laboratory of Radiobiology and Experimental Radiooncology, Center of Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Carpenter DJ, Fairchild AT, Adamson JD, Fecci PE, Sampson JH, Herndon JE, Torok JA, Mullikin TC, Kim GJ, Reitman ZJ, Kirkpatrick JP, Floyd SR. Outcomes in Patients with Intact and Resected Brain Metastasis Treated with 5-Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 8:101166. [PMID: 36845614 PMCID: PMC9943776 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (HF-SRS) with or without surgical resection is potentially a preferred treatment for larger or symptomatic brain metastases (BMs). Herein, we report clinical outcomes and predictive factors following HF-SRS. Methods and Materials Patients undergoing HF-SRS for intact (iHF-SRS) or resected (rHF-SRS) BMs from 2008 to 2018 were retrospectively identified. Linear accelerator-based image-guided HF-SRS consisted of 5 fractions at 5, 5.5, or 6 Gy per fraction. Time to local progression (LP), time to distant brain progression (DBP), and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Cox models assessed effect of clinical factors on OS. Fine and Gray's cumulative incidence model for competing events examined effect of factors on LP and DBP. The occurrence of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) was determined. Logistic regression examined predictors of LMD. Results Among 445 patients, median age was 63.5 years; 87% had Karnofsky performance status ≥70. Fifty-three % of patients underwent surgical resection, and 75% received 5 Gy per fraction. Patients with resected BMs had higher Karnofsky performance status (90-100, 41 vs 30%), less extracranial disease (absent, 25 vs 13%), and fewer BMs (multiple, 32 vs 67%). Median diameter of the dominant BM was 3.0 cm (interquartile range, 1.8-3.6 cm) for intact BMs and 4.6 cm (interquartile range, 3.9-5.5 cm) for resected BMs. Median OS was 5.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-6.0) following iHF-SRS and 12.8 months (95% CI, 10.8-16.2) following rHF-SRS (P < .01). Cumulative LP incidence was 14.5% at 18 months (95% CI, 11.4-18.0%), significantly associated with greater total GTV (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05-1.20) following iFR-SRS, and with recurrent versus newly diagnosed BMs across all patients (hazard ratio, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.01-5.15). Cumulative DBP incidence was significantly greater following rHF-SRS than iHF-SRS (P = .01), with respective 24-month rates of 50.0 (95% CI, 43.3-56.3) and 35.7% (95% CI, 29.2-42.2). LMD (57 events total; 33% nodular, 67% diffuse) was observed in 17.1% of rHF-SRS and 8.1% of iHF-SRS cases (odds ratio, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.34-4.53). Any radionecrosis and grade 2+ radionecrosis events were observed in 14 and 8% of cases, respectively. Conclusions HF-SRS demonstrated favorable rates of LC and radionecrosis in postoperative and intact settings. Corresponding LMD and RN rates were comparable to those of other studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J. Carpenter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina,Corresponding author: Scott Floyd, MD, PhD
| | | | - Justus D. Adamson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Peter E. Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - John H. Sampson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - James E. Herndon
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jordan A. Torok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Clair Hospital Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Trey C. Mullikin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Grace J. Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Zachary J. Reitman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - John P. Kirkpatrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina,Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Scott R. Floyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Voronova V, Vislobokova A, Mutig K, Samsonov M, Peskov K, Sekacheva M, Materenchuk M, Bunyatyan N, Lebedeva S. Combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with radiation therapy in cancer: A hammer breaking the wall of resistance. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1035884. [PMID: 36544712 PMCID: PMC9760959 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1035884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Immuno-oncology is an emerging field in the treatment of oncological diseases, that is based on recruitment of the host immune system to attack the tumor. Radiation exposure may help to unlock the potential of the immune activating agents by enhancing the antigen release and presentation, attraction of immunocompetent cells to the inflammation site, and eliminating the tumor cells by phagocytosis, thereby leading to an overall enhancement of the immune response. Numerous preclinical studies in mouse models of glioma, murine melanoma, extracranial cancer, or colorectal cancer have contributed to determination of the optimal radiotherapy fractionation, as well as the radio- and immunotherapy sequencing strategies for maximizing the antitumor activity of the treatment regimen. At the same time, efficacy of combined radio- and immunotherapy has been actively investigated in clinical trials of metastatic melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer and renal cell carcinoma. The present review summarizes the current advancements and challenges related to the aforementioned treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronika Voronova
- Department of Pharmacological Modeling, M&S Decisions LLC, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anastasia Vislobokova
- Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacy, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Kerim Mutig
- Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacy, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Mikhail Samsonov
- Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacy, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Kirill Peskov
- Department of Pharmacological Modeling, M&S Decisions LLC, Moscow, Russia,MID3 Research Center, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia,Artificial Intelligence Research Center, STU Sirius, Sochi, Russia
| | - Marina Sekacheva
- World-Class Research Center “Digital biodesign and personalized healthcare”, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Maria Materenchuk
- Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacy, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Natalya Bunyatyan
- Institute of Professional Education, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia,Federal State Budgetary Institution “Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Svetlana Lebedeva
- Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacy, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia,Institute of Professional Education, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia,*Correspondence: Svetlana Lebedeva,
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Nead KT, Haas A, Joo L, Wehner MR. Letter to the Editor. Challenges of immortal time biases in observational research. J Neurosurg 2022; 138:1482-1484. [PMID: 36461819 DOI: 10.3171/2022.10.jns222203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin T. Nead
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Allen Haas
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - LiJin Joo
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lehrer EJ, Gurewitz J, Bernstein K, Kondziolka D, Fakhoury KR, Rusthoven CG, Niranjan A, Wei Z, Lunsford LD, Malouff TD, Ruiz-Garcia H, Peterson JL, Bonney P, Hwang L, Yu C, Zada G, Deibert CP, Prasad RN, Raval RR, Palmer JD, Patel S, Picozzi P, Franzini A, Attuati L, Mathieu D, Trudel C, Lee CC, Yang HC, Jones BM, Green S, Ahluwalia MS, Sheehan JP, Trifiletti DM. Concurrent Administration of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Stereotactic Radiosurgery Is Well-Tolerated in Patients With Melanoma Brain Metastases: An International Multicenter Study of 203 Patients. Neurosurgery 2022; 91:872-882. [PMID: 36255215 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Melanoma brain metastases are commonly treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, the toxicity of these 2 treatments is largely unknown when administered concurrently. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the risk of radiation necrosis (RN) with concurrent and nonconcurrent SRS and ICIs. METHODS The guidelines from the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist were used. Inverse probability of treatment weighting, univariable and multivariable logistic regression, and the Kaplan-Meier method was utilized. RESULTS There were 203 patients with 1388 brain metastases across 11 international institutions in 4 countries with a median follow-up of 15.6 months. The rates of symptomatic RN were 9.4% and 8.2% in the concurrent and nonconcurrent groups, respectively ( P =.766). On multivariable logistic regression, V12 ≥ 10 cm 3 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.76; P =.006) and presence of BRAF mutation (OR: 2.20; P =.040) were associated with an increased risk of developing symptomatic RN; the use of concurrent over nonconcurrent therapy was not associated with an increased risk (OR: 1.06; P =.877). There were 20 grade 3 toxic events reported, and no grade 4 events reported. One patient experienced a grade 5 intracranial hemorrhage. The median overall survival was 36.1 and 19.8 months for the concurrent and nonconcurrent groups (log-rank P =.051), respectively. CONCLUSION Concurrent administration of ICIs and SRS are not associated with an increased risk of RN. Tumors harboring BRAF mutation, or perhaps prior exposure to targeted agents, may increase this risk. Radiosurgical optimization to maintain V12 < 10 cm 3 is a potential strategy to reduce the risk of RN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jason Gurewitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kenneth Bernstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Douglas Kondziolka
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kareem R Fakhoury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Chad G Rusthoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Zhishuo Wei
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Timothy D Malouff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Henry Ruiz-Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | | | - Phillip Bonney
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Lindsay Hwang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Cheng Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Gabriel Zada
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Rahul N Prasad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Raju R Raval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Samir Patel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Piero Picozzi
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Franzini
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Attuati
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milan, Italy
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Quebec, Canada
| | - Claire Trudel
- Department of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Quebec, Canada
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Brianna M Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sheryl Green
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
A Review of the Role of Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Immunotherapy in the Management of Primary Central Nervous System Tumors. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10112977. [PMID: 36428546 PMCID: PMC9687865 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10112977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used in the management of brain metastases. These therapies are commonly administered concurrently; as SRS may enhance anti-tumor immunity and responsiveness to ICIs. However, the use of ICIs with and without SRS in the management of primary brain tumors remains a controversial topic. Meningiomas are the most common nonmalignant and extra-parenchymal brain tumor, which often respond well to surgery and radiotherapy. However, higher grade meningiomas tend to be resistant to these treatments, and the use of chemotherapy and targeted agents in this setting have yielded disappointing results. Thus, there is heightened interest in the utilization of ICIs. Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary intraparenchymal brain tumor. It is associated with a grim prognosis with a median overall survival of approximately 20 months, despite optimal therapy. While SRS in the adjuvant setting, and ICI in the recurrent setting, have failed to demonstrate a survival benefit, SRS in the preoperative setting has the potential to enhance anti-tumor immunity and responsiveness to ICIs. Thus, these treatments represent an attractive option to add to the armamentarium of meningioma and glioblastoma management. In this review, we provide a detailed overview of the evidence supporting the use of ICIs and SRS in each of these settings.
Collapse
|
49
|
Lehrer EJ, Kowalchuk RO, Ruiz-Garcia H, Merrell KW, Brown PD, Palmer JD, Burri SH, Sheehan JP, Quninoes-Hinojosa A, Trifiletti DM. Preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of brain metastases and gliomas. Front Surg 2022; 9:972727. [PMID: 36353610 PMCID: PMC9637863 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.972727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is the delivery of a high dose ionizing radiation in a highly conformal manner, which allows for significant sparing of nearby healthy tissues. It is typically delivered in 1-5 sessions and has demonstrated safety and efficacy across multiple intracranial neoplasms and functional disorders. In the setting of brain metastases, postoperative and definitive SRS has demonstrated favorable rates of tumor control and improved cognitive preservation compared to conventional whole brain radiation therapy. However, the risk of local failure and treatment-related complications (e.g. radiation necrosis) markedly increases with larger postoperative treatment volumes. Additionally, the risk of leptomeningeal disease is significantly higher in patients treated with postoperative SRS. In the setting of high grade glioma, preclinical reports have suggested that preoperative SRS may enhance anti-tumor immunity as compared to postoperative radiotherapy. In addition to potentially permitting smaller target volumes, tissue analysis may permit characterization of DNA repair pathways and tumor microenvironment changes in response to SRS, which may be used to further tailor therapy and identify novel therapeutic targets. Building on the work from preoperative SRS for brain metastases and preclinical work for high grade gliomas, further exploration of this treatment paradigm in the latter is warranted. Presently, there are prospective early phase clinical trials underway investigating the role of preoperative SRS in the management of high grade gliomas. In the forthcoming sections, we review the biologic rationale for preoperative SRS, as well as pertinent preclinical and clinical data, including ongoing and planned prospective clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J. Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Roman O. Kowalchuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Henry Ruiz-Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Kenneth W. Merrell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Paul D. Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Joshua D. Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Stuart H. Burri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, United States
| | - Jason P. Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | | | - Daniel M. Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States,Correspondence: Daniel M. Trifiletti
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Alvi MA, Asher AL, Michalopoulos GD, Grills IS, Warnick RE, McInerney J, Chiang VL, Attia A, Timmerman R, Chang E, Kavanagh BD, Andrews DW, Walter K, Bydon M, Sheehan JP. Factors associated with progression and mortality among patients undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial metastasis: results from a national real-world registry. J Neurosurg 2022; 137:985-998. [PMID: 35171833 DOI: 10.3171/2021.10.jns211410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been increasingly employed in recent years to treat intracranial metastatic lesions. However, there is still a need for optimization of treatment paradigms to provide better local control and prevent progressive intracranial disease. In the current study, the authors utilized a national collaborative registry to investigate the outcomes of patients with intracranial metastatic disease who underwent SRS and to determine factors associated with lesion treatment response, overall progression, and mortality. METHODS The NeuroPoint Alliance SRS registry was queried for all patients with intracranial metastatic lesions undergoing single- or multifraction SRS at participating institutions between 2016 and 2020. The main outcomes of interest included lesion response (lesion-level analysis), progression using Response Assessment for Neuro-Oncology criteria, and mortality (patient-level analysis). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to report time to progression and overall survival, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to investigate factors associated with lesion response, progression, and mortality. RESULTS A total of 501 patients (1447 intracranial metastatic lesions) who underwent SRS and had available follow-up were included in the current analyses. The most common primary tumor was lung cancer (49.5%, n = 248), followed by breast (15.4%, n = 77) and melanoma (12.2%, n = 61). Most patients had a single lesion (44.9%, n = 225), 29.3% (n = 147) had 2 or 3 lesions, and 25.7% (n = 129) had > 3 lesions. The mean sum of baseline measurements of the lesions according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) was 35.54 mm (SD 25.94). At follow-up, 671 lesions (46.4%) had a complete response, 631 (43.6%) had a partial response (≥ 30% decrease in longest diameter) or were stable (< 30% decrease but < 20% increase), and 145 (10%) showed progression (> 20% increase in longest diameter). On multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, melanoma-associated lesions (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.34-0.67; p < 0.001) and larger lesion size (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.93-0.96; p < 0.001) showed lower odds of lesion regression, while a higher biologically effective dose was associated with higher odds (HR 1.001, 95% CI 1.0001-1.00023; p < 0.001). A total of 237 patients (47.3%) had overall progression (local failure or intracranial progressive disease), with a median time to progression of 10.03 months after the index SRS. Factors found to be associated with increased hazards of progression included male sex (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.108-1.99; p = 0.008), while administration of immunotherapy (before or after SRS) was found to be associated with lower hazards of overall progression (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.460-0.85; p = 0.003). A total of 121 patients (23.95%) died during the follow-up period, with a median survival of 19.4 months from the time of initial SRS. A higher recursive partitioning analysis score (HR 21.3485, 95% CI 1.53202-3.6285; p < 0.001) was found to be associated with higher hazards of mortality, while single-fraction treatment compared with hypofractionated treatment (HR 0.082, 95% CI 0.011-0.61; p = 0.015), administration of immunotherapy (HR 0.385, 95% CI 0.233-0.64; p < 0.001), and presence of single compared with > 3 lesions (HR 0.427, 95% CI 0.187-0.98; p = 0.044) were found to be associated with lower risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS The comparability of results between this study and those of previously published clinical trials affirms the value of multicenter databases with real-world data collected without predetermined research purpose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Ali Alvi
- 1Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- 2Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Anthony L Asher
- 3Neuroscience Institute, Carolinas Healthcare System and Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Giorgos D Michalopoulos
- 1Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- 2Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Inga S Grills
- 4Department of Neurological Surgery, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Ronald E Warnick
- 5Department of Neurosurgery, The Jewish Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - James McInerney
- 6Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Veronica L Chiang
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Albert Attia
- 8Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Robert Timmerman
- 9Department of Neurological Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Eric Chang
- 10Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Brian D Kavanagh
- 11Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - David W Andrews
- 12Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kevin Walter
- 13Department of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York; and
| | - Mohamad Bydon
- 1Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- 2Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- 14Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|