1
|
Amstutz F, D'Almeida PG, Wu X, Albertini F, Bachtiary B, Weber DC, Unkelbach J, Lomax AJ, Zhang Y. Quantification of deformable image registration uncertainties for dose accumulation on head and neck cancer proton treatments. Phys Med 2024; 122:103386. [PMID: 38805762 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients in radiotherapy require adaptive treatment plans due to anatomical changes. Deformable image registration (DIR) is used in adaptive radiotherapy, e.g. for deformable dose accumulation (DDA). However, DIR's ill-posedness necessitates addressing uncertainties, often overlooked in clinical implementations. DIR's further clinical implementation is hindered by missing quantitative commissioning and quality assurance tools. This study evaluates one pathway for more quantitative DDA uncertainties. METHODS For five HNC patients, each with multiple repeated CTs acquired during treatment, a simultaneous-integrated boost (SIB) plan was optimized. Recalculated doses were warped individually using multiple DIRs from repeated to reference CTs, and voxel-by-voxel dose ranges determined an error-bar for DDA. Followed by evaluating, a previously proposed early-stage DDA uncertainty estimation method tested for lung cancer, which combines geometric DIR uncertainties, dose gradients and their directional dependence, in the context of HNC. RESULTS Applying multiple DIRs show dose differences, pronounced in high dose gradient regions. The patient with largest anatomical changes (-13.1 % in ROI body volume), exhibited 33 % maximum uncertainty in contralateral parotid, with 54 % of voxels presenting an uncertainty >5 %. Accumulation over multiple CTs partially mitigated uncertainties. The estimation approach predicted 92.6 % of voxels within ±5 % to the reference dose uncertainty across all patients. CONCLUSIONS DIR variations impact accumulated doses, emphasizing DDA uncertainty quantification's importance for HNC patients. Multiple DIR dose warping aids in quantifying DDA uncertainties. An estimation approach previously described for lung cancer was successfully validated for HNC, for SIB plans, presenting different dose gradients, and for accumulated treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Amstutz
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland; Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Peter G D'Almeida
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland; Department of Information Technology & Electrical Engineering, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Xin Wu
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland; Department of Information Technology & Electrical Engineering, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jan Unkelbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Antony J Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland; Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ye Zhang
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oud M, Breedveld S, Rojo-Santiago J, Giżyńska MK, Kroesen M, Habraken S, Perkó Z, Heijmen B, Hoogeman M. A fast and robust constraint-based online re-optimization approach for automated online adaptive intensity modulated proton therapy in head and neck cancer. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:075007. [PMID: 38373350 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad2a98] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
Objective. In head-and-neck cancer intensity modulated proton therapy, adaptive radiotherapy is currently restricted to offline re-planning, mitigating the effect of slow changes in patient anatomies. Daily online adaptations can potentially improve dosimetry. Here, a new, fully automated online re-optimization strategy is presented. In a retrospective study, this online re-optimization approach was compared to our trigger-based offline re-planning (offlineTBre-planning) schedule, including extensive robustness analyses.Approach. The online re-optimization method employs automated multi-criterial re-optimization, using robust optimization with 1 mm setup-robustness settings (in contrast to 3 mm for offlineTBre-planning). Hard planning constraints and spot addition are used to enforce adequate target coverage, avoid prohibitively large maximum doses and minimize organ-at-risk doses. For 67 repeat-CTs from 15 patients, fraction doses of the two strategies were compared for the CTVs and organs-at-risk. Per repeat-CT, 10.000 fractions with different setup and range robustness settings were simulated using polynomial chaos expansion for fast and accurate dose calculations.Main results. For 14/67 repeat-CTs, offlineTBre-planning resulted in <50% probability ofD98%≥ 95% of the prescribed dose (Dpres) in one or both CTVs, which never happened with online re-optimization. With offlineTBre-planning, eight repeat-CTs had zero probability of obtainingD98%≥ 95%Dpresfor CTV7000, while the minimum probability with online re-optimization was 81%. Risks of xerostomia and dysphagia grade ≥ II were reduced by 3.5 ± 1.7 and 3.9 ± 2.8 percentage point [mean ± SD] (p< 10-5for both). In online re-optimization, adjustment of spot configuration followed by spot-intensity re-optimization took 3.4 min on average.Significance. The fast online re-optimization strategy always prevented substantial losses of target coverage caused by day-to-day anatomical variations, as opposed to the clinical trigger-based offline re-planning schedule. On top of this, online re-optimization could be performed with smaller setup robustness settings, contributing to improved organs-at-risk sparing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Oud
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Department of Medical Physics & Informatics, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Breedveld
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jesús Rojo-Santiago
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Department of Medical Physics & Informatics, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | - Michiel Kroesen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Steven Habraken
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Department of Medical Physics & Informatics, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Zoltán Perkó
- Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Department of Radiation Science and Technology, The Netherlands
| | - Ben Heijmen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mischa Hoogeman
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Department of Medical Physics & Informatics, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xu Y, Jin W, Butkus M, De Ornelas M, Cyriac J, Studenski MT, Padgett K, Simpson G, Samuels S, Samuels M, Dogan N. Cone beam CT-based adaptive intensity modulated proton therapy assessment using automated planning for head-and-neck cancer. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:13. [PMID: 38263237 PMCID: PMC10804468 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02406-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the feasibility of CBCT-based adaptive intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) using automated planning for treatment of head and neck (HN) cancers. METHODS Twenty HN cancer patients who received radiotherapy and had pretreatment CBCTs were included in this study. Initial IMPT plans were created using automated planning software for all patients. Synthetic CTs (sCT) were then created by deforming the planning CT (pCT) to the pretreatment CBCTs. To assess dose calculation accuracy on sCTs, repeat CTs (rCTs) were deformed to the pretreatment CBCT obtained on the same day to create deformed rCT (rCTdef), serving as gold standard. The dose recalculated on sCT and on rCTdef were compared by using Gamma analysis. The accuracy of DIR generated contours was also assessed. To explore the potential benefits of adaptive IMPT, two sets of plans were created for each patient, a non-adapted IMPT plan and an adapted IMPT plan calculated on weekly sCT images. The weekly doses for non-adaptive and adaptive IMPT plans were accumulated on the pCT, and the accumulated dosimetric parameters of two sets were compared. RESULTS Gamma analysis of the dose recalculated on sCT and rCTdef resulted in a passing rate of 97.9% ± 1.7% using 3 mm/3% criteria. With the physician-corrected contours on the sCT, the dose deviation range of using sCT to estimate mean dose for the most organ at risk (OARs) can be reduced to (- 2.37%, 2.19%) as compared to rCTdef, while for V95 of primary or secondary CTVs, the deviation can be controlled within (- 1.09%, 0.29%). Comparison of the accumulated doses from the adaptive planning against the non-adaptive plans reduced mean dose to constrictors (- 1.42 Gy ± 2.79 Gy) and larynx (- 2.58 Gy ± 3.09 Gy). The reductions result in statistically significant reductions in the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of larynx edema by 7.52% ± 13.59%. 4.5% of primary CTVs, 4.1% of secondary CTVs, and 26.8% tertiary CTVs didn't meet the V95 > 95% constraint on non-adapted IMPT plans. All adaptive plans were able to meet the coverage constraint. CONCLUSION sCTs can be a useful tool for accurate proton dose calculation. Adaptive IMPT resulted in better CTV coverage, OAR sparing and lower NTCP for some OARs as compared with non-adaptive IMPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yihang Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA
| | - William Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Michael Butkus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Mariluz De Ornelas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jonathan Cyriac
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Matthew T Studenski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Kyle Padgett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Garrett Simpson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Stuart Samuels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Michael Samuels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ, USA
| | - Nesrin Dogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bobić M, Christensen JB, Lee H, Choulilitsa E, Czerska K, Togno M, Safai S, Yukihara EG, Winey BA, Lomax AJ, Paganetti H, Albertini F, Nesteruk KP. Optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters for simultaneous measurement of point dose and dose-weighted LET in an adaptive proton therapy workflow. Front Oncol 2024; 13:1333039. [PMID: 38510267 PMCID: PMC10951997 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1333039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To demonstrate the suitability of optically stimulated luminescence detectors (OSLDs) for accurate simultaneous measurement of the absolute point dose and dose-weighted linear energy transfer (LETD) in an anthropomorphic phantom for experimental validation of daily adaptive proton therapy. Methods A clinically realistic intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment plan was created based on a CT of an anthropomorphic head-and-neck phantom made of tissue-equivalent material. The IMPT plan was optimized with three fields to deliver a uniform dose to the target volume covering the OSLDs. Different scenarios representing inter-fractional anatomical changes were created by modifying the phantom. An online adaptive proton therapy workflow was used to recover the daily dose distribution and account for the applied geometry changes. To validate the adaptive workflow, measurements were performed by irradiating Al2O3:C OSLDs inside the phantom. In addition to the measurements, retrospective Monte Carlo simulations were performed to compare the absolute dose and dose-averaged LET (LETD) delivered to the OSLDs. Results The online adaptive proton therapy workflow was shown to recover significant degradation in dose conformity resulting from large anatomical and positioning deviations from the reference plan. The Monte Carlo simulations were in close agreement with the OSLD measurements, with an average relative error of 1.4% for doses and 3.2% for LETD. The use of OSLDs for LET determination allowed for a correction for the ionization quenched response. Conclusion The OSLDs appear to be an excellent detector for simultaneously assessing dose and LET distributions in proton irradiation of an anthropomorphic phantom. The OSLDs can be cut to almost any size and shape, making them ideal for in-phantom measurements to probe the radiation quality and dose in a predefined region of interest. Although we have presented the results obtained in the experimental validation of an adaptive proton therapy workflow, the same approach can be generalized and used for a variety of clinical innovations and workflow developments that require accurate assessment of point dose and/or average LET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mislav Bobić
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | - Hoyeon Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Evangelia Choulilitsa
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | - Brian A. Winey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Antony J. Lomax
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | - Konrad P. Nesteruk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yagihashi T, Inoue T, Shiba S, Yamano A, Yamanaka M, Sato N, Inoue K, Omura M, Nagata H. Comparing Efficacy Between Robust and PTV Margin-based Optimizations for Interfractional Anatomical Variations in Prostate Tomotherapy. In Vivo 2024; 38:409-417. [PMID: 38148099 PMCID: PMC10756445 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Interfractional anatomical variations cause considerable differences between planned and actual radiotherapy doses. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of robust and planning target volume (PTV) margin-based optimizations for the anatomical variations in helical tomotherapy for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Ten patients underwent treatment-planning kilovolt computed tomography (kVCT) and daily megavolt computed tomography (MVCT). Two types of nominal plans, with a prescription of 60 Gy/20 fractions, were created using robust and PTV margin-based optimizations on kVCT for each patient. Subsequently, the daily estimated doses were recalculated using nominal plans, and all available MVCTs modified the daily patient-setup errors. Due to the difference in dose calculation accuracy between kVCT and MVCT, three scenarios with dose corrections of 1, 2, and 3% were considered in the recalculation process. The dosimetric metrics, including target coverage with the prescription dose, Paddick's conformity index, homogeneity index, and mean dose to the rectum, were analyzed. RESULTS A dosimetric comparison of the nominal plans demonstrated that the robust plans had better dose conformity, lower target coverage, and dose homogeneity than the PTV plans. In the daily estimated doses of any dose-corrected scenario, the target coverage and dose sparing to the rectum in the robust plans were significantly higher than those in the PTV plans, whereas dose conformity and homogeneity were identical to those of the nominal case. CONCLUSION Robust optimization is recommended as it accounts for anatomical variations during treatment regarding target coverage in helical tomotherapy plans for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayuki Yagihashi
- Department of Medical Physics, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
- Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Inoue
- Department of Medical Physics, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shintaro Shiba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Akihiro Yamano
- Department of Medical Physics, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
- Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masashi Yamanaka
- Department of Medical Physics, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Naoki Sato
- Department of Medical Physics, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kazumasa Inoue
- Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Motoko Omura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hironori Nagata
- Department of Medical Physics, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Amstutz F, Krcek R, Bachtiary B, Weber DC, Lomax AJ, Unkelbach J, Zhang Y. Treatment planning comparison for head and neck cancer between photon, proton, and combined proton-photon therapy - From a fixed beam line to an arc. Radiother Oncol 2024; 190:109973. [PMID: 37913953 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE This study investigates whether combined proton-photon therapy (CPPT) improves treatment plan quality compared to single-modality intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Different proton beam arrangements for CPPT and IMPT are compared, which could be of specific interest concerning potential future upright-positioned treatments. Furthermore, it is evaluated if CPPT benefits remain under inter-fractional anatomical changes for HNC treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS Five HNC patients with a planning CT and multiple (4-7) repeated CTs were studied. CPPT with simultaneously optimized photon and proton fluence, single-modality IMPT, and IMRT treatment plans were optimized on the planning CT and then recalculated and reoptimized on each repeated CT. For CPPT and IMPT, plans with different degrees of freedom for the proton beams were optimized. Fixed horizontal proton beam line (FHB), gantry-like, and arc-like plans were compared. RESULTS The target coverage for CPPT without adaptation is insufficient (average V95%=88.4 %), while adapted plans can recover the initial treatment plan quality for target (average V95%=95.5 %) and organs-at-risk. CPPT with increased proton beam flexibility increases plan quality and reduces normal tissue complication probability of Xerostomia and Dysphagia. On average, Xerostomia NTCP reductions compared to IMRT are -2.7 %/-3.4 %/-5.0 % for CPPT FHB/CPPT Gantry/CPPT Arc. The differences for IMPT FHB/IMPT Gantry/IMPT Arc are + 0.8 %/-0.9 %/-4.3 %. CONCLUSION CPPT for HNC needs adaptive treatments. Increasing proton beam flexibility in CPPT, either by using a gantry or an upright-positioned patient, improves treatment plan quality. However, the photon component is substantially reduced, therefore, the balance between improved plan quality and costs must be further determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Amstutz
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland; Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Reinhardt Krcek
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Antony J Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland; Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jan Unkelbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ye Zhang
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ng Wei Siang K, Both S, Oldehinkel E, Langendijk JA, Wagenaar D. Assessment of residual geometrical errors of clinical target volumes and their impact on dose accumulation for head and neck radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2023; 188:109856. [PMID: 37597803 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the residual geometrical errors (dr) and their impact on the clinical target volumes (CTV) dose coverage for head and neck cancer (HNC) proton therapy patients. METHODS We analysed 28 HNC patients treated with 70 Gy (RBE) and 54.25 Gy (RBE) to the therapeutic CTV70 and prophylactic CTV54.25, respectively. Daily cone beam CTs were converted to high quality synthetic CTs (sCTs). The CTVs from the nominal CT were propagated to the corresponding sCTs using a hybrid deformable image registration (propagated CTVs) in RayStation 11B. For 11 patients, all propagated CTVs were reviewed by our HNC radiation oncologist (physician corrected CTVs). The residual geometrical error dr was quantified as a function of the daily CTVs volume overlap with the nominal plan CTV. The errors dr(propagated CTVs) and dr(physician corrected CTVs) and the difference in dice similarity coefficients (ΔDSC) were determined. Using clinical plans, dose coverage and the tumor control probability (TCP) for the nominal, accumulated and voxel-wise minimum scenarios were determined. RESULTS The difference in the residual geometrical error dr (propagated CTVs - physician corrected CTVs) and mean DSC (|ΔDSC|mean) were minor: Δdr(CTV70) = 0.16 mm, Δdr(CTV54.25) = 0.26 mm, |ΔDSC|mean < 0.9%. For all 28 patients, dr(CTV70) = 1.91 mm and dr(CTV54.25) = 1.90 mm. However, CTV54.25 above and below the cricoid cartilage differed substantially (1.00 mm c.f. 3.93 mm). The CTV54.25 coverage below the cricoid was then almost always lower, although the TCP of the accumulated dose was higher than the TCP of the voxel-wise minimum dose. CONCLUSIONS Setup uncertainty setting of 2 mm is possible. The feasibility of using propagated CTVs for error determination is demonstrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelvin Ng Wei Siang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands; Holland Proton Therapy Center, Department of Medical Physics & Informatics, Delft, The Netherlands.
| | - Stefan Both
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Edwin Oldehinkel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk Wagenaar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nenoff L, Sudhyadhom A, Lau J, Sharp GC, Paganetti H, Pursley J. Comparing Predicted Toxicities between Hypofractionated Proton and Photon Radiotherapy of Liver Cancer Patients with Different Adaptive Schemes. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4592. [PMID: 37760560 PMCID: PMC10526201 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
With the availability of MRI linacs, online adaptive intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has become a treatment option for liver cancer patients, often combined with hypofractionation. Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) has the potential to reduce the dose to healthy tissue, but it is particularly sensitive to changes in the beam path and might therefore benefit from online adaptation. This study compares the normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) for liver and duodenal toxicity for adaptive and non-adaptive IMRT and IMPT treatments of liver cancer patients. Adaptive and non-adaptive IMRT and IMPT plans were optimized to 50 Gy (RBE = 1.1 for IMPT) in five fractions for 10 liver cancer patients, using the original MRI linac images and physician-drawn structures. Three liver NTCP models were used to predict radiation-induced liver disease, an increase in albumin-bilirubin level, and a Child-Pugh score increase of more than 2. Additionally, three duodenal NTCP models were used to predict gastric bleeding, gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity with grades >3, and duodenal toxicity grades 2-4. NTCPs were calculated for adaptive and non-adaptive IMRT and IMPT treatments. In general, IMRT showed higher NTCP values than IMPT and the differences were often significant. However, the differences between adaptive and non-adaptive treatment schemes were not significant, indicating that the NTCP benefit of adaptive treatment regimens is expected to be smaller than the expected difference between IMRT and IMPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Nenoff
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA (J.P.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Atchar Sudhyadhom
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA (J.P.)
- Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Jackson Lau
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA (J.P.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Gregory C. Sharp
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA (J.P.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA (J.P.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Jennifer Pursley
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA (J.P.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lalonde A, Bobić M, Sharp GC, Chamseddine I, Winey B, Paganetti H. Evaluating the effect of setup uncertainty reduction and adaptation to geometric changes on normal tissue complication probability using online adaptive head and neck intensity modulated proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:115018. [PMID: 37164020 PMCID: PMC10351361 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acd433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Objective. To evaluate the impact of setup uncertainty reduction (SUR) and adaptation to geometrical changes (AGC) on normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) when using online adaptive head and neck intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT).Approach.A cohort of ten retrospective head and neck cancer patients with daily scatter corrected cone-beam CT (CBCT) was studied. For each patient, two IMPT treatment plans were created: one with a 3 mm setup uncertainty robustness setting and one with no explicit setup robustness. Both plans were recalculated on the daily CBCT considering three scenarios: the robust plan without adaptation, the non-robust plan without adaptation and the non-robust plan with daily online adaptation. Online-adaptation was simulated using an in-house developed workflow based on GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo dose calculation and partial spot-intensity re-optimization. Dose distributions associated with each scenario were accumulated on the planning CT, where NTCP models for six toxicities were applied. NTCP values from each scenario were intercompared to quantify the reduction in toxicity risk induced by SUR alone, AGC alone and SUR and AGC combined. Finally, a decision tree was implemented to assess the clinical significance of the toxicity reduction associated with each mechanism.Main results. For most patients, clinically meaningful NTCP reductions were only achieved when SUR and AGC were performed together. In these conditions, total reductions in NTCP of up to 30.48 pp were obtained, with noticeable NTCP reductions for aspiration, dysphagia and xerostomia (mean reductions of 8.25, 5.42 and 5.12 pp respectively). While SUR had a generally larger impact than AGC on NTCP reductions, SUR alone did not induce clinically meaningful toxicity reductions in any patient, compared to only one for AGC alone.SignificanceOnline adaptive head and neck proton therapy can only yield clinically significant reductions in the risk of long-term side effects when combining the benefits of SUR and AGC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Lalonde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Mislav Bobić
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Gregory C Sharp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Ibrahim Chamseddine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Brian Winey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Qiu Z, Olberg S, den Hertog D, Ajdari A, Bortfeld T, Pursley J. Online adaptive planning methods for intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:10.1088/1361-6560/accdb2. [PMID: 37068488 PMCID: PMC10637515 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/accdb2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
Online adaptive radiation therapy aims at adapting a patient's treatment plan to their current anatomy to account for inter-fraction variations before daily treatment delivery. As this process needs to be accomplished while the patient is immobilized on the treatment couch, it requires time-efficient adaptive planning methods to generate a quality daily treatment plan rapidly. The conventional planning methods do not meet the time requirement of online adaptive radiation therapy because they often involve excessive human intervention, significantly prolonging the planning phase. This article reviews the planning strategies employed by current commercial online adaptive radiation therapy systems, research on online adaptive planning, and artificial intelligence's potential application to online adaptive planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zihang Qiu
- Department of Business Analytics, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States of America
| | - Sven Olberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States of America
| | - Dick den Hertog
- Department of Business Analytics, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ali Ajdari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States of America
| | - Thomas Bortfeld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States of America
| | - Jennifer Pursley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Trnkova P, Zhang Y, Toshito T, Heijmen B, Richter C, Aznar MC, Albertini F, Bolsi A, Daartz J, Knopf AC, Bertholet J. A survey of practice patterns for adaptive particle therapy for interfractional changes. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 26:100442. [PMID: 37197154 PMCID: PMC10183663 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Anatomical changes may compromise the planned target coverage and organs-at-risk dose in particle therapy. This study reports on the practice patterns for adaptive particle therapy (APT) to evaluate current clinical practice and wishes and barriers to further implementation. Materials and methods An institutional questionnaire was distributed to PT centres worldwide (7/2020-6/2021) asking which type of APT was used, details of the workflow, and what the wishes and barriers to implementation were. Seventy centres from 17 countries participated. A three-round Delphi consensus analysis (10/2022) among the authors followed to define recommendations on required actions and future vision. Results Out of the 68 clinically operational centres, 84% were users of APT for at least one treatment site with head and neck being most common. APT was mostly performed offline with only two online APT users (plan-library). No centre used online daily re-planning. Daily 3D imaging was used for APT by 19% of users. Sixty-eight percent of users had plans to increase their use or change their technique for APT. The main barrier was "lack of integrated and efficient workflows". Automation and speed, reliable dose deformation for dose accumulation and higher quality of in-room volumetric imaging were identified as the most urgent task for clinical implementation of online daily APT. Conclusion Offline APT was implemented by the majority of PT centres. Joint efforts between industry research and clinics are needed to translate innovations into efficient and clinically feasible workflows for broad-scale implementation of online APT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Trnkova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Corresponding author.
| | - Ye Zhang
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Toshiyuki Toshito
- Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Ben Heijmen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC), Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christian Richter
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marianne C. Aznar
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alessandra Bolsi
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Juliane Daartz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States of America
| | - Antje C. Knopf
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Medical Informatics, School of Life Science FHNW, Muttenz, Switzerland
| | - Jenny Bertholet
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bobić M, Lalonde A, Nesteruk KP, Lee H, Nenoff L, Gorissen BL, Bertolet A, Busse PM, Chan AW, Winey BA, Sharp GC, Verburg JM, Lomax AJ, Paganetti H. Large anatomical changes in head-and-neck cancers – a dosimetric comparison of online and offline adaptive proton therapy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 40:100625. [PMID: 37090849 PMCID: PMC10120292 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This work evaluates an online adaptive (OA) workflow for head-and-neck (H&N) intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and compares it with full offline replanning (FOR) in patients with large anatomical changes. Methods IMPT treatment plans are created retrospectively for a cohort of eight H&N cancer patients that previously required replanning during the course of treatment due to large anatomical changes. Daily cone-beam CTs (CBCT) are acquired and corrected for scatter, resulting in 253 analyzed fractions. To simulate the FOR workflow, nominal plans are created on the planning-CT and delivered until a repeated-CT is acquired; at this point, a new plan is created on the repeated-CT. To simulate the OA workflow, nominal plans are created on the planning-CT and adapted at each fraction using a simple beamlet weight-tuning technique. Dose distributions are calculated on the CBCTs with Monte Carlo for both delivery methods. The total treatment dose is accumulated on the planning-CT. Results Daily OA improved target coverage compared to FOR despite using smaller target margins. In the high-risk CTV, the median D98 degradation was 1.1 % and 2.1 % for OA and FOR, respectively. In the low-risk CTV, the same metrics yield 1.3 % and 5.2 % for OA and FOR, respectively. Smaller setup margins of OA reduced the dose to all OARs, which was most relevant for the parotid glands. Conclusion Daily OA can maintain prescription doses and constraints over the course of fractionated treatment, even in cases of large anatomical changes, reducing the necessity for manual replanning in H&N IMPT.
Collapse
|
13
|
Huiskes M, Astreinidou E, Kong W, Breedveld S, Heijmen B, Rasch C. Dosimetric impact of adaptive proton therapy in head and neck cancer - A review. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 39:100598. [PMID: 36860581 PMCID: PMC9969246 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) in head and neck cancer (HNC) is susceptible to anatomical changes and patient set-up inaccuracies during the radiotherapy course, which can cause discrepancies between planned and delivered dose. The discrepancies can be counteracted by adaptive replanning strategies. This article reviews the observed dosimetric impact of adaptive proton therapy (APT) and the timing to perform a plan adaptation in IMPT in HNC. Methods A literature search of articles published in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science from January 2010 to March 2022 was performed. Among a total of 59 records assessed for possible eligibility, ten articles were included in this review. Results Included studies reported on target coverage deterioration in IMPT plans during the RT course, which was recovered with the application of an APT approach. All APT plans showed an average improved target coverage for the high- and low-dose targets as compared to the accumulated dose on the planned plans. Dose improvements up to 2.5 Gy (3.5 %) and up to 4.0 Gy (7.1 %) in the D98 of the high- and low dose targets were observed with APT. Doses to the organs at risk (OARs) remained equal or decreased slightly after APT was applied. In the included studies, APT was largely performed once, which resulted in the largest target coverage improvement, but eventual additional APT improved the target coverage further. There is no data showing what is the most appropriate timing for APT. Conclusion APT during IMPT for HNC patients improves target coverage. The largest improvement in target coverage was found with a single adaptive intervention, and an eventual second or more frequent APT application improved the target coverage further. Doses to the OARs remained equal or decreased slightly after applying APT. The most optimal timing for APT is yet to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merle Huiskes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands,Corresponding author at: Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, P.O. Box 9600, Postal zone K1-P, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Eleftheria Astreinidou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Wens Kong
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Breedveld
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ben Heijmen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Coen Rasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands,HollandPTC, Delft, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Miyazaki K, Fujii Y, Yamada T, Kanehira T, Miyamoto N, Matsuura T, Yasuda K, Uchinami Y, Otsuka M, Aoyama H, Takao S. Deformed dose restoration to account for tumor deformation and position changes for adaptive proton therapy. Med Phys 2023; 50:675-687. [PMID: 36502527 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Online adaptation during intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) can minimize the effect of inter-fractional anatomical changes, but remains challenging because of the complex workflow. One approach for fast and automated online IMPT adaptation is dose restoration, which restores the initial dose distribution on the updated anatomy. However, this method may fail in cases where tumor deformation or position changes occur. PURPOSE To develop a fast and robust IMPT online adaptation method named "deformed dose restoration (DDR)" that can adjust for inter-fractional tumor deformation and position changes. METHODS The DDR method comprises two steps: (1) calculation of the deformed dose distribution, and (2) restoration of the deformed dose distribution. First, the deformable image registration (DIR) between the initial clinical target volume (CTV) and the new CTV were performed to calculate the vector field. To ensure robustness for setup and range uncertainty and the ability to restore the deformed dose distribution, an expanded CTV-based registration to maintain the dose gradient outside the CTV was developed. The deformed dose distribution was obtained by applying the vector field to the initial dose distribution. Then, the voxel-by-voxel dose difference optimization was performed to calculate beam parameters that restore the deformed dose distribution on the updated anatomy. The optimization function was the sum of total dose differences and dose differences of each field to restore the initial dose overlap of each field. This method only requires target contouring, which eliminates the need for organs at risk (OARs) contouring. Six clinical cases wherein the tumor deformation and/or position changed on repeated CTs were selected. DDR feasibility was evaluated by comparing the results with those from three other strategies, namely, not adapted (continuing the initial plan), adapted by previous dose restoration, and fully optimized. RESULTS In all cases, continuing the initial plan was largely distorted on the repeated CTs and the dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics for the target were reduced due to the tumor deformation or position changes. On the other hand, DDR improved DVH metrics for the target to the same level as the initial dose distribution. Dose increase was seen for some OARs because tumor growth had reduced the relative distance between CTVs and OARs. Robustness evaluation for setup and range uncertainty (3 mm/3.5%) showed that deviation in DVH-bandwidth for CTV D95% from the initial plan was 0.4% ± 0.5% (Mean ± S.D.) for DDR. The calculation time was 8.1 ± 6.4 min. CONCLUSIONS An online adaptation algorithm was developed that improved the treatment quality for inter-fractional anatomical changes and retained robustness for intra-fractional setup and range uncertainty. The main advantage of this method is that it only requires target contouring alone and saves the time for OARs contouring. The fast and robust adaptation method for tumor deformation and position changes described here can reduce the need for offline adaptation and improve treatment efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koichi Miyazaki
- Graduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.,Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.,Research and Development Group, Hitachi Ltd, Hitachi, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Yusuke Fujii
- Research and Development Group, Hitachi Ltd, Hitachi, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yamada
- Research and Development Group, Hitachi Ltd, Hitachi, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kanehira
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Naoki Miyamoto
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.,Division of Quantum Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Taeko Matsuura
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.,Division of Quantum Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Koichi Yasuda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Yusuke Uchinami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Manami Otsuka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Hidefumi Aoyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Seishin Takao
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.,Division of Quantum Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.,Global Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
MRI-based adaptive radiotherapy has the potential to reduce dysphagia in patients with head and neck cancer. Phys Med 2023; 105:102511. [PMID: 36563523 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
|
16
|
Yagihashi T, Inoue K, Nagata H, Yamanaka M, Yamano A, Suzuki S, Yamakabe W, Sato N, Omura M, Inoue T. Effectiveness of robust optimization against geometric uncertainties in TomoHelical planning for prostate cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 24:e13881. [PMID: 36576418 PMCID: PMC10113685 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Geometrical uncertainties in patients can severely affect the quality of radiotherapy. PURPOSE We evaluated the dosimetric efficacy of robust optimization for helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) planning in the presence of patient setup uncertainty and anatomical changes. METHODS Two helical IMRT plans for 10 patients with localized prostate cancer were created using either minimax robust optimization (robust plan) or a conventional planning target volume (PTV) margin approach (PTV plan). Plan robustness was evaluated by creating perturbed dose plans with setup uncertainty from isocenter shifts and anatomical changes due to organ variation. The magnitudes of the geometrical uncertainties were based on the patient setup uncertainty considered during robust optimization, which was identical to the PTV margin. The homogeneity index, and target coverage (TC, defined as the V100% of the clinical target volume), and organs at risk (OAR; rectum and bladder) doses were analyzed for all nominal and perturbed plans. A statistical t-test was performed to evaluate the differences between the robust and PTV plans. RESULTS Comparison of the nominal plans showed that the robust plans had lower OAR doses and a worse homogeneity index and TC than the PTV plans. The evaluations of robustness that considered setup errors more than the PTV margin demonstrated that the worst-case perturbed scenarios for robust plans had significantly higher TC while maintaining lower OAR doses. However, when anatomical changes were considered, improvement in TC from robust optimization was not observed in the worst-case perturbed plans. CONCLUSIONS For helical IMRT planning in localized prostate cancer, robust optimization provides benefits over PTV margin-based planning, including better OAR sparing, and increased robustness against systematic patient-setup errors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayuki Yagihashi
- Department of Medical Physics, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Kanagawa, Japan.,Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazumasa Inoue
- Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hironori Nagata
- Department of Medical Physics, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masashi Yamanaka
- Department of Medical Physics, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Kanagawa, Japan.,Medical Physics Laboratory, Division of Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita-shi, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akihiro Yamano
- Department of Medical Physics, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Suzuki
- Department of Medical Physics, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Kanagawa, Japan.,Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Wataru Yamakabe
- Department of Medical Physics, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Naoki Sato
- Department of Medical Physics, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Motoko Omura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Inoue
- Department of Medical Physics, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura City, Kanagawa, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhang Y, Alshaikhi J, Tan W, Royle G, Bär E. A probability model for anatomical robust optimisation in head and neck cancer proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2022; 68. [PMID: 36562611 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aca877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Objective.Develop an anatomical model based on the statistics of the population data and evaluate the model for anatomical robust optimisation in head and neck cancer proton therapy.Approach.Deformable image registration was used to build the probability model (PM) that captured the major deformation from patient population data and quantified the probability of each deformation. A cohort of 20 nasopharynx patients was included in this retrospective study. Each patient had a planning CT and 6 weekly CTs during radiotherapy. We applied the model to 5 test patients. Each test patient used the remaining 19 training patients to build the PM and estimate the likelihood of a certain anatomical deformation to happen. For each test patient, a spot scanning proton plan was created. The PM was evaluated using proton spot location deviation and dose distribution.Main results. Using the proton spot range, the PM can simulate small non-rigid variations in the first treatment week within 0.21 ± 0.13 mm. For overall anatomical uncertainty prediction, the PM can reduce anatomical uncertainty from 4.47 ± 1.23 mm (no model) to 1.49 ± 1.08 mm at week 6. The 95% confidence interval (CI) of dose metric variations caused by actual anatomical deformations in the first week is -0.59% ∼ -0.31% for low-risk CTD95, and 0.84-3.04 Gy for parotidDmean. On the other hand, the 95% CI of dose metric variations simulated by the PM at the first week is -0.52 ∼ -0.34% for low-risk CTVD95, and 0.58 ∼ 2.22 Gy for parotidDmean.Significance.The PM improves the estimation accuracy of anatomical uncertainty compared to the previous models and does not depend on the acquisition of the weekly CTs during the treatment. We also provided a solution to quantify the probability of an anatomical deformation. The potential of the model for anatomical robust optimisation is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | - Jailan Alshaikhi
- Saudi Proton Therapy Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Wenyong Tan
- Department of Oncology, Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University Shenzhen 518101, People's Republic of China
| | - Gary Royle
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | - Esther Bär
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.,University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Radiotherapy Physics, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zhang Y, Alshaikhi J, Amos RA, Tan W, Anaya VM, Pang Y, Royle G, Bär E. Pre-treatment analysis of non-rigid variations can assist robust intensity-modulated proton therapy plan selection for head and neck patients. Med Phys 2022; 49:7683-7693. [PMID: 36083223 PMCID: PMC10092578 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 08/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To incorporate small non-rigid variations of head and neck patients into the robust evaluation of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for the selection of robust treatment plans. METHODS A cohort of 20 nasopharynx cancer patients with weekly kilovoltage CT (kVCT) and 15 oropharynx cancer patients with weekly cone-beam CT (CBCT) were retrospectively included. Anatomical variations between week 0/week 1 of treatment were acquired using deformable image registration (DIR) for all 35 patients and then applied to the planning CT of four patients who have kVCT scanned each week to simulate potential small non-rigid variations (sNRVs). The robust evaluations were conducted on IMPT plans with: (1) different number of beam fields from 3-field to 5-field; (2) different beam angles. The robust evaluation before treatment, including the sNRVs and setup uncertainty, referred to as sNRV+R evaluation was compared with the conventional evaluation (without sNRVs) in terms of robustness consistency with the gold standard evaluation based on weekly CT. RESULTS Among four patients (490 scenarios), we observed a maximum difference in the sNRV+R evaluation to the nominal dose of: 9.37% dose degradation on D95 of clinical target volumes (CTVs), increase in mean dose (D mean $_{\text{mean}}$ ) of parotid 11.87 Gy, increase in max dose (D max $_{\text{max}}$ ) of brainstem 20.82 Gy. In contrast, in conventional evaluation, we observed a maximum difference to the nominal dose of: 7.58% dose degradation on D95 of the CTVs, increase in parotid D mean $_{\text{mean}}$ by 4.88 Gy, increase in brainstem D max $_{\text{max}}$ by 13.5 Gy. In the measurement of the robustness ranking consistency with the gold standard evaluation, the sNRV+R evaluation was better or equal to the conventional evaluation in 77% of cases, particularly, better on spinal cord, parotid glands, and low-risk CTV. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated the additional dose discrepancy that sNRVs can make. The inclusion of sNRVs can be beneficial to robust evaluation, providing information on clinical uncertainties additional to the conventional rigid isocenter shift.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK
| | - Jailan Alshaikhi
- Saudi Proton Therapy Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Richard A Amos
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK
| | - Wenyong Tan
- Department of Oncology, Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Virginia Marin Anaya
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Radiotherapy Physics, London, UK
| | - Yaru Pang
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK
| | - Gary Royle
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK
| | - Esther Bär
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK.,University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Radiotherapy Physics, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
An online adaptive plan library approach for intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 2022; 176:68-75. [PMID: 36150418 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT), the impact of setup errors and anatomical changes is commonly mitigated by robust optimization with population-based setup robustness (SR) settings and offline replanning. In this study we propose and evaluate an alternative approach based on daily plan selection from patient-specific pre-treatment established plan libraries (PLs). Clinical implementation of the PL strategy would be rather straightforward compared to daily online re-planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS For 15 head-and-neck cancer patients, the planning CT was used to generate a PL with 5 plans, robustly optimized for increasing SR: 0, 1, 2, 3, 5 mm, and 3% range robustness. Repeat CTs (rCTs) and realistic setup and range uncertainty distributions were used for simulation of treatment courses for the PL approach, treatments with fixed SR (fSR3) and a trigger-based offline adaptive schedule for 3 mm SR (fSR3OfA). Daily plan selection in the PL approach was based only on recomputed dose to the CTV on the rCT. RESULTS Compared to using fSR3 and fSR3OfA, the risk of xerostomia grade ≥ II & III and dysphagia ≥ grade III were significantly reduced with the PL. For 6/15 patients the risk of xerostomia and/or dysphagia ≥ grade II could be reduced by > 2% by using PL. For the other patients, adherence to target coverage constraints was often improved. fSR3OfA resulted in significantly improved coverage compared to PL for selected patients. CONCLUSION The proposed PL approach resulted in overall reduced NTCPs compared to fSR3 and fSR3OfA at limited cost in target coverage.
Collapse
|
20
|
Yao W, Zhang B, Han D, Polf J, Vedam S, Lasio G, Yi B. Use of CBCT plus plan robustness for reducing QACT frequency in intensity-modulated proton therapy: Head-and-neck cases. Med Phys 2022; 49:6794-6801. [PMID: 35933322 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Anatomic variation has a significant dosimetric impact in intensity-modulated proton therapy. Weekly or biweekly computed tomography (CT) scans, called quality assurance CTs (QACTs), are used to monitor anatomic and resultant dose changes to determine whether adaptive plans are needed. Frequent CT scans result in unwanted QACT dose and increased clinical workloads. This study proposed utilizing patient setup cone-beam CTs (CBCTs) and treatment plan robustness to reduce the frequency of QACTs. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from 27 patients with head-and-neck cancer, including 594 CBCTs, 136 QACTs, and 19 adaptive plans. For each CBCT, water-equivalent thickness (WET) along the pencil-beam path was calculated. For each treatment plan, the WET of the first-day CBCT was used as the reference, and the mean WET changes (ΔWET) in each following CBCT was used as the surrogate of proton range change. Using CBCTs acquired prior to a QACT, we predicted the ΔWET on the QACT day by a linear regression model. The impact of range change on target dose was calculated as the predicted ΔWET weighted by the monitor units of each field. In addition, plan robustness was estimated from the robust dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and combined with ΔWET to reduce QACT frequency. Robustness was estimated from the distance between the DVH curves of the nominal and worst scenarios. RESULTS When the estimated mean ΔWET was <6.5 mm (or <7.5 mm if the robustness was >95%), the QACT could be skipped without missing any adaptive planning; otherwise a QACT was required. Overall, 41% of QACTs could be eliminated when ΔWET was <6.5 mm and 56% when ΔWET was <7.5 mm, and robustness was >95%. At least one QACT could have been omitted in 25 of the 27 cases under skipping thresholds at ΔWETs <7.5 mm and R > 95%. CONCLUSION This study suggests that the number of QACTs can be greatly reduced by calculating range change in patient setup CBCTs and can be further reduced by combining this information with analyses of plan robustness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiguang Yao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Baoshe Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Dong Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jerimy Polf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sastry Vedam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Giovanni Lasio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Byongyong Yi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nesteruk KP, Bobić M, Sharp GC, Lalonde A, Winey BA, Nenoff L, Lomax AJ, Paganetti H. Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning Protocols for Online Adaptive Proton Therapy of Head-and-Neck Cancers. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14205155. [PMID: 36291939 PMCID: PMC9600085 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14205155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 10/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the suitability of low-dose CT protocols for online plan adaptation of head-and-neck patients. METHODS We acquired CT scans of a head phantom with protocols corresponding to CT dose index volume CTDIvol in the range of 4.2-165.9 mGy. The highest value corresponds to the standard protocol used for CT simulations of 10 head-and-neck patients included in the study. The minimum value corresponds to the lowest achievable tube current of the GE Discovery RT scanner used for the study. For each patient and each low-dose protocol, the noise relative to the standard protocol, derived from phantom images, was applied to a virtual CT (vCT). The vCT was obtained from a daily CBCT scan corresponding to the fraction with the largest anatomical changes. We ran an established adaptive workflow twice for each low-dose protocol using a high-quality daily vCT and the corresponding low-dose synthetic vCT. For a relative comparison of the adaptation efficacy, two adapted plans were recalculated in the high-quality vCT and evaluated with the contours obtained through deformable registration of the planning CT. We also evaluated the accuracy of dose calculation in low-dose CT volumes using the standard CT protocol as reference. RESULTS The maximum differences in D98 between low-dose protocols and the standard protocol for the high-risk and low-risk CTV were found to be 0.6% and 0.3%, respectively. The difference in OAR sparing was up to 3%. The Dice similarity coefficient between propagated contours obtained with low-dose and standard protocols was above 0.982. The mean 2%/2 mm gamma pass rate for the lowest-dose image, using the standard protocol as reference, was found to be 99.99%. CONCLUSION The differences between low-dose protocols and the standard scanning protocol were marginal. Thus, low-dose CT protocols are suitable for online adaptive proton therapy of head-and-neck cancers. As such, considering scanning protocols used in our clinic, the imaging dose associated with online adaption of head-and-neck cancers treated with protons can be reduced by a factor of 40.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konrad P. Nesteruk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Mislav Bobić
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gregory C. Sharp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Arthur Lalonde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Brian A. Winey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Lena Nenoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Antony J. Lomax
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Nenoff L, Buti G, Bobić M, Lalonde A, Nesteruk KP, Winey B, Sharp GC, Sudhyadhom A, Paganetti H. Integrating Structure Propagation Uncertainties in the Optimization of Online Adaptive Proton Therapy Plans. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14163926. [PMID: 36010919 PMCID: PMC9406068 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14163926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Currently, adaptive strategies require time- and resource-intensive manual structure corrections. This study compares different strategies: optimization without manual structure correction, adaptation with physician-drawn structures, and no adaptation. Strategies were compared for 16 patients with pancreas, liver, and head and neck (HN) cancer with 1-5 repeated images during treatment: 'reference adaptation', with structures drawn by a physician; 'single-DIR adaptation', using a single set of deformably propagated structures; 'multi-DIR adaptation', using robust planning with multiple deformed structure sets; 'conservative adaptation', using the intersection and union of all deformed structures; 'probabilistic adaptation', using the probability of a voxel belonging to the structure in the optimization weight; and 'no adaptation'. Plans were evaluated using reference structures and compared using a scoring system. The reference adaptation with physician-drawn structures performed best, and no adaptation performed the worst. For pancreas and liver patients, adaptation with a single DIR improved the plan quality over no adaptation. For HN patients, integrating structure uncertainties brought an additional benefit. If resources for manual structure corrections would prevent online adaptation, manual correction could be replaced by a fast 'plausibility check', and plans could be adapted with correction-free adaptation strategies. Including structure uncertainties in the optimization has the potential to make online adaptation more automatable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Nenoff
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Gregory Buti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mislav Bobić
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Arthur Lalonde
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Konrad P. Nesteruk
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Brian Winey
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Gregory Charles Sharp
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Atchar Sudhyadhom
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zhang Y, Alshaikhi J, Amos RA, Lowe M, Tan W, Bär E, Royle G. Improving workflow for adaptive proton therapy with predictive anatomical modelling: A proof of concept. Radiother Oncol 2022; 173:93-101. [PMID: 35667573 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To demonstrate predictive anatomical modelling for improving the clinical workflow of adaptive intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for head and neck cancer. METHODS 10 radiotherapy patients with nasopharyngeal cancer were included in this retrospective study. Each patient had a planning CT, weekly verification CTs during radiotherapy and predicted weekly CTs from our anatomical model. Predicted CTs were used to create predicted adaptive plans in advance with the aim of maintaining clinically acceptable dosimetry. Adaption was triggered when the increase in mean dose (Dmean) to the parotid glands exceeded 3 Gy(RBE). We compared the accumulated dose of two adaptive IMPT strategies: 1) Predicted plan adaption: One adaptive plan per patient was optimised on a predicted CT triggered by replan criteria. 2) Standard replan: One adaptive plan was created reactively in response to the triggering weekly CT. RESULTS Statistical analysis demonstrates that the accumulated dose differences between two adaptive strategies are not significant (p > 0.05) for CTVs and OARs. We observed no meaningful differences in D95 between the accumulated dose and the planned dose for the CTVs, with mean differences to the high-risk CTV of -1.20 %, -1.23 % and -1.25 % for no adaption, standard and predicted plan adaption, respectively. The accumulated parotid Dmean using predicted plan adaption is within 3 Gy(RBE) of the planned dose and 0.31 Gy(RBE) lower than the standard replan approach on average. CONCLUSION Prediction-based replanning could potentially enable adaptive therapy to be delivered without treatment gaps or sub-optimal fractions, as can occur during a standard replanning strategy, though the benefit of using predicted plan adaption over the standard replan was not shown to be statistically significant with respect to accumulated dose in this study. Nonetheless, a predictive replan approach can offer advantages in improving clinical workflow efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, United Kingdom.
| | - Jailan Alshaikhi
- Saudi Proton Therapy Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Richard A Amos
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Lowe
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Wenyong Tan
- Department of Oncology, Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University, China
| | - Esther Bär
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, United Kingdom; University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Gary Royle
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Nuyts S, Bollen H, Ng SP, Corry J, Eisbruch A, Mendenhall WM, Smee R, Strojan P, Ng WT, Ferlito A. Proton Therapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Early Clinical Experience and Current Challenges. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14112587. [PMID: 35681568 PMCID: PMC9179360 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Proton therapy is a promising type of radiation therapy used to destroy tumor cells. It has the potential to further improve the outcomes for patients with head and neck cancer since it allows to minimize the radiation dose to vital structures around the tumor, leading to less toxicity. This paper describes the current experience worldwide with proton therapy in head and neck cancer. Abstract Proton therapy (PT) is a promising development in radiation oncology, with the potential to further improve outcomes for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). By utilizing the finite range of protons, healthy tissue can be spared from beam exit doses that would otherwise be irradiated with photon-based treatments. Current evidence on PT for HNSCC is limited to comparative dosimetric analyses and retrospective single-institution series. As a consequence, the recognized indications for the reimbursement of PT remain scarce in most countries. Nevertheless, approximately 100 PT centers are in operation worldwide, and initial experiences for HNSCC are being reported. This review aims to summarize the results of the early clinical experience with PT for HNSCC and the challenges that are currently faced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Nuyts
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Correspondence:
| | - Heleen Bollen
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sweet Ping Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
| | - June Corry
- Division of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
| | - Avraham Eisbruch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32209, USA;
| | - Robert Smee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Prince of Wales Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia;
| | - Primoz Strojan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia;
| | - Wai Tong Ng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China;
| | - Alfio Ferlito
- Coordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group, 35125 Padua, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Borderías-Villarroel E, Taasti V, Van Elmpt W, Teruel-Rivas S, Geets X, Sterpin E. Evaluation of the clinical value of automatic online dose restoration for adaptive proton therapy of head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 2022; 170:190-197. [PMID: 35346754 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is highly sensitive to anatomical variations which can cause inadequate target coverage during treatment. This study compares not-adapted (NA) robust plans to two adaptive IMPT methods - a fully-offline adaptive (FOA) and a simplified automatic online adaptive strategy (dose restoration (DR)) to determine the benefit of DR, in head and neck cancer (HNC). MATERIAL/METHODS Robustly optimized clinical IMPT doses in planning-CTs (pCTs) were available for a cohort of 10 HNC patients. During robust re-optimization, DR used isodose contours, generated from the clinical dose on pCTs, and patient specific objectives to reproduce the clinical dose in every repeated-CT(rCT). For each rCT(n=50), NA, DR and FOA plans were robustly evaluated. RESULTS An improvement in DVH-metrics and robustness was seen for DR and FOA plans compared to NA plans. For NA plans, 74%(37/50) of rCTs did not fulfill the CTV coverage criteria (D98%>95%Dprescription). DR improved target coverage, target homogeneity and variability on critical risk organs such as the spinal cord. After DR, 52%(26/50) of rCTs met all clinical goals. Because of large anatomical changes and/or inaccurate patient repositioning, 48%(24/50) of rCTs still needed full offline adaptation to ensure an optimal treatment since dose restoration was not able to re-establish the initial plan quality. CONCLUSION Robust optimization together with fully-automatized DR avoided offline adaptation in 52% of the cases. Implementation of dose restoration in clinical routine could ensure treatment plan optimality while saving valuable human and material resources to radiotherapy departments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Borderías-Villarroel
- Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium. Avenue Hippocrate 54, Bte B1.54.07, 1200 Brussels, (Belgium).
| | - Vicki Taasti
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Doctor Tanslaan 12, 6229 ET Maastricht, (Netherlands).
| | - Wouter Van Elmpt
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Doctor Tanslaan 12, 6229 ET Maastricht, (Netherlands).
| | - S Teruel-Rivas
- Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium. Avenue Hippocrate 54, Bte B1.54.07, 1200 Brussels, (Belgium)
| | - X Geets
- Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium. Avenue Hippocrate 54, Bte B1.54.07, 1200 Brussels, (Belgium); Department of Radiation Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium. Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200 Brussels, (Belgium).
| | - E Sterpin
- Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium. Avenue Hippocrate 54, Bte B1.54.07, 1200 Brussels, (Belgium); Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, KULeuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, (Belgium).
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Scandurra D, Meijer T, Free J, van den Hoek J, Kelder L, Oldehinkel E, Steenbakkers R, Both S, Langendijk J. Evaluation of robustly optimised intensity modulated proton therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2022; 168:221-228. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.01.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
27
|
CT-on-Rails Versus In-Room CBCT for Online Daily Adaptive Proton Therapy of Head-and-Neck Cancers. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13235991. [PMID: 34885100 PMCID: PMC8656713 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13235991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the efficacy of CT-on-rails versus in-room CBCT for daily adaptive proton therapy. METHODS We analyzed a cohort of ten head-and-neck patients with daily CBCT and corresponding virtual CT images. The necessity of moving the patient after a CT scan is the most significant difference in the adaptation workflow, leading to an increased treatment execution uncertainty σ. It is a combination of the isocenter-matching σi and random patient movements induced by the couch motion σm. The former is assumed to never exceed 1 mm. For the latter, we studied three different scenarios with σm = 1, 2, and 3 mm. Accordingly, to mimic the adaptation workflow with CT-on-rails, we introduced random offsets after Monte-Carlo-based adaptation but before delivery of the adapted plan. RESULTS There were no significant differences in accumulated dose-volume histograms and dose distributions for σm = 1 and 2 mm. Offsets with σm = 3 mm resulted in underdosage to CTV and hot spots of considerable volume. CONCLUSION Since σm typically does not exceed 2 mm for in-room CT, there is no clinically significant dosimetric difference between the two modalities for online adaptive therapy of head-and-neck patients. Therefore, in-room CT-on-rails can be considered a good alternative to CBCT for adaptive proton therapy.
Collapse
|
28
|
Jagt TZ, Breedveld S, Hoogeman MS. Evaluation of alternative parameter settings for dose restoration and full plan adaptation in IMPT for prostate cancer. Phys Med 2021; 92:15-23. [PMID: 34826710 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE Intensity-modulated proton therapy is highly sensitive to anatomical variations. A dose restoration method and a full plan adaptation method have been developed earlier, both requiring several parameter settings. This study evaluates the validity of the previously selected settings by systematically comparing them to alternatives. MATERIALS/METHODS The dose restoration method takes a prior plan and uses an energy-adaptation followed by a spot-intensity re-optimization to restore the plan to its initial state. The full adaptation method uses an energy-adaptation followed by the addition of new spots and a spot-intensity optimization to fit the new anatomy. We varied: 1) The margins and robustness settings of the prior plan, 2) the spot-addition sample size, i.e. the number of added spots, 3) the spot-addition stopping criterion, and 4) the spot-intensity optimization approach. The last three were evaluated only for the full plan adaptation. Evaluations were done on 88 CT scans of 11 prostate cancer patients. Dose was prescribed as 55 Gy(RBE) to the lymph nodes and seminal vesicles with a boost to 74 Gy(RBE) to the prostate. RESULTS For the dose restoration method, changing the applied CTV-to-PTV margins and plan robustness in the prior plans yielded insufficient target coverage or increased OAR doses. For the full plan adaptation, more spot-addition iterations and using a different optimization approach resulted in lower OAR doses compared to the default settings while maintaining target coverage. However, the calculation times increased by up to 20 times, making these variations infeasible for online-adaptation. CONCLUSION We recommend maintaining the default setting for the dose restoration approach. For the full plan adaptation we recommend to focus on fine-tuning the optimization-parameters, and apart from this using the default settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thyrza Z Jagt
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sebastiaan Breedveld
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Mischa S Hoogeman
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Physics & Informatics, HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Paganetti H, Botas P, Sharp GC, Winey B. Adaptive proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66:10.1088/1361-6560/ac344f. [PMID: 34710858 PMCID: PMC8628198 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac344f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy treatments are typically planned based on a single image set, assuming that the patient's anatomy and its position relative to the delivery system remains constant during the course of treatment. Similarly, the prescription dose assumes constant biological dose-response over the treatment course. However, variations can and do occur on multiple time scales. For treatment sites with significant intra-fractional motion, geometric changes happen over seconds or minutes, while biological considerations change over days or weeks. At an intermediate timescale, geometric changes occur between daily treatment fractions. Adaptive radiation therapy is applied to consider changes in patient anatomy during the course of fractionated treatment delivery. While traditionally adaptation has been done off-line with replanning based on new CT images, online treatment adaptation based on on-board imaging has gained momentum in recent years due to advanced imaging techniques combined with treatment delivery systems. Adaptation is particularly important in proton therapy where small changes in patient anatomy can lead to significant dose perturbations due to the dose conformality and finite range of proton beams. This review summarizes the current state-of-the-art of on-line adaptive proton therapy and identifies areas requiring further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Pablo Botas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Foundation 29 of February, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gregory C Sharp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Brian Winey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Nenoff L, Matter M, Charmillot M, Krier S, Uher K, Weber DC, Lomax AJ, Albertini F. Experimental validation of daily adaptive proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34587589 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac2b84] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Anatomical changes during proton therapy require rapid treatment plan adaption to mitigate the associated dosimetric impact. This in turn requires a highly efficient workflow that minimizes the time between imaging and delivery. At the Paul Scherrer Institute, we have developed an online adaptive workflow, which is specifically designed for treatments in the skull-base/cranium, with the focus set on simplicity and minimizing changes to the conventional workflow. The dosimetric and timing performance of this daily adaptive proton therapy (DAPT) workflow has been experimentally investigated using an in-house developed DAPT software and specifically developed anthropomorphic phantom. After a standard treatment preparation, which includes the generation of a template plan, the treatment can then be adapted each day, based on daily imaging acquired on an in-room CT. The template structures are then rigidly propagated to this CT and the daily plan is fully re-optimized using the same field arrangement, DVH constraints and optimization settings of the template plan. After a dedicated plan QA, the daily plan is delivered. To minimize the time between imaging and delivery, clinically integrated software for efficient execution of all online adaption steps, as well as tools for comprehensive and automated QA checks, have been developed. Film measurements of an end-to-end validation of a multi-fraction DAPT treatment showed high agreement to the calculated doses. Gamma pass rates with a 3%/3 mm criteria were >92% when comparing the measured dose to the template plan. Additionally, a gamma pass rate >99% was found comparing measurements to the Monte Carlo dose of the daily plans reconstructed from the logfile, accumulated over the delivered fractions. With this, we experimentally demonstrate that the described adaptive workflow can be delivered accurately in a timescale similar to a standard delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Nenoff
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Center for Proton Therapy, Switzerland.,Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Matter
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Center for Proton Therapy, Switzerland.,Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Serge Krier
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Klara Uher
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Damien Charles Weber
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Center for Proton Therapy, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland
| | - Antony John Lomax
- Paul Scherrer Institute, Center for Proton Therapy, Switzerland.,Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|