'By the work, one knows the workman': the practice and profession of the embryologist and its translation to quality in the embryology laboratory

ASEBIR Quality Special Interest Group guidance for quality in assisted reproduction technology

Assisted human reproduction has undergone rapid advances since its inception 45 years ago. To keep pace with these advances, assisted reproduction laboratories should adhere to a quality management system that addresses staffing and training, physical space and air quality, equipment maintenance and other operational matters, and ensures gamete and embryo handling in accordance with the latest quality and safety standards. Accordingly, this review aims to provide a reference document that highlights the critical aspects to consider when establishing and operating an ART laboratory. The review collates and expands upon published national and international guidelines and consensus documents, providing easier access to this large body of important information.

The paradox of the Italian clinical embryologist in the national public health system: hints towards harmonization of a postgraduate educational curriculum

Clinical embryologists are highly trained laboratory professionals with multiple roles, including laboratory, clinical, biobanking and quality system management. In most European countries, clinical embryologists are trained to work in Medically Assisted Reproduction (MAR) centres without a specifically dedicated educational path. The criteria required for employment vary according to the educational structure and the public or private nature of the centre. We have herein described the educational profile required by Italian clinical embryologists to work in MAR centres of the National Health System (NHS). Public centres currently represent 36% of all the Italian MAR clinics. According to the Italian law, a future clinical embryologist must achieve a 3-4 year unpaid post-graduate specialization in a different field, choosing from Genetics, Microbiology, Clinical Pathology or Nutrition. Accesses to the above-mentioned post-graduate courses are themselves very limited. Clinical embryologists are basically trained by senior colleagues. This situation makes inevitably difficult to recruit laboratory staff in NHS centres. Moreover, it represents an emblematic example of the need for an equal training curriculum, possibly ensuring a comparable education quality, mobility of trainees and dissemination of skills for clinical embryologists all over Europe.

Low E-visibility of embryologists on fertility clinic websites: a web-based cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

This study assessed the visibility of embryologists on fertility clinic websites among Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) and the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) member clinics.

METHODS

During a 1-month interval (March 2022), all Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) and the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) member fertility clinic websites were evaluated. The professional representation of the primary care team was examined including specialties, the presence of headshots, and biographies.

RESULTS

A total of 446 fertility clinic websites were scanned in the search. The embryology team has the least common professional identification by their names (53.58%) compared to gynecology clinicians (96.21%, p < 0.001) and nurses (55.58%, p < 0.001). This trend also applies to other types of professional identifiers, such as headshots and biographies. Professional headshots of embryologists (50.34%) were less prominent than those of gynecology clinicians (93.51%, p < 0.001). A similar trend was observed in the biographies of the embryology team (47.20%) compared to gynecology clinicians (95.08%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The present study revealed that embryologists have low professional visibility on fertility clinic websites. Fertility clinics may prioritize enhancing the online visibility of their embryology laboratory team. This approach could potentially enhance the recognition of their team, foster transparency, and provide accessible information about the skills and expertise of healthcare professionals involved in the treatment process.

Evaluation of an automated dish preparation system for IVF and embryo culture using a mouse mode

Manual dish preparation for IVF in human fertility clinics or animal laboratories heavily relies on embryologists' experience, which can lead to occupational illness due to long-term and monotonous operation. Therefore, introducing an automated technique to replace traditional methods is crucial for improving working efficiency and reducing work burden for embryologists. In the current study in the mouse, both manual and automated methods were used to prepare IVF or embryo culture dishes. A one-way analysis of variance was conducted to compare several factors, including preparation time, qualified rates, media osmolality of dishes, fertilization rates, and embryonic development to assess the efficiency and potential of automated preparation. The results showed that automation system significantly reduced the required time and increased the efficiencies and qualified rates of dish preparation, especially for embryo culture dishes, without significantly altering medium osmolalities. There were no significant differences between two preparations in fertilization rates and embryo development in mice. Thus, automated dish preparation can improve working efficiency and qualified rates while maintaining fertilization rates and subsequent embryonic development without compromising osmolality stability of medium. It presents a superior alternative to manual preparation, reducing the workload of embryologists and facilitating the standardization of operational procedures.

Quality assurance (QA) for monitoring the performance of assisted reproductive technology (ART) staff using artificial intelligence (AI)

PURPOSE

Deep learning neural networks have been used to predict the developmental fate and implantation potential of embryos with high accuracy. Such networks have been used as an assistive quality assurance (QA) tool to identify perturbations in the embryo culture environment which may impact clinical outcomes. The present study aimed to evaluate the utility of an AI-QA tool to consistently monitor ART staff performance (MD and embryologist) in embryo transfer (ET), embryo vitrification (EV), embryo warming (EW), and trophectoderm biopsy (TBx).

METHODS

Pregnancy outcomes from groups of 20 consecutive elective single day 5 blastocyst transfers were evaluated for the following procedures: MD performed ET (N = 160 transfers), embryologist performed ET (N = 160 transfers), embryologist performed EV (N = 160 vitrification procedures), embryologist performed EW (N = 160 warming procedures), and embryologist performed TBx (N = 120 biopsies). AI-generated implantation probabilities for the same embryo cohorts were estimated, as were mean AI-predicted and actual implantation rates for each provider and compared using Wilcoxon singed-rank test.

RESULTS

Actual implantation rates following ET performed by one MD provider: "H" was significantly lower than AI-predicted (20% vs. 61%, p = 0.001). Similar results were observed for one embryologist, "H" (30% vs. 60%, p = 0.011). Embryos thawed by embryologist "H" had lower implantation rates compared to AI prediction (25% vs. 60%, p = 0.004). There were no significant differences between actual and AI-predicted implantation rates for EV, TBx, or for the rest of the clinical staff performing ET or EW.

CONCLUSIONS

AI-based QA tools could provide accurate, reproducible, and efficient staff performance monitoring in an ART practice.

Recalculating the staff required to run a modern assisted reproductive technology laboratory

STUDY QUESTION

What number of staff is sufficient to perform increasingly complicated processes in today's modern ART laboratories?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The adequate number of personnel required for the efficient and safe operation of modern ART laboratories needs to be calculated.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

In today's modern ART laboratories, the amount of time required to perform increasingly complicated processes has more than doubled, with a downward trend in the amount of work an embryologist can do. Different workload unit values have been used to evaluate each workload task and efficiency in a particular ART laboratory, as well as to occasionally compare one laboratory with another.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Seven senior embryologists working at different IVF centers, three public and four private centers, participated in this multicenter study conducted between 2019 and 2020. We prepared a survey to create a calculator for staff using the average (of three attempts) time spent in every laboratory by each embryologist of the center to perform any ART process.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Different laboratory processes and activities related to quality control, time spent and conventional human double witnessing were included in the survey. To calculate the number of processes that each embryologist can perform per year, an embryologist was considered to be having a full-time contract and working 7 or 8 h/day. The times included in the calculation of each task were those corresponding to the 95th percentile. For the calculations, Microsoft® Office Excel® Professional Plus 2019 was used.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The survey showed that the time needed per embryologist to perform the different processes necessary for a classic IVF cycle without time lapse (TL) was 8.11 h, and with TL, it was 10.27 h. The calculated time also considered the time spent in documentation handling, cycle preparation, database management and conventional human double witnessing verification. An ICSI without TL needed 8.55 h, and with TL, it needed 10.71 h. An ICSI-PGT without a TL cycle needed 11.75 h, and with TL, it needed 13.91 h. Furthermore, 1.81 h should be added for every vitrification support needed. The time needed to control more than 200 critical steps, including equipment control and culture parameters, was 30 min per day plus 3.9 min per device to control.The time spent in semen analysis (including documentation handling, cycle preparation and database management) or intrauterine insemination with a partner sperm was 2.7 h. For donor sperm, an additional hour was required for the management involved. The time required to perform a testicular biopsy and cryopreserve the sample was 4 h. Similarly, the time required to perform seminal cryopreservation was 3.7 h.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The study was conducted considering a full-time contract embryologist working 7 or 8 h/day, 5 days a week, with days off according to the Spanish regulations. However, our findings can be adapted to foreign regulations using the developed online calculation platform.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

A new advanced staff calculator allows any IVF laboratory to estimate the minimum number of embryologists necessary without compromising the security or success of the results. Nevertheless, we recommend a minimum of two qualified embryologists in every laboratory, regardless of the workload.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was funded by the Asociación para el Estudio de la Biología de la Reproducción (ASEBIR). None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Comprehensive Analysis of Global Research on Human Varicocele: A Scientometric Approach

Purpose

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of research trends on the etiology, mechanisms, potential risk factors, diagnosis, prognosis, surgical and non-surgical treatment of varicocele, and clinical outcomes before and after varicocele repair.

Materials and Methods

Varicocele studies published between 1988 and 2020 were retrieved from the Scopus database on April 5, 2021. Original studies on human varicocele were included, irrespective of language. Retrieved articles were manually screened for inclusion in various sub-categories. Bibliometric data was subjected to scientometric analysis using descriptive statistics. Network, heat and geographic mapping were generated using relevant software.

Results

In total, 1,943 original human studies on varicocele were published. These were predominantly from the northern hemisphere and developed countries, and published in journals from the United States and Germany. Network map analysis for countries showed several interconnected nodal points, with the USA being the largest, and Agarwal A. from Cleveland Clinic, USA, being a center point of worldwide varicocele research collaborations. Studies of adolescents were underrepresented compared with studies of adults. Studies on diagnostic and prognostic aspects of varicocele were more numerous than studies on varicocele prevalence, mechanistic studies and studies focusing on etiological and risk factors. Varicocele surgery was more investigated than non-surgical approaches. To evaluate the impact of varicocele and its treatment, researchers mainly analyzed basic semen parameters, although markers of seminal oxidative stress are being increasingly investigated in the last decade, while reproductive outcomes such as live birth rate were under-reported in the literature.

Conclusions

This study analyzes the publication trends in original research on human varicocele spanning over the last three decades. Our analysis emphasizes areas for further exploration to better understand varicocele’s impact on men’s health and male fertility.

The value of the modern embryologist to a successful IVF system: revisiting an age-old question

Background

The embryology laboratory remains one of the primary factors influencing the overall performance of the IVF clinic. Clinical embryology, however, has undergone remarkable advancements over the last decade. These developments in both practice and education have been driven together by science and technology.

Main body

The changes in clinical embryology practice have created a significant challenge for both the profession and the embryologist. New competencies for embryologists have subsequently emerged to provide and manage high-quality services for their patients and clinics. Embryologists’ efficacy behind the scenes reflects positively on the success of the fertility clinic. This framework will serve as the flagship document to shed light on the often-overlooked value of the embryologist as an intellectual and intangible asset for the clinic.

Conclusion

To fully leverage a modern embryologist’s skill set, significant investment is required from the IVF clinics’ leadership, which is associated with a substantial return on the IVF clinic’s success. From their side, embryologists should be up to date on further developments and innovations. On the other hand, mentors need to mend the curriculum to allow for better training of high-caliber embryologists.

Deep learning early warning system for embryo culture conditions and embryologist performance in the ART laboratory

Staff competency is a crucial component of the in vitro fertilization (IVF) laboratory quality management system because it impacts clinical outcomes and informs the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to continuously monitor and assess culture conditions. Contemporary quality control and assurance in the IVF lab can be automated (collect, store, retrieve, and analyze), to elevate quality control and assurance beyond the cursory monthly review. Here we demonstrate that statistical KPI monitoring systems for individual embryologist performance and culture conditions can be detected by artificial intelligence systems to provide systemic, early detection of adverse outcomes, and identify clinically relevant shifts in pregnancy rates, providing critical validation for two statistical process controls proposed in the Vienna Consensus Document; intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) fertilization rate and day 3 embryo quality.

A preliminary study of sperm identification in microdissection testicular sperm extraction samples with deep convolutional neural networks

Sperm identification and selection is an essential task when processing human testicular samples for in vitro fertilization. Locating and identifying sperm cell(s) in human testicular biopsy samples is labor intensive and time consuming. We developed a new computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA) system, which utilizes deep learning for near human-level performance on testicular sperm extraction (TESE), trained on a custom dataset. The system automates the identification of sperm in testicular biopsy samples. A dataset of 702 de-identified images from testicular biopsy samples of 30 patients was collected. Each image was normalized and passed through glare filters and diffraction correction. The data were split 80%, 10%, and 10% into training, validation, and test sets, respectively. Then, a deep object detection network, composed of a feature extraction network and object detection network, was trained on this dataset. The model was benchmarked against embryologists' performance on the detection task. Our deep learning CASA system achieved a mean average precision (mAP) of 0.741, with an average recall (AR) of 0.376 on our dataset. Our proposed method can work in real time; its speed is effectively limited only by the imaging speed of the microscope. Our results indicate that deep learning-based technologies can improve the efficiency of finding sperm in testicular biopsy samples.

ESHRE Clinical Embryologist certification: the first 10 years

STUDY QUESTION

What has the ESHRE programme ‘ESHRE Certification for Clinical Embryologists’ achieved after 10 years?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The post-exam analysis showed a pass rate of 60% for Clinical and 50% for Senior Clinical Embryologists and a high level of internal consistency of all exams, leading to a total of 773 certified Clinical and 493 Senior Clinical Embryologists over the decade.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

In an ESHRE survey on the educational and professional status of Clinical Embryology in Europe, it was found that education of laboratory personnel working in the field of assisted reproduction is highly variable between countries. In 2008, ESHRE introduced a programme, curriculum and certification in the field of Clinical Embryology. Knowledge gained by postgraduate study of recommended literature, following a clear curriculum, is verified by a written two-level exam for obtaining a certificate for Clinical (basic) or Senior Clinical (advanced) Embryologists. With a total of 1266 certificates awarded over a period of 10 years and recognition by the Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes and their Council for European Specialists Medical Assessment, the ESHRE Clinical Embryology exams have become an internationally recognized educational standard in the field of Clinical Embryology.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A retrospective analysis of all applications for ESHRE Clinical (2009–2018) and Senior Clinical Embryologist Certification (2008–2018) and exam results of the first decade was carried out by the Steering Committee for Clinical Embryologist Certification.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

A total of 2894 applications for ESHRE Certification for Clinical Embryologists and the results of 10 exams for the Clinical (1478 candidates) and 11 exams for Senior Clinical (987 candidates) levels were analysed. A detailed post-exam retrospective analysis was performed regarding difficulty, discrimination and reliability levels of 1600 multiple-choice questions (MCQs) with a single best answer among four options, from eight different curriculum topics (Basic cell biology, Genetics, Developmental biology, Female reproduction, Male reproduction, IVF laboratory, Cryopreservation and Laboratory management), representing the core theoretical knowledge of Clinical Embryology. Difficulty levels of the MCQs were subsequently compared regarding each topic and each yearly exam. The participation and success rates in the ESHRE Clinical Embryology exams were also assessed in terms of the educational and geographic backgrounds of candidates.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Over the 10 years studied, the mean pass rate for the Clinical Embryologist exam was 60% (range 41–86%), and for the Senior Clinical Embryologist exam was 50% (range 34–81%). On average, 63% European candidates and 35% non-European candidates passed the Clinical Embryologist exam, while 52% European candidates and 31% non-European candidates passed the Senior Clinical Embryologist exam. The candidates’ educational level impacted on the success of the Clinical Embryologist exam but not of the Senior Clinical Embryologist exam. The mean difficulty indices by study topic showed that in the period of 10 years, there were no statistically significant differences between topics, for either the Clinical or Senior Clinical Embryologist exams. However, the overall exam difficulty varied between years. Reassuringly, the exam MCQ discrimination and reliability indices always showed a high level of internal consistency in all exams.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Some data from the initial ESHRE certification programme were not obtained electronically, in particular data for education, implying tables and figures reflect the specified valid data periods. Several countries exhibit different study profiles for those working in ART laboratories, such that laboratory technicians/technologists predominate in some countries, while in others only biologists and medical doctors are allowed to work with human embryos. Such differences could consequently affect the exam performance of candidates from specific countries.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The ESHRE exams on Clinical Embryology are the most widely, internationally accepted tests of knowledge in the rapidly growing area of human reproduction. Clinical Embryology is increasingly recognized as a specific discipline for scientific staff who are collaborating closely with clinicians in managing human infertility through medically assisted reproduction. The analysis of the first 10 years of application of a two-level exam for Clinical Embryology shows a consistent high quality and reliability of the exam and MCQs used. These results represent an important follow-up of the quality of the ESHRE Certification programme for Clinical Embryologists, and convincingly position Clinical Embryology in the wider group of health disciplines that are harmonized through professional bodies such as ESHRE and European Board & College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. The exams provide a clear step towards the increasing professional recognition and establishment of Clinical Embryology within health systems at both European and international level.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No competing interest. All costs of the Steering Committee meetings were covered by ESHRE.