Grado de control del cLDL tras un síndrome coronario agudo en España. ¿Se utilizan adecuadamente los recursos terapéuticos existentes?

Strategies to improve cardiovascular health and treatment of dyslipidemia in Spain. Expert Insights Project

OBJECTIVES

To gather opinions, recommendations, and proposals for improvement from Spanish clinicians on cardiovascular (CV) health, with particular focus on dyslipidemia management.

METHODS

The Expert Insights project involved 8face-to-face sessions held throughout Spain, attended by 138 CV health experts. Clinicians answered to 25 questions survey related to CV health and dyslipidemia control. Each session included an analysis and a discussion on the perceived realities and areas for improvement.

RESULTS

72% of centers have a standardized process for monitoring patients after a CV episode at discharge, but only 37% during their clinical follow-up. Patient care and management are dependent on the physician, with a lack of coordination between hospital specialties and primary care (PC). 95% of clinicians believe it is necessary to standarize treatment optimization. 65% of centers prescribe combined lipid-lowering treatment after a CV episode. Updating cLDL levels in the Therapeutic Positioning Report and standardizing and globalizing the prescription document would reduce iPCSK9 prescription barriers and lead to more equitable access.

CONCLUSIONS

In Spain, there are significant deficiencies in the management of dyslipidemia, with a great need for a consensus on standardizing management processes and optimizing patient treatment. The opinions, recommendations, and improvement proposals from Spanish clinicians on CV health are an important starting point to improve the situation.

Efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid in acute coronary syndrome. Design of the clinical trial ES-BempeDACS

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Only about 1 out of every 3 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values <55mg/dL in the first year. The present study aims to evaluate the impact of early intensive therapy on lipid control after an AMI.

METHODS

An independent, prospective, pragmatic, controlled, randomized, open-label, evaluator-blinded clinical trial (PROBE design) will analyze the efficacy and safety of an oral lipid-lowering triple therapy: high-potency statin+bempedoic acid (BA) 180mg+ezetimibe (EZ) 10mg versus current European-based guidelines (high-potency statin±EZ 10mg), in AMI patients. LDL-C will be determined within the first 48hours. Patients with LDL-C ≥ 115mg/dL (without previous statin therapy), ≥ 100mg/dL (with previous low-potency or high-potency statin therapy at submaximal dose), or ≥ 70mg/dL (with previous high-potency statin therapy at high dose) will be randomly assigned 1:1 between 24 and 72hours post-AMI to the BA/EZ combination or to statin±EZ, without BA. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients reaching LDL-C <55mg/dL at 8 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

The results of this study will provide novel information for post-AMI LDL-C control by evaluating the usefulness of an early intensive lipid-lowering strategy based on triple oral therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Early intensive lipid-lowering triple oral therapy vs the treatment recommended by current clinical practice guidelines could facilitate the achievement of optimal LDL-C levels in the first 2 months after AMI (a high-risk period).

IDENTIFICATION NUMBER

EudraCT 2021-006550-31.

Impact of the Spanish consensus for improving lipid control on patients admitted for an acute coronary syndrome

INTRODUCTION

In 2020, the Spanish Society of Cardiology published a consensus to improve lipid control in secondary prevention patients. This study was aimed to assess the impact of the implementation of this consensus in clinical practice.

METHODS

Non-interventional, national and multicenter study, with a prospective and retrospective design in two cohorts. Implementation of the consensus was performed on the prospective cohort. Prospective cohort included patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) from December 2020 to March 2022 and were followed-up for 3 months. Retrospective cohort included patients with ACS in the same hospital, matched for main baseline clinical characteristics, between August 2019 to February 2020, with a follow-up of 3 months. Additionally, patients were included if they had previously received lipid-lowering therapy and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) was >55 mg/dL.

RESULTS

A total of 516 patients were included (245 in the prospective cohort and 271 in the retrospective cohort). Overall, mean age was 67.9 ± 11.4 years, 73.8 % were men, and 35.8 % had diabetes. At discharge, 98.4 % and 98.9 %, respectively (P = 0.71) were taking statins (90.6% vs 88.9 %; P = 0.564 high intensity statins), 58.4% vs 33.2 %; P<0.001 ezetimibe, 1.2% vs 0.4 %; P = 0.35 PCSK9 inhibitors. During the follow-up, the dose of statins was increased in 11.4% vs 3.3 % (P<0.001), and ezetimibe was added in 25.7% vs 25.8 % (P = 0.976). At study end, significantly more patients achieved LDL-C <55 mg/dL in the prospective cohort (45.6% vs 33.5 %; P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of the Spanish lipid consensus was associated with a significant improvement of LDL-C control after only 3 months.

[Prognostic impact of cardiovascular risk factors in patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Cardiovascular prevention measures place the emphasis on controlling cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF). However, the most recent studies provide disappointing data, the impact of which remains to be determined. The objective of this study was to analyse the impact that the different CVRFs, and their degree of control, have on the prognosis of patients after acute coronary syndrome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Epidemiological, pharmacological, and CVRF control data were collected from 1,689 consecutive patients admitted from 2018 to 2020 for acute coronary syndrome to a tertiary hospital. Finally, the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events was calculated.

RESULTS

The patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome were predominantly men, with body mass index>25Kg/m2, smokers (or former smokers) and with poor CVRF control (50% for hypertension and diabetes and 35% for dyslipidaemia), especially those patients with a personal history of ischaemic heart disease. An underutilisation of useful drugs for CVRF control was found. A directly proportional relationship was observed between the number of CVRFs (or their poor control) and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events at 2 years, hypertension being the factor with the greatest cardiovascular impact. The SARS-CoV-2 lockdown worsened the degree of CVRF control and cardiovascular prognosis.

CONCLUSION

There is still room for improvement in the control of CVRF, which would translate into a prognostic benefit for patients with ischaemic heart disease. The implementation of cardiovascular prevention campaigns seems essential.

Early approach to LDL-related risk after acute coronary syndrome: The OPTA Project

INTRODUCTION

Hyperlipidemia is the main underlying cause of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Reducing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol to recommended targets after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is of utmost importance as it is associated with a reduction of mortality and further cardiovascular events. Unfortunately, there are considerable gaps between guideline recommendations and clinical practice. In addition, the approach to treatment of this population is very heterogeneous, even in specialized cardiovascular units. Some easy-to-implement strategies may help to optimize the management of these patients.

AREAS COVERED

The OPTA Project was developed to identify these gaps and to provide recommendations to improve and harmonize the management of patients with ACS, with a specific focus on lipids.

EXPERT OPINION

Five areas of interest were defined: 1) evaluation of cardiovascular risk at admission, 2) development of a strategy to effectively and rapidly reduce LDL cholesterol levels, 3) determining LDL cholesterol goals (<55 mg/dL or stricter) and follow-up, 4) data collection during hospitalization, and 5) standardized discharge report. Specific recommendations are given to reduce inequalities, following the targets "the lower, the better" and "the earlier, the better".

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the lipid control of the patients that start PCSK9 inhibitors

OBJECTIVES

MEMOGAL study (NCT04319081) is aimed at evaluating changes in cognitive function in patients treated with PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i). This is the first analysis: (1) discussion about the role of the Hospital Pharmacists during the pandemic, and also the assessment of the impact of COVID-19 in the lipid control; (2) descriptive analysis; (3) effectiveness in LDL cholesterol (LDL-c) reduction of alirocumab and evolocumab; (4) communicate PCSK9i safety.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

It is a prospective Real-World Evidence analysis of patients that take PCSK9i for the first time in the usual clinical practice, and they are included after the first dispensation in the public pharmacy consultations of 12 Hospitals in Galicia from May 2020 to April 2021. Baseline values of LDL-c are the previous values before taking PCSK9 and the follow-up values are in 6 months time.

RESULTS

89 patients were included. 86.5% with cardiovascular disease and 53.9% with statin intolerances. 78.8% of the patients were treated with high intensity statins. Statins most used were rosuvastatin (34.1%) and atorvastatin (20.5%). Baseline value of LDL-c was 148mg/dL and the follow-up value was 71mg/dL. The baseline value of patients treated with alirocumab (N=43) was 144mg/dL and 73mg/dL in the follow-up. With evolocumab (N=46) was 151mg/dL in basaline and 69mg/dL in follow-up. The LDLc- reduction was 51.21% with evolocumab and 51.05% with alirocumab. 43.1% of the patients showed values >70mg/dL in six month time; 19.4% between 69mg/dl and 55mg/dL and 37.5% <55mg/dL. 58.3% of the patients achieved a reduction >50% of LDL-c. The adverse events were: injection point reaction (N=2), myalgias (N=1), flu-like symptoms (N=1) and neurocognitive worsening (N=1).

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Despite the number of prescriptions was reduced because of the pandemic, the lipid control was not affected. (2) Half of the patients treated with PSCK9i is due to statins intolerance and the 86% is for secondary prevention. (2) The reduction results were similar to pivotal clinical trials. Despite this, 39% of the total of the patients and 60% of patients with dual teraphy did not reach the goal of ESC/EAS guidelines (<55mg/dL and/or reduction>50%). There were not significant differences between evolocumab and alirocumab: 51.21% vs 51.05% (P=.972). (3) There were not any adverse events of special interest. The possible neurocognitive worsening will be studied as the primary endpoint once the MEMOGAL study has been completed.

Analysis of the prescription process of PCSK9 inhibitors in the cardiology departments of Spanish hospitals and optimization proposal. The IKIGAI study

AIMS

To ascertain the formalities and procedures required for the prescription of PCSK9 inhibitors in the cardiology departments of Spanish hospitals, making proposals for improvement to optimize the prescription process.

METHODS

A first phase of collecting information about the variables and administrative procedures required for the prescription of PCK9 inhibitors and the elaboration of a specific questionnaire and a second phase of collecting data with an online self-administered questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 88 hospitals participated in the study (mean number of beds 625; mean number of cardiologists 18 ± 10; 78% university hospitals). There was underuse of PCSK9 inhibitors (real prescription of 30 treatments/year; potential prescription of 80), mainly because of not fulfilling the therapeutic positioning report (52%) and application refusal (31%). Beyond the requirements of the therapeutic positioning report, 1.2 ± 0.4 applications are required with 8.5 ± 4.2 variables. Only 21% of hospitals did not require a previous authorization process and in the remaining hospitals, approval from a committee was necessary. The accumulated time of the prescription process was 6 weeks. Discontinuation rates during follow-up were 9% ± 12%.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors is clearly underused in Spain. This is mainly due to both inappropriate identification of patients, and complex administrative procedures that could inhibit/discourage prescription by cardiologists and consequently, limit their use. In addition, there is a substantial delay from drug approval tadministration.