The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: An individual patient data meta-analysis

Should basic life support-defibrillator training be compulsory for newly licensed Italian physicians? An observational study

INTRODUCTION

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a relevant event with a fatal outcome in most cases. Basic life support-defibrillator (BLSD) training is central to rescuing a patient in arrest and ensuring that the patient has a better chance of returning to spontaneous circulation. Despite this, BLSD training is not mandatory for newly licensed physicians. Our study aims to evaluate the preparedness of newly qualified doctors to manage an OHCA and the impact of BLSD training.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We tested 120 newly qualified doctors, members of the 'Italian Society of Medicine and Scientific Divulgation' network, evaluating their practical and theoretical knowledge in managing an OHCA before and after a BLSD training course conducted according to the American Heart Association guidelines.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine physicians (49.2%) had an adequate background of the theoretical basis of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); 37 (30.8%) were able to perform effective CPR on a mannequin, but only 19 (15.8%) were able to perform effective CPR with adequate depth and frequency of compressions. After the BLSD training course, 111 physicians (92.5%) were able to perform effective and quality CPR on a mannequin with feedback.

CONCLUSION

In Italy, BLSD training for physicians is not mandatory, and newly licensed physicians showed good knowledge of the theoretical basis of CPR, but few of them performed compressions of adequate depth and frequency. These results should guide future educational policy decisions in Italian academies.

RAndomized Cluster Evaluation of Cardiac ARrest Systems (RACE-CARS) trial: Study Rationale and Design

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occurs in nearly 350,000 people each year in the United States (US). Despite advances in pre- and in-hospital care, OHCA survival remains low and is highly variable across systems and regions. The critical barrier to improving cardiac arrest outcomes is not a lack of knowledge about effective interventions, but rather the widespread lack of systems of care to deliver interventions known to be successful. The RAndomized Cluster Evaluation of Cardiac ARrest Systems (RACE-CARS) trial is a 7-year pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial of 60 counties (57 clusters) in North Carolina using an established registry and is testing whether implementation of a customized set of strategically targeted community-based interventions improves survival to hospital discharge with good neurologic function in OHCA relative to control/standard care. The multi-faceted intervention comprises rapid cardiac arrest recognition and systematic bystander CPR instructions by 9-1-1 telecommunicators, comprehensive community CPR training and enhanced early automated external defibrillator (AED) use prior to emergency medical systems (EMS) arrival. Approximately 20,000 patients are expected to be enrolled in the RACE CARS Trial over 4 years of the assessment period. The primary endpoint is survival to hospital discharge with good neurologic outcome defined as a cerebral performance category (CPC) of 1 or 2. Secondary outcomes include the rate of bystander CPR, defibrillation prior to arrival of EMS, and quality of life. We aim to identify successful community- and systems-based strategies to improve outcomes of OHCA using a cluster randomized-controlled trial design that aims to provide a high level of evidence for future application.

Comparison of pre-hospital management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and its outcomes between the COVID-19 and pre-COVID-19 periods

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a time-sensitive medical emergency that needs immediate interventions. COVID-19 affected the performance of the emergency medical service (EMS) system in pre-hospital care, including the management of cardiac arrest. This study aimed to identify the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pre-hospital management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and its outcome in Qom City, Iran. In this descriptive-analytical study, the data were collected from the electronic registration system of the EMS center in Qom, Iran. All OHCA patients who received resuscitation during COVID-19 and before COVID-19 were enrolled in the study. Data consisted of the characteristics of OHCA patients, EMS interventions and response times, and the outcome of OHCA. A P-value of <0.05 was deemed statistically significant. 630 OHCA patients in the COVID-19 period and 524 OHCA patients in the pre-COVID-19 period were included in the study. Endotracheal intubation and defibrillation were done more in the COVID-19 period than in the pre-COVID-19 period (50.2 % vs. 17 %, p<0.001 %, and 40.1 % vs. 22.5 %, p < 0.001, respectively). The EMS response time was longer during the COVID-19 pandemic (9.1 ± 3.9 min vs. 7.6 ± 1.4 min, p < 0.001). The rate of pre-hospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was lower in the COVID-19 period (15.6 % vs. 8.4 %, p < 0.001). According to univariate analysis, ROSC was predicted by COVID-19 (p < 0.001). However, COVID-19 was not the statistically significant independent predictor after multivariate analysis (p < 0.67). The COVID-19 pandemic period influenced OHCA and ROSC. Also, it affected pre-hospital management in the OHCA situation. The negative impact of COVID-19 on the EMS response reflected the need to know and remove barriers to managing crises such as COVID-19.

The Incidence and Outcomes of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest During the COVID-19 Pandemic in South Korea: Multicenter Registry Study

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and disrupted the chain of survival. Even after the end of the pandemic, the risk of new variants and surges persists. Analyzing the characteristics of OHCA during the pandemic is important to prepare for the next pandemic and to avoid repeated negative outcomes. However, previous studies have yielded somewhat varied results, depending on the health care system or the specific characteristics of social structures.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate and compare the incidence, outcomes, and characteristics of OHCA during the prepandemic and pandemic periods using data from a nationwide multicenter OHCA registry.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, observational study using data from the Korean Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation Consortium (KoCARC) registry. This study included adult patients with OHCA in South Korea across 3 distinct 1-year periods: the prepandemic period (from January to December 2019), early phase pandemic period (from July 2020 to June 2021), and late phase pandemic period (from July 2021 to June 2022). We extracted and contrasted the characteristics of patients with OHCA, prehospital time factors, and outcomes for the patients across these 3 periods. The primary outcomes were survival to hospital admission and survival to hospital discharge. The secondary outcome was good neurological outcome.

RESULTS

From the 3 designated periods, a total of 9031 adult patients with OHCA were eligible for analysis (prepandemic: n=2728; early pandemic: n=2954; and late pandemic: n=3349). Witnessed arrest (P<.001) and arrest at home or residence (P=.001) were significantly more frequent during the pandemic period than during the prepandemic period, and automated external defibrillator use by bystanders was lower in the early phase of the pandemic than during other periods. As the pandemic advanced, the rates of the first monitored shockable rhythm (P=.10) and prehospital endotracheal intubation (P<.001) decreased significantly. Time from cardiac arrest cognition to emergency department arrival increased sequentially (prepandemic: 33 min; early pandemic: 35 min; and late pandemic: 36 min; P<.001). Both survival and neurological outcomes worsened as the pandemic progressed, with survival to discharge showing the largest statistical difference (prepandemic: 385/2728, 14.1%; early pandemic: 355/2954, 12%; and late pandemic: 392/3349, 11.7%; P=.01). Additionally, none of the outcomes differed significantly between the early and late phase pandemic periods (all P>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

During the pandemic, especially amid community COVID-19 surges, the incidence of OHCA increased while survival rates and good neurological outcome at discharge decreased. Prehospital OHCA factors, which are directly related to OHCA prognosis, were adversely affected by the pandemic. Ongoing discussions are needed to maintain the chain of survival in the event of a new pandemic.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03222999; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03222999.

A bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis between COVID-19 and cardiac arrest

Epidemiological studies link COVID-19 to increased cardiac arrest (CA) risk, but causality remains unclear due to potential confounding factors in observational studies . We conducted a Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using genome-wide association study (GWAS) data, employing COVID-19-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with significance values smaller than 5 × 10⁻⁸. We calculated inverse-variance weighted (IVW) MR estimates and performed sensitivity analyses using MR methods robust to horizontal pleiotropy. Additionally, a reverse MR analysis was conducted using CA-associated SNPs with significance values smaller than 1 × 10⁻⁵. Results indicated that infected COVID-19 (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.47-2.67, p = 0.79), hospitalized COVID-19 (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.70-1.49, p = 0.920), and severe respiratory COVID-19 (OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.81-1.21, p = 0.945) did not causally influence CA risk. Reverse MR analysis also did not support a causal effect of CA on COVID-19. Thus, associations in observational studies may stem from shared biological factors or environmental confounding.