Efficacy and safety of convex probe EBUS-TBNA in sarcoidosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

[Changes in mediastinal lymph node sampling practices]

INTRODUCTION

While mediastinoscopy is considered the gold standard for mediastinal node sampling, it is to some extent being superseded by endobronchial ultrasound. The objective of this study was to evaluate the different practices in our center regarding mediastinal lymph node sampling in lung cancer patients.

METHODS

Data were collected from patients having undergone mediastinal lymph node sampling by video-assisted-mediastinoscopy (VM) or by endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) in our center between August 2020 and July 2023. The modalities of the two procedures and their diagnostic accuracy were analyzed, as was their evolution over time.

RESULTS

The 362 patients comprised 217 who were sampled by EBUS and 145 by VM. Overall, the procedures became more frequent, with EBUS tending to supersede VM. The number of harvested lymph nodes gradually grew, and less unforeseen lymph node invasion and upstaging occurred.

CONCLUSION

The arrival in our center of endobronchial ultrasound yielded an overall increase of lymph node sampling despite a decrease in the number of mediastinoscopy procedures performed. Reinforced compliance with guidelines is needed to improve the diagnostic accuracy of these techniques and to better ensure quality of care.

Comparison between Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Node Biopsy and Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) can be limited by the inadequacy of intact tissues, especially in patients with lymphoma, sarcoidosis, and lymph node tuberculosis. A novel technique called transbronchial node biopsy (TBNB) by forceps or cryoprobe has been proposed and studied to improve specimen quality and diagnostic yield. We performed a systematic review of studies describing the safety and sensitivity of EBUS-TBNB versus EBUS-TBNA in diagnosing intrathoracic lymphadenopathy/masses.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure to identify studies focusing on the application of EBUS-TBNB for diagnosis of intrathoracic lymphadenopathy. The quality of each study was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool. Using inverse-variance (I-V) weighting, we performed a meta-analysis of diagnostic yield estimations. We also reviewed the complications related to the procedure.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in the final analysis. The meta-analysis yielded a pooled overall diagnostic yield of 77.80% (939/1,207) for EBUS-TBNA and 86.01% (834/958) for EBUS-TBNB, with an inverse-variance-weighted odds ratio of 3.13 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61-6.01; p = 0.0008) and I2 of 82%. The pooled diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNB versus EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of malignancy (including primary lung cancer and extrapulmonary malignancy) was 84.53% (590/698) for EBUS-TBNA and 90.84% (476/524) for EBUS-TBNB, with an I-V-weighted OR of 2.33 (95% CI, 1.15-4.74; p = 0.02) and I2 of 64%. The pooled diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNB versus EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of benignancy was 71.19% (252/354) for EBUS-TBNA and 86.62% (233/269) for EBUS-TBNB, with an I-V-weighted OR of 4.39 (95% CI, 2.00-9.65; p = 0.002) and I2 of 59%. The overall complications included bleeding (n = 11, 0.90%), pneumomediastinum (n = 6, 0.49%), pneumothorax (n = 6, 0.49%), pneumonia (n = 4, 0.33%), respiratory failure (n = 1, 0.08%), and haemoptysis (n = 1, 0.08%). The funnel plot analysis illustrated no major publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

EBUS-TBNB improves the overall diagnostic yield of sampling intrathoracic lymphadenopathy and mass lesions relative to EBUS-TBNA. The complication rate of EBUS-TBNB is higher than that of EBUS-TBNA but reportedly lower than that of surgical biopsies.

A framework for exclusion of alternative diagnoses in sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous syndrome that arises from a persistent immune response to a triggering antigen(s). There is no "gold standard" test or algorithm for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis, making the diagnosis one of exclusion. The presentation of the disease varies substantially between individuals, in both the number of organs involved, and the manifestations seen in individual organs. These qualities dictate that health care providers diagnosing sarcoidosis must consider a wide range of possible alternative diagnoses, from across a range of presentations and medical specialties (infectious, inflammatory, cardiac, neurologic). Current guideline-based diagnosis of sarcoidosis recommends fulfillment of three criteria: 1) compatible clinical presentation and/or imaging 2) demonstration of granulomatous inflammation by biopsy (when possible) and, 3) exclusion of alternative causes, but do not provide guidance on standardized strategies for exclusion of alternative diagnoses. In this review, we provide a summary of the most common differential diagnoses for sarcoidosis involvement of lung, eye, skin, central nervous system, heart, liver, and kidney. We then propose a framework for testing to exclude alternative diagnoses based on pretest probability of sarcoidosis, defined as high (typical findings with sarcoidosis involvement confirmed in another organ), moderate (typical findings in a single organ), or low (atypical/findings suggesting of an alternative diagnosis). This work highlights the need for informed and careful exclusion of alternative diagnoses in sarcoidosis.

Utility and safety of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (EBUS-TMC): A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Modalities to improve tissue acquisition during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) have been investigated. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (EBUS-TMC) is a modality to obtain larger histological samples by inserting a cryoprobe into the mediastinal lesion. We aimed to study the diagnostic yield and safety of EBUS-TMC.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of the PubMed and Embase databases to extract the relevant studies. We then performed a meta-analysis to calculate the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TMC and compare it with EBUS-TBNA.

RESULTS

Following a systematic search, we identified 14 relevant studies (869 patients undergoing EBUS-TMC and EBUS-TBNA). We then performed a meta-analysis of the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TMC and EBUS-TBNA from studies wherein both procedures were performed. The pooled diagnostic yield of EBUS-TMC was 92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89%-95%). The pooled diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA was 81% (95% CI, 77%-85%). The risk difference in yield was 11% (95% CI, 6%-15%, I2 = 0%) when EBUS-TMC and EBUS-TBNA were compared. The only complication reported commonly with EBUS-TMC was minor bleeding. The complication rate was comparable with EBUS-TBNA.

CONCLUSION

EBUS-TMC provides a greater diagnostic yield with a similar risk of adverse events compared to EBUS-TBNA. Future studies are required to clearly establish which patients are most likely to benefit from this modality.

Lymphadenopathy in the rheumatology practice: a pragmatic approach

Lymphadenopathy is a common clinical finding and diagnostic challenge within general medicine and rheumatology practice. It may represent a primary manifestation of an underlying immune-mediated disease or indicate an infectious or neoplastic complication requiring differing management. Evaluating lymphadenopathy is of particular relevance in rheumatology, given that lymph node enlargement is a common finding within the clinical spectrum of several well-known rheumatologic disorders including RA, SLE and SS. In addition, lymphadenopathy represents a hallmark manifestation of rare immunological diseases such as Castleman disease and IgG4-related disease that must be considered in the differential diagnosis because effective targeted treatments can now impact the prognosis of these conditions. In this review we present an overview of the clinical significance of lymphadenopathy in common and rare rheumatologic diseases and propose a practical approach to lymphadenopathy in the rheumatology practice. Differential diagnosis of Castleman disease and therapeutic options for this condition of increasing rheumatologic interest will be discussed in detail.

Clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, and course of ocular sarcoidosis with or without uveitis: A retrospective, comparative study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare characteristics, diagnosis, treatment, visual prognosis, and course between ocular sarcoidosis with or without uveitis in a population in Southern France.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with ocular sarcoidosis in a tertiary eye care center in Nice from January 2003 to December 2021. The inclusion criterion was biopsy-proven ocular sarcoidosis according to IWOS criteria as the first clinical manifestation of sarcoidosis.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients were included. Twenty patients had uveitis (70% panuveitis, 20% intermediate uveitis, and 10% anterior uveitis) and five patients had non-uveitic ocular sarcoidosis (one patient with dacryoadenitis, one patient with orbital granuloma, two patients with palpebral granuloma, and one patient with episcleritis). Only the cases with uveitis had bilateral involvement (85% of cases). There was no significant difference in ethnicity, biopsy diagnosis, systemic manifestations, or treatment between the two groups. Final visual outcomes remained good for both groups, with 96% of patients with BCVA>20/50, with no significant difference. Patients with non-uveitic sarcoidosis experienced less recurrence on treatment (P=0.042) and more remission (P=0.038) than patients with uveitis. Eighty percent of patients with uveitis had at least three suggestive clinical intraocular signs meeting IWOS criteria.

CONCLUSION

In this population in Southern France, uveitis was the most common presentation of ocular sarcoidosis. The type of ocular sarcoidosis does not appear to be correlated with the type of systemic manifestations, use of systemic therapy, or visual prognosis, but patients with non-uveitic ocular sarcoidosis appear to have a better course with fewer recurrences on treatment and more remission than patients with uveitic ocular sarcoidosis.

Diagnostic Yield and Safety of the 19-Gauge versus 22-Gauge Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Needle in Subjects with Sarcoidosis (GUESS)

INTRODUCTION

Observational data suggest that the 19-gauge (G) needle for endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) offers a higher diagnostic yield than the 22-G needle in sarcoidosis. No randomized trial has compared the yield of the two needles.

METHODS

We randomized consecutive subjects with suspected sarcoidosis and enlarged thoracic lymph nodes to undergo EBUS-TBNA with either the 19-G or the 22-G needle. We compared the study groups for diagnostic sensitivity (primary outcome) assessed by the yield of granulomas in subjects finally diagnosed with sarcoidosis. We also compared the sample adequacy, difficulty performing the needle puncture assessed on a visual analog scale (VAS), the subject's cough intensity on an operator-rated VAS, and procedure-related complications (secondary outcomes).

RESULTS

We randomized 150 (mean age, 43.0 years; 55% women) subjects and diagnosed sarcoidosis in 116 subjects. The diagnostic sensitivity of the 19-G needle (45/60, 75.0%) was not higher (p = 0.52) than the 22-G needle (39/56, 69.6%). We obtained adequate aspirates in 90.0% and 85.7% of subjects in the respective groups (p = 0.48). The operators had greater difficulty puncturing lymph nodes with the 19-G needle (p = 0.03), while the operator-assessed cough intensity was similar in the groups (p = 0.41). Transient hypoxemia was the only complication encountered during EBUS-TBNA (two subjects in either group).

CONCLUSION

We did not find the 19-G needle superior to the 22-G in diagnostic sensitivity, specimen adequacy, or safety of EBUS-TBNA in sarcoidosis. Puncturing the lymph nodes was more difficult with the 19-G needle.

Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Mediastinal Lymph Nodal Cryobiopsy in Patients With Nondiagnostic/Inadequate Rapid On-site Evaluation: A New Step in the Diagnostic Algorithm

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is considered the investigation of choice for sampling mediastinal nodes. A major drawback of EBUS-TBNA is its lower diagnostic yield for lymphoma and benign diseases. EBUS-guided mediastinal cryobiopsy (EBUS-MCB) is a novel technique that provides larger nodal biopsy samples, with an acceptable safety profile. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of EBUS-MCB in patients with an inconclusive rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE).

METHODS

This is a prospective study of patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA for undiagnosed mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Patients in whom ROSE did not yield a diagnosis (nondiagnostic ROSE) or ROSE revealed scanty atypical cells (inadequate ROSE) were subjected to EBUS-MCB. The diagnostic yield, adequacy, and complications of EBUS-MCB were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 196 patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA, 46 patients underwent EBUS-MCB. Thirty-two cases underwent EBUS-MCB for a nondiagnostic ROSE. EBUS-MCB confirmed the diagnosis in 19/32 (59.3%) cases. The additive diagnostic yield of EBUS-MCB over EBUS-TBNA was 43.7% (14/32 cases). In all 14 cases where EBUS-MCB was performed for an inadequate ROSE, the material obtained by EBUS-MCB was adequate for ancillary studies. The most common complication observed was a minor bleed in 13 cases.

CONCLUSION

EBUS-MCB has a diagnostic yield of 59.3% when performed in cases with a nondiagnostic EBUS-ROSE. The tissue obtained by EBUS-MCB is adequate for ancillary studies. We propose EBUS-MCB as an additional diagnostic step in cases with an inconclusive ROSE while performing EBUS-TBNA. Larger studies are, however, needed before EBUS-MCB can be incorporated in the diagnostic algorithm for the evaluation of mediastinal lesions.

High-Definition Videobronchoscopy for the Diagnosis of Airway Involvement in Sarcoidosis: The Enhance Sarcoidosis Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

The ability of high-definition (HD) videobronchoscopy to detect airway involvement in sarcoidosis has not been evaluated previously.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the role of HD videobronchoscopy in the identification of sarcoidosis-associated airway abnormalities (AAs)? What are the patterns of AAs more commonly observed and more frequently associated with the detection of granulomas in endobronchial biopsy (EBB)?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In this prospective international multicenter cohort study, consecutive patients with suspected sarcoidosis underwent airway inspection with an HD videobronchoscope and EBB using a standardized workflow. AAs were classified according to six patterns defined a priori: nodularity, cobblestoning, thickening, plaque, increased vascularity, and miscellaneous. We assessed diagnostic yield of EBB, prevalence of AAs, and interobserver agreement for different patterns of AAs.

RESULTS

AAs were identified in 64 of 134 patients with sarcoidosis (47.8%), with nodularity (n = 23 [17.2%]), plaque (n = 19 [14.2%]), and increased vascularity (n = 19 [14.2%]) being the most prevalent. The diagnostic yield of EBB was 36.6%. AAs were significantly more prevalent in patients with than in those without nonnecrotizing granulomas on EBB (67.4% vs 36.5%; P = .001). Likewise, parenchymal disease on CT scan imaging was significantly more common in patients with than in those without nonnecrotizing granulomas on EBB (79.6% vs 54.1%; P = .003). On a per-lesion analysis, nonnecrotizing granulomas were seen especially in EBB samples obtained from areas of cobblestoning (9/10 [90%]) and nodularity (17/29 [58.6%]). The overall diagnostic yield of random EBB was low (31/134 [23.1%]). The interobserver agreement for the different patterns of AA was fair (Fleiss κ = 0.34).

INTERPRETATION

In a population with a large prevalence of White Europeans, HD videobronchoscopy detected AAs in approximately one-half of patients with sarcoidosis. The diagnostic yield of EBB was higher in patients with parenchymal involvement on CT scan imaging and in those with AAs, especially if manifesting as cobblestoning and nodularity.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT4743596; URL: www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov.

Pulmonary sarcoidosis: A comprehensive review: Past to present

Sarcoidosis is a sterile non-necrotizing granulomatous disease without known causes that can involve multiple organs with a predilection for the lung and thoracic lymph nodes. Worldwide it is estimated to affect 2-160/100,000 people and has a mortality rate over 5 years of approximately 7%. For sarcoidosis patients, the cause of death is due to sarcoid in 60% of the cases, of which up to 80% are from advanced cardiopulmonary failure (pulmonary hypertension and respiratory microbial infections) in all races except in Japan were greater than 70% of the sarcoidosis deaths are due to cardiac sarcoidosis. Scadding stages for pulmonary sarcoidosis associates with clinical outcomes. Stages I and II have radiographic remission in approximately 30%-80% of cases. Stage III only has a 10%-40% chance of resolution, while stage IV has no change of resolution. Up to 40% of pulmonary sarcoidosis patients progress to stage IV disease with lung parenchyma fibroplasia, bronchiectasis with hilar retraction and fibrocystic disease. These patients are at highest risk for the development of precapillary pulmonary hypertension, which may occur in up to 70% of these patients. Sarcoid patients with pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension can respond to targeted pulmonary arterial hypertension medications. Stage IV fibrocytic sarcoidosis with significant pulmonary physiologic impairment, >20% fibrosis on HRCT or pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension have the highest risk of mortality, which can be >40% at 5-years. First line treatment for patients who are symptomatic (cough and dyspnea) with parenchymal infiltrates and abnormal pulmonary function testing (PFT) is oral glucocorticoids, such as prednisone with a typical starting dose of 20-40 mg daily for 2 weeks to 2 months. Prednisone can be tapered over 6-18 months if symptoms, spirometry, PFTs, and radiographs improve. Prolonged prednisone may be required to stabilize disease. Patients requiring prolonged prednisone ≥10 mg/day or those with adverse effects due to glucocorticoids may be prescribed second and third line treatements. Second and third line treatments include immunosuppressive agents (e.g., methotrexate and azathioprine) and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) medication; respectively. Effective treatments for advanced fibrocystic pulmonary disease are being explored. Despite different treatments, relapse rates range from 13% to 75% depending on the stage of sarcoid, number of organs involved, socioeconomic status, and geography. CONCLUSION: The mortality rate for sarcoidosis over a 5 year follow up is approximately 7%. Unfortunately, 10%-40% of patients with sarcoidosis develop progressive pulmonary disease, and >60% of deaths resulting from sarcoidosis are due to advance cardiopulmonary disease. Oral glucocorticoids are the first line treatment, while methotrexate and azathioprine are considered second and anti-TNF agents are third line treatments that are used solely or as glucocorticoid sparing agents for symptomatic extrapulmonary or pulmonary sarcoidosis with infiltrates on chest radiographs and abnormal PFT. Relapse rates have ranged from 13% to 75% depending on the population studied.

Utility of Narrow-band Imaging Bronchoscopy in the Diagnosis of Endobronchial Sarcoidosis

BACKGROUND

There are few reports on the utility of bronchoscopic narrow-band imaging (NBI) for visualizing endobronchial abnormalities in sarcoidosis. Our primary objective was to compare the sensitivity of finding endobronchial abnormality using NBI versus white light bronchoscopy (WLB) in patients with sarcoidosis. The secondary aim was to evaluate the sensitivity of NBI in diagnosing endobronchial sarcoidosis against a reference standard of positive endobronchial biopsy (EBB).

METHODS

We retrospectively included subjects with sarcoidosis, where we sequentially recorded WLB and NBI videos to visualize the endobronchial mucosa. We collected data on the demographic findings, sarcoidosis stage, and the histopathological findings of transbronchial needle aspiration, EBB, and transbronchial lung biopsy. Three experienced bronchoscopists viewed the video recordings and noted the abnormalities of the airway mucosa separately on WLB and NBI.

RESULTS

We included 28 subjects (mean age, 42.9 y; 53.6% men; 14 each, stages 1 and 2) with a final diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Granulomas were detected on EBB in 11 (39.3%) subjects. We identified endobronchial nodules in 10 and 15 subjects on WLB and NBI. The sensitivity of finding endobronchial abnormality using WLB and NBI was 35.7% (10/28) and 53.6% (15/28), respectively (χ 2 =1.77, df=1, P =0.18). The sensitivity of NBI in diagnosing endobronchial sarcoidosis against a positive EBB was 63.6% (7/11 subjects). There was excellent agreement (Κ=0.86) for detecting nodules on NBI among the 3 observers.

CONCLUSION

NBI might allow the identification of additional abnormalities not detected on WLB in sarcoidosis. Larger studies are required to confirm our observations.

Guidelines for endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA): Joint Indian Chest Society (ICS)/Indian Association for Bronchology (IAB) recommendations

Over the past decade, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has become an indispensable tool in the diagnostic armamentarium of the pulmonologist. As the expertise with EBUS-TBNA has evolved and several innovations have occurred, the indications for its use have expanded. However, several aspects of EBUS-TBNA are still not standardized. Hence, evidence-based guidelines are needed to optimize the diagnostic yield and safety of EBUS-TBNA. For this purpose, a working group of experts from India was constituted. A detailed and systematic search was performed to extract relevant literature pertaining to various aspects of EBUS-TBNA. The modified GRADE system was used for evaluating the level of evidence and assigning the strength of recommendations. The final recommendations were framed with the consensus of the working group after several rounds of online discussions and a two-day in-person meeting. These guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations encompassing indications of EBUS-TBNA, pre-procedure evaluation, sedation and anesthesia, technical and procedural aspects, sample processing, EBUS-TBNA in special situations, and training for EBUS-TBNA.

The Contribution of Cell Blocks in the Diagnosis of Mediastinal and Hilar Lymphadenopathy Samples From Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA)

Background Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a diagnostic procedure that allows clinicians to stage lung cancer by sampling lymph nodes in the mediastinum. EBUS-TBNA is recommended as a first step prior to mediastinoscopy for lung cancer mediastinal staging. This procedure has greatly aided pulmonologists in diagnosing mediastinal pathologies with substantial progress. In this study, our aim is to analyze how cell blocks affect the diagnostic yield of mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy using an EBUS cytology needle. Methods This retrospective study was conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital between May 2021 and September 2021. Patients with mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy in the absence of known or suspected primary lung cancer were included. The EBUS procedure was performed using a flexible bronchoscope equipped with a working channel suitable for transbronchial needle aspiration under direct ultrasound guidance. Data were recorded using Microsoft Excel and analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) v. 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Diagnostic accuracy measures were determined, and a p-value of 0.05 was established as the final threshold for statistical significance. Results The total number of patients in our study was 151. The sensitivity for cytology specimens, histology specimens, and a combined evaluation for the full group of patients was 77.14%, 83.33%, and 87.5%, respectively, with a negative predictive value of 27.22%, 25%, and 21.42%. The diagnostic accuracy for cytology specimens, histology specimens, and a combined evaluation was 71.42%, 76.19%, and 80%, respectively. Conclusion Our study found that the combined examination of specimens for both cytology and histology in the diagnosis of lung cancer, sarcoidosis, and tuberculosis resulted in a higher diagnostic yield compared to cytological assessment alone using EBUS-TBNA.

Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a disease of unknown cause characterized by granulomatous inflammation. Although the lung is almost universally involved, any organ can be affected. Complex pathogenesis and protean clinical manifestations are additional features of the disease. The diagnosis is one of exclusion, although the presence of noncaseating granulomas at disease sites is a prerequisite in most cases. The management of sarcoidosis requires a multidisciplinary approach, particularly when the heart, the brain, or the eyes are involved. The paucity of effective therapies and the lack of reliable predictors of disease behavior greatly contribute to making sarcoidosis a challenging disease to manage.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for the diagnosis of pulmonary sarcoidosis: A 9-year experience at a single center

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is valuable for diagnosing pulmonary sarcoidosis. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA and cytology in sarcoidosis during the first 9 years at our institution.

METHODS

Patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA for suspected sarcoidosis between January 2011 and November 2019 were identified retrospectively. EBUS-TBNA was performed with rapid on-site cytological evaluation of the samples. The final diagnosis was based on the pathology and/or cytology results, radiologic features, and clinical follow-up findings. The yield rate was analyzed annually.

RESULTS

Eighty patients underwent 83 EBUS-TBNA procedures for suspected sarcoidosis. In total, 136 lymph nodes were sampled. The mean number of lymph node stations sampled was 2.0 ± 0.6; the mean number of needle passes per lymph node was 3.5 ± 0.8. Sixty-five patients were diagnosed with sarcoidosis, with a total of 68 procedures. Nonnecrotizing granulomatous inflammation was detected in the EBUS-TBNA samples from 49/68 procedures (yield rate: 72.1%). Of 19 patients with sarcoidosis who did not obtain a pathological diagnosis with EBUS-TBNA, epithelioid cells and/or multinuclear giant cells suggestive of granulomatous inflammation were detected in five. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) for pathological diagnosis of sarcoidosis using EBUS-TBNA were 72.1%, 100%, 100%, and 24.0%, respectively. On using cytology, the sensitivity and NPV increased to 79.4% and 26.3%, respectively. The yield rate did not increase until 2016.

CONCLUSION

EBUS-TBNA is useful for diagnosing sarcoidosis. Cytology resulted in an additional yield rate of 7.3%, which improved as the number of cases increased.

The utility of WhatsApp-based off-site evaluation for rapid cytology of EBUS-TBNA samples

BACKGROUND

Whether off-site evaluation of slides by a cytologist viewing the images shared by WhatsApp improves the on-site evaluation by a pulmonologist (P-ROSE) remains unknown. This study's objective was to compare the sensitivity of P-ROSE and WHOSE for adequacy and diagnosis of cytology specimens obtained by endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our bronchoscopy database to identify subjects who underwent EBUS-TBNA for lymph node sampling and had reports of P-ROSE and WHOSE. We collected data on the adequacy of samples as reported by the pulmonologist (P-ROSE), remotely by the cytologist (WHOSE), and finally after detailed cytologic evaluation. The study's primary outcome was to assess the increment in sensitivity for adequacy and diagnostic category (using the final cytology report as reference) by incorporating WHOSE.

RESULTS

We included 264 (P-ROSE, n = 184; WHOSE, n = 80) subjects. The sensitivity (95% CI) for sample adequacy by P-ROSE and WHOSE was 65.3% (57.9%-72%) and 92% (83.6%-96.2%), respectively. There was a 26.6% (95% CI, 16%-35.2%) increment in the sensitivity for adequacy. The sensitivity (95% CI) for diagnosis by P-ROSE and WHOSE was 53.9% (46%-61.1%) and 89.8% (79.5%-95.3%), respectively. There was a 35.9% (95% CI, 23.4%-45%) increment in the sensitivity for diagnosis with WHOSE. The agreement between P-ROSE and final cytology in adequacy was poor (κ = -0.023, p = 0.616). The agreement between WHOSE and final cytology was moderate for adequacy (κ = 0.491, p = <0.001).

CONCLUSION

We found WHOSE significantly improves the performance of P-ROSE for rapid assessment of cytology specimens obtained by EBUS-TBNA.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in intrathoracic lymphadenopathy with extrathoracic malignancy

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for the diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lymph is poorly studied in patients with extrathoracic malignancies.

AIM

To evaluate the value of EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of enlarged intrathoracic lymph nodes in patients with extrathoracic malignancies.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients with extrathoracic malignancies who were referred to Peking University Cancer Hospital from January 2013 to December 2018 for EBUS-TBNA due to intrathoracic lymphadenopathy. The specimens were defined as positive for malignancy, negative for non-malignancy (tuberculosis, sarcoidosis, etc.), and without a definitive diagnosis. Sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV) for malignancy, and overall accuracy were calculated. Complications were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients underwent EBUS-TBNA and had a final diagnosis, among which 50 (62.5%) were diagnosed with extrathoracic malignancy with intrathoracic lymph nodes metastasis, 14 (17.5%) were diagnosed with primary lung cancer with nodal involvement, and 16 (20.0%) exhibited benign behavior including tuberculosis, sarcoidosis and reactive lymphadenitis or who had benign follow-up. The diagnostic sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy of EBUS-TBNA for intrathoracic lymphadenopathy in patients with extrathoracic malignancy were 93.8% (n = 60/64), 80.0% (n = 16/20), and 95.0% (n = 76/80), respectively. In the multivariate analysis, longer short axis of the lymph node (OR: 1.200, 95%CI: 1.024-1.407; P = 0.024) and synchronous lung lesion (OR: 19.449, 95%CI: 1.875-201.753; P = 0.013) were independently associated with malignant intrathoracic lymphadenopathy. No characteristics of the lymph nodes and EBUS-TBNA were associated with the location of malignant intrathoracic lymphadenopathy, and no major complication was observed.

CONCLUSION

EBUS-TBNA is a simple and accurate procedure for the diagnosis of intrathoracic lymphadenopathy with extrathoracic malignancy.

EBUS-TBNA in Extrathoracic Malignancies: Diagnostic and Prognostic Implications

PURPOSE

In patients with extrathoracic malignancies (EM) the role of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for the assessment of abnormal mediastinal lymph nodes (MLN) is controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic yield and prognostic significance of EBUS-TBNA in these patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients with EM and abnormal MLN detected by Computed Tomography (CT) and/or Positron Emission Tomography (PET).

RESULTS

A total of 161 patients with EM and abnormal MLN were included (93 males, 58%). The most common EM was melanoma (19%) and gastrointestinal cancer (17%). Assessed lymph nodes were mediastinal in 70% of cases and hilar in 30%. The most frequently sampled lymph nodes were subcarinal (45%) and lower right paratracheal (21%). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of malignancy were 88%, 100%, 100% and 87%, respectively. These values were similar regardless the type of EM except for head and neck tumors where the NPV was particularly low (67%). The diagnosis of neoplastic involvement by EBUS-TBNA implied a worse prognosis in terms of overall survival (p < 0.02) and cancer-specific survival (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with EM and abnormal MLN, EBUS-TBNA has a high diagnostic yield. However, the NPV decrease in patients with head and neck tumors. Neoplastic MLN detected by EBUS-TBNA has prognostic implications in these patients.

Comparison of a 22G Crown-Cut Needle with a Conventional 22G Needle with EBUS Guidance in Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis

INTRODUCTION

Endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a standard procedure in cases of enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes. Recently, new tools were developed aiming to improve the diagnostic yield. A novel crown-cut needle is considered to obtain tissue cores which can be beneficial for the evaluation by the pathologist. This study aimed to compare the novel 22G crown-cut needle with a conventional 22G needle with EBUS guidance in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis.

METHODS

We designed a single-center prospective randomized clinical trial between March 2020 and January 2021 with 30 patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy and suspected sarcoidosis.

RESULTS

24 patients (mean age 49.5 vs 54.1, mean FVC 73.7% vs 86.7%, mean DLCO 72.4% vs 72.5% for crown-cut needle vs conventional needle, respectively) were diagnosed with sarcoidosis. In the remaining six patients, sarcoidosis was reasonably excluded. The diagnostic yield for sarcoidosis was 77% with the crown-cut needle vs. 82% with the conventional needle (p > 0.05). In patients with histopathologic hallmarks typical of sarcoidosis (n = 19), the crown-cut needle was superior in detecting granulomas (8.3 vs 3.8 per cytoblock, p < 0.05) and histiocytes (502 vs 186 per cytoblock, p < 0.05). Four of seven bronchoscopists experienced difficulties passing through the bronchial wall with the crown-cut needle and one episode of bleeding occurred in this group which made interventions necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite equivalence in diagnostic accuracy, the crown-cut needle was superior to the conventional needle in detecting granulomas and histiocytes. This indicates greater potential for obtaining higher quality sample material with the crown-cut needle in cases of granulomatous inflammation.

Evaluation of the Utility of Liquid-based Cytology, Cell-blocks, and Flow Cytometric Immunophenotyping on Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Samples in the Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis

BACKGROUND

There is little information on the value of different processing methods for samples obtained during endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) in suspected sarcoidosis. We evaluated the role of conventional smears, liquid-based cytology (LBC), cell-blocks and flow cytometric immunophenotyping in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis using EBUS-TBNA samples.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of consecutive EBUS-TBNA samples from clinically suspected cases of sarcoidosis. In addition to conventional smears, we prepared LBC smears, cell-blocks, and performed flow cytometric evaluation of the CD4:CD8 ratio. The final diagnosis of sarcoidosis was made based on the relevant clinical details and laboratory investigations including the results of transbronchial and endobronchial biopsies (TBLB and endobronchial biopsy).

RESULTS

We included 60 subjects [mean age: 45.2 y; 29 (48.3%) men]. The sensitivity of conventional smears, LBC, and cell-blocks for diagnosing sarcoidosis was found to be 75.5%, 37.8%, 35%, respectively, when used alone. However, on combining conventional and LBC smears, the sensitivity increased to 84.4% and on combining all three techniques, the sensitivity was 86.7%. The CD4:CD8 ratio on flow cytometric immunophenotyping of EBUS-TBNA samples ranged from 0 to 11.5 with a mean of 3.17±2.78 in confirmed cases of sarcoidosis and 70% of these cases had CD4:CD8 ratio of more than 2.

CONCLUSION

Cell-blocks and liquid-based preparations add to the yield of conventional preparation of EBUS-TBNA samples in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. A combination of conventional and LBC works well in detecting almost 85% of the cases of sarcoidosis. Higher CD4:CD8 ratio favors a diagnosis of sarcoidosis.

Deep Learning Using Endobronchial-Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Image to Improve the Overall Diagnostic Yield of Sampling Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy

Lung cancer is the biggest cause of cancer-related death worldwide. An accurate nodal staging is critical for the determination of treatment strategy for lung cancer patients. Endobronchial-ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has revolutionized the field of pulmonology and is considered to be extremely sensitive, specific, and secure for lung cancer staging through rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), but manual visual inspection on the entire slide of EBUS smears is challenging, time consuming, and worse, subjective, on a large interobserver scale. To satisfy ROSE’s needs, a rapid, automated, and accurate diagnosis system using EBUS-TBNA whole-slide images (WSIs) is highly desired to improve diagnosis accuracy and speed, minimize workload and labor costs, and ensure reproducibility. We present a fast, efficient, and fully automatic deep-convolutional-neural-network-based system for advanced lung cancer staging on gigapixel EBUS-TBNA cytological WSIs. Each WSI was converted into a patch-based hierarchical structure and examined by the proposed deep convolutional neural network, generating the segmentation of metastatic lesions in EBUS-TBNA WSIs. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first research on fully automated enlarged mediastinal lymph node analysis using EBUS-TBNA cytological WSIs. We evaluated the robustness of the proposed framework on a dataset of 122 WSIs, and the proposed method achieved a high precision of 93.4%, sensitivity of 89.8%, DSC of 82.2%, and IoU of 83.2% for the first experiment (37.7% training and 62.3% testing) and a high precision of 91.8 ± 1.2, sensitivity of 96.3 ± 0.8, DSC of 94.0 ± 1.0, and IoU of 88.7 ± 1.8 for the second experiment using a three-fold cross-validation, respectively. Furthermore, the proposed method significantly outperformed the three state-of-the-art baseline models, including U-Net, SegNet, and FCN, in terms of precision, sensitivity, DSC, and Jaccard index, based on Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test (p<0.001). For a computational time comparison on a WSI, the proposed method was 2.5 times faster than U-Net, 2.3 times faster than SegNet, and 3.4 times faster than FCN, using a single GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, respectively. With its high precision and sensitivity, the proposed method demonstrated that it manifested the potential to reduce the workload of pathologists in their routine clinical practice.

Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Forceps Biopsy: A Retrospective Bicentric Study Using the Olympus 1.5 mm Mini-Forceps

When evaluating mediastinal/hilar lymphadenopathy (LAD) or masses, guidelines recommend endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) as an initial technique for tissue analysis and diagnosis. However, owing to the small sample size obtained by needle aspiration, its diagnostic yield (DY) is limited. EBUS transbronchial forceps biopsy (TBFB) used as a complimentary technique to EBUS-TBNA might allow for better histopathological evaluation, thus improving DY. In this retrospective bicentric study, we assessed the DY and safety of an EBUS-guided 1.5 mm mini-forceps biopsy combined with EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of mediastinal/hilar LAD or masses compared to EBUS-TBNA alone. In total, 105 patients were enrolled. The overall DY was 61.9% and 85.7% for TBNA alone and EBUS-TBNA combined with EBUS-TBFB, respectively (p < 0.001). While the combined approach was associated with a significantly higher DY for lung cancer diagnosis (97.1% vs. 76.5%, p = 0.016) and sarcoidosis (85.2% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.001), no significant differences in DY were calculated for subgroups with smaller sample sizes such as lymphoma. No major adverse events were observed. Using a 1.5 mm mini-forceps is a safe and feasible technique for biopsy of mediastinal or hilar LAD or masses with superior overall DY compared to EBUS-TBNA as a standalone technique.

Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Aspiration With a 19-Gauge Needle vs 21- and 22-Gauge Needles for Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is commonly used to evaluate mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Studies focusing on malignant lymphadenopathy have compared 21- and 22-gauge (21G and 22G, respectively) needles and have not identified an advantage of one needle size over the other in terms of diagnostic yield.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does the 19-gauge (19G) EBUS needle offer greater diagnostic yield and sensitivity vs the 21G and 22G EBUS needles for a diagnosis of sarcoidosis, lymphoma, or mediastinal lymphadenopathy not yet diagnosed?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This study retrospectively examined records of 730 patients from the Stather Canadian Outcomes Registry for Chest Procedures (SCOPE) database who underwent EBUS-TBNA for a diagnosis of suspected sarcoidosis, lymphoma, or mediastinal lymphadenopathy not yet diagnosed. A propensity score analysis of two groups was performed. One group comprised patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA with a 19G needle, the other with a 21G or 22G needle. Cases for analysis were selected with a 1:2 ratio of 19G vs 21/22G using logistic regression and random matching with all eligible 19G cases included.

RESULTS

There were 137 patients (312 targets) in the 19G group and 274 patients (631 targets) in the 21/22G group in the propensity score analysis. The diagnostic yield was 107 of 137 (78.1%) in the 19G group vs 194 of 274 (70.8%) in the 21/22G group (difference, 7.3%; 95% CI, -1.9 to 15.6; P = .116). The sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA for sarcoidosis was 80 of 84 (95.2%) in the 19G group vs 150 of 156 (96.2%) in the 21/22G group (difference, 1.0%; 95% CI, -4.2 to 8.2; P = .71). In patients with a final diagnosis of lymphoma, EBUS was diagnostic in 10 of 13 (76.9%) in the 19G group vs 12 of 12 (100%) in the 21/22G group (difference, 23.1%; 95% CI, -5.4 to 50.3; P = .08).

INTERPRETATION

The study did not identify an advantage of the 19G EBUS needle over the 21/22G EBUS needles for diagnostic yield nor sensitivity for sarcoidosis or lymphoma.

Effect of Needle Size on Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis with Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disease characterized by noncaseating granulomatous inflammation that most commonly involves the lungs. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has become an invaluable tool in the assessment of patients with mediastinal and/or hilar lymphadenopathy. Objective: It has been hypothesized that use of the larger 19-gauge (G) needle with EBUS-TBNA improves diagnostic sensitivity in sarcoidosis. However, it is unclear whether the existing literature supports this supposition. Data Sources: A literature search of Embase and Medline was performed by two reviewers. Included articles were evaluated for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Data Extraction: For quantitative analysis, we performed a meta-analysis using a binary random-effects model to determine pooled sensitivity. Subgroup analysis was performed based on needle size, use of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), study design, and prevalence of sarcoidosis in study group. Synthesis: Sixty-five studies with a total of 4,242 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall pooled sensitivity for diagnosis of sarcoidosis was 83.99% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81.22-86.53) among all studies. The 19G subgroup had a significantly higher sensitivity (93.73%; 95% CI, 89.72-97.74%; I² = 0.00%; P < 0.01) compared with the 21G subgroup (84.61%; 95% CI, 78.80-90.42%; I² = 69.83%), 22G subgroup (84.07%; 95% CI, 80.90-87.24%; I² = 85.21%) or unspecified 21G/22G subgroup (78.85%; 95% CI, 70.81-86.90%; I² = 84.47%). There were no significant differences with use of ROSE or prevalence of sarcoidosis or by study design. Conclusions: The use of 19G needles during EBUS-TBNA had the highest diagnostic sensitivity based on available studies. Further randomized controlled trials using 19G needles should be considered in patients with suspected sarcoidosis.

Clinical Profile of 327 patients with Sarcoidosis in India: An Ambispective Cohort Study in a Tuberculosis (TB) Endemic Population

Introduction:

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disease with a varied clinical presentation. We describe the clinical characteristics of patients with sarcoidosis from a tuberculosis (TB) endemic setting.

Methods:

We performed an analysis of the sarcoidosis database at a tertiary care facility in North India.

Results:

Of the 327 patients, 50.8% were male, with a mean age of 42.8 years (range: 16–70 years). Females were significantly older. 42.6% had comorbidities, of which diabetes (17.1%) was most common. More than half (57.1%) were obese. Serum angiotensin-converting enzyme levels were elevated in 186 (57.9%). Eleven (3.8%) had hypercalcemia, while hypercalciuria was present in 54 (31.7%). The majority (89.9%) were tuberculin skin test negative (<10 mm induration), while 71.9% were tuberculin anergic. 47.7% had normal spirometry, while a restrictive impairment was the most common abnormality (44.6%). Obstruction on spirometry was present in 8.3%. Nearly half (160, 49%) had involvement of an extrapulmonary site. Most patients were (96%) symptomatic. Cough, shortness of breath, fatigue, weight loss, and fever were the predominant symptoms. A majority had Stage 1 (47.7%) sarcoidosis. Two hundred and eighty-seven (87.8%) patients underwent bronchoscopy or endosonographic (endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration [EBUS-TBNA] or transesophageal bronchoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration [EUS-B-FNA]) sampling. A histopathological diagnosis with the demonstration of granulomas was achieved in 90.8%. The diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA/EUS-B-FNA was 77.4%. In 13.5% of patients, necrotizing granulomas were present in tissue samples.

Conclusion:

The clinical profile of patients with sarcoidosis in TB endemic settings has certain differences from nonendemic populations. Bronchoscopy and endosonography allow a confident diagnosis in the majority of patients.

Rapid On-site Evaluation (ROSE) in Capillary Pull Versus Suction Biopsy Technique With Endobronchial Ultrasound-transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA)

BACKGROUND

Suction and capillary pull are 2 biopsy techniques used in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). Although these techniques have been shown to perform comparably in terms of overall diagnostic yield, we hypothesized that the capillary pull technique would be associated with improved rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) adequacy rates thus allowing for a shorter procedure time.

METHODS

One hundred eighteen patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA for any indication were randomized to suction or capillary pull techniques for the first biopsy pass; the technique used for all subsequent passes was based on operator preference and was not recorded. The first pass was subjected to ROSE and an adequacy assessment was given. ROSE slides were also scored for cellularity of diagnostic/lesional cells and blood contamination. The overall procedure time was also recorded.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between suction and capillary pull techniques in terms of ROSE adequacy rates. Cellularity of diagnostic/lesional cells and blood contamination scores were also comparable. There was no significant difference in procedure time for the 2 techniques.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests no differences in ROSE outcomes between suction and capillary pull techniques in EBUS-TBNA. The technique used should therefore be left to the discretion of the operator.

Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) during endobronchial ultrasound bronchoscopy (EBUS) in the diagnosis of granulomatous diseases

AIM

We aimed to evaluate the role of Rapid On-Site Evaluation (ROSE) in improving the diagnostic contribution of EBUS-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in the diagnosis of granulomatous lymphadenitis.

METHODS

We retrospectively included all patients in the study who underwent EBUS-TBNA (n = 405) from September 2013 to September 2017. All cases who underwent EBUS-TBNA and were found to have "granuloma" in the final pathological diagnosis (n = 143) were included in the research.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-three cases who underwent EBUS and whose final pathological diagnosis was granuloma were included in the study. A total of 231 lymph nodes were sampled. The final diagnosis was found to be compatible with the examination during the procedure for 55 (85.9%) out of 64 patients for whom ROSE was performed. In addition, while 79.7% of the 64 patients who underwent ROSE were tested positive for granuloma, 9.4% were suspected to have granuloma, and no diagnostic result was obtained for 10.9%. The number of lymph node needle aspirations was statistically significantly lower in patients for whom ROSE was performed (P < .001). The final diagnosis was found to be compatible with the examination during the procedure for 55 (85.9%) out of 64 patients for whom ROSE was performed. According to the evaluation made on the duration, the procedure was completed in the first 15 minutes in 95.4% of the patients for whom ROSE was performed, while the procedure took longer than 15 minutes in 93.6% of the patients for whom ROSE was not performed.

CONCLUSION

We found a high incidence of congruence between ROSE and the final cytological diagnosis if granulomas were identified in the final cytology. Performing ROSE shortens the duration of the procedure and reduced sampling thus preventing complications that may occur due to prolongation of the procedure.

EBUS versus EUS-B for diagnosing sarcoidosis: The International Sarcoidosis Assessment (ISA) randomized clinical trial

Background and objective

Endosonography with intrathoracic nodal sampling is proposed as the single test with the highest granuloma detection rate in suspected sarcoidosis stage I/II. However, most studies have been performed in limited geographical regions. Studies suggest that oesophageal endosonographic nodal sampling has higher diagnostic yield than endobronchial endosonographic nodal sampling, but a head‐to‐head comparison of both routes has never been performed.

Methods

Global (14 hospitals, nine countries, four continents) randomized clinical trial was conducted in consecutive patients with suspected sarcoidosis stage I/II presenting between May 2015 and August 2017. Using an endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) scope, patients were randomized to EBUS or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‐B‐guided nodal sampling, and to 22‐ or 25‐G ProCore needle aspiration (2 × 2 factorial design). Granuloma detection rate was the primary study endpoint. Final diagnosis was based on cytology/pathology outcomes and clinical/radiological follow‐up at 6 months.

Results

A total of 358 patients were randomized: 185 patients to EBUS‐transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS‐TBNA) and 173 to EUS‐B‐fine‐needle aspiration (FNA). Final diagnosis was sarcoidosis in 306 patients (86%). Granuloma detection rate was 70% (130/185; 95% CI, 63–76) for EBUS‐TBNA and 68% (118/173; 95% CI, 61–75) for EUS‐B‐FNA (p = 0.67). Sensitivity for diagnosing sarcoidosis was 78% (129/165; 95% CI, 71–84) for EBUS‐TBNA and 82% (115/141; 95% CI, 74–87) for EUS‐B‐FNA (p = 0.46). There was no significant difference between the two needle types in granuloma detection rate or sensitivity.

Conclusion

Granuloma detection rate of mediastinal/hilar nodes by endosonography in patients with suspected sarcoidosis stage I/II is high and similar for EBUS and EUS‐B. These findings imply that both diagnostic tests can be safely and universally used in suspected sarcoidosis patients.

This global RCT in patients with suspected sarcoidosis stage I/II with an indication for endosonographic nodal sampling showed a similarly high granuloma detection rate and sensitivity for diagnosing sarcoidosis with endobronchial ultrasound versus endoscopic ultrasound‐B. The findings imply that both diagnostic tests (endobronchial/oesophageal) can be used safely and universally in suspected sarcoidosis patients.

Infectious complications of EBUS-TBNA: A nested case-control study using 10-year registry data

OBJECTIVES

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has become a standard procedure, but little is known about its infectious complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of infectious complications of EBUS-TBNA and its clinical course, including effects on anti-cancer treatment.

METHODS

This is a nested case-control study of patients who received EBUS-TBNA and were followed for at least 2 months at Samsung Medical Center from August 2009 to April 2019. Patients with clinical symptoms of infection and correlating chest images were defined as the infection group (n = 33). The controls were randomly selected from patients without infectious complication. Multivariate logistic regression with backward selection was used to identify the risk factors of infectious complications.

RESULTS

Of the 6826 patients, 33 (0.48%) infectious complications were identified, comprising pneumonia (n = 20) and mediastinal infections (n = 13). Target lesions with necrotic features on chest computed tomography (CT) scan (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49-6.40; P = 0.002) and procedures that were performed via the esophagus (aOR, 3.19; 95% CI, 1.47-6.88; P = 0.003) were independently associated with infectious complications. Among patients ultimately diagnosed with cancer, the infection group tended to refuse anti-cancer treatment compared to controls (32/459, 7.0% vs. 5/30, 16.7%; P = 0.066). However, among the patients who received anti-cancer treatment, there was no delay in onset of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Infectious complications of EBUS-TBNA are rare; however, attention should be paid if the target lesion appears necrotic on chest CT or if the procedure is performed via the esophagus. Although it was not conclusive due to its rarity, patients with infectious complications tended not to receive anti-cancer treatment.

Interventional Pulmonology: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Advances in Bronchoscopy

BACKGROUND

Interventional pulmonology is a rapidly evolving subspecialty of pulmonary medicine that offers advanced consultative and procedural services to patients with airway diseases, pleural diseases, as well as in the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic malignancy.

AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY

The institution of lung cancer screening modalities as well as the search of additional minimally invasive diagnostic and treatment modalities for lung cancer and other chronic lung diseases has led to an increased focus on the field of interventional pulmonology. Rapid advancements in the field over the last 2 decades has led to development of various new minimally invasive bronchoscopic approaches and techniques for patients with cancer as well as for patients with chronic lung diseases.

DATA SOURCES

A review of literature was performed using PubMed database to identify all articles published up till October 2020 relevant to the field of interventional pulmonology and bronchoscopy. The reference list of each article was searched to look for additional articles, and all relevant articles were included in the article.

THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES

Newer technologies are now available such navigation platforms to diagnose and possibly treat peripheral pulmonary nodules, endobronchial ultrasound in diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar adenopathy as well as cryobiopsy in the diagnosis of diffuse lung diseases. In addition, flexible and rigid bronchoscopy continues to provide new and expanding ability to manage patients with benign and malignant central airway obstruction. Interventions are also available for diseases such as asthma, chronic bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and emphysema that were traditionally treated with medical management alone.

CONCLUSIONS

With continued high quality research and an increasing body of evidence, interventional bronchoscopy has enormous potential to provide both safe and effective options for patients with a variety of lung diseases.

Diagnostic yield and safety of the ProCore versus the standard EBUS-TBNA needle in subjects with suspected sarcoidosis

Background: No randomized trial has compared the yield of the ProCore needle, a novel needle for endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA), with standard needles.Research design and methods: Consecutive subjects with intrathoracic lymphadenopathy due to suspected sarcoidosis were randomized 1:1 to undergo EBUS-TBNA with either the 22-gauge ProCore (EchoTip-ProCore, Cook-Medical) or the 22-gauge standard (Vizishot, Olympus) needle. The primary outcome was the diagnostic sensitivity; the secondary outcomes included the number of adequate aspirates obtained and procedure-related complications.Results: We randomized 100 (mean age, 43.4 years; 53% women) subjects. Of the 84 subjects finally diagnosed with sarcoidosis, the sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA was higher with the ProCore (36/42, 85.7%) versus the standard needle (31/42, 73.8%), although not statistically significant (p = 0.18). We obtained adequate aspirates in 95.2% and 90.5% subjects in the ProCore and the standard needle groups, respectively (p = 0.68). One complication (transient hypoxemia) occurred in each group. There were two incidences of the ProCore needle getting bent during the procedure.Conclusions: We found no difference in the sensitivity, specimen adequacy, or safety of EBUS-TBNA when performed with the ProCore or the Olympus needle in subjects with sarcoidosis. Larger studies are required to confirm our findings.[clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03656003].

Combined EBUS-IFB and EBUS-TBNA vs EBUS-TBNA alone for intrathoracic adenopathy: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) guided intranodal forceps biopsy (IFB) is considered complimentary to EBUS-TBNA for patients with intrathoracic lymphadenopathy when either additional tissue is requested for comprehensive molecular testing, or for suspected lymphoma and sarcoidosis. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the diagnostic yield and complications of combined EBUS-IFB and EBUS-TBNA compared to EBUS-TBNA alone.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar for studies evaluating the use of EBUS-IFB for diagnosis of intrathoracic adenopathy, assessing the quality of each study using the QUADAS-2 tool. Using inverse-variance weighting, we performed a meta-analysis of diagnostic yield estimations. We also reviewed the complications related to the procedure.

RESULTS

Six observational studies with 443 patients undergoing 467 biopsies were included in the final analysis. Meta-analysis yielded a pooled overall diagnostic yield of 67% (312/467) for EBUS-TBNA and 92% (428/467) for EBUS-TBNA + EBUS-IFB, with an inverse variance - weighted OR of 5.87 (95% CI, 3081 to 9.04, p<0.00001) and an I ²of 15%. The overall complications included pnuemomediastinum (1%), bleeding (0.8%) and respiratory failure (0.6%). The funnel plot analysis illustrated no major publication bias. Subgroup analysis showed increased diagnostic yield for lymphoma (86% vs 30%, p=0.03) and sarcoidosis (93% vs 58%, p<0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of EBUS-IFB to EBUS-TBNA improves the overall diagnostic yield of sampling intrathoracic adenopathy when compared to EBUS-TBNA alone. The complication rates of the combined approach are higher than with EBUS-TBNA, but are reportedly lower than with transbronchial or surgical biopsies.

Surgical treatment for mediastinitis after endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: 2 case reports

•

Mediastinitis by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration.

•

EBUS-related mediastinitis is treated effectively by surgical drainage.

•

Combination of surgery and medical treatment can be very effective in the treatment of inflammation caused by EBUS.

We report two cases of severe mediastinitis accompanied by abscess due to endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), that were successfully treated by effective surgical drainage. A 68-year-old woman was referred to our hospital due to chest discomfort and high fever after EBUS-TBNA, and a 54-year-old man was referred due to general weakness, chills, and high fever after the same procedure. Both were diagnosed with EBUS-related mediastinitis and discharged after surgical treatment. Similar to previous reports, the importance of surgical procedures for mediastinitis caused by EBUS-TBNA was suggested. Further research and establishment of guidelines on this matter is necessary.

Diagnostic efficacy of EBUS-TBNA in benign diseases in a population with a high prevalence of tuberculosis

SETTING

Although endobronchial ultrasonography-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has a well-known place in the staging and diagnosis of lung cancer, the place of EBUS is not clear in the diagnosis of benign diseases, especially in countries with a high prevalence of tuberculosis.

AIM

The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of EBUS-TBNA in benign diseases in a population with a high prevalence of tuberculosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between October 2011 and March 2018, 1077 EBUS-TBNA was applied.

RESULTS

The diagnosis was reached with mediastinoscopy or video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in 41 (74.5%) and with the second EBUS-TBNA performed in 14 (25.5%) of 55 EBUS practices in 41 patients with malignancy diagnosis. The final diagnosis was achieved with clinical/radiological features in 7 (77.7%) cases of sarcoidosis, with VATS/mediastinoscopy in 2 (22.2%) cases, with EBUS-TBNA performed for the second time in 6 (54.5%) tuberculosis cases and with acid-resistance bacilli reproduction in Lowenstein-Jensen culture in 5 (45.4%) cases. Two hundred and ninety-five (79.7%) patients were accepted as "benign disease" due to the absence of radiological and clinical progression of lesions in the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA is high in benign diseases such as sarcoidosis and tuberculosis.

Combination of endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration and conventional endoscopic techniques in sarcoidosis diagnosis. Optimal strategy to achieve high diagnostic yield

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosis of sarcoidosis is based on clinical status and radiologic specific findings. Tissue confirmation of noncaseating granulomas is crucial. Pathological confirmation of pulmonary sarcoidosis is most commonly accomplished by bronchoscopy, which has a diagnostic yield of approximately 60%-70%.

OBJECTIVES

In this prospective study, we analysed potential benefit of EBUS-TBNA and EBB combination, application of cell blocks and smears with puncturing more than one station of lymph nodes in order to determine optimal strategy in diagnosis of sarcoidosis.

METHODS

About 133 patients with suspicion of sarcoidosis (stage I and stage II) were included in this study. Each patient underwent conventional bronchoscopy with endobronchial biopsy (EBB) followed by the EBUS and puncturing at least two different lymph node stations.

RESULTS

Positive cytopathological verification of sarcoidosis in our study was obtained in 123 patients (92.5%). EBUS-TBNA was diagnostic in 116 patients (87.2%). EBB was positive in 26 patients (19.55%). Combination of EBUS-TBNA and EBB statistically increased diagnostic yield of sarcoidosis to 92.5%. Sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA with EBB was 93.9%, specificity 100%, PPV 100% and NPV 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining EBUS-TBNA from at least two lymph node stations and EBB increased diagnostic yield of sarcoidosis. Such diagnostic strategy had almost 93% of diagnostic yield in stage I and stage II of sarcoidosis. Taking into account the safety of the whole procedure with endobronchial ultrasonography combined with conventional endoscopy with EBB and its cost effectiveness, TBLB can be intended to diagnose stage III or IV of pulmonary sarcoidosis.

Value of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in the diagnosis of lung and mediastinal lesions

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the value of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of lung and mediastinal lesions.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study that included 52 patients during a 2-year period (2016 to 2018) who underwent EBUS-TBNA.

RESULTS

Among the 52 individuals submitted to the procedure, 22 (42.31%) patients were diagnosed with locally advanced lung cancer (N2 or N3 lymph node involvement). EBUS-TBNA confirmed the diagnosis of metastases from other extrathoracic tumors in the mediastinum or lung in 5 patients (9.61%), confirmed small cell lung cancer in 3 patients (5.76%), mediastinal sarcoidosis in 1 patient (1.92%), and reactive mediastinal lymph node in 8 patients (15.38%); insufficient results were found for 3 patients (5.76%). Based on these results, EBUS-TBNA avoided further subsequent surgical procedures in 39 of 52 patients (75%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 86%, 100%, 100%, 77%, and 90%, respectively. No major complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

EBUS-TBNA is a safe, effective, and valuable method. This technique can significantly reduce the rate of subsequent surgical procedures required for the diagnosis of lung and mediastinal lesions.

Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: A Clinical Update

Sarcoidosis remains difficult to diagnose, assess and treat. The last decade has brought significant diagnostic and therapeutic advances in the field of sarcoidosis including endobronchial ultrasound, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and biologics. In this article we use clinical vignettes to discuss commonly encountered cases to illustrate and explain the application of these, and other advances.

An update on the role of bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of pulmonary disease

Bronchoscopy has evolved over the past few decades and has been used by respiratory physicians to diagnose various airway and lung diseases. With the popularization of medical check-ups and growing interest in health, early diagnosis of lung diseases is essential. With the development of endobronchial ultrasound, ultrathin bronchoscopy, and electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy, bronchoscopy has been able to widen its scope in diagnosing pulmonary diseases. In this review, we have described the brief history, role, and complications of bronchoscopy used in diagnosing pulmonary lesions, from simple flexible bronchoscopy to bronchoscopy combined with several up-to-date technologies.

The utility of endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration in patients with suspected extra-pulmonary sarcoidosis without thoracic lymphadenopathy

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of extra-pulmonary sarcoidosis can be difficult, and a biopsy is usually required. We evaluated the utility of endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in patients with suspected extra-pulmonary sarcoidosis with thoracic lymph nodes ≤10 mm on chest computed tomography (CT) and no or minimal pulmonary infiltrates.

METHODS

The Cleveland Clinic bronchoscopy registry was screened. Patients with thoracic lymph nodes >10 mm on short axis or significant pulmonary infiltrates in the chest CT scan were excluded. Two separate analyses using expert consensus (before and after release of bronchoscopy results) were the reference standard.

RESULTS

15 patients met the inclusion criteria. 40% had suspected ocular, 33% cardiac and 27% neurologic sarcoidosis. Six patients (40%) had EBUS-TBNA compatible with sarcoidosis. When the reference standard was the consensus diagnosis blinded to bronchoscopy results, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of EBUS-TBNA were 56%, 83%, 83%, and 56% respectively. The combination of a positive EBUS-TBNA and BAL CD4/CD8 improved the specificity from 83 to 100%, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.074). When the reference standard was the consensus diagnosis with the bronchoscopic results, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of EBUS-TBNA were 75%, 100%, 100%, and 78% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with suspected extra-pulmonary sarcoidosis, the EBUS-TBNA may be useful in the diagnosis of patients with thoracic lymph nodes ≤10 mm and no or minimal pulmonary infiltrates on chest CT. Larger and prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.

Bronchoscopic sampling techniques in the era of technological bronchoscopy

Flexible bronchoscopy is a key diagnostic and therapeutic tool. New endoscopes and technologically advanced navigational modalities have been recently introduced on the market and in clinical practice, mainly for the diagnosis of mediastinal lymph adenopathies and peripheral lung nodules. Bronchoscopic sampling tools have not changed significantly in the last three decades, with the sole exception of cryobiopsy. We carried out a non-systematic, narrative literature review aimed at summarizing the scientific evidence on the main indications/contraindications, diagnostic yield, and safety of the available bronchoscopic sampling techniques. Performance of bronchoalveolar lavage, bronchial washing, brushing, forceps biopsy, cryobiopsy and needle aspiration techniques are described, focusing on indications and diagnostic accuracy in the work-up of endobronchial lesions, peripheral pulmonary abnormalities, interstitial lung diseases, and/or hilar-mediastinal lymph adenopathies. Main factors affecting the diagnostic yield and the navigational methods are evaluated. Preliminary data on the utility of the newest sampling techniques (i.e., new needles, triple cytology needle brush, core biopsy system, and cautery-assisted transbronchial forceps biopsy) are shown. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: A deep knowledge of bronchoscopic sampling techniques is crucial in the era of technological bronchoscopy for an optimal management of respiratory diseases.

The role of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in isolated intrathoracic lymphadenopathy in non-neoplastic patients: a common dilemma in clinical practice

Objective:

To determine the diagnostic yield of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in non-neoplastic patients with isolated intrathoracic lymphadenopathy (IL).

Methods:

This was a retrospective study of patients with isolated IL referred for EBUS-TBNA. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of granulomatous, reactive, and neoplastic lymphadenopathy. In cases of nonspecific granulomas, reactive lymphadenopathy, or inconclusive results, a definitive diagnosis was established by other diagnostic procedures or during a follow-up period of at least 18 months.

Results:

Among the 58 patients included in the study, EBUS-TBNA established a diagnosis of granulomatous disease in 22 (38%), reactive lymphadenopathy in 15 (26%), cancer in 8 (14%), and other diseases in 3 (5%). Results were inconclusive in 10 (17%), the diagnosis being established by other bronchoscopic procedures in 2 (20%) and by surgical procedures in 8 (80%). A final diagnosis of reactive lymphadenopathy was established in 12. Of those, 11 (92%) had their diagnosis confirmed during follow-up and 1 (8%) had their diagnosis confirmed by mediastinoscopy. In another 3, a final diagnosis of sarcoidosis or neoplasm was established. For the diagnosis of granulomatous disease, neoplasms, and reactive lymphadenopathy, EBUS-TBNA was found to have a sensitivity of 73%, 68%, and 92%, respectively; a specificity of 100%, 100%, and 93%, respectively; an accuracy of 86%, 93%, and 93%, respectively; a PPV of 100%, 100%, and 80%, respectively; and an NPV of 78%, 92%, and 98%, respectively.

Conclusions:

In non-neoplastic patients, granulomatous disease and reactive lymphadenopathy appear to be common causes of isolated IL. EBUS-TBNA shows promising results as a first-line minimally invasive diagnostic procedure. The results obtained by EBUS-TBNA can be optimized by examining clinical and radiological findings during follow-up or by comparison with the results obtained with other bronchoscopic methods.

Core needle biopsy with endobronchial ultrasonography: single center experience with 100 cases

INTRODUCTION

Adequate sampling by endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-transbronchial needle aspiration to meet the demands of precision medicine or histologic evaluation is challenging. There is increasing demand for core biopsy specimens with advances in therapy. Franseen enodoscopic ultrasound needles have shown promising results in gastroenterology application for obtaining core biopsies and same design has recently been extended for pulmonary use. We evaluated Franseen needles with EBUS to assess its utility, safety and ability to provide core biopsy specimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of our database at the University of Utah of patients undergoing EBUS with a Franseen needle was performed to ascertain the performance characteristics of this needle in the first 100 patients after its implementation. Medical records were also reviewed to identify any immediate procedure-related complications.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy locations were sampled in 100 patients. A total of 152 lymph nodes and 18 masses were sampled. Core biopsies, as per pathology report, were seen in 87% of patients. A clinically concordant pathological diagnosis was established in 97% of patients. Diagnostic yield for granulomatous lymphadenopathy was 95.6% (22 of 23). No patient-related adverse events were noted.

CONCLUSION

The Franseen needle evaluated in this study can safely procure core tissue samples during EBUS bronchoscopy that are adequate for histopathological diagnosis in benign and malignant lesions. Its ability to provide adequate tissue in patients with granulomatous inflammation is encouraging.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in Real Life

Background: EBUS-TBNA is an integral tool in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer and other diseases involving mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Most studies attesting to the performance of EBUS-TBNA are prospective analyses performed under strict protocols. The objective of our study was to compare the accuracy of EBUS-TBNA to surgery in diagnosing hilar and mediastinal pathologies in a tertiary hospital, staffed by pulmonologists with and without formal interventional pulmonary training.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed subjects who underwent EBUS-TBNA followed by a confirmatory surgical procedure from January 2012 to December 2018. The primary outcome was to evaluate the accuracy of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of all mediastinal disease. Secondary analyses determined the accuracy of EBUS-TBNA in cancer, NSCLC, and non-malignant lesions individually.

Results: One hundred and forty-three subjects had an EBUS-TBNA procedure followed by surgery. EBUS-TBNA for all pathologies had an accuracy of 81.2% (CI 95% 73.8–87.4) and sensitivity of 55.1% (CI 95% 41.5–68.3). The accuracy and sensitivity of individual groups were: cancer (81.7, 48.8%), NSCLC (84, 48.3%), and non-malignancy (78.9, 60%). The NSCLC group had 15 false negatives and 5 (33.3%) of them were due to non-sampling of EBUS accessible nodes. Missed sampling led to a change in the final staging in 8.6% of NSCLC subjects.

Conclusion: The accuracy of EBUS-TBNA across all groups was comparable to those reported previously. However, the sensitivity was comparatively lower. This was primarily due to the large number of EBUS-TBNA accessible lymph nodes that were not sampled. This data highlights the need for guidelines outlining the best sampling approach and lymph node selection.