The effect of corticosteroids on quality of life in a sarcoidosis clinic: the results of a propensity analysis

Predictors and Clinical Characteristics of Relapses in LGI1-Antibody Encephalitis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Relapses occur in 15%-25% of patients with leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 antibody (LGI1-Ab) autoimmune encephalitis and may cause additional disability. In this study, we clinically characterized the relapses and identified factors predicting their occurrence.

METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review of patients with LGI1-Ab encephalitis diagnosed at our center between 2005 and 2022. Relapse was defined as worsening of previous or appearance of new symptoms after at least 3 months of clinical stabilization.

RESULTS

Among 210 patients, 30 (14%) experienced a total of 33 relapses. The median time to first relapse was 23.9 months (range: 4.9-110.1, interquartile range [IQR]: 17.8). The CSF was inflammatory in 11/25 (44%) relapses, while LGI1-Abs were found in the serum in 16/24 (67%) and in the CSF in 12/26 (46%); brain MRI was abnormal in 16/26 (62%) relapses. Compared with the initial episode, relapses manifested less frequently with 3 or more symptoms (4/30 patients, 13% vs 28/30, 93%; p < 0.001) and had lower maximal modified Rankin scale (mRS) score (median 3, range: 2-5, IQR: 1 vs 3, range: 2-5, IQR: 0; p = 0.001). The median mRS at last follow-up after relapse (2, range: 0-4, IQR: 2) was significantly higher than after the initial episode (1, range: 0-4, IQR: 1; p = 0.005). Relapsing patients did not differ in their initial clinical and diagnostic features from 85 patients without relapse. Nevertheless, residual cognitive dysfunction after the initial episode (hazard ratio:13.8, 95% confidence interval [1.5; 129.5]; p = 0.022) and no administration of corticosteroids at the initial episode (hazard ratio: 4.8, 95% confidence interval [1.1; 21.1]; p = 0.036) were significantly associated with an increased risk of relapse.

DISCUSSION

Relapses may occur years after the initial encephalitis episode and are usually milder but cause additional disability. Corticosteroid treatment reduces the risk of future relapses, while patients with residual cognitive dysfunction after the initial episode have an increased relapse risk.

Circulating Mitochondrial DNA Is Associated With High Levels of Fatigue in Two Independent Sarcoidosis Cohorts

BACKGROUND

Patients with sarcoidosis who develop severe clinical phenotypes of pulmonary fibrosis or multiorgan disease experience debilitating symptoms, with fatigue being a common chief complaint. Studies that have investigated this patient-related outcome measure (PROM) have used the Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS), a self-reported questionnaire that reflects mental and physical domains. Despite extensive work, its cause is unknown and treatment options remain limited. Previously, we showed that the plasma of patients with sarcoidosis with extrapulmonary disease endorsing fatigue was enriched for mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), a ligand for the innate immune receptor toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9). Through our cross-disciplinary platform, we investigated a relationship between sarcoidosis-induced fatigue and circulating mtDNA.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is there a psychobiologic mechanism that connects sarcoidosis-induced fatigue and mtDNA-mediated TLR9 activation?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Using a local cohort of patients at Yale (discovery cohort) and the National Institutes of Health-sponsored Genomic Research in Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency and Sarcoidosis study (validation cohort), we scored the FAS and quantified in the plasma, mtDNA concentrations, TLR9 activation, and cytokine levels.

RESULTS

Although FAS scores were independent of corticosteroid use and Scadding stage, we observed a robust association between FAS scores, which included mental and physical domains, and multiorgan sarcoidosis. Subsequently, we identified a significant correlation between plasma mtDNA concentrations and all domains of fatigue. Additionally, we found that TLR9 activation is associated with all aspects of the FAS and partially mediates this PROM through mtDNA. Last, we found that TLR9-associated soluble mediators in the plasma are independent of all facets of fatigue.

INTERPRETATION

Through our cross-disciplinary translational platform, we identified a previously unrecognized psychobiologic connection between sarcoidosis-induced fatigue and circulating mtDNA concentrations. Mechanistic work that investigates the contribution of mtDNA-mediated innate immune activation in this PROM and clinical studies with prospective cohorts has the potential to catalyze novel therapeutic strategies for this patient population and those with similar conditions.

Anti-inflammatory Therapy for Sarcoidosis

Over 50% of patients with sarcoidosis will require anti-inflammatory therapy at some point in their disease course. Indications for therapy are to improve health-related quality of life, prevent or arrest organ dysfunction (or organ failure) or avoid death. Recently published treatment guidelines recommended a stepwise approach to therapy however there are some patients for whom up front combination or more intense therapy maybe reasonable. The last decade has seen an explosion of studies and trials evaluating novel therapeutic agents and treatment strategies. Currently available anti-inflammatory therapies and several novel therapies are discussed here.

Health-Related Quality of Life Assessment in Sarcoidosis

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is of major concern to patients with sarcoidosis. HRQoL impairment is the most common reason to treat the disease. Advances in patient-reported outcome (PRO) methodology offer the promise to use these instruments to follow quality of life in individual patients with sarcoidosis over time. Several HRQoL issues will be highlighted including their clinical importance, common causes in patients with sarcoidosis, the construction and use of PROs in clinical sarcoidosis trials, methods to adapt PROs to monitor HRQoL in individual patients with sarcoidosis, and the approach to improving HRQoL in this disease.

Treatment of Granulomatous Inflammation in Pulmonary Sarcoidosis

The management of pulmonary sarcoidosis is a complex interplay of disease characteristics, the impact of medications, and patient preferences. Foremost, it is important to weigh the risk of anti-granulomatous treatment with the benefits of lung preservation and improvement in quality of life. Because of its high spontaneous resolution rate, pulmonary sarcoidosis should only be treated in cases of significant symptoms due to granulomatous inflammation, lung function decline, or substantial inflammation on imaging that can lead to irreversible fibrosis. The longstanding basis of treatment has historically been corticosteroid therapy for the control of granulomatous inflammation. However, several corticosteroid-sparing options have increasing evidence for use in refractory disease, inability to taper steroids to an acceptable dose, or in those with toxicity to corticosteroids. Treatment of sarcoidosis should be individualized for each patient due to the heterogeneity of the clinical course, comorbid conditions, response to therapy, and tolerance of medication side effects.

Pulmonary sarcoidosis: A comprehensive review: Past to present

Sarcoidosis is a sterile non-necrotizing granulomatous disease without known causes that can involve multiple organs with a predilection for the lung and thoracic lymph nodes. Worldwide it is estimated to affect 2-160/100,000 people and has a mortality rate over 5 years of approximately 7%. For sarcoidosis patients, the cause of death is due to sarcoid in 60% of the cases, of which up to 80% are from advanced cardiopulmonary failure (pulmonary hypertension and respiratory microbial infections) in all races except in Japan were greater than 70% of the sarcoidosis deaths are due to cardiac sarcoidosis. Scadding stages for pulmonary sarcoidosis associates with clinical outcomes. Stages I and II have radiographic remission in approximately 30%-80% of cases. Stage III only has a 10%-40% chance of resolution, while stage IV has no change of resolution. Up to 40% of pulmonary sarcoidosis patients progress to stage IV disease with lung parenchyma fibroplasia, bronchiectasis with hilar retraction and fibrocystic disease. These patients are at highest risk for the development of precapillary pulmonary hypertension, which may occur in up to 70% of these patients. Sarcoid patients with pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension can respond to targeted pulmonary arterial hypertension medications. Stage IV fibrocytic sarcoidosis with significant pulmonary physiologic impairment, >20% fibrosis on HRCT or pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension have the highest risk of mortality, which can be >40% at 5-years. First line treatment for patients who are symptomatic (cough and dyspnea) with parenchymal infiltrates and abnormal pulmonary function testing (PFT) is oral glucocorticoids, such as prednisone with a typical starting dose of 20-40 mg daily for 2 weeks to 2 months. Prednisone can be tapered over 6-18 months if symptoms, spirometry, PFTs, and radiographs improve. Prolonged prednisone may be required to stabilize disease. Patients requiring prolonged prednisone ≥10 mg/day or those with adverse effects due to glucocorticoids may be prescribed second and third line treatements. Second and third line treatments include immunosuppressive agents (e.g., methotrexate and azathioprine) and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) medication; respectively. Effective treatments for advanced fibrocystic pulmonary disease are being explored. Despite different treatments, relapse rates range from 13% to 75% depending on the stage of sarcoid, number of organs involved, socioeconomic status, and geography. CONCLUSION: The mortality rate for sarcoidosis over a 5 year follow up is approximately 7%. Unfortunately, 10%-40% of patients with sarcoidosis develop progressive pulmonary disease, and >60% of deaths resulting from sarcoidosis are due to advance cardiopulmonary disease. Oral glucocorticoids are the first line treatment, while methotrexate and azathioprine are considered second and anti-TNF agents are third line treatments that are used solely or as glucocorticoid sparing agents for symptomatic extrapulmonary or pulmonary sarcoidosis with infiltrates on chest radiographs and abnormal PFT. Relapse rates have ranged from 13% to 75% depending on the population studied.

Quality of life in sarcoidosis

Having sarcoidosis often has a major impact on quality of life of patients and their families. Improving quality of life is prioritized as most important treatment aim by many patients with sarcoidosis, but current evidence and treatment options are limited. In this narrative review, we describe the impact of sarcoidosis on various aspects of daily life, evaluate determinants of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and provide an overview of the different patient-reported outcome measures to assess HRQoL in sarcoidosis. Moreover, we review the current evidence for pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to improve quality of life for people with sarcoidosis.

Interstitial Lung Disease and Sarcoidosis

Interstitial lung disease (ILD), a clinically recognized group of diseases resulting in pulmonary fibrosis, affects up to 200 individuals per 100,000 in the United States. Sarcoidosis has a wide range of clinical manifestations including pulmonary fibrosis. Health disparities are prevalent in both ILD and sarcoidosis around socioeconomic status, race, gender, and geographic location. This review outlines the known health disparities, discusses possible determinants of disparities, and outlines a path to achieve equity in ILD and sarcoidosis.

High-dose (40 mg) versus low-dose (20 mg) prednisolone for treating sarcoidosis: a randomised trial (SARCORT trial)

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend 20-40 mg·day-1 of oral prednisolone for treating pulmonary sarcoidosis. Whether the higher dose (40 mg·day-1) can improve outcomes remains unknown.

METHODS

We conducted an investigator-initiated, single-centre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03265405). Consecutive subjects with pulmonary sarcoidosis were randomised (1:1) to receive either high-dose (40 mg·day-1 initial dose) or low-dose (20 mg·day-1 initial dose) oral prednisolone, tapered over 6 months. The primary outcome was the frequency of relapse or treatment failure at 18 months from randomisation. Key secondary outcomes included the time to relapse or treatment failure, overall response, change in forced vital capacity (FVC, in litres) at 6 and 18 months, treatment-related adverse effects and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores using the Sarcoidosis Health Questionnaire and Fatigue Assessment Scale.

FINDINGS

We included 86 subjects (43 in each group). 42 and 43 subjects completed treatment in the high-dose and low-dose groups, respectively, while 37 (86.0%) and 41 (95.3%), respectively, completed the 18-month follow-up. 20 (46.5%) subjects had relapse or treatment failure in the high-dose group and 19 (44.2%) in the low-dose group (p=0.75). The mean time to relapse/treatment failure was similar between the groups (high-dose 307 days versus low-dose 269 days, p=0.27). The overall response, the changes in FVC at 6 and 18 months and the incidence of adverse effects were also similar. Changes in HRQoL scores did not differ between the study groups.

INTERPRETATION

High-dose prednisolone was not superior to a lower dose in improving outcomes or the HRQoL in sarcoidosis and was associated with similar adverse effects.

Living with sarcoidosis: Virtual roundtable dialogue with patients and healthcare professionals

BACKGROUND

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disease, characterised by the infiltration of various organs by non-necrotising granulomas. The disease's heterogeneity complicates the study of patients' experiences.

OBJECTIVE

To gather insight into life experiences, unmet needs and views on hypothetically emerging treatment options among patients living with sarcoidosis.

METHODS

Multinational, virtual, interactive, moderated discussion of specific questions between people with sarcoidosis, with experienced clinicians participating.

RESULTS

Nine patients with sarcoidosis from Australia, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Japan and the US, and three clinicians took part. All patients had pulmonary sarcoidosis, self-assessed as mild by five patients. The path to diagnosis was convoluted, with up to four physicians and a large number of tests involved. There was agreement that the process would be improved by earlier referral to specialists. The patients made a clear distinction between 'living with a condition' (adapting to the disease) and 'being ill'. The concept of remission was viewed sceptically as disease might develop in multiple organs. Panellists had a pragmatic attitude to therapies: side effects during a treatment course were accepted if overall symptoms improved. When considering hypothetical new therapies, improved quality of life (QoL) was the most important need; improved tolerability had lower priority. New therapies should be targeted on reducing disease progression and improving symptoms and QoL rather than corticosteroid withdrawal.

CONCLUSIONS

The interactive exchange provided insights into the need for earlier specialist referrals, distrust of the concept of remission in sarcoidosis, and the need for therapies targeted on reducing disease progression and improving symptoms and QoL.

Design and rationale of a pilot randomized clinical trial investigating the use of a mHealth app for sarcoidosis-associated fatigue

Fatigue is the most reported symptom in patients with sarcoidosis (SPs) and is a significant predictor of decreased quality of life that is strongly associated with stress and negative mood states. Few medications exist for treating fatigue in SPs, and outpatient physical rehabilitation programs are limited by availability and cost. Sarcoidosis in the US predominantly impacts minorities and underserved populations who are of working age and often have limited resources (e.g., financial, transportation, time off work) that may prevent them from attending in-person programs. The use of mobile health (mHealth) is emerging as a viable alternative to provide access to self-management resources to improve quality of life. The Sarcoidosis Patient Assessment and Resource Companion (SPARC) App is a sarcoidosis-specific mHealth App intended to improve fatigue and stress in SPs. It prompts SPs to conduct breathing awareness meditation (BAM) and contains educational modules aimed at improving self-efficacy. Herein we describe the design and methods of a 3-month randomized control trial comparing use of the SPARC App (10-min BAM twice daily) to standard care in 50 SPs with significant fatigue (FAS ≥22). A Fitbit® watch will provide immediate heartrate feedback after BAM sessions to objectively monitor adherence. The primary outcomes are feasibility and usability of the SPARC App (collected monthly). Secondary endpoints include preliminary efficacy at improving fatigue, stress, and quality of life. We expect the SPARC App to be a useable and feasible intervention that has potential to overcome barriers of more traditional in-person programs.

Coping styles with stress and its relations to psychiatric and clinical symptoms in patients with sarcoidosis: A latent profile analysis

OBJECTIVE

Although stress and styles of coping with it can have a major impact on one's health and can determine the course and management of chronic diseases, no previous studies have evaluated coping strategies and their relation to emotional distress and clinical symptoms in sarcoidosis.

METHODS

In two consecutive studies, we investigated differences in coping styles of sarcoidosis patients in comparison to healthy control subjects and the association of identified profiles to an objective measurement of disease (Forced Vital Capacity) and symptoms such as dyspnoea, pain, anxiety and depressive symptoms in 36 patients with sarcoidosis (study 1) and 93 patients with sarcoidosis (study 2).

RESULTS

Across two studies we found that patients with sarcoidosis used emotion-focused and avoidant coping significantly less often than healthy individuals, and that in both groups the profile with dominant problem (task)-focus style was the most beneficial in terms of mental health. Further, the profile of sarcoidosis patients characterized by the lowest intensity of all coping strategies was found to be superior in terms of physical health status (dyspnoe, pain and FVC level).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that successful management of sarcoidosis should include coping styles assessment and call for a multidisciplinary approach in diagnosis and treatment of sarcoidosis patients.

Health-related quality of life in cardiac sarcoidosis: a systematic review

People living with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) are likely to have worse clinical outcomes and greater impairment on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) than other sarcoidosis manifestations. CS can result in a constellation of intrusive symptoms (such as palpitations, dizziness, syncope/pre-syncope, chest pain, dyspnoea, orthopnoea, or peripheral oedema) and/or life-threatening episodes, requiring consideration of invasive cardiac procedures for diagnosis and for the management of acute events. Additionally, the presence of multisystemic involvement and persistent non-specific sarcoidosis symptoms negatively affect HRQoL. A systematic review was undertaken to explore the impact of CS on HRQoL in adults with CS. Multiple bibliographic databases were searched for studies with HRQoL as primary or secondary outcomes in CS (PROSPERO registration: CRD42019119752). Data extraction and quality assessments were undertaken independently by two authors. From the initial 1609 identified records, only 11 studies included CS patients but none specifically reported HRQoL scores for CS patients. The average representation of CS patients was 14.5% within these cohorts (range 2-22%). The majority (73%) was conducted in single-centre tertiary care settings, and only one study (9%) included longitudinal HRQoL data. CS patients were among those sarcoidosis patients with impaired HRQoL and worse outcomes, requiring higher doses of sarcoidosis-specific therapy which contribute to further deterioration of HRQoL. Sarcoidosis studies do not incorporate stratified HRQoL scores for CS patients. While there is a need for longitudinal and multicentre studies assessing HRQoL outcomes in CS cohorts, the development of CS-specific tools is also needed.

An expert overview of pulmonary fibrosis in sarcoidosis

INTRODUCTION

Advanced pulmonary sarcoidosis refers to phenotypes of pulmonary sarcoidosis that often lead to significant loss of lung function, respiratory failure, or death. Around 20% of patients with sarcoidosis may progress to this state which is mainly driven by advanced pulmonary fibrosis. Advanced fibrosis often presents with associated complications of sarcoidosis including infections, bronchiectasis, and pulmonary hypertension.

AREAS COVERED

This article will focus on the pathogenesis, natural history of disease, diagnosis, and potential treatment options of pulmonary fibrosis in sarcoidosis. In the expert opinion section, we will discuss the prognosis and management of patients with significant disease.

EXPERT OPINION

While some patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis remain stable or improve with anti-inflammatory therapies, others develop pulmonary fibrosis and further complications. Although advanced pulmonary fibrosis is the leading cause of death in sarcoidosis, there are no evidence-based guidelines for the management of fibrotic sarcoidosis. Current recommendations are based on expert consensus and often include multidisciplinary discussions with experts in sarcoidosis, pulmonary hypertension, and lung transplantation to facilitate care for such complex patients. Current works evaluating treatments include the use of antifibrotic therapies for treatment in advanced pulmonary sarcoidosis.

Treat to target and tight control: Could be a new approach in the treatment of sarcoidosis?

Sarcoidosis is a chronic granulomatous disease with multisystemic involvement. Although it is accepted as a benign disease, it can sometimes cause life-threatening organ (heart, brain) involvement that determines the prognosis of the disease. There are conflicting opinions about the treatment of the disease. In the generally accepted treatment approach the "step-by-step" model has gained weight. According to this approach, corticosteroids (CS) drugs alone are preferred in the first step in patients who require treatment. In the second step, immunosuppressive drugs (IS) are used in patients who do not respond to CS and/or have contraindications to CS use, and biologics (TNF-alpha inhibitors) are used in the third step. This treatment approach may be valid in cases with mild sarcoidosis. However, although sarcoidosis is considered a benign and self-limiting disease in some major organ involvement, the "step-by-step" approach may be a treatment option that puts the patient's life in danger. In such selected patients, much more rigorous, early and combined treatment approaches that definitely include CS, IS or biologic drugs may be required. In selected sarcoidosis patients with high risk, early diagnosis, "treat-to-target" (T2T) and "tight control" follow-up of patients seems to be a rational approach. This article reviews the "step-down" treatment regimens in light of recent literature data and hypothesizes that the T2T model may be a probable new treatment approach in patients with sarcoidosis.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiac Sarcoidosis

About 5% of sarcoidosis patients develop clinically manifest cardiac features. Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) typically presents with conduction abnormalities, ventricular arrhythmias and heart failure. Its diagnosis is challenging and requires a substantial degree of clinical suspicion as well as expertise in advanced cardiac imaging. Adverse events, particularly malignant arrhythmias and development of heart failure, are common among CS patients. A timely diagnosis is paramount to ameliorating outcomes for these patients. Despite weak evidence, immunosuppression (primarily with corticosteroids) is generally recommended in the presence of active inflammation in the myocardium. The burden of malignant arrhythmias remains important regardless of treatment, thus leading to the recommended use of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator in most patients with clinically manifest CS.

Sarcoidosis: Updates on therapeutic drug trials and novel treatment approaches

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous inflammatory disease of unknown etiology. It affects the lungs in over 90% of patients yet extra-pulmonary and multi-organ involvement is common. Spontaneous remission of disease occurs commonly, nonetheless, over 50% of patients will require treatment and up to 30% of patients will develop a chronic progressive non-remitting disease with marked pulmonary fibrosis leading to significant morbidity and death. Guidelines outlining an immunosuppressive treatment approach to sarcoidosis were recently published, however, the strength of evidence behind many of the guideline recommended drugs is weak. None of the drugs currently used for the treatment of sarcoidosis have been rigorously studied and prescription of these drugs is often based on off-label” indications informed by experience with other diseases. Indeed, only two medications [prednisone and repository corticotropin (RCI) injection] currently used in the treatment of sarcoidosis are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. This situation results in significant reimbursement challenges especially for the more advanced (and often more effective) drugs that are favored for severe and refractory forms of disease causing an over-reliance on corticosteroids known to be associated with significant dose and duration dependent toxicities. This past decade has seen a renewed interest in developing new drugs and exploring novel therapeutic pathways for the treatment of sarcoidosis. Several of these trials are active randomized controlled trials (RCTs) designed to recruit relatively large numbers of patients with a goal to determine the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of these new molecules and therapeutic approaches. While it is an exciting time, it is also necessary to exercise caution. Resources including research dollars and most importantly, patient populations available for trials are limited and thus necessitate that several of the challenges facing drug trials and drug development in sarcoidosis are addressed. This will ensure that currently available resources are judiciously utilized. Our paper reviews the ongoing and anticipated drug trials in sarcoidosis and addresses the challenges facing these and future trials. We also review several recently completed trials and draw lessons that should be applied in future.

The treatment of sarcoidosis: translating the European respiratory guidelines into clinical practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recently, the European Respiratory Society (ERS) developed new international guidelines for the treatment of sarcoidosis. This manuscript attempts to distill the ERS Sarcoidosis Treatment Guidelines to a manageable format that can be easily used by practitioners.

RECENT FINDINGS

The ERS Sarcoidosis Treatment Guidelines addressed the treatment of pulmonary, skin, cardiac, neurologic, and sarcoidosis-associated fatigue. Therapeutic drug dosing and treatment algorithms for these conditions were also addressed. Glucocorticoids were the initial recommended treatment for these conditions except for sarcoidosis-associated fatigue where a pulmonary exercise program or a neurostimulant was initially suggested. Because of the risk of glucocorticoid side-effects, the Guidelines recommended early consideration of glucocorticoid-sparing therapy including certain antimetabolites and two specific tumor necrosis alpha antagonists: infliximab and adalimumab.

SUMMARY

The ERS Sarcoidosis Treatment Guidelines used a rigorous GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) methodology to update treatment recommendations for this condition. This manuscript summarizes the Guideline findings in practical terms for clinicians. Suggested algorithms and treatment dosing recommendations are provided.

The Role of Cutibacterium acnes in Sarcoidosis: From Antigen to Treatable Trait?

Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes, formerly Propionibacterium acnes) is considered to be a non-pathogenic resident of the human skin, as well as mucosal surfaces. However, it also has been demonstrated that C. acnes plays a pathogenic role in diseases such as acne vulgaris or implant infections after orthopedic surgery. Besides a role in infectious disease, this bacterium also seems to harbor immunomodulatory effects demonstrated by studies using C. acnes to enhance anti-tumor activity in various cancers or vaccination response. Sarcoidosis is a systemic inflammatory disorder of unknown causes. Cultures of C. acnes in biopsy samples of sarcoidosis patients, its presence in BAL fluid, tissue samples as well as antibodies against this bacterium found in serum of patients with sarcoidosis suggest an etiological role in this disease. In this review we address the antigenic as well as immunomodulatory potential of C. acnes with a focus on sarcoidosis. Furthermore, a potential role for antibiotic treatment in patients with sarcoidosis will be explored.

Cognitive Difficulties and Health-Related Quality of Life in Sarcoidosis: An Analysis of the GRADS Cohort

Rationale: Subjective cognitive difficulties are common among sarcoidosis patients; however, previous studies have not modeled the link between cognitive difficulties and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Objectives: To determine whether cognitive difficulties are associated with HRQOL in sarcoidosis patients after adjusting for demographics, fatigue, and physical disease severity measures. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of the Genomic Research in Alpha-1 antitrypsin Deficiency and Sarcoidosis (GRADS) study data. We examined the association between self-reported cognitive difficulties (Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ)) and HRQOL (SF12v2 mental and physical component scores) while adjusting for the demographics, fatigue, and physical disease severity measures (i.e., organ involvement, forced vital capacity). Results: Approximately one-fourth of the patients with sarcoidosis endorsed cognitive difficulties. More frequent cognitive difficulties and more severe fatigue were significantly associated with worse mental HRQOL in the fully adjusted model, while older age was associated with better mental HRQOL. The association between cognitive difficulties and physical HRQOL was not significant in the final model. More severe fatigue, joint involvement, and reduced forced vital capacity (FVC) were associated with worse physical HRQOL, while higher income and higher education were associated with better physical HRQOL. Conclusions: Perceived cognitive difficulties are associated with diminished HRQOL after adjusting for demographics, organ involvement, pulmonary function, and fatigue. The association between cognitive difficulties and reduced HRQOL primarily occurs through the impact on mental components of HRQOL.

Effect of Corticosteroids on Left Ventricular Function in Patients With Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is an important cause of cardiomyopathy. The trajectory of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with CS undergoing treatment remains unclear. Patients with CS who were treated with corticosteroids and who underwent transthoracic echocardiography were studied. Baseline characteristics, treatment, echocardiographic data (including baseline to follow-up change in LVEF), and outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. Among 100 patients, 55 had baseline reduced LVEF (<50%), and 45 had preserved LVEF (≥50%). At follow-up, 82% of patients demonstrated stable or improved LVEF. Change in LVEF was significantly higher in the baseline reduced than in the preserved LVEF group (5% [interquartile range 0 to 15] vs 0% [interquartile range -10% to 5%], p = 0.001). There was no difference in corticosteroid exposure or use of heart failure guideline-directed medical therapy between patients who did experience improvement in LVEF and those who did not experience improvement in LVEF. On multivariable analysis, baseline reduced LVEF (Odds ratio 54.89, 95% confidence interval 3.84 to 785.09, p = 0.003) and complete heart block (Odds ratio 28.88, 95% confidence interval 2.17 to 383.74, p = 0.011) at presentation were significantly associated with reduced LVEF after treatment. In conclusion, most patients with CS treated with corticosteroids maintain or improve LV systolic function. Cardiac characteristics at presentation impact prognosis in CS, despite treatment.

Controversies in the Treatment of Cardiac Sarcoidosis

There are many challenging aspects of the management of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) with corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive therapy (IST). First, it is not always clear who will benefit from therapy or when to initiate treatment. Secondly, there are no randomized controlled trials or large prospective studies to guide what medications to use, at what doses, and for how long. The European Respiratory Society (ERS) clinical practice guidelines on the treatment of sarcoidosis makes a strong recommendation for the use of immuno-suppressive therapy in CS patients with functional cardiac abnormalities, including heart blocks, dysrhythmias, or cardiomyopathy where patients are considered at-risk of adverse outcomes. Corticosteroids are the first line immunosuppressive therapy in CS however, early initiation of second-line steroid sparing medications has been advocated and there is data to suggest that concomitant initiation of therapy may be more beneficial. The use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents (including infliximab and adalimumab) considered beneficial third-line anti-sarcoidosis treatment agents in other severe refractory manifestations of disease remains controversial.

A Comprehensive Review of Sarcoidosis Diagnosis and Monitoring for the Pulmonologist

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease with heterogenous clinical manifestations. Here we review the diagnosis of sarcoidosis and propose a clinically feasible diagnostic work-up and monitoring protocol. As sarcoidosis is a systemic disease, a multidisciplinary approach is recommended for best outcomes. However, since the lungs are frequently involved, the pulmonologist is often the referral physician for diagnosis and management. When sarcoidosis is suspected, diagnosis needs to be confirmed and organ involvement/impairment assessed. This process is also required to establish whether the patient is likely to benefit from treatment, as many cases of sarcoidosis are self-limited and remit spontaneously. Whether or not treatment is started, effective regular follow-up is necessary to monitor changes in the disease, including extension, progression, remissions, flare-ups, and complications.

Management of Advanced Pulmonary Sarcoidosis

The term "advanced sarcoidosis" is used for forms of sarcoidosis with a significant risk of loss of organ function or death. Advanced sarcoidosis often involves the lung and is described as "Advanced Pulmonary Sarcoidosis" (APS) which includes advanced pulmonary fibrosis, associated complications such as bronchiectasis and infections, and pulmonary hypertension. While APS affects a small proportion of patients with sarcoidosis, it is the leading cause of poor outcomes including death. Herein we review the major patterns of APS with a focus on the current management as well as potential approaches for improved outcomes for this most serious sarcoidosis phenotype.

Patterns of medication use and imaging following initial diagnosis of sarcoidosis

INTRODUCTION

Sarcoidosis is a rare inflammatory disease with unclear natural history. Using a large, retrospective, longitudinal, population-based cohort, we sought to define its natural history in order to guide future clinical studies.

METHODS

We identified 722 newly diagnosed cases of sarcoidosis within Kaiser Permanente Northwest health care records between 1995 and 2015. We investigated immunosuppressive medication use in the two years following diagnosis, analyzed demographic and clinical characteristics, and quantified chest imaging and pulmonary function testing (PFTs) across the clinical course.

RESULTS

Over two years of follow-up, 41% of patients were treated with prednisone. Of those, 75% tapered off their first course within 100 days, although half of those patients required recurrent therapy. Five percent of the entire cohort remained on prednisone for longer than one year, with an average daily dose of 10-20 mg. Chest imaging was associated with early prednisone use, and chest CT was associated with changes in prednisone dose. PFTs or demographics were not associated with prednisone use. Cumulative prednisone doses were significantly higher in African Americans (1,845 mg additional) and those who had a chest CT (2,015 mg additional). Overall, PFTs were less frequently obtained than chest imaging and had no significant change over disease course.

DISCUSSION

The natural history of sarcoidosis varies greatly. For those requiring therapy, corticosteroid burden is high. Chest imaging drives medication dose changes as compared to PFTs, but neither outcome fully captures the entire history of disease. Prospective cohorts are needed with purposefully collected, repeated measures that include objective clinical assessments and symptoms.

Patient reported side-effects of prednisone and methotrexate in a real-world sarcoidosis population

Currently prednisone is the first-line pharmacological treatment option for pulmonary sarcoidosis. Methotrexate is used as second-line therapy and seems to have fewer side-effects. No prospective comparative studies of first-line treatment with methotrexate exist. In this study, we evaluated patient reported presence and bothersomeness of side-effects of prednisone and methotrexate in a sarcoidosis population to guide the design of a larger prospective study. During a yearly patient information meeting 67 patients completed a questionnaire on medication use; 11 patients never used prednisone or methotrexate and were excluded from further analysis. Of the remaining 56 patients, 89% used prednisone and 70% methotrexate (present or former). Significantly more side-effects were reported for prednisone than for methotrexate, 78% versus 49% (p = 0.006). In conclusion, methotrexate seems to have fewer and less bothersome side-effects than prednisone. These findings need to be confirmed in a prospective study.

Clinical Presentation and Treatment of High-Risk Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disease of unknown cause with heterogenous clinical manifestations and variable course. Spontaneous remissions occur in some patients while others have progressive disease impacting survival, organ function, and quality of life. Four high-risk sarcoidosis phenotypes associated with chronic inflammation have recently been identified as high-priority areas for research. These include treatment-refractory pulmonary disease, cardiac sarcoidosis, neurosarcoidosis and multiorgan sarcoidosis. Significant gaps currently exist in understanding of these high-risk manifestations of sarcoidosis, including their natural history, diagnostic criteria, biomarkers, and the treatment strategy such as the ideal agent, optimal dose and treatment duration. The use of registries with well-phenotyped patients is a critical first step to study high-risk sarcoidosis manifestations systematically. We review the diagnostic and treatment approach to high-risk sarcoidosis manifestations. Appropriately identifying these disease sub-groups will help enroll well-phenotyped patients in sarcoidosis registries and clinical trials, a necessary step to narrow existing gaps in understanding of this enigmatic disease.

How to Tackle the Diagnosis and Treatment in the Diverse Scenarios of Extrapulmonary Sarcoidosis

Extrapulmonary sarcoidosis occurs in 30–50% of cases of sarcoidosis, most often in association with pulmonary involvement, and virtually any organ can be involved. Its incidence depends according to the organs considered, clinical phenotype, and history of sarcoidosis, but also on epidemiological factors like age, sex, geographic ancestry, and socio-professional factors. The presentation, symptomatology, organ dysfunction, severity, and lethal risk vary from and to patient even at the level of the same organ. The presentation may be specific or not, and its occurrence is at variable times in the history of sarcoidosis from initial to delayed. There are schematically two types of presentation, one when pulmonary sarcoidosis is first discovered, the problem is then to detect extrapulmonary localizations and to assess their link with sarcoidosis, while the other presentation is when extrapulmonary manifestations are indicative of the disease with the need to promptly make the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. To improve diagnosis accuracy, extrapulmonary manifestations need to be known and a medical strategy is warranted to avoid both under- and over-diagnosis. An accurate estimation of impairment and risk linked to extrapulmonary sarcoidosis is essential to offer the best treatment. Most frequent extrapulmonary localizations are skin lesions, arthritis, uveitis, peripheral lymphadenopathy, and hepatic involvement. Potentially severe involvement may stem from the heart, nervous system, kidney, eye and larynx. There is a lack of randomized trials to support recommendations which are often derived from what is known for lung sarcoidosis and from the natural history of the disease at the level of the respective organ. The treatment needs to be holistic and personalized, taking into account not only extrapulmonary localizations but also lung involvement, parasarcoidosis syndrome if any, symptoms, quality of life, medical history, drugs contra-indications, and potential adverse events and patient preferences. The treatment is based on the use of anti-sarcoidosis drugs, on treatments related to organ dysfunction and supportive treatments. Multidisciplinary discussions and referral to sarcoidosis centers of excellence may be helpful for difficult diagnosis and treatment decisions.

The Value of a Patient Global Assessment in Management of Sarcoidosis

The patient global assessment (PGA) is a reported outcome instrument used to gauge the patient's well-being. We performed a prospective study of patients seen at the University of Cincinnati Sarcoidosis Clinic. Two groups were studied: those at first visit during the time period (initial) and those seen at least one more time by the same physician (follow-up). A total of 1006, including 677 initial, visits occurred during the six-month period. Patients in whom anti-inflammatory treatment was initiated or increased had a significantly lower PGA score (ANOVA p < 0.001, p < 0.05 for increased versus all others). There was no significant difference in initial PGA score based on race, sex, or age. The change in PGA was significantly lower for patients in whom treatment was increased (ANOVA p < 0.001, increased different from all others, p < 0.05). The PGA was significantly lower for patients in whom anti-inflammatory therapy was increased; however, there was overlap between groups.

A Comprehensive Review of Sarcoidosis Treatment for Pulmonologists

Due to frequent lung involvement, the pulmonologist is often the reference physician for management of sarcoidosis, a systemic granulomatous disease with a heterogeneous course. Treatment of sarcoidosis raises some issues. The first challenge is to select patients who are likely to benefit from treatment, as sarcoidosis may be self-limiting and remit spontaneously, in which case treatment can be postponed and possibly avoided without any significant impact on quality of life, organ damage or prognosis. Systemic glucocorticosteroids (GCs) are the drug of first choice for sarcoidosis. When GCs are started, there is a > 50% chance of long-term treatment. Prolonged use of prednisone at > 10 mg/day or equivalent is often associated with severe side effects. In these and refractory cases, steroid-sparing options are advised. Antimetabolites, such as methotrexate, are the second-choice therapy. Biologics, such as anti-TNF and especially infliximab, are third-choice drugs. The three treatments can be used concomitantly. Regardless of whether treatment is started, the clinician needs to organize regular follow-up to monitor remissions, flares, progression, complications, toxicity and relapses in order to promptly adjust the drugs used.

ERS clinical practice guidelines on treatment of sarcoidosis

BACKGROUND

The major reasons to treat sarcoidosis are to lower the morbidity and mortality risk or to improve quality of life (QoL). The indication for treatment varies depending on which manifestation is the cause of symptoms: lungs, heart, brain, skin, or other manifestations. While glucocorticoids (GC) remain the first choice for initial treatment of symptomatic disease, prolonged use is associated with significant toxicity. GC-sparing alternatives are available. The presented treatment guideline aims to provide guidance to physicians treating the very heterogenous sarcoidosis manifestations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A European Respiratory Society Task Force (TF) committee composed of clinicians, methodologists, and patients with experience in sarcoidosis developed recommendations based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) methodology. The committee developed eight PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) questions and these were used to make specific evidence-based recommendations.

RESULTS

The TF committee delivered twelve recommendations for seven PICOs. These included treatment of pulmonary, cutaneous, cardiac, and neurologic disease as well as fatigue. One PICO question regarding small fiber neuropathy had insufficient evidence to support a recommendation. In addition to the recommendations, the committee provided information on how they use alternative treatments, when there was insufficient evidence to support a recommendation.

CONCLUSIONS

There are many treatments available to treat sarcoidosis. Given the diverse nature of the disease, treatment decisions require an assessment of organ involvement, risk for significant morbidity, and impact on QoL of the disease and treatment.

MESSAGE

An evidence based guideline for treatment of sarcoidosis is presented. The panel used the GRADE approach and specific recommendations are made. A major factor in treating patients is the risk of loss of organ function or impairment of quality of life.

Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in Sarcoidosis: Diagnosis, Management, and Health Outcomes

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL), though rarely considered as a primary endpoint in clinical trials, may be the single outcome reflective of patient priorities when living with a health condition. HRQoL is a multi-dimensional concept that reflects the degree to which a health condition interferes with participation in and fulfillment of important life areas. HRQoL is intended to capture the composite degree of physical, physiologic, psychological, and social impairment resulting from symptom burden, patient-perceived disease severity, and treatment side effects. Diminished HRQoL expectedly correlates to worsening disability and death; but interventions addressing HRQoL are linked to increased survival. Sarcoidosis, being a multi-organ system disease, is associated with a diffuse array of manifestations resulting in multiple symptoms, complications, and medication-related side effects that are linked to reduced HRQoL. Diminished HRQoL in sarcoidosis is related to decreased physical function, pain, significant loss of income, absence from work, and strain on personal relationships. Symptom distress can result clearly from a sarcoidosis manifestation (e.g., ocular pain, breathlessness, cough) but may also be non-specific, such as pain or fatigue. More complex, a single non-specific symptom, e.g., fatigue may be directly sarcoidosis-derived (e.g., inflammatory state, neurologic, hormonal, cardiopulmonary), medication-related (e.g., anemia, sleeplessness, weight gain, sub-clinical infection), or an indirect complication (e.g., sleep apnea, physical deconditioning, depression). Identifying and distinguishing underlying causes of impaired HRQoL provides opportunity for treatment strategies that can greatly impact a patient's function, well-being, and disease outcomes. Herein, we present a reference manual that describes the current state of knowledge in sarcoidosis-related HRQoL and distinguish between diverse causes of symptom distress and other influences on sarcoidosis-related HRQoL. We provide tools to assess, investigate, and diagnose compromised HRQoL and its influencers. Strategies to address modifiable HRQoL factors through palliation of symptoms and methods to improve the sarcoidosis health profile are outlined; as well as a proposed research agenda in sarcoidosis-related HRQoL.

A Pilot Randomized Trial of Transdermal Nicotine for Pulmonary Sarcoidosis

BACKGROUND

Tobacco smoking is associated with a reduced risk of developing sarcoidosis, and we previously reported that nicotine normalizes immune responses to environmental antigens in patients with active pulmonary sarcoidosis. The effects of nicotine on the progression of pulmonary sarcoidosis are unknown.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is nicotine treatment well tolerated, and will it improve lung function in patients with active pulmonary sarcoidosis?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

With local institutional review board approval, a randomized, double-blind, controlled pilot trial was conducted of daily nicotine transdermal patch treatment (21 mg daily) or placebo patch use for 24 weeks. The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and Cleveland Clinic enrolled 50 consecutive adult subjects aged ≥ 18 years with active pulmonary sarcoidosis, based on symptoms (ie, dyspnea, cough) and objective radiographic evidence of infiltrates consistent with nonfibrotic lung disease. Each study group was compared at 26 weeks based on repeated measures of FVC, FEV₁, quantitative lung texture score based on CT texture analysis, Fatigue Assessment Score (FAS), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and the Sarcoidosis Assessment Tool.

RESULTS

Nicotine treatment was associated with a clinically significant, approximately 2.1% (70 mL) improvement in FVC from baseline to 26 weeks. FVC decreased by a similar amount (2.2%) in the placebo group, with a net increase of 140 mL (95% CI, 10-260) when comparing nicotine vs placebo groups at 26 weeks. FEV₁ and FAS improved marginally in the nicotine-treated group, compared with those on placebo. No improvement was observed in lung texture score, FAS, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire score, or the Sarcoidosis Assessment Tool. There were no reported serious adverse events or evidence of nicotine addiction.

INTERPRETATION

Nicotine treatment was well tolerated in patients with active pulmonary sarcoidosis, and the preliminary findings of this pilot study suggest that it may reduce disease progression, based on FVC.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02265874; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Health-related quality of life in patients with recurrent pericarditis: results from a phase 2 study of rilonacept

BACKGROUND

Impact of recurrent pericarditis (RP) on patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was evaluated through qualitative patient interviews and as an exploratory endpoint in a Phase 2 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of rilonacept (IL-1α/IL-1β cytokine trap) to treat RP.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews were conducted with ten adults with RP to understand symptoms and HRQoL impacts, and the 10-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health (PROMIS GH) v1.2 was evaluated to determine questionnaire coverage of patient experience. The Phase 2 trial enrolled participants with active symptomatic RP (A-RP, n = 16) and corticosteroid-dependent participants with no active recurrence at baseline (CSD-RP, n = 9). All participants received rilonacept weekly during a 6-week base treatment period (TP) plus an optional 18-week extension period (EP). Tapering of concomitant medications, including corticosteroids (CS), was permitted during EP. HRQoL was assessed using the PROMIS GH, and patient-reported pain and blood levels of c-reactive protein (CRP) were collected at Baseline and follow-up periods. A secondary, descriptive analysis of the Phase 2 trial efficacy results was completed using HRQoL measures to characterize both the impact of RP and the treatment effect of rilonacept.

RESULTS

Information from qualitative interviews demonstrated that PROMIS GH concepts are relevant to adults with RP. From the Phase 2 trial, both participant groups showed impacted HRQoL at Baseline (mean PROMIS Global Physical Health [GPH] and Global Mental Health [GMH], were lower than population norm average). In A-RP, GPH/MPH improved by end of base TP and were sustained through EP (similar trends were observed for pain and CRP). Similarly, in CSD-RP, GPH/MPH improved by end of TP and further improved during EP, during CS tapering or discontinuation, without disease recurrence (low pain scores and CRP levels continued during the TP and EP).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study demonstrating impaired HRQoL in RP. Rilonacept treatment was associated with HRQoL improvements using PROMIS GH scores. Maintained/improved HRQoL during tapering/withdrawal of CS without recurrence suggests that rilonacept may provide an alternative to CS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.Gov; NCT03980522; 5 June 2019, retrospectively registered; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03980522 .

Barriers to Care Among Patients With Sarcoidosis: A Qualitative Study

RATIONALE

Lower income patients with sarcoidosis experience worse outcomes compared to those with higher incomes. The reasons for these disparities are not well understood.

OBJECTIVES

To identify patient reported barriers and facilitators to optimal care among sarcoidosis patients residing in high and low median income zip codes.

METHODS

Patients with biopsy proven sarcoidosis who received pharmacologic within the past year and were cared for in a sarcoidosis clinic of a large, urban medical system were included. Focus groups were stratified by high and low median income zip codes. Transcriptions were analyzed utilizing grounded theory.

RESULTS

Five focus groups were conducted - two included patients living in zip codes with high median incomes ($84,263, IQR $79,334-$89,795) and three included patients living in zip codes with low median incomes ($27,470, IQR $22,412-27,597). Sarcoidosis patients from low-income and high-income zip codes reported remarkably similar experiences. Patients reported sarcoidosis being a burden due to the disease manifestations and adverse effects of treatment which led to compromised ability to perform their activities of daily living at home or at work. Reported barriers to care included a perceived inadequate knowledge about sarcoidosis among providers, communication barriers with providers, and high cost of treatment. Patients from low-income zip codes experienced discrimination related to race and income, which served to compound mistrust. Patients sought to overcome these barriers through self-empowerment, including independent learning, self-advocacy, medication non-adherence and use of alternative therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with sarcoidosis who lived in high- and low-income zip codes expressed similar overall concerns regarding sarcoidosis care. However, patients from low-income zip codes more frequently expressed concerns of racial and income discrimination. Patients from both groups addressed these barriers through self-empowerment which included not adhering to prescribed therapies. Future work should focus on the effects of culturally and socioeconomically congruent, community-engaged interventions on quality of life of patients with sarcoidosis.

Tofacitinib as a Steroid-Sparing Therapy in Pulmonary Sarcoidosis, an Open-Label Prospective Proof-of-Concept Study

This is a prospective, open-label, proof-of-concept study of tofacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, as a steroid-sparing therapy in corticosteroid-dependent pulmonary sarcoidosis. Five patients with corticosteroid-dependent pulmonary sarcoidosis were treated with tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was a ≥ 50% reduction in corticosteroids at week 16 with no worsening in pulmonary function or respiratory symptoms. 60% of patients (3/5) met the primary endpoint. One patient was lost to follow up prior to steroid taper, and another was withdrawn due to worsening of known neurosarcoidosis. The three patients who met the primary endpoint each tapered to ≤ 5 mg/day prednisone, respiratory symptoms improved, and spirometry remained stable. In this proof-of-concept study, the addition of a JAK-inhibitor allowed 60% of patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis to successfully taper corticosteroids. JAK-inhibitors are a promising therapy for pulmonary sarcoidosis, which require further investigation in randomized trials.Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT03793439; registered Jan 4, 2019.

Biologic and advanced immunomodulating therapeutic options for sarcoidosis: a clinical update

Introduction: Sarcoidosis is a multi-organ disease with a wide range of clinical manifestations and outcomes. A quarter of sarcoidosis patients require long-term treatment for chronic disease. In this group, corticosteroids and cytotoxic agents be insufficient to control diseaseAreas covered: Several biologic agents have been studied for treatment of chronic pulmonary and extra-pulmonary disease. A review of the available literature was performed searching PubMed and an expert opinion regarding specific therapy was developed.Expert opinion: These agents have the potential of treating patients who have progressive disease. Many of these agents have different mechanisms of action, response rates, and toxicity profiles.

Treatment of Sarcoidosis: A Multidisciplinary Approach

Sarcoidosis is a systemic disease of unknown etiology defined by the presence of noncaseating granulomatous inflammation that can cause organ damage and diminished quality of life. Treatment is indicated to protect organ function and decrease symptomatic burden. Current treatment options focus on interruption of granuloma formation and propagation. Clinical trials guiding evidence for treatment are lacking due to the rarity of disease, heterogeneous clinical course, and lack of prognostic biomarkers, all of which contribute to difficulty in clinical trial design and implementation. In this review, a multidisciplinary treatment approach is summarized, addressing immunuosuppressive drugs, managing complications of chronic granulomatous inflammation, and assessing treatment toxicity. Discovery of new therapies will depend on research into pathogenesis of antigen presentation and granulomatous inflammation. Future treatment approaches may also include personalized decisions based on pharmacogenomics and sarcoidosis phenotype, as well as patient-centered approaches to manage immunosuppression, symptom control, and treatment of comorbid conditions.

Design of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate effectiveness of methotrexate versus prednisone as first-line treatment for pulmonary sarcoidosis: the PREDMETH study

BACKGROUND

Treatment of pulmonary sarcoidosis is recommended in case of significant symptoms, impaired or deteriorating lung function. Evidence-based treatment recommendations are limited and largely based on expert opinion. Prednisone is currently the first-choice therapy and leads to short-term improvement of lung function. Unfortunately, prednisone often has side-effects and may be associated with impaired quality of life. Methotrexate is presently considered second-line therapy, and appears to have fewer side-effects.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this trial is to investigate the effectiveness and tolerability of methotrexate as first-line therapy in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis compared with prednisone. The primary endpoint of this study will be the change in hospital-measured Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) between baseline and 24 weeks. Secondary objectives are to gain more insights in response to therapy in individual patients by home spirometry and patient-reported outcomes. Blood biomarkers will be examined to find predictors of response to therapy, disease progression and chronicity, and to improve our understanding of the underlying disease mechanism.

METHODS/DESIGN

In this prospective, randomized, non-blinded, multi-center, non-inferiority trial, we plan to randomize 138 treatment-naïve patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis who are about to start treatment. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either prednisone or methotrexate in a predefined schedule for 24 weeks, after which they will be followed up in regular care for up to 2 years. Regular hospital visits will include pulmonary function assessment, completion of patient-reported outcomes, and blood withdrawal. Additionally, patients will be asked to perform weekly home spirometry, and record symptoms and side-effects via a home monitoring application for 24 weeks.

DISCUSSION

This study will be the first randomized controlled trial comparing first-line treatment of prednisone and methotrexate and provide valuable data on efficacy, safety, quality of life and biomarkers. If this study confirms the hypothesis that methotrexate is as effective as prednisone as first-line treatment for sarcoidosis but with fewer side-effects, this will lead to improvement in care and initiate a change in practice. Furthermore, insights into the immunological mechanisms underlying sarcoidosis pathology might reveal new therapeutic targets.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered on the 19th of March 2020 in the International Clinical Trial Registry, www.clinicaltrials.gov; ID NCT04314193 .

Child-Adult Transition in Sarcoidosis: A Series of 52 Patients

(1) Background: Pediatric sarcoidosis is a rare and mostly severe disease. Very few pediatric series with a prolonged follow-up are reported. We aimed to evaluate the evolution of pediatric sarcoidosis in adulthood. (2) Material and methods: Patients over 18-years-old with a pediatric-onset sarcoidosis (≤15-year-old) who completed at least a three-year follow-up in French expert centers were included. Clinical information at presentation and outcome in adulthood were studied. (3) Results: A total of 52 patients were included (34 prospectively in childhood and 18 retrospectively in adulthood), with a mean age of 12 (±2.7) at diagnosis. The median duration time of follow-up was 11.5 years (range 3–44.5). Relapses mostly occurred during treatment decrease (84.5%), others within the three years after treatment interruption (9.1%), and rarely when the disease was stable for more than three years (6.4%). Sarcoidosis was severe in 11 (21.2%) in adulthood. Patients received a high corticosteroid cumulative dose (median 17,900 mg) for a median duration of five years (range 0–32), resulting in mostly mild (18; 35.3%) and rarely severe (2; 3.8%) adverse events. (4) Conclusions: Pediatric-onset sarcoidosis needed a long-term treatment in almost half of the patients. Around one fifth of pediatric-onset sarcoidosis patients had severe sarcoidosis consequences in adulthood.

Corticosteroid refractory sarcoidosis

A sarcoidosis patient may be refractory to corticosteroid therapy. This may be because corticosteroids are ineffective in relieving the sarcoidosis patient's symptoms/dysfunction or because the clinician has determined that the risks of corticosteroids outweigh their benefits. Interestingly, when corticosteroids truly fail to improve a sarcoidosis patient's condition, it is very rarely because of failure of the drug as an anti-granulomatous agent; rather, it is usually because the patient's symptoms were unrelated to active sarcoid granulomas. In this manuscript, we review the causes of corticosteroid refractory sarcoidosis. The clinician should consider these causes when confronted with a sarcoidosis patient who is either not responding to corticosteroids, developing corticosteroid side-effects, or is at significant risk of developing such side-effects. We believe that determining the cause of corticosteroid refractory sarcoidosis may aid the clinicians in optimizing the care of sarcoidosis patients and clinical researchers in appropriately stratifying patients for clinical trials.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Sarcoidosis

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) describes an individual's perception of the impact of health, disease, and treatment on their quality of life (QoL). It is a reflection of how the manifestation of an illness and its treatment is personally experienced. Assessing HRQoL is particularly important in sarcoidosis because the attributable disease mortality is relatively low, and one of the major reasons for initiating treatment is to improve quality of life. HRQoL has been assessed in sarcoidosis using various generic and sarcoid-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). It is important that both the direct and indirect effects of the disease, as well as potential toxicities of therapy, are captured in the various PROMs used to assess HRQoL in sarcoidosis. This article provides a general overview of HRQoL in patients with sarcoidosis. It describes the various PROMs used to assess HRQoL in sarcoidosis and addresses the various factors that influence HRQoL in sarcoidosis. Specific attention is paid to fatigue, small fiber neuropathy, corticosteroid therapy, and other disease-specific factors that affect HRQoL in sarcoidosis. It also provides an insight into interventions that have been associated with improved HRQoL in sarcoidosis and offers suggestions for future research in this important area.

Indications for treatment of sarcoidosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe the current knowledge on indications for sarcoidosis treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the lack of evidence-based recommendations, the sarcoidosis community has adopted the concept of starting systemic anti-inflammatory treatment because of potential danger (risk of severe dysfunction on major organs or death) or unacceptable impaired quality of life (QoL). On the contrary, while QoL and functionality are patients' priorities, few studies have evaluated treatment effect on patient-reported outcomes. The awareness of long-term corticosteroids toxicities and consequences on QoL and the emergence of novel drugs have changed therapeutic management. Second-line therapy, mainly methotrexate and azathioprine, are indicated for corticosteroids sparing or corticosteroids-resistant sarcoidosis. TNF-α inhibitors are a useful third-line therapy in chronic refractory disease. In addition to organ-targeted treatment, efforts should also be taken for treating nonorgan-specific symptoms, such as physical training for fatigue, and various disease complications.

SUMMARY

Clinicians should offer a tailored treatment for each patient and ensure a holistic multidisciplinary approach, including pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. Patient-centered communication is critical to drive shared decisions, in particular for the tricky situation of isolated impaired QoL as the unique therapeutic indication. Once treatment is decided, clinicians should define a clear therapeutic plan, including goals and instruments to assess response.

Managing Fatigue in Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease

Fatigue is one of the most burdensome symptoms in interstitial lung disease (ILD) and can have a major impact on quality of life, social interactions, and work capacity. The cause of fatigue is complex; it is caused or aggravated by a combination of different predisposing, precipitating, and perpetuating factors. There is no uniform definition of fatigue, but it is often divided in physical and mental components. Several validated questionnaires can be used for structural assessment of fatigue in daily care. Although the high burden of fatigue in ILD is recognized increasingly, studies that have investigated pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment options are scarce. Because fatigue in ILD is often a multifactorial problem, therapeutic interventions ideally should be aimed at different domains. One of the first steps is to optimize treatment of the underlying disease. Subsequently, treatable causes of fatigue should be identified and treated. Recently, an increasing number of studies showed that supportive measures have the potential to improve fatigue. However, evidence-based treatment guidelines are lacking, and more research is highly needed in this field. In clinical practice, a comprehensive, multidisciplinary, and individually tailored approach seems best fit to optimize treatment of fatigue in patients with ILD.