[Physiotherapy and COVID-19. From intensive care unit to home care-An overview of international guidelines]

Vibroacoustic therapy in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 complicated by respiratory failure: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Introduction

Coronavirus infection is a dangerous airborne disease that can lead to serious lung damage. Data on the effectiveness of low-frequency chest vibrations in the treatment of lung diseases are available; however, not so many of them exist. Vibroacoustic pulmonary therapy is a component of physiotherapy that improves lung perfusion and drainage without requiring active patient participation. This study aimed to increase statistical efficiency through maximizing the relevant information obtained from the clinical data. Calculating the sample size to determine the power of subsequent studies was also necessary.

Research methods

A pilot randomized parallel trial involving 60 patients was conducted. The patients were divided into two equal groups, where they received sessions of vibroacoustic pulmonary therapy using the "VibroLung" device in two modes "acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)" and "Pneumonia," with identical treatment. The patients were > 18 years old with detected COVID-19 by PCR and grade 2 and 3 lung lesions detected by computer tomography (CT). Blood sampling was performed in the morning at the same time before and after the hardware massage to determine PaO2, PaCO2, and P/F.

Results

As a result of the test, the following data were obtained: on the first day in the group using the "ARDS" mode, PaO2 indicators averaged 65, CI 95% [58.6-73.2] and on average 77.5, CI 95% [69.8-85.2], "before" and "after," respectively, which indicates improved oxygenation after the procedure. However, in the second group with the "Pneumonia" mode after its use, PaCO2 was higher after the session, on average 48.7, CI 95% [40.8-56.6], whereas before that, the following indicators had, on average 43.6, CI 95% [37.2-50].

Conclusion

Thus, the data obtained yielded ambiguous results, which are the basis for further study in future randomized controlled trials. As the treatment of coronavirus infection has no etiological treatment, even small shifts in the therapy of this category of patients can be significant.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05143372.

[Ventilatory management of SARS-CoV-2 acute respiratory failure]

COVID-19 pneumonia presents several particularities in its clinical presentation (cytokine storm, silent hypoxemia, thrombo-embolic risk) and may lead to a number of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) phenotypes. While the optimal oxygenation strategy in cases of hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (ARF) is still under debate, ventilatory management of COVID-19-related ARF has confirmed the efficacy of high-flow oxygen therapy and restored interest in other ventilatory approaches such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and noninvasive ventilation involving a helmet, which due to patient overflow are sometimes implemented outside of critical care units. However, further studies are still needed to determine which patients should be given which oxygenation technique, and under which conditions they require invasive mechanical ventilation, given that delayed initiation potentially burdens prognosis. During invasive mechanical ventilation, ventral decubitus and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation have become increasingly prevalent. While innovative therapies such as awake prone position or lung transplantation have likewise been developed, their indications, modalities and efficacy remain to be determined.

Effectiveness of exercise training on the dyspnoea of individuals with long COVID: A randomised controlled multicentre trial

BACKGROUND

COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) is a severe evolution of the Sars-Cov-2 infection and necessitates intensive care. COVID-19 may subsequently be associated with long COVID, whose symptoms can include persistent respiratory symptoms up to 1 year later. Rehabilitation is currently recommended by most guidelines for people with this condition.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of exercise training rehabilitation (ETR) on dyspnoea and health-related quality of life measures in people with continuing respiratory discomfort following CARDS.

METHODS

In this multicentre, two-arm, parallel, open, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial, we enroled adults previously admitted with CARDS to 3 French intensive care units who had been discharged at least 3 months earlier and who presented with an mMRC dyspnoea scale score > 1. Participants received either ETR or standard physiotherapy (SP) for 90 days. The primary outcome was dyspnoea, as measured by the Multidimensional Dyspnoea Profile (MDP), at day 0 (inclusion) and after 90 days of physiotherapy. Secondary outcomes were the mMRC and 12-item Short-Form Survey scores.

RESULTS

Between August 7, 2020, and January 26, 2022, 487 participants with CARDS were screened for inclusion, of whom 60 were randomly assigned to receive either ETR (n = 27) or SP (n = 33). Mean MDP following ETR was 42% lower than after SP (26.15 vs. 44.76); a difference of -18.61 (95% CI -27.78 to -9.44; p<10-4).

CONCLUSION

People who were still suffering from breathlessness three months after being discharged from hospital with CARDS had significantly improved dyspnoea scores when treated with ETR therapy for 90 days unlike those who only received SP. Study registered 29/09/2020 on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04569266).

The Role of Acute Rehabilitation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Study in the Czech Republic

In this retrospective study, we used data from the hospital information system (HIS) to evaluate the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on rehabilitation care at the University Hospital of Ostrava (UHO). From March 2020 to December 2021, 5173 COVID-19 cases were hospitalized at UHO. Cases within individual groups and categories are shown in a flowchart. The average patient age was 64.9 ± 16.9 years. The mean BMI value was 30.6 ± 6.8 in the rehabilitated group, which was significantly higher compared to that among the non-rehabilitated cases 29.1 ± 6.9 (p < 0.001). Among the admitted patients, 16.6% required artificial pulmonary ventilation (APV), 1.8% extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and 11.9% high-flow oxygenation (HF). The days of rehabilitation ranged from 1-102 days. Among all rehabilitated patients, 92.0% (n = 1302) had a hospitalization duration ranging from 1-15 days and 8.0% (n = 114) longer than 15 days. Overall, rehabilitation care plays an important role in providing exercise, mobilization, and rehabilitation interventions to survivors of critical illness associated with COVID-19, enabling the early and functional return to home, and it must, therefore, be integrated into the clinical care of patients with COVID-19.

Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines

Introduction

Post-COVID-19 syndrome is associated with significant health and potential socioeconomic burden. Due to its novel nature, there is a lack of clarity over best practice for the rehabilitation of patients with ongoing or new symptoms following acute COVID-19 infection. We conducted a systematic review of clinical and service guidelines for post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation.

Methods

This review was registered on PROSPERO and is reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We included guidelines formally published or endorsed by a recognised professional body, covering rehabilitation of people with symptoms following resolution of acute COVID-19 infection. We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, NHS Evidence, MedRxiv, PsyArXiv and Google for terms related to COVID-19, rehabilitation and guideline. Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion, data extracted and quality assessed using the AGREE II and AGREE-REX tools for clinical guidelines and the AGREE-HS tool for service guidelines. We included guidelines of sufficient quality in a narrative synthesis.

Results

We identified 12 790 articles, of which 37 guidelines (19 clinical only, 7 service only and 11 combined clinical and service) were included. Guidelines covered a range of countries, rehabilitation types, populations and rehabilitation settings. Synthesis of clinical guidelines (n=4) was structured following the patient pathway, from identification, to assessment, treatment and discharge, with consideration of specific patient groups. Synthesis of service guidelines (n=8) was structured according to the Donabedian framework.

Discussion

Though the available post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines were generally of poor quality, there was a high degree of consensus regarding the breadth of symptoms, the need for holistic assessment by a broad multidisciplinary team and person-centred care. There was less clarity on management options, measuring outcomes and discharge criteria.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42021236049.

A descriptive study of knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and precautions of physiotherapy and rehabilitation students regarding COVID-19

BACKGROUND: Physiotherapy and rehabilitation students need to be aware of the global COVID-19 pandemic and choose the correct interventions. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and precautions of physiotherapy and rehabilitation students regarding COVID-19 during the global pandemic. METHODS: A total of 438 physiotherapy and rehabilitation students participated in the study. A web-based descriptive cross-sectional questionnaire was conducted using the “Google Forms” on physiotherapy and rehabilitation students in the months of February, March, and April 2021. The online questionnaire consisted of six main sections containing 130 items: (1) sociodemographic information, (2) knowledge sources and knowledge about COVID-19, (3) attitudes about COVID-19, (4) behaviors, (5) precautions, and (6) being a physiotherapy and rehabilitation student during the COVID-19 pandemic. The collected data were reported in terms of mean, standard deviation, number, frequency, and percentage values. RESULTS: The vast majority of the participants (n = 291, 66.5%) often/always accessed information about COVID-19 via social media, 397 (90.6%) of them often/always wear masks. Moreover, 419 (95.6%) of the physiotherapy students knew the symptoms of COVID-19, and 409 (93.4%) of the students have been responded “yes” to the question of whether pulmonary rehabilitation should be applied in intensive care units for COVID-19 infections. CONCLUSIONS: Physiotherapy and rehabilitation students have adequate awareness about COVID-19. In this regard, physiotherapy and rehabilitation students should be included in appropriate educational programs to protect themselves, their relatives, and patients against COVID-19, and their knowledge about the treatment methods should be increased.

Remote Assessment of Quality of Life and Functional Exercise Capacity in a Cohort of COVID-19 Patients One Year after Hospitalization (TELECOVID)

Studies have reported persistent symptoms in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 up to 6 months post-discharge; however, sequalae beyond 6 months are unknown. This study aimed to investigate the clinical status of COVID-19 patients one year after hospital discharge and describe the factors related to poor outcomes. We conducted a single-center, prospective, cohort study of patients in Le Havre hospital (France) between 1 March 2020 and 11 May 2020. Baseline characteristics were collected from medical charts (including KATZ index and Clinical Frailty scale (CFS)), and a remote assessment was conducted 12 months after discharge. The main outcomes were the scores of the physical and mental components (PCS and MCS) of the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and performance on the one-minute sit-to-stand test (STST1′). Scores <50% of the predicted values were considered as poor, and univariate and multivariate analyses were undertaken to investigate factors related to poor outcomes. Remote assessment was performed for 128 of the 157 (82%) eligible patients. Twenty-two patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), 45 to the intermediate care unit (IU), and 61 to the general ward (GW). Patients who spent time in ICU were more independent and younger. A large proportion of the sample had poor physical (30%) and mental health (27%) and a poor functional exercise capacity (33%) at the remote assessment. Higher levels of frailty at admission and hospital discharge were, respectively, associated with a higher risk of poor functional exercise capacity (StdOR 3.64 (95%CI 1.39–10.72); p = 0.01) and a higher risk of poor mental health (StdOR 2.81 (95%CI 1.17–7.45); p = 0.03). Long-term outcomes following hospitalization for COVID-19 infection may be negative for at least one year after discharge. Remote follow-up assessment could be highly beneficial for COVID-19 patients.

Gefühlte und reale Arbeitsfähigkeit von Patient*innen mit Post-COVID Symptomatik nach mildem Akutverlauf: eine Analyse des Rehabilitation Needs Questionnaire (RehabNeQ)

Hintergrund Das Beschwerdebild der Folgeerscheinungen, die nach einer COVID-19-Erkrankung auch nach Monaten existieren können, wird immer deutlicher: das Post-COVID-Syndrom. Neben verschiedenen Symptomen können auch funktionellen Zusammenhänge bestehen, die die Arbeitsfähigkeit einschränken. Derzeitige Untersuchungen gehen von 10% der Infizierten aus, die dies betrifft. In Deutschland würde dies nach aktuellen Zahlen 380 000 Menschen betreffen. Das Ziel dieser Analyse war es zu zeigen, wie sich die reale und gefühlte Arbeitsfähigkeit bei Patient*innen mit Post-COVID Syndrom darstellt.

Methode Der Rehabilitation Needs Questionnaire wird routinemäßig bei Patient*innen mit Post-COVID-Symptomatik bei Vorstellungen in der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover bzw. dem Universitätsklinikum Jena ausgefüllt. Es erfolgte eine deskriptive Analyse der Fragebögen ab April 2021 unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Arbeitsfähigkeit. Ausgeschlossen wurden Patient*innen, die nicht im arbeitsfähigen Alter waren, oder bereits vor der COVID-19-Infektion arbeitsunfähig.

Ergebnisse 75 von 81 Fragebögen wurden im entsprechenden Zeitraum von einer Stichprobe im arbeitsfähigen Alter in die Auswertung mit einbezogen (68% von Frauen, 32% von Männern). Das Durchschnittsalter lag bei 42,5 Jahren, die Zeit seit der Infektion im Mittel bei 3 Monaten. 44 der 75 Personen (58,7%) waren zum Zeitpunkt der Befragung arbeitsfähig. Die empfundene Arbeitsfähigkeit wurde im Schnitt mit 5,1 von 10 möglichen Punkten angegeben. Frauen zeigten hier durchschnittlich 6,2 Punkte und Männer 4,7 Punkte. 59,1% (n=26) der Befragten gaben Schwierigkeiten beim Erhalt von notwendigen Therapien an. 31 (41,3%) Personen waren zum Zeitpunkt der Befragung aufgrund der POST-COVID-19-Erkrankung arbeitsunfähig. Das mittlere Alter der Gruppe lag bei 46,6 Jahren. 16 (51,6%) der 31 Proband*innen gaben an ununterbrochen seit der Infektion arbeitsunfähig zu sein. Schwierigkeiten beim Erhalt von notwendigen Therapien hatten in dieser Gruppe 64,5% (n=20).

Diskussion Die Rate derer, die nach einer COVID-19-Erkrankung auch nach Monaten noch arbeitsunfähig sind, ist hoch. Notwendige therapeutische Maßnahmen stehen entweder in nicht genügender Anzahl zur Verfügung oder werden trotz entsprechender Indikation nicht ausreichend verordnet. Weitere Untersuchungen sind notwendig, um die Wirksamkeit von Therapien zu belegen und welche Barrieren zur Rückkehr an den Arbeitsplatz bestehen. Die Auswirkungen können bei weiter steigenden Fallzahlen noch über Jahre hinweg Einfluss auf die Wirtschaftskraft des Landes haben.

Could Physical Therapy Interventions Be Adopted in the Management of Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19? A Scoping Review

As part of COVID-19 consequences, it has been estimated that 5% of patients affected by this disease will require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), and physical therapy techniques have been implemented in patients with other conditions admitted to ICU. The aim of the present study is to summarize all the available information about the implementation of physical therapy management in critically ill patients. From three clinical guidelines already published, we performed a search in PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and CINAHL, including systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, and randomized controlled trials, among others. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Quality assessment was developed through the AMSTAR-2 tool and PEDro Scale. A narrative synthesis was performed and 29 studies were included. The information extracted has been classified into four folders: ICU environment in COVID-19 (security aspects and management of the patient), respiratory physiotherapy (general indications and contraindications, spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated patient approaches), positional treatment, and exercise therapy (safety aspects and progression). The implementation of physiotherapy in patients affected with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU is a necessary strategy that prevents complications and contributes to the stabilization of patients in critical periods, facilitating their recovery.