Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) as a valid proxy measure for remission in schizophrenia: analyses of ziprasidone clinical study data

Proxy measures for the assessment of psychotic and affective symptoms in studies using electronic health records

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of standardised psychometric data in electronic health record (EHR)-based research. Proxy measures of symptom severity based on patients' clinical records may be useful surrogates in mental health EHR research.

AIMS

This study aimed to validate proxy tools for the short versions of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS-6) and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-6).

METHOD

A cross-sectional, multicentre study was conducted in a sample of 116 patients with first-episode psychosis from 12 public hospitals in Spain. Concordance between PANSS-6, YMRS-6 and MADRS-6 scores and their respective proxies was evaluated based on information from EHR clinical notes, using a variety of statistical procedures, including multivariate tests to adjust for potential confounders. Bootstrapping techniques were used for internal validation, and an independent cohort from the Treatment and Early Intervention in Psychosis Program (TIPP-Lausanne, Switzerland) for external validation.

RESULTS

The proxy versions correlated strongly with their respective standardised scales (partial correlations ranged from 0.75 to 0.84) and had good accuracy and discriminatory power in distinguishing between patients in and not in remission (percentage of patients correctly classified ranged from 83.9 to 91.4% and bootstrapped optimism-corrected area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 0.76 to 0.89), with high interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.81). The findings remained robust in the external validation data-set.

CONCLUSIONS

The proxy instruments proposed for assessing psychotic and affective symptoms by reviewing EHR provide a feasible and reliable alternative to traditional structured psychometric procedures, and a promising methodology for real-world practice settings.

Treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction of a virtual partial hospital program: A mixed-method study

OBJECTIVE

Despite a proliferation of virtual partial hospital programs (PHP) during the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a dearth of research on such programs. In the current study, we compared treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction between an in-person and a virtual PHP. Further, we examined patients' qualitative feedback about the virtual PHP.

METHOD

Participants included 282 patients attending a virtual PHP during the COVID-19 pandemic and 470 patients attending an in-person PHP one year prior. Patients completed daily measures of symptom severity, and post-treatment measures of patient satisfaction and treatment outcomes. Patients in the virtual PHP provided feedback about virtual care. Quantitative data were analyzed using multilevel modeling, and qualitative data were analyzed using the principles of inductive analysis.

RESULTS

Patients experienced a reduction in depression (b = -.28, p < .001) and anxiety symptoms (b = -.25, p < .001) over time and reported high satisfaction in both the in-person and virtual PHPs. There were no significant differences across programs. Virtual PHP patients identified unique advantages and disadvantages of virtual care.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that virtual PHPs should be explored as an ongoing model of care that may help to systematically reduce barriers to accessing mental health services.

A Comparative Study of Aripiprazole, Olanzapine, and L-Methylfolate Augmentation in Treatment Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

About half of the patients with Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) do not respond to serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) or have a partial improvement in their symptoms. This study aimed to compare the efficiency and safety of aripiprazole, olanzapine, and L-methyl folate in patients with resistant OCD. The study consisted of an open-label prospective phase of 12-weeks to ascertain resistance to SRIs and a second 6-week open-label addition phase for non or, partial responders of the first phase. One-hundred-fifteen patients entered the 16-week open-label phase. Fifty patients (43.47%) responded to the SRIs monotherapy, two patients developed adverse effects and another three were lost to the follow up. Sixty patients (52.2%) were considered treatment-resistant and entered the 6-week open-label aripiprazole, olanzapine, or L-methyl folate addition phase; Patients showed a significant improvement over 6-week study period in olanzapine and aripiprazole group as measured by YBOCS total score (p < 0.001) while there was no change in the L-methyl folate group at the end as compared with baseline (p = 0.150). Clinical Global Impression-Severity decreased from 4.90 to 2.90 in olanzapine and aripiprazole group at the end of 6 weeks while there was no change in the L-methyl folate group. The CGI-I was significant in the olanzapine and aripiprazole group (p < 0.001) while it was insignificant in the L-methyl folate group (p = 0.088). Augmentation of SRIs with olanzapine or aripiprazole could be a promising option for resistant OCD. L-methyl folate though shown to be effective in resistant depression was not effective in treatment resistant OCD.

Prediction of Early Symptom Remission in Two Independent Samples of First-Episode Psychosis Patients Using Machine Learning

BACKGROUND

Validated clinical prediction models of short-term remission in psychosis are lacking. Our aim was to develop a clinical prediction model aimed at predicting 4-6-week remission following a first episode of psychosis.

METHOD

Baseline clinical data from the Athens First Episode Research Study was used to develop a Support Vector Machine prediction model of 4-week symptom remission in first-episode psychosis patients using repeated nested cross-validation. This model was further tested to predict 6-week remission in a sample of two independent, consecutive Danish first-episode cohorts.

RESULTS

Of the 179 participants in Athens, 120 were male with an average age of 25.8 years and average duration of untreated psychosis of 32.8 weeks. 62.9% were antipsychotic-naïve. Fifty-seven percent attained remission after 4 weeks. In the Danish cohort, 31% attained remission. Eleven clinical scale items were selected in the Athens 4-week remission cohort. These included the Duration of Untreated Psychosis, Personal and Social Performance Scale, Global Assessment of Functioning and eight items from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. This model significantly predicted 4-week remission status (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) = 71.45, P < .0001). It also predicted 6-week remission status in the Danish cohort (ROC-AUC = 67.74, P < .0001), demonstrating reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

Using items from common and validated clinical scales, our model significantly predicted early remission in patients with first-episode psychosis. Although replicated in an independent cohort, forward testing between machine learning models and clinicians' assessment should be undertaken to evaluate the possible utility as a routine clinical tool.

The Association of Social Support and Symptomatic Remission among Community-Dwelling Schizophrenia Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

Schizophrenia is a mental disease that often leads to chronicity. Social support could reduce the severity of psychotic symptoms; therefore, its influence on remission should be examined. This study investigated the remission rates in community-dwelling schizophrenia patients and examined the association between social support and remission status. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 129 schizophrenia patients in Taiwan. Remission rates were evaluated, and the level of social support, clinical characteristics, sociodemographic variables, and healthy lifestyle status were compared between the remission and nonremission groups. The association between social support and remission was analyzed after adjusting for confounding factors. The mean illness duration is 12.9 years. More than 95% of the participants lived with their families, 63% were unemployed, and 43% achieved remission. Higher social support was observed in the remission group, and a significant correlation was observed between family domain of social support and remission status. Family support was a protective factor of symptomatic remission in community-dwelling schizophrenia patients in Taiwan. The results reflect the effects of a family-centered culture on patients during illness. Consequently, reinforcing family relationships and the capacity of families to manage the symptoms of patients and providing support to families are recommended.

Treatment Capacity and Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Schizophrenia Who Were Treated With Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with schizophrenia are often found incapable to consent to psychiatric treatment. We evaluated clinical outcomes for incapable and capable patients with schizophrenia treated with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).

METHODS

We conducted a chart review of all inpatients treated with an acute course of ECT between 2010 and 2018 at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada. Short-term outcomes included treatment response and cognitive impairment. We assessed whether incapable patients regained the capacity to consent to treatment. Long-term outcomes included readmissions and subsequent courses of acute or maintenance ECT.

RESULTS

A total of 159 (67%) incapable and 79 (33%) capable patients were included. Patients experienced treatment response (incapable, n = 108, 67.9%; capable, n = 52, 65.8%; P = .771) and few experienced cognitive impairment (incapable, n = 21, 13.2%; capable, n = 19, 24.1%; P = .043). A minority of patients were treated with a subsequent course of acute ECT (incapable, n = 46, 28.9%; capable, n = 16, 20.3%; P = .162). Incapable patients were more likely to be treated with maintenance ECT for at least 6 months (incapable, n = 46, 28.9%; capable, n = 13, 16.5%; P = .039). Both groups had similar readmission rates (incapable, n = 70, 44.0%; capable, n = 35, 44.3%; P = 1.000). Eight (5.0%) incapable patients regained capacity and 7 consented to further treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Irrespective of treatment capacity, the majority of patients demonstrated clinical improvement. Incapable patients experienced less cognitive side effects when compared with capable patients, though they had fewer treatments overall. This study informs clinicians, patients, and substitute decision-makers about the outcomes and challenges of ECT in patients with schizophrenia.

Cariprazine specificity profile in the treatment of acute schizophrenia: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized-controlled trials

Cariprazine is a new dopamine D2 and D3 receptor partial agonist antipsychotic. Meta-analytic evidence of efficacy in acute schizophrenia and specific groups of patients is lacking. We carried out a meta-analysis in patients with acute schizophrenia to evaluate the efficacy of cariprazine over placebo and active comparators in overall symptoms, positive and negative symptoms and quality of life. Low and high (≥6 mg/day) doses were tested separately. The possible effect of clinical-demographic modulators was also tested. Four studies (2144 patients) were included. Both high and low cariprazine doses proved superior to placebo in all symptom domains. The standardized mean difference (SMD) to placebo showed a modest impact on overall symptoms compared with meta-analytic results for other antipsychotics (SMD was similar to lurasidone, asenapine, ziprasidone and aripiprazole, but lower than risperidone, quetiapine and olanzapine). The SMD to placebo on negative symptoms was superior to many antipsychotics including aripiprazole, with a slightly more relevant effect of cariprazine low doses. This effect was probably on secondary negative symptoms since the short-term follow-up of the studies included. Meta-regression data further refined the compound clinical profile, suggesting that cariprazine may be particularly useful in young patients with a relatively short duration of disease.

Design and Methodology of the Korean Early Psychosis Cohort Study

The present study details the rationale and methodology of the Korean Early Psychosis Cohort Study (KEPS), which is a clinical cohort investigation of first episode psychosis patients from a Korean population. The KEPS is a prospective naturalistic observational cohort study that follows the participants for at least 2 years. This study includes patients between 18 and 45 years of age who fulfill the criteria for one of schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders according to the diagnostic criteria of DSM-5. Early psychosis is defined as first episode patients who received antipsychotic treatment for fewer than 4 consecutive weeks after the onset of illness or stabilized patients in the early stages of the disorder whose duration of illness was less than 2 years from the initiation of antipsychotic treatment. The primary outcome measures are treatment response, remission, recovery, and relapse. Additionally, several laboratory tests are conducted and a variety of objective and subjective psychiatric measures assessing early life trauma, lifestyle pattern, and social and cognitive functioning are administered. This long-term prospective cohort study may contribute to the development of early intervention strategies and the improvement of long-term outcomes in patients with schizophrenia.

Clinical Global Impression-severity score as a reliable measure for routine evaluation of remission in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders

AIMS

This study aimed to compare the performance of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) symptom severity criteria established by the Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group (RSWG) with criteria based on Clinical Global Impression (CGI) severity score. The 6-month duration criterion was not taken into consideration.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 112 chronic psychotic outpatients was examined. Symptomatic remission was evaluated according to RSWG severity criterion and to a severity criterion indicated by the overall score obtained at CGI-Schizophrenia (CGI-SCH) rating scale (≤3) (CGI-S).

RESULTS

Clinical remission rates of 50% and 49.1%, respectively, were given by RSWG and CGI-S, with a significant level of agreement between the two criteria in identifying remitted and non-remitted cases. Mean scores at CGI-SCH and PANSS scales were significantly higher among remitters, independent of the remission criteria adopted. Measures of cognitive functioning were largely independent of clinical remission evaluated according to both RSWG and CGI-S. When applying RSWG and CGI-S criteria, the rates of overall good functioning yielded by Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP) were 32.1% and 32.7%, respectively, while the mean scores at PSP scale differed significantly between remitted and non-remitted patients, independent of criteria adopted. The proportion of patients judged to be in a state of well-being on Social Well-Being Under Neuroleptics-Short Version scale (SWN-K) were, respectively, 66.1% and 74.5% among remitters according to RSWG and CGI-S; the mean scores at the SWN scale were significantly higher only among remitters according to CGI-S criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

CGI severity criteria may represent a valid and user-friendly alternative for use in identifying patients in remission, particularly in routine clinical practice.

Patterns of relapse and associated cost burden in schizophrenia patients receiving atypical antipsychotics

OBJECTIVE

To identify relapse in schizophrenia and the main cost drivers of relapse using a cost-based algorithm.

METHODS

Multi-state Medicaid data (1997-2010) were used to identify adults with schizophrenia receiving atypical antipsychotics (AP). The first schizophrenia diagnosis following AP initiation was defined as the index date. Relapse episodes were identified based on (1) weeks during the ≥2 years post-index associated with high cost increase from baseline (12 months before the index date) and (2) high absolute weekly cost. A compound score was then calculated based on these two metrics, where the 54% of patients associated with higher cost increase from baseline and higher absolute weekly cost were considered relapsers. Resource use and costs of relapsers during baseline and relapse episodes were compared using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and bootstrap methods.

RESULTS

In total, 9793 relapsers were identified with a mean of nine relapse episodes per patient. Duration of relapse episodes decreased over time (mean [median]; first episode: 34 [4] weeks; remaining episodes: 8 [1] weeks). Compared with baseline, resource utilization during relapse episodes was significantly greater in pharmacy, outpatient, and institutional visits (hospitalizations, emergency department visits), with IRRs ranging from 1.9-2.4 (all p < 0.0001). Correspondingly, relapse was associated with a mean (95% CI) incremental cost increase of $2459 ($2384-$2539) per week, with institutional visits representing 53% of the increase.

LIMITATIONS

Relapsers and relapse episodes were identified using a cost-based algorithm, as opposed to a more clinical definition of relapse. In addition, their identification was based on the assumption from literature that ~54% of schizophrenia patients will experience at least one relapse episode over a 2-year period.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant cost increases were observed with relapse in schizophrenia, driven mainly by institutional visits.

Short-term remission in schizophrenia as a combination of several outcome measures

Clinical, cognitive, metabolic and functioning variables have been evaluated in patients with schizophrenia in an 8-week trial with Ziprasidone. The aim of this post-hoc analysis is to investigate how these variables interact in determining short-term remission. Baseline values or the variation from baseline to endpoint were considered predictors. 262 schizophrenic patients were recruited. Two logistic regressions were conducted to determine which variables predict remission. The first was performed on baseline values as predictors. The second used the variation from baseline to endpoint (delta) of the outcome evaluations as predictors. Using literature reported criteria for remission, we distinguished 124 subjects (47.33%) in remission, and 138 not in remission at the end of the trial. The first logistic regression does not show a good fit. The second logistic regression, with delta scores as predictors, reports instead an overall good fit (71.8% of the predicted cases assigned to the right category). The analysis reveals that general score from Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), cholesterol LDL, subjective well-being under neuroleptic, Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) delta scores, drug dosage and premorbid intelligence entered in the equation. These results suggest that indexes such as cognition, metabolic status, other than symptoms, have to be taken into account in order to refine the short-term remission prediction.

Remission in schizophrenia: critical and systematic review

In 2005, the Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group published consensus criteria to define remission. These criteria have been widely accepted and utilized and have provided further insights about schizophrenia management and prognosis. We systematically reviewed studies that utilized these criteria, with the aim of assessing the remission rate in follow-up studies and the variables predicting or associated with remission. Remission has a reported rate of 17% to 78% (weighted mean = 35.6%) in first-episode schizophrenia and 16% to 62% (weighted mean = 37%) in multiple-episode patients, with no statistical difference between the two weighted means (p = .79). Patients who were treated with long-acting injectable risperidone showed high maintenance of remission status. Studies comparing second-generation antipsychotics versus haloperidol showed higher remission rates for the former. The variables most frequently associated with remission were better premorbid function, milder symptoms at baseline (especially negative symptoms), early response to treatment, and shorter duration of untreated psychosis. Variability in the length and frequency of follow-ups, as well as differences in dropout rates, could partially explain the differences in reported rates. Rates of symptomatic remission exceeded reported rates for functional recovery. Moreover, the majority of studies used Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group severity criteria only, neglecting duration. To enhance comparison between future research findings, we suggest further specifiers of the working group's criteria, to better define frequency and duration of follow-up, and proxy measures of remission.

Early improvement on antipsychotic treatment as a predictor of subsequent response in schizophrenia: analyses from ziprasidone clinical studies

OBJECTIVE

We examine data from short-term placebo-controlled and comparator-controlled clinical trials of ziprasidone in schizophrenia to confirm the predictive capacity of early symptom changes for response. We pose the question of how early is too early to consider "stay or switch" and evaluate the predictive capability of a clinical measure in this regard.

METHODS

We presented two separate pooled analyses of (i) two placebo-controlled and (ii) two active comparator (risperidone and olanzapine) randomized trials of ziprasidone in schizophrenia. Relationship between early changes in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scores and treatment outcome was evaluated.

RESULTS

Week 2 improvement was more reliably predictive of subsequent outcome than week 1 improvement using PANSS and BPRS scores with high sensitivity and specificity, whereas CGI-I had much lower specificity. Overall, non-improvement at week 1 or week 2 was highly predictive of non-response using BPRS scores and PANSS but not CGI-I.

CONCLUSIONS

These data, independent of antipsychotic used, confirm prior research showing that early improvement in symptoms is predictive of response. There appears to be an important window of time, beyond week 1, during which important clinical decisions to stay or switch medication may be made.