Greenhouse gas fluxes (CO2, N2O and CH4) of pea and maize during two cropping seasons: Drivers, budgets, and emission factors for nitrous oxide

N2O and CH4 fluxes from intensively managed grassland: The importance of biological and environmental drivers vs. management

Agriculture is the main contributor to anthropogenic nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) emissions. Therefore, mitigation options are urgently needed. In contrast to carbon dioxide, eddy covariance measurements of N2O and CH4 fluxes are still scarce, and thus little is known how environmental and biotic drivers as well as management affect the net N2O and CH4 exchange in grasslands. Thus, we investigated the most important drivers of net ecosystem N2O and CH4 fluxes in a temperate grassland, and continued a N2O mitigation experiment (increased clover proportion vs. fertilization with slurry). Random forest gap-filling models were able to capture intermittent emission peaks, performing better for half-hourly N2O than for CH4 fluxes. The unfertilized clover parcel (parcel B) continued to show lower N2O emissions (4.4 and 2.7 kg N2O-N ha-1 yr-1) compared to the fertilized parcel (parcel A; 6.9 and 5.9 kg N2O-N ha-1 yr-1) for 2019 and 2020, respectively. Tier 1 nitrogen (N) emission factors of 2.6 % and 1.9 % were observed at the fertilized parcel during the study period. Lower soil N concentrations indicated a lower N leaching risk at the clover than at the fertilized parcel. Annual CH4 emissions (including periods with sheep grazing) were similar from both parcels, and ranged from 25 to 38.5 kg CH4-C ha-1. The most important drivers of both N2O and CH4 fluxes were lagged precipitation and water filled pore space, but also management (for N2O from parcel B; CH4 from parcel A). Biotic variables such as vegetation height and leaf area index were important predictors for the N2O exchange, while grazing temporarily increased CH4 emissions. Overall, reducing N fertilization and increasing the legume proportion were effective N2O reduction measures. In particular, adjusting N fertilization to plant N demands can help to avoid high N2O emissions from grasslands.

Dew benefits on alpine grasslands are cancelled out by combined heatwave and drought stress

Increasing frequencies of heatwaves combined with simultaneous drought stress in Europe threaten the ecosystem water and carbon budgets of alpine grasslands. Dew as an additional water source can promote ecosystem carbon assimilation. It is known that grassland ecosystems keep high evapotranspiration as long as soil water is available. However, it is rarely being investigated whether dew can mitigate the impact of such extreme climatic events on grassland ecosystem carbon and water exchange. Here we use stable isotopes in meteoric waters and leaf sugars, eddy covariance fluxes for H₂O vapor and CO₂, in combination with meteorological and plant physiological measurements, to investigate the combined effect of dew and heat-drought stress on plant water status and net ecosystem production (NEP) in an alpine grassland (2000 m elevation) during the June 2019 European heatwave. Before the heatwave, enhanced NEP in the early morning hours can be attributed to leaf wetting by dew. However, dew benefits on NEP were cancelled out by the heatwave, due to the minor contribution of dew in leaf water. Heat-induced reduction in NEP was intensified by the combined effect of drought stress. The recovery of NEP after the peak of the heatwave could be linked to the refilling of plant tissues during nighttime. Among-genera differences of plant water status affected by dew and heat-drought stress can be attributed to differences in their foliar dew water uptake, and their reliance on soil moisture or the impact of the atmospheric evaporative demand. Our results indicate that dew influence on alpine grassland ecosystems varies according to the environmental stress and plant physiology.