Natural history of patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

Medication use in patients with functional seizures from a public and a private hospital

PURPOSE

Currently, we have limited knowledge of any potential differences among patients with functional seizures (FS), otherwise known as psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES), from different socioeconomic backgrounds. Investigating medication use among these patients may provide insight into the quality and intensity of medical care they receive. Thus, we aimed to assess and compare the frequency and quantity of antiseizure medications (ASMs), and psychiatric and other medications used among patients with FS from a private and public epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) in Cape Town, South Africa.

METHODS

Only video-electroencephalographically (video-EEG) confirmed patients with FS with no comorbid epilepsy were eligible for the study. For this retrospective case-control study we collected data on patients' medication-taking histories using digital patient records, starting with the earliest available digital patient record for each hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 305 patients from a private hospital and 67 patients from a public hospital were included in the study (N = 372). Patients with FS attending the public hospital had lower odds of taking any ASMs at presentation (aOR=0.39, 95% CI [0.20, 0.75]) and ever taking psychiatric medications (aOR=0.41, 95% CI [0.22, 0.78]) compared to FS patients from the private hospital. They did, however, have higher odds of being discharged with an ASM (aOR=6.60, 95% CI [3.27, 13.35]) and ever taking cardiovascular medication (aOR=2.69, 95% CI [1.22, 5.90]) when compared to the private hospital patients. With every additional presenting ASM (aOR=0.63, 95% CI [0.45, 0.89]) and psychiatric medication (aOR=0.58, 95% CI [0.40, 0.84]) the odds of being from the public hospital decreased. However, they increased with every additional discharge ASM (aOR=3.63, 95% CI [2.30, 5.72]) and cardiovascular medication (aOR=1.26, 95% CI [1.02, 1.55]).

CONCLUSION

Standard approaches to pharmacological treatment for patients with FS differed between the public and private hospitals and may indicate a gap in quality of care.

Long-term course of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: Who gets seizure-free, has better functional level and higher health-related quality of life?

BACKGROUND

The disease course of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) over a prolonged period of time remains unclear. The aims of the study were: 1. to describe the course of illness with a median follow-up time of 4 years and a range of 2-15 years; and 2. to identify distinguishing features between participants regarding seizure cessation, functional level and health-related quality of life.

METHODS

Formerly, inpatients of an epileptic ward diagnosed with PNES between 2000 and 2013 were contacted via mail. They were asked by questionnaire about illness characteristics, i.e., age at onset, PNES status at onset and in the course, treatments, psychosocial situation, and quality of life status.

RESULTS

Two-thirds of the N = 63 formerly inpatients were female, their age at onset was 26.7 years. Seizure frequency decreased significantly over time, 31.7% were currently seizure-free, but still only 37% were regularly employed. Only 48% had a satisfying health-related quality of life. The remitted participants had a shorter duration of illness and higher health-related quality of life. Participants with a good level of functioning were more likely to be male, took fewer medications, and had a higher health-related quality of life. Those participants with higher quality of life were more frequently employed and had fewer seizures.

CONCLUSIONS

As participants continue to be severely limited in their functional level and quality of life over the period under review, enhanced treatment approaches that address experiential avoidance seem to be needed.

Genetics of Functional Seizures; A Scoping Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Evidence on the genetics of functional seizures is scarce, and the purpose of the current scoping systematic review is to examine the existing evidence and propose how to advance the field.

METHODS

Web of science and MEDLINE were searched, from their initiation until May 2023. The following key words were used: functional neurological disorder(s), psychogenic neurological disorder(s), functional movement disorder(s), psychogenic movement disorder(s), functional seizures(s), psychogenic seizure(s), nonepileptic seizure(s), dissociative seizure(s), or psychogenic nonepileptic seizure(s), AND, gene, genetic(s), polymorphism, genome, epigenetics, copy number variant, copy number variation(s), whole exome sequencing, or next-generation sequencing.

RESULTS

We identified three original studies. In one study, the authors observed that six (5.9%) patients with functional seizures carried pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants. In another study, the authors observed that, in functional seizures, there was a significant correlation with genes that are over-represented in adrenergic, serotonergic, oxytocin, opioid, and GABA receptor signaling pathways. In the third study, the authors observed that patients with functional seizures, as well as patients with depression, had significantly different genotypes in FKBP5 single nucleotide polymorphisms compared with controls.

CONCLUSION

Future genetic investigations of patients with functional seizures would increase our understanding of the pathophysiological and neurobiological problems underlying this common neuropsychological stress-associated condition.

Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures-High Mortality Rate Is a 'Wake-Up Call'

Patients with epilepsy have an elevated mortality rate compared to the general population and now studies are showing a comparable death ratio in patients diagnosed with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. The latter is a top differential diagnosis for epilepsy and the unexpected mortality rate in these patients underscores the importance of an accurate diagnosis. Experts have called for more studies to elucidate this finding but the explanation is already available, embedded in the existing data. To illustrate, a review of the diagnostic practice in epilepsy monitoring units, of the studies examining mortality in PNES and epilepsy patients, and of the general clinical literature on the two populations was conducted. The analysis reveals that the scalp EEG test result, which distinguishes a psychogenic from an epileptic seizure, is highly fallible; that the clinical profiles of the PNES and epilepsy patient populations are virtually identical; and that both are dying of natural and non-natural causes including sudden unexpected death associated with confirmed or suspected seizure activity. The recent data showing a similar mortality rate simply constitutes more confirmatory evidence that the PNES population consists largely of patients with drug-resistant scalp EEG-negative epileptic seizures. To reduce the morbidity and mortality in these patients, they must be given access to treatments for epilepsy.

The neurobiology of functional neurological disorders characterised by impaired awareness

We review the neurobiology of Functional Neurological Disorders (FND), i.e., neurological disorders not explained by currently identifiable histopathological processes, in order to focus on those characterised by impaired awareness (functionally impaired awareness disorders, FIAD), and especially, on the paradigmatic case of Resignation Syndrome (RS). We thus provide an improved more integrated theory of FIAD, able to guide both research priorities and the diagnostic formulation of FIAD. We systematically address the diverse spectrum of clinical presentations of FND with impaired awareness, and offer a new framework for understanding FIAD. We find that unraveling the historical development of neurobiological theory of FIAD is of paramount importance for its current understanding. Then, we integrate contemporary clinical material in order to contextualise the neurobiology of FIAD within social, cultural, and psychological perspectives. We thus review neuro-computational insights in FND in general, to arrive at a more coherent account of FIAD. FIAD may be based on maladaptive predictive coding, shaped by stress, attention, uncertainty, and, ultimately, neurally encoded beliefs and their updates. We also critically appraise arguments in support of and against such Bayesian models. Finally, we discuss implications of our theoretical account and provide pointers towards an improved clinical diagnostic formulation of FIAD. We suggest directions for future research towards a more unified theory on which future interventions and management strategies could be based, as effective treatments and clinical trial evidence remain limited.

Evaluation of the Patient With Paroxysmal Spells Mimicking Epileptic Seizures

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic issue of paroxysmal spells, including epileptic seizure (ES) mimics, is one that neurologists frequently encounter. This review provides an up-to-date overview of the most common causes of ES mimics encountered in the outpatient setting.

REVIEW SUMMARY

Paroxysmal spells are characterized by changes in awareness, attention, perception, or abnormal movements. These can be broadly classified as ES and nonepileptic spells (NES). NES mimics ES but are distinguished by their symptomatology and lack of epileptiform activity on electroencephalography. NES may have psychological or physiological underpinnings. Psychogenic non-ES are the most common mimics of ES. Physiological causes of NES include syncope, cerebrovascular, movement, and sleep-related disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

Distinguishing NES from ES at times may be challenging even to the most experienced clinicians. However, detailed history with an emphasis on the clinical clues, including taking a moment-by-moment history of the event from the patient and observers and physical examination, helps create an appropriate differential diagnosis to guide further diagnostic testing. An accurate diagnosis of NES prevents iatrogenic harm, including unnecessary exposure to antiseizure medications and overuse of health care resources. It also allows for the correct specialist referral and appropriate treatment.

Moderators of cognitive behavioural therapy treatment effects and predictors of outcome in the CODES randomised controlled trial for adults with dissociative seizures

OBJECTIVE

We explored moderators of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) treatment effects and predictors of outcome at 12-month follow-up in the CODES Trial (N = 368) comparing CBT plus standardised medical care (SMC) vs SMC-alone for dissociative seizures (DS).

METHODS

We undertook moderator analyses of baseline characteristics to determine who had benefited from being offered CBT 12 months post-randomisation. Outcomes included: monthly DS frequency, psychosocial functioning (Work and Social Adjustment Scale - WSAS), and health-related quality of life (Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) SF-12v2 scores). When moderating effects were absent, we tested whether baseline variables predicted change irrespective of treatment allocation.

RESULTS

Moderator analyses revealed greater benefits (p < 0.05) of CBT on DS frequency for participants with more (≥22) symptoms (Modified PHQ-15) or ≥ 1 current (M.I.N.I.-confirmed) comorbid psychiatric diagnosis at baseline. The effect of CBT on PCS scores was moderated by gender; women did better than men in the CBT + SMC group. Predictors of improved outcome included: not receiving disability benefits, lower anxiety and/or depression scores (PCS, MCS, WSAS); shorter duration, younger age at DS onset, employment, fewer symptoms and higher educational qualification (PCS, WSAS); stronger belief in the diagnosis and in CBT as a "logical" treatment (MCS). Some variables that clinically might be expected to moderate/predict outcome (e.g., maladaptive personality traits, confidence in treatment) were not shown to be relevant.

CONCLUSION

Patient complexity interacted with treatment. CBT was more likely to reduce DS frequency in those with greater comorbidity. Other patient characteristics predicted outcome regardless of the received intervention.

Heterogeneity of patients with functional/dissociative seizures: Three multidimensional profiles

OBJECTIVE

Current concepts highlight the neurological and psychological heterogeneity of functional/dissociative seizures (FDS). However, it remains uncertain whether it is possible to distinguish between a limited number of subtypes of FDS disorders. We aimed to identify profiles of distinct FDS subtypes by cluster analysis of a multidimensional dataset without any a priori hypothesis.

METHODS

We conducted an exploratory, prospective multicenter study of 169 patients with FDS. We collected biographical, trauma (childhood and adulthood traumatic experiences), semiological (seizure characteristics), and psychopathological data (psychiatric comorbidities, dissociation, and alexithymia) through psychiatric interviews and standardized scales. Clusters were identified by the Partitioning Around Medoids method. The similarity of patients was computed using Gower distance. The clusters were compared using analysis of variance, chi-squared, or Fisher exact tests.

RESULTS

Three patient clusters were identified in this exploratory, hypothesis-generating study and named on the basis of their most prominent characteristics: A "No/Single Trauma" group (31.4%), with more male patients, intellectual disabilities, and nonhyperkinetic seizures, and a low level of psychopathology; A "Cumulative Lifetime Traumas" group (42.6%), with clear female predominance, hyperkinetic seizures, relatively common comorbid epilepsy, and a high level of psychopathology; and A "Childhood Traumas" group (26%), commonly with comorbid epilepsy, history of childhood sexual abuse (75%), and posttraumatic stress disorder, but also with a high level of anxiety and dissociation.

SIGNIFICANCE

Although our cluster analysis was undertaken without any a priori hypothesis, the nature of the trauma history emerged as the most important differentiator between three common FDS disorder subtypes. This subdifferentiation of FDS disorders may facilitate the development of more specific therapeutic programs for each patient profile.

Sustained improvement with mindfulness-based therapy for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

BACKGROUND

We previously reported on the efficacy of a manualized 12-session mindfulness-based therapy (MBT) for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES). Completion of MBT provided improvements in weekly PNES frequency and self-rated intensity.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we aimed to determine sustainability of improvement of seizure-related measures at 3- to 6-month follow-up after treatment completion. We also examined changes at treatment end and at follow-up on therapeutic targets of the MBT program.

METHODS

Patients with documented PNES were recruited from 2014 to 2018. Baseline measures were collected at time of diagnosis (T0) and at first follow-up post-diagnosis (T1). Outcomes are reported at MBT treatment completion (T3) and 3- to 6-month follow-up (T4). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for pair-wise comparisons of PNES frequency; linear mixed models were used for other outcomes.

RESULTS

Fourteen of the 26 MBT completers (54%) attended follow-up (median 147.5 days between T3 and T4). PNES frequency, intensity, and number of days/week with PNES remained reduced at T4 (p < 0.01 for all; median frequency reduction 1.3/week from T1). Illness perception and feeling understood remained improved at T4 (p < 0.001 for both) as did worry about PNES (p < 0.05). Illness attribution (physical, mental or both) changed from T0 to T3 (p < 0.01), but not to T4. Psychological flexibility did not change over time.

CONCLUSION

Previously reported improvements in seizure-related measures with MBT at treatment conclusion were maintained at 3- to 6-month follow-up. There were sustained improvements in some underlying processes (illness perception, feeling understood, and symptom worry) over the course of treatment and at follow-up. Long-term benefits of MBT need to be established with randomized controlled trials.

Diagnostic accuracy of clinical signs and symptoms for psychogenic nonepileptic attacks versus epileptic seizures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Psychogenic nonepileptic attacks (PNEA) are events of altered behavior that resemble epileptic seizures (ES) but are not caused by abnormal electrical cortical activity. Understanding which clinical signs and symptoms are associated with PNEA may allow better triaging for video-electroencephalogram monitoring (VEM) and for a more accurate prediction when such testing is unavailable.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review searching Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central from inception to March 29, 2019. We included original research that reported at least one clinical sign or symptom, included distinct groups of adult ES and PNEA with no overlap, and used VEM for the reference standard. Two authors independently assessed quality of the studies using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity of studies were evaluated using a bivariate random effects model.

RESULTS

We identified 4028 articles, of which 33 were included. There was a female sex predominance in the PNEA population (n = 22). From our meta-analysis, pooled sensitivities (0.27-0.72) and specificities (0.51-0.89) for PNEA were modest for individual signs. History of sexual abuse had the highest pooled specificity (89%), while the most sensitive feature was female sex (72%). Individual studies (n = 4) reported high levels of accuracy for ictal eye closure (sensitivity 64-73.7% and specificity 76.9-100%) and post-traumatic stress disorder (no reported sensitivity or specificity). Assuming the pre-test probability for PNEA in a tertiary care epilepsy center is 14%, even the strongest meta-analyzed features only exert modest diagnostic value, increasing post-test probabilities to a maximum of 33%.

CONCLUSIONS

This review reflects the limited certainty afforded by individual clinical features to distinguish between PNEA and ES. Specific demographic and comorbid features, even despite moderately high specificities, impart minimal impact on diagnostic decision making. This emphasizes the need for the development of multisource predictive tools to optimize diagnostic likelihood ratios.

Incidence and prevalence of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (functional seizures): a systematic review and an analytical study

AIM

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) or functional seizures are universal phenomena. However, data on their epidemiology is limited. The aim of the current study was to review the literature on the epidemiology of PNES and to provide analytical estimates of its incidence and prevalence based on the direct data that are available from previous studies on PNES.

METHODS

The methods of this work had two parts: (1) MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Scopus from inception to 19 October 2019 were systematically searched. (2) The analytical study of the incidence and prevalence of PNES was performed, based on the following data from previous studies: incidence of PNES, duration of PNES before making a diagnosis, outcome and mortality of PNES.

RESULTS

The search strategy yielded five articles; three were on the incidence and two on the prevalence. In the analytical part of the study, the incidence of PNES was calculated to be 3.1 (95% Confidence Interval: 1.1-5.1) per 100,000 population per year. The calculated prevalence rate of PNES in 2019 was 108.5 (95% Confidence Interval: 39.2-177.8) per 100,000 population, in the USA.

CONCLUSION

While, the generalizability of these calculated incidence and prevalence rates to other places in the world is limited, they give us a reasonable hint that PNES is a common condition and the prevalence is much more than that it was thought before.Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2021.1942870.

Cognitive-behavioural therapy compared with standardised medical care for adults with dissociative non-epileptic seizures: the CODES RCT

BACKGROUND

Dissociative (non-epileptic) seizures are potentially treatable by psychotherapeutic interventions; however, the evidence for this is limited.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dissociative seizure-specific cognitive-behavioural therapy for adults with dissociative seizures.

DESIGN

This was a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel-arm, mixed-methods randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

This took place in 27 UK-based neurology/epilepsy services, 17 liaison psychiatry/neuropsychiatry services and 18 cognitive-behavioural therapy services.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with dissociative seizures in the previous 8 weeks and no epileptic seizures in the previous year and meeting other eligibility criteria were recruited to a screening phase from neurology/epilepsy services between October 2014 and February 2017. After psychiatric assessment around 3 months later, eligible and interested participants were randomised between January 2015 and May 2017.

INTERVENTIONS

Standardised medical care consisted of input from neurologists and psychiatrists who were given guidance regarding diagnosis delivery and management; they provided patients with information booklets. The intervention consisted of 12 dissociative seizure-specific cognitive-behavioural therapy 1-hour sessions (plus one booster session) that were delivered by trained therapists, in addition to standardised medical care.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was monthly seizure frequency at 12 months post randomisation. The secondary outcomes were aspects of seizure occurrence, quality of life, mood, anxiety, distress, symptoms, psychosocial functioning, clinical global change, satisfaction with treatment, quality-adjusted life-years, costs and cost-effectiveness.

RESULTS

In total, 698 patients were screened and 368 were randomised (standardised medical care alone, n = 182; and cognitive-behavioural therapy plus standardised medical care, n = 186). Primary outcome data were obtained for 85% of participants. An intention-to-treat analysis with multivariate imputation by chained equations revealed no significant between-group difference in dissociative seizure frequency at 12 months [standardised medical care: median of seven dissociative seizures (interquartile range 1-35 dissociative seizures); cognitive-behavioural therapy and standardised medical care: median of four dissociative seizures (interquartile range 0-20 dissociative seizures); incidence rate ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.56 to 1.09; p = 0.144]. Of the 16 secondary outcomes analysed, nine were significantly better in the arm receiving cognitive-behavioural therapy at a p-value < 0.05, including the following at a p-value ≤ 0.001: the longest dissociative seizure-free period in months 7-12 inclusive post randomisation (incidence rate ratio 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 2.20; p = 0.001); better psychosocial functioning (Work and Social Adjustment Scale, standardised treatment effect -0.39, 95% confidence interval -0.61 to -0.18; p < 0.001); greater self-rated and clinician-rated clinical improvement (self-rated: standardised treatment effect 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.16 to 0.62; p = 0.001; clinician rated: standardised treatment effect 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.17 to 0.57; p < 0.001); and satisfaction with treatment (standardised treatment effect 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.27 to 0.73; p < 0.001). Rates of adverse events were similar across arms. Cognitive-behavioural therapy plus standardised medical care produced 0.0152 more quality-adjusted life-years (95% confidence interval -0.0106 to 0.0392 quality-adjusted life-years) than standardised medical care alone. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (cost per quality-adjusted life-year) for cognitive-behavioural therapy plus standardised medical care versus standardised medical care alone based on the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version, and imputed data was £120,658. In sensitivity analyses, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranged between £85,724 and £206,067. Qualitative and quantitative process evaluations highlighted useful study components, the importance of clinical experience in treating patients with dissociative seizures and potential benefits of our multidisciplinary care pathway.

LIMITATIONS

Unlike outcome assessors, participants and clinicians were not blinded to the interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant additional benefit of dissociative seizure-specific cognitive-behavioural therapy in reducing dissociative seizure frequency, and cost-effectiveness over standardised medical care was low. However, this large, adequately powered, multicentre randomised controlled trial highlights benefits of adjunctive dissociative seizure-specific cognitive-behavioural therapy for several clinical outcomes, with no evidence of greater harm from dissociative seizure-specific cognitive-behavioural therapy.

FUTURE WORK

Examination of moderators and mediators of outcome.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN05681227 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02325544.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 43. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Marital status in patients with functional (psychogenic nonepileptic) seizures: An international study

PURPOSE

The study aimed to investigate the marital status in a cohort of patients with functional seizures from seven countries in four continents. Factors associated with marital status were also explored.

METHODS

Adult patients with functional seizures who were admitted to the epilepsy monitoring units at centers in Iran, Qatar, USA, France, Georgia, Egypt, and United Arab Emirates (UAE) were retrospectively identified. Marital status was assessed in the whole cohort.

RESULTS

Four hundred thirty-two patients were included (241 from Iran, 52 from France, 48 from Qatar, 41 from the USA, 19 from UAE, 18 from Egypt, and 13 from Georgia); 302 were women and 130 were men. One hundred fifty (35%) subjects were single, 245 (57%) were married, and 37 (8%) were separated (31 divorced, 7%; 6 widowed, 1%). Auras with functional seizures were less frequently reported by single people in comparison with that by married patients (54% vs. 61%) [odds ratio (OR) = 0.58]. Separated people compared with those who were married less often had auras with their functional seizures (27% vs. 61%; OR = 0.26) and more often reported a history of sexual abuse (49% vs. 12%; OR = 6.14).

CONCLUSION

The marital status has significant associations with the semiology of functional seizures. A history of sexual abuse is significantly associated with being separated and should be inquired and tackled appropriately during the management process of patients with functional seizures.

Brain connectivity abnormalities in patients with functional (psychogenic nonepileptic) seizures: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the current endeavor was to systematically review the existing evidence on brain connectivity abnormalities in patients with functional seizures (FS).

METHODS

This systematic review was prepared according to the instructions of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. MEDLINE (accessed from PubMed) and Scopus from inception to April 4, 2020 were systematically searched. The following search strategy was implemented and these key words (in the title/abstract) were used: "connectivity" OR "network" AND "psychogenic" OR "dissociative" OR "nonepileptic".

RESULTS

Through the search strategy, we could identify eighteen articles. These studies have applied various methodologies and they could identify a variety of brain connectivity abnormalities in people with FS. However, none of these studies provided a high level of evidence. They were all small studies (none had a sample size of more than 21 patients). In addition, most of the studies did not match their cases and their controls with respect to the psychiatric comorbidities and other significant confounders.

CONCLUSION

Abnormal functional connectivity between emotion processing areas of the brain with regions involved in executive control and cognitive performance, and the functional connections of the anterior cingulate cortex are of major interest and may be involved in the pathophysiology of FS. Pursuing the concept of brain connectivity abnormalities in patients with FS and comparing the findings with well-matched controls in well-designed studies may result in a breakthrough in identifying the exact neurobiological origin of FS.

Is patient acceptance of the diagnosis of functional (psychogenic nonepileptic) seizures linked to their clinical characteristics?

PURPOSE

We investigated the rate of acceptance of functional seizures (FS) or psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) diagnosis in a cross-sectional study in a cohort from Iran. We hypothesized that the acceptance of FS diagnosis has association with clinical characteristics of the patients.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, all patients with FS, who were diagnosed at Shiraz Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Iran, from 2008 until 2018, were investigated. In a phone call interview in February 2020, we obtained the following information: whether they have accepted the diagnosis that was delivered to them; what is their seizure outcome (seizure-free during the past 12 months or not).

RESULTS

100 patients participated; at the time of the follow-up call, 74 (74%) patients expressed that they have accepted the diagnosis of FS. At the follow-up call, 48 patients (48%) were seizure-free and 52 patients (52%) were suffering from FS yet; 34 of seizure-free patients (71%) and 40 of those patients who still had seizures (77%) expressed that they have accepted the diagnosis of FS (p = .504; Fisher's exact test). Patients' characteristics and seizure semiology were not associated with the acceptance of the diagnosis of FS.

CONCLUSION

That the majority of patients with FS accept their diagnosis if it is delivered to them appropriately, and demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients do not have associations with this.

[Psychogenic pseudoseizures as psychoneurological problem]

The complexity of the problem is associated with the lack of reliable differential diagnostic indications for distinguishing epileptic and pseudo-epileptic seizures, as well as with the risk of provoking seizures during psychological sessions in patients with PPS. Therefore, apparently, only one of the Russian-language monographs that were published in recent years and one of the 1999 neurology guidelines pay attention to this problem. We have shown the nosological heterogeneity of patients with PPS, clinical particularities related to it and the need for a differentiated approach to its therapy. PPS is a serious clinical problem that can successfully be solved only by interdisciplinary development.

Psychogenic Non-epileptic Seizures and Pseudo-Refractory Epilepsy, a Management Challenge

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are neurobehavioral conditions positioned in a gray zone, not infrequently a no-man land, that lies in the intersection between Neurology and Psychiatry. According to the DSM 5, PNES are a subgroup of conversion disorders (CD), while the ICD 10 classifies PNES as dissociative disorders. The incidence of PNES is estimated to be in the range of 1.4-4.9/100,000/year, and the prevalence range is between 2 and 33 per 100,000. The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) has identified PNES as one of the 10 most critical neuropsychiatric conditions associated with epilepsy. Comorbidity between epilepsy and PNES, a condition leading to "dual diagnosis," is a serious diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for clinicians. The lack of prompt identification of PNES in epileptic patients can lead to potentially harmful increases in the dosage of anti-seizure drugs (ASD) as well as erroneous diagnoses of refractory epilepsy. Hence, pseudo-refractory epilepsy is the other critical side of the PNES coin as one out of four to five patients admitted to video-EEG monitoring units with a diagnosis of pharmaco-resistant epilepsy is later found to suffer from non-epileptic events. The majority of these events are of psychogenic origin. Thus, the diagnostic differentiation between pseudo and true refractory epilepsy is essential to prevent actions that lead to unnecessary treatments and ASD-related side effects as well as produce a negative impact on the patient's quality of life. In this article, we review and discuss recent evidence related to the neurobiology of PNES. We also provide an overview of the classifications and diagnostic steps that are employed in PNES management and dwell on the concept of pseudo-resistant epilepsy.

Cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with dissociative seizures (CODES): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Dissociative seizures are paroxysmal events resembling epilepsy or syncope with characteristic features that allow them to be distinguished from other medical conditions. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) plus standardised medical care with standardised medical care alone for the reduction of dissociative seizure frequency.

METHODS

In this pragmatic, parallel-arm, multicentre randomised controlled trial, we initially recruited participants at 27 neurology or epilepsy services in England, Scotland, and Wales. Adults (≥18 years) who had dissociative seizures in the previous 8 weeks and no epileptic seizures in the previous 12 months were subsequently randomly assigned (1:1) from 17 liaison or neuropsychiatry services following psychiatric assessment, to receive standardised medical care or CBT plus standardised medical care, using a web-based system. Randomisation was stratified by neuropsychiatry or liaison psychiatry recruitment site. The trial manager, chief investigator, all treating clinicians, and patients were aware of treatment allocation, but outcome data collectors and trial statisticians were unaware of treatment allocation. Patients were followed up 6 months and 12 months after randomisation. The primary outcome was monthly dissociative seizure frequency (ie, frequency in the previous 4 weeks) assessed at 12 months. Secondary outcomes assessed at 12 months were: seizure severity (intensity) and bothersomeness; longest period of seizure freedom in the previous 6 months; complete seizure freedom in the previous 3 months; a greater than 50% reduction in seizure frequency relative to baseline; changes in dissociative seizures (rated by others); health-related quality of life; psychosocial functioning; psychiatric symptoms, psychological distress, and somatic symptom burden; and clinical impression of improvement and satisfaction. p values and statistical significance for outcomes were reported without correction for multiple comparisons as per our protocol. Primary and secondary outcomes were assessed in the intention-to-treat population with multiple imputation for missing observations. This trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial registry, ISRCTN05681227, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02325544.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 16, 2015, and May 31, 2017, we randomly assigned 368 patients to receive CBT plus standardised medical care (n=186) or standardised medical care alone (n=182); of whom 313 had primary outcome data at 12 months (156 [84%] of 186 patients in the CBT plus standardised medical care group and 157 [86%] of 182 patients in the standardised medical care group). At 12 months, no significant difference in monthly dissociative seizure frequency was identified between the groups (median 4 seizures [IQR 0-20] in the CBT plus standardised medical care group vs 7 seizures [1-35] in the standardised medical care group; estimated incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0·78 [95% CI 0·56-1·09]; p=0·144). Dissociative seizures were rated as less bothersome in the CBT plus standardised medical care group than the standardised medical care group (estimated mean difference -0·53 [95% CI -0·97 to -0·08]; p=0·020). The CBT plus standardised medical care group had a longer period of dissociative seizure freedom in the previous 6 months (estimated IRR 1·64 [95% CI 1·22 to 2·20]; p=0·001), reported better health-related quality of life on the EuroQoL-5 Dimensions-5 Level Health Today visual analogue scale (estimated mean difference 6·16 [95% CI 1·48 to 10·84]; p=0·010), less impairment in psychosocial functioning on the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (estimated mean difference -4·12 [95% CI -6·35 to -1·89]; p<0·001), less overall psychological distress than the standardised medical care group on the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-10 scale (estimated mean difference -1·65 [95% CI -2·96 to -0·35]; p=0·013), and fewer somatic symptoms on the modified Patient Health Questionnaire-15 scale (estimated mean difference -1·67 [95% CI -2·90 to -0·44]; p=0·008). Clinical improvement at 12 months was greater in the CBT plus standardised medical care group than the standardised medical care alone group as reported by patients (estimated mean difference 0·66 [95% CI 0·26 to 1·04]; p=0·001) and by clinicians (estimated mean difference 0·47 [95% CI 0·21 to 0·73]; p<0·001), and the CBT plus standardised medical care group had greater satisfaction with treatment than did the standardised medical care group (estimated mean difference 0·90 [95% CI 0·48 to 1·31]; p<0·001). No significant differences in patient-reported seizure severity (estimated mean difference -0·11 [95% CI -0·50 to 0·29]; p=0·593) or seizure freedom in the last 3 months of the study (estimated odds ratio [OR] 1·77 [95% CI 0·93 to 3·37]; p=0·083) were identified between the groups. Furthermore, no significant differences were identified in the proportion of patients who had a more than 50% reduction in dissociative seizure frequency compared with baseline (OR 1·27 [95% CI 0·80 to 2·02]; p=0·313). Additionally, the 12-item Short Form survey-version 2 scores (estimated mean difference for the Physical Component Summary score 1·78 [95% CI -0·37 to 3·92]; p=0·105; estimated mean difference for the Mental Component Summary score 2·22 [95% CI -0·30 to 4·75]; p=0·084), the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 scale score (estimated mean difference -1·09 [95% CI -2·27 to 0·09]; p=0·069), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scale depression score (estimated mean difference -1·10 [95% CI -2·41 to 0·21]; p=0·099) did not differ significantly between groups. Changes in dissociative seizures (rated by others) could not be assessed due to insufficient data. During the 12-month period, the number of adverse events was similar between the groups: 57 (31%) of 186 participants in the CBT plus standardised medical care group reported 97 adverse events and 53 (29%) of 182 participants in the standardised medical care group reported 79 adverse events.

INTERPRETATION

CBT plus standardised medical care had no statistically significant advantage compared with standardised medical care alone for the reduction of monthly seizures. However, improvements were observed in a number of clinically relevant secondary outcomes following CBT plus standardised medical care when compared with standardised medical care alone. Thus, adults with dissociative seizures might benefit from the addition of dissociative seizure-specific CBT to specialist care from neurologists and psychiatrists. Future work is needed to identify patients who would benefit most from a dissociative seizure-specific CBT approach.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health Research, Health Technology Assessment programme.

[Pilot Data from the Evaluation of an Integrative Body Psychotherapy Program for Patients with Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures]

Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) occur in the context of various diseases. Therefore, PNES patients represent a heterogeneous group with different causative disorders. The etiology is still poorly understood. Previous concepts assume an increased rate of trauma disorders in PNES, which has been proven several times by previous studies 1 2. The clinical picture is threatening, which means that those affected often receive intensive care measures without benefiting from them 3. PNES patients accumulate especially in epilepsy centers, since a diagnostic differentiation from epileptic seizures is possible at those specialized centers. Often, the transition from making the diagnosis in epilepsy centers to follow-up treatment in psychosomatic/psychiatric settings is difficult. A reason could be that patients and practitioners are often involved in somatic disease concepts, which might be caused by the threatening clinical picture of PNES 28. Due to this difficulties, a special outpatient clinic was set up at the Charité Berlin for people with dissociative seizures, which settles in the transition from neurology to psychosomatics and works as a cooperation project 27. Out of the ambulance, a group treatment program (CORDIS) was developed, which aims at a better care of PNES patients at the interface between neurology and psychosomatic medicine. This modularized 10-week treatment program will be presented in this article and is the subject of a currently ongoing randomized, controlled evaluation study. The pilot data from the ongoing RCT study presented here showed significant effects in the effectiveness of the program, in particular the primary and secondary outcome measures.

Semiological classification of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: A systematic review and a new proposal

PURPOSE

A semiological classification of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) may help address proper diagnosis and management and also provide standardization for future studies. The aim of the current paper was to systematically review the literature on the proposed classification systems for the semiology of PNES and to provide a new proposal based on the best available evidence.

METHODS

I searched the electronic database PubMed on May 16, 2019 for articles that included the following search terms: "psychogenic" AND "semiology" or "classification" and also "nonepileptic" AND "semiology" or "classification" and also "pseudoseizure" AND "semiology" or "classification" since 1940. I applied the same methodology using the electronic database Scopus, though I limited the search to the title, abstract, and keywords.

RESULTS

I could identify 15 classification systems through this search strategy using the electronic database PubMed. Searching the Scopus did not yield any additional relevant papers.

CONCLUSION

I proposed a new semiological classification system for PNES based on this systematic review. This includes three major classes of motor seizures, nonmotor seizures, and mixed semiology. A universally accepted and appropriate semiological classification system for PNES may lead to better standardization of future studies and may also help in better understanding of the pathophysiological basis of this condition.

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures publications in PubMed: Geographical distribution of the publications

PURPOSE

The aim of the current study was to depict a comprehensive geographical picture of the existing literature on psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) and to highlight the needs for future works.

METHODS

We searched the electronic database PubMed on June 8, 2019 for articles that included any of the related key words to analyze all the relevant literature. We applied the advance search; field was adjusted to the title and dates were adjusted to 01/01/2000 until 06/08/2019. We selected the relevant articles. Location of the study was determined according to the affiliation(s) of the authors.

RESULTS

1017 papers were included. Interest in research and publication on PNES has risen over the past two decades. Six hundred and nine full length research original papers and 199 review articles were published on PubMed from 2000 until 2019. Continent-wise, most articles were from North America and Europe (41.1% of the whole publications from Europe and 40.8% from North America; 833 papers totally), followed by Asia (92 papers), Oceania (36 papers) and South America (31 publications), while only 0.9% of the papers (9 papers) were from Africa.

CONCLUSION

A global campaign is necessary to inform and educate the world on the issue of PNES and its significance. While PNES merit further epidemiological investigations, there is a significant disparity with regard to the location of the studies. There is a huge need to invest more on studies on various aspects of PNES in many places in the world, including African nations, India, and China.