Comparative analysis of the single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) to established bariatric procedures: an assessment of 2-year postoperative data illustrating weight loss, type 2 diabetes, and nutritional status in a single US center

Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileostomy with Sleeve Gastrectomy/Single Anastomosis Duodenal Switch (SADI-S/SADS) IFSO Position Statement-Update 2023

The single anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy/single anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S/SADS) has gained attention as an alternative to the traditional biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS). In 2021, IFSO endorsed SADI-S/SADS as a safe and effective procedure, underscoring the necessity for long-term multidisciplinary care and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A task force was established to conduct a systematic review of current evidence on SADI-S/SADS to guide clinical practice. A systematic review was conducted across three databases, focusing on studies examining SADI-S/SADS and its outcomes. A total of 93 studies were analyzed. SADI-S/SADS demonstrated efficacy in weight loss and medium-to-long-term control of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), along with positive outcomes regarding hypertension and hyperlipidemia. However, its impact on other comorbidities remains inconclusive. Frequent nutritional deficiencies were identified, particularly in fat-soluble vitamins, anemia, and hypoalbuminemia. Despite significant efforts, high-quality evidence on SADI-S/SADS remains scarce, prompting IFSO to advocate for increased registry participation, publication of long-term studies, and more RCTs. Lifelong supplementation and monitoring for nutritional deficiencies are recommended. The current position statement will be reviewed in 2 years.

Perioperative Safety and 1-Year Outcomes of Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass (SADI) vs. Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch (BPD/DS): A Randomized Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

This randomized clinical trial evaluated the clinical outcomes of two surgical interventions for obesity treatment: single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI) and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS). The SADI procedure was developed as a response to the challenges posed by the BPD/DS procedure, aiming to enhance surgical efficiency, minimize postoperative risks, and maintain therapeutic efficacy. The present study primarily focused on early complications and short-term results.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients with a body mass index (BMI) ranging from 42 to 72 kg/m2 were randomly assigned to either the SADI or BPD/DS procedure. Parameters compared included % excess weight loss (%EWL), % total weight loss (%TWL), length of hospital stay (LOS), re-admission rates, and complications.

RESULTS

Both groups had similar demographics and baseline characteristics. SADI had a mean operating time of 109 min, significantly shorter than BPD/DS at 139 min (p < 0.001). Early complications occurred in five patients in the SADI group and in four patients in the BPD/DS group with no mortality. Median LOS was 2 days for both SADI and BPD/DS. Within 30 days, one SADI patient and three BPD/DS patients required re-admission. Serious late complications necessitating reoperation were observed in three SADI and two BPD/DS patients. After 1 year, %EWL and %TWL were similar: SADI (81.8% ± 13.6% and 40.1% ± 5.9%) and BPD/DS (84.2% ± 14.0% and 41.6% ± 6.4%).

CONCLUSION

This trial suggests that both the SADI and BPD/DS yield comparable weight loss outcomes after 1 year, with a notable risk profile.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03938571 ( http://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov ).

Analysis of the 1-year efficacy of four different surgical methods for treating Chinese super obese (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2) patients

This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the perioperative and postoperative follow-up data of patients with super obesity who had undergone RYGB, SG, BPD/DS, and SADI-S. A retrospective observational study was conducted to analyze the perioperative and postoperative follow-up data of 60 patients with super obesity who had undergone bariatric surgery. A total of 34 men and 26 women were included in this study. The participants had an average preoperative BMI of 53.81 ± 3.25 kg/m2. The body weight and BMI of all four patient groups decreased significantly at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively compared with the preoperative values. Additionally, the TWL (%) and EWL (%) of all four groups increased gradually over the same period. Compared with the preoperative values, the systolic and diastolic blood pressure, glycosylated hemoglobin, uric acid, triglycerides, and total cholesterol decreased to varying degrees in the four groups 1 year postoperatively. RYGB, SG, BPD/DS, and SADI-S are all safe and effective in treating super obese patients and improving their metabolic diseases to a certain extent.

Evaluation study of single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy in the treatment of Chinese obese patients based on efficacy and nutrition

To evaluate the efficacy and nutrition of single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) in Chinese obese patients in the first postoperative year. Clinical data of 66 obese patients who underwent SADI-S surgery at China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University from November 2018 to May 2022 were retrospectively collected. The weight, body mass index (BMI), percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), and percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) were recorded at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Moreover, metabolic disease remission and nutrient deficiencies were assessed at 1 year postoperatively. Overall, 66 patients (38 males and 28 females) were recruited, with a mean age of 35 (18-61) years and an average preoperative BMI of 42.94 kg/m2. Before surgery, 38 patients had type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), 46 patients had hyperuricemia (HUA), 45 patients had hypertension (HTN), 35 patients had hyperlipidemia, 12 patients had hypercholesterolemia, 12 patients had hyper-low-density lipoproteinemia, and 14 patients had gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms (GERD). All patients had undergone a DaVinci robotic or laparoscopic SADI-S surgery, and none converted to laparotomy or died. Four patients developed postoperative complications and were cured and discharged after conservative treatment or surgical treatment. At 3, 6 and 12 months, the average %EWL was 62.07 ± 26.56, 85.93 ± 27.92, and 106.65 ± 29.65%, %TWL was 22.67 ± 4.94, 32.10 ± 5.18, and 40.56 ± 7.89%, respectively. Fasting blood glucose (FBG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), uric acid (UA), triglycerides (TG), blood pressure (BP), and other indexes were significantly lower after one year post-surgery compared with the preoperative period (P < 0.05). The remission rates of T2DM, HUA, HTN, hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, and hyper-low-density lipoproteinemia 1 year after surgery were 100, 65.2, 62.2, 94.3, 100, and100%, respectively. One year after surgery, the remission rate of GERD was 71.4% (10/14), the rate of new occurrence of GERD was 12.1% (8/66), and the overall incidence rate was 18.2% (12/66). Except for vitamin B12(vit B12), the other nutrient indexes were significantly decreased after 1 year of surgery relative to levels before surgery (P < 0.05). The deficiency rates for vitamin A (vit A), vitamin E (vit E), zinc ion (Zn), and folic acid (FA) were higher (45.5, 25.8, 24.2, and 16.7%, respectively); however, there were no related clinical symptoms. SADI-S had significant effects on weight loss and metabolic disease remission. The main nutrient deficiencies after SADI-S were vit A, vit E, Zn, and FA deficiencies. The long-term efficacy and safety of SADI-S warrant further follow-up.

Single Anastomosis Duodenoileostomy with Sleeve: A Comprehensive Review of Anatomy, Surgical Technique, and Outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve (SADI-S) is a recently endorsed metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) procedure in the US. Despite its favorable characteristics, the utilization of SADI-S remains limited, accounting for a mere 0.25% of all MBS procedures performed. This review aims to offer an updated examination of the technique, while also presenting the safety and outcomes associated with SADI-S on both the short and long term.

RECENT FINDINGS

The safety of SADI-S is well-established, with short-term complication rates as low as 2.6%. A common channel length of 300 cm has consistently shown a lower incidence of malabsorption complications compared to shorter lengths. Bile reflux after SADI-S is relatively rare with an incidence of only 1.23%. SADI-S demonstrated sustained total weight loss (%TWL) at 5 years (37%) and 10 years (34%) postoperatively. Resolution of weight-related medical conditions was also significant after SADI-S, with remission rates of diabetes mellitus as high as 86.6% with over 5 years of follow-up. SADI-S is a safe and effective MBS procedure that has shown impressive and sustainable results in terms of weight loss and improvement in obesity-related medical conditions. Careful limb length selection is essential in minimizing the risk of nutritional deficiencies. SADI-S holds great promise as a valuable option for individuals seeking effective weight loss and improvement in associated health conditions.

Outcomes of single anastomosis duodeno ileal bypass and single anastomosis stomach ileal bypass for type II diabetes: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Bariatric surgery has demonstrated long-term effectiveness in inducing weight loss and improving metabolic parameters for obesity. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal (SADI) bypass and single anastomosis sleeve-ileal (SASI) bypass have both emerged as new promising bariatric procedures. In this paper, we review the existing literature and compare the outcomes of SADI and SASI bypass procedures in regard to weight loss, complication rate, and improvement of type II diabetes (T2DM). This has not yet been done in the preexisting literature.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a systematic literature search of electronic databases focusing on weight loss outcomes, rate of complications and remission, or improvement of T2DM and other obesity-related comorbidities. Seventeen studies on SADI and nine studies on SASI were included. Both are similar in terms of surgical technique and have demonstrated fewer complications when compared to other bariatric procedures. Mean preoperative BMI was similar in both study groups: 46.4 kg/m2 in SADI and 48.8 kg/m2 in SASI. Mean %EWL at 12 months in the SADI group was 74.1% compared to 77.4% in the SASI group. Preoperative severity of T2DM appeared to be higher in the SASI patient group, with a higher preoperative HbA1c and fasting blood glucose levels. T2DM resolution was achieved in a significant proportion of both SADI and SASI patient populations (78.5% in SADI and 89.0% in SASI). Complication rates were comparable for both procedures.

EXPERT OPINION

Both SADI and SASI are effective in inducing weight loss at 12 months, with a low rate of major complications and mortality. From the studies included in this review, the SASI procedure had a higher impact on T2DM resolution compared to SADI.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) vs One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) vs Single Anastomosis Duodeno-ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S): a Systematic Review of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery

In recent years, combined restrictive and hypo-absorptive procedures have gained widespread acceptance. The rationale of this systematic review is to compare the safety and efficacy between Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). Eighteen eligible studies were finalized for this review. Weight loss outcomes were greater with SADI-S (5 years) and OAGB (10 years). SADI-S offered better resolution of diabetes whereas hypertension and dyslipidaemia resolution were better with OAGB. Although early complications and mortality were higher with SADI-S, late complications were more frequent with RYGB. Both SADI-S and OAGB are as effective as RYGB for weight loss, but OAGB offers lesser complications. However, more data is imperative to determine the next gold standard procedure.

Medium-Term Nutritional and Metabolic Outcome of Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S)

INTRODUCTION

Single Anastomosis Duodenal-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S), like other hypoabsorptive procedures, could be burdened by long-term nutritional deficiencies such as malnutrition, anemia, hypocalcemia, and hyperparathyroidism.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to report our experience in terms of mid-term (2 years) bariatric, nutritional, and metabolic results in patients who underwent SADI-S both as a primary or revisional procedure.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-one patients were scheduled for SADI-S as a primary or revisional procedure from July 2016 to February 2020 and completed at least 2 years of follow-up. Demographic features, bariatric, nutritional, and metabolic results were analyzed during a stepped follow-up at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients (47 female and 19 male) were included. The median preoperative BMI was 53 (48-58) kg/m². Comorbidities were reported in 48 (72.7%) patients. At 2 years, patients had a median BMI of 27 (27-31) kg/m² (p < 0.001) with a median %EWL of 85.3% (72.1-96.1), a TWL of 75 (49-100) kg, and a %TWL of 50.9% (40.7-56.9). The complete remission rate was 87.5% for type 2 diabetes mellitus, 83.3% for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and 64.5% for hypertension. The main nutritional deficiencies post SADI-S were vitamin D (31.82%) and folic acid deficiencies (9.09%).

CONCLUSION

SADI-S could be considered as an efficient and safe procedure with regard to nutritional status, at least in mid-term (2 years) results. It represents a promising bariatric procedure because of the excellent metabolic and bariatric outcomes with acceptable nutritional deficiency rates. Nevertheless, larger studies with longer follow-ups are necessary to draw definitive conclusions.

Efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy for the treatment of Chinese T2D patients with obesity

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for obese T2D. As one of the most effective bariatric surgeries, SADI-S was recently introduced in China, and there is limited evidence of its efficacy and safety in the treatment of obese T2D. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of SADI-S in the treatment of obese T2D in China.

METHODS

The clinical data of 32 obese T2D patients who underwent SADI-S was included in this study. Changes in weight-related indicators, diabetes-related indicators, and patient nutritional outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

SADI-S was conducted successfully in all of the 32 cases without conversion to laparotomy or death. The incidence of surgical complications was 15.6% (5/32). The major complication rate was 6.3% (2/32). At 1 year after surgery, the BMI (kg/m²) significantly decreased from 40.8 ± 7.4 to 23.9 ± 2.9 (P < 0.05) and the mean HbA1c significantly decreased from 8.5% (6.4-11.5) to 5.0% (3.8-5.6) (P < 0.05). At 2 years after surgery, the BMI (kg/m²) significantly decreased to 24.9 ± 2.4 (P < 0.05) and the mean HbA1c significantly decreased to (4.8 ± 0.4)% (P < 0.05). The %TWL was (40.4 ± 6.5)% and (42.9 ± 4.9)% at 1 year and 2 years, respectively. The complete remission rates for T2D were both 100% at 1 year and 2 years. Triglyceride levels were significantly improved compared with preoperative, from (3.2 ± 3.0) mmol/L to (1.0 ± 0.3) mmol/L (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in other nutritional outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The SADI-S has excellent curative effect in the treatment of Chinese obese T2D, but the operation is challenging and the complication rate is high. Its long-term efficacy and safety require further study.

Based on Propensity Matching Scores: Comparison of the Efficacy of Two Kinds of Bariatric Surgery for Obese Type 2 Diabetes

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of OADS and SG in treating obese T2D in China.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 99 obese Chinese patients with T2D undergoing OADS or SG with a 1-year postoperative follow-up from January 2014 to October 2021. Using the propensity score matching (PSM) method, patients from both groups were matched 1:1. Outcomes for losing weight, controlling diabetes, and nutrition were then determined.

RESULTS

There were 32 patients in each group after using the PSM method, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of all the baseline indicators (P > 0.05). When comparing weight loss outcomes, the OADS group outperformed the SG group in terms of change in BMI and %TWL, with statistically significant differences [15.0 (8.1-26.6) kg/m², 10.0 (4.10-23.5) kg/m² P = 0.001; 38.5% ± 6.7%, 29.5% ± 9.4%, P = 0.000]. When comparing the efficacy of diabetes, the OADS group outperformed the SG group in terms of HbA1C and complete remission of diabetes, with statistically significant differences [5.1 (3.8-5.6)%, 5.4 (4.3-7.9)%, P = 0.001; 100%, 75%, P = 0.005]. Besides, the incidence of postoperative zinc deficiency in the OADS group was significantly higher than in the SG group (P = 0.019) and there was no significant difference in other postoperative nutritional outcomes between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Although OADS and SG are both effective in the treatment of obese T2D, OADS performs better. Besides, the long-term efficacy of both needs to be recorded at subsequent follow-up.

Patient Selection and 30-Day Outcomes of SADI-S Compared to RYGB: a Retrospective Cohort Study of 47,375 Patients

PURPOSE

Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) offers a novel bariatric procedure with few comparative studies evaluating patient selection or perioperative outcomes. We aim to compare SADI-S to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The 2020 Metabolic and Bariatric Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) registry was analyzed, comparing SADI-S to RYGB. Bivariate analysis was performed to determine intergroup differences. Multivariable logistic regression determined factors associated with serious complications and mortality.

RESULTS

We evaluated 47,375 patients, with 501 (1.1%) receiving SADI-S. Patients undergoing SADI-S had higher body mass index (51.4 ± 9.7 kg/m² SADI-S vs. 44.6 ± 7.9 kg/m² RYGB; p < 0.001), and more metabolic comorbidities including non-insulin dependent diabetes (21.7% SADI-S vs 19.0% RYGB; p = 0.011), insulin dependent diabetes (12.0% SADI-S vs. 8.6% RYGB; p = 0.011), and hypertension (54.9% SADI-S vs 47.6% RYGB; p < 0.001). Patients undergoing SADI-S experienced more anastomotic leaks (2.2% vs. 0.5%; p < 0.001), reoperations (5.0% vs 2.6%; p < 0.001), pneumonias (1.6% vs 0.5%; p < 0.001), had sepsis more frequently (1.4% vs 0.3%; p < 0.001), and required more unplanned reintubations (1.2% vs 0.3%; p = 0.004). SADI-S was independently associated with serious complications (OR 1.45, CI 1.09-1.95, p < 0.001) but was not a predictor of mortality (OR 3.29, p = 0.060).

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison to RYGB, patients undergoing SADI-S were found to have more metabolic comorbidities. Compared to RYGB, SADI-S has worse perioperative outcomes and is independently associated with serious complications. It remains unclear whether this represents a learning curve or true findings and prospective studies analyzing the risk-benefit ratio following SADI-S are needed.

Evaluation of Metabolic Outcomes Following SADI-S: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) offers a novel bariatric procedure. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates observational and comparative studies evaluating SADI-S, with meta-analysis comparing outcomes to other malabsorptive procedures (MPs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted in March 2021. The study followed PRISMA guidelines. Studies evaluating SADI-S with n > 5 were included. Primary outcome was diabetes (DM) remission, and secondary outcomes included perioperative outcomes, comorbidity resolution, and weight loss.

RESULTS

We reviewed 2285 studies with 16 included evaluating 3319 patients and 1704 (51.3%) undergoing SADI-S. SADI-S patients had increased BMI (49.6 kg/m² vs 48.8 kg/m²) and weight (139.7 kg vs 137.1 kg), were more likely to have DM (46.3% vs 42.1%), and dyslipidemia (36.6% SADI-S vs 32.7%). SADI-S had a shorter operative duration than MPs (MD - 36.74, p < 0.001), 0.85-day shorter post-operative stay (p < 0.001), and trended towards fewer complications (OR 0.69, p = 0.06). Rate of reoperation (OR 0.83, p = 0.59) was similar and DM remission was similar (OR 0.07, p = 0.1). Subgroup analysis suggested greater DM remission than Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (OR 4.42, p = 0.04). SADI-S had fewer malabsorptive complications, though follow-up was shorter. Weight loss was 37.3% compared to 35.6% total weight loss after SADI-S and MPs, respectively.

CONCLUSION

SADI-S demonstrates improved metabolic and weight loss outcomes with lower perioperative risks. SADI-S represents a promising bariatric procedure but long-term outcomes are needed to guide future uptake.

Retrospective Comparison of SADI-S Versus RYGB in Chinese with Diabetes and BMI< 35kg/m2: a Propensity Score Adjustment Analysis

BACKGROUND

As a modification of the duodenal switch (DS), single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) has recently become very popular and is successful for weight loss and T2DM remission. However, current studies have been mostly aimed at patients with severe obesity.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we firstly compare primary SADI-S to the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in Chinese with diabetes and BMI< 35 kg/m2.

METHODS

Using a propensity score (PS) matching analysis, we analyzed all patients with diabetes and BMI< 35 kg/m2 who underwent primary SADI-S or RYGB. All surgeries were conducted by a single surgeon at a Chinese center from June 2017 to January 2019.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients who underwent SADI-S and 65 patients who underwent RYGB were included in our analysis. Of these, 26 (100%) of patients in the SADI-S group and 43 (66%) of patients in the RYGB group completed the 24-month follow-up. No severe perioperative complication was observed in either group. There was a statistically higher percentage of total weight loss with SADI-S at the 2-year follow-up when compared to RYGB (p = 0.017 after PS correction). After PS adjustment, 76.5% of patients in the SADI-S group and 82.4% of patients in the RYGB group achieved complete remission of T2DM (p = 1.000). Nutritional outcomes were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In Chinese with diabetes and BMI< 35 kg/m2, with comparable T2DM remission and nutritional outcomes, primary SADI-S allows for better weight loss than RYGB. Compared with RYGB, SADI-S is also a safe, effective, and feasible treatment for these patients.

Single-Anastomosis Duodenal Switch: Conceptual Difference between East and West

Single-anastomosis duodenal switch (SADS) has become increasingly popular. This review compared the conceptual difference between Eastern (SADS-E) and Western (SADS-W) countries. After searching for SADS through PubMed and high-impact journals, 19 articles with 2280 patients were included for analysis. We found SADS-W was reserved for patients with a high body mass index (BMI) without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Surgeons performing SADS-W used larger bougies and preferred shorter common channels. However, SADS-E was mainly preferred in T2DM patients with a low BMI. SADS-E bypassed less bowel and used smaller bougies. The spectra of major postoperative complications, nutritional deficiencies, and gastrointestinal disorders were different between SADS-E and SADS-W. SADS-W yielded better weight loss and better T2DM remission than SADS-E. SADS are effective bariatric and metabolic procedures with promising therapeutic outcomes and acceptable safety.

Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy Plus Procedures for Treatment of Morbid Obesity: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are the most commonly performed bariatric procedures globally, but both techniques have shortcomings. Several modifications of SG (SG plus procedures) have been developed, but the efficacy of the different procedures has not been completely elucidated. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SG plus procedures. Out of the initially identified 2357 studies, thirteen were selected for this meta-analysis: two studies on banded sleeve gastrectomy (BSG), four studies on sleeve gastrectomy plus duodenal-jejunal bypass (SG + DJB) or sleeve gastrectomy with loop duodenal-jejunal bypass (SADJB), two studies on sleeve gastrectomy with jejunal-jejunal bypass (SG + JJB), four studies on single anastomosis duodenal-ileal switch (SADI-S), and one study on stomach intestinal pylorus-sparing surgery (SIPS). SADI-S procedure was found to achieve significantly greater percentage of excess weight loss than the RYGB. SG + DJB and SADJB achieved greater weight loss than the RYGB. Major complications were fewer with SG + JJB than with RYGB, but the difference was not significant. Overall, SG plus procedures appear to achieve better weight loss and cause fewer complications than RYGB.

Primary SADI-S in Chinese with Diabetes and BMI < 35 kg/m2: a Retrospective Study with 2-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) is a bariatric procedure based on the standard duodenal switch surgery. It was first introduced in 2007 as a procedure for individuals with clinically severe obesity. Till date, primary SADI-S has not been used on Chinese with diabetes and body mass index (BMI) < 35 kg/m².

OBJECTIVES

Here, we account the use of this novel surgery in Chinese with diabetes and BMI < 35 kg/m².

METHODS

All relevant medical information, involving patients with diabetes and BMI < 35 kg/m², who received primary SADI-S at Beijing Shijitan Hospital from June 2017 to December 2018, was retrospectively assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were selected for evaluation, and all of them completed a 2-year follow-up. The age, diabetic duration, and preoperative BMI were 35.5 (range 20-63) years, 3.5 (range 0.5-18) years, and 34.40 (range 28.74-34.96) kg/m², respectively. At 24 months, the percentage of total body weight loss (%TWL) and BMI were 26.26 (range 13.33-43.88) and 24.72 (range 17.96-29.07) kg/m², respectively. There were no serious complications or sequelae within a 2-year follow-up. In addition, for diabetes, 20/23 people achieved complete remission, whereas 3 achieved partial remission.

CONCLUSION

SADI-S is a highly effective and feasible bariatric surgery for Chinese having diabetes and BMI < 35 kg/m². However, care must be taken to follow a strict criteria for patient selection and to monitor patients carefully for the detection of postoperative nutritional sequelae.

Single-Anastomosis Duodenal Ileostomy with Sleeve Gastrectomy "Continued Innovation of the Duodenal Switch"

Single-anastomosis duodenal ileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) is an important emerging procedure in bariatric surgery as an alternative to performing the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or the Roux-en-Y duodenal switch. With this significant weight loss and low weight regain, SADI-S has low complication rates. SADI-S, because of its anatomic configuration, also does not increase ulcer risk in patients, with almost no ulcers observed. Because of the short common channel, malnutrition is a risk. Diabetes resolution is higher than with RYGB. Overall SADI-S is a safe and effective procedure for patients with higher body mass index and patients with diabetes.

Metabolic efficacy following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with loop duodenal switch surgery for type 2 diabetes in Indian patients with severe obesity

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Metabolic surgery improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and severe obesity. Sleeve gastrectomy with loop duodenal switch (SLDS), a loop modification of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch, is aimed to reduce the malabsorption, without compromising the efficacy. This study was designed to analyze the metabolic efficacy following SLDS.

METHODS

Eighty patients, who underwent SLDS for T2DM and severe obesity between January 2014 and February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Complete T2DM remission was defined as HbA1_C < 6% in the absence of anti-diabetic medications. T2DM remission was analyzed at the 6-month and 1-year follow-ups in terms of various predictors. Prediction of T2DM remission by ABCD, DiaRem and IMS scores was analyzed. Lower ABCD scores and higher DiaRem and IMS scores indicate severe T2DM.

RESULTS

Following SLDS, HbA1_C significantly reduced from 8.7% to 5.5% at the 6-month and 5.1% at the 1-year follow-ups. T2DM remission was 82.5% at the 6-month and 90.8% at the 1-year follow-ups. Preoperative glycemic control positively predicted, while T2DM duration and preoperative insulin use negatively predicted T2DM remission. Higher ABCD score, lower DiaRem and IMS scores predicted higher T2DM remission. Severe hypoalbuminemia was 20% in patients with 250 cm common channel and 02% in patients with ≥300 cm common channel at the 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

SLDS is an effective surgery to treat T2DM with severe obesity. Shorter T2DM duration, better preoperative glycemic control and the absence of insulin use were associated with better T2DM remission. Malabsorption was significantly lesser, when common channel was ≥300 versus 250 cm.

Bariatric Surgery-How Much Malabsorption Do We Need?-A Review of Various Limb Lengths in Different Gastric Bypass Procedures

The number of obese individuals worldwide continues to increase every year, thus, the number of bariatric/metabolic operations performed is on a constant rise as well. Beside exclusively restrictive procedures, most of the bariatric operations have a more or less malabsorptive component. Several different bypass procedures exist alongside each other today and each type of bypass is performed using a distinct technique. Furthermore, the length of the bypassed intestine may differ as well. One might add that the operations are performed differently in different parts of the world and have been changing and evolving over time. This review evaluates the most frequently performed bariatric bypass procedures (and their variations) worldwide: Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass, Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass + Sleeve Gastrectomy, Biliopancreatic Diversion + Duodenal Switch and operations due to weight regain. The evaluation of the procedures and different limb lengths focusses on weight loss, remission of comorbidities and the risk of malnutrition and deficiencies. This narrative review does not aim at synthesizing quantitative data. Rather, it provides a summary of carefully selected, high-quality studies to serve as examples and to draw tentative conclusions on the effects of the bypass procedures mentioned above. In conclusion, it is important to carefully choose the procedure and small bowel length excluded from the food passage suited best to each individual patient. A balance has to be achieved between sufficient weight loss and remission of comorbidities, as well as a low risk of deficiencies and malnutrition. In any case, at least 300 cm of small bowel should always remain in the food stream to prevent the development of deficiencies and malnutrition.

Metabolic surgery: A clinical update

Metabolic and bariatric surgery has grown beyond 'experimental' weight-loss surgery. As techniques have advanced over the last few decades, so has the growing body of research and evidence, proving that both weight-loss and metabolic health improvement are induced. Metabolic surgery has become the more appropriate term for weight-loss surgery because of the altered gastrointestinal anatomy and subsequent beneficial metabolic effects. Although the tool of metabolic surgery has been well refined, a large portion of the global population does not have adequate access to it. This clinical update aims to (a) inform healthcare providers from all disciplines about the myriad of benefits of metabolic surgery and (b) equip them with the necessary knowledge to bridge the gap between patients in need of metabolic treatment and the therapies in metabolic surgery available to them.

Single Anastomosis Duodenal-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy/One Anastomosis Duodenal Switch (SADI-S/OADS) IFSO Position Statement-Update 2020

PreambleThe International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) has played an integral role in educating both the metabolic surgical and the medical communities at large about the role of innovative and new surgical and or endoscopic interventions in treating adiposity-based chronic diseases. The single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy/one anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S/OADS) is a relatively new procedure that has been proposed as an alternative to the conventional duodenal switch (DS) procedure. The IFSO published a position paper on SADI-S/OADS in 2018 with which concluded that this procedure was likely to be a safe and efficacious treatment for adiposity and its related diseases. However, it noted that there was insufficient long-term data and minimal high-level evidence available. The position statement called for patients to be enrolled in long-term multidisciplinary care encouraged the registration of patients in national registries, and called for more randomized controlled trials (RCT) (Obes Surg 28:1207-16, 2018) involving the procedure. The following position statement is an update of the previous position statement. It is issued by the IFSO SADI-S/OADS task force and has been reviewed and approved by both the IFSO Scientific Committee and Executive Board. This statement is based on current clinical knowledge, expert opinion, and published peer-reviewed scientific evidence. It will be reviewed again in 2 years.

Metabolic Efficacy and Diabetes Remission Predictors Following 'Sleeve Gastrectomy with Loop Duodenojejunal Bypass' Surgery

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with loop duodenojejunal bypass (SLDJB) is a novel metabolic surgery that is a modification of the single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve. Compared to conventional surgeries, SLDJB is highly effective in inducing diabetes remission. This study analyzed the metabolic efficacy of SLDJB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-eight patients with obesity and diabetes who underwent SLDJB between May 2013 and October 2017 were retrospectively analyzed to investigate the efficacy of their surgery and diabetes remission predictors. Complete diabetes remission was defined as an HbA1_c level <6% with cessation of insulin and oral hypoglycemic agents.

RESULTS

Complete diabetes remission occurred in 80.52% and 76.71% of patients at 1- and 3-year follow-ups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the rates of complete diabetes remission between the groups based on gender, preoperative body mass index (BMI), diabetes duration or preoperative insulin use. There was a significantly higher rate of complete remission in patients <50 years of age at the 1-year follow-up. Additionally, the rate of complete remission was significantly less when preoperative glycemic control was poor. Preoperative HbA1_c levels negatively predicted complete remission, but was significant only at the 3-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

SLDJB is highly effective in treating obesity with type 2 diabetes, and preoperative glycemic control was found to predict complete remission. Patients under 50 years of age had a better short-term response rate; however, the surgery was effective regardless of gender, preoperative BMI, duration of diabetes or preoperative insulin use.

A Matched Cohort Comparison of Long-term Outcomes of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) Versus Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-ileostomy with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S)

BACKGROUND

The long-term effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and single-anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) is unknown.

PURPOSE

Compare the long-term outcomes.

SETTING

Single private institute, USA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 1254 patients who underwent primary RYGB or SADI-S were used for a retrospective matched cohort. Data were obtained by matching every RYGB patient to a SADI-S patient of the same sex, body mass index (BMI), and weight. Only patients out 5 years and had at least one > 5-year follow-up visit were included.

RESULTS

The matched cohort included 61 RYGB and 61 SADI-S patients. There was no statistical, demographic difference between the two groups. At 5 years, a 100% follow-up was available in each group. The intraoperative outcomes were significantly better with SADI-S. The 30-day readmission, reoperation, emergency department (ED) visits, and complication rates were statistically similar between the two groups. The long-term complication rates, Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb complications, and number of patients with more than one complication were significantly lower with SADI-S. Weight loss was significantly greater in the SADI-S group at 5 years. The long-term weight-loss failure rate was significantly higher in the RYGB group. The SADI-S procedure was associated with fewer reintervention through 6 years (14.7% patients vs. 39.3% patients, p = 0.001). Conversion or reversal of the procedure was required only in the RYGB group. There also was no significant difference in nutritional outcomes between the two procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that problems, including long-term complications, reinterventions, weight-loss failure, and conversion, were more often associated with RYGB than with SADI-S. The SADI-S may be considered one of the viable alternatives to RYGB.

Prospective multicentre randomised trial comparing the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB): SADISLEEVE study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Despite the non-negligible weight loss failure rate at midterm, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) remains the reference procedure in the treatment of morbid obesity with metabolic comorbidities. A recently emerged procedure, the single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S), could be more effective on weight loss with similar morbidity and lower weight loss failure rate than RYGB. We propose the first randomised, open, multicentre superiority trial comparing the SADI-S to RYGB (SADISLEEVE).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The main objective is to demonstrate the superiority at 2 years after surgery of the SADI-S compared with RYGB in term of excess weight loss percentage. The secondary objectives are the evaluation of nutritional status, metabolic outcomes, overall complication rates and quality of life, within 2 years after surgery. Key inclusion criteria are obese patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m² or ≥35 kg/m² with at least one comorbid condition and candidate to a first bariatric procedure or after failure of sleeve gastrectomy. Patients randomised by minimisation in two arms, based on centre, surgery as a revisional procedure, presence of type 2 diabetes and BMI >50 kg/m² will be included over 2 years.A sample size of 166 patients in each group will have a power of 90% to detect a probability of 0.603 that excess weight loss in the RYGB arm is less than excess weight loss in the SADI-S arm with a 5% two-sided significance level. With a drop-out rate of 10%, it will be necessary to include 183 patients per group.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by Institutional Review Board of Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Morvan (CPP1089-HPS1). Study was also approved by the French national agency for drug safety (2018061500148). Results will be reported in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03610256.

Different Malabsorptive Obesity Surgery Interventions Result in Distinct Postprandial Amino Acid Metabolomic Signatures

PURPOSE

Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) is an effective weight loss surgical procedure. Yet, BPD-DS is technically difficult to perform and carries a higher risk of nutrient deficiencies as compared with other surgical interventions. Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) is a modified BPD-DS procedure conceived with the aim of decreasing the technical complexity, while retaining the weight loss efficiency. Whether the two surgical procedures diverge in nutrient absorption rates and malnutrition risk is still matter of debate. Our aim was to determine if postprandial nutrient absorption rates are different in patients subjected to BPD-DS or SADI-S for weight loss.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasma amino acid metabolomic profiling during mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) was performed in subjects (N = 18) submitted to BPD-DS (n = 9) or SADI-S (n = 9) 1.6 ± 0.1 years earlier.

RESULTS

Patients submitted to SADI-S or BPD-DS presented distinct postprandial metabolomic profiles. Postprandial excursions of total and essential amino acids-leucine, isoleucine, and valine-were higher after SADI-S as compared with BPD-DS.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that a simplified malabsorptive bariatric surgery procedure SADI-S results in greater essential branched-chain amino acid absorption when compared with the classical BPD-DS intervention. These findings suggest that SADI-S can potentially lower lifetime risk of postoperative protein malnutrition, as well as have a positive impact on systemic metabolism and glucose homeostasis.