1
|
Renodon-Corniere A, Mikawa T, Kuwabara N, Ito K, Levitsky D, Iwasaki H, Takahashi M. Human Rad51 Protein Requires Higher Concentrations of Calcium Ions for D-Loop Formation than for Oligonucleotide Strand Exchange. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:3633. [PMID: 38612444 PMCID: PMC11011376 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25073633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Human Rad51 protein (HsRad51)-promoted DNA strand exchange, a crucial step in homologous recombination, is regulated by proteins and calcium ions. Both the activator protein Swi5/Sfr1 and Ca2+ ions stimulate different reaction steps and induce perpendicular DNA base alignment in the presynaptic complex. To investigate the role of base orientation in the strand exchange reaction, we examined the Ca2+ concentration dependence of strand exchange activities and structural changes in the presynaptic complex. Our results show that optimal D-loop formation (strand exchange with closed circular DNA) required Ca2+ concentrations greater than 5 mM, whereas 1 mM Ca2+ was sufficient for strand exchange between two oligonucleotides. Structural changes indicated by increased fluorescence intensity of poly(dεA) (a poly(dA) analog) reached a plateau at 1 mM Ca2+. Ca2+ > 2 mM was required for saturation of linear dichroism signal intensity at 260 nm, associated with rigid perpendicular DNA base orientation, suggesting a correlation with the stimulation of D-loop formation. Therefore, Ca2+ exerts two different effects. Thermal stability measurements suggest that HsRad51 binds two Ca2+ ions with KD values of 0.2 and 2.5 mM, implying that one step is stimulated by one Ca2+ bond and the other by two Ca2+ bonds. Our results indicate parallels between the Mg2+ activation of RecA and the Ca2+ activation of HsRad51.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tsutomu Mikawa
- RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan;
| | - Naoyuki Kuwabara
- Structural Biology Research Center, Institute of Materials Structure Science, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801, Japan;
| | - Kentaro Ito
- Graduate School of Medical Life Science, Yokohama City University, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan;
| | - Dmitri Levitsky
- Nantes Université, CNRS, US2B, UMR 6286, F-44000 Nantes, France; (A.R.-C.); (D.L.)
| | - Hiroshi Iwasaki
- School of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan;
- Innovative Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama 226-8503, Japan
| | - Masayuki Takahashi
- School of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu M, Shi Y, Liu Y, Li Z, Wu H, Yu Z, Wang Z, Xu C. A Human Adenovirus C Infection-Related Gene Panel for Predicting Survival and Treatment Responsiveness in Glioma Patients. World Neurosurg 2024; 183:e173-e186. [PMID: 38097166 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Viruses are critical for the regulation of cancer development and for therapy. Human adenovirus C (HadVC) has been detected in central nervous system and glioma tissue. The objective of the present study was the development of a robust prognostic model based on HadVC infection (HadVCi)-relevant genes. METHODS The genome, transcriptome, and virome were systemically analyzed using The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset for training and 2 cohorts from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas and an immunotherapy trial cohort with 17 patients receiving anti-PD-1 treatment for validation. HadVCi-relevant gene selection from differentially expressed genes between HadVC-infected and non-HadVC-infected glioma patients using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was followed by Cox regression modeling to establish a prognostic HadVCi score. Kaplan-Meier and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to estimate the predictive capacity of the HadVCi score. The χ2, Spearman, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to identify the correlation with the clinicopathological parameters, treatment responsiveness, and immune landscape. Temozolomide-resistant glioma cells were established and analyzed at the transcriptional level using RNA sequencing data. RESULTS The HadVCi score was (-0.2526673∗TRPC6) + (-0.2244276∗RNF207) + (-0.0894468∗SEC31B) + (-0.0190214∗ZCRB1) + (-0.017122∗DNPH1) + (0.0495818∗CCDC34) + (0.1196349∗PURG) + (0.1778997∗LILRA5). The score possesses a strong ability to predict overall survival. Further analysis revealed a higher HadVCi score correlated with a malignant phenotype and poorer treatment responsiveness to temozolomide-based chemotherapy and combined therapies. Additionally, transcriptomic analysis showed malignancy-, stemness-, and radioresistant-related gene activation in the HadVCi group, which characterized the poor outcomes and limited sensitivity to standard therapy. CONCLUSIONS The HadVCi score could be an effective tool for survival prediction and treatment guidance for patients with glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengwan Wu
- Department of Oncology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Ying Shi
- Department of Oncology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Yuyang Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, 920th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force, Kunming, China
| | - Zhaoshen Li
- Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Hong Wu
- Integrative Cancer Center & Cancer Clinical Research Center, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhuoyang Yu
- Department of Oncology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhao Wang
- School of Electronic Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Chuan Xu
- Department of Oncology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Serafim RB, Cardoso C, Storti CB, da Silva P, Qi H, Parasuram R, Navegante G, Peron JPS, Silva WA, Espreafico EM, Paçó-Larson ML, Price BD, Valente V. HJURP is recruited to double-strand break sites and facilitates DNA repair by promoting chromatin reorganization. Oncogene 2024; 43:804-820. [PMID: 38279062 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-024-02937-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
HJURP is overexpressed in several cancer types and strongly correlates with patient survival. However, the mechanistic basis underlying the association of HJURP with cancer aggressiveness is not well understood. HJURP promotes the loading of the histone H3 variant, CENP-A, at the centromeric chromatin, epigenetically defining the centromeres and supporting proper chromosome segregation. In addition, HJURP is associated with DNA repair but its function in this process is still scarcely explored. Here, we demonstrate that HJURP is recruited to DSBs through a mechanism requiring chromatin PARylation and promotes epigenetic alterations that favor the execution of DNA repair. Incorporation of HJURP at DSBs promotes turnover of H3K9me3 and HP1, facilitating DNA damage signaling and DSB repair. Moreover, HJURP overexpression in glioma cell lines also affected global structure of heterochromatin independently of DNA damage induction, promoting genome-wide reorganization and assisting DNA damage response. HJURP overexpression therefore extensively alters DNA damage signaling and DSB repair, and also increases radioresistance of glioma cells. Importantly, HJURP expression levels in tumors are also associated with poor response of patients to radiation. Thus, our results enlarge the understanding of HJURP involvement in DNA repair and highlight it as a promising target for the development of adjuvant therapies that sensitize tumor cells to irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodolfo B Serafim
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), Avenida Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil
- São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rodovia Araraquara - Jaú, Km 01 - s/n, Campos Ville, Araraquara, SP, 14800-903, Brazil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Center for Cell-Based Therapy-CEPID/FAPESP, Rua Tenente Catão Roxo, 2501, Ribeirão Preto, 14051-140, Brazil
| | - Cibele Cardoso
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), Avenida Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil
- Center for Cell-Based Therapy-CEPID/FAPESP, Rua Tenente Catão Roxo, 2501, Ribeirão Preto, 14051-140, Brazil
- Department of Genetics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), Avenida Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil
| | - Camila B Storti
- Department of Genetics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), Avenida Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil
| | - Patrick da Silva
- Department of Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Hongyun Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Ramya Parasuram
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Geovana Navegante
- São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rodovia Araraquara - Jaú, Km 01 - s/n, Campos Ville, Araraquara, SP, 14800-903, Brazil
| | - Jean Pierre S Peron
- Department of Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Wilson A Silva
- Center for Cell-Based Therapy-CEPID/FAPESP, Rua Tenente Catão Roxo, 2501, Ribeirão Preto, 14051-140, Brazil
- Department of Genetics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), Avenida Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil
| | - Enilza M Espreafico
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), Avenida Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil
| | - Maria L Paçó-Larson
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), Avenida Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil
| | - Brendan D Price
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| | - Valeria Valente
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (USP), Avenida Bandeirantes, 3900, Ribeirão Preto, 14049-900, Brazil.
- São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rodovia Araraquara - Jaú, Km 01 - s/n, Campos Ville, Araraquara, SP, 14800-903, Brazil.
- Center for Cell-Based Therapy-CEPID/FAPESP, Rua Tenente Catão Roxo, 2501, Ribeirão Preto, 14051-140, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang Y, Gu W, Shao Y. The therapeutic targets of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modifications on tumor radioresistance. Discov Oncol 2023; 14:141. [PMID: 37522921 PMCID: PMC10390431 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-023-00759-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy is an important tool for malignant tumors, and its tolerance needs to be addressed. In recent years, several studies have shown that regulators of aberrant m6A methylation play an important role in the formation, development and invasion and metastasis of tumors. A large number of studies have confirmed aberrant m6A methylation as a new target for tumour therapy, but research on whether it can play a role in tumor sensitivity to radiotherapy has not been extensive and thorough enough. Recent studies have shown that all three major enzymes of m6A methylation have significant roles in radioresistance, and that the enzymes that play a role differ in different tumor types and by different mechanisms, including regulating tumor cell stemness, affecting DNA damage and repair, and controlling the cell cycle. Therefore, elucidating the mechanisms of m6A methylation in the radiotherapy of malignant tumors is essential to counteract radioresistance, improve the efficacy of radiotherapy, and even propose targeted treatment plans for specific tumors. The latest research progress on m6A methylation and radioresistance is reviewed in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 185 Juqian Street, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Wendong Gu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 185 Juqian Street, Changzhou, 213003, China.
| | - Yingjie Shao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 185 Juqian Street, Changzhou, 213003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Komarla A, Dufresne S, Towers CG. Recent Advances in the Role of Autophagy in Endocrine-Dependent Tumors. Endocr Rev 2023; 44:629-646. [PMID: 36631217 PMCID: PMC10335171 DOI: 10.1210/endrev/bnad001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Autophagy plays a complex role in several cancer types, including endocrine-dependent cancers, by fueling cellular metabolism and clearing damaged substrates. This conserved recycling process has a dual function across tumor types where it can be tumor suppressive at early stages but tumor promotional in established disease. This review highlights the controversial roles of autophagy in endocrine-dependent tumors regarding cancer initiation, tumorigenesis, metastasis, and treatment response. We summarize clinical trial results thus far and highlight the need for additional mechanistic, preclinical, and clinical studies in endocrine-dependent tumors, particularly in breast cancer and prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anvita Komarla
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
- The Cell and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Suzanne Dufresne
- The Cell and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Christina G Towers
- The Cell and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Alejo S, Palacios B, Venkata PP, He Y, Li W, Johnson J, Chen Y, Jayamohan S, Pratap U, Clarke K, Zou Y, Lv Y, Weldon K, Viswanadhapalli S, Lai Z, Ye Z, Chen Y, Gilbert A, Suzuki T, Tekmal R, Zhao W, Zheng S, Vadlamudi R, Brenner A, Sareddy GR. Lysine-specific histone demethylase 1A (KDM1A/LSD1) inhibition attenuates DNA double-strand break repair and augments the efficacy of temozolomide in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2023; 25:1249-1261. [PMID: 36652263 PMCID: PMC10326496 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efficient DNA repair in response to standard chemo and radiation therapies often contributes to glioblastoma (GBM) therapy resistance. Understanding the mechanisms of therapy resistance and identifying the drugs that enhance the therapeutic efficacy of standard therapies may extend the survival of GBM patients. In this study, we investigated the role of KDM1A/LSD1 in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair and a combination of KDM1A inhibitor and temozolomide (TMZ) in vitro and in vivo using patient-derived glioma stem cells (GSCs). METHODS Brain bioavailability of the KDM1A inhibitor (NCD38) was established using LS-MS/MS. The effect of a combination of KDM1A knockdown or inhibition with TMZ was studied using cell viability and self-renewal assays. Mechanistic studies were conducted using CUT&Tag-seq, RNA-seq, RT-qPCR, western blot, homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) reporter, immunofluorescence, and comet assays. Orthotopic murine models were used to study efficacy in vivo. RESULTS TCGA analysis showed KDM1A is highly expressed in TMZ-treated GBM patients. Knockdown or knockout or inhibition of KDM1A enhanced TMZ efficacy in reducing the viability and self-renewal of GSCs. Pharmacokinetic studies established that NCD38 readily crosses the blood-brain barrier. CUT&Tag-seq studies showed that KDM1A is enriched at the promoters of DNA repair genes and RNA-seq studies confirmed that KDM1A inhibition reduced their expression. Knockdown or inhibition of KDM1A attenuated HR and NHEJ-mediated DNA repair capacity and enhanced TMZ-mediated DNA damage. A combination of KDM1A knockdown or inhibition and TMZ treatment significantly enhanced the survival of tumor-bearing mice. CONCLUSIONS Our results provide evidence that KDM1A inhibition sensitizes GBM to TMZ via attenuation of DNA DSB repair pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvador Alejo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| | - Bridgitte E Palacios
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| | - Prabhakar Pitta Venkata
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| | - Yi He
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| | - Wenjing Li
- Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| | - Jessica D Johnson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| | - Yihong Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, P. R. China
- Greehey Children’s Cancer Research Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| | - Sridharan Jayamohan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| | - Uday P Pratap
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| | - Kyra Clarke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| | - Yi Zou
- Greehey Children’s Cancer Research Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| | - Yingli Lv
- Greehey Children’s Cancer Research Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| | - Korri Weldon
- Greehey Children’s Cancer Research Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| | - Suryavathi Viswanadhapalli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
- Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| | - Zhao Lai
- Greehey Children’s Cancer Research Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| | - Zhenqing Ye
- Greehey Children’s Cancer Research Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| | - Yidong Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, P. R. China
- Greehey Children’s Cancer Research Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| | - Andrea R Gilbert
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| | - Takayoshi Suzuki
- The Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Rajeshwar R Tekmal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
- Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| | - Weixing Zhao
- Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
- Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| | - Siyuan Zheng
- Greehey Children’s Cancer Research Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
- Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| | - Ratna K Vadlamudi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
- Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
- Audie L. Murphy South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| | - Andrew J Brenner
- Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
- Department of Hematology & Oncology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| | - Gangadhara R Sareddy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
- Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Magrath JW, Flinchum DA, Hartono AB, Goldberg IN, Espinosa-Cotton M, Moroz K, Cheung NKV, Lee SB. Genomic Breakpoint Characterization and Transcriptome Analysis of Metastatic, Recurrent Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor. Sarcoma 2023; 2023:6686702. [PMID: 37457440 PMCID: PMC10344636 DOI: 10.1155/2023/6686702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) is a rare pediatric cancer caused by the EWSR1-WT1 fusion oncogene. Despite initial response to chemotherapy, DSRCT has a recurrence rate of over 80% leading to poor patient prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of only 15-25%. Owing to the rarity of DSRCT, sample scarcity is a barrier in understanding DSRCT biology and developing effective therapies. Utilizing a novel pair of primary and recurrent DSRCTs, we present the first map of DSRCT genomic breakpoints and the first comparison of gene expression alterations between primary and recurrent DSRCT. Our genomic breakpoint map includes the lone previously published DSRCT genomic breakpoint, the breakpoint from our novel primary/recurrent DSRCT pair, as well as the breakpoints of five available DSRCT cell lines and five additional DSRCTs. All mapped breakpoints were unique and most breakpoints included a 1-3 base pair microhomology suggesting microhomology-mediated end-joining as the mechanism of translocation fusion and providing novel insights into the etiology of DSRCT. Through RNA-sequencing analysis, we identified altered genes and pathways between primary and recurrent DSRCTs. Upregulated pathways in the recurrent tumor included several DNA repair and mRNA splicing-related pathways, while downregulated pathways included immune system function and focal adhesion. We further found higher expression of the EWSR1-WT1 upregulated gene set in the recurrent tumor as compared to the primary tumor and lower expression of the EWSR1-WT1 downregulated gene set, suggesting the EWSR1-WT1 fusion continues to play a prominent role in recurrent tumors. The identified pathways including upregulation of DNA repair and downregulation of immune system function may help explain DSRCT's high rate of recurrence and can be utilized to improve the understanding of DSRCT biology and identify novel therapies to both help prevent recurrence and treat recurrent tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin W. Magrath
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Ave. New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Dane A. Flinchum
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Ave. New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Alifiani B. Hartono
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Ave. New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Ilon N. Goldberg
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Ave. New Orleans, LA, USA
| | | | - Krzysztof Moroz
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Ave. New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Nai-Kong V. Cheung
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sean B. Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Ave. New Orleans, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Antonelli F. 3D Cell Models in Radiobiology: Improving the Predictive Value of In Vitro Research. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:10620. [PMID: 37445795 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241310620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer is intrinsically complex, comprising both heterogeneous cellular composition and extracellular matrix. In vitro cancer research models have been widely used in the past to model and study cancer. Although two-dimensional (2D) cell culture models have traditionally been used for cancer research, they have many limitations, such as the disturbance of interactions between cellular and extracellular environments and changes in cell morphology, polarity, division mechanism, differentiation and cell motion. Moreover, 2D cell models are usually monotypic. This implies that 2D tumor models are ineffective at accurately recapitulating complex aspects of tumor cell growth, as well as their radiation responses. Over the past decade there has been significant uptake of three-dimensional (3D) in vitro models by cancer researchers, highlighting a complementary model for studies of radiation effects on tumors, especially in conjunction with chemotherapy. The introduction of 3D cell culture approaches aims to model in vivo tissue interactions with radiation by positioning itself halfway between 2D cell and animal models, and thus opening up new possibilities in the study of radiation response mechanisms of healthy and tumor tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Antonelli
- Laboratory of Biomedical Technologies, Division of Health Protection Technologies, Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, l'Energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile (ENEA), 00123 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Higginbottom SL, Tomaskovic-Crook E, Crook JM. Considerations for modelling diffuse high-grade gliomas and developing clinically relevant therapies. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2023; 42:507-541. [PMID: 37004686 PMCID: PMC10348989 DOI: 10.1007/s10555-023-10100-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
Diffuse high-grade gliomas contain some of the most dangerous human cancers that lack curative treatment options. The recent molecular stratification of gliomas by the World Health Organisation in 2021 is expected to improve outcomes for patients in neuro-oncology through the development of treatments targeted to specific tumour types. Despite this promise, research is hindered by the lack of preclinical modelling platforms capable of recapitulating the heterogeneity and cellular phenotypes of tumours residing in their native human brain microenvironment. The microenvironment provides cues to subsets of glioma cells that influence proliferation, survival, and gene expression, thus altering susceptibility to therapeutic intervention. As such, conventional in vitro cellular models poorly reflect the varied responses to chemotherapy and radiotherapy seen in these diverse cellular states that differ in transcriptional profile and differentiation status. In an effort to improve the relevance of traditional modelling platforms, recent attention has focused on human pluripotent stem cell-based and tissue engineering techniques, such as three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting and microfluidic devices. The proper application of these exciting new technologies with consideration of tumour heterogeneity and microenvironmental interactions holds potential to develop more applicable models and clinically relevant therapies. In doing so, we will have a better chance of translating preclinical research findings to patient populations, thereby addressing the current derisory oncology clinical trial success rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah L Higginbottom
- Intelligent Polymer Research Institute, AIIM Facility, Innovation Campus, University of Wollongong, Fairy Meadow, NSW, 2519, Australia
- Arto Hardy Family Biomedical Innovation Hub, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Eva Tomaskovic-Crook
- Intelligent Polymer Research Institute, AIIM Facility, Innovation Campus, University of Wollongong, Fairy Meadow, NSW, 2519, Australia.
- Arto Hardy Family Biomedical Innovation Hub, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Jeremy M Crook
- Intelligent Polymer Research Institute, AIIM Facility, Innovation Campus, University of Wollongong, Fairy Meadow, NSW, 2519, Australia.
- Arto Hardy Family Biomedical Innovation Hub, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Xu PF, Li C, Chen YS, Li DP, Xi SY, Chen FR, Li X, Chen ZP. Radiomics-based survival risk stratification of glioblastoma is associated with different genome alteration. Comput Biol Med 2023; 159:106878. [PMID: 37060774 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is a remarkable heterogeneous tumor with few non-invasive, repeatable, and cost-effective prognostic biomarkers reported. In this study, we aim to explore the association between radiomic features and prognosis and genomic alterations in GBM. METHODS A total of 180 GBM patients (training cohort: n = 119; validation cohort 1: n = 37; validation cohort 2: n = 24) were enrolled and underwent preoperative MRI scans. From the multiparametric (T1, T1-Gd, T2, and T2-FLAIR) MR images, the radscore was developed to predict overall survival (OS) in a multistep postprocessing workflow and validated in two external validation cohorts. The prognostic accuracy of the radscore was assessed with concordance index (C-index) and Brier scores. Furthermore, we used hierarchical clustering and enrichment analysis to explore the association between image features and genomic alterations. RESULTS The MRI-based radscore was significantly correlated with OS in the training cohort (C-index: 0.70), validation cohort 1 (C-index: 0.66), and validation cohort 2 (C-index: 0.74). Multivariate analysis revealed that the radscore was an independent prognostic factor. Cluster analysis and enrichment analysis revealed that two distinct phenotypic clusters involved in distinct biological processes and pathways, including the VEGFA-VEGFR2 signaling pathway (q-value = 0.033), JAK-STAT signaling pathway (q-value = 0.049), and regulation of MAPK cascade (q-value = 0.0015/0.025). CONCLUSIONS Radiomic features and radiomics-derived radscores provided important phenotypic and prognostic information with great potential for risk stratification in GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng-Fei Xu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guandong, 510060, PR China; Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (PKU-HKUST) Medical Center, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, 518035, Shenzhen, PR China
| | - Cong Li
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guandong, 510060, PR China; The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guandong, 510120, PR China; Guangdong Province Hospital of Chinese Medical, Guangzhou, Guandong, 510120, PR China
| | - Yin-Sheng Chen
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guandong, 510060, PR China
| | - De-Pei Li
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guandong, 510060, PR China
| | - Shao-Yan Xi
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guandong, 510060, PR China
| | - Fu-Rong Chen
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guandong, 510060, PR China
| | - Xin Li
- Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518107, PR China.
| | - Zhong-Ping Chen
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guandong, 510060, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Huang CY, Lai ZY, Hsu TJ, Chou FI, Liu HM, Chuang YJ. Boron Neutron Capture Therapy Eliminates Radioresistant Liver Cancer Cells by Targeting DNA Damage and Repair Responses. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2022; 9:1385-1401. [PMID: 36600987 PMCID: PMC9807134 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s383959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction For advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), resistance to conservative treatments remains a challenge. In previous studies, the therapeutic effectiveness and DNA damage responses of boric acid-mediated boron neutron capture therapy (BA-BNCT) in HCC have been demonstrated in animal models and HCC cell line. On the other hand, numerous studies have shown that high linear energy transfer (LET) radiation can overcome tumor resistance. Since BNCT yields a mixture of high and low LET radiation, we aimed to explore whether and how BA-BNCT could eliminate radioresistant HCC cells. Methods Radioresistant human HCC (HepG2-R) cells were established from HepG2 cells via intermittent irradiation. HepG2 and HepG2-R cells were then irradiated with either γ-ray or neutron radiation of BA-BNCT. Colony formation assays were used to assess cell survival and the relative biological effectiveness (RBE). The expression of phosphorylated H2AX (γH2AX) was also examined by immunocytochemistry and Western blot assays to evaluate the extent of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Finally, the expression levels of DNA damage response-associated proteins were determined, followed by cell cycle analysis and caspase-3 activity analysis. Results Our data demonstrated that under the same dose by γ-ray, BNCT effectively eliminated radioresistant HCC by increasing the number of DNA DSBs (p < 0.05) and impeding their repair (p < 0.05), which verified the high RBE of BNCT. We also found that BNCT resulted in delayed homologous recombination (HR) and inhibited the nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway during DNA repair. Markedly, BNCT increased cell arrest (p < 0.05) in the G2/M phase by altering G2 checkpoint signaling and increased PUMA-mediated apoptosis (p < 0.05). Conclusion Our data suggest that DNA damage and repair responses could affect the anticancer efficiency of BNCT in radioresistant HepG2-R cells, which highlights the potential of BNCT as a viable treatment option for recurrent HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chu-Yu Huang
- School of Medicine, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan,Institute of Bioinformatics and Structural Biology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan,Nuclear Science and Technology Development Center, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Zih-Yin Lai
- School of Medicine, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan,Institute of Bioinformatics and Structural Biology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan,Nuclear Science and Technology Development Center, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Tzu-Jung Hsu
- School of Medicine, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan,Institute of Bioinformatics and Structural Biology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan,Nuclear Science and Technology Development Center, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Fong-In Chou
- Nuclear Science and Technology Development Center, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Hong-Ming Liu
- Nuclear Science and Technology Development Center, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Jen Chuang
- School of Medicine, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan,Institute of Bioinformatics and Structural Biology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan,Nuclear Science and Technology Development Center, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan,Correspondence: Yung-Jen Chuang, School of Medicine, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, 300044, Taiwan, Tel +886-3-5742764, Fax +886-3-5715934, Email
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Thielhelm TP, Nourbakhsh A, Welford SM, Mellon EA, Bracho O, Ivan ME, Telischi F, Fernandez-Valle C, Dinh CT. RAD51 Inhibitor and Radiation Toxicity in Vestibular Schwannoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 167:860-868. [PMID: 35230908 PMCID: PMC9433467 DOI: 10.1177/01945998221083506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the RAD51 response (DNA repair) to radiation-induced DNA damage in patient-derived vestibular schwannoma (VS) cells and investigate the utility of RAD51 inhibitor (RI-1) in enhancing radiation toxicity. STUDY DESIGN Basic and translational science. SETTING Tertiary academic facility. METHODS VS tumors (n = 10) were cultured on 96-well plates and 16-well slides, exposed to radiation (0, 6, 12, or 18 Gy), and treated with RI-1 (0, 5, or 10 µM). Immunofluorescence was performed at 6 hours for γ-H2AX (DNA damage marker), RAD51 (DNA repair protein), and p21 (cell cycle arrest protein). Viability assays were performed at 96 hours, and capillary Western blotting was utilized to determine RAD51 expression in naïve VS tumors (n = 5). RESULTS VS tumors expressed RAD51. In cultured VS cells, radiation initiated dose-dependent increases in γ-H2AX and p21 expression. VS cells upregulated RAD51 to repair DNA damage following radiation. Addition of RI-1 reduced RAD51 expression in a dose-dependent manner and was associated with increased γ-H2AX levels and decreased viability in a majority of cultured VS tumors. CONCLUSION VS may evade radiation injury by entering cell cycle arrest and upregulating RAD51-dependent repair of radiation-induced double-stranded breaks in DNA. Although there was variability in responses among individual primary VS cells, RAD51 inhibition with RI-1 reduced RAD51-dependent DNA repair to enhance radiation toxicity in VS cells. Further investigations are warranted to understand the mechanisms of radiation resistance in VS and determine whether RI-1 is an effective radiosensitizer in patients with VS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torin P. Thielhelm
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Aida Nourbakhsh
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Scott M. Welford
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Eric A. Mellon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Olena Bracho
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Michael E. Ivan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Fred Telischi
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Cristina Fernandez-Valle
- Burnett School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Florida, College of Medicine, Orlando, FL
| | - Christine T. Dinh
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rajput M, Mishra D, Kumar K, Singh RP. Silibinin Radiosensitizes EGF Receptor-knockdown Prostate Cancer Cells by Attenuating DNA Repair Pathways. J Cancer Prev 2022; 27:170-181. [PMID: 36258717 PMCID: PMC9537578 DOI: 10.15430/jcp.2022.27.3.170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Emergence of radioresistance in prostate cancer (PCa) cells is a major obstacle in cancer therapy and contributes to the relapse of the disease. EGF receptor (EGFR) signaling plays an important role in the development of radioresistance. Herein, we have assessed the modulatory effects of silibinin on radiation-induced resistance via DNA repair pathways in EGFR-knockdown DU145 cells. shRNA-based silencing of EGFR was done in radioresistant human PCa DU145 cells and effects of ionizing radiation (IR) and silibinin were assessed using clonogenic and trypan blue assays. Furthermore, radiosensitizing effects of silibinin on PCa in context with EGFR were analyzed using flow cytometry, comet assay, and immunoblotting. Silibinin decreased the colony formation ability with an increased death of DU145 cells exposed to IR (5 Gray), with a concomitant decrease in Rad51 protein expression. Silibinin (25 μM) augmented the IR-induced cytotoxic effect in EGFR-knockdown PCa cells, along with induction of G2/M phase cell cycle arrest. Further, we studied homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathways in silibinin-induced DNA double-strand breaks in EGFR-knockdown DU145 cells. Silibinin down-regulated the expression of Rad51 and DNA-dependent protein kinase proteins without any considerable effect on Ku70 and Ku80 in IR-exposed EGFR-knockdown PCa cells. The pro-survival signaling proteins, phospho-extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK)1/2, phospho-Akt and phospho-STAT3 were decreased by silibinin in EGFR-deficient PCa cells. These findings suggest a novel mechanism of silibinin-induced radiosensitization of PCa cells by targeting DNA repair pathways, HR and NHEJ, and suppressing the pro-survival signaling pathways, ERK1/2, Akt and STAT3, in EGFR-knockdown PCa cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohit Rajput
- Cancer Biology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Deepali Mishra
- Cancer Biology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Kunal Kumar
- Cancer Biology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rana P. Singh
- Cancer Biology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, New Delhi, India,Special Centre for Systems Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India,Correspondence to Rana P. Singh, E-mail: , https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4261-7044
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Feu S, Unzueta F, Ercilla A, Pérez-Venteo A, Jaumot M, Agell N. RAD51 is a druggable target that sustains replication fork progression upon DNA replication stress. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0266645. [PMID: 35969531 PMCID: PMC9377619 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Solving the problems that replication forks encounter when synthesizing DNA is essential to prevent genomic instability. Besides their role in DNA repair in the G2 phase, several homologous recombination proteins, specifically RAD51, have prominent roles in the S phase. Using different cellular models, RAD51 has been shown not only to be present at ongoing and arrested replication forks but also to be involved in nascent DNA protection and replication fork restart. Through pharmacological inhibition, here we study the specific role of RAD51 in the S phase. RAD51 inhibition in non-transformed cell lines did not have a significant effect on replication fork progression under non-perturbed conditions, but when the same cells were subjected to replication stress, RAD51 became necessary to maintain replication fork progression. Notably, the inhibition or depletion of RAD51 did not compromise fork integrity when subjected to hydroxyurea treatment. RAD51 inhibition also did not decrease the ability to restart, but rather compromised fork progression during reinitiation. In agreement with the presence of basal replication stress in human colorectal cancer cells, RAD51 inhibition reduced replication fork speed in these cells and increased γH2Ax foci under control conditions. These alterations could have resulted from the reduced association of DNA polymerase α to chromatin, as observed when inhibiting RAD51. It may be possible to exploit the differential dependence of non-transformed cells versus colorectal cancer cells on RAD51 activity under basal conditions to design new therapies that specifically target cancer cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Feu
- Dept. Biomedicina, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fernando Unzueta
- Dept. Biomedicina, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Amaia Ercilla
- CIC bioGUNE, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Derio, Spain
| | | | - Montserrat Jaumot
- Dept. Biomedicina, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Neus Agell
- Dept. Biomedicina, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pavlova G, Belyashova A, Savchenko E, Panteleev D, Shamadykova D, Nikolaeva A, Pavlova S, Revishchin A, Golbin D, Potapov A, Antipina N, Golanov A. Reparative properties of human glioblastoma cells after single exposure to a wide range of X-ray doses. Front Oncol 2022; 12:912741. [PMID: 35992802 PMCID: PMC9386365 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.912741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy induces double-stranded DNA breaks in tumor cells, which leads to their death. A fraction of glioblastoma cells repair such breaks and reinitiate tumor growth. It was necessary to identify the relationship between high radiation doses and the proliferative activity of glioblastoma cells, and to evaluate the contribution of DNA repair pathways, homologous recombination (HR), and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) to tumor-cell recovery. We demonstrated that the GO1 culture derived from glioblastoma cells from Patient G, who had previously been irradiated, proved to be less sensitive to radiation than the Sus\fP2 glioblastoma culture was from Patient S, who had not been exposed to radiation before. GO1 cell proliferation decreased with radiation dose, and MTT decreased to 35% after a single exposure to 125 Gγ. The proliferative potential of glioblastoma culture Sus\fP2 decreased to 35% after exposure to 5 Gγ. At low radiation doses, cell proliferation and the expression of RAD51 were decreased; at high doses, cell proliferation was correlated with Ku70 protein expression. Therefore, HR and NHEJ are involved in DNA break repair after exposure to different radiation doses. Low doses induce HR, while higher doses induce the faster but less accurate NHEJ pathway of double-stranded DNA break repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Galina Pavlova
- Nikolay Nilovich (N.N.) Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery (NMRCN), Moscow, Russia
- Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Genetics Development, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Medical Genetics, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- *Correspondence: Galina Pavlova,
| | - Alexandra Belyashova
- Nikolay Nilovich (N.N.) Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery (NMRCN), Moscow, Russia
| | - Ekaterina Savchenko
- Nikolay Nilovich (N.N.) Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery (NMRCN), Moscow, Russia
| | - Dmitri Panteleev
- Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Genetics Development, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Dzhirgala Shamadykova
- Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Genetics Development, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anna Nikolaeva
- Nikolay Nilovich (N.N.) Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery (NMRCN), Moscow, Russia
| | - Svetlana Pavlova
- Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Genetics Development, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexander Revishchin
- Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Genetics Development, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Denis Golbin
- Nikolay Nilovich (N.N.) Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery (NMRCN), Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexander Potapov
- Nikolay Nilovich (N.N.) Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery (NMRCN), Moscow, Russia
| | - Natalia Antipina
- Nikolay Nilovich (N.N.) Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery (NMRCN), Moscow, Russia
| | - Andrey Golanov
- Nikolay Nilovich (N.N.) Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery (NMRCN), Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hersh AM, Gaitsch H, Alomari S, Lubelski D, Tyler BM. Molecular Pathways and Genomic Landscape of Glioblastoma Stem Cells: Opportunities for Targeted Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:3743. [PMID: 35954407 PMCID: PMC9367289 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive tumor of the central nervous system categorized by the World Health Organization as a Grade 4 astrocytoma. Despite treatment with surgical resection, adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, outcomes remain poor, with a median survival of only 14-16 months. Although tumor regression is often observed initially after treatment, long-term recurrence or progression invariably occurs. Tumor growth, invasion, and recurrence is mediated by a unique population of glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs). Their high mutation rate and dysregulated transcriptional landscape augment their resistance to conventional chemotherapy and radiation therapy, explaining the poor outcomes observed in patients. Consequently, GSCs have emerged as targets of interest in new treatment paradigms. Here, we review the unique properties of GSCs, including their interactions with the hypoxic microenvironment that drives their proliferation. We discuss vital signaling pathways in GSCs that mediate stemness, self-renewal, proliferation, and invasion, including the Notch, epidermal growth factor receptor, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt, sonic hedgehog, transforming growth factor beta, Wnt, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, and inhibitors of differentiation pathways. We also review epigenomic changes in GSCs that influence their transcriptional state, including DNA methylation, histone methylation and acetylation, and miRNA expression. The constituent molecular components of the signaling pathways and epigenomic regulators represent potential sites for targeted therapy, and representative examples of inhibitory molecules and pharmaceuticals are discussed. Continued investigation into the molecular pathways of GSCs and candidate therapeutics is needed to discover new effective treatments for GBM and improve survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M. Hersh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (A.M.H.); (H.G.); (S.A.); (D.L.)
| | - Hallie Gaitsch
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (A.M.H.); (H.G.); (S.A.); (D.L.)
- NIH Oxford-Cambridge Scholars Program, Wellcome—MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute and Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
| | - Safwan Alomari
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (A.M.H.); (H.G.); (S.A.); (D.L.)
| | - Daniel Lubelski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (A.M.H.); (H.G.); (S.A.); (D.L.)
| | - Betty M. Tyler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (A.M.H.); (H.G.); (S.A.); (D.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Nickoloff JA. Targeting Replication Stress Response Pathways to Enhance Genotoxic Chemo- and Radiotherapy. MOLECULES (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 27:molecules27154736. [PMID: 35897913 PMCID: PMC9330692 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27154736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Proliferating cells regularly experience replication stress caused by spontaneous DNA damage that results from endogenous reactive oxygen species (ROS), DNA sequences that can assume secondary and tertiary structures, and collisions between opposing transcription and replication machineries. Cancer cells face additional replication stress, including oncogenic stress that results from the dysregulation of fork progression and origin firing, and from DNA damage induced by radiotherapy and most cancer chemotherapeutic agents. Cells respond to such stress by activating a complex network of sensor, signaling and effector pathways that protect genome integrity. These responses include slowing or stopping active replication forks, protecting stalled replication forks from collapse, preventing late origin replication firing, stimulating DNA repair pathways that promote the repair and restart of stalled or collapsed replication forks, and activating dormant origins to rescue adjacent stressed forks. Currently, most cancer patients are treated with genotoxic chemotherapeutics and/or ionizing radiation, and cancer cells can gain resistance to the resulting replication stress by activating pro-survival replication stress pathways. Thus, there has been substantial effort to develop small molecule inhibitors of key replication stress proteins to enhance tumor cell killing by these agents. Replication stress targets include ATR, the master kinase that regulates both normal replication and replication stress responses; the downstream signaling kinase Chk1; nucleases that process stressed replication forks (MUS81, EEPD1, Metnase); the homologous recombination catalyst RAD51; and other factors including ATM, DNA-PKcs, and PARP1. This review provides an overview of replication stress response pathways and discusses recent pre-clinical studies and clinical trials aimed at improving cancer therapy by targeting replication stress response factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jac A Nickoloff
- Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wang Z, Jia R, Wang L, Yang Q, Hu X, Fu Q, Zhang X, Li W, Ren Y. The Emerging Roles of Rad51 in Cancer and Its Potential as a Therapeutic Target. Front Oncol 2022; 12:935593. [PMID: 35875146 PMCID: PMC9300834 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.935593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Defects in DNA repair pathways are emerging hallmarks of cancer. Accurate DNA repairs and replications are essential for genomic stability. Cancer cells require residual DNA repair capabilities to repair the damage from replication stress and genotoxic anti-tumor agents. Defective DNA repair also promotes the accumulation of genomic changes that eventually lead to tumorigenesis, tumor progression, and therapeutic resistance to DNA-damaging anti-tumor agents. Rad51 recombinase is a critical effector of homologous recombination, which is an essential DNA repair mechanism for double-strand breaks. Rad51 has been found to be upregulated in many malignant solid tumors, and is correlated with poor prognosis. In multiple tumor types, Rad51 is critical for tumor metabolism, metastasis and drug resistance. Herein, we initially introduced the structure, expression pattern of Rad51 and key Rad51 mediators involved in homologous recombination. Additionally, we primarily discussed the role of Rad51 in tumor metabolism, metastasis, resistance to chemotherapeutic agents and poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziyi Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shenyang Chest Hospital & Tenth People’s Hospital, Shenyang, China
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Renxiang Jia
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shenyang Chest Hospital & Tenth People’s Hospital, Shenyang, China
| | - Linlin Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shenyang Chest Hospital & Tenth People’s Hospital, Shenyang, China
| | - Qiwei Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiaohai Hu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Qiang Fu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xinyu Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Wenya Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- *Correspondence: Yi Ren, ; Wenya Li,
| | - Yi Ren
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shenyang Chest Hospital & Tenth People’s Hospital, Shenyang, China
- *Correspondence: Yi Ren, ; Wenya Li,
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Maksoud S. The DNA Double-Strand Break Repair in Glioma: Molecular Players and Therapeutic Strategies. Mol Neurobiol 2022; 59:5326-5365. [PMID: 35696013 DOI: 10.1007/s12035-022-02915-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Gliomas are the most frequent type of tumor in the central nervous system, which exhibit properties that make their treatment difficult, such as cellular infiltration, heterogeneity, and the presence of stem-like cells responsible for tumor recurrence. The response of this type of tumor to chemoradiotherapy is poor, possibly due to a higher repair activity of the genetic material, among other causes. The DNA double-strand breaks are an important type of lesion to the genetic material, which have the potential to trigger processes of cell death or cause gene aberrations that could promote tumorigenesis. This review describes how the different cellular elements regulate the formation of DNA double-strand breaks and their repair in gliomas, discussing the therapeutic potential of the induction of this type of lesion and the suppression of its repair as a control mechanism of brain tumorigenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Semer Maksoud
- Experimental Therapeutics and Molecular Imaging Unit, Department of Neurology, Neuro-Oncology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Darwis NDM, Horigome E, Li S, Adachi A, Oike T, Shibata A, Hirota Y, Ohno T. Radiosensitization by the Selective Pan-FGFR Inhibitor LY2874455. Cells 2022; 11:cells11111727. [PMID: 35681425 PMCID: PMC9179643 DOI: 10.3390/cells11111727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Ionizing radiation activates cytoprotective pathways in cancer cells. Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) is a key player in these pathways. Thus, FGFR signaling is a potential target to induce radiosensitization. LY2874455 is an orally administrable selective pan-FGFR inhibitor. However, the radiosensitizing effects of LY2874455 remain unclear. In this study, we addressed this issue by using radioresistant human cancer cell lines H1703 (FGFR1 mutant), A549 (FGFR1–4 wild-type), and H1299 (FGFR1–4 wild-type). At an X-ray dose corresponding to 50%-clonogenic survival as the endpoint, 100 nM LY2874455 increased the sensitivity of H1703, A549, and H1299 cells by 31%, 62%, and 53%, respectively. The combination of X-rays and LY2874455 led to a marked induction of mitotic catastrophe, a hallmark of radiation-induced cell death. Furthermore, combination treatment suppressed the growth of A549 xenografts to a significantly greater extent than either X-rays or the drug alone without noticeable toxicity. This is the first report to show the radiosensitizing effect of a selective pan-FGFR inhibitor. These data suggest the potential efficacy of LY2874455 as a radiosensitizer, warranting clinical validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narisa Dewi Maulany Darwis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan; (N.D.M.D.); (E.H.); (S.L.); (A.A.); (Y.H.); (T.O.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jl. Diponegoro No. 71, Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta 10430, Indonesia
| | - Eisuke Horigome
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan; (N.D.M.D.); (E.H.); (S.L.); (A.A.); (Y.H.); (T.O.)
| | - Shan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan; (N.D.M.D.); (E.H.); (S.L.); (A.A.); (Y.H.); (T.O.)
| | - Akiko Adachi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan; (N.D.M.D.); (E.H.); (S.L.); (A.A.); (Y.H.); (T.O.)
| | - Takahiro Oike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan; (N.D.M.D.); (E.H.); (S.L.); (A.A.); (Y.H.); (T.O.)
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan
- Correspondence:
| | - Atsushi Shibata
- Signal Transduction Program, Gunma University Initiative for Advanced Research (GIAR), Gunma University, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan;
| | - Yuka Hirota
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan; (N.D.M.D.); (E.H.); (S.L.); (A.A.); (Y.H.); (T.O.)
| | - Tatsuya Ohno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan; (N.D.M.D.); (E.H.); (S.L.); (A.A.); (Y.H.); (T.O.)
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Gunma, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Xie S, Hong Z, Li Y, Wang J, Wang J, Li S, Liu Y. RNF216 Alleviates Radiation-Induced Apoptosis and DNA Damage Through Regulating Ubiquitination-Mediated Degradation of p53 in Glioblastoma. Mol Neurobiol 2022; 59:4703-4717. [PMID: 35594003 DOI: 10.1007/s12035-022-02868-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and lethal subtype of glioma, characterized by uncontrolled cancer cell proliferation, extensive infiltration, and therapeutic resistance. Ring finger protein 216 (RNF216) is a RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase aberrantly expressed in multiple human cancers. Tumor protein 53 (p53) is a transcription factor that acts as a tumor suppressor. This study aimed to compare the RNF216 expression in GBM tissues and normal peritumoral tissues and to examine the effects of RNF216 overexpression/knockdown on tumorigenesis, radioresistance, and the p53 pathway in GBM. The results showed that RNF216 was overexpressed in GBM tissues and cell lines, and high RNF216 expression was related to a poor prognosis. RNF216 overexpression promoted GBM cell growth and inhibited apoptosis, while RNF216 knockdown impaired GBM cell growth and enhanced cell death. RNF216 was also highly expressed in recurrent GBM tissues compared with paired primary tumors. The upregulation of RNF216 not only facilitated GBM cell growth but also protected cells against X-ray irradiation-induced apoptosis and DNA damage, while RNF216 knockdown exerted opposite effects. Moreover, the implantation of GBM cells with RNF216 silencing suppressed tumorigenesis and increased radiosensitivity of mice bearing GBM xenografts. Further analysis revealed that RNF216 overexpression reduced the stability of p53 protein via ubiquitination and negatively regulated the p53 pathway, while RNF216 knockdown preserved the p53 protein. In conclusion, RNF216 effectively attenuated radiation-induced apoptosis and DNA damage in GBM via inducing ubiquitination-mediated degradation of p53. These findings suggest the potential therapeutic use of RNF216 inhibition for tumorigenesis and therapeutic resistance in GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Songwang Xie
- Department of Neurovascular Intervention, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei, China
| | - Zhen Hong
- Department of Neurovascular Intervention, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei, China
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Neurovascular Intervention, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei, China
| | - Junyong Wang
- Department of Neurovascular Intervention, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Neurovascular Intervention, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei, China
| | - Shaoquan Li
- Department of Neurovascular Intervention, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei, China
| | - Yongchang Liu
- Department of Neurovascular Intervention, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei, China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Singh B, Roy Chowdhury S, Mansuri MS, Pillai SJ, Mehrotra S. The BRCA2 and CDKN1A-interacting protein (BCCIP) stabilizes stalled replication forks and prevents degradation of nascent DNA. FEBS Lett 2022; 596:2041-2055. [PMID: 35592921 DOI: 10.1002/1873-3468.14406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
DNA replication stress is characterized by impaired replication fork progression, causing some of the replication forks to collapse and form DNA breaks. It is a primary cause of genomic instability leading to oncogenic transformation. The repair-independent functions of the proteins RAD51 and BRCA2, which are involved in homologous recombination (HR)-mediated DNA repair, are crucial for protecting nascent DNA strands from nuclease-mediated degradation. The BRCA2 and CDKN1A-interacting protein (BCCIP) associates with BRCA2 and RAD51 during HR-mediated DNA repair. Here, we investigated the role of BCCIP during the replication stress response. We find that in the presence of replication stress, BCCIP deficiency increases replication fork stalling and results in DNA double-strand break formation. We show that BCCIP is recruited to stalled replication forks and prevents MRE11 nuclease-mediated degradation of nascent DNA strands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhawna Singh
- Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Kharghar, 410210, India.,Homi Bhabha National Institute, BARC Training School Complex, Anushakti nagar, Mumbai, India
| | - Shalini Roy Chowdhury
- Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Kharghar, 410210, India
| | - Mohammad Shoaib Mansuri
- Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Kharghar, 410210, India
| | | | - Sonam Mehrotra
- Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Kharghar, 410210, India.,Homi Bhabha National Institute, BARC Training School Complex, Anushakti nagar, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Czajkowski D, Szmyd R, Gee HE. Impact of DNA damage response defects in cancer cells on response to immunotherapy and radiotherapy. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 66:546-559. [PMID: 35460184 PMCID: PMC9321602 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The DNA damage response (DDR) is a complex set of downstream pathways triggered in response to DNA damage to maintain genomic stability. Many tumours exhibit mutations which inactivate components of the DDR, making them prone to the accumulation of DNA defects. These can both facilitate the development of tumours and provide potential targets for novel therapeutic interventions. The inhibition of the DDR has been shown to induce radiosensitivity in certain cancers, rendering them susceptible to treatment with radiotherapy and improving the therapeutic window. Moreover, DDR defects are a strong predictor of patient response to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). The ability to target the DDR selectively has the potential to expand the tumour neoantigen repertoire, thus increasing tumour immunogenicity and facilitating a CD8+ T and NK cell response against cancer cells. Combinatorial approaches, which seek to integrate DDR inhibition with radiotherapy and immunotherapy, have shown promise in early trials. Further studies are necessary to understand these synergies and establish reliable biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Radosław Szmyd
- Genome Integrity Unit, Children's Medical Research Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Harriet E Gee
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Genome Integrity Unit, Children's Medical Research Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Transcriptomic Profiling of DNA Damage Response in Patient-Derived Glioblastoma Cells before and after Radiation and Temozolomide Treatment. Cells 2022; 11:cells11071215. [PMID: 35406779 PMCID: PMC8997841 DOI: 10.3390/cells11071215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive, invasive and treatment-resistant tumour. The DNA damage response (DDR) provides tumour cells with enhanced ability to activate cell cycle arrest and repair treatment-induced DNA damage. We studied the expression of DDR, its relationship with standard treatment response and patient survival, and its activation after treatment. The transcriptomic profile of DDR pathways was characterised within a cohort of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type glioblastoma from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and 12 patient-derived glioblastoma cell lines. The relationship between DDR expression and patient survival and cell line response to temozolomide (TMZ) or radiation therapy (RT) was assessed. Finally, the expression of 84 DDR genes was examined in glioblastoma cells treated with TMZ and/or RT. Although distinct DDR cluster groups were apparent in the TCGA cohort and cell lines, no significant differences in OS and treatment response were observed. At the gene level, the high expression of ATP23, RAD51C and RPA3 independently associated with poor prognosis in glioblastoma patients. Finally, we observed a substantial upregulation of DDR genes after treatment with TMZ and/or RT, particularly in RT-treated glioblastoma cells, peaking within 24 h after treatment. Our results confirm the potential influence of DDR genes in patient outcome. The observation of DDR genes in response to TMZ and RT gives insight into the global response of DDR pathways after adjuvant treatment in glioblastoma, which may have utility in determining DDR targets for inhibition.
Collapse
|
25
|
Colapietro A, Yang P, Rossetti A, Mancini A, Vitale F, Chakraborty S, Martellucci S, Marampon F, Mattei V, Gravina GL, Iorio R, Newman RA, Festuccia C. The Botanical Drug PBI-05204, a Supercritical CO2 Extract of Nerium Oleander, Is Synergistic With Radiotherapy in Models of Human Glioblastoma. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:852941. [PMID: 35401175 PMCID: PMC8984197 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.852941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common as well as one of the most malignant types of brain cancer. Despite progress in development of novel therapies for the treatment of GBM, it remains largely incurable with a poor prognosis and a very low life expectancy. Recent studies have shown that oleandrin, a unique cardiac glycoside from Nerium oleander, as well as a defined extract (PBI-05204) that contains this molecule, inhibit growth of human glioblastoma, and modulate glioblastoma patient-derived stem cell-renewal properties. Here we demonstrate that PBI-05204 treatment leads to an increase in vitro in the sensitivity of GBM cells to radiation in which the main mechanisms are the transition from autophagy to apoptosis, enhanced DNA damage and reduced DNA repair after radiotherapy (RT) administration. The combination of PBI-05204 with RT was associated with reduced tumor progression evidenced by both subcutaneous as well as orthotopic implanted GBM tumors. Collectively, these results reveal that PBI-05204 enhances antitumor activity of RT in preclinical/murine models of human GBM. Given the fact that PBI-05204 has already been examined in Phase I and II clinical trials for cancer patients, its efficacy when combined with standard-of-care radiotherapy regimens in GBM should be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Colapietro
- Laboratory of Radiobiology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Peiying Yang
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Alessandra Rossetti
- Laboratory of Radiobiology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Andrea Mancini
- Laboratory of Radiobiology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Flora Vitale
- Laboratory of Neurophysiology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Sharmistha Chakraborty
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Stefano Martellucci
- Biomedicine and Advanced Technologies Rieti Center, Sabina Universitas, Rieti, Italy
- Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Environmental Pathology, University Hub “Sabina Universitas”, Rieti, Italy
| | - Francesco Marampon
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mattei
- Biomedicine and Advanced Technologies Rieti Center, Sabina Universitas, Rieti, Italy
| | - Giovanni Luca Gravina
- Laboratory of Radiobiology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Roberto Iorio
- Laboratory of Biology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Robert A. Newman
- Phoenix Biotechnology, Inc., San Antonio, TX, United States
- *Correspondence: Robert A. Newman, ; Claudio Festuccia,
| | - Claudio Festuccia
- Laboratory of Radiobiology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
- *Correspondence: Robert A. Newman, ; Claudio Festuccia,
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nickoloff JA, Sharma N, Taylor L, Allen SJ, Hromas R. Nucleases and Co-Factors in DNA Replication Stress Responses. DNA 2022; 2:68-85. [PMID: 36203968 PMCID: PMC9534323 DOI: 10.3390/dna2010006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
DNA replication stress is a constant threat that cells must manage to proliferate and maintain genome integrity. DNA replication stress responses, a subset of the broader DNA damage response (DDR), operate when the DNA replication machinery (replisome) is blocked or replication forks collapse during S phase. There are many sources of replication stress, such as DNA lesions caused by endogenous and exogenous agents including commonly used cancer therapeutics, and difficult-to-replicate DNA sequences comprising fragile sites, G-quadraplex DNA, hairpins at trinucleotide repeats, and telomeres. Replication stress is also a consequence of conflicts between opposing transcription and replication, and oncogenic stress which dysregulates replication origin firing and fork progression. Cells initially respond to replication stress by protecting blocked replisomes, but if the offending problem (e.g., DNA damage) is not bypassed or resolved in a timely manner, forks may be cleaved by nucleases, inducing a DNA double-strand break (DSB) and providing a means to accurately restart stalled forks via homologous recombination. However, DSBs pose their own risks to genome stability if left unrepaired or misrepaired. Here we focus on replication stress response systems, comprising DDR signaling, fork protection, and fork processing by nucleases that promote fork repair and restart. Replication stress nucleases include MUS81, EEPD1, Metnase, CtIP, MRE11, EXO1, DNA2-BLM, SLX1-SLX4, XPF-ERCC1-SLX4, Artemis, XPG, and FEN1. Replication stress factors are important in cancer etiology as suppressors of genome instability associated with oncogenic mutations, and as potential cancer therapy targets to enhance the efficacy of chemo- and radiotherapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jac A. Nickoloff
- Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523, USA
| | - Neelam Sharma
- Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523, USA
| | - Lynn Taylor
- Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523, USA
| | - Sage J. Allen
- Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523, USA
| | - Robert Hromas
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine and the Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Meyer F, Engel AM, Krause AK, Wagner T, Poole L, Dubrovska A, Peitzsch C, Rothkamm K, Petersen C, Borgmann K. Efficient DNA Repair Mitigates Replication Stress Resulting in Less Immunogenic Cytosolic DNA in Radioresistant Breast Cancer Stem Cells. Front Immunol 2022; 13:765284. [PMID: 35280989 PMCID: PMC8913591 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.765284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a major cause of tumor therapy failure. This is mainly attributed to increased DNA repair capacity and immune escape. Recent studies have shown that functional DNA repair via homologous recombination (HR) prevents radiation-induced accumulation of DNA in the cytoplasm, thereby inhibiting the intracellular immune response. However, it is unclear whether CSCs can suppress radiation-induced cytoplasmic dsDNA formation. Here, we show that the increased radioresistance of ALDH1-positive breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) in S phase is mediated by both enhanced DNA double-strand break repair and improved replication fork protection due to HR. Both HR-mediated processes lead to suppression of radiation-induced replication stress and consequently reduction of cytoplasmic dsDNA. The amount of cytoplasmic dsDNA correlated significantly with BCSC content (p=0.0002). This clearly indicates that HR-dependent avoidance of radiation-induced replication stress mediates radioresistance and contributes to its immune evasion. Consistent with this, enhancement of replication stress by inhibition of ataxia telangiectasia and RAD3 related (ATR) resulted in significant radiosensitization (SER37 increase 1.7-2.8 Gy, p<0.0001). Therefore, disruption of HR-mediated processes, particularly in replication, opens a CSC-specific radiosensitization option by enhancing their intracellular immune response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Meyer
- Laboratory of Radiobiology & Experimental Radiooncology, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Center of Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anna Maria Engel
- Laboratory of Radiobiology & Experimental Radiooncology, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Center of Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ann Kristin Krause
- Laboratory of Radiobiology & Experimental Radiooncology, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Center of Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tim Wagner
- Laboratory of Radiobiology & Experimental Radiooncology, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Center of Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lena Poole
- Laboratory of Radiobiology & Experimental Radiooncology, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Center of Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anna Dubrovska
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Claudia Peitzsch
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Kai Rothkamm
- Laboratory of Radiobiology & Experimental Radiooncology, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Center of Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Cordula Petersen
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Center of Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kerstin Borgmann
- Laboratory of Radiobiology & Experimental Radiooncology, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Center of Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- *Correspondence: Kerstin Borgmann,
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Xu J, Wu PJ, Lai TH, Sharma P, Canella A, Welker AM, Beattie C, Timmers CD, Lang FF, Jacob NK, Elder JB, Lonser R, Easley M, Pietrzak M, Sampath D, Puduvalli VK. Disruption of DNA Repair and Survival Pathways through Heat Shock Protein inhibition by Onalespib to Sensitize Malignant Gliomas to Chemoradiation therapy. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:1979-1990. [PMID: 35140124 PMCID: PMC9064967 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-0468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proficient DNA repair by homologous recombination (HR) facilitates resistance to chemo-radiation in glioma stem cells (GSCs). We evaluated whether compromising HR by targeting HSP90, a molecular chaperone required for the function of key HR proteins, using onalespib, a long-acting, brain-penetrant HSP90 inhibitor, would sensitize high-grade gliomas to chemo-radiation in vitro and in vivo Experimental Design: The ability of onalespib to deplete HR client proteins, impair HR repair capacity, and sensitize GBM to chemo-radiation was evaluated in vitro in GSCs, and in vivo using zebrafish and mouse intracranial glioma xenograft models. The effects of HSP90 inhibition on the transcriptome and cytoplasmic proteins was assessed in GSCs and in ex vivo organotypic human glioma slice cultures. RESULTS Treatment with onalespib depleted CHK1 and RAD51, two key proteins of the HR pathway, and attenuated HR repair, sensitizing GSCs to the combination of radiation and temozolomide (TMZ). HSP90 inhibition reprogrammed the transcriptome of GSCs and broadly altered expression of cytoplasmic proteins including known and novel client proteins relevant to GSCs. The combination of onalespib with radiation and TMZ extended survival in a zebra fish and a mouse xenograft model of GBM compared to the standard of care (radiation and TMZ) or onalespib with radiation. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study demonstrate that targeting HR by HSP90 inhibition sensitizes GSCs to radiation and chemotherapy and extends survival in zebrafish and mouse intracranial models of GBM. These results provide a preclinical rationale for assessment of HSP90 inhibitors in combination with chemoradiation in GBM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihong Xu
- Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Pei-Jung Wu
- Division of Neuro-oncology, The Ohio State University
| | - Tzung-Huei Lai
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University
| | - Pratibha Sharma
- Department of Neuro-oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | - Frederick F Lang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Naduparambil K Jacob
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - J Bradley Elder
- Dardinger Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University
| | - Russell Lonser
- Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
| | | | | | - Deepa Sampath
- Hematopoeitic Biology and Malignancy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Vinay K Puduvalli
- Department of Neuro-oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Xu Q, Zhang H, Liu H, Han Y, Qiu W, Li Z. Inhibiting autophagy flux and DNA repair of tumor cells to boost radiotherapy of orthotopic glioblastoma. Biomaterials 2021; 280:121287. [PMID: 34864449 DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Radio-resistance of glioblastoma (GBM) remains a leading cause of radiotherapy failure because of the protective autophagy induced by X-Ray irradiation and tumor cells' strong capability of repairing damaged DNA. It is of great importance to overcome the radio-resistance for improving the efficacy of radiotherapy. Herein, we report the novel mechanism of core-shell copper selenide coated gold nanoparticles (Au@Cu2-xSe NPs) inhibiting the protective autophagy and DNA repair of tumor cells to drastically boost the radiotherapy efficacy of glioblastoma. We reveal that the core-shell Au@Cu2-xSe NPs can inhibit the autophagy flux by effectively alkalizing lysosomes. They can increase the SQSTM1/p62 protein levels of tumor cells without influencing their mRNA. We also reveal that Au@Cu2-xSe NPs can increase the ubiquitination of DNA repair protein Rad51, and promote the degradation of Rad51 by proteasomes to prevent the DNA repair. The simultaneous inhibition of protective autophagy and DNA repair significantly suppress the growth of orthotopic GBM by using radiotherapy and our novel Au@Cu2-xSe NPs. Our work provides a new insight and paradigm to significantly improve the efficacy of radiotherapy by rationally designing theranostic nano-agents to simultaneously inhibit protective autophagy and DNA repair of tumor cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Xu
- Center for Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School for Radiological and Interdisciplinary Sciences (RAD-X), Soochow University, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiation Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Suzhou, 215123, P.R. China
| | - Hao Zhang
- Center for Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School for Radiological and Interdisciplinary Sciences (RAD-X), Soochow University, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiation Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Suzhou, 215123, P.R. China; College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123, P.R. China.
| | - Hanghang Liu
- Center for Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School for Radiological and Interdisciplinary Sciences (RAD-X), Soochow University, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiation Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Suzhou, 215123, P.R. China
| | - Yaobao Han
- Center for Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School for Radiological and Interdisciplinary Sciences (RAD-X), Soochow University, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiation Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Suzhou, 215123, P.R. China
| | - Weibao Qiu
- Paul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Institute of Biomedical and Health Engineering, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, P.R. China
| | - Zhen Li
- Center for Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School for Radiological and Interdisciplinary Sciences (RAD-X), Soochow University, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiation Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Suzhou, 215123, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Morrison C, Weterings E, Mahadevan D, Sanan A, Weinand M, Stea B. Expression Levels of RAD51 Inversely Correlate with Survival of Glioblastoma Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13215358. [PMID: 34771522 PMCID: PMC8582387 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Identifying prognostic and predictive biomarkers for glioblastoma (GBM), a primary brain tumor, is essential in improving patient survival. We utilized gene expression profiling to investigate a uniform population of GBM patients who had been treated with surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy versus normal brain tissue, and identified high RAD51 expression as a poor prognostic marker that is amenable to therapeutic intervention. This observation was confirmed utilizing a publicly available gene expression dataset in a cohort of GBM patients. Abstract Treatment failures of glioblastoma (GBM) occur within high-dose radiation fields. We hypothesized that this is due to increased capacity for DNA damage repair in GBM. We identified 24 adult GBM patients treated with maximal safe resection followed by radiation with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. The mRNA from patients was quantified using NanoString Technologies’ nCounter platform and compared with 12 non-neoplastic temporal lobe tissue samples as a control. Differential expression analysis identified seven DNA repair genes significantly upregulated in GBM tissues relative to controls (>4-fold difference, adjusted p values < 0.001). Among these seven genes, Cox proportional hazards models identified RAD51 to be associated with an increased risk of death (HR = 3.49; p = 0.03). Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis showed that patients with high RAD51 expression had significantly shorter OS compared to low levels (median OS of 10.6 mo. vs 20.1 mo.; log-rank p = 0.03). Our findings were validated in a larger external dataset of 162 patients using publicly available gene expression data quantified by the same NanoString technology (median OS of 13.8 mo. vs. 17.4 mo; log-rank p = 0.006). Within this uniformly treated GBM population, RAD51, in the homologous recombination pathway, was overexpressed (vs. normal brain) and inversely correlated with OS. High RAD51 expression may be a prognostic biomarker and a therapeutic target in GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA; (C.M.); (E.W.)
| | - Eric Weterings
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA; (C.M.); (E.W.)
| | - Daruka Mahadevan
- Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA;
| | - Abhay Sanan
- Center for Neurosciences, Tucson, AZ 85718, USA;
| | - Martin Weinand
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA;
| | - Baldassarre Stea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA; (C.M.); (E.W.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(520)-694-0861
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Liew H, Meister S, Mein S, Tessonnier T, Kopp B, Held T, Haberer T, Abdollahi A, Debus J, Dokic I, Mairani A. Combined DNA Damage Repair Interference and Ion Beam Therapy: Development, Benchmark, and Clinical Implications of a Mechanistic Biological Model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 112:802-817. [PMID: 34710524 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.09.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our purpose was to develop a mechanistic model that describes and predicts radiation response after combined DNA damage repair interference (DDRi) and particle radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS The heterogeneous dose distributions of protons and 4He ions were implemented into the "UNIfied and VERSatile bio-response Engine" (UNIVERSE). Predictions for monoenergetic and mixed fields over clinically relevant dose and linear energy transfer range were compared with experimental in vitro survival data measured in this work as well as data available in the literature, including different cell lines and DDR interferences. Ultimately, UNIVERSE predictions were investigated in a patient plan. RESULTS UNIVERSE accurately predicts survival of cell lines with and without DDRi in clinical settings of ion beam therapy based only on 3 parameters derived from photon data. With increasing dose or linear energy transfer, the radiosensitizing effect of DDRi decreases, resulting in diminished relative biological effect of ion beam radiation for cells subjected to DDRi in comparison to cells that are not. Similar trends were observed in patient plan recalculations; however, this analysis also suggests that DDRi + particle radiation therapy may better preserve the therapeutic window in comparison to DDRi + photon radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS The presented framework represents the first mechanistic model of combined DDRi and particle radiation therapy comprehensively benchmarked in clinically relevant scenarios and a step toward more personalized treatment. It reveals potential differences between DDRi + photon radiation therapy versus DDRi + particle radiation therapy, which have not been described so far. UNIVERSE could aid in appraising the clinical viability of combined administration of radiosensitizing drugs and charged particle therapy, as well as the identification of patients with known DDR deficiencies in the tumor who might benefit from therapy with light ions, freeing limited space at heavy ion therapy centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Liew
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sarah Meister
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Biology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stewart Mein
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Kopp
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Haberer
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ivana Dokic
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; National Centre of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Medical Physics, Pavia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lozinski M, Bowden NA, Graves MC, Fay M, Tooney PA. DNA damage repair in glioblastoma: current perspectives on its role in tumour progression, treatment resistance and PIKKing potential therapeutic targets. Cell Oncol (Dordr) 2021; 44:961-981. [PMID: 34057732 DOI: 10.1007/s13402-021-00613-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aggressive, invasive and treatment resistant nature of glioblastoma makes it one of the most lethal cancers in humans. Total surgical resection is difficult, and a combination of radiation and chemotherapy is used to treat the remaining invasive cells beyond the tumour border by inducing DNA damage and activating cell death pathways in glioblastoma cells. Unfortunately, recurrence is common and a major hurdle in treatment, often met with a more aggressive and treatment resistant tumour. A mechanism of resistance is the response of DNA repair pathways upon treatment-induced DNA damage, which enact cell-cycle arrest and repair of DNA damage that would otherwise cause cell death in tumour cells. CONCLUSIONS In this review, we discuss the significance of DNA repair mechanisms in tumour formation, aggression and treatment resistance. We identify an underlying trend in the literature, wherein alterations in DNA repair pathways facilitate glioma progression, while established high-grade gliomas benefit from constitutively active DNA repair pathways in the repair of treatment-induced DNA damage. We also consider the clinical feasibility of inhibiting DNA repair in glioblastoma and current strategies of using DNA repair inhibitors as agents in combination with chemotherapy, radiation or immunotherapy. Finally, the importance of blood-brain barrier penetrance when designing novel small-molecule inhibitors is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathew Lozinski
- School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Drug Repurposing and Medicines Research, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Nikola A Bowden
- Centre for Drug Repurposing and Medicines Research, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Moira C Graves
- Centre for Drug Repurposing and Medicines Research, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Fay
- Centre for Drug Repurposing and Medicines Research, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Genesis Cancer Care, Gateshead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul A Tooney
- School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
- Centre for Drug Repurposing and Medicines Research, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Beyond the Double-Strand Breaks: The Role of DNA Repair Proteins in Cancer Stem-Cell Regulation. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194818. [PMID: 34638302 PMCID: PMC8508278 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a tumor cell population maintaining tumor growth and promoting tumor relapse if not wholly eradicated during treatment. CSCs are often equipped with molecular mechanisms making them resistant to conventional anti-cancer therapies whose curative potential depends on DNA damage-induced cell death. An elevated expression of some key DNA repair proteins is one of such defense mechanisms. However, new research reveals that the role of critical DNA repair proteins is extending far beyond the DNA repair mechanisms. This review discusses the diverse biological functions of DNA repair proteins in CSC maintenance and the adaptation to replication and oxidative stress, anti-cancer immune response, epigenetic reprogramming, and intracellular signaling mechanisms. It also provides an overview of their potential therapeutic targeting. Abstract Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are pluripotent and highly tumorigenic cells that can re-populate a tumor and cause relapses even after initially successful therapy. As with tissue stem cells, CSCs possess enhanced DNA repair mechanisms. An active DNA damage response alleviates the increased oxidative and replicative stress and leads to therapy resistance. On the other hand, mutations in DNA repair genes cause genomic instability, therefore driving tumor evolution and developing highly aggressive CSC phenotypes. However, the role of DNA repair proteins in CSCs extends beyond the level of DNA damage. In recent years, more and more studies have reported the unexpected role of DNA repair proteins in the regulation of transcription, CSC signaling pathways, intracellular levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT). Moreover, DNA damage signaling plays an essential role in the immune response towards tumor cells. Due to its high importance for the CSC phenotype and treatment resistance, the DNA damage response is a promising target for individualized therapies. Furthermore, understanding the dependence of CSC on DNA repair pathways can be therapeutically exploited to induce synthetic lethality and sensitize CSCs to anti-cancer therapies. This review discusses the different roles of DNA repair proteins in CSC maintenance and their potential as therapeutic targets.
Collapse
|
34
|
Tang Z, Dokic I, Knoll M, Ciamarone F, Schwager C, Klein C, Cebulla G, Hoffmann DC, Schlegel J, Seidel P, Rutenberg C, Brons S, Herold-Mende C, Wick W, Debus J, Lemke D, Abdollahi A. Radioresistance and Transcriptional Reprograming of Invasive Glioblastoma Cells. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 112:499-513. [PMID: 34534627 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Infiltrative growth pattern is a hallmark of glioblastoma (GBM). Radiation therapy aims to eradicate microscopic residual GBM cells after surgical removal of the visible tumor bulk. However, in-field recurrences remain the major pattern of therapy failure. We hypothesized that the radiosensitivity of peripheral invasive tumor cells (peri) may differ from the predominantly investigated tumor bulk. METHODS AND MATERIALS Invasive GBM populations were generated via debulking of the visible tumor core and serial orthotopic transplantation of peri cells, and sustained proinvasive phenotype of peri cells was confirmed in vitro by scratch assay and time lapse imaging. In parallel, invasive GBM cells were selected by transwell assay and from peri cells of patient-derived 3-dimensional spheroid cultures. Transcriptome analysis deciphered a GBM invasion-associated gene signature, and functional involvement of key pathways was validated by pharmacologic inhibition. RESULTS Compared with the bulk cells, invasive GBM populations acquired a radioresistant phenotype characterized by increased cell survival, reduced cell apoptosis, and enhanced DNA double-strand break repair proficiency. Transcriptome analysis revealed a reprograming of invasive cells toward augmented activation of epidermal growth factor receptor- and nuclear factor-κB-related pathways, whereas metabolic processes were downregulated. An invasive GBM score derived from this transcriptional fingerprint correlated well with patient outcome. Inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor and nuclear factor-κB signaling resensitized invasive cells to irradiation. Invasive cells were eradicated with similar efficacy by particle therapy with carbon ions. CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that invasive tumor cells constitute a phenotypically distinct and highly radioresistant GBM subpopulation with prognostic impact that may be vulnerable to targeted therapy and carbon ions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zili Tang
- Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ivana Dokic
- Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Knoll
- Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Federica Ciamarone
- Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Biosciences, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Schwager
- Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carmen Klein
- Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gina Cebulla
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Biosciences, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dirk C Hoffmann
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Biosciences, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julian Schlegel
- Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Seidel
- Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christiane Rutenberg
- Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Brons
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christel Herold-Mende
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dieter Lemke
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- Division of Molecular & Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) of the Heidelberg University, and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; CCU Translational Radiation Oncology, CCU Radiation Oncology, CCU Neurooncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Li S, Zhang H, Wei X. Roles and Mechanisms of Deubiquitinases (DUBs) in Breast Cancer Progression and Targeted Drug Discovery. Life (Basel) 2021; 11:life11090965. [PMID: 34575114 PMCID: PMC8467271 DOI: 10.3390/life11090965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Deubiquitinase (DUB) is an essential component in the ubiquitin—proteasome system (UPS) by removing ubiquitin chains from substrates, thus modulating the expression, activity, and localization of many proteins that contribute to tumor development and progression. DUBs have emerged as promising prognostic indicators and drug targets. DUBs have shown significant roles in regulating breast cancer growth, metastasis, resistance to current therapies, and several canonical oncogenic signaling pathways. In addition, specific DUB inhibitors have been identified and are expected to benefit breast cancer patients in the future. Here, we review current knowledge about the effects and molecular mechanisms of DUBs in breast cancer, providing novel insight into treatments of breast cancer-targeting DUBs.
Collapse
|
36
|
Cornforth MN, Bedford JS, Bailey SM. Destabilizing Effects of Ionizing Radiation on Chromosomes: Sizing up the Damage. Cytogenet Genome Res 2021; 161:328-351. [PMID: 34488218 DOI: 10.1159/000516523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
For long-term survival and evolution, all organisms have depended on a delicate balance between processes involved in maintaining stability of their genomes and opposing processes that lead toward destabilization. At the level of mammalian somatic cells in renewal tissues, events or conditions that can tip this balance toward instability have attracted special interest in connection with carcinogenesis. Mutations affecting DNA (and its subsequent repair) would, of course, be a major consideration here. These may occur spontaneously through endogenous cellular processes or as a result of exposure to mutagenic environmental agents. It is in this context that we discuss the rather unique destabilizing effects of ionizing radiation (IR) in terms of its ability to cause large-scale structural rearrangements to the genome. We present arguments supporting the conclusion that these and other important effects of IR originate largely from microscopically visible chromosome aberrations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael N Cornforth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
| | - Joel S Bedford
- Department of Environmental & Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
| | - Susan M Bailey
- Department of Environmental & Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Inhibition of the DSB repair protein RAD51 potentiates the cytotoxic efficacy of doxorubicin via promoting apoptosis-related death pathways. Cancer Lett 2021; 520:361-373. [PMID: 34389435 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
The anthracycline derivative doxorubicin (Doxo) induces DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by inhibition of DNA topoisomerase type II. Defective mismatch repair (MMR) contributes to Doxo resistance and has been reported for colon and mammary carcinomas. Here, we investigated the outcome of pharmacological inhibition of various DNA repair-related mechanisms on Doxo-induced cytotoxicity employing MMR-deficient HCT-116 colon carcinoma cells. Out of different inhibitors tested (i.e. HDACi, PARPi, MRE11i, RAD52i, RAD51i), we identified the RAD51-inhibitor B02 as the most powerful compound to synergistically increase Doxo-induced cytotoxicity. B02-mediated synergism rests on pleiotropic mechanisms, including pronounced G2/M arrest, damage to mitochondria and caspase-driven apoptosis. Of note, B02 also promotes the cytotoxicity of oxaliplatin and 5-fluoruracil (5-FU) in HCT-116 cells and, furthermore, also increases Doxo-induced cytotoxicity in MMR-proficient colon and mammary carcinoma cells. Summarizing, pharmacological inhibition of RAD51 is suggested to synergistically increase the cytotoxic efficacy of various types of conventional anticancer drugs in different tumor entities. Hence, pre-clinical in vivo studies are preferable to determine the therapeutic window of B02 in a clinically oriented therapeutic regimen.
Collapse
|
38
|
Gianni P, Matenoglou E, Geropoulos G, Agrawal N, Adnani H, Zafeiropoulos S, Miyara SJ, Guevara S, Mumford JM, Molmenti EP, Giannis D. The Fanconi anemia pathway and Breast Cancer: A comprehensive review of clinical data. Clin Breast Cancer 2021; 22:10-25. [PMID: 34489172 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2021] [Revised: 07/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The development of breast cancer depends on several risk factors, including environmental, lifestyle and genetic factors. Despite the evolution of DNA sequencing techniques and biomarker detection, the epidemiology and mechanisms of various breast cancer susceptibility genes have not been elucidated yet. Dysregulation of the DNA damage response causes genomic instability and increases the rate of mutagenesis and the risk of carcinogenesis. The Fanconi Anemia (FA) pathway is an important component of the DNA damage response and plays a critical role in the repair of DNA interstrand crosslinks and genomic stability. The FA pathway involves 22 recognized genes and specific mutations have been identified as the underlying defect in the majority of FA patients. A thorough understanding of the function and epidemiology of these genes in breast cancer is critical for the development and implementation of individualized therapies that target unique tumor profiles. Targeted therapies (PARP inhibitors) exploiting the FA pathway gene defects have been developed and have shown promising results. This narrative review summarizes the current literature on the involvement of FA genes in sporadic and familial breast cancer with a focus on clinical data derived from large cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiota Gianni
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Hematology, Oncology, Palliative Medicine, Rheumatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
| | - Evangelia Matenoglou
- Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Georgios Geropoulos
- Thoracic Surgery Department, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London
| | - Nirav Agrawal
- Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research at Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, NY
| | - Harsha Adnani
- Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research at Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, NY
| | - Stefanos Zafeiropoulos
- Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research at Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, NY; Elmezzi Graduate School of Molecular Medicine, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, NY
| | - Santiago J Miyara
- Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research at Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, NY; Elmezzi Graduate School of Molecular Medicine, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, NY
| | - Sara Guevara
- Department of Surgery, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, New York, NY
| | - James M Mumford
- Department of Family Medicine, Glen Cove Hospital, Glen Cove, New York, NY; Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, NY
| | - Ernesto P Molmenti
- Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research at Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, NY; Department of Surgery, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, New York, NY; Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, NY
| | - Dimitrios Giannis
- Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research at Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Nickoloff JA, Sharma N, Allen CP, Taylor L, Allen SJ, Jaiswal AS, Hromas R. Roles of homologous recombination in response to ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage. Int J Radiat Biol 2021; 99:903-914. [PMID: 34283012 PMCID: PMC9629169 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1956001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ionizing radiation induces a vast array of DNA lesions including base damage, and single- and double-strand breaks (SSB, DSB). DSBs are among the most cytotoxic lesions, and mis-repair causes small- and large-scale genome alterations that can contribute to carcinogenesis. Indeed, ionizing radiation is a 'complete' carcinogen. DSBs arise immediately after irradiation, termed 'frank DSBs,' as well as several hours later in a replication-dependent manner, termed 'secondary' or 'replication-dependent DSBs. DSBs resulting from replication fork collapse are single-ended and thus pose a distinct problem from two-ended, frank DSBs. DSBs are repaired by error-prone nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ), or generally error-free homologous recombination (HR), each with sub-pathways. Clarifying how these pathways operate in normal and tumor cells is critical to increasing tumor control and minimizing side effects during radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The choice between NHEJ and HR is regulated during the cell cycle and by other factors. DSB repair pathways are major contributors to cell survival after ionizing radiation, including tumor-resistance to radiotherapy. Several nucleases are important for HR-mediated repair of replication-dependent DSBs and thus replication fork restart. These include three structure-specific nucleases, the 3' MUS81 nuclease, and two 5' nucleases, EEPD1 and Metnase, as well as three end-resection nucleases, MRE11, EXO1, and DNA2. The three structure-specific nucleases evolved at very different times, suggesting incremental acceleration of replication fork restart to limit toxic HR intermediates and genome instability as genomes increased in size during evolution, including the gain of large numbers of HR-prone repetitive elements. Ionizing radiation also induces delayed effects, observed days to weeks after exposure, including delayed cell death and delayed HR. In this review we highlight the roles of HR in cellular responses to ionizing radiation, and discuss the importance of HR as an exploitable target for cancer radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jac A. Nickoloff
- Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Neelam Sharma
- Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Christopher P. Allen
- Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Flow Cytometry and Cell Sorting Facility, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Lynn Taylor
- Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Sage J. Allen
- Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Aruna S. Jaiswal
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine and the Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Robert Hromas
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine and the Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Chien JCY, Badr CE, Lai CP. Multiplexed bioluminescence-mediated tracking of DNA double-strand break repairs in vitro and in vivo. Nat Protoc 2021; 16:3933-3953. [PMID: 34163064 PMCID: PMC9124064 DOI: 10.1038/s41596-021-00564-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The dynamics of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repairs including homology-directed repair and nonhomologous end joining play an important role in diseases and therapies. However, investigating DSB repair is typically a low-throughput and cross-sectional process, requiring disruption of cells and organisms for subsequent nuclease-, sequencing- or reporter-based assays. In this protocol, we provide instructions for establishing a bioluminescent repair reporter system using engineered Gaussia and Vargula luciferases for noninvasive tracking of homology-directed repair and nonhomologous end joining, respectively, induced by SceI meganuclease, SpCas9 or SpCas9 D10A nickase-mediated editing. We also describe complementation with orthogonal DSB repair assays and omics analyses to validate the reporter readouts. The bioluminescent repair reporter system provides longitudinal and rapid readout (~seconds per sample) to accurately and efficiently measure the efficacy of genome-editing tools and small-molecule modulators on DSB repair. This protocol takes ~2-4 weeks to establish, and as little as 2 h to complete the assay. The entire bioluminescent repair reporter procedure can be performed by one person with standard molecular biology expertise and equipment. However, orthogonal DNA repair assays would require a specialized facility that performs Sanger sequencing or next-generation sequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christian E. Badr
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA, United States,Neuroscience Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, United States,To whom correspondence should be addressed: Christian E. Badr, Tel: 1-617-643-3485; Fax: 1-617-724-1537; ; Charles P. Lai, Tel: 886-2-2366-8204; Fax: 886-2-2362-0200; . C.E.B and C.P.L contributed equally to this work
| | - Charles P. Lai
- Institute of Atomic and Molecular Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan,To whom correspondence should be addressed: Christian E. Badr, Tel: 1-617-643-3485; Fax: 1-617-724-1537; ; Charles P. Lai, Tel: 886-2-2366-8204; Fax: 886-2-2362-0200; . C.E.B and C.P.L contributed equally to this work
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lang F, Liu Y, Chou FJ, Yang C. Genotoxic therapy and resistance mechanism in gliomas. Pharmacol Ther 2021; 228:107922. [PMID: 34171339 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Glioma is one of the most common and lethal brain tumors. Surgical resection followed by radiotherapy plus chemotherapy is the current standard of care for patients with glioma. The existence of resistance to genotoxic therapy, as well as the nature of tumor heterogeneity greatly limits the efficacy of glioma therapy. DNA damage repair pathways play essential roles in many aspects of glioma biology such as cancer progression, therapy resistance, and tumor relapse. O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) repairs the cytotoxic DNA lesion generated by temozolomide (TMZ), considered as the main mechanism of drug resistance. In addition, mismatch repair, base excision repair, and homologous recombination DNA repair also play pivotal roles in treatment resistance as well. Furthermore, cellular mechanisms, such as cancer stem cells, evasion from apoptosis, and metabolic reprogramming, also contribute to TMZ resistance in gliomas. Investigations over the past two decades have revealed comprehensive mechanisms of glioma therapy resistance, which has led to the development of novel therapeutic strategies and targeting molecules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fengchao Lang
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Yang Liu
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Fu-Ju Chou
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Chunzhang Yang
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review discusses current and investigative strategies for targeting DNA repair in the management of glioma. RECENT FINDINGS Recent strategies in glioma treatment rely on the production of overwhelming DNA damage and inhibition of repair mechanisms, resulting in lethal cytotoxicity. Many strategies are effective in preclinical glioma models while clinical feasibility remains under investigation. The presence of glioma biomarkers, including IDH mutation and/or MGMT promoter methylation, may confer particular susceptibility to DNA damage and inhibition of repair. These biomarkers have been adopted as eligibility criteria in the design of multiple ongoing clinical trials. Targeting DNA repair mechanisms with novel agents or therapeutic combinations is a promising approach to the treatment of glioma. Further investigations are underway to optimize this approach in the clinical setting.
Collapse
|
43
|
Flint DB, Bright SJ, McFadden CH, Konishi T, Ohsawa D, Turner B, Lin SH, Grosshans DR, Chiu HS, Sumazin P, Shaitelman SF, Sawakuchi GO. Cell lines of the same anatomic site and histologic type show large variability in intrinsic radiosensitivity and relative biological effectiveness to protons and carbon ions. Med Phys 2021; 48:3243-3261. [PMID: 33837540 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To show that intrinsic radiosensitivity varies greatly for protons and carbon (C) ions in addition to photons, and that DNA repair capacity remains important in governing this variability. METHODS We measured or obtained from the literature clonogenic survival data for a number of human cancer cell lines exposed to photons, protons (9.9 keV/μm), and C-ions (13.3-77.1 keV/μm). We characterized their intrinsic radiosensitivity by the dose for 10% or 50% survival (D10% or D50% ), and quantified the variability at each radiation quality by the coefficient of variation (COV) in D10% and D50% . We also treated cells with DNA repair inhibitors prior to irradiation to assess how DNA repair capacity affects their variability. RESULTS We found no statistically significant differences in the COVs of D10% or D50% between any of the radiation qualities investigated. The same was true regardless of whether the cells were treated with DNA repair inhibitors, or whether they were stratified into histologic subsets. Even within histologic subsets, we found remarkable differences in radiosensitivity for high LET C-ions that were often greater than the variations in RBE, with brain cancer cells varying in D10% (D50% ) up to 100% (131%) for 77.1 keV/μm C-ions, and non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer cell lines varying up to 55% (76%) and 51% (78%), respectively, for 60.5 keV/μm C-ions. The cell lines with modulated DNA repair capacity had greater variability in intrinsic radiosensitivity across all radiation qualities. CONCLUSIONS Even for cell lines of the same histologic type, there are remarkable variations in intrinsic radiosensitivity, and these variations do not differ significantly between photon, proton or C-ion radiation. The importance of DNA repair capacity in governing the variability in intrinsic radiosensitivity is not significantly diminished for higher LET radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David B Flint
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Scott J Bright
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Conor H McFadden
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Teruaki Konishi
- Single Cell Radiation Biology Group, Institute for Quantum Life Science, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences for Radiation Damages, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Daisuke Ohsawa
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences for Radiation Damages, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Broderick Turner
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David R Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hua-Sheng Chiu
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Pavel Sumazin
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Simona F Shaitelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gabriel O Sawakuchi
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
RAD51 Inhibition Induces R-Loop Formation in Early G1 Phase of the Cell Cycle. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22073740. [PMID: 33916766 PMCID: PMC8038378 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22073740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
R-loops are three-stranded structures generated by annealing of nascent transcripts to the template DNA strand, leaving the non-template DNA strand exposed as a single-stranded loop. Although R-loops play important roles in physiological processes such as regulation of gene expression, mitochondrial DNA replication, or immunoglobulin class switch recombination, dysregulation of the R-loop metabolism poses a threat to the stability of the genome. A previous study in yeast has shown that the homologous recombination machinery contributes to the formation of R-loops and associated chromosome instability. On the contrary, here, we demonstrate that depletion of the key homologous recombination factor, RAD51, as well as RAD51 inhibition by the B02 inhibitor did not prevent R-loop formation induced by the inhibition of spliceosome assembly in human cells. However, we noticed that treatment of cells with B02 resulted in RAD51-dependent accumulation of R-loops in an early G1 phase of the cell cycle accompanied by a decrease in the levels of chromatin-bound ORC2 protein, a component of the pre-replication complex, and an increase in DNA synthesis. Our results suggest that B02-induced R-loops might cause a premature origin firing.
Collapse
|
45
|
Abad E, Civit L, Potesil D, Zdrahal Z, Lyakhovich A. Enhanced DNA damage response through RAD50 in triple negative breast cancer resistant and cancer stem-like cells contributes to chemoresistance. FEBS J 2021; 288:2184-2202. [PMID: 33090711 DOI: 10.1111/febs.15588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Revised: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
A growing body of evidence supports the notion that cancer resistance is driven by a small subset of cancer stem cells (CSC), responsible for tumor initiation, growth, and metastasis. Both CSC and chemoresistant cancer cells may share common qualities to activate a series of self-defense mechanisms against chemotherapeutic drugs. Here, we aimed to identify proteins in chemoresistant triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells and corresponding CSC-like spheroid cells that may contribute to their resistance. We have identified several candidate proteins representing the subfamilies of DNA damage response (DDR) system, the ATP-binding cassette, and the 26S proteasome degradation machinery. We have also demonstrated that both cell types exhibit enhanced DDR when compared to corresponding parental counterparts, and identified RAD50 as one of the major contributors in the resistance phenotype. Finally, we have provided evidence that depleting or blocking RAD50 within the Mre11-Rad50-NBS1 (MRN) complex resensitizes CSC and chemoresistant TNBC cells to chemotherapeutic drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Etna Abad
- Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laia Civit
- Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Potesil
- Research Group Proteomics, CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Zbynek Zdrahal
- Research Group Proteomics, CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, Federal Research Center of Fundamental and Translational Medicine, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Alex Lyakhovich
- Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain
- National Centre for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Alves ALV, Gomes INF, Carloni AC, Rosa MN, da Silva LS, Evangelista AF, Reis RM, Silva VAO. Role of glioblastoma stem cells in cancer therapeutic resistance: a perspective on antineoplastic agents from natural sources and chemical derivatives. Stem Cell Res Ther 2021; 12:206. [PMID: 33762015 PMCID: PMC7992331 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-021-02231-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the highest-grade form of glioma, as well as one of the most aggressive types of cancer, exhibiting rapid cellular growth and highly invasive behavior. Despite significant advances in diagnosis and therapy in recent decades, the outcomes for high-grade gliomas (WHO grades III-IV) remain unfavorable, with a median overall survival time of 15–18 months. The concept of cancer stem cells (CSCs) has emerged and provided new insight into GBM resistance and management. CSCs can self-renew and initiate tumor growth and are also responsible for tumor cell heterogeneity and the induction of systemic immunosuppression. The idea that GBM resistance could be dependent on innate differences in the sensitivity of clonogenic glial stem cells (GSCs) to chemotherapeutic drugs/radiation prompted the scientific community to rethink the understanding of GBM growth and therapies directed at eliminating these cells or modulating their stemness. This review aims to describe major intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms that mediate chemoradioresistant GSCs and therapies based on antineoplastic agents from natural sources, derivatives, and synthetics used alone or in synergistic combination with conventional treatment. We will also address ongoing clinical trials focused on these promising targets. Although the development of effective therapy for GBM remains a major challenge in molecular oncology, GSC knowledge can offer new directions for a promising future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Laura V Alves
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Rua Antenor Duarte Villela, 1331, CEP 14784 400, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Izabela N F Gomes
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Rua Antenor Duarte Villela, 1331, CEP 14784 400, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Adriana C Carloni
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Rua Antenor Duarte Villela, 1331, CEP 14784 400, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marcela N Rosa
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Rua Antenor Duarte Villela, 1331, CEP 14784 400, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luciane S da Silva
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Rua Antenor Duarte Villela, 1331, CEP 14784 400, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Adriane F Evangelista
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Rua Antenor Duarte Villela, 1331, CEP 14784 400, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rui Manuel Reis
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Rua Antenor Duarte Villela, 1331, CEP 14784 400, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil.,Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal.,ICVS/3B's PT Government Associate Laboratory, 4806-909, Braga, Portugal
| | - Viviane Aline O Silva
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Rua Antenor Duarte Villela, 1331, CEP 14784 400, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
The CD44high Subpopulation of Multifraction Irradiation-Surviving NSCLC Cells Exhibits Partial EMT-Program Activation and DNA Damage Response Depending on Their p53 Status. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22052369. [PMID: 33673439 PMCID: PMC7956695 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22052369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Ionizing radiation (IR) is used for patients diagnosed with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, radiotherapy remains largely palliative due to the survival of specific cell subpopulations. In the present study, the sublines of NSCLC cells, A549IR (p53wt) and H1299IR (p53null) survived multifraction X-ray radiation exposure (MFR) at a total dose of 60 Gy were investigated three weeks after the MFR course. We compared radiosensitivity (colony formation), expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers, migration activity, autophagy, and HR-dependent DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair in the bulk and entire CD44high/CD166high CSC-like populations of both parental and MFR survived NSCLC cells. We demonstrated that the p53 status affected: the pattern of expression of N-cadherin, E-cadherin, Vimentin, witnessing the appearance of EMT-like phenotype of MFR-surviving sublines; 1D confined migratory behavior (wound healing); the capability of an irradiated cell to continue to divide and form a colony of NSCLC cells before and after MFR; influencing the CD44/CD166 expression level in MFR-surviving NSCLC cells after additional single irradiation. Our data further emphasize the impact of p53 status on the decay of γH2AX foci and the associated efficacy of the DSB repair in NSCLC cells survived after MFR. We revealed that Rad51 protein might play a principal role in MFR-surviving of p53 null NSCLC cells promoting DNA DSB repair by homologous recombination (HR) pathway. The proportion of Rad51 + cells elevated in CD44high/CD166high population in MFR-surviving p53wt and p53null sublines and their parental cells. The p53wt ensures DNA-PK-mediated DSB repair for both parental and MFR-surviving cells irrespectively of a subsequent additional single irradiation. Whereas in the absence of p53, a dose-dependent increase of DNA-PK-mediated non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) occurred as an early post-irradiation response is more intensive in the CSC-like population MFR-surviving H1299IR, compared to their parental H1299 cells. Our study strictly observed a significantly higher content of LC3 + cells in the CD44high/CD166high populations of p53wt MFR-surviving cells, which enriched the CSC-like cells in contrast to their p53null counterparts. The additional 2 Gy and 5 Gy X-ray exposure leads to the dose-dependent increase in the proportion of LC3 + cells in CD44high/CD166high population of both parental p53wt and p53null, but not MFR-surviving NSCLC sublines. Our data indicated that autophagy is not necessarily associated with CSC-like cells’ radiosensitivity, emphasizing that careful assessment of other milestone processes (such as senescence and autophagy-p53-Zeb1 axis) of primary radiation responses may provide new potential targets modulated for therapeutic benefit through radiosensitizing cancer cells while rescuing normal tissue. Our findings also shed light on the intricate crosstalk between autophagy and the p53-related EMT, by which MFR-surviving cells might obtain an invasive phenotype and metastatic potential.
Collapse
|
48
|
Devarajan N, Jayaraman S, Mahendra J, Venkatratnam P, Rajagopal P, Palaniappan H, Ganesan SK. Berberine-A potent chemosensitizer and chemoprotector to conventional cancer therapies. Phytother Res 2021; 35:3059-3077. [PMID: 33559280 DOI: 10.1002/ptr.7032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Chemotherapy and radiotherapy are mainstay treatments for cancer patients. However, their clinical outcomes are highly limited by the resistance of malignant tumors to these therapies and the incurrence of serious damages in vital organs. This in turn necessitates the development of adjunct drugs that overcomes chemo/radioresistance in refractory cancers and protects vital organs from the cytotoxic effects of cancer therapies. In recent years, Berberine (BBR), a natural isoquinoline alkaloid has garnered more attention due to its potent chemosensitizing and chemoprotective properties. BBR effectively sensitizes refractory cancers to chemotherapy and radiotherapy by ameliorating the diverse events underlying therapy resistance. Furthermore, it protects the heart, liver, lungs, and kidneys from severe damages caused by these therapies. In this review, we discuss the molecular mechanisms underlying the chemo/radiosensitizing and chemo/radioprotective potential of BBR during cancer treatment. Also, we highlight the limitations that hamper the clinical application of BBR as an adjunct drug and how novel innovations have been made in recent years to circumvent these challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nalini Devarajan
- Central Research Laboratory, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India
| | - Selvaraj Jayaraman
- Department of Biochemistry, Saveetha Dental College & Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India
| | - Jaideep Mahendra
- Department of Periodontology, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College, and Hospital, Chennai, India
| | - Purushothaman Venkatratnam
- Central Research laboratory, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India
| | - Ponnulakshmi Rajagopal
- Central Research Laboratory, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India
| | - Hema Palaniappan
- Department of Pharmacology, Coimbatore Medical College, Coimbatore, India
| | - Senthil Kumar Ganesan
- Laboratory of Functional Genomics, Structural Biology & Bioinformatics Division, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, India.,Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Li LY, Guan YD, Chen XS, Yang JM, Cheng Y. DNA Repair Pathways in Cancer Therapy and Resistance. Front Pharmacol 2021; 11:629266. [PMID: 33628188 PMCID: PMC7898236 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.629266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 155] [Impact Index Per Article: 51.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA repair pathways are triggered to maintain genetic stability and integrity when mammalian cells are exposed to endogenous or exogenous DNA-damaging agents. The deregulation of DNA repair pathways is associated with the initiation and progression of cancer. As the primary anti-cancer therapies, ionizing radiation and chemotherapeutic agents induce cell death by directly or indirectly causing DNA damage, dysregulation of the DNA damage response may contribute to hypersensitivity or resistance of cancer cells to genotoxic agents and targeting DNA repair pathway can increase the tumor sensitivity to cancer therapies. Therefore, targeting DNA repair pathways may be a potential therapeutic approach for cancer treatment. A better understanding of the biology and the regulatory mechanisms of DNA repair pathways has the potential to facilitate the development of inhibitors of nuclear and mitochondria DNA repair pathways for enhancing anticancer effect of DNA damage-based therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lan-Ya Li
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yi-di Guan
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xi-Sha Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jin-Ming Yang
- Department of Cancer Biology and Toxicology, Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Yan Cheng
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
YM155 and BIRC5 downregulation induce genomic instability via autophagy-mediated ROS production and inhibition in DNA repair. Pharmacol Res 2021; 166:105474. [PMID: 33549731 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Revised: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Activation of autophagy plays a critical role in DNA repair, especially for the process of homologous recombination. Despite upregulation of autophagy promotes both the survival and the death of cells, the pathways that govern the pro-cell death effects of autophagy are still incompletely understood. YM155 is originally developed as an expression suppressant of BIRC5 (an anti-apoptotic molecule) and it has reached Phase I/II clinical trials for the treatment of variety types of cancer. However, the target-specificity of YM155 has recently been challenged as several studies reported that YM155 exhibits direct DNA damaging effects. Recently, we discovered that BIRC5 is an autophagy negative-modulator. Using function-comparative analysis, we found in the current study that YM155 and BIRC5 siRNA both induced early "autophagy-dependent ROS production-mediated" DNA damage/strand breaks and concurrently downregulated the expression of RAD54L, RAD51, and MRE11, which are molecules known for their important roles in homologous recombination, in human cancer (MCF7, MDA-MB-231, and SK-BR-3) and mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cells. Similar to the effects of YM155 and BIRC5 siRNA, downregulation of RAD54L and RAD51 by siRNA induced autophagy and DNA damage/strand breaks in cells, suggesting YM155/BIRC5 siRNA might also induce autophagy partly through RAD54L and RAD51 downregulations. We further observed that prolonged YM155 and BIRC5 siRNA treatment induced autophagic vesicle formation proximal to the nucleus and triggered DNA leakage. In conclusion, our findings reveal a novel mechanism of action of YM155 (i.e. induces autophagy-dependent ROS production-mediated DNA damage) in cancer cells and show the functional complexity of BIRC5 and autophagy involving the modulation of genome stability, highlighting that upregulation of autophagy is not always beneficial to the DNA repair process. Our findings can aid the development of a variety of BIRC5-directly/indirectly targeted anticancer therapies that are currently under pre-clinical and clinical investigations.
Collapse
|