1
|
Das PK, Bhatnagar T, Banik S, Majumdar S, Dutta D. Structural and molecular dynamics simulation studies of CBL-interacting protein kinase CIPK and its complexes related to plant salinity stress. J Mol Model 2024; 30:248. [PMID: 38965105 DOI: 10.1007/s00894-024-06037-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT Calcium-dependent signaling in plants is responsible for several major cellular events, including the activation of the salinity-responsive pathways. Calcium binds to calcineurin B-like protein (CBL), and the resulting CBL-Ca2+ complex binds to CBL-interacting protein kinase (CIPK). The CBL-CIPK complex enhances the CIPK interaction with an upstream kinase. The upstream kinase phosphorylates CIPK that, in turn, phosphorylates membrane transporters. Phosphorylation influences transporter activity to kick-start many downstream functions, such as balancing the cytosolic Na+-to-K+ ratio. The CBL-CIPK interaction is pivotal for Ca2+-dependent salinity stress signaling. METHODS Computational methods are used to model the entire Arabidopsis thaliana CIPK24 protein structure in its autoinhibited and open-activated states. Arabidopsis thaliana CIPK24-CBL4 complex is predicted based on the protein-protein docking methods. The available structural and functional data support the CIPK24 and the CIPK24-CBL4 complex models. Models are energy-minimized and subjected to molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. MD simulations for 500 ns and 300 ns enabled us to predict the importance of conserved residues of the proteins. Finally, the work is extended to predict the CIPK24-CBL4 complex with the upstream kinase GRIK2. MD simulation for 300 ns on the ternary complex structure enabled us to identify the critical CIPK24-GRIK2 interactions. Together, these data could be used to engineer the CBL-CIPK interaction network for developing salt tolerance in crops.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tanya Bhatnagar
- Department of Biotechnology, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, India
| | - Sanhita Banik
- Department of Biotechnology, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, India
| | - Sambit Majumdar
- Department of Biotechnology, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, India
| | - Debajyoti Dutta
- Department of Biotechnology, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, India.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhao N, Wu T, Wang W, Zhang L, Gong X. Review and Comparative Analysis of Methods and Advancements in Predicting Protein Complex Structure. Interdiscip Sci 2024:10.1007/s12539-024-00626-x. [PMID: 38955920 DOI: 10.1007/s12539-024-00626-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
Protein complexes perform diverse biological functions, and obtaining their three-dimensional structure is critical to understanding and grasping their functions. In many cases, it's not just two proteins interacting to form a dimer; instead, multiple proteins interact to form a multimer. Experimentally resolving protein complex structures can be quite challenging. Recently, there have been efforts and methods that build upon prior predictions of dimer structures to attempt to predict multimer structures. However, in comparison to monomeric protein structure prediction, the accuracy of protein complex structure prediction remains relatively low. This paper provides an overview of recent advancements in efficient computational models for predicting protein complex structures. We introduce protein-protein docking methods in detail and summarize their main ideas, applicable modes, and related information. To enhance prediction accuracy, other critical protein-related information is also integrated, such as predicting interchain residue contact, utilizing experimental data like cryo-EM experiments, and considering protein interactions and non-interactions. In addition, we comprehensively review computational approaches for end-to-end prediction of protein complex structures based on artificial intelligence (AI) technology and describe commonly used datasets and representative evaluation metrics in protein complexes. Finally, we analyze the formidable challenges faced in current protein complex structure prediction tasks, including the structure prediction of heteromeric complex, disordered regions in complex, antibody-antigen complex, and RNA-related complex, as well as the evaluation metrics for complex assessment. We hope that this work will provide comprehensive knowledge of complex structure predictions to contribute to future advanced predictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nan Zhao
- Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China
- School of Mathematics, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China
| | - Tong Wu
- Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China
- School of Mathematics, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China
| | - Wenda Wang
- Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China
- School of Mathematics, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China
| | - Lunchuan Zhang
- School of Mathematics, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China.
| | - Xinqi Gong
- Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China.
- School of Mathematics, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China.
- Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing, 100084, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jeppesen M, André I. Accurate prediction of protein assembly structure by combining AlphaFold and symmetrical docking. Nat Commun 2023; 14:8283. [PMID: 38092742 PMCID: PMC10719378 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43681-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
AlphaFold can predict the structures of monomeric and multimeric proteins with high accuracy but has a limit on the number of chains and residues it can fold. Here we show that a combination of AlphaFold and all-atom symmetric docking simulations enables highly accurate prediction of the structure of complex symmetrical assemblies. We present a method to predict the structure of complexes with cubic - tetrahedral, octahedral and icosahedral - symmetry from sequence. Focusing on proteins where AlphaFold can make confident predictions on the subunit structure, 27 cubic systems were assembled with a median TM-score of 0.99 and a DockQ score of 0.72. 21 had TM-scores of above 0.9 and were categorized as acceptable- to high-quality according to DockQ. The resulting models are energetically optimized and can be used for detailed studies of intermolecular interactions in higher-order symmetrical assemblies. The results demonstrate how explicit treatment of structural symmetry can significantly expand the size and complexity of AlphaFold predictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mads Jeppesen
- Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ingemar André
- Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Magi Meconi G, Sasselli IR, Bianco V, Onuchic JN, Coluzza I. Key aspects of the past 30 years of protein design. REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS. PHYSICAL SOCIETY (GREAT BRITAIN) 2022; 85:086601. [PMID: 35704983 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6633/ac78ef] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Proteins are the workhorse of life. They are the building infrastructure of living systems; they are the most efficient molecular machines known, and their enzymatic activity is still unmatched in versatility by any artificial system. Perhaps proteins' most remarkable feature is their modularity. The large amount of information required to specify each protein's function is analogically encoded with an alphabet of just ∼20 letters. The protein folding problem is how to encode all such information in a sequence of 20 letters. In this review, we go through the last 30 years of research to summarize the state of the art and highlight some applications related to fundamental problems of protein evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Magi Meconi
- Computational Biophysics Lab, Center for Cooperative Research in Biomaterials (CIC biomaGUNE), Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Paseo de Miramon 182, 20014, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Ivan R Sasselli
- Computational Biophysics Lab, Center for Cooperative Research in Biomaterials (CIC biomaGUNE), Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Paseo de Miramon 182, 20014, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | | | - Jose N Onuchic
- Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Department of Physics & Astronomy, Department of Chemistry, Department of Biosciences, Rice University, Houston, TX 77251, United States of America
| | - Ivan Coluzza
- BCMaterials, Basque Center for Materials, Applications and Nanostructures, Bld. Martina Casiano, UPV/EHU Science Park, Barrio Sarriena s/n, 48940 Leioa, Spain
- Basque Foundation for Science, Ikerbasque, 48009, Bilbao, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lensink MF, Brysbaert G, Mauri T, Nadzirin N, Velankar S, Chaleil RAG, Clarence T, Bates PA, Kong R, Liu B, Yang G, Liu M, Shi H, Lu X, Chang S, Roy RS, Quadir F, Liu J, Cheng J, Antoniak A, Czaplewski C, Giełdoń A, Kogut M, Lipska AG, Liwo A, Lubecka EA, Maszota-Zieleniak M, Sieradzan AK, Ślusarz R, Wesołowski PA, Zięba K, Del Carpio Muñoz CA, Ichiishi E, Harmalkar A, Gray JJ, Bonvin AMJJ, Ambrosetti F, Vargas Honorato R, Jandova Z, Jiménez-García B, Koukos PI, Van Keulen S, Van Noort CW, Réau M, Roel-Touris J, Kotelnikov S, Padhorny D, Porter KA, Alekseenko A, Ignatov M, Desta I, Ashizawa R, Sun Z, Ghani U, Hashemi N, Vajda S, Kozakov D, Rosell M, Rodríguez-Lumbreras LA, Fernandez-Recio J, Karczynska A, Grudinin S, Yan Y, Li H, Lin P, Huang SY, Christoffer C, Terashi G, Verburgt J, Sarkar D, Aderinwale T, Wang X, Kihara D, Nakamura T, Hanazono Y, Gowthaman R, Guest JD, Yin R, Taherzadeh G, Pierce BG, Barradas-Bautista D, Cao Z, Cavallo L, Oliva R, Sun Y, Zhu S, Shen Y, Park T, Woo H, Yang J, Kwon S, Won J, Seok C, Kiyota Y, Kobayashi S, Harada Y, Takeda-Shitaka M, Kundrotas PJ, Singh A, Vakser IA, Dapkūnas J, Olechnovič K, Venclovas Č, Duan R, Qiu L, Xu X, Zhang S, Zou X, Wodak SJ. Prediction of protein assemblies, the next frontier: The CASP14-CAPRI experiment. Proteins 2021; 89:1800-1823. [PMID: 34453465 PMCID: PMC8616814 DOI: 10.1002/prot.26222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 07/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
We present the results for CAPRI Round 50, the fourth joint CASP-CAPRI protein assembly prediction challenge. The Round comprised a total of twelve targets, including six dimers, three trimers, and three higher-order oligomers. Four of these were easy targets, for which good structural templates were available either for the full assembly, or for the main interfaces (of the higher-order oligomers). Eight were difficult targets for which only distantly related templates were found for the individual subunits. Twenty-five CAPRI groups including eight automatic servers submitted ~1250 models per target. Twenty groups including six servers participated in the CAPRI scoring challenge submitted ~190 models per target. The accuracy of the predicted models was evaluated using the classical CAPRI criteria. The prediction performance was measured by a weighted scoring scheme that takes into account the number of models of acceptable quality or higher submitted by each group as part of their five top-ranking models. Compared to the previous CASP-CAPRI challenge, top performing groups submitted such models for a larger fraction (70-75%) of the targets in this Round, but fewer of these models were of high accuracy. Scorer groups achieved stronger performance with more groups submitting correct models for 70-80% of the targets or achieving high accuracy predictions. Servers performed less well in general, except for the MDOCKPP and LZERD servers, who performed on par with human groups. In addition to these results, major advances in methodology are discussed, providing an informative overview of where the prediction of protein assemblies currently stands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc F Lensink
- CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Institute for Structural and Functional Glycobiology, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Guillaume Brysbaert
- CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Institute for Structural and Functional Glycobiology, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Théo Mauri
- CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Institute for Structural and Functional Glycobiology, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Nurul Nadzirin
- Protein Data Bank in Europe (PDBe), European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, UK
| | - Sameer Velankar
- Protein Data Bank in Europe (PDBe), European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Tereza Clarence
- Biomolecular Modelling Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Paul A Bates
- Biomolecular Modelling Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Ren Kong
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Bin Liu
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Guangbo Yang
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Ming Liu
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Hang Shi
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Xufeng Lu
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Shan Chang
- Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
| | - Raj S Roy
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Farhan Quadir
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Jian Liu
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Jianlin Cheng
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
- Institute for Data Science and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Anna Antoniak
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | | | - Artur Giełdoń
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Mateusz Kogut
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | | | - Adam Liwo
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Emilia A Lubecka
- Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland
| | | | | | - Rafał Ślusarz
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Patryk A Wesołowski
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
- Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Gdansk and Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Karolina Zięba
- Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | | | - Eiichiro Ichiishi
- International University of Health and Welfare Hospital (IUHW Hospital), Nasushiobara City, Japan
| | - Ameya Harmalkar
- Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Gray
- Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Alexandre M J J Bonvin
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Ambrosetti
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rodrigo Vargas Honorato
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Zuzana Jandova
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Brian Jiménez-García
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Panagiotis I Koukos
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Siri Van Keulen
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte W Van Noort
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Manon Réau
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jorge Roel-Touris
- Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sergei Kotelnikov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Innopolis University, Russia
| | - Dzmitry Padhorny
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Kathryn A Porter
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrey Alekseenko
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Institute of Computer-Aided Design of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Mikhail Ignatov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Israel Desta
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ryota Ashizawa
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Zhuyezi Sun
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Usman Ghani
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nasser Hashemi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sandor Vajda
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dima Kozakov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Mireia Rosell
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (ICVV), CSIC - Universidad de la Rioja - Gobierno de La Rioja, Logrono, Spain
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Luis A Rodríguez-Lumbreras
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (ICVV), CSIC - Universidad de la Rioja - Gobierno de La Rioja, Logrono, Spain
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Fernandez-Recio
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (ICVV), CSIC - Universidad de la Rioja - Gobierno de La Rioja, Logrono, Spain
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Sergei Grudinin
- Université Grenoble Alpes, Inria, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LJK, Grenoble, France
| | - Yumeng Yan
- School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Hao Li
- School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Peicong Lin
- School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Sheng-You Huang
- School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Charles Christoffer
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Genki Terashi
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Jacob Verburgt
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Daipayan Sarkar
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Tunde Aderinwale
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Xiao Wang
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Daisuke Kihara
- Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Tsukasa Nakamura
- Graduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Yuya Hanazono
- Institute for Quantum Life Science, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Tokai, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Ragul Gowthaman
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, Maryland, USA
| | - Johnathan D Guest
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, Maryland, USA
| | - Rui Yin
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, Maryland, USA
| | - Ghazaleh Taherzadeh
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, Maryland, USA
| | - Brian G Pierce
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, Maryland, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Zhen Cao
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
| | - Luigi Cavallo
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
| | - Romina Oliva
- University of Naples "Parthenope", Napoli, Italy
| | - Yuanfei Sun
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, Texas, USA
| | - Shaowen Zhu
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, Texas, USA
| | - Yang Shen
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, Texas, USA
| | - Taeyong Park
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeonuk Woo
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinsol Yang
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sohee Kwon
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jonghun Won
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chaok Seok
- Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yasuomi Kiyota
- School of Pharmacy, Kitasato University, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Yoshiki Harada
- School of Pharmacy, Kitasato University, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Petras J Kundrotas
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
| | - Amar Singh
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
| | - Ilya A Vakser
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
| | - Justas Dapkūnas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Kliment Olechnovič
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Česlovas Venclovas
- Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Rui Duan
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Liming Qiu
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Xianjin Xu
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Shuang Zhang
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Xiaoqin Zou
- Institute for Data Science and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
- Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gaber A, Pavšič M. Modeling and Structure Determination of Homo-Oligomeric Proteins: An Overview of Challenges and Current Approaches. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:9081. [PMID: 34445785 PMCID: PMC8396596 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22169081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Protein homo-oligomerization is a very common phenomenon, and approximately half of proteins form homo-oligomeric assemblies composed of identical subunits. The vast majority of such assemblies possess internal symmetry which can be either exploited to help or poses challenges during structure determination. Moreover, aspects of symmetry are critical in the modeling of protein homo-oligomers either by docking or by homology-based approaches. Here, we first provide a brief overview of the nature of protein homo-oligomerization. Next, we describe how the symmetry of homo-oligomers is addressed by crystallographic and non-crystallographic symmetry operations, and how biologically relevant intermolecular interactions can be deciphered from the ordered array of molecules within protein crystals. Additionally, we describe the most important aspects of protein homo-oligomerization in structure determination by NMR. Finally, we give an overview of approaches aimed at modeling homo-oligomers using computational methods that specifically address their internal symmetry and allow the incorporation of other experimental data as spatial restraints to achieve higher model reliability.
Collapse
|
7
|
Baek M, Anishchenko I, Park H, Humphreys IR, Baker D. Protein oligomer modeling guided by predicted interchain contacts in CASP14. Proteins 2021; 89:1824-1833. [PMID: 34324224 PMCID: PMC8616806 DOI: 10.1002/prot.26197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
For CASP14, we developed deep learning‐based methods for predicting homo‐oligomeric and hetero‐oligomeric contacts and used them for oligomer modeling. To build structure models, we developed an oligomer structure generation method that utilizes predicted interchain contacts to guide iterative restrained minimization from random backbone structures. We supplemented this gradient‐based fold‐and‐dock method with template‐based and ab initio docking approaches using deep learning‐based subunit predictions on 29 assembly targets. These methods produced oligomer models with summed Z‐scores 5.5 units higher than the next best group, with the fold‐and‐dock method having the best relative performance. Over the eight targets for which this method was used, the best of the five submitted models had average oligomer TM‐score of 0.71 (average oligomer TM‐score of the next best group: 0.64), and explicit modeling of inter‐subunit interactions improved modeling of six out of 40 individual domains (ΔGDT‐TS > 2.0).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minkyung Baek
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ivan Anishchenko
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Hahnbeom Park
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ian R Humphreys
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - David Baker
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vakser IA. Challenges in protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2020; 64:160-165. [PMID: 32836051 DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2020.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Revised: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 07/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Current developments in protein docking aim at improvement of applicability, accuracy and utility of modeling macromolecular complexes. The challenges include the need for greater emphasis on protein docking to molecules of different types, proper accounting for conformational flexibility upon binding, new promising methodologies based on residue co-evolution and deep learning, affinity prediction, and further development of fully automated docking servers. Importantly, new developments increasingly focus on realistic modeling of protein interactions in vivo, including crowded environment inside a cell, which involves multiple transient encounters, and propagating the system in time. This opinion paper offers the author's perspective on these challenges in structural modeling of protein interactions and the future of protein docking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilya A Vakser
- Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Burman SSR, Nance ML, Jeliazkov JR, Labonte JW, Lubin JH, Biswas N, Gray JJ. Novel sampling strategies and a coarse-grained score function for docking homomers, flexible heteromers, and oligosaccharides using Rosetta in CAPRI rounds 37-45. Proteins 2020; 88:973-985. [PMID: 31742764 PMCID: PMC8589291 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Critical Assessment of PRediction of Interactions (CAPRI) rounds 37 through 45 introduced larger complexes, new macromolecules, and multistage assemblies. For these rounds, we used and expanded docking methods in Rosetta to model 23 target complexes. We successfully predicted 14 target complexes and recognized and refined near-native models generated by other groups for two further targets. Notably, for targets T110 and T136, we achieved the closest prediction of any CAPRI participant. We created several innovative approaches during these rounds. Since round 39 (target 122), we have used the new RosettaDock 4.0, which has a revamped coarse-grained energy function and the ability to perform conformer selection during docking with hundreds of pregenerated protein backbones. Ten of the complexes had some degree of symmetry in their interactions, so we tested Rosetta SymDock, realized its shortcomings, and developed the next-generation symmetric docking protocol, SymDock2, which includes docking of multiple backbones and induced-fit refinement. Since the last CAPRI assessment, we also developed methods for modeling and designing carbohydrates in Rosetta, and we used them to successfully model oligosaccharide-protein complexes in round 41. Although the results were broadly encouraging, they also highlighted the pressing need to invest in (a) flexible docking algorithms with the ability to model loop and linker motions and in (b) new sampling and scoring methods for oligosaccharide-protein interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shourya S. Roy Burman
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Morgan L. Nance
- Program in Molecular Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Jason W. Labonte
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Joseph H. Lubin
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Naireeta Biswas
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jeffrey J. Gray
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Program in Molecular Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Leman JK, Weitzner BD, Lewis SM, Adolf-Bryfogle J, Alam N, Alford RF, Aprahamian M, Baker D, Barlow KA, Barth P, Basanta B, Bender BJ, Blacklock K, Bonet J, Boyken SE, Bradley P, Bystroff C, Conway P, Cooper S, Correia BE, Coventry B, Das R, De Jong RM, DiMaio F, Dsilva L, Dunbrack R, Ford AS, Frenz B, Fu DY, Geniesse C, Goldschmidt L, Gowthaman R, Gray JJ, Gront D, Guffy S, Horowitz S, Huang PS, Huber T, Jacobs TM, Jeliazkov JR, Johnson DK, Kappel K, Karanicolas J, Khakzad H, Khar KR, Khare SD, Khatib F, Khramushin A, King IC, Kleffner R, Koepnick B, Kortemme T, Kuenze G, Kuhlman B, Kuroda D, Labonte JW, Lai JK, Lapidoth G, Leaver-Fay A, Lindert S, Linsky T, London N, Lubin JH, Lyskov S, Maguire J, Malmström L, Marcos E, Marcu O, Marze NA, Meiler J, Moretti R, Mulligan VK, Nerli S, Norn C, Ó'Conchúir S, Ollikainen N, Ovchinnikov S, Pacella MS, Pan X, Park H, Pavlovicz RE, Pethe M, Pierce BG, Pilla KB, Raveh B, Renfrew PD, Burman SSR, Rubenstein A, Sauer MF, Scheck A, Schief W, Schueler-Furman O, Sedan Y, Sevy AM, Sgourakis NG, Shi L, Siegel JB, Silva DA, Smith S, Song Y, Stein A, Szegedy M, Teets FD, Thyme SB, Wang RYR, Watkins A, Zimmerman L, Bonneau R. Macromolecular modeling and design in Rosetta: recent methods and frameworks. Nat Methods 2020; 17:665-680. [PMID: 32483333 PMCID: PMC7603796 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-020-0848-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 402] [Impact Index Per Article: 100.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The Rosetta software for macromolecular modeling, docking and design is extensively used in laboratories worldwide. During two decades of development by a community of laboratories at more than 60 institutions, Rosetta has been continuously refactored and extended. Its advantages are its performance and interoperability between broad modeling capabilities. Here we review tools developed in the last 5 years, including over 80 methods. We discuss improvements to the score function, user interfaces and usability. Rosetta is available at http://www.rosettacommons.org.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Koehler Leman
- Center for Computational Biology, Flatiron Institute, Simons Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, USA.
| | - Brian D Weitzner
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Lyell Immunopharma Inc., Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Steven M Lewis
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Cyrus Biotechnology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jared Adolf-Bryfogle
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Nawsad Alam
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, IMRIC, Ein Kerem Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Rebecca F Alford
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Melanie Aprahamian
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - David Baker
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kyle A Barlow
- Graduate Program in Bioinformatics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Patrick Barth
- Institute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Benjamin Basanta
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Biological Physics Structure and Design PhD Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Brian J Bender
- Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Kristin Blacklock
- Institute of Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Jaume Bonet
- Institute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Scott E Boyken
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Lyell Immunopharma Inc., Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Phil Bradley
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Chris Bystroff
- Department of Biological Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA
| | - Patrick Conway
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Seth Cooper
- Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bruno E Correia
- Institute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Brian Coventry
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rhiju Das
- Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Frank DiMaio
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lorna Dsilva
- Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Roland Dunbrack
- Institute for Cancer Research, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alexander S Ford
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Brandon Frenz
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Cyrus Biotechnology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Darwin Y Fu
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Caleb Geniesse
- Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Ragul Gowthaman
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, MD, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Gray
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Program in Molecular Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dominik Gront
- Faculty of Chemistry, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Sharon Guffy
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Scott Horowitz
- Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA
- The Knoebel Institute for Healthy Aging, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Po-Ssu Huang
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Thomas Huber
- Research School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Tim M Jacobs
- Program in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - David K Johnson
- Center for Computational Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA
| | - Kalli Kappel
- Biophysics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - John Karanicolas
- Institute for Cancer Research, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hamed Khakzad
- Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Institute for Computational Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- S3IT, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Karen R Khar
- Cyrus Biotechnology, Seattle, WA, USA
- Center for Computational Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA
| | - Sagar D Khare
- Institute of Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
- Center for Integrative Proteomics Research, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
- Computational Biology and Molecular Biophysics Program, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Firas Khatib
- Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, Dartmouth, MA, USA
| | - Alisa Khramushin
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, IMRIC, Ein Kerem Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Indigo C King
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Cyrus Biotechnology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Robert Kleffner
- Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brian Koepnick
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Tanja Kortemme
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Georg Kuenze
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Brian Kuhlman
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Daisuke Kuroda
- Medical Device Development and Regulation Research Center, School of Engineering, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jason W Labonte
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Chemistry, Franklin & Marshall College, Lancaster, PA, USA
| | - Jason K Lai
- Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gideon Lapidoth
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Andrew Leaver-Fay
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Steffen Lindert
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Thomas Linsky
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Nir London
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, IMRIC, Ein Kerem Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Joseph H Lubin
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sergey Lyskov
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jack Maguire
- Program in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Lars Malmström
- Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Institute for Computational Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- S3IT, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Division of Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Enrique Marcos
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Research in Biomedicine Barcelona, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Orly Marcu
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, IMRIC, Ein Kerem Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Nicholas A Marze
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jens Meiler
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
- Departments of Chemistry, Pharmacology and Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
- Institute for Chemical Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Rocco Moretti
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Vikram Khipple Mulligan
- Center for Computational Biology, Flatiron Institute, Simons Foundation, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Santrupti Nerli
- Department of Computer Science, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Christoffer Norn
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Shane Ó'Conchúir
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Noah Ollikainen
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sergey Ovchinnikov
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Michael S Pacella
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Xingjie Pan
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hahnbeom Park
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ryan E Pavlovicz
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Cyrus Biotechnology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Manasi Pethe
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
- Center for Integrative Proteomics Research, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Brian G Pierce
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, MD, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Kala Bharath Pilla
- Research School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Barak Raveh
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, IMRIC, Ein Kerem Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - P Douglas Renfrew
- Center for Computational Biology, Flatiron Institute, Simons Foundation, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shourya S Roy Burman
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Aliza Rubenstein
- Institute of Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
- Computational Biology and Molecular Biophysics Program, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Marion F Sauer
- Chemical and Physical Biology Program, Vanderbilt Vaccine Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Andreas Scheck
- Institute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - William Schief
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ora Schueler-Furman
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, IMRIC, Ein Kerem Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Yuval Sedan
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, IMRIC, Ein Kerem Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Alexander M Sevy
- Chemical and Physical Biology Program, Vanderbilt Vaccine Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Nikolaos G Sgourakis
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Lei Shi
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Justin B Siegel
- Department of Chemistry, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA
- Genome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | | | - Shannon Smith
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Yifan Song
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Cyrus Biotechnology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Amelie Stein
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Maria Szegedy
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Frank D Teets
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Summer B Thyme
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ray Yu-Ruei Wang
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Andrew Watkins
- Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Lior Zimmerman
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, IMRIC, Ein Kerem Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Richard Bonneau
- Center for Computational Biology, Flatiron Institute, Simons Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, USA.
- Department of Computer Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
- Center for Data Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Singh A, Dauzhenka T, Kundrotas PJ, Sternberg MJE, Vakser IA. Application of docking methodologies to modeled proteins. Proteins 2020; 88:1180-1188. [PMID: 32170770 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Revised: 02/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Protein docking is essential for structural characterization of protein interactions. Besides providing the structure of protein complexes, modeling of proteins and their complexes is important for understanding the fundamental principles and specific aspects of protein interactions. The accuracy of protein modeling, in general, is still less than that of the experimental approaches. Thus, it is important to investigate the applicability of docking techniques to modeled proteins. We present new comprehensive benchmark sets of protein models for the development and validation of protein docking, as well as a systematic assessment of free and template-based docking techniques on these sets. As opposed to previous studies, the benchmark sets reflect the real case modeling/docking scenario where the accuracy of the models is assessed by the modeling procedure, without reference to the native structure (which would be unknown in practical applications). We also expanded the analysis to include docking of protein pairs where proteins have different structural accuracy. The results show that, in general, the template-based docking is less sensitive to the structural inaccuracies of the models than the free docking. The near-native docking poses generated by the template-based approach, typically, also have higher ranks than those produces by the free docking (although the free docking is indispensable in modeling the multiplicity of protein interactions in a crowded cellular environment). The results show that docking techniques are applicable to protein models in a broad range of modeling accuracy. The study provides clear guidelines for practical applications of docking to protein models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amar Singh
- Computational Biology Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
| | - Taras Dauzhenka
- Computational Biology Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
| | - Petras J Kundrotas
- Computational Biology Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
| | - Michael J E Sternberg
- Centre for Integrative Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, UK
| | - Ilya A Vakser
- Computational Biology Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.,Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Contreras S, Bertolani SJ, Siegel JB. A Benchmark for Homomeric Enzyme Active Site Structure Prediction Highlights the Importance of Accurate Modeling of Protein Symmetry. ACS OMEGA 2019; 4:22356-22362. [PMID: 31909318 PMCID: PMC6941179 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b02636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
Accurate prediction and modeling of an enzyme's active site are critical for engineering efforts as well as providing insight into an enzyme's naturally occurring function. Previous efforts demonstrated that the integration of constraints enforcing strict geometric orientations between catalytic residues significantly improved the modeling accuracy for the active sites of monomeric enzymes. In this study, a similar approach was explored to evaluate the effect on the active sites of homomeric enzymes. A benchmark of 17 homomeric enzymes with known structures and a bound ligand relevant to the established chemistry were identified from the protein data bank. The enzymes identified span multiple classes as well as symmetries. Unlike what was observed for the monomeric enzymes, upon the application of catalytic geometric constraints, there was no significant improvement observed in modeling accuracy for either the active site of the protein structure or the accuracy of the subsequently docked ligand. Upon further analysis, it is apparent that the symmetric interface being modeled is inaccurate and prevented the active sites from being modeled at atomic-level accuracy. This is consistent with the challenge others have identified in being able to predict de novo protein symmetry. To further improve the accuracy of active site modeling for homomeric proteins, new methodologies to accurately model the symmetric interfaces of these complexes are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie
C. Contreras
- Department
of Chemistry, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, and Genome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States
| | - Steve J. Bertolani
- Department
of Chemistry, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, and Genome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States
| | - Justin B. Siegel
- Department
of Chemistry, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, and Genome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States
- E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|