Physiologic tolerance of descending thoracic aortic balloon occlusion in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in the presence of associated severe traumatic brain injury: A propensity-score matched study

BACKGROUND

Experimental work suggested that resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) preserves cerebral circulation in animal models of traumatic brain injury. No clinical work has evaluated the role of REBOA in the presence of associated severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). We investigated the impacts of REBOA on neurological and survival outcomes.

METHODS

Propensity-score matched study, using the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database. Patients with severe TBI patients (Abbreviated Injury Scale ≥3) receiving REBOA within 4 ​h from arrival were matched with similar patients not receiving REBOA. Neurological matching included head AIS, pupils, and midline shift. Clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

434 REBOA patients were matched with 859 patients without REBOA. Patients in the REBOA group had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (63.6 ​% vs 44.2 ​%, p ​< ​0.001), severe sepsis (4.4 ​% vs 2.2 ​%, p ​= ​0.029), acute kidney injury (10.1 ​% vs 6.6 ​%, p ​= ​0.029), and withdrawal of life support (25.4 ​% vs 19.6 ​%, p ​= ​0.020) despite of lower craniectomy/craniotomy rate (7.1 ​% vs 12.7 ​%, p ​< ​0.002).

CONCLUSION

In patients with severe TBI, REBOA use is associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality, AKI, and infectious complications.

Cerebral haemodynamics and intracranial pressure during haemorrhagic shock and resuscitation with total endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in an animal model

PURPOSE

To assess changes of cerebral haemodynamic and intracranial pressure (ICP) in animals, with or without elevated ICP, during controlled haemorrhagic shock and resuscitation with Total REBOA (tREBOA).

METHOD

In 22 anaesthetized and normoventilated pigs, after placement of catheters for monitoring invasive proximal blood pressure (pMAP), ICP, and vital parameters, and 60 min stabilisation phase, a controlled haemorrhagic shock (HS), was conducted. In 11 pigs (EICPG), an elevated ICP of 25-30 mmHg at the end HS was achieved by simulating an epidural mass. In 11 pigs (NICPG), the ICP was normal. tREBOA was then applied for 120 min. The changes of pMAP and ICP were followed, and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) calculated. The integrity of the autoregulation was estimated using a calculated Modified-Long Pressure Reactivity Index (mL-PRx).

RESULTS

After stabilisation, hemodynamics and physiological parameters were similar and normal in both groups. At the end of the HS, ICP was 16 mmHg in NICPG vs. 32 in EICPG (p = 0.0010). CPP was 30 mmHg in NICPG vs. 6 mmHg in EICPG (p = 0.0254). After aorta occlusion CPP increased immediately in both groups reaching after 15 min up to104 mmHg in NICPG vs. 126 mmHg in EICPG. Cerebrovascular reactivity seems to be altered during bleeding and occlusion phases in both groups with positive mL-PRx. The alteration was more pronounced in EICPG, but reversible in both groups.

CONCLUSION

tREBOA is lifesaving by restoration the cerebral circulation defined as CPP in animals with HS with normal or elevated ICP. Despite the observation of short episodes of cerebral autoregulation impairment during the occlusion, mainly in EICPG, tREBOA seems to be an effective tool for improving cerebral perfusion in HS that extends the crucial early window sometimes known as the "golden hour" for resuscitation even after a traumatic brain injury.

Aortoesophageal fistula with hemorrhagic shock successfully treated with resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta

BACKGROUND

Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare cause of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Despite diagnostic and therapeutic advances, the mortality rate in AEF patients remains high because of its fulminant course, even with maximal intensive care. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a resuscitation technique to control life-threatening bleeding. It has become an important modality in the management of life-threatening, traumatic or non-traumatic, arterial bleeding. However, it's use in hemorrhagic shock caused by cancer has rarely been reported.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 51-year-old woman with a history of esophageal cancer presented to our emergency department with hematemesis. Computed tomography was performed because of a strong suspicion of hemorrhagic shock. With a diagnosis of AEF due to esophageal cancer, emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair was performed while the bleeding was controlled using REBOA. Staged elective esophageal reconstruction was successfully performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemostasis is crucial in patients who present with suspected hemorrhagic shock attributable to AEF. The timely implementation of REBOA has shown promise and potential effectiveness in such cases.

The UK resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in trauma patients with life-threatening torso haemorrhage: the (UK-REBOA) multicentre RCT

Background

The most common cause of preventable death after injury is haemorrhage. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta is intended to provide earlier, temporary haemorrhage control, to facilitate transfer to an operating theatre or interventional radiology suite for definitive haemostasis.

Objective

To compare standard care plus resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta versus standard care in patients with exsanguinating haemorrhage in the emergency department.

Design

Pragmatic, multicentre, Bayesian, group-sequential, registry-enabled, open-label, parallel-group randomised controlled trial to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of standard care plus resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, compared to standard care alone.

Setting

United Kingdom Major Trauma Centres.

Participants

Trauma patients aged 16 years or older with confirmed or suspected life-threatening torso haemorrhage deemed amenable to adjunctive treatment with resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta.

Interventions

Participants were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to: standard care, as expected in a major trauma centre standard care plus resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta.

Main outcome measures

Primary: Mortality at 90 days. Secondary: Mortality at 6 months, while in hospital, and within 24, 6 and 3 hours; need for haemorrhage control procedures, time to commencement of haemorrhage procedure, complications, length of stay (hospital and intensive care unit-free days), blood product use. Health economic: Expected United Kingdom National Health Service perspective costs, life-years and quality-adjusted life-years, modelled over a lifetime horizon.

Data sources

Case report forms, Trauma Audit and Research Network registry, NHS Digital (Hospital Episode Statistics and Office of National Statistics data).

Results

Ninety patients were enrolled: 46 were randomised to standard care plus resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta and 44 to standard care. Mortality at 90 days was higher in the standard care plus resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta group (54%) compared to the standard care group (42%). The odds ratio was 1.58 (95% credible interval 0.72 to 3.52). The posterior probability of an odds ratio > 1 (indicating increased odds of death with resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta) was 86.9%. The overall effect did not change when an enthusiastic prior was used or when the estimate was adjusted for baseline characteristics. For the secondary outcomes (3, 6 and 24 hours mortality), the posterior probability that standard care plus resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta was harmful was higher than for the primary outcome. Additional analyses to account for intercurrent events did not change the direction of the estimate for mortality at any time point. Death due to haemorrhage was more common in the standard care plus resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta group than in the standard care group. There were no serious adverse device effects. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta is less costly (probability 99%), due to the competing mortality risk but also substantially less effective in terms of lifetime quality-adjusted life-years (probability 91%).

Limitations

The size of the study reflects the relative infrequency of exsanguinating traumatic haemorrhage in the United Kingdom. There were some baseline imbalances between groups, but adjusted analyses had little effect on the estimates.

Conclusions

This is the first randomised trial of the addition of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta to standard care in the management of exsanguinating haemorrhage. All the analyses suggest that a strategy of standard care plus resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta is potentially harmful.

Future work

The role (if any) of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in the pre-hospital setting remains unclear. Further research to clarify its potential (or not) may be required.

Trial registration

This trial is registered as ISRCTN16184981.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 14/199/09) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 54. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

An assessment of nationwide trends in emergency department (ED) resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) use - A trauma quality improvement program registry analysis

BACKGROUND

Use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for temporary hemorrhage control in severe non-compressible torso trauma remains controversial, with limited data on patient selection and outcomes. This study aims to analyze the nationwide trends of its use in the emergency department (EDs).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS-TQIP) from 2017 to 2022 was performed, focusing on REBOA placements in EDs.

RESULTS

The analysis included 3398 REBOA procedures. Majority patients were male (76 ​%) with a median age of 40 years (27-58) and injury severity score of 20 (20-41). The most common mechanism was collision (64 ​%), with emergency surgeries most frequently performed for pelvic trauma (14 ​%). Level 1 trauma centers performed 82 ​% of these procedures, with consistent low annual utilization (<200 facilities). Survival rates were 85 ​% at 1-h post-placement, decreasing significantly to 42 ​% by discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

REBOA usage in remains limited but steady, primarily occurring at level 1 trauma center EDs. While short-term survival rates are favorable, they drop significantly by the time of discharge.

INVESTIGATING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BLEEDING, CLOTTING, AND COAGULOPATHY DURING AUTOMATED PARTIAL REBOA STRATEGIES IN A HIGHLY LETHAL PORCINE HEMORRHAGE MODEL

ABSTRACT

Background: Death due to hemorrhagic shock, particularly, noncompressible truncal hemorrhage, remains one of the leading causes of potentially preventable deaths. Automated partial and intermittent resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (i.e., pREBOA and iREBOA, respectively) are lifesaving endovascular strategies aimed to achieve quick hemostatic control while mitigating distal ischemia. In iREBOA, the balloon is titrated from full occlusion to no occlusion intermittently, whereas in pREBOA, a partial occlusion is maintained. Therefore, these two interventions impose different hemodynamic conditions, which may impact coagulation and the endothelial glycocalyx layer. In this study, we aimed to characterize the clotting kinetics and coagulopathy associated with iREBOA and pREBOA, using thromboelastography (TEG). We hypothesized that iREBOA would be associated with a more hypercoagulopathic response compared with pREBOA due to more oscillatory flow. Methods: Yorkshire swine (n = 8/group) were subjected to an uncontrolled hemorrhage by liver transection, followed by 90 min of automated pREBOA, iREBOA, or no balloon support (control). Hemodynamic parameters were continuously recorded, and blood samples were serially collected during the experiment (i.e., eight key time points: baseline (BL), T0, T10, T30, T60, T90, T120, T210 min). Citrated kaolin heparinase assays were run on a TEG 5000 (Haemonetics, Niles, IL). General linear mixed models were employed to compare differences in TEG parameters between groups and over time using STATA (v17; College Station, TX), while adjusting for sex and weight. Results: As expected, iREBOA was associated with more oscillations in proximal pressure (and greater magnitudes of peak pressure) because of the intermittent periods of full aortic occlusion and complete balloon deflation, compared to pREBOA. Despite these differences in acute hemodynamics, there were no significant differences in any of the TEG parameters between the iREBOA and pREBOA groups. However, animals in both groups experienced a significant reduction in clotting times (R time: P < 0.001; K time: P < 0.001) and clot strength (MA: P = 0.01; G: P = 0.02) over the duration of the experiment. Conclusions: Despite observing acute differences in peak proximal pressures between the iREBOA and pREBOA groups, we did not observe any significant differences in TEG parameters between iREBOA and pREBOA. The changes in TEG profiles were significant over time, indicating that a severe hemorrhage followed by both pREBOA and iREBOA can result in faster clotting reaction times (i.e., R times). Nevertheless, when considering the significant reduction in transfusion requirements and more stable hemodynamic response in the pREBOA group, there may be some evidence favoring pREBOA usage over iREBOA.

Impact of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta on gastrointestinal function with a matched cohort study

Background

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) can temporarily control arterial hemorrhage in torso trauma; however, the abdominal visceral blood flow is also blocked by REBOA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of REBOA on gastrointestinal function.

Methods

A retrospective review identified all trauma patients admitted to our trauma center between 2008 and 2019. We used propensity score matching analysis to compare the gastrointestinal function between subjects who underwent REBOA and those who did not. Data on demographics, feeding intolerance (FI), time to feeding goal achievement, and complications were retrieved.

Results

During the study period, 55 patients underwent REBOA. A total of 1694 patients met the inclusion criteria, 27 of whom were a subset of those who underwent REBOA. After 1:1 propensity score matching, the REBOA and no-REBOA groups were assigned 22 patients each. Patients in the REBOA group had a significantly higher incidence of FI (77% vs. 27%; OR, 9.1; 95% CI, 2.31 to 35.7; p=0.002) and longer time to feeding goal achievement (8 vs. 6 days, p=0.022) than patients in the no-REBOA group. Patients in the REBOA group also showed significantly prolonged durations of ventilator use (8 vs. 4 days, p=0.023). Furthermore, there was no difference in the mortality rate between the groups (9% vs. 9%, p=1.000).

Conclusions

REBOA was associated with gastrointestinal dysfunction. Our study findings can be useful in providing guidance on managing nutrition in trauma patients who undergo REBOA.

Level of evidence

Level IV.

Study type

Care management.

Emergency Department Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in Trauma Patients With Exsanguinating Hemorrhage: The UK-REBOA Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Bleeding is the most common cause of preventable death after trauma.

Objective

To determine the effectiveness of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) when used in the emergency department along with standard care vs standard care alone on mortality in trauma patients with exsanguinating hemorrhage.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Pragmatic, bayesian, randomized clinical trial conducted at 16 major trauma centers in the UK. Patients aged 16 years or older with exsanguinating hemorrhage were enrolled between October 2017 and March 2022 and followed up for 90 days.

Intervention

Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 allocation) to a strategy that included REBOA and standard care (n = 46) or standard care alone (n = 44).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days. Ten secondary outcomes included mortality at 6 months, while in the hospital, and within 24 hours, 6 hours, or 3 hours; the need for definitive hemorrhage control procedures; time to commencement of definitive hemorrhage control procedures; complications; length of stay; blood product use; and cause of death.

Results

Of the 90 patients (median age, 41 years [IQR, 31-59 years]; 62 [69%] were male; and the median Injury Severity Score was 41 [IQR, 29-50]) randomized, 89 were included in the primary outcome analysis because 1 patient in the standard care alone group declined to provide consent for continued participation and data collection 4 days after enrollment. At 90 days, 25 of 46 patients (54%) had experienced all-cause mortality in the REBOA and standard care group vs 18 of 43 patients (42%) in the standard care alone group (odds ratio [OR], 1.58 [95% credible interval, 0.72-3.52]; posterior probability of an OR >1 [indicating increased odds of death with REBOA], 86.9%). Among the 10 secondary outcomes, the ORs for mortality and the posterior probabilities of an OR greater than 1 for 6-month, in-hospital, and 24-, 6-, or 3-hour mortality were all increased in the REBOA and standard care group, and the ORs were increased with earlier mortality end points. There were more deaths due to bleeding in the REBOA and standard care group (8 of 25 patients [32%]) than in standard care alone group (3 of 18 patients [17%]), and most occurred within 24 hours.

Conclusions and Relevance

In trauma patients with exsanguinating hemorrhage, a strategy of REBOA and standard care in the emergency department does not reduce, and may increase, mortality compared with standard care alone.

Trial Registration

isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN16184981.

Balloons on the battlefield: REBOA implementation in the UK Defence Medical Services

Established in 2018, the Defence Endovascular Resuscitation (DefER) group recognised that resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) offered an option to improve survival in battle casualties dying from haemorrhage, particularly in remote and austere surgical settings. Following a successful jHub opportunity assessment, DefER purchased training and operational kit at pace. By 1 April 2019, the first forward surgical group undertook a bespoke endovascular training and assessment package. Results of the pilot were presented back to a jHub 4* Innovation Board, which initially awarded £500 000 to fund the project to full implementation. Med Op Cap provided a solution to establish REBOA as a core capability on to the 370 modules. REBOA catheters and arterial access kit are now available to deployed Role 2 facilities across defence as an adjunct to damage control resuscitation in specific circumstances. REBOA has, from a standing start, gained pan-Defence Medical Services (DMS) endorsement and has been integrated into deployed damage control resuscitation. To establish a new resuscitation capability across all Role 2 platforms within 15 months of inception represents implementation at pace. This agility was unlocked by empowering clinicians to develop the platform in conjunction with commercial procurement. This article describes how this innovative pathway facilitated the rapid introduction of a lifesaving haemorrhage control technique to equip DMS clinicians.

Investigating the variability in pressure-volume relationships during hemorrhage and aortic occlusion

Introduction

The pressure-volume (P-V) relationships of the left ventricle are the classical benchmark for studying cardiac mechanics and pumping function. Perturbations in the P-V relationship (or P-V loop) can be informative and guide the management of heart failure, hypovolemia, and aortic occlusion. Traditionally, P-V loop analyses have been limited to a single-beat P-V loop or an average of consecutive P-V loops (e.g., 10 cardiac cycles). While there are several algorithms to obtain single-beat estimations of the end-systolic and end-diastolic pressure-volume relations (i.e., ESPVR and EDPVR, respectively), there remains a need to better evaluate the variations in P-V relationships longitudinally over time. This is particularly important when studying acute and transient hemodynamic and cardiac events, such as active hemorrhage or aortic occlusion. In this study, we aim to investigate the variability in P-V relationships during hemorrhagic shock and aortic occlusion, by leveraging on a previously published porcine hemorrhage model.

Methods

Briefly, swine were instrumented with a P-V catheter in the left ventricle of the heart and underwent a 25% total blood volume hemorrhage over 30 min, followed by either Zone 1 complete aortic occlusion (i.e., REBOA), Zone 1 endovascular variable aortic control (EVAC), or no occlusion as a control, for 45 min. Preload-independent metrics of cardiac performance were obtained at predetermined time points by performing inferior vena cava occlusion during a ventilatory pause. Continuous P-V loop data and other hemodynamic flow and pressure measurements were collected in real-time using a multi-channel data acquisition system.

Results

We developed a custom algorithm to quantify the time-dependent variance in both load-dependent and independent cardiac parameters from each P-V loop. As expected, all pigs displayed a significant decrease in the end-systolic pressures and volumes (i.e., ESP, ESV) after hemorrhage. The variability in response to hemorrhage was consistent across all three groups. However, upon introduction of REBOA, we observed significantly high levels of variability in both load-dependent and independent cardiac metrics such as ESP, ESV, and the slope of ESPVR (Ees). For instance, pigs receiving REBOA experienced a 342% increase in ESP from hemorrhage, while pigs receiving EVAC experienced only a 188% increase. The level of variability within the EVAC group was consistently less than that of the REBOA group, which suggests that the EVAC group may be more supportive of maintaining healthier cardiac performance than complete occlusion with REBOA.

Discussion

In conclusion, we successfully developed a novel algorithm to reliably quantify the single-beat and longitudinal P-V relations during hemorrhage and aortic occlusion. As expected, hemorrhage resulted in smaller P-V loops, reflective of decreased preload and afterload conditions; however, the cardiac output and heart rate were preserved. The use of REBOA and EVAC for 44 min resulted in the restoration of baseline afterload and preload conditions, but often REBOA exceeded baseline pressure conditions to an alarming level. The level of variability in response to REBOA was significant and could be potentially associated to cardiac injury. By quantifying each P-V loop, we were able to capture the variability in all P-V loops, including those that were irregular in shape and believe that this can help us identify critical time points associated with declining cardiac performance during hemorrhage and REBOA use.

Traumatic hemorrhage and chain of survival

Trauma is the number one cause of death among Americans between the ages of 1 and 46 years, costing more than $670 billion a year. Following death related to central nervous system injury, hemorrhage accounts for the majority of remaining traumatic fatalities. Among those with severe trauma that reach the hospital alive, many may survive if the hemorrhage and traumatic injuries are diagnosed and adequately treated in a timely fashion. This article aims to review the recent advances in pathophysiology management following a traumatic hemorrhage as well as the role of diagnostic imaging in identifying the source of hemorrhage. The principles of damage control resuscitation and damage control surgery are also discussed. The chain of survival for severe hemorrhage begins with primary prevention; however, once trauma has occurred, prehospital interventions and hospital care with early injury recognition, resuscitation, definitive hemostasis, and achieving endpoints of resuscitation become paramount. An algorithm is proposed for achieving these goals in a timely fashion as the median time from onset of hemorrhagic shock and death is 2 h.

REBOA for the Treatment of Blast Polytrauma: Zone 3 Provides Cerebral Perfusion, Attenuates Organ Dysfunction and Reperfusion Coagulopathy Compared to Zone 1 in a Swine Model

BACKGROUND

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a lifesaving therapy for hemorrhagic shock following pelvic/lower extremity injuries in military settings. However, Zone 1 aortic occlusion (AO; above the celiac artery), while providing brain/cardiac perfusion, may induce/worsen visceral ischemia and organ dysfunction. In contrast, AO Zone 3 (below the renal arteries) provides abdominal perfusion potentially minimizing ischemia/reperfusion injury. We hypothesized that, compared with AO Zone 1, AO Zone 3 provides neuro/cardioprotection while minimizing visceral ischemia and reperfusion coagulopathy after severe traumatic hemorrhage due to pelvic/lower extremity injuries.

METHODS

Fifty-kilogram male Yorkshire swine underwent a blast polytrauma injury followed by a resuscitation protocol with randomization to no AO (No AO, n = 6) or AO with REBOA at Zone 1 (AO Zone 1; n = 6) or Zone 3 (AO Zone 3; n = 4). Vital signs and intracranial pressure (ICP) were monitored for 240 minutes. Citrate native and tissue plasminogen activator challenge thrombelastography, prothrombin time, creatinine, lipase, total bilirubin, troponin, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays protein levels were measured at set intervals.

RESULTS

Both AO groups had significant increases in mean arterial pressure during aortic occlusion. All three groups had significant increases in ICP, but final ICP in the No AO group (26 ± 5.8 mm Hg) was significantly elevated compared with AO Zone 1 (17 ± 5.2 mm Hg) and AO Zone 3 (16 ± 4.2 mm Hg) ( p < 0.01). The final mean troponin in the No AO group (4.10 ± 5.67 ng/mL) was significantly higher than baseline (0.03 ± 0.02 ng/mL, p < 0.05), while the two AO groups had no significant changes ( p > 0.05). AO Zone 1 was the only group associated with hyperfibrinolysis ( p < 0.05) and significantly increased prothrombin time ( p < 0.05). Only AO Zone 1 group had significantly higher markers of organ damage.

CONCLUSION

Compared with AO Zone 1, AO Zone 3 provided similar neuro/cardioprotection but with less organ dysfunction and coagulopathy. This study suggests that Zone 3 REBOA may be preferable over Zone 1 for treating military relevant blast polytrauma with minimal intra-abdominal and chest trauma, but further clinical investigation is warranted.

Tandem use of gastroesophageal resuscitative occlusion of the aorta followed by resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in a lethal liver laceration model

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal resuscitative occlusion of the aorta (GROA) has been shown effective in creating zone II aortic occlusion capable of temporarily improving survival in animal models of lethal noncompressible torso hemorrhage. In this study, tandem application of GROA transitioning to resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is explored to demonstrate feasibility as a potential point-of-injury bridge to more advanced care, using a swine model of lethal abdominal hemorrhage.

METHODS

Swine (n = 19) were anesthetized, instrumented, and subjected to a combination of controlled and uncontrolled hemorrhage from a grade-V liver laceration. Animals were designated as intervention (n = 9; GROA to REBOA) or control (n = 10), for 60 minutes. Following intervention, devices were deactivated, and animals received blood and crystalloid resuscitation. Animals were monitored for 4 hours.

RESULTS

Injury resulted in onset of class IV shock in all animals with a mean arterial pressure (SD) of 24.5 (4.11) mm Hg at the start of intervention. Nine of 10 controls died during the intervention period with a median (interquartile) survival time of 8.5 (9.25) minutes. All animals receiving the intervention survived both the 60-minute intervention period demonstrating a significant survival improvement ( p = 0.0007). Transition from GROA to REBOA was successful in all animals with a transition time ranging from 30 to 90 seconds. Mean arterial pressure significantly improved in animals receiving GROA to REBOA for the duration of intervention, regardless of the method of aortic occlusion, with a range of 70.9 (16.04) mm Hg to 101.1 (15.3) mm Hg. Additional hemodynamics, metrics of shock, and oxygenation remained stable during intervention.

CONCLUSION

Less invasive technologies such as GROA may present an opportunity to control noncompressible torso hemorrhage more rapidly, with a subsequent transition to more advanced care such as REBOA.

Development of a computational fluid dynamic model to investigate the hemodynamic impact of REBOA

Background: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a lifesaving intervention for major truncal hemorrhage. Balloon-tipped arterial catheters are inserted via the femoral artery to create a temporary occlusion of the aorta, which minimizes the rate of internal bleeding until definitive surgery can be conducted. There is growing concern over the resultant hypoperfusion and potential damage to tissues and organs downstream of REBOA. To better understand the acute hemodynamic changes imposed by REBOA, we developed a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamic (CFD) model under normal, hemorrhage, and aortic occlusion conditions. The goal was to characterize the acute hemodynamic changes and identify regions within the aortic vascular tree susceptible to abnormal flow and shear stress. Methods: Hemodynamic data from established porcine hemorrhage models were used to build a CFD model. Swine underwent 20% controlled hemorrhage and were randomized to receive a full or partial aortic occlusion. Using CT scans, we generated a pig-specific aortic geometry and imposed physiologically relevant inlet flow and outlet pressure boundary conditions to match in vivo data. By assuming non-Newtonian fluid properties, pressure, velocity, and shear stresses were quantified over a cardiac cycle. Results: We observed a significant rise in blood pressure (∼147 mmHg) proximal to REBOA, which resulted in increased flow and shear stress within the ascending aorta. Specifically, we observed high levels of shear stress within the subclavian arteries (22.75 Pa). Alternatively, at the site of full REBOA, wall shear stress was low (0.04 ± 9.07E-4 Pa), but flow oscillations were high (oscillatory shear index of 0.31). Comparatively, partial REBOA elevated shear levels to 84.14 ± 19.50 Pa and reduced flow oscillations. Our numerical simulations were congruent within 5% of averaged porcine experimental data over a cardiac cycle. Conclusion: This CFD model is the first to our knowledge to quantify the acute hemodynamic changes imposed by REBOA. We identified areas of low shear stress near the site of occlusion and high shear stress in the subclavian arteries. Future studies are needed to determine the optimal design parameters of endovascular hemorrhage control devices that can minimize flow perturbations and areas of high shear.

The Effects of Increasing Aortic Occlusion Times at the Level of the Highest Renal Artery (Zone II) in the Normovolemic Rabbit Model

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of increasing zone II resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) occlusion times on physiological, end-organ and inflammatory responses in rabbits to assess the safe aortic occlusion time in a normovolemic rabbit model.

METHODS

The zone ll aorta was occluded with a balloon in 32 rabbits (8 animals each for 15, 30, 60, and 90 min). 8 rabbits served as a control. ELISAs were used to examine the serum levels of ALT, AST, Cr, BUN, MDA, SOD, IL-8, IL-6, and TNF-α; HE staining was used to identify the morphological changes in the kidney; RT-PCR was used to detect the mRNA levels of IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α and NF-κB in the kidney and uterus; and Western blotting was used to measure the protein expression levels of IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α and NF-κB in the kidney and uterus.

RESULTS

Plasma concentrations of liver markers, kidney markers, inflammatory factors and oxidative stress indicators were significantly increased at the end of reperfusion in the 30 min, 60 min and 90 min groups. Damage to the kidney occurred in the 30 min, 60 min and 90 min groups. The mRNA and protein expression levels of IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α and NF-κB in the kidney and uterus were significantly increased at the end of reperfusion in the 30 min group, and as the time of occlusion extended, these levels continued to increase.

CONCLUSION

Activation of systemic inflammation and ischaemia-reperfusion injury of end-organs occurred when the occlusion time reached 30 min. Therefore, 15 min should be regarded as a safe period of REBOA in zone II.

A clinical study of the hemodynamic and metabolic effects of Zone 3 REBOA for sacral and pelvic tumor resections

Background

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a key procedure in sacral and pelvic tumor resection that provides hemorrhage control. However, few studies have been performed to capture the effects of REBOA in a nonshock condition and provide a detailed description of the changes occurring with prolonged occlusion time. This study aimed to examine the hemodynamic and metabolic effects of Zone 3 REBOA for sacral and pelvic tumor resections following different periods of REBOA.

Methods

In total, 121 patients who underwent surgical tumor resections of the pelvis and/or the sacrum with the use of aortic balloon occlusion were prospectively enrolled from October 2020 to December 2021. All cases were divided into Group A (occlusion time ≤ 60 min, n = 57) and Group B (occlusion time ≥ 90 min, n = 64). Physiologic parameters were continuously recorded, and laboratory specimens were obtained at regular intervals.

Results

Balloon inflation resulted in a significant increase in SBP from 106 to 120 mmHg and decreased to 96 mmHg immediately following balloon deflation. With the application of REBOA, the median blood loss was only 1200 ml (range, 400–7900). When deflating the REBOA, the arterial pH was lower than baseline (7.36 vs. 7.41, p < 0.01), the arterial lactate concentration increased from 0.9 to 1.4 mmol/L (p < 0.01), serum potassium measurements increased from 3.99 to 4.12 mmol/L, serum calcium measurements decreased from 2.31 to 2.04 mmol/L, and blood creatinine decreased from 64 to 60 µmol/L. The operating time of Group B was longer than that of patients in Group A, and the patients in Group B needed more blood units to be transfused. Although laboratory measurements, including pH, potassium, calcium, and blood creatinine, were at the same level in two groups comparison, the lactate was significantly higher in Group B after deflation (p = 0.01).

Conclusions

The results of this study showed that acceptable hemodynamic and metabolic stability can be attained when the occlusion time of REBOA is more than 90 min, although the long duration of occlusion caused relatively higher lactate levels.

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for trauma patients with uncontrolled torso haemorrhage: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial (the UK-REBOA trial)

BACKGROUND

Haemorrhage is the most common cause of preventable death after injury. REBOA is a novel technique whereby a percutaneously inserted balloon is deployed in the aorta, providing a relatively quick means of temporarily controlling haemorrhage and augmenting cerebral and coronary perfusion, until definitive control of haemorrhage can be attained. The aim of the UK-REBOA trial is to establish the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a policy of standard major trauma centre treatment plus REBOA, as compared with standard major trauma centre treatment alone, for the management of uncontrolled torso haemorrhage caused by injury.

METHODS

Pragmatic, Bayesian, group-sequential, randomised controlled trial, performed in 16 major trauma centres in England. We aim to randomise 120 injured patients with suspected exsanguinating haemorrhage to either standard major trauma centre care plus REBOA or standard major trauma centre care alone. The primary clinical outcome is 90-day mortality. Secondary clinical outcomes include 3-h, 6-h, and 24-h mortality; in-hospital mortality; 6-month mortality; length of stay (in hospital and intensive care unit); 24-h blood product use; need for haemorrhage control procedure (operation or angioembolisation); and time to commencement of haemorrhage control procedure (REBOA, operation, or angioembolisation). The primary economic outcome is lifetime incremental cost per QALY gained, from a health and personal social services perspective.

DISCUSSION

This study, which is the first to randomly allocate patients to treatment with REBOA or standard care, will contribute high-level evidence on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of REBOA in the management of trauma patients with exsanguinating haemorrhage and will provide important data on the feasibility of implementation of REBOA into mainstream clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN16184981.

Safety and Effectiveness of Aortic Occlusion for Those Undergoing Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA): A Retrospective Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is used to temporarily control bleeding and maintain the cerebral and coronary blood flow in cases in which it is difficult to control hemorrhagic shock. However, the safety and effectiveness of REBOA remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to estimate the safety and effectiveness of aortic occlusion in patients who undergo REBOA catheter placement.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent REBOA catheter placement at Fukuyama City Hospital Emergency Medical Center from August 1, 2008 to March 31, 2020. A propensity score-matching analysis was used to compare 30-day survival between patients who undergo REBOA catheter placement with and without aortic occlusion.

RESULTS

Overall, 122 of the 147 who underwent REBOA catheter placement at Fukuyama City Hospital were eligible for inclusion. Thirty-five patients in the Occlusion group and 35 patients in the Nonocclusion group were selected by propensity score matching. According to the 30-day survival rate, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.288 log-rank test). Moreover, the required treatment, the types and incidence of complications, and other outcomes did not differ according to the presence or absence of aortic occlusion in patients who underwent REBOA catheter placement.

CONCLUSION

According to the results of this study, in trauma patients who undergo REBOA catheter placement, the presence of aortic occlusion was not significantly associated with 30-day mortality. Furthermore, the performance of aortic occlusion was not associated with a significant increase in complications.

Gastroesophageal resuscitative occlusion of the aorta prolongs survival in a lethal liver laceration model

BACKGROUND

Noncompressible torso hemorrhage management remains a challenge especially in the prehospital setting. We evaluated a device designed to occlude the aorta from the stomach (gastroesophageal resuscitative occlusion of the aorta [GROA]) for its ability to stop hemorrhage and improve survival in a swine model of lethal liver laceration and compared its performance to resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) and controls.

METHODS

Swine (n = 24) were surgically instrumented and a 30% controlled arterial hemorrhage over 20 minutes was followed by liver laceration. Animals received either GROA, REBOA, or control (no treatment) for 60 minutes. Following intervention, devices were deactivated, and animals received whole blood and crystalloid resuscitation. Animals were monitored for an additional 4 hours.

RESULTS

The liver laceration resulted in the onset of class IV shock. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) (standard deviation) decreased from 84.5 mm Hg (11.69 mm Hg) to 27.1 mm Hg (5.65 mm Hg) at the start of the intervention. Seven of eight control animals died from injury prior to the end of the intervention period with a median survival (interquartile) time of 10.5 minutes (12 minutes). All GROA and REBOA animals survived the duration of the intervention period (60 minutes) with median survival times of 86 minutes (232 minutes) and 79 minutes (199 minutes) after resuscitation, respectively. The GROA and REBOA animals experienced a significant improvement in survival compared with controls (p = 0.01). Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta resulted in higher MAP at the end of intervention 114.6 mm Hg (22.9 mm Hg) compared with GROA 88.2 mm Hg (18.72 mm Hg) (p = 0.024), as well as increased lactate compared with GROA 13.2 meq·L-1 (1.56 meq·L-1) versus 10.5 meq·L-1 (1.89 meq·L-1) (p = 0.028). Histological examination of the gastric mucosa in surviving animals revealed mild ischemic injury from both GROA and REBOA.

CONCLUSION

The GROA and REBOA devices were both effective at temporarily stanching lethal noncompressible torso hemorrhage of the abdomen and prolonging survival.

Endovascular Perfusion Augmentation for Critical Care Decreases Vasopressor Requirements while Maintaining Renal Perfusion

BACKGROUND

Ischemia reperfusion injury causes a profound hyperdynamic distributive shock. Endovascular perfusion augmentation for critical care (EPACC) has emerged as a hemodynamic adjunct to vasopressors and crystalloid. The objective of this study was to examine varying levels of mechanical support for the treatment of ischemiareperfusion injury in swine.

METHODS

Fifteen swine underwent anesthesia and then a controlled 30% blood volume hemorrhage followed by 30 min of supra-celiac aortic occlusion to create an ischemia-reperfusion injury Animals were randomized to standardized critical care (SCC), EPACC with low threshold (EPACC-Low), and EPACC with high threshold (EPACC-High). The intervention phase lasted 270 min after injury Hemodynamic markers and laboratory values of ischemia were recorded.

RESULTS

During the intervention phase, SCC spent 82.4% of the time avoiding proximal hypotension (>60 mm Hg), while EPACC-Low spent 97.6% and EPACC-High spent 99.5% of the time avoiding proximal hypotension, P  < 0.001. Renal artery flow was statistically increased in EPACC-Low compared with SCC (2.29 mL/min/kg vs. 1.77 mL/ min/kg, P  < 0.001), while renal flow for EPACC-High was statistically decreased compared with SCC (1.25 mL/min/kg vs. 1.77 mL/min/kg, P  < 0.001). EPACC animals required less intravenous norepinephrine, (EPACC-Low: 16.23mcg/kg and EPACC-High: 13.72 mcg/kg), compared with SCC (59.45 mcg/kg), P = 0.049 and P = 0.013 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with SCC, EPACC-High and EPACC-Low had decreased norepinephrine requirements with decreased frequency of proximal hypotension. EPACC-Low paradoxically had increased renal perfusion despite having a mechanical resistor in the aorta proximal to the renal arteries. This is the first description of low volume mechanical hemodynamic support in the setting of profound shock from ischemia-reperfusion injury in swine demonstrating stabilized proximal hemodynamics and augmented distal perfusion.

Challenges and Opportunities for Endovascular Treatment of Hemorrhage in Combat Casualty Care

ABSTRACT

The care of the hemorrhaging patient continues to evolve. The use of endovascular techniques to treat hemorrhage has increased significantly in civilian trauma care over the past 15 years and is identified as a major national trauma care research priority. Endovascular techniques are being increasingly employed to treat major thoracoabdominal arterial injuries and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta is being adopted at trauma centers as a supportive adjunct to resuscitation in the exsanguinating patient. Emerging endovascular technology offers the opportunity to provide temporary or permanent control of non-compressible torso hemorrhage, which remains a vexing problem in combat casualty care. Endovascular advances have not been translated to the care of combat casualties to any significant degree, however. This review provides a summary and analysis of the gap between civilian endovascular hemorrhage control and combat casualty care practice to better align future research and development efforts.

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of Aorta Versus Aortic Cross-Clamping by Thoracotomy for Noncompressible Torso Hemorrhage: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The effect of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of aorta (REBOA) in lowering mortality rate compared to resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) is inconclusive. In this updated systematic review and meta-analysis, we determined the effectiveness of the two techniques in patients with noncompressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Online databases (PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE) were searched until April 23, 2021, for original articles investigating the effect of REBOA on relevant outcomes (e.g., mortality in ED, mortality before discharge, in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay and length of ICU stay) among NCTH patients in contrast to open aortic occlusion by RT. Data on baseline characteristics and endpoints were extracted. Review Manager version 5.4.1 and OpenMetaAnalyst were used for analyses. Risk ratios (RR) and the weighted mean differences (WMD) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included having 3241 patients in total (REBOA: 1179 and RT: 2062). The pooled analysis demonstrated that compared to RT, mortality was significantly lower in the REBOA group in all settings: In emergency department (ED) (RR 0.63 [0.45, 0.87], P = 0.006, I² = 81%), before discharge (RR= 0.86 [0.75, 0.98], P = 0.03, I^{2 =} 93%), and in-hospital mortality (RR 0.80 [0.68, 0.95], P = 0.009, I^{2 =} 85%). Similarly, the length of ICU stay was significantly lower in REBOA group (WMD = 0.50 [-0.48, 1.48], P = 0.32, I^{2 =}97%). However, no significant differences were observed in the length of hospital stay (WMD = 0.0 [-0.26, 0.26] P = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Our pooled analysis shows REBOA to be effective in reducing mortality among NCTH patients. However, due to limited studies, the positive findings should be viewed discreetly and call for further investigation.

Targeted Regional Optimization: Increasing the Therapeutic Window for Endovascular Aortic Occlusion In Traumatic Hemorrhage

ABSTRACT

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) allows for effective temporization of exsanguination from non-compressible hemorrhage (NCTH) below the diaphragm. However, the therapeutic window for aortic occlusion is time-limited given the ischemia-reperfusion injury generated. Significant effort has been put into translational research to develop new strategies to alleviate the ischemia-reperfusion injury and extend the application of endoaortic occlusion. Targeted regional optimization (TRO) is a partial REBOA strategy to augment proximal aortic and cerebral blood flow while targeting minimal threshold of distal perfusion beyond the zone of partial aortic occlusion. The objective of TRO is to reduce the degree of ischemia caused by complete aortic occlusion while providing control of distal hemorrhage. This review provides a synopsis of the concept of TRO, pre-clinical, translational experiences with TRO and early clinical outcomes. Early results from TRO strategies are promising; however, further studies are needed prior to large-scale implementation into clinical practice.

End-tidal Carbon Dioxide as an Indicator of Partial REBOA and Distal Organ Metabolism in Normovolemia and Hemorrhagic Shock in Anesthetized Pigs

INTRODUCTION

It is difficult to estimate the ischemic consequences when using partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA). The aim was to investigate if end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) is correlated to degree of aortic occlusion, measured as distal aortic blood flow, and distal organ metabolism, estimated as systemic oxygen consumption (VO2), in a porcine model of normovolemia and hemorrhagic shock.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nine anesthetized pigs (25-32 kg) were subjected to incremental steps of zone 1 aortic occlusion (reducing distal aortic blood flow by 33%, 66%, and 100%) during normovolemia and hemorrhagic grade IV shock. Hemodynamic and respiratory variables, and blood samples, were measured. Systemic VO2 was correlated to ETCO2 and measures of partial occlusion previously described.

RESULTS

Aortic occlusion gradually lowered distal blood flow and pressure, whereas ETCO2, VO2 and carbon dioxide production decreased at 66% and 100% aortic occlusion. Aortic blood flow correlated significantly to ETCO2 during both normovolemia and hemorrhage (R = 0.84 and 0.83, respectively) and to femoral mean pressure (R = 0.92 and 0.83, respectively). Systemic VO2 correlated strongly to ETCO2 during both normovolemia and hemorrhage (R = 0.91 and 0.79, respectively), blood flow of the superior mesenteric artery (R = 0.77 and 0.85, respectively) and abdominal aorta (R = 0.78 and 0.78, respectively), but less to femoral blood pressure (R = 0.71 and 0.54, respectively).

CONCLUSION

ETCO2 was correlated to distal aortic blood flow and VO2 during incremental degrees of aortic occlusion thereby potentially reflecting the degree of aortic occlusion and the ischemic consequences of partial REBOA. Further studies of ETCO2, and potential confounders, in partial REBOA are needed before clinical use.

Emerging approaches to pre-hospital hemorrhage control: a narrative review

In the United States, trauma claims the lives of over 150,000 civilians each year. In military settings, trauma and exsanguination result in 50% of combat related deaths. The majority of these deaths result from uncontrolled non-compressible hemorrhage. Non-compressible hemorrhage often results from deep vascular injuries within the torso, however can also occur secondary to penetrating injuries that involve the extremities. Given the high mortality rates for non-compressible hemorrhage, rapid and effective management of patients suffering from hemorrhage is essential to good patient outcomes. Consequently, there has been increasing interest in solutions for point-of-injury hemorrhage control in trauma and military medicine. Undoubtedly there is a great need for prehospital hemostatic interventions that can be deployed by trained and untrained personnel. Since 2001, various hemostatic agents have been developed, each with its advantages based upon the type and severity of injury, wound size, wound location, accessibility to injury site, and the coagulation status of the patient. These agents are often used in the military setting as a temporizing measure prior to definitive therapy and include techniques such as resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) and bioengineered agents including ResQFoam, RevMedx’s XSTAT, Tranexamic acid (TXA), and QuikClot Combat Gauze (QCG). Here, we review the indications, composition, technique, efficacy, and outcomes of these hemostatic agents.

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in combat casualties: The past, present, and future

BACKGROUND

Noncompressible torso hemorrhage is a leading cause of preventable death on the battlefield. Intra-aortic balloon occlusion was first used in combat in the 1950s, but military use was rare before Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. During these wars, the combination of an increasing number of deployed vascular surgeons and a significant rise in deaths from hemorrhage resulted in novel adaptations of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) technology, increasing its potential application in combat. We describe the background of REBOA development in response to a need for minimally invasive intervention for hemorrhage control and provide a detailed review of all published cases (n = 47) of REBOA use for combat casualties. The current limitations of REBOA are described, including distal ischemia and reperfusion injury, as well as ongoing research efforts to adapt REBOA for prolonged use in the austere setting.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

Prehospital aortic blood flow control techniques for non-compressible traumatic hemorrhage

Non-compressible hemorrhage in the junctional areas and torso could be life-threatening and its prehospital control remains extremely challenging. The aim of this review was to compare commonly used techniques for the control of non-compressible hemorrhage in prehospital settings, and thereby provide evidence for further improvements in emergency care of traumatic injuries. Three techniques were reviewed including external aortic compression (EAC), abdominal aortic junctional tourniquet (AAJT), and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA). In prehospital settings, all three techniques have demonstrated clinical effectiveness for the control of severe hemorrhage. EAC is a cost- and equipment-free, easy-to-teach, and immediately available technique. In contrast, AAJT and REBOA are expensive and require detailed instructions or systematic training. Compared with EAC, AAJT and REBOA have greater potentials in the management of traumatic hemorrhage. AAJT can be used not only in the junctional areas but also in pelvic and bilateral lower limb injuries. However, both AAJT and REBOA should be used for a limited time (less than 1 hour) due to possible consequences of ischemia and reperfusion. Compared with EAC and AAJT, REBOA is invasive, requiring femoral arterial access and intravascular guidance and inflation. Mortality from non-compressible hemorrhage could be reduced through the prehospital application of aortic blood flow control techniques. EAC should be considered as the first-line choice for many non-compressible injuries that cannot be managed with conventional junctional tourniquets. In comparison, AAJT or REBOA is recommended for better control of the aorta blood flow in prehospital settings. Although these three techniques each have advantages, their use in trauma is not widespread. Future studies are warranted to provide more data about their safety and efficacy.

Gastroesophageal resuscitative occlusion of the aorta: Physiologic tolerance in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock

BACKGROUND

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has been shown to be effective for management of noncompressible torso hemorrhage. However, this technique requires arterial cannulation, which can be time-consuming and not amendable to placement in austere environments. We present a novel, less invasive aortic occlusion device and technique designated gastroesophageal resuscitative occlusion of the aorta (GROA). In this study, we aimed to characterize the physiological tolerance and hemodynamic effects of a prototype GROA device in a model of severe hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation and compare with REBOA.

METHODS

Swine (N = 47) were surgically instrumented for data collection. A 35% controlled arterial hemorrhage was followed by randomizing animals to 30-minute, 60-minute, or 90-minute interventions of GROA, REBOA, or control. Following intervention, devices were deactivated, and animals received whole blood and crystalloid resuscitation. Animals were monitored for an additional 4 hours.

RESULTS

All animals except one GROA 90-minute application survived the duration of their intervention periods. Survival through resuscitation phase in GROA, REBOA, and control groups was similar in the 30-minute and 60-minute groups. The 90-minute occlusion groups exhibited deleterious effects upon device deactivation and reperfusion with two GROA animals surviving and no REBOA animals surviving. Mean (SD) arterial pressure in GROA and REBOA animals increased across all groups to 98 (31.50) mm Hg and 122 (24.79) mm Hg, respectively, following intervention. Lactate was elevated across all GROA and REBOA groups relative to controls during intervention but cleared by 4 hours in the 30-minute and 60-minute groups. Postmortem histological examination of the gastric mucosa revealed mild to moderate inflammation across all GROA groups.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the hemodynamic effects and physiological tolerance of GROA was similar to REBOA. The GROA device was capable of achieving high zone II full aortic occlusion and may be able to serve as an effective method of aortic impingement.

State-of-the-Art Review-Endovascular Resuscitation

ABSTRACT

The emerging concept of endovascular resuscitation applies catheter-based techniques in the management of patients in shock to manipulate physiology, optimize hemodynamics, and bridge to definitive care. These interventions hope to address an unmet need in the care of severely injured patients, or those with refractory non-traumatic cardiac arrest, who were previously deemed non-survivable. These evolving techniques include Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of Aorta, Selective Aortic Arch Perfusion, and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and there is a growing literature base behind them. This review presents the up-to-date techniques and interventions, along with their application, evidence base, and controversy within the new era of endovascular resuscitation.

Ultrasound-guided versus blind vascular access followed by REBOA on board of a medical helicopter in a hemorrhagic ovine model

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of en-route resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) on board of a helicopter.

METHODS

Six sedated male sheep (weighing 42-54 kg) underwent a controlled hemorrhage until the systolic blood pressure (BP) dropped to <90 mmHg, and were placed into a low capacity Eurocopter AS-350 (France). During the 30-minutes normal flight, every animal underwent blind (left side) and ultrasound-guided (US) (right side) vascular access (VA) to the femoral artery followed by REBOA: the first catheter (Rescue balloon, Japan) - into Zone I, the second one (MIT, Russia) - Zone III. In case of blind VA failure, an alternate US-puncture was attempted. Six experienced flight anesthetists were enrolled into the study. Vascular access and REBOA catheter placement (confirmed by X-Ray later) success rate and timing were recorded.

RESULTS

Among six blind punctures one was successful, 2/6 - were into the vein, 3/6 - completely failed and switched to US-punctures (making total number of US-punctures nine). Eight out of nine US-punctures were successful. However, correct wire insertion and sheath placement was performed in 1/6 animal in the 'blind' group and only in 6/9 animals in the 'US' group. It took a median of 65 seconds (range 5-260) for US-puncture and a median of 4 minutes to get the sheath in. Among the 9 VAs, there were 2 REBOA failures (1 ruptured balloon [MIT] and 1 mistaken vena cava placement primarily recognized by a sudden drop of BP and later confirmed by X-Ray). Five out of seven balloons were placed in a desired intra-aortic position: 4/5 in Zone I and 1/2 - in Zone III. A median time for a successful REBOA procedure was 5.0 (range 2.5-10.0) minutes (1 min after sheath placement).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates the potential feasibility of the en-route REBOA which can be performed within 5 minutes. Ultrasound-guidance is critically important to achieve en-route VA.

Increased crystalloid fluid requirements during zone 3 Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) versus Abdominal Aortic and Junctional Tourniquet (AAJT) after class II hemorrhage in swine

Purpose

Pelvic and lower junctional hemorrhage result in a significant amount of trauma related deaths in military and rural civilian environments. The Abdominal Aortic and Junctional Tourniquet (AAJT) and infra-renal (zone 3) Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) are two options for resuscitation of patients with life threatening blood loss from and distal to the pelvis. Evidence suggest differences in the hemodynamic response between AAJT and zone 3 REBOA, but fluid management during resuscitation with the devices has not been fully elucidated. We compared crystalloid fluid requirements (Ringer’s acetate) between these devices to maintain a carotid mean arterial pressure (MAP) > 60 mmHg.

Methods

60 kg anesthetized and mechanically ventilated male pigs were subjected to a mean 1030 (range 900–1246) mL (25% of estimated total blood volume, class II) haemorrhage. AAJT (n = 6) or zone 3 REBOA (n = 6) were then applied for 240 min. Crystalloid fluids were administered to maintain carotid MAP. The animals were monitored for 30 min after reperfusion.

Results

Cumulative resuscitative fluid requirements increased 7.2 times (mean difference 2079 mL; 95% CI 627–3530 mL) in zone 3 REBOA (mean 2412; range 800–4871 mL) compared to AAJT (mean 333; range 0–1000 mL) to maintain target carotid MAP. Release of the AAJT required vasopressor support with norepinephrine infusion for a mean 9.6 min (0.1 µg/kg/min), while REBOA release required no vasopressor support.

Conclusion

Zone 3 REBOA required 7.2 times more crystalloids to maintain the targeted MAP. The AAJT may therefore be considered in a situation of hemorrhagic shock to limit the need for crystalloid infusions, although removal of the AAJT caused more severe hemodynamic and metabolic effects which required vasopressor support.

Lessons Learned From the Battlefield and Applicability to Veterinary Medicine-Part 1: Hemorrhage Control

In humans, the leading cause of potentially preventable death on the modern battlefield is undoubtedly exsanguination from massive hemorrhage. The US military and allied nations have devoted enormous effort to combat hemorrhagic shock and massive hemorrhage. This has yielded numerous advances designed to stop bleeding and save lives. The development of extremity, junctional and truncal tourniquets applied by first responders have saved countless lives both on the battlefield and in civilian settings. Additional devices such as resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) and intraperitoneal hemostatic foams show great promise to address control the most difficult forms (non-compressible) of hemorrhage. The development of next generation hemostatic dressings has reduced bleeding both in the prehospital setting as well as in the operating room. Furthermore, the research and fielding of antifibrinolytics such as tranexamic acid have shown incredible promise to ameliorate the effects of acute traumatic coagulopathy which has led to significant morbidity and mortality in service members. Advances from lessons learned on the battlefield have numerous potential parallels in veterinary medicine and these lessons are ripe for translation to veterinary medicine.

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA): update and insights into current practices and future directions for research and implementation

Background

In this review, we assess the state of Resuscitative Endovascular Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) today with respect to out-of-hospital (OOH) vs. inhospital (H) use in blunt and penetrating trauma, as well as discuss areas of promising research that may be key in further advancement of REBOA applications.

Methods

To analyze the trends in REBOA use, we conducted a review of the literature and identified articles with human or animal data that fit the respective inclusion and exclusion criteria. In separate tables, we compiled data extracted from selected articles in categories including injury type, zone and duration of REBOA, setting in which REBOA was performed, sample size, age, sex and outcome. Based on these tables as well as more detailed review of some key cases of REBOA usage, we assessed the current state of REBOA as well as coagulation and histological disturbances associated with its usage. All statistical tests were 2-sided using an alpha=0.05 for significance. Analysis was done using SAS 9.5 (Cary, NC). Tests for significance was done with a t-test for continuous data and a Chi Square Test for categorical data.

Results

In a total of 44 cases performed outside of a hospital in both military and civilian settings, the overall survival was found to be 88.6%, significantly higher than the 50.4% survival calculated from 1,807 cases of REBOA performed within a hospital (p<.0001). We observe from human data a propensity to use Zone I in penetrating trauma and Zone III in blunt injuries. We observe lower final metabolic markers in animal studies with shorter REBOA time and longer follow-up times.

Conclusions

Further research related to human use of REBOA must be focused on earlier initiation of REBOA after injury which may depend on development of rapid vascular access devices and techniques more so than on any new improvements in REBOA. Future animal studies should provide detailed multisystem organ assessment to accurately define organ injury and metabolic burden associated with REBOA application. Overall, animal studies must involve realistic models of injury with severe clinical scenarios approximating human trauma and exsanguination, especially with long-term follow-up after injury.

A feasibility study of partial REBOA data in a high-volume trauma center

PURPOSE

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is used to temporize patients with infradiaphragmatic hemorrhage. Current guidelines advise < 30 min, to avoid ischemia/ reperfusion injury, whenever possible. The technique of partial REBOA (P-REBOA) has been developed to minimize the effects of distal ischemia. This study presents our clinical experience with P-REBOA, comparing outcomes to complete occlusion (C-REBOA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients' electronic data and local REBOA registry between January 2016 and May 2019.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

adult trauma patients who received Zone I C-REBOA or P-REBOA for infradiaphragmatic hemorrhage, who underwent attempted exploration in the operating room. Comparison of outcomes based on REBOA technique (P-REBOA vs C-REBOA) and occlusion time (> 30 min, vs ≤ 30 min) RESULTS: 46 patients were included, with 14 treated with P-REBOA. There were no demographic differences between P-REBOA and C-REBOA. Prolonged (> 30 min) REBOA (regardless of type of occlusion) was associated with increased mortality (32% vs 0%, p = 0.044) and organ failure. When comparing prolonged P-REBOA with C-REBOA, there was a trend toward lower ventilator days [19 (11) vs 6 (9); p = 0.483] and dialysis (36.4% vs 16.7%; p = 0.228) with significantly less vasopressor requirement (72.7% vs 33.3%; p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

P-REBOA can be delivered in a clinical setting, but is not currently associated with improved survival in prolonged occlusion. In survivors, there is a trend toward lower organ support needs, suggesting that the technique might help to mitigate ischemic organ injury. More clinical data are needed to clarify the benefit of partial occlusion REBOA.

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for thoracic trauma: A translational swine study

Noncompressible torso hemorrhage in trauma is particularly lethal. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has the potential to stabilize these patients, but currently is contraindicated for major thoracic bleeding. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of REBOA on the hemodynamic and metabolic profile as well as its effect on early survival in a porcine model of thoracic hemorrhage and shock.

METHODS

Forty-eight male Yorkshire swine (60-80 kg) underwent 30% hemorrhage and were randomized to three thoracic injuries, with and without zone 1 REBOA occlusion: pulmonary parenchymal injury, thoracic venous injury, or subclavian artery injury. Following hemorrhage, thoracic injuries were induced (time of major thoracic injury) and allowed to bleed freely. The REBOA groups had zone 1 occlusion after the thoracic injury, with deflation at the end of prehospital. All groups had whole blood resuscitation at the end of prehospital and were euthanized at end of the hospital care phase. Survival, total blood loss, mean arterial pressure, end-tidal CO2, and arterial blood gas parameters were analyzed. Statistical significance was determined by t tests and two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance.

RESULTS

The use of REBOA improved the hemodynamics in all three injury patterns, with no differences observed in the outcomes of short-term survival and thoracic blood loss between the REBOA and non-REBOA groups. All groups showed equivalent changes in markers of shock (pH, HCO3, and base excess) prior to resuscitation.

CONCLUSION

In this animal study of hemorrhage and major thoracic bleeding, the addition of zone 1 REBOA did not significantly affect short-term survival or blood loss, while providing hemodynamic stabilization. Therefore, in noncompressible thoracic bleeding, without immediate surgical capability, long-term outcomes may be improved with REBOA, and thoracic hemorrhage should not be considered contraindications to REBOA use.

Emerging hemorrhage control and resuscitation strategies in trauma: Endovascular to extracorporeal

This article reviews four emerging endovascular hemorrhage control and extracorporeal perfusion techniques for management of trauma patients with profound hemorrhagic shock including hemorrhage-induced traumatic cardiac arrest: resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, selective aortic arch perfusion, extracorporeal life support, and emergency preservation and resuscitation. The preclinical and clinical studies underpinning each of these techniques are summarized. We also present an integrated conceptual framework for how these emerging technologies may be used in the future care of trauma patients in both resource-rich and austere environments.

Reperfusion repercussions: A review of the metabolic derangements following resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta

BACKGROUND

Current resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) literature focuses on improving outcomes through careful patient selection, diligent catheter placement, and expeditious definitive hemorrhage control. However, the detection and treatment of post-REBOA ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) remains an area for potential improvement. Herein, we provide a review of the metabolic derangements that we have encountered while managing post-REBOA IRI in past swine experiments. We also provide data-driven clinical recommendations to facilitate resuscitation post-REBOA deflation that may be translatable to humans.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the laboratory data from 25 swine across three varying hemorrhagic shock models that were subjected to complete REBOA of either 45 minutes, 60 minutes, or 90 minutes. In each model the balloon was deflated gradually following definitive hemorrhage control. Animals were then subjected to whole blood transfusion and critical care with frequent electrolyte monitoring and treatment of derangements as necessary.

RESULTS

Plasma lactate peaked and pH nadired long after balloon deflation in all swine in the 45-minute, 60-minute, and 90-minute occlusion models (onset of peak lactate, 32.9 ± 6.35 minutes, 38.8 ± 10.55 minutes, and 49.5 ± 6.5 minutes; pH nadir, 4.3 ± 0.72 minutes, 26.9 ± 12.32 minutes, and 42 ± 7.45 minutes after balloon deflation in the 45-, 60-, and 90-minute occlusion models, respectively). All models displayed persistent hypoglycemia for more than an hour following reperfusion (92.1 ± 105.5 minutes, 125 ± 114.9 minutes, and 96 ± 97.8 minutes after balloon deflation in the 45-, 60-, and 90-minute occlusion groups, respectively). Hypocalcemia and hyperkalemia occurred in all three groups, with some animals requiring treatment more than an hour after reperfusion.

CONCLUSION

Metabolic derangements resulting from REBOA use are common and may worsen long after reperfusion despite resuscitation. Vigilance is required to detect and proactively manage REBOA-associated IRI. Maintaining a readily available "deflation kit" of pharmacological agents needed to treat common post-REBOA electrolyte abnormalities may facilitate management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

Novel use of XSTAT 30 for mitigation of lethal non-compressible torso hemorrhage in swine

Background

Management of Non-Compressible Torso Hemorrhage (NCTH) consists primarily of aortic occlusion which has significant adverse outcomes, including ischemia-reperfusion injury, in prolonged field care paradigms. One promising avenue for treatment is through use of RevMedx XSTAT 30™ (an FDA approved sponge-based dressing utilized for extremity wounds). We hypothesized that XSTAT 30™ would effectively mitigate NCTH during a prolonged pre-hospital period with correctable metabolic and physiologic derangements.

Methods and findings

Twenty-four male swine (53±2kg) were anesthetized, underwent line placement, and splenectomy. Animals then underwent laparoscopic transection of 70% of the left lobe of the liver with hemorrhage for a period of 10min. They were randomized into three groups: No intevention (CON), XSTAT 30™-Free Pellets (FP), and XSTAT 30™-Bagged Pellets (BP). Animals were observed for a pre-hospital period of 180min. At 180min, animals underwent damage control surgery (DCS), balanced blood product resuscitation and removal of pellets followed by an ICU period of 5 hours. Postoperative fluoroscopy was performed to identify remaining pellets or bags. Baseline physiologic and injury characteristics were similar. Survival rates were significantly higher in FP and BP (p<0.01) vs CON. DCS was significantly longer in FP in comparison to BP (p = 0.001). Two animals in the FP group had pellets discovered on fluoroscopy following DCS. There was no significant difference in blood product or pressor requirements between groups. End-ICU lactates trended to baseline in both FP and BP groups.

Conclusions

While these results are promising, further study will be required to better understand the role for XSTAT in the management of NCTH.

Distal organ inflammation and injury after resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in a porcine model of severe hemorrhagic shock

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of Aorta (REBOA) has emerged as a potential life-saving maneuver for the management of non-compressible torso hemorrhage in trauma patients. Complete REBOA (cREBOA) is inherently associated with the burden of ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) and organ dysfunction. However, the distal organ inflammation and its association with organ injury have been little investigated. This study was conducted to assess these adverse effects of cREBOA following massive hemorrhage in swine.

METHODS

Spontaneously breathing and consciously sedated Sinclair pigs were subjected to exponential hemorrhage of 65% total blood volume over 60 minutes. Animals were randomized into 3 groups (n = 7): (1) Positive control (PC) received immediate transfusion of shed blood after hemorrhage, (2) 30min-cREBOA (A30) received Zone 1 cREBOA for 30 minutes, and (3) 60min-cREBOA (A60) given Zone 1 cREBOA for 60 minutes. The A30 and A60 groups were followed by resuscitation with shed blood post-cREBOA and observed for 4h. Metabolic and hemodynamic effects, coagulation parameters, inflammatory and end organ consequences were monitored and assessed.

RESULTS

Compared with 30min-cREBOA, 60min-cREBOA resulted in (1) increased IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β in distal organs (kidney, jejunum, and liver) (p < 0.05) and decreased reduced glutathione in kidney and liver (p < 0.05), (2) leukopenia, neutropenia, and coagulopathy (p < 0.05), (3) blood pressure decline (p < 0.05), (4) metabolic acidosis and hyperkalemia (p < 0.05), and (5) histological injury of kidney and jejunum (p < 0.05) as well as higher levels of creatinine, AST, and ALT (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

30min-cREBOA seems to be a feasible and effective adjunct in supporting central perfusion during severe hemorrhage. However, prolonged cREBOA (60min) adverse effects such as distal organ inflammation and injury must be taken into serious consideration.

A three-tier Rescue stent improves outcomes over balloon occlusion in a porcine model of noncompressible hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Noncompressible hemorrhage remains a high-mortality injury, and aortic balloon occlusion poses limitations in terms of distal ischemic injury. Our hypothesis was that a retrievable Rescue stent would confer improved outcome over aortic balloon occlusion.

METHODS

A three-tier, retrievable stent graft was laser welded from nitinol and polytetrafluoroethylene to provide rapid thoracic and abdominal coverage with an interval bare metal segment to preserve visceral flow. Anesthetized swine had injury of the thoracic or abdominal aorta followed by balloon occlusion or a Rescue stent. A 1-hour long damage-control phase with blood repletion was used to simulate the prolonged interval between injury and repair, especially in the battlefield setting. Following the damage-control phase, the balloon or stent were retrieved followed by vascular repair and recovery to 48 hours. Animals were compared in terms of hemodynamics, blood loss, neurophysiologic spinal cord ischemia, ischemic organ injury, and survival.

RESULTS

Despite antegrade hemorrhage control, balloon occlusion averaged 3.5 L of retrograde hemorrhage, loss of visceral perfusion, and permanent spinal cord ischemia by neurophysiology in six of seven animals. After permanent repair, all balloon occlusion animals died with only a single short term (5 hours) survivor. Conversely, Rescue stent animals revealed rapid hemorrhage control (in under 2 minutes) whether the injury was thoracic or abdominal with improved hemodynamics, preserved visceral flow, reduced spinal cord ischemia, negligible histologic organ injury and survival to end of study in all abdominal injured animals (n = 6) and four of six thoracic injured animals, with two deaths related to arrhythmia.

CONCLUSION

Compared with aortic balloon occlusion, a Rescue stent offers superior hemorrhage control and survival by virtue of reduced ischemic injury and direct control of the hemorrhagic injury. The Rescue stent may become a useful tool for damage control, especially on the battlefield where definitive repair presents logistical challenges.

Mitigating Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Using a Bilobed Partial REBOA Catheter: Controlled Lower-Body Hypotension

BACKGROUND

Non-compressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH) is the leading cause of potentially preventable death on the battlefield. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) aims to restore central blood pressure and control NCTH below the balloon, but risks ischemia-reperfusion injury to distal organs when prolonged. We tested a bilobed partial REBOA catheter (pREBOA), which permits some of the blood to flow past the balloon.

METHODS

Female swine (n = 37, 6 groups, n = 5-8/group), anesthetized and instrumented, were exponentially hemorrhaged 50% of estimated blood volume (all except time controls [TC]). Negative controls (NC) did not receive REBOA or resuscitation. Positive controls (PC) received retransfusion after 120 min. REBOA groups received REBOA for 120 min, then retransfusion. Balloon was fully inflated in the full REBOA group (FR), and was partially inflated in partial REBOA groups (P45 and P60) to achieve a distal systolic blood pressure of 45 mm Hg or 60 mm Hg.

RESULTS

Aortic occlusion restored baseline values of proximal mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, and carotid flow in pREBOA groups. Lactate reached high values during occlusion in all REBOA groups (9.9 ± 4.2, 8.0 ± 4.1, and 10.7 ± 2.9 for P45, P60, and FR), but normalized by 6 to 12 h post-deflation in the partial groups. All TC and P60 animals survived 24 h. The NC, PC, and P45 groups survived 18.2 ± 9.5, 19.3 ± 10.6, and 21.0 ± 8.4 h. For FR animals mean survival was 6.2 ± 5.8 h, significantly worse than all other animals (P < 0.01, logrank test).

CONCLUSIONS

In this porcine model of hemorrhagic shock, animals undergoing partial REBOA for 120 min survived longer than those undergoing full occlusion.

Standardized distances for placement of REBOA in patients with aortic stenosis

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a technique where a balloon is advanced through the common femoral artery and temporarily inflated for treatment of cardiac arrest or non-compressible haemorrhage. The aim of this study was to measure intravascular distances relevant for correct placement of the REBOA catheter using computer tomographic (CT) scans. In a series of CT scans of the aorta from 100 patients diagnosed with severe aortic stenosis planned for transcatheter aortic valve implantation, we measured the intravascular distance from the insertion site in the common femoral artery to two potential zones for placement of the REBOA catheter; between the left subclavian artery and the celiac trunk (Zone 1), as well as between the aortic bifurcation and the distal take-off of the renal arteries (Zone 3). The mean (± SD) intravascular distance from the femoral artery to intra-aortic Zone 1 was 36 (± 2.5) cm for the lower border and 60 (± 4.1) cm for the upper border, respectively. For intra-aortic Zone 3, the mean (± SD) intravascular distance was 21 (± 2.1) cm to the lower border and 31 (± 2.3) cm to the upper border. Calculated potentially safe intervals for placement of the REBOA in Zone 1 was with 99.7% likelihood between 43 and 48 cm. No similar potentially safe interval could be calculated for Zone 3. According to this cohort study of patients with severe aortic stenosis, the balloon of the REBOA catheter should travel intraarterially between 43 (lower limit) and 48 cm (upper limit) from the site of insertion into the common femoral artery, which would lead to correct placement in intra-aortic Zone 1 in 99.7% of cases. In contrast, no potential safety interval could be similarly defined for insertion in Zone 3.

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta and traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A nationwide study

OBJECTIVE

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a less-invasive method for temporary hemostasis compared with cross-clamping the aorta through resuscitative thoracotomy (RT). Although the survival benefits of REBOA remained unclear, pathophysiological benefits were identified in patients with traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (t-OHCA). We examined the clinical outcomes of t-OHCA with the hypothesis that REBOA would be associated with higher survival to discharge compared with RT.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Japan Trauma Data Bank (2004-2019). Adult patients with t-OHCA who had arrived without a palpable pulse and undergone aortic occlusion were included. Patients were divided into REBOA or RT groups, and propensity scores were developed using age, mechanism of injury, presence of signs of life, presence of severe head and/or chest injury, Injury Severity Score, and transportation time. Inverse probability weighting by propensity scores was performed to compare survival to discharge between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Among 13,247 patients with t-OHCA, 1483 were included in this study. A total of 144 (9.7%) patients were treated with REBOA, and 5 of 144 (3.5%) in the REBOA group and 10 of 1339 (0.7%) in the RT group survived to discharge. The use of REBOA was significantly associated with increased survival to discharge (odds ratio, 4.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.61-14.19), which was confirmed by inverse probability weighting (adjusted odds ratio, 3.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.90-7.32).

CONCLUSIONS

REBOA for t-OHCA was associated with higher survival to discharge. These results should be validated by further research.

A New Pressure-Regulated, Partial Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta Device Achieves Targeted Distal Perfusion

BACKGROUND

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) reduces blood loss and improves hemodynamics. Complete occlusion results in distal ischemia, limiting its use for prolonged care. This study evaluated two next-generation partial REBOA (pREBOA) catheters and their ability to achieve targeted distal aortic flow.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Swine underwent hemorrhagic shock, complete aortic occlusion, controlled continuous balloon deflation, and targeted distal perfusion (TDP; 300-mL/min) phases. They were randomized into three groups (n = 6/group), one managed with the current ER-REBOA (ER), and two with the new pREBOA technologies: a bilobed (BL) device and a semicompliant pREBOA-PRO (PRP). Hemodynamics including flow rates and mean arterial pressures at the carotid artery and infrarenal aorta were recorded.

RESULTS

Hemodynamics were comparable between groups during hemorrhage and complete occlusion phases. During the controlled continuous balloon deflation phase, the distal aortic flow rate strongly correlated with percent balloon volume in BL and PRP groups, suggesting a precise control of distal perfusion. The slope of flow-balloon-volume curves was greater in the ER group than BL and PRP groups, indicating the change in distal aortic flow rate was more sensitive to the balloon volume (less titratable) when using ER. During the TDP phase, variation in distal aortic flow and mean arterial pressure with respect to the target flow was lower in ER and PRP groups, than the BL group.

CONCLUSIONS

Pressure-regulated occlusion using the next-generation pREBOA catheters is more controlled than the first-generation ER-REBOA catheter and allow for targeted and precise distal perfusion.

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in Experimental Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Aortic Occlusion Level Matters

Introduction:

Aortic occlusion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) increases systemic arterial pressures. Correct thoracic placement during the resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) may be important for achieving effective CPR.

Hypothesis:

The positioning of the REBOA in the thoracic aorta during CPR will affect systemic arterial pressures.

Methods:

Cardiac arrest was induced in 27 anesthetized pigs. After 7 min of CPR with a mechanical compression device, REBOA in the thoracic descending aorta at heart level (zone Ib, REBOA-Ib, n = 9), at diaphragmatic level (zone Ic, REBOA-Ic, n = 9) or no occlusion (control, n = 9) was initiated. The primary outcome was systemic arterial pressures during CPR.

Results:

During CPR, REBOA-Ic increased systolic blood pressure from 86 mmHg (confidence interval [CI] 71–101) to 128 mmHg (CI 107–150, P < 0.001). Simultaneously, mean and diastolic blood pressures increased significantly in REBOA-Ic (P < 0.001 and P = 0.006, respectively), and were higher than in REBOA-Ib (P = 0.04 and P = 0.02, respectively) and control (P = 0.005 and P = 0.003, respectively). REBOA-Ib did not significantly affect systemic blood pressures. Arterial pH decreased more in control than in REBOA-Ib and REBOA-Ic after occlusion (P = 0.004 and P = 0.005, respectively). Arterial lactate concentrations were lower in REBOA-Ic compared with control and REBOA-Ib (P = 0.04 and P < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions:

Thoracic aortic occlusion in zone Ic during CPR may be more effective in increasing systemic arterial pressures than occlusion in zone Ib. REBOA during CPR was found to be associated with a more favorable acid–base status of circulating blood. If REBOA is used as an adjunct in CPR, it may be of importance to carefully determine the aortic occlusion level.

The study was performed following approval of the Regional Animal Ethics Committee in Linköping, Sweden (application ID 418).

A contemporary assessment of devices for Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA): resource-specific options per level of care

PURPOSE

Use of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) as adjunct for temporary hemorrhage control in patients with exsanguinating torso hemorrhage is increasing. Characteristics of aortic occlusion balloons (AOB) are diverse and evolving as efforts are made to improve the technology. It is important to select a device that fits the requirements of the medical situation to minimize the risk of failure and complications. The aim of this study is to appraise guidance in the choice of an AOB in a specific situation.

METHODS

We assessed 29 AOB for differences and outline possible advantages and disadvantages of each. Bending stiffness was measured with a three-point bending device.

RESULTS

Diameter of the AOB ranged from 6 (ER-REBOA™) to 10 (Coda^®-46) French. However, some need large-bore access sheaths up to 22 French (Fogarty^®-45 and LeMaitre^®-45) or even insertion via cut-down (Equalizer™-40). Bending stiffness varied from 0.08 N/mm (± 0.008 SD; Coda^®-32) to 0.72 N/mm (± 0.024 SD; Russian prototype). Rescue Balloon™ showed kinking of the shaft at low bending pressures. The only non-compliant AOB is REBOA Balloon^®. ER-REBOA™, Fogarty^®, LeMaitre^®, REBOA Balloon^®, and Rescue Balloon™ are provided with external length marks to assist blind positioning.

CONCLUSION

In resource-limited settings, a guidewire- and fluoroscopy-free, rather stiff device, such as ER-REBOA™, Fogarty^®, and LeMaitre^®, is warranted. Of these devices, ER-REBOA™ is the only catheter compatible with seven French sheaths and specifically designed for emergency hemorrhage control. Of the over-the-wire devices, Q50^® has several features that facilitate use and reduce the risk of malplacement or vessel damage.

Effect of partial and complete aortic balloon occlusion on survival and shock in a swine model of uncontrolled splenic hemorrhage with delayed resuscitation

BACKGROUND

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is accepted as a resuscitation adjunct and bridge to definitive hemostasis. The ischemic burden of REBOA may be mitigated by a partial REBOA (P-REBOA) strategy permitting longer occlusion times and military use for combat trauma. We evaluated REBOA and P-REBOA in a swine multiple trauma model with uncontrolled solid organ hemorrhage and delayed resuscitation and surgical hemostasis.

METHODS

Anesthetized swine (51.9 ± 2.2 kg) had 20 mL/kg hemorrhage and closed femur fracture. Splenic transection was performed and free bleeding permitted for 10 minutes. Controls (n = 5) were hemorrhaged but had no REBOA, REBOA (n = 8) had 60 minutes complete zone 1 occlusion, P-REBOA (n = 8) had 15 minutes complete occlusion and 45 minutes 50% occlusion. Splenectomy was performed and plasma (15 mL/kg) resuscitation initiated 5 minutes prior to deflation. Resuscitation goal was 80 mm Hg systolic with epinephrine as needed. Animals were monitored for 6 hours.

RESULTS

An initial study with 120-minute occlusion had universal fatality in three REBOA (upon deflation) and three P-REBOA animals (after 60 minutes inflation). With 60-minute occlusion, mortality was 100%, 62.5%, and 12.5% in the control, REBOA, and P-REBOA groups, respectively (p < 0.05). Survival time was shorter in controls (120 ± 89 minutes) than REBOA and P-REBOA groups (241 ± 139, 336 ± 69 minutes). Complete REBOA hemorrhaged less during inflation (1.1 ± 0.5 mL/kg) than Control (5.6 ± 1.5) and P-REBOA (4.3 ± 1.4), which were similar. Lactate was higher in the REBOA group compared with the P-REBOA group after balloon deflation, remaining elevated. Potassium increased in REBOA after deflation but returned to similar levels as P-REBOA by 120 minutes.

CONCLUSION

In a military relevant model of severe uncontrolled solid organ hemorrhage 1-hour P-REBOA improved survival and mitigated hemodynamic and metabolic shock. Two hours of partial aortic occlusion was not survivable using this protocol due to ongoing hemorrhage during inflation. There is potential role for P-REBOA as part of an integrated minimally invasive field-expedient hemorrhage control and resuscitation strategy.