1
|
Chen SY, Radomski SN, Stem M, Papanikolaou A, Gabre-Kidan A, Gearhart SL, Efron JE, Atallah C. Factors associated with not undergoing surgery for locally advanced rectal cancers: An NCDB propensity-matched analysis. Surgery 2023; 174:1323-1333. [PMID: 37852832 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The traditional treatment paradigm for patients with locally advanced rectal cancers has been neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by curative intent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aimed to assess surgery trends for locally advanced rectal cancers, factors associated with forgoing surgery, and overall survival outcomes. METHODS Adults with locally advanced rectal cancers were retrospectively analyzed using the National Cancer Database (2004-2019). Propensity score matching was performed. Factors associated with not undergoing surgery were identified using multivariable logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used for 5-year overall survival analysis, stratified by stage and treatment type. RESULTS A total of 72,653 patients were identified, with 64,396 (88.64%) patients undergoing neoadjuvant + surgery ± adjuvant therapy, 579 (0.80%) chemotherapy only, 916 (1.26%) radiation only, and 6,762 (9.31%) chemoradiation only. The proportion of patients who underwent surgery declined over the study period (95.61% in 2006 to 92.29% in 2019, P trend < .001), whereas the proportion of patients who refused surgery increased (1.45%-4.48%, P trend < .001). Factors associated with not undergoing surgery for locally advanced rectal cancers included older age, Black race (odds ratio 1.47, 95% CI 1.35-1.60, P < .001), higher Charlson-Deyo score (score ≥3: 1.79, 1.58-2.04, P < .001), stage II cancer (1.22, 1.17-1.28, P < .001), lower median household income, and non-private insurance. Neoadjuvant + surgery ± adjuvant therapy was associated with the best 5-year overall survival, regardless of stage, in unmatched and matched cohorts. CONCLUSION Despite surgery remaining an integral component in the management of locally advanced rectal cancers, there is a concerning decline in guideline-concordant surgical care for rectal cancer in the United States, with evidence of persistent socioeconomic disparities. Providers should seek to understand patient perspectives/barriers and guide them toward surgery if appropriate candidates. Continued standardization, implementation, and evaluation of rectal cancer care through national accreditation programs are necessary to ensure that all patients receive optimal treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Y Chen
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Shannon N Radomski
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Miloslawa Stem
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Angelos Papanikolaou
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, NYC, NY
| | - Alodia Gabre-Kidan
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Susan L Gearhart
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jonathan E Efron
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Chady Atallah
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, NYC, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Podda M, Sylla P, Baiocchi G, Adamina M, Agnoletti V, Agresta F, Ansaloni L, Arezzo A, Avenia N, Biffl W, Biondi A, Bui S, Campanile FC, Carcoforo P, Commisso C, Crucitti A, De'Angelis N, De'Angelis GL, De Filippo M, De Simone B, Di Saverio S, Ercolani G, Fraga GP, Gabrielli F, Gaiani F, Guerrieri M, Guttadauro A, Kluger Y, Leppaniemi AK, Loffredo A, Meschi T, Moore EE, Ortenzi M, Pata F, Parini D, Pisanu A, Poggioli G, Polistena A, Puzziello A, Rondelli F, Sartelli M, Smart N, Sugrue ME, Tejedor P, Vacante M, Coccolini F, Davies J, Catena F. Multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer: recommendations from the SICG (Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery), SIFIPAC (Italian Society of Surgical Pathophysiology), SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and new technologies), and the WSES (World Society of Emergency Surgery) International Consensus Project. World J Emerg Surg 2021; 16:35. [PMID: 34215310 PMCID: PMC8254305 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-021-00378-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Although rectal cancer is predominantly a disease of older patients, current guidelines do not incorporate optimal treatment recommendations for the elderly and address only partially the associated specific challenges encountered in this population. This results in a wide variation and disparity in delivering a standard of care to this subset of patients. As the burden of rectal cancer in the elderly population continues to increase, it is crucial to assess whether current recommendations on treatment strategies for the general population can be adopted for the older adults, with the same beneficial oncological and functional outcomes. This multidisciplinary experts' consensus aims to refine current rectal cancer-specific guidelines for the elderly population in order to help to maximize rectal cancer therapeutic strategies while minimizing adverse impacts on functional outcomes and quality of life for these patients. METHODS The discussion among the steering group of clinical experts and methodologists from the societies' expert panel involved clinicians practicing in general surgery, colorectal surgery, surgical oncology, geriatric oncology, geriatrics, gastroenterologists, radiologists, oncologists, radiation oncologists, and endoscopists. Research topics and questions were formulated, revised, and unanimously approved by all experts in two subsequent modified Delphi rounds in December 2020-January 2021. The steering committee was divided into nine teams following the main research field of members. Each conducted their literature search and drafted statements and recommendations on their research question. Literature search has been updated up to 2020 and statements and recommendations have been developed according to the GRADE methodology. A modified Delphi methodology was implemented to reach agreement among the experts on all statements and recommendations. CONCLUSIONS The 2021 SICG-SIFIPAC-SICE-WSES consensus for the multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer aims to provide updated evidence-based statements and recommendations on each of the following topics: epidemiology, pre-intervention strategies, diagnosis and staging, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, surgery, watch and wait strategy, adjuvant chemotherapy, synchronous liver metastases, and emergency presentation of rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Podda
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Cagliari University Hospital "D. Casula", Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
| | - Patricia Sylla
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gianluca Baiocchi
- ASST Cremona, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Michel Adamina
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Winterthur, Winterthur - University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Ferdinando Agresta
- Department of General Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, AULSS2 Trevigiana del Veneto, Vittorio Veneto, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- 1st General Surgery Unit, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Nicola Avenia
- SC Chirurgia Generale e Specialità Chirurgiche Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Walter Biffl
- Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Memorial Hospital, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Antonio Biondi
- Department of General Surgery and Medical - Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Simona Bui
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Fabio C Campanile
- Department of Surgery, ASL VT - Ospedale "San Giovanni Decollato - Andosilla", Civita Castellana, Italy
| | - Paolo Carcoforo
- Department of Surgery, Unit of General Surgery, University Hospital of Ferrara, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Claudia Commisso
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Antonio Crucitti
- General and Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Cristo Re Hospital and Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola De'Angelis
- Unit of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Digestive Surgery, Regional General Hospital F. Miulli, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Gian Luigi De'Angelis
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of General and Metabolic Surgery, Poissy and Saint Germain en Laye Hospitals, Poissy, France
| | | | - Giorgio Ercolani
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Gustavo P Fraga
- Division of Trauma Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Federica Gaiani
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | | | - Yoram Kluger
- Division of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Ari K Leppaniemi
- Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Andrea Loffredo
- UOC Chirurgia Generale - AOU san Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Università di Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Tiziana Meschi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma Geriatric-Rehabilitation Department, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Ernest E Moore
- Ernest E Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, Denver, USA
| | | | | | - Dario Parini
- Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Adolfo Pisanu
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Cagliari University Hospital "D. Casula", Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Gilberto Poggioli
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Polistena
- Dipartimento di Chirurgia Pietro Valdoni Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza Università degli Studi di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Puzziello
- UOC Chirurgia Generale - AOU san Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Università di Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Fabio Rondelli
- SC Chirurgia Generale e Specialità Chirurgiche Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | | | | | - Michael E Sugrue
- Letterkenny University Hospital and CPM sEUBP Interreg Project, Letterkenny, Ireland
| | | | - Marco Vacante
- Department of General Surgery and Medical - Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Justin Davies
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Parma Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cèfaro GA, Genovesi D, Vinciguerra A, Augurio A, Di Tommaso M, Marchese R, Borzillo V, Tasciotti L, Taraborrelli M, Innocenti P, Colecchia G, Di Nicola M. Effects of Preoperative Radiochemotherapy with Capecitabine for Resectable Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in Elderly Patients. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 98:622-9. [DOI: 10.1177/030089161209800513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Aims and background Rectal cancer is a common disease of elderly people. However, patients over 70 years of age are often not included in clinical trials. There is a lack of data concerning the use of radiochemotherapy with capecitabine in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the impact of preoperative radiochemotherapy with capecitabine on downstaging and sphincter preservation and to assess treatment compliance and toxicity in elderly patients. Methods Twenty-six patients with resectable locally advanced rectal cancer (stage II-III/TNM) aged >70 years received preoperative radiotherapy and concurrent oral capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily during the whole period of radiotherapy. Two patients who refused surgery after chemoradiation therapy were excluded from the analysis. Results Eighty-one percent of patients underwent anterior resection and 18.1% underwent abdominoperineal resection. Overall tumor downstaging, considering both T and N categories, was observed in 18/24 patients (75%). Treatment compliance was good and toxicity rates were similar to those of younger people. Conclusions Age is not a contraindication to any therapy and elderly patients who can tolerate radiochemotherapy should be treated like younger patients. Preoperative radiochemotherapy with capecitabine for patients aged >70 years has a good impact on tumor downstaging, increases the feasibility of sphincter-preserving surgery, and is also safe and well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Domenico Genovesi
- Radiation Oncology Department, G d'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | | | | | - Monica Di Tommaso
- Radiation Oncology Department, G d'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Rita Marchese
- Radiation Oncology Department, G d'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | | | - Lucia Tasciotti
- Radiation Oncology Department, G d'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Innocenti
- Surgery Department, G. d'Annunzio University, Chieti, G d'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Colecchia
- Surgery Department, Santo Spirito Hospital, Pescara, G d'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Marta Di Nicola
- Laboratory of Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Science, G d'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Is Chemotherapy or Radiation Therapy in Addition to Surgery Beneficial for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in the Elderly? A National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) Study. World J Surg 2016; 40:447-55. [PMID: 26566779 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3319-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for Stages II and III rectal cancer recommend neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by curative intent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. It is unclear whether therapies in addition to surgery are truly beneficial in elderly patients. Our aim was to compare the survival of patients over 80 with Stages II and III rectal cancer undergoing curative intent surgery with or without additional therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB 2006-2011) was queried for patients over 80 with Stages II and III rectal cancer. The primary outcome was overall survival. Patients were stratified based upon therapy group. Univariate group comparisons were made. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling survival analyses were performed. RESULTS The query yielded 3098 patients over 80 with Stage II (N = 1566) or Stage III (N = 1532) disease. Approximately, half of the patients received surgery only. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed improved survival for patients receiving neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy in addition to surgery, but there was no significant difference between those that received guideline concordant care (GCC), neoadjuvant chemoradiation only, or post-operative chemotherapy only. Cox proportional hazard modeling identified age >90 and margin positivity as independent risk factors for decreased overall survival. CONCLUSION Analysis of NCDB data for Stages II and III rectal cancer in patients over 80 shows a survival benefit of adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant therapy over surgery alone. There does not appear to be a difference in survival between patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation, post-resection adjuvant chemotherapy, or GCC.
Collapse
|
5
|
Thiels CA, Bergquist JR, Meyers AJ, Johnson CL, Behm KT, Hayman AV, Habermann EB, Larson DW, Mathis KL. Outcomes with multimodal therapy for elderly patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2015; 103:e106-14. [PMID: 26662377 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2015] [Revised: 09/30/2015] [Accepted: 10/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment guidelines for stage II and III rectal cancer include neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, surgery and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Although data support this recommendation in younger patients, it is unclear whether this benefit can be extrapolated to elderly patients (aged 75 years or older). METHODS This was a retrospective review of patients aged at least 75 years with stage II or III rectal cancer who underwent surgery with curative intent from 1996 to 2013 at the Mayo Clinic. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log rank test were used to compare overall survival between therapy groups. Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the independent effect of treatment group on survival. RESULTS A total of 160 elderly patients (median age 80 years) with stage II (66) and stage III (94) rectal cancer underwent surgical resection. Only 30·0 and 33·8 per cent received neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy respectively. Among patients with stage II disease, there was no significant difference in 60-month survival between patients who received any additional therapy and those who had surgery alone (55 versus 38 per cent respectively; P = 0·184), whereas additional therapy improved survival in patients with stage III tumours (58 versus 30 per cent respectively; P = 0·007). Multivariable analysis found a survival benefit for additional therapy in elderly patients with stage III disease (hazard ratio 0·58, 95 per cent c.i. 0·34 to 0·98). CONCLUSION A multimodal approach in elderly patients with stage III rectal cancer improved oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C A Thiels
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - J R Bergquist
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - A J Meyers
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - C L Johnson
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - K T Behm
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - A V Hayman
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - E B Habermann
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - D W Larson
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - K L Mathis
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dodgion CM, Neville BA, Lipsitz SR, Schrag D, Breen E, Zinner MJ, Greenberg CC. Hospital variation in sphincter preservation for elderly rectal cancer patients. J Surg Res 2014; 191:161-8. [PMID: 24750983 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2013] [Revised: 02/24/2014] [Accepted: 03/14/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The primary goal of an operation for rectal cancer is to cure cancer and, where possible, preserve continence. A wide range of sphincter preservation rates have been reported. This study evaluated hospital variation in the use of low anterior resection (LAR), local excision (LE), and abdominoperineal resection (APR) in the treatment of elderly rectal cancer patients. METHODS Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data, we identified 4959 patients older than 65 y with stage I-III rectal cancer diagnosed from 2000-2005 who underwent operative intervention at one of 370 hospitals. We evaluated the distribution of hospital-specific procedure rates and used generalized mixed models with random hospital effects to examine the influence of patient characteristics and hospital on operation type, using APR as a reference. RESULTS The median hospital performed APR on 33% of elderly patients with rectal cancer. Hospital was a stronger predictor of LAR receipt than any patient characteristic, explaining 32% of procedure choice, but not a strong predictor of LE, explaining only 3.8%. Receipt of LE was primarily related to tumor size and tumor stage, which combined explained 31% of procedure variation. CONCLUSIONS Receipt of LE is primarily determined by patient characteristics. In contrast, the hospital where surgery is performed significantly influences whether a patient undergoes an LAR or APR. Understanding the factors that cause this institutional variation is crucial to ensuring equitable availability of sphincter preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher M Dodgion
- Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Bridget A Neville
- Center for Outcomes and Policy Research, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stuart R Lipsitz
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Center for Outcomes and Policy Research, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elizabeth Breen
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael J Zinner
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Caprice C Greenberg
- Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Safety of robotic general surgery in elderly patients. J Robot Surg 2010; 4:91-8. [PMID: 27628773 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-010-0191-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2010] [Accepted: 04/27/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
As the life expectancy of people in Western countries continues to rise, so too does the number of elderly patients. In parallel, robotic surgery continues to gain increasing acceptance, allowing for more complex operations to be performed by minimally invasive approach and extending indications for surgery to this population. The aim of this study is to assess the safety of robotic general surgery in patients 70 years and older. From April 2007 to December 2009, patients 70 years and older, who underwent various robotic procedures at our institution, were stratified into three categories of surgical complexity (low, intermediate, and high). There were 73 patients, including 39 women (53.4%) and 34 men (46.6%). The median age was 75 years (range 70-88 years). There were 7, 24, and 42 patients included, respectively, in the low, intermediate, and high surgical complexity categories. Approximately 50% of patients underwent hepatic and pancreatic resections. There was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in terms of morbidity, mortality, readmission or transfusion. Mean overall operative time was 254 ± 133 min (range 15-560 min). Perioperative mortality and morbidity was 1.4% and 15.1%, respectively. Transfusion rate was 9.6%, and median length of stay was 6 days (range 0-30 days). Robotic surgery can be performed safely in the elderly population with low mortality, acceptable morbidity, and short hospital stay. Age should not be considered as a contraindication to robotic surgery even for advanced procedures.
Collapse
|
8
|
Varpe P, Huhtinen H, Rantala A, Grönroos J. Patient's age should not play a key role in clinical decisions on surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Aging Clin Exp Res 2010; 22:42-6. [PMID: 20305366 DOI: 10.1007/bf03324814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Recent advances in surgical techniques and adjuvant treatments have decreased morbidity and mortality in patients with rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to clarify the effects of aging on the choice, feasibility and safety of various treatment modalities in patients with rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS During 2003-2006, a total of 274 rectal cancers were diagnosed at Turku University Central Hospital. Patient and tumor characteristics, treatment modalities chosen, and complications were recorded, and patients were followed up prospectively for 1-3 years after treatment. Patients were then divided into two groups: under 75 (n=181) and 75 years or older (n=93) at the moment of diagnosis. Patient data in the two age groups were analysed and compared with each other. RESULTS Of the total of 274 patients with rectal cancer, 243 (89%) underwent surgery. The percentage of patients operated was higher (p=0.03) in the younger (92%) than in the older group (83%). The main reasons for non-operative or palliative treatment were severe concomitant diseases and metastasized cancer. Preoperative radiation therapy was given more often (p<0.01) to young (72%) than old (27%) patients. With these selections, there was no difference in 30-day postoperative mortality (1% vs 1%, ns) or postoperative complications (22% vs 34%, ns) between two groups. CONCLUSION With preoperative selection, patients over 75 with rectal cancer are suitable for major surgery, as morbidity and mortality rates are comparable to those in younger patients.
Collapse
|
9
|
Huh JW, Park YA, Lee KY, Kim SA, Sohn SK. Recurrences after local excision for early rectal adenocarcinoma. Yonsei Med J 2009; 50:704-8. [PMID: 19881976 PMCID: PMC2768247 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2009.50.5.704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2008] [Revised: 01/05/2009] [Accepted: 01/05/2009] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The role of local excision in treating rectal cancer patients continues to be controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term oncological results of local excision for early rectal adenocarcinomas and review the outcomes of salvage therapy on rectal cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between March 1992 and September 2005, 35 consecutive patients with early-stage primary rectal adenocarcinomas were treated by local excision with curative intent. The mean tumor distance from the anal verge was 5 cm (range, 1-10 cm). RESULTS The median follow-up was 66 months (range, 17-161 months). Pathological examination revealed 23 cases of T1 and 12 cases of T2. Recurrence had developed in 10 patients (6 local recurrences, 4 systemic recurrences). Purely extrapelvic recurrence was observed in only two (5.7%) patients. Of the eight recurrent patients with surgical salvage, five survived with no evidence of disease at the time of this analysis. The 5-year local recurrence-free and disease-free survival rates were 79.6% and 67.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION Local excision alone of early-staged rectal adenocarcinomas, even in the ideal candidate, is followed by a relatively higher local recurrence rate than previously reported and may not be a valid modality. Either the use of adjuvant therapy with local excision, even in patients with T1 lesions or the use of preoperative therapy followed by local excision has good promise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung Wook Huh
- Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital and Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Yoon Ah Park
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kang Young Lee
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Ah Kim
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung-Kook Sohn
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Saarilahti K, Arponen P, Vaalavirta L, Tenhunen M, Blomqvist C. Chemoradiotherapy of anal cancer is feasible in elderly patients: treatment results of mitomycin-5-FU combined with radiotherapy at Helsinki University Central Hospital 1992-2003. Acta Oncol 2009; 45:736-42. [PMID: 16938817 DOI: 10.1080/02841860600849075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
The number of elderly patients with cancer is steadily increasing in developed countries and their treatment is a growing challenge for oncological departments. Anal cancer is the first tumour in which chemoradiotherapy with the intent of organ preservation has largely replaced surgery and is an interesting model of modern multimodal oncological treatment. At the Department of Oncology of the Helsinki University Central Hospital we have treated all patients irrespective of age following the same guidelines if there have been no specific contraindications on the basis of intercurrent diseases. The results suggest that the chemoradiotherapy protocol used in the treatment of anal cancer is reasonably well tolerated in elderly patients and the tumour control is comparable to those achieved in younger patients. After successful cancer therapy the life expectancy in these patients can be very long.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kauko Saarilahti
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fiorica F, Cartei F, Carau B, Berretta S, Spartà D, Tirelli U, Santangelo A, Maugeri D, Luca S, Leotta C, Sorace R, Berretta M. Adjuvant radiotherapy on older and oldest elderly rectal cancer patients. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2009; 49:54-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2008.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2007] [Revised: 04/26/2008] [Accepted: 05/05/2008] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
12
|
Merlin F, Prochilo T, Tondulli L, Kildani B, Beretta GD. Colorectal cancer treatment in elderly patients: an update on recent clinical studies. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2009; 7:357-63. [PMID: 19036687 DOI: 10.3816/ccc.2008.n.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in the Western world, with > 500,000 new cases diagnosed each year. One of the strongest risk factors for colon cancer is age. Physicians and their older patients commonly face the dilemma of whether to give/receive systemic chemotherapy for CRC. Evidence supports similar survival benefits with adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy in elderly patients compared with younger age groups. Data on treatment- related side effects did not reveal a different toxicity profile for elderly patients. The safety and efficacy of systemic chemotherapy in fit older patients were proven, and this group of patients could be enrolled in clinical trials. Conversely, frail older patients are more likely to suffer adverse outcomes when faced with stressors and might not benefit from chemotherapy. Despite a growing body of data, a great deal of work is still needed to establish optimal strategies to care for patients diagnosed with cancer later in life. There is a paucity of reports published in the literature because of the difficulty in routinely collecting such data. We report an overview of recent studies (clinical trials, pooled analysis, and population studies) to provide more information and to identify new and better treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Merlin
- U.O.Oncologia Medica, Ospedale Sant'Orsola Fatebenefratelli, via Vittorio Emanuele II, Brescia, Italy
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tan E, Tilney H, Thompson M, Smith J, Tekkis PP. The United Kingdom National Bowel Cancer Project – Epidemiology and surgical risk in the elderly. Eur J Cancer 2007; 43:2285-94. [PMID: 17681782 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2007] [Revised: 06/13/2007] [Accepted: 06/20/2007] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the epidemiology and risk of surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly. METHODS Patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery were identified from the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) bowel cancer database, comprising 47,455 patients treated over a 5-year period. Demographic characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients aged <75 and those 75 or above. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were the length of hospital stay, abdominoperineal excision (APER) rates and lymph node harvest. RESULTS Elderly patients were likely to be female and have higher American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) grade, while Dukes' stage was lower. They underwent surgery less often (81% versus 88%, p<0.001), but more frequently needed urgent or emergency procedures (p<0.001) and non-excisional surgery (7.7% versus 6.6%, p<0.001). Operative mortality was significantly higher for the older age group (10.6% versus 3.8%, p<0.001), and their median length-of-stay was 2 days longer (p<0.001). Mortality has improved over time for elderly patients with ASA grade III, and Dukes' stage A and D disease, but not for other subgroups. CONCLUSION Significant differences in the demographic characteristics and operative risk-factors between under-75s, and those aged 75 or above exist. These variations are reflected in the inferior outcomes experienced by elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emile Tan
- Imperial College, Department of Biosurgery & Surgical Technology, 10th Floor, QEQM, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chang GJ, Skibber JM, Feig BW, Rodriguez-Bigas M. Are we undertreating rectal cancer in the elderly? An epidemiologic study. Ann Surg 2007; 246:215-21. [PMID: 17667499 PMCID: PMC1933551 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e318070838f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To better understand the reasons for decreased survival rates in elderly patients with rectal cancer by performing an epidemiologic evaluation of age-related differences in treatment and survival. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA The incidence of rectal cancer increases with older age, and localized disease can be curatively treated with stage-appropriate radical surgery. However, older patients have been noted to experience decreased survival. METHODS Patients with localized rectal adenocarcinoma were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1991-2002). Cancer-specific survival by age, sex, surgery type, tumor grade, lymph node status, and use of radiation therapy was evaluated using univariate and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS We identified 21,390 patients who met the selection criteria. The median age was 68 years. Each half-decade increase in age > or =70 years was associated with a 37% increase in the relative risk (RR) for cancer-related mortality (RR = 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-1.42); decreased receipt of cancer-directed surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.63); more local excision and less radical surgery (OR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.72-0.81); less radiotherapy (OR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.61-0.67); and greater likelihood of N0 pathologic stage classification (OR = 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.15) (P < 0.0001 for each factor). The effect of age on cancer-specific mortality persisted in multivariate analysis with each half-decade increase in age > or =70 years resulting in a 31% increase in cancer-specific mortality (RR = 1.31; 95% CI, 1.25-1.36; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In elderly patients, rectal cancer is characterized by decreased cancer-related survival rates that are associated with less aggressive treatment overall and decreased disease stages at presentation. Investigation into the reasons for these treatment differences may help to define interventions to improve cancer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George J Chang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson, Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Le AT, Albo D, Berger DH. Quality of Life in the Elderly with Rectal Cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 205:124-31. [PMID: 17617341 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.02.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2006] [Revised: 02/01/2007] [Accepted: 02/07/2007] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anne T Le
- Michael E DeBakey, Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, and the Houston Center for Quality of Care and Utilization Studies and Operative Care Line, Michael E DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bretagnol F, Merrie A, George B, Warren BF, Mortensen NJ. Local excision of rectal tumours by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Br J Surg 2007; 94:627-33. [PMID: 17335125 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) allows locally complete excision of rectal tumours and provides an alternative to conventional surgery for benign tumours. However, its role in the curative treatment of invasive carcinoma is controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the morbidity and long-term results for rectal tumours excised by TEM. METHODS Between February 1993 and January 2005, 200 patients underwent TEM for excision of adenomas (148) or carcinomas (52). The median tumour distance from the anal verge was 8 (range 1-16) cm. RESULTS Mortality and morbidity rates were 0.5 and 14.0 per cent respectively. At a median follow-up of 33 (range 2-133) months, local recurrence had developed in 11 patients (7.6 per cent) with an adenoma. Histological examination of carcinomas revealed pathological tumour (pT) stage 1 in 31 patients, pT2 in 17 and pT3 in four. Immediate salvage surgery was performed in seven patients (13 per cent). At a median follow-up of 34 (range 1-102) months, eight patients (15 per cent) with carcinomas had developed local recurrence. The overall and disease-free 5-year survival rates for patients with carcinomas were 76 and 65 per cent respectively. CONCLUSION TEM is an appropriate surgical treatment option for benign rectal tumours. For carcinomas, it is oncologically safe provided that resection margins are clear, but strict patient selection is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Bretagnol
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bretagnol F, Rullier E, George B, Warren BF, Mortensen NJ. Local therapy for rectal cancer: still controversial? Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50:523-33. [PMID: 17285233 DOI: 10.1007/s10350-006-0819-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Many considerations, such as morbidity, sexual and urinary dysfunction, or risk of definitive stoma have led to the increased popularity of local therapy in the therapeutic strategy for rectal cancer. However, its role in curative intent is still controversial with oncologic long-term results lower than those obtained by radical surgery. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, Abstract books, and reference lists from reviews were searched with English language publications to review the current status of evidence for local therapy in rectal cancer, looking especially at the oncologic results and patient selection. We have focused on the new strategies combining neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment to explain their place in the management of rectal cancer. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS The key to potentially curative local treatment for rectal cancer is patient selection by identifying the best candidates with preoperative tumor staging and clinical and pathologic assessment of favorable features. Low-risk T1 is suitable for local excision alone. Limited data suggest that adjuvant chemoradiotherapy may be helpful in patients with unfavorable T1 and T2 lesions, achieving a local recurrence rate<20 percent. However, the efficacy of salvage surgery after local excision is uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Bretagnol
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|