Aids for eye drop administration

Real-world evaluation of novel eye drop bottle sensors: Cloud-based AI support for eye drop adherence

Purpose

To understand real-world eye drop adherence among glaucoma patients and evaluate the performance of our proposed cloud-based support for eye drop adherence (CASEA).

Design

Prospective, observational case series.

Methods

Setting: The Department of Ophthalmology at Tsukazaki Hospital. Patient or study population: Glaucoma patients treated at the hospital from May 2021 to September 2022, with 61 patients initially enrolled. Intervention or observation procedures: Pharmacists guided eye drop administration before the study. Changes in bottle orientation were detected using an accelerometer attached to the container, and acceleration waveforms and date/time data were recorded. Patients visited the clinic during the 4th and 8th weeks to report their eye drop administration, and the data were uploaded to the cloud. Main outcome measures: Two AI models (B-LSTM) were created to analyze the eye drop bottle movement time-series data for patients treating one or both eyes. The models were evaluated by comparing the true administration status with the AI model judgment.

Results

Four of the 61 study subjects dropped out. The remaining 57 patients achieved recall, precision, and accuracy values of 98.6 %, 98.6 %, and 95.9 %, respectively, for the two-eyes model and 95.8 %, 98.8 %, and 95.6 % for the one-eye model. Three low-accuracy participants (77.1 %, 71.0 %, and 81.0 %) improved to 100 %, 99.1 %, and 100 %, respectively, after undergoing an additional 8-week performance validation using an aid-type container designed to ensure that the bottle was fully inverted during instillation.

Conclusions

CASEA precisely monitored daily eye drop adherence and enhanced treatment efficacy by identifying patients with difficulty self-medicating. This system has the potential to improve glaucoma patient outcomes by supporting adherence.

Squeezability of eye drop containers used in dry eye disease management

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Ocular lubricants are the mainstay of dry eye management and are available in a variety of formulations and bottle designs. The squeezability of ocular lubricant bottles may influence administration and compliance.

BACKGROUND

A key component for managing dry eye disease is the use of ocular lubricants. The different bottle types, each with their unique material strength and dispensing mechanism, may be challenging for patients with limited hand and pinch strength. The aim of this study was to evaluate the force required to expulse a drop from different eye drop containers used in the management of dry eye disease.

METHODS

The force, in newtons (N), required to expulse a drop from different eye drops was evaluated five times using a force gauge, and divided by bottle type, i.e. tubes, unidose, multidose with preservatives, and multidose preservative free (MDPF) bottles.

RESULTS

Sixty (n = 60) bottles were examined with 57 eye lubricants and 3 dry eye medications (cyclosporine (0.5% and 0.9%), and lifitegrast). The average force varied depending on the bottle type (tubes 4.28 ± 1.29 N; unidose 14.24 ± 4.83 N; multidose 16.62 ± 5.21 N; MDPF 26.68 ± 8.32 N, p < 0.001). Post-hoc test revealed that MDPF bottles required more force than all other bottle types (p < 0.001), and among those, the ophthalmic squeeze dispenser bottle required significantly more force (p < 0.001). Lifitegrast required more force (17.38 ± 2.13 N) than cyclosporine 0.5% (9.16 ± 0.80 N, p < 0.024) and cyclosporine 0.9% (5.68 ± 0.40 N, p < 0.001), but was not significantly different from unidose ocular lubricants (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The squeezability of bottles used in dry eye disease management varies with bottle type. Hand and pinch strength should be considered when choosing products for dry eye disease management, as the squeezability of an ophthalmic drop can influence its administration and compliance.

Estimation of Topical Glaucoma Medication Over-Prescription and Its Associated Factors

This study aims to report the disparity between the ideal and actual quantities of eyedrops prescribed to individual glaucoma patients. This retrospective observational study included 676 patients receiving treatment with antiglaucoma topical medication(s) in at least one eye. These patients had follow-up appointments scheduled at mean intervals of 3.4 ± 1.4 months and were actively using antiglaucoma medication. The mean age was 70.4 ± 11.9 years, with 372 (55%) being male. The over-prescription volume was 1.4 ± 1.7 bottles per month for each medication when prescribed for both eyes. Multiple regression analysis revealed that older age (p = 0.03), hyperopic refractive error (p < 0.0001), and the use of multiple medications (p = 0.03) were associated with a larger over-prescription volume, while the use of unit-dose medication only (p < 0.0001) was associated with a smaller over-prescription volume. Factors such as sex, Mini-Cog cognitive function score, best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, glaucoma type, and a history of cataract surgery were not significantly associated. This study revealed a significant over-prescription of eyedrops for glaucoma patients, with actual prescriptions often exceeding the theoretically ideal amount by 2.4 times, influenced by factors like age and the format of prescriptions, where unit-dose eyedrops show promise in reducing excess.

Factors Associated with Topical Medication Instillation Failure in Glaucoma: VRAMS-QPiG Study

INTRODUCTION

To report eyedrop instillation techniques and factors associated with instillation failure among glaucoma subjects in the Video-Recorded Assessment of Medication Skill and Questionnaire-based evaluation of Perception in Glaucoma Study.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional observational study, subjects were 60 patients with glaucoma (mean ± standard deviation age, 68.4 ± 11.3 years; 30 men) who required ocular hypotensive medication(s). Subjects completed ophthalmologic examinations and the Mini-Cog cognitive function test; their typical eyedrop instillation technique was video-recorded. Subjects rated their technique as successes/failures by questionnaire and two examiners rated the successes/failures based on video assessment. Discrepancy between self-reported and video-assessed success/failure rates of instillation was the main outcome measures. Multivariate logistic regression identified factors in instillation failure.

RESULTS

Of 48/56 (86%) self-reported successes, 27/48 (56%) failed based on video assessment; as a result, 32/56 (57%) were inconsistent between subjective and objective assessments. Overall, 30/56 (54%) failed based on video assessment. In the subject-based data model, older age [odds ratio (OR) 0.93/year, P = 0.025] and lower cognitive function score (OR 2.7/score, P = 0.025) were factors in failed instillations. In the eye-based data model, less myopic objective refractive error (OR 0.77/diopter, P = 0.016) and lower visual field foveal threshold (OR 1.1/decibel, P = 0.041) were factors in failures.

CONCLUSION

In addition to older age, decreased cognitive function, hyperopia, and decreased foveal sensitivity are risks for failed eyedrop instillation. Treating physicians can screen patients who require guidance by checking the risk factors of instillation failure rather than by relying on patient reports.

Patients with Low Vision Struggle with Placing Eye Drops and Benefit from an Eye Drop Aid

PURPOSE

To evaluate eye drop self-administration in a low-vision patient population and test whether a nose-pivoted drop delivery device (NPDD, GentleDrop) can improve eye drop delivery in these patients.

DESIGN

Repeated-measures case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty subjects (58 eyes) with low vision, defined as best-corrected visual acuity worse than 20/60 or visual field worse than 20° in the better-seeing eye.

METHODS

We video-recorded subjects while self-administering eye drops using their own traditional delivery at baseline, after a standardized teaching, and with an NPDD. Two masked graders independently reviewed each drop delivery. Primary success was defined as the drop reaching the eye without the bottle touching the eye or eyelids. Subjects rated ease-of-use (1-10 scale, 10 = easiest) after each drop delivery and completed a satisfaction survey, which included asking whether subjects could place drops independently (1-5 scale, 5 = most independent).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Logistic-transformed generalized estimating equation regression to compare technique satisfaction, ease-of-use, independence, no contact, and success.

RESULTS

Primary success was observed in 30 (52%) of 58 eyes at baseline and increased to 44 eyes (76%) with an NPDD (P = 0.013). Bottle tip contact occurred in 23 (40%) of 58 eyes at baseline and 8 eyes (14%) with an NPDD (P = 0.004). Mean ease-of-use scores were 6.7 ± 3.1 at baseline and 8.3 ± 1.8 (P < 0.001) with an NPDD. Likewise, the NPDD improved success, bottle tip contact, and ease-of-use compared with post-teaching traditional delivery (P < 0.01). Twenty-two (73%) of 30 subjects preferred the NPDD to traditional delivery. Twenty-nine (97%) thought the NPDD was comfortable to use, and all would recommend the device. A subgroup analysis was performed on 16 subjects that self-reported difficulty instilling drops at baseline. The NPDD showed similar results, and it increased confidence in placing drops independently (4.6 ± 0.9) compared with baseline (2.7 ± 1.6, P < 0.001). Fifteen (94%) subjects in this subgroup preferred the NPDD.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-vision subjects struggled to self-administer eye drops. An NPDD can improve bottle tip contact, ease-of-use, satisfaction, and independence. Eye care providers could consider screening low-vision patients about difficulty with eye drop self-administration and recommending eye drop aids.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Safety, adherence and discontinuation in varenicline solution nasal spray clinical trials for dry eye disease

Aim: Herein, we report safety outcomes for varenicline solution nasal spray (VNS) within the context of clinical trial discontinuation, contrasting those with discontinuation outcomes from topical cyclosporine and lifitegrast clinical trials. Materials & methods: 1061 subjects were randomized across three clinical trials to receive either VNS 0.06 mg, VNS 0.03 mg, VNS 0.006 mg or vehicle control. Subjects who discontinued from treatment were noted and assigned to their appropriate categories. Results: Despite treatment emergent adverse events, 93.5% of subjects receiving VNS completed the treatment period. By comparison, only 80% of subjects in the integrated clinical trials for cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion and 91% of subjects in the integrated trials for lifitegrast ophthalmic solution completed the full treatment period, respectively. Conclusion: In clinical trials, VNS demonstrated improvements in dry eye disease signs and symptoms, was well-tolerated, and had an overall completion rate >93%. Conventional dry eye treatments (e.g., cyclosporine and lifitegrast) noted considerably higher discontinuation rates in their clinical trials.

Within-Trial Cost-Effectiveness of an Adherence-Enhancing Educational Intervention for Glaucoma

PURPOSE

To assess the within-trial cost-effectiveness of a behavioral intervention to improve glaucoma medication adherence.

DESIGN

Prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of randomized, controlled trial data.

METHODS

The study setting was a Veterans Affairs (VA) eye clinic. The patient population comprised veterans with medically treated glaucoma and self-reported poor adherence. Participants were randomized to a personalized educational session with a reminder bottle to promote medication adherence or to a control session on general eye health. Costs were assessed from the perspective of the VA payor at 6 months using the VA Managerial Cost Accounting System. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted using bootstrapped samples. The main outcome measures were the proportion of participants attaining ≥80% adherence as measured by electronic monitor, total intervention and medical resource costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios comparing intervention to control at 6 months.

RESULTS

Of 200 randomized participants, 95 of 100 assigned to the intervention and 97 of 100 assigned to the control had adherence outcomes at 6 months, and the proportion of adherent patients was higher in the intervention group compared to control (0.78 vs 0.40, P < .0001). All participants had costs at 6 months. The total cost at 6 months was $1,149,600 in the intervention group (n = 100) compared to $1,298,700 in the control group (n = 100). Thus, in a hypothetical cohort of 100 patients, the intervention was associated with cost savings (-$149,100) and resulted in 38 additional patients achieving medication adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

An adherence-enhancing behavioral intervention was effective and cost saving at 6 months.

Fluorescent Nanosystems for Drug Tracking and Theranostics: Recent Applications in the Ocular Field

The greatest challenge associated with topical drug delivery for the treatment of diseases affecting the posterior segment of the eye is to overcome the poor bioavailability of the carried molecules. Nanomedicine offers the possibility to overcome obstacles related to physiological mechanisms and ocular barriers by exploiting different ocular routes. Functionalization of nanosystems by fluorescent probes could be a useful strategy to understand the pathway taken by nanocarriers into the ocular globe and to improve the desired targeting accuracy. The application of fluorescence to decorate nanocarrier surfaces or the encapsulation of fluorophore molecules makes the nanosystems a light probe useful in the landscape of diagnostics and theranostics. In this review, a state of the art on ocular routes of administration is reported, with a focus on pathways undertaken after topical application. Numerous studies are reported in the first section, confirming that the use of fluorescent within nanoparticles is already spread for tracking and biodistribution studies. The first section presents fluorescent molecules used for tracking nanosystems’ cellular internalization and permeation of ocular tissues; discussions on the classification of nanosystems according to their nature (lipid-based, polymer-based, metallic-based and protein-based) follows. The following sections are dedicated to diagnostic and theranostic uses, respectively, which represent an innovation in the ocular field obtained by combining dual goals in a single administration system. For its great potential, this application of fluorescent nanoparticles would experience a great development in the near future. Finally, a brief overview is dedicated to the use of fluorescent markers in clinical trials and the market in the ocular field.

Commentary on the EMA reflection paper on the pharmaceutical development of medicines for use in the older population

Older people are often affected by impaired organ and bodily functions resulting in multimorbidity and polypharmacy, turning them into the main user group of many medicines. Very often, medicines have not specifically been developed for older people, causing practical medication problems for them like limited availability of easy to swallow formulations, easy to open packaging and dosing instructions for enteral administration. In 2020, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) published a reflection paper 'Pharmaceutical development of medicines for use in the older population', which discusses how the emerging needs of an ageing European population can be addressed by medicines regulation. The paper intends to help industry to better consider the needs of older people during pharmaceutical/clinical medicines development by summarising data on the most relevant topics, providing early suggestions on how to move forward and prompting expert discussions and studies into knowledge gaps. Topics include patient acceptability, (dis)advantages of an administration route, formulation, dosage form, packaging, dosing device and user instruction. While the paper is directed at older people and the pharmaceutical industry, the reflections are also relevant to younger patients with similar disease-related needs and of value to other stakeholders parties, e.g., healthcare professionals, academics, patients and caregivers, as the paper makes clear what can be expected from industry and where collaborative work is needed. This commentary provides an overview of the different steps in the development of the reflection paper, discusses points considered most controversial and/or subject to (multidisciplinary) expert discussions and indicates their value for real world clinical practice.

Moxifloxacin releasing intraocular implant based on a cross-linked hyaluronic acid membrane

Intraocular antibiotic delivery is an important technique to prevent bacterial infection after ophthalmic surgery, such as cataract surgery. Conventional drug delivery methods, such as antibiotic eye drops, have limitations for intraocular drug delivery due to the intrinsic barrier effect of the cornea. Therefore, frequent instillation of antibiotic eyedrops is necessary to reach a sufficient bactericidal concentration inside the eye. In this study, an intraocular implant, MXF-HA, that combines hyaluronic acid (HA) and moxifloxacin (MXF) was developed to increase the efficiency of intraocular drug delivery after surgery. MXF-HA is manufactured as a thin, transparent, yellow-tinted membrane. When inserted into the eye in a dry state, MXF-HA is naturally hydrated and settles in the eye, and the MXF contained therein is delivered by hydrolysis of the polymer over time. It was confirmed through in vivo experiments that MXF delivery was maintained in the anterior chamber of the eye at a concentration sufficient to inhibit Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus for more than 5 days after implantation. These results suggest that MXF-HA can be utilized as a potential drug delivery method for the prevention and treatment of bacterial infections after ophthalmic surgery.

Comparison of the Usability of Eye Drop Aids and the Conventional Bottle

(1) Background: Eye drops are the most common route of administration for ophthalmic medications. Administering drops can be a major hurdle for patients, potentially resulting in noncompliance and treatment failure. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of two different aids and the conventional bottle for eye drop instillation; (2) Methods: An interventional crossover study involving standard eye drop bottle, Opticare aid and Autodrop aid. The study included healthy subjects without a history of regular eye drop use; (3) Results: Twenty-six subjects were enrolled. Of those subjects, 96% and 92% were able to assemble the eye drop bottle into the Autodrop and the Opticare aids, respectively. Subjective assessment indicated that Autodrop was significantly easier to assemble than Opticare (95% CI: -1.6802 to -0.1659, p = 0.02). When using either aid, there was no contamination of the bottle tip, which occurred in 46% of subjects when no aid was used (p = 0.0005). Fewer drops were expelled when using the conventional bottle as compared to the aids (p = 0.05 compared to Autodrop, p = 0.1 compared to Opticare); (4) Conclusions: Autodrop and Opticare can assist patients with eye drop placement. These aids completely prevented bottle tip contamination, which was frequently observed when the conventional bottle was used alone.

A Comparison of Patient Acceptance of 3 Eye Drop Instillation Aids

PRECIS

Patients can be quite amenable to using eye drop instillation aids. We should consider recommending these devices to patients who otherwise struggle with drop instillation and medication adherence.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare patient acceptance of 3 commercially available eye drop instillation aids in a diverse tertiary care population.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized controlled study, 39 patients being treated with topical antihypertensives were assigned to Arm A (no intervention) or Arm B (AutoDrop, AutoSqueeze, or SimplyTouch). Subjects in Arm B were instructed to administer their eye drop with the assigned drop aid at every use for ~6 weeks. Satisfaction surveys were administered at 3 and 6 weeks, where patients also reported the number of drops missed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two of 39 subjects completed study participation and full data analysis. Within this total group, 24 subjects were randomized to drop aids (AutoDrop N=10, AutoSqueeze N=8, SimplyTouch N=6), and 8 were randomized to no drop aid. At the 3 and 6-week timepoints, patients found instillation easier with AutoDrop (70.0%, 60.0%) followed by the AutoSqueeze (62.5%, 75.0%), and lastly SimplyTouch (33.3%, 33.3%). For the AutoSqueeze, the mean number of drops missed with and without the drop aid were significantly different (P=0.015 at 3 wk, P=0.008 at 6 wk). There was no difference in the mean number of drops missed with the AutoDrop and SimplyTouch at either timepoint.

CONCLUSIONS

For the AutoDrop and AutoSqueeze groups, over 60% of the patients found the devices helpful and would consider using them long-term. Our results suggest that patients would be amenable to using eye drop instillation aids, although more objective data is needed to determine whether these devices would improve medication compliance and clinical outcomes.

In vivo drug delivery via contact lenses: The current state of the field from origins to present

Over the past half century, contact lenses have been investigated for their potential as drug delivery devices for ocular therapeutics. Hundreds of studies have been published in the pursuit of the most effective and efficient release strategies and methods for contact lens drug delivery. This paper provides a thorough overview of the various contact lens drug delivery strategies, with a specific, comprehensive focus on in vivo studies that have been published since the field began in 1965. Significant accomplishments, current trends, as well as future strategies and directions are highlighted. In vivo study analysis provides a straightforward perspective and assessment of method success and commercialization potential in comparison to benchtop, in vitro studies. Analysis of the majority of published work indicates in vitro and in vivo studies do not correlate with a correlation coefficient of 0.25, with many in vitro studies grossly overestimating drug release duration and not showing appreciable drug release control. However, there has been an increase in activity in the last decade, and some methods have generated promising results exhibiting controlled release with commercialization potential. Clinical translation of drug releasing lenses is on the horizon and has high potential to impact a large number of patients providing efficacious treatment compared to current topical treatments.

Health Literacy and Success with Glaucoma Drop Administration

PURPOSE

To assess the relationship between health literacy and successful glaucoma drop administration.

DESIGN

Substudy of a single-site interventional randomized controlled trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Veterans receiving care at the Durham Veterans Affairs Eye Clinic who had a diagnosis of open-angle glaucoma were recruited if they endorsed poor drop adherence.

METHODS

Participants underwent a health literacy evaluation using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) as well as a qualitative assessment of eye drop administration technique using 3 different criteria: (1) the drop was instilled in the eye, (2) only 1 drop was dispensed, and (3) the bottle was not potentially contaminated. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess the association of REALM score and successful drop administration, adjusting for age, disease severity, and Veterans Administration Care Assessment Needs (CAN) score.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Successful drop administration.

RESULTS

Of the 179 participants with REALM scores and observed drop administration, 78% read at a high school level (HSL) or more and 22% read at less than HSL. Of the 179 participants, 87% (n = 156) successfully instilled the drop into the eye (criterion 1). A greater proportion of participants who read at HSL or more successfully instilled the drop in the eye compared with those reading at less than HSL (90.6% vs. 75.0%; P = 0.02). Rates of success with criterion 1 were similar across different levels of visual field severity. Care Assessment Needs scores were not statistically significant between those who did and those did not have successful overall drop technique.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor health literacy may be associated with decreased successful drop instillation in the eye in patients with glaucoma. Screening for and considering health literacy in developing interventions to improve glaucoma self-management may improve treatment adherence in a vulnerable population.

Investigation of visual and physical factors associated with inadequate instillation of eyedrops among patients with glaucoma

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of eyedrop instillation failure and its related physical and visual function factors among glaucoma patients who used hypotensive eyedrops daily.

Subjects and methods

Patients with a history of self-instillation of one or more ocular hypotensive ophthalmic solutions for six or more months were enrolled. Definitions of instillation failure were eyedrop instillation other than on the eye surface; eyedrop contact with eyelashes; eyedrop bottle tip contact with the eyelashes, eye surface or ocular adnexa; or two or more drops instilled with one instillation trial. To clarify factors related to instillation failure, we used visual function tests and investigated cervical spine extension angles during instillation, pinching strength, physical ataxia (evaluated using the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia), motor dysfunction of the upper limbs (evaluated using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire), and vision quality (evaluated using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25).

Results

Of 103 total subjects, 61.2% satisfied the definition of instillation failure. Instillation of the eyedrop other than at the cul-desac (76.2%) was the most frequent reason for failure, followed by contact of the tip of the eyedrop bottle (22.2%) and instillation of the same or more than two eyedrops in a single attempt (11.1%). Advanced age, a shallow cervical spine extension angle, weak pinching strength, poor motor dysfunction of the upper limbs, the degree of ataxia, poor best-corrected visual acuity, and visual field scores were significant risk factors for instillation failure. Vision quality may have some relation to instillation failure.

Conclusion

It is highly recommended that instillation failure be routinely investigated even among patients with adequate experience using eyedrops and that correct therapies are chosen in a patient-based fashion.

Novel Eye Drop Delivery Aid Improves Outcomes and Satisfaction

PURPOSE

To compare a nose-pivoted drop delivery device (NPDD) with traditional eye drop delivery in glaucoma subjects.

DESIGN

Repeated-measures case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty glaucoma subjects (100 eyes) who reported difficulty self-administering eye drops.

METHODS

We compared eye drop delivery using a NPDD against traditional delivery techniques at baseline (baseline traditional) and after standardized teaching (post-teaching traditional). Subjects used a 1-to-10 scale (10 being easiest) to rate the ease of delivery with each technique and completed a satisfaction survey. Two graders used digital video to independently review eye drop delivery and recorded: (1) accurate placement: the eye drop reached the ocular surface; (2) no contact: no bottle tip contact against the ocular or periocular surface; and (3)number of eye drops dispensed. We defined primary success as accurate placement and no contact; secondary success as primary success with only 1 drop dispensed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We used logistic-transformed generalized estimating equation (GEE) regression to compare technique satisfaction, accuracy, no contact, and primary and secondary success. Number of drops dispensed was compared using a Cox model.

RESULTS

Forty-seven of 50 subjects (94%) preferred the NPDD over traditional eye drop delivery. The mean score for ease of use was higher for the NPDD (8.9 ± 1.1) than baseline traditional (6.7 ± 2.1; P < 0.001) and post-teaching traditional (7.0 ± 2.0; P < 0.001). Forty-nine of 50 (98%) subjects thought the NPDD was comfortable to use and would recommend the device. The eye drop reached the ocular surface in a similar percentage of subjects (>90%) with each method. The bottle tip contacted fewer eyes with the NPDD (10 eyes) than baseline traditional (33 eyes; P < 0.001) and post-teaching traditional (25 eyes; P = 0.009). The number of drops dispensed was lower with the NPDD (1.7 ± 1.2) than baseline traditional (2.2 ± 1.6; P = 0.017) and post-teaching traditional (2.4 ± 1.8; P = 0.006). The NPDD increased primary and secondary success of eye drop delivery (86% and 54%, respectively) compared to baseline traditional (66% [P = 0.001] and 28% [P < 0.001]) and post-teaching traditional (70% [P = 0.005] and 40% [P = 0.018]).

CONCLUSIONS

Eye drop users preferred the NPDD over traditional eye drop delivery. The NPDD improved eye drop delivery success, reduced bottle tip contact, and decreased the number of eye drops wasted.

Improving Adherence to Topical Medication in Patients with Glaucoma

The glaucomas form a heterogenous group of conditions, which collectively account for one of the most common irreversible causes of blindness worldwide. The only treatment, for which there is evidence, to stop or slow glaucomatous disease progression is to lower intraocular pressure (IOP); this is most often initially achieved with topical medication. Adherence to anti-glaucoma therapy is known to be low even when compared with adherence to therapy for other chronic conditions. We performed a PubMed search to review evidence as to how adherence to and persistence with anti-glaucoma medications might be improved. Approaches to improving adherence include technological (such as using smart drop bottles or automated reminders) use of instillation aids, improving communication with patient education and improving tolerability of eye drop formulations. There is limited short-term evidence that automated reminders can be effective and, unfortunately, instillation aids have not proved to be efficacious with respect to improving adherence. A range of factors have been identified which affect adherence and persistence, although only a multi-faceted approach has proven evidence of efficacy, compared to improved patient education alone. There is now a wider range of available preservative-free eye drops, which have been shown to be non-inferior in achieving IOP control, with fewer side effects and improved short-term adherence. Further studies relating to adherence are warranted, particularly given the projected increase in glaucoma prevalence worldwide.

Patients' Experience of Using Eye Drop Guide Device to Aid Self-Administration of Glaucoma Medications

Purpose

To determine the characteristics of the patients who preferred using the eye drop guide (EDG) regularly and their opinions toward the guide in order to select the patients for prescribing the EDG appropriately.

Patients and Methods

Fifty-seven glaucoma patients who completed the primary study, “The effect of ‘eye drop guide’ on the success rate of eye drop self-instillation in glaucoma patients”, were included. Patients’ instillation techniques, routine instillation or using the EDG, were chosen independently. After 4–6 months, they were interviewed about the frequency of EDG use and their rating scores toward the guide in 4 aspects including aiming aids, contamination prevention, reduction of drop waste, and ease of use. The differences in opinion scores between each frequency group and the factors associated with the regularity of EDG use were statistically analyzed.

Results

Of fifty-seven patients completing the interview, 19.3% used the EDG everyday, while 45.6% had never used the EDG. The nonusers rated significantly lower scores in all aspects (p-value < 0.005). From multivariate analysis, the factors associated with the preference not to use the EDG were administering in supine position (p-value < 0.001, adjusted OR 34.866, 95% CI 4.974–244.412) and more than one eye drop use (p-value = 0.048, adjusted OR 5.280, 95% CI 1.018–27.396).

Conclusion

The EDG should be selectively prescribed for the particular patients who had one medication and performed instillation in sitting or standing position. Although the regular EDG users tended to have positive opinions on the EDG, their long-term compliance with the guide was underinvestigated.

'The mean mummy way' - experiences of parents instilling eye drops to their young children as described in online forums and blogs

BACKGROUND

Adults often have difficulty instilling eye drops in their own eyes, but little has been documented about the difficulties experienced by parents when administering eye drops to their young children, where the challenges of instillation are accentuated by their inability to cooperate. This qualitative study explores parents' experiences of administering eye drops to their children as described in online forum discussions and blog posts.

METHODS

This was an exploratory study using qualitative methods. We thematically analysed the written exchanges between parents participating in online forum discussions and blog posts about the administration of eye drops to their young children.

RESULTS

We found 64 forum discussion threads and 4 blog posts, representing 464 unique contributors expressing their experiences of eye drop administration to young children. Three major themes were identified - administration challenges, administration methods and role of health care professionals. Besides describing their children's distress, parents discussed their own discomfort and anxiety when administering eye drops. Parents used a variety of techniques to facilitate adherence with medication, including restraining the child, role-play, reassurance, distraction, or reward. The ideas exchanged about eye drop administration occasionally included reiteration of professional advice, but were dominated by parents' own ideas/suggestions; interestingly health care professionals were considered diagnosticians and prescribers, rather than sources of practical advice on administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents struggling to deliver eye drops to their young children may seek advice on how to administer treatment from parental on-line discussion forums. The distress experienced by the young child and their parents is a powerful reminder to clinicians that procedures common and routine in health care may be challenging to parents. The advice given to parents needs to go beyond the instillation of the eye drops, and include advice on child restraint, distraction techniques and allaying distress. Forewarned of the potential difficulties and provided with coping strategies parents can employ when the child resists, could alleviate their own and their child's distress.

Validation of a More Reliable Method of Eye Drop Self-Administration

SIGNIFICANCE

We propose an alternative method for eye drop self-administration. Similar IOP reductions were found with this method compared with clinician instillation. The alternative method of self-administration potentially benefits patients who have trouble successfully instilling drops.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to validate the efficacy of an alternative method of drop instillation.

METHODS

This study is a randomized controlled crossover clinical trial. Thirty participants were recruited. A drop of 0.5% timolol maleate was instilled into subject's eye on two separate visits. On one visit, eye drop instillation was by a trained clinician, and on the other, self-instillation using an alternative method was used. The order was randomly chosen. Intraocular pressure was measured before drop instillation and 2 hours after drop instillation. The investigator was masked during measurement, and an observer recorded the IOP measurements.

RESULTS

Mean ± SD IOP measurement before 0.5% timolol maleate instillation measured 13.89 ± 2.29 mmHg. An average reduction 3.75 ± 2.36 mmHg was found with clinician administration, and an average reduction of 3.32 ± 2.31 mmHg was recorded with the new method. No significance was found in IOP reduction between two groups P < .45. Percent reduction was 25.17 ± 16.21% and 24.38 ± 16.31% in clinician instillation and alternative instillation method group, respectively. No significant difference was found. This percentage reduction was similar to previously reported studies. No reported cases of eye infection or irritation were found in any case, within a 3-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

We have proposed a more reliable method for instillation that provides a larger area for instillation and lessen the risk of contamination and patient's fear for eye drops. Similar efficacy was found compared with that of having a clinician directly administer the drop. This alternative method could potentially benefit patients who require topical eye drop therapy and result in increased compliance.

The Effect of Patient Education and Telemedicine Reminders on Adherence to Eye Drops for Glaucoma

PURPOSE

To determine the improvement in patient adherence to topical ocular hypotensive therapy by introducing a personalized illustrated medication reference chart and telereminder.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-nine patients with glaucoma who were using at least 3 or more eye drops were recruited from the ophthalmology clinic at the National University Hospital of Singapore.

METHODS

Participants were randomized into 3 groups: control, reference chart only, and reference chart with telereminder. They completed a survey on demographics, barriers to glaucoma medication adherence, and self-adherence (measured by the Morisky adherence scale) before and 6 weeks after intervention. Logistic regression analysis was performed on the barriers that contribute to nonadherence and paired t tests were conducted for the preimplementation and postimplementation effects of intervention on adherence score.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in mean adherence score based on the Morisky adherence scale before and after intervention in participants from all 3 groups.

RESULTS

In our study, 71% of participants who were nonadherent to medications had multiple barriers to adherence, with lack of self-efficacy and forgetfulness being the most common factors. Only the reference chart with telereminder group showed a statistically significant increase in mean adherence score, from 7.18 to 7.69 (P = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to medication in chronic diseases like glaucoma is an important healthcare issue to address. Most of these patients have poor adherence because of multiple factors, and hence interventions aimed at improving adherence should be multifaceted to target these barriers.

Noncompliance with Prescribed Eyedrop Regimens Among Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery—Prevalence, Consequences, and Solutions

Collapse

Innovative bulls eye drop applicator for self-instillation of eye drops

PURPOSE

To report the role of Bulls eye drop applicator device in self-instillation of eye drops and in prevention of wastage of medicine.

METHODS

A small pocket sized device "Bulls eye drop applicator" was developed, which is a simple, handy, mirror-based attachment which can be attached to any eye drop bottle to help in accurate self-instillation of the drops in the eye. The prototype of this device was tried in ten volunteer subjects (Group 1) and 15 patients (Group 2); they were asked to use lubricating eye drops (5 ml bottle) in one eye without the device (N) and in the other eye with the device (M). The numbers of attempts for the application of eye drops were noted and the residual eye drops in the returned bottles were measured for quantitative assessment.

RESULTS

Ten volunteers and 11/15 patients completed the study. At the completion of the study, there were a total of 232 applications of eye drops in the Group 1 N (without device) and 1 M (with device). To achieve these 232 applications, there were 330 attempts without the device and 266 attempts of instillation were needed with the device (P < 0.0001). In Group 2, there were a total of 544 applications of eye drops; to achieve this, there were 879 attempts in Group 2 N and 685 attempts of instillation in Group 2 M (p < 0.0001). The cumulative quantity of residual drops in the returned bottles collected from Group 2 N was 5.1 ml and it was 19.7 ml in Group 2 M (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The number of attempts of instillation reduced significantly with the use of the eye drop applicator device. The use of eye drops applicator device reduced the wastage of drops from 42.2% to 14.6% in Group 1 N Vs Group 1 M and saving of about 35.7 % in Group 2 M compared to Group 2 N.

The Patient Beyond the Sphincter-Cognitive and Functional Considerations Affecting the Natural History of Artificial Urinary Sphincters

Artificial urinary sphincters (AUS) are common. Life expectancy at average implantation (71.5 years) is 14 years. During this period patients must still possess manual dexterity and cognitive capabilities needed to operate the AUS, otherwise it is practically unfunctional. Still, available data regarding AUS durability deal with medical and mechanical factors. Issues as age-related deteriorating manual dexterity and cognitive capabilities precluding patients from operating an apparently intact AUS have not been addressed. We set to focus on these aspects. We review the natural history of manual dexterity, physical, and cognitive deterioration of aging men and propose counseling and screening algorithms for evaluating these aspects.

The Routine Use of Intracameral Antibiotics to Prevent Endophthalmitis After Cataract Surgery: How Good is the Evidence?

Post-operative endophthalmitis (POE) following cataract surgery is an uncommon, vision-threatening complication that has been reported to occur at rates of between approximately 0.03% and 0.2%. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of endophthalmitis is critical for minimizing vision loss, but most recent efforts have focused on the prophylactic administration of antibiotics to prevent the development of endophthalmitis. Surgeons from around the world have different topical and intracameral antibiotic usage patterns to prevent endophthalmitis, and to date no general consensus regarding best practice has emerged. Several studies have reported on the routine use of intracameral cefuroxime, moxifloxacin, and vancomycin, including a single randomized clinical trial by the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ESCRS) in 2007. These studies have notable shortcomings, but many authors suggest that intracameral cefuroxime together with topical antibiotics probably decreases the risk of endophthalmitis. However, the deleterious effects of routine prophylactic antibiotics, which include toxicity, cost, and increasing antimicrobial resistance, among others, are noteworthy. In contrast, aseptic technique with pre-operative instillation of povidone-iodine remains the only technique supported by level I evidence to reduce the incidence of endophthalmitis. Although the routine use of intracameral antibiotics continues to increase throughout the world, data from multicenter, randomized, prospective trials is needed to provide better guidance regarding the prophylactic use of antibiotics.

Compliance to topical anti-glaucoma medications among patients at a tertiary hospital in North India

Purpose

The present study aims to estimate the prevalence of non-compliance and improper drop administration technique among glaucoma patients and describe common obstacles to medication compliance.

Methods

A hospital-based cross-sectional study, using standardized questionnaire and direct observation by study personnel was conducted among glaucoma patients aged 18 years and above at a tertiary care charitable eye hospital in North India. 151 consecutive glaucoma patients on medical therapy following up at the glaucoma clinics for at least 6 months were recruited. Non-compliance was defined as missing at-least one drop of medication per week and (or) the inability to accurately describe the medication regimen. Study personnel also assessed drop administration technique during application of eye drops by patients treating ophthalmologist-provided information, including measures of disease stability. Factors such as socioeconomic status, presence of caregiver, and number of medications with their effect on compliance were studied using chi-square statistics.

Results

Among 151 patients interviewed, around 49% of patients reported problems in using glaucoma medications, with 16% of them reporting total non-compliance. 35% of patients demonstrated improper drop administration technique. Forgetfulness was cited as the main reason for being non-compliant and had a significant association with non-compliance (P = 0.00). Paying patients were more compliant as compared to subsidized patients (P = 0.05). Disease was more stable in compliant patients compared to non-compliant patients (P = 0.05). No other factor had significant association with compliance (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Over 50% of the patients surveyed were non-compliant, and 35% demonstrated improper administration technique. Glaucoma patients should be educated on the importance of compliance and aids that minimize forgetfulness, and delivery systems facilitating the delivery of medications to the eye could be considered to enhance patient adherence.