Delayed anti-VEGF injections during the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in visual acuity in patients with three common retinal diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Reactivation of stable neovascular age-related macular degeneration following treat-and-extend regimen discontinuation

BACKGROUND

To describe the incidence and pattern of reactivation of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) following successful treatment with treat-and-extend intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with treated nAMD who did not require further treatment over a 6-month period and who attended their 3-monthly optical coherence tomography monitoring clinic in Moorfields Eye Hospital from 1 November 2019 to 31 January 2020 were included. Patients with diagnoses of macular neovascularization other than AMD, and patients with incomplete data were excluded. Baseline demographics recorded were age, sex, race, laterality, cause of macular neovascularization, drug, number of injections, and duration of treatment. Date, setting, symptoms, and time to retreatment were collected among patients with disease reactivation.

RESULTS

The medical records of 286 patients were included. Most patients were female (64.3%), white (68.18%), and were receiving aflibercept monotherapy (55.2%). Mean number of injections at baseline was 17.79 ± 11.74 (range 3-62) with a mean treatment duration of 39.47 ± 30.68 months (range 2-139). Reactivation of AMD was identified in 32.2% of cases with 87% of recurrences identified via scheduled visit. The most common symptom was blurring of vision in 44.6%, while 39.1% were asymptomatic. Mean time from baseline to retreatment was 29.37 ± 22.40 months (range 5-104), with 20.7%, 73.9% and 88.04% of these patients requiring retreatment within 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite prior treatment with no reactivation in 6 months, 32.2% reactivate, 73.9% of which within 3 years. A significant proportion, 39.1%, reactivated without symptoms necessitating regular monitoring in the first 5 years.

Economic Assessment in Resource-Constrained Systems: Individual-Level Simulation Model in Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Oedema

INTRODUCTION

Cost-effectiveness analyses typically ignore healthcare system resource constraints. Ophthalmology is affected by resource constraints because of increasing disease prevalence and the use of resource-intensive treatments. This study evaluated the impact of resource constraints on the cost-effectiveness of faricimab 6 mg, compared with aflibercept 2 mg and ranibizumab biosimilar 0.5 mg, for treating wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) or diabetic macular oedema (DMO) over a 5-year horizon.

METHODS

A microsimulation model estimated the impact of resource constraints on patients visits, delays, costs and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) losses due to treatment delays at a typical UK National Health Service eye hospital treating 1500 patients with wAMD and 500 patients with DMO. Patient characteristics, treatment regimens and treatment intervals were informed using published literature and expert opinion. Resource constraint was represented by limiting the number of available intravitreal injection appointments per week, with growing demand caused by rising disease prevalence. The model compared outcomes across three scenarios; each scenario involved treating all patients with one of the three treatments.

RESULTS

Over 5 years, in a resource-constrained hospital, compared with aflibercept, faricimab use resulted in the avoidance of 12,596 delays, saved GBP/£15,108,609 in cost and avoided the loss of 60.06 QALYs. Compared with ranibizumab biosimilar, faricimab use resulted in the avoidance of 18,910 delays, incurred £2,069,088 extra cost and avoided the loss of 105.70 QALYs, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £19,574/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

Accounting for resource constraints in health economic evaluation is crucial. Emerging therapies that are more durable and require less frequent clinic visits can reduce treatment delays, leading to improved QALY outcomes and reduced burden on healthcare systems. Faricimab reduced the number of delayed injections, leading to improved QALY outcomes for patients in a healthcare system with resource constraints. Faricimab is cost-saving when compared with aflibercept and cost-effective when compared with ranibizumab biosimilar.

Association between time to treatment and outcome in branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To investigate the association between the time from onset to initial treatment and changes in visual acuity or the number of treatments in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BVO).

DESIGN

Retrospective.

METHODS

Thirty-nine eyes of 39 consecutive patients with untreated acute-phase BVO who visited the University of Tokyo Hospital and were followed up for at least one year were included. The patients were initially treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy and additional pro re nata therapy within six months of onset. The patients were classified according to the time from disease onset to the first treatment (group A: 28 days or less, group B: over 28 days).

RESULTS

The mean (SD) age was 73 ± 8 years, and 19 patients were male. The mean (SD) time to the first treatment was 31.6 ± 17.9 days. The mean (SD) logMAR visual acuity at first treatment was 0.37 ± 0.30. After 12 months of treatment, the mean (SD) logMAR change was - 0.15 ± 0.23, and the mean number (SD) of treatments was 3.1 ± 1.7. No significant association was observed between the timing of treatment initiation and changes in logMAR visual acuity. Patients in group A and central macular thickness at the initial visit were independently associated with the greater number of treatments at one year (p = 0.03 and p = 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

At one year, the time between onset and the start of anti-VEGF therapy for BVO was not associated with subsequent visual acuity changes. Meanwhile, it may have significant association with the number of treatments.

The Continuing Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Diabetic Retinopathy Screenings

PURPOSE

This retrospective observational study of health claims data seeks to quantify the prolonged impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on DR screening rates in central Massachusetts.

METHODS

Retrospective claims data from the UMass Memorial Managed Care Network were collected for the years of 2018-2022. Comprehensive and DR screening exams were identified using CPT codes for patients with diabetes. Data were derived from claims submitted by the UMass Memorial Managed Care network to four insurance programs via CPT billing code for comprehensive and DR screening exams for patients with diabetes. Over one million claims for the years 01/2018-05/2022 were collected.

RESULTS

We found a significant decrease in unadjusted DR screening rates in the post-lockdown period compared to the pre-COVID-19 period (p < 0.001). Bivariate analysis revealed a 15.1% decrease in weekly DR screenings during post-lockdown (RR = 0.849, 95% CI = 0.811, 0.888). After adjusting for seasonal variation, the mean weekly DR screening rate was 12% lower in the post-lockdown period, with a 95% CI of 6.1% to 17.5% decrease (Adjusted RR = 0.880, 95% CI = 0.825, 0.939 Stratified analysis based on patient status revealed a significant decrease in adjusted DR screening rates for established patients post-lockdown compared to pre-pandemic (p < 0.0001), while no significant difference was observed for new patients (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The impact of COVID-19 on DR screening and treatment rates persisted even after the resumption of non-essential care services, with a discrepancy between new and established patients. Future research should work to identify and overcome the barriers to DR screening.

Impact of COVID-19 on a real-world treat-and-extend regimen with aflibercept for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on injection intervals among patients treated for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients treated at a single practice using a treat-and-extend regimen with intravitreal aflibercept between December 2018 and April 2021.

METHODS

The primary outcome was the change in injection intervals. Secondary outcomes included differences in best-recorded visual acuity (BRVA) and central subfield thickness (CST). Associations were evaluated with linear mixed-effects modelling.

RESULTS

This study included 1839 injections from 185 eyes (141 patients). The median (interquartile range) injection intervals in the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods were 60 (42-70) and 70 (49-90) days, respectively. The pandemic was associated with a mean injection interval lengthening of 7.2 days (P < 0.001), a decrease in BRVA of 3.1 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (P < 0.001), and a reduction in CST of 14.7 μm (P = 0.003). The presence of exudative intraretinal fluid was associated with a reduction in treatment intervals of 11.1 days (P < 0.001), a reduction in BRVA of 1.9 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (P < 0.001), and an increase in CST of 52.4 μm (P < 0.001). The presence of subretinal fluid was associated with a reduction in treatment intervals of 8.5 days (P < 0.001) and an increase in CST of 21.6 μm (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study estimated that the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic resulted in an injection extension of 7.2 days with associated decreases in BRVA and CST that are unlikely clinically significant on a population basis. This builds on evidence suggesting that long-term vascular endothelial growth factor suppression can facilitate meaningful interval extensions while maintaining visual acuity.

Long-term results of the treatment of patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration during the COVID-19 pandemic

PURPOSE

To quantify the long-term impact (24 months) on the visual results and activity of neovascular lesions of COVID-19 confinement in patients with nAMD in our population.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study of patients with nAMD who attended consultation or were treated during the 3 months before confinement was carried out.

RESULTS

144 patients (168 eyes) with nAMD were included, 51 of them (35.42%) came during confinement, and at 24 months the final cohort was 118 patients (133 eyes). The previous VA of 57.99 ± 23.68 letters decreased, clinically relevant and statistically significant, by an average of 6.87 (±16.84) and 7.89 (±19.58) at 12- and 24-months follow-up. This change differs significantly from the two-year vision change observed in the national database of pretreated patients. The median number of injections and consultations is lower in our group at 12 months, compared to the pre-pandemic national database, and tends to equalize at 24 months. We did not find differences in vision when we compared patients who attended consultations during confinement or in treatment intervals greater than 8 weeks (Tq8w).

CONCLUSIONS

The VA of patients with nAMD decreased significantly after confinement, probably due to the lower number of antiangiogenic injections and consultations during the first year, and did not recover during the second year despite the increase in the number of injections and visits close to those reported before confinement.

RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSIONS BEFORE AND DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: Visual Outcomes and Treatment Patterns in a Country with no Mandatory Lockdown

PURPOSE

To investigate the incidence, treatment patterns, and visual outcomes in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and central RVO before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in a country with no mandatory lockdown.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 788 patients presenting with a RVO during the years 2019 to 2022 at St. Erik Eye Hospital. The control group and study groups consisted of patients presenting before and during the pandemic, respectively.

RESULTS

The incidence of diagnosed RVO cases decreased from 281 patients before the pandemic to 236 patients during the first year of the pandemic ( P < 0.05). In patients with branch RVO at the end of follow-up, the best-corrected visual acuity improved 10.3 letters (95% confidence intervals [CI] 7.6-12.9) in the control group compared with 14.3 letters (95% CI 12.6-16.0) in the study groups ( P < 0.05). In patients with central RVO, the best-corrected visual acuity improved 6.3 letters (95% CI 2.7-10.0) in the control group compared with 8.6 letters (95% CI 5.7-11.4) in the study groups (p = NS). Overall, the number of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections increased from 7.0 (95% CI 6.6-7.3) in the control group to 7.6 (95% CI 7.4-7.8) in the study groups ( P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Good visual and anatomical outcomes were sustained, and the number of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections increased significantly in patients with RVO during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated disruptions in health-care provision on clinical outcomes in people with diabetes: a systematic review

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered disruptions to health care and lifestyles that could conceivably impact diabetes management. We set out to identify the impact of disruptions caused by COVID-19 on clinical outcomes in people with diabetes. We performed a systematic review of the available literature in the MEDLINE and OVID databases from Jan 1, 2020, to June 7, 2023, and included 138 studies (n>1 000 000 people). All but five studies were judged to be at some risk of bias. All studies compared prepandemic with pandemic periods. All-cause mortality (six studies) and diabetes-related mortality (13 studies) showed consistent increases, and most studies indicated increases in sight loss (six studies). In adult and mixed samples, data generally suggested no difference in diabetic ketoacidosis frequency or severity, whereas in children and adolescents most studies showed increases with some due to new-onset diabetes (69 studies). Data suggested decreases in hospital admissions in adults but increases in diabetes-related admissions to paediatric intensive care units (35 studies). Data were equivocal on diabetic foot ulcer presentations (nine studies), emergency department admissions (nine studies), and overall amputation rates (20 studies). No studies investigated renal failure. Where reported, the impact was most pronounced for females, younger people, and racial and ethnic minority groups. Further studies are needed to investigate the longer-term impact of the pandemic and the on potential differential impacts, which risk further exacerbating existing inequalities within people with diabetes.

Disruption of diabetes and hypertension care during the COVID-19 pandemic and recovery approaches in the Latin America and Caribbean region: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted primary healthcare globally, with particular impacts on diabetes and hypertension care. This review will examine the impact of pandemic disruptions of diabetes and hypertension care services and the evidence for interventions to mitigate or reverse pandemic disruptions in the Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) region.

METHODS AND ANALYSES

This scoping review will examine care delivery disruption and approaches for recovery of primary healthcare in the LAC region during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on diabetes and hypertension awareness, detection, treatment and control. Guided by Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology framework, this protocol adheres to the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for scoping review protocols and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance for protocol development and scoping reviews. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Global Health, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science and LILACS for peer-reviewed literature published from 2020 to 12 December 2022 in English, Spanish or Portuguese. Studies will be considered eligible if reporting data on pandemic disruptions to primary care services within LAC, or interventions implemented to mitigate or reverse pandemic disruptions globally. Studies on COVID-19 or acute care will be excluded. Two reviewers will independently screen each title/abstract for eligibility, screen full texts of titles/abstracts deemed relevant and extract data from eligible full-text publications. Conflicts will be resolved through discussion and with the help of a third reviewer. Appropriate analytical techniques will be employed to synthesise the data, for example, frequency counts and descriptive statistics. Quality will be assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No ethics approval was needed as this is a scoping review of published literature. Results will be disseminated in a report to the World Bank and the Pan American Health Organization, in peer-reviewed scientific journals, and at national and international conferences.

Intravitreal Injection Planning during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Study of Two Tertiary University Centers in Italy

The COVID-19 pandemic has hampered the optimum management of retinal diseases. This study examined the impact of the pandemic on the intravitreal-injection practice in two academic centers in Italy along with the related medico-legal implications. A retrospective analysis of electronic medical records from 16 March 2020 to 14 March 2021 at the ophthalmological departments of University of Cagliari (SGD) and University Magna Græcia of Catanzaro (UMG) was conducted. The data collected between 16 March 2020 and 14 June 2020 (lockdown), 15 June 2020 and 13 September 2020 (unlock), and 14 September 2020 and 14 March 2021 (second wave) were compared with those of the same period of the previous year. Weekly data on the administered drug and the number and type of treated disease were collected and analyzed. During the lockdown, a drop of 59% at SGD (p < 0.00001) and 77% at UMG (p < 0.00001) in intravitreal injections was found. In the first year of the pandemic, the reduction in injections was approximately of 27% (p < 0.0008) and 38% (p < 0.0001) at SGD and UMG, respectively. The COVID-19-related containment measures and the health resources redistribution have led to a delay in the treatment of chronic diseases of the retina, prioritizing the undeferrable ones. The lack of management guidelines has conceived relevant ethical and medico-legal issues that need to be considered in future measures planning.