Vasopressin inhibits endotoxin-induced upregulation of inflammatory mediators in activated macrophages

Microbial and Host Metabolites at the Backstage of Fever: Current Knowledge about the Co-Ordinate Action of Receptors and Molecules Underlying Pathophysiology and Clinical Implications

Fever represents an elevation of body temperature, that exerts a protective effect against pathogens. Innate immune cells and neurons are implicated in the regulation of body temperature. Pathogen-associated molecular patterns, i.e., lipopolysaccharides from Gram-negative bacteria and peptidoglycan and lipoteichoic acid from Gram-positive bacteria are exogenous pyrogens, that bind to Toll-like receptors on immune and non-immune cells. The subsequent release of pro-inflammatory cytokines [interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-6 and Tumor necrosis factor-alpha] and their passage through the brain trigger the febrile response. In fact, neurons of the pre-optic area produce prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), that, in turn, bind to the PGE2 receptors; thus, generating fever. Apart from classical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, i.e., aspirin and acetaminophen, various botanicals are currently used as antipyretic agents and, therefore, their mechanisms of action will be elucidated.

Oxytocin and Vasopressin Systems in Obesity and Metabolic Health: Mechanisms and Perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The neurohypophysial endocrine system is identified here as a potential target for therapeutic interventions toward improving obesity-related metabolic dysfunction, given its coinciding pleiotropic effects on psychological, neurological and metabolic systems that are disrupted in obesity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Copeptin, the C-terminal portion of the precursor of arginine-vasopressin, is positively associated with body mass index and risk of type 2 diabetes. Plasma oxytocin is decreased in obesity and several other conditions of abnormal glucose homeostasis. Recent data also show non-classical tissues, such as myocytes, hepatocytes and β-cells, exhibit responses to oxytocin and vasopressin receptor binding that may contribute to alterations in metabolic function. The modulation of anorexigenic and orexigenic pathways appears to be the dominant mechanism underlying the effects of oxytocin and vasopressin on body weight regulation; however, there are apparent limitations associated with their use in direct pharmacological applications. A clearer picture of their wider physiological effects is needed before either system can be considered for therapeutic use.

Comprehensive biology of antipyretic pathways

Pyrogens, the fever inducing substances accidently enter into a human body through contamination from medical or pharmaceutical products may create mild to severe complications including septicaemia and shocking syndromes. To avoid such drastic situations all the pharmaceuticals and medical devices are analysed for presence of pyrogens prior to their release into market. The entry of exogenous pyrogens like bacterial endotoxins induces the release of endogenous pyrogens or inflammatory cytokines that activate immune system to defend against these pathogens. Generation of heat is considered as one of the important defence mechanism of body achieved through receptor mediated interaction of endogenous pyrogens at the thermoregulatory centre of hypothalamus. However, uncontrolled fever and febrile reaction may cause lethal effects to the subject itself. So a well sophistically functioning antipyretic mechanism is necessary to achieve thermoregulation. The coordinated interaction of antipyretic cytokines and other mediators are active in human immune system which play a crucial role in maintaining thermal homeostasis. The multiple interacting antipyretic signals and their mechanism are the major subjects of this review.

Immune therapy in sepsis: Are we ready to try again?

Immune therapy to ease the burden of sepsis has thus far failed to consistently improve patient outcomes. Advances in cancer immune therapy and awareness that prolonged immune-suppression in sepsis can leave patients vulnerable to secondary infection and death have driven resurgence in the field of sepsis immune-therapy investigation. As we develop and evaluate these novel therapies, we must learn from past experiences where single-mediator targeted immune therapies were blindly delivered to heterogeneous patient cohorts with complex and evolving immune responses. Advances in genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and point-of-care technology, coupled with a better understanding of sepsis pathogenesis, have meant that personalised immune-therapy is on the horizon. Here, we review the complex immune pathogenesis in sepsis and the contemporary immune therapies that are being investigated to manipulate this response. An outline of the immune biomarkers that may be used to support this approach is also provided.

Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Is Involved in Mediating the Anti-inflammation Effects of Vasopressin

Vasopressin possesses potent anti-inflammatory capacity. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and its downstream activator Akt contribute to endogenous anti-inflammation capacity. We sought to elucidate whether PI3K is involved in mediating the anti-inflammation effects of vasopressin. Macrophages (RAW264.7 cells) were randomized to receive endotoxin, endotoxin plus vasopressin, or endotoxin plus vasopressin plus the nonselective PI3K inhibitor (LY294002) or the selective isoform inhibitor of PI3Kα (PIK-75), PI3Kβ (TGX-221), PI3Kδ (IC-87114), or PI3Kγ (AS-252424). Compared to macrophages treated with endotoxin, the concentrations of cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6) and chemokine (macrophage inflammatory protein-2) in macrophages treated with endotoxin plus vasopressin were significantly lower (all P < 0.05). The concentrations of phosphorylated nuclear factor-κB p65 (p-NF-κB p65) in nuclear extracts and phosphorylated inhibitor-κBα (p-I-κBα) in cytosolic extracts as well as NF-κB-DNA binding activity were also lower (all P < 0.05). Of note, except for macrophages treated with endotoxin plus vasopressin plus PIK-75, the concentrations of cytokines, chemokine, p-NF-κB p65, and p-I-κBα as well as NF-κB-DNA binding activity in macrophages treated with endotoxin plus vasopressin plus LY294002, TGX-221, IC-87114, or AS-252424 were significantly higher than those in macrophages treated with endotoxin plus vasopressin (all P < 0.05). In contrast, the phosphorylated Akt concentration in macrophages treated with endotoxin plus vasopressin was significantly higher than that in macrophages treated with endotoxin or in macrophages treated with endotoxin plus vasopressin plus LY294002, TGX-221, IC-87114, or AS-252424, but not PIK-75. These data confirmed that PI3K, especially the isoforms of PI3Kβ, PI3Kδ, and PI3Kγ, is involved in mediating the anti-inflammatory effects of vasopressin.

Vasopressin in Septic Shock; Assessment of Sepsis Biomarkers: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Background and Aims:

Vasopressin (VP) in sepsis apart from vasoconstrictive effect may have some immunomodulatory effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of VP on different aspect of sepsis by measuring of sepsis biomarkers.

Materials and Methods:

In this trial, a total number of 42 septic shock patients were included. The first group received norepinephrine (NE) infusion to reach the target mean arterial pressure (MAP) of ≥ 65 mm Hg and the second group received arginine vasopressin (AVP) infusion in addition to NE. Serum lactate, C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-10, pentraxin 3 (PTX3), angiopoietin 1 and 2 (Ang 1 and 2) levels were assessed.

Results:

Level of IL-6 and IL-10 decreased, but there was no significant difference between the two groups after 48 h. CRP and PTX3 levels were not also significantly different between groups. Although Angs were not statistically different, there was a trend toward higher Ang-1 in and lower Ang 2 in AVP group after 24 and 48 h. In addition, lactate level did not differ between NE and AVP groups. There was no interaction between VP and hydrocortisone use on IL-6, IL-10, and PTX3, but a significant statistical interaction on Ang 1 and Ang 2 were observed.

Conclusions:

Although analysis of sepsis biomarkers showed no significant difference between two groups, no immunomodulatory effect for VP alone, subgroup analysis of hydrocortisone used in this study showed that the combination of glucocorticoids and AVP had a significant effect on Angs level which eventually causes less endothelial permeability and higher MAP in this group of patients.

Vasopressin inhibits endotoxin binding in activated macrophages

BACKGROUND

Vasopressin possesses potent anti-inflammatory effects. Endotoxin recognition (mediated by cluster of differentiation 14 [CD14]), endotoxin binding, and subsequent nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) activation are essential mechanisms for initiation of the inflammatory response. We elucidated the effects of vasopressin on these essential mechanisms of inflammation with the hypothesis that vasopressin could inhibit CD14 expression, endotoxin binding, and NF-κB activation in activated macrophages.

METHODS

Murine macrophage-like cell line RAW264.7 cells were stimulated with endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide [LPS]; 100 ng/mL) or LPS plus vasopressin (1000 pg/mL; designated as the LPS and the LPS + V groups, respectively). After reaction, between-group differences in inflammatory molecule concentrations and levels of NF-κB activation, endotoxin-macrophages binding, and CD14 expression were compared. Analysis of variance was performed for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The concentrations of chemokine macrophage inflammatory protein 2 and cytokine interleukin 6 of the LPS + V group were significantly lower than those of the LPS group (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001). The nuclear concentration of phosphorylated NF-κB p65 and cytosolic concentration of phosphorylated inhibitor-κBα of the LPS + V group were significantly lower than those of the LPS group (all P < 0.05). In addition, the level of endotoxin-macrophages binding of the LPS + V group was significantly lower than that of the LPS group (P < 0.001). The level of surface CD14 expression of the LPS + V group was also significantly lower than that of the LPS group (P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed the potent anti-inflammatory effects of vasopressin. The mechanisms underlying the anti-inflammatory effects of vasopressin may involve its effects on inhibiting CD14 expression, endotoxin binding, and subsequent NF-κB activation.