Difficulties in performing clinical trials of antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children

Drugging Hijacked Kinase Pathways in Pediatric Oncology: Opportunities and Current Scenario

Childhood cancer is considered rare, corresponding to ~3% of all malignant neoplasms in the human population. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports a universal occurrence of more than 15 cases per 100,000 inhabitants around the globe, and despite improvements in diagnosis, treatment and supportive care, one child dies of cancer every 3 min. Consequently, more efficient, selective and affordable therapeutics are still needed in order to improve outcomes and avoid long-term sequelae. Alterations in kinases' functionality is a trademark of cancer and the concept of exploiting them as drug targets has burgeoned in academia and in the pharmaceutical industry of the 21st century. Consequently, an increasing plethora of inhibitors has emerged. In the present study, the expression patterns of a selected group of kinases (including tyrosine receptors, members of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and MAPK pathways, coordinators of cell cycle progression, and chromosome segregation) and their correlation with clinical outcomes in pediatric solid tumors were accessed through the R2: Genomics Analysis and Visualization Platform and by a thorough search of published literature. To further illustrate the importance of kinase dysregulation in the pathophysiology of pediatric cancer, we analyzed the vulnerability of different cancer cell lines against their inhibition through the Cancer Dependency Map portal, and performed a search for kinase-targeted compounds with approval and clinical applicability through the CanSAR knowledgebase. Finally, we provide a detailed literature review of a considerable set of small molecules that mitigate kinase activity under experimental testing and clinical trials for the treatment of pediatric tumors, while discuss critical challenges that must be overcome before translation into clinical options, including the absence of compounds designed specifically for childhood tumors which often show differential mutational burdens, intrinsic and acquired resistance, lack of selectivity and adverse effects on a growing organism.

Hemostatic and thrombotic disorders in the pediatric patient

This review focuses on significant advances in the field of pediatric hemostasis and thrombosis, with a focus on published studies within the past decade. The evaluation and management of patients with excessive bleeding remain cornerstones of consultative hematology. We will describe the development of validated bleeding assessment tools relevant to pediatric practice, laboratory advances in the evaluation of von Willebrand disease, and a shift in clinical practice regarding the interpretation of normal coagulation studies in patients with significant bleeding phenotypes. There have also been critical advances in the management of hemostatic disorders. This review highlights new treatment paradigms in hemophilia and the rise of multidisciplinary medical homes for women living with bleeding disorders. Given the continued increase in the incidence of thrombosis, particularly in the hospital setting, a full call to arms against pediatric venous thromboembolism is now essential. We will describe recently completed clinical trials of direct oral anticoagulants in children and adolescents and ongoing work to elucidate the appropriate duration of therapy for children with provoked thrombosis. Recent work regarding the prevention of pediatric venous thromboembolism is highlighted, including studies of thromboprophylaxis and the development of risk prediction models for hospital-acquired thrombosis. Finally, we review advances in our understanding of thrombotic sequelae and the need for continued refinement of our evaluation tools. Despite the significant advances in pediatric hemostasis and thrombosis over the past decade, many unanswered questions remain for the next generation of investigators.

Efficacy of Early Prophylaxis Against Catheter-Associated Thrombosis in Critically Ill Children: A Bayesian Phase 2b Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES

We obtained preliminary evidence on the efficacy of early prophylaxis on the risk of central venous catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis and its effect on thrombin generation in critically ill children.

DESIGN

Bayesian phase 2b randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

Seven PICUs.

PATIENTS

Children less than 18 years old with a newly inserted central venous catheter and at low risk of bleeding.

INTERVENTION

Enoxaparin adjusted to anti-Xa level of 0.2-0.5 international units/mL started at less than 24 hours after insertion of central venous catheter (enoxaparin arm) versus usual care without placebo (usual care arm).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

At the interim analysis, the proportion of central venous catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis on ultrasonography in the usual care arm, which was 54.2% of 24 children, was significantly higher than that previously reported. This resulted in misspecification of the preapproved Bayesian analysis, reversal of direction of treatment effect, and early termination of the randomized clinical trial. Nevertheless, with 30.4% of 23 children with central venous catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis on ultrasonography in the enoxaparin arm, risk ratio of central venous catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis was 0.55 (95% credible interval, 0.24-1.11). Including children without ultrasonography, clinically relevant central venous catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis developed in one of 27 children (3.7%) in the enoxaparin arm and seven of 24 (29.2%) in the usual care arm (p = 0.02). Clinically relevant bleeding developed in one child randomized to the enoxaparin arm. Response profile of endogenous thrombin potential, a measure of thrombin generation, was not statistically different between trial arms.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest the efficacy and safety of early prophylaxis that should be validated in a pivotal randomized clinical trial.

Safety of dabigatran etexilate for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in children

This open-label, single-arm, prospective cohort trial is the first phase 3 safety study to describe outcomes in children treated with dabigatran etexilate for secondary venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention. Eligible children aged 12 to <18 years (age stratum 1), 2 to <12 years (stratum 2), and >3 months to <2 years (stratum 3) had an objectively confirmed diagnosis of VTE treated with standard of care (SOC) for ≥3 months, or had completed dabigatran or SOC treatment in the DIVERSITY trial (NCT01895777) and had an unresolved clinical thrombosis risk factor requiring further anticoagulation. Children received dabigatran for up to 12 months, or less if the identified VTE clinical risk factor resolved. Primary end points included VTE recurrence, bleeding events, and mortality at 6 and 12 months. Overall, 203 children received dabigatran, with median exposure being 36.3 weeks (range, 0-57 weeks); 171 of 203 (84.2%) and 32 of 203 (15.8%) took capsules and pellets, respectively. Overall, 2 of 203 children (1.0%) experienced on-treatment VTE recurrence, and 3 of 203 (1.5%) experienced major bleeding events, with 2 (1.0%) reporting clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events, and 37 (18.2%) minor bleeding events. There were no on-treatment deaths. On-treatment postthrombotic syndrome was reported for 2 of 162 children (1.2%) who had deep vein thrombosis or central-line thrombosis as their most recent VTE. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships of dabigatran were similar to those in adult VTE patients. In summary, dabigatran showed a favorable safety profile for secondary VTE prevention in children aged from >3 months to <18 years with persistent VTE risk factor(s). This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02197416.

A multi-national trial of a direct oral anticoagulant in children with cardiac disease: Design and rationale of the Safety of ApiXaban On Pediatric Heart disease On the preventioN of Embolism (SAXOPHONE) study

Anticoagulation in children is problematic for multiple reasons. Currently used anticoagulants have significant disadvantages and may negatively affect quality of life (QOL). This manuscript describes the design, rationale, and methods of a prospective, randomized, open label phase II multi-national clinical trial of a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), apixaban, in children and infants with congenital and acquired heart disease. This trial is designed to gather preliminary safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) data, as well as generate data on QOL of individuals taking apixaban compared to the standard of care (SOC) anticoagulants vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). A key issue this trial seeks to address is the practice of using therapeutics tested in adult trials in the pediatric population without robust pediatric safety or efficacy data. Pediatric heart diseases are not common, and specific diagnoses often meet the criteria of a rare disease; thus, statistical efficacy may be difficult to achieve. This trial will provide valuable PK and safety data intended to inform clinical practice for anticoagulation in pediatric heart diseases, a setting in which a fully powered phase III clinical trial is not feasible. A second consideration this trial addresses is that metrics besides efficacy, such as QOL, have not been traditionally used as endpoints in regulated anticoagulation studies yet may add substantial weight to the clinical decision for use of a DOAC in place of VKA or LMWH. This study examines QOL related to both heart disease and anticoagulation among children randomized to either SOC or apixaban. There are considerable strengths and benefits to conducting a clinical trial in pediatric rare disease populations via an industry-academic collaboration. The SAXOPHONE study represents a collaboration between Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS)/Pfizer Alliance, and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's (NHLBI) Pediatric Heart Network (PHN) and may be an attractive model for future pediatric drug trials.

Design and rationale for the DIVERSITY study: An open-label, randomized study of dabigatran etexilate for pediatric venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

The current standard of care (SOC) for pediatric venous thromboembolism (VTE) comprises unfractionated heparin (UFH), or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) followed by LMWH or vitamin K antagonists, all of which have limitations. Dabigatran etexilate (DE) has demonstrated efficacy and safety for adult VTE and has the potential to overcome some of the limitations of the current SOC. Pediatric trials are needed to establish dosing in children and to confirm that results obtained in adults are applicable in the pediatric setting.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the design and rationale of a planned phase IIb/III trial that will evaluate a proposed dosing algorithm for DE and assess the safety and efficacy of DE versus SOC for pediatric VTE treatment.

PATIENTS/METHODS

An open-label, randomized, parallel-group noninferiority study will be conducted in approximately 180 patients aged 0 to <18 years with VTE, who have received initial UFH or LMWH treatment and who are expected to require ≥3 months of anticoagulation therapy. Patients will receive DE or SOC for 3 months. DE will be administered twice daily as capsules, pellets, or an oral liquid formulation according to patient age. Initial doses will be calculated using a proposed dosing algorithm.

RESULTS

There will be two coprimary endpoints: a composite efficacy endpoint comprising the proportion of patients with complete thrombus resolution, freedom from recurrent VTE and VTE-related mortality, and a safety endpoint: freedom from major bleeding events.

CONCLUSION

Findings will provide valuable information regarding the efficacy and safety of DE for the treatment of pediatric VTE. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT01895777.

Heparin for the treatment of thrombosis in neonates

BACKGROUND

Among pediatric patients, newborns are at highest risk of developing thromboembolism. Neonatal thromboembolic (TE) events may consist of both venous and arterial thromboses and often iatrogenic complications (eg, central catheterization). Treatment guidelines for pediatric patients with TE events most often are extrapolated from the literature regarding adults. Options for the management of neonatal TE events include expectant management; nitroglycerin ointment; thrombolytic therapy or anticoagulant therapy, or a combination of the two; and surgery. Since the 1990s, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has become the neonatal anticoagulant of choice. Reasons for its appeal include predictable dose response, no need for venous access, and limited monitoring requirements. The overall major complication rate is around 5%. Whether preterm infants are at increased risk is unclear. No data are available on the frequency of osteoporosis, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), or other hypersensitivity reactions in children and neonates exposed to LMWH.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether heparin treatment (both unfractionated heparin [UFH] and LMWH) reduces mortality and morbidity rates in preterm and term newborn infants with diagnosed thrombosis. The intervention is compared with placebo or no treatment. Also, to assess the safety of heparin therapy (both UFH and LMWH) for potential harms.Subgroup analyses were planned to examine gestational age, birth weight, mode of thrombus diagnosis, presence of a central line, positive family history for genetic disorders (thrombophilia, deficiency of protein S and protein C, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase [MTHFR] mutation), route of heparin administration, type of heparin used, and location of thrombus (see "Subgroup analysis and investigation of heterogeneity").

SEARCH METHODS

We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2016, Issue 4), MEDLINE via PubMed (1966 to May 9, 2016), Embase (1980 to May 9, 2016), and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL; 1982 to May 9, 2016). We searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized, quasi-randomized, and cluster-randomized controlled trials comparing heparin versus placebo or no treatment in preterm and term neonates with a diagnosis of thrombosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. Two review authors independently assessed studies identified by the search strategy for inclusion.

MAIN RESULTS

Our search strategy yielded 1160 references. Two review authors independently assessed all references for inclusion. We found no completed studies and no ongoing trials for inclusion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no studies that met our inclusion criteria and no evidence from randomized controlled trials to recommend or refute the use of heparin for treatment of neonates with thrombosis.

Safety and Efficacy Outcomes of Home and Hospital Warfarin Management Within a Pediatric Anticoagulation Clinic

The complexity of managing children with chronic disease has led to an increase in the use of long-term warfarin therapy. Time in therapeutic range (TTR) is the preferred method for determining efficacy and stability of warfarin management. This study aimed to determine the TTR achievement and incidence of adverse events among pediatric warfarin patients managed by an anticoagulation clinic over 12 months and to compare TTR achievement between patients self-testing (PST) at home and those monitored using routine methods. International normalized ratio (INR) results reported for 2012 for children currently having their warfarin therapy managed by a dedicated pediatric anticoagulation clinic were analyzed. Warfarin-related adverse events were recorded. A total of 164 patients were included. In total, 93 children performed PST and 71 children tested their INR at a hospital or pathology service. TTR achievement for the cohort was 67.1% (95% confidence interval, 64.4-69.7). A total of 69.2% of INR tests conducted at home were within the TTR compared with 64.3% of INR tests conducted at a hospital or pathology service (P=0.07). One major bleeding event occurred and there was 1 thrombotic episode. PST demonstrated noninferior warfarin stability compared with routine methods. Routine outcome evaluation of pediatric anticoagulation management within single institutions is necessary to confirm the success of such programs.

Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound for catheter-related thrombosis in children

BACKGROUND

Compared with consultative US performed by the radiology department, point-of-care US performed by non-radiology physicians can accurately diagnose deep venous thrombosis in adults.

OBJECTIVE

In preparation for a multicenter randomized controlled trial, we determined the accuracy of point-of-care US in diagnosing central venous catheter-related thrombosis in critically ill children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Children <18 years old with a central venous catheter who were admitted to the intensive care unit were enrolled. Consultative and point-of-care compression ultrasounds with Doppler were done on the vein where the catheter was inserted within 24 h after insertion. Repeat US was obtained within 24 h of removal of the catheter. All images were centrally, blindly and independently adjudicated for thrombosis by a team of pediatric radiologists. Chance-corrected agreement between readings was calculated.

RESULTS

From 84 children, 152 pairs of consultative and point-of-care ultrasounds were analyzed. A total of 38 (25.0%) consultative and 17 (11.2%) point-of-care ultrasounds were positive for thrombosis. The chance-corrected agreement between consultative and point-of-care ultrasounds was 0.17 (standard error: 0.07; P = 0.008). With consultative US as a reference, the sensitivity of point-of-care US was 28.1% (95% confidence interval: 13.7%-46.7%) with a specificity of 91.8% (95% confidence interval: 84.4%-96.4%). A catheter in the subclavian vein was associated with discordant readings (adjusted odds ratio: 4.00; 95% confidence interval: 1.45-13.94).

CONCLUSION

Point-of-care US, when performed by non-radiology physicians and centrally adjudicated by pediatric radiologists in the setting of a multicenter randomized controlled trial, may not accurately diagnose catheter-related thrombosis in critically ill children.

Improving evidence on anticoagulant therapies for venous thromboembolism in children: key challenges and opportunities

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increasingly diagnosed in pediatric patients, and anticoagulant use in this population has become common, despite the absence of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for this indication. Guidelines for the use of anticoagulants in pediatrics are largely extrapolated from large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults, smaller dose-finding and observational studies in children, and expert opinion. The recently FDA-approved direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, provide potential advantages over oral vitamin K antagonists and subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs). However, key questions arise regarding their potential off-label clinical application in pediatric thromboembolic disease. In this Perspective, we provide background on the use of LMWHs such as enoxaparin as the mainstay of treatment of pediatric provoked VTE; identify key questions and challenges with regard to DOAC trials and future DOAC therapy in pediatric VTE; and discuss applicable lessons learned from the recent pilot/feasibility phase of a large multicenter RCT of anticoagulant duration in pediatric VTE. The challenges and lessons learned present opportunities to improve evidence for anticoagulant therapies in pediatric VTE through future clinical trials.

UNBLOCK: an open-label, dose-finding, pharmacokinetic and safety study of bivalirudin in children with deep vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Direct thrombin inhibitors offer potential advantages over unfractionated heparin but have been poorly studied in children.

OBJECTIVES

To determine appropriate dosing of bivalirudin in children and adolescents and the relationship between activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and plasma bivalirudin concentration.

PATIENTS/METHODS

The UNBLOCK (UtilizatioN of BivaLirudin On Clots in Kids) study was an open-label, single-arm, dose-finding, pharmacokinetic, safety and efficacy study of bivalirudin for the acute treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in children aged 6 months to 18 years. Drug initiation consisted of a bolus dose (0.125 mg kg(-1) ) followed by continuous infusion (0.125 mg kg h(-1) ). Dose adjustments were based on the APTT, targeting a range of 1.5-2.5 times each patient's baseline APTT. Safety was assessed by specific bleeding endpoints and efficacy by repeat imaging at 48-72 h and 25-35 days.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients completed the study. Following the bolus dose and the initial infusion rate, most patients' APTT values were within the target range. The infusion rate bivalirudin correlated more closely with drug concentration than the APTT. At 48-72 h, nine (50%) patients had complete or partial thrombus resolution, increasing to 16 (89%) at 25-35 days. No major and one minor bleeding event occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Bivalirudin demonstrated reassuring safety and noteworthy efficacy in terms of early clot resolution in children and adolescents with DVT. Although a widely available and familiar monitoring tool, the APTT correlates poorly with plasma bivalirudin concentration, possibly limiting its utility in managing pediatric patients receiving bivalirudin for DVT.

Multicenter dose-finding and efficacy and safety outcomes in neonates and children treated with dalteparin for acute venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) constitute the mainstay of anticoagulant therapy for pediatric venous thromboembolism (VTE). The safety and effectiveness of dalteparin, an LMWH, has not been established in children, and pediatric data on dalteparin for VTE are limited to one single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE

To establish dose-finding (primary endpoint) and efficacy/safety outcomes (secondary endpoints) in children treated with dalteparin in a substudy of the Kids-DOTT trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective multicenter trial using dalteparin subcutaneously twice daily for acute VTE in children aged ≤ 21 years was conducted under an investigator-held Investigational New Drug application registered with the US Food and Drug Administration. Initial weight-based dosing per protocol was as follows: infants (< 12 months), 150 IU kg(-1) ; children (1-12 years), 125 IU kg(-1) ; and adolescents (13-18 years), 100 IU kg(-1) . Bleeding events were categorized according to ISTH criteria. Descriptive non-parametric statistics were employed for all analyses.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (67% male) were enrolled from January 2010 to October 2013 across four centers. No supratherapeutic levels were observed. Median (range) therapeutic doses by age group were as follows: infants (n = 3), 180 IU kg(-1) (146-181 IU kg(-1) ); children (n = 7), 125 IU kg(-1) (101-175 IU kg(-1) ); and adolescents (n = 8), 100 IU kg(-1) (91-163 IU kg(-1) ). The median duration of dalteparin use was 48 days (range: 2-169 days), and the median follow-up was 10.5 months (range: 2-35 months). There were no related serious adverse events, no clinically relevant bleeding events, and no symptomatic recurrent VTEs.

CONCLUSION

Dalteparin successfully achieved targeted anti-factor Xa levels in 18 children and young adults with acute VTE with a standardized age-based dosing regimen, with a favorable safety and efficacy profile.

Quality of life assessment in children commencing home INR self-testing

INTRODUCTION

Management of oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) in children is complex and frequent testing of the International Normalised Ratio (INR) is a significant burden. This study evaluates the impact of a home INR self-testing (home ST) program on the quality of life (QoL) of children and their families. The aim of the study was to determine if participation in a home ST program improves QoL for children requiring long-term OAT and their families.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Children aged eight to 18 years requiring long-term OAT and parents of children participated. Quantitative methods comprised three validated QoL questionnaires; the anticoagulation specific PAC QL©, the PedsQL™ and the PedsQL FIM™. Questionnaires were completed before commencing home ST and 6-12 months later. Qualitative methods consisted of open-ended questions which participants answered when completing the questionnaires for the second time. Results of INRs tested at home were collected.

RESULTS

Fifty-five parents and 35 children participated. The percentage of time the children's INRs were in their target therapeutic range was 71.3. Parents reported statistically significant improvements in QoL for themselves (mean increase 6.9), their family (mean increase 8.6) and their child (mean increase 11.1) following the commencement of home ST (difference p≤0.003 on all questionnaires). The children did not report a statically significant improvement in QoL.

CONCLUSION

Parents reported significant improvement for their child's QoL, their QoL and the families' function following commencement of home ST. Children did not report a significant improvement in their QoL, but clearly identified satisfaction with home ST.

Warfarin anticoagulation after congenital heart surgery at a large children's hospital

Management of warfarin in pediatric patients remains a clinical challenge. Warfarin may be administered after congenital heart surgery, and the risks of morbidity can be high. Currently, no data exist to describe the initiation of warfarin and the risk factors for morbidity in post-congenital heart surgery patients. This study aimed to characterize the time required to reach anticoagulation for patients administered warfarin therapy after cardiac surgery and to identify and characterize the risk factors for supratherapeutic anticoagulation and adverse events after warfarin initiation. This retrospective study reviewed all patients between 2006 and 2011 who received warfarin anticoagulation after cardiac surgery at our institution. Factors associated with a prolonged time required to reach an international normalized ratio (INR) of 2 and factors related to supratherapeutic anticoagulation (INR ≥ 4) were identified. The inclusion criteria were met by 59 patients. The median time required to reach an INR of at least 2 after initiation of warfarin was 2 days (interquartile range (IQR), 2-4). The only groups that required a significantly longer time to reach an INR of 2 were those with a postoperative delay in initiation of warfarin and those receiving heparin anticoagulation before and during warfarin initiation. Nine patients experienced an INR of 4 or more. However, no thrombotic events occurred, and significant bleeding was uncommon. In the largest reported group of patients undergoing anticoagulation after cardiac surgery, warfarin was well tolerated across all age groups. The median time required to reach an INR of 2 after loading with warfarin was 2 days, and adverse events were uncommon.

Current and future management of pediatric venous thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an increasingly common complication encountered in tertiary care pediatric settings. The purpose of this review is to summarize the epidemiology, current and emerging pharmacotherapeutic options, and management of this disease. Over 70% of VTE occur in children with chronic diseases. Although they are seen in children of all ages, adolescents are at greatest risk. Pediatric VTE is associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality; recurrent VTE and post-thrombotic syndrome are commonly seen in survivors. In recent years, anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin has emerged as the mainstay of therapy, but compliance is limited by its onerous subcutaneous administration route. New anticoagulants either already approved for use in adults or in the pipeline offer the possibility of improved dose stability and oral routes of administration. Current recommended anticoagulation course durations are derived from very limited case series and cohort data, or extrapolations from adult literature. However, the pathophysiologic underpinnings of pediatric VTE are dissimilar from those seen in adults and are often variable within groups of pediatric patients. Clinical studies and trials in pediatric VTE are underway which will hopefully improve the quality of evidence from which therapeutic guidelines are derived.

Argatroban therapy in pediatric patients requiring nonheparin anticoagulation: an open-label, safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic study

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of pediatric patients suffer from thrombotic events necessitating anticoagulation therapy including heparins. Some such patients develop heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and thus require alternative anticoagulation. As such, studies evaluating the safety, efficacy, and dosing of alternative anticoagulants are required.

PROCEDURE

In this multicenter, single arm, open-label study, 18 patients ≤ 16 years old received argatroban for either a suspicion of or being at risk for HIT, or other conditions requiring nonheparin anticoagulation. Endpoints included thrombosis, thromboembolic complications, and bleeding.

RESULTS

Patients (ages, 1.6 weeks to 16 years) received argatroban usually for continuous anticoagulation (n = 13) or cardiac catheterization (n = 4). One catheterization patient received a 250 µg/kg bolus only; 17 patients received argatroban continuous infusion (median (range)) 1.1 (0.3-12) µg/kg/min (of whom four received a bolus) for 3.0 (0.1-13.8) days. In patients without bolus dosing, typically argatroban 1 µg/kg/min was initiated, with therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) (1.5-3× baseline) achieved within 7 hr. Within 30 days, thrombosis occurred in five patients (two during therapy). No one required amputation or died due to thrombosis during therapy. Two patients had major bleeding. Pharmacometric analyses demonstrated the optimal initial argatroban dose to be 0.75 µg/kg/min (if normal hepatic function), with dose reduction necessary in hepatic impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric patients requiring nonheparin anticoagulation, argatroban rapidly provides adequate levels of anticoagulation and is generally well tolerated. For continuous anticoagulation, argatroban 0.75 µg/kg/min (0.2 µg/kg/min in hepatic impairment), adjusted to achieve therapeutic aPTTs, is recommended.

Safety and efficacy of warfarin in paediatric patients with prosthetic cardiac valves: a retrospective audit

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines for warfarin management in children are essentially extrapolated from adult evidence. This study aimed to address that lack of paediatric-specific data regarding warfarin safety and efficacy for this population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective clinical audit was conducted within a cardiac referral centre incorporating a paediatric anticoagulation service. Children (0-16 years) with a prosthetic cardiac valve were included. Warfarin related outcomes were collected between January 1st 2004 and December 31st 2009. Analysis included the percentage of INR tests within, above, or below the target therapeutic range (TTR). Adverse event data was collected regarding major bleeding and thrombotic events.

RESULTS

75 patient years of warfarin therapy were recorded. 44.0% of INR tests were within the TTR. INR tests not within the TTR were twice as likely to be sub-therapeutic. Children with aortic prosthetic valves achieved their TTR less frequently than children with prosthetic mitral or tricuspid valves. There were no thrombotic events and 3 major bleeding events.

CONCLUSIONS

Although less than 50% of INR results were within the TTR, oral anticoagulant management resulted in acceptable safety and efficacy outcomes for this cohort. Further studies are needed to confirm optimal paediatric-specific warfarin management strategies for children with prosthetic heart valves.

Predictive value of pediatric thrombosis diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry

Data on the validity of pediatric thrombosis diagnoses are missing. We aimed to examine the predictive value of a diagnosis of venous and arterial thrombosis using the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR). We identified all first-time diagnoses among children and adolescents (aged 0–18 years) between 1994 and 2006 in DNPR. In total, 1138 potential cases of thrombosis were identified; the medical records were retrieved for 1112 (97.7%) and the positive predictive value (PPV) computed. Overall, the diagnosis of thrombosis was verified in 598 of the 1112 cases, corresponding to a PPV of 53.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 50.8–56.7). Diagnoses from wards had the PPV of 62.5% (95% CI: 59.4–65.6). The predictive value of a thrombosis diagnosis from wards was age-dependent, with a higher PPV (77.4%, 95% CI: 68.7–84.7) in neonates (<28 days) and adolescents (15–18 years) (68.2%; 95% CI: 63.2–72.5)) than in children (28 days–14 years) (51.2%; (95% CI: 46.0–56.4)). The PPV of a thrombosis diagnosis was improved by restricting the analysis to diagnoses from wards, primary diagnoses, and admissions with a length of stay of three or more days. The results indicate that an interpretation of nonvalidated hospital discharge data for pediatric thrombosis in a registry like DNPR should be made with caution.

Primary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in children

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is rare in children and young adolescents, and occurs predominantly in those with congenital heart disease in whom guidelines exist for VTE prophylaxis. For other paediatric patients, the rarity of the event makes writing an evidence-based clinical practice guideline difficult because each of the known risk factors contributes only a small increase in risk. Thrombophilia screening is controversial because few results assist with prediction of likely thrombosis and may not alter recommendations for prophylaxis. Recent publications highlight the importance of non-pharmacological prevention of VTE in children and adolescents undergoing surgery and the importance of liaison among surgeon, anaesthetist and haematologist. This annotation was written with the aim of collating current evidence for VTE prophylaxis and emphasising the need for further research in vulnerable subgroups.

[Prevention of perioperative venous thromboembolism in children]

Venous thromboembolic events (VTE) occur in children at the time of surgery. Few guidelines about how to assess the risk and provide prophylaxis have been developed and published so far. It is uncertain if any of these guidelines have been adopted into clinical practice. The article discusses the specific differences of the haemostatic system throughout childhood, risk assessment, choice and dosing of antithrombotic agents, difficulties in drug monitoring and side effects of treatment including HIT. Current available recommendations and guidelines are summarized. Current evidence on which to base risk stratification and prevention of VTE for children undergoing surgery consists mainly of cohort studies, case series, case reports and expert opinion. Many suggestions are merely extrapolated from results from clinical trials in adults. Primary healthy children who undergo minor surgery including circumcision, herniotomy and appendectomy do not need antithrombotic prophylaxis. Children with multiple risk factors for VTE including severe underlying conditions and long-term immobilization, children with central venous lines and children with a history of VTE should be considered to receive VTE prophylaxis. Older children (Tanner II+) should be treated following adult guidelines. Standard unfractionated heparin and low molecular heparin are the most frequently recommended antithrombotic drugs. Decision for VTE prophylaxis must widely be based on individual risk assessment by experienced physicians. Newly developed scores and guidelines may provide assistance. Well designed clinical studies in children that provide proper evidence on risk assessment for VTE at the time of surgery and investigate safety and efficacy of antithrombotic prophylaxis/treatment are urgently needed.

Clot busting in kids: less PTS?

Goldenberg and colleagues' retrospective analysis of pediatric patients with high-risk, occlusive lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) suggests that thrombolytic therapy with tPA (with or without mechanical thrombolysis) may decrease the risk of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS).

In pursuit of evidence-based treatments for paediatric stroke: the UK and Chest guidelines

BACKGROUND

Arterial ischaemic stroke and cerebral sinovenous thrombosis are increasingly seen in infants and children. Incidence ranges from two to six per 100,000 children a year. Adverse outcome including death, neurological deficits, and reduced quality of life affect most children with stroke. Residual neurological deficits last many decades, for the rest of a patient's life. Of major concern is the risk of recurrent stroke, which affects up to 25% of children who have arterial ischaemic stroke after the newborn period. Children with ischaemic stroke are empirically treated with antithrombotics including antiplatelet (aspirin and clopidogrel) and anticoagulant (heparins and warfarin) drugs. No randomised controlled trials have been done besides those in patients with sickle-cell disease and adult trial data are not directly applicable to paediatric stroke due to maturational differences in coagulation and vascular systems as well as different stroke mechanisms.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

National and international networks of clinical and basic researchers focused on paediatric stroke are now developing. Recently published cohort and case-controlled studies are elucidating stroke mechanisms, outcomes, and treatment safety in children. Two sets of guidelines have been published in the past 6 months. These guidelines differ both in the scope of treatments and subgroups of patients with stroke they cover; however, both focus on ischaemic stroke beyond the newborn period. There are areas of agreement-for children with sickle-cell disease and stroke, both guidelines recommend initial and maintenance transfusion therapy to reduce the proportion of sickle-cell haemoglobin to less than 30%. For children with sinovenous thrombosis or arterial stroke due to dissection or cardiac embolism, both guidelines recommend anticoagulant therapy with warfarin or low molecular weight heparin for 3-6 months. However, the guidelines diverge in their recommendations for the initial treatment of non-haemorrhagic arterial ischaemic stroke, one recommending aspirin and the other 5-7 days of anticoagulants. The guidelines also differ in their recommendations for long-term treatment of children after arterial ischaemic stroke, one set recommending maintenance aspirin in all patients and the other only in children with vasculopathy. These differences arise from both a lack of sufficient evidence and the differing views of neurologists and haematologists in the treatment of paediatric cerebral thrombosis. WHERE NEXT?: Multicentre studies and networks provide increasingly precise data regarding mechanisms, outcomes, and treatment safety in paediatric stroke. These data and networks will enable clinical trials to address areas of divergent opinion and improve the outcome from childhood stroke in the near future.