Dose-escalation study of rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939)--an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor--for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total hip replacement

The safety and efficacy of NOACs versus LMWH for thromboprophylaxis after THA or TKA: A systemic review and meta-analysis

The differences in the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation between different types of new oral anticoagulants(NOACs) and low molecular weight heparin(LMWH) are still controversial. The main purposes of this study were to analyze safety and efficacy of NOACs versus LMWH for thromboprophylaxis, and perform subgroup analyses stratified by individual NOACs and different populations after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI and Wanfang databases until June 31, 2022. This systematic review and meta-analysis included 46 randomized controlled trials (RCT) with 39, 924 patients. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of thromboprophylaxis between LMWH and NOACs. NOACs were more effective in reducing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (RR0.59; 95%CI 0.49-0.71) and adverse events (RR: 0.96; 95%CI: 0.93-0.99) than LMWH. The subgroup analyses for different anticoagulants revealed that rivaroxaban (RR:0.49; 95%CI:0.36-0.66), apixaban (RR: 0.54; 95%CI: 0.36-0.81) and edoxaban (RR:0.49; 95%CI: 0.32-0.75) have the lower risk of DVT than LMWH. Apixaban (RR:0.89; 95%CI: 0.80-1.00) had superior prevention of bleeding to LMWH. Edoxaban exhibited a lower risk of VTE (RR: 0.46; 95%CI: 0.33-0.65), advantage events (RR: 0.87; 95%CI: 0.82-0.93), and drug-related adverse events (DRAEs) (RR: 0.64; 95%CI: 0.53-0.76) than LMWH. East Asian population was superior to western population for preventing DVT, advantage events, and DRAE using NOACs. In conclusion, NOACs are more effective than LMWH at preventing DVT and adverse events after arthroplasty. Apixaban has lower bleeding than LMWH, and East Asian populations may benefit more than western population from NOACs.

Antithrombotic prophylaxis following total hip arthroplasty: a level I Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several clinical investigations have compared different pharmacologic agents for the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, no consensus has been reached. The present investigation compared enoxaparin, fondaparinux, aspirin and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) commonly used as prophylaxis following total hip arthroplasty (THA). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed, setting as outcomes of interest the rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) and major and minor haemorrhages.

METHODS

This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension statement for reporting systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of healthcare interventions. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two or more drugs used for the prophylaxis of VTE following THA were accessed. PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases were accessed in March 2023 with no time constraint.

RESULTS

Data from 31,705 patients were extracted. Of these, 62% (19,824) were women, with age, sex ratio, and body mass index (BMI) being comparable at baseline. Apixaban 5 mg, fondaparinux, and rivaroxaban 60 mg were the most effective in reducing the rate of DVT. Dabigatran 220 mg, apixaban 5 mg, and aspirin 100 mg were the most effective in reducing the rate of PE. Apixaban 5 mg, ximelagatran 2 mg and aspirin 100 mg were associated with the lowest rate of major haemorrhages, while rivaroxaban 2.5 mg, apixaban 5 mg and enoxaparin 40 mg were associated with the lowest rate of minor haemorrhages.

CONCLUSION

Administration of apixaban 5 mg demonstrated the best balance between VTE prevention and haemorrhage control following THA. Level of evidence Level I, network meta-analysis of RCTs.

Rivaroxaban versus nadroparin for thromboprophylaxis following thoracic surgery for lung cancer: A randomized, noninferiority trial

The benefit of rivaroxaban in thromboprophylaxis after oncologic lung surgery remains unknown. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban, patients who underwent thoracic surgery for lung cancer were enrolled, and randomly assigned to rivaroxaban or nadroparin groups in a 1:1 ratio; anticoagulants were initiated 12-24 h after surgery and continued until discharge. Four hundred participants were required according to a noninferiority margin of 2%, assuming venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurrence rates of 6.0% and 12.6% for patients in the rivaroxaban and nadroparin groups, respectively. The primary efficacy outcome was any VTE during the treatment and 30-day follow-up periods. The safety outcome was any on-treatment bleeding event. Finally, 403 patients were randomized (intention-to-treat [ITT] population), with 381 included in per-protocol (PP) population. The primary efficacy outcomes occurred in 12.5% (25/200) of the rivaroxaban group and 17.7% (36/203) of the nadroparin group (absolute risk reduction, -5.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], [-12.2-1.7]), indicating the noninferiority of rivaroxaban in ITT population. Sensitivity analysis was performed in the PP population and yielded similar results, confirming the noninferiority of rivaroxaban. In the safety analysis population, the incidence of any on-treatment bleeding events did not differ significantly between the groups (12.2% for rivaroxaban vs. 7.0% for nadroparin; relative risk [RR], 1.9; 95% CI, [0.9-3.7]; p = .08), including major bleeding (9.7% vs. 6.5%; RR, 1.6 [95% CI, 0.9-3.7]; p = .24), and nonmajor bleeding (2.6% vs. 0.5%; RR, 5.2 [95% CI, 0.6-45.2]; p = .13). Rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis after oncologic lung surgery was shown to be noninferior to nadroparin.

Joint 2022 European Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for the prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in thoracic surgery

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a potentially fatal but preventable postoperative complication. Thoracic oncology patients undergoing surgical resection, often after multimodality induction therapy, represent among the highest risk groups for postoperative VTE. Currently there are no VTE prophylaxis guidelines specific to these thoracic surgery patients. Evidenced-based recommendations will help clinicians manage and mitigate risk of VTE in the postoperative period and inform best practice.

OBJECTIVE

These joint evidence-based guidelines from The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons aim to inform clinicians and patients in decisions about prophylaxis to prevent VTE in patients undergoing surgical resection for lung or esophageal cancer.

METHODS

The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included broad membership to minimize potential bias when formulating recommendations. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, which were subject to public comment.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 24 recommendations focused on pharmacological and mechanical methods for prophylaxis in patients undergoing lobectomy and segmentectomy, pneumonectomy, and esophagectomy, as well as extended resections for lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The certainty of the supporting evidence for the majority of recommendations was judged as low or very low, largely due to a lack of direct evidence for thoracic surgery. The panel made conditional recommendations for use of parenteral anticoagulation for VTE prevention, in combination with mechanical methods, over no prophylaxis for cancer patients undergoing anatomic lung resection or esophagectomy. Other key recommendations include: conditional recommendations for using parenteral anticoagulants over direct oral anticoagulants, with use of direct oral anticoagulants suggested only in the context of clinical trials; conditional recommendation for using extended prophylaxis for 28 to 35 days over in-hospital prophylaxis only for patients at moderate or high risk of thrombosis; and conditional recommendations for VTE screening in patients undergoing pneumonectomy and esophagectomy. Future research priorities include the role of preoperative thromboprophylaxis and the role of risk stratification to guide use of extended prophylaxis.

Efficacy of 11 anticoagulants for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To systematically review the efficacy of 11 anticoagulants in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total hip or knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, VIP, and China Biology Medicine databases were electronically searched for studies assessing the efficacy of different anticoagulants for the prevention of VTE after total hip or knee arthroplasty from January 1, 2010, to January 27, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and graded the evidence using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis. The network meta-analysis was then performed using Stata 16.0 software and R 4.1.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of 61 articles were included. The results of network meta-analysis showed that apixaban, edoxaban, fondaparinux, rivaroxaban, and darexaban were the most effective anticoagulants for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty (P < .05), while there was no difference in the efficacy among the anticoagulants for the prevention of pulmonary embolism (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Apixaban, edoxaban, fondaparinux, rivaroxaban, and darexaban have the best efficacy for the prevention of VTE after total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Joint 2022 European Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for the prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in thoracic surgery

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a potentially fatal but preventable postoperative complication. Thoracic oncology patients undergoing surgical resection, often after multimodality induction therapy, represent among the highest risk groups for postoperative VTE. Currently there are no VTE prophylaxis guidelines specific to these thoracic surgery patients. Evidenced-based recommendations will help clinicians manage and mitigate risk of VTE in the postoperative period and inform best practice.

OBJECTIVE

These joint evidence-based guidelines from The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons aim to inform clinicians and patients in decisions about prophylaxis to prevent VTE in patients undergoing surgical resection for lung or esophageal cancer.

METHODS

The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included broad membership to minimize potential bias when formulating recommendations. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, which were subject to public comment.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 24 recommendations focused on pharmacological and mechanical methods for prophylaxis in patients undergoing lobectomy and segmentectomy, pneumonectomy, and esophagectomy, as well as extended resections for lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The certainty of the supporting evidence for the majority of recommendations was judged as low or very low, largely due to a lack of direct evidence for thoracic surgery. The panel made conditional recommendations for use of parenteral anticoagulation for VTE prevention, in combination with mechanical methods, over no prophylaxis for cancer patients undergoing anatomic lung resection or esophagectomy. Other key recommendations include: conditional recommendations for using parenteral anticoagulants over direct oral anticoagulants, with use of direct oral anticoagulants suggested only in the context of clinical trials; conditional recommendation for using extended prophylaxis for 28 to 35 days over in-hospital prophylaxis only for patients at moderate or high risk of thrombosis; and conditional recommendations for VTE screening in patients undergoing pneumonectomy and esophagectomy. Future research priorities include the role of preoperative thromboprophylaxis and the role of risk stratification to guide use of extended prophylaxis. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022;▪:1-31).

The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin versus rivaroxaban in the prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Thromboprophylaxis following total hip and knee arthroplasty is variable across institutions, but commonly consists of enoxaparin, and more recently rivaroxaban. We aimed to analyze the current evidence on the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis following TKA or THA.

METHODS

This study was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Electronic database searches were performed using three databases from their dates of inception to June 2020. Relevant randomized controlled studies were identified, with data extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

From eight studies, 13,384 patients were included, with 5700 undergoing TKA and 7684 undergoing THA. There were 6629 patients receiving rivaroxaban and 6755 patients receiving enoxaparin. From the total cohort, rivaroxaban was associated with significantly lower rates of major VTE (p = 0.009) and DVT (p < 0.001) when compared to enoxaparin. There was no significant difference in bleeding complications between rivaroxaban and enoxaparin groups (p = 0.14). Subgroup analysis of patients undergoing THA demonstrated that rivaroxaban reduced risk of major VTE (p = 0.002) and DVT (p = 0.01) with no significant differences in any other complications. For those undergoing TKA, rivaroxaban significantly reduced the risk of DVT (p < 0.001) but was associated with higher rates of post-operative blood transfusion (p = 0.03). Cost-analysis revealed that rivaroxaban was superior to enoxaparin, with the medication cost needed to prevent one DVT being $1081 and $432 less with rivaroxaban for THA and TKA respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Rivaroxaban may be a safe and cost-effective alternative to enoxaparin for routine thromboprophylaxis following total knee or hip arthroplasty.

Efficacy and Safety of Enoxaparin versus New Oral Anticoagulants to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism after Total Hip Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Prophylactic anticoagulant therapy is recommended for reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after a total hip replacement (THR). However, it is not clear which anticoagulant is preferable. Hence, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized double-blind controlled trials (RDBCTs) were conducted to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of enoxaparin in comparison with newer oral anticoagulants for the prevention of VTE after THR. The Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed/Medline databases were used for PICO search strategy. Relative risks (RR) of symptomatic VTE, clinically relevant bleeding, mortality, and a net clinical endpoint were estimated employing a random effect meta-analysis. ITC and RevMan software were used for indirect and direct comparisons, respectively. Nine RDBCTs comprising 24,584 patients were included. As compared to enoxaparin, a reduced risk for symptomatic VTE was observed with rivaroxaban (confidence interval [CI]: 0.32–0.77; RR: 0.46%) and comparable with apixaban (0.12–1.26; 0.42%) and dabigatran (0.22–2.20; 0.70%). Contrarily to enoxaparin, a greater risk for clinically relevant bleeding was observed with rivaroxaban (1.03–1.48; 1.23%), comparable with dabigatran (0.96–1.33; 1.10%) and reduced with apixaban (0.19–5.66; 0.96%). In indirect or direct comparisons, the interventions did not differ on the net clinical endpoint. In conclusion, the findings of this meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants as compared to enoxaparin for the prevention of VTE after total hip replacement surgery.

Efficacy and safety of edoxaban tosylate hydrate 15 mg in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with impaired renal function after orthopedic surgery of the lower extremities

Background

Although not indicated in the USA, edoxaban tosylate hydrate 15 mg is used for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after orthopedic surgery of the lower extremities in Japan. However, its efficacy and safety in patients with impaired renal function have not been fully evaluated. We aimed to investigate the intervention’s effectiveness in these patients.

Methods

From 2018 to 2020, patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, hip fracture surgery, or knee arthroplasty single granule replacement and with renal dysfunction were evaluated. Safety was evaluated according to bleeding occurrence during edoxaban treatment and liver function endpoints. Patients were divided into the 15- and 30-mg oral groups, including 23 patients with impaired renal function and 209 with normal renal function, respectively.

Results

VTE incidence in the 15- and 30-mg groups was 8.7% and 8.6%, respectively; the intergroup difference was insignificant (odds ratio [OR] 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22–4.56; p = 1.00). Bleeding did not occur in the 15-mg group and was noted in 9 patients in the 30-mg group during treatment with edoxaban; the intergroup difference was insignificant (p = 1.00). The increase in aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels was 30% in the 15-mg group and 19% in the 30-mg group, with no difference between the groups (p = 0.27). Multivariate analysis showed that the dose of edoxaban was not a significant factor associated with the incidence of VTE (adjusted OR 2.31; 95% CI 0.39–13.8; p = 0.36).

Conclusions

Edoxaban 15 mg in patients with impaired renal function may be as effective as edoxaban 30 mg in patients with normal renal function. However, the number of cases included in this study was small and the power was insufficient; therefore, a study with a larger sample size is desirable.

An Iron-Mesoionic Carbene Complex for Catalytic Intramolecular C-H Amination Utilizing Organic Azides

The synthesis of N-heterocycles is of paramount importance for the pharmaceutical industry. They are often synthesized through atom economic and environmentally unfriendly methods, generating significant waste. A less explored, but greener, alternative is the synthesis through the direct intramolecular C-H amination utilizing organic azides. Few examples exist by using this method, but many are limited due to the required use of stoichiometric amounts of Boc₂O. Herein, we report a homoleptic C,O-chelating mesoionic carbene-iron complex, which is the first iron-based complex that does not require the addition of any protecting groups for this transformation and that is active also in strong donor solvents such as THF or even DMSO. The achieved turnover number is an order of magnitude higher than any other reported catalytic system. A variety of C-H bonds were activated, including benzylic, primary, secondary, and tertiary. By following the reaction over time, we determined the presence of an initiation period. Kinetic studies showed a first-order dependence on substrate concentration and half-order dependence on catalyst concentration. Intermolecular competition reactions with deuterated substrate showed no KIE, while separate reactions with deuterium-labeled substrate resulted in a KIE of 2.0. Moreover, utilizing deuterated substrate significantly decreased the initiation period of the catalysis. Preliminary mechanistic studies suggest a unique mechanism involving a dimeric iron species as the catalyst resting state.

Efficacy and Safety of Thromboprophylaxis Post-Orthopedic Surgery

Given the high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) post-orthopedic surgery and the vital role of thromboprophylaxis in preventing VTEs, this meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of thromboprophylaxis post major orthopedic surgery and the relevant safety measures. In this review, we conducted a computer-aided search of Google Scholar, PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, Medline, and EMBASE databases. We included all published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that utilized enoxaparin, fondaparinux, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and aspirin for VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), hip fracture surgery, and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) based on primary and secondary outcomes. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. All statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager Software. A total of 23 RCTs were included with a total sample of 48,424 patients and an overall low risk of bias. The efficacy of enoxaparin in preventing VTEs in the TKA group was significantly better than fondaparinux. In the THA group, the efficacy of enoxaparin was significantly better than apixaban. The efficacies of fondaparinux, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and aspirin were comparable to that of enoxaparin in reducing VTE-associated mortality, major bleeding, and adverse events. In conclusion, we found that all included drugs were non-inferior to enoxaparin in VTE-associated mortality, major bleeding, and adverse events.

Efficacy and safety of anticoagulants for postoperative thrombophylaxis in total hip and knee arthroplasty: A PRISMA-compliant Bayesian network meta-analysis

Objective

To search, review, and analyze the efficacy and safety of various anticoagulants from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of anticoagulants for THA and TKA.

Design

PRISMA-compliant Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.

Data sources and study selection

The databases of The Medline, Embase, ClinicalTrial, and Cochrane Library databases were searched until March 2017 for RCTs of patients undergoing a THA or TKA.

Main outcomes and measures

The primary efficacy measurement was the venous thromboembolism Odds ratio (OR). The safety measurement was the odds ratio of major or clinically relevant bleeding. OR with 95% credibility intervals (95%CrIs) were calculated. Findings were interpreted as associations when the 95%CrIs excluded the null value.

Results

Thirty-five RCTs (53787 patients; mean age range, mostly 55–70 years; mean weight range, mostly 55–90 kg; and a higher mean proportion of women than men, around 60%) included the following Anticoagulants categories: fondaparinux, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, low-molecular-weight heparin, ximelagatran, aspirin, warfarin. Anticoagulants were ranked for effectiveness as follows: fondaparinux (88.89% ± 10.90%), edoxaban (85.87% ± 13.34%), rivaroxaban (86.08% ± 10.23%), apixaban (68.26% ± 10.82%), dabigatran (41.63% ± 12.26%), low-molecular-weight heparin (41.03% ± 9.60%), ximelagatran (37.81% ± 15.87%), aspirin (35.62% ± 20.60%), warfarin (9.89% ± 9.07%), and placebo (4.56% ± 6.37%). Ranking based on clinically relevant bleeding events was as follows: fondaparinux (14.53% ± 15.25%), ximelagatran (18.93% ± 17.49%), rivaroxaban (23.86% ± 15.14%), dabigatran (28.30% ± 14.18%), edoxaban (38.76% ± 24.25%), low-molecular-weight heparin (53.28% ± 8.40%), apixaban (71.81% ± 10.92%), placebo (76.26% ± 14.61%), aspirin (86.32% ± 25.74%), and warfarin (87.95% ± 11.27%). No statistically significant heterogeneity was observed between trials.

Conclusions and relevance

According to our results, all anticoagulant drugs showed some effectiveness for VTE prophylaxis. Our ranking indicated that fondaparinux and rivaroxaban were safer and more effective than other anticoagulant drugs for patients undergoing THA or TKA.

Venous Thromboembolism While on Anticoagulation With Apixaban

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common condition whose pathophysiology is explained by Virchow's triad with stasis, hypercoagulability, and endothelial injury. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) showed non-inferiority when compared with conventional treatment using subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and warfarin, but treatment failure is a concern and remains a challenge for physicians. In our case report, we present a patient who had VTE in the form of a saddle pulmonary embolus while on apixaban.

Associations between model-predicted rivaroxaban exposure and patient characteristics and efficacy and safety outcomes in the prevention of venous thromboembolism

Anticoagulant plasma concentrations and patient characteristics might affect the benefit–risk balance of therapy. The study objective was to assess the impact of model-predicted rivaroxaban exposure and patient characteristics on outcomes in patients receiving rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis (VTE-P) after hip/knee replacement surgery. Post hoc exposure–response analyses were conducted using data from the phase 3 RECORD1–4 studies, in which 12,729 patients were randomized to rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily or enoxaparin for ≤ 39 days. Multivariate regression approaches were used to correlate model-predicted individual rivaroxaban exposures and patient characteristics with outcomes. In the absence of measured rivaroxaban exposure, exposure estimates were predicted based on individual increases in prothrombin time (PT) and by making use of the known correlation between rivaroxaban plasma concentration and dynamics of PT. No significant associations between rivaroxaban exposure and total VTE or major bleeding were identified. A significant association between exposure and a composite of major or non-major clinically relevant (NMCR) bleeding from day 4 after surgery was observed. The relationship was shallow, with an approximate predicted absolute increase in a composite of major or NMCR bleeding from 1.08 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76–1.54] to 2.18% (95% CI 1.51–3.17) at the 5th and 95th percentiles of trough plasma concentration, respectively. In conclusion, based on the underlying data and analysis, no reliable target window for exposure with improved benefit–risk could be identified within the investigated exposure range. Hence, monitoring rivaroxaban levels is unlikely to be beneficial in VTE-P.

Ranking the efficacy of anticoagulants for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulants are essential in the prevention of venous thromboembolism. However, the effectiveness and safety of different anticoagulants have always been controversial. Therefore, we aimed to expand the sample of anticoagulant results and rank the efficacy and safety of 19 anticoagulants in the prevention of venous thromboembolism when total knee or total hip arthroplasty procedure is performed.

METHODS

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials of adult patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty were conducted. The trials were identified from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases, in which anticoagulants were used as interventions randomized controlled trial. The incidence of venous embolism and bleeding are the key outcomes of assessing the efficacy of intervention drugs. We used the Physical Therapy Evidence Database (PEDro) to assess risk bias and used pairwise comparison and network meta-analysis with random effects to estimate the summary relative risk. The study has been registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42020200747.

RESULTS

From the 4083 identified manuscripts, 45,067 participants from 53 randomized trials were included in the analysis and randomly assigned to 19 anticoagulants. With Enoxaparin as a control, Rivaroxaban (risk difference 0.07, 95 % credible interval 0.06 to 0.08), Edoxaban (RD 0.09, 95 % CrI 0.08 to 0.11), and Apixaban (RD 0.05, 95 % CrI 0.04 to 0.06) had the best effect in preventing VTE. However, in terms of comprehensive bleeding rate, Apixaban, Edoxaban, and Darexaban were the most effective and stable. Although effective in preventing VTE, bleeding remains relatively high in Rivaroxaban. Enoxaparin is low-molecular-weight heparin that is widely used in clinics, and although its overall efficacy is not the best, its efficacy and safety are very stable.

CONCLUSION

According to the available data, Apixaban, Edoxaban, and Darexaban are better than any anticoagulants in the prevention of VTE and bleeding during total knee or total hip arthroplasty. In our study, Fondaparinux, Eribaxaban, Dalteparin, Betrixaban, Bemiparin, Reviparin, Acenocoumarol, and Tinzaparin were scarce in the included studies, therefore, more evidence is needed to prove their efficacy and safety.

Risk of Major Gastrointestinal Bleeding With New vs Conventional Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There is controversy over whether use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) associates with increased risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) compared with conventional therapies (such as vitamin K antagonists or anti-platelet agents). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from randomized controlled trials and high-quality real-world studies.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov Website databases (through Oct 12, 2018) for randomized controlled trials and high-quality real-world studies that reported major GIB events in patients given NOACs or conventional therapy. Relative risks (RRs) for randomized controlled trials and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for real-world studies were calculated separately using random-effects models.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 43 randomized controlled trials (183,752 patients) and 41 real-world studies (1,879,428 patients). The pooled major rates of GIB for patients on NOACs (1.19%) vs conventional treatment (0.92%) did not differ significantly (RR from randomized controlled trials, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.91-1.31 and aHR from real-world studies, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.94-1.10; P_interaction=.52). Rivaroxaban, but not other NOACs, was associated with an increased risk for major GIB (RR from randomized controlled trials, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.17-1.65 and aHR from real-world studies, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04-1.23; P_interaction = .06). Analyses of subgroups, such as patients with different indications, dosage, or follow-up time, did not significantly affect results. Meta-regression analysis failed to detect any potential confounding to impact the primacy outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from randomized controlled trials and real-world studies, we confirmed that there is no significant difference in risk of major GIB between patients receiving NOACs vs conventional treatment. Rivaroxaban users had a 39% increase in risk for major GIB.

American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention of venous thromboembolism in surgical hospitalized patients

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common source of perioperative morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

These evidence-based guidelines from the American Society of Hematology (ASH) intend to support decision making about preventing VTE in patients undergoing surgery.

METHODS

ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to minimize bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline-development process, including performing systematic reviews. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 30 recommendations, including for major surgery in general (n = 8), orthopedic surgery (n = 7), major general surgery (n = 3), major neurosurgical procedures (n = 2), urological surgery (n = 4), cardiac surgery and major vascular surgery (n = 2), major trauma (n = 2), and major gynecological surgery (n = 2).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients undergoing major surgery in general, the panel made conditional recommendations for mechanical prophylaxis over no prophylaxis, for pneumatic compression prophylaxis over graduated compression stockings, and against inferior vena cava filters. In patients undergoing total hip or total knee arthroplasty, conditional recommendations included using either aspirin or anticoagulants, as well as for a direct oral anticoagulant over low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). For major general surgery, the panel suggested pharmacological prophylaxis over no prophylaxis, using LMWH or unfractionated heparin. For major neurosurgery, transurethral resection of the prostate, or radical prostatectomy, the panel suggested against pharmacological prophylaxis. For major trauma surgery or major gynecological surgery, the panel suggested pharmacological prophylaxis over no prophylaxis.

Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban for the prevention of thrombosis following total hip or knee replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic anticoagulant therapy is recommended to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total hip or knee arthroplasty, and has become the standard of care. Rivaroxaban is a novel oral medication that directly inhibits factor Xa for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic conditions.

METHOD

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to determine the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery. We reviewed several databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase and the US trial registry to detect appropriate RCTs for our meta-analysis. The primary efficacy outcome of this meta-analysis was the combination of any deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), non-fatal pulmonary embolism (PE), and death from any cause. The main safety outcome was bleeding events which included significant bleeding events, clinically relevant insignificant bleeding events, or minor events. Other end points were the number of patients who received blood transfusion the volume of transfused whole blood or red blood cells, and the volume of postoperative drainage.

RESULT

Thirteen RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. This meta-analysis showed that the overall rate of VTE events, DVT, PE, and death were 1%, 6%, < 1% and < 1%, respectively, for patients receiving treatment with rivaroxaban after THA and TKA surgery. The subgroup analysis demonstrated rivaroxaban had more superior effects in THA patients. The pooled analysis of bleeding events showed that the overall rate of major bleeding events, overt bleeding events associated with fall in Hb of > 2 g/DL, clinically overt bleeding events leading to transfusion of > 2 units of blood, clinically overt bleeding events leading to further surgeries, and non-major bleeding events were < 1%, < 1%, < 1%, < 1%, and 3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This is the first systematic review of the literature providing incidence of efficacy and safety outcomes for thromboprophylaxis in THA and TKA patients. Moreover, this meta-analysis showed that rivaroxaban had more superior effect in THA patients.

Comparison of efficiency and safety of rivaroxaban, apixaban and enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after arthroplastic surgery: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban, apixaban and enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after arthroplastic surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis containing a wide range of randomized controlled trials about efficiency and safety of rivaroxaban, apixaban and enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after arthroplastic surgery in the recent decade from January 2006 to June 2018. The present study separately analyzed the following key components: the different efficiency and safety for rivaroxaban and enoxaparin; apixaban and enoxaparin; and enoxaparin and other new developed anticoagulants.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies containing 58885 patients were included. In results of efficacy outcomes, total events occurred in 4.89% patients of rivaroxaban group and 9.55% patients of the control group; however, no significant difference was observed in apixaban groups of their efficacy outcomes. Primary events didn't show significant difference when comparing apixaban with the control or comparing enoxaparin with the control. In analysis of safety outcomes, bleeding events occurred in 3.41% patients of rivaroxaban group compared with 2.84% patients of the control groups; bleeding events in apixaban groups were 4.09% compared with the control groups 4.64%. Bleeding events occurred in 3.51% patients of enoxaparin group, slightly lower than 5.82% of the control group.

CONCLUSION

Direct oral anticoagulant, rivaroxaban might have better efficacy outcomes in thromboprophylaxis after arthroplastic surgery; however, apixaban showed no significantly different efficacy outcomes compared with enoxaparin, and enoxaparin may have equal or even better safety outcomes compared with direct oral anticoagulants.

Safety and efficacy of a new thromboprophylaxis regiment for total knee and total hip replacement: a retrospective cohort study in 265 patients

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a significant complication following knee and hip arthroplasty. National and international guidelines recommend pharmacological and mechanical thromboprophylaxis following surgery, unless contraindicated, to reduce the risk of VTE. This study aimed to explore the safety and efficacy profile of an adapted thromboprophylaxis regimen consisting of sequential enoxaparin and rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis following knee or hip arthroplasty at a London teaching hospital.

Methods

A total of 265 patients who received sequential enoxaparin and rivaroxaban and mechanical thromboprophylaxis following knee and hip arthroplasty were included in the study. Efficacy outcomes assessed for 90 days post-operatively included: pulmonary embolism, deep-vein thrombosis, other VTE, myocardial infarction, stroke and death secondary to thrombosis. Safety outcomes were assessed during and for two days after thromboprophylaxis course duration and consisted of major bleeding episodes, clinically-relevant non-major bleeding episodes, and total bleeding.

Results

There was 1 patient (0.4%) who experienced a stroke, and no other efficacy outcomes occurred. Major bleeding occurred in 2.3% (n = 6/265) of patients, whilst clinically-relevant non-major bleeding occurred in 3.4% (n = 9/265), with a total bleeding incidence of 16.2% (n = 43/265). No patients required a return to theatre.

Conclusion

The regimen consisting of sequential enoxaparin and rivaroxaban is associated with a significant bleeding risk, although the risk of patients requiring a return to theatre is low. Further prospective trials are required to compare the safety and efficacy profiles of this regimen with established thromboprophylaxis regimens.

Oral anticoagulants for primary prevention, treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolic disease, and for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation: systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

Warfarin is effective for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), but anticoagulation is underused in clinical care. The risk of venous thromboembolic disease during hospitalisation can be reduced by low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH): warfarin is the most frequently prescribed anticoagulant for treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Warfarin-related bleeding is a major reason for hospitalisation for adverse drug effects. Warfarin is cheap but therapeutic monitoring increases treatment costs. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have more rapid onset and offset of action than warfarin, and more predictable dosing requirements.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the best oral anticoagulant/s for prevention of stroke in AF and for primary prevention, treatment and secondary prevention of VTE.

DESIGN

Four systematic reviews, network meta-analyses (NMAs) and cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) of randomised controlled trials.

SETTING

Hospital (VTE primary prevention and acute treatment) and primary care/anticoagulation clinics (AF and VTE secondary prevention).

PARTICIPANTS

Patients eligible for anticoagulation with warfarin (stroke prevention in AF, acute treatment or secondary prevention of VTE) or LMWH (primary prevention of VTE).

INTERVENTIONS

NOACs, warfarin and LMWH, together with other interventions (antiplatelet therapy, placebo) evaluated in the evidence network.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Efficacy Stroke, symptomatic VTE, symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis and symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Safety Major bleeding, clinically relevant bleeding and intracranial haemorrhage. We also considered myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality and evaluated cost-effectiveness.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE and PREMEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library, reference lists of published NMAs and trial registries. We searched MEDLINE and PREMEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library. The stroke prevention in AF review search was run on the 12 March 2014 and updated on 15 September 2014, and covered the period 2010 to September 2014. The search for the three reviews in VTE was run on the 19 March 2014, updated on 15 September 2014, and covered the period 2008 to September 2014.

REVIEW METHODS

Two reviewers screened search results, extracted and checked data, and assessed risk of bias. For each outcome we conducted standard meta-analysis and NMA. We evaluated cost-effectiveness using discrete-time Markov models.

RESULTS

Apixaban (Eliquis^®, Bristol-Myers Squibb, USA; Pfizer, USA) [5 mg bd (twice daily)] was ranked as among the best interventions for stroke prevention in AF, and had the highest expected net benefit. Edoxaban (Lixiana^®, Daiichi Sankyo, Japan) [60 mg od (once daily)] was ranked second for major bleeding and all-cause mortality. Neither the clinical effectiveness analysis nor the CEA provided strong evidence that NOACs should replace postoperative LMWH in primary prevention of VTE. For acute treatment and secondary prevention of VTE, we found little evidence that NOACs offer an efficacy advantage over warfarin, but the risk of bleeding complications was lower for some NOACs than for warfarin. For a willingness-to-pay threshold of > £5000, apixaban (5 mg bd) had the highest expected net benefit for acute treatment of VTE. Aspirin or no pharmacotherapy were likely to be the most cost-effective interventions for secondary prevention of VTE: our results suggest that it is not cost-effective to prescribe NOACs or warfarin for this indication.

CONCLUSIONS

NOACs have advantages over warfarin in patients with AF, but we found no strong evidence that they should replace warfarin or LMWH in primary prevention, treatment or secondary prevention of VTE.

LIMITATIONS

These relate mainly to shortfalls in the primary data: in particular, there were no head-to-head comparisons between different NOAC drugs.

FUTURE WORK

Calculating the expected value of sample information to clarify whether or not it would be justifiable to fund one or more head-to-head trials.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013005324, CRD42013005331 and CRD42013005330.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Interpretation of endpoints in a network meta-analysis of new oral anticoagulants following total hip or total knee replacement surgery

New oral anticoagulant (NOAC) regimens [dabigatran 150 mg (D150) and 220 mg (D220), rivaroxaban 10 mg (R20), and apixaban 2.5 mg bid (A5)] were effective and safe compared to enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following elective total knee (TKR) or hip replacement (THR) surgery. First a cluster analysis was used to identify homogeneous studies for the trial programs of each NOAC. Second, only studies reporting VTE and VTE-related death, major bleeding, and mortality were included. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for each NOAC regimen versus the comparator. Third, these data were used for the indirect comparison between NOACs. Cluster analysis identified duration of treatment (10 ± 5 and 34 ± 5 days) as the only homogeneous parameter across all NOAC programs (p>0.05) except for A5 and VTE over 10 ± 5 days (analysis not performed). The results of the calculated OR and 95% CI of the four NOAC regimens over 10 ± 5 and 34 ± 5 days showed inferiority of D150 and D220 compared to R10 for VTE (p<0.01, p<0.001). Comparisons of major bleeding and mortality were not different for all indirect comparisons. Despite the lack of standard definitions for VTE and bleeding outcomes, cluster analysis seems to be an appropriate tool to identify homogeneity across trial programs and to perform an indirect comparison for NOACs for prevention of VTE following TKR and THR surgery.

New oral anticoagulants in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in orthopaedic patients: Are they really better?

Prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism (VTE) is considered standard of care. Appropriate chemoprophylaxis for VTE has been mandated by the United States government agencies and consumer groups. However, controversies exist regarding the most clinically relevant and safe chemoprophylaxis protocols in patients undergoing joint replacement surgery. Thus, this paper reviews the clinical efficacy and safety of newer oral anticoagulants. A literature search was performed for oral anticoagulants in advanced stages of development using PubMed and abstracts from thrombosis meetings. Most clinical trial data have demonstrated equal or superior efficacy in venographic endpoints in comparison to low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH). However, bleeding complications have been reported to occur with oral anticoagulants as frequently as or more frequently than with LMWH. Other potential complications reported include liver enzyme elevation and cardiac irregularities. It remains to be established whether newer oral anticoagulants will be better alternatives to the current standard-ofcare in real-life medical clinical practice.

Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and the Relative Risk of Surgical Site Bleeding Complications: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Venous Thromboprophylaxis in Patients After Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism causes significant morbidity and mortality in patients after total joint arthroplasty. Although network meta-analyses have demonstrated a benefit of various thromboprophylactic agents, there remains a concern in the surgical community regarding the resulting wound complications. There is currently no systematic review of the surgical site bleeding complications of thromboprophylactic agents. The aim of this study was to systematically review the surgical site bleeding outcomes of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in this population.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Randomized controlled trials comparing more than one of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), warfarin, rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, aspirin, or no pharmacologic treatment in patients after total hip or knee arthroplasty were selected for inclusion. Five meta-analyses were performed to compare LMWH with control, warfarin, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran.

RESULTS

Forty-five randomized controlled trials of 56,730 patients were included. LMWH had a significantly increased relative risk of surgical site bleeding in comparison with control (relative risk, 2.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-3.85) and warfarin (1.54; 1.23-1.94). The relative risk of LMWH trended higher than apixaban (1.27; 1.00-1.63) and was similar to rivaroxaban (0.95; 0.74-1.23). Only 1 study reported the risk of surgical site bleeding in LMWH vs dabigatran (5.97; 2.08-17.11).

CONCLUSION

LMWH increased the risk of surgical site bleeding compared with control, warfarin. and dabigatran and trended toward an increased risk compared with apixaban. The risk of surgical site bleeding was similar with LMWH and rivaroxaban.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Vs. Enoxaparin for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism Following Orthopedic Surgery: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis

We carried out a dose–response model‐based meta‐analysis to assess venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding with factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors (apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) and a thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran) compared with European (EU) (40 mg q.d.) and North American (NA) (30 mg Q12H) dose regimens of a low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin) following orthopedic surgery. Statistically significant differences in both VTE and bleeding outcomes were found between the NA and EU doses of enoxaparin, with odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for the NA vs. EU dose of 0.73 (0.71–0.76) and 1.20 (1.14–1.29) for total VTE and major bleeding, respectively. At approved doses, estimated odds ratios vs. both doses of enoxaparin for the three FXa inhibitors (range: 0.35–0.75 for VTE; 0.76–1.09 for bleeding) compared with those for dabigatran (range: 0.66–1.21 for VTE; 1.10–1.38 for bleeding) suggested generally greater efficacy and less bleeding for the FXa inhibitors.

Pulmonary Embolism Rates Following Total Hip Arthroplasty With Prophylactic Anticoagulation: Some Pulmonary Emboli Cannot Be Avoided

BACKGROUND

A symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) after total joint arthroplasty has been described as a "never event." Despite potent anticoagulants and improvements in patient care, PE continues to occur following total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study evaluates symptomatic PE rates over time in THA patients enrolled in multicenter randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis regimens.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify clinical trials assessing prophylactic anticoagulation in patients undergoing THA between January 1995 and December 2015. Inclusion criteria consisted of RCTs evaluating prophylactic anticoagulation in patients undergoing THA. A random effect model was used to combine PE rates across studies.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies (34,764 patients) were included. Patients were administered low molecular weight heparin (13,590 patients), oral factor Xa inhibitors (6609 patients), oral direct thrombin inhibitors (5965 patients), indirect factors Xa/IIa inhibitors (3444 patients), aspirin (2427 patients), and warfarin (489 patients). Mobile compression was used in 199 patients, and placebo was used in 2041 patients. Across all included studies, the estimated PE rate was 0.21% (95% confidence interval: 0.13%, 0.32%). Between 1997 and 2013, the proportion of PEs did not change in regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Although the PE rate was low, it was consistent throughout the 17 years spanning these RCTs, which excluded patients with significant morbidity. These results suggest that even healthy THA patients receiving aggressive anticoagulation still have a risk for PE, and the "never event" designation requires reassessment.

Rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis after total hip or knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most widespread severe complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We conducted this meta-analysis to further validate the benefits and harms of rivaroxaban use for thromboprophylaxis after THA or TKA. We thoroughly searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was applied to test the robustness of our findings and to obtain a more conservative estimation. Of 316 articles screened, nine studies were included. Compared with enoxaparin, rivaroxaban significantly reduced symptomatic VTE (P = 0.0001) and symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT; P = 0.0001) but not symptomatic pulmonary embolism (P = 0.57). Furthermore, rivaroxaban was not associated with an increase in all-cause mortality, clinically relevant non-major bleeding and postoperative wound infection. However, the findings were accompanied by an increase in major bleeding (P = 0.02). The TSA demonstrated that the cumulative z-curve crossed the traditional boundary but not the trial sequential monitoring boundary and did not reach the required information size for major bleeding. Rivaroxaban was more beneficial than enoxaparin for preventing symptomatic DVT but increased the risk of major bleeding. According to the TSA results, more evidence is needed to verify the risk of major bleeding with rivaroxaban.

Evidence-Based Development and Rationale for Once-Daily Rivaroxaban Dosing Regimens Across Multiple Indications

Background:

Rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, has been developed to meet clinical needs in a broad range of indications in adults: prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective hip or knee replacement surgery, treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism, prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation having one or more risk factors, and in Europe, prevention of atherothrombotic events after an acute coronary syndrome in patients with elevated cardiac biomarkers. However, the precise dose and regimen vary with the indication, leading to this effort to provide clarity concerning the appropriate use of rivaroxaban. This article reviews the clinical development program for rivaroxaban and summarizes the evidence for each approved, indication-specific dose regimen.

Results:

Although initially investigated for twice-daily dosing, early observations, including the finding that the pharmacodynamic effects of rivaroxaban last longer than the elimination half-life, suggested that once-daily dosing might be attainable and effective. These observations were evaluated within the extensive phase II program, which, together with pharmacology studies, provides the evidence underpinning the selection of once-daily regimens for most, but not all, of the approved clinical indications for rivaroxaban.

Conclusion:

The evidence for each dosing regimen demonstrates that although pharmacology studies are of paramount importance, dose regimens must be subjected to careful empirical validation. Once-daily dosing was shown to be clinically appropriate for most rivaroxaban indications. Furthermore, a “one size fits all” approach to dosing frequency is unlikely to result in a regimen that yields optimal patient outcomes across different indications.

Oral direct factor Xa inhibitor versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip or knee arthroplasty: Systemic review, traditional meta-analysis, dose-response meta-analysis and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the efficacy and safety of direct factor Xa inhibitors for thromboprophylaxis after total hip or knee replacement. To delineate the dose response effect of direct factor Xa inhibitors. To compare the efficacy between any two direct factor Xa inhibitors.

DESIGN

Systemic review, traditional meta-analysis, dose-response meta-analysis and network meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCE

PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials of rivaroxaban, apixaban, betrixaban, darexaban and edoxaban were compared with enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total hip or knee replacement. Two reviewers independently checked the quality of RCTs. Another two investigators independently extracted data. The primary efficacy outcomes (composite of deep venous thrombosis, non-fatal pulmonary embolism and death of all causes) and the primary bleeding outcomes (major bleeding and non-major but clinically relevant bleeding) were summarized for meta-analysis. Stata software was used for traditional meta-analysis and dose-response meta-analysis, and Winbugs software was used for network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty trials with 38,507 subjects in the intention-to-treat population were included. Compared with enoxaparin, the risk of total venous thromboembolism was lower with rivaroxaban (relative risk 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 0.81), apixaban (0.62, 0.47 to 0.81), and edoxaban (0.62, 0.39 to 0.97) and similar to darexaban (0.96, 0.84 to 1.11) and betrixaban (1.28, 0.97 to 1.68). Compared with enoxaparin, the risk of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding was higher with rivaroxaban (1.52, 1.14 to 2.02), lower with betrixaban (0.34, 0.14 to 0.84) and similar to apixaban (0.88, 0.73 to 1.05), darexaban (0.85, 0.66 to 1.09) or edoxaban (1.30, 0.72 to 2.33). The risk of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding of rivaroxaban had a linear relationship with its treatment doses; the risk of total venous thromboembolism of betrixaban and darexaban had linear relationships with their respective treatment doses. There was no linear nor non-liner relationships between the effect of apixaban and its treatment dose. The ranking of total venous thromboembolism risk from low to high was: rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, enoxaparin, darexaban, and betrixaban. The ranking of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding from low to high was: betrixaban, enoxaparin, darexaban, edoxaban, apixaban, and rivaroxaban.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct oral factor Xa inhibitors are more effective to prevent venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement. Their anticoagulant effect was not necessarily compromised with a higher bleeding risk. Rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban showed a better anticoagulant effect, as compared with enoxaparin. Rivaroxaban had a higher bleeding rate, while apixaban and edoxaban did not show significantly higher bleeding risks.

Dosing of rivaroxaban by indication: getting the right dose for the patient

INTRODUCTION

Vitamin K antagonists were the only oral anticoagulants available for several decades, but they require frequent coagulation monitoring and dose adjustment. The direct oral anticoagulants rivaroxaban , dabigatran, apixaban, and, most recently, edoxaban have been approved for the management of specific thromboembolic indications.

AREAS COVERED

This review will provide a brief overview of the cell-based coagulation model, the main determinants of arterial and venous thrombosis, and the pharmacological rationale and clinical evidence for the different dosing regimens of rivaroxaban. Published articles indexed on PubMed and Medline covering arterial and venous thrombi pathophysiology, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban, and Phase II and Phase III clinical studies with rivaroxaban as well as real-world evidence were analyzed.

EXPERT OPINION

Education on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics, as well as how to manage adverse events, is needed to increase physician knowledge and confidence in using direct oral anticoagulants, as specifically discussed for rivaroxaban in this article. The continued uptake of direct oral anticoagulants in clinical practice depends on understanding of the clinical evidence and reassurance provided by emerging real-world data.

Rivaroxaban for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic disease

Objectives

A number of direct oral anticoagulants are now available and offer alternative strategies for anticoagulation therapy. Rivaroxaban, a direct oral Factor Xa inhibitor, is approved for use across several thromboembolic indications. This article aims to provide an overview of the key pharmacological characteristics of rivaroxaban and the rationale and evidence for the use of different dose regimens across its licenced indications, and offer practical guidance to healthcare professionals on responsible use. References were sourced via PubMed searches using the search string (rivaroxaban AND (pharmacokinetics OR pharmacodynamics OR (clinical studies) OR (drug interaction)) NOT review NOT (children OR pediatrics OR paediatrics OR adolescent)).

Key findings

Rivaroxaban exhibits predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and thus does not require routine coagulation monitoring, unlike vitamin K antagonists (e.g. warfarin). Rivaroxaban also has a lower potential for drug–drug and food–drug interactions compared with warfarin; however, co-administration with strong inhibitors of both cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein is not recommended. The data indicate that dose adjustment is not necessary for age, gender or body weight. The dosing regimens of rivaroxaban vary depending on the indication, and phase III studies have demonstrated a favourable benefit–risk profile of rivaroxaban compared with traditional standard of care.

Summary

Rivaroxaban may offer an anticoagulant option that could simplify and improve the management of patients with thromboembolic disorders.

Clinical use of rivaroxaban: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic rationale for dosing regimens in different indications

Target-specific oral anticoagulants have become increasingly available as alternatives to traditional agents for the management of a number of thromboembolic disorders. To date, the direct Factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban is the most widely approved of the new agents. The dosing of rivaroxaban varies and adheres to specific schedules in each of the clinical settings in which it has been investigated. These regimens were devised based on the results of phase II dose-finding studies and/or pharmacokinetic modeling, and were demonstrated to be successful in randomized, phase III studies. In most cases, the pharmacodynamic profile of rivaroxaban permits once-daily dosing. A once-daily dose is indicated for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery, the long-term prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, and the long-term secondary prevention of recurrent VTE. Twice-daily dosing is required in the acute phase of treatment in patients with VTE and in the combination of rivaroxaban with standard single or dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome events. This article reviews the empirical and clinical rationale supporting the dose regimens of rivaroxaban in each clinical setting.

Comparison of rivaroxaban and parnaparin for preventing venous thromboembolism after lumbar spine surgery

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban for preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) after lumbar spine surgery.

METHODS

In this randomized, controlled study, 665 patients who underwent lumbar surgery were randomly assigned to receive either rivaroxaban or parnaparin. Rivaroxaban and parnaparin were used for preventing postoperative venous thrombosis. The occurrence of postoperative efficacy endpoint events (venous thrombosis) and safety endpoint events (hemorrhage) was compared for each group.

RESULTS

Efficacy endpoint results: in the rivaroxaban group, there were 6 thrombotic events (1.7%), 2 cases with severe VTE (0.6%), and 3 cases with symptomatic VTE (0.9%). In the parnaparin group, there were 10 thrombotic events (3.1%), 4 cases with severe VTE (1.2%), and 6 cases with symptomatic VTE (1.9%). Safety endpoint results: in the rivaroxaban group, there were 21 cases with bleeding events (6.2%), 2 cases with severe bleeding (0.6%), and 19 cases with non-severe bleeding (5.6%). In the parnaparin group, there were 21 bleeding events (6.2%), 1 case with severe bleeding (0.3%), and 16 cases with non-severe bleeding (4.9%). The incidences of thromboembolic events, including severe and symptomatic VTE, were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). Bleeding event rates, including severe and non-severe bleeding, were also not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Rivaroxaban proved to be equally effective as parnaparin for anticoagulation therapy, with both drugs exhibiting a similar prevention effect against postoperative VTE after lumbar spine surgery, without increasing the risk of postoperative bleeding.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total joint arthroplasty

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after total joint arthroplasty is considered best practice. However, over the past 5 years, there has been considerable debate about the ideal prophylactic regimen or modality. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the American College of Chest Physicians published their most recent clinical practice guidelines about VTE prophylaxis in 2011 and 2012, respectively. In addition, the Surgical Care Improvement Project published their latest recommendations in 2014. In this review, commonly used VTE prophylaxis options and the latest clinical guidelines will be discussed.

A clinical and pharmacologic assessment of once-daily versus twice-daily dosing for rivaroxaban

Altering doses and regimens of a drug has consequences for the drug's pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. Based on a half-life of 5-13 h, it is expected that the Factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban would be best suited to a twice-daily rather than a once-daily dose regimen. However, although rivaroxaban is used as a twice-daily regimen for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and secondary prevention after acute coronary syndromes, the approved dosing is once-daily for prevention of VTE after orthopaedic surgery, long-term secondary prevention of VTE and stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Rivaroxaban dosing was based on the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of several rivaroxaban doses and regimens in phase II trials. A clear overall advantage of twice-daily dosing compared with once-daily dosing was not documented for indications for which once-daily dosing was subsequently selected. Once-daily dosing was therefore selected for these indications because it is expected to be associated with better compliance than twice-daily dosing, and potentially, with improved outcomes. These studies and data obtained with another Factor Xa inhibitor, edoxaban, in addition to previous experience with low molecular weight heparins, indicate that the clinical impact of once-daily versus twice-daily doses on outcome in terms of efficacy and safety cannot be reliably predicted from pharmacology data, e.g. elimination half-life, obtained during pre-clinical and early phase I clinical studies but rather should be ascertained empirically in phase II and III clinical trials.

A randomized direct comparison of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of apixaban and rivaroxaban

Background

Currently, there are no direct comparisons of apixaban and rivaroxaban, two new oral direct factor Xa inhibitors approved for management of thromboembolic disorders.

Objective

Compare the pharmacokinetics and anti-factor Xa activity (AXA) of apixaban and rivaroxaban.

Methods

In this randomized, open-label, two-period, two-treatment crossover study, healthy subjects (N=14) received apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily (BID) and rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily (QD) for 4 days with a ≥4.5-day washout. Plasma samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic and AXA assessments; parameters were calculated using noncompartmental methods.

Results

Median time-to-maximum concentration was 2 hours for both compounds, and the mean half-life was 8.7 and 7.9 hours for apixaban and rivaroxaban, respectively. Daily exposure, the area under the curve (AUC_(0–24)), appeared similar for rivaroxaban (1,094 ng · h/mL) and apixaban (935 ng · h/mL), whereas mean peak-to-trough plasma concentration ratio was 3.6-fold greater for rivaroxaban (16.9) than apixaban (4.7). Coefficient of variation for exposure parameters (AUC_0–24, C_max, C_min) was 20%–24% for apixaban versus 29%–46% for rivaroxaban. Peak AXA, AXA AUC_(0–24), and AXA fluctuation were ~2.5-, 1.3-, and 3.5-fold higher for rivaroxaban than apixaban, respectively. Trough concentrations and AXA were lower for rivaroxaban (10 ng/mL and 0.17 IU/mL vs 17 ng/mL and 0.24 IU/mL for apixaban, respectively). Rivaroxaban exhibited a steeper concentration–AXA response (slope: 0.0172 IU/ng vs 0.0134 IU/ng for apixaban, P<0.0001).

Conclusion

Apixaban 2.5 mg BID demonstrated less intersubject variability in exposure, lower AXA AUC, and higher trough and smaller peak-to-trough fluctuations in plasma concentration and AXA, suggesting more constant anticoagulation compared with rivaroxaban 10 mg QD. However, the clinical impact of these differences on the relative efficacy and safety of apixaban and rivaroxaban remains to be determined.

Rivaroxaban vs. low molecular weight heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip or knee arthroplasty: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Rivaroxaban is increasingly used to prevent venous thromboembolism after hip or knee arthroplasty. Studies evaluating the effectiveness of rivaroxaban compared to low molecular weight heparin after orthopedic surgery in routine practice are scarce.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in 121 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, between 2002 and 2012. We included patients aged 66 years or older (median age 73 years) who received an outpatient prescription for subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin (n = 11 471) or oral rivaroxaban (n = 12 850) on hospital discharge after a total knee or hip arthroplasty. The two coprimary outcomes assessed within 30 days of the prescription date were emergency department visit or hospitalization with venous thromboembolism (either deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism; primary efficacy outcome) and a hospitalization with non-traumatic major hemorrhage (primary safety outcome).

RESULTS

Rivaroxaban use increased over the study period. Compared to low molecular weight heparin, rivaroxaban was associated with a lower 30-day risk of hospitalization with venous thromboembolism (0.47% vs. 0.81%; relative risk 0.58; 95% confidence interval 0.42-0.81; P = 0.001) with no significant difference in hospitalizations for major bleeding (0.18% vs. 0.20%; relative risk 0.89; 95% confidence interval 0.50-1.59; P = 0.700).

CONCLUSIONS

In routine practice, anticoagulant prophylaxis with rivaroxaban compared to low molecular weight heparin after hospital discharge from total hip or knee arthroplasty is associated with a lower risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism with no difference in the risk of bleeding.

New oral pharmacotherapeutic agents for venous thromboprophylaxis after total hip arthroplasty

Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) are at high risk for developing venous thromboembolism and, therefore, require short term prophylaxis with antithrombotic agents. Recently, target specific oral anticoagulants (TSOA) including the direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran, and the factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban have been approved for THA thrombopropylaxis in various countries. The TSOAs provide a rapid acting, oral alternative to parenteral agents including low-molecular weight heparins (LMWH) and fondaparinux; and compared to warfarin, they do not require routine laboratory monitoring and possess much fewer drug-drug interactions. Based on phase III clinical studies, TSOAs have established themselves as an effective and safe option for thromboprophylaxis after THA compared to LMWH, particularly enoxaparin, but require additional evaluation in specific populations such as the renally impaired or elderly. The ability to monitor and reverse these TSOAs in the case of bleeding complications or suspected sub- or supra-therapeutic anticoagulation is of importance, but remains investigational. This review will focus on the drug-specific characteristics, efficacy, safety, and economic impact of the TSOAs for thromboprophylaxis following THA, as well as the aspects of therapeutic monitoring and anticoagulation reversal in the event of bleeding complications or a need for urgent reversal.

The discovery of rivaroxaban: translating preclinical assessments into clinical practice

Direct oral anticoagulants that target a single coagulation factor (such as factor Xa or thrombin) have been developed in recent years in an attempt to address some of the limitations of traditional anticoagulants. Rivaroxaban is an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor that inhibits free and clot-bound factor Xa and factor Xa in the prothrombinase complex. Preclinical studies demonstrated a potent anticoagulant effect of rivaroxaban in plasma as well as the ability of this agent to prevent and treat venous and arterial thrombosis in animal models. These studies led to an extensive phase I clinical development program that investigated the pharmacological properties of rivaroxaban in humans. In these studies, rivaroxaban was shown to exhibit predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and to have no clinically relevant interactions with many commonly prescribed co-medications. The pharmacodynamic effects of rivaroxaban (for example, inhibition of factor Xa and prolongation of prothrombin time) were closely correlated with rivaroxaban concentrations in plasma. The encouraging findings from preclinical and early clinical studies were expanded upon in large, randomized phase III studies, which demonstrated the clinical efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in a broad spectrum of patients. This article provides an overview of the discovery and development of rivaroxaban, describing the pharmacodynamic profile established in preclinical studies and the optimal translation to clinical studies in healthy subjects and patient populations.

New oral therapies for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism

PURPOSE

Data comparing traditional and novel anticoagulants are reviewed, and the potential use of new oral agents for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is assessed.

SUMMARY

Practical challenges in using traditional anticoagulants are well established and have led to the search for new oral agents. Apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran etexilate are new oral anticoagulants that may offer simpler, more effective, and safer treatment and prevention of VTE, which may increase adherence to such therapy, improve outcomes, and decrease overall health care costs. Their immediate onset of anticoagulant effect, ease of oral administration, and lack of needed regular anticoagulation monitoring are of interest in the medical and pharmacy communities. However, in the treatment and prevention of VTE, more data will be needed to determine their ultimate place in therapy. This review is intended to provide pharmacists with an objective overview of practical considerations that can help them understand the clinical data to facilitate their selection of anticoagulants.

CONCLUSION

Apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran etexilate are new oral agents for the prevention and treatment of VTE.

New oral anticoagulants increase risk for gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

A new generation of oral anticoagulants (nOAC), which includes thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors, has been shown to be effective, but little is known about whether these drugs increase patients' risk for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). Patients who require OAC therapy frequently have significant comorbidities and may also take aspirin and/or thienopyridines. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk of GIB and clinically relevant bleeding in patients taking nOAC.

METHODS

We queried MEDLINE, EMbase, and the Cochrane library (through July 2012) without language restrictions. We analyzed data from 43 randomized controlled trials (151,578 patients) that compared nOAC (regardless of indication) with standard care for risk of bleeding (19 trials on GIB). Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with the Cochran Q test and the Higgins I(2) test.

RESULTS

The overall OR for GIB among patients taking nOAC was 1.45 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.97), but there was substantial heterogeneity among studies (I2, 61%). Subgroup analyses showed that the OR for atrial fibrillation was 1.21 (95% CI, 0.91-1.61), for thromboprophylaxis after orthopedic surgery the OR was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.31-1.96), for treatment of venous thrombosis the OR was 1.59 (95% CI, 1.03-2.44), and for acute coronary syndrome the OR was 5.21 (95% CI, 2.58-10.53). Among the drugs studied, the OR for apixaban was 1.23 (95% CI, 0.56-2.73), the OR for dabigatran was 1.58 (95% CI, 1.29-1.93), the OR for edoxaban was 0.31 (95% CI, 0.01-7.69), and the OR for rivaroxaban was 1.48 (95% CI, 1.21-1.82). The overall OR for clinically relevant bleeding in patients taking nOAC was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.00-1.34), with similar trends among subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies on treatment of venous thrombosis or acute coronary syndrome have shown that patients treated with nOAC have an increased risk of GIB, compared with those who receive standard care. Better reporting of GIB events in future trials could allow stratification of patients for therapy with gastroprotective agents.

Rivaroxaban and other novel oral anticoagulants: pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects, specific patient populations and relevance of coagulation monitoring

Unlike traditional anticoagulants, the more recently developed agents rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban target specific factors in the coagulation cascade to attenuate thrombosis. Rivaroxaban and apixaban directly inhibit Factor Xa, whereas dabigatran directly inhibits thrombin. All three drugs exhibit predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics that allow for fixed oral doses in a variety of settings. The population pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban, and also dabigatran, have been evaluated in a series of models using patient data from phase II and III clinical studies. These models point towards a consistent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile, even when extreme demographic factors are taken into account, meaning that doses rarely need to be adjusted. The exception is in certain patients with renal impairment, for whom pharmacokinetic modelling provided the rationale for reduced doses as part of some regimens. Although not routinely required, the ability to measure plasma concentrations of these agents could be advantageous in emergency situations, such as overdose. Specific pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics must be taken into account when selecting an appropriate assay for monitoring. The anti-Factor Xa chromogenic assays now available are likely to provide the most appropriate means of determining plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban and apixaban, and specific assays for dabigatran are in development.

NEW ANTICOAGULANTS AS THROMBOPROPHYLAXIS AFTER TOTAL HIP OR KNEE REPLACEMENT

Objectives: Due to a high risk of thromboembolism in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery, it has become standard practice to give thromboprophylactic treatment. We assessed the relative efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two new oral anticoagulants, rivaroxaban and dabigatran, relative to subcutaneous enoxaparin for the prevention of thromboembolism after total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement surgery (TKR).

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature to assess efficacy and safety, and evaluated quality of documentation using GRADE. Cost-effectiveness was assessed by developing a decision model. The model combined two modules; a decision tree for the short-term prophylaxis and a Markov model for the long-term complications and survival gain.

Results: For rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin, we found statistically significant decreases in deep vein thrombosis, but also a trend toward increased risk of major bleeding. For mortality and pulmonary embolism there were no statistically significant differences between the treatments. We did not find statistically significant differences between dabigatran and enoxaparin for our efficacy and safety outcomes. Assuming a willingness to pay of EUR62,500 per QALY, rivaroxaban following THR had a probability of 38 percent, and enoxaparin following TKR had a probability of 34 percent of being cost-effective. Clinical efficacy had the greatest impact on decision uncertainty.

Conclusions: Dabigatran and rivaroxaban are comparable with enoxaparin following THR and TKR regarding the efficacy and safety outcomes. However, there is great uncertainty regarding which strategy is the most cost-effective. More research on clinical efficacy of rivaroxaban and dabigatran is likely to change our results.