Assessment of genetic and non-genetic risk factors for venous thromboembolism in glioblastoma - The predictive significance of B blood group

Inherited thrombophilia gene mutations and risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

In the general population, individuals with an inherited thrombophilia have a higher risk of thrombosis, but the effect of inherited thrombophilia on the risk of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains controversial. Our objective was to determine the risk of VTE in cancer patients with inherited thrombophilia. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting on VTE after a cancer diagnosis in adult patients who were tested for inherited thrombophilia. In September 2022, we searched Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central. Two reviewers screened the abstracts/full texts and assessed study quality using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. We used Mantel-Haenszel random-effects models to estimate pooled odds ratios (OR) of VTE and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). We included 37 and 28 studies in the systematic review and meta-analysis, respectively. Most studies focused on specific cancer types and hematologic malignancies were rare. The risk of VTE was significantly higher in cancer patients with non-O (compared with O) blood types (OR: 1.56 [95% CI: 1.28-1.90]), Factor V Leiden, and Prothrombin Factor II G20210A mutations compared with wild types (OR: 2.28 [95% CI: 1.51-3.48] and 2.14 [95% CI: 1.14-4.03], respectively). Additionally, heterozygous and homozygous methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T had ORs of 1.50 (95% CI: 1.00-2.24) and 1.38 (95% CI: 0.87-2.22), respectively. Among those with Plasminogen-Activator Inhibitor-1 4G/5G, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) A C634G, and VEGF C2578A mutations, there was no significant association with VTE. In conclusion, this meta-analysis provided evidence that non-O blood types, Factor V Leiden, and Prothrombin Factor II G20210A mutations are important genetic risk factors for VTE in cancer patients.

Thrombophilia gene mutations predict venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Inherited thrombophilia and cancer both independently increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, whether the increased VTE risk associated with inherited thrombophilia exists in cancer patients is less clear.

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to determine the influence of inherited thrombophilia on VTE and bleeding risk in moderate-to-high-risk ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

METHODS

We conducted a post hoc analysis using blood samples from patients enrolled in the AVERT trial to determine if previously recognized thrombophilia gene mutations (prothrombin factor [F] II G20210A, FXI, fibrinogen gamma, serpin family A member 10, FV K858R, FXIII, FV Leiden [FVL], and ABO blood) were associated with VTE or bleeding during the 7-months after starting chemotherapy. Logistic regression was used to compare heterozygous and homozygous mutations (combined) to wild-type. VTE rates, bleeding rates, and risk differences for mutations stratified by prophylactic anticoagulation use were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 447 patients, there were 39 VTE and 39 bleeding events. The odds of VTE were significantly increased with FVL mutation and non-O blood type (odds ratio [OR]: 5.2; 95% CI: 1.9-14.7 and OR: 2.7; 95% CI: 1.2-6.1, respectively). The use of anticoagulation prophylaxis resulted in complete protection in FVL patients, whereas those not receiving anticoagulation had a VTE rate of 119 per 100 patient-years. Lower VTE rates were also observed in non-O blood type patients taking prophylactic anticoagulation. No other thrombophilia genes tested were significantly associated with VTE or bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that FVL mutation and ABO blood type may be important VTE predictors in cancer patients starting chemotherapy.

Epidemiology, biology, and management of venous thromboembolism in gliomas: An interdisciplinary review

Patients with diffuse glioma are at high risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) over the course of the disease, with up to 30% incidence in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) and a lower but nonnegligible risk in lower-grade gliomas. Recent and ongoing efforts to identify clinical and laboratory biomarkers of patients at increased risk offer promise, but to date, there is no proven role for prophylaxis outside of the perioperative period. Emerging data suggest a higher risk of VTE in patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type glioma and the potential mechanistic role of IDH mutation in the suppression of production of the procoagulants tissue factor and podoplanin. According to published guidelines, therapeutic anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or alternatively, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients without increased risk of gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding is recommended for VTE treatment. Due to the elevated risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in GBM, anticoagulation treatment remains challenging and at times fraught. There are conflicting data on the risk of ICH with LMWH in patients with glioma; small retrospective studies suggest DOACs may convey lower ICH risk than LMWH. Investigational anticoagulants that prevent thrombosis without impairing hemostasis, such as factor XI inhibitors, may carry a better therapeutic index and are expected to enter clinical trials for cancer-associated thrombosis.

Methylation associated with long- or short-term survival in glioblastoma patients from the Nordic phase 3 trial

Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) have a poor outcome, but even among patients receiving the same therapies and with good prognostic factors, one can find those with exceptionally short and long survival. From the Nordic trial, which randomized GBM patients of 60 years or older between two radiotherapy arms (60 Gy or 34 Gy) or temozolomide (TMZ), we selected 59 with good prognostic factors. These selected GBM patients were equally distributed according to treatment and MGMT promoter methylation status but had long or short survival. Methylation profiling with the Illumina Infinium Methylation EPIC BeadChip arrays was performed and utilized for methylation-based CNS tumor classification, and pathway enrichment analysis of differentially methylated CpG sites (DMCs), as well as calculation of epigenetic age acceleration with three different algorithms, to compare the long and short survival groups. Samples identified by the classifier as non-GBM IDH wildtype were excluded. DMCs between long- and short-term survivors were found in patients with methylated MGMT promoter treated with TMZ (123,510), those with unmethylated MGMT treated with 60Gy radiotherapy (4,086), and with methylated MGMT promoter treated with 34Gy radiotherapy (39,649). Long-term survivors with methylated MGMT promoter treated with TMZ exhibited hypermethylation of the Wnt signaling and the platelet activation, signaling, and aggregation pathways. The joint analysis of radiotherapy arms revealed 319 DMCs between long- and short-term survivors with unmethylated MGMT and none for samples with methylated MGMT promoter. An analysis comparing epigenetic age acceleration between patients with long- and short-term survival across all treatment arms showed a decreased epigenetic age acceleration for the latter. We identified DMCs for both TMZ and RT-treated patients and epigenetic age acceleration as a potential prognostic marker, but further systematic analysis of larger patient cohorts is necessary for confirmation of their prognostic and/or predictive properties.

Venous thromboembolic events in glioblastoma patients: an epidemiological study

Background and purpose

Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) are a major complication in cancer patients, and therefore, also in brain cancer patients, anticoagulants are considered appropriate in the treatment of VTEs.

Methods

Frequency, risk factors, and treatment of VTEs, as well as associated complications, were assessed in a population‐based cohort of glioblastoma patients in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland. Correlations between clinical data and survival were retrospectively analyzed using the log‐rank test and Cox regression models.

Results

Four hundred fourteen glioblastoma patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase wild‐type status were identified. VTEs were documented in 65 patients (15.7%). Median time from tumor diagnosis to the occurrence of a VTE was 1.8 months, and 27 patients were diagnosed with VTEs postoperatively (within 35 days; 42.2%). History of a prior VTE was more common in patients who developed VTEs than in those who did not (p = 0.004). Bevacizumab treatment at any time during the disease course was not associated with occurrence of VTEs (p = 0.593). Most patients with VTEs (n = 61, 93.8%) were treated with therapeutic anticoagulation. Complications occurred in 14 patients (23.0%), mainly intracranial hemorrhages (n = 7, 11.5%). Overall survival did not differ between patients diagnosed with VTEs and those who had no VTE (p = 0.139). Tumor progression was the major cause of death (n = 283, 90.7%), and only three patients (1.0%) died in association with acute VTEs.

Conclusions

Venous thromboembolic events occurred early in the disease course, suggesting that the implementation of primary venous thromboembolism prophylaxis during first‐line chemoradiotherapy could be explored in a randomized setting.

ABO blood group type and risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in patients with cancer. Although in the general population blood type non-O is associated with increased VTE risk, the impact of ABO blood type on risk of cancer-associated VTE has not been clarified. To determine the influence of ABO blood type on cancer-associated VTE risk, we conducted an analysis within the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study, a prospective cohort study including patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent cancer observed for the primary outcome VTE. Restricted cubic spline analysis was performed and specific time-restricted subdistribution hazard ratios (SHR) were calculated to investigate the association between non-O blood type and VTE over time. One thousand, seven hundred and eight patients were included in the analysis (median follow-up time: 24 months; interquartile range: 10-24), and 151 patients developed VTE (8.8%). During the first 3 months of follow-up, there was no association between non-O blood type and VTE risk (SHR: 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-1.67). Thereafter, non-O blood type was associated with a higher VTE risk (SHR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.12-2.85). Furthermore, non-O blood type was associated with increased VTE risk in patients with intermediate and low thrombotic risk tumor types (SHR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.09-2.73) but not in very high-risk types (pancreatic, gastroesophageal, and brain cancer; SHR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.55-1.61). This association was weakened after adjustment for factor VIII. Non-O blood type is a time-dependent predictor of VTE in patients with cancer. It is associated with increased VTE risk beyond 3 months of follow-up and in patients with intermediate- and low-risk tumor types.

Role of von Willebrand factor in venous thromboembolic disease

Objective

Evolving evidence of the shared risk factors and pathogenic mechanisms in arterial and venous thrombosis questions of the strict vascular dichotomy of arterial vs venous. The connection between arterial and venous thrombosis has been highlighted by common underlying inflammatory processes, a concept known as thromboinflammatory disease. Using this relationship, we can apply knowledge from arterial disease to better understand and potentially mitigate venous disease. A protein that has been extensively studied in atherothrombotic disease and inflammation is von Willebrand factor (VWF). Because many predisposing and provoking factors of venous thromboembolism (VTE) have been shown to directly modulate VWF levels, it is, perhaps, not surprising that VWF has been highlighted by several recent association studies of patients with VTE.

Methods

In the present narrative review, we investigated more deeply the effects of VWF in venous disease by synthesizing the data from clinical studies of deep vein thrombosis of the limbs, pulmonary embolism, portal and cerebral vein thrombosis, and the complications of thrombosis, including post-thrombotic syndrome, venous insufficiency, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. We have also discussed the findings from preclinical studies to highlight novel VWF biochemistry in thrombosis and therapeutics.

Results

Across the spectrum of venous thromboembolic disease, we consistently observed that elevated VWF levels conferred an increased risk of VTE and long-term venous complications. We have highlighted important findings from VWF molecular research and have proposed mechanisms by which VWF participates in venous disease. Emerging evidence from preclinical studies might reveal novel targets for thromboinflammatory disease, including specific VWF pathophysiology. Furthermore, we have highlighted the utility of measuring VWF to prognosticate and risk stratify for VTE and its complications.

Conclusions

As the prevalence of inflammatory processes, such as aging, obesity, and diabetes increases in our population, it is critical to understand the evolving role of VWF in venous disease to guide clinical decisions and therapeutics.

The Impact of ABO Blood Type on Developing Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The impact of ABO blood type in the development of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients remains controversial. To develop a sense of the current opinion in this area, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. In March 2021, we performed a systematic search of PubMed, the Cochrane library, and Scopus for studies that compared cancer patients who had a blood type of either O or non-O (A, B, and AB). Our objective was to use multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine how ABO blood type was associated with the development of venous thromboembolism. Our selection criteria were met by a total of nine studies in 25,884 patients for the systematic review and five studies in 22,777 patients for the meta-analysis. In cancer patients, we found that non-O blood type was associated with a nearly two-fold increase in risk of venous thromboembolism (pooled OR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.44–2.10). Additionally, among the eligible patients, 21,889 patients were post-operative urological cancer patients. In these patients, the analysis also showed an association between non-O blood type and increasing risk of venous thromboembolism after pelvic surgery for malignancy (pooled OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.36–2.20). Our meta-analysis suggested that non-O blood type is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism among patients with cancer. As blood type is routinely determined preoperatively by objective and standardized methods, we anticipate that our results will be useful for managing venous thromboembolism in cancer patients, especially after pelvic surgery for urological cancers.