Absence of hypercoagulability after nCoV-19 vaccination: An observational pilot study

Coagulation and inflammatory response after intramuscular or intradermal mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: secondary analysis of a randomized trial

Background

Fractional-dosed intradermal (i.d.) vaccination produces antibody concentrations above the proposed proxy for protection against severe disease as compared with intramuscular (i.m.) vaccination and may be associated with a decreased prothrombotic effect.

Objectives

To assess changes in coagulation following standard dosed i.m. or fractional-dosed i.d. (one-fifth of i.m.) mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and to determine the association between the inflammatory response and coagulation.

Methods

This study was embedded in a randomized controlled trial assessing the immunogenicity of an i.d. fractional-dosed mRNA-1273 vaccine. Healthy participants, aged 18 to 30 years, were randomized (2:1) to receive either 2 doses of i.d. or i.m. vaccine. Blood was drawn prior to first and second vaccination doses and 1 and 2 weeks after the second dose. The outcomes were changes in coagulation parameters (primary endpoint peak height of the thrombin generation curve) and inflammation (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hs-CRP]).

Results

One hundred twenty-three participants were included (81 i.d.; 42 i.m.). Peak height increased after vaccination (i.m., 28.8 nmol; 95% CI, 6.3-63.8; i.d., 17.3 nmol; 95% CI, 12.5-47.2) and recovered back to baseline within 2 weeks. I.m. vaccination showed a higher inflammatory response compared with i.d. vaccination (extra increase hs-CRP, 0.92 mg/L; 95% CI, 0.2-1.7). Change in endogenous thrombin potential was associated with change in hs-CRP (beta, 28.0; 95% CI, 7.6-48.3).

Conclusion

A transient increase in coagulability after mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccination occurred, which was associated with the inflammatory response. While i.d. administration showed antibody concentrations above the proposed proxy for protection against severe disease, it was associated with less systemic inflammation. Hence, i.d. vaccination may be safer.

Acute limb ischemia secondary to vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia

Vaccine-associated thrombosis has previously been described in patients presenting with cerebral sinus thrombosis, deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, or mesenteric venous thrombosis. Only recently has arterial thrombosis gained attention. A new entity known as vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) has been associated with the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines produced by AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson. We describe a case series of three patients who presented with acute limb ischemia with vaccine-associated arterial occlusions, one of whom was diagnosed with VITT.

Head-to-head comparison of four COVID-19 vaccines on platelet activation, coagulation and inflammation. The TREASURE study

INTRODUCTION

Studies exploring alterations in blood coagulation and platelet activation induced by COVID-19 vaccines are not concordant. We aimed to assess the impact of four COVID-19 vaccines on platelet activation, coagulation, and inflammation considering also the immunization dose and the history of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

METHODS

TREASURE study enrolled 368 consecutive subjects (161 receiving viral vector vaccines -ChAdOx1-S/Vaxzevria or Janssen- and 207 receiving mRNA vaccines -Comirnaty/Pfizer-BioNTech or Spikevax/Moderna). Blood was collected the day before and 8 ± 2 days after the vaccination. Platelet activation markers (P-selectin, aGPIIbIIIa and Tissue Factor expression; number of platelet-monocyte and -granulocyte aggregates) and microvesicle release were analyzed by flow cytometry. Platelet thrombin generation (TG) capacity was measured using the Calibrated Automated Thrombogram. Plasma coagulation and inflammation markers and immune response were evaluated by ELISA.

RESULTS

Vaccination did not induce platelet activation and microvesicle release. IL-6 and CRP levels (+30%), D-dimer, fibrinogen and F₁₊₂ (+13%, +3.7%, +4.3%, respectively) but not TAT levels significantly increased upon immunization with all four vaccines, with no difference among them and between first and second dose. An overall minor post-vaccination reduction of aPC, TM and TFPI, all possibly related to endothelial function, was observed. No anti-PF4 seroconversion was observed.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the four COVID-19 vaccines administered to a large population sample induce a transient inflammatory response, with no onset of platelet activation. The minor changes in clotting activation and endothelial function might be potentially involved at a population level in explaining the very rare venous thromboembolic complications of COVID-19 vaccination.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are not associated with hypercoagulability in apparently healthy people

Background

SARS-CoV-2 adenoviral vector DNA vaccines have been linked to the rare but serious thrombotic postvaccine complication vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. This has raised concerns regarding the possibility of increased thrombotic risk after any SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

Objectives

To investigate whether SARS-CoV-2 vaccines cause coagulation activation leading to a hypercoagulable state.

Methods

This observational study included 567 health care personnel; 521 were recruited after the first dose of adenoviral vector ChAdOx1-S (Vaxzevria, AstraZeneca) vaccine and 46 were recruited prospectively before vaccination with a messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine, either Spikevax (Moderna, n = 38) or Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech, n = 8). In the mRNA group, samples were acquired before and 1 to 2 weeks after vaccination. In addition to the prevaccination samples, 56 unvaccinated blood donors were recruited as controls (total n = 102). Thrombin generation, D-dimer levels, and free tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) levels were analyzed.

Results

No participant experienced thrombosis, vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, or thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100 × 10⁹/L) 1 week to 1 month postvaccination. There was no increase in thrombin generation, D-dimer level, or TFPI level in the ChAdOx1-S vaccine group compared with controls or after the mRNA vaccines compared with baseline values. Eleven of 513 (2.1%) participants vaccinated with ChAdOx1-S had anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies without a concomitant increase in thrombin generation.

Conclusion

In this study, SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were not associated with thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, increased thrombin generation, D-dimer levels, or TFPI levels compared with baseline or unvaccinated controls. These findings argue against the subclinical activation of coagulation post-COVID-19 vaccination.

[Neurological complications after covid-19 vaccination]

The aim of our work was to study the relevance and incidence of neurological post-vaccination complications during the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on the results of a systematic literature search of several databases, the current review describes the diagnosed complications, including neurological, that occurred after the administration of the COVID-19 vaccine during the pandemic period. To fully establish the pathophysiological mechanisms of the development of a causal relationship of neurological complications with vaccines against COVID-19, it becomes necessary to continue long-term studies. This will make it possible to carry out a pharmacological correction of the quality of vaccine safety.

Investigation of differences in coagulation characteristics between hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 Alpha, Delta, and Omicron variant infection using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM): A single-center, retrospective, observational study

BACKGROUND

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Omicron variant has a low rate of serious illness, is highly contagious, and has spread rapidly since January 2022. The number of severe cases and deaths remains problematic. Here, we aimed to elucidate the coagulation pathology of Omicron-infected patients using rotational thromboelastometry.

METHODS

Patients with coronavirus disease 2019, hospitalized and treated from January 2021 to April 2022, were included. The Alpha-Delta and Omicron groups were defined during admission. Blood tests, clinical course, and rotational thromboelastometry measurements were compared using a propensity score-matched cohort.

RESULTS

Both groups had 21 patients each. Lactate dehydrogenase (Alpha-Delta group [interquartile range] vs. Omicron group [interquartile range]; 449 [368-518] U/L vs. 241 [196-398] U/L, p = 0.01) and ferritin (1428 [1145-3061] ng/dl vs. 481 [188-881] ng/dl, p = 0.0002) levels were significantly lower in the Omicron group. In rotational thromboelastometry, the thrombus hardness indexes FIBTEM A5 (29 [23-34] mm vs. 23 [18-28] mm, p = 0.034) and maximum clot firmness (34 [27-40] mm vs. 26 [21-33] mm, p = 0.021) were significantly lower in the Omicron group, whereas the fibrinolysis index FIBTEM LI60 (98 [92-100] % vs. 100 [100-100] %, p = 0.0082) was higher.

CONCLUSION

Severe coagulation abnormalities may be less likely in Omicron-infected patients than in those infected with the previous Alpha and Delta variants.

Investigation of thrombin generation assay to predict vaso-occlusive crisis in adulthood with sickle cell disease

Introduction

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited hemoglobinopathy disorder. The main consequence is synthesis of hemoglobin S leading to chronic hemolysis associated with morbidity. The aim of this study was to investigate Thrombin Generation Assay (TGA) to assess hypercoagulability in SCD and TGA parameters as biomarkers of vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) risk and hospitalization within 1 year.

Materials and methods

We performed TGA in platelet poor plasma (PPP) with 1 pM of tissue factor and 4 μM of phospholipid-standardized concentration, in duplicate for patients and controls. We measured thrombomodulin (TM), soluble endothelial Protein C Receptor and Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor (TFPI).

Results

A total of 113 adult patients with SCD, 83 at steady state and 30 during VOC, and 25 healthy controls matched on age and gender were included. Among the 83 patients at steady state, (36 S/S-1 S/β⁰, 20 S/Sα³.⁷, and 19 S/C-7 S/β⁺) 28 developed a VOC within 1 year (median: 4 months [2.25–6]). We observed an increase of peak and velocity associated with a shortening of lagtime and time to peak (TTP) and no difference of endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) in patients compared to controls. TFPI (p < 0.001) and TM (p = 0.006) were significantly decreased. TGA confirmed hypercoagulability in all SCD genotypes and clinical status. The association of ETP > 1,207 nM.min and peak >228.5 nM presented a sensitivity of 73.5% and a specificity of 93.9% to predict VOC development within 1 year.

Conclusion

We have demonstrated a hypercoagulable state in SCD associated with chronic hemolysis. These preliminary findings suggest that TGA parameters, as ETP and peak, could be used to predict VOC development within 1 year.

Population-wide persistent hemostatic changes after vaccination with ChAdOx1-S

Various vaccines were developed to reduce the spread of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Cov-2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. Quickly after the start of vaccination, reports emerged that anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, including ChAdOx1-S, could be associated with an increased risk of thrombosis. We investigated the hemostatic changes after ChAdOx1-S vaccination in 631 health care workers. Blood samples were collected 32 days on average after the second ChAdOx1-S vaccination, to evaluate hemostatic markers such as D-dimer, fibrinogen, α2-macroglobulin, FVIII and thrombin generation. Endothelial function was assessed by measuring Von Willebrand Factor (VWF) and active VWF. IL-6 and IL-10 were measured to study the activation of the immune system. Additionally, SARS-CoV-2 anti-nucleoside and anti-spike protein antibody titers were determined. Prothrombin and fibrinogen levels were significantly reduced after vaccination (−7.5% and −16.9%, p < 0.0001). Significantly more vaccinated subjects were outside the normal range compared to controls for prothrombin (42.1% vs. 26.4%, p = 0.026) and antithrombin (23.9% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.0010). Thrombin generation indicated a more procoagulant profile, characterized by a significantly shortened lag time (−11.3%, p < 0.0001) and time-to-peak (−13.0% and p < 0.0001) and an increased peak height (32.6%, p = 0.0015) in vaccinated subjects compared to unvaccinated controls. Increased VWF (+39.5%, p < 0.0001) and active VWF levels (+24.1 %, p < 0.0001) pointed toward endothelial activation, and IL-10 levels were significantly increased (9.29 pg/mL vs. 2.43 pg/mL, p = 0.032). The persistent increase of IL-10 indicates that the immune system remains active after ChAdOx1-S vaccination. This could trigger a pathophysiological mechanism causing an increased thrombin generation profile and vascular endothelial activation, which could subsequently result in and increased risk of thrombotic events.

Analysis of Thromboembolic and Thrombocytopenic Events After the AZD1222, BNT162b2, and MRNA-1273 COVID-19 Vaccines in 3 Nordic Countries

IMPORTANCE

Vaccinations are paramount to halt the COVID-19 pandemic, and safety data are essential to determine the risk-benefit ratio of each COVID-19 vaccine.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between the AZD1222, BNT162b2, and mRNA-1273 vaccines and subsequent thromboembolic and thrombocytopenic events.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This self-controlled case series used individual-level data from national registries in Norway, Finland, and Denmark. Participants included individuals with hospital contacts because of coronary artery disease, coagulation disorders, or cerebrovascular disease between January 1, 2020, and May 16, 2021.

EXPOSURES

AZD1222, BNT162b2, or mRNA-1273 vaccine.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURE

Relative rate (RR) of hospital contacts for coronary artery disease, coagulation disorders, or cerebrovascular disease in a 28-day period following vaccination compared with the control period prior to vaccination.

RESULTS

We found 265 339 hospital contacts, of whom 112 984 [43%] were for female patients, 246 092 [93%] were for patients born in 1971 or earlier, 116 931 [44%] were for coronary artery disease, 55 445 [21%] were for coagulation disorders, and 92 963 [35%] were for cerebrovascular disease. In the 28-day period following vaccination, there was an increased rate of coronary artery disease following mRNA-1273 vaccination (RR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.02-1.25]), but not following AZD1222 vaccination (RR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.82-1.03]) or BNT162b2 vaccination (RR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.92-0.99]). There was an observed increased rate of coagulation disorders following all 3 vaccines (AZD1222: RR, 2.01 [95% CI, 1.75-2.31]; BNT162b2: RR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.07-1.19]; and mRNA-1273: RR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.07-1.47]). There was also an observed increased rate of cerebrovascular disease following all 3 vaccines (AZD1222: RR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.16-1.52]; BNT162b2: RR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.05-1.13]; and mRNA-1273: RR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.09-1.35]). For individual diseases within the main outcomes, 2 notably high rates were observed: 12.04 (95% CI, 5.37-26.99) for cerebral venous thrombosis and 4.29 (95% CI, 2.96-6.20) for thrombocytopenia, corresponding to 1.6 (95% CI, 0.6-2.6) and 4.9 (95% CI, 2.9-6.9) excess events per 100 000 doses, respectively, following AZD1222 vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this self-controlled case series, there was an increased rate of hospital contacts because of coagulation disorders and cerebrovascular disease, especially for thrombocytopenia and cerebral venous thrombosis, following vaccination with AZD1222. Although increased rates of several thromboembolic and thrombocytopenic outcomes following BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccination were observed, these increases were less than the rates observed after AZD1222, and sensitivity analyses were not consistent. Confirmatory analysis on the 2 mRNA vaccines by other methods are warranted.

Anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 adenoviral-vector vaccines trigger subclinical antiplatelet autoimmunity and increase of soluble platelet activation markers

To slow down the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic an unequalled vaccination campaign was initiated. Despite proven efficacy and safety, a rare but potentially fatal complication of adenoviral-vector vaccines, called vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), has emerged the pathogenesis of which seems to be related to the development of platelet-activating anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies. While a few studies have evaluated the incidence of anti-PF4 positivity in anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine recipients, to date no studies have assessed whether an antiplatelet immunological response develops and if this associates with platelet and blood clotting activation. We carried out a prospective study in healthy subjects who received the first dose of ChAdOx1 or Ad26.COV2.S or BNT162b2 vaccines to evaluate platelet-specific and non-specific immune response and in vivo platelet activation and blood clotting activation. Individuals receiving ChAdOx1 and, less so, Ad26.COV2.S developed with high frequency auto- or alloantiplatelet antibodies, increased circulating platelet-derived microvesicles and soluble P-selectin associated with mild blood clotting activation. Our study shows that an immunological reaction involving platelets is not uncommon in individuals receiving anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, especially after ChAdOx1 and Ad26.COV2.S, and that it associates with in vivo platelet and blood clotting activation.

Headache onset after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Background

Vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are used to reduce the risk of developing Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Despite the significant benefits in terms of reduced risk of hospitalization and death, different adverse events may present after vaccination: among them, headache is one of the most common, but nowadays there is no summary presentation of its incidence and no description of its main features.

Methods

We searched PubMed and EMBASE covering the period between January 1^st 2020 and August 6^th, 2021, looking for record in English and with an abstract and using three main search terms (with specific variations): COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2; Vaccination; headache/adverse events. We selected manuscript including information on subjects developing headache after injection, and such information had to be derived from a structured form (i.e. no free reporting). Pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Analyses were carried out by vaccine vs. placebo, by first vs. second dose, and by mRNA-based vs. “traditional” vaccines; finally, we addressed the impact of age and gender on post-vaccine headache onset.

Results

Out of 9338 records, 84 papers were included in the review, accounting for 1.57 million participants, 94% of whom received BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1. Headache was generally the third most common AE: it was detected in 22% (95% CI 18–27%) of subjects after the first dose of vaccine and in 29% (95% CI 23–35%) after the second, with an extreme heterogeneity. Those receiving placebo reported headache in 10–12% of cases. No differences were detected across different vaccines or by mRNA-based vs. “traditional” ones. None of the studies reported information on headache features. A lower prevalence of headache after the first injection of BNT162b2 among older participants was shown.

Conclusions

Our results show that vaccines are associated to a two-fold risk of developing headache within 7 days from injection, and the lack of difference between vaccine types enable to hypothesize that headache is secondary to systemic immunological reaction than to a vaccine-type specific reaction. Some descriptions report onset within the first 24 h and that in around one-third of the cases, headache has migraine-like features with pulsating quality, phono and photophobia; in 40–60% of the cases aggravation with activity is observed. The majority of patients used some medication to treat headache, the one perceived as the most effective being acetylsalicylic acid.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-022-01400-4.

Assessing clinically meaningful hypercoagulability after COVID-19 Vaccination: a longitudinal study

A large number of daily requests to exclude possible prothrombotic risk factors for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines were received. Our aim was to longitudinally evaluate coagulation profiles in a series of healthy subjects who received COVID-19 vaccination and assess hypercoagulability thereafter. Volunteers awaiting a first or second dose of either the ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2 vaccine were enrolled. Venous samples were obtained at baseline (before the vaccine) and longitudinally 3 ± 2 days (T1) and 10 ± 2 days after the vaccine (T2). Global coagulation monitoring was assessed via platelet count, whole blood thromboelastometry and impedance aggregometry, plasma thrombin generation, and anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin immunoglobulin G antibodies. One hundred and twenty-two subjects were enrolled (61 [50%] ChAdOx1 and 61 BNT162b2). The ChAdOx1 cohort showed a slight but transient increase in thrombin generation (mainly endogenous thrombin potential [ETP] with thrombomodulin and ETP ratio) at T1, which promptly decreased at T2. In addition, the second dose of either vaccine was associated with increased thrombin peak, ETP with thrombomodulin, and ETP ratio. At baseline, 3.2% of the ChAdOx1 cohort and 1.6% BNT162b2 cohort were positive for PF4/heparin antibodies with a stable titer through T1 and T2. No relevant differences were detected in platelet count and aggregation, or thromboelastometry parameters. No thrombotic or hemorrhagic events occurred. We can confirm that no clinically meaningful hypercoagulability occurred after either vaccine, albeit keeping in mind that thrombin generation may increase in the first days after the second dose of either vaccine and after the first dose of the ChAdOx1 vaccine.

Stroke Associated with COVID-19 Vaccines

Objectives

Development of safe and effective vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains the cornerstone of controlling this pandemic. However, there are increasing reports of various types of stroke including ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke, as well as cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) after COVID-19 vaccination. This paper aims to review reports of stroke associated with COVID-19 vaccines and provide a coherent clinical picture of this condition.

Materials and methods

A literature review was performed with a focus on data from recent studies.

Results

Most of such patients are women under 60 years of age and who had received ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine. Most studies reported CVST with or without secondary ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, and some with Vaccine-induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT). The most common clinical symptom of CVST seen after COVID-19 vaccination was headache. The clinical course of CVST after COVID-19 vaccination may be more severe than CVST not associated with COVID vaccination. Management of CVST following COVID-19 vaccination is challenging and may differ from the standard treatment of CVST. Low molecular weight heparin is commonly used in the treatment of CVST; however, it may worsen outcomes in CVST associated with VITT. Furthermore, administration of intravenous immunoglobulin and high-dose glucocorticoids have been recommended with various success rates.

Conclusion

These contradictory observations are a source of confusion in clinical decision-making and warrant further study and development of clinical guidelines. Clinicians should be aware of clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of stroke associated with COVID-19 vaccination.

COVID-19, Vaccines, and Thrombotic Events: A Narrative Review

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a deadly pandemic that has affected millions of people worldwide, is associated with cardiovascular complications, including venous and arterial thromboembolic events. Viral spike proteins, in fact, may promote the release of prothrombotic and inflammatory mediators. Vaccines, coding for the spike protein, are the primary means for preventing COVID-19. However, some unexpected thrombotic events at unusual sites, most frequently located in the cerebral venous sinus but also splanchnic, with associated thrombocytopenia, have emerged in subjects who received adenovirus-based vaccines, especially in fertile women. This clinical entity was soon recognized as a new syndrome, named vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, probably caused by cross-reacting anti-platelet factor-4 antibodies activating platelets. For this reason, the regulatory agencies of various countries restricted the use of adenovirus-based vaccines to some age groups. The prevailing opinion of most experts, however, is that the risk of developing COVID-19, including thrombotic complications, clearly outweighs this potential risk. This point-of-view aims at providing a narrative review of epidemiological issues, clinical data, and pathogenetic hypotheses of thrombosis linked to both COVID-19 and its vaccines, helping medical practitioners to offer up-to-date and evidence-based counseling to their often-alarmed patients with acute or chronic cardiovascular thrombotic events.

Cumulative Evidence for the Association of Thrombosis and the Prognosis of COVID-19: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Although thrombosis events have been reported in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the association between thrombosis and COVID-19-related critical status or risk of mortality in COVID-19 has been inconsistent.

Objective

We conducted a meta-analysis of reports assessing the association between thrombosis and the prognosis of COVID-19.

Methods

The EMBASE, Ovid-MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases were searched up to December 9, 2021, and additional studies were retrieved via manual searching. Studies were included if they reported the risk of COVID-19-related critical status or COVID-19-related mortality in relation to thrombosis. The related data were extracted by two authors independently, and a random effects model was conducted to pool the odds ratios (ORs). In addition, stratified analyses were conducted to evaluate the association.

Results

Among 6,686 initially identified studies, we included 25 studies published in 2020 and 2021, with a total of 332,915 patients according to predefined inclusion criteria. The associations between thrombosis and COVID-19-related mortality and COVID-19-related critical status were significant, with ORs of 2.61 (95% CI, 1.91–3.55, p < 0.05) and 2.9 (95% CI, 1.6–5.24, p < 0.05), respectively. The results were statistically significant and consistent in stratified analyses.

Conclusions

Thrombosis is associated with an increased risk of mortality and critical status induced by COVID-19. Further prospective studies with large sample sizes are required to establish whether these associations are causal by considering more confounders and to clarify their mechanisms.

Observational studies cannot prove causality. However, autopsy studies show thrombosis events preceding COVID-19-related deaths. The results of this meta-analysis reported that thrombosis was associated with a 161% increased risk of mortality from COVID-19 and a 190% increased risk of COVID-19-related critical status. The type of thrombosis included in the original studies also seemed to be related to the results.

Post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination venous sinus thrombosis: a literature review of 308 cases

There is accumulating evidence that SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations can be complicated by venous sinus thrombosis (VST). This review aimed at summarising and discussing previous and recent advances regarding the diagnosis, pathogenesis, treatment, and outcome of post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination VST. At least 308 patients with post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination VST have been reported as per the end of July 2021. Ages among these 308 patients ranged between 22 and 81 years, 69 were male and 197 were female. Post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination VST most commonly occurred with the ChAdOx1-S vaccine followed by the BNT126b2 vaccine. In the vast majority of cases, VST occurred after the first dose. Only in six patients did VST occur after the second dose. Latency between vaccination and onset of VST ranged between 0 and 24 days. Regarding treatment, most patients received heparin followed by oral anticoagulants. Seven patients received IVIGs and six patients received steroids because of concomitant vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Complete recovery was reported in 5 patients. Partial recovery was reported in 9 patients. Eight patients were alive or discharged. Sixty-two patients died. The outcome was not specified in the remainder. In conclusion, SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations can be complicated by VST. There is female preponderance and the outcome is frequently poor.

Clinical use of thrombin generation assays

Determining patient's coagulation profile, i.e. detecting a bleeding tendency or the opposite, a thrombotic risk, is crucial for clinicians in many situations. Routine coagulation assays and even more specialized tests may not allow a relevant characterization of the hemostatic balance. In contrast, thrombin generation assay (TGA) is a global assay allowing the dynamic continuous and simultaneous recording of the combined effects of both thrombin generation and thrombin inactivation. TGA thus reflects the result of procoagulant and anticoagulant activities in blood and plasma. Because of this unique feature, TGA has been widely used in a wide array of settings from both research, clinical and pharmaceutical perspectives. This includes diagnosis, prognosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of inherited and acquired bleeding and thrombotic disorders. In addition, TGA has been shown to provide relevant information for the diagnosis of coagulopathies induced by infectious diseases, comprising also disturbance of the coagulation system in COVID-19, or for the assessment of early recurrence in breast cancer. This review article aims to document most clinical applications of TGA.