Hyperacute Rejection of Living Related Kidney Grafts Caused by Endothelial Cell–Specific Antibodies: Case Reports

Unraveling the Role of Allo-Antibodies and Transplant Injury

Alloimmunity driving rejection in the context of solid organ transplantation can be grossly divided into mechanisms predominantly driven by either T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), though the co-existence of both types of rejections can be seen in a variable number of sampled grafts. Acute TCMR can generally be well controlled by the establishment of effective immunosuppression (1, 2). Acute ABMR is a low frequency finding in the current era of blood group and HLA donor/recipient matching and the avoidance of engraftment in the context of high-titer, preformed donor-specific antibodies. However, chronic ABMR remains a major complication resulting in the untimely loss of transplanted organs (3-10). The close relationship between donor-specific antibodies and ABMR has been revealed by the highly sensitive detection of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (7, 11-15). Injury to transplanted organs by activation of humoral immune reaction in the context of HLA identical transplants and the absence of donor specific antibodies (17-24), strongly suggest the participation of non-HLA (nHLA) antibodies in ABMR (25). In this review, we discuss the genesis of ABMR in the context of HLA and nHLA antibodies and summarize strategies for ABMR management.

Isolated De Novo Antiendothelial Cell Antibodies and Kidney Transplant Rejection

BACKGROUND

Studies analyzing the role of antiendothelial cell antibodies (AECAs) in large series of kidney transplant recipients are scarce, and HLA, MHC (major histocompatibility complex) class I-related chain A (MICA), and angiotensin II type 1 receptor have not been formally excluded as targets.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of a cohort of kidney transplant recipients.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

324 kidney transplant recipients who were negative for anti-HLA, anti-MICA, and anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies were tested for AECAs in pre- and posttransplantation serum samples.

PREDICTORS

AECA-positive (preformed [pre⁺/post⁺] vs de novo [pre^-/post⁺]) versus AECA-negative (pre^-/post^-) before or after transplantation.

OUTCOMES

Patient mortality, transplant loss, and acute rejection events.

RESULTS

66 (20%) patients were AECA positive (39 [12%] preformed, 27 [8%] de novo) and 258 (80%) were AECA negative. During a follow-up of 10 years, 7 (18%) AECA pre⁺/post⁺ patients had rejections compared with 14 (52%) AECA pre^-/post⁺ and 57 (22%) AECA pre^-/post^- recipients (OR, 3.80; P=0.001). AECA pre^-/post⁺ status emerged as an independent risk factor for transplant rejection compared to the AECA pre^-/post^- group (OR, 5.17; P<0.001). However, AECA pre⁺/post⁺ and AECA pre^-/post⁺ patients did not show higher risk for either patient death (ORs of 1.49 [P=0.7] and 1.06 [P=0.9], respectively) or transplant loss (ORs of 1.22 and 0.86, respectively; P for both = 0.8) compared to the AECA pre^-/post^- population.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study. Posttransplantation sera were collected before or after rejection, entailing a nearly cross-sectional relationship between the exposure and outcome. Lack of identification of precise antigens for AECAs.

CONCLUSIONS

De novo AECAs may be associated with rejection. These antibodies might serve as biomarkers of endothelium damage in kidney transplant recipients.

Moving beyond HLA: a review of nHLA antibodies in organ transplantation

Given the finite graft life expectancy of HLA identical organ transplants and the recognition of humoral graft injury in the absence of donor directed anti-HLA antibodies, the clinical impact of antibodies against non-HLA (nHLA) antigens in transplant injury is being increasingly recognized. The recognition of the impact of nHLA antigen discrepancies between donor and recipient on transplant outcomes is timely given the advances in rapid and lower cost sequencing methods that can soon provide complete maps of all recipient and donor HLA and nHLA mismatch data. In this review, we present a summary of recent reports evaluating the role of nHLA antibodies and their relevance to the field of organ transplantation.

Antiendothelial cells antibodies in patients with systemic sclerosis in relation to pulmonary hypertension and lung fibrosis

Although scleroderma is generally considered a fibrosing disease, it is now recognized that the underlying vascular pathology is playing a fundamental role in its pathogenesis. The present study was aimed at testing the prevalence of anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECA) in systemic scleroderma (SSc) patients with and without pulmonary hypertension (PH) and in relation to the presence of pulmonary fibrosis. Fifty four SSc patients (50 females and 4 male, mean age 55.7 ± 16.3 years) were prospectively screened. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography with the estimation of pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and tricuspid regurgitant peak gradient (TRPG). All patients suspected to have pulmonary hypertension were referred for right heart catheterization. Restrictive lung disease was confirmed by HRCT. A healthy control group included (n = 27; 7 men and 20 women, mean age 49.8 ± 12.1 years). The study of AECA was performed using the indirect immunofluorescence method on commercially available human umbilical vein endothelial cells. The HRCT scans in patients with suspected interstitial lung disease revealed signs of lung fibrosis in 15 (out of the 36 examined patients). TRPG at rest of 31 mmHg was demonstrated in 14 (21%) patients. During cardiac catheterization, arterial PH was found in two patients. Resting venous PH was found in one patient and an excessive post capillary PAP elevation at rest was demonstrated in 11 patients. At the baseline, 14/54 patients (26%) were positive for AECA. In the control group, the frequency of the antibodies was 3/27 (11%). No statistical correlation between antibody titter and the presentation of the disease existed. AECA were highly prevalent in a subgroup of patients suffering from interstitial pulmonary fibrosis. Out of the 15 patients suffering from lung fibrosis, 7 were AECA positive. The presence of AECA correlated very well with antinuclear antibodies (ANA), but was not related to the profile of ANA. Our findings support evidence that endothelial cell damage is involved in SSc, as there was increased prevalence of circulating AECA of the IgG isotype in SSc patients. AECA may also be related to the complications of SSc, like pulmonary fibrosis.

Ectonucleotidases in solid organ and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Extracellular nucleotides are ubiquitous signalling molecules which modulate distinct physiological and pathological processes. Nucleotide concentrations in the extracellular space are strictly regulated by cell surface enzymes, called ectonucleotidases, which hydrolyze nucleotides to the respective nucleosides. Recent studies suggest that ectonucleotidases play a significant role in inflammation by adjusting the balance between ATP, a widely distributed proinflammatory danger signal, and the anti-inflammatory mediator adenosine. There is increasing evidence for a central role of adenosine in alloantigen-mediated diseases such as solid organ graft rejection and acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplantation are established treatment modalities for a broad spectrum of benign and malignant diseases. Immunological complications based on the recognition of nonself-antigens between donor and recipient like transplant rejection and GvHD are still major challenges which limit the long-term success of transplantation. Studies in the past two decades indicate that purinergic signalling influences the severity of alloimmune responses. This paper focuses on the impact of ectonucleotidases, in particular, NTPDase1/CD39 and ecto-5'-nucleotidase/CD73, on allograft rejection, acute GvHD, and graft-versus-leukemia effect, and on possible clinical implications for the modulation of purinergic signalling after transplantation.

IgM antibodies towards pre-endothelial cells: strong indication for an association with accelerated rejection. A case report

A 27-year-old woman developed a graft loss due to an accelerated humoral rejection after receiving a blood group identical, human leucocyte antigens (HLA) haploidentical living-related kidney, despite the fact that she did not refer any sensitization event before transplantation. The complement-dependent cytotoxicity and flow cytometry crossmatches were negative for T and B cells. Retrospectively, IgM antibodies against donor precursor endothelial Tie-2(+) cells were detected using a commercially available assay and the pre-transplant serum sample. This case illustrates the necessity of detection of other than the classical HLA-directed antibodies prior organ grafting.

De novo development of circulating anti-endothelial cell antibodies rather than pre-existing antibodies is associated with post-transplant allograft rejection

Anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs) are thought to be involved in the development of renal allograft rejection. To explore this further, we determine whether AECAs play a role both in predicting the incidence of allograft rejection and long-term outcomes by analysis of serum samples from 226 renal allograft recipients for AECAs pre- and post-transplant. Surprisingly, the presence of pre-existing AECAs was not associated with either an increased risk of rejection or a detrimental impact on recipient/graft survival. Subsequent de novo AECAs, however, were associated with a significantly increased risk of early acute rejection. Moreover, these rejections tended to be more severe with a significantly increased incidence of both steroid-resistant and multiple episodes of acute rejection. The acute rejections associated with de novo AECAs did not correlate with C4d deposition at the time of renal biopsy, but did demonstrate an association with the presence of glomerulitis and peritubular capillary inflammation. Significantly more patients with de novo AECAs developed graft dysfunction. Thus, our prospective study suggests the emergence of de novo AECAs is associated with transplant rejection that may lead to allograft dysfunction.

Advances in diagnosing and managing antibody-mediated rejection

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a unique, significant, and often severe form of allograft rejection that is not amenable to treatment with standard immunosuppressive medications. Significant advances have occurred in our ability to predict patients at risk for, and to diagnose, AMR. These advances include the development of newer anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-antibody detection techniques and assays for non-HLA antibodies associated with AMR. The pathophysiology of AMR suggests a prime role for antibodies, B cells and plasma cells, but other effector molecules, especially the complement system, point to potential targets that could modify the AMR process. An emerging and potentially larger problem is the development of chronic AMR (CAMR) resulting from de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) that emerge more than 100 days posttransplantation. Therapeutic options include: (1) High-dose intravenously administered immunoglobulin (IVIG), which has many potential benefits. (2) The use of IVIG+rituximab (anti-CD20, anti-B cell). (3) The combination of plasmapheresis (PP)+low-dose IVIG with or without rituximab. Data support the efficacy of all of the above approaches. Newer approaches to treating AMR include using the proteosome inhibitor (bortezomib), which induces apoptosis in plasma cells, and eculizumab (anti-C5, anticomplement monoclonal antibody).